PG 2 · cols. 241–258
S. Clemens I Romanus (opera dubia), Homiliae viginti: Homilia IX
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PG 2 · cols. 241–258
Editors' preface
(29) ‹anchor: in the column's first lines, above the unit (end of Homily VIII): τοῖς› · call in col 241
Ita S, βεβαίας ἐλπίδος πιστεύειν, ἅμα τοῖς C, βεβαίας ἐλπίδι πιστεύειν, ἅμα τοῖς O.
So S, "to believe with firm hope (gen.), together with those" C; "to believe with firm hope (dat.), together with those" O.
(printed under page 118)
(30) ‹anchor: in the column's first lines, above the unit (end of Homily VIII): μετὰ τῶν› · call in col 241
μενόντων p. μετὰ τῶν C.
μενόντων after μετὰ τῶν, C.
(printed under page 118)
(31) ‹anchor: Τῇ μὲν οὖν› · call in col 241
οὖν add. c. O. Tum id. ἑταίροις, ut legi vult C, cujus text. ἑτέροις.
οὖν added with O. Then the same has ἑταίροις, as C wishes it read; his text has ἑτέροις.
(printed under page 118)
(32) ‹anchor: τριῶν αὐτοῦ› · call in col 241
αὐτοῦ adjunxi c. O.
I have added αὐτοῦ with O.
(printed under page 118)
(33) ‹anchor: ἀσεβούντων μὴ› · call in col 241
οὐ O.
οὐ O.
(printed under page 118)
(34) ‹anchor: οὖν μείζων› · call in col 241
Ita O c. S, μεῖζον C.
So O with S; μεῖζον C.
(printed under page 118)
(35) ‹anchor: ὡς ὄντας› · call in col 241
Vbb. ὡς ὄντας ap. S non exstant.
The words ὡς ὄντας are not found in S.
(printed under page 118)
(36) ‹anchor: τὸν ὑμέτερον ὑποδράμῃ› · call in col 241
ὑποδράμῃ leg. censet D, suffragante O, ἀποδράμῃ C. Postea ὄχλοι; O.
D judges that ὑποδράμῃ should be read, with O in support; ἀποδράμῃ C. Afterwards ὄχλοι; O.
(printed under page 118)
(37) ‹anchor: τοὺς ὁμοίους› · call in col 241
ὁμοίως O.
ὁμοίως O.
(printed under page 118)
(38) ‹anchor: ἔχει τὴν› · call in col 241
Fortasse leg. τοῦ. S.
Perhaps read τοῦ. S.
(printed under page 118)
(39) ‹anchor: γοῦν, εὐθὺς› · call in col 241
εὐθὺ C. Tum τρία καὶ pro τριακόσια C, qui quidem genuinam Ottoboniani Lect. jam vidit exstare in Gen. IX, 28.
εὐθὺ C. Then τρία καὶ for τριακόσια C, who indeed already saw that the genuine reading of the Ottobonianus is found in Gen. 9:28.
(printed under page 118)
(40) ‹anchor: ἕτερος πειθοῖ› · call in col 241
Ita O c. S, πειθῷ C.
So O with S; πειθῷ C.
(printed under page 118)
(41) ‹anchor: τοῦ ποιήσαντος τὸν› · call in col 241
τόν assumpsi ex O. Tum S: leg. Μεσραΐμ, cfr. Rec. IV, 27: Ex quibus unus Cham nomine, cuidam ex filiis suis, qui Mesraim appellabatur. Chron. Alex. p. 62. Rad.: οὗτος Μεσραεὶμ ὁ Αἰγύπτιος—οἰκήτωρ γίνεται Βάκτρων.
I have taken τόν from O. Then S: read Μεσραΐμ; compare Recognitions 4.27: "Of whom one, Cham by name, to one of his sons, who was called Mesraim." Chronicon Alexandrinum p. 62, Rader's edition: "this Mesraim the Egyptian — becomes the settler of Bactra."
(printed under page 118)
(15) ‹anchor: ἡ μὲν μοναρχία› · call in col 241 — Variorum notae; set under col 242 (see n242).
(a) ‹anchor: superstes› · call in col 242
Gen. IX, 28.
Gen. 9:28.
VARIAE LECTIONES (printed under page 118)
(15) ‹anchor: ἡ μὲν μοναρχία› · call in col 241 (Greek; no call in the facing Latin)
Ἡ μὲν μοναρχία, etc. Usque ad finem capitis. In scripto Damasceno exstant ecloga περὶ ἀναρχίας. (Parallelorum lib. I, cap. 22.) Vide superius homil. 3, cap. 62. COT.
"Monarchy, on the one hand," etc. To the end of the chapter. In the writing of Damascene there is an extract "On anarchy" (Parallels, book 1, ch. 22). See above, Homily 3, ch. 62. Cotelier.
(printed under page 118)
VARIAE LECTIONES (printed under page 119)
(16) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 243
Rec. IV, 27: Hunc gentes, quae tunc erant, Zoroastren appellaverunt, admirantes primum magicae artis auctorem, cujus nomine etiam libri super hoc plurimi habentur. Hic ergo astris multum ac frequenter intentus et volens apud homines videri deus, velut scintillas quasdam ex stellis producere et hominibus ostentare coepit, quo rudes atque ignari in stuporem miraculi traherentur; cupiensque augere de se hujusmodi opinionem, saepius ista moliebatur, usquequo ab ipso daemone, quem importunius frequentabat, igni succensus concremaretur. DRESSEL.
