PG 1 · cols. 379–458
Clement of Rome (attributed), Epistolae duae ad virgines (Two Letters to Virgins), Latin of Villecourt
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PG 1 · cols. 379–458
Editors' preface
(none) <!-- The images show the page head (title, Syriac incipit, Cap. I opening) and no footnote text. A call (a) is printed in the Syriac (col 379, before the colophon) and after "Fin." (col 380), but its note is not within the rendered images; check the full page. --> (printed under page 187)
(Textum Syriacum ex Gallandio [Vet. Patr., t. I] expressimus, adhibitis Typographei Imperialis typis.)
(The Syriac text we have reproduced from Galland [Veteres Patres, vol. I], using the types of the Imperial Printing Office.)
<!-- note: a single parenthesis line under the title block (DUÆ EPISTOLÆ SANCTI CLEMENTIS ROMANI DISCIPULI PETRI … INTERPRETE CLEMENTE VILLECOURT S. R. E. CARDINALI), set in bold across the full page width above the Syriac title and text. It runs on over col. 380; the whole line is legible in the page-foot images and is set once here (Q3a completed it; "Typographei" as printed). Nothing else in col. 379 is editors' prose: above the title is the end of the previous page's Syriac; below the parenthesis is the Syriac of the letter, ending "Fin." with a call (a) to the foot. Faint show-through from the reverse page is not part of this column. -->
(a) · call in col 381 (Syriac text only)
ܕܗܝܡܢܘܬܐ. Fin.
[Syriac reading, "of faith" (transcription uncertain at this resolution)], Fin. [siglum, as printed].
(printed under page 188)
(b) · call in col 381 (Syriac text only)
ܗܝܡܢܘܬܐ. id.
[Syriac reading, "faith" (transcription uncertain)], the same [siglum].
(printed under page 188)
(c) · call in col 381 (Syriac text only)
ܕܐܬܠܗܘܢ. id.
[Syriac reading (transcription uncertain; check against the page)], the same [siglum].
(printed under page 188)
(48) ‹anchor: quae operibus splendescit› · call in col 382
Maximi erat momenti primis Ecclesiae temporibus, inculcare bonorum operum necessitatem, ne fideles otio torpentes, sola fide quam sibi finxissent, ad coelestem patriam pervenire posse existimarent. Hic confodiuntur omnium saeculorum haeretici qui, ut sectarios allicerent, suaeque perversae doctrinae devincirent, unice sterili fidei salutem annexuri erant.
It was of the greatest moment in the first times of the Church to inculcate the necessity of good works, lest the faithful, growing sluggish in idleness, should suppose they could reach the heavenly fatherland by faith alone, a faith they had fashioned for themselves. Here are run through the heretics of every age who, to entice followers and bind them to their perverse doctrine, would tie salvation solely to a barren faith.
(printed under page 188)
(49) ‹anchor: Deo et hominibus› · call in col 382
Prov. III, 3.
Prov. 3:3.
(printed under page 188)
(50) ‹anchor: ad perfectam diem› · call in col 382
Prov. IV, 18.
Prov. 4:18.
(printed under page 188)
(a) · call in col 383 (Syriac text only)
ܕܢܘܗܪ Fin.
[Syriac reading, "of light" (transcription uncertain at this resolution)], Fin. [siglum, as printed].
(printed under page 189)
(b) · call in col 383 (Syriac text only)
ܘܥܒ̈ܕܘܗܝ. id.
[Syriac reading, "and his works" (transcription uncertain)], the same [siglum].
(printed under page 189)
(51) · call in col 384
Matth. V, 16.
Matt. 5:16.
(printed under page 189)
(52) · call in col 384
I Cor. XIV, 40.
1 Cor. 14:40.
(printed under page 189)
(53) ‹anchor: seducat inanibus verbis› · call in col 384
Ephes. V, 6.
Eph. 5:6.
(printed under page 189)
(a) · call in col 385 (Syriac text only)
ܐܬܢܨܚܬ. Fin.
[Syriac reading (transcription uncertain at this resolution; check against the page)], Fin. [siglum, as printed].
(printed under page 190)
(54) · call in col 386
II Tim. III, 5.
2 Tim. 3:5.
(printed under page 190)
(55) · call in col 386
Gal. VI, 4.
Gal. 6:4.
(printed under page 190)
(56) · call in col 386
Luc. VI, 44.
Luke 6:44.
(printed under page 190)
(57) · call in col 386
II Tim. II, 7.
2 Tim. 2:7.
(printed under page 190)
(58) ‹anchor: et multiplicamini› · call in col 386
Gen. I, 28.
Gen. 1:28.
(printed under page 190)
(none) <!-- The only foot note called in this column is the Syriac-text note (a) (a Syriac word followed by "Fin."), called in the Syriac of Chapter V. It is Syriac apparatus and is not set, as at col 379 (see Page apparatus). Q4 removed an earlier uncertain transcription of it that had been set here against that rule. --> (printed under page 191)
(59) · call in col 388
I Petr. I, 4.
1 Pet. 1:4.
(printed under page 191)
(60) ‹anchor: non mentitur Deus› · call in col 388
Tit. I, 2.
Titus 1:2.
(printed under page 191)
(61) ‹anchor: vitae genus remuneretur› · call in col 388
Nemo non videt hic virginibus applicari a sancto Clemente textum Isaiae (cap. LVI, 5). Eamdem, sequentibus saeculis, applicationem ejusdem loci fecerunt multi doctores.
No one fails to see that here Saint Clement applies to virgins the text of Isaiah (56:5). In the following centuries many doctors made the same application of that passage.
(printed under page 191)
(a) · call in col 389 (Syriac text only)
ܩܢܘܢ. Fin.
[Syriac reading (transcription uncertain at this resolution; check against the page)], Fin. [siglum, as printed].
(printed under page 192)
(62) · call in col 390
I Cor. VII, 32-34.
1 Cor. 7:32–34.
(printed under page 192)
(63) ‹anchor: in Christo Jesu› · call in col 390
Phil. III, 14.
Phil. 3:14.
(printed under page 192)
(none) <!-- The only foot note called in this column is the Syriac-text note (a) (a Syriac word, probably "of virginity", followed by "Fin."), called in the Syriac. It is Syriac apparatus and is not set, as at cols 379 and 387 (see Page apparatus). Q4 removed the transcription that had been set here against that rule. --> (printed under page 193)
(64) · call in col 392
Luc. VII, 28.
Luke 7:28.
(printed under page 193)
(65) ‹anchor: in libro vitae› · call in col 392
Phil. IV, 3. Haec verba dulcia erant et in ore et sub calamo sancti Clementis, qui, in hac Epistola sancti Pauli expresse inter electos nominatur. Seipsum vero sanctus pontifex prae modestia nominare non debuit. Cum Clemente, ait Apostolus, et caeteris adjutoribus meis quorum nomina sunt in libro vitae! O prophetia beatitudinis, ore apostolico prolata! Utinam involvas homonymum exsulem sorti beatae patroni anhelantem!
Phil. 4:3. These words were sweet both on the lips and under the pen of Saint Clement, who in this Epistle of Saint Paul is expressly named among the elect. The holy pontiff, out of modesty, ought not to name himself. "With Clement," says the Apostle, "and my other fellow workers, whose names are in the book of life!" O prophecy of blessedness, uttered by an apostle's mouth! May you take in also an exile who bears the same name and longs for his patron's blessed lot!
(printed under page 193)
(66) · call in col 394
Hebr. XIII, 7.
Heb. 13:7.
(printed under page 194)
(67) · call in col 394
I Cor. IV, 16.
1 Cor. 4:16.
(printed under page 194)
(68) ‹anchor: salvari non possent› · call in col 394
Profecto sanctus Clemens non exigit a virginibus omnimodam Christi perfectionem; sed hic indirecte arguit fucatam Vestalium virtutem, aut fictam castitatem harum virginum quas accusat Apostolus, dicens : Habentes damnationem, quia primam fidem irritam fecerunt (I Tim. V, 12).
Certainly Saint Clement does not demand of virgins Christ's perfection in every respect; but here he indirectly rebukes the painted virtue of the Vestals, or the feigned chastity of those virgins whom the Apostle accuses, saying: "Having condemnation, because they have made void their first faith" (1 Tim. 5:12).
(printed under page 194)
(69) ‹anchor: ego sanctus sum› · call in col 394
Levit. XI, 44.
Lev. 11:44.
(printed under page 194)
(70) · call in col 396
Gal. V, 21, etc.
Gal. 5:21, etc.
(printed under page 195)
(71) ‹anchor: scurrilitatem, stultiloquium› · call in col 396
Ephes. V, 4.
Eph. 5:4.
(printed under page 195)
(72) ‹anchor: detractiones, susurrationes› · call in col 396
II Cor. XII, 20.
2 Cor. 12:20.
(printed under page 195)
(73) ‹anchor: clamorem, blasphemiam› · call in col 396
Ephes. IV, 31.
Eph. 4:31.
(printed under page 195)
(74) ‹anchor: idolorum servitus› · call in col 396
Ephes. V, 5.
Eph. 5:5.
(printed under page 195)
(75) ‹anchor: radix omnium malorum› · call in col 396
I Tim. VI, 10.
