PG 65 · cols. 679–832
Proclus of Constantinople, Orations
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PG 65 · cols. 679–832
Editors' preface
(1) ‹anchor: ORATIO I.› · call in col 679
Haec illa celebris oratio est, in qua sanctus Proclus adhuc episcopus Cyzici de Nestorio revexit triumphum. Prima ipsa verba indicant habitam celebri pro Mariae solemniis conventu; nec alio, quam τοῦ εὐαγγελισμοῦ, sacratissimae ejus Annuntiationis, quando Emmanuelem concipiens, vere effecta est Deipara. Sequor maxime perantiquum Regium codicem, quo textus videtur purior, ac qualem fere habuit antiquus interpres, quem Riccardus existimat Dionysium Exiguum, subjectis variis aliorum lectionibus. Accessit novissimus cardinalis Mazarini codex, qui ipse emendatissimus videri potest, ex quo subinde aliqua notis intexui.
This is that celebrated oration in which Saint Proclus, while still bishop of Cyzicus, carried off his triumph over Nestorius. Its very first words show that it was delivered at a crowded gathering for the solemnities of Mary, and at none other than that τοῦ εὐαγγελισμοῦ, of her most sacred Annunciation, when, conceiving Emmanuel, she was truly made Mother of God. I follow chiefly the very ancient Royal codex, in which the text seems purer, and much such as the ancient translator had (whom Riccardi thinks to be Dionysius Exiguus), with various readings of the others set beneath. Last came the codex of Cardinal Mazarin, which may itself seem the most correct, and from which I have from time to time woven some things into the notes.
(printed under page 344)
(2) ‹anchor: εἰς τὴν Παναγίαν› · call in col 680 (Greek only)
Ms. codex Mazar. ὑπεραγίαν.
The Mazarin manuscript codex reads ὑπεραγίαν ("the all-surpassingly holy").
(printed under page 344)
(3) ‹anchor: καὶ μάλιστα› · call in col 680 (Greek only)
Id. cod. μάλα.
The same codex reads μάλα.
(printed under page 344)
[scripture references at the foot of the text, as printed] ³ Rom. V, 20. ⁴ Exod. III, 2. ⁵ Isa. XIX, 1. ⁶ Judic. VI, 37. ⁷ Gen. III, 6. ⁸ Gen. IV, 1.
³ Romans 5:20. ⁴ Exodus 3:2. ⁵ Isaiah 19:1. ⁶ Judges 6:37. ⁷ Genesis 3:6. ⁸ Genesis 4:1.
(printed under page 345)
(4) · call in col 681 (Greek only; call not in the visible part of the page)
Leg. cum aliis, δοροφορεῖ.
Read, with others, δοροφορεῖ [sic; i.e. δορυφορεῖ, "escorts as a bodyguard"].
(printed under page 345)
(5) · call in col 681 (Greek only; call not in the visible part of the page)
Al. ἐφαπλώσασα.
Others read ἐφαπλώσασα ("spreading over").
(printed under page 345)
(6) ‹anchor: ἡ τῆς Παρθένου› · call in col 681 (Greek only)
Al. ἡ ἐκ τῆς παρθένου.
Others read ἡ ἐκ τῆς παρθένου ("the [flesh] from the Virgin").
(printed under page 345)
(7) ‹anchor: ὁ Λόγος› · call in col 681 (Greek only)
Al. ἐνέχεεν, ἐκεῖ ὁ λόγος.
Others read ἐνέχεεν, ἐκεῖ ὁ λόγος ("poured in, there the Word").
(printed under page 345)
(8) ‹anchor: Κάϊν προέκυψεν› · call in col 681 (Greek only)
Ms. cod. Mazar. προέκυψεν.
The Mazarin manuscript codex reads προέκυψεν.
(printed under page 345)
(9) · call in col 682 (call not in the visible part of the page)
Corporatum portavit. Μετὰ σώματος βαστάσασα. Sic et vetus ille Vaticanus: cum corpore portavit; non ut male interpres concilii Ephesini, et post eum Riccardus: In corpore suo gestavit. Tametsi enim hoc maximum est, ut Maria utero et in suo corpore gestaverit Dominum; hic tamen Proclus modum praecipue respicit, quo eum qui super Cherubim incorporeus sedet, cum corpore ac eo indutum ipsa portavit.
"Carried him embodied." Μετὰ σώματος βαστάσασα. So too that old Vatican [translator]: "carried with a body"; not, as the translator of the Council of Ephesus wrongly has it, and Riccardi after him, "carried in her own body." For although this is the greatest thing, that Mary bore the Lord in her womb and in her own body, here Proclus looks chiefly to the manner in which she herself carried him who sits bodiless above the Cherubim, with a body and clothed in it.
(printed under page 345)
(10) · call in col 682 (call not in the visible part of the page)
Textorium jugum. Liquet satis non accipi hic vocem ἱστὸς pro ipsa tela, sub cujus metaphora Proclus unionem ipsam naturarum describit factam in Maria, quam paulo superius ejus ἐργαστήριον dixit, velut opificinam: hic pressius, ἱστόν textorium ipsum instrumentum, in quo mirabilis illa tela ac consertio naturarum facta sit divina virtute ac arte. Vide Riccardum.
"Weaver's loom." It is clear enough that the word ἱστός is not taken here for the web itself, under which metaphor Proclus describes the very union of the natures made in Mary, whom a little above he called its ἐργαστήριον, as it were its workshop: here, more precisely, ἱστός is the weaving instrument itself, on which that wondrous web and interweaving of the natures was made by divine power and art. See Riccardi.
(printed under page 345)
(11) ‹anchor: caro ex virgine› · call in col 682
Impolluta caro ex virgine. Placuit haec lectio; ut ipsa significetur Christi caro, ac quam ipse gestavit; cujus unione ac mirabili textura cum deitate, facta est oeconomiae illa tela ac tunica.
"The undefiled flesh from the Virgin." This reading was preferred, so that Christ's flesh itself is meant, and that which he bore; by whose union and wondrous weaving with the Godhead that web and tunic of the economy was made.
(printed under page 345)
(12) ‹anchor: utero incircumscripte› · call in col 682
Incircumscripte. Habent constanter codices ἀπεριγράπτως· quae vox in subjecta materia admodum communis est; nec video ut debuerint interpretes adjectivo reddere, tanquam esset ἀπερίγραπτος· vel adverbium minus quadraret, quod unum tamen maxime quadrat, ut et paulo inferius τὸ ἀφθάρτως· ex quo male Gajanitae, teste Anastasio lib. Ὁδηγ. cap. 10 sibi ἄφθαρτος fecerant, ut eo probarent Christi etiam corporis incorruptionem, cum Proclus solum designet modum nativitatis. Quod ejus loco habent modo codices, ἀφράστως, per imperitiam irrepsit antiquariorum, et quia proxime praecedebat τὸ ἄφραστον.
"Uncircumscribedly." The codices constantly have ἀπεριγράπτως, a word quite common in this subject matter; nor do I see why the translators should have rendered it by an adjective, as if it were ἀπερίγραπτος, or as if the adverb fitted less well, when it alone fits best, as does ἀφθάρτως a little below, from which the Gaianites, on the witness of Anastasius, Hodegos, ch. 10, wrongly made ἄφθαρτος for themselves, in order to prove by it the incorruption even of Christ's body, though Proclus marks only the manner of the birth. The reading the codices now have in its place, ἀφράστως, crept in through the copyists' unskilfulness, and because τὸ ἄφραστον came just before.
(printed under page 345)
[scripture references at the foot of the text, as printed] ⁹ Joan. XX, 28. ¹⁰ Hebr. II, 14. ¹¹ Psal. CIX, 4. ¹² Joan. I, 14. ¹³ I Cor. I, 23. ¹⁴ I Cor. II, 8. ¹⁵ II Cor. VIII, 9.
⁹ John 20:28. ¹⁰ Hebrews 2:14. ¹¹ Psalm 109(110):4. ¹² John 1:14. ¹³ 1 Corinthians 1:23. ¹⁴ 1 Corinthians 2:8. ¹⁵ 2 Corinthians 8:9.
(printed under page 346)
(13) ‹anchor: spicam edidit› · call in col 683
Spicam edidit, τὸν ἄσταχυν ἐβλάστησε. Palam active, sive colonum illum Proclus intelligat Spiritum sanctum, sive ipsum Verbum; nam utrique tribuitur formatio Dominici corporis, et ea, ut spicam Christum ac hominem sine semine ediderunt; nec video ut interpretes ab ea ejus phrasi abhorrere debuerint, ac neutro reddere. Paulo inferius in verbis illis, ἄρα καὶ τὸ τοῖς ἀνθρώποις διακονεῖν· sic secutus Vat. codicem, ut nolim non monere, aliam esse aliorum omnium codicum, tum quos profert Riccardus, tum quos ego vidi duos regios ac unum card. Mazar. sic nimirum, ἄρα καὶ τοῖς ἀγγέλοις ὕβρις ἀνθρώποις διακονεῖν.
"Brought forth the ear of corn," τὸν ἄσταχυν ἐβλάστησε. Plainly active, whether Proclus means by that husbandman the Holy Spirit or the Word himself; for to both is ascribed the forming of the Lord's body, and they brought forth Christ, as an ear of corn, and a man without seed; nor do I see why the translators should have shrunk from this phrase of his and rendered it as neuter. A little below, in the words ἄρα καὶ τὸ τοῖς ἀνθρώποις διακονεῖν, I have so followed the Vatican codex that I would not fail to point out that all the other codices have another [reading], both those Riccardi cites and those I have seen, two Royal and one of Cardinal Mazarin, namely this: ἄρα καὶ τοῖς ἀγγέλοις ὕβρις ἀνθρώποις διακονεῖν ("then it is an outrage for the angels too to serve men").
(printed under page 346)
(14) · call in col 683 (call not in the visible part of the page)
Leg. ἀφθάρτως ex S. Anastasii Hodego, (cap. 10, pag. 74) et quia series ipsa petit. — Hunc in locum Anastasii vide sis Germonium De veter. haeret. eccl. dogm. corrupt. pag. 336. Caeterum et Leontius Byzantinus lib. I contra Nestor. et Eutych. (Bibl. PP. Paris. tom. IV, part. I, pag. 979) legit ἀφθάρτως· vertit enim Turrianus incorrupte. Sed mirum, inquit Riccardus, (in not. ad hanc orat. pag. 86) ita legisse Anastasium et Leontium, cum omnes quos viderim codices habeant ἀφράστως, arcano modo; et etiam Lat. interpres Vat. sic legit, quia vertit, ineffabiliter. Ex quibus optime probat sanctus Proclus, Christum natum ex virgine, fuisse etiam Deum, cum illum ipsum S. Thomas et Dominum et Deum appellet. Haec ille. Legimus etiam ἀφράστως in collect. Conc. Labb. tom. III, p. 579, edit. Ven. Labb.
Read ἀφθάρτως ("incorruptibly"), from Saint Anastasius's Hodegos (ch. 10, p. 74), and because the sequence itself requires it. On this passage of Anastasius see, if you will, Germon, De veteribus haereticis ecclesiasticorum codicum corruptoribus, p. 336. Leontius of Byzantium, too, Book I Against Nestorius and Eutyches (Bibliotheca Patrum, Paris, vol. IV, part 1, p. 979), reads ἀφθάρτως, for Turrianus translates "incorruptly." "But it is strange," says Riccardi (in his note on this oration, p. 86), "that Anastasius and Leontius read so, since all the codices I have seen have ἀφράστως, 'in a hidden way'; and the Vatican Latin translator also read so, since he translates 'ineffably.' From these words Saint Proclus proves excellently that Christ, born of the Virgin, was also God, since Saint Thomas calls him both Lord and God." So he. We also read ἀφράστως in Labbe's collection of the Councils, vol. III, p. 579, Venice edition of Labbe.
(printed under page 346)
[scripture references at the foot of the text, as printed] ¹⁶ Hebr. VII, 3. ¹⁷ Ephes. I, 7.
¹⁶ Hebrews 7:3. ¹⁷ Ephesians 1:7.
(printed under page 347)
(15) ‹anchor: τὰς ὠνὰς ἡμῶν περιέφερε› · call in col 685 (Greek only)
Al. προέφερε.
Others read προέφερε ("brought forward").
(printed under page 347)
(16) ‹anchor: τοῦ κακοῦ λύσις› · call in col 685 (Greek only)
Al. λύτρωσις.
Others read λύτρωσις ("redemption").
(printed under page 347)
(17) ‹anchor: μηδὲν πρὸς παροχὴν ἀπορῶν› · call in col 685 (Greek only)
Al. ᾧ μ. ἄπορον.
Others read ᾧ μ[ηδὲν] ἄπορον ("to whom nothing is impossible").
(printed under page 347)
(18) ‹anchor: ὑπῆρχε ἀθάνατος› · call in col 685 (Greek only)
Maz. αὐτὸς μόνος ὑπάρχων.
The Mazarin codex reads αὐτὸς μόνος ὑπάρχων ("being himself alone").
(printed under page 347)
(19) · call in col 686 (call not in the visible part of the page)
Deus et homo. Alii aliud etymum illius vocis afferre solent, ac praecipue, ut Gabriel Fortitudo Dei dicatur; vel etiam fortis Deus: ea phrasi, qua psal. I, 1, dicitur, Beatus vir; ubi Hebraea simili fere forma habent atque in nomine Gabriel, redduntque Hebraizantes, Beatitudines viri. Nomen גבר virum potentem significat, ac fortitudinem.
"God and man." Others usually give another etymology of that word, and chiefly that Gabriel is to be called "Strength of God," or even "strong God," by the idiom by which Psalm 1:1 says "Blessed the man," where the Hebrew has almost the same form as in the name Gabriel, and those who render Hebraically translate "Blessednesses of the man." The noun גבר [Hebrew letters faint in the scan] means a mighty man, and strength.
(printed under page 347)
(none) — no numbered footnotes on this page; only the scripture references below. [scripture references at the foot of the text, as printed] ¹⁸ Rom. III, 23. ¹⁹ Psal. CXLIII, 5. ²⁰ Jerem. XVII, 14. ²¹ Psal. LXXIX, 3. ²² III Reg. VIII, 27. ²³ Psal. LXXVIII, 8. ²⁴ Mich. VII, 2. ²⁵ Psal. LXIX, 2. ²⁶ Habac. II, 3. ²⁷ Psal. CXVIII, 176. ²⁸ Psal. XLIX, 3. ²⁹ Galat. III, 13.
¹⁸ Romans 3:23. ¹⁹ Psalm 143(144):5. ²⁰ Jeremiah 17:14. ²¹ Psalm 79(80):3. ²² 3 Kings (1 Kings) 8:27. ²³ Psalm 78(79):8. ²⁴ Micah 7:2. ²⁵ Psalm 69(70):2. ²⁶ Habakkuk 2:3. ²⁷ Psalm 118(119):176. ²⁸ Psalm 49(50):3. ²⁹ Galatians 3:13.
(printed under page 348)
[scripture references at the foot of the text, as printed] ³⁰ Luc. I, 79. ³¹ Coloss. I, 13. ³² Ephes. V, 8. ³³ Psal. CXVII, 26. ³⁴ Isa. LVIII, 1. ³⁵ Psal. LVIII, [verse cut off at the scan's edge] ³⁶ Psal. CXVII, 27. ³⁷ Joan. I, 14. ³⁸ Cant. III, 11. ³⁹ Joan. XIX, 2. ⁴⁰ Gen. III, 18. ⁴¹ Joan. I, 18. ⁴² Psal. CIII, 3. ⁴³ Matth. IX, 10. ⁴⁴ Joan. XVIII, 33. ⁴⁵ Psal. CIII, 2. ⁴⁶ Matth. XXVII, 52. ⁴⁷ ibid. 63. ⁴⁸ Isa. VI, 3.
³⁰ Luke 1:79. ³¹ Colossians 1:13. ³² Ephesians 5:8. ³³ Psalm 117(118):26. ³⁴ Isaiah 58:1. ³⁵ Psalm 58(59) [verse not legible]. ³⁶ Psalm 117(118):27. ³⁷ John 1:14. ³⁸ Song of Songs 3:11. ³⁹ John 19:2. ⁴⁰ Genesis 3:18. ⁴¹ John 1:18. ⁴² Psalm 103(104):3. ⁴³ Matthew 9:10. ⁴⁴ John 18:33. ⁴⁵ Psalm 103(104):2. ⁴⁶ Matthew 27:52. ⁴⁷ Ibid., [verse] 63. ⁴⁸ Isaiah 6:3.
(printed under page 349)
(20) · call in col 690 (call not in the visible part of the page)
Illud quidem obumbravit ei; hoc ex ea carnem assumpsit. Ὃ μὲν γὰρ ἐπεσκίασεν αὐτήν· ὃ δὲ ἐσαρκώθη ἐξ αὐτῆς. Affert Riccardus variantes multas lectiones; sed ego hanc Regii codicis vice omnium arbitror ac probatissimam: cui simile est, quod superius posuit, ἀποθνήσκει ὃ ἐγένετο, καὶ λυτροῦται ὃ ὑπῆρχε. Ut ubique quod est Dei ac quod hominis, in eodem Domino Jesu ac Filio distinguat, ac cuique rationi, quae sunt propria, tribuat. Qua Deus, erat cum Maria juxta angeli verbum, Dominus tecum, antequam etiam incarnaretur; ipseque ei obumbravit, ut sine ardore concupiscentiae conciperet ipsum; ut homo, carnem ex ea sumpsit. Sic paulo inferius: ὃ μὲν ἦν, ἔσωσεν· ὃ δὲ γέγονεν, ἔπαθεν· Quod erat, id est, Deus, salutem contulit; quod factum est, id est, homo, mortem subiit.
"The one overshadowed her; the other took flesh from her." Ὃ μὲν γὰρ ἐπεσκίασεν αὐτήν· ὃ δὲ ἐσαρκώθη ἐξ αὐτῆς. Riccardi brings many variant readings; but I judge this reading of the Royal codex to stand in place of them all and to be the best attested. Like it is what he set above: "he dies as what he became, and redeems as what he was." So that everywhere he distinguishes in the one Lord Jesus and Son what is God's and what is man's, and assigns to each aspect what belongs to it. As God, he was with Mary, according to the angel's word, "The Lord is with thee," even before he was made flesh; and he himself overshadowed her, so that she conceived him without the heat of concupiscence; as man, he took flesh from her. So a little below: "what he was, saved; what he became, suffered": what he was, that is, God, brought salvation; what he became, that is, man, underwent death.
(printed under page 349)
(21) ‹anchor: gloriose praedicabatur› · call in col 690
Illic sanctus gloriose praedicabatur. Hunc lo- (continues)
"There he was gloriously proclaimed holy." This pas[sage] … (continues)
(printed under page 349)
[scripture references at the foot of the text, as printed] ⁴⁹ Ezech. XLIV, 1, 2. ⁵⁰ Psal. CIX, 5.
⁴⁹ Ezekiel 44:1–2. ⁵⁰ Psalm 109(110):5 [as printed; the words quoted are verse 1].
(printed under page 350)
(22) · call in col 691 (call not in the visible part of the page)
Aperui, ut homo. Sic ipse exposuerim: ut spectata quidem naturae humanae conditione, Dominus vulvam aperturus esset; at non tamen aperuerit potentia deitatis, ad quam claustra ipsa perinde habent ac si aperta essent: quae est etiam expositio Amphilochii.
"I opened, as man." I would explain it thus: that, considering the condition of human nature, the Lord would have opened the womb; yet he did not open it, by the power of the Godhead, to which the barriers themselves are just as if they were open. This is also Amphilochius's explanation.
(printed under page 350)
(23) · call in col 691 (call not in the visible part of the page)
Edidit Riccardus ex antiquo Cryptaeferratensi codice, stilo scommatico ac polemico in Judaeos, sive etiam Judaeorum nomine in asseclas Nestorianos: totam Procli, ut patet ex crebro usu vocis μορφὴ et σχῆμα, ἀντὶ φύσεως quem sanctus Ephraemius apud Photium ipsi tribuit.
Riccardi published it from an ancient codex of Grottaferrata, in a mocking and polemical style against the Jews, or else, under the Jews' name, against the Nestorian partisans: wholly Proclus's, as is clear from the frequent use of the words μορφή and σχῆμα in place of φύσις, a usage Saint Ephraem, as reported by Photius, attributes to him.
(printed under page 350)
(24) · call not in the visible part of the page (column not determinable)
Leg. cum aliis ἀφθάρτως.
Read, with others, ἀφθάρτως ("incorruptibly").
(printed under page 350)
[scripture references at the foot of the text, as printed] ⁵¹ Psal. CIII, 24. ⁵² Isa. XL, 22. ⁵³ Psal. XVIII, 6. ⁵⁴ Bar. III, 38. ⁵⁵ Hebr. IV, 15. ⁵⁶ Matth. VIII, 23; Luc. VIII, 23. ⁵⁷ Psal. LXXVI, 17.
⁵¹ Psalm 103(104):24. ⁵² Isaiah 40:22. ⁵³ Psalm 18(19):6. ⁵⁴ Baruch 3:38. ⁵⁵ Hebrews 4:15. ⁵⁶ Matthew 8:23; Luke 8:23. ⁵⁷ Psalm 76(77):17.
(printed under page 351)
(25) ‹anchor: Ignem temperat aqua› · call in col 694
Ignem temperat aqua. Haud dubium desiderari vocem aliquam; nec enim duae illae voces, πῦρ, ὕδωρ sic absolute cohaerent; nec quis facile possit sanare locum absque novo codice.
"Water tempers fire." No doubt some word is missing; for those two words, πῦρ, ὕδωρ ("fire, water"), do not hang together standing alone like this; nor could anyone easily heal the passage without a new codex.
(printed under page 351)
(26) ‹anchor: suo modo testimonio› · call in col 694
Suo modo testimonio, ἀρτίως ἐμαρτύρησεν. Bene Riccardus futurum μαρτυρήσει, mutavit praeterito. Porro indicat Proclus, paulo ante lectum fuisse Evangelium Matth. VIII, 23, sive Luc. VIII, 23, de sedata maris tempestate ac expulsis daemonibus: ut hoc indicio haberi possit certum tempus habitae hujus orationis; nona scilicet dominica ab indictione, qua etiam exstat Ceramei homilia. Liquet vero ex his et similibus, ut non esset unius Ecclesiae Hierosolymitanae traditio, ut post lectum Evangelium inter Missarum solemnia haberetur concio; quo Wastelius argumento hinc inde monumenta Chrysostomo inscripta, Joanni suo ac Hierosolymitano minus solida veritate nititur asserere.
"By its own testimony," ἀρτίως ἐμαρτύρησεν ("has just borne witness"). Riccardi rightly changed the future μαρτυρήσει to the past. Further, Proclus indicates that the Gospel had been read a little before, Matthew 8:23 or Luke 8:23, on the stilling of the storm at sea and the driving out of the demons; so that by this sign the exact time at which this oration was delivered can be had: namely the ninth Sunday from the Indiction, on which there is also a homily of Cerameus. And it is clear from these and like passages that it was not the tradition of the one Church of Jerusalem that a sermon was given during the solemnities of the Mass after the Gospel had been read; on which argument Wastelius, with less solid truth, tries to claim here and there for his John of Jerusalem works inscribed with Chrysostom's name.
