PG 11 · cols. 341–413
Origenes, Περὶ ἀρχῶν seu De principiis liber quartus, Rufino interprete
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PG 11 · cols. 341–413
Editors' preface
(62) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call above the foot (column not visible)
Ipse. Sic mss. Editi, « ipsum. »
"Ipse" (he himself): so the manuscripts. The printed editions have "ipsum" (it itself).
(printed under page 175)
(63) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call above the foot (column not visible)
Sanctus Hieronymus epistola 94 ad Avitum ait Origenem « post disputationem longissimam qua omnem creaturam corpoream in spiritualia corpora et tenuia dicit esse mutandam, cunctamque substantiam in unum corpus mundissimum et omni splendore purius convertendam, et talem qualem nunc humana mens non potest cogitare, » ad extremum intulisse : « Et erit Deus omnia in omnibus, ut universa natura corporea redigatur in eam substantiam quae omnibus melior est ; in divinam scilicet, qua nulla est melior. » Ex quibus cum sequi videatur Deo corpus, licet tenuissimum, inesse, haec dissimulavit Rufinus, aut in alium sensum detorsit. Vide l. ii Origenian., q. 1.
Saint Jerome, in his Letter 94 to Avitus, says that Origen, "after a very long discussion in which he says that every bodily creature is to be changed into spiritual and subtle bodies, and that the whole of substance is to be turned into one body most pure and brighter than any splendour, and such as the human mind cannot now conceive," at last added: "And God shall be all in all, so that the whole of bodily nature may be brought back into that substance which is better than all; namely into the divine, than which none is better." Since from these words it would seem to follow that there is a body in God, however subtle, Rufinus passed over them in silence or twisted them into another sense. See Origeniana, book II, question 1.
(printed under page 175)
(64) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call above the foot (column not visible)
Vide l. ii Origenian., quaest. 11, num. 15.
See Origeniana, book II, question 11, number 15.
(printed under page 175)
(65) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image (the Greek heading)› · call in col 341
Graeca haec desumpta sunt e capite primo Philocaliae, et collata cum quinque codd. mss., nempe tribus Regiis 952, 2877, 2274, uno Coisliniano num. 226, et cum altero illustrissimi D. D. Foucault.
This Greek is taken from the first chapter of the Philocalia, and has been collated with five manuscripts: namely three of the Royal Library, 952, 2877 and 2274, one Coislin manuscript, no. 226, and another belonging to the most illustrious Monsieur Foucault.
(printed under page 175)
(66) ‹anchor: τῶν βλεπομένων, προσπαραλαμβάνομεν› · call in col 341 (Greek only)
Προσπαραλαμβάνομεν. Ita quatuor mss. Editio autem Tarini, προπαραλαμβάνομεν. Infra tres mss., πειρώμεθα κρατύνειν. Reliqui cum edit. Tarini, πειράμεθα κρατύνειν. Paulo post, καὶ πρῶτόν γε τοῦ ἀπ' αὐτῶν τῶν γραμμάτων. In primo Regio deest τῶν γραμμάτων, quod sine sensus dispendio abesse potest. Forte etiam hoc loco pro πρῶτόν γε τοῦ ἀπ' αὐτῶν, legendum πρὸ τοῦ γε ἀπ' αὐτῶν.
"Προσπαραλαμβάνομεν" (we take in addition): so four manuscripts. But Tarin's edition has "προπαραλαμβάνομεν" (we take beforehand). Below, three manuscripts read "πειρώμεθα κρατύνειν" (let us try to strengthen); the rest, with Tarin's edition, "πειράμεθα κρατύνειν" (we try to strengthen). A little after: "καὶ πρῶτόν γε τοῦ ἀπ' αὐτῶν τῶν γραμμάτων". The first Royal manuscript lacks "τῶν γραμμάτων" (of the writings), which can be absent with no loss to the sense. Perhaps in this place too, for "πρῶτόν γε τοῦ ἀπ' αὐτῶν" (and first of what [is drawn] from them), one should read "πρὸ τοῦ γε ἀπ' αὐτῶν" (before [drawing] from them).
(printed under page 175)
(67) ‹anchor: Dei Spiritu inspiratae› · call in col 342
Prius videtur ostendere quod ipsae Scripturae divinae sint, id est Dei Spiritu inspiratae. Ita omnes codd. mss. In editis deest « prius, » et legitur, « videtur ostendere quod ipsae divinae Scripturae sint Dei Spiritu inspiratae. » Paulo post mss., « proferentes de Moyse.... et ex verbis ; » editi, « proferentes aliqua de Moyse.... et aliqua ex verbis. » Mox mss., « innumeri quoque sint doctores. » Editi, « inventi quoque sint doctores. » Infra mss., « insinuare atque innotescere potuit. » Editi, « insinuare ita, atque inolescere potuit. » Post paululum mss., « innotescere eam quae sibi visa fuerat. » Editi, « innotescere super eam quae sibi visa fuerat. » Mox. mss., « qua etiam exteras nationes.... provocarent, ne conati quidem sunt. » Editi, « quae etiam caeteras nationes .... provocaret, nec conati quidem sunt. »
"It seems [necessary] first to show that the Scriptures themselves are divine, that is, inspired by the Spirit of God": so all the manuscripts. The printed editions lack "first" and read "it seems [necessary] to show that the divine Scriptures themselves are inspired by the Spirit of God." A little after, the manuscripts have "bringing forward from Moses.... and from the words"; the editions, "bringing forward some things from Moses.... and some things from the words." Next, the manuscripts: "there are also countless teachers." The editions: "there have also been found teachers." Below, the manuscripts: "could instil and make known." The editions: "could thus instil and take root." A little after, the manuscripts: "to make known that which had seemed good to him." The editions: "to make known concerning that which had seemed good to him." Next, the manuscripts: "by which they might summon even foreign nations.... they did not even try." The editions: "which might summon even the other nations .... they did not even try."
(printed under page 175)
(68) ‹anchor: atque universis exteris› · call in col 343
Sic mss. Editi vero, « caeteris. » Mox mss., « ad observantiam Moyseae legis et discipulatum se Christi. » Editi, « ad observantiam Moyseae legis et in disciplinatum se Christi. » Paulo post mss., « venerantur.... affligantur.... agantur in mortem. » Editi, « venerabantur.... affligerentur.... agerentur in mortem. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions have "caeteris" (other). Next, the manuscripts: "[gave themselves] to the observance of the Mosaic law and to the discipleship of Christ." The editions: "to the observance of the Mosaic law and into the discipleship of Christ." A little after, the manuscripts: "venerantur.... affligantur.... agantur in mortem" (venerate.... are afflicted.... are put to death). The editions: "venerabantur.... affligerentur.... agerentur in mortem" (venerated.... were afflicted.... were put to death).
(printed under page 176)
(69) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 344 (Greek only)
Ita quatuor mss. Editio autem Tarini, εἰσενεγκάμενον τῶν περὶ ἀληθείας φιλοσόφων ἐπαγγελλομένων.
So four manuscripts. But Tarin's edition has "εἰσενεγκάμενον τῶν περὶ ἀληθείας φιλοσόφων ἐπαγγελλομένων" (having brought in, of the philosophers who profess [to teach] about truth).
(printed under page 176)
(70) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 344 (Greek only)
Νόμους εἶναι καλούς. Ita tres mss. In edit. Tarini deest εἶναι. Infra omnes mss., περὶ τοῦ ἀδύνατον αὐτοῖς. Tarinus, περὶ τοῦ ἀδυνάτου αὐτοῖς.
"Νόμους εἶναι καλούς" (that the laws are good): so three manuscripts. Tarin's edition lacks "εἶναι" (are). Below, all the manuscripts have "περὶ τοῦ ἀδύνατον αὐτοῖς" (about its being impossible for them); Tarin, "περὶ τοῦ ἀδυνάτου αὐτοῖς" (about what was impossible for them).
(printed under page 176)
(71) ‹anchor: τὴν οἰκουμένην ἡμῶν› · call in col 344 (Greek only)
Vox ἡμῶν deest apud Tarinum, sed habetur in omnibus nostris mss. Infra omnes mss., μισουμένων μὲν ὑπὸ τῶν.
The word "ἡμῶν" (our) is missing in Tarin, but is found in all our manuscripts. Below, all the manuscripts read "μισουμένων μὲν ὑπὸ τῶν" (being hated by those).
(printed under page 176)
(72) ‹anchor: πρὸς τῷ μισεῖσθαι› · call in col 344 (Greek only)
Πρὸς τῷ μισεῖσθαι. Ita recte quatuor mss. Editio autem Tarini, πρὸς τὸ μισεῖσθαι. Ibidem omnes codd. mss., τῶν τὸν τοῦ Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ λόγον παραδεξαμένων. Edit. Tarini, τῶν τοῦ Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ λόγον παραδεξαμένων.
"Πρὸς τῷ μισεῖσθαι" (besides being hated): so, rightly, four manuscripts. But Tarin's edition has "πρὸς τὸ μισεῖσθαι". In the same place all the manuscripts read "τῶν τὸν τοῦ Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ λόγον παραδεξαμένων" (of those who have received the word of Jesus Christ); Tarin's edition, "τῶν τοῦ Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ λόγον παραδεξαμένων" (without the article "τὸν").
(printed under page 176)
(70) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image (Interpretatio nova)› · scripture reference under the Interpretatio nova
Matth. X, 18.
Matthew 10:18.
(printed under page 177)
(71) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image (Interpretatio nova)› · scripture reference under the Interpretatio nova
Matth. XXIV, 14.
Matthew 24:14.
(printed under page 177)
(72) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image (Interpretatio nova)› · scripture reference under the Interpretatio nova
Matth. VII, 22.
Matthew 7:22.
(printed under page 177)
(73) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 345 (Greek only)
Primus codex Regius, διὰ Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ.
The first Royal manuscript reads "διὰ Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ" (through Jesus Christ).
(printed under page 177)
(74) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 345 (Greek only)
Idem, ὀνόματι σῷ.
The same [manuscript] reads "ὀνόματι σῷ" (in your name).
(printed under page 177)
(75) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 345 (Greek only)
Primus codex Regius, ὥστε μὴ ἀληθῆ γενέσθαι ταῦτα. Paulo post idem, σωτηρίας δόγματα.
The first Royal manuscript reads "ὥστε μὴ ἀληθῆ γενέσθαι ταῦτα" (so that these things did not come true). A little after, the same has "σωτηρίας δόγματα" (teachings of salvation).
(printed under page 177)
(77) ‹anchor: ὅτι προεφητεύθη› · call in col 345 (Greek only)
Sic omnes mss. Editio Tarini, ἐπροφητεύθη.
So all the manuscripts. Tarin's edition has "ἐπροφητεύθη" (a variant form of "was prophesied").
(printed under page 177)
(78) ‹anchor: πάντων τῶν Ἰουδαϊκῶν› · call in col 345 (Greek only)
Tarin., πάντων γὰρ Ἰουδαϊκῶν. In tribus regiis et Coisliniano deest γάρ. Paulo post primus codex Regius, τῶν τότε κατὰ τὸν ναόν.
Tarin reads "πάντων γὰρ Ἰουδαϊκῶν" (for of all the Jewish [things]). In the three Royal manuscripts and the Coislin, "γάρ" (for) is missing. A little after, the first Royal manuscript reads "τῶν τότε κατὰ τὸν ναόν" (of the things then in the temple).
(printed under page 177)
(73) ‹anchor: ante praedixerant› · scripture reference, call in col 346 and the Interpretatio nova
Gen. XLIX.
Genesis 49.
(printed under page 177)
(76) ‹anchor: viderentur› · call in col 346 (full-width line)
Sic optime mss. Male editi, « ad fidem ea quae dicta sunt.... minus esse viderentur. » Paulo post mss., « declaratur verum esse. » Editi, « declaratur vera esse. »
So, excellently, the manuscripts. The printed editions badly read "[had not come] to fulfilment, the things that were said.... would seem to be less." A little after, the manuscripts: "it is declared to be true." The editions: "they are declared to be true."
(printed under page 177)
(79) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 346
Cultorum. Ita mss. Editi, « multorum. » Vide notas ad lib. iii Contra Celsum, num. 8.
"Cultorum" (of the worshippers): so the manuscripts. The printed editions have "multorum" (of many). See the notes on Book III of Against Celsus, number 8.
(printed under page 177)
(80) ‹anchor: jactantiae quamplurimum› · call in col 346
Ita mss. Editi vero, « se jactabant quamplurimi. » Mox mss., « simul universa destructa sunt. » In editis deest « universa. » Infra mss., « qui permaneant usque ad adventum. » Editi, « qui permaneat, » etc. Paulo post mss., « usquequo venit ille. » Editi, « usquequo veniet ille. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions read "very many boasted." Next, the manuscripts: "all were destroyed together." The editions lack "all." Below, the manuscripts: "who should remain until the coming." The editions: "who should remain" (singular), etc. A little after, the manuscripts: "until he came." The editions: "until he shall come."
(printed under page 177)
(74) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image (Interpretatio nova)› · scripture reference under the Interpretatio nova
Ose. iii, 4.
Hosea 3:4.
(printed under page 178)
(75) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image (Interpretatio nova)› · scripture reference under the Interpretatio nova
Gen. XLIX, 10.
Genesis 49:10.
(printed under page 178)
(76) ‹anchor: irritabo eos› · scripture reference, call in col 347
Deut. XXXII, 21.
Deuteronomy 32:21.