1 Tim. 6:10.
(printed under page 195)
(76) ‹anchor: se arma ministret› · call in col 396
Primo intuitu exuberantior videbitur ista tot vitiorum enumeratio, praesertim cum sermo dirigatur ad eos qui, viam perfectionis ingressi, supponi facile nequeunt his facinoribus inquinandi. Sed loquebatur sanctus Clemens in saeculo et in urbe scelerum immanitate nimium notis. Indirecte perstringebat sanctus pontifex innumeram hanc turbam caelibum Romanorum et Graecorum qui honestas nuptias fugiebant, ut in omnibus flagitiis liberius volutarentur. Istos delineaverat Apostolus (Rom. I, 26, 27). In passiones ignominiae et in reprobum sensum traditos, immutantes naturalem usum, in eum usum qui est (continues)
At first sight this listing of so many vices will seem excessive, especially since the discourse is addressed to those who, having entered the way of perfection, cannot easily be supposed to be stained by these crimes. But Saint Clement was speaking in an age and in a city all too well known for the monstrousness of their wickedness. The holy pontiff was indirectly censuring that countless crowd of unmarried Romans and Greeks who shunned honourable marriage so as to wallow the more freely in every vice. The Apostle had drawn their portrait (Rom. 1:26–27): given up to shameful passions and to a reprobate mind, changing the natural use into that use which is (continues)
(printed under page 195)
<!-- note: UNSET — not settable from the supplied images. c396_1–3 are crops of the Latin column 396 (the facing Syriac col. 395 cut off at the left). The foot-note band at the bottom of c396_3 is cropped too: only the right-hand ends of the lines show, ending with the opening of note 76 ("… In pas … est"). The end of note 76 is printed at the head of the foot notes of the NEXT page (cols 397–398, "contra naturam, exardescentes … protegere debuissent"), and no image of that page's foot-note band was supplied. The right-hand ends of those continuation lines do appear in the c398_3 crop, but every line is cut off on the left, so the note cannot be set whole from it. Needs a full-width render of the foot-note band on the page with cols 397–398. Nothing guessed. -->
(76, continued) · call in col 396 contra naturam, exardescentes in desideriis suis in invicem, repletos omni iniquitate, malitia, fornicatione, nequitia, plenos invidia, homicidio, contentione, dolo, malignitate, susurrones, detractores, Deo odibiles, contumeliosos, superbos, elatos, inventores malorum, parentibus non obedientes, sine affectione, absque foedere, sine misericordia. Attente legenti praesentem sancti Clementis Epistolam, alteramque ab ipso scriptam super eadem materia, clare perspectum est. ambas fuisse scriptas a viro qui sancti Pauli apostoli sensus et verba penitissime meditatus, ea quasi sibi propria fecerat. Opponit quoque sanctus pontifex veri eunuchi Christiani vitam moribus Vestalium Romanarum quae immunditiis horrendis saepius convictae poenas meritas luebant quandoque, id est quando ipsarum constupratores iidem non fuerant qui castitatem earum protegere debuissent.
against nature, burning in their lusts one towards another, filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication, wickedness, full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malignity, whisperers, detractors, hateful to God, insolent, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, without affection, faithless, without mercy. To anyone who reads attentively the present Epistle of Saint Clement, and the other written by him on the same subject, it is clearly evident that both were written by a man who had meditated most deeply on the thoughts and words of the holy apostle Paul and had made them, as it were, his own. The holy pontiff also sets the life of the true Christian eunuch against the morals of the Roman Vestals, who, convicted all too often of horrible impurities, paid the penalties they deserved now and then, that is, when their defilers were not the very men who ought to have protected their chastity.
(printed under page 196)
(77) · call in col 398
Joan. III, 6.
John 3:6.
(printed under page 196)
(78) · call in col 398
Ibid., 31.
Ibid., 3:31.
(printed under page 196)
(79) · call in col 398
Rom. VIII, 7.
Rom. 8:7.
(printed under page 196)
(80) · call in col 398
Rom. VII, 18.
Rom. 7:18.
(printed under page 196)
(81) · call in col 398
Gen. VI, 3.
Gen. 6:3.
(printed under page 196)
(82) · call in col 398
Rom. VIII, 9.
Rom. 8:9.
(printed under page 196)
(83) ‹anchor: nequam a Domino› · call in col 398
I Reg. XVI, 14.
1 Sam. (1 Kgs Vulg.) 16:14.
(printed under page 196)
(84) ‹anchor: his qui credunt› · call in col 398
Haec verba sancti Clementis satis indicant Epistolam istam et sequentem praecipue spectare ministros sacros, de quibus exigebatur ut, si ante ordinationem nuptias contraxissent, eos unam tantum uxorem habuisse, et a die ordinationis (continues)
These words of Saint Clement show clearly enough that this Epistle and the following one chiefly concern the sacred ministers, of whom it was required that, if they had contracted marriage before ordination, they should have had only one wife, and from the day of ordination (continues)
(printed under page 196)
(85) · call in col 400
Haec verba patenter alludunt capiti sexto Actuum in quo narratur electio septem diaconorum, praesertim sancti Stephani, cujus veteres Patres specialiter castitatem celebrarunt. Hinc pontifex consecrator, alloquens eos qui consecrandi sunt diaconi : « Cogitate, ait, beatum Stephanum merito praecipuae castitatis, ab apostolis, ad officium istud electum, » (Ex Pontificali.) »
These words plainly allude to the sixth chapter of Acts, which tells of the election of the seven deacons, and above all of Saint Stephen, whose chastity the ancient Fathers especially celebrated. Hence the consecrating pontiff, addressing those who are to be consecrated deacons, says: "Consider blessed Stephen, chosen by the apostles for this office on account of his outstanding chastity." (From the Pontifical.)
(printed under page 197)
(86) · call in col 400
Philipp. II, 15, 16.
Phil. 2:15–16.
(printed under page 197)
(87) ‹anchor: benedixit Dominus› · call in col 400
Isa. lxi, 9.
Isa. 61:9.
(printed under page 197)
(88) ‹anchor: diligunt illum› · call in col 400
I Cor. II, 9.
1 Cor. 2:9.
(printed under page 197)
(89) · call in col 402
Taxat ibi sanctus Clemens haereticos hujus aevi, discipulos Simonis, Menandri, Saturnili (quidam historici illum Saturninum vocant), Basilidis et Nicolai. « Simon Magus, ait sanctus Epiphanius, quamdam mulierculam nomine Helenam nactus, patria Tyriam, sibi eam copulat, quacum palam nullam habere se necessitudinem simulans, homo vafer, clam omni se in libidinum genere volutabat... Menander, discipulus Simonis, ab ejus dogmate non dissentiebat, nisi quod majorem se antecessore suo jactabat. Saturnilus nuptias condemnabat, ejusque discipulus Basilides nullum non genus pravitatis libidinisque permittebat. Nicolaus e numero septem diaconorum fuit qui ab apostolis delecti fuerant... Uxorem habuit, ab eaque sibi aliquando temperavit, ut eos imitaretur quos Deo penitus addictos cernebat. Sed intemperantiam suam perpetuo coercere non potuit; imo in omne genus libidinis, contumeliae ac pravitatis erupit » (Sanctus Epiph. Adv. haer., l. I). Cur autem sanctus Clemens non nominat hos nefandos haereticos quos debellat? Quia satis jam noti erant. Praeterea suscitandi non erant novi hostes contra Ecclesiam quae undique persecutionibus conflagrabat. Caeterum, expresse declarat sanctus Epiphanius nostrum pontificem, in his de virginitate epistolis, contra istos haereticos colluctasse.
Here Saint Clement censures the heretics of this age, the disciples of Simon, Menander, Saturnilus (some historians call him Saturninus), Basilides and Nicolaus. "Simon Magus," says Saint Epiphanius, "having found a certain wretched woman named Helena, a Tyrian by birth, joins her to himself; and while openly pretending to have no tie with her, the crafty man wallowed in secret in every kind of lust... Menander, Simon's disciple, did not dissent from his teaching, except that he boasted himself greater than his predecessor. Saturnilus condemned marriage, and his disciple Basilides permitted every kind of depravity and lust. Nicolaus was one of the seven deacons who had been chosen by the apostles... He had a wife, and for a time abstained from her, to imitate those he saw wholly given to God. But he could not restrain his incontinence for good; rather, he broke out into every kind of lust, outrage and depravity" (Saint Epiphanius, Against Heresies, bk I). Why then does Saint Clement not name these abominable heretics whom he combats? Because they were already well enough known. Besides, new enemies were not to be stirred up against a Church that was ablaze on every side with persecutions. For the rest, Saint Epiphanius expressly declares that our pontiff wrestled against these heretics in these epistles on virginity.
(printed under page 198)
(90) ‹anchor: ne cibum quidem sumere› · call in col 402
I Cor. V, 11.
1 Cor. 5:11.
(printed under page 198)
(91) ‹anchor: quae non oportet› · call in col 402
I Tim. V, 13.
1 Tim. 5:13.
(printed under page 198)
(92) · call in col 404
II Thess. III, 14.
2 Thess. 3:14.
(printed under page 199)
(93) · call in col 404
Prov. XXIV, 31.
Prov. 24:31.
(printed under page 199)
(94) · call in col 404
Prov. XV, 19.
Prov. 15:19.
(printed under page 199)
(95) ‹anchor: de quibus affirmant› · call in col 404
I Tim. I, 7.
1 Tim. 1:7.
(printed under page 199)
(96) ‹anchor: doctores et prophetas› · call in col 404
I Cor. XII, 28.
1 Cor. 12:28.
(printed under page 199)
(97) ‹anchor: totum corpus› · call in col 404
Jac. III, 2.
Jas 3:2.
(printed under page 199)
(98) ‹anchor: quasi sermones Dei› · call in col 404
I Petr. IV, 11.
