PG 14 · cols. 184–196
Origenes, Ex tomis IV et V Commentariorum in Evangelium Joannis
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PG 14 · cols. 184–196
Editors' preface
(59) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 183
Joan. I, 1.
John 1:1.
(printed under page 98)
(60) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 183
ibid. 14.
Ibid., 14.
(printed under page 98)
(61) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 183
I Cor. XIII, 12.
1 Corinthians 13:12.
(printed under page 98)
(62) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 183
Joan. I, 7.
John 1:7.
(printed under page 98)
(63) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 183
ibid.
Ibid.
(printed under page 98)
(64) ‹anchor: vidit unquam› · call in col 184
ibid. 18.
Ibid., 18.
(printed under page 98)
(65) ‹anchor: ipse solus› · call in col 184
Matth. XI, 27.
Matthew 11:27.
(printed under page 98)
(66) ‹anchor: coelestis attraxerit› · call in col 184
Joan. VI, 44.
John 6:44.
(printed under page 98)
(67) ‹anchor: potestatis esse› · call in col 183
I Cor. II, 4.
1 Corinthians 2:4.
(printed under page 98)
(27) ‹anchor: ἐγίνετο› · call in col 184
Ἐγίνετο. Lege ἐδύνατο.
Ἐγίνετο ("came to be"): read ἐδύνατο ("was able").
(printed under page 98)
(28) ‹anchor: τῆς δευτέρας› · call in col 184
Εἰκὸς μέντοιγε πρὸ τῆς δευτέρας. Vide quae supra ad Comm. in Matth. XVII super hoc argumento observata sunt.
Εἰκὸς μέντοιγε πρὸ τῆς δευτέρας ("it is likely, however, before the second"): see what was observed on this subject above, on the Commentary on Matthew XVII.
(printed under page 98)
(29) ‹anchor: in Apologia pro Origene› · call in col 184
Hocce fragmentum, quod e secundo tomo depromptum fertur, nullibi tamen in eo tomo reperies; unde vel detruncatum eum esse concludendum est, vel suspicandum fragmentum istud e tomo quinto esse depromptum, quemadmodum et illud quod ex eodem tomo infra afferimus. Et revera idem est utriusque fragmenti initium, eadem fere verba; sed cum prius Pamphilo probandum incumberet ex Deo Patre (juxta Origenem) Filium esse natum, et unius esse cum Patre substantiae, alienum vero a substantiis creaturarum, postquam dixit : « Unigenitus Filius Salvator noster, qui solus ex Patre natus est, solus natura et non adoptione Filius est, » relicto quodam intervallo, ad posteriora, quae ad rem probandam pertinent, statim progreditur his verbis : « Item in eodem libro. Unus ergo est, » etc. Paulo post vero, ut probet ex Origene Filium Dei per prolationem natum non esse, idem hocce initium resumit, cujus contextum, quem hic exhibemus, ubi ea de re agitur, ad finem usque transcribit. Deinde quamvis nulla auctoritas, nullae variantes lectiones admoneant tomum II pro tomo V positum esse in Apologia Pamphili, Rufinus ipse hujus interpres facile potuit decipi. Ex littera enim Π unde quintus numerus apud Graecos exprimitur, facile fit numerus II, si linea superius transversa aut non advertatur aut deleatur.
This fragment, which is said to be drawn from the second tome, you will nevertheless find nowhere in that tome; so one must conclude either that the tome is truncated, or suspect that this fragment was drawn from the fifth tome, like the one we cite below from the same tome. And in fact both fragments begin the same way, with almost the same words; but since it fell to Pamphilus first to prove that (according to Origen) the Son was born of God the Father, and is of one substance with the Father but foreign to the substances of creatures, after saying: "The only-begotten Son our Saviour, who alone was born of the Father, alone is Son by nature and not by adoption," he leaves a certain gap and at once passes on to the later matter that bears on the proof, with these words: "Likewise in the same book. He is therefore one," etc. A little later, however, to prove from Origen that the Son of God was not born by emission, he takes up this same opening again and copies out its whole context, which we give here, where that question is dealt with, to the end. Further, although no authority and no variant readings suggest that tome II was put for tome V in Pamphilus's Apology, Rufinus himself, its translator, could easily have been misled. For the letter Π, by which the number five is expressed among the Greeks, easily becomes the numeral II if the stroke across the top is either overlooked or rubbed out.
