PG 6 · cols. 205–226
Excerpta ex praefatione editoris Ienensis (J. C. T. Otto, Ienae 1842): I. De Justini codicibus editis; II. De Justini codicibus in alias linguas versis; III. De Justini codicibus manuscriptis
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PG 6 · cols. 205–226
Editors' preface
- full_width band across cols 205/206 (set by hand by QA Q1 at the head of c205_a.md, from the page images of cols 205 and 206): title LECTORI.; the Patrologia editors' notice Ienae anno 1842 ... communicabimus. EDIT. PATR. (editors' matter); section heading I. DE JUSTINI CODICIBUS EDITIS (printed without a final point); the bracketed sub-heading (S. Justini, philosophi et martyris Opera ... haec editio.). The work's title EXCERPTA EX PRAEFATIONE EDITORIS IENENSIS stands only in the running head across the page top. - UNSURE: notice line 7 opening word read as usque (in variis usque nobilissimis); notice line 8 ends libr. at the right margin (abbreviation as printed, or libri cut by the scan edge). - footnotes (1) J. Alb. Fabricius ... and (2) De alia editione a. 1595 ... stand at the foot of this page but are called in col. 206: set under col. 206.
(1) ‹anchor: τ' αἰχμητῇ› · call in col 206
J. Alb. Fabricius (Biblioth. Græc. cur. Harles. vol. VII. Hamb. 1801, 4, p. 61) utramque refert Apologiam Græce pridem Romæ (in-8°) impressam esse a Zannero una cum Gregorii Thaumaturgi, Athanasii, Basilii M., Gregorii Naz. et J. Chrysostomi nonnullis, curante Hieronymo Bunello, S. J. At vero de hac editione valde dubitandum est.
J. A. Fabricius (Bibliotheca Graeca, ed. Harles, vol. VII, Hamburg 1801, quarto, p. 61) reports that both Apologies were printed in Greek long ago at Rome (in octavo) by Zannetti, together with some works of Gregory Thaumaturgus, Athanasius, Basil the Great, Gregory Nazianzen and John Chrysostom, under the care of Girolamo Brunelli, S.J. But this edition is very much to be doubted.
(printed under page 109)
(2) ‹anchor: a. 1592› · call in col 206
De alia editione a. 1595 jam Mich. Maittaire (Annall. typograph. Hagæ Comit. 1725, 4, tom. III, p. II, p. 810, not. b) dubitavit.
Michael Maittaire (Annales typographici, The Hague 1725, quarto, vol. III, part II, p. 810, note b) already doubted another edition of the year 1595.
(printed under page 109)
(3) ‹anchor: vel potius Vitebergæ› · call in col 208
Vide Wilh. Ern. Tentzel, Miscellann. eccles. (Lips. 1703, 4), p. I, p. 165.
See Wilhelm Ernst Tentzel, Miscellanea ecclesiastica (Leipzig 1703, quarto), part I, p. 165.
(printed under page 110)
(4) ‹anchor: editio Benedictina, etc.› · call in col 208
Recensionem editionis Benedictinæ, quæ in nostra reviviscit, omittimus. EDIT. PATR.
We omit the review of the Benedictine edition, which lives again in ours. EDITORS OF THE PATROLOGIA.
(printed under page 110)
(5-6) ‹anchor: nobis profuit› · call in col 210 Codex ille mstus, quem V. D. consulendum curavit, fuit Claromontanus, Regio a Stephano typis descripto consimillimus.
That manuscript, which the learned man had consulted, was the Clermont codex, very closely alike to the Royal codex that Stephanus put into print.
(printed under page 111)
(7) ‹anchor: Cryptæ Ferratæ› · call in col 213
De hujus monasterii (ordinis S. Basilii) bibliotheca vid. Frider. Blume: Iter Italicum, tom. II (Hal. 1827, 8), p. 191 sqq.
On the library of this monastery (of the Order of St Basil) see Friedrich Blume, Iter Italicum, vol. II (Halle 1827, octavo), p. 191 ff.
(printed under page 113)
(8) ‹anchor: quondam servabatur› · call in col 214, paragraph 1 (moved under col 213 on receipt; read on the page by QA Q1)
Cf. Fr. Blume l. c., tom. III (Hal. 1830, 8), p. 72.
Compare Fr. Blume, in the work cited, vol. III (Halle 1830, octavo), p. 72.
(printed under page 113)
(9) ‹anchor: 1575, 8› · call in col 214
Huic editioni Parisiensi adjuncta est B. Hippolyti Oratio de consummatione mundi et Antichristo et secundo adventu Domini Jesu Christi, ex interpretatione Joannis Pici.
Added to this Paris edition is St Hippolytus's Oration on the end of the world, the Antichrist and the second coming of the Lord Jesus Christ, in the translation of Jean Picus.
(printed under page 113)
(10) ‹anchor: elucubrationis› · call in col 215
Restant tantummodo hæc Pseudo-Justini scripta: Justini Epistola [ad Zenam et Serenum] de vita Christiana, Latine, in Claudii Chantelou, mon. Bened. Bibliotheca Patrum ascetica, etc. Tom. I (Paris. 1661, 4), p. 1 sqq., atque: S. Justini mart. Eversio falsorum Aristotelis dogmatum, Latine, Guil. Postello, in tenebrarum Babylonicarum dispulsionem interprete. Paris. apud Sebast. Nivellium 1552, 16.
