PG 14 · cols. 523–572
Origenes, Commentariorum in Evangelium Joannis tomus XIX
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PG 14 · cols. 523–572
Editors' preface
(21) ‹anchor: et Patrem meum sciretis› · call in col 523
Joan. VIII, 19.
John 8:19.
(printed under page 268)
(22) ‹anchor: unde sim› · call in col 523
Joan. VII, 28.
John 7:28.
(printed under page 268)
(91) ‹anchor: title (Greek heading)› · call in col 523
Τρισκαιδέκατον. Codex Bodleianus, ὀκτωκαιδέκατον.
"Thirteenth." The Bodleian codex has "eighteenth."
(printed under page 268)
(92) ‹anchor: title (Greek heading)› · call in col 523
Τοῦ Ἰακώβ. Deest in codice Bodleiano.
"Of James." It is missing in the Bodleian codex.
(printed under page 268)
(93) ‹anchor: start of the tome, Ἀπεκρίθη› · call in col 523
Deesse videtur hujus tomi initium. Nullum enim tomum incipit Origenes, quin pluribus vel paucis alloquatur familiarem suum Ambrosium, eique expressis verbis enuntiet quotus sit numero tomus ille, quem ei nuncupat ac mittit, quemadmodum videre licet in caeteris octo tomis qui supersunt. Hic vero nil simile reperitur. Tomus incipit ab abrupto contra morem : nulla praefatio, nulla ipsius tomi enuntiatio. Praeterea in fine plus quam dimidia sui parte mutilum eum esse inde liquet, quod desinat in versum 25 capitis VIII Evangelii Joannis, vicesimus vero tomus incipiat a versu 37 ejusdem capitis; ac proinde manifeste deest explanatio undecim versuum, nimirum 26-36.
The beginning of this tome seems to be missing. For Origen begins no tome without addressing his friend Ambrose in more or fewer words, and telling him in express terms what the number of the tome is that he dedicates and sends to him, as can be seen in the other eight tomes that survive. Here, however, nothing of the kind is found. Against his custom the tome begins abruptly: no preface, no statement of the tome itself. Moreover, it is clear that it is mutilated at the end by more than half of itself, since it ends at verse 25 of chapter 8 of John's Gospel, while the twentieth tome begins from verse 37 of the same chapter; and so the explanation of eleven verses, namely 26–36, is plainly missing.
(printed under page 268)
(94) ‹anchor: Εἰ μὲν πρὸς τούς› · call in col 523
Εἰ μὲν πρὸς τούς, etc. Codex Regius, perperam, ὁ μὲν πρὸς τούς, etc.
"If ... to those," etc. The Royal codex wrongly has "the ... to those," etc.
(printed under page 268)
(95) ‹anchor: καὶ ὁ φάσκων› · call in col 523
Καὶ ὁ φάσκων. In codice Regio desideratur καί.
"And the one saying." In the Royal codex "and" is wanting.
(printed under page 268)
(23) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 526
Joan. VII, 26, 27.
John 7:26–27.
(printed under page 269)
(24) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 526
Joan. VIII, 13.
John 8:13.
(printed under page 269)
(25) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 526
Joan. VII, 28, 29.
John 7:28–29.
(printed under page 269)
(26) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 526
Joan. II, 22.
John 2:22 [as printed].
(printed under page 269)
(27) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 526
ibid.
Same place.
(printed under page 269)
(28) ‹anchor: Patrem habet› · call in col 526
I Joan. II, 23.
1 John 2:23.
(printed under page 269)
(29) ‹anchor: vos nescitis› · call in col 526
Joan. VII, 28.
John 7:28.
(printed under page 269)
(30) ‹anchor: vobis locutus sum› · call in col 526
Joan. VIII, 40.
John 8:40.
(printed under page 269)
(31) ‹anchor: Pater unum sumus› · call in col 526
Joan. X, 30.
John 10:30.
(printed under page 269)
(32) ‹anchor: veritas et vita› · call in col 526
Joan. XIV, 6.
John 14:6.
(printed under page 269)
(33) ‹anchor: Ego sum resurrectio› · call in col 526
Joan. XI, 25.
John 11:25.
(printed under page 269)
(34) ‹anchor: unde sim scitis› · call in col 526
Joan. VII, 28.
John 7:28.
(printed under page 269)
(35) ‹anchor: neque Patrem meum› · call in col 526
Joan. VIII, 19.
John 8:19.
(printed under page 269)
(36) ‹anchor: unde sit› · call in col 526
Joan. VII, 25 seq.
John 7:25 ff.
(printed under page 269)
(96) ‹anchor: τῇ ἀγεννήτῳ› · call in col 526
Ἡνωμένης τῇ ἀγεννήτῳ. Codex Regius, ἀγενήτῳ. Caeterum erronea haec videntur, neque enim natura divina θειοτέρα φύσις Filii unitur naturae ingenitae Patris, sed eadem est; non ἥνωται, sed ἡ αὐτή ἐστι.
"United to the unbegotten." The Royal codex has "ungenerated." But these words seem erroneous, for the divine nature, the "more divine nature" of the Son, is not united to the unbegotten nature of the Father, but is the same; it is not "united," but "is the same."
(printed under page 269)
(97) ‹anchor: ταῦτα προτέτακται› · call in col 526
Προτέτακται. Sic codex Bodleianus; Regius, προστέτακται.
"Are set before." So the Bodleian codex; the Royal has "are commanded."
(printed under page 269)
(37) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 527
ibid. 13 seq.
Same place, 13 ff.
(printed under page 270)
(38) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 527
Matth. XIII, 55.
Matthew 13:55.
(printed under page 270)
(39) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 527
Joan. VIII, 14.
John 8:14.
(printed under page 270)
(40) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 527
ibid. 19.
Same place, 19.
(printed under page 270)
(41) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 527
Joan. VII, 28.
John 7:28.
(printed under page 270)
(42) ‹anchor: neque Patrem meum› · call in col 527
Joan. VIII, 19.
John 8:19.
(printed under page 270)
(43) ‹anchor: misit me, Pater› · call in col 527
ibid, 18.
Same place, 18.
(printed under page 270)
(44) ‹anchor: in primo Regum› · call in col 527
I Reg. II, 12.
1 Kings [1 Samuel] 2:12.
(97*) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 527 Lege hic ἐπισταμένων ὅτι, expuncto ἦν· quinque autem abhinc lineis, corrige κἂν ἐγώ, pro, καὶ ἐγώ. EDIT. PATROL.
Read here "of those knowing that," deleting "was"; and five lines further on, correct to "even if I" in place of "and I." EDITORS OF THE PATROLOGIA.
(printed under page 270)
(98) ‹anchor: ἢ εἰ ἐξεδέχοντο περί› · call in col 527
Ἢ εἰ ἐξεδέχοντο. Sic codex Bodleianus; Regius, ἐπεὶ ἐξεδέχοντο.
"Or if they understood." So the Bodleian codex; the Royal has "since they understood."
(printed under page 270)
(99) ‹anchor: οἱ ἑτερόδοξοι› · call in col 527
Χρὴ μέντοι γε εἰδέναι, ὅτι οἱ ἑτερόδοξοι, etc. Cerdoniani, Marcionitae, Valentiniani, aliique ejusdem ζύμης haeretici. HUETIUS.
"But one must know that the heterodox," etc. The Cerdonians, Marcionites, Valentinians, and other heretics of the same leaven. HUET.
(printed under page 270)
(1) ‹anchor: [Interrogemus] enim› · call in col 527
Haec e Perionio.
These words are from Périon.
(printed under page 270)
(45) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 530
Rom. III, 19.
Romans 3:19.
(printed under page 271)
(46) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 530
Psal. XLV, 10.
Psalm 45[46]:10.
(printed under page 271)
(47) ‹anchor: testatur Dominus dicens› · call in col 530
Matth. V, 8.
Matthew 5:8.
(printed under page 271)
(48) ‹anchor: in eo dicto› · call in col 530
Matth. XI, 27.
Matthew 11:27.
(printed under page 271)
(49) ‹anchor: illi ad justitiam› · call in col 530
Gen. XV, 6; Rom. IV, 3; Galat. III, 6; Jac. II, 23.
Genesis 15:6; Romans 4:3; Galatians 3:6; James 2:23.
(printed under page 271)
(50) ‹anchor: crediderant, Judaeos› · call in col 530
Joan. VIII, 31, 32.
John 8:31–32.
(printed under page 271)
(51) ‹anchor: in eodem Spiritu› · call in col 530
I Cor. XII, 8, 9.
1 Corinthians 12:8–9.
(printed under page 271)
(52) ‹anchor: neque Patrem meum› · call in col 530
Joan. VIII, 19.
John 8:19.
(printed under page 271)
(53) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 531
I Joan. II, 23.
1 John 2:23.
(printed under page 272)
(54) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 531
Gen. II, 23.
Genesis 2:23.
(printed under page 272)
(55) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 531
Gen. IV, 1.
Genesis 4:1.
(printed under page 272)
(56) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 531
Ephes. V, 32.
Ephesians 5:32.
(printed under page 272)
(57) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 531
I Cor. VI, 16, 17.
1 Corinthians 6:16–17.
(printed under page 272)
(58) ‹anchor: sermo dicens› · call in col 531
Joan. VIII, 19.