(printed under page 351)
[scripture references at the foot of the text, as printed; the doubled call figures are as printed] ⁵⁸ Rom. V, 14. ⁵⁹⁻⁵⁹ Gen. III, 6. ¹⁻⁶⁰ Joan. XII, 34. ⁶¹ Gen. II, 21.
⁵⁸ Romans 5:14. ⁵⁹ Genesis 3:6. ⁶⁰ John 12:34 [as printed; the words quoted are 12:32]. ⁶¹ Genesis 2:21.
(printed under page 352)
(27) · call in col 695 (call not in the visible part of the page)
Exsilit qui est ad imaginem, σκιρτᾷ ὁ κατ' εἰκόνα· Ipse nimirum animus; quod sequenti membro magis explicat, τίκτεται ὁ λόγος· ratio paritur. Fuit forte in ea opinione, ut anima rationalis ac λόγος, vere exiret ac educeretur e materia sic disposita, a qua nec alii quidam aequales abhorruerunt: quanquam fuit tandem ab Ecclesia proscripta. Non licet, aut libet alias opiniones quas subinde Proclus indicat, adnotare, in quibus praesertim nihil est periculi, tametsi est aliquid novi, ac a nostrorum ac modernorum philosophia abhorrentis, ut paulo ante, de formatione stellarum ex lumine.
"He who is after the image leaps forth," σκιρτᾷ ὁ κατ' εἰκόνα: that is, the mind itself; which he explains further in the next clause, τίκτεται ὁ λόγος, "reason is born." Perhaps he held the opinion that the rational soul, the λόγος, truly came forth and was drawn out of matter so disposed, an opinion from which certain others of his contemporaries did not shrink either, although it was at length condemned by the Church. There is neither room nor wish to note other opinions that Proclus indicates from time to time, in which above all there is no danger, though there is something new and foreign to the philosophy of our own people and of the moderns, as a little before, on the forming of the stars from light.
(printed under page 352)
(28) ‹anchor: naturae principium› · call in col 695
Naturae principium, φύσεως ἀρχή. Nihil his Procli clarius. Prosequitur enim, quibus conveniat Adamum inter et Christum, ut ille hujus figura fuit: quare valde ridicula Riccardi conjectura, ut loco φύσεως, sit legendum φθίσεως· pro naturae, corruptionis; atque ab eo auctor Christi ac Adami comparationem incohaverit, in quo illi maxime videntur contrarii. Adamus ergo naturae principium, ut caput generis; eoque figura Christi, qui principium est ac auctor vitae aeternae, caput ipse praedestinatorum.
"The beginning of nature," φύσεως ἀρχή. Nothing is clearer than these words of Proclus. For he goes through the points in which Adam and Christ agree, as the one was the figure of the other; hence Riccardi's conjecture is quite ridiculous, that in place of φύσεως we should read φθίσεως, "of corruption" for "of nature," and that the author began his comparison of Christ and Adam with the point in which they seem most opposed. Adam, then, is the beginning of nature, as head of the race; and in this the figure of Christ, who is the beginning and author of eternal life, himself the head of the predestined.
(printed under page 352)
(none) — no numbered footnotes on this page; only the scripture references below. [scripture references at the foot of the text, as printed] ⁶² Matth. XI, 12. ⁶³ Deut. IV, 9-12. ⁶⁴ Matth. XIX, 26.
⁶² Matthew 11:12. ⁶³ Deuteronomy 4:9–12. ⁶⁴ Matthew 19:26.
(printed under page 353)
[scripture references at the foot of the text, as printed] ⁶⁵ Zach. II, 10. ⁶⁶ Zach. IV, 1-6. ⁶⁷ Rom. XI, 33. ⁶⁸ Ezech. XLIV, 2, 3. ⁶⁹ Job III, 10. ⁷⁰ Joan. VIII, 12.
⁶⁵ Zechariah 2:10. ⁶⁶ Zechariah 4:1–6. ⁶⁷ Romans 11:33. ⁶⁸ Ezekiel 44:2–3. ⁶⁹ Job 3:10. ⁷⁰ John 8:12.
(printed under page 354)
(29) · call in col 699 (call not visible on the page; the lemma is the Latin "Et convertit me")
Et convertit me, ἐπέστρεψέ με. Velut stitit, traxitque ad spectaculum ac visionem. Deest illud pronomen in LXX ubi redditur, Et reversus est, etc. Posset reddi: et accurrit angelus, etc. Gentianus Hervetus etiam reddit, et convertit me, in Quaestionibus Anastasii Nicaeni.
"And he turned me," ἐπέστρεψέ με: as if to say, he set me in place and drew me to the spectacle and vision. That pronoun is missing in the Septuagint, where it is rendered "And he returned," etc. It could be rendered "and the angel ran up," etc. Gentian Hervet too renders "and he turned me," in the Questions of Anastasius of Nicaea.
(printed under page 354)
[scripture references at the foot of the text, as printed; the small call figures are blurred in the scan (they could be read 81–89, 60) and are given here in sequence after the previous page's ⁷⁰] ⁷¹ Luc. I, 78. ⁷² Psal. CXVIII, 105. ⁷³ Prov. VI, 23. ⁷⁴ Rom. II, 14. ⁷⁵ Sap. XIII, 5. ⁷⁶ Rom. VII, 12. ⁷⁷ Galat. VI, 2. ⁷⁸ Isa. II, 3. ⁷⁹ Rom. X, 4. ⁸⁰ Isa. XI, 1-3.
⁷¹ Luke 1:78. ⁷² Psalm 118(119):105. ⁷³ Proverbs 6:23. ⁷⁴ Romans 2:14. ⁷⁵ Wisdom 13:5. ⁷⁶ Romans 7:12. ⁷⁷ Galatians 6:2. ⁷⁸ Isaiah 2:3. ⁷⁹ Romans 10:4. ⁸⁰ Isaiah 11:1–3.
(printed under page 355)
(30) · call in col 701 (Greek only; call not in the visible part of the page)
Leg. νόμου, juxta LXX.
Read νόμου ("of the law"), following the Septuagint.
(printed under page 355)
(31) ‹anchor: in nube› · call in col 702
In nube. In qua nimirum Deus positum voluit symbolum clementiae, et ut deinceps mundus non esset periturus simili aquarum diluvio.
"In the cloud": in which, that is, God willed a sign of mercy to be set, and a pledge that the world would not thereafter perish by a like flood of waters.
(printed under page 355)
[scripture references at the foot of the text, as printed] ⁸¹ Joan. I, 4. ⁸² Isa. LXI, 10, 11, sec. LXX. ⁸³ Isa. LXII, 1.
⁸¹ John 1:4. ⁸² Isaiah 61:10–11, according to the Septuagint. ⁸³ Isaiah 62:1.
(printed under page 356)
(32) ‹anchor: ORATIO III› · call in col 703
Hanc quoque habuit idem Riccardus ex eadem Cryptaeferratensi bibliotheca: opus sane, quanquam breve, Procli vena ac ingenio dignum. Indicat habuisse illam altero die a Christi natalitiorum festo die: quae forte ratio fuit, ut potius inscripta sit De Incarnatione, quam In festum natalis Domini.
This too the same Riccardi had from the same library of Grottaferrata: a work, though short, truly worthy of Proclus's vein and talent. It indicates that he delivered it on the day after the feast of Christ's Nativity; which was perhaps the reason why it is entitled On the Incarnation rather than On the Feast of the Lord's Nativity.
(printed under page 356)
(33) ‹anchor: Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ› · call in col 704 (Greek only)
Colum. codex, εἰς τὰ γενέθλια τοῦ Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ.
The Colum[na?] codex [abbreviation as printed]: "On the Nativity of Jesus Christ."
(printed under page 356)
[scripture references at the foot of the text, as printed] ⁸⁴ Nah. I, 15; II, 1. ⁸⁵ Exod. XXXII, 1 sqq. ⁸⁶ Isa. LVIII, 4. ⁸⁷ Psal. CXVII, 24.
⁸⁴ Nahum 1:15; 2:1. ⁸⁵ Exodus 32:1 ff. ⁸⁶ Isaiah 58:4. ⁸⁷ Psalm 117(118):24.
(printed under page 357)
(34) ‹anchor: ἐν αὐταῖς› · call in col 705 (Greek only; the call is printed "(33)" in the text, as printed)
Leg. αὐτῇ.
Read αὐτῇ ("in it").
(printed under page 357)
(35) · call in col 706 (call not in the visible part of the page)
Insufflans in faciem tuam. Allusio est ad insufflationem qua Deus homini animam indidit: vel etiam ad dominicam illam in discipulos (Joan. XX, 22). Idem enim et naturae primum, et gratiae postea insufflavit Spiritum; ipse qui e terra ascendit, ac resurrexit, nostrae primitiae ac auctor resurrectionis. Etiam Cyrillus in Nahum II, explicat de resurrectione: et Chrysostomus hom. II ex decem Romae editis.
"Breathing into thy face." An allusion to the breathing by which God put a soul into man, or else to the Lord's breathing on the disciples (John 20:22). For the same one breathed the Spirit, first of nature and afterwards of grace; he who went up from the earth and rose again, our firstfruits and the author of resurrection. Cyril too, on Nahum 2, explains it of the resurrection; and Chrysostom, Homily 2 of the ten published at Rome.
(printed under page 357)
(36) ‹anchor: Christianorum solemnia› · call in col 706
Christianorum solemnia. Eodem fere modo Asterius festum Kalendarum traducens, Christianorum percenset festa, ac eorum rationes. Videndus item Chrysostomus in Philogonium, ac homil. de Pentecost. apud Ducaeum.
"The solemnities of the Christians." In almost the same way Asterius, holding up the feast of the Kalends to scorn, reviews the feasts of the Christians and their reasons. See likewise Chrysostom on Philogonius, and the homily on Pentecost, in Fronton du Duc.
(printed under page 357)
(37) ‹anchor: partus admirabilis› · call in col 706
Partus admirabilis, τόκος παράδοξος. Habentur haec ac sequentia, usque ad illa verba, καὶ ἄνθρωπος ἐξ ἐμοῦ, in codice Columnensi Procli nomine, inter Patrum testimonia de duabus naturis, ut refert Riccardus.
"A wondrous birth," τόκος παράδοξος. These words and those that follow, up to the words καὶ ἄνθρωπος ἐξ ἐμοῦ ("and man from me"), are found in the Colonna codex under Proclus's name, among the testimonies of the Fathers on the two natures, as Riccardi reports.
(printed under page 357)
[scripture reference at the foot of the text, as printed] ⁸⁸ Philipp. II, 7.
⁸⁸ Philippians 2:7.
(printed under page 358)
(38) · call in col 707 (call not in the visible part of the page)
Commodavit, ἐκήχρα. Communius scribitur hoc verbum per ι, quod Dorica dialecto passim mutatur in η. Putem tamen nihil hic Proclum Dorici affectasse, sed totum antiquarii esse, quod paulo insolentius videtur. Liquet enim ut plerique scribendo litteras sono affines, ac nec modo satis distinctas, confundant.
"He lent," ἐκήχρα. This verb is more commonly written with ι, which in the Doric dialect is regularly changed into η. Yet I would think that Proclus affected nothing Doric here, and that what seems rather unusual is wholly the copyist's. For it is clear how most people, in writing, confuse letters that are alike in sound and not well distinguished in shape.
(printed under page 358)
(39) ‹anchor: ORATIO IV.› · call in col 707
Jam edita fuerat Lugduni Batavorum ex mendoso satis codice. Riccardus ex triplici Romano conatus est restituere. Exstat Theodoti Ancyrani Oratio In Act. synodi Ephesinae, pag. 3, cap. 9, simili argumento, et eodem fere initio, ut vel ejusdem oporteat esse, vel alterum alterum imitatum, ac pene alterius exordium orationis exscripsisse. Conjicit Riccardus non esse eam orationem Theodoti, sed solum sequentem, tum ex styli diversitate, tum quia desideratur illa in codice Bavarico; tum denique quia Epiphanius diaconus in VII synodo percensens hujus Theodoti opuscula, singulariter nominat, καὶ τὸν λόγον εἰς τὴν γέννησιν τοῦ Κυρίου. Verum argumentum hoc leve admodum est; nam iisdem ipsis Actis, c. 12, habetur ejusdem Theodoti oratio alia, De dominica Incarnatione habita in die sancti Joannis evangelistae, cujus nihil Epiphanius meminit. Sanctus quoque Nicephorus adversus Iconomachos, tanquam ejus indubitatum monumentum affert Orationem in sanctam Mariam et Symeonem, opponitque aliis incertis, quae iidem, Theodoti Ancyrani nomine opponebant: quam ipsam Epiphanius omisit: nisi forte, et melius, eas omnes orationes comprehendit inter scriptas ad Lausum adversus Nestorium tomis sex: ex quibus verisimile est acceptas esse tres illas in synodo recitatas, quae vere totae adversus Nestorium militant; ut et quam citat sanctus Nicephorus in Mariam et Symeonem, quod relatum ab eo excerptum indicat. Putemque sex illos tomos illustre fuisse Theodoti opus, ac apprime notum; reliquas vero quas percenset Epiphanius orationes, singulares fuisse tractatus, alia aliaque occasione habitos, ut doctis ejusmodi episcopis moris erat. Quia vero in Marianis sumus, libuit hoc loco illud in Mariam excerptum Theodoti producere, ex quo forte integra ipsa oratio aliquando agnosci poterit, ac quandiu totus ipse Nicephorus non prodit. Ἐκ τοῦ εἰς τὴν πανύμνητον Θεοτόκον καὶ τὸν Συμεῶνα συντεθειμένου λόγου Θεοδότῳ τῆς Ἀγκύρας· Χαίροις χώρημα ἐλάχιστον, χωρῆσαν τὸν τοῖς πᾶσιν ἀχώρητον. Καὶ τίς τὴν γενεὰν τοῦ ἀρχαιοτέρου τῆς γεννήσεως διηγήσεται; Τί θαυμάσομεν· τὸν θεῖον καὶ ἀνέκφραστον τόκον, ἢ τὴν ἀνερμήνευτον λοχείαν; Οὐ περιδράττεται τῷ λόγῳ τὰ ὑπὲρ λόγον· οὐ περιγράφεται νῷ τὰ ὑπὲρ ἔννοιαν. Εἰ γὰρ καὶ γράφει γραφεὺς τὴν μητέρα τῆς οἰκονομίας, ἀλλ' οὐχ ἑρμηνεύει λόγος τὸν τρόπον τῆς κυοφορίας. Ἀρχὴν ἐπιθῶμεν τῷ τόκῳ; ἀλλ' οὐχ ὑφέστηκεν ἄτερ τοῦ ἀνάρχου. Βρέφος ὀνομάσομεν τὸν τεχθέντα; ἀλλὰ τὸν παλαιὸν τῶν ἡμερῶν κέκτηται προκαταρκτικὸν καὶ αἴτιον. Νικᾷ τὴν ὕφεσιν ἡ ἐπίτασις, καὶ ὑπερίπταται τῆς περιγραφῆς (continues)
It had already been published at Leiden from a rather faulty codex. Riccardi tried to restore it from three Roman [codices]. There is an oration of Theodotus of Ancyra in the Acts of the Synod of Ephesus, p. 3, ch. 9, on a like subject and with almost the same opening, so that either it must be by the same man, or one imitated the other and all but copied out the other's exordium. Riccardi conjectures that that oration is not Theodotus's, but only the following one, both from the difference of style and because it is missing in the Bavarian codex; and finally because Epiphanius the deacon, at the Seventh Synod, reviewing the little works of this Theodotus, names in particular καὶ τὸν λόγον εἰς τὴν γέννησιν τοῦ Κυρίου ("and the oration on the Lord's birth"). But this argument is very slight; for in those same Acts, ch. 12, there is another oration of the same Theodotus, On the Lord's Incarnation, delivered on the day of Saint John the Evangelist, which Epiphanius does not mention at all. Saint Nicephorus too, against the Iconoclasts, brings forward as an undoubted work of his an Oration on Saint Mary and Symeon, and sets it against other doubtful pieces which they put forward under the name of Theodotus of Ancyra; and Epiphanius left out this very one: unless perhaps, and more likely, he includes all those orations among the writings to Lausus against Nestorius in six books; from which it is likely that the three recited at the synod were taken, which truly fight against Nestorius from beginning to end; as also the one Saint Nicephorus cites on Mary and Symeon, which the excerpt he reports shows. And I would think that those six books were Theodotus's celebrated work, and very well known; but that the other orations Epiphanius lists were separate treatises, delivered on one occasion or another, as was the custom of such learned bishops. And since we are among Marian matters, I have chosen to bring forward here that excerpt of Theodotus on Mary, from which perhaps the whole oration itself may one day be recognized, so long as Nicephorus himself does not appear in full. "From the oration composed by Theodotus of Ancyra on the all-hymned Theotokos and Symeon: Hail, smallest of spaces, which contained him whom all things cannot contain. And who shall declare the generation of him who is older than birth? What shall we marvel at: the divine and inexpressible birth, or the childbearing that cannot be interpreted? What is above reason is not grasped by reason; what is above understanding is not circumscribed by the mind. For though a painter paints the mother of the economy, speech does not interpret the manner of the bearing. Shall we set a beginning to the birth? But it did not exist apart from him who is without beginning. Shall we name him who was born an infant? But he possesses the Ancient of Days as his first principle and cause. The exaltation conquers the lowering, and flies above the circumscription …" (continues)
(printed under page 358)
(40) ‹anchor: ἐκήχρα› · call in col 708 (Greek only)
Leg. τὴν αὐτῆς.
Read τὴν αὐτῆς ("her own").
(printed under page 358)
[scripture references at the foot of the text, as printed] ⁶⁹ Dan. II, 34. ⁷⁰ Prov. XXX, 19. ⁷¹ Gen. III, 1.
⁶⁹ Daniel 2:34. ⁷⁰ Proverbs 30:19. ⁷¹ Genesis 3:1.
(printed under page 359)
(41) · call in col 710 (call not in the visible part of the page)
Quod novam, ξένην. A qua longe erat genus humanum. Theodotus habet κοινήν, communem: quo etiam titulo illustris admodum fit dies Christi natalis; malimque ego τὸ κοινήν.
"Because new," ξένην ("strange"): one from which the human race was far removed. Theodotus has κοινήν, "common," a title by which the day of Christ's birth is also made most illustrious; and I would prefer κοινήν.
(printed under page 359)
(42) · call in col 710 (call not in the visible part of the page)
Nam natura. Sequor sancti Andreae codicem, ex quo restituta littera, plana est ac facilis: nulloque modo adduci possim, ut Riccardi lectionem probem, putemque scripsisse Proclum, loco τεκοῦσαν, σεκοῦραν. Tametsi enim κοῦρα possit accipi pro κόρη, et κόρη loco παρθένος, nusquam tamen Proclus sic Atticam dialectum Ionica commutavit in voce κόρη, nihilque impeditius littera, quam sibi ille ex Heidelbergensi composuit: qui plane emendandus est, ut pro ἀγνοεῖ, sit ἐννοεῖ· quod unum series tota petit, qua doceat Proclus, quid gratia supra humani rationem partus ac puerperii in Maria praestiterit.
"For nature." I follow the codex of Sant'Andrea, from which the text, once restored, is plain and easy; and I could in no way be brought to approve Riccardi's reading and think that Proclus wrote σεκοῦραν in place of τεκοῦσαν. For although κοῦρα can be taken for κόρη, and κόρη in place of παρθένος, nowhere did Proclus thus exchange the Attic dialect for the Ionic in the word κόρη; and nothing is more tangled than the text he made up for himself from the Heidelberg [codex], which plainly must be emended so as to read ἐννοεῖ for ἀγνοεῖ; which alone the whole sequence requires, in which Proclus teaches what grace accomplished in Mary beyond the order of human birth and childbearing.
(printed under page 359)
(43) · call in col 710 (call not in the visible part of the page)
Nuptiarum expers, γάμων ἀμύητος. Valde displicet quod reddit Riccardus: a profanis nuptiis aliena. Sunt namque nuptiae nihil profanae, tametsi sanctior est ac sacratior virginitas. Verbum illud ἀμύητος sonat non initiatam, sacrorum metaphora, quibus initiari dicebantur qui eorum fiebant participes, eaque docebantur. Quod sequitur, καὶ γάμων ἀδόητος· ac velut explicatio praecedentium ponitur, non male possit exponi, quae ne audisset quidem de nuptiis: ut quae se Deo voto obstrinxisset, nec aliter fuisset tradita Josepho, quam ut custodi, non ut marito; ut plures Patres tradunt, ipseque adeo Proclus orat. VI; qua de re adi Georgium Nicomed.
"Without part in marriage," γάμων ἀμύητος. Riccardi's rendering, "a stranger to profane marriage," is much to be disliked. For marriage is in no way profane, although virginity is holier and more sacred. The word ἀμύητος means "uninitiated," a metaphor from the sacred rites, into which those were said to be initiated who were made sharers in them and taught them. What follows, καὶ γάμων ἀδόητος, set as a kind of explanation of the foregoing, could not badly be explained as "she who had not even heard of marriage": as one who had bound herself to God by vow, and had been given to Joseph only as to a guardian, not as to a husband; as many Fathers teach, and Proclus himself in Oration VI; on which matter consult George of Nicomedia.
(printed under page 359)
[scripture references at the foot of the text, as printed; the small call figures are blurred. They read 72–74, and page 361's references run on from them at ⁷⁵, so they are set as 72–74. The previous pages' figures, read as 88 and 89–91, may in fact be 68 and 69–71: check against the page] ⁷² Act. II, 31; Psal. XV, 10. ⁷³ Jon. II, 11 [last figure blurred; could read 14]. ⁷⁴ Isa. IX, 6.
⁷² Acts 2:31; Psalm 15(16):10. ⁷³ Jonah 2:11. ⁷⁴ Isaiah 9:6.
(printed under page 360)
(44) ‹anchor: novum indumentum› · call in col 711
Ac perquam novum indumentum, καὶ καινότατον. Praefero eam lectionem Palat. impress. cui affinis Heidelberg. καὶ καινότερον· Riccardus vitandae causa cacophoniae legit καὶ νοερόν· quae sane lectio nihil apta est; nec enim indumentum illud in sacrae Virginis utero factum, ac quod Verbum induit, νοερόν est, prout νοερόν contra corpus distinguitur: sed ipsum corpus anima intelligente praeditum; cujus duntaxat editionis modum vere novum et admirabilem urget Proclus: quin ne ipse quidem Riccardus reddit τὸ νοερόν.