Recognitions 4.27: "The nations which then existed called him Zoroaster, marvelling at him as the first author of the magic art, under whose name there are also very many books on this subject. So he, gazing much and often at the stars and wishing to seem a god among men, began to draw forth, as it were, sparks from the stars and to display them to men, so that the rude and ignorant were drawn into amazement at the wonder; and desiring to increase this opinion of himself, he attempted these things more often, until he was set on fire and burnt up by the very demon whom he importuned too insistently." Dressel.
(printed under page 119)
(17) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 243
Τὸ τῆς βασιλείας προσέχε πῦρ. Vide cap. 6. Ignem regni Zoroastreum commemorant post Chronici Alexandrini dicti auctorem p. 88, Michael Glycas Annalium parte II, p. 129; Georgius Cedrenus in Compendio Historiarum p. 13, et Suidas voce Ζωροάστρης. Quin etiam rem ignotam non fuisse Ammiano Marcellino ostendunt ea quae de magis dicit lib. XXIII, p. 253: Feruntque, si justum est credi, etiam ignem coelitus lapsum apud se sempiternis foculis custodiri, cujus portionem exiguam ut faustam praeisse quondam Asiaticis regibus dicunt. Atque hinc videtur originem sumpsisse mos ferendi ignem ante Persarum reges; quos postea imitati sunt imperatores Romani. COT.
"Attend to the fire of the kingdom." See ch. 6. The Zoroastrian fire of the kingdom is mentioned, after the author of the so-called Chronicon Alexandrinum (p. 88), by Michael Glycas, Annals part 2, p. 129; George Cedrenus in the Compendium of Histories p. 13; and Suidas under the word Ζωροάστρης. Indeed, that the matter was not unknown to Ammianus Marcellinus is shown by what he says of the magi in book 23, p. 253: "And they say, if it is right to believe it, that they also keep among them in perpetual braziers a fire that fell from heaven, a small portion of which, as an omen of good fortune, they say once went before the kings of Asia." And from this the custom of carrying fire before the kings of the Persians seems to have taken its origin; the Roman emperors later imitated them. Cotelier.
(printed under page 119)
(18) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 243
Antinoum Hadriani respicere videtur auctor Homiliarum. S. DRESSEL.
The author of the Homilies seems to have Hadrian's Antinous in view. S. Dressel.
(printed under page 119)
(19) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 243
Τό adjunxi c. O. Cfr. Recogn. IV, 28: «Hinc enim et nomen post mortem ejus Zoroaster, hoc est vivum sidus, appellatum est ab his, qui post unam generationem Graecae linguae loquela fuerant repleti.» Ad quem locum plura dedit Cl. Cfr. praeter ea Diog. Laert. Prooem. § 8: Δείνων ἐν τῇ πέμπτῃ τῶν ἱστοριῶν μεθερμηνευόμενόν φησι τὸν Ζωροάστρην ἀστροθύτην εἶναι. Φησὶ δὲ τοῦτο καὶ ὁ Ἑρμόδωρος, ubi vide, quae adnotaverunt Mer. Casaubonus et Menagius. S. ID.
I have added τό with O. Compare Recognitions 4.28: "For hence also after his death the name Zoroaster, that is, 'living star,' was given him by those who after one generation had been filled with the speech of the Greek tongue." On that passage Cl[ericus] gave more. Compare besides Diogenes Laertius, Prologue § 8: "Dinon in the fifth book of his Histories says that Zoroaster, when translated, is 'star-worshipper'; Hermodorus says this too" — where see the notes of Meric Casaubon and Ménage. S. The same (Dressel).
(printed under page 119)
(20) ‹anchor: ναοῖς τιμῶσιν› · call in col 243
Καὶ οἱ λοιποὶ ἐκεῖσε τοὺς κεραυνῷ θνήσκοντας, ὡς θεοφιλεῖς θάπτοντες, ναοῖς τιμῶσιν. Mos quippe erat, isque testatissimus, ut κεραυνοπλῆγες, sacro fulminis igne icti, non cremarentur, sed quo loco exstincti fuerant eodem terra conderentur: locum autem sacrum censebant, templum vocabant, et aris, sacrificiis, caeteroque cultu dignabantur. Testimonia proferre non necesse habeo. Sed ad vocem θεοφιλεῖς, vide nos supra in Recognit. IV, 28. COT.
"And the rest there, burying those who die by lightning as dear to God, honour them with temples." For it was the custom, and a very well attested one, that the lightning-struck, hit by the sacred fire of the thunderbolt, were not cremated but buried in the very place where they had died; and they held the place sacred, called it a temple, and honoured it with altars, sacrifices and other worship. I need not bring forward the testimonies. But on the word θεοφιλεῖς, see us above on the Recognitions 4.28. Cotelier.
(printed under page 119)
(42) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 244
Imo potius ὡρονομοῦντα S.
Or rather ὡρονομοῦντα S.
(printed under page 119)
(43) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 244
ἠνάγκασε C.
ἠνάγκασε C.
(printed under page 119)
(44) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 244
S. C vertit illius, quod adigebatur, hoc est τοῦ πυρός. Rectius: illius, qui adegerat.
S. C translates "of that which was being driven," that is, τοῦ πυρός ("of the fire"). More correctly: "of him who had driven (it)."
(printed under page 119)
(45) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 244
τιμωρήσητε O.
τιμωρήσητε O.