John 8:19.
(printed under page 272)
(59) ‹anchor: agniti a Deo› · call in col 531
Galat. IV, 9.
Galatians 4:9.
(printed under page 272)
(60) ‹anchor: qui sunt ejus› · call in col 531
II Tim. II, 19.
2 Timothy 2:19.
(printed under page 272)
(61) ‹anchor: de manu Patris› · call in col 531
Joan. X, 28, 29.
John 10:28–29.
(printed under page 272)
(62) ‹anchor: neque Patrem meum› · call in col 531
Joan. VIII, 19.
John 8:19.
(printed under page 272)
(2) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 531
Ἀνθρώπου καὶ Κυρίου. Ita codex Bodleianus. In Regio deest καί.
"Of man and of the Lord." So the Bodleian codex. In the Royal, "and" is missing.
(printed under page 272)
(3) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 531
Φησί. Deest in codice Regio.
"He says." It is missing in the Royal codex.
(printed under page 272)
(4) ‹anchor: τοῖς ἑτεροδόξοις› · call in col 531
Καὶ ἔστι γε τοῖς ἑτεροδόξοις. Cerdoniani, et Marcionitae, quos hic lacessit, Δημιουργόν cognitum, Christi Patrem ignotum opinabantur. Epiphanius haer. XLI, cap. 1, et XLII, cap. 2. Mox pro χαριζομένων αὐτοῖς, legendum videtur χαριζόμενοι αὐτοῖς, vel χαριζομένων ἡμῶν αὐτοῖς.
"And it is possible for the heterodox." The Cerdonians and Marcionites, whom he attacks here, held that the Demiurge was known and the Father of Christ unknown. Epiphanius, Heresy 41, ch. 1, and 42, ch. 2. Just after, in place of "of those granting to them," one should apparently read "granting to them," or "while we grant to them."
(printed under page 272)
(5) ‹anchor: οὐκ ἔστιν ἀληθές› · call in col 531
Ὅπερ τάχα οὐκ ἔστιν ἀληθές, etc. Sic habent omnes ms. Negandi particulam praetermisit Ferrarius, et quae proxime sequuntur aliter legit. Perionius autem priorem illam pericopes partem neglexit. Τὸ οὐκ retinuimus, ita volente sensu. Loci autem totius haec est sententia : Ac heterodoxis quidem gratificantes concedere possumus Moysen et prophetas Patrem non cognovisse (quod tamen fortasse verum non est; nam si Patrem non agno- (continues)
"Which perhaps is not true," etc. So all the manuscripts have it. Ferrarius left out the negative particle and read what immediately follows differently. Périon, for his part, neglected that first part of the passage. We have kept the "not," as the sense requires. The meaning of the whole place is this: and to gratify the heterodox we may grant that Moses and the prophets did not know the Father (which, however, is perhaps not true; for if they did not ac- (continues)
(printed under page 272)
(2) ‹anchor: περὶ ἀνθρώπου καὶ Κυρίου› · call in col 532
Ἀνθρώπου καὶ Κυρίου. Ita codex Bodleianus. In Regio deest καί.
"Of a man and the Lord." So the Bodleian codex. In the Royal codex "and" is missing.
(printed under page 272)
(3) ‹anchor: φησὶ, « τῇ πόρνῃ› · call in col 532
Φησί. Deest in codice Regio.
"He says." It is missing in the Royal codex.
(printed under page 272)
(4) ‹anchor: τοῖς ἑτεροδόξοις› · call in col 532
Καὶ ἔστι γε τοῖς ἑτεροδόξοις. Cerdoniani, et Marcionitae, quos hic lacessit, Δημιουργόν cognitum, Christi Patrem ignotum opinabantur. Epiphanius haer. XLI, cap. 1, et XLII, cap. 2. Mox pro χαριζομένων αὐτοῖς, legendum videtur χαριζόμενοι αὐτοῖς, vel χαριζομένων ἡμῶν αὐτοῖς.
"And it is indeed possible for the heterodox." The Cerdonians and Marcionites, whom he attacks here, held that the Demiurge was known and the Father of Christ unknown. Epiphanius, Heresies XLI, ch. 1, and XLII, ch. 2. Just after, for χαριζομένων αὐτοῖς, it seems we should read χαριζόμενοι αὐτοῖς, or χαριζομένων ἡμῶν αὐτοῖς.
(printed under page 272)
(5) ‹anchor: ὅπερ τάχα οὐκ ἔστιν ἀληθὲς› · call in col 532
Ὅπερ τάχα οὐκ ἔστιν ἀληθές, etc. Sic habent omnes ms. Negandi particulam praetermisit Ferrarius, et quae proxime sequuntur aliter legit. Perionius autem priorem illam pericopes partem neglexit. Τὸ οὐκ retinuimus, ita volente sensu. Loci autem totius haec est sententia : Ac heterodoxis quidem gratificantes concedere possumus Moysen et prophetas Patrem non cognovisse (quod tamen fortasse verum non est ; nam si Patrem non agno-
"Which perhaps is not true," etc. So all the manuscripts have it. Ferrarius left out the negative particle and read what immediately follows differently. Perionius, for his part, neglected that first part of the passage. We have kept the οὐκ, as the sense requires. The meaning of the whole place is this: And indeed, to oblige the heterodox, we can grant that Moses and the prophets did not know the Father (which, however, is perhaps not true; for if they did not know
(printed under page 272; continues under the next page)
(63) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 534
Joan. XX, 17.
John 20:17.
(printed under page 273)
(64) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 534
Rom. VIII, 23.
Romans 8:23.
(printed under page 273)
(65) ‹anchor: laudabo te› · call in col 534
Psal. XXI, 23.
Psalm 21[22]:23.
(printed under page 273)
(66) ‹anchor: hunc in modum dicentis› · call in col 534
Act. VII, 2 seq.
Acts 7:2 ff.
(printed under page 273)
(67) ‹anchor: Romanos, in his› · call in col 534
Rom. I, 1, 2 seq.
Romans 1:1–2 ff.
(printed under page 273)
(6) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 534
Παραδεξόμεθα. Ita habet codex Bodleianus; Regius, παραδεξάμεθα, male.
"We shall accept." So the Bodleian codex has it; the Royal, wrongly, "we accepted."
(printed under page 273)
(7) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 534
Εὐξάμενον. Sic codex Bodleianus; Regius, εὐξόμενον, male.
"Having prayed." So the Bodleian codex; the Royal, wrongly, "about to pray."
(printed under page 273)
(8) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 534
Καὶ γὰρ εὐχόμενοι τῷ Θεῷ οὐ λέγουσι, Πάτερ. Sic hunc locum, in Regio codice luxatum, sanitati restituunt codd. Bodleianus et Barberinus.
"For even when praying to God they do not say, Father." So the Bodleian and Barberini codices restore to health this passage, which is dislocated in the Royal codex.
(printed under page 273)
(9) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 534
Δι' αὐτοῦ πιστεύοντας. Sic codex Bodleianus, optime; Regius, male, διὰ τοὺς πιστεύοντας.
"Believing through him." So the Bodleian codex, very well; the Royal, wrongly, "because of those believing."
(printed under page 273)
(10) ‹anchor: παντὶ τῷ κόσμῳ χάριν› · call in col 534
Ἐκκενουμένην. Omnino legendum ἐκχεομένην.
"Being emptied out." One should certainly read "being poured out."
(printed under page 273)
(68) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 535
Joan. VIII, 19.
John 8:19.
(printed under page 274)
(69) ‹anchor: vidit et Patrem› · call in col 535
Joan. XIV, 9.
John 14:9.
(printed under page 274)
(70) ‹anchor: ad opera sua› · call in col 535
Prov. VIII, 22.
Proverbs 8:22.
(printed under page 274)
(11) ‹anchor: τῆς σοφίας προσαγωγῆς› · call in col 535
Προσαγωγῆς. Scribendum προαγωγῆς.
"Bringing to." One should write "leading forward."
(printed under page 274)
(12) ‹anchor: ἐστι τοῦ Θεοῦ› · call in col 535
Ὁ Μονογενής ἐστι τοῦ Θεοῦ, etc. Sic hunc locum, in Regio codice vitiatum, sanitati restituit codex Bodleianus.
"Is the Only-begotten of God," etc. So the Bodleian codex restores to health this passage, which is corrupted in the Royal codex.
(printed under page 274)
(13) ‹anchor: καὶ μετὰ ταῦτα κεκαθαρισμένοι› · call in col 535
Codd. Regius et Barberinus, κεκαθαρισμένοι· Bodleianus, κεκαθαρμένοι.
The Royal and Barberini codices have "having been cleansed" (κεκαθαρισμένοι); the Bodleian has "having been purified" (κεκαθαρμένοι).
(printed under page 274)
(71) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 538
Joan. I, 29.
John 1:29.
(printed under page 275)
(72) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 538
Joan. VIII, 19.
John 8:19.
(printed under page 275)
(73) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 538
ibid. 20.
Same place, 20.
(printed under page 275)
(74) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 538
Luc. XXI, 1, 2 seq.
Luke 21:1–2 ff.
(printed under page 275)
(75) ‹anchor: sic se habent› · call in col 538
Marc. XII, 41 seq.