1 Pet. 4:11.
(printed under page 199)
(99) · call in col 406
Eccli. V, 14.
Sir. 5:14.
(printed under page 200)
(100) · call in col 406
Eccle. III, 7.
Eccles. 3:7.
(printed under page 200)
(1) · call in col 406
Prov. XXV, 11.
Prov. 25:11.
(printed under page 200)
(2) · call in col 406
Coloss. IV, 6.
Col. 4:6.
(printed under page 200)
(3) · call in col 406
Prov. XVIII, vi.
Prov. 18:6 [printed "xviii, vi"].
(printed under page 200)
(4) · call in col 406
Prov. XIII, 3.
Prov. 13:3.
(printed under page 200)
(5) ‹anchor: beatum populum dicunt› · call in col 406
Isa. III, 12.
Isa. 3:12.
(printed under page 200)
(6) ‹anchor: corda innocentium› · call in col 406
Rom. XVI, 18.
Rom. 16:18.
(printed under page 200)
(7) ‹anchor: in foveam cadunt› · call in col 406
Matth. XV, 14.
Matt. 15:14.
(printed under page 200)
(8) ‹anchor: Hi portabunt judicium› · call in col 406
Gal. V, 10.
Gal. 5:10.
(printed under page 200)
(9) ‹anchor: sapientiam animalem› · call in col 406
Jac. III, 15.
Jas 3:15.
(printed under page 200)
(10) ‹anchor: humanae sapientiae verbis› · call in col 406
I Cor. II, 4.
1 Cor. 2:4.
(printed under page 200)
(11) ‹anchor: in filios diffidentiae› · call in col 406
Ephes. II, 2.
Eph. 2:2.
(printed under page 200)
(12) · call in col 408
Jac. I, 5.
Jas 1:5.
(printed under page 201)
(13) · call in col 408
Cuicunque homini rem ac verba serio perpendenti meditantique, locus iste sufficeret ad probandam hujus Epistolae authenticitatem : evidens est enim mentionem hic fieri de donis et revelationibus quae communia erant temporibus apostolicis, et de quibus disserit sanctus Paulus (I Cor. XIV). Quis falsarius de talibus fictionem struere unquam cogitasset? Detur vero reperiri potuisse impostorem qui hujusmodi charismatum fraudulentam existentiam finxisset : sermonem tunc non raptim absolvisset, sed late tractasset. Igitur et materia et brevitas, et candor virum apostolicum demonstrant. Et quid dicam de auctoritate loquentis? Quis enim ausus fuisset ita fidelium et perfectorum mores dirigere, nisi vir apostolicus, imo pontifex?
For anyone who seriously weighs and ponders the matter and the words, this passage would suffice to prove the authenticity of this Epistle: for it is evident that mention is made here of the gifts and revelations that were common in apostolic times, and which Saint Paul discusses (1 Cor. 14). What forger would ever have thought of building a fiction on such things? But grant that an impostor could have been found to invent the existence of charisms of this kind: he would then not have dispatched the subject in haste, but treated it at length. So the matter, the brevity and the candour all show an apostolic man. And what shall I say of the authority of the speaker? Who would have dared so to direct the conduct of the faithful and the perfect, unless an apostolic man, indeed a pontiff?
(printed under page 201)
(a) · call in col 409 (Syriac text only)
ܒܚܡܬܐ. Fin.
[Syriac reading (transcription uncertain at this resolution; check against the page)], Fin. [siglum, as printed].
(printed under page 202)
(14) · call in col 410
Matth. XVII, 20.
Matt. 17:20.
(printed under page 202)
(15) ‹anchor: sine odio et nequitia› · call in col 410
Igitur abjiciendis daemonibus ab obsessis apti non sunt nisi qui habent verum spiritum orationis, simplicitatis, humilitatis, mortificationis, sanctae laetitiae, vigilantiae, castitatis, charitatis, paupertatis et innocentiae : contraria enim contrariis curantur. Porro, omnes praedictae virtutes opponuntur spiritui nequam qui semper illas oppugnat ac funditus evertere cupit.
So none are fit to cast demons out of the possessed except those who have the true spirit of prayer, simplicity, humility, mortification, holy joy, watchfulness, chastity, charity, poverty and innocence: for contraries are cured by contraries. Moreover, all the virtues named are opposed to the wicked spirit, who always attacks them and longs to overthrow them utterly.
(printed under page 202)
(16) ‹anchor: gratis date› · call in col 410
Matth. X, 8.
Matt. 10:8.
(printed under page 202)
(17) ‹anchor: carnis mortificate› · call in col 410
Rom. VIII, 13.
Rom. 8:13.
(printed under page 202)
(18) · call in col 412
Matth. X, 8.
Matt. 10:8.
(18*) · call in col 412 Matth. XXV, 36.
Matt. 25:36.
<!-- The second numeral looks like "18" with an asterisk or a damaged figure; check against the page. --> (printed under page 203)
(19) ‹anchor: et ego non uror› · call in col 412
II Cor. XI, 29.
2 Cor. 11:29.
(printed under page 203)
(20) ‹anchor: credunt in Deum› · call in col 412
Ut honoremus Deum in fratribus nostris, et fratres nostros propter Deum.
That we may honour God in our brethren, and our brethren for God's sake.
(printed under page 203)
(a) · call in col 413 (Syriac text only)
ܢܣܒܘܢ Fin.
[Syriac reading (transcription uncertain at this resolution; check against the page)], Fin. [siglum, as printed].
<!-- The call numbered (23) in the Latin was not located with certainty in the visible text; the call after "venerentur" reads 22 or 23 at this resolution. Anchors for 22/23 to be checked. --> (printed under page 204)
(21) · call in col 414
Alludit sanctus Clemens his verbis sancti Pauli : Charitas fraternitatis maneat in vobis : et hospitalitatem nolite oblivisci : per hanc enim latuerunt quidam, angelis hospitio receptis (Hebr. XIII, 1, 2).
Saint Clement alludes to these words of Saint Paul: "Let the charity of the brotherhood abide in you; and do not forget hospitality, for by it some, unawares, have received angels as guests" (Heb. 13:1–2).
(printed under page 204)
(22) ‹anchor: ac rationi pervium› · call in col 414
Hoc monitum sancti Clementis nemo mirari debet : plurimi enim inter primos Christianos seduci poterant adhuc reminiscentia tot deitatum quas coluerant. Quidam etiam in tentationem quamdam induci poterant per dogma unius Dei in tribus personis.
No one should wonder at this warning of Saint Clement: for many among the first Christians could still be led astray by the memory of the many deities they had worshipped. Some too could be drawn into a kind of temptation by the dogma of one God in three persons.
(printed under page 204)
(23) ‹anchor: cultores venerentur› · call in col 414
Ex verbis quae praecedunt et quae sequuntur, evidenter patet operarios quos hic memorat sanctus Clemens esse imprimis viros sacro ministerio addictos.
From the words that precede and follow it is plainly evident that the labourers Saint Clement mentions here are above all men devoted to the sacred ministry.
(printed under page 204)
(24) ‹anchor: in messem suam› · call in col 414
Matth. IX, 37, 38.
Matt. 9:37–38.
(printed under page 204)
(25) ‹anchor: in vitam aeternam› · call in col 414
Joan. VI, 27.
John 6:27.
(printed under page 204)
(26) ‹anchor: de hominum salute solliciti› · call in col 414
Salutem hominum curarunt tres sanctissimae Trinitatis personae, quae (continues)
The three persons of the most holy Trinity have cared for the salvation of men, who (continues)
(printed under page 204)
<!-- note: UNSET — not settable from the supplied images. c414_1–3 are crops of the Latin column 414 (the facing Syriac col. 413 cut off at the left). The foot-note band at the bottom of c414_3 shows only the right-hand ends of the lines of notes 21–25 and the start of note 26 ("… curarunt tres sanctissimæ Trinitatis personæ, quæ"). The end of note 26 is printed at the head of the foot notes of the NEXT page (cols 415–416, "viris apostolicis imitandae proponuntur … Joan. XIII, 15"), and no image of it was supplied. So the forms "aa extra" and "theolcgi" could NOT be checked. Nothing goes into misprints.tsv until they are seen on the page. Needs a full-width render of the foot-note band on the page with cols 415–416. Nothing guessed. -->
(a) · call in col 415 (Syriac text only)
ܕܐܬܕܪ: Fin.
[Syriac reading (transcription uncertain at this resolution; check against the page)], Fin. [siglum, as printed].
(printed under page 205)
(26, continued) · call in col 414 viris apostolicis imitandae proponuntur. Illae conjunctim semper agunt in operibus aa extra, ut loquuntur theolcgi. Hinc in plurali numero dicit Creator omnium : Faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram (Gen. I, 26). Ignoro qua mente motus fuerit D. de Prémagny qui hunc locum Epistolae sancti Clementis quasi suggillare tentaverit. In Levitico, c. XX, 26, ipsemet Deus dicit : Eritis mihi sancti, quia sanctus sum ego Dominus. Et Salvator noster : Qui sequitur me, non ambulat in tenebris (Joan. VIII, 12). Exemplum dedi vobis, ut quemadmodum ego feci vobis, ita et vos faciatis (Joan. XIII, 15).
… are set before apostolic men for imitation. They always act together in their works ad extra [printed "aa extra"], as the theologians [printed "theolcgi"] say. Hence the Creator of all speaks in the plural number: Let us make man to our image and likeness (Gen. 1:26). I do not know with what intention D. de Prémagny was moved, who tried, as it were, to find fault with this passage of the Epistle of Saint Clement. In Leviticus 20:26 God Himself says: You shall be holy to me, because I the Lord am holy. And our Saviour: He who follows me does not walk in darkness (John 8:12). I have given you an example, that as I have done to you, so you also may do (John 13:15).
