PG 2 · cols. 196–217
S. Clemens I Romanus (opera dubia), Homiliae viginti: Homilia VI
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PG 2 · cols. 196–217
Editors' preface
Note: these are VARIAE LECTIONES keyed to the Greek text; the calls are printed in the Greek only. Calls 59 (after Διόπερ) and 60 (after ἔχειν) stand in the lines above I., which belong to the previous unit; calls 61–63 stand in this unit's text. (printed under page 95)
(59) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 196
δι' ὅπερ C.
δι' ὅπερ C.
(printed under page 95)
(60) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 196
D proponit ἥκειν.
D proposes ἥκειν.
(printed under page 95)
(61) ‹anchor: ἐλθὼν ἔγωγε› · call in col 196
ἐγώ γε C.
ἐγώ γε C.
(printed under page 95)
(62) ‹anchor: Καὶ ὅμως οὐδὲν› · call in col 196
οὐδέ O.
οὐδέ O.
(printed under page 95)
(63) ‹anchor: Ανουβίων οὗτος› · call in col 196
Ita O et C ex conject., οὕτως in textu.
So O, and C by conjecture; οὕτως in the text.
(printed under page 95)
(64) ‹anchor: ἀφηγήσαντό μοι› · call in col 196
ἀφηγήσαιτό μοι S, mendose.
ἀφηγήσαιτό μοι S, wrongly.
(printed under page 95)
(65) ‹anchor: τῇ Ῥώμῃ, συνερχόμενός› · call in col 196
συνεργόμενος C, συνεργούμενος S.
συνεργόμενος C, συνεργούμενος S.
(printed under page 95)
(66) ‹anchor: μοιχείαις ἐνεχομένους› · call in col 196
ἀνεχομένους C.
ἀνεχομένους C.
(printed under page 95)
(67) ‹anchor: περὶ θεῶν φρονῶν› · call in col 196
φρονῶν desideratur in O.
φρονῶν is missing in O.
(printed under page 95)
(68) ‹anchor: αὐτοὶ χαμάτῳ› · call in col 196
Pro Cι χαμάτων D legendum censet διὰ χαμάτων : conjectura jam superflua.
For "Cι χαμάτων" [as printed] D thinks one should read διὰ χαμάτων: a conjecture now superfluous.
(printed under page 95)
(69) ‹anchor: Κοῖος, Κρῖος› · call in col 196
Ita S, auct. D. Cfr. Hes. Theog. 134, 375, χριός C, O.
So S, on D's authority. Compare Hesiod, Theogony 134, 375; χριός C, O.
(printed under page 95)
(70) ‹anchor: θήλειαι› · call in col 196
θήλαι O. Tum id. θεα sine accentu, Θεία conj. C. Cfr. Hes. Theog. 135, 371. Apollod. 1, 2, 4. Dein τυθύς O.
θήλαι O. Then the same has θεα without accent; Θεία conjectured by C. Compare Hesiod, Theogony 135, 371; Apollodorus 1, 2, 4. Next, τυθύς O.
(printed under page 95)
(71) ‹anchor: αὐτὸν τῆς βασιλείας› · call in col 196
Lege τὴν βασιλείαν S.
Read τὴν βασιλείαν S.
(printed under page 95)
(72) ‹anchor: καταπιεῖν λίθον› · call in col 196
λίθον addidi c. O, quam vocem deesse jam monuit D. Cfr. Recogn. x, 19, ὅς in exordio sequentis periodi addidi c. O.
I have added λίθον with O, a word D had already noted was missing. Compare Recognitions X, 19. At the start of the following sentence I have added ὅς with O.
(printed under page 95)
(73) ‹anchor: θλίψας ἐξέωσεν› · call in col 196
Ita S, ἔξωσεν C, ἐξῶσεν O.
So S; ἔξωσεν C, ἐξῶσεν O.
(printed under page 95)
Note: the VARIAE LECTIONES are keyed to the Greek (col 197); their calls are printed in the Greek only. Calls 74–79 are not visible in the part of the page shown (presumably above, or on the previous page). The VARIORUM NOTAE (98*) are also called from the Greek. VARIAE LECTIONES (printed under page 96)
(74) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 198
δέ transcripsi ex O.
I have transcribed δέ from O.
(printed under page 96)
(75) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 198
πατέρος C.
πατέρος C.
(printed under page 96)
(76) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 198
ἐπ' O.
ἐπ' O.
(printed under page 96)
(77) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 198
οὐχ αὐτή C, οὐχ αὐτή (sic) Cl, οὐχ αὔτη O.
οὐχ αὐτή C, οὐχ αὐτή (sic) Cl, οὐχ αὔτη O.
(printed under page 96)
(78) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 198
τήν O.
τήν O.
(printed under page 96)
(79) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 198
ἐπί O.
ἐπί O.
(printed under page 96)
(80) ‹anchor: τῆς θεᾶς τιμῇ› · call in col 198
Ita scripsi c. O, qui quidem pr. man. in textu exh. τῇ τῆς θεᾶς τιμῆ, ap. C, ἡ τ. θ. τιμή.
So I have written with O, which indeed in the first hand shows in the text τῇ τῆς θεᾶς τιμῆ; in C, ἡ τ[ῆς] θ[εᾶς] τιμή.
(printed under page 96)
(81) ‹anchor: στοιχείων ἀτάκτων› · call in col 198
Leg. ἀτάκτως. D.
Read ἀτάκτως. D.
(printed under page 96)
(82) ‹anchor: γαῖα γένοισθε› · call in col 198
Ita O. c. S., γένησθε C. Cfr. Iliad. vii, 99.
So O, with S; γένησθε C. Compare Iliad VII, 99.
(printed under page 96)
(83) ‹anchor: καὶ μετ'› · call in col 198
μετά O.
μετά O.
(printed under page 96)
(84) ‹anchor: χάος ἐγένετο› · call in col 198
V. Hes. Theog. 116. S.
See Hesiod, Theogony 116. S.
(printed under page 96)
(85) ‹anchor: (98*) δηλονότι› · call in col 198
δῆλον ὅτι C.
δῆλον ὅτι C.
VARIORUM NOTAE (98*) ‹anchor: Τὸ δὲ ἐγένετο› · call in col 198 Τὸ δὲ ἐγένετο. Eodem modo Hesiodus intelligitur apud Philonem Judaeum libro Περὶ ἀφθαρσίας κόσμου, p. 491. Verba Philonis digna sunt quae hic legantur: Πατέρα δὲ τοῦ Πλατωνικοῦ δόγματος ἔνιοι νομίζουσι τὸν Ἡσίοδον, γενητὸν καὶ ἄφθαρτον οἰόμενοι τὸν κόσμον ὑπ' ἐκείνου λέγεσθαι· γενητὸν μέν, ὅτι φησίν· Ἤπου μὲν πρώτιστα χάος γένετ', αὐτὰρ ἔπειτα Γαῖ' εὐρύστερνος, πάντων ἕδος ἀσφαλὲς αἰεί. Ἄφθαρτον δέ, ὅτι διάλυσιν καὶ φθορὰν οὐ μεμήνυκεν αὐτοῦ. Cot.
"But it came to be." Hesiod is understood in the same way by Philo the Jew in the book On the Indestructibility of the World, p. 491. Philo's words deserve to be read here: "Some consider Hesiod the father of the Platonic doctrine, thinking that the world is said by him to be generated and indestructible: generated, because he says, 'First of all Chaos came to be, and then broad-breasted Earth, the ever-sure seat of all'; indestructible, because he has given no indication of its dissolution and destruction." Cotelier.
(printed under page 96)
Note: the VARIAE LECTIONES are keyed to the Greek (col 200); their calls are printed in the Greek only. Calls 86–92 and (99) are not visible in the part of the page shown. VARIAE LECTIONES (printed under page 97)
(86) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 199
Cfr. Lobeck Aglaoph. p. 475 seqq.; Brandis Hist. philos. Graec. rom. I, 60, 67. S.
Compare Lobeck, Aglaophamus, p. 475 ff.; Brandis, History of Greek and Roman Philosophy I, 60, 67. S.
(printed under page 97)
(87) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 199
οὕτως S.
οὕτως S.