"And a most new garment," καὶ καινότατον. I prefer this reading of the printed Palatine [edition], to which the Heidelberg [codex] is close, καὶ καινότερον ("and newer"). Riccardi, to avoid a cacophony, reads καὶ νοερόν ("and intellectual"), a reading quite unsuitable; for that garment made in the sacred Virgin's womb, which the Word put on, is not νοερόν in the sense in which νοερόν is distinguished from body, but is the body itself endowed with an intelligent soul; and of this Proclus presses only the manner of its bringing forth, as truly new and wondrous. Indeed, not even Riccardi himself translates νοερόν.
(printed under page 360)
(45) ‹anchor: loco Virginis› · call in col 711
Audiendam loco Virginis. Intricat Riccardus adjuncta voce εἴκω, ex Heidelberg. ut ait. Planam ego litteram ex Palat. impress. ac sancti Andreae existimo, ipsam quam reddo; non quam ille a contextu remotissimam comminiscitur. Inducit Proclus naturam, sua primum edicentem, tum desinentem in virginalem partum, ac denique inducit ipsam Virginem suam adversus Judaeos propugnantem virginitatem.
"To be heard in place of the Virgin." Riccardi tangles it by adding the word εἴκω, from the Heidelberg [codex], as he says. I judge the plain text to be that of the printed Palatine and of Sant'Andrea, the very one I translate; not the one he devises, very far removed from the context. Proclus brings in Nature, first declaring what is hers, then ending in the virginal birth; and finally he brings in the Virgin herself, defending her virginity against the Jews.
(printed under page 360)
[scripture references at the foot of the text, as printed] ⁷⁵ Gen. III, 7. ⁷⁶ Num. XVII, 8. ⁷⁷ Isa. VII, 14. ⁷⁸ Psal. II, 7. ⁷⁹ Hebr. VII, 3. ⁸⁰ Malach. IV, 2. ⁸¹ Isa. IX, 2. ⁸² Luc. I, 28.
⁷⁵ Genesis 3:7. ⁷⁶ Numbers 17:8. ⁷⁷ Isaiah 7:14. ⁷⁸ Psalm 2:7. ⁷⁹ Hebrews 7:3. ⁸⁰ Malachi 4:2. ⁸¹ Isaiah 9:2. ⁸² Luke 1:28.
(printed under page 361)
(46) ‹anchor: ex natura› · call in col 714
Ex natura, ἀμυήτως. Retineo eam vocem ex Heidelberg., pro qua Riccardus suspicatur legendum ἀμυθήτως· quo etiam modo habet in textu, sive ita ex suo emendavit, sive ex aliquo codice. Verum existimo τὸ ἀμυήτως, aptius esse; cum praecipue duabus aliis vocibus explicetur vis tota vocis ἀμυθήτως, nempe τῷ, ἀρρήτως et ἀφράστως, τὸ ἀμυήτως autem pro subjecta materia congruentissime exponitur, ut sit velut non comparabiliter, ut loquitur sanctus Leo serm. De transfigurat. id est, non aliunde ac voluntate, in eorum morem quae μυεῖσθαι ac doceri dicimus. Idem itaque sit Proclo, γεννηθεὶς ἀμυήτως· atque Leoni non aliunde factus comparabilis, sed a natura ac per naturam natus aequalis.
"By nature," ἀμυήτως ("without initiation"). I keep this word from the Heidelberg [codex], in place of which Riccardi suspects we should read ἀμυθήτως ("unspeakably"), and so he has it in his text, whether he emended it so on his own or from some codex. But I judge ἀμυήτως to be more fitting, especially since the whole force of the word ἀμυθήτως is set out by two other words, namely ἀρρήτως and ἀφράστως; while ἀμυήτως is explained most suitably for the subject in hand, as meaning "not by acquired likeness," as Saint Leo puts it in his sermon On the Transfiguration: that is, not from elsewhere and by will, after the manner of things we say are "initiated" (μυεῖσθαι) and taught. So for Proclus "born without initiation" would be the same as for Leo "not made comparable from elsewhere, but born equal from nature and through nature."
(printed under page 361)
[scripture references at the foot of the text, as printed] ⁸³ Luc. II, 14. ⁸⁴ Isa. VII, 14. ⁸⁵ Dan. VII, 13.
⁸³ Luke 2:14. ⁸⁴ Isaiah 7:14. ⁸⁵ Daniel 7:13.
(printed under page 362)
(48) · call in col 715 (call not in the visible part of the page; presumably at the title of the oration)
Habetur duplici regio codice, quorum alter ἀνεπίγραφος· altero ascripta sancto Joanni Chrysostomo, ex quo Savilius eidem inscriptam edidit, sed inter ejus ἀμφιβαλλόμενα. Joannes Damascenus Epistola De trisagio citat Procli nomine: cujus etiam nomine olim redditam, ac in duas lectiones distributam pro festo Assumptionis sanctae Mariae, Riccardus e Vaticana edidit. Congruit stylo reliquis Procli.
It is found in two Royal codices, one of which is ἀνεπίγραφος ("without title"); in the other it is ascribed to Saint John Chrysostom, from which Savile published it under his name, but among his ἀμφιβαλλόμενα ("doubtful works"). John Damascene, in his letter On the Trisagion, cites it under Proclus's name; and under his name too Riccardi published from the Vatican [library] a version made long ago and divided into two readings for the feast of the Assumption of Saint Mary. It agrees in style with Proclus's other works.
(printed under page 362)
(50) · call in col 715 (call not in the visible part of the page)
Sanctorum memoria celebres conventus. Retineo lectionem Regii cod. μαρτυρικαὶ πανηγύρεις, eodemque sensu explico ac Riccardus alteram Rom. cod. et S. Damasc. μαρτυρίαι καὶ πανηγύρεις· ut τὸ μαρτυρικαί, aeque pateat ac nomen μαρτυρίαι· sitque adjunctum voci πανηγύρεις, ad designandos sacros conventus, ac monumenti ergo institutos: cum alioqui vox πανηγύρεις significet etiam nundinas, ac ejusmodi profana. Μαρτυρικαὶ ergo πανηγύρεις· ipsae sunt μαρτυρίαι, et testimonia: seu festa in memoriam beneficiorum Dei, ac virtutis sanctorum instituta: ipsumque quod postea ipse auctor τῶν ἁγίων μνήμας appellat: memorias sanctorum: id est, festa eis monumento posita. Nam non loqui de solis martyribus, liquet ex exemplis quae affert sanctorum Veteris Testamenti, quorum plures non fuerunt martyres, ut stricte dicitur martyr, qui pro Christo aut virtute, agone defunctus est.
"Gatherings made famous by the memory of the saints." I keep the reading of the Royal codex, μαρτυρικαὶ πανηγύρεις, and explain it in the same sense in which Riccardi explains the other reading, of the Roman codex and Saint Damascene, μαρτυρίαι καὶ πανηγύρεις: so that μαρτυρικαί is as broad as the noun μαρτυρίαι, and is joined to the word πανηγύρεις to denote sacred gatherings, instituted as memorials; since otherwise the word πανηγύρεις also means fairs and profane things of that kind. "Martyrial gatherings," then, are themselves μαρτυρίαι, testimonies: that is, feasts instituted in memory of God's benefits and of the saints' virtue; the very thing the author himself afterwards calls τῶν ἁγίων μνήμας, "memorials of the saints," that is, feasts set up as monuments to them. For that he is not speaking of the martyrs alone is clear from the examples he brings of the saints of the Old Testament, most of whom were not martyrs, as "martyr" is strictly said of one who has died in the contest for Christ or for virtue.
(printed under page 362)
(47) ‹anchor: ἐπινοίας› · call in col 716 (Greek only)
Heidelb. et Palat. ἐννοίας.
The Heidelberg [codex] and the Palatine [edition] read ἐννοίας ("of thought").
(printed under page 362)
(49) ‹anchor: πανηγύρεις› · call in col 716 (Greek only)
Damasc. et Rom. μαρτυρία καὶ πανηγ.
Damascene and the Roman [codex] read μαρτυρία καὶ πανηγ[ύρεις] ("testimony and festal gatherings").
(printed under page 362)
[scripture references at the foot of the text, as printed] ⁸⁶ Dan. III, 57. ⁸⁷ Ezech. III, 12. ⁸⁸ Gen. IV, 4. ⁸⁹ Eccli. XLIV, 16. ⁹⁰ Hebr. VII, 3.
⁸⁶ Daniel 3:57. ⁸⁷ Ezekiel 3:12. ⁸⁸ Genesis 4:4. ⁸⁹ Sirach 44:16. ⁹⁰ Hebrews 7:3.
(printed under page 363)
(51) · call in col 717 (Greek variant; call not in the visible part of the page)
Leg. Χριστοῦ.
Read Χριστοῦ ("of Christ").
(printed under page 363)
(53) ‹anchor: οὐκ ἐμολύνθη› · call in col 717 (Greek only)
Erat ἐμόλυνε in Reg., nec est in eo γεννηθείς.
The Royal [codex] had ἐμόλυνε ("defiled"), and γεννηθείς ("born") is not in it.
(printed under page 363)
(52) · call in col 718 (call not in the visible part of the page)
Ut Christi imago. Sic lego, ὡς Χριστοῦ εἰκών, pro Θεοῦ· vel certe excidit vox Υἱοῦ. Palam enim alludit auctor ad verba Pauli Hebr. VII, 3, ἀφωμοιωμένος δὲ τῷ Υἱῷ τοῦ Θεοῦ· assimilatus Filio Dei; ut ejus scilicet figura, ac ceu expressa quaedam imago anterioribus temporibus symbolo exhibita. Non ita proprie Riccardus, Dei exemplar; nam exemplar, est ipsum prototypum ac forma principalis, cui aliud assimiletur: quod non habet Melchisedech Dei Filio comparatus, sed contra, ut ipsa Pauli verba sonant: quanquam exemplaris vox eo etiam sensu, ac pro imagine ac figura, cum alibi, tum in ipsa Epistola ad Hebraeos ab interprete usurpatur.
"As the image of Christ." So I read, ὡς Χριστοῦ εἰκών, in place of Θεοῦ ("of God"); or else the word Υἱοῦ ("of the Son") has certainly fallen out. For the author plainly alludes to Paul's words in Hebrews 7:3, ἀφωμοιωμένος δὲ τῷ Υἱῷ τοῦ Θεοῦ, "made like unto the Son of God": as his figure, that is, and as a kind of express image shown in earlier times by a symbol. Riccardi's "the exemplar of God" is not so apt; for an exemplar is the prototype itself and the principal form to which something else is made like; which is not the case with Melchizedek compared to the Son of God, but the reverse, as Paul's own words say. Although the word "exemplar" is also used in that sense, for image and figure, by the translator, both elsewhere and in the Epistle to the Hebrews itself.
(printed under page 363)
(91) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 719
Psal. XVIII, 1.
Psalm 18:1.
(printed under page 364)
(92) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 719
Isa. VI, 6.
Isaiah 6:6.
(printed under page 364)
(93) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 719
Luc. VIII, 24.
Luke 8:24.
(printed under page 364)
(94) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 719
Isa. XIX, 1.
Isaiah 19:1.
(printed under page 364)
(95) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 719
Matth. XXVII, 45.
Matthew 27:45.
(printed under page 364)
(96) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 719
ibid. 52.
Same chapter, verse 52.
(printed under page 364)
(97) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 719
Exod. XIX, 18.
Exodus 19:18.
(printed under page 364)
(98) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 719
Exod. III, 2.
Exodus 3:2.
(printed under page 364)
(99) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 719
Psal. CXIII, 3.
Psalm 113:3.
(printed under page 364)
(1) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 719
Exod. XIV, 16.
Exodus 14:16.
(printed under page 364)
(2) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 719
Num. XVII, 8.
Numbers 17:8.
(printed under page 364)
(3) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 719
Dan. III, 50.
Daniel 3:50.
(printed under page 364)
(4) ‹anchor: celebratur Debbora› · call in col 719
Judic. IV, 14.
Judges 4:14.
(printed under page 364)
(5) ‹anchor: Benedicta tu in mulieribus› · call in col 719
Luc. I, 28.
Luke 1:28.
(printed under page 364)
(6) ‹anchor: fructus ventris tui› · call in col 719
ibid. 42.
Same chapter, verse 42.
(printed under page 364)
(54) ‹anchor: Δούλη,› · call in col 720 (printed in the Greek only)
Rom. ὁμολογοῦσα, καὶ κηρύττουσα.
The Rome edition reads ὁμολογοῦσα, καὶ κηρύττουσα ("she confessing, and proclaiming").
(printed under page 364)
(55) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible
Ad Romanum unum codicem, ex quo singulari Riccardus ediderat, accessit alter Regius, ex quo multa emendata sunt. Plures Riccardi naevos in notis indico : a quibus indicandis liberum me fere in aliis existimavi, ob novam quam cudi versionem, et ut ne viri labores sugillare ultro viderer.
To the single Roman manuscript, from which alone Riccardi had published, a second, the Royal manuscript, has been added, and many things have been corrected from it. I point out a good many of Riccardi's blemishes in the notes; elsewhere I have generally thought myself free from pointing them out, because of the new version I have produced, and so as not to seem to go out of my way to disparage the man's labours.
(printed under page 365)
(56) ‹anchor: Ἐγκώμιον εἰς τὴν Θεοτόκον Μαριάμ (title)› · call in col 721 (printed in the Greek only)
Emendatur collatione Reg. cod., num. 188.
Corrected by collation with the Royal manuscript, no. 188.
(printed under page 365)
(57) ‹anchor: ἀναδράμωμεν› · call in col 721 (printed in the Greek only)
Clausa ex Reg. cod.
The bracketed words are from the Royal manuscript.
(printed under page 365)
(58) ‹anchor: τὸν ὄκνον› · call in col 721 (printed in the Greek only)
Reg. ὄγκον.
The Royal manuscript reads ὄγκον ("bulk, burden").
(printed under page 365)
(61) ‹anchor: ἐβρίμυξε θάνατον› · call in col 721 (printed in the Greek only)
Reg. desiderat usque θεῖον γάρ · ac reliqua postmodum usque μάθωμεν ποίαν, ubi incipiet enarrari locus Matthaei, qui est argumentum hujus orationis.
The Royal manuscript lacks the text up to θεῖον γάρ, and the rest after it up to μάθωμεν ποίαν, where the exposition of the passage of Matthew that is the subject of this oration will begin.
(printed under page 365)
(7) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 722
Isa. VII, 14.
Isaiah 7:14.
(printed under page 365)
(8) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 722
Matth. I, 23.
Matthew 1:23.
(printed under page 365)
(9) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 722
Isa. LXIII, 9, sec. LXX.
Isaiah 63:9, according to the Septuagint.
(printed under page 365)
(10) ‹anchor: et terra, et aurum› · call in col 722
Gen. II, 11.
Genesis 2:11.
(printed under page 365)
(11) ‹anchor: mittere in terram› · call in col 722
Luc. XII, 49.
Luke 12:49.
(printed under page 365)
(59) ‹anchor: Quis porro carbo› · call in col 722
Quis porro carbo ? ἄνθραξ; Accepit Proclus pro carbone, alioqui non quadraret auctoritas subjuncta : Ignem veni mittere. Vox Hebraica בדלח non aliud significat quam lapidem pretiosum. Vulg. Bdelium. Isaiae autem VI, ubi etiam LXX habent ἄνθρακα, alia vox est, quae prunam ardentem ac carbonem significet.
"And what is the carbo?" ἄνθραξ. Proclus took it as "coal"; otherwise the authority added after it, "I came to cast fire", would not fit. The Hebrew word בדלח means nothing other than a precious stone; the Vulgate has "bdellium". But in Isaiah 6, where the Septuagint also has ἄνθρακα, the word is a different one, meaning a burning ember or coal.
(printed under page 365)
(60) ‹anchor: porri ejusmodi› · call in col 722
Porri ejusmodi, τοῦ τοιούτου πράσου. A quo lapis prasinus, velut porraceus, ac porraceo virore, ut a lapide scite divertat ad porri qualitatem, a quo lapis ita dictus est. Sic forte in superiori voce ἄνθραξ, luserit. Riccardus obscurat, cum ita reddit : Qui caustica prasini ejusmodi pallentis natura : ac male mutat τὸ πράσον, in πράσινον · ex quo non fiat amaricans illa comestio, sed ex illo.
"Of such a leek", τοῦ τοιούτου πράσου. From the leek the stone prasinus takes its name, as "leek-like", for its leek-green colour; so he deftly turns from the stone to the property of the leek, from which the stone was so named. Perhaps he played in the same way on the earlier word ἄνθραξ. Riccardi obscures it when he renders, "who by the caustic nature of such a pale prasinus", and wrongly changes τὸ πράσον into πράσινον; for that bitter eating would come not from the stone but from the leek.
(printed under page 365)
(12) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 723
Psal. CVI, 30.
Psalm 106:30.
(printed under page 366)
(13) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 723
Psal. XCII, 1.
Psalm 92:1.
(printed under page 366)
(14) ‹anchor: ordinem Melchisedech› · call in col 723
Hebr. V, 10.
Hebrews 5:10.
(printed under page 366)
(15) ‹anchor: virginitatis sermones› · call in col 723
Prov. XVI, 24.
Proverbs 16:24.
(printed under page 366)
(62) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Γρ. κτήσεται.
Another reading (γράφεται): κτήσεται ("will acquire").
(printed under page 366)
(63) ‹anchor: Divinae voluntatis portum (lemma)› · call in col 723
Divinae voluntatis portum. Juxta quod multi codices Graeci, et Suniae habent. Τοῦ θελήματος αὐτοῦ · Deduxit eos in portum voluntatis suae ; nempe Deus, pro quo alii αὐτῶν · quod et Hieronymus magis probat ad praefatum Suniam.
"The haven of the divine will." So many Greek manuscripts, and the text of Sunia, read: τοῦ θελήματος αὐτοῦ, "He led them into the haven of his will", that is, God's; for which others read αὐτῶν ("their"), which Jerome too prefers in writing to the aforesaid Sunia.
(printed under page 366)
(64) ‹anchor: Eminentiorisque, ac beati incorporeorum ordinis (lemma)› · call in col 723
Eminentiorisque, ac beati incorporeorum ordinis. Id est, angelici, angelicam enim virtutem ubique depraedicant sancti, ac in iis, Cyprianus, Fulgentius et Amphilochius, quos Riccardus refert : nulli autem absolute dicunt superioris ordinis quam angelici ; quod is male reddit, eminentioris felicioris que ordinis, quam sint angeli ipsi. Ὑπερκειμένης · Supra humanam utique virtutem, ac per hoc, μακαρίας τάξεως τῶν ἀσωμάτων · beati incorporearum mentium ordinis. Hoc tantum in nobis parte aliqua superior nonnunquam dicta sit, quod angelis σύμφυτος, ut Amphilochius vocat, cognata et a natura, nobis sit πρόσκτητος, ac multo labore comparabilis.
"And of the more eminent and blessed order of the bodiless", that is, the angelic; for the saints everywhere extol angelic virtue, among them Cyprian, Fulgentius and Amphilochius, whom Riccardi cites; but none of them speaks outright of an order higher than the angelic, which he wrongly renders "of an order more eminent and happier than the angels themselves are". Ὑπερκειμένης: above human virtue, that is, and so μακαρίας τάξεως τῶν ἀσωμάτων, "of the blessed order of bodiless minds". It may sometimes have been called in some respect superior only in this, that what is σύμφυτος in the angels, as Amphilochius calls it, inborn and theirs by nature, is in us πρόσκτητος, acquired, and to be won by much labour.
(printed under page 366)
(65) ‹anchor: Duo ordines, principum ac subjectorum (lemma)› · call in col 723
Duo ordines, principum ac subjectorum. Locus pro laconica brevitate Procli obscurior. Praesides istos ac subditos exponit deinde ipsemet ; Deo dicatos homines, et saeculares : ecclesiasticos, et laicos : putemque deesse, τὸ ἀντεχόμενον· quod infra repetens, habet ; expressique in versione. Non video satis, ut sic clare duos hos ordines ex ante dictis auctor colligat : nisi forte quia Christus, cum sit sacerdos et rex excellenti utrumque ratione, sacerdosque ad sacerdotes ac sacri ordinis ministros habeat per se, uti rex ad saeculares ac laicos ; ideo utraque parte constantem habeat Christianam rempublicam, ac utroque jure subjectam. Parum differat divisio haec ἀρχόντων καὶ ἀρχομένων, ab illa Dionysii in Hierarchiam duplicem, quarum altera activa purget, illuminet, consummet, vere illa ἀρχόντων ac praesidum ; passiva altera, haec ipsa ab illa recipiat, eoque ἀρχομένων ac subditorum, quique vel si reges sint, vel si angelicis exculti moribus, summoque gradu ascetae ac Nazaraei (nisi aliud, ac clericatus ordoque sacer, ut fere in nostris, accedat), praesidentiam ejusmodi agentis hierarchiae sub summo hierarcha Christo agnoscant, ac se ea perfici gaudeant
"Two orders, of rulers and of subjects." Because of Proclus's laconic brevity the passage is rather obscure. He himself afterwards explains these rulers and subjects: men dedicated to God, and men of the world; churchmen and laity. And I should think τὸ ἀντεχόμενον is missing, which he has when he repeats this below; I have rendered it in the version. I do not quite see how the author so plainly draws these two orders from what was said before, unless perhaps because Christ, being priest and king each in an eminent way, stands as priest to the priests and ministers of the sacred order, and as king to the men of the world and the laity, and so has a Christian commonwealth made up of both parts and subject to him by both rights. This division of ἀρχόντων καὶ ἀρχομένων, rulers and ruled, would differ little from Dionysius's division into a twofold Hierarchy: one active, which purifies, illuminates and perfects, truly that of the ἀρχόντων and rulers; the other passive, which receives these very things from the first and is therefore that of the ἀρχομένων and subjects. These, even if they are kings, or formed in angelic ways of life, ascetics and Nazarites of the highest degree (unless something else, the clerical state and sacred order, be added, as mostly among us), acknowledge the presidency of that acting hierarchy under Christ the supreme hierarch, and rejoice to be perfected by it
(printed under page 366)
(67) ‹anchor: utriusque pietas› · call in col 723
Dignitatis utriusque pietas, ἑκάστου δηλοῦσθαι ἀξιώματος. Riccardus, τὸ, ἑκάστου refert ad ἐνδύματος · liquet tamen referendum ad ἀξιώματος, satisque intelligi in priori illa voce, nisi Proclus geminatum posuit, ac alterum excidit.
"The piety of each dignity", ἑκάστου δηλοῦσθαι ἀξιώματος. Riccardi refers ἑκάστου to ἐνδύματος ("garment"); but it plainly belongs with ἀξιώματος ("dignity"), and is sufficiently understood in that earlier word, unless Proclus wrote it twice and the second has dropped out.
(printed under page 366)
(62) ‹anchor: κτίσεται› · call in col 724 (printed in the Greek only)
Γρ. κτήσεται.
Another reading (γράφεται): κτήσεται ("will acquire").
(printed under page 366, in the left foot, under col. 723; n723 also carries this note with "call not visible", and that copy is the one to drop)
(66) ‹anchor: Ὃν τρόπον› · call in col 724 (printed in the Greek only)
Γρ. γάρ.