Mark 12:41 ff.
(printed under page 275)
(14) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 538
Codex Bodleianus, ἀκούσεται· Regius, ἀκούσει τε,
The Bodleian codex has "will hear"; the Royal, "and you will hear,"
(printed under page 275)
(15) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 538
Καὶ λελαλῆσθαι. In codice Regio deest καί, sed legitur in Bodleiano.
"And to have been spoken." In the Royal codex "and" is missing, but it is read in the Bodleian.
(printed under page 275)
(16) ‹anchor: ὃν εἶχεν› · call in col 538
Ὃν εἶχεν. Ὃν excidit e codice Regio, sed exstat in Bodleiano.
"Which she had." "Which" has dropped out of the Royal codex, but is extant in the Bodleian.
(printed under page 275)
(17) ‹anchor: καὶ πᾶς ἔβαλλε› · call in col 538
Καὶ πᾶς ἔβαλλε. Sic habent codices Bodleianus et Barberinus, ubi Regius perperam habet καὶ πᾶσιν ἔβαλλε. Vulgata Marci exemplaria Graeca, πῶς ὁ ὄχλος βάλλει.
"And everyone was casting." So the Bodleian and Barberini codices have it, where the Royal wrongly has "and he was casting to all." The common Greek copies of Mark have "how the crowd casts."
(printed under page 275)
(18) ‹anchor: Εἰ τὸ ἱερόν› · call in col 538
Εἰ τὸ ἱερόν, etc. Codex Bodleianus, εἴτε τὸ ἱερόν, etc. Ferrarius videtur legisse εἴτε τὸ ἱερὸν ἀνάγομεν τοῦ Θεοῦ, καὶ τὰ κατὰ τὸν ναὸν, εἴτε τὸν πνευματικὸν λόγον. Legendum fortasse εἰ τὸ ἱερὸν ἀνάγομεν τοῦ Θεοῦ καὶ τὰ κατὰ τὸν ναὸν εἰς τὸν πνευματικὸν λόγον.
"If the temple," etc. The Bodleian codex has "whether the temple," etc. Ferrarius seems to have read "whether we interpret anagogically the temple of God and the things in the shrine, or the spiritual word." Perhaps one should read "if we refer the temple of God and the things in the shrine to the spiritual word."
(printed under page 275)
(76) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 539
I Thess. V, 21, 22.
1 Thessalonians 5:21–22.
(printed under page 276)
(77) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 539
Matth. XXV, 15.
Matthew 25:15.
(printed under page 276)
(19) ‹anchor: τὴν ἐντολὴν Ἰησοῦ λέγουσαν› · call in col 539
Τὴν ἐντολὴν Ἰησοῦ λέγουσαν. Ad hoc effatum alludit Origenes homil. 19 in Jerem., num. 9 : Ὁ Κύριος δοκιμάζει μὲν δίκαια, ἀποδοκιμάζει δὲ ἄδικα, καὶ ἔστιν, ἵνα οὕτως ὀνομάσω, τραπεζίτης δικαίων καὶ ἀδίκων. Et tom. XII in Matth., num. 2, μὴ δόκιμοι τραπεζῖται· et in Matth. tom. XVII, num. 31 : Ὁ κατὰ τὴν Γραφὴν ὀνομαζόμενος δόκιμος τραπεζίτης· et tractat. XXVI in eumdem evangelistam num. 28 : « Tamen propter eos qui non possunt quasi trapezitae inter verba discernere, vera habeantur, an falsa; » et tractat. XXVII, num. 33 : « Vere enim qui implet illud mandatum, quod ait : Estote prudentes nummularii, » etc. Pamphilus in Apologetico : « Ab his vero qui Origenis libros legunt, istud penitus exclusum esse putant mandatum, quo probabiles effici jubentur trapezitae. » Idem proferunt iisdem verbis Clemens Alexandr. lib. I Stromat., Epiphanius haeres. XLIV, cap. 2, et Hieronymus ep. ad Min. et Alex., quod frustra tamen in Evangeliis Novoque adeo Testamento quaesiveris. Existimat Croius Observ. in Nov. Testam., cap. 28, verba haec non αὐτολεξεί a Patribus Christo tribui, sed e parabola de talentis, quae habetur Matth. cap. XXV et Luc. cap. XIX sententiam fuisse collectam a Patribus et conflatam. Ego secus sentio : nam si sententiam solum Patres excepissent, quomodo in eadem plane verba Christo tribuenda conspirassent? Verisimilius ergo mihi fit excepta haec fuisse ex Evangelio secundum Hebraeos, in quod plurima inseruerunt Nazaraei, quae sibi ab apostolis eorumve successoribus ore traditae fuerant. Multa certe ex hoc Evangelio deprompta fragmenta Hieronymus nobis sparsim in libris suis repraesentavit, qui Evangelii hujus exscribendi facultatem a Nazaraeis Beroeam habitantibus impetraverat. Sexcenta antiqui Patres Christi apostolorumve dicta vel facta memoriae prodiderunt, quae in Novi Testamenti libris non comparent; quaeque ex eo secundum Hebraeos Evangelio propagata, vel ex traditionibus profecta sunt. Nos quidem plurima hujusmodi in Origene deprehendimus. Quot putas facinora edidisse Christum, vel dicta protulisse, quae scriptis tradita non sunt : quae si quis singula voluisset persequi litteris, ne mundus quidem, ut ait Joannes XXI, 25, tot libros capere universus potuisset? Quid quod innumera veterum prophetarum apophthegmata memoriae, non litteris mandata, scriptores sacri prophetis illis recentiores usurparunt. Nec minus verisimile est aliqua in Evangeliis canonicis olim fuisse habita, quae demum interciderint : non ejusmodi sane, quibus fidei dogmata continerentur; eorum quippe « iota unum, aut unus apex non praeteribit. » Ad reliqua quod attinet, quidni aliqua excidisse credamus; cum e Novi Testamenti diversis lectionibus appareat multa inde sive temporis diuturnitatem, sive librariorum negligentiam expunxisse? HUETIUS.
"The commandment of Jesus that says." Origen alludes to this saying in Homily 19 on Jeremiah, no. 9: "The Lord approves what is just and rejects what is unjust, and is, if I may so name him, a money-changer of the just and the unjust." And in Tome 12 on Matthew, no. 2, "not approved money-changers"; and in Tome 17 on Matthew, no. 31: "the one named in Scripture an approved money-changer"; and in Tractate 26 on the same evangelist, no. 28: "Yet because of those who cannot, like money-changers, discern between words, whether they are to be held true or false"; and Tractate 27, no. 33: "For truly he who fulfils that commandment which says: Be prudent money-changers," etc. Pamphilus in the Apology: "By those who read Origen's books they think that commandment wholly excluded by which money-changers are bidden to become approved." Clement of Alexandria, Stromata book 1, Epiphanius, Heresy 44, ch. 2, and Jerome in the letter to Minervius and Alexander bring forward the same in the same words; yet you would look for it in vain in the Gospels and indeed in the whole New Testament. Croius, in his Observations on the New Testament, ch. 28, thinks that these words are not ascribed to Christ word for word by the Fathers, but that the sense was gathered and put together by the Fathers from the parable of the talents found in Matthew ch. 25 and Luke ch. 19. I think otherwise: for if the Fathers had taken only the sense, how would they have agreed on exactly the same words to ascribe to Christ? It seems more likely to me, then, that these words were taken from the Gospel according to the Hebrews, into which the Nazarenes inserted a great many things that had been handed down to them by word of mouth from the apostles or their successors. Jerome certainly reproduced for us, scattered through his books, many fragments drawn from this Gospel, having obtained from the Nazarenes living at Beroea leave to copy it. The ancient Fathers recorded countless sayings or deeds of Christ or the apostles that do not appear in the books of the New Testament, and these either spread from that Gospel according to the Hebrews or came from traditions. We indeed have found a great many of this kind in Origen. How many deeds do you think Christ performed, or sayings he uttered, that were not handed down in writing? If anyone had wished to pursue them one by one in letters, not even the whole world, as John says (21:25), could have held so many books. What of the fact that the sacred writers who came after those prophets made use of countless sayings of the ancient prophets that had been committed to memory, not to writing? Nor is it less likely that some things were once contained in the canonical Gospels that later dropped out: not, surely, such as contained dogmas of the faith, for of these "not one iota or one stroke shall pass away." As for the rest, why should we not believe that some things fell out, since it is clear from the variant readings of the New Testament that either the length of time or the carelessness of copyists has struck out many things from it? HUET.
(printed under page 276)
(20) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 539
Codex Regius, συνεὶς φερέτω, Barberinus, συνεισφερέτω, Bodleianus, εἰσφερέτω..
The Royal codex has "understanding, let him bring"; the Barberini, "let him contribute"; the Bodleian, "let him bring in."
(printed under page 276)
(21) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 539
Codex Bodleianus, ὃ δύναται· Regius et Barberinus, ὃς δύναται.
The Bodleian codex has "what he can"; the Royal and Barberini, "who can."
(printed under page 276)
(22) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 539
Codex Bodleianus, πράττει· Regius, perperam, πρὸς ἄττη.
The Bodleian codex has "does"; the Royal, wrongly, "πρὸς ἄττη."
