PG 10 · cols. 63–94
Julius Africanus, Quae supersunt ex quinque libris Chronographiae
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PG 10 · cols. 63–94
Editors' preface
(none - the page 38 foot notes are set under col 64)
(continued) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 64
hoc in loco aliquid deesse apparet ex particula τε, quae in omnibus nostris codicibus, et apud Nicephorum habetur. Quare supplenda videntur haec verba καὶ ἀπὸ μνήμης ἐς ὅσον ἐξικνοῦντο. Ita certe legisse videtur Rufinus, qui sic vertit: Ordinem supradictae generationis partim memoriter, partim etiam ex Dierum libris, in quantum erat possibile, perdocebant.
that something is missing at this point is clear from the particle τε, which is found in all our manuscripts and in Nicephorus. So these words seem to need supplying: "and from memory, as far as they could reach." Rufinus at least seems to have read it so, for he translates: They taught the order of the aforesaid generation partly from memory, partly also from the books of Days, so far as was possible.
(printed under page 38)
(27) ‹anchor: Εἰ καὶ μὴ ἀμμάρτυρος› · call in col 64
Εἰ καὶ μὴ ἀμμάρτυρος. In codice Regio et apud Nicephorum legitur εἰ καὶ ἀμάρτυρος, quod idem est. Caeterum, quanti facienda sit haec evangelici loci explicatio, patet ex his Africani verbis: quippe qui fatetur eam nullo testimonio fulciri veterum scriptorum. Admitti tamen eam vult a nobis, eo quod nulla melior afferri possit. Quae cum ita sint, nollem Eusebium in vestibulo Historiae suae mentionem hujus rei fecisse. Satius profecto fuisset ac consultius hanc Evangeliorum dissonantiam silentio involvere, ne lectoribus a fide nostra alienis, cujusmodi tunc temporis erant quamplurimi, occasio subministraretur de Evangeliorum veritate dubitandi. Certe Julianus Augustus in libro contra Christianos hanc evangelistarum dissensionem nobis objicit, teste Hieronymo in Commentariis in Matthaeum. Locus Juliani exstat apud Cyrillum in libro octavo contra Julianum. Auctor Quaestionum Veteris et Novi Testamenti, cap. 56, de hac dissonantia loquens, Africani opinionem improbat. Sed ipse aliam affert minus probabilem.
Even if it is not without witness. In the Regius manuscript and in Nicephorus the reading is "even if without witness", which comes to the same. For the rest, how much this explanation of the Gospel passage is worth is plain from these words of Africanus, since he admits that it is supported by no testimony of the ancient writers. Yet he wants us to accept it, because no better one can be offered. This being so, I could wish that Eusebius had not mentioned this matter in the entrance hall of his History. It would surely have been better and wiser to wrap this disagreement of the Gospels in silence, so that readers estranged from our faith, of whom there were very many at that time, should not be given occasion to doubt the truth of the Gospels. Certainly the emperor Julian, in his book against the Christians, throws this disagreement of the evangelists at us, as Jerome attests in his Commentaries on Matthew. Julian's passage survives in Cyril, in the eighth book against Julian. The author of the Questions on the Old and New Testament, ch. 56, speaking of this disagreement, rejects Africanus's opinion. But he himself offers another, less probable one.
(printed under page 38)
(28) ‹anchor: Ματθὰν ὁ ἀπὸ Σολομῶνος› · call in col 64
Ματθὰν ὁ ἀπὸ Σολομῶνος. Mira est varietas accentus in hoc nomine. Maz. quidem et Fuk. codex accentum habent in antepenultima. Nicephorus vero et Fuk. codex penultimam circumflectunt. In Regio ac Med. duplex est accentus, tum in penultima, tum in antepenultima syllaba. Idque in aliis etiam nominibus supradicti codices observant, quoties ambiguum est, quonam accentu notanda sint vocabula, ut denotetur in aliis quidem exemplaribus hunc accentum, in aliis vero illum reperiri. Quinetiam nostri codices paulo ante scriptum habent, ἀπὸ τοῦ Δαβὶδ διὰ Σολομῶντος τὰς γενεὰς καταριθμουμένοις. Sic enim omnes nostri codices, excepto Regio, qui Σολόμωνος illic habet.
Matthan, the one from Solomon. The accent on this name varies remarkably. The Mazarin and the Fuk. manuscript put the accent on the antepenult; but Nicephorus and the Fuk. manuscript put a circumflex on the penult. In the Regius and the Medicean there is a double accent, both on the penult and on the antepenult. The aforesaid manuscripts do this with other names too, whenever it is doubtful with which accent the words should be marked, to show that one accent is found in some copies and the other in others. Indeed, a little earlier our manuscripts have written "to those counting the generations from David through Solomon" (Σολομῶντος). So all our manuscripts read, except the Regius, which has Σολόμωνος there.
(printed under page 38)
(29) ‹anchor: Ὁμομήτριοι ἄρα ἀδελφοί› · call in col 64
Ὁμομήτριοι ἄρα ἀδελφοί. In hac conciliatione quam refert Africanus, duo sunt quae nonnihil difficultatis habere videntur. Primum enim dubito, an licuerit uterino fratri viduam fratris sui uxorem ducere, et ex ea liberos procreare in nomen ac familiam fratris sui transituros. Lex enim Deuteronomii cap. xxv loquitur de fratre, qui habitat in eadem domo, et qui est συγγενής. Quod quidem solis germanis aut consanguineis competit. Nam uterinus frater non est ex eadem domo, neque ex eodem genere; cum genus, praesertim apud Judaeos, ex paterna stirpe ducatur. Certe Africanus diserte testatur Jacobum et Heli fratres uterinos contribules quidem fuisse, ex diverso tamen genere, ἐκ διαφόρων δύο γενῶν. Secundo loco dubitare quis non immerito possit, utrum in generationibus recensendis ratio a Judaeis habita sit patrum adoptivorum. Exemplum habemus illustre in Obed, cujus in genealogia Christi fit mentio. Nam cum Maalon mortuus (continues)
So they were brothers by the same mother. In this reconciliation which Africanus reports there are two points that seem to involve some difficulty. First, I doubt whether a uterine brother was permitted to marry his brother's widow and beget children by her who would pass into his brother's name and family. For the law of Deuteronomy, ch. 25, speaks of a brother who lives in the same house and who is a kinsman (συγγενής). That fits only full brothers or brothers by the same father. For a uterine brother is not of the same house nor of the same lineage, since lineage, especially among the Jews, is traced from the father's stock. Africanus certainly states expressly that Jacob and Heli, uterine brothers, were indeed of the same tribe, yet of different lineage, "from two different families". Second, one might with good reason doubt whether, in reckoning the generations, the Jews took account of adoptive fathers. We have a notable example in Obed, who is mentioned in the genealogy of Christ. For when Mahlon had died (continues)
(printed under page 38)
(30) ‹anchor: τῶν κομπωδέστερον› · call in col 64
Κομπωδέστ. Leg. χρόνων κομπωδέστερον φλυαροῦντες. GOAR.
More boastfully. Read "babbling more boastfully about the ages". GOAR.
(printed under page 38)
(31) ‹anchor: Τὸ ἀνέκαθ.› · call in col 66
Τὸ ἀνέκαθ. Leg. γεγονότες ἀπὸ Ἀβραὰμ τὸ ἀνέκαθεν ἀρξάμενοι. GOAR.
From of old. Read "being descended from Abraham, beginning from of old". GOAR.
(printed under page 39)
(32) ‹anchor: Εἰς τὴν ἐπιφάνειαν› · call in col 66
Εἰς τὴν ἐπιφάνειαν τοῦ σωτηρ. Observa, Christi natalem diem ἐπιφάνειαν vocari Africani testimonio, qui Antonino Heliogabalo imperante vixit. ID.