(printed under page 98)
(30) ‹anchor: ΙΩΑΝΝΗΝ› · call in col 184
Ἐκ τοῦ τετάρτου, etc. Exstat hoc fragmentum cap. 4 Philocaliae.
Ἐκ τοῦ τετάρτου ("From the fourth"), etc.: this fragment survives in chapter 4 of the Philocalia.
(printed under page 98)
(31) ‹anchor: εὑρίσκῃ› · call in col 184
Εὑρίσκῃ. Sic mss.; libb. editi, εὑρίσκει.
Εὑρίσκῃ: so the manuscripts; the printed books have εὑρίσκει.
(printed under page 98)
(32) ‹anchor: τῶν λόγων› · call in col 184
Τῶν λόγων. Legendum videtur εἶναι τῶν λόγων.
Τῶν λόγων: it seems we should read εἶναι τῶν λόγων ("to be of words").
(printed under page 98)
(33) ‹anchor: τοῦ Εὐαγγελίου› · call in col 185
Εὐαγγελίου. Codex Thuanus, εὐαγγελιστοῦ.
Εὐαγγελίου ("of the Gospel"): the Thuanus codex has εὐαγγελιστοῦ ("of the evangelist").
(printed under page 99)
(35) ‹anchor: ἀρκούμενος› · call in col 185
Ἐπεὶ μὴ ἀρκούμενος, etc. In Petaviano Philocaliae codice, quem Holmiae vidimus, eadem haec ad oram adtexta erant, quae in Reg. ms. deprehendit Tarinus, ea scilicet : τὸν Ἀμβρόσιον αἰνίττεται, πρὸς ὃν πάντα τὰ ἐξηγηματικὰ σχεδὸν αὐτοῦ πεποίηται γράμματα. HUETIUS.
Ἐπεὶ μὴ ἀρκούμενος ("Since, not being content"), etc.: in Petau's codex of the Philocalia, which we saw at Stockholm, the same words were added in the margin that Tarin found in the Royal manuscript, namely: "He is hinting at Ambrose, to whom he addressed almost all his exegetical writings." HUET.
(printed under page 99)
(36) ‹anchor: ἐργοδιωκτῶν› · call in col 185
Ἐργοδιωκτῶν. Luculenta id Origenis epistola declarat.
Ἐργοδιωκτῶν ("taskmasters"): a letter of Origen's shows this clearly.
(printed under page 99)
(37) ‹anchor: ἀπόντας› · call in col 185
Ἀπόντας. Alexandria enim tunc temporis aberat Ambrosius, cum haec scriberet Origenes : sic enim ipse tomo primo in Joann., num. 4, affatur Ambrosium : Ποίαν ἐχρῆν εἶναι μετὰ τὸ κατὰ τὸ σῶμα κεχωρίσθαι ἡμᾶς ἀλλήλων διαφέρουσαν (ἀπαρχὴν) ἢ τὴν περὶ Εὐαγγελίου ἐξέτασιν; HUETIUS.
Ἀπόντας ("absent"): for Ambrose was away from Alexandria at the time Origen wrote this; so he himself addresses Ambrose in tome I on John, no. 4: "What (first-fruits) ought there to be, now that we are separated from one another in body, more excellent than the examination of the Gospel?" HUET.
(printed under page 99)
(38) ‹anchor: τοῦ ποιῆσαι› · call in col 185
Υἱέ μου, φύλαξαι τοῦ, etc. Aliter locus hic interpungitur in vulgatis τῶν Ο' editionibus. ID.
Υἱέ μου, φύλαξαι τοῦ ("My son, beware of"), etc.: this passage is punctuated differently in the common editions of the Seventy. THE SAME.
(printed under page 99)
(68) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 186
I Cor. II, 12.
1 Corinthians 2:12.
(printed under page 99)
(69) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 186
II Cor. IV, 7.
2 Corinthians 4:7.
(printed under page 99)
(70) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 186
I Cor. I, 27.
1 Corinthians 1:27.
(printed under page 99)
(71) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 186
ibid. 26.
Ibid., 26.
(printed under page 99)
(72) ‹anchor: sed et peritis› · call in col 186
Rom. I, 14.
Romans 1:14.
(printed under page 99)
(73) ‹anchor: Novi Testamenti› · call in col 186
II Cor. III, 6.