(printed under page 119)
(46) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 244
δουλίαν O, cui voci subnotatae in marg. respondet φιλίαν man. sec.
δουλίαν O; to this word, which is marked beneath, φιλίαν in a second hand answers in the margin.
(printed under page 119)
(47) ‹anchor: Τούτῳ τῷ› · call in col 244
τῷ, quod S omisit, textui reddidi c. O.
τῷ, which S omitted, I have restored to the text with O.
(printed under page 119)
(48) ‹anchor: μορφῶν ἱστᾶσιν› · call in col 244
ἱστῶσιν O.
ἱστῶσιν O.
(printed under page 119)
(49) ‹anchor: οἱ δυναστεύοντες› · call in col 244
δυναστεύσαντες C, quae lectio etiam pr. man. apparet in marg. codicis O.
δυναστεύσαντες C, a reading which also appears in the first hand in the margin of codex O.
(printed under page 119)
(50) ‹anchor: Πολλῷ› · call in col 244
Ita O et ex conject. C, in cuj. textu πολλῶν. Tum μεταγενεστέρων O.
So O, and C by conjecture, in whose text πολλῶν. Then μεταγενεστέρων O.
VARIORUM NOTAE (printed under page 119)
VARIAE LECTIONES (printed under page 120)
(51) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 245
ὑπαρχῆς O, qui comma ponit post οὔσης.
ὑπαρχῆς O, which puts a comma after οὔσης.
(printed under page 120)
(52) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 245
πρῶτοι βασιλείας C.
πρῶτοι βασιλείας C.
(printed under page 120)
(53) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 245
Φθάε O; legat, qui voluerit, Φθάς, ex Suida. Cl. Lacunam cod. Ott. post Ἥφαιστος explevi duce Jamblicho De myster. Aegypt. VIII, 3. Ἕλληνες δὲ εἰς Ἥφαιστον μεταλαμβάνουσι τὸν Φθᾶ, τῷ τεχνικῷ μόνον προσβάλλοντες— ἀγαθῶν δὲ ποιητικὸς ὤν, Ὄσιρις κέκληται.
Φθάε O; let whoever wishes read Φθάς, from Suidas. Cl[ericus]. I have filled the gap in the Ottobonian codex after Ἥφαιστος guided by Iamblichus, On the Mysteries of the Egyptians 8.3: "The Greeks render Phtha as Hephaestus, attending only to his craftsmanship — but being the maker of good things, he is called Osiris."
VARIORUM NOTAE (printed under page 120)
(21) ‹anchor: Ἥφαιστος› · call in col 245 — set once under col 246 (see n246)
(21) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 246
Τὸ πῦρ ἰδίᾳ διαλέκτῳ Φθαὲ καλέσαντες, ὃ ἑρμηνεύεται Ἥφαιστος. Leget qui voluerit Φθὰς, ex Suida. Φθὰς, inquit, ὁ Ἥφαιστος παρὰ Μεμφίταις. Καὶ παροιμία, «ὁ Φθάς σοι λελάληκεν·» οἱ δὲ Ἀφθάς φασιν, ὡς σταφὶς ἀσταφὶς, σταχὺς ἀσταχύς. At voce Ἀφθὰς, Aphtham Bacchum interpretatur, memoriae forsan errato. Verba enim Eusebii sunt, Praepar. evang. lib. III, cap. 11, ex Porphyrio: Τὸν δὲ θεὸν τοῦτον (Κνὴφ, τὸν δημιουργὸν) ἐκ τοῦ στόματος προΐεσθαί φασιν (Αἰγύπτιοι) ὠὸν, ἐξ οὗ γεννᾶσθαι θεὸν, ὃν αὐτοὶ προσαγορεύουσι Φθᾶ, οἱ δὲ Ἕλληνες, Ἥφαιστον. Hunc porro deum Cneph, opificem, ex ore ovum effudisse narrant Aegyptii, ex eoque natum esse deum, qui ab iis Phtha, Ἥφαιστος (Vulcanus) a Graecis nominetur. Addo praeceptori discipulum, Porphyrio Jamblichum, qui libro De mysteriis, ubi de Aegyptiorum opinione circa Deum atque deos, ita loquitur, ex versione Ficini (non autem Scutelli segmento 8, cap. 3): Secundum vero alium ordinem (Mercurius) praeponit deum Emeph diis coelestibus, tanquam ducem, quem ait intellectum esse seipsum intelligentem, atque in se intelligentias convertentem. Huic unum impartibile anteponit, quod appellat primum exemplar, aut expressionem, aut effigiem, quod Icthon appellat: in quo est primum intelligens, et intelligibile primum, quod solo silentio colitur. Praeter hoc autem rerum apparentium opificio alii duces praesunt. Nam opifex intellectus, qui et veritatis est dominus, atque sapientia, quatenus in generationem progrediens occultam latentium rationum potentiam traducit in lucem, Amum Aegyptiaca lingua vocatur: quatenus autem sine mendacio peragit omnia, et artificiose simul cum veritate, Phtha nuncupatur. Graeci vero hunc Vulcanum nominant, artificiosum duntaxat considerantes. Quantum vero effector est bonorum, appellatur Osiris, aliasque denominationes habet propter potentias actionesque differentes. Quorum en Graeca ex codicibus Regiis 1208, 2416, 2422: Κατ' ἄλλην δὲ τάξιν προτάττει (Ἑρμῆς) θεὸν τὸν Ἠμήφ (f. Κνήφ), τῶν ἐπουρανίων θεῶν ἡγούμενον· ὃν φησιν νοῦν εἶναι αὐτὸν ἑαυτὸν νοοῦντα, καὶ τὰς νοήσεις εἰς ἑαυτὸν ἐπιστρέφοντα. Τούτου δὲ τὸ ἓν ἀμερὲς, καὶ ὃ φησι πρῶτον μάγευμα προτάττει, ὃν καὶ Εἰκτὼν ἐπονομάζει. Ἐν ᾧ δὴ τὸ πρῶτόν ἐστι νοοῦν, καὶ τὸ πρῶτον νοητὸν, ὃ δὴ καὶ διὰ σιγῆς μόνης θεραπεύεται. Ἐπὶ δὲ τούτοις τῶν ἐμφανῶν δημιουργίας ἄλλοι προεστήκασιν ἡγεμόνες. Ὁ γὰρ δημιουργικὸς νοῦς, καὶ τῆς ἀληθείας προστάτης, καὶ σοφία ἐρχόμενος μὲν ἐπὶ γένεσιν, καὶ τὴν ἀφανῆ τῶν κεχρυμμένων λόγων δύναμιν εἰς φῶς ἄγων, Ἀμοῦν κατὰ τὴν τῶν Αἰγυπτίων γλῶσσαν λέγεται· συντελῶν δὲ ἀψευδῶς ἕκαστα, καὶ τεχνικῶς μετ' ἀληθείας φασίν· (l. Φθᾶ) Ἕλληνες δὲ εἰς Ἥφαιστον μεταλαμβάνουσι τὸν Φθᾶ, τῷ τεχνικῷ μόνον προσβάλλοντες. Ἀγαθῶν δὲ ποιητικὸς ὢν, Ὄσιρις κέκληται. Καὶ ἄλλας δι' ἄλλας δυνάμεις τε καὶ ἐνεργείας ἐπωνυμίας ἔχει. Denique nomen proprium Χομαεφθὰ regis Thebaeorum, exponitur κόσμος φιλήφαιστος, apud Georgium Syncellum Chronographiae p. 109. Habent autem hic praeclaram etymologiam Ἥφαιστος a Φθὰς, qui hujusmodi deductionibus oblectantur. Nam si quisquam est parum fidens ingeniosae arti, eamque suspectam magis habens, quam certam, is ego sum. COT.