To the epiphany of the Saviour. Note that Christ's birthday is called the "epiphany" on the testimony of Africanus, who lived under the emperor Antoninus Heliogabalus. THE SAME.
(printed under page 39)
(33) ‹anchor: ὡς οἶμαι› · call in col 66
Ὡς οἶμαι. Leg. ὡς οἶμαι, ὑπὸ τοῦ Πνεύματος, ὅτι οἱ υἱοὶ Θεοῦ ἀπὸ τοῦ Σὴθ προσαγορεύονται. ID.
As I think. Read "as I think, by the Spirit, because the sons of God are so named from Seth". THE SAME.
(printed under page 39)
(34) ‹anchor: ἀποκαλεῖν› · call in col 66
Ἀποκαλεῖν. Leg. ἀποκαλεῖ. ID.
To call. Read "calls". THE SAME.
(printed under page 39)
(35) ‹anchor: τὴν ἀγανάκτησιν› · call in col 66
Τὴν ἀγανάκτ. Εἰς ἀγανάκτησιν κινήσασθαι. ID. — Locus manifeste vitiosus. ED. PATR.
The indignation. "To be moved to indignation." THE SAME. — The passage is plainly corrupt. EDITOR OF THE PATROLOGIA.
(printed under page 39)
(36) ‹anchor: ἔτει δὲ ἀριθμῶν› · call in col 66
Ἔτει δὲ ἀριθ. — Ἐσχολακότας συνιέναι χρή, οὓς τῶν ἄστρων κινήσεως καὶ τῶν μετεώρων τὴν γνῶσιν ταῖς γυναιξὶ παραδεδωκέναι λέγει, ἀφ' ὧν... ID.
And further of numbers. — One must understand "those who had devoted themselves", whom he says handed on to the women the knowledge of the motion of the stars and of the heavenly bodies, from whom... THE SAME.
(printed under page 39)
(37) ‹anchor: ἐτῶν ρϟε′› · call in col 66
Ἐτῶν ρϟε′. Error librarii est ρϟε′, ut lineis superioribus σκε′, Graecis codicibus ρϟ′ et σε′ legentibus. ID.
Of 195 years. ρϟε′ (195) is a copyist's error, as is σκε′ (225) in the lines above, the Greek manuscripts reading ρϟ′ (190) and σε′ (205). THE SAME. (The second numeral is not fully clear in the scan.)
(printed under page 39)
(38) ‹anchor: Μαθουσάλα ἐτῶν ρπη′› · call in col 67
Μαθουσάλα ἐτῶν ρπη′. Legendum ρπζ′, ex Syncelli testimonio suadeo. Scribit enim pag. 16: Μαθουσάλα γενόμενος ἑκατὸν ἑξήκοντα ἑπτὰ ἐτῶν ἐγέννησε τὸν Λάμεχ, τῷ χιλιοστῷ τετρακοσιοστῷ πεντηκοστῷ τετάρτῳ ἔτει τοῦ κόσμου. Τινὰ δὲ τῶν ἀντιγράφων, τῷ ἑκατοστῷ ὀγδοηκοστῷ ἑβδόμῳ ἔτει αὐτοῦ Μαθουσάλα φέρουσιν τὴν γέννησιν Λάμεχ. Οἷς ὁ Ἀφρικανὸς ἀκολουθήσας. GOAR.
Methuselah, of 188 years. On the testimony of Syncellus I advise reading ρπζ′ (187). For he writes, p. 16: "Methuselah, at the age of one hundred and sixty-seven, begot Lamech, in the one thousand four hundred and fifty-fourth year of the world. But some of the copies put the birth of Lamech in Methuselah's one hundred and eighty-seventh year. Africanus followed these." GOAR.
(printed under page 40)
(39) ‹anchor: ἅ τινα ἴσμεν ἐν Παρθίᾳ› · call in col 67
Ἅ τινα ἴσμεν ἐν Παρθίᾳ. Imo in Armenia: nisi librarius cunctis auctoribus certior vaticinetur. Cedrenus ex Georgio: Τὰ ὄρη Ἀραρὰτ ἴσμεν ἐν Παρθίᾳ Ἀρμενίας· τινὲς δέ φασιν ἐν Κελαιναῖς τῆς Φρυγίας. Syncellus ipse inferius: ἐπὶ τὰ ὄρη τοῦ Ἀραράτ, τοῦτ' ἔστι τῆς Ἀρμενίας. ID.
Which we know to be in Parthia. Rather in Armenia, unless the copyist prophesies more surely than all the authorities. Cedrenus, from George: "We know the mountains of Ararat to be in Parthia of Armenia; but some say in Celaenae of Phrygia." Syncellus himself, further on: "upon the mountains of Ararat, that is, of Armenia." THE SAME.
(printed under page 40)
(40) ‹anchor: τινὲς δὲ ἐν Κελαιναῖς› · call in col 67
Τινὲς δὲ ἐν Κελαιναῖς τῆς Φρυγίας. Quod Phrygiae nigrae mons sit Ararat, ex quo Marsyas fluvius emanat, et, Ortelio teste, ex oraculis Sibyllinis dicatur in eo arca constitisse. Conciliatas de diversis quibus arca resedisse dicitur locis sententias lege inter Allatii notas ad Eustathii 49. ID.
But some in Celaenae of Phrygia. Because there is a mountain Ararat in Black Phrygia, from which the river Marsyas flows, and, on Ortelius's testimony, the Sibylline oracles are said to state that the ark came to rest on it. For the opinions about the various places where the ark is said to have settled, reconciled, read Allatius's notes on Eustathius, 49. THE SAME.
(printed under page 40)
(41) ‹anchor: ἔτη ,γσζ′› · call in col 70
Ἔτη ,γσζ′. Mendosum numerum ,γσζ in ,γσοζ′ commutandum cogit haec ratio. A mundi ortu ad diluvium numerat Africanus annos 2262, quibus ad Abrahae natalem diem addit alios 1015. Ex utraque igitur summa collegit ,γσοζ′ 3277. GOAR.
Years 3207. The following reasoning compels changing the faulty number ,γσζ (3207) to ,γσοζ′ (3277). From the beginning of the world to the Flood Africanus counts 2262 years, to which he adds another 1015 up to Abraham's birthday. From the two sums together, then, he arrived at ,γσοζ′, 3277. GOAR.
(41*) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 70 Forte σκήπτεται. EDIT. PATROL.
Perhaps σκήπτεται ("is alleged"). EDITOR OF THE PATROLOGIA.
(printed under page 41)
(42) ‹anchor: Ἡ ποιμενικὴ σκηνὴ› · call in col 70
Ἡ ποιμεν. Haec et sequentia de Jacob ab Africano enarrata, exstant apud Syncellum l. c. refertque Scaliger in suis excerptis Graecis Eusebianis pag. 22, tacito Syncelli nomine: quod praeteriit Tillemontium Mém. eccl. tom. III, p. 255.
The shepherd's. This and what follows about Jacob, as told by Africanus, survives in Syncellus at the place cited; and Scaliger reports it in his Greek excerpts of Eusebius, p. 22, without naming Syncellus, which escaped Tillemont, Mémoires ecclésiastiques, vol. III, p. 255.
(printed under page 41)
(43) ‹anchor: Ἀντωνίνου› · call in col 71
Ἀντωνίνου. Heliogabalum intellige, cujus aetate florebat Africanus. Eo sane sensu haec accepit idem Syncellus, qui statim subdit: ὥς φησιν ὁ Ἀφρικανός, ἕως τῶν χρόνων αὐτοῦ Ἀντωνίνου ἱστορήσας.