(printed under page 178)
(81) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 347
Patriarcham, etc. Chrysostomus in homilia contra Judaeos et gentiles, Quod Christus sit Deus, meminit patriarchae Judaeorum. Ejusmodi patriarcham memorant itidem multi scriptores ecclesiastici. Origenes in opusculo quod in alio tomo edemus, ut genuinum fragmentum Commentariorum in Psalmos, dicit se cum patriarcha Judaeorum, Jullo nomine, congressum esse. Patriarcham item Judaeorum memorant Cyrillus Jerosolymitanus, Hieronymus, et maxime Theodoretus dialog. 1, ex cujus dictis colligitur patriarchas Judaeorum se ex progenie Davidis esse falso jactitasse. Horum alter in Judaea degebat, alter Babylone. De iis agunt qui de Judaeorum republica tractavere. Vide praesertim Petavium in notis ad Epiphanium, et Jacobum Gothefridum ad cod. Theodos. tom. VI, pag. 213.
"Patriarch," etc. Chrysostom, in the homily against the Jews and the pagans, That Christ is God, mentions the patriarch of the Jews. Many ecclesiastical writers likewise mention such a patriarch. Origen, in a short work which we shall publish in another volume as a genuine fragment of the Commentaries on the Psalms, says that he met the patriarch of the Jews, Jullus by name. The patriarch of the Jews is also mentioned by Cyril of Jerusalem, by Jerome, and above all by Theodoret, Dialogue 1, from whose words it is gathered that the patriarchs of the Jews falsely boasted that they were of the line of David. One of these lived in Judaea, the other in Babylon. Those who have written on the Jewish commonwealth treat of them. See especially Petavius in his notes on Epiphanius, and Jacques Godefroy on the Theodosian Code, volume VI, page 213.
(printed under page 178)
(82) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 348 (Greek only)
Καθίσονται. Ita quatuor mss. Editio Tarini, καθήσονται.
"Καθίσονται" (they shall sit): so four manuscripts. Tarin's edition has "καθήσονται" (another form of the same).
(printed under page 178)
(83) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 348 (Greek only)
Τῶν ἀπὸ τοῦ σπέρματος. Ita duo codd. Regii, et Coislinianus. In editione Tarini deest τῶν.
"Τῶν ἀπὸ τοῦ σπέρματος" (of those from the seed): so two Royal manuscripts and the Coislin. In Tarin's edition "τῶν" (of those) is missing.
(printed under page 178)
(84) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 348 (Greek only)
Duo Regii et Coislinianus, καθίσονται. Tarinus, καθήσονται. Ibidem primus Regius, οὐκ ὄντος βασιλέως, οὐδὲ ἄρχοντος.
Two Royal manuscripts and the Coislin read "καθίσονται" (they shall sit); Tarin, "καθήσονται". In the same place the first Royal manuscript reads "οὐκ ὄντος βασιλέως, οὐδὲ ἄρχοντος" (there being no king, nor ruler).
(printed under page 178)
(85) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 348 (Greek only)
Primus codex Regius, πιστευσάντων.
The first Royal manuscript reads "πιστευσάντων" (of those who believed).
(printed under page 178)
(86) ‹anchor: τοῦ Ἰησοῦ γεγενημένη› · call in col 348 (Greek only)
Idem, ἢ διὰ τοῦ Ἰησοῦ γεγενημένη. Infra idem : ἐπ' οὐκ ἔθνει, ἐπὶ ἔθνει. Paulo post idem, σφόδρα σαφῶς καταλαβεῖν.
The same reads "ἢ διὰ τοῦ Ἰησοῦ γεγενημένη" (than that made through Jesus). Below, the same: "ἐπ' οὐκ ἔθνει, ἐπὶ ἔθνει" (by a no-nation, by a nation). A little after, the same: "σφόδρα σαφῶς καταλαβεῖν" (to grasp very clearly).
(printed under page 178)
(77) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · scripture reference (Interpretatio nova / above the foot)
I Cor. I, 26.
1 Corinthians 1:26.
(printed under page 179)
(78) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · scripture reference (Interpretatio nova / above the foot)
Ibid. 29.
Ibid., verse 29.
(printed under page 179)
(79) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · scripture reference (Interpretatio nova / above the foot)
Psalm. xliv, 3.
Psalm 44 (45):3.
(printed under page 179)
(87) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 349 (Greek only)
Idem, καὶ τὰ ἀσθενῆ καὶ ἐξουδενημένα.
The same [manuscript] reads "καὶ τὰ ἀσθενῆ καὶ ἐξουδενημένα" (and the weak and despised things).
(printed under page 179)
(88) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 349 (Greek only)
Ita quatuor mss. Editio Tarini, ἐργυθείσης.
So four manuscripts. Tarin's edition has "ἐργυθείσης" (as printed; evidently a corrupt form).
(printed under page 179)
(89) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 349 (Greek only)
Ἐνιαυτὸν γάρ που καὶ μῆνας ὀλίγους ἐδίδαξεν. Irenaeus lib. i, cap. 3, num. 3, tradit Valentinianos in hoc errore versatos fuisse, ut Jesum uno tantum anno post baptisma praedicasse crederent. In eumdem, praeter Origenem, impegere Clemens Alexandrinus lib. i Stromat., pag. 340 ; Tertullianus lib. adversus Judaeos, cap. 18. Una est istorum omnium sententia, Christum anno 15 imperii Tiberii, quo baptizatum fuisse scribit Lucas, passum esse, anno scilicet aetatis 30, ac proinde anno uno duntaxat post baptismum et ante mortem suam publicas apud Judaeos habuisse conciones.
"For he taught for a year, it seems, and a few months." Irenaeus, Book I, chapter 3, number 3, records that the Valentinians fell into this error, believing that Jesus preached for only one year after his baptism. Besides Origen, Clement of Alexandria fell into the same error, Stromata Book I, page 340, and Tertullian, in the book Against the Jews, chapter 18. All these hold one opinion: that Christ suffered in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius, the year in which Luke writes that he was baptized, that is, in the thirtieth year of his age, and so that he held public discourses among the Jews for only one year, after his baptism and before his death.
(printed under page 179)
(80) ‹anchor: fines terrae› · scripture reference, call in col 350
Psal. LXXI, 7, 8.
Psalm 71 (72):7–8.
(printed under page 179)
(81) ‹anchor: signum domui David› · scripture reference, call in col 350
Isai. VII, 14.
Isaiah 7:14.
(printed under page 179)
(82) ‹anchor: et vincimini› · scripture reference, call in col 350
Isai. VIII, 9.
Isaiah 8:9.
(printed under page 179)
(83) ‹anchor: meum Israel› · scripture reference, call in col 350
Mich. V, 2.
Micah 5:2.
(printed under page 179)
(84) ‹anchor: septimanae annorum› · scripture reference, call in col 350
Dan. IX.
Daniel 9.
(printed under page 179)
(90) ‹anchor: prophetantur de Christo› · call in col 350
De Christo. Haec desunt in editis, sed habentur in mss. Paulo post mss., « decorus specie. » In editis deest, « specie. » Infra mss., « et multitudo pacis. » Editi, « et abundantia pacis. »
"Concerning Christ": these words are missing in the printed editions, but are found in the manuscripts. A little after, the manuscripts: "comely in form." The editions lack "in form." Below, the manuscripts: "and a multitude of peace." The editions: "and abundance of peace."
(printed under page 179)
(91) ‹anchor: Bethleem, terra› · call in col 350
Sic mss. In editis deest, « terra, » et pro « exigua » legitur, « minima. » Infra mss., « inveniet quod et quae ausi sunt aggredi, supra hominem sunt. » Paulo post mss., « divina quadam quae eis aderat. » Editi, « divina quidem quae eis aderat. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions lack "land," and for "exigua" (small) read "minima" (least). Below, the manuscripts: "he will find that what they also dared to undertake is beyond man." A little after, the manuscripts: "by a certain divine [power] which was present with them." The editions: "by a divine [power] indeed which was present with them."
(printed under page 179)
(85) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image (Interpretatio nova)› · scripture reference under the Interpretatio nova
Luc. X.
Luke 10.
(printed under page 180)
(92) ‹anchor: de omnium› · call in col 351
Ita mss. Editi, « omni. » Ibidem mss., « prophetarum vaticinatio, sive Moysis lex, divina esse. » Editi, « prophetarum vaticinia, sive Moysi lex divina etiam. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions have "omni" (every). In the same place the manuscripts: "the prophecy of the prophets, or the law of Moses, [was] divine." The editions: "the prophecies of the prophets, or the law of Moses [was] also divine."
(printed under page 180)
(93) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 352 (Greek only)
Primus Regius, ἕως τοῦ ἡγουμένου κατὰ τὸν Δανιήλ. Infra idem codex, ἐπὶ τὸ καταγγεῖλαι. Alii cum Tarino, ἐπὶ τῷ καταγγεῖλαι.
The first Royal manuscript reads "ἕως τοῦ ἡγουμένου κατὰ τὸν Δανιήλ" (until the leader, according to Daniel). Below, the same manuscript has "ἐπὶ τὸ καταγγεῖλαι" (for proclaiming); the others, with Tarin, "ἐπὶ τῷ καταγγεῖλαι".
(printed under page 180)
(94) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 352 (Greek only)
Θεῖον. Ita tres mss. Regii. Editio Tarini, Θεοῦ.
"Θεῖον" (divine): so three Royal manuscripts. Tarin's edition has "Θεοῦ" (of God).
(printed under page 180)
(95) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 352 (Greek only)
Primus codex Regius, κινηθέντες.
The first Royal manuscript reads "κινηθέντες" (moved).
(printed under page 180)
(96) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 352 (Greek only)
Idem, καὶ εἰ τεράστια.
The same reads "καὶ εἰ τεράστια" (and if wonders).
(printed under page 180)
(97) ‹anchor: ἡ Ἰησοῦ ἐπιδημία› · call in col 352 (Greek only)
Primus cod. Regius, ἡ Χριστοῦ ἐπιδημία.
The first Royal manuscript reads "ἡ Χριστοῦ ἐπιδημία" (the coming of Christ).
(printed under page 180)
(98) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 353 (Greek only)
Tarinus, ὡς ἐνουρανίῳ χάριτι.
Tarin reads "ὡς ἐνουρανίῳ χάριτι" (as by heavenly grace).
(printed under page 181)
(99) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 353 (Greek only)
Post πεπιστευμένους in codice primo Regio additur, ἡμῖν εἶναι.
After "πεπιστευμένους" (believed), the first Royal manuscript adds "ἡμῖν εἶναι" (by us to be).
(printed under page 181)
(1) ‹anchor: τὰ μὴ γινωσκόμενα παρὰ› · call in col 353 (Greek only)
In primo Regio deest παρά, quod etiam abesse potest.
In the first Royal manuscript "παρά" (by) is missing, which can also be dispensed with.
(printed under page 181)
(2) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 354
Veritatis. Deest in editis, sed habetur in mss. Mox aliquot mss., « quae cooperta verbi bona tegebantur. »
"Of truth": missing in the printed editions, but found in the manuscripts. Next, some manuscripts: "which, covered, were hidden as the good things of the word."
(printed under page 181)
(3) ‹anchor: paulo lentius› · call in col 354
In mss. legitur « lentius. » In libb. editis, « latentius. » Paulo post mss., « explicantur ut penitus in his lateat. » Editi pro « explicantur, » habent, « occultantur. » Mox mss., « ne credantur quidem. » Editi, « ne crederentur quidem. » Infra mss., « humanae eloquentiae fucus. » Editi, « humanae intelligentiae fucus. »
In the manuscripts one reads "lentius" (more slowly). In the printed books, "latentius" (more hiddenly). A little after, the manuscripts: "are unfolded so that [the reason] lies wholly hidden in them." For "are unfolded," the editions have "are hidden." Next, the manuscripts: "are not even believed." The editions: "were not even believed." Below, the manuscripts: "the varnish of human eloquence." The editions: "the varnish of human understanding."
(printed under page 181)
(86) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · scripture reference (above the foot)
II Cor. IV, 7.
2 Corinthians 4:7.
(printed under page 182)
(87) ‹anchor: qui destruentur› · scripture reference, call in col 355
I Cor. II, 6.
1 Corinthians 2:6.
(printed under page 182)
(4) ‹anchor: esse intelligerent› · call in col 355
Sic mss. Editi vero, « etiam intelligerent. » Mox mss., « ad fidem credulitatemque perducti. » Editi, « ad fidem credulitatemque putent se perduci. » Paulo post mss., « initia scientiae. » Editi, « initia sapientiae. » Paulo infra mss., « qui dissolvuntur. » Mox mss., describetur in cordibus. » Editi, « describitur in cordibus. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions read "they also understood." Next, the manuscripts: "brought to faith and belief." The editions: "think themselves brought to faith and belief." A little after, the manuscripts: "the beginnings of knowledge." The editions: "the beginnings of wisdom." A little below, the manuscripts: "who are being dissolved." Next, the manuscripts: "will be inscribed in [our] hearts." The editions: "is inscribed in [our] hearts."
(printed under page 182)
(5) ‹anchor: in haereses declinarunt› · call in col 355 (chapter heading)
Alias, caput II.
Otherwise, chapter II.
(printed under page 182)
(6) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 356 (Greek only)
Primus Reg. codex pro μόνον habet Θεόν.
For "μόνον" (only), the first Royal manuscript has "Θεόν" (God).
(printed under page 182)
(7) ‹anchor: χρόνοις αἰωνίοις σεσιγημένου› · call in col 356 (Greek only)
Idem codex Regius : τρανῶς κατὰ ἀποκάλυψιν μυστηρίου χρόνοις αἰωνίοις σεσιγημένου.
The same Royal manuscript: "τρανῶς κατὰ ἀποκάλυψιν μυστηρίου χρόνοις αἰωνίοις σεσιγημένου" (clearly, according to the revelation of the mystery kept silent for eternal ages).