(printed under page 205)
(27) · call in col 416
Rom. XVI, 18.
Rom. 16:18.
(printed under page 205)
(28) · call in col 416
Philip. III, 19.
Phil. 3:19.
(printed under page 205)
(29) ‹anchor: justitia coram ipso› · call in col 416
Luc. I, 75.
Luke 1:75.
(printed under page 205)
(30) ‹anchor: per omnia placentes› · call in col 416
Coloss. I, 10.
Col. 1:10.
(printed under page 205)
(31) ‹anchor: coram hominibus› · call in col 416
II Cor. VIII, 21.
2 Cor. 8:21.
(printed under page 205)
(32) ‹anchor: bonum est et acceptum› · call in col 416
I Tim. II, 3.
1 Tim. 2:3.
(printed under page 205)
(33) ‹anchor: nec nos ungunt› · call in col 418
Inter charitatis officia, Christus ipse (Luc. VII, 46) et, post ipsum, Apostolus (I Tim. V, 10), duo praefata opera numeraverat. Cum autem ex ipsis charitatis operibus occasionem captet diabolus homines ad peccatum adducendi, sapienter judicavit sanctus Clemens amovendam esse hanc tentationis lapsusque originem, non quidem erga fideles laicos, sed erga clericos, ut nihil omnino sinistri in eos rumoris fingi posset, nihilque detrahi famae castitatis ac modestiae ipsorum.
Among the duties of charity Christ Himself (Luke 7:46), and after Him the Apostle (1 Tim. 5:10), had counted the two works just mentioned. But since the devil seizes on these very works of charity as an occasion for leading men into sin, Saint Clement wisely judged that this source of temptation and of falling should be removed, not indeed for the faithful laity, but for clerics, so that no unfavourable rumour at all could be invented against them, and nothing be taken from their reputation for chastity and modesty.
(printed under page 206)
(a) ‹anchor: Syriac column; call in the Syriac text, not legible in the foot image› · call in col 419 (Syriac column; no Latin counterpart in the note)
ܕܚܢܝ. Fin. [Syriac word uncertain in this image]
[Syriac variant reading] "Fin." [abbreviation not expanded: siglum or source of the reading, uncertain]
(printed under page 207)
(b) ‹anchor: Syriac column; call not legible in the foot image› · call in col 419 (Syriac column; no Latin counterpart in the note)
ܘܣܢܝ. Id. [Syriac word uncertain in this image]
[Syriac variant reading] "Id." (the same source)
(printed under page 207)
(34) ‹anchor: populi Dei ornamenta et munia› · call in col 420
Nihil instructione plenius ac brevius dici potest. Indicat sanctus Clemens quae fuerint in Ecclesiae incunabulis sacerdotum et praedicatorum cautiones, ut coram fidelibus ministerium suum honorarent, secundum Apostoli praeceptum. Non omnes indistincte ad praedicationem applicabantur; sed illi praecipue qui tali munere congrue fungi poterant. Caeteri qui munus istud non exercebant praedicantibus plaudebant, nec invidebant. Praedicatores autem divino timore, non tumore pleni, pruritumque linguae intemperantis cohibentes, invigilabant ne quid ex ore suo excideret quod gravitatem, honestatem sobrietatemque non saperet; sed in omnibus Dei gloriam salutemque proximorum inquirebant, et vitam cujusvis maculae et fraudis expertem fidelibus inspirabant.
Nothing fuller or briefer can be said by way of instruction. Saint Clement shows what precautions the priests and preachers took in the cradle of the Church, so as to honour their ministry before the faithful, according to the Apostle's precept. Not all were set to preaching indiscriminately, but chiefly those who could fittingly discharge such an office. The rest, who did not exercise that office, applauded the preachers and did not envy them. The preachers, for their part, full of the fear of God, not of swelling pride, and restraining the itch of an intemperate tongue, kept watch that nothing should fall from their mouth that did not savour of gravity, decency and sobriety; but in all things they sought the glory of God and the salvation of their neighbours, and breathed into the faithful a life free of every stain and deceit.
(printed under page 207)
(a) ‹anchor: (Syriac) ܡܢ› · call in col 421 (Syriac column; no Latin counterpart in the note)
ܣܬܪ̈ܝ. Fin. [Syriac word uncertain in this image]
[Syriac variant reading] "Fin." [abbreviation not expanded: siglum or source of the reading, uncertain]
(printed under page 208)
(35) ‹anchor: nobis opus sunt subministrant› · call in col 422
Patet ex Epistola sancti Pauli ad Philemonem, et ex aliis epistolis primos Christianos nihil charius habuisse quam exercitium charitatis, praesertim erga viros ecclesiasticos. Ea charitas ex viva fide procedebat, et eo usque progrediebatur, ut oculos suos eruissent, si necesse fuisset, et suis doctoribus dedissent; quia eos ut Dei angelos, imo ut Jesum Christum excipiebant. Hinc clerus eo cautior erga mulieres esse debebat, quo earum pietas et gratitudo periculosius se manifestassent. Praeterea ipsi viri in rebus domesticis natura imperitiores, dilectione formabantur ad haec charitatis officia, erga sanctos et dilectos magistros exercenda.
It is plain from Saint Paul's Epistle to Philemon, and from other epistles, that the first Christians held nothing dearer than the exercise of charity, especially towards churchmen. That charity proceeded from a living faith, and went so far that they would have plucked out their own eyes, had it been necessary, and given them to their teachers; for they received them as angels of God, nay as Jesus Christ. Hence the clergy had to be the more cautious towards women, the more dangerously the women's piety and gratitude might have shown themselves. Besides, the men themselves, by nature less skilled in household matters, were trained by love to these offices of charity, to be performed towards their holy and beloved teachers.
(printed under page 208)
(36) ‹anchor: et aedificationis› · call in col 422
Unusquisque proprium donum habet ex Deo (I Cor. VII, 7). Miraculorum dono praecipue fruebatur Moyses, eloquentia vero Aaron.
"Every one has his proper gift of God" (1 Cor. 7:7). Moses especially enjoyed the gift of miracles, Aaron that of eloquence.
(printed under page 208)
(37) ‹anchor: viri viros› · call in col 422
Secundum praescriptum Apostoli, in osculo sancto (II Cor. XIII, 12).
According to the Apostle's precept, "with a holy kiss" (2 Cor. 13:12).
(printed under page 208)
(38) ‹anchor: modestia coopertam, salutant› · call in col 422
Per hujusmodi salutationem designatur, ni fallor, manus tectae deosculatio: videtur enim consuetudinem hanc manus deosculationis a primaevis Ecclesiae diebus ad nos usque permeasse. Desierunt autem cooperiri manus quando manicarum usus introductus est in virorum vestimentis. Vix enim severior (continues)
By a greeting of this kind is meant, unless I am mistaken, the kissing of the covered hand: for this custom of kissing the hand seems to have come down to us from the earliest days of the Church. Hands ceased to be covered, however, when the use of sleeves was brought into men's garments. For scarcely a stricter (continues)
(printed under page 208)
<!-- note: UNSET — not settable from the supplied images. c422_1–3 are crops of the Latin column 422 (the facing Syriac col. 421 cut off at the left). The foot-note band at the bottom of c422_3 shows only the right-hand ends of its lines, which belong to the earlier part of note 38 ("… Vix enim severior"). The end of note 38 is printed at the head of the foot notes of the NEXT page (cols 423–424, "etiam modestia laeditur … the two Virgil verses … the Quintilian sentence … Non omittet eruditus lector … Epistolae sancti Clementis"), and no image of it was supplied. Needs a full-width render of the foot-note band on the page with cols 423–424. Nothing guessed. -->
(39) ‹anchor: call not in the visible page foot› · call in col 424
Frater sanctus, id est Christianus. Tempore sancti Clementis, plurimi adhuc loci Christianis carebant. Ibi tamen saepe reperiebantur catechumeni aut etiam gentiles in Christianos propensissimi. Hos crederem a sancto pontifice socios esse vocatos, quia concordibus animis in gratiam hujus novae societatis conspirabant. Isti magnum honorem reputabant suscipere Christianos, praesertim vero Christi ministros, mox futuri ipsi Christi discipuli et saepius nobilior martyrum ipsius seges.
"A holy brother", that is, a Christian. In Saint Clement's time very many places still had no Christians. Yet there were often to be found there catechumens, or even pagans very well disposed towards the Christians. These, I should think, the holy pontiff calls "companions", because with one mind they were at one in favour of this new fellowship. They counted it a great honour to receive Christians, and above all the ministers of Christ, being themselves soon to become disciples of Christ, and often the nobler harvest of his martyrs.
(printed under page 209)
(40) ‹anchor: vituperetur ministerium nostrum› · call in col 424
II Cor. VI, 3.
2 Cor. 6:3.
(printed under page 209)
(41) ‹anchor: Deo autem manifesti sumus› · call in col 424
II Cor. V, 11.