(printed under page 97)
(88) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 199
κράσεις ἄλλοτε ἄλλας, deleta praepositione, legi vult D.
D wants κράσεις ἄλλοτε ἄλλας read, with the preposition deleted.
(printed under page 97)
(89) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 199
ὡς C.
ὡς C.
(printed under page 97)
(90) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 199
ἐξ ἑκάστου scribit D, probante Lobeckio Aglaoph., p. 475. Quod C vertit mirum in modum, nescio unde hanc interpretationem hauserit. S. Sequens τῶν inserui c. O.
D writes ἐξ ἑκάστου, with Lobeck's approval, Aglaophamus, p. 475. As for C's rendering "mirum in modum" ("in a wondrous manner"), I do not know where he got this interpretation. S. The following τῶν I have inserted with O.
(printed under page 97)
(91) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 199
εἰς excidit ap. Cl et S.
εἰς has dropped out in Cl and S.
(printed under page 97)
(92) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 199
συνειλήθη mavult Lobeck l. l., p. 475. S. Tum κύτος conj. C; νυκτός uterque hom. codex.
Lobeck, in the place cited, p. 475, prefers συνειλήθη. S. Then κύτος is C's conjecture; both manuscripts of the Homilies have νυκτός.
(printed under page 97)
(93) ‹anchor: τοῦ παρειληφότος› · call in col 199
κατειληφότος recte scr. Lobeck l. l. S.
Lobeck, in the place cited, rightly writes κατειληφότος. S.
(printed under page 97)
(94) ‹anchor: ὡς ἂν› · call in col 199
πλῆρες ἤνωσαν C.
πλῆρες ἤνωσαν C.
VARIORUM NOTAE (printed under page 97)
(99) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 199
Ἀπείρου τινὸς βυθοῦ ἀεὶ ῥέοντος. Et quibusdam interpositis: αὐτοῦ τοῦ ἀπείρου πελάγους, etc. Pertinent huc loca Recognitionum lib. x, cap. 17 et 31, etc. Itemque verba Porphyrii libro De antro Nympharum, sub finem: Πόντος δέ, καὶ θάλασσα καὶ κλύδων, καὶ παρὰ Πλάτωνι ἡ ὑλικὴ σύστασις. Caeterum et apud Platonem materiae congeries, pontus, mare ac procellarum aestus appellatur. Nicephorus in Synesium p. 385: Βυθὸν δέ φασι τὴν ὕλην. Atque hinc Bythus Valentinianorum. Vide in Chronographia Georgii Syncelli p. 29. Cot.
"Of a boundless deep ever flowing." And, after some words between: "of the boundless sea itself," etc. To this belong the passages of the Recognitions, book X, chapters 17 and 31, etc. Likewise the words of Porphyry in the book On the Cave of the Nymphs, near the end: "Sea, and ocean and surge, and in Plato the material composition." Moreover, in Plato too the mass of matter is called sea, ocean and the surge of storms. Nicephorus on Synesius, p. 385: "They call matter the Deep." And hence the Bythos of the Valentinians. See the Chronography of George Syncellus, p. 29. Cotelier.
(printed under page 97)
Note: the VARIAE LECTIONES are keyed to the Greek (col 201); their calls are printed in the Greek only. Calls 95–100 and Variorum Notae (100), (1)–(3) are not visible in the part of the page shown. The numbering of the variants restarts at 1 on this page. VARIAE LECTIONES (printed under page 98)
(95) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 202
ἕνεκα C.
ἕνεκα C.
(printed under page 98)
(96) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 202
μορφωθῆς O.
μορφωθῆς O.
(printed under page 98)
(97) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 202
κραναίου c. O, κραμαίου cod. Ci, in cuj. marg. conject. κραμείου p. κεραμείου S : ἀκμαίου ex conject. scr. Lobeck l. l. p. 479. Ἡρακαπαίου conj. Hermannus ap. Lob. In collectione sua fragmentorum Orphicorum Hermannus hoc fragmentum praetermisit. Deinde post σχισθέντος Lobeck addit ὑπέκ.
κραναίου with O; κραμαίου the manuscript Ci, in whose margin the conjecture κραμείου p. [as printed]; κεραμείου S; Lobeck, in the place cited, p. 479, writes ἀκμαίου by conjecture. Ἡρακαπαίου [as printed] is Hermann's conjecture in Lobeck. In his collection of the Orphic fragments Hermann passed over this fragment. Next, after σχισθέντος Lobeck adds ὑπέκ.
(printed under page 98)
(98) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 202
κύτος O.
κύτος O.
(printed under page 98)
(99) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 202
ὑποκειμένης ἕως φυσικῆς C.
ὑποκειμένης ἕως φυσικῆς C.
(printed under page 98)
(100) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 202
τάς O et ex conject. C, τῆς id. in textu. S. Caeterum tota periodus haud sana. Sensus flagitat, ut legatur τὴν... γόνιμον ὑπολειφθεῖσαν ὕλην... ἡ θερμότης εἰς τὰς π. δ. οὐσίας.
τάς O, and C by conjecture; τῆς the same in the text. S. Moreover, the whole sentence is far from sound. The sense demands that one read τὴν ... γόνιμον ὑπολειφθεῖσαν ὕλην ... ἡ θερμότης εἰς τὰς π[άντων] δ[ιέκρινεν] οὐσίας.
(printed under page 98)
(1) ‹anchor: καὶ πολὺ› · call in col 202
ὑπεχώρησεν C.
ὑπεχώρησεν C.
(printed under page 98)
(2) ‹anchor: διαυγὲς ὂν› · call in col 202
πολλήν C.
πολλήν C.
VARIORUM NOTAE (printed under page 98)
(100) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 202
Λαμπυρίδων. Lucentes vespere per arva cicindelae. Ita appellant rustici stellantes volatus, Graeci vero lampyridas, incredibili benignitate naturae. Plinius lib. xviii, cap. 26. Cot.
"Of glow-worms." "Fireflies shining in the evening over the fields: so the country people call these starry flyers, but the Greeks lampyrides, by an incredible kindness of nature." Pliny, book XVIII, chapter 26. Cotelier.
(printed under page 98)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 202
Πολυχανδέος ᾠοῦ. Rufinus, Recognit. x, 17, 30: Ovi immanis: Ὑπερμεγεθὲς ᾠόν, Athenagoras, Legatione pro Christianis, p. 18. In Hesychio, et Theocriti Scholiaste, πολυχανδέα· πολλὰ χωροῦσαν, πολυχώρητον. De ovo autem isto didicerat Orpheus ab Aegyptiis, qui ex ore Dei prodiisse dicebant ovum, hoc est mundum, ut legere est apud Eusebium, Praeparat. evang. lib. iii, cap. 11, p. 115. Sed et πρωτογόνου ᾠοῦ meminit Helladius Besantinous codice 279 Photianae Bibliothecae. Hic, πρωτοσύστατον ᾠόν. Vide nos superius ad Recognit. x, 17. Videnda quoque Phoenicum Theologia, Praeparat. evang. lib. i, cap. 10, p. 33. Id.
"Of a capacious egg." Rufinus, Recognitions X, 17, 30: "of a huge egg"; "an exceedingly great egg," Athenagoras, Plea for the Christians, p. 18. In Hesychius and the scholiast on Theocritus: πολυχανδέα, "holding much, very roomy." Orpheus had learned about this egg from the Egyptians, who said that an egg, that is, the world, came forth from the mouth of God, as may be read in Eusebius, Preparation for the Gospel, book III, chapter 11, p. 115. Helladius Besantinous also mentions the "first-born egg," in codex 279 of Photius's Library. Here, "the first-formed egg." See our note above on Recognitions X, 17. See also the Theology of the Phoenicians, Preparation for the Gospel, book I, chapter 10, p. 33. The same [Cotelier].
(printed under page 98)
(2) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 202
Ἡ δὲ τοῦ κύτους. Periodus imperfecta vel corrupta. Quid si minima mutatione reponatur, τὰς πάντων διέκρινεν οὐσίας? Iste sensus emerget: Molis vero intus fecunda relicta materia, ut et multo in tempore usque ad naturale subjectum calor subfervefaciens, cunctorum substantias discrevit. Vide cap. 12. Id.
