PG 2 · cols. 1167–1186
The Letter to Diognetus
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PG 2 · cols. 1167–1186
Editors' preface
(none) — no call in the Latin translation below the title; notes (35)–(38), printed under this column, are called in the Prooemia above the title (not in this unit)
ANONYMI VIRI APOSTOLICI EPISTOLA AD DIOGNETUM. Ex interpretatione Henrici Stephani, pluribus locis emendata. (GALLAND., Vet. Patr. Biblioth., I, 320.) (The title is printed full width across cols 1167–1168 below the end of the Prooemia; Migne's Latin title, set untranslated per UNIT.md. The chapter synopsis printed full width beneath it goes with the Greek column, n1168.)
(39) ‹Διόγνητε, ὑπερεσπουδακότα› · printed under col 1167 (left half of the note band)
Ὑπερεσπουδακότα. Ante hanc vocem legebatur ὡς in Beureri exemplari, quod ut prorsus inutile, videtur Stephanus expunxisse.
Ὑπερεσπουδακότα. Before this word ὡς was read in Beurer's copy, which Stephanus seems to have struck out as wholly useless.
(40) ‹αὐτόν τε κόσμον› · printed under col 1167, continued under col 1168
Αὐτόν τε κόσμον. Mallet Stephanus αὐτόν τε τὸν κόσμον. Sed haud scio an operam ludat doctissimus grammaticus, dum in hoc scripto emendando sic versatur, quasi Platonis esset aut Demosthenis opus.
Αὐτόν τε κόσμον. Stephanus would prefer αὐτόν τε τὸν κόσμον. But I rather think the most learned grammarian wastes his effort, busying himself with emending this writing as though it were a work of Plato or Demosthenes.
(41) ‹μάλιστα ἂν ἀκοῦσαί› · printed under col 1168
Ἀκοῦσαι. Legit Stephan. ἀκούσαντα, et paulo post tum ipse tum Sylburgius σοὶ δέ pro σοί τε. Non tamen repugnat illud ἀκοῦσαι, et miror Stephano displicuisse. Mihi quidem ita detur loqui, ut audiam in primis meliorem te esse factum. Similis precatio in exordio Coho⟨r⟩tationis Justini ad Graecos.
Ἀκοῦσαι. Stephanus reads ἀκούσαντα, and a little after both he himself and Sylburgius read σοὶ δέ for σοί τε. Yet that ἀκοῦσαι is not objectionable, and I wonder that it displeased Stephanus. "May it be granted me so to speak that I may hear above all that you have been made better." There is a similar prayer at the opening of Justin's Exhortation to the Greeks.
CAP. I. Occasio Epistolae. Diogneti quaestiones proponuntur: 1. In quo Deo scilicet fiduciam habentes Christiani, mundum et mortem contemnant. 2. Cur Graecorum et Judaeorum sacris abjectis, novam religionem sectentur. 3. Unde ille amor, quo se mutuo prosequuntur. 4. Cur tam sero in orbem terrarum inductum sit hoc institutum.
CHAP. I. The occasion of the letter. The questions of Diognetus are set out: 1. In what God, namely, the Christians trust, that they despise the world and death. 2. Why, casting aside the rites of the Greeks and the Jews, they follow a new religion. 3. Whence comes that love with which they cherish one another. 4. Why this way of life has been brought into the world so late.
CAP. II. Exponit auctor Epistolae, cur Christiani simulacra non colant, ut Graeci.
CHAP. II. The author of the letter explains why the Christians do not worship images, as the Greeks do.
(Both synopses are printed full width across cols 1167–1168; the chapter numbers are supplied in the Greek text as [1] and [2].)
(42) ‹τίνος ὑποστάσεως› · printed under col 1169
Ὑποστάσεως. Vertit Stephan. subsistentiae; sed melius, opinor, reddidisset, substantiae. Paulo post ἐρεῖτε recte dici contendit, videlicet ab ἐρέω; quo quidem de themate disseruisse se monet in Thesauro suo.
Ὑποστάσεως. Stephanus translated it "subsistentiae"; but he would have rendered it better, I think, as "substantiae". A little after, he maintains that ἐρεῖτε is correctly said, namely from ἐρέω; and he notes that he has discussed this stem in his Thesaurus.
(43) ‹ἀνθρώπου τοῦ φυλάξοντος› · printed under col 1169
Φυλάξοντος. Sic posuit Stephanus pro eo quod erat in cod. mss. φυλάξαντος.
Φυλάξοντος. So Stephanus put it, in place of what stood in the manuscript copies, φυλάξαντος.
(44) ‹κεραμεὺς ἔπλασεν; οὐ πρὶν› · printed under col 1169, continued at the head of the note band under col 1170
Οὐ πρὶν, etc. Sic totum hunc locum immutat Stephanus: Καὶ οὐ πρὶν, ἢ ταῖς τέχναις τούτων εἰς τὴν μορφὴν τούτων ἐκτυπωθῆναι, ἦν ἕκαστον αὐτῶν ἑκάστῳ εἴδει ὡς καὶ νῦν μεταμεμορφωμένον. Sed prorsus inutile videtur tot voces addere et immutare, ubi unius litterae emendatio commodam affert sententiam. Nam si leg⟨a⟩s ἕκαστον pro ἕκαστος, sic locus reddi poterit: Nonne prius quam horum artibus in has formas effingerentur, unumquodque ab unoquoque artifice variis modis, idque etiam hactenus, immutabatur? Videbantur simulacra stabilitatem quamdam, utpote diis consecrata, acquisivisse. Quare observat auctor epistolae hoc beneficium esse artificum, quibus quandiu caruerunt simulacra, tandiu iisdem mutationibus obnoxia fuerunt ac aliae res eadem ex materia constantes.