(printed under page 276)
(23) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 539
Codex Barberinus, πάντων· Regius et Bodleianus, πάντως.
The Barberini codex has "of all"; the Royal and Bodleian, "altogether."
(printed under page 276)
(24) ‹anchor: πιστῶν ὑπολαμβανομένων› · call in col 539
Πιστῶν ὑπολαμβανομένων. Codex Bodleianus in margine habet ex conjectura, πιστὸς ὑπολαμβάνων. Barberinus, item in margine, ὑπὸ πιστῶν ὑπολαμβανομένων. Ferrarius videtur conjiciendo legisse πιστὸς ὑπολαμβανόμενος.
"Of believers being supposed." The Bodleian codex has in the margin, by conjecture, "a believer supposing." The Barberini, also in the margin, "being supposed by believers." Ferrarius seems to have read by conjecture "being supposed a believer."
(printed under page 276)
(78) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 542
Luc. XXI, 3.
Luke 21:3.
(printed under page 277)
(79) ‹anchor: Deus vero in corde› · call in col 542
I Reg. XVI, 7.
1 Kings [1 Samuel] 16:7.
(printed under page 277)
(80) ‹anchor: Ego sum lux mundi› · call in col 542
Joan. VIII, 12.
John 8:12.
(printed under page 277)
(81) ‹anchor: Patrem meum sciretis› · call in col 542
ibid. 19.
Same place, 19.
(printed under page 277) (24*) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 542 Ἃ ἀποδέδωκεν. Sic recte habet codex Bodleianus, Regius vero male omisit ἅ.
"Which he has rendered." So the Bodleian codex rightly has it; the Royal wrongly omitted "which."
(printed under page 277)
(25) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 542
Codex Bodleianus, βαλοῦσαν, Regius, βάλλουσαν.
The Bodleian codex has "having cast"; the Royal, "casting."
(printed under page 277)
(26) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 542
Codex Bodleianus, εἶπε, Regius, εἰπών.
The Bodleian codex has "he said"; the Royal, "having said."
(printed under page 277)
(27) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 542
Codex Bodleianus, ἐλάχιστον, Regius, ἐλαχίστη.
The Bodleian codex has "least" (neuter); the Royal, "least" (feminine).
(printed under page 277)
(28) ‹anchor: πτωχὴ ψυχὴ καὶ ὑστερουμένη› · call in col 542
Codd. Barberinus et Bodleianus, οἷά ποτε πτωχὴ ψυχὴ καὶ ὑστερουμένη. In Regio pro οἷα legitur εἰ, et deest ψυχή.
The Barberini and Bodleian codices have "what things a poor and needy soul ever." In the Royal "if" is read for "what things," and "soul" is missing.
(printed under page 277)
(29) ‹anchor: καὶ διὰ τοῦτο› · call in col 542
Καὶ διὰ τοῦτο. In codice Regio desideratur καί.
"And for this reason." In the Royal codex "and" is wanting.
(printed under page 277)
(82) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 543
Sap. VII, 9.
Wisdom 7:9.
(printed under page 278)
(83) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 543
I Cor. II, 6, 7.
1 Corinthians 2:6–7.
(printed under page 278)
(84) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 543
ibid. 6.
Same place, 6.
(printed under page 278)
(85) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 543
Prov. VIII, 22.
Proverbs 8:22.
(printed under page 278)
(86) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 543
Psal. XI, 7.
Psalm 11[12]:7.
(printed under page 278)
(87) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 543
Joan. I, 2.
John 1:2.
(printed under page 278)
(88) ‹anchor: docens in templo› · call in col 543
Joan. VIII, 20.
John 8:20.
(printed under page 278)
(89) ‹anchor: capere Dei verbum› · call in col 543
Joan. XXI, 25.
John 21:25.
(printed under page 278)
(90) ‹anchor: pro mundo pati, tacet› · call in col 543
Joan. XIX, 1, 11.
John 19:1, 11.
(printed under page 278)
(30) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 543
Τῶν ἀγνῶν λογίων. Supple, ἐν ὄψει, quod praecedit; id vidit Ferrarius. Ad marginem codicis Barberini ex conjectura legitur, ἐπὶ τῶν ἀγνῶν λογίων.
"Of the pure oracles." Supply "in sight," which precedes; Ferrarius saw this. In the margin of the Barberini codex is read, by conjecture, "upon the pure oracles."
(printed under page 278)
(31) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 543
Ὁ Ἰησοῦς. Deest in codice Regio, sed legitur in Bodleiano.
"Jesus." It is missing in the Royal codex, but is read in the Bodleian.
(printed under page 278)
(32) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 543
Codex Bodleianus, καὶ εἴ τίς γε· Regius, ἐπεί τίς γε.
The Bodleian codex has "and if anyone"; the Royal, "since anyone."
(printed under page 278)
(33) ‹anchor: τοσοῦτον οὐδείς› · call in col 543
Τοσοῦτον. Deest in codice Regio, sed habetur in Bodleiano.
"So long." It is missing in the Royal codex, but is found in the Bodleian.
(printed under page 278)
(34) ‹anchor: αὐτῷ δύναται› · call in col 543
Δύναται. Desideratur in codice Regio, sed legitur in Bodleiano.
"Is able." It is wanting in the Royal codex, but is read in the Bodleian.
(printed under page 278)
(35) ‹anchor: ὄντι ἐν τῷ ἱερῷ› · call in col 543
Post ἐν τῷ ἱερῷ codex Bodleianus habet ἔδει πιασθῆναι.
After "in the temple" the Bodleian codex has "he had to be seized."
(printed under page 278)
(91) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 546
Joan. XVIII, 3.
John 18:3.
(printed under page 279)
(92) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 546
Joan. VIII, 20.
John 8:20.
(printed under page 279)
(93) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 546
ibid. 21.
Same place, 21.
(printed under page 279)
(94) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 546
ibid. 58, 59.
Same place, 58–59.
(printed under page 279)
(95) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 546
Joan. IX, 1.
John 9:1.
(printed under page 279)
(96) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 546
Joan. VIII, 30.
John 8:30.
(printed under page 279)
(97) ‹anchor: agnoscunt veritatem› · call in col 546
ibid. 31, 32.
Same place, 31–32.
(printed under page 279)
(98) ‹anchor: ipse docet, dicens› · call in col 546
ibid. 28.
Same place, 28.
(printed under page 279)
(99) ‹anchor: cibi solidi› · call in col 546
Hebr. V, 12, 14.
Hebrews 5:12, 14.
(printed under page 279)
(1) ‹anchor: tali dicit› · call in col 546
I Cor. II, 2.
1 Corinthians 2:2.
(printed under page 279)
(2) ‹anchor: Paulus talibus› · call in col 546
ibid. 3.
Same place, 3.
(printed under page 279)
(3) ‹anchor: vestro moriemini› · call in col 546
Joan. VIII, 21.
John 8:21.
(printed under page 279)
(36) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 546
Codex Bodleianus, ἕτερα πλείονα, in Regio deest ἕτερα.
The Bodleian codex has "many other things"; in the Royal "other" is missing.
(printed under page 279)
(37) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 546
Codex Bodleianus, οἱονεὶ πένητες· Regius, οἷον οἱ πένητες.
The Bodleian codex has "as it were poor"; the Royal, "such as the poor."
(printed under page 279)
(38) ‹anchor: οὐδὲ πολλοὶ γνώσονται› · call in col 546
Codex Bodleianus, καὶ τῇ ἀληθείᾳ ἐλεύθεροι οὐ γίνονται· Regius, καὶ εἰ μὴ ἀλήθεια ἐλεύθεροι, ἐλεύθεροι οὐ γίνονται.
The Bodleian codex has "and they do not become free by the truth"; the Royal, "and if not truth free, they do not become free."
(printed under page 279)
(39) ‹anchor: χωροῦσι τὴν ἀλήθειαν› · call in col 546
Codex Bodleianus ἀλήθειαν· Regius vero, ἐλευθερίαν.
The Bodleian codex has "truth"; the Royal, however, "freedom."
(printed under page 279)
(4) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 547
Joan. VII, 30.
John 7:30.
(printed under page 280)
(5) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 547
Joan. VIII, 37.
John 8:37.
(printed under page 280)
(6) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 547
Joan. VIII, 40.
John 8:40.
(printed under page 280)
(7) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 547
Matth. VII, 8.
Matthew 7:8.
(printed under page 280)
(8) ‹anchor: in corde tuo› · call in col 547
Rom. X, 6, 8.
Romans 10:6, 8.
(printed under page 280)
(9) ‹anchor: vel ecce illic› · call in col 547
Luc. XVII, 21.
Luke 17:21.
(printed under page 280)
(10) ‹anchor: juxta dicentem› · call in col 547
Luc. XII, 20.
Luke 12:20.
(printed under page 280)
(40) ‹anchor: ἐν καιρῷ εὑρεθῇ› · call in col 547
Εὑρεθῇ. Deest in codice Regio, at legitur in Bodleiano.
"He may be found." It is missing in the Royal codex, but is read in the Bodleian.
(printed under page 280)
(11) ‹anchor: quamobrem inquit› · call in col 550
Joan. XI, 4.
John 11:4.