"But that of the hollow." The sentence is incomplete or corrupt. What if, with a very small change, τὰς πάντων διέκρινεν οὐσίας were restored? This sense will emerge: "The fruitful matter left within the mass, as the heat, warming it gently over a long time up to its natural substrate, separated the substances of all things." See chapter 12. The same [Cotelier].
(printed under page 98)
(3) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 202
Καὶ πολὺ τῆς ὑποκειμένης οὐσίας πλῆθος, Πλούτωνα προσηγόρευσαν. Nam Πλούτων deduci solet a πλοῦτος et πλοῦτος a πολύς. Cujus etymologiae Plutonis rationes varias habes in Etymologico magno, Platonis Cratylo, Ciceronis lib. ii De natura deorum, Eusebii Praeparat. evang. lib. iii, cap. 11, ejusdem Oratione de laudibus Constantini; item apud Lucianum, Fulgentium, Cornutum aliosque. Id.
"And the great mass of the underlying substance they called Pluto." For Πλούτων is usually derived from πλοῦτος ("wealth"), and πλοῦτος from πολύς ("much"). For the various grounds of this etymology of Pluto, see the Etymologicum Magnum, Plato's Cratylus, Cicero's On the Nature of the Gods book II, Eusebius's Preparation for the Gospel book III, chapter 11, and his Oration in Praise of Constantine; also Lucian, Fulgentius, Cornutus and others. The same [Cotelier].
(printed under page 98)
(4) ‹anchor: καὶ φρονιμώτατος› · call in col 202
Intelligentiam aeri primus assignavit Diogenes Apolloniates. Καί μοι δοκέει, ait apud Simplic. in Phys. fol. 33, τὸ τὴν νόησιν ἔχον εἶναι ὁ ἀὴρ καλεόμενος. Plura dabunt Brandis., Hist. phil. Graec. Rom. I, 280. Panzerbieter, De Diog. Apoll., fragm. IV-VI. S. — Dressel.
Diogenes of Apollonia was the first to assign intelligence to the air. "And it seems to me," he says in Simplicius on the Physics, fol. 33, "that what has intelligence is what is called air." Brandis, History of Greek and Roman Philosophy I, 280, and Panzerbieter, On Diogenes of Apollonia, fragments IV–VI, will give more. S. — Dressel.
(printed under page 98)
Note: the VARIAE LECTIONES are keyed to the Greek (col 204); their calls are printed in the Greek only. Calls 3–10 and Variorum Nota (5) are not visible in the part of the page shown. Ink blots in the scan obscure one letter each in notes 5 and 11 (marked [blot]). VARIAE LECTIONES (printed under page 99)
(3) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 203
θερμότητα O.
θερμότητα O.
(printed under page 99)
(4) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 203
ἰσχνότατον C.
ἰσχνότατον C.
(printed under page 99)
(5) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 203
Ita D, ὃν ἐμᾷ τι C, [blot]νόματι O.
So D; ὃν ἐμᾷ τι C; [ὀ]νόματι O.
(printed under page 99)
(6) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 203
καί O.
καί O.
(printed under page 99)
(7) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 203
Cfr. Lobeck Agl. p. 550 seqq. S.
Compare Lobeck, Aglaophamus, p. 550 ff. S.
(printed under page 99)
(8) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 203
ὡς O.
ὡς O.
(printed under page 99)
(9) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 203
θερῶν O.
θερῶν O.
(printed under page 99)
(10) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 203
δι' ὃ C.
δι' ὃ C.
(printed under page 99)
(11) ‹anchor: φρενῶν θολωτικὸν› · call in col 203
θολοτ[blot]κόν C. Cum O omisi Ci τήν ante θολεράν.
θολοτ[ι]κόν C. With O, I have omitted the τήν of Ci before θολεράν.
(printed under page 99)
(12) ‹anchor: πόρων διεῖρον› · call in col 203
διέρπον conj. D, διῆκον conjectare possint alii secundum S.
διέρπον is D's conjecture; others might conjecture διῆκον, according to S.
(printed under page 99)
(13) ‹anchor: γῆν, Κόρην› · call in col 203
Δήμητραν εἰς τήν (leg. γῆν), Κόρην C, Δήμητρα εἰς γῆν, Κόρην S, Δήμητρα καὶ τὴν Κόρην O.
Δήμητραν εἰς τήν (read γῆν), Κόρην C; Δήμητρα εἰς γῆν, Κόρην S; Δήμητρα καὶ τὴν Κόρην O.
VARIORUM NOTAE (printed under page 99)
(5) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 203
Παλμὸν... πάλλεσθαι. Palpitationem, vibrationem. Palpitare, vibrare. Vulgare Etymum. Pari modo Apollinem ἀπὸ τοῦ ἀεὶ πάλλειν τὰς ἀκτῖνας dictum vult Plato, teste Macrobio lib. i Saturnal., cap. 17: ἀπὸ τῆς τῶν ἀκτίνων πάλσεως. Porphyrius apud Eusebium, Praeparat. evang. lib. iii, cap. 11: ἀπὸ τοῦ πάλλειν τὰς ἀκτῖνας τὰς ἰδίας. In Etymologico. Est enim Minerva virtus solis, Porphyrio in cap. eodem Macrobii. Alii per Minervam summum aetheris cacumen intelligunt, apud Macrob. lib. iii, cap. 4; idque convenit cum his nostri Operis verbis, κατὰ κορυφῆς ἐλθὸν τοῦ αἰθέρος, et cum iis quae Cornutus, Martianus, multique de Minerva scripsere. Minervam alii aetherium verticem, et summitatis ipsius esse summam dixerunt. Arnobius, lib. iii: Aetheris partem superiorem Minervam tenere dicunt. Et: Minervam summum aethera esse dixerunt. Augustinus, De civitate Dei lib. iv, cap. 10, et lib. vii, cap. 16. Potest etiam hic πάλλεσθαι sumi in sensu passivo, juxta illud Etymologici: Παλλάς· ἡ Ἀθηνᾶ. Ἡ παρὰ τὸ ἀναπεπάλθαι ἐκ τῆς κεφαλῆς τοῦ Διός. Cot.
"Throbbing ... to quiver." Palpitation, vibration; to palpitate, to vibrate. The common etymology. In the same way Plato would have Apollo named from his ever "brandishing" his rays, as Macrobius testifies, Saturnalia book I, chapter 17: "from the brandishing of the rays." Porphyry in Eusebius, Preparation for the Gospel, book III, chapter 11: "from brandishing his own rays." In the Etymologicum. For Minerva is the power of the sun, according to Porphyry in the same chapter of Macrobius. Others understand by Minerva the highest summit of the ether, in Macrobius book III, chapter 4; and this agrees with these words of our Work, "having come by the crown of the ether," and with what Cornutus, Martianus and many others wrote of Minerva. "Others have said that Minerva is the ethereal summit, and the height of the topmost point itself." Arnobius, book III: "They say that Minerva holds the upper part of the ether." And: "They have said that Minerva is the highest ether." Augustine, City of God book IV, chapter 10, and book VII, chapter 16. Here πάλλεσθαι can also be taken in a passive sense, according to that entry of the Etymologicum: "Pallas: Athena. Or from her having leapt out of the head of Zeus." Cotelier.
(printed under page 99)
(6) ‹anchor: εἶναι νόμιζε› · call in col 203
Ἀπόλλωνα δὲ ἥλιον τὸν περιπολοῦντα εἶναι νόμιζε. Allusio ad aliud Apollinis veriloquium apud Platonem in Cratylo, Ἀπόλλων quasi ἀπολῶν, hoc est ὁμοπολῶν: aut ad haec Macrobiana: Cleanthes ὡς ἀπ' ἄλλων καὶ ἄλλων τόπων τὰς ἀνατολὰς ποιουμένου, quod ab aliis atque aliis locorum declinationibus faciat ortus. Cornificius arbitratur Apollinem nominatum ἀπὸ τοῦ ἀναπολεῖν, id est, quia intra circuitum mundi, quem Graeci πόλον appellant, impetu la- (continues)
"Consider Apollo to be the sun that goes round." An allusion to another etymology of Apollo in Plato's Cratylus, Apollo as if apolōn, that is, homopolōn ["moving together"]; or to these words of Macrobius: "Cleanthes [names him] as one who makes his risings from one place and then another, because he makes his risings from different declinations of places. Cornificius thinks Apollo is named from anapolein, that is, because within the circuit of the world, which the Greeks call the pole, by the impulse ... (continues)
(printed under page 99)
Note: the VARIAE LECTIONES are keyed to the Greek (col 205); their calls are printed in the Greek only. Under the Greek column the VARIORUM NOTAE open with the end of note (6) (begun under an earlier column), then note (7), called after περίοδον, which continues under col 206. An ink blot obscures one letter in the end of note (6) (marked [blot]). (printed under page 100)
(14) ‹anchor: αἱ μεταμορφώσεις› · call in col 205
μεταμορφώσεις O in textu, μεταμορφώσης al. man. ad oram.