Οὐ πρὶν, etc. Stephanus alters this whole passage thus: Καὶ οὐ πρὶν, ἢ ταῖς τέχναις τούτων εἰς τὴν μορφὴν τούτων ἐκτυπωθῆναι, ἦν ἕκαστον αὐτῶν ἑκάστῳ εἴδει ὡς καὶ νῦν μεταμεμορφωμένον. But it seems wholly useless to add and change so many words, when the correction of a single letter yields a suitable sense. For if you read ἕκαστον for ἕκαστος, the passage could be rendered thus: "Before they were fashioned by the arts of these men into these forms, was not each one being changed by each craftsman in various ways, and that even up to now?" The images seemed to have acquired a certain stability, as being consecrated to the gods. Therefore the author of the letter observes that this is a favour done by the craftsmen, and that so long as the images lacked it, so long were they liable to the same changes as other things consisting of the same material.
(45) ‹ὅμοια τοιούτοις› · printed under col 1170
Τοιούτοις. Stephanus legendum monet τούτοις. Quod quidem minime necessarium existimaverim.
Τοιούτοις. Stephanus advises reading τούτοις. Which I should judge not at all necessary.
(46) ‹τέλεόν τε› · printed under col 1170
Τέλεόν τε. In Beureri apographo additur αὐτοῖς; atque ita legit Stephanus. In eodem Beureri exemplari alia manu legebatur τέλεον δέ.
Τέλεόν τε. In Beurer's transcript αὐτοῖς is added; and so Stephanus reads. In the same copy of Beurer, τέλεον δέ was read in another hand.
(47) ‹ὀστρακίνους σέβοντες ἀφυλάκτους› · printed under col 1170
Ἀφυλάκτους. In Beureri apographo ἀφυλάκτως.
Ἀφυλάκτους. In Beurer's transcript ἀφυλάκτως.
(48) ‹Οὐκοῦν τὴν αἴσθησιν› · printed under col 1170
Αἴσθησιν. In Beureri apographo αὐτοῦ ἐλέγχετε. Conjicit Stephanus scriptum fuisse, τὴν αἴσθησιν οὐκ ἔχειν ἐλέγχετε.
Αἴσθησιν. In Beurer's transcript αὐτοῦ ἐλέγχετε. Stephanus conjectures that there was written τὴν αἴσθησιν οὐκ ἔχειν ἐλέγχετε.
(none) — no call in Migne's Latin translation in this column; notes (44, continued) and (45)–(48), printed under this column, are called in the Greek of col 1169 and set whole in n1169
(none) — no call in Migne's Latin translation in this column; notes (49)–(51), printed under this column, are called in the Greek of col 1172 and set in n1172
(none) — the captions CAP. III and CAP. IV, printed full width across cols 1171–1172, are set with the Greek column in n1172
(49) ‹καὶ τὰ πλείω› · printed under col 1171
Πλείω. Hanc vocem addit Beureri apographum, sicque legendum vidit Stephanus ex litteris π et λ, quarum vestigia in cod. mss. supererant.
Πλείω. Beurer's transcript adds this word, and Stephanus saw that it should be read so from the letters π and λ, traces of which survived in the manuscript copies.
(50) ‹ἀξιοῦσι φρονεῖν› · printed under col 1171
Φρονεῖν. Post hanc vocem aliquid deesse existimat Stephanus, vel figuram esse quae vocatur ἀνταπόδοτον. Sylburgius addendum putat ὀρθῶς φρονοῦσι. Sed nihil desiderabimus si illud εἰ μὲν eodem modo accipiamus, ac εἰ καί, etsi, quamvis, ut in interpretatione emendavimus. Similem habemus verborum constructionem initio Apologiae primae Justini. Ibidem pro εἰς Θεὸν ἕνα malunt Stephanus et Sylb. εἰ. Sed φρονεῖν hoc loco idem est ac πιστεύειν.
Φρονεῖν. Stephanus thinks that something is missing after this word, or that it is the figure called ἀνταπόδοτον. Sylburgius thinks ὀρθῶς φρονοῦσι should be added. But we shall miss nothing if we take that εἰ μὲν in the same way as εἰ καί, "even if", "although", as we have corrected in the translation. We have a similar construction of words at the beginning of Justin's First Apology. In the same place, for εἰς Θεὸν ἕνα Stephanus and Sylburgius prefer εἰ. But φρονεῖν in this place is the same as πιστεύειν.
(51) ‹μωρίαν εἰκὸς› · printed under col 1171
Εἰκός. Legendum censet Stephanus ὡς εἰκός vel εἰκότως Ibidem ἢ pro οὐ legendum conjicit. Sed haec minime necessaria.
Εἰκός. Stephanus judges that ὡς εἰκός or εἰκότως should be read. In the same place he conjectures that ἢ should be read for οὐ. But these are not at all necessary.
(52) ‹τῶν εἰς τὰ κωφὰ› · printed under col 1172
Εἰς τὰ κωφά. Hanc praepositionem addendam monent Stephanus, Beur. et Sylburg. Paulo post legendum, ut iidem monent, ἐνδεικνυμένων et τὰ μὴ δυνάμενα.
Εἰς τὰ κωφά. Stephanus, Beurer and Sylburgius advise that this preposition be added. A little after, as the same advise, one should read ἐνδεικνυμένων and τὰ μὴ δυνάμενα.