(printed under page 281)
(12) ‹anchor: vos non potestis venire› · call in col 550
Joan. VIII, 21.
John 8:21.
(printed under page 281)
(13) ‹anchor: laudabimus Dominum› · call in col 550
Psal. CXIII, 17, 18.
Psalm 113[115]:17–18.
(printed under page 281)
(14) ‹anchor: ipsa moritur› · call in col 550
Ezech. XVIII, 20.
Ezekiel 18:20.
(printed under page 281)
(15) ‹anchor: Joannes ad mortem› · call in col 550
I Joan. V, 16, 17.
1 John 5:16–17.
(printed under page 281)
(16) ‹anchor: detrimentum patiatur› · call in col 550
Matth. XVI, 26.
Matthew 16:26.
(printed under page 281)
(41) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 550
Ferrarius videtur legisse πῶς οἱ μὴ πιστεύσαντες, ὅτι ἔζων ἐν ἀσθενείᾳ, μέλλουσί ποτε ἀποθανεῖσθαι.
Ferrarius seems to have read "how those who did not believe, because they lived in weakness, are at some time to die."
(printed under page 281)
(42) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 550
Αὐτοῖς. Legendum videtur αὐτῶν.
"To them." One should apparently read "of them."
(printed under page 281)
(43) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 550
Καὶ ὁ ἰατρός. Deest in codice Bodleiano.
"And the physician." It is missing in the Bodleian codex.
(printed under page 281)
(44) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 550
Εἴπομεν. Ferrarius legebat εἴπωμεν.
"We said." Ferrarius read "let us say."
(printed under page 281)
(45) ‹anchor: εἶναι δύνασθαι› · call in col 550
Ἀπὸ τοῦ ἔτι αὐτὴν εἶναι δύνασθαι. Legendum fortasse ἀπὸ τοῦ ἔτι ἰαθῆναι δύνασθαι, vel ἀπὸ τοῦ ἔτι αὐτὴν ἰατὴν εἶναι δύνασθαι, vel quid simile.
"From its still being able to be." Perhaps one should read "from its still being able to be healed," or "from its still being able to be curable," or something similar.
(printed under page 281)
(46) ‹anchor: ἁμαρτία δηλονότι› · call in col 550
Ἁμαρτία δηλονότι. Ἁμαρτία videtur παρέλκειν.
"A sin, clearly." "Sin" seems superfluous.
(printed under page 281)
(47) ‹anchor: μὴ παρεσκευάσθαι› · call in col 550
Νῦν μὲν μὴ παρεσκευάσθαι. Negandi particula in Ferrario non comparet; quam genuinam tamen ratio et codices manuscripti et Perionius clamant.
"Not now to have been prepared." The negative particle does not appear in Ferrarius; yet reason, the manuscript codices and Périon all proclaim it genuine.
(printed under page 281)
(17) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 551
I Cor. III, 15.
1 Corinthians 3:15.
(printed under page 282)
(18) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 551
Joan. VIII, 21.
John 8:21.
(printed under page 282)
(19) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 551
Joan. XIII, 36.
John 13:36.
(printed under page 282)
(20) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 551
Matth. XII, 32.
Matthew 12:32.
(printed under page 282)
(21) ‹anchor: potestis venire› · call in col 551
Joan. VIII, 22.
John 8:22.
(printed under page 282)
(48) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 551
Sic recte habet codex Bodleianus, perperam vero Regius et Barberinus, δὲ δύνησθαι.
So the Bodleian codex rightly has it; the Royal and Barberini wrongly have "but to be able" (δὲ δύνησθαι).
(printed under page 282)
(49) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 551
Legendum videtur ἐὰν βλασφημήσῃ τις εἰς τὸ Πνεῦμα, etc.
One should apparently read "if anyone blasphemes against the Spirit," etc.
(printed under page 282)
(50) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 551
Οὐ μέντοι γε εἰ μὴ ἐν τῷ μέλλοντι. Agnoscis hic semina Origeniani erroris, qui damnatorum poenis finem imponebat. HUETIUS.
"Not, however, if not in the age to come." You recognise here the seeds of Origen's error, which set an end to the punishments of the damned. HUET.
(printed under page 282)
(51) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 551
Codex Regius, φησὶ γάρ· Πῶς, etc.
The Royal codex has "for he says: How," etc.
(printed under page 282)
(52) ‹anchor: ἐν ἀγνοίᾳ ποτέ› · call in col 551
Ἐν ἀγνοίᾳ. In codice Regio male omittitur ἐν.
"In ignorance." In the Royal codex "in" is wrongly omitted.
(printed under page 282)
(53) ‹anchor: δὲ αὐτοὺς μεταβάλλειν› · call in col 551
Δυνατὸν δὲ αὐτούς. In Regio codice deest δέ.
"But it is possible for them." In the Royal codex "but" is missing.
(printed under page 282)
(54) ‹anchor: οὐ δύνασθε ἐλθεῖν› · call in col 551
Ἄξιον ζητῆσαι πόθεν κινηθέντες οἱ Ἰουδαῖοι πρὸς τό· Ὅπου ἐγὼ ὑπάγω, ὑμεῖς οὐ δύνασθε ἐλθεῖν. Haec desiderantur in Regio codice, sed restituuntur e Bodleiano.
"It is worth asking what moved the Jews, at the words: Where I am going you cannot come." These words are wanting in the Royal codex, but are restored from the Bodleian.
(printed under page 282)
(55) ‹anchor: οὐ δύνανται ἀπιέναι› · call in col 551
Codex Regius, perperam, δύναται.
The Royal codex wrongly has "is able" (singular).
(printed under page 282)
(48) ‹anchor: ὕστερον δὲ δυνήσεσθαι› · call in col 552
Sic recte habet codex Bodleianus, perperam vero Regius et Barberinus, δὲ δύνησθαι.
So the Bodleian codex rightly has it; but the Royal and the Barberini wrongly have δὲ δύνησθαι.
(printed under page 282)
(49) ‹anchor: εἰς τὸ Πνεῦμα› · call in col 552
Legendum videtur ἐὰν βλασφημήσῃ τις εἰς τὸ Πνεῦμα, etc.
It seems we should read "if anyone blasphemes against the Spirit," etc.
(printed under page 282)
(50) ‹anchor: ἐν τῷ μέλλοντι αἰῶνι› · call in col 552
Οὐ μέντοι γε εἰ μὴ ἐν τῷ μέλλοντι. Agnoscis hic semina Origeniani erroris, qui damnatorum poenis finem imponebat. HUETIUS.
"Yet it does not follow that if not in the age to come." You recognise here the seeds of the Origenist error, which set an end to the punishments of the damned. HUET.
(printed under page 282)
(51) ‹anchor: φησί· « Πῶς› · call in col 552
Codex Regius, φησὶ γάρ· Πῶς, etc.
The Royal codex has "for he says: How," etc.
(printed under page 282)
(52) ‹anchor: ἐν ἀγνοίᾳ ποτὲ› · call in col 552
Ἐν ἀγνοίᾳ. In codice Regio male omittitur ἐν.
"In ignorance." In the Royal codex "in" is wrongly omitted.
(printed under page 282)
(53) ‹anchor: δυνατὸν δὲ αὐτοὺς› · call in col 552
Δυνατὸν δὲ αὐτούς. In Regio codice deest δέ.
"And it is possible for them." In the Royal codex "and" is missing.
(printed under page 282)
(54) ‹anchor: ὑμεῖς οὐ δύνασθε ἐλθεῖν, » φασὶ› · call in col 552
Ἄξιον ζητῆσαι πόθεν κινηθέντες οἱ Ἰουδαῖοι πρὸς τό· Ὅπου ἐγὼ ὑπάγω, ὑμεῖς οὐ δύνασθε ἐλθεῖν. Haec desiderantur in Regio codice, sed restituuntur e Bodleiano.
"It is worth inquiring what moved the Jews, in reply to the saying: Where I go, you cannot come." These words are wanting in the Royal codex, but are restored from the Bodleian.
(printed under page 282)
(55) ‹anchor: οὐ δύνανται ἀπιέναι› · call in col 552
Codex Regius, perperam, δύναται.
The Royal codex wrongly has "is able."
(printed under page 282)
(22) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 554
Matth. XII, 24; Luc. XI, 15.
Matthew 12:24; Luke 11:15.
(printed under page 283)
(23) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 554
ibid. 12.
Same place, 12.
(printed under page 283)
(24) ‹anchor: unus aliquis prophetarum› · call in col 554
Marc. VI, 15; Luc. IX, 8.
Mark 6:15; Luke 9:8.
(printed under page 283)
(25) ‹anchor: interfecturus est seipsum› · call in col 554
Joan. VIII, 22.
John 8:22.
(printed under page 283)
(56) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 554
Πολλά. Deest in codice Regio.
"Many things." It is missing in the Royal codex.
(printed under page 283)
(57) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 554
Codices Regius et Barberinus, male, ἄδηλον.
The Royal and Barberini codices wrongly have "unclear."
(printed under page 283)
(58) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 554
Iidem codd. Regius et Barberinus, βίβλοις.
The same codices, the Royal and Barberini, have "books."