Another reading (γράφεται): γάρ ("for").
(printed under page 366)
(70) ‹anchor: ἐσθίειν› · call in col 725 (printed in the Greek only)
Ἴσ. ἐσθίων.
Perhaps (ἴσως) ἐσθίων ("eating").
(printed under page 367)
(16) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 726
Gen. II, 9.
Genesis 2:9.
(printed under page 367)
(17) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 726
ibid. 19.
Same chapter, verse 19.
(printed under page 367)
(18) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 726
ibid. 20.
Same chapter, verse 20.
(printed under page 367)
(19) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 726
I Petr. II, 2.
1 Peter 2:2.
(printed under page 367)
(20) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 726
Exod. XXXIII, 3.
Exodus 33:3.
(printed under page 367)
(21) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 726
Psal. XLIV, 14.
Psalm 44:14.
(printed under page 367)
(22) ‹anchor: protulit grossos suos› · call in col 726
Cant. II, 13.
Song of Songs 2:13.
(printed under page 367)
(23) ‹anchor: et favum mellis› · call in col 726
Luc. XXIV, 42.
Luke 24:42.
(printed under page 367)
(24) ‹anchor: eris homines capiens› · call in col 726
Luc. V, 10.
Luke 5:10.
(printed under page 367)
(25) ‹anchor: et mel comedet› · call in col 726
Isa. VII, 15.
Isaiah 7:15.
(printed under page 367)
(26) ‹anchor: parvulos malitia› · call in col 726
I Cor. XIV, 20.
1 Corinthians 14:20.
(printed under page 367)
(68) ‹anchor: In parte animi volente (lemma)› · call in col 726 (call not visible on this page foot)
In parte animi volente. Significare videtur, pulcra virginum specie sollicitari humanam cupiditatem ac exerceri, uti per lignum scientiae boni et mali, cupiditas Adae in paradiso sollicitata ac exercita fuit ; seu esse eadem ratione occasionem peccati, ut quis ea se incautius demulceri permittat. Riccardus : Virgineus decor effrenem coercens naturae cupiditatem. At ubi ea cum ligno scientiae analogia ? Num vero illud Adae cupiditatem coercuit ? Possit quoque naturalis cupiditas in bonum sumi, idque magis velit Proclus, quam exerceat ac provocet virginitatis species ac decor. Nam neque ipse ligni scientiae boni et mali appetitus malus erat, ut ordinatus fuisset, et pro tempore statuto a Deo, uti Gregorius Nyssenus et alii.
"In the willing part of the soul." He seems to mean that human desire is stirred and exercised by the fair beauty of virgins, as Adam's desire in paradise was stirred and exercised by the tree of the knowledge of good and evil; or that it is, in the same way, an occasion of sin if one lets oneself be too incautiously charmed by it. Riccardi: "virginal beauty restraining the unbridled desire of nature". But where then is the analogy with the tree of knowledge? Did that tree restrain Adam's desire? Natural desire may also be taken in a good sense, and Proclus may rather mean that the beauty and loveliness of virginity exercises and provokes it. For the very appetite for the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was not evil, had it been ordered, and kept to the time appointed by God, as Gregory of Nyssa and others hold.
(printed under page 367)
(69) ‹anchor: et mel comedet› · call in col 726
Butyrum et mel comedet. Verba sunt Isa. VII, 15, in virginis dicta filium : qui quidem πρωτοτύπως est ipse Christus : ex eo autem, omnes malitia parvuli a mystici lavacri partu, qui et ipsi sanctae virginis Ecclesiae filii sunt, butyrumque et mel comedunt in signum innocentiae. Sic plana Procli allegoria, non qualem Riccardus repraesentat. Nec ille quidquam alludit ad sanctissimum morem impertiendi Eucharistia recens baptizatos, ut ipse vult, sed ad illum alium quem diximus, dandi eis in cibum butyrum et mel.
"He shall eat butter and honey." These are the words of Isaiah 7:15, spoken of the virgin's son, who in the first and original sense (πρωτοτύπως) is Christ himself; but after him all who are little ones in malice from the birth of the mystical laver, who are themselves also sons of the holy virgin Church, eat butter and honey as a sign of innocence. So Proclus's allegory is plain, not such as Riccardi represents it. Nor does he allude at all to the most holy custom of giving the Eucharist to the newly baptized, as Riccardi would have it, but to that other custom we have mentioned, of giving them butter and honey to eat.
(printed under page 367)
(27) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 727
Matth. III, 4.
Matthew 3:4.
(printed under page 368)
(28) ‹anchor: baptizat in Spiritu sancto› · call in col 727
Joan. I, 33.
John 1:33.
(printed under page 368)
(29) ‹anchor: omni credenti› · call in col 727
Rom. X, 4.
Romans 10:4.
(printed under page 368)
(30) ‹anchor: impossibile est placere› · call in col 727
Hebr. XI, 6.
Hebrews 11:6.
(printed under page 368)
(31) ‹anchor: bit vitam aeternam› · call in col 727
Joan. III, 36.
John 3:36.
(printed under page 368)
(71) ‹anchor: Summi frutices (lemma)› · call in col 727 (call not visible on this page foot)
Summi frutices, ἀκρίδες. Vulg. Locustae : aequivoca voce Graeca ad utrumque. Multi Patres eam Procli expositionem sequuntur, ac in iis, praeceptor ejus Chrysostomus, cum aliis locis, cum homilia de Poenitentia, et in Decollationem ejusdem Joannis, quam ex Reg. ms. integram nuper edidi. Male Riccardus, et contra fidem interpretis, sensu alio exponit, quam Proclus velit : Esca ejus erat, locustae.
"The tips of shrubs", ἀκρίδες. The Vulgate has "locusts"; the Greek word is ambiguous and can mean either. Many Fathers follow this interpretation of Proclus's, among them his teacher Chrysostom, in other places and in the homily on Penance, and on the Beheading of the same John, which I recently published complete from the Royal manuscript. Riccardi wrongly, and against a translator's duty, renders it in a sense other than Proclus intends: "His food was locusts."
(printed under page 368)
(72) ‹anchor: Quam procul a saeculi agro (lemma)› · call in col 727 (call not visible on this page foot)
Quam procul a saeculi agro, πολὺ τῆς κοσμικῆς ἀπῴκισται χώρας. Nihil clarius ; at non clarum satis Riccardo ita reddenti : alte in hujus mundi campo condita residet : nemo certe eum sensum dederit τοῦ, ἀποικίζεσθαι.
"How far from the field of the world", πολὺ τῆς κοσμικῆς ἀπῴκισται χώρας. Nothing is clearer; but it was not clear enough to Riccardi, who renders "it lies hidden deep in the field of this world". Certainly no one would give ἀποικίζεσθαι ("to be removed to a far settlement") that sense.
(printed under page 368)
(73) ‹anchor: Perflatili vaporatione (lemma)› · call in col 727 (call not visible on this page foot)
Perflatili vaporatione, εὐριπίστου ἀναθυμιάσεως. Ut constans in allegoria, fumum fumo declaret, ac sic habere Joannis animum ad carnalium cupiditatum fumos, uti mel silvestre ad fumum naturalem, et quo domesticae apes sollicitari solent. Parerga hic notata de Euripo, nec ab eo fumus sive vapor dicitur εὐρίπιστος, sed a ῥιπίζω, cujus nota significatio.
"By a blown vapour", εὐριπίστου ἀναθυμιάσεως. Keeping to his allegory, he explains smoke by smoke: John's soul stands to the smoke of carnal desires as wild honey to natural smoke, by which domestic bees are commonly stirred up. The remarks noted here about the Euripus are beside the point; the smoke or vapour is not called εὐρίπιστος from that, but from ῥιπίζω ("to fan"), whose meaning is well known.
(printed under page 368)
(74) ‹anchor: Necdum credens in Dominum (lemma)› · call in col 727 (call not visible on this page foot)
Necdum credens in Dominum. Fide nimirum explicatiori, ac credens venisse, quod ejus illata verba plane declarant ; facitque hoc ad testimonii de Christo certitudinem, ad quod perhibendum solo divino instinctu ac afflatu inductus sit. Non potuit a parentibus discere, qui defuncti sunt brevi post ejus nativitatem : at nec ab aliis, cum extra omnem humanam consuetudinem ageret in deserto, usque ad tempus ostensionis suae, quando Spiritus illic Domini super eum factus est. Quae adduntur, velut non placeret non esset visurus Deum, etc., ampliatione quadam exponenda sunt, ut intelligantur pro eo tempore quo fides sufficienter proposita foret ; ac quando jam explicator quaereretur : quo etiam modo potest exponi sententia Chrysostomi hom. De fide et lege naturae tom. VI Ducaei, cum videtur docere, non fuisse Cornelium vere justum, ante quam a Petro doceretur. Non fuisse ejus in utero exsultationem motum liberum, et quo Deum vere agnoverit, tenet sanctus doctor III part. quaest. 17, art. 3 et 6, in quod etiam inclinat Augustinus epist. LVII Ad Dardanum.
"Not yet believing in the Lord." With a more explicit faith, that is, and believing that he had come, as the words quoted from him plainly show; and this serves the certainty of his testimony to Christ, to bear which he was moved by divine prompting and inspiration alone. He could not have learned it from his parents, who died soon after his birth, nor from others, since he lived in the desert apart from all human company until the time of his showing, when the Spirit of the Lord came upon him there. What is added, as that he would not please and would not see God, etc., must be explained with a certain broadening, so as to be understood of the time when faith had been sufficiently set forth and a more explicit faith was by then required. In the same way one can explain the opinion of Chrysostom in the homily On faith and the law of nature (vol. VI of Ducaeus), where he seems to teach that Cornelius was not truly just before he was taught by Peter. That his leaping in the womb was not a free act, by which he truly recognized God, is held by the holy Doctor, Part III, question 17, articles 3 and 6; Augustine also inclines to this in Letter 57, To Dardanus.
(printed under page 368)
(75) ‹anchor: καὶ ἐρχόμενον› · call in col 728 (printed in the Greek only)
Apud Joan. μένον.
In John the word is μένον ("remaining").
(printed under page 368)
(76) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Vat. εὑρεθήσεται.
The Vatican manuscript reads εὑρεθήσεται ("will be found").
(printed under page 369)
(32) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 730
Isa. LXV, 8.
Isaiah 65:8.
(printed under page 369)
(33) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 730
Hebr. XI, 4.
Hebrews 11:4.
(printed under page 369)
(34) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 730
Hebr. VII, 3.
Hebrews 7:3.
(printed under page 369)
(35) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 730
Gen. XXII, 2.
Genesis 22:2.
(printed under page 369)
(36) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 730
Exod. VII, 1.
Exodus 7:1.
(printed under page 369)
(37) ‹anchor: dignitatis habenas suscipit› · call in col 730
Gen. XLI, 40.
Genesis 41:40.
(printed under page 369)
(38) ‹anchor: incedit per aethera› · call in col 730
IV Reg. II, 11.
4 Kings (2 Kings) 2:11.
(printed under page 369)
(39) ‹anchor: funditus evertat› · call in col 730
Jer. I, 10.
Jeremiah 1:10.
(printed under page 369)
(40) ‹anchor: obstruit Daniel› · call in col 730
Dan. VI, 22.
Daniel 6:22.
(printed under page 369)
(41) ‹anchor: horribili servantur› · call in col 730
Dan. III, 49.
Daniel 3:49.
(printed under page 369)
(42) ‹anchor: filii nuncupantur› · call in col 730
Marc. V, 17.
Mark 5:17 (so printed; the naming of the sons of Zebedee is Mark 3:17).
(printed under page 369)
(43) ‹anchor: coelestis constituitur› · call in col 730
Joan. III, 29.
John 3:29.
(printed under page 369)
(44) ‹anchor: de Spiritu sancto› · call in col 730
Matth. I, 18.
Matthew 1:18.
(printed under page 369)
(45) ‹anchor: semel in Sancta› · call in col 730
Hebr. IX, 11, 12.
Hebrews 9:11–12.
(printed under page 369)
(77) ‹anchor: Isaac Dominicae passionis typus (lemma)› · call in col 730 (call not visible on this page foot)
Isaac Dominicae passionis typus. Qui adhuc virgo sit jussus offerri, quanquam postea dederit conjugio operam ; uti et Moyses prius dederat, post tantam illam Domino assiduitatem deinceps continens, ut sanctus Epiphanius explicat haer. LXXVIII, ut non solum παρθενίαν et omnimodam ἁγνείαν, virginitatem ac perfectam castimoniam, qualis fuit utriusque Joannis, decetque Deo sacros homines, commendet ac laudet ; verum etiam σωφροσύνην ac pudicitiam, quae deceat saeculares ac homines Christiana sobrietate quandoque conjugiis utentes. De aliis, Elia, Daniele, tribus pueris, Jacobo, etc., videri potest Riccardus, ac quos ille citat, Hieronymus, Epiphanius, etc.
"Isaac, a type of the Lord's Passion." He was ordered to be offered while still a virgin, though afterwards he gave himself to marriage; as Moses too had done earlier, and after his long close attendance on the Lord lived continently from then on, as Saint Epiphanius explains, Heresy 78. So he commends and praises not only παρθενία and complete ἁγνεία, virginity and perfect chastity, such as that of both Johns and as befits men consecrated to God, but also σωφροσύνη and modesty, such as befits people of the world and those who at times use marriage with Christian sobriety. On the others, Elijah, Daniel, the three young men, Jacob, etc., see Riccardi and those he cites, Jerome, Epiphanius, etc.
(printed under page 369)
(46) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 731
Dan. II, 34.
Daniel 2:34.
(printed under page 370)
(47) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 731
Hebr. X, 29.
Hebrews 10:29.
(printed under page 370)
(48) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 731
Exod. III, 5.
Exodus 3:5.
(printed under page 370)
(49) ‹anchor: aquas (80) excalefaceret› · call in col 731
Isa. LXIV, 2.
Isaiah 64:2.
(printed under page 370)
(50) ‹anchor: luce ambulat, non offendit› · call in col 731
Joan. XI, 9.
John 11:9.
(printed under page 370)
(51) ‹anchor: ferant super terram› · call in col 731
Psal. LXXII, 9.
Psalm 72:9.
(printed under page 370)
(52) ‹anchor: de Spiritu sancto› · call in col 731
Matth. I, 18.
Matthew 1:18.
(printed under page 370)
(53) ‹anchor: suum primogenitum› · call in col 731
ibid. 25.
Same chapter, verse 25.
(printed under page 370)
(78) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Γρ. ἑαυτόν.
Another reading (γράφεται): ἑαυτόν ("himself").
(printed under page 370)
(79) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Ἴσ. τὴν ἀκανθώδη φύσιν.
Perhaps (ἴσως) τὴν ἀκανθώδη φύσιν ("the thorny nature").
(printed under page 370)
(80) ‹anchor: aquas (80) excalefaceret› · call in col 731
Gentilium aquas, τὰ ἐθνικὰ ὕδατα θερμάνῃ. Subjuncta verba, κατὰ τὸ γεγραμμένον · palam indicant alludi ad Scripturae locum aliquem ; nec alius occurrit quam qui exstat (Isa. LXIV, 2) quo Dominicus adventus instar ignis significatur, facientis ebullire ac effervere aquas. המסים מים תבעה אש. Pagninus : Sicut aquam bullire facit ignis. Vulg. aquae arderent igni. Significatur effectus divini adventus ad vindictam, tametsi Proclus allegoriam transfert ad adventum Domini ad salutem, quo vere efferbuerunt aquae gentilium divino ejus igne. LXX : Καὶ κατακαύσει πῦρ τοὺς ὑπεναντίους · Et comburet ignis adversarios : quod ipsum potuit respicere Proclus, ac tum ex eo, tum ex aliis, ac Hebraica veritate, habere τὰ ἐθνικὰ ὕδατα. Siquidem, Aquae multae ; populi multi (Apoc. XVII, 15).
"The waters of the Gentiles", τὰ ἐθνικὰ ὕδατα θερμάνῃ. The words that follow, κατὰ τὸ γεγραμμένον ("as it is written"), plainly show an allusion to some passage of Scripture; and none comes to mind but the one in Isaiah 64:2, where the Lord's coming is signified as like a fire that makes waters boil and seethe: המסים מים תבעה אש. Pagnini: "As fire makes water boil." The Vulgate: "the waters would burn with fire." The effect signified is that of the divine coming for vengeance, although Proclus turns the allegory to the Lord's coming for salvation, at which the waters of the Gentiles truly boiled up with his divine fire. The Septuagint: Καὶ κατακαύσει πῦρ τοὺς ὑπεναντίους, "And fire shall burn up the adversaries"; Proclus may have had this very text in view, and drawn τὰ ἐθνικὰ ὕδατα both from it and from other places and from the Hebrew original. For "many waters" are "many peoples" (Rev. 17:15).
(printed under page 370)
(83) ‹anchor: τοῦ ἀγαθοῦ› · call in col 733 (printed in the Greek only)
Reg. τοῦ καθαροῦ.
The Royal manuscript reads τοῦ καθαροῦ ("of the pure [clay]").
(printed under page 371)
(54) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 734
Gal. VI, 15.
Galatians 6:15.
(printed under page 371)
(55) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 734
Marc. XI, 14 ; Matth. XXI, 19.
Mark 11:14; Matthew 21:19.
(printed under page 371)
(56) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 734
II Cor. VI, 14.
2 Corinthians 6:14.
(printed under page 371)
(57) ‹anchor: Moysi similem (82)› · call in col 734
Deut. XVIII, 15, 18 ; Act. III, 22.
Deuteronomy 18:15, 18; Acts 3:22.
(printed under page 371)
(58) ‹anchor: dabit fructum suum› · call in col 734
Psal. LXXXIV, 13.
Psalm 84:13.
(printed under page 371)
(81) ‹anchor: Adulterinum corporalis peccati numisma (lemma)› · call in col 734 (call not visible on this page foot)
Adulterinum corporalis peccati numisma. Multa Riccardus in vocem νόμισμα, sed quibus duntaxat declaret vocem ; ne verbum quidem quo explicet mentem Procli, quam nec reddidit, mutato antecedenti in consequens, ac liberius commutatis aliis, uti collata versio docebit. Numisma illud peccati, haud aliud est, quam quod praecedenti colo dixerat, ut alterum altero explicet ; ipsa nimirum sexuum discretio, occasione peccati inducta, et ex illius praevisione, ut nimirum crasso illo ac brutali modo mutuae conjunctionis propagaretur humanum genus futurum mortale a peccato, diviniori ac altiori modo propagandum, ut immune a peccato immortale mansisset : estque ea opinio trita Graecis Patribus, ac in iis Amphilochio in Peccatr. et Gregorio Nysseno lib. De opificio hominis, de qua dicta sufficiant ad praefatum Amphilochium.
"The counterfeit coin of bodily sin." Riccardi says much on the word νόμισμα, but only to explain the word; not a word to explain Proclus's meaning, which he did not render either, turning the antecedent into the consequent and changing other things rather freely, as comparison of the versions will show. That coin of sin is nothing other than what he had said in the preceding clause, so that each explains the other: namely, the very distinction of the sexes, brought in on the occasion of sin and in foresight of it, so that the human race, made mortal by sin, should be propagated in that gross and brute manner of mutual union, though it would have been propagated in a more divine and higher manner had it remained immortal and free from sin. This opinion is common among the Greek Fathers, among them Amphilochius, In Peccatr., and Gregory of Nyssa, On the Making of Man; on it what was said in the preface to Amphilochius may suffice.
(printed under page 371)
(82) ‹anchor: Prophetam illum Moysi similem› · call in col 734
Prophetam illum Moysi similem, ὁ κατὰ Μωϋσέα προφήτης · κατ' ἐμέ (Deut. XVIII, 15, 18), repetitum a Stephano (Act. III, 22) nec bene satis Riccardus : Prophetam a Moyse signatum ; aliud certe, ὁ καθ' ἡμᾶς ἄνθρωπος · quam homo a nobis designatus : nempe homo nobis similis : quod passim Christum vocant theologi. Quod porro spectat ad expositionem, quam sic multis dialogismo hoc Proclus prosequitur, ut Joseph non cognoverit Mariam, donec illa peperisset, id est, nesciverit divinum in ea mysterium ante Domini nativitatem ; videri illa possit minus favere tantae illi Josephi sanctitati, quanta decebat sponsum Virginis. Ut tamen gratiae in apostolis oeconomiam attenderimus, utque ea toto Domini incolatus tempore rudes adeo permiserit, haud ita absurdum videatur, ut et Joseph haud absimili modo, post etiam oraculum, nonnihil dubius ac animi anceps, pro tanta sacramenti sublimitate ac novitate, permanserit. In Zacharia cui tantum praedictus esset partus sterilis, toties jam in aliis exhibitus, incredulitas gravior fuit, cum praesertim ille sacerdos esset, quem sacra historia non lateret : in Josepho autem qui faber esset, et cui majus omnibus sacramentum conceptus virginalis revelatum esset, longe excusabilius sit, ut non statim integram omnino fidem adhibuerit angelo, nec plene cognoverit quod Spiritus sanctus in sponsa operatus esset, donec ab edita demum prole amplior gratia affulsisset. Fuerit itaque ab oraculo persuasus ut ne dimitteret sponsam ; non tamen ut omnem prorsus dubietatem abjiceret. Nihil certe videtur obstare, ut ne aestus ejusmodi cogitationum qualem describit Proclus, ad probationem viri sancti toto illo tempore permissus sit : tametsi Hieronymi ac aliorum expositio videtur germanior, ut sermo sit de cognitione per copulam carnalem, quam neget evangelista praecessisse Christi nativitatem, nec dicat secutam esse. Idem cum Proclo sentiunt alii, in quibus Athanasius hom. in descriptionem sanctae Mariae. Ipsa porro sancta Maria, quam ipsam Proclus in sequentibus ob mysterii incomprehensibilitatem, dubitantem inducit, citius persuasa fuit, ad cujus, uti et sponsi in ejusmodi dubitatione defensionem, satis videantur, quae Proclus idem scripsit.