(53) ‹τὸ δὲ δοκεῖν› · printed under col 1172
Τὸ δὲ δοκεῖν. Frustra hic lacunam suspicantur Stephanus et Sylburgius. Satis est legere τῷ δὲ δοκεῖν, vel subaudire κατά ante haec verba, quorum is est sensus: aeque stultum esse, rebus sensu carentibus sacrificia offerre, et Deo qui nulla re indiget, putare se aliquid praebere. Ipse Stephanus fatetur legi posse τῷ δὲ δοκεῖν, haec verba conjungendo cum praecedentibus.
Τὸ δὲ δοκεῖν. Stephanus and Sylburgius suspect a lacuna here in vain. It is enough to read τῷ δὲ δοκεῖν, or to understand κατά before these words, whose sense is this: that it is equally foolish to offer sacrifices to things lacking sense, and to think that one is giving something to God, Who needs nothing. Stephanus himself admits that τῷ δὲ δοκεῖν can be read, joining these words with those preceding.
(54) ‹τῆς περιτομῆς› · printed under col 1172
Τὴν τῆς περιτομῆς. Stephanus addendum existimat οὐδὲ vel οὐδενὸς ἄξια λόγου σὺ νομίζω.
Τὴν τῆς περιτομῆς. Stephanus thinks that οὐδὲ should be added, or [that one should read] οὐδενὸς ἄξια λόγου σὺ νομίζω.
(55) ‹πῶς οὐ θέμις› · printed under col 1172
Πῶς οὐ θέμις. Delet οὐ Steph. vel legit ἀθέμιτον.
Πῶς οὐ θέμις. Stephanus deletes οὐ, or reads ἀθέμιτον.
CAP. III. Negat ipsos etiam Judaeos a superstitione immunes esse, dum iis Deum indigere putant, quae ethnici rebus sensu carentibus donabant.
CHAP. III. He denies that even the Jews themselves are free from superstition, since they think that God needs the things that the heathen used to give to things lacking sense.
CAP. IV. Caetera Judaeorum instituta non aptiora ad Deum colendum evincit.
CHAP. IV. He proves that the other institutions of the Jews are no better suited to the worship of God.
(Both captions are printed full width across cols 1171–1172; the chapter numbers are supplied in the Greek text as [3] and [4].)
(56) ‹μαρτύ-ριον› · printed under col 1173 (call on the second half of the split word, in this column)
Μαρτύριον. In cod. ms. erat tantum μαρτύρ, quemadmodum etiam paulo post χλ. Utramque vocem explevit Stephan. legendo μαρτύριον et χλεύης.
Μαρτύριον. In the manuscript there was only μαρτύρ, as also a little after χλ. Stephanus filled out both words, reading μαρτύριον and χλεύης.
(57) ‹τῶν μηνῶν› · printed under col 1173
Μηνῶν. Sic pro μ Stephanus, Beur. et Sylb. emendant.
Μηνῶν. So Stephanus, Beurer and Sylburgius correct, for μ.
(58) ‹ἀλλαγὰς κατὰ› · printed under col 1173
Κατά. In apographo Beureri erat καταδιαιρεῖν. Legit Steph. καταῤῥυθμίζειν; ὅτι additum ex Stephano et Beur. Mox Judaeorum curiositas intelligenda est: Curiosum studium varia ad Dei cultum, qualem sibi fingebant pertinentia acervandi; sic ipse explicat Stephanus.
Κατά. In Beurer's transcript there was καταδιαιρεῖν. Stephanus reads καταῤῥυθμίζειν; ὅτι is added from Stephanus and Beurer. Next, the "curiosity" of the Jews is to be understood as "a curious zeal for heaping up various things pertaining to the worship of God, such as they fashioned for themselves"; so Stephanus himself explains it.
(59) ‹ἀνθρώπων μαθήματι› · printed under col 1173
Μαθήματι. Iidem legunt μάθημά τι, et paulo post εὑρημένον pro εἰρημένον. Non displicet Sylburgio ᾑρημένον, electum. Legendum crediderim μάθημα τοῦτο. Illud μαθήματι ortum videtur ex simili casu vocum praecedentium.
Μαθήματι. The same read μάθημά τι, and a little after εὑρημένον for εἰρημένον. Sylburgius is not displeased with ᾑρημένον, "chosen". I should think μάθημα τοῦτο is to be read. That μαθήματι seems to have arisen from the like case of the preceding words.
(60) ‹μαθήματι τοῦτ'› · printed under col 1173, continued under col 1174
Μαθήματι τοῦτ'. Legendo μάθημα τοῦτο, ut legendum monui, sic reddendus hic locus: Neque investigatione quadam et hominum curiosorum sollicitudine haec disciplina ab eis inventa. MARAN. in Emendandis.
Μαθήματι τοῦτ'. Reading μάθημα τοῦτο, as I have advised it should be read, this passage is to be rendered thus: "Nor has this teaching been discovered by them through any investigation or the solicitude of curious men." MARAN. in the Emendanda.
(61) ‹ἐν τοῖς ἐγχωρίοις› · printed under col 1174
Ἐν τοῖς. Delet Stephan. praepositionem.
Ἐν τοῖς. Stephanus deletes the preposition.
(62) ‹παρατίθενται, ἀλλ'› · printed under col 1174
Ἀλλ'... Stephanus et Beurerus legunt ἀλλ' οὐ κοινήν. Mallet Sylburgius ἀλλ' οὐ πάντῃ κοινὴν vel ἀλλ' ὁσίως κοινήν. Sed frigida prorsus haec ejusdem vocis repetitio, et hoc perpolito scriptore prorsus indigna. Quamobrem, ni fallor, legendum ἀλλ' οὐ κοίτην: mensam communem apponimus, at cubile nequaquam. Quibus verbis et iniquos de Christianis rumores repellit, et quantum ab ethnicorum moribus discreparent, demonstrat. Simili prorsus sententia Tertullianus: Omnia, inquit Apol. 39, indiscreta sunt apud nos praeter uxores. In isto solo consortium solvimus, in quo solo caeteri homines consortium exercent.