(printed under page 283)
(59) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 554
Οὐ ψεύδει τῷ Βεελζεβοὺλ λόγων ὄντων. Locus mendi valde suspectus. Lego cum Perionio οὐ ψευδῆς περὶ τοῦ Βεελζεβοὺλ, λέγοντος οὕτως· neque enim placet lectio codicis Bodleiani qui pro οὐ ψεύδει τῷ Βεελζεβούλ, etc., habet ψευδῶν περὶ τοῦ Βεελζεβοὺλ λόγων ὄντων.
"Not by a lie to Beelzebul, the words being." A passage strongly suspected of error. With Périon I read "not false about Beelzebul, as he says thus"; for I do not like the reading of the Bodleian codex, which in place of "not by a lie to Beelzebul," etc., has "the words about Beelzebul being false."
(printed under page 283)
(60) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 554
Codex Regius, παραδεξάμενοι.
The Royal codex has "having accepted."
(printed under page 283)
(61) ‹anchor: αὐτὸν ἑαυτὸν ἀποκτείναντα› · call in col 554
Αὐτὸν ἑαυτὸν ἀποκτείναντα. Sic habet codex Bodleianus, Regius vero, αὐτὸν ἀποκτείνοντα.
"That he, having killed himself." So the Bodleian codex has it; the Royal, however, "that he, killing."
(printed under page 283)
(62) ‹anchor: μὴ εὑρισκόμενοι› · call in col 554
Codex Bodleianus, εὑρισκόμενοι· Regius, εὑρισκόμενα. Legendum videtur εὑρίσκομεν.
The Bodleian codex has "finding" (masculine participle); the Royal, "found" (neuter). One should apparently read "we find."
(printed under page 283)
(63) ‹anchor: ἀπαιτούντων τινῶν αὐτάς› · call in col 554
Ἀπαιτούντων τινῶν αὐτάς, etc. Origenes infra tom. XXVIII in Joan., num. 5, Τάχα δὲ καὶ εἶδεν ὁ τηλικοῦτος Ἰησοῦς καὶ τὴν ψυχὴν αὐτὴν τοῦ Λαζάρου, ἤτοι ἀγομένην ὑπὸ τῶν τεταγμένων ἐπὶ τούτοις ἤ, etc. Supra scripsit Origenes tom. XIII in Joan., num. 49, angelorum ministerio animas hominum corporibus illigari : cui doctrinae consequens erat eas quoque eorumdem ministrorum ope ab hominum corporibus dissolvi. Philastrius haeres. CXX : « Ignorantes quod anima hominis, cum exierit de saeculo, sive bona, sive mala, id est pia, atque impia, ab angelo ducitur in locum statutum, ut in futurum percipiat juxta quod gessit in hoc saeculo constituta. » Idem quoque ethnicis creditum fuisse video : ministros illos animarum ductores, ψυχοπομποὺς appellat Plutarchus. Eosdem autem animarum in statuta loca deducendarum negotium suscipere daemones, qui earum, dum corpori conjunctae essent, curam gesserint, scribit Plato in Phaedone : Λέγεται δὲ οὕτως, ὡς ἄρα τελευτήσαντα ἕκαστον ὁ ἑκάστου δαίμων, ὅσπερ ζῶντα εἰλήχει, οὕτως ἄγειν ἐπιχειρεῖ εἰς δή τινα τόπον, οἷ δεῖ τοὺς συλλεγέντας διαδικασαμένους, εἰς ᾅδου πορεύεσθαι μετὰ ἡγεμόνος ἐκείνου ᾧ δὴ προστέτακται τοὺς ἐνθένδε ἐκεῖσε πορεῦσαι. « Ita autem circumfertur : unumquemque mortuorum ab eo daemone, qui viventem sortitus fuerit, in quemdam locum duci, ubi oporteat omnes manes congregatos ex rati consti- (continues)
"Some demanding them back," etc. Origen below, Tome 28 on John, no. 5: "Perhaps Jesus, being so great, also saw the very soul of Lazarus, either being led by those appointed over these things, or," etc. Above, in Tome 13 on John, no. 49, Origen wrote that souls are bound to human bodies by the ministry of angels; and it followed from this teaching that they are also released from human bodies by the help of the same ministers. Philastrius, Heresy 120: "Not knowing that the soul of a man, when it has gone out of the world, whether good or bad, that is, godly or ungodly, is led by an angel to an appointed place, so that in the future it may receive according to what it did while placed in this world." I see that the same was believed by the pagans too: Plutarch calls those ministers, the guides of souls, "psychopomps." And Plato writes in the Phaedo that the business of leading souls to their appointed places is undertaken by the daemons who had charge of them while they were joined to the body: "It is said thus: that when each has died, the daemon of each, who had him as his lot while living, undertakes to lead him to a certain place, where those gathered must be judged and then go to Hades with that guide who is charged with conveying those from here to there." "Thus it is told: that each of the dead is led by that daemon who had him as his lot while living to a certain place, where all the shades gathered must, by a fixed ordi- (continues)
(printed under page 283)
(26) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 555
Luc. XII, 20.
Luke 12:20.
(printed under page 284)
(27) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 555
Joan. X, 18.
John 10:18.
(printed under page 284)
(28) ‹anchor: crucifixi fuere› · call in col 555
Joan. XIX, 32.
John 19:32.
(printed under page 284)
(29) ‹anchor: emisit spiritum› · call in col 555
Matth. XXVII, 50.
Matthew 27:50.
(printed under page 284)
(30) ‹anchor: Filius Dei erat hic› · call in col 555
Matth. XXVII, 51 seq.
Matthew 27:51 ff.
(printed under page 284)
(64) ‹anchor: [(64) quippe cum omnium› · call in col 555
Haec e Perionio supplevimus.
We have supplied these words from Périon.
(printed under page 284)
(65) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 555
Codex Bodleianus, γάρ τίνα τε βούλεται. Regius et Barberinus, γὰρ τίνας τε βούλεται. Legebat Perionius γάρ τινα, ὅτε βούλεται, quod mihi valde probatur.
The Bodleian codex has "for whom (singular) he wishes"; the Royal and Barberini, "for whom (plural) he wishes." Périon read "for someone, when he wishes," which I strongly approve.
(printed under page 284)
(66) ‹anchor: μὴ ἀπᾴδουσαν› · call in col 555
Codd. Regius et Barberinus, ἀποδοῦσαν, male.
The Royal and Barberini codices wrongly have "having rendered."
(printed under page 284)
(67) ‹anchor: εἰσῆλθον εἰς τὴν ἁγίαν πόλιν› · call in col 555
Iidem codd. Regius et Barberinus, εἰσελθόντες, male.
The same codices, the Royal and Barberini, wrongly have "having entered."
(printed under page 284)
(31) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 558
Mich. V, 2; Matth. II, 6; Joan. VII, 42.
Micah 5:2; Matthew 2:6; John 7:42.
(printed under page 285)
(32) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 558
Joan. III, 22.
John 3:22.
(printed under page 285)
(33) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 558
Joan. VII, 40 seq.
John 7:40 ff.
(printed under page 285)
(34) ‹anchor: locutus est homo› · call in col 558
ibid. 46.
Same place, 46.
(printed under page 285)
(35) ‹anchor: exsecrabiles sunt› · call in col 558
ibid. 47-49.
Same place, 47–49.
(printed under page 285)
(36) ‹anchor: neque surgit› · call in col 558
ibid. 51, 52.
Same place, 51–52.
(printed under page 285)
(37) ‹anchor: lumen vitae› · call in col 558
Joan. VIII, 12.
John 8:12.
(printed under page 285)
(38) ‹anchor: qui misit me Pater› · call in col 558
ibid. 13-18.
Same place, 13–18.
(printed under page 285)
(39) ‹anchor: Patrem meum sciretis› · call in col 558
Joan. VIII, 19.
John 8:19.
(printed under page 285)
(68) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 558
Αὐτοῦ. Lego αὐτούς.
"Of him." I read "them."
(printed under page 285)
(69) ‹anchor: ὁ ὄχλος οὗτος› · call in col 558
Ferrarius videtur legisse ἀλλ' ἢ οὐχ ὁ ὄχλος.
Ferrarius seems to have read "but is not the crowd."
(printed under page 285)
(40) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 559
ibid. 21, 22.
Same place, 21–22.
(printed under page 286)
(41) ‹anchor: tertia die resurget› · call in col 559
Matth. XX, 17 seq.
Matthew 20:17 ff.
(printed under page 286)
(42) ‹anchor: et interfici› · call in col 559
Matth. XVI, 21.
Matthew 16:21.
(printed under page 286)
(43) ‹anchor: tertia die resurget› · call in col 559
Matth. XVII, 21, 22.
Matthew 17:21–22.
(printed under page 286)
(44) ‹anchor: crucifige eum› · call in col 559
Luc. XXIII, 21.
Luke 23:21.
(printed under page 286)
(45) ‹anchor: voce valida, exspiraverit› · call in col 559
Joan. XIX, 32, 33.
John 19:32–33.
(printed under page 286)
(46) ‹anchor: me occidet me› · call in col 559
Gen. IV, 14.
Genesis 4:14.
(printed under page 286)
(47) ‹anchor: septuplo vindicabitur› · call in col 559
ibid. 15.
Same place, 15.
(printed under page 286)
(70) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 559
Haec supplevimus e Perionio.