(printed under page 182)
(8) ‹anchor: ὡς ἐν ἐπιδρομῇ› · call in col 356 (Greek only)
Idem, ἐν παραδρομῇ.
The same reads "ἐν παραδρομῇ" (in passing).
(printed under page 182)
(88) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · scripture reference (above the foot)
Zach. IX, 10.
Zechariah 9:10.
(printed under page 183)
(89) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · scripture reference (above the foot)
Isa. vii, 15.
Isaiah 7:15.
(printed under page 183)
(90) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · scripture reference (above the foot)
Isa. xi, 6 seqq.
Isaiah 11:6 and following.
(printed under page 183)
(9) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 357 (Greek only)
Post ἄφεσιν, idem codex Regius addit, καὶ τυφλοῖς ἀνάβλεψιν.
After "ἄφεσιν" (release), the same Royal manuscript adds "καὶ τυφλοῖς ἀνάβλεψιν" (and recovery of sight to the blind).
(printed under page 183)
(10) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 357 (Greek only)
Primus codex Regius, ἐκλέξασθαι, male.
The first Royal manuscript reads "ἐκλέξασθαι" (to choose), wrongly.
(printed under page 183)
(11) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 357 (Greek only)
Idem, Ἰησοῦν Χριστόν. Infra idem, ἐκκέκαυται ἀπὸ θυμοῦ μου.
The same reads "Ἰησοῦν Χριστόν" (Jesus Christ). Below, the same: "ἐκκέκαυται ἀπὸ θυμοῦ μου" (has been kindled from my wrath).
(printed under page 183)
(12) ‹anchor: ἀγέννητος› · call in col 357 (Greek only)
Duo codd. Regii, ἀγέννητος. Tarinus, ἀγένητος.
Two Royal manuscripts read "ἀγέννητος" (unbegotten). Tarin, "ἀγένητος" (unoriginate).
(printed under page 183)
(91) ‹anchor: ex furore meo› · scripture reference, call in col 358
Jerem. xv, 14.
Jeremiah 15:14.
(printed under page 183)
(92) ‹anchor: et quartam progeniem› · scripture reference, call in col 358
Exod. XX, 5.
Exodus 20:5.
(printed under page 183)
(93) ‹anchor: Saul in regem› · scripture reference, call in col 358
I Reg. XV, 11.
1 Kings (1 Samuel) 15:11.
(printed under page 183)
(94) ‹anchor: et creo mala› · scripture reference, call in col 358
Isai. XLV, 7.
Isaiah 45:7.
(printed under page 183)
(95) ‹anchor: Dominus non fecerit› · scripture reference, call in col 358
Amos. III, 6.
Amos 3:6.
(printed under page 183)
(96) ‹anchor: super portas Jerusalem› · scripture reference, call in col 358
Mich. I, 12.
Micah 1:12.
(printed under page 183)
(13) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 358
Ita mss. Editi autem, « debuit prius aedificare civitatem Dei. » Paulo post mss, « existimarunt esse prophetatum quia deberet. » Editi, « existimant prophetatum quia debet. »
So the manuscripts. But the printed editions read "he ought first to have built the city of God." A little after, the manuscripts: "they thought it had been prophesied that he ought." The editions: "they think it was prophesied that he ought."
(printed under page 183)
(14) ‹anchor: jus fasque› · call in col 358
Ita recte mss. Male editi, « contrarium falsoque. » Ibidem mss., « assumentem eum sibi Christi nomen. » In editis deest « eum sibi. » Mox mss., « quod in lege scriptum est. » In editis deest « in lege. »
So, rightly, the manuscripts. The printed editions wrongly read "contrary, and falsely." In the same place the manuscripts: "him, as one taking to himself the name of Christ." The editions lack "him … to himself." Next, the manuscripts: "what is written in the law." The editions lack "in the law."
(printed under page 183)
(97) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · scripture reference (above the foot)
I Reg. XVIII, 10.
1 Kings (1 Samuel) 18:10.
(printed under page 184)
(15) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 359
Sic mss. Editi autem, « vanis. » Paulo post mss., « ex simplicioribus scilicet eorum. » Editi, « ex simplicioribus quibusque. » Mox mss., « creatore Deo nullum esse. » In editis deest, « Deo » et « esse. »
So the manuscripts. But the printed editions have "vanis" (empty). A little after, the manuscripts: "from the simpler, that is, of them." The editions: "from all the simpler ones." Next, the manuscripts: "that there is none [greater] than God the Creator." The editions lack "God" and "is."
(printed under page 184)
(16) ‹anchor: Scripturas sanctas› · call in col 359
Sanctas. Deest in editis. Infra mss., « indicentur per Scripturas sanctas. » In editis deest « sanctas. » Ibidem mss., « simpliciores quique credentium. » In editis deest, « credentium. »
"Holy": missing in the printed editions. Below, the manuscripts: "are indicated through the holy Scriptures." The editions lack "holy." In the same place, the manuscripts: "all the simpler of the believers." The editions lack "of the believers."
(printed under page 184)
(17) ‹anchor: ψευδοδοξιῶν καὶ ἀσεβειῶν› · call in col 360 (Greek only)
Primus codex Regius, ψευδολόγων καὶ ἀσεβῶν.
The first Royal manuscript reads "ψευδολόγων καὶ ἀσεβῶν" (of false-speaking and impious [words]).
(printed under page 184)
(18) ‹anchor: εἰ γοῦν ἐπαπορήσαι› · call in col 360 (Greek only)
Primus Reg. codex, ἐπαπορήσει.
The first Royal manuscript reads "ἐπαπορήσει" (shall raise the question).
(printed under page 184)
(19) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 361 (Greek only)
Idem, ᾧ δυνήσονται ἐφαρμόσαι ἕκαστον τῶν.
The same [manuscript] reads "ᾧ δυνήσονται ἐφαρμόσαι ἕκαστον τῶν" (to which they will be able to fit each of the).
(printed under page 185)
(20) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 361 (Greek only)
Idem, δεχθησομένων.
The same reads "δεχθησομένων" (of those that will be received).
(printed under page 185)
(21) ‹anchor: τὰ γεγραμμένα ἐμφαινομένων› · call in col 361 (Greek only)
Primus codex Regius, ἐμφαινομένην. Coislinianus, ἐκφαινομένων.
The first Royal manuscript reads "ἐμφαινομένην" (appearing, agreeing with the concealment); the Coislin, "ἐκφαινομένων" (being shown forth).
(printed under page 185)
(98) ‹anchor: in doctrina Spiritus› · scripture reference, call in col 362
I Cor. II, 16, 13.
1 Corinthians 2:16, 13.
(printed under page 185)
(22) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 362
Sic mss. Editi vero, « et quae Deo revelante, a quamplurimis. » Mox mss., « difficilia et occulta sunt, tunc. » Editi, « difficilia et obscura sunt, tamen. » Paulo post mss., « certum est apud omnes stylum propheticum..... aenigmatibus consitum esse. » Editi, « certum est quod omnes cernunt stylum propheticum..... aenigmatibus confertum. » Mox mss., « nunquid non ibi. » In editis deest, « non. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions read "and which, God revealing, by very many." Next, the manuscripts: "are difficult and hidden, then." The editions: "are difficult and obscure, yet." A little after, the manuscripts: "it is certain among all that the prophetic style ..... is planted with riddles." The editions: "it is certain, as all see, that the prophetic style ..... is crammed with riddles." Next, the manuscripts: "is there not there also." The editions lack "not."
(printed under page 185)
(99) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · scripture reference (Interpretatio nova)
Luc. XI, 52.
Luke 11:52.
(printed under page 186)
(1) ‹anchor: qui proposuerint tibi› · scripture reference, call in col 363
Prov. XXII, 20, 21.
Proverbs 22:20–21.
(printed under page 186)
(23) ‹anchor: in anima sua› · call in col 363
In anima sua. Haec desunt in editis, sed habentur in mss. Infra mss., « qui destruentur. »
"In his soul": these words are missing in the printed editions, but are found in the manuscripts. Below, the manuscripts: "who will be destroyed."
(printed under page 186)
(24) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 364 (Greek only)
Sic duo codd. Regii. Tarinus vero : διαγνώσεως.
So two Royal manuscripts. But Tarin: "διαγνώσεως" (of discernment).
(printed under page 186)
(25) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 364 (Greek only)
Sic duo codd. Regii. Tarinus, ἐξ αὐτῶν. Editi, « qui dissolvuntur. » Mox mss., « in gloriam nostram. » Editi, « in gloria nostra. »
So two Royal manuscripts. Tarin, "ἐξ αὐτῶν" (from them). The printed editions [of the Latin] have "who are dissolved." Next, the manuscripts: "unto our glory." The editions: "in our glory." [As printed, the words from "Editi" onward continue note (23) on the Latin, and appear to have been set in the wrong note.]
(printed under page 186)
(26) ‹anchor: αὐτὰ τρισσῶς› · call in col 364 (Greek only)
Primus codex Regius, τριχῶς, et paulo post ἀπογράψασθαι λόγους ἀληθείας.
The first Royal manuscript reads "τριχῶς" (in three ways), and a little after "ἀπογράψασθαι λόγους ἀληθείας" (to write down words of truth).
(printed under page 186)
(27) ‹anchor: τοῦ αἰῶνος τούτου› · call in col 364 (Greek only)
Οὐδὲ τῶν ἀρχόντων τοῦ αἰῶνος τούτου. Haec desiderantur in editione Tarini, sed habentur in codice Coisliniano. Mox primus codex Regius, τὴν καταργουμένην pro τῶν καταργουμένων. Infra idem, σκιὰν περιέχοντος.
"Nor of the rulers of this age": these words are wanting in Tarin's edition, but are found in the Coislin manuscript. Next, the first Royal manuscript has "τὴν καταργουμένην" (which is being brought to nothing, agreeing with wisdom) for "τῶν καταργουμένων" (who are being brought to nothing). Below, the same: "σκιὰν περιέχοντος" (containing a shadow).
(printed under page 186)
(2) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · scripture reference (above the foot)
I Cor. II, 6, 7.
1 Corinthians 2:6–7.
(printed under page 187)
(3) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · reference (above the foot)
Lib. i vis. 2, num. 4.
[Hermas, Shepherd,] Book I, Vision 2, number 4.
(printed under page 187)
(28) ‹anchor: ἡ λέξις αὕτη› · call in col 365 (Greek only)
Primus codex Regius, ἔχει δὲ ἡ λέξις.
The first Royal manuscript reads "ἔχει δὲ ἡ λέξις" (and the text runs).
(printed under page 187)
(29) ‹anchor: μὲν νουθετήσει› · call in col 365 (Greek only)
Idem, νομοθετήσει.
The same reads "νομοθετήσει" (will legislate).
(printed under page 187)
(30) ‹anchor: ἡ νουθετοῦσα› · call in col 365 (Greek only)
Idem, νομοθετοῦσα, et paulo post, τὸ γράμμα νομοθετοῦν.
The same reads "νομοθετοῦσα" (legislating, feminine), and a little after, "τὸ γράμμα νομοθετοῦν" (the letter legislating).
(printed under page 187)
(31) ‹anchor: μηδέπω πατέρα› · call in col 365 (Greek only)
Πατέρα. Sic recte omnes codd. mss. Apud Tarinum mendose legitur παρά.
"Πατέρα" (father): so, rightly, all the manuscripts. In Tarin it is misread "παρά" (beside).
(printed under page 187)
(32) ‹anchor: τοῦ γράμματος ἐξιστάμενος› · call in col 365 (Greek only)
Primus codex Regius, ὁ ἔξω τοῦ γράμματος.
The first Royal manuscript reads "ὁ ἔξω τοῦ γράμματος" (he who is outside the letter).
(printed under page 187)
(33) ‹anchor: ἐν τοῖς ἑξῆς› · call in col 365 (Greek only)
Primus codex Regius : ἐφεξῆς.
The first Royal manuscript: "ἐφεξῆς" (in what follows).
(printed under page 187)
(34) ‹anchor: δύο ἢ τρεῖς› · call in col 365 (Greek only)
Idem : δύο ἢ τρεῖς. Tarinus, δύο καὶ τρεῖς.
The same: "δύο ἢ τρεῖς" (two or three). Tarin, "δύο καὶ τρεῖς" (two and three).
(printed under page 187)
(35) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 366
Sic mss. Editi vero, « Hermes. » Infra mss, « orphanos jubetur et viduas commonere. » Editi, « orphanos et viduas videtur commonere. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions read "Hermes." Below, the manuscripts: "is commanded to admonish the orphans and widows." The editions: "seems to admonish the orphans and widows."
(printed under page 187)
(36) ‹anchor: sensum capacem› · call in col 366 (full-width line)
Capacem. Sic mss. Editi vero, « pro capacitate. » Paulo post mss., « id est consequentia historialis, » etc. Editi, « id est convenientia historialis, » etc.
"Capacem" (capable): so the manuscripts. The printed editions read "according to capacity." A little after, the manuscripts: "that is, the historical sequence," etc. The editions: "that is, the historical fittingness," etc.
(printed under page 187)
(4) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · scripture reference (above the foot)
Joan. II.
John 2.
(printed under page 188)
(5) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · scripture reference (above the foot)
Rom. II.
Romans 2.
(printed under page 188)
(6) ‹anchor: bovem triturantem› · scripture reference, call in col 367
I Cor. IX, 9.
1 Corinthians 9:9.
(printed under page 188)
(7) ‹anchor: saeculi cognovit› · scripture reference, call in col 367
I Cor. II, 7.