2 Cor. 5:11.
(printed under page 209)
(42) ‹anchor: castitatem ac Dei timorem redolent› · call in col 426
In his quae ad mysteria et sacramenta spectabant, nihil expresse ab oratore quolibet revelabatur, praesertimque nihil a quovis auctore claris verbis scribebatur; sensum vero intentum penetrabant initiati quibus datum erat nosse veritates absconditas. Caeteris autem, licet catechumenis, in parabolis serius evolvendis omnia dicebantur. Num quis mirari deberet si diebus istis fervoris ac persecutionis animae devotae cum gaudio excepissent reconciliationis ministros, istique, modestiae causa, in unum ejusdem loci latus mulieres secrevissent, dum unaquaeque, vicissim, internam mentem, in exomologesi, revelasset! Textui superiori satis congruit illa sententia. Conferri possunt quae hic a sancto Clemente dicuntur cum verbis sancti Basilii in Regulis brevioribus, praesertim 108 et 110, et nota erit prudentia primis saeculis adhibita in mulierum confessione, quae saepe fiebat coram testibus saltem satis distantibus. Solum discrimen inter verba utriusque sancti in eo est, quod prudenter tacuerit sanctus Clemens nomen confessionis quam saeculo IV sanctus Basilius exprimere potuit. Genuflexi fideles ante sacerdotem confitebantur. Hinc prodiit ab infidelibus ad quos imperfecta pervenerat hujus ritus notitia, turpis adorationis accusatio erga confessarium: ut videre est apud Minutium Felicem, cap. 9. Usus sedilis confessionalis, qualis hodie adhibetur, serius introductus est.
In matters touching the mysteries and sacraments nothing was revealed explicitly by any speaker, and above all nothing was written in plain words by any author; but the initiated, to whom it was given to know the hidden truths, penetrated the meaning intended. To the rest, though they were catechumens, everything was said in parables to be unfolded later. Should anyone wonder if in those days of fervour and persecution devout souls received the ministers of reconciliation with joy, and these, for modesty's sake, set the women apart in one side of the same place, while each in turn revealed her inner mind in the exomologesis [confession]! That sense fits the text above well enough. What Saint Clement says here may be compared with the words of Saint Basil in the Shorter Rules, especially 108 and 110, and the prudence used in the first centuries in the confession of women will be evident; it was often made before witnesses, at least at a fair distance. The only difference between the words of the two saints is that Saint Clement prudently kept silent the name of confession, which Saint Basil in the fourth century could state. The faithful confessed on their knees before the priest. Hence arose, among unbelievers to whom an imperfect knowledge of this rite had come, the charge of a shameful adoration of the confessor: as may be seen in Minucius Felix, ch. 9. The use of the confessional seat, such as is used today, was introduced later.
(printed under page 210)
(43) ‹anchor: prout fert ipsarum status› · call in col 426
Quemadmodum socios ad catechumenorum aliorumque virorum Christianis addictorum ordinem referri posse judicavimus, sic mulieres socias eidem ordini ascribere nihil vetat.
Just as we judged that "companions" could be referred to the class of catechumens and other men attached to the Christians, so nothing forbids assigning the women "companions" to the same class.
(printed under page 210)
(44) ‹anchor: sanctorum pedes lavit› · call in col 428
I Tim. V, 10.
1 Tim. 5:10.
(printed under page 211)
(45) ‹anchor: in pace repetit› · call in col 428
Hic assignatur discrimen servatum, Ecclesia nascente, inter sanctos seu fideles laicos et Dei ministros: laicorum quippe modestorum licet ac verecundorum mulieres lavabant pedes; hos ungebant, caeteraque consueta charitatis et urbanitatis officia erga ipsos, more patriae, impendebant; clerici vero haec omnia denegabant praeter ea quibus nullatenus carere poterant.
Here is set out the distinction kept, when the Church was coming to birth, between the saints or lay faithful and the ministers of God: the women washed the feet of laymen, modest and bashful though they were, anointed them, and paid them the other customary offices of charity and courtesy, after the manner of the country; but the clergy refused all these, except those they could in no way do without.
(printed under page 211)
(46) ‹anchor: ut salvi fiant› · call in col 428
I Cor. X, 33.
1 Cor. 10:33.
(printed under page 211)
(a) ‹anchor: (Syriac) ܠܐ› · call in col 429 (Syriac column; no Latin counterpart in the note)
ܒܗ. Fin. [Syriac word uncertain in this image]
[Syriac variant reading] "Fin." [abbreviation not expanded: siglum or source of the reading, uncertain]
(printed under page 212)
(47) ‹anchor: call not in the visible page foot› · call in col 430
Rom. XIV, 15.
Rom. 14:15.
(printed under page 212)
(48) ‹anchor: call not in the visible page foot› · call in col 430
I Cor. VIII, 12.
1 Cor. 8:12.
(printed under page 212)
(49) ‹anchor: …mus (word cut at the top of the image; uncertain)› · call in col 430
Nullus lector intelligens mirabitur quod hic cibus memoretur, cum sermo sit de virginitate: nam sponte et sine negotio ex verbis sancti Clementis hoc instituitur ratiocinium: Romanos et Corinthios monet divus Paulus ne fratribus infirmis occasionem scandali praebeant, utendo coram ipsis cibo licet indifferenti; quanto magis caveri debet ne suspicio mala fidelium animis ingeratur propter periculosum contubernium.
No intelligent reader will wonder that food is mentioned here when the subject is virginity: for this reasoning arises of itself and without effort from Saint Clement's words: the divine Paul warns the Romans and Corinthians not to give weak brethren occasion of scandal by eating, in their presence, food that is in itself indifferent; how much more must one take care that an evil suspicion be not thrust into the minds of the faithful by reason of a dangerous living together.
(printed under page 212)
(50) ‹anchor: semper est pavidus› · call in col 430
Prov. XXVIII, 14.
Prov. 28:14.
(printed under page 212)
(51) ‹anchor: call not in the visible page foot› · call in col 432
Matth. X, 16.
Matt. 10:16.
(printed under page 213)
(52) ‹anchor: call not in the visible page foot› · call in col 432
Ephes. V, 15, 16.
Eph. 5:15–16.
(printed under page 213)
(53) ‹anchor: call not in the visible page foot› · call in col 432
Westinus scribit vestras, sed mendose, ni fallor.
Wetstein [printed "Westinus"] writes "vestras" ("your"), but wrongly, unless I am mistaken.
(printed under page 213)
(54) ‹anchor: margaritas ante porcos› · call in col 432
Matth. VII, 6.
Matt. 7:6.
(printed under page 213)
(55) ‹anchor: glorificemus Deum› · call in col 432
Pastores animarum qui vitae sanctimonia bonum Christi odorem non spargunt, canibus sanctum projiciunt et margaritas ante porcos mittunt. Inde enim pravi, aut praeoccupatis opinionibus obcaecati homines facile inducuntur ut a religionis ministris in religionem contemptum suum ac furorem convertant eamque cum ipsis dilacerent; sicque impletur Christi vaticinium dicentis: Ne forte conculcent eas pedibus et conversi dirumpant vos (Matth. VII, 6).
Pastors of souls who do not spread the good odour of Christ by holiness of life throw what is holy to the dogs and cast pearls before swine. For thereby wicked men, or men blinded by prejudice, are easily led to turn their contempt and fury from the ministers of religion onto religion itself, and to tear it to pieces together with them; and so is fulfilled Christ's prophecy, who says: "Lest perhaps they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you" (Matt. 7:6).
(printed under page 213)
(a) ‹anchor: call above the visible page foot (Syriac)› · call in col 433 (Syriac column; no Latin counterpart in the note)
ܗܠܝܬܐ. Fin. [Syriac word uncertain in this image]
[Syriac variant reading] "Fin." [abbreviation not expanded: siglum or source of the reading, uncertain]
(printed under page 214)
(b) ‹anchor: call above the visible page foot (Syriac)› · call in col 433 (Syriac column)
ܒܥܠܝܬܐ. Id. [Syriac word uncertain in this image]
[Syriac variant reading] "Id." (the same source)
(printed under page 214)
(c) ‹anchor: (Syriac) ܕܡܣܝܢܐ› · call in col 433 (Syriac column)
ܘܢܒܥܘܢ. Id. [Syriac word uncertain in this image]
[Syriac variant reading] "Id." (the same source)
(printed under page 214)
(d) ‹anchor: (Syriac) ܘܕܒܫܝܢ› · call in col 433 (Syriac column)
ܘܡܥܢܝܢ. Id. [Syriac word uncertain in this image]
[Syriac variant reading] "Id." (the same source)
(printed under page 214)
(e) ‹anchor: (Syriac) ܘܡܥܢܝܢ› · call in col 433 (Syriac column)
ܘܡܗܘܢ. Id. [Syriac word uncertain in this image]
[Syriac variant reading] "Id." (the same source)
(printed under page 214)
(f) ‹anchor: (Syriac) ܘܗܘܝܢ› · call in col 433 (Syriac column)
ܡܠܡܝܢ. Id. [Syriac word uncertain; the line is cut at the image's lower edge, siglum read as "Id." from its visible remnant]
[Syriac variant reading] "Id." (the same source)
(printed under page 214)
(56) ‹anchor: quod non decet› · call in col 434
Haec meditentur qui sibimetipsis missionem dederunt in terras alienas, ut circumferant illuc eloquia sacra, in omnes linguas et pro arbitrio suo conversa, omnibusque populis infidelibus prostituta. O vere mercenarii, qui non animas quaerunt sed nummos; non gloriam Dei, sed sponsae Christi humiliationem ac tribulationem intendunt! Horum autem consiliorum quis finis? Qui habitat in coelis irridebit eos: et Dominus subsannabit eos (Psal. II, 4).
Let them ponder this who have given themselves a mission to foreign lands, to carry about there the sacred oracles, turned into every tongue at their own pleasure and prostituted to all unbelieving peoples. O true hirelings, who seek not souls but money; who aim not at the glory of God but at the humiliation and tribulation of the Bride of Christ! But what is the end of these designs? "He that dwells in heaven shall laugh at them: and the Lord shall deride them" (Ps. 2:4).
