PG 12 · cols. 870–879
Origen (Latin of Rufinus), Homilies on Joshua, Homily 9
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PG 12 · cols. 870–879
Editors' preface
(56) ‹anchor: in lapidibus ejus› · call in col 870
Codex Sangerm., « ejus. » Libb. editi, « altaris. » Paulo post idem ms., « et quomodo legit illud in auribus. » Libb. editi, « et quomodo relegit Jesus Deuteronomium in auribus. »
The Saint-Germain codex has "ejus" (its); the printed books have "altaris" (of the altar). A little further on the same manuscript has "et quomodo legit illud in auribus" (and how he read it in the ears); the printed books have "et quomodo relegit Jesus Deuteronomium in auribus" (and how Jesus read the Deuteronomy over again in the ears).
(printed under page 439)
(57) ‹anchor: et quomodo› · call in col 870
Idem ms., « et quomodo. » Libb. editi, « ubi. »
The same manuscript has "et quomodo" (and how); the printed books have "ubi" (where).
(printed under page 439)
(58) ‹anchor: excelso omnium Deo› · call in col 871
Deo. Deest in libris antea editis, sed exstat in manuscriptis. Paulo post codex Sangermanensis, « quod ait post victoriam. »
Deo (to God): missing in the books printed earlier, but present in the manuscripts. A little further on the Saint-Germain codex has "quod ait post victoriam" (which he says after the victory).
(printed under page 440)
(59) ‹anchor: sacrificium salutaris› · call in col 871
Codex Sangermanensis, « salutis. » Atque ita habet Gemeticensis.
The Saint-Germain codex has "salutis" (of salvation); and so has the Jumièges manuscript.
(printed under page 440)
(60) ‹anchor: ipso summo angulari› · call in col 871
Gemetic. et duo Ebroic., « ipso summo angulari. » In libris editis deest, « summo. »
The Jumièges manuscript and two Évreux manuscripts have "ipso summo angulari" (the chief corner [stone] itself); in the printed books "summo" (chief) is missing.
(printed under page 440)
(61) ‹anchor: quod nunc descripsimus› · call in col 871
Cod. Sang., « Christus Jesus quem nunc descripsimus. »
The Saint-Germain codex has "Christus Jesus quem nunc descripsimus" (Christ Jesus, whom we have now described).
(printed under page 440)
(62) ‹anchor: apostolus Paulus› · call in col 871
Paulus. Deest in libris editis, sed exstat in omnibus mss.
Paulus (Paul): missing in the printed books, but present in all the manuscripts.
(printed under page 440)
(63) ‹anchor: ex Christi humilitate formatus› · call in col 872
Codex Sangermanensis cum uno Ebroicensi, « ex Christi humilitate formatus. » Alter Ebroicensis, « et Christi humilitate informatus. » Libb. editi, « et Christi humilitati conformatus. »
The Saint-Germain codex with one Évreux manuscript has "ex Christi humilitate formatus" (formed from the humility of Christ). The other Évreux manuscript has "et Christi humilitate informatus" (and shaped by the humility of Christ). The printed books have "et Christi humilitati conformatus" (and conformed to the humility of Christ).
(printed under page 440)
(64) ‹anchor: dicamus omnes unanimiter› · call in col 872
Codex Sangerm., « unanimes. »
The Saint-Germain codex has "unanimes" (of one mind).
(printed under page 440)
(65) ‹anchor: et erant› · call in col 874
Idem cum uno Ebroicensi, « erant. » Alii, « erunt. »
The same [manuscript], with one Évreux manuscript, has "erant" (they were); others have "erunt" (they will be).
(printed under page 441)
(66) ‹anchor: sex ignobiliores› · call in col 875
Post « ignobiliores, » Sangermanensis addit « interpungit, » quod in aliis mss. non exstat.
After "ignobiliores" (the less noble) the Saint-Germain manuscript adds "interpungit" (he divides), which is not found in the other manuscripts.
(printed under page 442)
(67) ‹anchor: ultimus filius Liae› · call in col 875
Liae. Deest in libris editis, sed habetur in omnibus mss.
Liae (of Lia): missing in the printed books, but found in all the manuscripts.