1 Corinthians 2:7.
(printed under page 188)
(8) ‹anchor: saeculorum devenerunt› · scripture reference, call in col 367
I Cor. X, 11.
1 Corinthians 10:11.
(printed under page 188)
(37) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 367
Ita mss. Editi vero : « convenienter. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions read "convenienter" (fittingly).
(printed under page 188)
(38) ‹anchor: προειρημένοις› · call in col 368 (Greek only)
Idem, εἰρημένοις.
The same [manuscript] reads "εἰρημένοις" (to the things said).
(printed under page 188)
(39) ‹anchor: γενομένῳ› · call in col 368 (Greek only)
Idem : γεγενημένῳ.
The same: "γεγενημένῳ" (having come to be).
(printed under page 188)
(40) ‹anchor: ἀναγομένης› · call in col 368 (Greek only)
Ita duo codices Regii. Tarinus, ἀγομένης.
So two Royal manuscripts. Tarin, "ἀγομένης" (being led).
(printed under page 188)
(41) ‹anchor: τοῦτον τὸν νόμον› · call in col 368 (Greek only)
Primus cod. Reg., νόμον. Tarinus, τόπον.
The first Royal manuscript reads "νόμον" (law). Tarin, "τόπον" (place).
(printed under page 188)
(42) ‹anchor: ἀπὸ τῆς Ἐξόδου› · call in col 368 (Greek only)
Sic mss. Tarinus, ὑπὸ τῆς Ἐξόδου.
So the manuscripts. Tarin, "ὑπὸ τῆς Ἐξόδου" (by Exodus).
(printed under page 188)
(43) ‹anchor: ἀκολουθούσης πέτρας› · call in col 368 (Greek only)
Sic mss. Tarinus, Ἔπινον ἐξ ἀκολουθούσης πέτρας.
So the manuscripts. Tarin, "Ἔπινον ἐξ ἀκολουθούσης πέτρας" (they drank from a following rock).
(printed under page 188)
(9) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · scripture reference (above the foot)
I Cor. X, 4.
1 Corinthians 10:4.
(printed under page 189)
(10) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · scripture reference (above the foot)
Exod. XXV, 40 ; Hebr. VIII, 5.
Exodus 25:40; Hebrews 8:5.
(printed under page 189)
(11) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · scripture reference (above the foot)
Galat. IV, 21, seqq.
Galatians 4:21 and following.
(printed under page 189)
(44) ‹anchor: αἱ δύο διαθῆκαι› · call in col 369 (Greek only)
Apud Tarinum desunt, αἱ δύο, quae habentur in mss.
In Tarin the words "αἱ δύο" (the two) are missing; they are found in the manuscripts.
(printed under page 189)
(45) ‹anchor: τις ὑμᾶς› · call in col 369 (Greek only)
Tarinus, ἡμᾶς, et praeterea omisit ἐν βρώσει.
Tarin reads "ἡμᾶς" (us), and besides omitted "ἐν βρώσει" (in food).
(printed under page 189)
(46) ‹anchor: οἵτινες ὑποδείγμασι› · call in col 369 (Greek only)
Primus codex Reg., ὑποδείγματι.
The first Royal manuscript reads "ὑποδείγματι" (in a copy, singular).
(printed under page 189)
(47) ‹anchor: περὶ δὲ τῆς λοιπῆς› · call in col 369 (Greek only)
Sic mss. Tarinus vero, περὶ τῆς λοιπῆς.
So the manuscripts. But Tarin reads "περὶ τῆς λοιπῆς" (about the rest, without "δέ").
(printed under page 189)
(12) ‹anchor: umbra futurorum› · scripture reference, call in col 370
Coloss. II, 16.
Colossians 2:16.
(printed under page 189)
(13) ‹anchor: umbrae deserviunt coelestium› · scripture reference, call in col 370
Hebr. VIII, 5.
Hebrews 8:5.
(printed under page 189)
(48) ‹anchor: scripta sunt, ignorant› · call in col 370
Sic mss. Editi vero, « quosdam qui videbantur sibi legere legem et non intelligere, pro eo quod allegoriam esse in his quae scripta sunt, ignorabant. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions read "certain men who seemed to themselves to read the law and not to understand it, because they did not know that there was allegory in what is written."
(printed under page 189)
(49) ‹anchor: Qui sub lege estis› · call in col 370
Qui sub lege estis. Haec desunt in editis, sed habentur in mss.
"You who are under the law": these words are missing in the printed editions, but are found in the manuscripts.
(printed under page 189)
(50) ‹anchor: non videbitur› · call in col 370
Sic recte mss. Male vero editi, « per quinque libros Moysi hoc non videbitur. »
So, rightly, the manuscripts. The printed editions wrongly read "through the five books of Moses this will not be seen."
(printed under page 189)
(14) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image (Interpretatio nova)› · scripture reference (above the foot)
Rom. XI, 4.
Romans 11:4.
(printed under page 190)
(51) ‹anchor: prospicientem contextum› · call in col 371
Sic optime mss. Male editi « aliorum prospiciens contectum. »
So, excellently, the manuscripts. The printed editions wrongly read "looking forward to a covering of other things."
(printed under page 190)
(52) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 372 (Greek only)
Sic mss. Tarinus autem, ὑπό.
So the manuscripts. But Tarin has "ὑπό" (by).
(printed under page 190)
(53) ‹anchor: σαρκὸς ἀνθρωπίνης› · call in col 372 (Greek only)
Primus codex Reg., ἀνθρωπίνως.
The first Royal manuscript reads "ἀνθρωπίνως" (in human fashion).
(printed under page 190)
(54) ‹anchor: τούτου ἐνέργεια› · call in col 372 (Greek only)
Idem, ἡ τούτου ἐνέργεια, Tarinus, ἡ τούτων ἐνέργεια. Primus codex Regius habet paulo post, ναγκαῖον δέ.
The same [manuscript] reads "ἡ τούτου ἐνέργεια" (his working); Tarin, "ἡ τούτων ἐνέργεια" (their working). A little after, the first Royal manuscript has "[ἀ]ναγκαῖον δέ" (and [it is] necessary; printed without its initial letter).
(printed under page 190)
(55) ‹anchor: καὶ τῶν αἰτίων› · call in col 372 (Greek only)
Idem, καὶ τὴν αἰτίαν.
The same reads "καὶ τὴν αἰτίαν" (and the cause).
(printed under page 190)
(56) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 373 (Greek only)
Tarinus, σοφίας, male.
Tarin reads "σοφίας" (of wisdom), wrongly.
(printed under page 191)
(57) ‹anchor: Ἀλλ' ἐπεὶ› · call in col 373 (Greek only)
Ἐπεί. Deest apud Tarinum, sed habetur in mss. Caeterum de vario quo accipi debet Scriptura sensu quid senserit Origenes disseritur Origenianorum libro ii, quaestione decima tertia.
"Ἐπεί" (since): missing in Tarin, but found in the manuscripts. As for Origen's view of the various senses in which Scripture is to be taken, it is discussed in the Origeniana, Book II, question thirteen.
(printed under page 191)
(58) ‹anchor: τινα οἱονεὶ› · call in col 373 (Greek only)
Οἱονεί. Omisit Tarinus, sed restituit primus codex Regius.
"Οἱονεί" (as it were): Tarin omitted it, but the first Royal manuscript restored it.
(printed under page 191)
(59) ‹anchor: ἵνα μὴ πάντη› · call in col 373 (Greek only)
Tarinus, πάντες, sed primus cod. Reg., πάντη.
Tarin reads "πάντες" (all), but the first Royal manuscript has "πάντη" (wholly).
(printed under page 191)
(60) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 374
Sic recte mss. Male vero editi, « mysterio. »
So, rightly, the manuscripts. The printed editions wrongly read "mysterio" (by a mystery).
(printed under page 191)
(61) ‹anchor: texta sunt› · call in col 374 (full-width line)
Editi, « tecta sunt, » sed mss., « texta sunt. » Ibidem mss., « Scripturae sanctae corpus. » In editis deest, « sanctae. » Mox mss., « aedificari et proficere qui aliter non possent. » Male editi, « aedificare et proficere qui litteraliter non possent. »
The printed editions read "tecta sunt" (are covered), but the manuscripts "texta sunt" (are woven). In the same place the manuscripts: "the body of holy Scripture." The editions lack "holy." Next, the manuscripts: "be built up and advance, who otherwise could not." The editions wrongly read "build up and advance, who could not literally."
(printed under page 191)
(62) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 375
Sic mss. Editi, « extrusos nos ac exclusos. » Infra mss., « vel in his quae geri debent. » Editi, « de his quae geri debent. » Mox mss., « sicubi quidem invenit ea. » Merlinus, « sicubi quidam invenerunt ea. » Genebrardus, « sicubi quidem convenerunt ea. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions read "us thrust out and shut out." Below, the manuscripts: "or in those things which ought to be done." The editions: "about those things which ought to be done." Next, the manuscripts: "wherever indeed he found them." Merlin: "wherever certain men found them." Génébrard: "wherever indeed they agreed."
(printed under page 192)
(63) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 375
Aptari posse intelligentiae spiritali, ordinis utriusque textum. Haec desunt in editis, sed habentur in mss.
"Could be fitted to the spiritual understanding, the texture of each order": these words are missing in the printed editions, but are found in the manuscripts.
(printed under page 192)
(64) ‹anchor: suae arte contexuit› · call in col 375
Ita mss. Editi vero, « sapientia sive arte contexuit, unde etiam non parva. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions read "wove together with wisdom or art; whence also not a few."
(printed under page 192)
(68) ‹anchor: altius repetitae› · call in col 375 (full-width line)
Sic mss. Genebrardus, « repetendam. » Merlinus, « repetere. » Mox mss., « ad adventum Christi scripta sunt. » In editis deest vox, « scripta. »
So the manuscripts. Génébrard: "to be sought again." Merlin: "to seek again." Next, the manuscripts: "were written up to the coming of Christ." The editions lack the word "written."
(printed under page 192)
(65) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 376 (Greek only)
Sic mss. Tarinus, ὑπό.
So the manuscripts. Tarin has "ὑπό" (by).
(printed under page 192)
(66) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 376 (Greek only)
Primus codex Reg., ἀληθεύουσαι.
The first Royal manuscript reads "ἀληθεύουσαι" (being true).
(printed under page 192)
(67) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 376 (Greek only)
Idem, πλεονάκις.
The same reads "πλεονάκις" (more often).
(printed under page 192)
(69) ‹anchor: περὶ τῶν› · call in col 376 (Greek only)
Primus codex Regius, ἐπὶ τῶν, et paulo post, ἀλλὰ γὰρ ἅτε τὸ αὐτό.
The first Royal manuscript reads "ἐπὶ τῶν" (in the case of), and a little after, "ἀλλὰ γὰρ ἅτε τὸ αὐτό" (but indeed, being the same).
(printed under page 192)
(70) ‹anchor: μὴ γεγενημένων› · call in col 376 (Greek only)
Idem, μὴ γεγενημένην.
The same reads "μὴ γεγενημένην" (which did not happen, agreeing with the history).
(printed under page 192)
(71) ‹anchor: γοῦν νοῦν ἔχων› · call in col 376 (Greek only)
Τίς γοῦν νοῦν ἔχων, etc. Vide Origenian. lib. ii, q. 8, n. 6, et q. 13, n. 2.
"Who then that has sense," etc. See Origeniana, Book II, question 8, number 6, and question 13, number 2.
(printed under page 192)
(15) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · scripture reference (above the foot)
Gen. II.
Genesis 2.
(printed under page 193)
(16) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · scripture reference (above the foot)
Gen. IV.
Genesis 4.
(printed under page 193)
(72) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 377 (Greek only)
Sic duo mss. Tarinus, ὑπὸ τοῦ ξύλου.
So two manuscripts. Tarin, "ὑπὸ τοῦ ξύλου" (under the tree).
(printed under page 193)
(73) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 377 (Greek only)
Legendum videtur, ζητεῖν τί πρόσωπον Θεοῦ καὶ τί ἐξέρχεσθαι.
It seems one should read "ζητεῖν τί πρόσωπον Θεοῦ καὶ τί ἐξέρχεσθαι" (to ask what the face of God is, and what going out [from it] is).
(printed under page 193)
(74) ‹anchor: συνυφαίνεσθαι› · call in col 377 (Greek only)
Συνυφαίνεσθαι. Deest in primo codice Regio.
"Συνυφαίνεσθαι" (to be woven in): missing in the first Royal manuscript.
(printed under page 193)
(17) ‹anchor: diabolus dicitur› · scripture reference, call in col 378
Matth. IV.
Matthew 4.
(printed under page 193)
(75) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 378
Editi libb. « convenienter. » Paulo post mss. « quis vero ita idiotes invenietur. » Editi « quis vero ita idiotes invenitur. »
The printed books read "convenienter" (fittingly). A little after, the manuscripts: "but who will be found so unlearned." The editions: "but who is found so unlearned."
(printed under page 193)
(76) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 378
Sic mss. Editi « monet lectorem, » omissa voce « prudentem. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions read "warns the reader," leaving out the word "prudent."
(printed under page 193)
(77) ‹anchor: a diabolo Jesus› · call in col 378
Vox « Jesus » deest in editis, sed habetur in mss.
The word "Jesus" is missing in the printed editions, but is found in the manuscripts.
(printed under page 193)
(18) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · scripture reference (above the foot)
Genes. xvii, 14.
Genesis 17:14.
(printed under page 194)
(19) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · scripture reference (above the foot)
Exod. XVI, 29.
Exodus 16:29.