There remain only these Pseudo-Justinian writings: Justin's Letter [to Zenas and Serenus] on the Christian life, in Latin, in Claude Chantelou, Benedictine monk, Bibliotheca Patrum ascetica, etc., vol. I (Paris 1661, quarto), p. 1 ff.; and St Justin Martyr's Overthrow of the false dogmas of Aristotle, in Latin, translated by Guillaume Postel for the dispelling of the Babylonian darkness, Paris, Sébastien Nivelle, 1552, sextodecimo.
(printed under page 114)
(11) ‹anchor: codicibus mstis› · call in col 217, paragraph 3 (Referam autem de iis ... codicibus mstis (11); read on the page by QA Q2a)
De suppositorum Justino librorum codicibus mstis adeas Fabricium, Biblioth. Græc., ed. Harles, Hamburgi 1801, in-4°, t. VII, p. 68 sqq.
On the manuscripts of the books falsely ascribed to Justin, consult Fabricius, Bibliotheca Graeca, ed. Harles, Hamburg 1801, quarto, vol. VII, p. 68 ff.
(printed under page 115)
(12) ‹anchor: not visible in the foot images› · call in col 219 (inferred: the call is not in the lower parts of either column shown)
Montefalconius autem (Palæogr. Gr., p. 276) ista duo folia integra a Baane exercitii et animi causa unciali charactere opinatur descripta esse.
Montfaucon, however (Palaeographia Graeca, p. 276), thinks that those two folios were copied whole by Baanes in uncial script, for practice and for pleasure.
(printed under page 116)
(13) ‹anchor: exaratus videtur› · call in col 220
Idem Montefalconius (l. c. p. 277 sqq.) decimo hunc codicem sæculo judicat scriptum esse. « Nam, inquit, in aliquot ejusdem formæ codices incidi, anni notam ferentes, qui omnes eodem sæculo exarati sunt. Hic dativo ι ascribitur, ut in ἐπιστολῆι, quod in aliquot exemplaribus observatur; in pluribus omittitur. Accentus non ita accurate ubique notantur, sed haud raro negliguntur, et spiritus similiter, qui prisca forma plerumque describuntur. »
The same Montfaucon (in the work cited, p. 277 ff.) judges that this codex was written in the tenth century. "For," he says, "I have come upon several codices of the same form bearing a note of the year, all written in that same century. Here iota is written beside the dative, as in ἐπιστολῆι, which is seen in some copies; in most it is left out. The accents are not marked carefully everywhere but are fairly often neglected, and the breathings likewise, which are mostly written in the ancient form."
(printed under page 116)
(14) ‹anchor: exaratus est› · call in col 221
At Nic. le Nourry (Apparat. ad biblioth. max. vett. PP., etc. p. I, p. 467) hunc certe non ineleganteni codicem sæculo opinatur decimo quarto conscriptum esse.
But Nicolas Le Nourry (Apparatus ad Bibliothecam maximam veterum Patrum, etc., part I, p. 467) thinks that this codex, certainly not an inelegant one, was written in the fourteenth century.
(printed under page 117)
(15) ‹anchor: corrosus est› · call in col 222
Hoc jam Gust. Hænel. adnotavit: Catalogg. librorum mstorum, etc., p. 466.
Gustav Hänel has already noted this: Catalogi librorum manuscriptorum, etc., p. 466.
(printed under page 117)
(16) ‹anchor: exaratus est› · call in col 222
Hic codex mstus quidem passim habet lectiones deteriores, veras tamen plurimis locis conservavit; idem, ut ex multis potest concludi, non ad Codd. Reg. 3 et Clarom. familiam, sed ad egregiam Codd. Regg. 1, 2 et 4 pertinet maximeque convenit cum Reg. 2.
This manuscript does here and there have inferior readings, yet in a great many places it has kept the true ones; and, as can be concluded from many things, it belongs not to the family of the Royal codex 3 and the Clermont codex but to the excellent family of Royal codices 1, 2 and 4, and agrees most closely with Royal 2.
(printed under page 117)
(17) ‹anchor: not visible in the foot images› · call in col 225 (inferred: the note starts under col 225; the call is not in the lower parts of either column shown)
De egregia hac bibliotheca videsis Fr. Blume: Iter Italicum, tom. III, p. 122 sqq.
On this excellent library see Fr. Blume, Iter Italicum, vol. III, p. 122 ff.
(printed under page 119)
(17) ‹anchor: Angelica (S. Agostino› · call in col 226
De egregia hac bibliotheca videsis Fr. Blume : Iter Italicum, tom. III, p. 122 sqq.
On this excellent library see Fr. Blume, Iter Italicum, vol. III, p. 122 ff.
(printed under page 119; added by QA Q1)
- col 226: (S. Agostino haberi: the parenthesis opened before S. Agostino is not closed on the page (the call (17) follows the name); restored as printed by QA Q1 (the import had silently closed it). UNSURE: Emillum (the page may read Emilium; kept as the file has it).