Ἀλλ'... Stephanus and Beurer read ἀλλ' οὐ κοινήν. Sylburgius would prefer ἀλλ' οὐ πάντῃ κοινὴν or ἀλλ' ὁσίως κοινήν. But this repetition of the same word is utterly flat, and wholly unworthy of this highly polished writer. Therefore, unless I am mistaken, one should read ἀλλ' οὐ κοίτην: "we set a common table, but by no means a common bed." With these words he both repels the unjust rumours about the Christians and shows how far they differed from the morals of the heathen. Tertullian has a quite similar thought: "All things," he says (Apol. 39), "are held in common among us except wives. In that alone we dissolve partnership, in which alone other men practise partnership."
(63) ‹ζωοποιοῦνται· πτωχεύουσι› · printed under col 1174, continued at the head of the note band under col 1175
Πτωχεύουσι. Dicere malim de Christianis: Pauperes sunt et multos ditant, quam, ut reddidit Stephanus, Mendici sunt. MARAN. ibid. — Haec scribens auctor epistolae respexit ad II Cor. VI, 10: ὡς πτωχοὶ, πολλοὺς δὲ πλουτίζονται: quae verba Vulg. interpres ita reddit: Sicut egentes, multos autem locupletantes. Sic mox infra prae oculis habuit idem auctor I Cor. IV, 12, λοιδορούμενοι, εὐλογοῦμεν: Maledicimur, et benedicimus.
Πτωχεύουσι. I should prefer to say of the Christians, "They are poor and make many rich", rather than, as Stephanus rendered it, "They are beggars". MARAN. ibid. — In writing this the author of the letter had in view 2 Cor. 6:10, ὡς πτωχοὶ, πολλοὺς δὲ πλουτίζονται, which words the Vulgate translator renders thus: "As needy, yet enriching many." So, just below, the same author had before his eyes 1 Cor. 4:12, λοιδορούμενοι, εὐλογοῦμεν: "We are reviled, and we bless."
CAP. V. Christianorum mores graphice depingit.
CHAP. V. He vividly depicts the way of life of the Christians.
(Printed full width across cols 1173–1174; the chapter number [5] stands in the imported Greek text.)
(none) — no call in Migne's Latin translation in this column; notes (60, continued), (61), (62) and (63, beginning), printed under this column, are called in the Greek of col 1173 and set whole in n1173
(none) — the caption CAP. V, printed full width across cols 1173–1174, is set with the Greek column in n1173
(*) ‹sed e mundo non sunt› · printed under col 1175 (first line of the note band) Joan. XVII, 11, 14, 16.
John 17:11, 14, 16.
(63, continued) — continued from col 1174 at the head of the right-hand part of this column's note band; called in col 1173, set whole in n1173
(none) — the captions CAP. VI and CAP. VII, printed full width across cols 1175–1176, are set with the Greek column in n1176
(64) ‹ζωοποιοῦνται μένοντες› · printed under col 1176
Μένοντες. Steph. mavult μὲν ὄντες.
Μένοντες. Stephanus prefers μὲν ὄντες.
(65) ‹αὐτοὶ δὲ συνέχουσι› · printed under col 1176
Συνέχουσι. Eadem habemus in Justini Apol. II, n. 7.
Συνέχουσι. We have the same in Justin, Apol. II, n. 7.
(66) ‹τὸν Λόγον τὸν ἅγιον› · printed under col 1176
Τὸν ἅγιον. Monet Stephanus in cod. ms. vix aliud quam primam hujus vocis litteram deprehendi.
Τὸν ἅγιον. Stephanus notes that in the manuscript scarcely more than the first letter of this word could be made out.
CAP. VI. Velut animam in corpore, Christianos in mundo versari probat.
CHAP. VI. He shows that the Christians dwell in the world as the soul in the body.
CAP. VII. Haec religio a Deo instituta, qui non rem creatam, sed proprium Filium misit ut salvaret homines. Manifesta Filii adventus indicia.
CHAP. VII. This religion was instituted by God, Who sent not a created thing but His own Son to save men. Clear signs of the Son's coming.
(Both captions are printed full width across cols 1175–1176; the chapter numbers stand in the imported Greek text.)
(67) ‹εἴληφε φυλάσσειν› · printed under col 1177
Φυλάσσειν. Post hanc vocem vel post εἴληφε non dubitat Stephanus quin ἥλιος vel ὁ ἥλιος a librario omissum fuerit. Στοιχεῖα hoc loco non quatuor elementa, sed astra intelligi debent, quae postea enumerantur, nimirum, sol, luna et stellae. Vid. not. in I Theophili librum, num. 44.
Φυλάσσειν. Stephanus has no doubt that after this word, or after εἴληφε, ἥλιος or ὁ ἥλιος was omitted by the copyist. By στοιχεῖα in this place are to be understood not the four elements but the heavenly bodies, which are listed afterwards, namely the sun, the moon and the stars. See the note on the first book of Theophilus, num. 44.
(68) ‹ἐν ἐπιεικείᾳ, πραΰτητι› · printed under col 1177
Πραΰτητι. Stephanus observat addendum esse καί.
Πραΰτητι. Stephanus observes that καί should be added.