μεταμορφώσεις O in the text, μεταμορφώσης in another hand in the margin.
(printed under page 100)
(15) ‹anchor: μυρίας αὐτοῦ› · call in col 205
αὐτῶν O.
αὐτῶν O.
(printed under page 100)
(16) ‹anchor: ἡ διικνουμένη› · call in col 205
διηνουμένη Cl et S, qui conj. διικνουμένη, ut jam evulgaverat C.
διηνουμένη Cl and S, who conjectured διικνουμένη, as C had already published.
(printed under page 100)
(17) ‹anchor: διικνουμένη τὸν› · call in col 205
τῶν O.
τῶν O.
(printed under page 100)
(18) ‹anchor: ἄφρονας δείξεις› · call in col 205
ἄῤῥενας μίξεις palmaria est conject. Ci.
ἄῤῥενας μίξεις is an excellent conjecture of Ci.
(printed under page 100)
(19) ‹anchor: Διὸ τὸν λόγον› · call in col 205
δι ὃ C.
δι ὃ C.
(printed under page 100)
(20) ‹anchor: ὕλης κατ'› · call in col 205
κατά O.
κατά O.
(printed under page 100)
(21) ‹anchor: τῶν ὑπ' αὐτῆς› · call in col 205
Leg. fort. ἐπ'. S.
Perhaps read ἐπ'. S.
(printed under page 100)
(22) ‹anchor: ἐπικεφαλαιῶν› · call in col 205
ἐπὶ κεφαλαίων O.
ἐπὶ κεφαλαίων O.
(printed under page 100)
(23) ‹anchor: ὡς ἡ κάτω› · call in col 205
ἡ add. c. O.
ἡ added with O.
(printed under page 100)
(24) ‹anchor: Ποσειδῶν ἡμίσειά› · call in col 205
Ποσειδῶν ἡμίσεια scripsi ex conjectura, Ποσειδῶν, ὃς ἤ τις C, Ποσειδῶν ὃς ημις (sic) O, Ποσειδῶν, ὅστις legi vult D.
I have written Ποσειδῶν ἡμίσεια by conjecture; Ποσειδῶν, ὃς ἤ τις C; Ποσειδῶν ὃς ημις (sic) O; D wants Ποσειδῶν, ὅστις read.
(printed under page 100)
(25) ‹anchor: ὁλκοτάτῃ φύσει› · call in col 205
Ita S, ὁλκωτάτη C, O. Comparativus ὁλκότερος occurrit hom. IX, 15. Tum ὥσπερ C, ὅπερ vel ὅσπερ jam proposuit S.
So S; ὁλκωτάτη C, O. The comparative ὁλκότερος occurs in Homily IX, 15. Then ὥσπερ C; S had already proposed ὅπερ or ὅσπερ.
(printed under page 100)
(26) ‹anchor: Ζεὺς, ἥτις› · call in col 205
ητις (sic) O.
ητις (sic) O.
(printed under page 100) VARIORUM NOTAE (6, end) ‹continued from an earlier column› tus ad ortus refertur. Quo loci nota connec[blot]i in versione binas lectiones, ἀναπολάς et ἀνατολάς, ἀναπολεῖν et ἀνατολεῖν, cum originis ratio posteriorem excludat. Cot.
…is referred to the risings. At this place note that the two readings, ἀναπολάς and ἀνατολάς, ἀναπολεῖν and ἀνατολεῖν, are joined in the version, though the account of the origin excludes the latter. Cotelier.
(printed under page 100)
(7) ‹anchor: περίοδον› · call in col 205 · continues under col 206
Ὃν καὶ Μίθραν ἐκάλεσαν, ἐνιαυτοῦ συμπληροῦντα περίοδον. Hanc in rem singularis est locus Hieronymi ad caput III Amosi prophetae. Basilides omnipotentem Deum portentoso nomine appellat Ἄβραξας, et eumdem secundum Graecas litteras, et annui cursus numerum dicit in solis circulo contineri: quem ethnici sub eodem numero aliarum litterarum vocant Μίθραν, seu potius Μεῖθραν, aut quod alii legunt Μήθρην· ut idem numerus constet: nimirum 365, qui in Ἄβραξας, et in Μεῖθρας ac Μήθρης invenitur. De Mithra alii multa subministrabunt. Ego vero duntaxat proponam doctis examinanda verba corrupta et obscura Porphyrii lib. IV De abstinentia, cap. 16, ubi ex Pallade scriptore rationem reddens cur Mithrae mysteriis initiati nominibus animalium appellarentur, ait: Τὴν κοινὴν φορὰν οἴεσθαι, ὡς πρὸς τὴν τοῦ ζωδιακοῦ κύκλου ἀποτείνειν· τὴν δὲ ἀληθινὴν ὑπόληψιν καὶ ἀκριβῆ [continues under col 206]
"Whom they also called Mithras, completing the cycle of the year." On this matter there is a remarkable passage of Jerome on chapter III of the prophet Amos: "Basilides calls the almighty God by the monstrous name Abraxas, and says that the same name, according to the Greek letters, and the number of the year's course, is contained in the circle of the sun; whom the heathen, under the same number in other letters, call Mithras", or rather Meithras, or as others read Methres, so that the same number holds: namely 365, which is found in Abraxas and in Meithras and Methres. Others will supply much about Mithras. I for my part will only put before the learned, for examination, the corrupt and obscure words of Porphyry, On Abstinence, book IV, chapter 16, where, giving from the writer Pallas the reason why those initiated into the mysteries of Mithras were called by the names of animals, he says: "that the common opinion supposes it to refer to the circle of the zodiac; but the true and exact understanding… [continues under col 206]
(14) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 206
μεταμορφώσεις O in textu, μεταμορφώσῃς al. man. ad oram.
μεταμορφώσεις O in the text; μεταμορφώσῃς another hand in the margin.
(printed under page 100)
(15) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 206
αὐτῶν O.
αὐτῶν O.
(printed under page 100)
(16) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 206
διηνουμένη Cl et S, qui conj. διχνουμένη, ut jam evulgaverat C.
διηνουμένη Cl and S, who conjectures διχνουμένη, as C had already published.
(printed under page 100)
(17) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 206
τῶν O.
τῶν O.
(printed under page 100)
(18) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 206
ἄρρενας μίξεις palmaria est conject. Ci.
ἄρρενας μίξεις is an excellent conjecture of Ci.
(printed under page 100)
(19) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 206
δι' ὃ C.
δι' ὃ C.
(printed under page 100)
(20) ‹anchor: ὕλης κατ'› · call in col 206
κατά O.
κατά O.
(printed under page 100)
(21) ‹anchor: τῶν ὑπ'› · call in col 206
Leg. fort. ἐπ'. S.
Perhaps read ἐπ'. S.
(printed under page 100)
(22) ‹anchor: ἐπικεφαλαιῶν› · call in col 206
ἐπὶ κεφαλαίων O.
ἐπὶ κεφαλαίων O.
(printed under page 100)
(23) ‹anchor: ὡς ἡ› · call in col 206
ἡ add. c. O.
ἡ added with O.
(printed under page 100)
(24) ‹anchor: Ποσειδῶν ἡμίσειά› · call in col 206
Ποσειδῶν ἡμίσεια scripsi ex conjectura, Ποσειδῶν, ὅς ἤ τις C, Ποσειδῶν ὅς ημις (sic) O, Ποσειδῶν, ὅστις legi vult D.