2 Corinthians 3:6.
(printed under page 99)
(74) ‹anchor: Ecclesiaste Salomon› · call in col 186
Eccle. XII, 12.
Ecclesiastes 12:12.
(printed under page 99)
(33) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 186
Εὐαγγελίου. Codex Thuanus, εὐαγγελιστοῦ.
Εὐαγγελίου ("of the Gospel"): the Thuanus codex has εὐαγγελιστοῦ ("of the evangelist").
(printed under page 99)
(34) ‹anchor: Joannis Evangelium› · call in col 186
Exstat hoc fragmentum cap. 5 Philocaliae.
This fragment survives in chapter 5 of the Philocalia.
(printed under page 99)
(35) ‹anchor: μὴ ἀρκούμενος› · call in col 186
Ἐπεὶ μὴ ἀρκούμενος, etc. In Petaviano Philocaliae codice, quem Holmiae vidimus, eadem haec ad oram adtexta erant, quae in Reg. ms. deprehendit Tarinus, ea scilicet : τὸν Ἀμβρόσιον αἰνίττεται, πρὸς ὃν πάντα τὰ ἐξηγηματικὰ σχεδὸν αὐτοῦ πεποίηται γράμματα. HUETIUS.
Ἐπεὶ μὴ ἀρκούμενος ("Since, not content"), etc.: in the Petau codex of the Philocalia, which we saw at Stockholm, the same words were written in the margin that Tarin found in the Royal manuscript, namely: "He is hinting at Ambrose, to whom almost all his exegetical writings are addressed." HUET.
(printed under page 99)
(36) ‹anchor: ἐργοδιωκτῶν› · call in col 186
Ἐργοδιωκτῶν. Luculenta id Origenis epistola declarat.
Ἐργοδιωκτῶν ("taskmasters"): a letter of Origen shows this clearly.
(printed under page 99)
(37) ‹anchor: ἀπόντας› · call in col 186
Ἀπόντας. Alexandria enim tunc temporis aberat Ambrosius, cum haec scriberet Origenes : sic enim ipse tomo primo in Joann., num. 4, affatur Ambrosium : Ποίαν ἐχρῆν εἶναι μετὰ τὸ κατὰ τὸ σῶμα κεχωρίσθαι ἡμᾶς ἀλλήλων διαφέρουσαν (ἀπαρχὴν) ἢ τὴν περὶ Εὐαγγελίου ἐξέτασιν; HUETIUS.
Ἀπόντας ("absent"): for Ambrose was away from Alexandria at the time Origen wrote this; so Origen himself addresses Ambrose in the first tome on John, no. 4: "What [first-fruit] should be more excellent, now that we are separated from one another in body, than the examination of the Gospel?" HUET.
(printed under page 99)
(38) ‹anchor: φύλαξαι τοῦ› · call in col 186
Υἱέ μου, φύλαξαι τοῦ, etc. Aliter locus hic interpungitur in vulgatis τῶν Ο' editionibus. ID.
Υἱέ μου, φύλαξαι τοῦ ("My son, beware of"), etc.: this passage is punctuated differently in the common editions of the Seventy. The same [Huet].
(printed under page 99)
(75) ‹anchor: Evangelium adimplevit› · call in col 187
Rom. XV, 19.
Romans 15:19.
(printed under page 100)
(76) ‹anchor: praevaliturae sunt› · call in col 187
Matth. XVI, 18.
Matthew 16:18.
(printed under page 100)
(39) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 187
Δόξομεν. Codex Thuan. δείξομεν.
Δόξομεν ("we shall seem"): the Thuanus codex has δείξομεν ("we shall show").
(printed under page 100)
(40) ‹anchor: τὴν Γραφὴν› · call in col 187
Τὴν Γραφήν. Thuan. codex, τῶν Γραφῶν.
Τὴν Γραφήν ("the Scripture"): the Thuanus codex has τῶν Γραφῶν ("of the Scriptures").
(printed under page 100)
(41) ‹anchor: Μωϋσέα φήσει› · call in col 187
Τὸν τηλικοῦτον Μωϋσέα φήσει. Hoc etiam argumento, praeter alia, probare possumus alterutrum e Commentariis in Job Origeni vulgo tributis supposititium esse, cum posterius a Perionio interpretatum Moysem librum Jobi scripsisse, prius vero hebraice convertisse doceat. HUETIUS.