(69) ‹τὴν παρουσίαν ὑποστήσεται› · printed under col 1177, continued under col 1178
Ὑποστήσεται. Perantiqua haec lacuna; siquidem librarius, a quo scriptum exemplar Stephani, ad marginem monet se eam in antiquissimo codice invenisse. Non pauca deesse putat Stephanus, quibus et praecedens sermo finiebatur, et alius inchoabatur. Legendum putat οὐχ ὁρᾷς παραβαλλομένους. Hujus loci sensum explere potest decerpta ex Justini dialogo, num. 121 sententia, ubi S. martyr, ex eo quod inglorio et informi et despecto Christi primo adventu, tantus fuerit illius splendor et tanta potentia, ut nulla in gente ignoretur et ex omni genere homines poenitentiam agant, concludit quanta sit futura secundi adventus majestas.
Ὑποστήσεται. This lacuna is very ancient; for the copyist by whom Stephanus's exemplar was written notes in the margin that he found it in a very old manuscript. Stephanus thinks that not a little is missing, with which the preceding discourse was ended and another begun. He thinks one should read οὐχ ὁρᾷς παραβαλλομένους. The sense of this passage can be filled out by a thought taken from Justin's Dialogue, num. 121, where the holy martyr, from the fact that at Christ's first coming, inglorious, without form and despised, His splendour and power were so great that He is unknown in no nation and men of every race do penance, concludes how great the majesty of His second coming will be.
(70) ‹πλείονες κολάζοντες› · printed under col 1178
Κολάζοντες. Observat Sylburgius non minus commode dici posse κολάζονται. Quo plures supplicio afficiuntur.
Κολάζοντες. Sylburgius observes that κολάζονται could be said no less suitably: "The more are punished."
(71) ‹ἀνθρώπου οὐ δοκεῖ› · printed under col 1178
Οὐ δοκεῖ. Delet Stephanus οὐ, et sic restituendum hunc locum existimat: Haec videntur ab hominibus fieri? Necesse non videtur quidquam mutare. Haec quoque in eorum numerum veniunt, quae Justini sententiis gemella sunt; simillima enim occurrunt Apol. II, num. 10.
Οὐ δοκεῖ. Stephanus deletes οὐ, and thinks the passage should be restored thus: "Do these things seem to be done by men?" It does not seem necessary to change anything. These words too come into the number of those that are twins of Justin's sayings; for very similar things occur in Apol. II, num. 10.
(72) ‹ὧν οἱ μὲν πῦρ› · printed under col 1178
Ὧν οἱ μὲν πῦρ. Nulla erat in Beureri apographo lacuna, sed Stephanus ait nonnullas litteras in ms. exemplari ante ultimam vocem legi non potuisse. Quapropter scriptum fuisse putat οἱ μέν τινες. Mox Stephanus legit δύναιντ' ἄν.
Ὧν οἱ μὲν πῦρ. There was no lacuna in Beurer's transcript, but Stephanus says that some letters in the manuscript exemplar before the last word could not be read. He therefore thinks οἱ μέν τινες was written. Next, Stephanus reads δύναιντ' ἄν.
CAP. VIII. Quam miser hominum status ante Verbi adventum.
CHAP. VIII. How wretched the state of men was before the coming of the Word.
(Printed full width across cols 1177–1178; the chapter number [8] stands in the imported Greek text.)
(none) — no call in Migne's Latin translation in this column; notes (69, continued), (70), (71) and (72), printed under this column, are called in the Greek of col 1177 and set in n1177
(none) — the caption CAP. VIII, printed full width across cols 1177–1178, is set with the Greek column in n1177
(none) — no call in Migne's Latin translation in this column; notes (73)–(76), printed under this column, are called in the Greek of col 1180 and set in n1180
(none) — the caption CAP. IX, printed full width across cols 1179–1180, is set with the Greek column in n1180
(73) ‹ἀόργητος καὶ ἀγαθός› · printed under col 1179
Καὶ ἀγαθός. Has voces expungendas putat Stephanus, quia mox sequitur καὶ μόνος ἀγαθός, sed, ut observat Sylburgius, nihil mutandum.
Καὶ ἀγαθός. Stephanus thinks these words should be struck out, because καὶ μόνος ἀγαθός follows shortly; but, as Sylburgius observes, nothing should be changed.
(74) ‹ἐπεὶ δὲ ἀπεκάλυψε› · printed under col 1179
Ἐπεὶ δὲ ἀπεκάλυψε. E regione horum verborum ascriptum erat ad marginem ms. codicis: Ὅτι ἐκρύπτετο τοσούτους χρόνους τὸ μυστήριον τῆς ἁγίας Τριάδος μέχρι τοῦ βαπτίσματος τοῦ ἐν Ἰορδάνῃ.
Ἐπεὶ δὲ ἀπεκάλυψε. Opposite these words there was written in the margin of the manuscript: "That the mystery of the Holy Trinity was hidden for so many ages until the baptism in the Jordan."
(75) ‹καὶ ἰδεῖν› · printed under col 1179
Καὶ ἰδεῖν. Beurerus legit ἰδεῖν καὶ ποιῆσαι. Melius cum Sylburgio legemus κατανοῆσαι. Ibidem Beureri apographum προσεδόκα, et mox ἐπιθυμίας ἀταλλομένους.
Καὶ ἰδεῖν. Beurer reads ἰδεῖν καὶ ποιῆσαι. We shall do better to read κατανοῆσαι with Sylburgius. In the same place Beurer's transcript has προσεδόκα, and shortly after ἐπιθυμίας ἀταλλομένους.