(printed under page 214)
(57) ‹anchor: agere pergant› · call in col 434
Quilibet fidelis catholicus, quantum valet, obicem ponere potest et debet juxta prudentiae regulas, ministerio usurpato et circuitionibus vagorum sectariorum. Quanto magis principes et magistratus! Civilis tamen potestas limites sibi praescriptos nunquam transgredi debet nec invadere in jura Ecclesiae, quae ipsa, in his quae religionem spectant, terminos assignat non transiliendos.
Any Catholic believer, so far as he is able, can and must, according to the rules of prudence, put an obstacle in the way of the usurped ministry and the circuits of wandering sectaries. How much more princes and magistrates! Yet the civil power must never overstep the limits prescribed to it, nor invade the rights of the Church, which herself, in matters that concern religion, assigns the bounds not to be crossed.
(printed under page 214)
(58) ‹anchor: cooperatores honorate› · call in col 434
Videtur alludere sanctus Clemens verbis Apostoli (Philip. IV, 3), quae tamen nullibi integre citat, prae modestia, quia in his expresse nominatur.
Saint Clement seems to allude to the Apostle's words (Phil. 4:3), which, however, he nowhere quotes in full, out of modesty, because he is named in them expressly.
(printed under page 214)
(59) ‹anchor: in illo fideles ac recti manseritis› · call in col 434
Quis non videt haec verba soli Ecclesiae principi convenire?
Who does not see that these words befit only the prince of the Church?
(printed under page 214)
(a) ‹anchor: (Syriac) first line of Caput VIII, before ܐܠܡܐ› · call in col 435 (Syriac column; no Latin counterpart in the note)
ܐܠܡܐ. Fin. [Syriac word uncertain in this image]
[Syriac variant reading] "Fin." [abbreviation not expanded: siglum or source of the reading, uncertain]
(printed under page 215)
(60) ‹anchor: pretiosam animam capit› · call in col 438
Prov vi, 26.
Prov. 6:26.
(printed under page 216)
(61) ‹anchor: mulier pulchra valde› · call in col 440
II Reg. XI, 2.
2 Kings (Vulgate numbering; = 2 Sam.) 11:2.
(printed under page 217)
(62) ‹anchor: capietur ab illa› · call in col 440
Eccle. VII, 27.
Eccles. 7:27 (Vulgate; 7:26 in modern numbering).
(printed under page 217)
(63) ‹anchor: call not in the visible page foot› · call in col 444
Eccli. IX, 8.
Ecclus. 9:8.
(printed under page 219)
(64) ‹anchor: call not in the visible page foot› · call in col 444
Ibid., 12.
Ibid., 9:12.
(printed under page 219)
(65) ‹anchor: call not in the visible page foot› · call in col 444
Prov. VI, 27, 28, 29.
Prov. 6:27–29.
(printed under page 219)
(66) ‹anchor: call not in the visible page foot› · call in col 444
Ibid., 25.
Ibid., 6:25.
(printed under page 219)
(67) ‹anchor: in efficacia illius› · call in col 444
Eccli. IX, 4.
Ecclus. 9:4.
(printed under page 219)
(68) ‹anchor: videat ne cadat› · call in col 444
I Cor. X, 12.
1 Cor. 10:12.
(printed under page 219)
(69) ‹anchor: docet Apostolus› · call in col 444
I Tim. V, 11.
1 Tim. 5:11.
(printed under page 219)
(a) ‹anchor: (Syriac) before ܥܡ ܓܒܪ̈ܐ› · call in col 445 (Syriac column; no Latin counterpart in the note)
ܥܦܪ̈ܐ. Fin. [Syriac word uncertain in this image]
[Syriac variant reading] "Fin." [abbreviation not expanded: siglum or source of the reading, uncertain]
(printed under page 220)
(b) ‹anchor: (Syriac) line beginning ܘܗܘܐ; call letter faint in the image› · call in col 445 (Syriac column)
ܗܘܐ. Id. [Syriac word uncertain in this image]
[Syriac variant reading] "Id." (the same source)
(printed under page 220)
(70) ‹anchor: call not in the visible page foot› · call in col 446
Exod. XIV, 29. Notandum est in textu Hebraico, sicut in Vulgata hic tantum exprimi sensum sicci maris. Nec tamen minus certum est mare istud quod siccis pedibus filii Israel calcarunt, fuisse mare vocatum in textu Hebraico et Syriaco mare Suph, id est, algosum; quia sinus Arabicus, ibi designatus, alga marina abundans est. Vulgatae translatio semper mare Suph vertit per mare rubrum. Authenticitatem hujus epistolae in dubium revocat D. de Premagny, quia S. Clemens, vel potius Syriacus translator, conservavit vocem Hebraicam Suph. Hac occasione dicit adnotator mare istud esse ignotum; sed vox Suph frequenter adhibetur in Scripturis, ut in praevia dissertatione demonstratum est. Santes Pagninus, in sua versione Bibliorum, ubique idem verbum Suph conservavit. Sed quidam, ait S. Paulus (I Tim. I, 6, 7), aberrantes conversi sunt in vaniloquium, volentes esse legis doctores, non intelligentes neque quae loquuntur, neque de quibus affirmant.
Exod. 14:29. Note that in the Hebrew text, as in the Vulgate, only the sense of "the dry sea" is expressed here. Yet it is no less certain that the sea which the children of Israel trod dry-shod was called in the Hebrew and Syriac text the sea Suph, that is, the weedy sea, because the Arabian gulf there meant abounds in seaweed. The Vulgate translation always renders the sea Suph as "the Red Sea". M. de Premagny calls the authenticity of this epistle into doubt because Saint Clement, or rather the Syriac translator, kept the Hebrew word Suph. On this occasion the annotator says that this sea is unknown; but the word Suph is often used in the Scriptures, as was shown in the preceding dissertation. Santes Pagninus, in his version of the Bible, kept the same word Suph throughout. "But some," says Saint Paul (1 Tim. 1:6–7), "going astray, are turned aside unto vain babbling, desiring to be teachers of the law, understanding neither the things they say, nor whereof they affirm."
(printed under page 220)
(71) ‹anchor: gloriose enim magnificatus est› · call in col 446
Exod. XV.
Exod. 15.
(printed under page 220)
(72) ‹anchor: Eliseum et Giezi› · call in col 446
Diu Giezi laudabiliter vixit in obsequio Elisei, donec avaritia mancipium factus, domini sui maledictionem incurrit.
For a long time Gehazi lived commendably in Elisha's service, until, made the slave of avarice, he incurred his master's curse.
(printed under page 220)
(73) ‹anchor: cum muliere loquebatur› · call in col 448
Joan. IV, 27.
John 4:27.
(printed under page 221)
(74) ‹anchor: ascendi ad Patrem meum› · call in col 448
Joan. XX, 17.
John 20:17.
(printed under page 221)
(75) ‹anchor: in amaritudine est› · call in col 450
IV Reg. IV, 27.
4 Kings (Vulgate numbering; = 2 Kings) 4:27.
(printed under page 222)
(76) ‹anchor: de facultatibus suis› · call in col 450
Luc. VIII, 3.
Luke 8:3.
(printed under page 222)
(77) ‹anchor: permaneamus regula› · call in col 450
Philip. iii, 16.
Phil. 3:16.
(printed under page 222)
(78) ‹anchor: call not in the visible page foot› · call in col 452
I Joan. IV, 6.
1 John 4:6.
(printed under page 223)
<!-- This page is no longer the Epistolae ad virgines: it carries a fragment of an old Latin version of 1 Clement (Pitra, Spicilegium Solesmense) with Greek above at left. Migne's full-width notes (a), (b) at the very foot are set here. The editor's notes (14)–(18), printed in small type in two columns beneath the text, are set once under the Latin column, in n454. --> (printed under page 224)
(a) ‹anchor: EX SPICILEGIO SOLESMENSI (call printed after SOLESMENSI, in the full-width heading)› · call in col 453
Tom. I, p. 293.
Vol. I, p. 293.
(printed under page 224)
(b) ‹anchor: diaconus noster Romanus (in note 14)› · call in col 453
Vide Prolegomena ad Spicilegium Solesmense, p. LVII,
See the Prolegomena to the Spicilegium Solesmense, p. LVII.
(printed under page 224)
(Spicilegium Solesmense, complectens SS. Patrum scriptorumque ecclesiasticorum anecdota hactenus opera, selecta e Graecis Orientalibusque et Latinis codicibus, publici juris facta curante domno J. B. PITRA, O. S. B. monacho e congregatione Gallica; tom. I, Parisiis ap. Firmin Didot fratres, 1852, in-4°. — Cum editoris permissione.)
(The Solesmes Spicilegium, comprising works of the holy Fathers and ecclesiastical writers hitherto unpublished, selected from Greek, Oriental and Latin manuscripts, and made public under the care of Dom J. B. Pitra, O.S.B., monk of the French Congregation; vol. I, Paris, Firmin Didot brothers, 1852, quarto. — By permission of the editor.)