—Φθὰ, aut plenius Ἀφθὰ vocasse videntur Aegyptii Ἥφαιστον, quae vox ex Aegyptia detorta, quod apud eos אפה aphah, ut apud Hebraeos, coquere significarit; quod artis coquendorum metallorum eum putarent inventorem fuisse. CLER.—Longe a veritate aberrat Cler. Nihil prorsus est commune voci Aegyptiacae cum Hebraico quod allegat verbo. Veram genuinamque significationem nominis φθὰς habes in Jablonski Pantheo Aegypt. p. 50. «Est vero, ait doctissimus aegyptologus, interpretatio haec adeo facilis et obvia, adeoque se sponte et ultro offert, ut qui mediocres tantum in studio linguae Aegyptiacae progressus fecit, aberrare hic plane nequeat. Nam Φθὰς significat definientem, decernentem, ordinantem. Sic etiam interpretatur cel. Lacrozius, in Thes. epistolico, tom. III, p. 155, nempe: Constitutor sive ordinator rerum. DRACH.
"Calling fire in their own dialect Phthae, which is interpreted Hephaestus." Whoever wishes may read Φθάς, from Suidas. "Phthas," he says, "is Hephaestus among the Memphites. And there is a proverb, 'Phthas has spoken to you'; but others say Aphthas, as staphis/astaphis, stachys/astachys." But under the word Ἀφθάς he interprets Aphtha as Bacchus, perhaps by a slip of memory. For the words are Eusebius's, Preparation for the Gospel book 3, ch. 11, from Porphyry: "This god (Kneph, the demiurge), they (the Egyptians) say, sends forth from his mouth an egg, from which is born a god whom they call Phtha, and the Greeks Hephaestus." That is: the Egyptians relate that this god Cneph, the maker, poured out an egg from his mouth, and from it was born the god who is named Phtha by them, Hephaestus (Vulcan) by the Greeks. To the teacher I add the pupil, to Porphyry Iamblichus, who in his book On the Mysteries, where he treats of the Egyptians' opinion concerning God and the gods, speaks thus, in Ficino's version (not Scutellius's, section 8, ch. 3): "According to another order, (Hermes) places before the heavenly gods, as their leader, the god Emeph, whom he says is an intellect understanding itself and turning intellections back upon itself. Before him he places the one indivisible, which he calls the first exemplar, or expression, or image, which he calls Icthon: in which is the first understanding and the first intelligible, which is worshipped by silence alone. Besides this, other leaders preside over the making of visible things. For the creative intellect, which is also lord of truth and wisdom, in so far as, proceeding into generation, it brings into light the hidden power of the latent reasons, is called Amun in the Egyptian tongue; in so far as it accomplishes all things without falsehood, and artfully together with truth, it is named Phtha. The Greeks call him Vulcan, considering only his craftsmanship. In so far as he is the maker of good things, he is called Osiris, and he has other names on account of his different powers and actions." Here is the Greek of these, from the Royal codices 1208, 2416, 2422: [the same passage in Greek, with "(perhaps Κνήφ)" for Ἠμήφ and "(read Φθᾶ)" for φασίν]. Finally, the proper name Chomaephtha of a king of the Thebans is explained as "world dear to Hephaestus," in George Syncellus, Chronography p. 109. Those who delight in such derivations have here a splendid etymology, Ἥφαιστος from Φθάς. For if anyone has little confidence in this ingenious art, and holds it more suspect than sure, I am he. Cotelier. — The Egyptians seem to have called Hephaestus Phtha, or more fully Aphtha, a word bent from the Egyptian, because among them אפה aphah, as among the Hebrews, meant "to bake"; for they thought him the inventor of the art of smelting metals. Clericus. — Clericus strays far from the truth. The Egyptian word has nothing at all in common with the Hebrew verb he cites. You have the true and genuine meaning of the name Phthas in Jablonski, Pantheon Aegyptiorum p. 50: "This interpretation," says the most learned Egyptologist, "is so easy and obvious, and so offers itself of its own accord, that anyone who has made even modest progress in the study of the Egyptian language cannot possibly go wrong here. For Phthas means one who defines, decrees, orders. So too the celebrated La Croze interprets it in the Thesaurus epistolicus, vol. 3, p. 155, namely: 'Establisher or orderer of things.'" Drach.