Τὸν τηλικοῦτον Μωϋσέα φήσει ("he will say that so great a man as Moses"): by this argument too, among others, we can prove that one or the other of the Commentaries on Job commonly attributed to Origen is spurious, since the latter, translated by Périon, teaches that Moses wrote the book of Job, and the former that he translated it from Hebrew. HUET.
(printed under page 100)
(42) ‹anchor: in Joannem› · call in col 187
Exhibet hocce fragmentum Eusebius Hist. eccles. lib. VI, c. 25.
Eusebius gives this fragment in the Ecclesiastical History, book 6, chapter 25.
(printed under page 100)
(43) ‹anchor: καὶ δευτέραν› · call in col 187
Ἔστω δὲ καὶ δευτέραν, etc. Eam admittit Origenes homil. 7 in Josue : « Petrus etiam duabus Epistolarum suarum personat tubis. » Eusebius lib. III Hist., cap. 3 : Τὴν δὲ φερομένην αὐτοῦ (Πέτρου) δευτέραν οὐκ ἐνδιάθηκον μὲν εἶναι παρειλήφαμεν· ὅμως δὲ πολλοῖς χρήσιμος φανεῖσα, μετὰ τῶν ἄλλων ἐσπουδάσθη Γραφῶν. « Quae vero secunda appellatur, eam quidem inter sacros Novi Testamenti libros positam non esse a majoribus accepimus. Sed (continues)
Ἔστω δὲ καὶ δευτέραν ("let there be a second as well"), etc.: Origen admits it in Homily 7 on Joshua: "Peter too sounds through the two trumpets of his Epistles." Eusebius, History book 3, chapter 3: "The so-called second epistle of his (Peter's) we have received as not canonical; yet since it seemed useful to many, it has been studied with the other Scriptures." "The one called the second, we have received from our elders, was not placed among the sacred books of the New Testament. But (continues)
(printed under page 100)
EX EODEM TOMO QUINTO COMMENTARIORUM IN JOANNEM (42). Interprete Henrico Valesio.
FROM THE SAME FIFTH TOME OF THE COMMENTARIES ON JOHN (42).
<!-- note: editors' heading, printed centred across the full page width (cols 187–188), set once here in c188. On the page it stands below the end of §2 (Ὅσον γὰρ … καταλελοιπέναι, ending at mark C) and directly above §3 (Ὁ δὲ ἱκανωθεὶς … / Is vero quem Deus idoneum reddidit …), not above §2 as the brief says. The call (42) points to the footnote "Exhibet hocce fragmentum Eusebius Hist. eccles. lib. VI, c. 25", which is page-foot matter and is not set here. The italic linking line above §2 (Εἶτα, εἰπὼν, ὡς εἰς ὀλίγα τοῦ Εὐαγγελίου ῥητὰ … ἐπιφέρει / Deinde, postquam dixit [Origenes] …) is the excerptor's link within the fragment, not a Migne heading, and is not set here. No other editors' prose in this column. -->
Interprete Joanne Tarino.
Translated by Jean Tarin.
<!-- note: editors' matter. A single italic line, centred and set across the full width of cols 189–190 (set once here, in col 189). It stands below the italic lead-in "Εἶτα, ἀπαριθμησάμενος προφήτας…" / "Deinde, prophetis et apostolis enumeratis…" (Eusebius's framing, with the Latin's [Origenes.] supplied) and directly above the paragraph "4. Μετὰ ταῦτα" / "4. (45) Hæreo deinde". It names the translator of the Latin version that follows (Jean Tarin, translator of the Philocalia). Nothing else in col 189 is editors' prose in the column; the footnotes and the notes (44)–(47) at the foot of the page are excluded. -->
(77) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 190
Joan. XXI, 20.
John 21:20.
(printed under page 101)
(78) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 190
ibid. 25.
Ibid., 25.
(printed under page 101)
(79) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 190
Apoc. X, 4.
Revelation 10:4.
(printed under page 101)
(80) ‹anchor: multos libros componas› · call in col 190
Eccle. XII, 12.
Ecclesiastes 12:12.
(printed under page 101)
(81) ‹anchor: sapiens eris› · call in col 190
Prov. X, 19.
Proverbs 10:19.
(printed under page 101)
(82) ‹anchor: de piscibus› · call in col 190
III Reg. IV, 32, 33.