<!-- note: the parenthesis stands under the headings SUPERIORUM EPISTOLARUM FRAGMENTA / "Quae in his non exstant, seu aliorum operum, apud veteres relicta." / I. / EX SPICILEGIO SOLESMENSI (a), and is set across the full page width in four lines of italic (Pitra's name in roman capitals; "tom. I, Parisiis ap. Firmin Didot fratres," and "1852, in-4°" in roman). Read whole from the column images of 453 and 454 together (Q2, 2026-10-05). Below the parenthesis follow Pitra's own italic lemma ("S. Clemens Romanus ordinandorum de Ecclesiae consensu…"), the bracketed heading "[Fragmentum ad fidem antiqui interpretis (14) recognitum.]", then the Greek of 1 Clem. 43–44 with the Latin facing, and the foot notes (14)–(18) (set in n454) with Migne's (a)/(b) (set above). -->
(14) ‹anchor: interpretis (14) recognitum (call in the full-width bracketed heading, right half)› · call in col 454
Interpretis. Quis sit vetus ille interpres, non potui diu et moleste quaerere, quin pluries ea mecum revolverim, quibus a Paulino Nolano conditam fuisse Clementinam versionem, tam Paulinus ipse (epist. 46), quam Gennadius (Catal. XLVIII), diserte testatur. Audiendus illustris ille interpres ac piissimus, in epistola ad Rufinum, nostram versionem describens quasi graphice: « Credo enim in Translatione sancti Clementis, praeter alias ingenii mei defectiones, hanc te potissimum imperitiae meae penuriam considerasse, quod aliqua in quibus intelligere vel exprimere verba non potui, sensu potius apprehenso, vel, ut verius dicam, opinata transtulerim. » Quibus mox Paulinus addit eodem tempore quo haec scribebantur, ab ipso legi Moysis libros, quos hic ipsius Clementis locus illustrat. Inferre igitur exinde licet, primum exstitisse antiquam Clementinae epistolae Latinam versionem hactenus incognitam, Paulino Nolano, ut probabile est, interprete; tum Rufinum inter et Paulinum intercessisse quoddam de Clemente litterarum commercium, quo unus Recognitiones, quae, deperdito textu Graeco, ex Latina tantum versione permanserunt; alter vero Epistolas sibi vertendas recepit, quas adeo raptim transtulit, ut, neglecta rudi versione, nonnisi Graece ad nos usque Clementinae litterae pervenerint. Caeterum Joannes hic diaconus noster Romanus (b), primus et unus omnium veterum Latinorum est, qui tanti pontificis epistolas, Graece forsan, Latine certo tunc temporis Romae exstantes, authentico testimonio adduxerit. In codice Paris. Sangerman. 838 exstat, fol. 111.
"Of the translator." Who that old translator may be, I could not inquire long and painstakingly without turning over in my mind, again and again, the testimony by which both Paulinus himself (Letter 46) and Gennadius (Catalogue 48) state expressly that a version of Clement was made by Paulinus of Nola. That illustrious and most devout translator deserves a hearing; in his letter to Rufinus he describes our version almost to the life: "For I believe that in the Translation of Saint Clement, besides the other failings of my wit, you have noticed above all this poverty of my inexperience, that some things, where I could not understand or render the words, I translated by grasping the sense instead, or, to speak more truly, by guesswork." To which Paulinus soon adds that at the very time this was being written he was reading the books of Moses, which this passage of Clement himself illustrates. It may therefore be inferred, first, that there existed an ancient Latin version of Clement's epistle, hitherto unknown, with Paulinus of Nola, as is probable, for translator; next, that there passed between Rufinus and Paulinus a certain exchange of letters about Clement, by which the one took the Recognitions, which, the Greek text being lost, have survived only in the Latin version, and the other took the Epistles to translate; and he translated them so hastily that, the rough version being neglected, Clement's letters have come down to us only in Greek. For the rest, our John the Roman deacon here (b) is the first and only one of all the old Latins to have cited in authentic testimony the epistles of so great a pontiff, existing at that time in Rome, perhaps in Greek, certainly in Latin. It is found in the Paris codex Saint-Germain 838, fol. 111.
(printed under page 224)
(15) ‹anchor: ad Corinthios› · call in col 454
Ad Corinthios. Addendum, prima; collectoris usum quam brevius titulos exprimendi, eo minus quisque sanus incusabit, quod auctores designet Noster multo uberius quam caeteri istiusmodi commentatores; quinimo magni velim facias hoc Joannis nostri testimonium de S. Clemente, utpote Romanum et forsan pontificium; excipiasque libenter veteris interpretationis Paulino Nolano, ut conjici lubet, ascribendae laciniam prorsus unicam.
"To the Corinthians." Add "first"; no one of sound mind will blame the compiler's habit of giving titles as briefly as possible, the less so because our author names his authorities far more fully than the other commentators of this kind; nay, I would have you set great store by this testimony of our John on Saint Clement, as being Roman and perhaps papal; and welcome gladly this wholly unique shred of the old translation, to be ascribed, as one may conjecture, to Paulinus of Nola.
(printed under page 224)
(16) ‹anchor: Sciebat› · call in col 454
Sciebat. Singula verba, ut colligenda quam diligenter, sic nunquam pensanda satis; incidunt enim in locum pene desperatum in textu Graeco, vulneribus adeo confossum, ut pro virili quisque editor mederi sategerit. Attento igitur hoc primo verbo sciebat, exploratum pene mihi est bonam esse Cotelerii lectionem, huc ἐνόησεν inserentis, ubi Junius aliique legunt ἐποίησεν.
"He knew." The individual words, as they must be gathered with all possible care, so can never be weighed enough; for they fall on a passage of the Greek text that is almost desperate, so pierced with wounds that every editor has striven to heal it as best he could. Attending, then, to this first word, "he knew", I am almost certain that Cotelier's reading is sound, who inserts ἐνόησεν ("he perceived") here, where Junius and others read ἐποίησεν ("he did").
(printed under page 224)
(17) ‹anchor: floritura esset› · call in col 454
Floritura erat. Raro exemplo habes paradigma, ad quod provocat inusitatum floritum, de quo quidem mentio nonnulla; de priore vero in lexicis altum silentium.
"Was to flower." You have here, by a rare example, the paradigm to which the unusual "floritum" appeals; of that there is indeed some mention, but of the former the lexicons are entirely silent.
(printed under page 224)
(18) ‹anchor: honorabilis Aaron inveniretur› · call in col 454
Ut honorabilis Aaron inveniretur. Horum in Graeco nec vola nec vestigium; neque non excitatur mihi suspicio, vel loco doxologiae, quae glossema sapit, alia exstitisse primitus Latinis nostris respondentia, vel haec esse quae Paulinus candide ait non valuisse se intelligere aut exprimere, nec nisi opinata, sensu potius apprehenso, transtulisse.
"That Aaron might be found honourable." Of these words there is neither trace nor track in the Greek; and the suspicion arises in me either that, in place of the doxology, which smacks of a gloss, other words originally stood there answering to our Latin, or that these are the words which Paulinus candidly says he could not understand or render, and translated only by guesswork, grasping the sense instead.
(printed under page 224)
<!-- As on page 224, this page carries fragments of 1 Clement (here from John Damascene and Irenaeus) with the editor's notes (19)–(23) in small type in two columns beneath. Latin at left (col 455), Greek at right (col 456). Calls (19), (20), (21) are in col 455; (22) and (23) are called in col 456 (Irenaeus's Latin running on), and set there as superscripts; the notes are set here. --> (printed under page 225)
(19) ‹anchor: Hanc formam tenentes apostoli (from the lemma)› · call in col 455
Hanc formam tenentes apostoli. Sive Paulino, sive Joanni diacono grates agere est propter asservatam hanc formam. Hinc enim solvitur lis diu et acriter a viris doctis agitata ob vocem Graecam ἐπινομήν, quae uti prorsus insolens, negotii multum multis facessivit. Alii siquidem legebant ἀπονομήν, alii ἐπιλογήν, alii ἐπιταγήν, alii demum ἐπιμονήν. Nec minor in ejus Interpretatione dissensus: hi reddebant ordinem praescriptum, isti praescriptas officiorum vices, illi praeceptum aut formam. Ut ut sit, ultima stante sententia, forma esto genuinus sensus, sitque illa vox Graeca primigenia, quae ad hanc significationem magis accesserit.
"The apostles, holding this form." Thanks are due, whether to Paulinus or to John the deacon, for preserving this word "form". For it settles the dispute long and keenly argued by learned men over the Greek word ἐπινομήν, which, being quite unusual, has given many people much trouble. Some read ἀπονομήν, others ἐπιλογήν, others ἐπιταγήν, others again ἐπιμονήν. Nor was there less disagreement over its interpretation: some rendered it "a prescribed order", others "the prescribed succession of offices", others "a precept" or "a form". However that may be, if the last opinion stands, let "form" be the genuine sense, and let that Greek word be the original one which comes nearest to this meaning.
(printed under page 225)
(20) ‹anchor: Vel (from the lemma)› · call in col 455
Vel. Istud insititium est aut paulo liberius interpres nodum per paraphrasin explicuit; quem ut solveret Davisius, in his οἱ ἀπόστολοι ἡμῶν, aut legendum putavit εὖ μήν, aut prorsus delendum ἡμῶν. Erit forsan qui conjiciet collectorem legisse: ὁ ἀπόστολός τε καὶ ἡμεῖς, ac transtulisse latiori modo: apostolus vel successores ejus, Petrum intendens ac primos ipsius διαδόχους, nempe Linum, Cletum, Clementem. Quid plura? Clemens a Petro quartus potuit scribere, interpresque adamussim legere: vel successores ejus.