(printed under page 194)
(78) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 379
Sic mss. Editi vero « inconveniens est : cum oporteret si lex. » Paulo post mss. « incircumcisus masculus, id est qui non fuerit. » In edit. deest « masculus. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions read "is unfitting: since it ought, if the law." A little after, the manuscripts: "the uncircumcised male, that is, who has not been." The editions lack "male."
(printed under page 194)
(79) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 379
Ita recte omnino mss. Male vero editi « coli. » Quod autem ait Origenes tragelaphum fabulosum esse animal, et gryphem nunquam ab homine ullo captum esse, id secus videtur omnibus fere Scripturae sacrae recentioribus interpretibus. Vide Synopsim criticorum et aliorum commentatorum in Levit. XI, 13, et in Deut. XIV, 5. Paulo post mss. « sed et de Sabbati opinatissima observatione. » Editi, « sed et de Sabbato opinatissima observatione. » Paulo infra mss. « quicunque in Scripturis sanctis nihil. » In editis deest « sanctis. »
So, quite rightly, the manuscripts. The printed editions wrongly read "coli" (to be worshipped). As for Origen's saying that the goat-stag is a fabulous animal and that the griffin was never caught by any man, nearly all the more recent interpreters of Holy Scripture think otherwise. See the Synopsis of the critics and of other commentators on Leviticus 11:13 and on Deuteronomy 14:5. A little after, the manuscripts: "but also concerning the much-vaunted observance of the Sabbath." The editions: "but also concerning the much-vaunted observance on the Sabbath." A little below, the manuscripts: "whoever [wish to understand] nothing in the holy Scriptures." The editions lack "holy."
(printed under page 194)
(80) ‹anchor: τῷ ὅσον› · call in col 380 (Greek only)
Sic mss. Tarinus, τῶν ὅσον.
So the manuscripts. Tarin, "τῶν ὅσον" (of those, as much as).
(printed under page 194)
(81) ‹anchor: ὃν ὡς καθαρὸν› · call in col 380 (Greek only)
Primus codex Reg., ᾧ ὡς καθαρῷ.
The first Royal manuscript reads "ᾧ ὡς καθαρῷ" (which, as being clean).
(printed under page 194)
(82) ‹anchor: ὑποχείριος ἀνθρώπῳ› · call in col 380 (Greek only)
Tarinus, ἀνθρώπων.
Tarin reads "ἀνθρώπων" (of men).
(printed under page 194)
(83) ‹anchor: Καθίσεσθε› · call in col 380 (Greek only)
Primus cod. Reg., καθήσεσθε.
The first Royal manuscript reads "καθήσεσθε" (you shall sit).
(printed under page 194)
(84) ‹anchor: ὁ Σαμαρεύς› · call in col 380 (Greek only)
Idem codex, ἐστὶ καὶ Θεοδόσιος ὁ Σαμαρεύς. De Dositheo vide not. ad lib. i Contra Celsum, n. 57.
The same manuscript reads "ἐστὶ καὶ Θεοδόσιος ὁ Σαμαρεύς" (is also Theodosius the Samaritan). On Dositheus, see the notes on Book I of Against Celsus, number 57.
(printed under page 194)
(85) ‹call not on this foot; Greek-text note› · call in col 381 (Greek text only)
Idem, ἀδύνατον. Infra Tarinus, ἐληλύθασι λέγοντες.
The same [manuscript reads] ἀδύνατον. Below, Tarin [reads] ἐληλύθασι λέγοντες.
(printed under page 195)
(86) ‹call not on this foot; Greek-text note› · call in col 381 (Greek text only)
Primus codex Regius, πεπονθώς τις.
The first Royal manuscript [reads] πεπονθώς τις.
(printed under page 195)
(87) ‹call not on this foot; Greek-text note› · call in col 381 (Greek text only)
Tarinus ἐστὶ λαβεῖν δεξιὸν ὀφθαλμόν. Primus codex Regius, ἐστὶν ἐκβαλεῖν.
Tarin [reads] ἐστὶ λαβεῖν δεξιὸν ὀφθαλμόν. The first Royal manuscript [reads] ἐστὶν ἐκβαλεῖν.
(printed under page 195)
(88) ‹call not on this foot; Greek-text note› · call in col 381 (Greek text only)
Idem ms. ἀνενεκτέον. Tarinus, ἀνεκτέον.
The same manuscript [reads] ἀνενεκτέον. Tarin [reads] ἀνεκτέον.
(printed under page 195)
(89) ‹ἑαυτὸν τῷ ἐπισπάσασθαι› · call in col 381 (Greek text only)
Tarinus, τὸ ἐπισπάσασθαι.
Tarin [reads] τὸ ἐπισπάσασθαι.
(printed under page 195)
(20–24) ‹scripture references, set full width under the Interpretatio nova› · call in col 382 ²⁰ Jer. XVI, 21. ²¹ Luc. X, 4. ²² Matth. X. ²³ Matth. V. ²⁴ I Cor. VII, 18.
20 Jeremiah 16:21. 21 Luke 10:4. 22 Matthew 10. 23 Matthew 5. 24 1 Corinthians 7:18.
(printed under page 195)
(90) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 382
Sic mss. Editi vero « gelu et pruinis ut neque duas. »
So the manuscripts. But the printed editions [read] "gelu et pruinis ut neque duas."
(printed under page 195)
(91) ‹et videbuntur› · call in col 382
Editi « videbantur. » Infra mss. « sibi adesse deprehendimus. » Editi « sibi adesse comprehendimus. »
The printed editions [read] "videbantur." Below, the manuscripts [read] "sibi adesse deprehendimus"; the printed editions, "sibi adesse comprehendimus."
(printed under page 195)
(25–26) ‹ut bene sit tibi; testimonium dices› · call in col 383 ²⁵ Exod. XX, 12. ²⁶ Ibid. xx, 13.
25 Exodus 20:12. 26 Ibid. 20:13.
(printed under page 196)
(92) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 383
Sic mss. Editi vero « docere » Infra mss. « et singulæ eorum uxores. »
So the manuscripts; but the printed editions [read] "docere." Below, the manuscripts [read] "et singulae eorum uxores."
(printed under page 196)
(93) ‹χρησίμων νομοθεσίᾳ› · call in col 384 (Greek text only)
Duo mss., χρησίμῳ νομοθεσίᾳ.
Two manuscripts [read] χρησίμῳ νομοθεσίᾳ.
(printed under page 196)
(94) ‹τοῦ Σωτῆρος› · call in col 384 (Greek text only)
Tarinus, παρὰ τοῦ Σωτῆρος, sed primus codex Regius ut in nostro textu.
Tarin [reads] παρὰ τοῦ Σωτῆρος; but the first Royal manuscript [reads] as in our text.
(printed under page 196)
(95) ‹καὶ ἐντολὴν› · call in col 384 (Greek text only)
Idem codex, ἐντολάς.
The same manuscript [reads] ἐντολάς.
(printed under page 196)
(96) ‹τῶν ἀσθενούντων› · call in col 384 (Greek text only)
Primus cod. Reg., ἀσθενῶν.
The first Royal manuscript [reads] ἀσθενῶν.
(printed under page 196)
(97) ‹νοῦν φιλοτιμητέον› · call in col 385 (Greek text only)
Sic mss. Tarinus vero, φιλοτιμησάμενος. Paulo post Tarinus, περὶ τὴν κατὰ τὴν λέξιν ἀδυνάτων λόγων νοητῶς τοῖς οὐ μόνον ἀδυνάτοις. Sed codex Coislinianus ut in nostro textu.
So the manuscripts; but Tarin [reads] φιλοτιμησάμενος. A little later Tarin [reads] περὶ τὴν κατὰ τὴν λέξιν ἀδυνάτων λόγων νοητῶς τοῖς οὐ μόνον ἀδυνάτοις. But the Coislin manuscript [reads] as in our text.
(printed under page 197)
(98) ‹λεγόμεναι› · call in col 385 (Greek text only; the call in the Greek is printed "(99)")
Λεγόμεναι. Deest apud Tarinum, sed reperitur in duobus mss. Sunt autem qui pro λεγόμεναι malint τελούμεναι.
Λεγόμεναι: wanting in Tarin, but found in two manuscripts. And there are those who would prefer τελούμεναι in place of λεγόμεναι.
(printed under page 197)
(27–29) ‹scripture references, set under the Interpretatio nova› · call in col 386 ²⁷ Matth. V, 34. ²⁸ Ibid. 14. ²⁹ I Thess. V, 14.
27 Matthew 5:34. 28 Ibid. 14. 29 1 Thessalonians 5:14.
(printed under page 197)
(99) ‹consequenter› · call in col 386
Sic mss. Editi vero, « convenienter. » Mox mss., « electam esse a Deo. » Editi, « effectam esse a Deo. »
So the manuscripts; but the printed editions [read] "convenienter." Next, the manuscripts [read] "electam esse a Deo"; the printed editions, "effectam esse a Deo."
(printed under page 197)
(1) ‹metropolis autem› · call in col 386
Erat Jerusalem, metropolis autem. Haec desunt in editis, sed habentur in mss. Mox mss., « in aliis quidem divinis libris. » In editis deest « divinis. »
"Erat Jerusalem, metropolis autem": these words are wanting in the printed editions but are found in the manuscripts. Next, the manuscripts [read] "in aliis quidem divinis libris"; in the printed editions "divinis" is wanting.
(printed under page 197)
(30–31) ‹scripture references, set under the Interpretatio nova› · call in col 387 ³⁰ I Cor. X, 18. ³¹ Rom. IX, 6.
30 1 Corinthians 10:18. 31 Romans 9:6.
(printed under page 198)
(2) ‹Ἀλλ' οὐδὲ ὁ ἐν τῷ› · call in col 388 (Greek text only; Rufinus's Latin lacks this passage)
Ἀλλ' οὐδὲ ὁ ἐν τῷ, etc. Ab his verbis usque ad numerum 22 desideratur interpretatio Rufini.
Ἀλλ' οὐδὲ ὁ ἐν τῷ, etc.: from these words as far as number 22, Rufinus's translation is wanting.
(printed under page 198)
(3) ‹call not on this foot; Greek-text note› · call in col 388 (Greek text only)
Primus codex Regius, σωματικῶν.
The first Royal manuscript [reads] σωματικῶν.
(printed under page 198)
(4) ‹call not on this foot; Greek-text note› · call in col 388 (Greek text only)
Ita secundus Regius. Tarinus vero, ἐπαγγελλόμεναι.
So the second Royal manuscript; but Tarin [reads] ἐπαγγελλόμεναι.
(printed under page 198)
(5) ‹call not on this foot; Greek-text note› · call in col 388 (Greek text only)
Primus cod Reg., ἐπανερχώμεθα.
The first Royal manuscript [reads] ἐπανερχώμεθα.
(printed under page 198)
(6) ‹call not on this foot; Greek-text note› · call in col 389 (Greek text only)
Primus Regius, χρήσασθαι.
The first Royal manuscript [reads] χρήσασθαι.
(printed under page 199)
(7) ‹call not on this foot; Greek-text note› · call in col 389 (Greek text only)
Sic idem codex. Tarinus, ἐκ Θεοῦ. Legendum videtur, εἰ Παύλου ὡς Θεοῦ.
So the same manuscript. Tarin [reads] ἐκ Θεοῦ. It seems one should read εἰ Παύλου ὡς Θεοῦ.
(printed under page 199)
(32–34) ‹scripture references, set under the Interpretatio nova› · call in col 390 ³² Matth. XV, 24. ³³ Galat. iv, 26. ³⁴ Hebr. XII, 22.
32 Matthew 15:24. 33 Galatians 4:26. 34 Hebrews 12:22.
(printed under page 199)
(8) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 390
Ebion namque pauper apud Hebræos interpretatur. Desunt in editis, sed habentur in mss. Infra mss., « quæ ascripta est in cœlis. » Editi, « quæ scripta est in cœlis. »
"Ebion namque pauper apud Hebraeos interpretatur": these words are wanting in the printed editions but are found in the manuscripts. Below, the manuscripts [read] "quae ascripta est in coelis"; the printed editions, "quae scripta est in coelis."
(printed under page 199)
(9) ‹vel de Judæa› · call in col 390
Sic mss. Editi, « Juda. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions [read] "Juda."
(printed under page 199)
(35–37) ‹scripture references, set under the Interpretatio nova› · call in col 391 ³⁵ Ezech. XXIX et seq. ³⁶ Ezech. XXVI et seq. ³⁷ Isa. xiv.
35 Ezekiel 29 and following. 36 Ezekiel 26 and following. 37 Isaiah 14.
(printed under page 200)
(10) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 391
Vide l. ii Origenian., q. 11, num. 11.
See Origeniana, book II, question 11, number 11.
(printed under page 200)
(11) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 391
Propheta de Pharaone rege Ægypti. Hæc desunt in editis, sed habentur in mss. Mox mss., « textus ipse indicat lectionis. » Editi, « exitus ipse indicat lectionis. » Vide notas ad librum i, c. 5, num 4 et 5.
"Propheta de Pharaone rege Aegypti": these words are wanting in the printed editions but are found in the manuscripts. Next, the manuscripts [read] "textus ipse indicat lectionis"; the printed editions, "exitus ipse indicat lectionis." See the notes on book I, chapter 5, numbers 4 and 5.
(printed under page 200)
(12) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 391
Non possunt intelligi de aliquo homine veluti rege Tyri dicta; sed et de Nabuchodonosor ea quæ multis in locis ab Scriptura dicuntur. Hæc omnia desunt in editis, sed habentur in mss. Infra mss., « ita dignius possit intelligi. » Editi, « ita digne possit intelligi. »
"Non possunt intelligi de aliquo homine veluti rege Tyri dicta; sed et de Nabuchodonosor ea quae multis in locis ab Scriptura dicuntur": all these words are wanting in the printed editions but are found in the manuscripts. Below, the manuscripts [read] "ita dignius possit intelligi"; the printed editions, "ita digne possit intelligi."