"That Prophet like Moses", ὁ κατὰ Μωϋσέα προφήτης; κατ' ἐμέ, "like me" (Deut. 18:15, 18), repeated by Stephen (Acts 3:22). Riccardi's "the Prophet marked out by Moses" is not right; for ὁ καθ' ἡμᾶς ἄνθρωπος is surely something other than "a man designated by us": namely "a man like us", as the theologians commonly call Christ. As for the interpretation that Proclus pursues at such length in this dialogue, that Joseph did not know Mary until she had given birth, that is, did not know the divine mystery in her before the Lord's birth: it might seem less favourable to the great holiness of Joseph that befitted the Virgin's spouse. Yet if we consider the economy of grace in the apostles, and how it left them so untaught through the whole time of the Lord's sojourn, it would not seem so absurd that Joseph too, in much the same way, even after the oracle, remained somewhat doubtful and wavering in mind before the sublimity and novelty of so great a mystery. In Zachary, to whom only the birth from a barren woman was foretold, a thing already shown so often in others, unbelief was more grievous, especially as he was a priest, to whom the sacred history was not unknown; but in Joseph, who was a carpenter, and to whom the mystery of the virginal conception, greater than all, had been revealed, it would be far more excusable that he did not at once give the angel entirely full belief, nor fully understand what the Holy Spirit had wrought in his spouse, until at last, once the child was born, a fuller grace had shone on him. So he may have been persuaded by the oracle not to put away his spouse, yet not so as to cast off all doubt entirely. Certainly nothing seems to prevent such a tide of thoughts as Proclus describes having been permitted, through all that time, for the proving of the holy man; although the interpretation of Jerome and others seems more genuine, that the passage speaks of knowledge by carnal union, which the evangelist denies preceded Christ's birth, without saying that it followed. Others agree with Proclus, among them Athanasius in the homily On the description of holy Mary. As for holy Mary herself, whom Proclus in what follows represents as doubting because of the incomprehensibility of the mystery, she was persuaded sooner; and what Proclus himself wrote may seem enough for her defence, as for her spouse's, in such doubting.
(printed under page 371)
(59) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 735
Matth. I, 20.
Matthew 1:20.
(printed under page 372)
(60) ‹anchor: prophetici oraculi veritatem› · call in col 735
Isa. VII, 14.
Isaiah 7:14.
(printed under page 372)
(84) ‹anchor: Non est cognitionis defectus (lemma)› · call in col 735 (call not visible on this page foot)
Non est cognitionis defectus, etc. Sensus est : Nedum jam ignorantis esse, quod sic Joseph suspectam habeat conjugem, sed et impensioris incredulitatis : post nimirum angeli responsum.
"It is not a want of knowledge", etc. The sense is: that Joseph should so hold his wife in suspicion is now not merely the mark of one who does not know, but of a more intense unbelief; that is, after the angel's answer.
(printed under page 372)
(85) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Male edit. μακαριοτέραν.
The edition wrongly reads μακαριοτέραν ("more blessed").
(printed under page 372)
(86) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Reg. φῶς.
The Royal manuscript reads φῶς ("light").
(printed under page 372)
(87) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Reg. deest, υἱόν.
In the Royal manuscript υἱόν ("son") is missing.
(printed under page 372)
(88) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Edit. τί δὲ τοῦτο · περιπτύσσομαι.
The edition reads τί δὲ τοῦτο · περιπτύσσομαι ("but what is this? I embrace").
(printed under page 372)
(89) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Male edit. εὔνομον.
The edition wrongly reads εὔνομον ("lawful").
(printed under page 372)
(92) ‹anchor: ad districtum ratiocinium› · call in col 735
Ad districtum ratiocinium, εἰς τὸ ἀκριβὲς λογοθέσιον. Quo probanti Deo per aquas redargutionis reddenda sit ratio, uti praescribitur (Num. V, 18 seqq. Ita etiam Riccardus. Liber apocryphus Jacobi nomine, nedum Mariam, sed et Josephum habet vocatum ad illud ratiocinium, ac divino judicio probatum ; cujus eadem esset atque Mariae suspicio criminis ; rei nimirum male cum Maria habitae, quam Deo dicatam Virginem in custodiam, ac ceu depositum accepisset.
"To the strict reckoning", εἰς τὸ ἀκριβὲς λογοθέσιον: where account must be rendered to God, who tests by the waters of conviction, as is prescribed (Num. 5:18 ff.; so Riccardi too). The apocryphal book under the name of James has not only Mary but Joseph too summoned to that reckoning and tried by the divine judgement, since the same suspicion of crime would fall on him as on Mary: that of having dealt wrongly with Mary, whom he had received as a Virgin dedicated to God, into his keeping and as it were in trust.
(printed under page 372)
(90) ‹anchor: θεῖον λόγον› · call in col 736 (printed in the Greek only)
Edit. τόκον.
The edition reads τόκον ("birth").
(printed under page 372)
(91) ‹anchor: ἐθνικῆς ἀπολαβοῦσα› · call in col 736 (printed in the Greek only)
Reg. μεταλαβοῦσα.
The Royal manuscript reads μεταλαβοῦσα ("having partaken of").
(printed under page 372)
(93) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Reg. Δαυϊτικήν.
The Royal manuscript reads Δαυϊτικήν ("of David").
(printed under page 373)
(94) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Edit. στέργομαί τε ἀληθῶς.
The edition reads στέργομαί τε ἀληθῶς ("and I am truly loved").
(printed under page 373)
(95) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Reg. εἰς τὸν Θεόν.
The Royal manuscript reads εἰς τὸν Θεόν ("towards God").
(printed under page 373)
(96) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Edit. ἐπαγγελλομένην.
The edition reads ἐπαγγελλομένην ("promising").
(printed under page 373)
(98) ‹anchor: Ὦ Ἰωσήφ› · call in col 737 (printed in the Greek only)
Reg. ὦ πρεσβύτα.
The Royal manuscript reads ὦ πρεσβύτα ("O old man").
(printed under page 373)
(1) ‹anchor: ὡς ἄχρωμον› · call in col 737 (printed in the Greek only)
Edit. male ἄχραμον.
The edition wrongly reads ἄχραμον.
(printed under page 373)
(2) ‹anchor: ἀπωθεῖτο› · call in col 737 (printed in the Greek only)
Edit. male ἀπωχεῖτο.
The edition wrongly reads ἀπωχεῖτο.
(printed under page 373)
(61) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 738
Isa. XI, 1.
Isaiah 11:1.
(printed under page 373)
(62) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 738
Luc. X, 35.
Luke 10:35.
(printed under page 373)
(63) ‹anchor: et matrem ejus› · call in col 738
Matth. II, 13.
Matthew 2:13.
(printed under page 373)
(64) ‹anchor: capere capiat› · call in col 738
Matth. XIX, 12.
Matthew 19:12.
(printed under page 373)
(65) ‹anchor: stellam consideravit› · call in col 738
Matth. II, 12.
Matthew 2:12.
(printed under page 373)
(66) ‹anchor: infantem gestabat› · call in col 738
Luc. II, 25 sqq.
Luke 2:25 ff.
(printed under page 373)
(97) ‹anchor: Probatum commoda denarium (lemma)› · call in col 738 (call not visible on this page foot)
Probatum commoda denarium. Plana allusio ad parabolam Samaritani (Luc. X, 35). Riccardus obscurat : Probato utere denario, etc.
"Lend the approved denarius." A plain allusion to the parable of the Samaritan (Luke 10:35). Riccardi obscures it: "Use the approved denarius", etc.
(printed under page 373)
(99) ‹anchor: se ipse deplorabat› · call in col 738
Se ipse deploravit, ἑαυτὸν ἐταλάνιζεν. Uti solent quos bonum aliquod latuit ; sive etiam qui peccaverunt aliquid ignorantia. Riccardus non bene sua pro probatis Procli substituit.
"He bewailed himself", ἑαυτὸν ἐταλάνιζεν: as those do from whom some good has been hidden, or who have sinned in something through ignorance. Riccardi does wrong to substitute his own words for Proclus's sound ones.
(printed under page 373)
(67) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 739
Luc. I, 34.
Luke 1:34.
(2*) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant) Edit. λαβήν.
The edition reads λαβήν.
(printed under page 374)
(3) ‹anchor: τῆς κτίσεως› · call in col 740 (printed in the Greek only)
Edit. φύσεως
The edition reads φύσεως ("of nature").
(printed under page 374)
(4) ‹anchor: Δέξομαι› · call in col 740 (printed in the Greek only)
Edit. λέξομαι.
The edition reads λέξομαι.
(printed under page 374)
(5) ‹anchor: Ἐδέξω› · call in col 740 (printed in the Greek only)
Edit. δέξου.
The edition reads δέξου ("receive!").
(printed under page 374)
(6) ‹anchor: Ἀγνοεῖς ποίων› · call in col 741 (printed in the Greek only)
Reg. ποία.
The Royal manuscript reads ποία ("what kind of").
(printed under page 375)
(68) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 743
Gal. IV, 23.
Galatians 4:23.
(printed under page 376)
(69) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 743
Luc. I, 47.
Luke 1:47.
(printed under page 376)
(70) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 743
Matth. V, 15.
Matthew 5:15.
(printed under page 376)
(71) ‹anchor: ex Patre fuit genitus› · call in col 743
Psal. CIX, 3.
Psalm 109:3.
(printed under page 376)
(7) ‹anchor: Asceticus ac vitae religiosae ramus (lemma)› · call in col 743 (call not visible on this page foot)
Asceticus ac vitae religiosae ramus, ἀσκητικὸς κλάδος. Praeclare id in Joannem vitae asceticae ac monachalis praecipuum post Eliam, et ducem. Male Riccardus : excultus surculus : quo fere modo erravit Sifanus in Amphilochii orat. in Hypapantem ad illa verba, ἀσκητικὸν ἐγκαλλώπισμα · dum reddit, virtutis studii et mentis exercitationis ornamentum : pro, exercitatorum, ac ascetici ordinis. Loquitur de virginitate, quae reipsa sic habet ad ascetas ac monachos.
"Ascetic branch and branch of the religious life", ἀσκητικὸς κλάδος. Finely said of John, the chief and leader, after Elijah, of the ascetic and monastic life. Riccardi wrongly renders "a cultivated shoot"; Sifanus went wrong in almost the same way in Amphilochius's oration on the Hypapante, at the words ἀσκητικὸν ἐγκαλλώπισμα, rendering "the ornament of the pursuit of virtue and the exercise of the mind" instead of "of those in training, the ascetic order". He is speaking of virginity, which in fact stands in that relation to ascetics and monks.
(printed under page 376)
(8) ‹anchor: Solitarium par turturum (lemma)› · call in col 743 (call not visible on this page foot)
Solitarium par turturum. De Joanne liquet ratio, cujus est abunde nota solitudo ac eremi incolatus : de Elisabetha non item. Putem ipsam quoque sic vocatam, quia tandem vitans Herodis persecutionem, ac cavens puero Joanni, in eremum secesserit, ubi etiam mortua sit. Cujus rei narratio habetur in apocrypho nomine Jacobi fratris Domini ; quando etiam refertur Zacharias Joannis pater in templo necatus, quod rogatus, sic fuga matris elapsum puerum non repraesentaverit.
"A solitary pair of turtle-doves." As for John the reason is clear, for his solitude and dwelling in the desert are abundantly known; not so for Elizabeth. I should think she too is so called because in the end, avoiding Herod's persecution and protecting the boy John, she withdrew into the desert, where she also died. The story is told in the apocryphal book under the name of James the Lord's brother, where it is also related that Zachary, John's father, was killed in the temple because, when asked, he did not produce the boy, who had thus escaped by his mother's flight.
(printed under page 376)
(9) ‹anchor: senectutis vulnus› · call in col 743 (so printed in the Latin; the matching Greek call there is (13))
Edit. πληρουμένην.
The edition reads πληρουμένην ("being fulfilled").
(printed under page 376)
(10) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Reg. πλαστουργόν.
The Royal manuscript reads πλαστουργόν ("fashioner").
(printed under page 376)
(11) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Γρ. χρυσοχόον.
Another reading (γράφεται): χρυσοχόον ("goldsmith").
(printed under page 376)
(12) ‹anchor: ὁ μηνυτὴς› · call in col 744 (printed in the Greek only)
Male edit. λῃστής.
The edition wrongly reads λῃστής ("robber").
(printed under page 376)
(13) ‹anchor: τοῦ γήρως ἡ τομή› · call in col 744 (in the Latin the call at "vulnus" is printed as (9))
Senectutis vulnus, τοῦ γήρως ἡ τομή. Riccardus in notis legit et exponit τοῦ γήρους · ἀπὸ τοῦ γήρους · quod est vox. Id vero contra codicum fidem, quibus est γήρως · ἀπὸ τοῦ, γῆρας, a quo etiam legi γήρους, cum in ms. tum apud Savilium. Nec illa oppositio quam Proclo tribuit, quadrat. Non enim infans Joannes locutus est, quando Zachariae loquela excisa fuit, sed longe post. Restituendum ergo ex nostro φυή pro φωνή · et retinendum τὸ γήρως · ut idem eo significet, quod antecedentibus et consequentibus omnibus, natum Joannem divino miraculo ex effetis parentibus ; eoque etiam posse divino miraculo nasci Dominum ex Virgine ; quo tota angeli ratiocinatio refertur. Longe ineptior erat illa conjugatio : ὁ λῃστής, τὸν κριτήν. Alia Joannis ad Dominum persona, quam furis ad judicem, a quo ut tali, nihil nisi poenam exspectare. Non ergo Joannes λῃστής, sed λῃστῶν μηνυτής, delator furum : cum peccatores ad Domini provocat tribunal, cujus toties comminatione terret. Devoraverat hoc Riccardus, qui tot locis culicem colat.
"The wound of old age", τοῦ γήρως ἡ τομή. Riccardi in his notes reads and explains τοῦ γήρους, from γῆρυς, which means "voice". But that is against the manuscripts, which have γήρως, from γῆρας ("old age"), from which I have also found γήρους read, both in the manuscript and in Savile. Nor does the antithesis he attributes to Proclus fit; for the infant John did not speak when Zachary's speech was cut off, but long after. So φυή ("growth") must be restored from our manuscript in place of φωνή ("voice"), and γήρως kept, so that it means the same as everything before and after: that John was born by a divine miracle of parents past bearing, and that therefore the Lord too could be born of a Virgin by a divine miracle, to which the angel's whole argument is directed. That pairing ὁ λῃστής, τὸν κριτήν ("the robber, the judge") was far more inept. John's role towards the Lord is other than a thief's towards a judge, from whom, being such, he can expect nothing but punishment. So John is not a λῃστής but a λῃστῶν μηνυτής, an informer against thieves, when he summons sinners to the Lord's tribunal, with whose threat he so often terrifies them. Riccardi, who strains at a gnat in so many places, had swallowed this.
(printed under page 376)
(14) ‹anchor: ἡ φυή› · call in col 744 (printed in the Greek only)
Edit. ἡ φωνή.
The edition reads ἡ φωνή ("the voice").
(printed under page 376)
(15) ‹anchor: τοῦ νηπίου› · call in col 744 (printed in the Greek only)
Edit. τῶν νηπίων.
The edition reads τῶν νηπίων ("of the infants").
(printed under page 376)
(16) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Edit. ὁμολογεῖν.
The edition reads ὁμολογεῖν ("to confess").
(printed under page 377)
(72) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 746
Cant. II, 13.
Song of Songs 2:13.
(printed under page 377)
(17) ‹anchor: Nec sicut nos angeli (lemma)› · call in col 746 (call not visible on this page foot)
Nec sicut nos angeli, μὴ καθ' ἡμᾶς τοὺς ἀγγέλους. Male Riccardus : per nos angelos. Proponit in exemplum modum quo ipsi divina accipiunt ἁπλάστως, simpliciter ; abjectis nimirum terrenorum rationibus ac imaginibus, Deoque mentem his liberam devote accommodando : seu etiam sincere, ingenue.
"Nor as we angels do", μὴ καθ' ἡμᾶς τοὺς ἀγγέλους. Riccardi wrongly: "through us angels". He offers as an example the way the angels themselves receive divine things ἁπλάστως, simply: that is, setting aside the reasonings and images of earthly things, and devoutly applying to God a mind free of them; or else sincerely, candidly.
(printed under page 377)
(18) ‹anchor: Interminata inquirere (lemma)› · call in col 746 (call not visible on this page foot)
Interminata inquirere, πολυπραγμονεῖν τὰ ἀπέραντα. Alludit plane ad illud I Tim. I, 4, γενεαλογίαις ἀπεράντοις, quod ego cum Estio lubens explicem, infiniti laboris et operae, et in quibus frustra quis insudet.
"To pry into things without end", πολυπραγμονεῖν τὰ ἀπέραντα. He plainly alludes to 1 Timothy 1:4, γενεαλογίαις ἀπεράντοις ("endless genealogies"), which I would gladly explain with Estius as things of infinite labour and toil, over which one sweats in vain.
(printed under page 377)
(73) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 747
Matth. XVII, 26.
Matthew 17:26.
(printed under page 378)
(74) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 747
Luc. IX, 58.
Luke 9:58.
(printed under page 378)
(75) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 747
Joan. I, 29.
John 1:29.
(printed under page 378)
(76) ‹anchor: nasci parvulum› · call in col 747
Isa. IX, 6.
Isaiah 9:6.
(printed under page 378)
(77) ‹anchor: carnalis cogitationis› · call in col 747
Isa. LII, 1, 2.
Isaiah 52:1–2.
(printed under page 378)
(19) ‹anchor: Quae evacuatur (lemma)› · call in col 747 (call not visible on this page foot)
Quae evacuatur, τὸ καταργούμενον. Verba sunt Pauli II Cor. III, 7, pie a Proclo detorta ad suum propositum : sed Riccardo obscurata.
"Which is done away", τὸ καταργούμενον. These are Paul's words, 2 Corinthians 3:7, piously bent by Proclus to his own purpose, but obscured by Riccardi.
(printed under page 378)
(20) ‹anchor: quod ego testator› · call in col 747
Quod ego testator, ἐμοῦ διατιθεμένου. Alludit ad Apostolum (Hebr. IX, 15) : Ubi enim testamentum est, mors intercedat necesse est testatoris. Romanus codex mutilus erat et vitiosus, unde non mirum ut nihil ex eo sani Riccardus reddiderit.
"Because I, the testator", ἐμοῦ διατιθεμένου. He alludes to the Apostle (Heb. 9:15): "For where there is a testament, the death of the testator must of necessity intervene." The Roman manuscript was mutilated and faulty, so it is no wonder Riccardi rendered nothing sound from it.
(printed under page 378)
(21) ‹anchor: tanquam non esset› · call in col 747
Nasci parvulum tanquam non esset, καὶ τίκτεται ὡς μὴ ὤν, παιδίον. Sic ipsemet bene distinguit Riccardus, at perperam reddit, aut certe obscurius : Nasci eum, qui parvulus non est. Clare Proclus, ut et Patres alii, illis vocibus (Isa. IX, 6) : Natus parvulus ; et, datus Filius : declaratas vult ambas Christi rationes ; quarum altera, cum non esset, nascitur in tempore, pro communi ratione creaturae : altera ab aeterno exsistens, per effectum temporalem datur.
"A little child is born as one who was not", καὶ τίκτεται ὡς μὴ ὤν, παιδίον. Riccardi himself punctuates it rightly so, but renders it wrongly, or at least obscurely: "that he is born who is not a little one". Proclus, like other Fathers, plainly means that by those words (Isa. 9:6), "a little child is born" and "a Son is given", both aspects of Christ are declared: in the one, not having been, he is born in time, in the common manner of a creature; in the other, existing from eternity, he is given by a temporal effect.
(printed under page 378)
(22) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Reg. ἐπιβῶ.
The Royal manuscript reads ἐπιβῶ ("I tread upon").
(printed under page 378)
(23) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Reg. περιλήψεσθαι.
The Royal manuscript reads περιλήψεσθαι ("to be going to embrace").
(printed under page 378)
(24) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Edit. ἄναρχον.
The edition reads ἄναρχον ("without beginning").
(printed under page 378)
(25) ‹anchor: καινῷ μνήματι› · call in col 748 (printed in the Greek only)
Reg. μνημείῳ.
The Royal manuscript reads μνημείῳ ("tomb").
(printed under page 378)
(26) ‹anchor: γεύσασθαι μὴ δυναμένου› · call in col 748 (printed in the Greek only)
Edit. male δυναμένους, reliquis mutilis.
The edition wrongly reads δυναμένους, with the rest mutilated.
(printed under page 378)
(27) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Male edit. τῆς φωτιστικῆς.
The edition wrongly reads τῆς φωτιστικῆς ("of the illuminating").
(printed under page 379)
(28) ‹anchor: τὴν νεαρὰν› · call in col 749 (printed in the Greek only)
Edit. male νοερόν.
The edition wrongly reads νοερόν ("intellectual").
(printed under page 379)
(29) ‹anchor: τοῦ δικαίου› · call in col 749 (printed in the Greek only)
Male edit. οὐ δικαίου.
The edition wrongly reads οὐ δικαίου ("not just").
(printed under page 379)
(30) ‹anchor: μὴ ἄπρακτον› · call in col 749 (printed in the Greek only)
Edit. ἄπρατον.
The edition reads ἄπρατον ("unsold").
(printed under page 379)
(31) ‹anchor: Ἀντιταξώμεθα› · call in col 749 (printed in the Greek only)
Reg. ἀντιτάξωμεν.
The Royal manuscript reads ἀντιτάξωμεν (active voice, "let us set against").
(printed under page 379)
(32) ‹anchor: βαρυτάτην κείμεθα τιμωρίαν› · call in col 749 (printed in the Greek only)
Edit. πονηρίαν.
The edition reads πονηρίαν ("wickedness").
(printed under page 379)
(33) ‹anchor: καὶ ἴδωμεν› · call in col 749 (printed in the Greek only)
Edit. ἴδωμεν καί.
The edition reads ἴδωμεν καί ("let us see and").
(printed under page 379)
(34) ‹anchor: τὴν παιδοποιίαν ἐνεπορεύσατο› · call in col 749 (printed in the Greek only)
Edit. ἐπριᾶτο.
The edition reads ἐπριᾶτο ("bought").
(printed under page 379)
(35) ‹anchor: καὶ ἡ χώρα› · call in col 749 (printed in the Greek only)
Reg. χαρά.
The Royal manuscript reads χαρά ("joy").
(printed under page 379)
(78) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 751
I Cor. XV, 49.
1 Corinthians 15:49.
(printed under page 380)
(79) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 751
Gen. III, 6.
Genesis 3:6.
(printed under page 380)
(36) ‹anchor: Ab instruendis insidiis destiterimus (lemma)› · call in col 751 (call not visible on this page foot)
Ab instruendis insidiis destiterimus. ἀποστῶμεν τῆς ἐπιβουλῆς. Restituenda interrogatio ex ms. reg. ut sint verba cohortantis, uti et sequentia, male a Riccardo detorta.
"Shall we have ceased from laying snares?" ἀποστῶμεν τῆς ἐπιβουλῆς. The question must be restored from the Royal manuscript, so that these are the words of one exhorting, like what follows, which Riccardi wrongly twisted.
(printed under page 380)
(37) ‹anchor: Mulier illa terreni (lemma)› · call in col 751 (call not visible on this page foot)
Mulier illa terreni, τοῦ χοϊκοῦ. Quem opponit τῷ, τοῦ ἐπουρανίου · mutuatus verba Pauli I Cor. XV, 49. Nonnihil luxata verba Rom. codicis Riccardum deceperunt, ut aliter redderet. Quod sequitur, αὕτη καὶ τὴν διήγησιν ἐβδελύξατο · dissimulantius mollit, reddendo : Ista etiam ad nuntiantis verba commota. Significat Proclus, repudiasse Mariam, animoque abominatam fuisse angelicam salutationem, nec ei facilem aures accommodasse, insidias veritam Evae similes, usque dum plene instructa fuit, ac vere Dei nuntium agnovit ; quod ipsum Andreas Cretensis magnae in femina virtutis tradit, Orat. in Annuntiat., ac est revera, sexu ad fidem leviori.