We have supplied these words from Périon.
(printed under page 286)
(71) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 559
Ἐν τῷ. Deest in codice Regio.
"In the." It is missing in the Royal codex.
(printed under page 286)
(72) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 559
Πῶς τὸν βίον ἐξελήλυθε. Ita tom. XXXII in Joan., num. 13, πρὸ τοῦ τοῦτον ἐξελθεῖν τὸν βίον, ἦν ἐν τῷ κόλπῳ τοῦ Ἀβραάμ. Et in eodem tomo paulo inferius, num. 16, οὐ γὰρ μόνον κατὰ τὸ ἁπλούστερον ἐξῆλθε τὸν οἶκον.
"How he departed this life." So in Tome 32 on John, no. 13: "before he departed this life, he was in Abraham's bosom." And in the same tome a little further down, no. 16: "for not only in the simpler sense did he go out of the house."
(printed under page 286)
(73) ‹anchor: καὶ παραδοθήσεται τοῖς ἔθνεσιν› · call in col 559
Codex Bodleianus, καὶ παραδοθήσεται, in Regio deest καί.
The Bodleian codex has "and he will be handed over"; in the Royal "and" is missing.
(printed under page 286)
(74) ‹anchor: κράξας φωνῇ μεγάλῃ› · call in col 559
Cod. Bodleian., ἐπὶ τὸ πλῆξαι τὰ σκέλη αὐτοῦ, κράξας, etc. Regius, ἐπιπλῆξαι τὰ σκέλη, κράξας.
The Bodleian codex has "to strike his legs, having cried out," etc. The Royal has "to strike upon the legs, having cried out."
(printed under page 286)
(75) ‹anchor: ἢ πῶς πᾶς› · call in col 559
Codex Bodleianus, ἢ πῶς πᾶς, Regius, ἢ ἐπὶ πᾶς. Paulo post in Regio perperam legitur ἀδικούμενα pro ἐκδικούμενα.
The Bodleian codex has "or how everyone"; the Royal, "or upon everyone" [the end of the line is cut at the scan edge]. A little further on, the Royal wrongly reads "wronged" for "avenged."
(printed under page 286)
(48) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 562
Matth. XVI, 22.
Matthew 16:22.
(printed under page 287)
(49) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 562
ibid. 23.
Same place, 23.
(printed under page 287)
(50) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 562
Ephes. V, 2.
Ephesians 5:2.
(printed under page 287)
(51) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 562
Psal. CIX, 4.
Psalm 109[110]:4.
(printed under page 287)
(52) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 562
Joan. I, 29.
John 1:29.
(printed under page 287)
(53) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 562
Joan. VIII, 22.
John 8:22.
(printed under page 287)
(54) ‹anchor: Ego sum lux mundi› · call in col 562
ibid. 12.
Same place, 12.
(printed under page 287)
(76) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 562
Codex Bodleianus, ἀρχιερέων εὐσεβῶν, Regius, ἀρχιερέως εὐσεβῶς.
The Bodleian codex has "of pious high priests"; the Royal, "of the high priest piously."
(printed under page 287)
(77) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 562
Codex Bodleianus, Μήτι ἀποκτενεῖ, Regius, Μὴ ἀποκτενεῖ.
The Bodleian codex has "Surely he will not kill"; the Royal, "He will not kill."
(printed under page 287)
(78) ‹anchor: not visible in the page foot› · call in col 562
Codex Bodleianus, παρά, Regius, περί.
The Bodleian codex has "from"; the Royal, "about."
(printed under page 287)
(79) ‹anchor: οἱονεὶ κρείττονος αὐτοῦ› · call in col 562
Κρείττονος. Sic mss. et ipse Ferrarius, qui vertit, « quasi Jesus melior, ac praestantior esset, » sed tamen legendum videtur κρείττονες, et ita lego.
"Better" (genitive singular). So the manuscripts, and Ferrarius himself, who translates "as if Jesus were better and more excellent"; yet it seems one should read "better" (nominative plural), and so I read.
(printed under page 287)
(80) ‹anchor: τοὺς δὲ Ἰουδαίους αὐτό› · call in col 562
Codex Bodleianus, αὐτό· Regius, αὐτῷ.
The Bodleian codex has "it"; the Royal, "to him."
(printed under page 287)
(81) ‹anchor: κατὰ πάντα ἠλίθιον› · call in col 562
Κατὰ πάντα. Deest in Regio codice, sed legitur in codicibus Bodleiano et Barberino.
"In every way." It is missing in the Royal codex, but is read in the Bodleian and Barberini codices.
(printed under page 287)
(55) · call in col 563
Joan. VIII, 23.
John 8:23.
(printed under page 288)
(56) · call in col 563
Joan. III, 31, 32.
John 3:31–32.
(printed under page 288)
(57) · call in col 563
Coloss. I, 15.
Colossians 1:15.
(printed under page 288)
(58) · call in col 563
I Cor. XV, 47.
1 Corinthians 15:47.
(printed under page 288)
(59) ‹anchor: eorum quae videntur› · call in col 563
II Cor. IV, 18.
2 Corinthians 4:18.
(printed under page 288)
(82) ‹anchor: καὶ πᾶς γε ὁ τοιοῦτος› · call in col 563
Codex Barberinus in margine habet τοιούτοις, sicque videtur legisse Ferrarius.
The Barberini codex has τοιούτοις in the margin, and Ferrarius seems to have read it so.
(printed under page 288)
(83) ‹anchor: δεηθέντας τῆς› · call in col 563
Codex Bodleianus, τῆς· Regius, τούς, male.
The Bodleian codex has τῆς; the Regius has τούς, wrongly.
(printed under page 288)
(84) ‹anchor: ὅσον δὲ› · call in col 563
Ὅσον δέ, etc. Legendum videtur ὅσον δὲ δεῖ ἐπὶ τῷ κόσμῳ τόπους κόσμου συνεξετάζεσθαι, εἶεν ἄν τινες, etc. In codice Bodleiano ante εἶεν legitur εἰ.
Ὅσον δέ, etc. It seems we should read ὅσον δὲ δεῖ ἐπὶ τῷ κόσμῳ τόπους κόσμου συνεξετάζεσθαι, εἶεν ἄν τινες, etc. ("insofar as places of the world must be compared with one another in the world, there would be some…"). In the Bodleian codex εἰ is read before εἶεν.
(printed under page 288)
(60) · call in col 566
Joan. XV, 19.
John 15:19.
(printed under page 289)
(61) · call in col 566
Luc. XIX, 10.
Luke 19:10.
(printed under page 289)
(62) · call in col 566
Ephes. IV, 9.
Ephesians 4:9.
(printed under page 289)
(63) · call in col 566
ibid. 10.
Ibid., 4:10.
(printed under page 289)
(64) · call in col 566
Matth. VI, 21.
Matthew 6:21.
(printed under page 289)
(65) · call in col 566
I Cor. XV, 49.
1 Corinthians 15:49.
(printed under page 289)
(66) · call in col 566
Hebr. IV, 14.
Hebrews 4:14.
(printed under page 289)
(67) ‹anchor: in mundo sunt diligit› · call in col 566
I Joan. II, 15 seq.
1 John 2:15 ff.
(printed under page 289)
(68) ‹anchor: et ego mundo› · call in col 566
Galat. VI, 14.
Galatians 6:14.
(printed under page 289)
(69) ‹anchor: tota mente sua› · call in col 566
Matth. XXII, 37.
Matthew 22:37.
(printed under page 289)
(70) ‹anchor: et templum idolorum› · call in col 566
II Cor. VI, 14-16.
2 Corinthians 6:14–16.
(printed under page 289)
(71) ‹anchor: in lacu infimo› · call in col 566
Psal. LXXXVII, 7.
Psalm 87(88):7.
(printed under page 289)
(72) ‹anchor: est etiam qui ascendit› · call in col 566
Ephes. IV, 9, 10.
Ephesians 4:9–10.
(printed under page 289)
(73) ‹anchor: procident omnes descendentes› · call in col 566
Psal. XXI, 30.
Psalm 21(22):30.
(printed under page 289)
(74) ‹anchor: quis confitebitur tibi› · call in col 566
Psal. VI, 6.
Psalm 6:6.
(printed under page 289)
(85) · call in col 566
Ὁ Σωτήρ. Deest in codice Regio, sed legitur in Bodleiano.
Ὁ Σωτήρ ("the Saviour"): missing in the Regius codex, but read in the Bodleian.
(printed under page 289)
(86) · call in col 566
Sic habet codex Bodleianus, melius quam Regius, in quo legitur ἑκάστου ἔργα οἷον εἶπα.
So the Bodleian codex has it, better than the Regius, in which is read ἑκάστου ἔργα οἷον εἶπα.
(printed under page 289)
(87) ‹anchor: κόσμον τοῦτον ἀγάπην τόν› · call in col 566
Codex Bodleianus, τόν· Regius, τήν, male.
The Bodleian codex has τόν; the Regius τήν, wrongly.
(printed under page 289)
(88) ‹anchor: καὶ τά› · call in col 566
Codex Bodleianus, καὶ τῶν.
The Bodleian codex has καὶ τῶν.