(printed under page 200)
(13) ‹videndum est (13)› · call in col 391
Sed videndum est, etc. Hæc et sequentia usque ad num 23 desunt in textu Græco.
"Sed videndum est," etc.: these words and those that follow, as far as number 23, are wanting in the Greek text.
(printed under page 200)
(14) ‹in Babyloniam› · call in col 391
Sic mss. Editi, « Babylonem. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions [read] "Babylonem."
(printed under page 200)
(15) ‹Et forsitan quomodo› · call in col 391 (Jerome's version)
Et forsitan quomodo, etc. Fragmentum istud, quod Latine e Græco versum exhibet Hieronymus in epistola ad Avitum, Græco utcunque respondet at sequentis fragmenti quod affert ibidem, nullum exstat in versione Rufini vestigium, nec in Græco textu qui ultra numerum 23 non excurrit. Hic tamen illud apposuimus quod commodior alibi non videretur locus. De utroque hæc adnotat sanctus doctor : « Quibus dictis (Origenes) nititur approbare, et firmamentum, id est, cœlum ad comparationem superioris cœli esse inferos, et hanc terram quam incolimus collatione firmamenti inferos appellari; et rursum ad comparationem inferorum qui subter nos sunt, nos cœlum dici, ut quod aliis infernus est, aliis cœlum sit.
"Et forsitan quomodo," etc.: this fragment, which Jerome gives translated from Greek into Latin in his letter to Avitus, answers more or less to the Greek; but of the following fragment, which he cites in the same place, no trace survives in Rufinus's version, nor in the Greek text, which does not run beyond number 23. We have nevertheless set it here, because no more suitable place appeared elsewhere. On both the holy doctor remarks: "By these words (Origen) strives to prove both that the firmament, that is, the heaven, is the underworld in comparison with the higher heaven, and that this earth which we inhabit is called the underworld in comparison with the firmament; and again, that in comparison with the underworld beneath us we are called heaven, so that what is the underworld to some is heaven to others."
(printed under page 200)
(16) ‹23. (16) Fortassis enim› · call in col 391
Vide l. ii Origenian., q. 11, n. 3 et 11.
See Origeniana, book II, question 11, numbers 3 and 11.
(printed under page 200)
(17) ‹call not on this foot; Greek-text note› · call in col 392 (Greek text only)
Sic mss. Tarinus vero, ἐρημωθησόμενος ὥστε.
So the manuscripts; but Tarin [reads] ἐρημωθησόμενος ὥστε.
(18–19) ‹call not on this foot; Greek-text note› · call in col 392 (Greek text only) Primus Reg., μεμελανωμένοις.
The first Royal manuscript [reads] μεμελανωμένοις.
(printed under page 200)
(20) ‹οἱ ἐντεῦθεν› · call in col 392 (Greek text only)
Τάχα δὲ ὥσπερ οἱ ἐντεῦθεν, etc. Vide clarissimum Huetium Origenianorum lib. ii, quæst. 11 num. 3.
Τάχα δὲ ὥσπερ οἱ ἐντεῦθεν, etc.: see the most illustrious Huet, Origeniana, book II, question 11, number 3.
(printed under page 200)
(21) ‹ἐνταῦθα› · call in col 392 (Greek text only)
Primus cod. Reg., αὐτόθι.
The first Royal manuscript [reads] αὐτόθι.
(printed under page 200)
(23) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 393
Hunc locum in editis corruptum sic restituunt mss. In antea editis legitur, « in hunc locum descendunt. Nam illis infernæ hic morientium animæ dicuntur. Credo ob hanc distinctionem, » etc. Ibidem mss., « sicut dicitur, » quod deest in editis.
This passage, corrupt in the printed editions, the manuscripts restore thus. In the earlier editions one reads "in hunc locum descendunt. Nam illis infernae hic morientium animae dicuntur. Credo ob hanc distinctionem," etc. In the same place the manuscripts [have] "sicut dicitur," which is wanting in the printed editions.
(printed under page 201)
(24) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 393
Sic mss. Editi, « inhabitaverat. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions [read] "inhabitaverat."
(printed under page 201)
(25) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 393
Unde consequens, etc. Ab his verbis usque ad ista, « quæ omnia, ut diximus, » etc., desideratur textus Græcus cujus jacturam utcunque reparat alterum versionis sancti Hieronymi appositum e regione fragmentum, cujus utique textus Græcus interiit.
"Unde consequens," etc.: from these words as far as these, "quae omnia, ut diximus," etc., the Greek text is wanting; its loss is in some measure made good by the second fragment of Saint Jerome's version, set opposite, whose Greek text has likewise perished.
(25*) ‹illis gentibus› · call in col 393 Sic mss. Male editi, « generibus. » Paulo post mss., « evidentes et satis manifestas assertiones horum. » Editi, « evidentiores rationes eorum. »
So the manuscripts; the printed editions wrongly [read] "generibus." A little later the manuscripts [read] "evidentes et satis manifestas assertiones horum"; the printed editions, "evidentiores rationes eorum."
(printed under page 201)
(26) ‹populis præfuerint› · call in col 393
Regendisque populis præfuerint. Hæc desunt in antea editis, reperiuntur autem in mss. Paulo post mss., « in quo diligentius considera si non indicatur. » Editi, « id quo dilucidius considera si non dicatur. » Mox mss., « ille vero altior et profundior. » Editi, « ille vero altior et profundus. »
"Regendisque populis praefuerint": these words are wanting in the earlier editions but are found in the manuscripts. A little later the manuscripts [read] "in quo diligentius considera si non indicatur"; the printed editions, "id quo dilucidius considera si non dicatur." Next, the manuscripts [read] "ille vero altior et profundior"; the printed editions, "ille vero altior et profundus."
(printed under page 201)
(38–39) ‹scripture references, set under the Interpretatio nova› · call in col 394 ³⁸ Psal. LXXXV, 13. ³⁹ Matth. XIII, 44.
38 Psalm 85:13. 39 Matthew 13:44.
(printed under page 201)
(22) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 394 (column not certain from the foot)
Caute lege.
Read with caution.
(printed under page 201)
(27) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 394 (column not certain from the foot)
Caute lege.
Read with caution.
(printed under page 201)
(39–42) ‹scripture references, set under the Interpretatio nova› · call in col 395 ³⁹⁻⁴⁰ Isa. xlv. ⁴¹ Rom. IX, 6. ⁴² Hebr. VIII, 5.
39–40 Isaiah 45. 41 Romans 9:6. 42 Hebrews 8:5.
(printed under page 202)
(28) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 395 (column not certain from the foot)
Sic mss. Editi, « innumerabiles. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions [read] "innumerabiles."
(printed under page 202)
(29) ‹non adducuntur› · call in col 396
Sic mss. Editi, « adduntur. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions [read] "adduntur."
(printed under page 202)
(30) ‹ad sanctum numerum› · call in col 396
Præcipue tamen ad sanctum numerum, etc. Sanctus Hieronymus epist. 94 ad Avitum hunc locum carpere videtur his verbis : « Dicit (Origenes) in fine omnium rerum, quando ad cœlestem Jerusalem reversuri sumus, adversariarum fortitudinum contra populum Dei bella consurgere, ut non sit eorum otiosa virtus, sed exerceantur ad prælia, et habeant materiam roboris, quam utique consequi non possint, nisi fortes primum adversariis institerint, quos ratione et ordine et solertia repugnandi, in libro Numerorum legimus esse superatos. » Verum hæc omnia quæ legerat in Græco Hieronymus, aut dissimulavit Rufinus, aut in alium sensum detorsit.
"Praecipue tamen ad sanctum numerum," etc.: Saint Jerome, in letter 94 to Avitus, seems to censure this passage in these words: "He (Origen) says that at the end of all things, when we are to return to the heavenly Jerusalem, wars of the adverse powers will rise against the people of God, so that their strength may not be idle but may be exercised for battles and have matter for its might, which they could not attain unless they first stood firm against adversaries, whom we read in the book of Numbers to have been overcome by method and order and skill in fighting back." But all these things that Jerome had read in the Greek, Rufinus either passed over in silence or twisted into another sense.
(printed under page 202)
(31) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 397 (column not certain from the foot)
Spei. Deest in editis, sed habetur in mss.
"Spei": wanting in the printed editions, but found in the manuscripts.
(31*) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 397 (column not certain from the foot) Alii legunt charitatis. Edit. Patrol.
Others read "charitatis." Editor of the Patrologia.
(printed under page 203)
(32) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 397
Sic mss. Editi vero, « pecora et multa alia possidentes præveniunt et præcipiunt locum aptum partubus. »
So the manuscripts; but the printed editions [read] "pecora et multa alia possidentes praeveniunt et praecipiunt locum aptum partubus."
(printed under page 203)
(33) ‹audire non potuit› · call in col 397
Sic mss. Editi, « eam quam a Deo audire non potuit legem. » Mox mss. « significare videbitur. » Editi, « significare videatur. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions [read] "eam quam a Deo audire non potuit legem." Next, the manuscripts [read] "significare videbitur"; the printed editions, "significare videatur."
(printed under page 203)
(43–44) ‹scripture references, set under the Interpretatio nova› · call in col 398 ⁴³ Thren. IV, 20. ⁴⁴ Apoc. XIV, 6.
43 Lamentations 4:20. 44 Revelation 14:6.
(printed under page 203)
(34) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 398 (column not certain from the foot)
Primo. Deest in antea editis, sed habetur in mss.
"Primo": wanting in the earlier editions, but found in the manuscripts.
(printed under page 203)
(35) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 398 (column not certain from the foot)
Legibus. Deest in editis, reperitur autem in mss.
"Legibus": wanting in the printed editions, but found in the manuscripts.
(printed under page 203)
(36) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 398 (column not certain from the foot)
Adventum. Deest in editis, sed habetur in mss. Paulo post mss., « dignius omnes sanctos. » Editi, « dignos omnes sanctos. »
"Adventum": wanting in the printed editions, but found in the manuscripts. A little later the manuscripts [read] "dignius omnes sanctos"; the printed editions, "dignos omnes sanctos."
(printed under page 203)
(37) ‹call not on this foot; Jerome's version› · call in col 398 (column not certain from the foot)
Sicut enim per umbram Evangelii, etc. Commodiorem locum non reperi ubi celebre istud insererem fragmentum quod e lib. iv Περὶ ἀρχῶν affert Hieronymus in epistola ad Avitum. Postremæ partis quæ futuram in cœlis Salvatoris passionem innuere videtur, Græca verba repræsentat Justinianus ad calcem epistolæ ad Menam. At vero ultima verba ἕως τῆς συντελείας τοῦ παντὸς αἰῶνος, cum verterit sanctus Hieronymus, « in consummatione sæculorum, » clarissimus Huetius Origenianorum lib. ii, quæst. 3, num. 23, pro ἕως legendum putat ἐπί. Cæterum utrum revera opinatus sit Origenes Christum aliquando in supernis locis passurum, disquirit Huetius ibidem num. 23 et 24.
"Sicut enim per umbram Evangelii," etc.: I found no more suitable place in which to insert this celebrated fragment, which Jerome cites from Book IV of the Περὶ ἀρχῶν in his letter to Avitus. The Greek words of its last part, which seems to hint at a future passion of the Saviour in the heavens, Justinian gives at the end of his letter to Menas. But since Saint Jerome rendered the last words, ἕως τῆς συντελείας τοῦ παντὸς αἰῶνος, as "in consummatione saeculorum," the most illustrious Huet (Origeniana, book II, question 3, number 23) thinks ἐπί should be read for ἕως. Whether Origen really held that Christ would at some time suffer in the regions above, Huet investigates in the same place, numbers 23 and 24.
(printed under page 203)
(38) ‹inquirere voluerimus› · call in col 398 (Jerome's version)
Caute lege.
Read with caution.
(printed under page 203)
(45–53) ‹scripture references, set full width› · call in col 399 and col 400 ⁴⁵ Ps. XLIV, 14. ⁴⁶ Rom. XI, 33. ⁴⁷ Ibid. ⁴⁸ Eccle. VII, 24. ⁴⁹ Isa. xli, 22, 23. ⁵⁰ Isa. vi, 3. ⁵¹ Eccli. XVI, 22. ⁵² Coloss. I, 15. ⁵³ Ibid. 17.
45 Psalm 44:14. 46 Romans 11:33. 47 Ibid. 48 Ecclesiastes 7:24. 49 Isaiah 41:22–23. 50 Isaiah 6:3. 51 Ecclesiasticus 16:22. 52 Colossians 1:15. 53 Ibid. 17.
(printed under page 204)
(39) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 399
Dei. Deest in editis, sed habetur in mss.
"Dei": wanting in the printed editions, but found in the manuscripts.
(printed under page 204)
(40) ‹investigari posse› · call in col 399
Posse. Deest item in editis.
"Posse": likewise wanting in the printed editions.
(printed under page 204)
(41) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 399 (column not certain from the foot)
Nam et Hebræus doctor, etc. Vide lib. i, cap. 3, n. 4, ubi eadem fere reperiuntur et verba Græca apponuntur.
"Nam et Hebraeus doctor," etc.: see book I, chapter 3, number 4, where nearly the same words are found and the Greek words are set beside them.
(printed under page 204)
(49–53) ‹scripture references› · call in col 400 ⁴⁹ Isa. XLI, 22, 23. ⁵⁰ Isa. VI, 3. ⁵¹ Eccli. XVI, 22. ⁵² Coloss. I, 15. ⁵³ Ibid. 17.