(printed under page 442)
(68) ‹anchor: ut dicant› · call in col 875
Sangerm., « et desideriis inflammantur, quam hoc magis habent in prospectu, dicentes. » Tres alii codd. mss., « vel promissionum desideriis inflammantur, quam hoc magis habent in prospectu. » Mox Gemeticensis cum uno Ebroicensi pro « dicentes » habent « ut dicant. » In libris antea editis sic legitur, « vel promissionum ipsarum, quam hoc magis habentes in prospectu et dicentes. » Paulo post ubi mss. habent, « sufficit mihi non expelli, » in libris editis deest, « mihi. »
The Saint-Germain manuscript has "et desideriis inflammantur, quam hoc magis habent in prospectu, dicentes" (and are inflamed by desires, rather than having this chiefly in view, saying). Three other manuscript codices have "vel promissionum desideriis inflammantur, quam hoc magis habent in prospectu" (or are inflamed by desires for the promises, rather than having this chiefly in view). Next, the Jumièges manuscript with one Évreux manuscript has "ut dicant" (so as to say) instead of "dicentes" (saying). In the books printed earlier it reads thus: "vel promissionum ipsarum, quam hoc magis habentes in prospectu et dicentes" (or of the promises themselves, rather than having this chiefly in view and saying). A little further on, where the manuscripts have "sufficit mihi non expelli" (it is enough for me not to be cast out), "mihi" (for me) is missing in the printed books.
(printed under page 442)
(69) ‹anchor: mali metu bonum› · call in col 876
Sangerm., « pro malo etiam bonum. »
The Saint-Germain manuscript has "pro malo etiam bonum" (good even in return for evil).
(printed under page 442)
(70) ‹anchor: et poenas› · call in col 876
Idem, « praescriptiones et poenas. »
The same has "praescriptiones et poenas" (prescriptions and penalties).
(printed under page 442)
(71) ‹anchor: omnia verba legis› · call in col 876
Idem restituit vocem « legis, » quae deerat in libris editis.
The same restores the word "legis" (of the law), which was missing in the printed books.
(printed under page 442)
(72) ‹anchor: quid indicet› · call in col 877
Mss., « indicet. » Libb. editi, « dicit. »
The manuscripts have "indicet" (should indicate); the printed books have "dicit" (says).
(printed under page 443)
(73) ‹anchor: quid enim› · call in col 877
Mss., « quid enim. » Libb. editi, « quia nihil. »
The manuscripts have "quid enim" (for what); the printed books have "quia nihil" (because nothing).
(printed under page 443)
(74) ‹anchor: appellatione secernit, intelligamus› · call in col 877
Mss., « intelligamus. » Libb. editi, « intelligimus. »
The manuscripts have "intelligamus" (let us understand); the printed books have "intelligimus" (we understand).
(printed under page 443)
(75) ‹anchor: Si vero simul› · call in col 877
Libb. editi, « simul. » Unus codex Ebroicensis, « in illis. » Reliqui mss., « similis. »
The printed books have "simul" (together); one Évreux codex has "in illis" (in them); the other manuscripts have "similis" (like).
(printed under page 443)
(76) ‹anchor: imitando viros› · call in col 878
Codex Sangerman., « viros. » Libb. editi, « meliores. »
The Saint-Germain codex has "viros" (men); the printed books have "meliores" (better ones).
(printed under page 443)
(77) ‹anchor: nuper suscepta› · call in col 878
Omnes mss., « suscepta. » Libb. editi, « suscepti. »
All the manuscripts have "suscepta" (received, agreeing with the faith); the printed books have "suscepti" (received, agreeing with the persons).
(printed under page 443)
(78) ‹anchor: gesta decernit› · call in col 878
Codex Sangerman., « secernit. » Ibid. libb. antea editi, « Jesu nobis recitante.... cordibus nostris, » sed omnes mss. ut in nostro textu
The Saint-Germain codex has "secernit" (he separates). In the same place the books printed earlier have "Jesu nobis recitante.... cordibus nostris" (Jesus reciting to us.... in our hearts), but all the manuscripts read as in our text.
(printed under page 443) (78*) ‹anchor: Christi sermonem› · call in col 878 Codex Sangerm., « sermones. »
The Saint-Germain codex has "sermones" (words).
(printed under page 443)
(79) ‹anchor: mulieres reputantur› · call in col 878
Idem, « deputantur. »
The same has "deputantur" (are assigned).
(printed under page 443)
(80) ‹anchor: potuerunt, ita› · call in col 879
In eodem deest, « ita. »
In the same [manuscript] "ita" (so) is missing.
(printed under page 444)
(81) ‹anchor: profusius propagetur› · call in col 879
Idem ms. habet, « propagetur. » Libb. editi, « prorogetur. » Mox in eodem codice manuscripto omittitur, « obtinere non valebunt. »
The same manuscript has "propagetur" (be spread abroad); the printed books have "prorogetur" (be prolonged). Next, in the same manuscript codex, "obtinere non valebunt" (they will not be able to hold) is omitted.
(printed under page 444)