Of Antoninus. Understand Heliogabalus, in whose time Africanus flourished. Syncellus certainly took it in that sense, for he adds at once: "as Africanus says, having written his history down to the times of Antoninus himself."
(printed under page 42)
(44) ‹anchor: θαυμασίαν τερέβινθον› · call in col 71
Θαυμασίαν τερέβινθον. De qua copiose Scaliger (in not. ad Graeca Euseb. p. 414), imponens etiam lectori, ubi Hegesippum eam superstitem negasse asserit, qui tantum an maneret sibi dixit incertum. Certius de illa disserunt oculati testes, Franciscus Quaresmius in Elucidat. terrae sanctae, Eugenius Rogerius, et alii de sacris peregrinationibus auctores. GOAR. — Videsis Valesium ad Eusebium De vit. Constant. lib. III, cap. 53, nott. 3 et 5, qui et alibi ad ejusdem Eusebii Hist. eccl. lib. IV, cap. 6, observat ex S. Hieronymo in cap. XXXI Jeremiae, exsecrabile fuisse Judaeis, mercatum celeberrimum qui quotannis fiebat ad Terebinthum, invisere.
A marvellous terebinth. Scaliger writes about it at length (in his notes on the Greek Eusebius, p. 414), and even misleads the reader when he asserts that Hegesippus denied it still survived; Hegesippus only said he was uncertain whether it remained. Eyewitnesses discuss it with more certainty: Franciscus Quaresmius in his Elucidation of the Holy Land, Eugène Roger, and other writers on holy pilgrimages. GOAR. — See Valesius on Eusebius, Life of Constantine, book III, ch. 53, notes 3 and 5; elsewhere too, on the same Eusebius's Church History, book IV, ch. 6, he observes from St Jerome on Jeremiah ch. 31 that it was abhorrent to the Jews to visit the very famous fair held every year at the Terebinth.
(printed under page 42)
(45) ‹anchor: μετῆρεν› · call in col 71
Μετῆρεν. Praemittendum censet Goarus ἐντεῦθεν· quod minus necessarium videtur: θάψας... μετῆρεν.
He moved away. Goar thinks "from there" should be put before it; this seems hardly necessary: "having buried ... he moved away".
(printed under page 42)
(46) ‹anchor: ἐφ' ὃν τὰς ἐκτενὰς ἀνέφερον› · call in col 71
Ἐφ' ὃν τὰς ἐκτενὰς ἀνέφερον. Ἐκτενάς se ignorare fatetur Scaliger. Usitat Ecclesia Orientalis: preces videlicet protensiores a diacono pronuntiandae, quibus pro cunctis hominum generibus variisque humanae vitae necessitatibus Ecclesia diserte et explicate Deum O. M. exorat. Quanti faciendae ab omni vere Christiano homine, vetustas earum a quatuordecim jam saeculis probata commonet. De illis abunde in nostris Euchologicis. GOAR. — Svicerum adi, si placet, in Thes. Eccl. tom. I, pag. 1075, v. Ἐκτενής, II. Caeterum Allatius in notis ad Eustathium pag. 293, haec Africani verba corrupta censet, atque ita ex suo Eustathio restituenda: ἐφ' ὃν τά τε ὁλοκαυτώματα καὶ τὰς ἑκατόμβας ἀνέφερον. Quod minime admittendum videtur. Verba enim Africani παραφράζειν auctor perhibetur, ut mox patebit.
On which they offered the ectenes. Scaliger admits he does not know what ἐκτενάς are. The Eastern Church uses them: that is, extended prayers to be said by the deacon, in which the Church prays clearly and in detail to God, the Best and Greatest, for every kind of people and the various needs of human life. How highly every true Christian should value them is shown by their antiquity, attested now for fourteen centuries. On them, abundantly, in our Euchologion notes. GOAR. — Consult Suicer, if you will, Thesaurus Ecclesiasticus, vol. I, p. 1075, under Ἐκτενής, II. Allatius, however, in his notes on Eustathius, p. 293, thinks these words of Africanus corrupt and to be restored from his Eustathius thus: "on which they offered both the whole burnt offerings and the hecatombs". This seems by no means acceptable. For the author is reckoned to be paraphrasing Africanus's words, as will soon appear.
(printed under page 42)
(47) ‹anchor: ἐν ταῖς πανηγύρεσι› · call in col 71
Ἐν ταῖς πανηγύρεσι. Ut mercatum ethnicis, ita Christianis sacrum conventum indicat πανήγυρις. Ethnicam solam significantiam memorat Scaliger. GOAR.
At the festivals. As πανήγυρις means a fair for the pagans, so for Christians it means a sacred assembly. Scaliger mentions only the pagan meaning. GOAR.
(printed under page 42)
(48) ‹anchor: ἡ δ' οὐ κατεχομένη δοκεῖ πιμπραμένη› · call in col 71
Ἡ δ' οὐ κατεχ. δοκ. πιμπρ. His ceu fide dubia Scaligero nutantibus, et a praeviis paginis textus Euseb. 22 rescissis et expunctis, certius testimonium reddit Eustathius ab Allatio editus. Sic enim ille pag. 77: Ἐν ᾧ τόπῳ ὑπῆρχε καὶ ἡ τερέβινθος, ὑφ' ἣ ἔκρυψεν Ἰακὼβ τοῦ Λάβαν τὰ εἴδωλα· ἥτις ἐστὶ καὶ νῦν εἰς τιμὴν τῶν προγόνων ὑπὸ τῶν πλησιοχώρων θρησκεύεται. Ἔστι γὰρ ἄχρι τοῦ δεῦρο παρὰ τὸ πρέμνον αὐτῆς βωμός, ἐφ' ὃν τά τε ὁλοκαυτώματα καὶ τὰς ἑκατόμβας ἀνέφερον· εἶναί τέ φασι ῥάβδον αὐτὴν ἑνὸς τῶν ἐπιξενωθέντων ἀγγέλων τῷ Ἀβραάμ, ἥνπερ τῷ τόπῳ τότε παρὼν ἐνεφύτευσε· καὶ ἐξ αὐτῆς ἡ ἀξιάγαστος αὕτη ἀνεφύη τερέβινθος. Ὑφαφθεῖσα γὰρ ὅλη πῦρ γίνεται, καὶ νομίζεται τοῖς πᾶσιν εἰς κόνιν ἐκ τῆς φλογὸς ἀναλύεσθαι, κατασβεσθεῖσα μέντοι ἀσινὴς ὅλη καὶ ἀκέραιος δείκνυται. Hoc est: « Eo loci (quo Abraham et Jacob et Joseph sepulti) stabat terebinthus, sub qua Labani simulacra Jacob occultavit. Ea etiamnum perseverat; et in majorum honorem a vicinis incolis praecipuo honore colitur. Ad ejus enim stipitem in hodiernum usque diem altare erectum est, ad quod holocausta et hecatombas offerebant. Baculumque unius ex angelis ab Abraham hospitio exceptis eam esse dicunt, quem tunc inibi loci plantans in terram fixit: et ex eo mira illa terebinthus prodiit. Succenso etenim igne tota flammis ardet, et jam jam in cineres vertenda ex flammae magnitudine apparet. Igne vero sopito, pura omnino et incorrupta demonstratur. » Hac de re insuper habet nonnulla Eusebius Demonstr. evang. lib. V, cap. 9, pag. 234. ID.