(76) ‹ἀλλὰ τὸν νοῦν τῆς δικαιοσύνης δημιουργῶν› · printed under col 1179
Ἀλλὰ τὸν νοῦν τῆς δικαιοσύνης δημιουργῶν. Sed mentem justitiae creans. Id est, praeparans illam justitiam, quae non littera sed spiritu continetur, quaeque est justitia Dei (ut ait Apostolus Rom. III, 22) per fidem Jesu Christi in omnes et super omnes qui credunt in eum. MARAN. in Addend.
Ἀλλὰ τὸν νοῦν τῆς δικαιοσύνης δημιουργῶν. "But creating the mind of righteousness": that is, preparing that righteousness which consists not in the letter but in the spirit, and which is the righteousness of God (as the Apostle says, Rom. 3:22) through faith in Jesus Christ, unto all and upon all who believe in Him. MARAN. in the Addenda.
(77) ‹ὅτι ὁ μισθὸς› · printed under col 1180
Μισθός. Addit Stephanus τῆς ἁμαρτίας, sed melius in apographo Beureri μισθὸς αὐτῆς nempe injustitiae, de qua paulo ante locutus est auctor Epistolae.
Μισθός. Stephanus adds τῆς ἁμαρτίας, but Beurer's transcript has better μισθὸς αὐτῆς, namely of the unrighteousness of which the author of the letter spoke a little before.
(78) ‹ὡς… ὑπερβαλλούσης› · printed under col 1180
Ὡς. . . . ὑπερβαλλούσης. Legit Stephanus ὡς ὑπὸ τῆς ὑπερβαλλούσης φιλανθρωπίας καὶ ἀγάπης, melius quam Beureri apographon, ὡς τῆς ὑπερβαλλούσης φιλανθρωπίας μία ἀγάπη τοῦ Θεοῦ οὐχ ἐμίσησεν. Libenter legerem ὦ ὑπερβαλλούσης φιλανθρωπίας οἷα ἀγάπη.
Ὡς. . . . ὑπερβαλλούσης. Stephanus reads ὡς ὑπὸ τῆς ὑπερβαλλούσης φιλανθρωπίας καὶ ἀγάπης, better than Beurer's transcript, ὡς τῆς ὑπερβαλλούσης φιλανθρωπίας μία ἀγάπη τοῦ Θεοῦ οὐχ ἐμίσησεν. I should gladly read ὦ ὑπερβαλλούσης φιλανθρωπίας οἷα ἀγάπη.
(79) ‹ἠνέσχετο, λέγων αὐτὸς› · printed under col 1180
Λέγων. Videtur hoc verbum additum fuisse ab aliquo existimante verba Isaiae citari ex cap. LIII. Sed manifestum est non de Filio hic agi, sed de Patre, qui peccata nostra ipse suscepisse dicitur, minus accurate id quidem, sed tamen eo sensu, quod Filium suum pro nobis tradendo, ipse nobis victimam suppeditavit qua peccata nostra expiarentur.
Λέγων. This word seems to have been added by someone who thought that the words of Isaiah, ch. 53, were being quoted. But it is plain that the subject here is not the Son but the Father, Who is said to have Himself taken up our sins, not very precisely indeed, but yet in this sense: that by delivering up His Son for us He Himself supplied us with a victim by which our sins might be expiated.
CAP. IX. Filius sero missus, quia oportebat ut homines ex peccatis suis cognoscerent se vita indignos esse: nec in alio quam in Filio Dei justificari posse.
CHAP. IX. The Son was sent late, because it was fitting that men should learn from their own sins that they were unworthy of life, and that they could be justified in none other than in the Son of God.
(Printed full width across cols 1179–1180; the chapter number [9] stands in the imported Greek text.)
(80) ‹ἐν τίνι δικαιωθῆναι› · printed under col 1181
Δικαιωθῆναι. Satis apte ad Calviniana commenta reddiderat Stephanus, pro justis haberi: et paulo post δικαιώσῃ, faciat ut pro justis habeantur.
Δικαιωθῆναι. Stephanus had rendered it quite in keeping with the Calvinist fictions, "to be held as just"; and a little after δικαιώσῃ, "should cause them to be held as just".
(81) ‹ἐὰν ποθῇς› · printed under col 1181
Ποθῇς. Dubitat Stephanus utrum legatur in ms. ποθῇς, an ποθήσῃς.
Ποθῇς. Stephanus is in doubt whether ποθῇς or ποθήσῃς is read in the manuscript.
(82) ‹πρῶτον μὲν ἐπίγνωσιν› · printed under col 1181
Ἐπίγνωσιν. Addit Sylburgius πατρός σοι παρέξει. Mox Stephanus πάντα τὰ ἐν κόσμῳ vel ἐν τῇ γῇ. Sylburgius ἐν τῇ ὑπ' οὐρανόν.
Ἐπίγνωσιν. Sylburgius adds πατρός σοι παρέξει. Next, Stephanus [supplies] πάντα τὰ ἐν κόσμῳ or ἐν τῇ γῇ; Sylburgius ἐν τῇ ὑπ' οὐρανόν.
(83) ‹οἷς μόνοις› · printed under col 1181, continued under col 1182
Μόνοις. Post hanc vocem erat in ms. codice littera, quam Stephanus initium esse putat vocis ἄνω aut ἀτενές. Habebat ἄνω apographon Beureri.
Μόνοις. After this word there was a letter in the manuscript, which Stephanus thinks is the beginning of the word ἄνω or ἀτενές. Beurer's transcript had ἄνω.
(84) ‹ταῦτα ἐκτὸς› · printed under col 1182
Ἀλλὰ ταῦτα ἐκτὸς, κ. τ. λ. Sed haec extra ejus majestatem sunt. Id est, contraria illius ditissimae beneficentiae, quam imitari debemus. MARANUS, in Emendandis.