49 Isaiah 41:22, 23. 50 Isaiah 6:3. 51 Sirach 16:22. 52 Colossians 1:15. 53 Ibid. 1:17.
(printed under page 204)
(41) ‹Nam et Hebræus doctor› · call in col 400
Nam et Hebræus doctor, etc. Vide lib. I, cap. 3, n. 4, ubi eadem fere reperiuntur et verba Græca apponuntur.
"Nam et Hebraeus doctor", etc.: see Book I, chapter 3, no. 4, where nearly the same things are found and the Greek words are added.
(printed under page 204)
(42) ‹Seraphim› · call in col 400
Seraphim. Deest in editis. Ibidem mss., « in facie Dei et in pedibus ejus. » Editi, « in faciem Dei et sub pedibus ejus. » Infra mss. « quos annumeravit spiritus. » Editi, « qui annumerantur spiritus. » Paulo post mss., « assequi poterunt. » Editi, « assequi potuerunt. » Infra mss., « cui est gloria in sæcula. » Editi, « cui est gloria in sæcula sæculorum, amen. » Mox mss. « parum de nominibus. » Editi, « parum de omnibus nominibus. »
"Seraphim": wanting in the printed editions. In the same place the manuscripts [read] "in facie Dei et in pedibus ejus"; the printed editions, "in faciem Dei et sub pedibus ejus." Below, the manuscripts [read] "quos annumeravit spiritus"; the printed editions, "qui annumerantur spiritus." A little later the manuscripts [read] "assequi poterunt"; the printed editions, "assequi potuerunt." Below, the manuscripts [read] "cui est gloria in saecula"; the printed editions, "cui est gloria in saecula saeculorum, amen." Next, the manuscripts [read] "parum de nominibus"; the printed editions, "parum de omnibus nominibus."
(printed under page 204)
(43) ‹Paulus dicit› · call in col 400
Paulus dicit. Sic mss. Editi vero, « dicunt. » Infra mss., « quorum significatio proprie nullis omnino potest humanæ linguæ sermonibus explicari. » Editi, « quorum significationem proprie nullus omnino potest humanæ linguæ sermonibus explicare. » Paulo post mss. recte omnino : « non pro vilitate sermonis. » Male editi, « non pro utilitate sermonis. »
"Paulus dicit": so the manuscripts; but the printed editions [read] "dicunt." Below, the manuscripts [read] "quorum significatio proprie nullis omnino potest humanae linguae sermonibus explicari"; the printed editions, "quorum significationem proprie nullus omnino potest humanae linguae sermonibus explicare." A little later the manuscripts read, quite rightly, "non pro vilitate sermonis"; the printed editions wrongly, "non pro utilitate sermonis."
(printed under page 204)
(44) ‹call not on this foot; Greek-text note› · call in col 401 (Greek text only)
Ὅρα ἐπαναλαβόντα, etc. Marcello Ancyrano (ut videre est apud Eusebium lib. i adversus eumdem Marcellum) hæc admodum displicebant : quod inde sequi putaret Origenem secundam quamdam substantiam δευτέραν ὑπόθεσιν in Filio agnoscere. Verum si per se spectetur hic locus, catholicus est, nec aliud docet Origenes, ut optime adnotavit Eusebius, quam non licere corporalem quamdam et passivam generationem divinitatis Filii Dei commisceri. Certe nullus calumniæ locus relinquetur, si quæ statim hunc locum excipiunt in versione Rufini, genuina prorsus sunt et sincera : Huetius autem putat hæc verba : « Aut ex nullis substantibus Filium procreatum a Patre, id est extra substantiam suam, ut fuerit aliquando quando non fuerit, » vel a Rufino fuisse interpretationi intexta, vel ab aliis Rufino antiquioribus Græco ipsi contextui inserta contra Arium, quem Sozomenus ait πρότερον παρ' ἑτέρου μὴ εἰρημένον τολμῆσαι ἐν Ἐκκλησίᾳ ἀποφήνασθαι τὸν Υἱὸν τοῦ Θεοῦ ἐξ οὐκ ὄντων γεγενῆσθαι, καὶ εἶναί ποτε ὅτε οὐκ ἦν : « primum in Ecclesia ausum esse dicere quod nemo ante illum dixerat, Filium scilicet Dei ex non exstantibus exstitisse, et fuisse aliquando cum non esset. » Sed falsus est Sozomenus. Athanasius enim libro De decretis Nicænæ synodi, pag. 233, Origenis verba refert quæ huic Rufinianæ versionis loco valde affinia sunt, et ex quibus liquet ante Arium fuisse hæreticos qui dicerent « fuisse aliquando quando non erat Filius, » quosque sic refellit Origenes : Εἰ ἔστιν εἰκὼν τοῦ Θεοῦ τοῦ ἀοράτου, ἀόρατος εἰκών, ἐγὼ δὲ τολμήσας προσθείην ἄν, ὅτι καὶ ὁμοιότης τυγχάνων τοῦ Πατρὸς, οὐκ ἔστιν ὅτε οὐκ ἦν. Πότε γὰρ ὁ Θεὸς ὁ κατὰ τὸν Ἰωάννην φῶς λεγόμενος (ὁ Θεὸς γὰρ φῶς ἐστίν) ἀπαύγασμα οὐκ εἶχε τῆς ἰδίας δόξης, ἵνα τολμήσας τις ἀρχὴν δῷ εἶναι Υἱοῦ πρότερον οὐκ ὄντος; Πότε δὲ ἡ τῆς ἀῤῥήτου καὶ ἀκατονομάστου καὶ ἀφθέγκτου ὑποστάσεως τοῦ Πατρὸς εἰκών, ὁ χαρακτήρ, Λόγος, ὁ γινώσκων τὸν Πατέρα, οὐκ ἦν; Κατανοείτω γὰρ ὁ τολμῶν, καὶ λέγων, Ἦν ποτε ὅτε οὐκ ἦν ὁ Υἱὸς, ὅτι ἐρεῖ καὶ τό· Σοφία ποτὲ οὐκ ἦν, καὶ Λόγος οὐκ ἦν, καὶ ζωὴ οὐκ ἦν. « Si est imago Dei invisibilis, invisibilis quoque est ipsa imago. Quin etiam addere ausim, cum sit similitudo Patris, non posse fieri ut aliquando non fuerit. Quando enim Deus quem Joannes lucem appellat (nam Deus lux est), propriæ gloriæ splendore caruit, ut quis audeat principium exsistendi Filio tribuere, quasi scilicet antea non fuisset? Quandonam vero non erat Verbum, Verbum, inquam, quod et Patrem cognoscit, et est character ac imago ejusdem substantiæ, quæ digne nec exprimi, nec nominari, nec proferri possit? Intelligat enim qui dicere audet : Fuit aliquando cum non esset Filius, idem esse ac si diceret : Sapientia aliquando non erat, Verbum non erat, vita non erat. » Idem Origenes rursus ita alibi loquitur teste Athanasio ibidem : Ἀλλ' οὐ θέμις ἐστὶν οὐδὲ ἀκίνδυνον διὰ τὴν ἀσθένειαν ἡμῶν τὸ, ὅσον ἐφ' ἡμῖν, ἀποστερεῖσθαι τὸν Θεὸν τοῦ ἀεὶ συνόντος αὐτῷ Λόγου μονογενοῦς, σοφίας ὄντος ᾗ προσέχαιρεν· οὕτω γὰρ οὐδὲ ἀεὶ χαίρων νοηθήσεται. « Verum nefas est nec periculo vacat propter nostram infirmitatem, Deum, quantum in nobis est, unigenito privare Verbo quod semper cum illo fuit, et illa erat sapientia qua delectabatur. Alioquin eum non semper fuisse delectatum intelligendum erit. » Vide lib. ii Origenian., q. 2.
"Ὅρα ἐπαναλαβόντα," etc.: these words greatly displeased Marcellus of Ancyra (as may be seen in Eusebius, book I against that same Marcellus), because he thought it followed from them that Origen acknowledged in the Son a certain second substance, a δευτέραν ὑπόθεσιν. But if this passage is regarded in itself it is catholic, and Origen teaches nothing else, as Eusebius very well observed, than that it is not lawful to mix with the divinity of the Son of God a bodily and passible generation. Certainly no room for calumny will be left if what immediately follows this passage in Rufinus's version is wholly genuine and sound. Huet, however, thinks that these words, "Or that the Son was begotten by the Father from no substances, that is, outside His own substance, so that there was once a time when He was not," were either woven into the translation by Rufinus or inserted into the Greek text itself, against Arius, by others older than Rufinus: Arius, who Sozomen says πρότερον παρ' ἑτέρου μὴ εἰρημένον τολμῆσαι ἐν Ἐκκλησίᾳ ἀποφήνασθαι τὸν Υἱὸν τοῦ Θεοῦ ἐξ οὐκ ὄντων γεγενῆσθαι, καὶ εἶναί ποτε ὅτε οὐκ ἦν: "first dared to say in the Church what no one before him had said, namely that the Son of God came to be from things that did not exist, and that there was once a time when He was not." But Sozomen is mistaken. For Athanasius, in his book On the Decrees of the Synod of Nicaea, page 233, quotes words of Origen closely akin to this passage of Rufinus's version, from which it is clear that before Arius there were heretics who said "that there was once a time when the Son was not," and whom Origen refutes thus: [Greek as printed, rendered by the Latin that follows:] "If He is the image of the invisible God, the image itself is invisible too. Indeed I would dare to add that, since He is the likeness of the Father, it cannot be that there was a time when He was not. For when did God, whom John calls light (for God is light), lack the radiance of His own glory, that anyone should dare to assign to the Son a beginning of existence, as though He had not been before? And when was the Word not, the Word, I say, who knows the Father and is the stamp and image of that same substance, which can be fittingly neither expressed nor named nor uttered? Let him who dares to say 'There was a time when the Son was not' understand that it is the same as if he said 'Wisdom once was not, the Word was not, life was not.'" The same Origen speaks thus again elsewhere, on the witness of Athanasius in the same place: [Greek as printed, rendered by the Latin that follows:] "But it is unlawful, and not without danger because of our weakness, to deprive God, so far as lies in us, of the only-begotten Word who was always with Him, and who was that wisdom in which He delighted. Otherwise it will have to be understood that He was not always delighted." See Origeniana, book II, question 2.
(printed under page 205)
(54) ‹Deus lux est› · call in col 402
⁵⁴ I Joan. I.
54 1 John 1.
(printed under page 205)
(45) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 402 (column not certain from the foot) · (continues)
Sic mss. Editi « habebit necessario corpus. » Paulo post mss., « partem aliquam substantiæ Dei in Filium versam aut ex nullis substantibus. » Libb.
So the manuscripts. The printed editions [read] "habebit necessario corpus." A little later the manuscripts [read] "partem aliquam substantiae Dei in Filium versam aut ex nullis substantibus." The books …
(printed under page 205)
(55–61) ‹scripture references, set full width› · call in col 403 and col 404 ⁵⁵ Hebr. I. ⁵⁶ II Cor. XIII, 3. ⁵⁷ Galat. ii, 20. ⁵⁸ Matth. XXII; Luc. XX. ⁵⁹ Coloss. I, 16. ⁶⁰ Joan. I, 3. ⁶¹ Psalm. xxxii, 6.
55 Hebrews 1. 56 2 Corinthians 13:3. 57 Galatians 2:20. 58 Matthew 22; Luke 20. 59 Colossians 1:16. 60 John 1:3. 61 Psalm 32:6.
(printed under page 206)
(46) ‹nemo consequenter› · call in col 403
Sic mss. Editi vero, « convenienter. »
So the manuscripts; but the printed editions [read] "convenienter."
(printed under page 206)
(47) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 404 (column not certain from the foot)
Aliis. Deest in editis, at reperitur in mss. Paulo post mss. « secundum evangelicam sententiam. » Editi, « secundum doctrinam evangelicam. » Mox mss. « de Trinitatis ratione. » Editi, « de æternitatis ratione. »
"Aliis": wanting in the printed editions, but found in the manuscripts. A little later the manuscripts [read] "secundum evangelicam sententiam"; the printed editions, "secundum doctrinam evangelicam." Next, the manuscripts [read] "de Trinitatis ratione"; the printed editions, "de aeternitatis ratione."
(printed under page 206)
(48) ‹conditione significans› · call in col 404
Sic mss. Editi, « universorum conditiones significans. » Mox mss., « competenter admonebimus. » Editi, « consequenter admonebimus. » Paulo post mss., « intra brevissimi corporis claustra conclusa est, ita ut. » Editi, « in brevissimi corporis claustro clausa est, ut. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions [read] "universorum conditiones significans." Next, the manuscripts [read] "competenter admonebimus"; the printed editions, "consequenter admonebimus." A little later the manuscripts [read] "intra brevissimi corporis claustra conclusa est, ita ut"; the printed editions, "in brevissimi corporis claustro clausa est, ut."
(printed under page 206)
(49) ‹intra corporis› · call in col 404
Sic recte mss. Editi, « cordis. » Mox mss., « cauta pietatis debet. » Editi, « una pietatis debet. » Paulo post mss., « putetur esse divulsio. » Editi, « putetur esse divisio. » Paulo infra mss., « corrigiam calceamentorum. » Editi, « corrigiam calceamenti. »
So the manuscripts, rightly. The printed editions [read] "cordis." Next, the manuscripts [read] "cauta pietatis debet"; the printed editions, "una pietatis debet." A little later the manuscripts [read] "putetur esse divulsio"; the printed editions, "putetur esse divisio." A little below, the manuscripts [read] "corrigiam calceamentorum"; the printed editions, "corrigiam calceamenti."