But it is not consumed, though it seems to burn. Since Scaliger wavers over these words as of doubtful credit, and cut and struck them out of the preceding pages of his text of Eusebius, p. 22, Eustathius, edited by Allatius, gives surer testimony. For he says, p. 77 (the Greek, which the note then renders in Latin): « In that place (where Abraham and Jacob and Joseph were buried) stood the terebinth under which Jacob hid Laban's idols. It survives even now, and is held in special honour by the neighbouring inhabitants in honour of their forefathers. For at its trunk an altar has been set up, standing to this very day, on which they used to offer whole burnt offerings and hecatombs. They say it is the staff of one of the angels whom Abraham received as guests, which he planted, fixing it in the ground in that very place at that time; and from it that wonderful terebinth sprang. For when fire is kindled, it burns wholly in flames, and from the size of the blaze appears on the very point of turning to ashes. But when the fire dies down, it is shown entirely clean and unharmed. » Eusebius also has something on this matter, Demonstration of the Gospel, book V, ch. 9, p. 234. THE SAME.
(printed under page 42)
(49) ‹anchor: ἀπὸ Ἀδὰμ τοίνυν› · call in col 71
Ἀπὸ Ἀδὰμ τοίνυν. Eadem repetit ex Africano Syncellus paulo post pag. 111, al. 88, ipsumque annis 110 vel 109 a vero aberrasse, utrobique contendit. Ad hunc autem locum adnotat ista Goarus: « Ut Levi, ita et Joseph ab Adamo soboles 24a numeratur: qui, ob Cainan ab Africano praeteritum, ipsi tertia supra vicesimam recensetur. Observa γέννησιν, haud τελευτήν, hic legendum. »
From Adam, then. Syncellus repeats the same from Africanus a little later, p. 111 (other edition 88), and in both places maintains that he strayed from the truth by 110 or 109 years. On this passage Goar notes: « Like Levi, Joseph too is counted the 24th descendant from Adam; because Africanus leaves out Cainan, he is reckoned by him the twenty-third. Note that "birth", not "death", is to be read here. »
(printed under page 42)
(50) ‹anchor: Ὠγυγόν› · call in col 71
Ὠγυγόν. Ozygum cum Viveto in Solinum, alii Ogygem pronuntiantibus, ubique reddidi. Ὠγυγόν Graece scribunt Josephus in Apionem, Eusebius De praepar., cap. 1; Tatianus Orat. adv. gent.; Clemens I Strom., et alii. Ogygium etiam Eusebius Latinus ad annum Abrahae 220. GOAR.
Ogygus. I have everywhere rendered "Ogygus" [printed "Ozygum"], with Vives on Solinus, though others say "Ogyges". In Greek Josephus writes Ὠγυγόν in Against Apion, Eusebius in the Preparation, ch. 1, Tatian in the Oration against the Greeks, Clement in Stromata I, and others. The Latin Eusebius also has "Ogygius" at the year of Abraham 220. GOAR.
(printed under page 42)
(51) ‹anchor: ὃς ... ἐπώνυμος› · call in col 71
Ὃς... ἐπώνυμος. Ut ab antiquo malo nomen accepit, ita primis et vetustis malis dedit nomen pa- (continues)
Who ... gave his name. As he took his name from an ancient evil, so he gave his name to the first and oldest evils (continues)
(printed under page 42)
(continued) ‹anchor: not visible› · call before col 73
…omnia, Ὠγύγια κακά. Verba porro sequentia, expuncto τῷ μετὰ, inter duas virgulas, quod in textu reperiebatur, hic incluso, legenda hoc ordine interpolata. Πολλῶν διαφθαρέντων διασωθεὶς, κατὰ τὴν ἐξ Αἰγύπτου τοῦ λαοῦ μετὰ Μωϋσέως ἔξοδον γενέσθαι. GOAR.
…all, "Ogygian evils". The following words, moreover, with the μετά struck out that stood in the text, enclosed here between two commas, should be read, rearranged in this order: "having been saved when many perished, lived at the time of the exodus of the people with Moses from Egypt." GOAR.
(printed under page 43)
(52) ‹anchor: ἡ νῦν Ἀττικὴ› · call in col 73
Ἡ νῦν Ἀττική. De Acte et Attica Pontacus in Eusebium erudite. Isthaec Africani Georgius Syncellus refutat pag. 70 seq., al. 56. ID.
What is now Attica. Pontac writes learnedly on Acte and Attica in his notes on Eusebius. Georgius Syncellus refutes these statements of Africanus, p. 70 ff., in the other edition 56. THE SAME.
(printed under page 43)
(53) ‹anchor: ἔτη ͵ασλεʹ› · call in col 73
Ἔτη ͵ασλεʹ. A Moyse ad Cyrum numerat Africanus 1235 annos: Syncellus centum minus. Hic, Cainan annis jam superioribus numeratis, posterius spatium contraxit; Africanus iisdem postremo, id est Judicum tempore repositis, spatium idem auxisse deprehenditur. ID.
1,235 years. From Moses to Cyrus Africanus counts 1,235 years; Syncellus a hundred fewer. The latter, having already counted Cainan's years in the earlier period, shortened the later span; Africanus is found to have enlarged the same span by putting those years back at the end, that is, in the time of the Judges. THE SAME.
(printed under page 43)
(54) ‹anchor: συνεχρόνησεν› · call in col 73
Συνεχρόνησεν. Forte συνεχρόνισεν. VIGER.
Was contemporary. Perhaps συνεχρόνισεν. VIGER.
(printed under page 43)
(52) ‹anchor: ἡ νῦν Ἀττική› · call in col 74
Ἡ νῦν Ἀττική. De Acte et Attica Pontacus in Eusebium erudite. Isthaec Africani Georgius Syncellus refutat pag. 70 seq., al. 56. ID.
What is now Attica. Pontac writes learnedly on Acte and Attica in his Eusebius. George Syncellus refutes these statements of Africanus, p. 70 ff. (other edition 56). THE SAME.
(printed under page 43)
(53) ‹anchor: ἔτη ,ασλε′› · call in col 74
Ἔτη ,ασλε′. A Moyse ad Cyrum numerat Africanus 1235 annos: Syncellus centum minus. Hic, Cainan annis jam superioribus numeratis, posterius spatium contraxit; Africanus iisdem postremo, id est Judicum tempore repositis, spatium idem auxisse deprehenditur. ID.
1235 years. From Moses to Cyrus Africanus counts 1235 years; Syncellus a hundred fewer. Syncellus, having already counted Cainan's years earlier, shortened the later span; Africanus is found to have lengthened that same span by putting those years in at the end, that is, in the time of the Judges. THE SAME.
(printed under page 43)
(54) ‹anchor: τῇ Ἑβραίων συνεχρόνησεν› · call in col 74
Συνεχρόνησεν. Forte συνεχρόνισεν. VIGER.
Was contemporary. Perhaps συνεχρόνισεν (the regular spelling). VIGER.
(printed under page 43)
(55) ‹anchor: ταῦτα γὰρ Ἀθηναίων ἱστοροῦσιν› · call in col 75
Ταῦτα γὰρ Ἀθην. ἱστορ. Malim ταῦτα γὰρ ἱστοροῦσιν, deleto Ἀθηναίων. VIGER.
For the Athenians record these things. I should prefer "for they record these things", deleting "of the Athenians". VIGER.
(55*) ‹anchor: καὶ τῶν Ἀττικῶν ἀπ.› · call in col 75 Καὶ τῶν Ἀτ. ἀπ. Vertit interpres quasi, expuncto καί, genitivum Ἀττικῶν ad comparativum ἀκριβέστερον retulisset. EDIT. PATROL.
And of the Attic ... The translator rendered it as though, with καί struck out, he had referred the genitive Ἀττικῶν to the comparative ἀκριβέστερον ("more exactly than the Attic writers"). EDITOR OF THE PATROLOGIA.