(printed under page 120)
VARIAE LECTIONES (printed under page 121)
(22) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 247
Cotelerius haec male vertit: vera non quod Deus condemnet. Eodem modo τὰ ἀληθῆ (= τἀληθῶς) usurpatur hom. XI, 12, 29; XIV, 7. S. DRESSEL.
Cotelier translated this badly: "true things, not that God condemns." In the same way τὰ ἀληθῆ (= τἀληθῶς, "truly") is used in Homily 11.12, 29; 14.7. S. Dressel.
(printed under page 121)
(54) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 248
παρελθουσῶν O.
παρελθουσῶν O.
(printed under page 121)
(55) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 248
διὰ excidit e recens. Clerico-Schwegleriana.
διὰ has dropped out of the Clericus–Schwegler recension.
(printed under page 121)
(56) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 248
Fort. leg. τῆς πλάνης S.
Perhaps read τῆς πλάνης. S.
(printed under page 121)
(57) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 248
Conjectaverim παραδοθεῖσαν καὶ φυλαχθεῖσαν θρησκείαν, cl. Rec. IV, 14. S.
I would conjecture παραδοθεῖσαν καὶ φυλαχθεῖσαν θρησκείαν, comparing Recognitions 4.14. S.
(printed under page 121)
(58) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 248
Vbb. κρίσει καὶ ἐξουσίᾳ — ἐὰν μὲν οὖν τὰ ἡμέτερα des. in O.
The words from κρίσει καὶ ἐξουσίᾳ to ἐὰν μὲν οὖν τὰ ἡμέτερα are wanting in O.
(printed under page 121)
(59) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 248
μόνον O, conj. etiam S, μόνους C.
μόνον O, conjectured also by S; μόνους C.
(printed under page 121)
(60) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 248
τοιαῦτα p. αὐτοὶ αὐτὰ C.
τοιαῦτα in place of αὐτοὶ αὐτὰ, C.
(printed under page 121)
(61) ‹anchor: σώματα εἰσκρίνονται› · call in col 248
Ita S, εἰσκρίνεται C, O.
So S; εἰσκρίνεται C, O.
(printed under page 121)
(62) ‹anchor: ψυχῇ ἀνακίρνανται› · call in col 248
ἀνακίρνανται S, O, ἀνακίρνατα C.
ἀνακίρνανται S, O; ἀνακίρνατα C.
(printed under page 121)
(63) ‹anchor: τῶν ἑαυτοῖς› · call in col 248
αὐτοῖς O.
αὐτοῖς O.
(printed under page 121)
(64) ‹anchor: χαλεπώτατον, ἐπάν› · call in col 248
ἐπάν S, O, ἐπ' ἂν C.
ἐπάν S, O; ἐπ' ἂν C.
(printed under page 121)
(65) ‹anchor: συμποθείσης› · call in col 248
συμποθείσης D, O, συμπαθείσης C, qui conj. συμπαγείσης.
συμποθείσης D, O; συμπαθείσης C, who conjectures συμπαγείσης.
(printed under page 121)
(66) ‹anchor: Τὸ δὲ› · call in col 248
τοῦ δέ scribit Schliemannus Clem. p. 166, 569. Recte. Cf. Hom. IV, 9. S. Dein deest τῶν in O.
Schliemann (Die Clementinen, p. 166, 569) writes τοῦ δέ. Rightly. Compare Homily 4.9. S. Then τῶν is wanting in O.
(printed under page 121)
(67) ‹anchor: εἶναι καὶ› · call in col 248
καί S, O, desideratur ap. C. D legi vult πνεύματα ὄντα δεῖσθαι.
καί S, O; it is lacking in C. D wants πνεύματα ὄντα δεῖσθαι read.
VARIORUM NOTAE (printed under page 121)
(22) ‹anchor: τὰ ἀληθῆ› · call in col 248 — set once under col 247 (see n247)
VARIAE LECTIONES (printed under page 122)
(68) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 249
τοὺς C. Tum id. ὀδόντας et τὰ ἐκείνου αἰδοῖα.
τοὺς C. Then the same has ὀδόντας and τὰ ἐκείνου αἰδοῖα.
(printed under page 122)
(69) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 249
δῆλον ὅτι C.
δῆλον ὅτι C.