"Or." This is an insertion, or else the translator unravelled the knot somewhat freely by paraphrase; to loosen it, Davies thought that in the words οἱ ἀπόστολοι ἡμῶν ("our apostles") one should either read εὖ μήν or delete ἡμῶν altogether. Someone will perhaps conjecture that the compiler read ὁ ἀπόστολός τε καὶ ἡμεῖς ("both the apostle and we") and translated it more broadly, "the apostle or his successors", meaning Peter and his first διαδόχους (successors), namely Linus, Cletus, Clement. What more? Clement, fourth from Peter, could have written it, and the translator read it exactly: "or his successors".
(printed under page 225)
(21) ‹anchor: II (21), the Irenaeus heading› · call in col 455
Quin hoc fragmentum ad 1 epistolam pertineat, Irenaei praefatio dubitare non sinit. In eo Clementis sententiarum potius summa refertur, quam ipsa verba. Idcirco Graecum Irenaei textum referre supersedemus.
Irenaeus's preface allows no doubt that this fragment belongs to the first epistle. In it the substance of Clement's thoughts is reported rather than his very words. We therefore refrain from giving Irenaeus's Greek text.
(printed under page 225)
(22) ‹anchor: qui ignem (22) praeparaverit› · call in col 456
Forte nihil aliud, quam quod hic Irenaeus indicat, commemorare voluit apud Justinum auctor responsionum ad quaest. 74, ubi ait: Si praesentis rerum status finis est impiorum per ignem judicium, prout dicunt prophetarum et apostolorum scripta, insuperque Sibyllae ipsius, quemadmodum ait beatus Clemens in epistola ad Corinthios. Quod si ita est, Clementis epistolam primam citat ille scriptor, non secundam: adeoque ruit Usserii, adversus hanc, argumentum, quasi in ea Sibyllini libri, quos Clemente posteriores esse vult, laudati fuerint. Sed neque in allato loco pseudo-Justinus Sibyllinos libros a Clemente citatos esse affirmat: commode enim illius verba intelligere ita licet, ut praesentis status finem fore impiorum per ignem judicium prophetae, apostoli, ac Sibylla, necnon Clemens dixerint, maxime si valet Cotelerii conjectura, in Graeco καὶ ὡς (non καθώς) φησὶν ὁ μακάριος Κλήμης, legendum esse opinantis.
Perhaps the author of the Responses among Justin's works, at question 74, meant to recall nothing other than what Irenaeus points to here, where he says: "If the end of the present state of things is the judgement of the ungodly by fire, as the writings of the prophets and apostles say, and moreover of the Sibyl herself, as the blessed Clement says in the epistle to the Corinthians." If so, that writer is citing Clement's first epistle, not the second; and so Ussher's argument against this one collapses, namely that the Sibylline books, which he holds to be later than Clement, are cited in it. But neither does pseudo-Justin affirm, in the passage adduced, that the Sibylline books were cited by Clement: for his words may fairly be understood to mean that the prophets, the apostles and the Sibyl, and Clement as well, said that the end of the present state would be the judgement of the ungodly by fire, especially if Cotelier's conjecture holds, who thinks that in the Greek one should read καὶ ὡς ("and as"), not καθώς ("just as"), φησὶν ὁ μακάριος Κλήμης ("the blessed Clement says").
(printed under page 225)
(23) ‹anchor: diabolo et angelis ejus (23)› · call in col 456
His allatis Irenaeus Clementis epistolam commendat his verbis: Hunc Patrem Domini nostri Jesu Christi ab Ecclesiis annuntiari, ex ipsa Scriptura qui velint discere possunt, et apostolicam Ecclesiae traditionem intelligere; cum sit vetustior epistola his qui nunc falso docent. Ubi discimus duplicem Christianae scientiae fontem, Scripturam nimirum et traditionem.
Having adduced these words, Irenaeus commends Clement's epistle thus: "That this Father of our Lord Jesus Christ is proclaimed by the Churches, those who wish can learn from the Scripture itself, and can understand the apostolic tradition of the Church, since the epistle is older than those who now teach falsely." Here we learn of the twofold source of Christian knowledge, namely Scripture and tradition.
(printed under page 225)
(none; notes (21) tail, (22) and (23), printed under this column, are set in n455)
<!-- Fragments of Clement continue (Greek at left, col 457; Latin at right, col 458). Note 79 sits beneath the Greek column only. Notes (24)–(26) are the editor's notes in two columns at the foot: (24) and (25), called in the full-width headings V and VII and printed under this column ((25) running on to the head of the right foot-note column), are set here; (26) is called in the Latin of col. 458. Note (23) on page 225 ends there; nothing runs over onto this page. --> (printed under page 226)
(79) ‹anchor: ταύταις ἐμμαίνειν› · call in col 457 (Greek text; no call seen in the facing Latin)
Leg. ἐμμένειν. Max., Ser. 62, pag. 673.
Read ἐμμένειν ("to abide in") [for ἐμμαίνειν]. Maximus, Sermon 62, p. 673.
(printed under page 226)
(24) ‹anchor: Ex vetusto codice (24), heading V› · call in col 457
In quo scil. continentur Eclogae sacrae S. Joannis Damasceni. Excerptum fuerat hoc fragmentum Cotelerii opera ex cap. Περὶ τῶν προσκαίρων καὶ τῶν αἰωνίων ἀγαθῶν, καὶ ὅτι χρὴ τῶν παρόντων τὰ μέλλοντα προτιμᾷν· quod respondet capiti 20 libri III Parallelorum apud Damascenum olim editorum, ubi tamen desiderabatur, quoad illud in novissima Damasceni editione tom. II, pag. 787, eruditissimus vir Michael Lequien nobis exhibuit.
That is, the one in which the Sacra Eclogae of Saint John Damascene are contained. This fragment had been excerpted through Cotelier's labour from the chapter "On temporal and eternal goods, and that the things to come must be preferred to the things present"; this corresponds to chapter 20 of Book III of the Parallels formerly published among Damascene's works, where, however, it was missing, until that most learned man Michel Lequien presented it to us in the latest edition of Damascene, vol. II, p. 787.
(printed under page 226)
(25) ‹anchor: VII (25), heading VII› · call in col 457
Fragmentum hoc debemus Joanni Ernesto Grabio, qui illud tomo I Spicilegii Patrum, pag. 289, in lucem emisit. Postrema illius pars, a verbis ὃ γὰρ μισεῖ τις ad finem usque, a Maximo edit. Combefisii, sermoni 62, inserta jam habebatur.
We owe this fragment to Johann Ernst Grabe, who brought it to light in volume I of the Spicilegium Patrum, p. 289. Its last part, from the words ὃ γὰρ μισεῖ τις ("for what a man hates") to the end, was already to be had, inserted by Maximus (Combefis's edition) in Sermon 62.
(printed under page 226)
(24) ‹anchor: call above the visible page foot› · call in col 458
In quo scil. continentur Eclogae sacrae S. Joannis Damasceni. Excerptum fuerat hoc fragmentum Cotelerii opera ex cap. Περὶ τῶν προσκαίρων καὶ τῶν αἰωνίων ἀγαθῶν, καὶ ὅτι χρὴ τῶν παρόντων τὰ μέλλοντα προτιμᾷν· quod respondet capiti 20 libri iii Parallelorum apud Damascenum olim editorum, ubi tamen desiderabatur, quoad illud in novissima Damasceni editione tom. II, pag. 787, eruditissimus vir Michael Lequien nobis exhibuit.
That is, the one containing the Sacred Eclogues of Saint John Damascene. This fragment had been extracted through Cotelier's efforts from the chapter "On temporal and eternal goods, and that one must prefer things to come to things present"; this corresponds to chapter 20 of book 3 of the Parallels formerly published among Damascene's works, where, however, it was missing, until the most learned Michel Le Quien set it before us in the latest edition of Damascene, vol. 2, p. 787.
(printed under page 226)
(25) ‹anchor: heading VII› · call in col 458
Fragmentum hoc debemus Joanni Ernesto Grabio, qui illud tomo I Spicilegii Patrum, pag. 289, in lucem emisit. Postrema illius pars, a verbis ὃ γὰρ μισεῖ τις ad finem usque, a Maximo edit. Combefisii, sermoni 62, inserta jam habebatur.
We owe this fragment to Johann Ernst Grabe, who brought it to light in volume 1 of his Spicilegium Patrum, p. 289. Its last part, from the words ὃ γὰρ μισεῖ τις ("for what one hates") to the end, was already to be had, inserted by Maximus in Sermon 62 of Combefis's edition.
(printed under page 226)
(26) ‹anchor: Vivit, inquit› · call in col 458
Nemo non videt Dei nomine Personam Patris intelligi. Id enim antiquis moris esse nullus ignorat, nisi qui in ipsorum scriptis peregrinus est, ut cum Deum simpliciter sine adjuncto in Scripturis legunt vel ipsi enuntiant, Patrem hoc nomine expressum interpretentur atque ipsi exprimant. Ex hoc autem fragmento nonnulli, specialem de Spiritu sancto sermonem a Clemente habitum esse volunt, idque subsequenti confirmant; sed rem non evincunt; cum etiam in epistolis de Spiritu sancto haec disserere licuerit, ac certum sit mutilas esse epistolas superiores.
Everyone sees that by the name "God" the Person of the Father is meant. For no one is unaware that this was the custom of the ancients, unless he is a stranger to their writings: that when they read "God" simply, without qualification, in the Scriptures, or say it themselves, they take the Father to be expressed by this name and themselves express him by it. From this fragment, however, some would have it that Clement delivered a special discourse on the Holy Spirit, and they confirm it from the following one; but they do not prove the point, since he could have discussed these things in his epistles as well, and it is certain that the epistles above are mutilated.
(printed under page 226)