3 Kings (1 Kings) 4:32–33.
(printed under page 101)
(83) ‹anchor: dicat perditis› · call in col 190
Prov. I, 24.
Proverbs 1:24.
(printed under page 101)
(84) ‹anchor: utpote mortuus› · call in col 190
Act. XX, 7, 9.
Acts 20:7, 9.
(printed under page 101)
(85) ‹anchor: non effugies peccatum› · call in col 190
Prov. X 19.
Proverbs 10:19.
(printed under page 101)
(43) (continued) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 190
tamen cum utilis esse videretur quamplurimis, una cum reliquis sacrae Scripturae libris studiose lectitata est; » et cap. 25 : Τῶν δὲ ἀντιλεγομένων, γνωρίμων δ' οὖν τοῖς πολλοῖς, ἡ λεγομένη Ἰακώβου φέρεται, καὶ ἡ Ἰούδα, ἥ τε Πέτρου δευτέρα ἐπιστολή, καὶ ἡ ὀνομαζομένη δευτέρα καὶ τρίτη Ἰωάννου. « Ex iis vero quae in dubium revocantur, a multis tamen commemorari videmus, est Epistola quae dicitur Jacobi, et quae Judae, et secunda Petri, Joannis item altera et tertia. » HUETIUS.
(continued) yet since it seemed useful to very many, it has been diligently read together with the other books of holy Scripture"; and chapter 25: "Among the disputed books, which are nonetheless known to most, are the one called James's, and Jude's, and the second epistle of Peter, and the so-called second and third of John." "Of those that are called in question, yet which we see mentioned by many, are the Epistle said to be James's, and Jude's, and the second of Peter, and likewise John's second and third." HUET.
(printed under page 101)
(44) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 190
Ἐπεὶ οὐ πάντες φασὶ γνησίους εἶναι. Origenes homil. 7 in Jos. : « Addit nihilominus adhuc et Joannes tuba canere per Epistolas suas, » et Eusebius loco proxime laudato. ID.
Ἐπεὶ οὐ πάντες φασὶ γνησίους εἶναι ("since not all say they are genuine"): Origen, Homily 7 on Joshua: "John too adds his trumpet-call through his Epistles," and Eusebius in the place just cited. The same [Huet].
(printed under page 101)
(45) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 190
Ex cap. 5 Philocaliae.
From chapter 5 of the Philocalia.
(printed under page 101)
(46) ‹anchor: σωτήρια λέγῃ πολλά› · call in col 190
Κἂν ἅγιά τις καὶ σωτήρια λέγῃ πολλά. Haec desunt in codice Regio, sed restituuntur e codice Thuan.
Κἂν ἅγιά τις καὶ σωτήρια λέγῃ πολλά ("even if one says many holy and saving things"): these words are missing in the Royal codex but are restored from the Thuanus codex.
(printed under page 101)
(47) ‹anchor: Ἐξέτεινον λόγους› · call in col 190
Ἐξέτεινον λόγους. Id secuti sunt Syrus et Arabs. Reliqui interpretes legerunt, χεῖρά μου, quod ad idem recidit, nam qui verba facturi erant, manu sibi audientiam faciebant. Sic Paulus Act. XIII, 16 : Κατασείσας τῇ χειρὶ εἶπεν· et Pers. satyr. 4 : Fert animus calidae fecisse silentia turbae Majestate manus..... Et Caesar apud Luc. : ..... Tumultum Composuit vultu dextraque silentia jussit. Huic observationi hoc adde, significationem illam erectis primoribus digitis tribus, pollice, indice et medio, conclusis medio et auriculari fieri solitam.
Ἐξέτεινον λόγους ("I stretched out words"): the Syriac and Arabic followed this. The other translators read χεῖρά μου ("my hand"), which comes to the same thing, for those about to speak gained a hearing with the hand. So Paul, Acts 13:16: "Beckoning with his hand, he said"; and Persius, Satire 4: "His spirit moves him to have made silence in the hot crowd by the majesty of his hand....." And Caesar in Lucan: "..... The uproar he calmed with his look, and with his right hand commanded silence." Add to this observation that the sign was usually made with the first three fingers raised, thumb, index and middle, and the middle [sic] and little fingers closed.
(printed under page 101)
(86) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 191
Joan. I, 1.
John 1:1.