(printed under page 44)
(56) ‹anchor: ἔκ τε› · call in col 75
Ἔκ τε. Particula τε aut expungenda est, aut aliquid aliud postulat. ID.
And from. The particle τε must either be struck out or calls for something further. THE SAME.
(printed under page 44)
(57) ‹anchor: κατὰ τὴν Αἴγυπτον› · call in col 75
Κατὰ τὴν Αἴγυπτον. Vel haec delenda, vel reponendum ἀπ' Αἰγύπτου. ID.
Throughout Egypt. Either these words should be deleted or "from Egypt" restored. THE SAME.
(printed under page 44)
(58) ‹anchor: δειχθήσεται› · call in col 75
Δειχθήσεται. Forte δείκνυται. ID.
Will be shown. Perhaps "is shown". THE SAME.
(printed under page 44)
(59) ‹anchor: ἧς τὸ τελευταῖον› · call in col 75
Ἧς τὸ τελευταῖον. Deest hic aliquid. Quo enim τὸ ἧς refertur? Forte ante hunc articulum (continues)
Of which the last. Something is missing here. For to what does "of which" refer? Perhaps before this article (continues)
(printed under page 44)
(60) ‹anchor: Σπαρτοί› · call in col 78
Σπαρτοί. Hanc vocem, quae, si sola spectetur, nullum habet sensum, non vertit interpres. EDIT. PATROL. Supplendum credo vel ὀδόντες, vel στρατιῶται, vel aliquid simile. Omnino enim post Europam, de Cadmo Cadmique militibus ex draconis dentibus repente satis, locutus videtur. VIGER.
Sown men. The translator did not render this word, which taken alone makes no sense. EDITOR OF THE PATROLOGIA. I think "teeth" or "soldiers" or something similar must be supplied. For after Europa he seems clearly to have spoken of Cadmus and of Cadmus's soldiers, sprung up suddenly from the dragon's sown teeth. VIGER.
(printed under page 45)
(61) ‹anchor: ὅτι τε› · call in col 79
Ὅτι τε. Forte τούς. VIGER.
That and. Perhaps τούς ("the"). VIGER.
(printed under page 46)
(62) ‹anchor: Αἰσχύλος› · call in col 79
Αἰσχύλος, κ. τ. λ. Iis quae hic ex Africano recitat Chronici Paschalis auctor, ista praemittit: Γράφει δὲ ὁ Ἀφρικανὸς ὧδε πρὸς λέξιν· Αἰσχ. Quae quidem verba omittit codex Holstenianus, ut ad hunc locum observat cl. Cangius.
Aeschylus, etc. Before what he quotes here from Africanus, the author of the Paschal Chronicle puts this: "Africanus writes thus, word for word: Aeschylus …". The Holstenius manuscript omits these words, as the renowned Du Cange observes on this passage.
(printed under page 46)
(63) ‹anchor: Capitulum› · call in col 79
Capitulum, etc. Hanc interpretationem exhibet doctor maximus in Comment. in Daniel. IX, 24, ubi haec praemittit: « Africanus in quinto Temporum volumine, de septuaginta hebdomadibus haec locutus ad verbum est: » Capitulum, etc. Ex edit. Martianaei tom. III, p. 1110.
The chapter, etc. This rendering is given by the greatest of doctors [Jerome] in his Commentary on Daniel 9:24, where he first says: « Africanus, in the fifth volume of his Chronicles, spoke word for word as follows about the seventy weeks: » The chapter, etc. From Martianay's edition, vol. III, p. 1110.
(printed under page 46)
(64) ‹anchor: usque ad Baptistam Joannem› · call in col 79
Baptistam Joannem. Cod. Vatic. baptismum Joannis, apud Vallarsium, Opp. Hieron. tom. V, pag. 682.
John the Baptist. The Vatican manuscript has the baptism of John, in Vallarsi, Works of Jerome, vol. V, p. 682.
(printed under page 46)
Interpretatio S. Hieronymi. I. Capitulum quod in Daniele de septuaginta hebdomadibus legimus, multa et mirabilia continet, quae nunc longum est dicere: ergo quod ad praesens opus pertinet, de temporibus disserendum est. Nullique dubium quin de adventu Christi praedicatio sit, qui post septuaginta hebdomadas mundo apparuit; post quem consummata sunt delicta, et finem accepit peccatum, et deleta est iniquitas; et annuntiata justitia sempiterna, quae legis justitiam vinceret; et impleta est visio et prophetia, quia lex et prophetae usque ad Baptistam Joannem: et unctus est Sanctus sanctorum: quae omnia priusquam Christus humanum corpus assumeret, sperabantur magis quam tenebantur. Dicit autem ipse angelus septuaginta annorum hebdomadas, id est, annos quadringentos nonaginta, ab exitu sermonis, ut respondeatur, et ut aedificetur Jerusalem, vicesimum Artaxerxis regis Persarum annum habere principium. Neemias quippe hujus pincerna, sicut in Esdrae libro legimus, rogavit regem; accepitque responsum, ut aedificaretur Jerusalem. Et iste egressus est sermo, qui exstruendae urbis et circumdandae muris daret licentiam; quae usque ad illud tempus vicinarum gentium patebat incursibus. Siquidem ad Cyri regis imperium, qui petentibus reverti Jerosolymam dederat potestatem, Jesus pontifex et Zorobabel, et postea Esdras sacerdos, et caeteri qui cum eis proficisci voluerant, templum et urbem et muros ejus aedificare conati sunt, probibentibus in circuitu nationibus ne impleretur opus, quasi hoc rex non jussisset. <!-- note: Block begins at the centred italic heading "Interpretatio S. Hieronymi." below the two-column section XVI ("...ex lege acquirebatur" / Greek "...του Σωτῆρος") and ends with "quasi hoc rex non jussisset." immediately above the footnotes (61)-(64); it stops at the foot of the page, and its continuation (if any) is on the next page. Footnote calls (63) after "Capitulum" and (64) after "Joannem" omitted. UNSURE: "deleta": the first letters are damaged in the scan, so the word is read from context. "probibentibus" is set as it appears to be printed (perhaps a misprint for "prohibentibus"); the scan is too soft to be sure. -->
(65) ‹anchor: ad annum quintumdecimum› · call in col 81 (in Jerome's interpretation, set across the full page width)
Quintum decimum. Africani textus, ἑκκαιδέκατον. Sic et paulo infra, ubi iterum sanctus doctor, (continues)
Fifteenth. Africanus's text has "sixteenth". So too a little below, where the holy doctor again (continues)
(printed under page 47)