Ἀλλὰ ταῦτα ἐκτὸς, κ. τ. λ. "But these things are outside His majesty": that is, contrary to His most bountiful beneficence, which we ought to imitate. MARANUS, in the Emendanda.
(85) ‹Θεὸς ἐν οὐρανοῖς› · printed under col 1182
Ἐν οὐρανοῖς. In hac voce librarios lapsos esse putat Stephanus ob scripturae similitudinem, et legendum ἐν ἀνθρώποις. Nam brevitatis causa scribi solet ἐν ἄνοις pro ἐν ἀνθρώποις.
Ἐν οὐρανοῖς. Stephanus thinks that the copyists slipped at this word because of the similarity of the writing, and that ἐν ἀνθρώποις should be read. For for brevity's sake ἐν ἄνοις is commonly written for ἐν ἀνθρώποις.
CAP. X. Diogneto ostendit auctor, quot et quanta ad eum ventura sint bona, si fidem suscipiat.
CHAP. X. The author shows Diognetus how many and how great the good things are that will come to him if he accepts the faith.
(Printed full width across cols 1181–1182, below a full-width line of Migne's Latin translation; the chapter number [10] stands in the imported Greek text.)
(none) — no call in Migne's Latin translation in this column; notes (83, continued), (84) and (85), printed under this column, are called in the Greek of col 1181 and set in n1181
(none) — the caption CAP. X, printed full width across cols 1181–1182, is set with the Greek column in n1181
(none) — no call in Migne's Latin translation in this column; notes (86)–(90), printed under this column, are called in the Greek of col 1184 and set in n1184
(none) — the captions CAP. XI and CAP. XII, printed full width across cols 1183–1184, are set with the Greek column in n1184
(86) ‹τὸ πῦρ› · printed under col 1183
Τὸ πῦρ. Ad oram codicis, quo usus est Stephanus, ascriptum erat: Καὶ ὧδε ἐγκοπὴν εἶχε τὸ ἀντίγραφον. Sic emendat Stephanus, τότε τοὺς ὑπομένοντας ὑπὲρ δικαιοσύνης τὸ πῦρ θαυμάσεις καὶ μακαρίσεις ὅταν, etc. Legere mallet Sylburgius sine transpositione, τὸ πῦρ τὸ ἐπίγειον καὶ τότε αὐτοὺς μακαρίσεις ὅταν.
Τὸ πῦρ. In the margin of the manuscript that Stephanus used there was written: "Here too the exemplar had a break." Stephanus corrects thus: τότε τοὺς ὑπομένοντας ὑπὲρ δικαιοσύνης τὸ πῦρ θαυμάσεις καὶ μακαρίσεις ὅταν, etc. Sylburgius would prefer to read, without transposition, τὸ πῦρ τὸ ἐπίγειον καὶ τότε αὐτοὺς μακαρίσεις ὅταν.
(87) ‹λόγῳ προσφιλεῖ› · printed under col 1183
Προσφιλεῖ. Sic habebat Beureri apographon: sed quia spatium erat in ms. inter προσφιλ. et εῖ, addendum putat Sylburgius καὶ ἀληθεῖ.
Προσφιλεῖ. So Beurer's transcript had it; but since there was a space in the manuscript between προσφιλ. and εῖ, Sylburgius thinks καὶ ἀληθεῖ should be added.
(88) ‹προσφιλεῖ γεννηθεὶς› · printed under col 1183
Προσφιλεῖ γεννηθείς. Legi etiam posset προσφιλὴς γενηθείς. Et Verbo amicus factus. MARAN. in Addend.
Προσφιλεῖ γεννηθείς. One could also read προσφιλὴς γενηθείς: "and made a friend to the Word". MARAN. in the Addenda.
(89) ‹μαθηταῖς δὲ διηγούμενος› · printed under col 1183
Διηγούμενος. Scriptum fuisse putat Stephanus ἐκδιηγούμενος in codice ms.
Διηγούμενος. Stephanus thinks that ἐκδιηγούμενος was written in the manuscript.
(90) ‹ἔγνωσαν Πατρὸς μυστήρια› · printed under col 1183, continued under col 1184
Ἔγνωσαν πατρὸς μυστήρια, κ. τ. λ. Sic etiam videtur scribi et intelligi posse: ἔγνωσαν πατρὸς μυστήρια, οὗ χάριν ἀπέστειλε Λόγον: Cognoverunt Patris mysteria, nimirum qua de causa sermonem miserit. MARAN. ibid.
Ἔγνωσαν πατρὸς μυστήρια, κ. τ. λ. It seems that it can also be written and understood thus: ἔγνωσαν πατρὸς μυστήρια, οὗ χάριν ἀπέστειλε Λόγον: "They came to know the mysteries of the Father, namely for what reason He sent the Word." MARAN. ibid.
(91) ‹ὁ καινὸς φανεὶς› · printed under col 1184
Οὗτος ὁ ἀπ' ἀρχῆς, ὁ καινὸς φανείς. Legere malim, οὗτος ὁ ἀπ' ἀρχῆς, καινὸς φανείς. Hic qui ab initio erat, novus apparuit. MARAN. ibid.
Οὗτος ὁ ἀπ' ἀρχῆς, ὁ καινὸς φανείς. I should prefer to read οὗτος ὁ ἀπ' ἀρχῆς, καινὸς φανείς: "He Who was from the beginning appeared new." MARAN. ibid.