(printed under page 122)
(70) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 249
Ci τε ante πάσης omisi c. O.
[Cl.?] I have omitted τε before πάσης with O.
(printed under page 122)
(71) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 249
τῷ C.
τῷ C.
(printed under page 122)
(72) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 249
διαμαρτύρεσθαι O.
διαμαρτύρεσθαι O.
(printed under page 122)
(73) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 249
βραδύτητα C. Tum δέ om. O.
βραδύτητα C. Then δέ is omitted by O.
(printed under page 122)
(74) ‹anchor: ἑκάστῳ ἐννοηθῆναι› · call in col 249
ἐκνοηθῆναι C. Deinde τοῦ ἐν αὐτῷ p. τοῦ ἑαυτοῦ O.
ἐκνοηθῆναι C. Next, τοῦ ἐν αὐτῷ in place of τοῦ ἑαυτοῦ, O.
(printed under page 122)
(75) ‹anchor: σωτηρίας ἀμελήσῃ› · call in col 249
ἀμελήσει O.
ἀμελήσει O.
(printed under page 122)
(76) ‹anchor: ἃ βούλονται› · call in col 249
βούλονται O, ut voluit S. βούλεται C.
βούλονται O, as S wished; βούλεται C.
(printed under page 122)
(77) ‹anchor: καὶ αὐτοὺς› · call in col 249
Ita S. τους absque accentu cod. Ci, qui καὶ τούτους proposuit, τούς O.
So S. τους without accent in the codex of Cl[ericus?], who proposed καὶ τούτους; τούς O.
(printed under page 122)
(78) ‹anchor: αἵματος ἀμετρίας› · call in col 249
ἀμετρία O.
ἀμετρία O.
(printed under page 122)
(79) ‹anchor: οὐδὲ ὅτι› · call in col 249
Pro ὅτι S legi vult ὅλως. Tum inserui εἰσίν c. O. Deinde ἢ delendum putat S.
For ὅτι S wants ὅλως read. Then I have inserted εἰσίν with O. Next, S thinks ἢ should be deleted.
VARIORUM NOTAE (printed under page 122)
(23) ‹anchor: αἰτίᾳ› · call in col 249 — set once under col 250 (see n250)
(23) ‹anchor: γεώδης ψυχή, αἰτία› · call in col 250
S: ἡ διὰ conj. Neander gnost. Syst. p. 418. Vocem αἰτία explicavit Crednerus in commentatione sua de Essenis et Ebionaeis (Winer, Zeitschr. für wiss. Theol. 1829) p. 282. τῶν ante βρωτῶν adscripsi c. O. DRESSEL.
S: Neander, Genetische Entwickelung der gnostischen Systeme p. 418, conjectures ἡ διὰ. Credner explained the word αἰτία in his essay on the Essenes and Ebionites (Winer, Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Theologie 1829) p. 282. I have added τῶν before βρωτῶν with O. Dressel.
(printed under page 122)
(a) ‹anchor: vel animae› · call in col 251
Congruentius Graeco verteretur: quae instanti timori vel cupiditati formas attribuit. EDIT. PATROL.
It would be rendered more in keeping with the Greek: "which gives shapes to present fear or desire." Editor of the Patrologia.
VARIAE LECTIONES (printed under page 123)
(24) ‹anchor: Εἰσὶν δὲ› · call in col 252 (Greek; no call in the facing Latin)
Cotelerius in versione vehementer labitur. Caeterum Graeca quoque haud sana sunt. Fortasse verba εἰσὶν δέ mutanda sunt in ἄλλους δέ cui emendationi fidem facit Recognitionum liber, cujus paraphrasis haec est: Aliis etiam daemones in visu per diversas imagines apparentes interdum minas intendunt, interdum sanitates pollicentur (IV, 19). Cfr. infra c. 14. S. Post οὗτοι commate distinxi, assumpsique οὓς ex O. DRESSEL.
Cotelier errs badly in his version. But the Greek too is not sound. Perhaps the words εἰσὶν δέ should be changed to ἄλλους δέ, an emendation confirmed by the book of the Recognitions, whose paraphrase is this: "To others too the demons, appearing in a vision through various images, sometimes hold out threats, sometimes promise cures" (4.19). Compare below, ch. 14. S. After οὗτοι I have put a comma, and taken οὓς from O. Dressel.
(printed under page 123)
(80) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 252
ἤ τε C, ἦτε S.
ἤ τε C; ἦτε S.
(printed under page 123)
(81) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 252
καθεστᾶσιν C, καθιστᾶσιν S.
καθεστᾶσιν C; καθιστᾶσιν S.
(printed under page 123)
(82) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 252
ἠπατημένους O.
ἠπατημένους O.
(printed under page 123)
(83) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 252
Ita S, qui οὕτως conj., ὅμως C, O.
So S, who conjectures οὕτως; ὅμως C, O.
(printed under page 123)
(84) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 252
ἐλεῶντας C.
ἐλεῶντας C.
(printed under page 123)
(85) ‹anchor: τοὺς δαίμονας› · call in col 252
τοὺς δαίμονας dedi ex conject., τοῦ δαίμονος C, qui conj. τοῦ δαίμονας, ut est in O, τὸ δαίμονες S.
I have given τοὺς δαίμονας by conjecture; τοῦ δαίμονος C, who conjectures τοῦ δαίμονας [sic], as it is in O; τὸ δαίμονες S.