Interpretatio S. Hieronymi. II. Mansit itaque imperfectum opus usque ad Neemiam, et vicesimum annum regis Artaxercis: quo tempore regni Persarum, centum et quindecim anni fuerant evoluti; captivitatis autem Jerusalem, centesimus octogesimus et quintus annus erat; et tunc primum Artaxerxes jussit muros extrui Jerusalem: cui operi praefuit Neemias; et aedificata est platea, et muri circumdati; et ex illo tempore si numerare velis, septuaginta annorum hebdomadas usque ad Christum poteris invenire. Quod si harum principium ab alio tempore voluerimus sumere, et tempora non concurrent, et multa reperiemus contraria. Nam si a Cyro, et prima ejus indulgentia qua Judaeorum est laxata captivitas, septuaginta numerentur hebdomadae: centum et eo amplius inveniemus annos, qui statutum septuaginta hebdomadarum excedant numerum, et multo plus, si ex qua die locutus est Danieli angelus; additurque amplior numerus, si captivitatis exordium volueris hebdomadarum habere principium. Permansit enim regnum Persarum, usque ad initium Macedonum, annis ducentis triginta; et ipsi Macedones regnaverunt annis trecentis; atque exinde usque ad annum quintumdecimum Tiberii Caesaris, quando passus est Christus, numerantur anni sexaginta; qui simul faciunt annos quingentos nonaginta, ita ut centum supersint anni. Interpretatio S. Hieronymi. III. A vicesimo autem anno Artaxerxis usque ad Christum, complentur hebdomadae septuaginta, juxta <!-- note: Two full-width blocks on col. 81-82, lower half. Block 1 (heading + §II) follows the column text ending "sextumdecimum, annos sexaginta" (82C) and ends "centum supersint anni."; then a two-column line (Greek Γʹ / Latin "III. Ab Artaxerxe autem septuaginta hebdomades") is excluded as column text. Block 2 (heading + §III) is the last line of the page above footnote (65); it breaks off at "juxta" and CONTINUES on the next page (cols 83-84). Footnote call (65) after "quintumdecimum" omitted. UNSURE: "imperfectum" (print blurred, could read "imperlectum"); "et muri circumdati" (ink blot over "muri"). Spaces before colons/period normalised. -->
(none) <!-- The foot of this page carries no notes; the run-over of note (65), marked "(continues)" on page 47, is not printed here. --> (printed under page 48)
Interpretatio S. Hieronymi. lunarem Hebraeorum supputationem, qui menses non juxta solis, sed juxta lunae cursum numerant. Nam a centesimo et quintodecimo anno regni Persarum, quando Artaxerxes rex ejusdem imperii vicesimum regni sui habebat annum, et erat octogesimae et tertiae Olympiadis annus quartus, usque ad ducentesimam secundam Olympiadem, et secundum ejusdem Olympiadis annum. Tiberiique Caesaris annum quintum decimum, colliguntur anni quadringenti septuaginta quinque, qui faciunt annos Hebraicos quadringentos nonaginta, juxta lunares, ut diximus, menses. Qui secundum illorum supputationem possunt facere per singulos menses dies viginti novem, et semis: ita ut solis circulus per annos quadringentos nonaginta plus habeat dies trecentos sexaginta quinque, et quartam diei partem; et per duodecim menses singulorum annorum, undecim dies et quarta diei pars amplius reperiatur. Unde Graeci et Judaei, per octo annos trium mensium ἐμβολισμοὺς faciunt. Si enim octies undecim, et quartam partem volueris supputare, nonaginta dies, hoc est, tres menses efficies; et in quadringentis septuaginta quinque annis octonarii reperientur anni quinquaginta novem, et menses tres: qui simul faciunt plus minusve annos quindecim; quos si quadringentis septuaginta quinque annis volueris addere, septuaginta annorum facies hebdomadas, hoc est, simul annos quadringentos nonaginta. <!-- note: Block sits in the lower middle of the page (cols 83-84). It begins with the centred heading "Interpretatio S. Hieronymi." directly below the full-width last line of Migne's Latin column version ("detractis diebus ... conficies.", excluded: that is the column translation's section end, not Jerome). The paragraph opens lowercase ("lunarem") as printed, presumably continuing an excerpt that starts on an earlier page, and ends complete with "nonaginta." It is followed by the numbered full-width heading "XVII. Apud Syncellum l. c., pag. 307, al. 244 seqq." (fragment heading with its source line; it belongs with the Greek, not set here), and then the two columns resume with the chapter title "Περὶ τῶν Ὑρκανῷ καὶ Ἀντιγόνῳ συμβάντων καὶ περὶ Ἡρώδου, Σεβαστοῦ, Ἀντωνίου καὶ Κλεοπάτρας ἐν ἐπιτόμῳ." Does not run onto the next page. Printed full stop before "Tiberiique" kept as printed. UNSURE: (none). -->
(66) ‹anchor: Ἡρώδου δὲ πρὸς Ἀντώνιον ἐλθόντος› · call in col 85
Ἐλθόντος.... Desunt nonnulla. GOAR.
Had come.... Some words are missing. GOAR.
(printed under page 49) (66*) ‹anchor: τῆς Συρίας ἐπιτροπὴν Ἡρώδης› · call in col 85 Interpres aliter distinguit, nempe sic...Γαβλάνην, πρὸς δὲ καὶ τ. Σ. ἐπιτροπήν. Ἡρώδης. ED. PATR.
The translator punctuates differently, namely thus: "...Gaulanis, and in addition the procuratorship of Syria. Herod". EDITORS OF THE PATROLOGIA.
(printed under page 49)
(67) ‹anchor: Ἐπιπίπτει δὲ Ἡρώδῃ› · call in col 85
Ἡρώδῃ.... Locus mutilus. ID.
Upon Herod.... The passage is mutilated. THE SAME.
(printed under page 49)
(68) ‹anchor: ἐν τῷ μεσαιολίῳ› · call in col 85
Ἐν τῷ μεσαιολίῳ. Tria verba praecedentia in omnibus mss. legenda Scaliger expungit p. 60, scribitque, Μαισαιόλιον, ubi illa Μεσαιόλιον legunt, substituens διεχρήσατο, vice δὲ ἐχρήσατο, ubique reperto. Mihi praesens locus mutilus est, et in eo de Actiaca victoria mentio desideratur: et τὸ Μαισαιόλιον in Μαυσωλαῖον commutatur. Cleopatra quippe sepulcri, Mausolaei nonnunquam ob fabricae molem vocati, clausa praesidio seipsam confecit. GOAR.
In the mausoleum. Scaliger, p. 60, strikes out the three preceding words, which are to be read in all the manuscripts, and writes Μαισαιόλιον where they read Μεσαιόλιον, putting διεχρήσατο in place of δὲ ἐχρήσατο, which is found everywhere. To me the present passage is mutilated, and mention of the Actian victory is missing from it; and Μαισαιόλιον is changed into Μαυσωλαῖον. For Cleopatra made away with herself shut up in the protection of the tomb, which was sometimes called a Mausoleum because of the mass of its building. GOAR.
(printed under page 49)
(66) ‹anchor: ἐλθόντος› · call in col 86
Ἐλθόντος.... Desunt nonnulla. GOAR.
Having come ... Some words are missing. GOAR.
(66*) ‹anchor: τῆς Συρίας ἐπιτροπὴν Ἡρώδης› · call in col 86 Interpres aliter distinguit, nempe sic...Γαβλάνην, πρὸς δὲ καὶ τ. Σ. ἐπιτροπήν. Ἡρώδης. ED. PATR.
The translator punctuates differently, namely thus: "... Gaulanitis, and besides the procuratorship of Syria. Herod ..." EDITOR OF THE PATROLOGIA.
(printed under page 49)
(67) ‹anchor: ἐπιπίπτει δὲ Ἡρώδῃ› · call in col 86
Ἡρώδῃ.... Locus mutilus. ID.
Upon Herod ... The passage is mutilated. THE SAME.
(printed under page 49)
(68) ‹anchor: ἐν τῷ μεσαιολίῳ› · call in col 86
Ἐν τῷ μεσαιολίῳ. Tria verba praecedentia in omnibus mss. legenda Scaliger expungit p. 60, scribitque, Μαισαιόλιον, ubi illa Μεσαιόλιον legunt, substituens διεχρήσατο, vice δὲ ἐχρήσατο, ubique reperto. Mihi praesens locus mutilus est, et in eo de Actiaca victoria mentio desideratur: et τὸ Μαισαιόλιον in Μαυσωλαῖον commutatur. Cleopatra quippe sepulcri, Mausolaei nonnunquam ob fabricae molem vocati, clausa praesidio seipsam confecit. GOAR.