(92) ‹εὑρεθεὶς› · printed under col 1184
Εὑρεθείς. Legit Stephanus καὶ ἀρχαῖος εὑρεθείς. Beurerus καὶ παλαιός. Mallem καὶ ἐν χρόνῳ εὑρεθείς, et in tempore inventus, aut aliquid simile, quod naturae divinae aeternitati opponatur.
Εὑρεθείς. Stephanus reads καὶ ἀρχαῖος εὑρεθείς; Beurer καὶ παλαιός. I should prefer καὶ ἐν χρόνῳ εὑρεθείς, "and found in time", or something similar that would be set against the eternity of the divine nature.
(93) ‹ἐπιζητοῦσι δωρουμένη› · printed under col 1184
Δωρουμένη. Verti etiam posset, donata, ut observat Stephanus.
Δωρουμένη. It could also be translated "given as a gift", as Stephanus observes.
(94) ‹οἱ γενόμενοι› · printed under col 1184
Οἱ γενόμενοι. Miror doctissimum interpretem Stephanum reddidisse, qui fuistis, et mox qui produxistis, cum nihil magis sententiae contrarium esse possit. Haec enim ad gentiles dicuntur. Non incommode deleretur articulus ante γενόμενοι.
Οἱ γενόμενοι. I am surprised that the most learned translator Stephanus rendered it "you who were", and shortly after "you who brought forth", since nothing could be more contrary to the sense. For these words are said to the gentiles. The article before γενόμενοι might well be deleted.
CAP. XI. Quanti sint momenti ea cognoscere, quae Verbum incarnatum docuit.
CHAP. XI. Of how great importance it is to know the things that the incarnate Word taught.
CAP. XII. Vehementer interest hominibus veram scientiam percipere, quae in Ecclesia non sine vita et charitate comparatur.
CHAP. XII. It greatly concerns men to gain the true knowledge, which is acquired in the Church, not without life and charity.
(Both captions are printed full width across cols 1183–1184; the chapter numbers are supplied in the Greek text as [11] and [12].)
(95) ‹ἀλλ' οὐ τὸ τῆς γνώσεως› · printed under col 1185
Ἀλλ' οὐ τὸ τῆς γνώσεως, κ. τ. λ. Sic reddendum crediderim: Verum non cognitionis lignum occidit, sed inobedientia. MARAN. in Emendand.
Ἀλλ' οὐ τὸ τῆς γνώσεως, κ. τ. λ. I should think it is to be rendered thus: "But it is not the tree of knowledge that kills, but disobedience." MARAN. in the Emendanda.
(96) ‹ὁ Ἀποστόλος› · printed under col 1185
Ἣν δύναμιν ἐνιδὼν ὁ Ἀπόστολος. Id est: cum perspexisset Apostolus quam vim habeat illa utriusque ligni, nempe cognitionis et vitae, conjunctio. Obscura Stephani interpretatio: Quam facultatem cum perspexisset Apostolus. MARAN. ibid.
Ἣν δύναμιν ἐνιδὼν ὁ Ἀπόστολος. That is: "when the Apostle had perceived what force that joining of the two trees, namely of knowledge and of life, has." Stephanus's rendering, "Which faculty when the Apostle had perceived", is obscure. MARAN. ibid.
(97) ‹ὑπὸ τοῦ ὄφεως πλανᾶται› · printed under col 1185
Ὑπὸ τοῦ ὄφεως. Praemittit καί Beurerus.
Ὑπὸ τοῦ ὄφεως. Beurer puts καί before it.
(98) ‹μὴ ἀγαπήσας› · printed under col 1185
Μὴ ἀγαπήσας. Ita Beurerus et Sylburgius: posterior littera hujus voculae μή legi non potuit in ms. codice, sed tantum μ. Stephanus reddidit ob amorem vitae. Mox idem Beurerus ἤτω οὖν σοι.
Μὴ ἀγαπήσας. So Beurer and Sylburgius: the second letter of this little word μή could not be read in the manuscript, but only μ. Stephanus rendered it "for love of life". Shortly after, the same Beurer has ἤτω οὖν σοι.
(99) ‹καὶ καρπὸν› · printed under col 1186
Καὶ καρπόν. Stephanus et Beurerus καὶ καρποῦ ἐρῶν. Melius Sylburgius καὶ καρπὸν ἐκπληρῶν.
Καὶ καρπόν. Stephanus and Beurer [read] καὶ καρποῦ ἐρῶν. Sylburgius better, καὶ καρπὸν ἐκπληρῶν.
(99*) ‹οὐδὲ Εὔα φθείρεται› · printed under col 1186 Οὐδὲ Εὔα φθείρεται. Clarior erit interpretatio, si sic reddamus: Ubi neque Eva corrumpitur. MARAN., ibid.
Οὐδὲ Εὔα φθείρεται. The rendering will be clearer if we translate thus: "Where neither is Eve corrupted." MARAN., ibid.
(100) ‹καὶ κηροὶ› · printed under col 1186
Κηροί. Vox corrupta, nec evidenter lecta in ms. codice. Non sanabitur vulnus, si legamus cum Sylburgio καιροί. Sed si ponamus χοροί, nihil puto superfuturum difficultatis. Stephanus voces sequentes sic reddit, et cum mundo coaptatur. Videtur legendum ἁρμόζονται.
Κηροί. A corrupt word, not clearly read in the manuscript. The wound will not be healed if we read καιροί with Sylburgius. But if we put χοροί, I think no difficulty will remain. Stephanus renders the following words thus: "and is fitted together with the world". It seems one should read ἁρμόζονται.
(none) — no call in Migne's Latin translation in this column; notes (99), (99*) and (100), printed under this column, are called in the Greek of col 1185 and set in n1185