I have written Ποσειδῶν ἡμίσεια by conjecture; Ποσειδῶν, ὅς ἤ τις C; Ποσειδῶν ὅς ημις (sic) O; D wants Ποσειδῶν, ὅστις read.
(printed under page 100)
(25) ‹anchor: κάτω ὁλκοτάτῃ› · call in col 206
Ita S, ὁλκωτάτῃ C, O. Comparativus ὁλκότερος occurrit hom. ix, 15. Tum ὥσπερ C, ὅπερ vel ὅσπερ jam proposuit S.
So S; ὁλκωτάτῃ C, O. The comparative ὁλκότερος occurs in Homily IX, 15. Then ὥσπερ C; S had already proposed ὅπερ or ὅσπερ.
(printed under page 100)
(26) ‹anchor: Ζεύς, ἥτις› · call in col 206
ητις (sic) O.
ητις (sic) O.
VARIORUM NOTAE (printed under page 100)
(6) (continued) ‹anchor: on the previous page› · call in col 206
(continued) tus ad ortus refertur. Quo loci nota conne[blot]i in versione binas lectiones, ἀναπολάς et ἀνατολάς, ἀναπολεῖν et ἀνατολεῖν, cum originis ratio posteriorem excludat. Cot.
(printed under page 100)
(7) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 206
Ὃν καὶ Μίθραν ἐκάλεσαν, ἐνιαυτοῦ συμπληροῦντα περίοδον. Hanc in rem singularis est locus Hieronymi ad caput iii Amosi prophetae. Basilides omnipotentem Deum portentoso nomine appellat Ἄβραξας, et eumdem secundum Graecas litteras, et annui cursus numerum dicit in solis circulo contineri: quem ethnici sub eodem numero aliarum litterarum vocant Μίθραν, seu potius Μείθραν, aut quod alii legunt Μήθρην· ut idem numerus constet: nimirum 365, qui in Ἄβραξας, et in Μείθρας ac Μήθρης invenitur. De Mithra alii multa subministrabunt. Ego vero duntaxat proponam doctis examinanda verba corrupta et obscura Porphyrii lib. iv De abstinentia, cap. 16, ubi ex Pallade scriptore rationem reddens cur Mithrae mysteriis initiati nominibus animalium appellarentur, ait: Τὴν κοινὴν φορὰν οἴεσθαι, ὡς πρὸς τὴν τοῦ ζωδιακοῦ κύκλου ἀποτείνειν· τὴν δὲ ἀληθινὴν ὑπόληψιν καὶ ἀκριβῆ περὶ τῶν ἀνθρωπίνων ψυχῶν αἰνίττεσθαι, ἃς παντοδαποῖς περιέχεσθαι σώμασι λέγουσι. Καὶ γὰρ Λατίνων τινὰς τῇ σφῶν διαλέκτῳ ἄπρους, καὶ σκώπρους, λασούρους τε καὶ μερούλους καλεῖν. Quid, amabo, sibi volunt voces, σκώπρους, λασούρους? Scribendumne est σκρώφους et λάρους, quod conjectabam? ut primum sit Scrophae cognomen, proprium familiae Romanae Tremelliorum, in Varrone et Macrobio; posterius vero, praenomen Lartis. Nam Lar Herminii consulis, Tolumnii Velentium regis, et Porsennae regis Clusinorum praenomen, Graecis est Λάρος: putaveruntque forsan Graecorum nonnulli non mediocri errore, deduci hoc vocis a laro ave. Haec si vera non videbuntur, alia libenter accipiemus. Restat ut Latinam interpretationem subnectamus. Vulgus existimare, hoc ad zodiaci circulum respicere: veram tamen opinionem et accuratam esse, quae censet illud de animabus humanis aliquid subinnuere, quas omne genus corporibus circumdatas aiunt. Etenim Latinos (f. Λατίνους) aliquos sua lingua Apros et Scrofas, Lares (pro Lartes) atque Merulas appellare. Id.
"Whom they also called Mithras, completing the circuit of the year." On this subject there is a remarkable passage of Jerome on chapter 3 of the prophet Amos: "Basilides calls the almighty God by the monstrous name Abraxas, and says that the same, according to the Greek letters, and the number of the year's course, is contained in the circle of the sun; whom the pagans, with the same number in other letters, call Mithras," or rather Meithras, or, as others read, Methres, so that the number comes out the same: namely 365, which is found in Abraxas, and in Meithras and Methres. Others will supply much about Mithras. I shall only put before the learned, for examination, some corrupt and obscure words of Porphyry, On Abstinence book IV, chapter 16, where, giving from the writer Pallas the reason why those initiated into the mysteries of Mithras were called by the names of animals, he says: "The common view is that this refers to the circle of the zodiac; but the true and exact understanding is that it hints at human souls, which they say are clothed in bodies of every kind. For some of the Latins in their own tongue are called apri, scopri, lasuri and meruli." What, pray, do the words scopri, lasuri mean? Should one write scrophi and lari, as I conjectured? so that the first would be the cognomen Scropha, proper to the Roman family of the Tremellii, in Varro and Macrobius; and the second the praenomen Lars. For Lar, the praenomen of the consul Herminius, of Tolumnius king of the Veientes, and of Porsenna king of the Clusini, is Laros in Greek; and perhaps some of the Greeks thought, in no small error, that this word was derived from the bird laros [the gull]. If these things do not seem true, we shall gladly accept others. It remains to add the Latin translation: "The common people think this refers to the circle of the zodiac; but that the true and accurate opinion is the one which holds that it hints at something about human souls, which they say are clothed in bodies of every kind. For some Latins (perhaps Λατίνους) in their own tongue are called Boars and Sows, Lares (for Lartes) and Blackbirds." The same [Cotelier].
(printed under page 100)
Note: the VARIAE LECTIONES are keyed to the Greek (col 208); their calls are printed in the Greek only. Calls 27–31 are not visible in the part of the page shown. VARIAE LECTIONES (printed under page 101)
(27) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 207
ἀφορίσθη O. Tum leg. καὶ καθ' ἑαυτὰ τέτακται ἕκαστον. S.
ἀφορίσθη O. Then read καὶ καθ' ἑαυτὰ τέτακται ἕκαστον. S.
(printed under page 101)
(28) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 207
Νηρηΐδος O.
Νηρηΐδος O.
(printed under page 101)
(29) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 207
Ἀππίον S.
Ἀππίον S.
(printed under page 101)
(30) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 207
τά adj. c. O. D : Cotelerii versionem non satis capio. Legendum videtur οὐράνιοι τῶν Μοιρῶν περιστηρίγματα, duodecim coelestes (sive dii) sunt Parcarum fulcimenta. Astrologos enim ex Zodiaci signis fata nascentium praedixisse nemini latet. Vide Achil. Tat. Isag. ad Arat. Phaen. c. 23, p. 145.
τά added with O. D: I do not fully understand Cotelier's translation. It seems one should read οὐράνιοι τῶν Μοιρῶν περιστηρίγματα, "the twelve heavenly ones (or gods) are the props of the Fates." For it is known to everyone that astrologers foretold the fates of those being born from the signs of the Zodiac. See Achilles Tatius, Introduction to Aratus's Phaenomena, chapter 23, p. 145.
(printed under page 101)
(31) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 207
Scribe παραληφθεὶς cum Davisio, vel quod ego praetulerim, παραπλασθεὶς vel simile aliquid S.
Write παραληφθεὶς with Davis, or, what I would prefer, παραπλασθεὶς or something similar. S.
(printed under page 101)
(32) ‹anchor: τέλειος καὶ› · call in col 207
καί male omisit S c. Cl. Tum προσενέγκειν O.
S wrongly omitted καί, with Cl. Then προσενέγκειν O.