(printed under page 123)
(86) ‹anchor: ψυχὰς συμπίνωσιν› · call in col 252
συμπίνωσιν S, O, συμπίνουσιν C.
συμπίνωσιν S, O; συμπίνουσιν C.
(printed under page 123)
(87) ‹anchor: τὸ ἴδιον αὐτῶν› · call in col 252
δι' αὐτῶν p. ἴδιον αὐτῶν O.
δι' αὐτῶν in place of ἴδιον αὐτῶν, O.
(printed under page 123)
(88) ‹anchor: ξοάνων ἰδέας› · call in col 252
εἰδέας C.
εἰδέας C.
(printed under page 123)
(89) ‹anchor: Πόσοι› · call in col 252
Ita C ex conject. in marg., πόσοις id. in textu, ut O.
So C by conjecture in the margin; the same has πόσοις in the text, as O.
(printed under page 123)
(90) ‹anchor: ὕπαρ συναντήσαντες› · call in col 252
Ita in marg. C, qui in textu ὑπερσυναντήσαντες, ut O.
So in the margin of C, which has ὑπερσυναντήσαντες in the text, as O.
(printed under page 123)
(91) ‹anchor: ὄναρ ἐπιφάνεια› · call in col 252
ἐπιφανείη O.
ἐπιφανείη O.
(printed under page 123)
(92) ‹anchor: ψυχῆς τὰ› · call in col 252
τά melius abesset. S. Deinde παροῦσι C ex conject., παρία in textu.
τά would better be absent. S. Next, παροῦσι C by conjecture, παρία in the text.
VARIORUM NOTAE (printed under page 123)
(24) ‹anchor: Εἰσὶν δὲ› · call in col 252 — set once under col 251 (see n251)
(93) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 253
εἰδέας C.
εἰδέας C.
(printed under page 124)
(94) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 253
διά C.
διά C.
(printed under page 124)
(95) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 253
εἰδέας C.
εἰδέας C.
(printed under page 124)
(96) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 253
Ita scriptura cod. Ottob. explicanda esse videtur. Accusativo opus esse, jam vidit S, ἀλήθεια vulgo.
So the writing of the Ottobonian codex seems to need to be interpreted. S already saw that an accusative is needed; ἀλήθεια in the common text.
(printed under page 124)
(97) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 253
Fort. leg. τις S.
Perhaps read τις. S.
(printed under page 124)
(98) ‹anchor: προσοικειωμένα› · call in col 253
προσωκειώμενα O.
προσωκειώμενα O.
(printed under page 124)
(99) ‹anchor: ταῦτα τὰ› · call in col 253
τά delet S. Tum ἰαθῆναι C, ἰασθῆναι Cl. Labitur Schweglerus quod ad lectionem Cotelerii. — Deinde μαντικὰ ὄντα καὶ εἰδότα ad daemonas referendum est, de quibus saepe, quasi τὰ δαιμόνια praecesserit, neutro genere loquitur auctor homiliarum Supra c. 10, et infra c. 19, 20. S.
S deletes τά. Then ἰαθῆναι C, ἰασθῆναι Cl[ericus]. Schwegler is mistaken as to Cotelier's reading. — Next, μαντικὰ ὄντα καὶ εἰδότα is to be referred to the demons, of whom the author of the Homilies often speaks in the neuter gender, as if τὰ δαιμόνια had preceded: above, ch. 10, and below, chs. 19, 20. S.
(printed under page 124)
(100) ‹anchor: διὰ τί› · call in col 253
δύνανται p. διὰ τί O. Tum idem πολὺν χρόνον χρόνον χρηματίζουσι.
δύνανται in place of διὰ τί, O. Then the same has πολὺν χρόνον χρόνον χρηματίζουσι.
(printed under page 124)
(1) ‹anchor: προσφέρειν τι› · call in col 253
τίς O.
τίς O.
(printed under page 124)
(2) ‹anchor: τεθνεώτων ἢ› · call in col 253
ἢ addidit D.
D added ἢ.
(printed under page 124)
(3) ‹anchor: τινες ἀνεζήτησαν› · call in col 253
συνεζήτησαν C. Post ἀποτυχίας perperam puncto majori distinxerat. Verum restituit D. Tum εὑρήκειτε S, O, εὑρήκητε C.
συνεζήτησαν C. After ἀποτυχίας he had wrongly put a heavier stop. D restored the true reading. Then εὑρήκειτε S, O; εὑρήκητε C.
(printed under page 124)
(4) ‹anchor: ἀποτυχίας τῶν› · call in col 253
τήν O.
τήν O.
(printed under page 124)
(a) ‹anchor: possunt cognosci› · call in col 254
Legere mallem cum Cotelerio curari, et in Graeco ἰαθῆναι. EDIT. PATROL.
I would rather read, with Cotelier, curari ("be cured"), and in the Greek ἰαθῆναι. Editor of the Patrologia.
VARIAE LECTIONES (printed under page 124)
(a) ‹anchor: et vadat› · call in col 255
Matth. VIII, 9.
Matt. 8:9.
VARIAE LECTIONES (printed under page 125)
(5) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 256
Ita O c. S. κεχρηματεῖσθαι C.
So O with S; κεχρηματεῖσθαι C.
(printed under page 125)
(6) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 256
νῦν transcripsi ex O.
I have copied νῦν from O.
(printed under page 125)
(7) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 256
οὐκ εἴ τι O c. D, οὐχί τι C.
οὐκ εἴ τι O with D; οὐχί τι C.