"That woman of the earthy one", τοῦ χοϊκοῦ, which he sets against τοῦ ἐπουρανίου ("of the heavenly one"), borrowing Paul's words, 1 Corinthians 15:49. The somewhat dislocated words of the Roman manuscript misled Riccardi into rendering otherwise. What follows, αὕτη καὶ τὴν διήγησιν ἐβδελύξατο ("she even loathed the account"), he softens evasively, rendering "she too was moved at the messenger's words". Proclus means that Mary rejected the angelic salutation and abhorred it in her mind, and did not readily lend it her ears, fearing a snare like Eve's, until she had been fully instructed and truly recognized God's messenger. Andrew of Crete records this very thing as a mark of great virtue in a woman (Oration on the Annunciation), and so it truly is, in a sex quicker to believe.
(printed under page 380)
(38) ‹anchor: corruptionem adiret› · call in col 751
Cum corruptionem adiret, μεταλαβοῦσα τῆς φθορᾶς. Cum sumeret quod ad interitum erat, nempe fructum ligni vetiti ; ut ubique currant quaesitae illae Procli antitheses, restituto textu, ubi menda obscurabant. Quod statim sequitur, αὕτη τῆς θείας χαρᾶς ἐντὸς γενηθεῖσα, verba illa respicit (Matth. XXV, 21, 23) : Intra in gaudium Domini tui. Ut velit significare immensum quoddam Mariae gaudium ab illapsu Domini in eam, quale fere erit beatorum. Riccardus nihil exprimit.
"When she came to corruption", μεταλαβοῦσα τῆς φθορᾶς: when she took what led to destruction, namely the fruit of the forbidden tree; so that, with the text restored where errors obscured it, Proclus's studied antitheses run smoothly throughout. What follows at once, αὕτη τῆς θείας χαρᾶς ἐντὸς γενηθεῖσα ("she, having come within the divine joy"), looks to the words (Matt. 25:21, 23) "Enter into the joy of your Lord", meaning an immense joy of Mary at the Lord's descent into her, almost such as the joy of the blessed will be. Riccardi expresses none of this.
(printed under page 380)
(39) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Male edit. ἀρχόμεθα κελεύειν.
The edition wrongly reads ἀρχόμεθα κελεύειν ("we begin to command").
(printed under page 380)
(40) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Male edit. γυνὴ τῶν ὀφθαλμῶν τοῦ χοϊκοῦ.
The edition wrongly reads γυνὴ τῶν ὀφθαλμῶν τοῦ χοϊκοῦ ("the woman of the eyes of the earthy one").
(printed under page 380)
(41) ‹anchor: τῆς φθορᾶς› · call in col 752 (in the Latin the call is printed at "adiret", note 38)
Male edit. τῆς οὐδεμιᾶς φθορᾶς.
The edition wrongly reads τῆς οὐδεμιᾶς φθορᾶς ("of no corruption").
(printed under page 380)
(42) ‹anchor: κυβερνήτην καταλάβωμεν› · call in col 752 (printed in the Greek only)
Edit. ὑπολάβωμεν.
The edition reads ὑπολάβωμεν ("suppose").
(printed under page 380)
(43) ‹anchor: συκοφαντικοῖς πλήξομεν› · call in col 752 (printed in the Greek only)
Edit. πλήττωμεν.
The edition reads πλήττωμεν ("let us strike").
(printed under page 380)
(44) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Edit. συνηγοροῦντες.
The edition reads συνηγοροῦντες ("pleading on behalf").
(printed under page 381)
(80) ‹anchor: nardi pistici alabastrum› · call in col 754
Joan. XII, 3.
John 12:3.
(printed under page 381)
(81) ‹anchor: spiritu sanctificata› · call in col 754
I Cor. VII, 34.
1 Corinthians 7:34.
(printed under page 381)
(45) ‹anchor: Injustum judicium judicare festinant (lemma)› · call in col 754 (call not visible on this page foot)
Injustum judicium judicare festinant. Ad haec verba Riccardus : Mire premit Nestorianos, quos a diabolo excitatos inducit. Nihil tamen Proclus hoc loco adversus Nestorianos disputat, sed Judaeos tantum perstringit, quorum etiam in terminis meminit, et in quos tota haec quadrat diabolica peroratio, ne minimum vero in Nestorianos : atque ut quis attentius perspiciat, viderit omnino respicere inductam Mariae accusationem, quam habet liber apocryphus Jacobi fratris Domini nomine, qua molitus sit diabolus Mariam perdere, atque in ea conceptum coeleste margaritum, antequam maturum tempore in lucem prodiret. Sic ergo agebat diabolus per Judaeos, ἵν' ἀφανισθῇ τὸ ἄσπιλον ὄστρεον · non quod frigide et indigne Procli interprete reddit Riccardus, ut delitescat incontaminata ostrea, quod nihil impediret margariti in ea τελεσφόρησιν · velut, maturo partu editionem : sed, ut deleretur ac exterminio daretur ; prout delebantur, qui rei criminis redargutionis aquas illas potassent. Nunquid vero Nestoriani de delenda sic Maria ac fetu in ea perdendo, post quadringentos annos ab ejus editione ac partu, cogitaverunt ? Nunquid priores Herode in Mariam ac prolem ii debaccharunt, cujus Proclus conatum a diabolo provocatum subjungit, ubi prior ille non successisset, et ut editus in lucem Dominus Jesus per eum periret, qui in utero exstingui nequivisset ? Facessant rogo istae naeniae, sibique ipsos patres sinamus. Et ut synopsi proponam quid tot dialogismis agat Proclus, noveris esse quatuor : primo enarrat quid inter Mariam ac Joseph intercedere potuit sermonis, in ea hypothesi, ut vir beatus toto conceptionis tempore animi anxius fuerit, nec satis rei sacramentum noverit. Secundo explicat, quid inter eamdem Mariam et angelum nuntiantem, cum necdum omnino persuasa crederet ; non quidem ullo modo dubia de Dei potentia, sed de nuntio an esset a Deo, deque modo implendae rei, non violato voto. Tertio, quid specie increpationis intus animo Dominus insonaret inter eas moras, et dum prudens Virgo post verba Gabrielis assensum libraret. Quarto denique edisserit diaboli querelas post divinam Virginis conceptionem, ejusque in eam ac prolem machinamenta, cum per se subjectosque daemonum populos, tum per Judaeos primum ac ante partum, postmodumque ac brevi a partu, per Herodem : nihil ad alios Christi ac Mariae hostes progressus, vel Nestorianos, vel Helvidianos, a quibus tamen videri possit cavere, expositione loci Matthaei, quo perpetua Mariae virginitas videri posset impeti. Similem prosopopoeiam Mariae et Joseph habet Athanasius hom. in censum sanctae Mariae ; nec ea displicet, quidquid in eam loquatur Holstenius.
"They hasten to pass an unjust judgement." At these words Riccardi: "He presses the Nestorians wonderfully, bringing them in as stirred up by the devil." Yet Proclus here disputes nothing against the Nestorians; he only censures the Jews, whom he even names explicitly, and whom this whole diabolical peroration fits, but not in the least the Nestorians. Anyone who looks more closely will see that it plainly refers to the accusation brought against Mary that the apocryphal book under the name of James the Lord's brother contains, by which the devil schemed to destroy Mary, and in her the heavenly pearl conceived, before it should come to light in due time. So the devil was acting through the Jews, ἵν' ἀφανισθῇ τὸ ἄσπιλον ὄστρεον: not, as Riccardi renders it, coldly and unworthily of Proclus, "that the spotless oyster may lie hidden", which would in no way hinder the τελεσφόρησις of the pearl in it, the bringing forth at a ripe birth; but "that it might be blotted out and given over to destruction", as those were destroyed who, guilty of a crime, had drunk those waters of conviction. Did the Nestorians, four hundred years after her childbirth, think of so destroying Mary and the child in her? Did they, before Herod, rage against Mary and her child? Proclus adds Herod's attempt, provoked by the devil, when that first attempt had failed, that the Lord Jesus, once born, might perish by him who could not be extinguished in the womb. Away, I beg, with these trifles, and let us leave the Fathers to themselves. To set out in a synopsis what Proclus is doing in so many dialogues, know that there are four things. First he relates what conversation could have passed between Mary and Joseph, on the supposition that the blessed man was anxious in mind through the whole time of the conception and did not sufficiently understand the mystery. Second he sets out what passed between the same Mary and the announcing angel, when she did not yet believe, being not wholly persuaded; not in any way doubting God's power, but whether the messenger was from God, and how the thing would be accomplished without breaking her vow. Third, what the Lord inwardly sounded in her soul, in the manner of a rebuke, during that delay, while the prudent Virgin weighed her assent after Gabriel's words. Fourth and last, he sets out the devil's complaints after the Virgin's divine conception, and his machinations against her and her child, both by himself and by the hosts of demons subject to him, and through the Jews, first, before the birth, and afterwards, soon after the birth, through Herod. He goes on to none of the other enemies of Christ and Mary, neither Nestorians nor Helvidians, though he might seem to guard against these by his exposition of the passage of Matthew by which Mary's perpetual virginity might seem to be attacked. Athanasius has a similar dramatized speech of Mary and Joseph in the homily On the census of holy Mary; nor is it displeasing, whatever Holstenius may say against it.
(printed under page 381)
(46) ‹anchor: altare holocautomatum› · call in col 754
Aureum altare holocautomatum. Videtur Proclus confundere altare incensi quod erat aureum, in quo solum adolebatur thymiama, cum altari quod erat ante portam tabernaculi, in quo victimae et ὁλοκαυτώματα offerebantur ac cremabantur, quod ex terra et impolitis lapidibus exstructum, non laminis aureis vestitum erat, sed aeneis ; quocirca putem scripsisse χαλκοῦν, ex quo antiquarii exscripserint χρυσοῦν, nisi pro ὁλοκαυτωμάτων, scripserat θυμιαμάτων, quod magis probo.
"Golden altar of holocausts." Proclus seems to confuse the altar of incense, which was golden and on which only incense was burned, with the altar before the door of the tabernacle, on which victims and ὁλοκαυτώματα (whole burnt offerings) were offered and burned, which was built of earth and unhewn stones and overlaid not with plates of gold but of bronze. So I should think he wrote χαλκοῦν ("bronze"), from which copyists wrote χρυσοῦν ("golden"); unless for ὁλοκαυτωμάτων he had written θυμιαμάτων ("of incense"), which I prefer.
(printed under page 381)
(47) ‹anchor: aureum candelabrum› · call in col 754
Aureum candelabrum. Riccardus candelabrum in lucernam mutat : sed piget plura ejus notare : tu, lector, ex paucis istis, alia toto opere, ubi nihil moneo, cautum nova versione putans, conji[…]
"Golden lampstand." Riccardi changes the lampstand into a lamp; but I am loath to note more of his errors. You, reader, from these few, conje[cture] the rest throughout the work where I give no warning, considering yourself safeguarded by the new version. [The last word is cut off at the foot of the page image.]
(printed under page 381)
(82) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 755
Hebr. IX, 4.
Hebrews 9:4.
(printed under page 382)
(83) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 755
ibid. 13.
Same chapter, verse 13.
(printed under page 382)
(84) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 755
Ezech. XLIV, 1.
Ezekiel 44:1.
(printed under page 382)
(85) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 755
Isa. VIII, 1.
Isaiah 8:1.
(printed under page 382)
(86) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 755
Matth. XIII, 33.
Matthew 13:33.
(printed under page 382)
(87) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 755
Gen. XXVII, 27.
Genesis 27:27.
(printed under page 382)
(88) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 755
III Reg. X, 22.
3 Kings (1 Kings) 10:22.
(printed under page 382)
(89) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 755
Cant. V, 3.
Song of Songs 5:3.
(printed under page 382)
(90) ‹anchor: per primiparas juvencas› · call in col 755
I Reg. VII, 7.
1 Kings (1 Samuel) 7:7 (so printed; the two milch cows drawing the ark are at 1 Sam. 6:7).
(printed under page 382)
(91) ‹anchor: salvatur Pharaone› · call in col 755
Exod. II, 3.
Exodus 2:3.
(printed under page 382)
(92) ‹anchor: veri jurisjurandi› · call in col 755
Gen. XXV, 32.
Genesis 25:32.
(printed under page 382)
(93) ‹anchor: circa undecimam› · call in col 755
Matth. X, 1.
Matthew 10:1 (so printed; the labourers in the vineyard are Matt. 20:1).
(printed under page 382)
(94) ‹anchor: e coelo descendens› · call in col 755
Judic. VII, 37.
Judges 7:37 (so printed; Gideon's fleece is Judg. 6:37).
(printed under page 382)
(48) ‹anchor: matri ipsi lactanti› · call in col 755 (the Greek call at this place, αὐτῇ, is (53))
Matri ipsi lactanti. Deesse particulas quas hic descripsi, suadet tum series, et quia alioqui vitiosus est textus, tum Moysis historia, in qua filia Pharaonis matri ipsi Moysis vocatae ad alendum ac lactandum puerum, mercedem promittit. Velit forte Proclus allegoria, esse hanc Moysis matrem, Synagogam, sive Judaicum populum, cui gentium Ecclesia, ut velit Moysen lactare, id est, ad Christum converti, vitam aeternam promittat.
"To the nursing mother herself." That the words I have written here are missing is suggested both by the sequence, since otherwise the text is faulty, and by the story of Moses, in which Pharaoh's daughter promises wages to Moses' own mother, called to nurse and suckle the child. Perhaps Proclus means by the allegory that this mother of Moses is the Synagogue, or the Jewish people, to whom the Church of the Gentiles promises eternal life if it will suckle Moses, that is, be converted to Christ.
(printed under page 382)
(49) ‹anchor: immortalitatis aqua› · call in col 755
Immortalitatis aqua effluxit, ἔβρυσεν ἀθανασίας ὕδωρ. Palam approbat Proclus, quam Hieronymus probat lectionem, et habent Vulg. ac Hebr. (Gen. XXV, 32) : Invenimus aquam : cum Graeca habeant negativam : Non invenimus aquam.
"The water of immortality flowed out", ἔβρυσεν ἀθανασίας ὕδωρ. Proclus plainly approves the reading that Jerome approves, found in the Vulgate and the Hebrew (Gen. 25:32 [so printed; the well is at 26:32]): "We have found water"; whereas the Greek has the negative: "We have not found water."
(printed under page 382)
(50) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Male edit. προενεμήθη.
The edition wrongly reads προενεμήθη ("was allotted beforehand").
(printed under page 382)
(51) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call not visible (Greek variant)
Edit. πνευματικῆς.
The edition reads πνευματικῆς ("spiritual").
(printed under page 382)
(52) ‹anchor: Θεὸς ὢν› · call in col 756 (printed in the Greek only)
Reg. νέος ὤν.
The Royal manuscript reads νέος ὤν ("being young / new").
(printed under page 382)
(53) ‹anchor: δώσειν αὐτῇ› · call in col 756 (in the Latin the call at this place is (48))
Ἴσ. τῇ τεκούσῃ καὶ θηλαζούσῃ.
Perhaps (ἴσως) τῇ τεκούσῃ καὶ θηλαζούσῃ ("to her who bore and nursed him").
(printed under page 382)
(54) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot (presumably the oration's title)› · call not visible
Theophaniorum dies nonnullis ipse est dies natalitiorum Christi, quod in eo Christus se in carne mundo exhibuerit : communiori tamen usu significat diem Epiphaniorum ac Luminum, nempe diem Christi baptismo sacrum, quomodo accipit Proclus sua hac oratione, quam iterum paucis quibusdam auctam ac emendatam ex Regio codice damus.
For some, the day of the Theophany is the very day of Christ's birth, because on it Christ showed himself to the world in the flesh; but in more common usage it means the day of the Epiphany and of the Lights, that is, the day sacred to Christ's baptism. So Proclus takes it in this oration of his, which we give again, enlarged by a few passages and corrected from the Royal manuscript.
(printed under page 383)
(95) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 758
Psal. LI, 10.
Psalm 51:10.
(printed under page 383)
(96) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 758
Gen. II, 9.
Genesis 2:9.
(printed under page 383)
(97) ‹anchor not visible on this page foot› · call in col 758
Luc. I, 35.
Luke 1:35.
(printed under page 383)
(98) ‹anchor: in Oriente emicans› · call in col 758
Matth. II, 2.
Matthew 2:2.
(printed under page 383)
(99) ‹anchor: testimonium defert› · call in col 758
Matth. III, 7.
Matthew 3:7 (so printed; the Father's voice at the baptism is Matt. 3:17).
(printed under page 383)
(55) ‹anchor: Mundi peccatum suscepit› · call in col 758
Mundi peccatum suscepit, ἀνέλαβε. Sic infra ait : ἀνέλαβε τὴν τοῦ δούλου μορφήν · suscepit formam servi. Sed cum de peccato agitur, exponenda potius quam extendenda est propositio, ut peccatum intelligat, poenas peccatis nostris debitas : juxta quod dicitur (Isa. LIII, 4) : Ipse iniquitates nostras portat.
"He took up the sin of the world", ἀνέλαβε. So he says below: ἀνέλαβε τὴν τοῦ δούλου μορφήν, "he took up the form of a servant". But where sin is concerned, the statement must be explained rather than stretched, so that by "sin" he means the penalties owed for our sins, according to the saying (Isa. 53:4): "He bears our iniquities."
(printed under page 383)
(1) · call in col 759
Psal. CXVII, 26.
Psalm 117 (118):26.
(printed under page 384)
(2) · call in col 759
ibid. 27.
The same, verse 27.
(printed under page 384)
(3) ‹anchor: omnibus hominibus, erudiens nos› · call in col 759
Tit. II, 11.
Titus 2:11.
(printed under page 384)
(4) ‹anchor: formam servi accipere› · call in col 759
Philipp. II, 7.
Philippians 2:7.
(printed under page 384)
(5) ‹anchor: ut baptizaretur ab eo› · call in col 759
Matth. III, 13.
Matthew 3:13.
(printed under page 384)
(56) · call in col 761 (Greek)
Edit. γῆν.
The edition reads γῆν ("earth").
(printed under page 385)
(57) ‹anchor: ἐξ ἀλοχεύτου› · call in col 761 (Greek)
Edit. ἀσπόρου.
The edition reads ἀσπόρου ("unsown").
(printed under page 385)
(58) · call in col 761 (Greek)
Quae meam virtutem excedunt, τὰ ὑπὲρ δύναμιν. Addidi necessaria haec ex Reg. cod. in quo vicissim aberant illa, ταῦτα οὐ δύναμαι· quibus utrisque integra est littera.
"Things which exceed my power", τὰ ὑπὲρ δύναμιν. I have added these necessary words from the Royal manuscript, in which, in turn, the words ταῦτα οὐ δύναμαι ("these things I cannot") were missing; with both together the text is complete.
(printed under page 385)
(6) · call in col 762
I Petr. II, 22.
1 Peter 2:22.
(printed under page 385)
(7) · call in col 762
Luc. I, 44.
Luke 1:44.
(printed under page 385)
(8) ‹anchor: Sodomitas illos me exurat› · call in col 762
Gen. XIX, 24.
Genesis 19:24.
(printed under page 385)
(9) ‹anchor: Abironque deglutiet› · call in col 762
Num. XVI, 31.
Numbers 16:31.
(printed under page 385)
(10) ‹anchor: et tu venis ad me› · call in col 762
Matth. III, 14.
Matthew 3:14.
(printed under page 385)
(11) ‹anchor: Domino, quoniam bonus› · call in col 762
Psal. CV, 1.
Psalm 105 (106):1.
(printed under page 385)
(12) ‹anchor: In aeternum misericordia ejus› · call in col 762
ibid.
The same place.
(printed under page 385)
(13) ‹anchor: et apparuit nobis› · call in col 762
Psal. CVII, 26.
Psalm 107, verse 26 [as printed; the verse quoted is Psalm 117 (118):26].
(printed under page 385)
(14) · call in col 763
Matth. III, 17.
Matthew 3:17.
(printed under page 386)
(15) ‹anchor: transfigurationis testes assumentem spectemus› · call in col 763
Matth. XVII, 1; Luc. IX, 18.
Matthew 17:1; Luke 9:18 [as read; the transfiguration is Luke 9:28].
(printed under page 386)
(16) ‹anchor: paschalem agnum mactavit› · call in col 763
Exod. XII, 5.
Exodus 12:5.
(printed under page 386)
(17) ‹anchor: igne consumpsit› · call in col 763
III Reg. VIII, 33.
3 Kings (1 Kings) 8:33 [as read; Elijah's sacrifice is 3 Kings 18:33].
(printed under page 386)
(18) ‹anchor: reseravit et clausit› · call in col 763
Exod. XIV, 11.
Exodus 14:11 [as read; the parting of the sea is 14:21].
(printed under page 386)
(19) ‹anchor: cohibuit effuditque› · call in col 763
III Reg. XVII, 1.
3 Kings (1 Kings) 17:1.
(printed under page 386)
(20) ‹anchor: terrestrium et infernorum› · call in col 763
Philipp. II, 10.
Philippians 2:10.
(printed under page 386)
(59) · call in col 763
Exstat in Reg. cod. inscripta Chrysostomo, ex quo mihi exscripseram. Edidit Savilius inter ejus νοθευόμενα, ac ei falso ascripta. Codices alii vindicant Proclo, e quibus Romana editio, ac Lugduno-Batava. — Vide Montfauconium in indice Chrysost. tom. XIII, v. Δεῦτε.
It survives in the Royal manuscript under the name of Chrysostom, from which I had copied it out. Savile published it among his spurious works, falsely ascribed to him. Other manuscripts claim it for Proclus, and from them come the Roman edition and the Leiden edition. — See Montfaucon in the index to Chrysostom, vol. XIII, under the word Δεῦτε.
(printed under page 386)
(60) ‹anchor: ascendit in montem excelsum› · call in col 763
In montem excelsum. Non habet Lucae Evangelium vocem excelsum, ex quo tamen auctor citat: sed Matthaeus et Marcus, ut forte lapsus sit memoria. Nec enim promptum ad fidem, ut ea vox ex Lucae codice exciderit.
"Into a high mountain." Luke's Gospel, from which the author is nevertheless quoting, does not have the word "high"; Matthew and Mark have it, so that perhaps his memory slipped. For it is not easy to believe that the word has fallen out of the text of Luke.