(printed under page 101)
(33) ‹anchor: αὐτὸς καὶ› · call in col 207
Cotelerius legi vult καὶ ἀκμή, ἥτις ἐρᾷν ἐπιθυμίαν, quod etiam vertendo expressit. At ea scriptura neque Graeca est, neque Cotelerii versio ex ea efficitur. Quare Davisius locum corruptissimum ita restituendum esse putavit: ἔστι δ' αὐτὸς κατ' ἀκμήν, ᾗ τις ἐὰν ἐπιθυμῇ ἔχειν Πολυξένην, quod interpretatur: Est vero ipse in aetatis flore, quo tempore si quis ducere cupiat Polyxenam. Parum apte. Meo quidem judicio sic scribendum: Ἔτι (non ἔστι) δ' αὐτὸς κατ' ἀκμὴν ἥβης, ἔχειν ἐπιθυμῶν Πολυξένην, — ἀναιρεῖται, (vel etiam κατ' ἀκμὴν ἡλικίας ἐπιθυμῶν Πολυξένην : nam verbum ἐπιθυμεῖν a scriptoribus aetatis inferioris cum accusativo conjungi notum est cf. Hom. xvii, 12). S.
Cotelier wants καὶ ἀκμή, ἥτις ἐρᾷν ἐπιθυμίαν read, which he also expressed in his translation. But that reading is not Greek, nor does Cotelier's translation follow from it. So Davis thought this very corrupt place should be restored thus: ἔστι δ' αὐτὸς κατ' ἀκμήν, ᾗ τις ἐὰν ἐπιθυμῇ ἔχειν Πολυξένην, which he renders: "He is in the flower of his age, the time at which one might wish to marry Polyxena." Not very apt. In my judgement one should write: Ἔτι (not ἔστι) δ' αὐτὸς κατ' ἀκμὴν ἥβης, ἔχειν ἐπιθυμῶν Πολυξένην, — ἀναιρεῖται ("while still in the prime of youth, desiring to have Polyxena, he is slain"), (or even κατ' ἀκμὴν ἡλικίας ἐπιθυμῶν Πολυξένην: for it is known that writers of the later age construe the verb ἐπιθυμεῖν with the accusative; compare Homily XVII, 12). S.
(printed under page 101)
(34) ‹anchor: καὶ ξένην› · call in col 207
Virgulam delevi post ξένην et addidi ἐπιθυμῇ c. O, in quo ἐπιθυμεῖ.
I have deleted the comma after ξένην and added ἐπιθυμῇ with O, in which ἐπιθυμεῖ.
VARIORUM NOTAE (printed under page 101)
(8) ‹anchor: Ἀχιλλεὺς προσηγορεύθη› · call in col 207
Διὰ τὸ μαζοῖς χείλη μὴ προσενεγκεῖν, Ἀχιλλεὺς προσηγορεύθη. Verba ex verbis Apollodori lib. iii Bibliothecae: Ὠνόμασεν Ἀχιλλέα, ὅτι τὰ χείλη μαστοῖς οὐ προσήνεγκε. Latine rem sic expressit Tertullianus, De pallio cap. 4: Quandoquidem labiis vacuerat ab uberum gustu; ubi consulendae Notae magni illius Salmasii, qui tamen in eo audiendus non est, quod Etymologici verba sollicitat, non animadvertens in iis duplicem conjungi originationem, hanc a χεῖλη et aliam in Eustathio quoque a χιλὸς seu χιλή. Sed haec levia sunt, nec digna quae nos morentur. Cot.
"Because he did not put his lips to the breast, he was called Achilles." The words are taken from the words of Apollodorus, Library book III: "He named him Achilles, because he had not put his lips to the breast." Tertullian expressed the matter in Latin thus, On the Pallium chapter 4: "since his lips had been kept from the taste of the breast"; where the Notes of the great Salmasius should be consulted, who, however, is not to be followed in tampering with the words of the Etymologicum, not noticing that two derivations are joined in them, this one from χεῖλη ["lips"], and another, found in Eustathius too, from χιλὸς or χιλή ["fodder"]. But these are trifles, not worth delaying us. Cotelier.
(printed under page 101)
(9) ‹anchor: ἐπιθυμίαν, Πολυξένην› · call in col 207
Ἔστι δὲ αὐτὸς καὶ ἀκμὴν ἥτις ἐὰν ἐπιθυμίαν Πολυξένην. Sensus constabit, si modo legas: Ἔστι δὲ αὐτὸς κατ' ἀκμήν, ᾗ τις ἐὰν ἐπιθυμῇ ἔχειν Πολυξένην· Est vero ipse in aetatis flore, quo tempore si quis ducere cupiat Polyxenam. Videlicet, Paris cum Deiphobo Achillem juvenem peremit, dum Polyxenae conjugium speraret. Davis.
"And he is also the prime, which, if desire, Polyxena." The sense will stand if only you read: Ἔστι δὲ αὐτὸς κατ' ἀκμήν, ᾗ τις ἐὰν ἐπιθυμῇ ἔχειν Πολυξένην: "He is in the flower of his age, the time at which one might wish to marry Polyxena." That is, Paris with Deiphobus killed the young Achilles while he was hoping to marry Polyxena. Davis.
(printed under page 101)
Note: the VARIAE LECTIONES are keyed to the Greek (col 209); their calls are printed in the Greek only. Calls 35–40 and Variorum Nota (10) are not visible in the part of the page shown. VARIAE LECTIONES (printed under page 102)
(35) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 210
ἐστίν om. O.
ἐστίν omitted in O.
(printed under page 102)
(36) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 210
Leg. ἐπιθυμίαν. Non enim Junonem socordem, sed ejus potiundi cupidam fecit τῶν Ἑσπερίδων μῆλον. D.
Read ἐπιθυμίαν. For the apple of the Hesperides did not make Juno sluggish, but eager to obtain it. D.
(printed under page 102)
(37) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 210
ἐφίσταται D, ἐπίσταται C, παράγειν ἐπίσταται O.
ἐφίσταται D; ἐπίσταται C; παράγειν ἐπίσταται O.
(printed under page 102)
(38) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 210
φιλονικοτέρους O.
φιλονικοτέρους O.
(printed under page 102)
(39) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 210
ὃς O c. S, ὃ C.
ὃς O, with S; ὃ C.
(printed under page 102)
(40) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 210
δειλοῖς C.
δειλοῖς C.
(printed under page 102)
(41) ‹anchor: Αὐτάρκως δὲ› · call in col 210
δέ excidit ap. Cl et S.
δέ has dropped out in Cl and S.
(printed under page 102)
(42) ‹anchor: χρόνος ἀρκέσει› · call in col 210
Malim ἀρκέσειεν. S.
I should prefer ἀρκέσειεν. S.
(printed under page 102)
(43) ‹anchor: αἰνιγματωδῶς ἐλέγχθη› · call in col 210
ἐλεγχθῆναι O.
ἐλεγχθῆναι O.
(printed under page 102)
(44) ‹anchor: ψευδῶς πεπραγμένα› · call in col 210
Sensus postulare videtur ἀψευδῶς πεπραγμένα, vere facta. D. Nequaquam. Recte sibi opponuntur τὰ ἀληθῆ τῶν θεῶν ἁμαρτήματα, et ὑπὸ τῶν θεῶν ψευδῶς, sive οὐκ ἀληθῶς πεπραγμένα. S. Idem Ἀππίον.
The sense seems to require ἀψευδῶς πεπραγμένα, "truly done." D. By no means. "The true sins of the gods" and "things falsely, that is not truly, done by the gods" are rightly set against each other. S. The same [reads] Ἀππίον.
(printed under page 102)
(45) ‹anchor: Διόπερ› · call in col 210
Δι' ὅπερ C. Tum reposui vbb. ἀλλὰ κακούς in Ed. Schwegleriana omissa.
Δι' ὅπερ C. Then I have restored the words ἀλλὰ κακούς, omitted in Schwegler's edition.
VARIORUM NOTAE (printed under page 102)
(10) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 210
Ὄφιν ἀνελὼν Ἡρακλῆς, ὁ γνήσιος καὶ φιλόσοφός ἐστι νοῦς, etc. Cornutus: Ἡρακλῆς δέ ἐστιν ὁ ἐν τοῖς ὅλοις λόγος, etc. In Collectaneis Constantini Porphyrogenetae, excerpta ex Joannis Antiocheni Historia Chronica, ipso initio: Ὅτε τὸν Ἡρακλέα τὸν τῆς Ἀλκμήνης, φιλόσοφον ἱστοροῦσιν, etc. Tria loca integra conferre operae pretium fuerit: quorum ultimum feliciter emendavit ad oram libri sui ὁ μακαρίτης Joannes Tarinus, vir summo ingenio, summa eruditione, summa virtute. Ubi enim legitur, ἐνίκησε τὸν υἱὸν τῆς φαύλης ἐπιθυμίας, apposuit Ἰόν. Ἰός autem, hoc est venenum, optime quadrat ad fabulam illic relatam draconis ab Hercule occisi. Cot.