In the mesaeolium. Scaliger, p. 60, strikes out the three preceding words, which are to be read in all the manuscripts, and writes Μαισαιόλιον where they read Μεσαιόλιον, putting διεχρήσατο in place of δὲ ἐχρήσατο, which is found everywhere. To me the present passage is mutilated, and mention of the victory at Actium is missing from it; and Μαισαιόλιον should be changed to Μαυσωλαῖον. For Cleopatra killed herself shut up in the protection of her tomb, which was sometimes called a Mausoleum because of the size of the building. GOAR.
(printed under page 49)
(69) ‹anchor: μέχρι τοῦδε οἱ Λαγίδαι› · call in col 87
Μέχρι τοῦδε οἱ Λαγίδαι. Ambigue et incerto de fati Cleopatrae anno locutum auctorem, ac modo ab orbis conditi anno 5468 annis modo duobus posterius consignasse jam supra observavimus: quare quod hic in annos duos sequiores, et mundi 5472 removeatur, ad Georgium nil spectat, cum privatus is sit Africani, cujus haec dicta referuntur, computus. Ex ejus porro verbis celeberrimae tres epochae chronologis Africani sensuum studiosis perquirendae ultro se offerunt. Prima est Alexandri mortis et Graecorum imperii, quam in mundi 5174, non ut Georgius in 5170, conjicit. Nam cum Lagidarum exterminium in mundi 5472, duobus nimirum de tercentum minus post institutum ab eis imperium remittat, ante annos 298, mundi 5174, illud primo stabilitum liquet, ante Christianam aeram annis 426. Africanus quippe natalis Christi epocham eamdem, quam Georgius, statuit ex pag. 258 et 259. Secunda est, Actiacos annos et Aegypti captae aeram ad mundi 5472, ante Christi natalem annis 28, devinciri. Tertia tandem Augusti annos a mundi 5461 numerari. Nam cum undecimus Augusti ex Regio nostro Barb. et Percz. attente inspectis iisque cum Palat. collatis, sit qui mundi 5472, et Olympiadis CLXXXVII, quartus recensetur ab Africano: ex ejus calculis anno 5461 duntaxat imperium adiisse necesse est, ante Christi ortum 40 vel 41, prout Christus 5500 vel 5501 natus ab eo asseritur. Suspicionem tamen meam ne subticeam, ια′ vice ιδ′ a primis librariis lectum arbitror, et 11 Augusti annum, 14 vice redditum. Auctor enim, ex Africano, ut reor, scribit supra: Οἱ ἐν Ἀλεξανδρείᾳ ἀπὸ τοῦ ιδ′ ἔτους ἀριθμοῦσι Αὐγούστου χρόνους, ab Augusti, inquam, 14, qui capta Alexandria signatur in Fastis. GOAR.
Up to this point the Lagids. We have already observed above that the author spoke ambiguously and uncertainly about the year of Cleopatra's death, putting it now in the year 5468 from the founding of the world, now two years later. So the fact that it is moved here two years later, to the year of the world 5472, has nothing to do with George, since this is Africanus's own reckoning, whose words are being quoted. From his words, moreover, three very famous epochs present themselves of their own accord, to be investigated by chronologers eager to understand Africanus. The first is that of Alexander's death and the empire of the Greeks, which he puts in the year of the world 5174, not, as George does, in 5170. For since he sets the extinction of the Lagids in the year of the world 5472, that is, two short of three hundred years after they founded their rule, it is clear that their rule was first established 298 years earlier, in the year of the world 5174, 426 [so printed] years before the Christian era. For Africanus fixes the same epoch of Christ's birth as George, from pp. 258 and 259. The second is that the Actian years and the era of the capture of Egypt are tied to the year of the world 5472, 28 years before Christ's birth. The third, finally, is that the years of Augustus are counted from the year of the world 5461. For since, after careful inspection of our Regius, Barb. and Percz. manuscripts and their collation with the Palatine, the eleventh year of Augustus is the one which Africanus reckons as the year of the world 5472 and the fourth of Olympiad 187, by his calculations Augustus must have come to power only in the year 5461, 40 or 41 years before Christ's birth, according as Christ is stated by him to have been born in 5500 or 5501. Yet, not to keep my suspicion quiet, I think the first copyists read ια′ (11) instead of ιδ′ (14), and rendered the 11th year of Augustus instead of the 14th. For the author, drawing, I think, on Africanus, writes above: "Those in Alexandria count the years of Augustus from the 14th year", from the 14th of Augustus, I say, which is marked in the Fasti by the capture of Alexandria. GOAR.
(printed under page 50)
(70) ‹anchor: Ἡρώδης ἐκτίσας τὴν Γαβινίων πόλιν› · call in col 87
Ἡρώδης ἐκτίσας τὴν Γαβινίων πόλιν. Lepide Scaliger. Not. pag. 259: Quare Cuthaei sive Samaritae Γαβίνιοι vocentur, dicere fortasse possem, nisi corruptus esset locus. Nihil hic a corruptione Scaligero timendum: integer est Africani locus, iisdem omnino verbis tribus in mss digestus. Subindicat, quod ille veretur exponere, Josephus lib. XIV Ant., cap. 10, a Gabinio Syriae proconsule, altero Samariae ante Herodem reparatore sic nuncupatam. Gabinius, inquit, Judaeam perlustrabat, et quotquot inveniebat urbes dirutas, aedificari jubebat: atque hoc pacto instauratae sunt Samaria, Azotus, Scythopolis, Antedon, Raphia, Dora, Marissa, et aliae non paucae: idque mandante Gabinio, quorum posthac habitatio tuta permansit, cum ante longo tempore desertae fuissent. Ut itaque sine civibus et aedificiis urbs Samaria, ita sine nomine jacuit ad primam usque a Gabinio susceptam ejus reparationem, qua Γαβινίων πόλις appellari meruit: ac secutis demum annis ab Herode ἐπικτισθεῖσα, Sebastes in Augusti honorem accepit appellationem. ID.
Herod, having founded the city of the Gabinians. Scaliger is witty here. Notes, p. 259: Why the Cuthaeans or Samaritans should be called Gabinians I might perhaps be able to say, were the passage not corrupt. Scaliger need fear no corruption here: Africanus's passage is sound, set out in exactly the same words in three manuscripts. What Scaliger is afraid to explain Josephus suggests, Antiquities book XIV, ch. 10: the city was so named from Gabinius, proconsul of Syria, the other restorer of Samaria before Herod. Gabinius, he says, went through Judaea and ordered all the ruined cities he found to be rebuilt; and in this way Samaria, Azotus, Scythopolis, Anthedon, Raphia, Dora, Marisa and not a few others were restored; and this at Gabinius's command, and their habitation remained safe thereafter, though they had long been deserted. So, just as the city of Samaria lay without citizens and buildings, so it lay without a name until the first restoration of it, undertaken by Gabinius, by which it earned the name "city of the Gabinians"; and in the years that followed, rebuilt further by Herod, it received the name Sebaste in honour of Augustus. THE SAME.
(printed under page 50)
(71) ‹anchor: Ἦν Ὀλυμπιὰς ρπθ′› · call in col 87
Ἦν Ὀλυμπιὰς ρπθ′. Plura erudite observat in hunc locum Goarus, quem adisis.
It was the 189th Olympiad. Goar makes many learned observations on this passage; consult him.
(printed under page 50)
(71*) ‹anchor: ἔτος ιϛ′, ἔτει› · call in col 90 Forte leg. ἔτη, vel, ἕτερα, subintellecto ἔτη. Caeterum non purus videtur locus. EDIT. PATROL.
Perhaps read ἔτη ("years"), or ἕτερα ("other"), with ἔτη understood. But the passage does not seem sound. EDITOR OF THE PATROLOGIA.