(printed under page 102)
(87) ‹anchor: remittens nos, dicit› · call in col 191
ibid. V, 39.
Ibid. 5:39.
(printed under page 102)
(88) ‹anchor: appellat, dicens› · call in col 191
Psal. XXXIX, 8.
Psalm 39(40):8.
(printed under page 102)
(89) ‹anchor: Quid? vidisse› · call in col 191
Apoc. V, 1. 4.
Revelation 5:1, 4.
(printed under page 102)
(47) (continued) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 191
Hoc gestu cum populum alloquerentur episcopi, eodem ipsi benedicebant e salutatorio, qui mos ad haec tempora deductus est. HUETIUS.
(continued) When bishops addressed the people with this gesture, they also used it to bless from the salutatorium, a custom that has come down to our own times. HUET.
(printed under page 102)
(48) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 191
Ὁ πᾶς δὴ τοῦ Θεοῦ Λόγος, etc. Eadem habebat Petavianus ille codex Holmiensis, quae repraesentavit Tarinus, ea nimirum : Λόγον ἐνταῦθα τοῦ Θεοῦ οὐ τὸν οὐσιώδη νοήσεις, (ἀμερὴς γὰρ ἐκεῖνος, ἢ Θεός·) ἀλλὰ τὸν περὶ αὐτοῦ Λόγον ἐκ ποικίλων θεωρημάτων συγκείμενον, ὃ καὶ αὐτὸς τῷ πρώτῳ ὁμωνύμως (Petav. ὁμώνυμος) ἐν ἀρχῇ πρὸς τὸν Θεὸν λέγεται. Eadem quoque ad oram suae interpretationis Genebrardus exhibuit Latine ita conversa : « Verbum hic Dei essentiale ne intelligas (expers enim partium est, tanquam Deus), sed Verbum quod de ipso exsistit e variis contemplationibus compositum, quod etiam cum priore illo nomine communicans, in principio apud Deum fuisse dicitur. » ID.
Ὁ πᾶς δὴ τοῦ Θεοῦ Λόγος ("the whole Word of God"), etc.: that Petau codex at Stockholm had the same words that Tarin reproduced, namely: "By the Word of God here you will understand not the essential Word (for he is without parts, as God), but the word about him, composed of various insights, which, sharing the name with the first, is itself said to be in the beginning with God" (Petau's codex: ὁμώνυμος). Génébrard too gave the same in the margin of his translation, rendered into Latin thus: "Do not understand here the essential Word of God (for he is without parts, as God), but the word that exists about him, composed of various contemplations, which, sharing that former name, is also said to have been in the beginning with God." The same [Huet].
(printed under page 102)
(49) ‹anchor: τὰ περὶ αὐτοῦ› · call in col 191
Τὰ περὶ αὐτοῦ. Haec desunt in vulgato Philocaliae textu, sed restituuntur e mss.
Τὰ περὶ αὐτοῦ ("the things concerning him"): these words are missing in the common text of the Philocalia but are restored from the manuscripts.
(printed under page 102)
(90) ‹anchor: nemo aperiet ?› · call in col 194
Apoc. III, 7.
Revelation 3:7.
(printed under page 103)
(91) ‹anchor: ut scriptum est› · call in col 194
Psal. LXVIII, 29.
Psalm 68(69):29.
(printed under page 103)
(92) ‹anchor: ait enim Daniel› · call in col 194
Cap. VII, vers. 10.
Chapter 7, verse 10.
(printed under page 103)
(93) ‹anchor: Moyses dicens› · call in col 194
Exod. XXXII, 32.
Exodus 32:32.
(printed under page 103)
(94) ‹anchor: sic interpretor› · call in col 194
Isa. XXIX, 11, 12.
Isaiah 29:11–12.
(printed under page 103)
(95) ‹anchor: nemo aperiet› · call in col 194
ibid. XXII, 22.
Ibid. 22:22.
(printed under page 103)
(96) ‹anchor: nemo claudet› · call in col 194
ibid.
Ibid.
(printed under page 103)
(97) ‹anchor: modulatio, et vae› · call in col 194
Ezech. II, 9.
Ezekiel 2:9.
(printed under page 103)
(98) ‹anchor: perscripta erant› · call in col 194
Apoc. X, 9, 10.
Revelation 10:9–10.
(printed under page 103)
(99) ‹anchor: ait Apostolus› · call in col 194
Rom. II, 16.