"Heracles, having slain the serpent, is the genuine and philosophic mind," etc. Cornutus: "Heracles is the reason in all things," etc. In the Collections of Constantine Porphyrogenitus, extracts from the Chronicle of John of Antioch, at the very beginning: "When they tell of Heracles, son of Alcmene, as a philosopher," etc. It would be worth comparing the three passages in full; the last of them was happily emended in the margin of his copy by the late Jean Tarin, a man of the highest talent, the highest learning and the highest virtue. For where one reads, "he conquered the son of base desire," he wrote beside it Ἰόν. And ἰός, that is, venom, fits excellently with the story told there of the dragon slain by Hercules. Cotelier.
(printed under page 102)
Note: the VARIAE LECTIONES are keyed to the Greek (col 212); their calls are printed in the Greek only. Calls 46–56 are not visible in the part of the page shown. No Variorum Notae on this page. VARIAE LECTIONES (printed under page 103)
(46) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 211
τεκτον (sic) τεκνοκτονίας O, priore voce subnotata.
τεκτον (sic) τεκνοκτονίας O, with the former word marked beneath [for deletion].
(printed under page 103)
(47) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 211
τε inserui c. O. Tum ἀρρενομίξεις C.
I have inserted τε with O. Then ἀρρενομίξεις C.
(printed under page 103)
(48) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 211
D. conj. πράξεσιν.
D conjectures πράξεσιν.
(printed under page 103)
(49) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 211
ἀσεβέστεροι C.
ἀσεβέστεροι C.
(printed under page 103)
(50) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 211
Ita O c. S, αἰδοῦνται C.
So O, with S; αἰδοῦνται C.
(printed under page 103)
(51) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 211
τῆς O.
τῆς O.
(printed under page 103)
(52) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 211
μὴ σεμνά C.
μὴ σεμνά C.
(printed under page 103)
(53) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 211
ὀχήματα, ἅ τινα C, σχήματα jam D recte conjecit.
ὀχήματα, ἅ τινα C; D already rightly conjectured σχήματα.
(printed under page 103)
(54) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 211
δέ om. O, sed praebet subsequens μή, quod non est in textu Ci. Idem μή in marg.
δέ omitted in O, but it gives the following μή, which is not in the text of Ci. The same has μή in the margin.
(printed under page 103)
(55) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 211
αὐτούς C, αὐτά S.
αὐτούς C; αὐτά S.
(printed under page 103)
(56) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 211
ὑπό S, deest ap. C et in O.
ὑπό S; it is missing in C and in O.
(printed under page 103)
(57) ‹anchor: ἐκεῖναι ἐτολμήθησαν› · call in col 211
Ita O c. S, ἐτόλμησαν C. Aliam praeterea emendandi rationem proponit D, qui scribi vult μοχθηρῶν ἀνδρῶν — ἐκεῖναι τόλμαι ἦσαν αἱ ὕβρεις.
So O, with S; ἐτόλμησαν C. D also proposes another way of emending, wanting μοχθηρῶν ἀνδρῶν — ἐκεῖναι τόλμαι ἦσαν αἱ ὕβρεις written.
(printed under page 103)
(58) ‹anchor: δὲ νοῦν› · call in col 211
S. Notum est Anaxagorae πάντα διεκόσμησε νοῦς ap. Simpl. Phys. fol. 33 b. Schaubach, Anax. fragm. fr. VIII, De Stoicis cfr. Diog. Laert. VII, 134, 137.
S. Anaxagoras's "Mind set all things in order" is well known, in Simplicius on the Physics, fol. 33b; Schaubach, Fragments of Anaxagoras, fr. VIII. On the Stoics compare Diogenes Laertius VII, 134, 137.
(printed under page 103)
(59) ‹anchor: διακεκοσμῆσθαι› · call in col 211
Ita O c. S, διακεκοσμεῖσθαι C.
So O, with S; διακεκοσμεῖσθαι C.
(printed under page 103)
(60) ‹anchor: μὲν οἱ μὲν› · call in col 211
ἀποφηνάμενος μὲν φύσει O. Tum δεδημιουργῆσθαι S, O, δεδημιουργεῖσθαι C.
ἀποφηνάμενος μὲν φύσει O. Then δεδημιουργῆσθαι S, O; δεδημιουργεῖσθαι C.
(printed under page 103)
(61) ‹anchor: δυνάμενοι δὲ› · call in col 211
δέ S, O, μέν C.
δέ S, O; μέν C.
(printed under page 103)
(62) ‹anchor: ἀλληγορῆσαι› · call in col 211
ἀλληγορῇ O.
ἀλληγορῇ O.
(printed under page 103)
Note: the VARIAE LECTIONES are keyed to the Greek (col 213); their calls are printed in the Greek only. Calls 63–67 are not visible in the part of the page shown. VARIAE LECTIONES (printed under page 104)
(63) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 214
ποτέ ἐστιν C. Tum vbb. μεταμορφούμενοι γάμους διέλυον, βίους διέφθειρον repetuntur in O expuncta.
ποτέ ἐστιν C. Then the words μεταμορφούμενοι γάμους διέλυον, βίους διέφθειρον are repeated in O, marked for deletion.
(printed under page 104)
(64) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 214
Hanc Ci conjecturam expr. S, σχῆμα uterque Hom. codex.
S printed this conjecture of Ci; both manuscripts of the Homilies have σχῆμα.
(printed under page 104)
(65) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 214
Ita D, θεοῖς C, O. Cfr. c. 2 : οὐ πατέρος ἀδελφοὺς ἐκόλασεν.
So D; θεοῖς C, O. Compare chapter 2: οὐ πατέρος ἀδελφοὺς ἐκόλασεν.
(printed under page 104)
(66) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 214
ἐπιδεικνύουσιν O.
ἐπιδεικνύουσιν O.
(printed under page 104)
(67) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 214
μέν τις, ἐν Πάτραις C, μέντις ἐν ἄτραις O. Ci comma post τις recte delevit S. Deinceps Αἰγύπτω· τίς Θ.
μέν τις, ἐν Πάτραις C; μέντις ἐν ἄτραις O. S rightly deleted Ci's comma after τις. Next, Αἰγύπτω· τίς Θ [sic, for O].
(printed under page 104)
(68) ‹anchor: Τὸ δὲ› · call in col 214
Malim ὁ δέ. S. Tum ἰδέ O c. S, εἰδέ C.
I should prefer ὁ δέ. S. Then ἰδέ O, with S; εἰδέ C.
(printed under page 104)
(69) ‹anchor: λέγουσι Λήδᾳ› · call in col 214
Λήδᾳ om. O. Subinde : An συνεῖναι σχηματισμένον, C in notis.
Λήδᾳ omitted in O. Next: "Perhaps συνεῖναι σχηματισμένον?", C in his notes.
(printed under page 104)
(70) ‹anchor: ὃν› · call in col 214
Leg. ὅ. De re cfr. Mülleri Archaeol. § 128, 1, 351, 4. Tum χῆνα γράψαντες cfr. hom. v, 13, scribi vult Valckenarius, Diatr. in Eurip. reliq., p. 68, ed. Lips. Is vir doctissimus totum locum sic restituit : Τὸν δι' αὐτῶν ὄντα πατέρα θεῶν τε καὶ ἀνθρώπων, ὃν οἱ πολλοὶ Δία λέγουσιν, Λήδᾳ συνεσχηματισμένον χῆνα γράψαντες ἐν πίνακι δημοσίᾳ ἀνατιθέασιν. S.
Read ὅ. On the subject compare Müller's Archaeology §128, 1; 351, 4. Then Valckenaer, Diatribe on the Remains of Euripides, p. 68, Leipzig edition, wants χῆνα γράψαντες written (compare Homily V, 13). That most learned man restores the whole passage thus: "The one who by their account is father of gods and men, whom most call Zeus, they paint as a goose joined in form with Leda and set up on a public tablet." S.