(printed under page 51)
(a) ‹anchor: regni Balthasar› · call in col 91
Dan. VIII, 1.
Dan. 8:1.
(printed under page 52)
(b) ‹anchor: circumscribentur› · call in col 91
Ibid. 13, 14.
Ibid. 8:13–14.
(printed under page 52)
(72) ‹anchor: τὸ μὲν ἔτος ἐπῖχαν› · call in col 91
Τὸ μὲν ἔτος ἐπῖχαν. Frequentes per hunc Africani textum respersi errores, Scaligerum ut Animadv. pag. 261 scriberet impulerunt: « Ego ista non assequor, neque qui ea somniabat, intelligebat. » Et inferius: « Mira vero discrepantia disputationis hujus cum ea quae est (ejusdem Africani) in lib. ἀποδείξ., quanquam idem sit argumentum. Omnino haec, ut hic exstant, nemo assequitur. » Petavius De doctr. temp., lib. XII, cap. 30, eamdem Africani sententiam, tum hic, tum lib. VIII De demonstr. evang., aliis verbis apud Eusebium expositam testatur. GOAR.
The year, then, they held back. The many errors scattered through this text of Africanus drove Scaliger to write, Animadversions p. 261: « I do not follow these things, nor did the man who dreamed them understand them. » And further on: « There is a remarkable discrepancy between this discussion and the one (by the same Africanus) in the book of the Demonstration, though the subject is the same. No one at all can follow these things as they stand here. » Petavius, On the Doctrine of Times, book XII, ch. 30, testifies that this same view of Africanus is set out in other words in Eusebius, both here and in book VIII of the Demonstration of the Gospel. GOAR.
(printed under page 52)
(73) ‹anchor: τὰ πέντε› · call in col 91
Τὰ πέντε. Cod. Barb., τὰ πάντα. ID.
The five. The Barberini manuscript has "all". THE SAME.
(printed under page 52)
(74) ‹anchor: ἐννενηκοστοτέταρτα› · call in col 91
Ἐννενηκοστοτέταρτα. Scaliger, ἐννενηκοστά. ID.
Ninety-four parts. Scaliger reads "ninetieths". THE SAME.
(printed under page 52)
(75) ‹anchor: ἔτη ι′› · call in col 91
Ἔτη ι′. Cod. Barb., ἔτη διακόσια. ID.
Ten years. The Barberini manuscript has "two hundred years". THE SAME.
(printed under page 52)
(76) ‹anchor: τὸν χρόνον› · call in col 91
Χρόνον. P. χρόνους. ID.
Time. P. has "times". THE SAME.
(printed under page 52)
(76*) ‹anchor: ab Adam condito› · call in col 93 (call not visible in the foot images) Ab Adam condito. In Graeco, ab Adam et creatione. EDIT. PATROL.
From Adam's creation. In the Greek, from Adam and the creation. EDITOR OF THE PATROLOGIA.
(printed under page 53)
(77) ‹anchor: Ἡμεῖς γάρ› · call in col 93 (call not visible in the foot images)
Ἡμεῖς γάρ. Hunc locum recitat S. Basilius l. c. sic praelocutus: Ἀλλ' οὐδὲ Ἀφρικανὸν τὸν ἱστοριογράφον τὸ τοιοῦτον εἶδος τῆς δοξολογίας παρέλαθε. Φαίνεται γὰρ ἐν τῷ πέμπτῳ τῆς τῶν Χρόνων ἐπιτομῆς, οὕτω καὶ αὐτὸς λέγων· Ἡμεῖς, κ. τ. λ. « At nec Africanum historicum talis glorificandi forma praeteriit. Siquidem constat in quinta De temporibus epitoma, et ipsum ad hunc loqui modum: Nos, etc. » Quo ex loco conjicit Tillemontius Mém. eccl. tom. III, p. 256, Africanum quinto suo Chronographiae libro his verbis finem imposuisse.
For we. St Basil quotes this passage at the place cited, introducing it thus (the Greek, then rendered in Latin): « Nor did this form of glorifying escape Africanus the historian either. For it is plain that in the fifth book of his epitome On the Times he too speaks in this way: We, etc. » From this passage Tillemont, Mémoires ecclésiastiques, vol. III, p. 256, conjectures that Africanus ended the fifth book of his Chronography with these words.
(printed under page 53)
(78) ‹anchor: τῶν ῥημάτων› · call in col 93 (call not visible in the foot images)
Τῶν ῥημάτων. Tres mss. τῶν ῥητῶν. MARAN.
Of the words. Three manuscripts read τῶν ῥητῶν ("of the sayings"). MARAN.
(printed under page 53)
(79) ‹anchor: ἡμῖν πατρί› · call in col 93 (call not visible in the foot images)
Ἡμῖν πατρί. Sic mss. quinque. Editi, ἡμῶν πατράσι. Qui praebuit nostris patribus omnium servatorem. Ibidem hae voces καὶ Κύριον ἡμῶν, desunt in tribus mss. Mox editi, καὶ ἡ μεγαλοσύνη. At codices mss. ut in textu. ID.
To us ... the Father. So five manuscripts. The printed editions have "to our fathers": who gave our fathers the Saviour of all. In the same place the words "and our Lord" are missing in three manuscripts. Just after, the printed editions have "and the majesty". But the manuscripts read as in the text. THE SAME.
(printed under page 53)
(80) ‹anchor: Sic autem se habet› · call in col 93
Ruinart., Act. mart. p. 20 ed. Veron. 1731.
Ruinart, Acts of the Martyrs, p. 20, Verona edition, 1731.
(printed under page 53)
XIX. Apud S. Basilium lib. De Spiritu sancto, cap. 29, § 73, Opp. tom. III, pag. 61 edit. Paris.
XIX. In St Basil, book On the Holy Spirit, chapter 29, § 73, Works vol. III, p. 61, Paris edition.
Julii Africani fragmentum ex libris Cestorum vide supra col. 45.
For the fragment of Julius Africanus from the books of the Cesti, see above, col. 45.
<!-- note: The full-width heading XIX (fragment number with its source line, set in italic) stands between the end of fragment XVIII's run-on Latin ("adventum et ejus resurrectionem 5531 colliguntur … intercurrunt.") and the Greek/Latin pair "Ἡμεῖς γὰρ (77) οἱ κἀκείνων …" / "Nos enim qui et illorum …"; the mark before "edit." looks like a stray bracket or blot and is not set. After the rule closing the Chronographia comes the full-width pointer line to col. 45, set above. Other: below the second rule begin the next work's title "PASSIO S. SYMPHOROSAE ET SEPTEM FILIORUM EJUS", Galland's attribution line "(Galland., Bibliotheca Patrum, tom. I, Proleg. p. LXXI, et p. 329, ex editis et mss. codd.)", the heading ADMONITIO, its three-item synopsis (I–III) and the opening of the Admonitio (§ I "Quandoquidem Acta …" and the quoted Ruinart text "B. Symphorosae filiorumque …"), which runs on into col. 94. These belong to the Passio S. Symphorosae and are not set here. The footnotes (76*)–(81) at the page foot are not set. -->
(76*) ‹anchor: ab Adam condito (facing Latin, not set)› · call in col 94 Ab Adam condito. In Graeco, ab Adam et creatione. EDIT. PATROL.
From the founding of Adam. In the Greek, from Adam and the creation. EDITORS OF THE PATROLOGIA.
(printed under page 53)
(81) ‹anchor: testatur Eusebius› · call in col 94
Euseb., Hist. eccl. lib. VI, cap. 31.
Eusebius, Church History, book VI, ch. 31.
(printed under page 53)