(printed under page 386)
(61) ‹anchor: Petrus, Jacobus et Joannes› · call in col 763
Ut Petrus, Jacobus, etc., ἵνα οἱ περὶ Πέτρον, καὶ Ἰάκωβον, καὶ Ἰωάννην μάθωσι. Praefert Riccardus lectionem Vat. codicis ἵνα μάθωμεν, ut nos qui, etc., valde id frivola ratione, quia scilicet nulli erant in monte praeter istos tres, qui discere haberent eam Christi excellentiam: quasi ea verba non eosdem ipsos significent, idque admodum trita phrasi, sacris pariter ac profanis scriptoribus. Joan. XI, 19: Ἐληλύθεισαν πρὸς τὰς περὶ τὴν Μάρθαν καὶ Μαρίαν· venerunt ad Martham et Mariam. Vertisset Riccardus, ad Marthae et Mariae ancillas, vel quid simile: quod longe absurdum est.
"That Peter, James," etc.: ἵνα οἱ περὶ Πέτρον, καὶ Ἰάκωβον, καὶ Ἰωάννην μάθωσι. Riccardi prefers the reading of the Vatican manuscript, ἵνα μάθωμεν, "that we who," etc., and on a very frivolous ground: namely, that there was no one on the mountain besides those three who could learn that excellence of Christ — as if those words did not mean the very same men, and that in a well-worn phrase, used by sacred and profane writers alike. John 11:19: Ἐληλύθεισαν πρὸς τὰς περὶ τὴν Μάρθαν καὶ Μαρίαν, "they came to Martha and Mary." Riccardi would have translated "to the maidservants of Martha and Mary", or something of the kind, which is quite absurd.
(printed under page 386)
(62) ‹anchor: πατάξας διῆλθε› · call in col 765 (Greek)
Al. διεῖλε.
Another reading: διεῖλε ("divided").
(printed under page 387)
(21) · call in col 766
Joan. XVII, 11.
John 17:11.
(printed under page 387)
(22) · call in col 766
Matth. XVII, 2, 3.
Matthew 17:2–3.
(printed under page 387)
(23) ‹anchor: nesciens quid diceret› · call in col 766
Luc. IX, 33.
Luke 9:33.
(printed under page 387)
(24) ‹anchor: divisit trajecitque› · call in col 766
Exod. XIV, 21.
Exodus 14:21.
(printed under page 387)
(25) ‹anchor: profundum pervium fecit› · call in col 766
Matth. XIV, 25.
Matthew 14:25.
(printed under page 387)
(26) ‹anchor: farinam et oleum multiplicavit› · call in col 766
III Reg. XVII, 14.
3 Kings (1 Kings) 17:14.
(printed under page 387)
(27) · call in col 767
Matth. XIV, 15.
Matthew 14:15.
(printed under page 388)
(28) · call in col 767
Coloss. III, 2.
Colossians 3:2.
(printed under page 388)
(29) · call in col 767
Gen. III,
Genesis 3 [no verse printed].
(printed under page 388)
(30) · call in col 767
Gen. IV, 12.
Genesis 4:12.
(printed under page 388)
(31) · call in col 767
Psal. XVII, 10.
Psalm 17 (18):10.
(printed under page 388)
(32) · call in col 767
Heb. II, 14.
Hebrews 2:14.
(printed under page 388)
(33) ‹anchor: in lumine. Ipse namque … sicut vestimento› · call in col 767
Psal. CIII, 2.
Psalm 103 (104):2.
(printed under page 388)
(34) ‹anchor: vivorum judex exsistens atque mortuorum› · call in col 767
Act. X, 42.
Acts 10:42.
(printed under page 388)
(35) ‹anchor: ipsum audite› · call in col 767
Matth. XVII, 5.
Matthew 17:5.
(printed under page 388)
(36) ‹anchor: Christus Filius Dei vivi› · call in col 767
Matth. XVI, 16.
Matthew 16:16.
(printed under page 388)
(63) ‹anchor: tu Bar Jona› · call in col 767
Tu Bar Jona. Sic fuit cognominatus Petrus a Domino, cum eum Dei Filium confessus esset (Matth. XVI, 16), sonatque ea vox filius columbae; ac sublimem ejus sensum designat cognoscenda deitate Christi. Simon autem est Hebr. שמע, quod est, audire, velut dicat, esse adhuc auditorem ac discipulum, quem divina scientissimum ac magistrum esse oporteret. Simili phrasi Asterius exhortatoria ad poenitentiam in excerptis Photianis τὸν ἀπόστολον, contraponit Simoni.
"You, Bar Jona." Peter was so surnamed by the Lord when he had confessed him to be the Son of God (Matt. 16:16), and the word means "son of the dove"; it marks the lofty understanding he showed in recognizing Christ's godhead. "Simon", on the other hand, is the Hebrew שמע, which means "to hear", as if to say that he who ought to be most learned in divine things, and a master, is still a hearer and a disciple. With a similar turn of phrase Asterius, in his exhortation to penance among the excerpts preserved by Photius, sets "the apostle" over against "Simon".
(printed under page 388)
(64) · call in col 768 (Greek)
Al. συρίσας.
Another reading: συρίσας ("having whistled").
(printed under page 388)
(65) · call in col 768 (Greek)
Reg. παρακοήν.
The Royal manuscript reads παρακοήν ("disobedience").
(printed under page 388)
(66) ‹anchor: ἐν φωτί› · call in col 768 (Greek)
Reg. φωνῇ.
The Royal manuscript reads φωνῇ ("with a voice").
(printed under page 388)
(67) ‹anchor: τὸ δὲ Ἑρμονιείμ› · call in col 769 (Greek)
Ἑρμών.
Hermon.
(printed under page 389)
(68) · call in col 769 (Greek)
Mecum omnia ante saecula condidit, πάντα σὺν ἐμοὶ πρὸ αἰώνων δημιουργήσαντι. Videtur locutio durior. Non enim omnia creata sunt πρὸ αἰώνων, sed potius ἐπ' αἰώνων· videturque Deo proprium, ut πρὸ αἰώνων exsistat, ac προαιώνιος, ante saecula et praeaeternus, ut auctor ipse saeculorum. Videtur Proclus condita accipere in decreto ac divina praefinitione: quae et ipsa suo modo creatio est, ac est praeaeterna: tametsi terminus est in tempore.
"Who with me made all things before the ages", πάντα σὺν ἐμοὶ πρὸ αἰώνων δημιουργήσαντι. The expression seems rather harsh. For not all things were created "before the ages" (πρὸ αἰώνων), but rather "in the ages" (ἐπ' αἰώνων); and it seems proper to God to exist before the ages, and to be προαιώνιος, "before the ages and pre-eternal", as himself the author of the ages. Proclus seems to take things made as made in the decree and divine predetermination, which is itself in its own way a creation, and is pre-eternal, although its term is in time.
(printed under page 389)
(37) · call in col 770
Matth. XXVI, 22.
Matthew 26:22.
(printed under page 389)
(38) · call in col 770
Matth. XXVI, 31, 33.
Matthew 26:31, 33.
(printed under page 389)
(39) · call in col 770
Isa. XLIV, 24.
Isaiah 44:24.
(printed under page 389)
(40) ‹anchor: qui descendit de caelo› · call in col 770
Joan. III, 13.
John 3:13.
(printed under page 389)
(41) ‹anchor: formam servi accipiens› · call in col 770
Philipp. II, 7.
Philippians 2:7.
(printed under page 389)
(42) ‹anchor: quae sunt Dei› · call in col 770
Matth. XVI, 23.
Matthew 16:23.
(printed under page 389)
(43) ‹anchor: in Jordane flumine› · call in col 770
Matth. III, 17.
Matthew 3:17.
(printed under page 389)
(44) ‹anchor: in nomine tuo exsultabunt› · call in col 770
Psal. LXXXVIII, 13.
Psalm 88 (89):13.
(printed under page 389)
(45) ‹anchor: super omne nomen› · call in col 770
Philipp. II, 8.
Philippians 2:8 [as printed; the words quoted are 2:9].
(printed under page 389)
(46) · call in col 771
Luc. IX, 26.
Luke 9:26.
(printed under page 390)
(47) · call in col 771
Rom. XI, 35.
Romans 11:35.
(printed under page 390)
(48) ‹anchor: nihil solliciti sitis› · call in col 771
Philipp. IV, 5.
Philippians 4:5.
(printed under page 390)
(49) ‹anchor: in die honeste ambulemus› · call in col 771
Rom. XIII, 12, 13.
Romans 13:12–13.
(printed under page 390)
(50) ‹anchor: quinque prudentes virgines› · call in col 771
Matth. XXV, 1.
Matthew 25:1.
(printed under page 390)
(51) ‹anchor: Christum vigiles suscipiamus› · call in col 771
Luc. XII, 35.
Luke 12:35.
(printed under page 390)
(52) ‹anchor: Mariae unguentum amplectamur› · call in col 771
Joan. XII, 3.
John 12:3.
(printed under page 390)
(53) ‹anchor: Rex Israel› · call in col 771
ibid. 13.
The same, verse 13.
(printed under page 390)
(54) ‹anchor: invocantibus eum in veritate› · call in col 771
Psal. CXLIV, 18.
Psalm 144 (145):18.
(printed under page 390)
(69) · call in col 771
Edidit Riccardus ex uno codice Cryptaeferr. Visum est pauca subinde emendare, eaque hic notare.
Riccardi published it from a single manuscript of Grottaferrata. It seemed good to emend a few things here and there, and to note them here.
(printed under page 390)
(70) ‹anchor: quinque prudentes virgines› · call in col 771
Perinde ac quinque prudentes virgines. Mutavi interpunctionem, ut ista de virginibus ad oleum spectent, quod praecipue commendatur in earum parabola, quo nimirum sapientes ac fatuae discretae habentur: non quia sine aliqua dormitatione exspectaverint sponsum. Ait enim evangelista (Matth. XXV, 5) exspectando, ac dum moram faceret, dormitasse omnes ac dormiisse. Potius ergo sequens colon aliam parabolam respicit, fidelis servi exspectantis dominum, ac exspectatione vigilis (Luc. XII, 35).
"Like the five wise virgins." I have changed the punctuation, so that these words about the virgins refer to the oil, which is what is chiefly commended in their parable, and by which, of course, the wise and the foolish are told apart — not because the wise awaited the bridegroom without any drowsiness. For the evangelist says (Matt. 25:5) that while they waited, and while he delayed, they all grew drowsy and slept. The following clause, then, rather looks to another parable, that of the faithful servant who awaits his master and is watchful in his waiting (Luke 12:35).
(printed under page 390)
(71) ‹anchor: Bene, qui venit› · call in col 771
Bene. Mutavi τὸ, καλός, in καλῶς. Liquet enim ut nihil in istis accurati sint antiquarii, utque hoc unum aptum sit, nec illud quidquam congruat. Perstringit, quod pluribus declaravit Orat. in sancta Theophania, ut Christus veniat semper, vel in se, vel in creatura, in qua per providentiam nobis praedicat; ut vel hoc indicio idem utriusque auctor eluceat. Notas fusiores si desideres, require in Riccardo: ego plerumque minus necessarias autumo.
"Well." I have changed καλός to καλῶς. For it is plain how careless the copyists are in such matters, and that this alone fits while the other does not agree at all. He touches briefly on what he set out at greater length in the Oration on the Holy Theophany: that Christ comes always, either in himself or in the creation, in which by his providence he preaches to us — so that by this sign, too, the same author of both may shine forth. If you want fuller notes, look for them in Riccardi; for my part I judge them for the most part not very necessary.
(printed under page 390)
(55) · call in col 774
Zach. IX, 9.
Zechariah 9:9.
(printed under page 391)
(56) · call in col 775
Joan. XII, 21.
John 12:21.
(printed under page 392)
(57) · call in col 775
Luc. XIX, 3.
Luke 19:3.
(printed under page 392)
(58) ‹anchor: ut clarificetur Filius hominis› · call in col 775
Joan. XII, 23.
John 12:23.
(printed under page 392)
(59) ‹anchor: ubi est timor meus› · call in col 775
Malach. I, 6.
Malachi 1:6.
(printed under page 392)
(72) ‹anchor: ἐπειγόμενοι› · call in col 776 (Greek)
Ἴσ. τῆς ὁδοῦ ἐπειγ.
Perhaps τῆς ὁδοῦ ἐπειγ[όμενοι] ("hastening on the road").
(printed under page 392)
(73) ‹anchor: τὸν σταυρὸν βαλών› · call in col 776 (Greek)
Leg. καλῶν
Read καλῶν ("calling").
(printed under page 392)
(74) · call in col 777 (Greek)
Exstant Chrysostomi, Cyrilli et aliorum in diem hanc sacratissimam tractatus egregii, quibus praecipue mysteriorum traditionem celebrant, id est, sacrae Eucharistiae sacramenti institutionem: qua de causa Proclus ipso statim initio appellat μυστηρίων πανήγυριν, mysteriorum celebritatem.
There survive excellent treatises of Chrysostom, Cyril and others on this most holy day, in which they chiefly celebrate the handing on of the mysteries, that is, the institution of the sacrament of the holy Eucharist; for which reason Proclus, at the very beginning, calls it μυστηρίων πανήγυριν, "the festival of the mysteries".
(printed under page 393)
(75) · call in col 777 (Greek)
Ἴσ. ψωμίον, ut ubique in seq. et apud Joan.
Perhaps ψωμίον ("morsel"), as everywhere in what follows and in John.
(printed under page 393)
(76) ‹anchor: ηὐτρέπισται κλῆρον› · call in col 777 (Greek)
Leg. ὁ οὐράνιος κλῆρος. Ἴσ. ηὐτρέπισμαι.
Read ὁ οὐράνιος κλῆρος ("the heavenly inheritance", nominative). Perhaps ηὐτρέπισμαι.
(printed under page 393)
(77) · call in col 777 (Greek)
Ab impuro gratiam revocaret. Velut nimirum eam purissimis suis labiis exsugendo. Sic Chryst. Orat. in descensum ad inferos: ἀσπάζομαί σε, Ἰούδα, οὐχ ἵνα ἀγάπην δωρήσωμαι, ἣν ἀπεβάλου· ἀλλ' ἵνα κενώσω τὴν χάριν, ἣν δέδωκά σοι. Osculor te, Juda, non ut charitatem tribuam quam amisisti; sed ut exhauriam gratiam quam tibi tribueram. Sic et Paulinus epist. XXII ad Severum. Paulo post male Riccardus exponit vocem τόλμαν, ut sit tolerantia. Esto enim eo sensu alibi exponi possit: at hic nihil ille congruit: sed quo communiter, facinus, atrox factum, ac similia redditur: μήνυμα αὐτῆς τῆς τόλμης· signum ipsius facinoris ac proditionis, osculum. Nolim otium terere notandis aliis.
"To recall the grace from the impure man": as if, that is, by drawing it out with his own most pure lips. So Chrysostom, in the Oration on the Descent into Hell: ἀσπάζομαί σε, Ἰούδα …, "I kiss you, Judas, not to bestow the love which you have cast away, but to drain out the grace which I had given you." So too Paulinus, Letter 22, to Severus. A little further on Riccardi wrongly explains the word τόλμα as meaning "endurance". Granted it may be explained in that sense elsewhere; here it does not fit at all, but rather the sense in which it is commonly rendered, "a crime", "an atrocious deed" and the like: μήνυμα αὐτῆς τῆς τόλμης, "the sign of the crime itself and of the betrayal", the kiss. I would rather not waste leisure noting other things.
(printed under page 393)
(60) · call in col 778
Matth. XIII, 55.
Matthew 13:55.
(printed under page 393)
(61) · call in col 778
Psal. XXIII, 8.
Psalm 23 (24):8.
(printed under page 393)
(62) · call in col 778
Joan. XIII, 5.
John 13:5.
(printed under page 393)
(63) · call in col 778
ibid. 27, 30.
The same, verses 27 and 30.
(printed under page 393)
(64) ‹anchor: sed salvare venerat› · call in col 778
Joan. III, 19.
John 3:19 [as printed; the words echo 3:17].
(printed under page 393)
(65) ‹anchor: osculo Filium hominis tradis› · call in col 778
Luc. XXII, 48.
Luke 22:48.
(printed under page 393)
(66) · call in col 779
I Tim. VI, 10.
1 Timothy 6:10.
(printed under page 394)
(67) · call in col 779
Zach. XI, 12.
Zechariah 11:12.
(printed under page 394)
(68) · call in col 779
Marc. XIV, 5.
Mark 14:5.
(printed under page 394)
(69) ‹anchor: ea quae mittebantur portabat› · call in col 779
Joan. XII, 6.
John 12:6.
(printed under page 394)
(70) ‹anchor: et detrimentum sui faciat› · call in col 779
Luc. IX, 25.
Luke 9:25.
(printed under page 394)
(71) ‹anchor: natus non fuisset homo ille› · call in col 779
Matth. XXVI, 24.
Matthew 26:24.
(printed under page 394)
(78) ‹anchor: mercedis ac praemii› · call in col 779
Humanae illud mercedis et praemii, τὸ κατὰ ἀνθρώπους ἐπιτίμιον. Velut salarium, ut eo baberet, quo suae avaritiae faceret satis, concreditis Domini qualibuscunque pecuniis, quibus ad libitum uti posset. Riccardus: ἐπιτίμιον, quod maximi honoris, maximaeque aestimationis est; nihil id ad propositum: nec enim ferre loculos, ac temporalem oeconomum agere, eximium aliquid erat ac maximi honoris in collegio apostolico; nec honoribus, sed lucro ac pecuniis, avarus animus satiandus erat.
"That human wage and reward", τὸ κατὰ ἀνθρώπους ἐπιτίμιον: a salary, as it were, so that he might have the wherewithal to satisfy his avarice, the Lord's money of whatever kind being entrusted to him to use as he pleased. Riccardi takes ἐπιτίμιον as "something of the greatest honour and the highest esteem"; that is nothing to the purpose. For to carry the purse and act as steward of temporal things was nothing outstanding or of the greatest honour in the college of the apostles; and an avaricious mind was to be satisfied not with honours but with gain and money.
(printed under page 394)
(79) · call in col 780 (Greek)
Leg. ἐξέμηνε.
Read ἐξέμηνε ("drove mad").
(printed under page 394)
(80) · call in col 780 (Greek)
Erat μοιχούσης.
The text had μοιχούσης ("committing adultery").
(printed under page 394)
(81) ‹anchor: οὐ μόνον ἐπλήσθη› · call in col 780 (Greek)
Leg. οὐ μόνον οὐκ.
Read οὐ μόνον οὐκ ("not only not").
(printed under page 394)
(82) · call in col 781 (Greek)
Ἴσ. αὐτῷ.
Perhaps αὐτῷ.
(printed under page 395)
(72) · call in col 782
Joan. XIII, 26, 27.
John 13:26–27.
(printed under page 395)
(73) ‹anchor: divinum Patris sinum› · call in col 782
Joan. I, 18.
John 1:18.
(printed under page 395)
(74) ‹anchor: mundo crucifixos› · call in col 782
Galat. VI, 14.
Galatians 6:14.
(printed under page 395)
(75) ‹anchor: Filius Dei vivi› · call in col 782
Matth. XVI, 16.
Matthew 16:16.
(printed under page 395)
(76) ‹anchor: in ore ejus dolus› · call in col 782
Psal. XXXI, 2.
Psalm 31 (32):2.
(printed under page 395)
(77) ‹anchor: trementem sermones meos› · call in col 782
Isa. LXVI, 2.
Isaiah 66:2.
(printed under page 395)
(78) ‹anchor: est regnum caelorum› · call in col 782
Matth. V, 3.
Matthew 5:3.
(printed under page 395)
(83) ‹anchor: ORATIO XI› · call in col 782
Habuit Riccardus ex Vaticano, contulitque cum uno Cryptaefer. codice, et altero Sirleti. Nihil Procli aliis charactere ac doctrina deterior est. Non male Riccardus distinguit a sequenti, tametsi codex Sirleti ex quo edidit, haec illaque continua habebat. Palam enim spectant ad alium aliumque diem; nempe Parasceves, et Paschae, sive etiam Sabbati sancti. Videtur tamen in secunda aliquid desiderari pro exordio, nisi ita ex abrupto incepit ad exhibendam magnitudinem affectus.
Riccardi had it from the Vatican manuscript, and collated it with a manuscript of Grottaferrata and another of Sirleto. It is in no way inferior to the other works of Proclus in style and doctrine. Riccardi does well to separate it from the following oration, although the Sirleto manuscript from which he published it had the two run together. For they plainly belong to different days: namely to Good Friday and to Easter, or else to Holy Saturday. Yet something seems to be wanting in the second by way of an opening, unless he began thus abruptly to show the greatness of his feeling.
(printed under page 395)
(79) · call in col 783
Psal. XXIII, 8.
Psalm 23 (24):8.
(printed under page 396)
(80) · call in col 783
Gen. III, 24.
Genesis 3:24.
(printed under page 396)
(81) · call in col 783
Joan. I, 5.
John 1:5.
(printed under page 396)
(82) · call in col 783
Psal. CVI, 16.
Psalm 106 (107):16.
(printed under page 396)
(83) ‹anchor: mors devoraverat› · call in col 783
Isa. XXV, 28.
Isaiah 25:28 [as read; the verse is Isaiah 25:8].
(printed under page 396)
(84) ‹anchor: stimulus tuus› · call in col 783
I Cor. XV, 55.
1 Corinthians 15:55.
(printed under page 396)
(85) ‹anchor: Enoch mihi profers› · call in col 783
Gen. V, 24.
Genesis 5:24.
(printed under page 396)
(86) ‹anchor: Isaac mentionem facis› · call in col 783
Gen. XXV, 8.
Genesis 25:8.
(printed under page 396)
(84) ‹anchor: hic quoque declinavit› · call in col 783
Hic quoque declinavit, etc. Sirleti et Crypt. habent negativam, οὐκ ἔφυγε, sed melius abest a Vaticano. Revera enim effugit, sive vitavit mortem ac declinavit, juxta illud Hebr. XI, 5: Fide Enoch translatus est, ne videret mortem: haud tamen congressione cum ea victor fuit, ejusve abrogavit legem, sicut Dominus, cum etiam in fine saeculorum maneat moriturus.
"He too escaped," etc. The Sirleto and Grottaferrata manuscripts have the negative, οὐκ ἔφυγε ("he did not escape"), but it is better absent, as in the Vatican manuscript. For in fact he did escape, that is, avoided and evaded death, according to Hebrews 11:5, "By faith Enoch was taken up, so that he should not see death"; yet he did not conquer it by meeting it in combat, nor abolish its law, as the Lord did, since he still remains to die at the end of the ages.
(printed under page 396)
(85) ‹anchor: Moysen divine extollis› · call in col 783
Divine extollis, ἐκθειάζεις. Existimat Riccardus dictum hoc in superstitiosos Judaeos, qui Moysen ut deum colerent, ejusque adorarent imaginem: eos nimirum quos Epiphanius refert lib. II Panar. haer. IV. Verum ii pauci admodum erant in Arabia Petraea, ac valde obscuri: ut non debuerit Proclus, ita universim scelus hoc Judaeis improperare, ob paucorum illorum culpam. Mitius ergo accipio τὸ ἐκθειάζειν· ut in homines quoque sacros, quin et res alias, quadrare potest. Sic Orat. in S. Stephanum, τὸν κάλαμον ἐκθειάζων· arundinem divine extollens; quod bene ibi Riccardus reddit.