VARIORUM NOTAE (printed under page 104)
(11) ‹anchor: θανάτου προσκυνεῖται› · call in col 214
Παρ' Αἰγυπτίοις ἔτι καὶ νῦν ἄνθρωπος ὡς Θεὸς πρὸ τοῦ θανάτου προσκυνεῖται. Et hom. ii, c. 6. Eleganter, ut omnia, Minucius Felix : Aegyptii sane hominem sibi quem colant eligunt, illum unum propitiant, illum de omnibus consulunt, illi victimas caedunt : et ille, qui caeteris deus, sibi certe homo est, velit nolit; nec enim conscientiam suam decipit, si fallit alienam. Idem traditur a Porphyrio Περὶ τῆς τῶν ἐμψύχων ἀποχῆς, lib. iv, num. 9, citantque Porphyrium Eusebius lib. iii Praeparat. evang., cap. 4, 12, ac Theodoritus, sermone contra Graecos. Cot.
"Among the Egyptians even now a man is worshipped as a god before his death." So also Homily II, chapter 6. Minucius Felix puts it elegantly, as he does everything: "The Egyptians indeed choose for themselves a man to worship; him alone they propitiate, him they consult about everything, to him they slaughter victims: and he who is a god to the others is surely a man to himself, whether he will or no; for he does not deceive his own conscience, even if he deceives another's." The same is reported by Porphyry, On Abstinence from Animal Food, book IV, no. 9, and Porphyry is cited by Eusebius, Preparation for the Gospel book III, chapters 4 and 12, and by Theodoret in his discourse against the Greeks. Cotelier.
(printed under page 104)
Note: the VARIAE LECTIONES are keyed to the Greek (col 216); their calls are printed in the Greek only. Calls 71–74 are not visible in the part of the page shown. No Variorum Notae on this page. VARIAE LECTIONES (printed under page 105)
(71) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 215
θεός O.
θεός O.
(printed under page 105)
(72) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 215
Ita O c. S, Θεόν C.
So O, with S; Θεόν C.
(printed under page 105)
(73) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 215
δύνανται O. Tum ἀπ' ἄλλου S.
δύνανται O. Then ἀπ' ἄλλου S.
(printed under page 105)
(74) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 215
τά τε γὰρ στοιχεῖα τὰ δ' εἴτε ἀεὶ ἀλλήλοις συνῆπτον O, intermediis vocabulis omissis.
τά τε γὰρ στοιχεῖα τὰ δ' εἴτε ἀεὶ ἀλλήλοις συνῆπτον O, the words in between being omitted.
(printed under page 105)
(75) ‹anchor: ὁμοίως τε› · call in col 215
τε S, τό C, O.
τε S; τό C, O.
(printed under page 105)
(76) ‹anchor: οὐδὲν ἐνέλιπε› · call in col 215
ὅσα ποτε ζῶν δεῖ ἔχειν, οὐδὲν ἐνέλειπε C.
ὅσα ποτε ζῶν δεῖ ἔχειν, οὐδὲν ἐνέλειπε C.
(printed under page 105)
(77) ‹anchor: εἶναι νοεῖν› · call in col 215
νοῦν O.
νοῦν O.
(printed under page 105)
(78) ‹anchor: διεστῶτα συνήγαγεν› · call in col 215
τὰ στοιχεῖα ἡδίστως ἢ συνήγαγεν O, συνήγαμεν ex Cotelerio minus accurate notat S, cum exstet ap. Cl.
τὰ στοιχεῖα ἡδίστως ἢ συνήγαγεν O. S, not quite accurately, records συνήγαμεν from Cotelier, whereas [συνήγαγεν] stands in Cl.
(printed under page 105)
(79) ‹anchor: μὴν ἔρως› · call in col 215
Secundum Parmenidem et Empedoclem. Cf. Karsten, Parmenid. reliq. v. 131. Emped. reliq., p. 346 sqq. Arist. Metaph. 1, 4, 1. S.
According to Parmenides and Empedocles. Compare Karsten, Remains of Parmenides, verse 131; Remains of Empedocles, p. 346 ff.; Aristotle, Metaphysics I, 4, 1. S.
(printed under page 105)
(80) ‹anchor: μετ' Ἀνουβίωνος› · call in col 215
Ἀννουβίωνος O. Tum μόνον C.
Ἀννουβίωνος O. Then μόνον C.
(printed under page 105)
(81) ‹anchor: ὡς ἀπαντησόμενοι› · call in col 215
ἀπαντήσομεν O, ad oram correctum in ἀπαντησάμενοι.
ἀπαντήσομεν O, corrected in the margin to ἀπαντησάμενοι.
(printed under page 105)
Note: the page shown holds the opening of Homily VII. The VARIAE LECTIONES are keyed to the Greek; their calls are printed in the Greek only. Calls 82–86 stand in this unit's text (end of Homily VI); call (12) on the title of Homily VII and calls 87–93 stand in the next unit's text, below the cut. VARIAE LECTIONES (printed under page 106)
(82) ‹anchor: ἔπεμψεν νόσους› · call in col 217
ὅσπυς O.
ὅσπυς O.
(printed under page 106)
(83) ‹anchor: μὲν αὐτόθεν› · call in col 217
αὐτόθι C.
αὐτόθι C.
(printed under page 106)
(84) ‹anchor: συνεξεληλύθεισαν› · call in col 217
Ita O c. S, συνεξεληλύθησαν C.
So O, with S; συνεξεληλύθησαν C.
(printed under page 106)
(85) ‹anchor: ὑπ' αὐτῷ θεραπευθησόμενοι› · call in col 217
ὑπ' αὐτοῦ C.
ὑπ' αὐτοῦ C.
(printed under page 106)
(86) ‹anchor: τετυχηκέναι ὑπ' αὐτῷ› · call in col 217
ὑπ' αὐτοῦ τετυχηκέναι C.
ὑπ' αὐτοῦ τετυχηκέναι C.
(printed under page 106)
(87) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 217
τῇ praefixi c. O. Idem postea τὸν ὄρθρον.
I have prefixed τῇ with O. The same afterwards has τὸν ὄρθρον.
(printed under page 106)
(88) ‹anchor: μηδὲ ἐπὶ› · call in col 217
ἐπί om. O.
ἐπί omitted in O.
(printed under page 106)
(89) ‹anchor: ὡς μὴ› · call in col 217
μή deest in O.
μή is missing in O.
(printed under page 106)
(90) ‹anchor: συμβαινόντων ἀνθρώπῳ› · call in col 217
ἀνθρώπων C, ἀνθρώποις in marg. Vocem ἀνθρώπων delendam censet D, συμβαινόντων παθῶν proponit S : conjecturae jam superfluae.
ἀνθρώπων C, ἀνθρώποις in the margin. D thinks the word ἀνθρώπων should be deleted; S proposes συμβαινόντων παθῶν: conjectures now superfluous.
(printed under page 106)
(91) ‹anchor: κακῷ ὑποπτευόμενα› · call in col 217
ὑποπτενόμενα O. Tum idem ἀποβησόμενα c. D, ἀποσόμενα C, idem f. ἐπεσόμενα vel ἀποσωζόμενα in marg.
ὑποπτενόμενα O. Then the same has ἀποβησόμενα, with D; ἀποσόμενα C, and the same [C] in the margin, perhaps ἐπεσόμενα or ἀποσωζόμενα.
(printed under page 106)
(92) ‹anchor: βουθυτήσας ἑστίασιν› · call in col 217
εἱστίασεν Epit. c. 54.
εἱστίασεν the Epitome, chapter 54.
(printed under page 106)
(93) ‹anchor: γὰρ ἀπαρχῆς› · call in col 217
ἀπ' ἀρχῆς O.
ἀπ' ἀρχῆς O.
VARIORUM NOTAE (printed under page 106)
(12) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 217
Homiliae septimae alteram inscriptionis partem ap. C. obviam ΕΝ ΤΥΡΩ Δ', quae scholion redolet, omisi c. O. Dress.
The second part of the title of the seventh Homily found in C, ΕΝ ΤΥΡΩ Δ' ["at Tyre, 4"], which smacks of a scholion, I have omitted with O. Dressel.
(printed under page 106)