Romans 2:16.
(printed under page 103)
(50) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 193
Γεγεννημένοι. Ita codex Thuanus; Regius, γενόμενοι.
Γεγεννημένοι ("begotten"): so the Thuanus codex; the Royal has γενόμενοι ("having become").
(printed under page 103)
(51) ‹anchor: ἐὰν ἀνοίξῃ› · call in col 193
Ἀνοίξῃ. Ita mss. Tarinus vero in textu, ἀνοίξει.
Ἀνοίξῃ: so the manuscripts; but Tarin in his text has ἀνοίξει.
(printed under page 103)
(52) ‹anchor: τὰ Εὐαγγέλια› · call in col 193
Ἀθετούντων τὰ Εὐαγγέλια. Non omnia, sed Matthaei, Marci et Joannis. Lucae autem Evangelium admittebant quidem, sed ita ut a dictatore suo Marcione interpolatum fuerat. Epiphanius haeres. XLII, cap. 9, 10. HUETIUS.
Ἀθετούντων τὰ Εὐαγγέλια ("who reject the Gospels"): not all of them, but those of Matthew, Mark and John. Luke's Gospel they did accept, but only as it had been interpolated by their dictator Marcion. Epiphanius, Heresy 42, chapters 9–10. HUET.
(printed under page 103)
(53) ‹anchor: πεῖσαι ἡμᾶς› · call in col 193
Ἡμᾶς. Ita mss. Tarinus in textu, ὑμᾶς.
Ἡμᾶς ("us"): so the manuscripts; Tarin in his text has ὑμᾶς ("you").
(printed under page 103)
(90*) ‹anchor: litterae, sed spiritus› · call in col 195 II Cor. III, 6.
2 Corinthians 3:6.
(91*) ‹anchor: lucem habitat inaccessibilem› · call in col 195 I Tim. VI, 16.
1 Timothy 6:16.
(92*) ‹anchor: Abba Pater› · call in col 195 Rom. VIII, 15.
Romans 8:15.
(93*) ‹anchor: ex Deo nati sint› · call in col 195 Joan. I, 12.
John 1:12.
(94*) ‹anchor: Dii estis› · call in col 195 Psal. LXXXI, 6.
Psalm 81(82):6.
(95*) ‹anchor: Filii Excelsi omnes› · call in col 195 ibid.
Ibid.
(printed under page 104)
(54) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 195
Θεοῦ. Ita mss. Tarinus, Χριστοῦ.
Θεοῦ ("of God"): so the manuscripts; Tarin has Χριστοῦ ("of Christ").
(printed under page 104)
(55) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 195
Βρώματα. Forte legendum, δόγματα.
Βρώματα ("foods"): perhaps read δόγματα ("doctrines").
(printed under page 104)
(56) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 195
Πεπληρωμένον. Sic mss. Tarinus πεπληρωμένου.
Πεπληρωμένον: so the manuscripts; Tarin has πεπληρωμένου.
(printed under page 104)
(57) ‹anchor: not visible on this page› · call in col 195
Αὐτὸς γοῦν ἀπορίᾳ, etc. Ambrosium alloquitur, qui cum Valentiniana haeresi esset infectus, virus illud Origenis cura evomuit, et saniorem doctrinam amplexus est. HUETIUS.
Αὐτὸς γοῦν ἀπορίᾳ ("you yourself, then, for want"), etc.: he is addressing Ambrose, who, having been infected with the Valentinian heresy, vomited out that poison through Origen's care and embraced sounder doctrine. HUET.
(printed under page 104)
EX EODEM TOMO V, APUD PAMPHILUM MARTYREM IN APOLOGIA PRO ORIGENE.
FROM THE SAME FIFTH TOME, IN PAMPHILUS THE MARTYR, IN THE APOLOGY FOR ORIGEN.
<!-- note: editors' heading, set full width across cols 195–196 in the middle band, below the short rule that closes the last Greek paragraph (ending "ἐπιδίδωμι", with its facing Latin ending "projiciam") and above the Latin fragment "Unigenitus Filius Salvator noster…". The words "Apologia pro Origene" are italic in the print. The quoted "« Item in eodem libro. »" lower down is Pamphilus's own text, not editors' prose, so it is not set here. No other editors' prose in this column; the scripture references (90*–95*) and notes (54)–(57) at the page foot are apparatus. -->