(printed under page 289)
(89) ‹anchor: τοῦ ναοῦ τυγχάνοντος› · call in col 566
Codex Bodleianus, τυγχάνοντος· Regius τυγχάνειν.
The Bodleian codex has τυγχάνοντος; the Regius τυγχάνειν.
(printed under page 289)
(75) · call in col 567
I Cor. XV, 26.
1 Corinthians 15:26.
(printed under page 290)
(76) · call in col 567
Ephes. IV, 10.
Ephesians 4:10.
(printed under page 290)
(77) ‹anchor: Primogenitus omnis creaturae› · call in col 567
Coloss. I, 15.
Colossians 1:15.
(printed under page 290)
(78) ‹anchor: est sapientia multiformis› · call in col 567
Ephes. III, 10.
Ephesians 3:10.
(printed under page 290)
(79) ‹anchor: Omnia in sapientia fecisti› · call in col 567
Psal. CIII, 24.
Psalm 103(104):24.
(printed under page 290)
(90) · call in col 567
Καὶ γόνυ. In Regio codice deest καί.
Καὶ γόνυ ("and the knee"): in the Regius codex καί is missing.
(printed under page 290)
(91) · call in col 567
Codex Bodleianus, πρότερον· Regius, πρότεροι.
The Bodleian codex has πρότερον; the Regius πρότεροι.
(printed under page 290)
(92) · call in col 567
Codex Bodleianus, ὑποταχθήσονται· Regius, ὑποτάσσονται.
The Bodleian codex has ὑποταχθήσονται; the Regius ὑποτάσσονται.
(printed under page 290)
(93) · call in col 567
Codex Bodleianus, ἐστὶ βασιλείας· Regius, ἐστὶν ἡ βασιλεία.
The Bodleian codex has ἐστὶ βασιλείας; the Regius ἐστὶν ἡ βασιλεία.
(printed under page 290)
(94) · call in col 567
Codd. Bodleianus et Barberinus, καταβάσεως· Regius, βάσεως.
The Bodleian and Barberini codices have καταβάσεως; the Regius βάσεως.
(printed under page 290)
(95) · call in col 567
Οὐχ ἁπλῶς, etc. Sic habet codex Bodleianus, quod per grammaticas leges non licet. In Regio et Barberino legitur, οὐχ ἁπλῶς εὑρήσεις διαφορὰν ἐπιπλεῖον νοητῶς καταβαινουσῶν νοήσεις. Huetius vocem νοήσεις expungebat, vel ita certe legendum censebat, οὐχ ἁπλῶς εὑρήσεις, καὶ διαφορὰν ἐπιπλεῖον νοητῶς καταβαινουσῶν νοήσεις.
Οὐχ ἁπλῶς, etc. So the Bodleian codex has it, which the rules of grammar do not allow. In the Regius and the Barberini is read οὐχ ἁπλῶς εὑρήσεις διαφορὰν ἐπιπλεῖον νοητῶς καταβαινουσῶν νοήσεις. Huet struck out the word νοήσεις, or at any rate thought it should be read thus: οὐχ ἁπλῶς εὑρήσεις, καὶ διαφορὰν ἐπιπλεῖον νοητῶς καταβαινουσῶν νοήσεις.
(printed under page 290)
(96) · call in col 567
Codex Bodleianus, περὶ τῆς· Regius, περὶ τοῦ.
The Bodleian codex has περὶ τῆς; the Regius περὶ τοῦ.
(printed under page 290)
(97) ‹anchor: τοῦ ὅλου› · call in col 567
Τοῦ ὅλου. In codice Bodleiano deest ὅλου.
Τοῦ ὅλου ("of the whole"): in the Bodleian codex ὅλου is missing.
(printed under page 290)
(98) ‹anchor: ὅτι οὐδέν› · call in col 567
Codex Bodleianus, ὅτι οὐδέν· in Regio deest ὅτι.
The Bodleian codex has ὅτι οὐδέν; in the Regius ὅτι is missing.
(printed under page 290)
(99) ‹anchor: ὡς οὐδέ› · call in col 567
Codex Bodleianus, ὡς οὐδέ· in Regio omittitur, ὡς.
The Bodleian codex has ὡς οὐδέ; in the Regius ὡς is omitted.
(printed under page 290)
(1) ‹anchor: κτίσις καταβολή ἐστιν› · call in col 567
Οὗ ἡ κτίσις καταβολή ἐστιν. In hac voce, (continues)
Οὗ ἡ κτίσις καταβολή ἐστιν ("whose creation is a casting-down"). In this word, (continues)
(printed under page 290)
(80) · call in col 570
Joan. VIII, 23.
John 8:23.
(printed under page 291)
(81) · call in col 570
Joan. XVII, 24; Ephes. I, 4; I Petr. I, 20.
John 17:24; Ephesians 1:4; 1 Peter 1:20.
(printed under page 291)
(82) · call in col 570
Joan. XV, 19; Marc. VIII, 34.
John 15:19; Mark 8:34.
(printed under page 291)
(83) · call in col 570
Joan. VIII, 24.
John 8:24.
(printed under page 291)
(84) · call in col 570
ibid. 21.
Ibid., 8:21.
(printed under page 291)
(85) ‹anchor: Jacobi nomine circumfertur› · call in col 570
Jac. II, 20.
James 2:20.
(printed under page 291)
(86) ‹anchor: sunt ad mortem› · call in col 570
Rom. VI, 16.
Romans 6:16.
(printed under page 291)
(87) ‹anchor: ex Deo natus est› · call in col 570
I Joan. V, 1.
1 John 5:1.
(printed under page 291)
(88) ‹anchor: Primogenitus omnis creaturae› · call in col 570
Coloss. I, 14.
Colossians 1:14 [as printed; the verse is 1:15].
(printed under page 291)
(89) ‹anchor: moriemini in peccatis vestris› · call in col 570
Joan. VIII, 24.
John 8:24.
(printed under page 291)
(90) ‹anchor: in principio apud Deum› · call in col 570
Joan. I, 2.
John 1:2.
(printed under page 291)
(2) · call in col 570
Ἐπίτηδες διὰ τὴν τοιαύτην. Sic recte habet codex Bodleianus, in Regio autem et Barberino perperam legitur, ἐπίτηδες τοιαύτην ἐπίνοιαν πλασάντων ὀνομάτων ἁγίων.
Ἐπίτηδες διὰ τὴν τοιαύτην ("deliberately, on account of such a…"). So the Bodleian codex rightly has it; in the Regius and Barberini, however, is wrongly read ἐπίτηδες τοιαύτην ἐπίνοιαν πλασάντων ὀνομάτων ἁγίων.
(printed under page 291)
(3) · call in col 570
Codex Bodleianus, ζητήσεσθε· Regius, ζητῆτε.
The Bodleian codex has ζητήσεσθε; the Regius ζητῆτε.
(printed under page 291)
(4) ‹anchor: ἐὰν γάρ› · call in col 570
Codex Bodleianus, ἐὰν γάρ· Regius, ἐὰν δέ.
The Bodleian codex has ἐὰν γάρ; the Regius ἐὰν δέ.
(printed under page 291)
(5) ‹anchor: ἐπεὶ ὁ πιστεύσας› · call in col 570
Ἐπεὶ ὁ πιστεύσας, etc. Ferrarius videtur legisse ἔτι ὁ πιστεύσας, etc.
Ἐπεὶ ὁ πιστεύσας ("since he who has believed"), etc. Ferrarius seems to have read ἔτι ὁ πιστεύσας ("further, he who has believed"), etc.
(printed under page 291)
(91) · call in col 571
Ephes. II, 14.
Ephesians 2:14.
(printed under page 292)
(92) · call in col 571
Psal. XXXVIII, 8.
Psalm 38(39):8.
(printed under page 292)
(93) · call in col 571
Psal. CXVII, 14.
Psalm 117(118):14.
(printed under page 292)
(94) · call in col 571
Joan. VIII, 25.
John 8:25.
(printed under page 292)
(95) ‹anchor: moriemini in peccatis vestris› · call in col 571
ibid. 24.
Ibid., 8:24.
(printed under page 292)
(6) · call in col 571
Codices Bodleianus et Barberinus, εἰ ἐνδίδομεν. In Regio codice deest εἰ.
The Bodleian and Barberini codices have εἰ ἐνδίδομεν; in the Regius codex εἰ is missing.
(printed under page 292)
(7) · call in col 571
Τὸ εἶναι ἀνθρώπου μεῖζον. Lego τι εἶναι ἀνθρώπου. Ferrarius videtur legisse τις εἶναι ἀνθρώπου μείζων.
Τὸ εἶναι ἀνθρώπου μεῖζον ("the being greater than a man"). I read τι εἶναι ἀνθρώπου ("to be something [greater] than a man"). Ferrarius seems to have read τις εἶναι ἀνθρώπου μείζων ("to be someone greater than a man").
(printed under page 292)
(8) ‹anchor: καὶ παραπλήσιος› · call in col 571
Codex Regius, οὐχ ἂν μὴ ἕν τι τούτων ἦν, παραπλήσιον, sed Bodleianus lectionem nostri textus exhibet.
The Regius codex has οὐχ ἂν μὴ ἕν τι τούτων ἦν, παραπλήσιον; but the Bodleian gives the reading of our text.
(printed under page 292)