(printed under page 125)
(8) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 256
καλῶς, quod exh. cod. Reg. 804, deest in utroque Hom. codice. Μεταμεληθέντες καὶ κατὰ τὸ ἀρέσκον αὐτῷ βιώσαντες habet Epit. c. 66.
καλῶς, which the Royal codex 804 shows, is wanting in both codices of the Homilies. The Epitome, ch. 66, has "having repented and lived according to what pleases him."
(printed under page 125)
(9) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 256
τῶν adjungunt cod. Reg. 804 et Epit. c. 66.
The Royal codex 804 and the Epitome, ch. 66, add τῶν.
(printed under page 125)
(10) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 256
παραδοθεῖσαν ἐντολήν cod. Reg. 804.
παραδοθεῖσαν ἐντολήν the Royal codex 804.
(printed under page 125)
(11) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 256
ἐξ αὐτῆς O. Dein πεῖραν D, πεῖρα C, D.
ἐξ αὐτῆς O. Then πεῖραν D; πεῖρα C, D [sic].
(printed under page 125)
(12) ‹anchor: βασιλεύοντες› · call in col 256
Ita O et C ex conject., βασιλευοῦντες id. in textu, ἀπολαύοντες Epit. l. c.
So O, and C by conjecture; the same has βασιλευοῦντες in the text; ἀπολαύοντες the Epitome at the place cited.
(printed under page 125)
(13) ‹anchor: ἀεννάῳ› · call in col 256
ἀενάῳ C.
ἀενάῳ C.
(printed under page 125)
(14) ‹anchor: μόνον ἐνιδόντων› · call in col 256
Fortasse leg. ἐπόντων: sola praesentia propelluntur vertunt Recognit. IV, 32. S.
Perhaps read ἐπόντων: the Recognitions (4.32) render "they are driven off by your mere presence." S.
(printed under page 125)
(15) ‹anchor: ἐχθὲς› · call in col 256
χθές O. Tum fortasse leg. ἐπιθεμένου, S.
χθές O. Then perhaps read ἐπιθεμένου. S.
(printed under page 125)
(16) ‹anchor: ὑμᾶς› · call in col 256
ὑμᾶς S, O, ὑμεῖς C.
ὑμᾶς S, O; ὑμεῖς C.
(printed under page 125)
(17) ‹anchor: καὶ ἔρχεται› · call in col 256
ἔρχεσθαι O.
ἔρχεσθαι O.
(printed under page 125)
(18) ‹anchor: καὶ πορεύεται› · call in col 256
πορεύεσθαι O.
πορεύεσθαι O.
(printed under page 125)
VARIAE LECTIONES (printed under page 126)
(19) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 257
Post καρδίας C inserendum putat τοῦ vel Θεοῦ. Cfr. e. g. hom. XI, 24. Fortasse τῶν ὅλων mutandum in τὸν Θεοῦ S.
After καρδίας C thinks τοῦ or Θεοῦ should be inserted. Compare e.g. Homily 11.24. Perhaps τῶν ὅλων should be changed to τὸν Θεοῦ. S.
(printed under page 126)
(20) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 257
Ita O c. marg. Ci, in cujus textu καί.
So O with the margin of Cl[ericus?], in whose text καί.
(printed under page 126)
(21) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 257
μόνον O.
μόνον O.
(printed under page 126)
(22) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 257
Ita locum corruptum atque mancum sanavi c. O. Ap. C est οὕτω τὸ θεῖον ἅγιον. Ita conject. Θεοῦ ἅγιον vel Θεοῦ ὀνόματα non opus est.
So I have healed the corrupt and defective passage with O. In C it reads οὕτω τὸ θεῖον ἅγιον. Thus there is no need for the conjecture Θεοῦ ἅγιον or Θεοῦ ὀνόματα.
(printed under page 126)
(23) ‹anchor: Ἔσθ' ὅτε δὲ› · call in col 257
δέ subnotatur in O, ad cuj. oram διά.
δέ is marked beneath in O, in whose margin διά.
(printed under page 126)
(24) ‹anchor: ἀνέλωσιν› · call in col 257
θελήσωσιν ἀνελῶσιν C.
θελήσωσιν ἀνελῶσιν C.
(printed under page 126)
(25) ‹anchor: ἑαυτὸν ἑκὼν› · call in col 257
ἑκών addidi c. O, subinde ἐκδῷ S, ἐκδώῃ C, O.
I have added ἑκών with O; then ἐκδῷ S, ἐκδώῃ C, O.
(printed under page 126)
(26) ‹anchor: βαπτισάμενοι, τῷ› · call in col 257
Ita S, τό C, O.
So S; τό C, O.
(printed under page 126)
(27) ‹anchor: ἐπιδιδόναι› · call in col 257
ἐπιδιδόντες O.
ἐπιδιδόντες O.
(printed under page 126)
(28) ‹anchor: τῶν ἐχθὲς› · call in col 257
χθές O.
χθές O.
(printed under page 126)
(29) ‹anchor: προσῄεσαν› · call in col 257
Ita O c. S, προσίεσαν C.
So O with S; προσίεσαν C.
(printed under page 126)
(30) ‹anchor: ὀρθρίτερον› · call in col 257
ὀρθριώτερον Cl et S, qui hic et infra mavult ὀρθριαίτερον.
ὀρθριώτερον Cl[ericus] and S, who here and below prefers ὀρθριαίτερον.
(printed under page 126)