(printed under page 206)
(62–73) ‹scripture references, set full width› · call in col 405 and col 406 ⁶² Joan. I, 26. ⁶³ Joan. X, 18. ⁶⁴ Matth. XXVI, 38. ⁶⁵ Joan. XII, 27. ⁶⁶ Job xiv, 4, 5. ⁶⁷ Isai. VII. ⁶⁸ Psal. XLIV, 8. ⁶⁹ Colos. iii, 3. ⁷⁰ I Joan. II, 6. ⁷¹ II Cor. XIII, 4. ⁷² I Cor. II, 2. ⁷³ Philipp. II, 6.
62 John 1:26. 63 John 10:18. 64 Matthew 26:38. 65 John 12:27. 66 Job 14:4–5. 67 Isaiah 7. 68 Psalm 44:8. 69 Colossians 3:3. 70 1 John 2:6. 71 2 Corinthians 13:4. 72 1 Corinthians 2:2. 73 Philippians 2:6.
(printed under page 207)
(50) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 405 (column not certain from the foot)
Sic mss. Editi vero : « neque tamen per hoc illum affirmare credendum est, quod pars. » Paulo post mss., « de incorporeo partem dici aut divisionem aliquam fieri, sed, » etc. In editis, legitur « ab » pro « de, » et omittitur « fieri. »
So the manuscripts; but the printed editions [read] "neque tamen per hoc illum affirmare credendum est, quod pars." A little later the manuscripts [read] "de incorporeo partem dici aut divisionem aliquam fieri, sed," etc. In the printed editions "ab" is read for "de," and "fieri" is omitted.
(printed under page 207)
(51) ‹manifestissime (51)› · call in col 405
Ita recte mss. Editi vero, « quali omnes voluntates et dispensationes Verbi ac sapientiæ indeclinabilis possint impleri. Quod autem habuerit, manifestissime. » Paulo post mss., « sicut fuit in anima Pauli. » Editi, « sicut fuerit in anima Pauli. » Mox mss., « illud sentiendum est. » Editi, « sciendum est. »
So the manuscripts, rightly; but the printed editions [read] "quali omnes voluntates et dispensationes Verbi ac sapientiae indeclinabilis possint impleri. Quod autem habuerit, manifestissime." A little later the manuscripts [read] "sicut fuit in anima Pauli"; the printed editions, "sicut fuerit in anima Pauli." Next, the manuscripts [read] "illud sentiendum est"; the printed editions, "sciendum est."
(printed under page 207)
(52) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 406 (column not certain from the foot)
Ipso. Ita mss. Editi vero, « Christo. » Mox editi, « quis enim alius intelligendus est Christus qui in eo absconditus. »
"Ipso": so the manuscripts; but the printed editions [read] "Christo." Next, the printed editions [read] "quis enim alius intelligendus est Christus qui in eo absconditus."
(printed under page 207)
(53) ‹rationabiles dicimur› · call in col 406
Sic mss. Editi, « dicuntur. » Infra mss. recte, « de ipsa anima dictum videri. » Editi, « de ipsa anima Dei videri. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions [read] "dicuntur." Below, the manuscripts rightly [read] "de ipsa anima dictum videri"; the printed editions, "de ipsa anima Dei videri."
(printed under page 207)
(54) ‹se exinaniverat› · call in col 406 (the last line is smudged in the scan; readings in square brackets are uncertain)
Sic mss. Editi, « [exinanivit]. » Mox mss., « in Filium adoptatur. » Editi « [in Filio adoptatur]. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions [read] "[exinanivit]." Next, the manuscripts [read] "in Filium adoptatur"; the printed editions, "[in Filio adoptatur]."
(printed under page 207)
(74–76) ‹scripture references› · call in col 407 ⁷⁴ Isa. x, 17. ⁷⁵ Sap. XI, 18. ⁷⁶ Gen. I, 1.
74 Isaiah 10:17. 75 Wisdom 11:18. 76 Genesis 1:1.
(printed under page 208)
(55) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 407
Sic mss. Editi, « corporalibus. » Infra mss., « significare invenietur. » Editi, « signare invenietur. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions [read] "corporalibus." Below, the manuscripts [read] "significare invenietur"; the printed editions, "signare invenietur."
(printed under page 208)
(56) ‹Non enim, inquit› · call in col 407
Inquit. Deest in antea editis. Mox mss. recte, « multitudinem ursorum. » Editi, « similitudinem ursorum. »
"Inquit": wanting in the earlier editions. Next, the manuscripts rightly [read] "multitudinem ursorum"; the printed editions, "similitudinem ursorum."
(printed under page 208)
(57) ‹non aliud eis› · call in col 407
Sic mss. Editi, « esse. » Paulo post mss., « unum aliquod elementum. » Editi, « unum ad elementum. » Paulo post mss., « convertibilem substantiam vel mutabilem vel divisibilem. » In editis deest, « substantiam, » et « vel divisibilem. » Post paululum mss., « secundum hæc quæ in prioribus. » Editi, « secundum hæc enim in prioribus. »
So the manuscripts. The printed editions [read] "esse." A little later the manuscripts [read] "unum aliquod elementum"; the printed editions, "unum ad elementum." A little later the manuscripts [read] "convertibilem substantiam vel mutabilem vel divisibilem"; in the printed editions "substantiam" and "vel divisibilem" are wanting. Shortly after, the manuscripts [read] "secundum haec quae in prioribus"; the printed editions, "secundum haec enim in prioribus."
(printed under page 208)
(58) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 408 (column not certain from the foot)
Recte mss., « esse. » Male vero editi, « est. » Mox mss., « nihil aliud esse naturam corpoream. » Editi, « nihil aliud esse materiam corpoream. »
Rightly the manuscripts [read] "esse"; but wrongly the printed editions, "est." Next, the manuscripts [read] "nihil aliud esse naturam corpoream"; the printed editions, "nihil aliud esse materiam corpoream."
(printed under page 208)
(59) ‹quod vigilat› · call in col 408
Sic omnes mss. Editi, « in eo qui vigilat vel in eo qui dormit, aut in eo qui loquitur. »
So all the manuscripts. The printed editions [read] "in eo qui vigilat vel in eo qui dormit, aut in eo qui loquitur."
(printed under page 208)
(77) ‹call not on this foot› · call in col 409
⁷⁷ Psal. CXXXVIII, 16.
77 Psalm 138:16.
(printed under page 209)
(60) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 409
Ita optime mss. Male editi, « imperfectum meum viderunt oculi tui ; » ex sequentibus enim liquet Origenem vitiosa lectione deceptum existimasse non Deum prophetæ, sed prophetam « imperfectum » Dei vidisse. Paulo post mss. ; « a qualitatibus dividens. » Editi, « a quantitatibus dividens. »
So the manuscripts, very well. The printed editions wrongly [read] "imperfectum meum viderunt oculi tui"; for it is clear from what follows that Origen, misled by a faulty reading, thought that it was not God who saw the prophet's "imperfect" but the prophet who saw God's. A little later the manuscripts [read] "a qualitatibus dividens"; the printed editions, "a quantitatibus dividens."
(printed under page 209)
(61) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 409
Quæque rerum visibilium. Hæc desunt in antea editis, sed habentur in mss. Ibidem mss., « ad principium venerit. » Editi, « ad principium veniret. » Mox mss., « absque qualitatibus perviderit. » Editi, « absque quantitatibus pervidet. »
"Quaeque rerum visibilium": these words are wanting in the earlier editions but are found in the manuscripts. In the same place the manuscripts [read] "ad principium venerit"; the printed editions, "ad principium veniret." Next, the manuscripts [read] "absque qualitatibus perviderit"; the printed editions, "absque quantitatibus pervidet."
(printed under page 209)
(62) ‹natura bonus› · call in col 409
Bonus. Deest in antea editis, at reperitur in omnibus mss.
"Bonus": wanting in the earlier editions, but found in all the manuscripts.
(printed under page 209)
(63) ‹Si enim Patrem cognoscit Filius› · call in col 409 (Jerome's version)
Si enim Patrem cognoscit Filius, etc. Sanctus Hieronymus epist. 94 ad Avitum hæc quæ ad hunc locum pertinere videntur, affert e lib. iv Περὶ ἀρχῶν, sed Rufinus quoniam catholicæ fidei ea repugnare putabat, in versione sua omisit. Verba Græca quæ postremæ hujus fragmenti parti respondent, exhibet Justinianus ad calcem epistolæ ad Menam. Vide lib. ii Origenianorum, quæstion. 2.
"Si enim Patrem cognoscit Filius," etc.: Saint Jerome, in letter 94 to Avitus, cites from Book IV of the Περὶ ἀρχῶν these words, which seem to belong to this passage; but Rufinus, because he thought them contrary to the catholic faith, left them out of his version. The Greek words answering to the last part of this fragment Justinian gives at the end of his letter to Menas. See Origeniana, book II, question 2.
(printed under page 209)
(64) ‹call not on this foot; Jerome's version› · call in col 410 (column not certain from the foot)
Caute lege.
Read with caution.
(printed under page 209) (64*) ‹call not on this foot› · call in col 410 (column not certain from the foot) Sensus Græci Justinian. est : omnino verum esse declarabit quod dictum est : « Pater qui misit me major me est. » Edit. Patrol.
The sense of Justinian's Greek is: "he will show that what was said is entirely true: 'The Father Who sent Me is greater than I.'" Editor of the Patrologia.
(printed under page 209)
(65) ‹call not on this foot› · call in col 411 (column not certain from the foot)
Caute lege.
Read with caution.
(printed under page 210)
(66) ‹call not on this foot; Jerome's version› · call in col 411 (column not certain from the foot)
Si quis autem potuerit ostendere, etc. Hoc item fragmentum exhibet ibidem Hieronymus e lib. iv Περὶ ἀρχῶν, a Rufino autem utpote erroneum dissimulatum est. Vide lib. ii Origenian., q. 11, num. 9.
"Si quis autem potuerit ostendere," etc.: this fragment too Jerome gives in the same place from Book IV of the Περὶ ἀρχῶν; but Rufinus passed it over in silence as erroneous. See Origeniana, book II, question 11, number 9.
(printed under page 210)
(67) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 411
Sic omnes codd. mss. Editi, « utputa omnes oculi qui lucis participant, unius naturæ sunt. » Infra mss., « unius sine dubio debet esse naturæ. » Editi, « ejusdem sine dubio debet esse naturæ. » Mox mss., « sapientiæ et sanctificationi participant. » Editi, « de ipsa sanctificatione participant. »
So all the manuscript codices. The printed editions [read] "utputa omnes oculi qui lucis participant, unius naturae sunt." Below, the manuscripts [read] "unius sine dubio debet esse naturae"; the printed editions, "ejusdem sine dubio debet esse naturae." Next, the manuscripts [read] "sapientiae et sanctificationi participant"; the printed editions, "de ipsa sanctificatione participant."
(printed under page 210)
(68) ‹rationabilemque naturam› · call in col 411 (Jerome's version)
Intellectualem rationabilemque naturam, etc. Hæc quæ e libro quarto Περὶ ἀρχῶν profert Hieronymus in epist. ad Avitum, omissa sunt a Rufino. Vide lib. ii Origenian., q. 1, num. 5, 6, 7.
"Intellectualem rationabilemque naturam," etc.: these words, which Jerome brings forward from the fourth book of the Περὶ ἀρχῶν in his letter to Avitus, were omitted by Rufinus. See Origeniana, book II, question 1, numbers 5, 6, 7.
(printed under page 210)
(69) ‹participium sumpserunt› · call in col 411
Sic mss. In editis omittitur : « et humanæ animæ ejusdem lucis et sapientiæ participium sumpserunt. »
So the manuscripts. In the printed editions "et humanae animae ejusdem lucis et sapientiae participium sumpserunt" is omitted.
(printed under page 210)
(78–80) ‹scripture references› · call in col 412 ⁷⁸ Ps. XXII, 27. ⁷⁹ Luc. VI, 36. ⁸⁰ Matth. V, 48.
78 Psalm 22:27 [as printed]. 79 Luke 6:36. 80 Matthew 5:48.
(printed under page 210)
(70) ‹call not on this foot; Latin-text note› · call in col 412 (column not certain from the foot)
Sic mss. Editi vero : « non autem sicut ipsa Patris et Filii... participium trahit, quæ incorrupta est et æterna. Unde valde conveniens et necessarium est. »
So the manuscripts; but the printed editions [read] "non autem sicut ipsa Patris et Filii... participium trahit, quae incorrupta est et aeterna. Unde valde conveniens et necessarium est."
(printed under page 210)
(71) ‹Imago namque Dei› · call in col 412
Dei. Deest in editis, sed habetur in mss.
"Dei": wanting in the printed editions, but found in the manuscripts.
(printed under page 210)
(72) ‹unigenitus Filius› · call in col 413
In editis deest, « unigenitus ejus. »
"unigenitus ejus" is wanting in the printed editions.
(printed under page 211, above the rule)
(73) ‹indecenter› · call in col 413
Indecenter. Omittunt editi, sed restituunt mss. Ibidem mss., « utemur exemplo. » Editi, « utatur exemplo. »
"Indecenter": the printed editions omit it, but the manuscripts restore it. In the same place the manuscripts [read] "utemur exemplo"; the printed editions, "utatur exemplo."
(printed under page 211, above the rule) <!-- Also above the rule: ⁶¹ Prov. II, 5 and note (74), both called in col 414's text; (74) runs on into col 414's foot. Below the rule the foot holds the editor's full-width Monitum to Origen's De oratione (§§1–3), which belongs to the next unit. --> (printed under page 211)