"You extol divinely", ἐκθειάζεις. Riccardi thinks this is said against superstitious Jews who worshipped Moses as a god and adored his image — those, namely, whom Epiphanius reports in book II of the Panarion, heresy IV. But they were very few, in Arabia Petraea, and very obscure; so that Proclus ought not to have charged this crime against the Jews in general because of the fault of those few. I therefore take ἐκθειάζειν in a milder sense, as it can apply to holy men too, and even to other things. So in the Oration on St Stephen, τὸν κάλαμον ἐκθειάζων, "extolling the reed divinely", which Riccardi renders well there.
(printed under page 396)
(86) ‹anchor: καὶ θανάτου› · call in col 785 (Greek)
Leg. θάνατον.
Read θάνατον ("death", accusative).
(printed under page 397)
(87) · call in col 786
Deut. XXXIV, 6.
Deuteronomy 34:6.
(printed under page 397)
(88) ‹anchor: in medio manuum tuarum› · call in col 786
Zach. XIII, 6.
Zechariah 13:6.
(printed under page 397)
(89) ‹anchor: in domo dilecti mei› · call in col 786
ibid.
The same place.
(printed under page 397)
(90) ‹anchor: Ex Aegypto vineam transtuli› · call in col 786
Psal. LXXIX, 9.
Psalm 79 (80):9.
(printed under page 397)
(91) ‹anchor: sed clamorem› · call in col 786
Isa. V, 4, 7.
Isaiah 5:4, 7.
(printed under page 397)
(92) ‹anchor: inter mortuos liber› · call in col 786
Psal. LXXXVII, 6.
Psalm 87 (88):6.
(printed under page 397)
(93) · call in col 787
I Cor. I, 23-25.
1 Corinthians 1:23–25.
(printed under page 398)
(94) · call in col 787
Psal. LXXXVII, 7.
Psalm 87 (88):7.
(printed under page 398)
(87) · call in col 787
Vix adduci possum, ut ne hoc totum ἀπάνθισμα, seu partem plenioris orationis accipiam. Vox illa τοιγαροῦν, aliquid jam expositum respicit. Dicta videtur in Sabbato Paschae, et in recens baptizatos; seu occasione baptismi, cujus ea die ritus celebris est.
I can hardly bring myself not to take this whole piece as an extract, that is, part of a fuller oration. The word τοιγαροῦν ("therefore") looks back to something already set out. It seems to have been delivered on Holy Saturday, and to the newly baptized; or on the occasion of baptism, whose rite is solemnly celebrated on that day.
(printed under page 398)
(88) · call in col 787
Admirare reginae magnificentiam. Obscurum quid hic velit auctor, ac eo nomine intelligat. Riccardus existimat notare Pulcheriam augustam, quae et βασιλὶς et virgo, tunc clara in urbe esset: in quam quadrent omnia illa pietatis opera, quae ille commemorat. Ac sane ut unam aliquam personam haec respiciant, vix aliam respexerint. Quod sic autem statim tria in Neophotistos verba prolocutus, ad imperatricem sermonem convertat; ea videtur ratio, quod forte ipsa adesset, ac interfuisset baptismo, inque baptizandos aliquid contulisset, ut ea Proclus occasione paucis laudans, velut ad exemplum novis Christianis proponat, atque in ea Christi crucis tropaea praedicet.
"Admire the queen's magnificence." It is obscure what the author means here and whom he understands by that name. Riccardi thinks it refers to the Augusta Pulcheria, who, being both empress and virgin, was then renowned in the City, and to whom all those works of piety he lists would fit. And certainly, if these words point to some one person, they could hardly point to anyone else. As to why, after saying just three words to the newly baptized, he should at once turn his discourse to the empress, the reason seems to be that perhaps she was herself present, had attended the baptism, and had contributed something to those being baptized; so that Proclus, taking the occasion to praise her briefly, sets her before the new Christians as an example, and proclaims in her the trophies of Christ's cross.
(printed under page 398)
(95) · call in col 790
Psal. IV, 3.
Psalm 4:3.
(printed under page 399)
(96) · call in col 790
Isa. LIII, 5.
Isaiah 53:5.
(printed under page 399)
(97) · call in col 790
Luc. I, 78.
Luke 1:78.
(printed under page 399)
(98) · call in col 790
ibid. 51.
The same, verse 51.
(printed under page 399)
(99) · call in col 790
II Cor. VIII, 9.
2 Corinthians 8:9.
(printed under page 399)
(1) · call in col 790
Luc. I, 51, 52.
Luke 1:51–52.
(printed under page 399)
(2) · call in col 790
Hebr. II, 14.
Hebrews 2:14.
(printed under page 399)
(3) · call in col 790
Isa. XXVII, 1.
Isaiah 27:1.
(printed under page 399)
(4) · call in col 790
Joan. I, 9.
John 1:9.
(printed under page 399)
(89) ‹anchor: ORATIO XIII› · call in col 790
Descripsit Riccardus ex vetustissimo codice Vaticano, et contulit cum altero Columnensi. Nicetas in Catena in Lucam, cap. XXIII, testimonium affert ex ista Orat[… illegible: scan defect …]ς: ἀλλ' ὦ Ἰουδαῖε, a quibus auctor, Judaeos, sive etiam Judaizantes Nestorianos, ac alios purum hominem Christum docentes, a creaturae nova immutatione ipso patiente, egregie premit.
Riccardi copied it from a very ancient Vatican manuscript, and collated it with another, of the Colonna library. Nicetas, in the Catena on Luke, ch. 23, cites a testimony from this oration [… illegible …]: "But, O Jew …", with which words the author presses hard on the Jews — or on the Judaizing Nestorians and the others who teach that Christ was a mere man — from the new transformation of the creation while he himself suffered.
(printed under page 399)
(5) · call in col 791
Joan. I, 29.
John 1:29.
(printed under page 400)
(6) · call in col 791
II Cor. V, 17.
2 Corinthians 5:17.
(printed under page 400)
(7) ‹anchor: in consilio super terram› · call in col 791
Isa. IV, 2, sec. LXX,
Isaiah 4:2, according to the Septuagint.
(printed under page 400)
(90) · call in col 793 (Greek)
Leg. χειροποιήτων.
Read χειροποιήτων ("made with hands").
(printed under page 401)
(91) ‹anchor: τῷ κράτει› · call in col 793 (Greek)
Leg. τὸ κράτος.
Read τὸ κράτος ("the power", accusative).
(printed under page 401)
(8) · call in col 794
Gen. IV, 8.
Genesis 4:8.
(printed under page 401)
(9) ‹anchor: Naboth justus lapidaretur› · call in col 794
III Reg. XXI, 14.
3 Kings (1 Kings) 21:14.
(printed under page 401)
(10) ‹anchor: in medio tui effunderetur› · call in col 794
Matth. XXIII, 35.
Matthew 23:35.
(printed under page 401)
(11) ‹anchor: inclinavit et descendit› · call in col 794
Psal. XVII, 10.
Psalm 17 (18):10.
(printed under page 401)
(12) ‹anchor: premunt dorsa› · call in col 794
Matth. XIV, 30.
Matthew 14:30.
(printed under page 401)
(92) ‹anchor: a Manasse secari› · call in col 794
A Manasse, ὑπὸ τοῦ Μανασσῆ. Sic passim alii; ut certa traditio sit, secatum fuisse a Manasse. Quod serra lignea, habent praeter Proclum, Justinus in Dialog. cum Tryphone; auctor imperf. Hom[il.] XXXIII, in c. XIX Matth. Male Riccardus expo[nit]: A Manasse, hoc est, inquit, sub ejus imperio. Imo ab ipso, seu ejus jussu: cum quo stat, ut a populo sectus fuerit, quod ait Origenes in cap. XXIII Matth., sive regis impii mandatum exsequente, sive ad idem conspirante scelus.
"By Manasseh", ὑπὸ τοῦ Μανασσῆ. So others say everywhere, so that it is a settled tradition that he was sawn asunder by Manasseh. That it was with a wooden saw, besides Proclus, Justin has in the Dialogue with Trypho, and the author of the Opus imperfectum, Homily 33, on Matthew ch. 19. Riccardi explains it wrongly: "By Manasseh, that is," he says, "under his rule." No: by him, that is, at his command; which is consistent with his having been sawn asunder by the people, as Origen says on Matthew ch. 23 — the people either carrying out the impious king's order or conspiring in the same crime.
(printed under page 401)
(93) ‹anchor: gravant ac premunt dorsa› · call in col 794
Gravant ac premunt, βαρεῖ. Respicit evan[gelicum] illud: Et cum coepisset mergi, etc., velut (continues)
"Weigh down and press", βαρεῖ. He has in view that passage of the Gospel: "And when he began to sink," etc., as if (continues)
(printed under page 401)
(13) · call in col 795
Baruch III, 38.
Baruch 3:38.
(printed under page 404)
(14) · call in col 795
Psal. XXIII, 10.
Psalm 23 (24):10.
(printed under page 404)
(15) ‹anchor: Christum ante luciferum› · call in col 795
Psal. CIX, 3.
Psalm 109 (110):3.
(printed under page 404)
(94) · call in col 795
Exscripsit Riccardus ex codice Vaticano, et contulit cum Columnensi. Notat passim dialectos, quae sunt vitia scriptionis.
Riccardi copied it from the Vatican manuscript and collated it with the Colonna manuscript. Here and there he notes "dialect forms", which are faults of copying.
(printed under page 404)
(95) · call in col 795
Hebdomadae hujus festivitas. Tota festive olim agebatur, cujus vestigium aliquod in officii divini ritu nobis remansit, qua sic paschales peragimus ferias, ut sola in eis recolamus Dominicae resurrectionis sacramenta. Quod ait, habere illius festivitatem hebdomadae, τοσοῦτον πλῆθος· tantam multitudinem ac frequentiam; celebrantium accipit, quibus revera fiat illustris ac praeclarus conventus: non rerum, quod reddit Riccardus, ut praecedentia verba, ad festi splendorem spectent; nempe complecti nova et vetera; alia ad splendorem conventus, quo simul festum diem agant angeli atque homines, ipsaque adeo elementa.
"The festival of this week." Formerly the whole week was kept as a feast, and some trace of this remains to us in the rite of the divine office, in that we so keep the Easter weekdays as to commemorate in them only the mysteries of the Lord's resurrection. When he says that the festival of that week has τοσοῦτον πλῆθος, "so great a multitude and throng", he means of those celebrating, by whom the gathering is made truly illustrious and splendid — not of things, as Riccardi renders it, so that, like the preceding words, they would refer to the splendour of the feast, namely that it embraces things new and old. The other words refer to the splendour of the gathering, in which angels and men, and even the very elements, keep the feast day together.
(printed under page 404)
(96) ‹anchor: agni victima› · call in col 795
Agni victima, διὰ τῆς τοῦ ἀμνοῦ σφαγῆς. Sic corrigo, pro φαγῆς· quae vox neque Graeca est, nec satis apta. Immolatione enim agni, ejusque sanguinis aspersione liberati sunt Israelitae, non comestione praecise, quae velut consequenter habuit, et quasi ad vires confirmandas pro itinere quod erant festinato auspicaturi, urgentibus ad profectionem Aegyptiis.
"By the victim of the lamb", διὰ τῆς τοῦ ἀμνοῦ σφαγῆς ("by the slaughter of the lamb"). So I correct it, in place of φαγῆς, a word that is neither Greek nor apt enough. For the Israelites were set free by the sacrifice of the lamb and the sprinkling of its blood, not strictly by the eating of it, which followed as a consequence, as it were to strengthen them for the journey they were about to begin in haste, with the Egyptians pressing them to depart.
(printed under page 404)
(97) · call in col 797 (Greek)
Κύριος. Ita rescripsi. Sic enim mox iterum citatur hic locus Davidicus, infra sub finem § 3, Riccardus et Combefisius, Χριστός.
Κύριος ("Lord"). So I have rewritten it; for this passage of David is cited again shortly, below, towards the end of § 3. Riccardi and Combefis have Χριστός ("Christ").
(printed under page 405)
(98) · call in col 797 (Greek)
Haec chorus in Chrysostomi liturgia.
These words are sung by the choir in the liturgy of Chrysostom.
(printed under page 405)
(16) · call in col 798
Exod. XII, 3 sqq.
Exodus 12:3 and following.
(printed under page 405)
(17) · call in col 798
Joan. X, 11.
John 10:11.
(printed under page 405)
(18) · call in col 798
Exod. XIV, 27.
Exodus 14:27.
(printed under page 405)
(19) · call in col 798
Exod. XV, 1.
Exodus 15:1.
(printed under page 405)
(20) · call in col 798
Psal. XCII, 1.
Psalm 92 (93):1.
(printed under page 405)
(21) ‹anchor: qui de caelo descendi› · call in col 798
Joan. VI, 31.
John 6:31.
(printed under page 405)
(22) ‹anchor: fines saeculorum devenerunt› · call in col 798
I Cor. X, 11.
1 Corinthians 10:11.
(printed under page 405)
(23) ‹anchor: Dominum gloriae crucifixissent› · call in col 798
I Cor. II, 8.
1 Corinthians 2:8.
(printed under page 405)
(24) ‹anchor: Ego sum lux mundi› · call in col 798
Joan. VIII, 12.
John 8:12.
(printed under page 405)
(25) ‹anchor: et veritas, et vita› · call in col 798
Joan. XIV, 6.
John 14:6.
(printed under page 405)
(26) ‹anchor: et resurrectio› · call in col 798
Joan. XI, 25.
John 11:25.
(printed under page 405)
(99) ‹anchor: hoc servent› · call in col 798
Qui ne ipsum hoc servent. Levi mutatione restituo, sequorque Columnensis lectionem, οἵπερ, loco ὅπερ. Quod ait hoc est; typos ac figuras frustra servari, qui ne quidem jam typi sint et figurae, evacuante ea veritate. Erant enim signa rei futurae, quae jam desiit futura esse; eoque desierunt ipsa esse quod erant.
"Which do not even keep this." I restore it with a slight change, and follow the Colonna manuscript's reading οἵπερ in place of ὅπερ. What he says is this: that types and figures are kept in vain when they are no longer even types and figures, the truth having emptied them. For they were signs of a thing to come, which has now ceased to be to come; and so they themselves have ceased to be what they were.
(printed under page 405)
(1) · call in col 799
Retinui titulum quem codex Columnensis praefert, rejecta illa parte quam ex aliis Vaticanis addiderat Riccardus, καὶ εἰς τὸν ἅγιον Ἰωάννην τὸν θεολόγον, ἀπόστολόν τε καὶ εὐαγγελιστήν. Non enim dicta est in sancti Joannis evangelistae festo, vel in ejus peculiariter laudem. Ita spectat ad diem Paschae, ut vix Proclus magis immoretur in Dominicae resurrectionis mysteriis, quam in aliis. Legunt Graeci illud Evangelium ipso die Paschae, ut bene Riccardus colligit ex Chrysostomi hom. VII De resurrect. t. III, habentque etiamnum Graecorum libri ecclesiastici, quibus evangelia digesta sunt in usum totius anni: tota vero hebdomada legunt evangelia quae vocant matutina, quibus continetur Dominicae resurrectionis historia.
I have kept the title that the Colonna codex carries, rejecting the part that Riccardi had added from other Vatican manuscripts, "and on Saint John the Theologian, apostle and evangelist." For it was not delivered on the feast of Saint John the Evangelist, nor particularly in his praise. It looks so much to the day of Easter that Proclus hardly dwells more on the mysteries of the Lord's resurrection than on other matters. The Greeks read that Gospel on Easter Day itself, as Riccardi rightly gathers from Chrysostom's seventh homily On the Resurrection, vol. III; and the church books of the Greeks, in which the Gospels are arranged for use through the whole year, still have it so: and through the whole week they read the Gospels they call the morning Gospels, which contain the history of the Lord's resurrection.
(printed under page 406)
(2) ‹anchor: a Patre› · call in col 799
Generationem Filii a Patre. Quod hic saepius repetitur, Πατρὸς πρὸς τὸν Υἱὸν γέννησιν, durius est ad verbum: Generatio qua Pater ad Filium habet.
"The generation of the Son from the Father." What is often repeated here, Πατρὸς πρὸς τὸν Υἱὸν γέννησιν, is harsher word for word: "the generation which the Father has towards the Son."
(printed under page 406)
(3) ‹anchor: Manichaeorum ruina› · call in col 799
Gravisque est Manichaeorum ruina. Difficilior illatio, ut Verbi cum Patre asserta coaeternitas, sit Manichaeorum ruina. Quia tamen illi pluribus erroribus erant implicati, hoc quoque potuerunt laborare, ut Christum creaturam existimarent, eoque non coaeternum Patri. Sane, cum ipse Manes se Christum jactaret, haud ita insanus erat, ut se Deo coaeternum ac ab aeterno exsistentem putaret.
"And heavy is the downfall of the Manichees." The inference is rather difficult, that the asserted co-eternity of the Word with the Father should be the downfall of the Manichees. Yet since they were entangled in many errors, they may have suffered from this one too, of thinking Christ a creature, and therefore not co-eternal with the Father. Certainly, though Manes boasted himself to be Christ, he was not so mad as to think himself co-eternal with God and existing from eternity.
(printed under page 406)
(4) ‹anchor: δυνάμεις, λειτουργοί (call printed in the Greek, col 800)› · call in col 799
Ἄλ. λειτουργοῦσι· ἄλ. αἰνοῦσι.
Other manuscripts: "serve"; others: "praise".
(printed under page 406)
(5) ‹anchor: ὕψη ὑπερπέτησας› · call printed in col 801 (Greek) only · note set once under col 802 (see n802.md, footnote (5)); printed under page 407
(5) ‹anchor: ὕψη ὑπερπτήσας (call printed in the Greek, col 801)› · call in col 802
Vatic. ὑπερυψηπέτησας.
Vatican manuscript: ὑπερυψηπέτησας ("you flew high above").
(printed under page 407)
(6) ‹anchor: Sed vilis erat› · call in col 802
Vicus, ἡ κώμη. Bethsaidam intelligit, qua natum Joannem habet Chrysostomus hom. I in Joannem. Facta est ex vico postea civitas ac πόλις, quod eam Joannes vocat cap. I, vers. 44. Sic Josephus narrat lib. XVIII Antiquit. cap. 3, quanquam etiam majores vici, urbes etiam appellarentur. Plura notat Riccardus.
"Village," ἡ κώμη. He means Bethsaida, where Chrysostom, Homily 1 on John, has John born. From a village it later became a city, a πόλις, as John calls it in chapter 1, verse 44. So Josephus relates, Antiquities book 18, chapter 3, although the larger villages were also called towns. Riccardi notes more.
(printed under page 407)
(7) ‹anchor: κτίσιν γνωρίσαντα (call printed in the Greek, col 804)› · call in col 803
Ἴσ. γνωρίσασαν.
Perhaps γνωρίσασαν ("[the creature] recognizing").
(printed under page 408)
(8) · call in col 806
Exscripta est ex vetusto codice Cryptae ferratae. Tota adversus Macedonianos ac Eunomianos decurrit, variis Scripturae locis Spiritus sancti divinitatem probans. Id enim illi contendebant, non haberi ex Scriptura, eum Deum esse.
It was copied from an ancient codex of Grottaferrata. The whole of it runs against the Macedonians and Eunomians, proving the divinity of the Holy Spirit from various places of Scripture. For they maintained that it is not found in Scripture that he is God.
(printed under page 409)
(9) ‹anchor: διὰ Τριάδος βεβαιουμένων (call printed in the Greek, col 805)› · call in col 806
Leg. ᾧ τὸ δόκιμον βεβαιούμενον.
Read: ᾧ τὸ δόκιμον βεβαιούμενον ("by whom the proven [time] is confirmed").
(printed under page 409)
(10) ‹anchor: τοῦ Πνεύματος (call printed in the Greek, col 805)› · call in col 806
Leg. Σωτῆρος.
Read: Σωτῆρος ("of the Saviour").
(printed under page 409)
(11) ‹anchor: probatum tempus› · call in col 806
A quo etiam probatum tempus, etc. Mera barbaries est, quod habet textus, levi, quam feci, mutatione sanandus. Ex hora itaque tertia, quae hora fuit crucis juxta Marcum XV, 25, congruum ostendit tempus adventus Spiritus sancti, excluditque ab eo Judaeorum calumniam de ebrietate, cum Judaeis, non nisi hora sexta, sabbatis ac festis diebus prandere moris esset, uti Josephus in Vita sua.
"By whom also the time was proved," etc. What the text has is sheer barbarism, to be healed by the slight change I have made. So from the third hour, which according to Mark 15:25 was the hour of the cross, he shows the fitting time of the Holy Spirit's coming, and rules out the Jews' slander of drunkenness, since it was the Jews' custom on sabbaths and feast days not to take their meal until the sixth hour, as Josephus says in his Life.
(printed under page 409)
(12) ‹anchor: in vellus fuit› · call in col 806
Salvatoris adventus. Cogor aliquid praesumere, ac mutare nomen Spiritus, Πνεύματος· in quo palam videatur errasse antiquarius. Sequentia enim ἐπὶ δὲ τοῦ Πνεύματος aperte indicant comparare auctorem adventum Spiritus, alterius adventui; nempe Filii ac Verbi, qui ita quietus fuerit, eo quod ad oeconomiam veniret, id est, ad sumendam [illegible] ea suaviter ac mirabili incli- (continues)
"The coming of the Saviour." I am forced to presume something and to change the name "Spirit," Πνεύματος, in which the copyist plainly seems to have erred. For what follows, ἐπὶ δὲ τοῦ Πνεύματος, clearly shows that the author compares the coming of the Spirit with another coming, namely that of the Son and Word, which was so quiet because he came for the economy, that is, to take [illegible] it sweetly and with wonderful (continues)
(printed under page 409)
(13) · call in col 810
Praeter alios codices quos citat Riccardus, etiam Seguierianus Procli hanc orationem habet. Stylus universus ac compositio Proclum loquitur; cujus nihil praeferebat, quam ei in Stephanum alteram abrogavi, ac legitimo auctori restitui. — Malui scilicet eam Asterii orationem seorsim edere, ac reliquis ejusdem sancti Patris jam editis adjicere, quam confundere cum Procli orationibus, quibuscum nihil commune habet. Adverterat ipse Riccardus (pag. 496) nullos habere Procli characteres; nullas antitheses, Proclo satis familiares, nullam parono[m]asiam, non pressas sententias, nec sacrae Scripturae flosculos inspersos: ut sola codicum antiquitate persuasus ei ascripserit. . . . Photius ergo in sua Bibliotheca (cod. CCLXXI) sermonem hunc ut Asterii defloravit; totusque Asterii reliquis stylo ac omnibus consentit. — Haec Combefisius in Auctar. nov. tom. I, pag. 299, ubi exstat laudata Oratio in sanctum Stephanum Asterio asserta, quae in editione Riccardi sub nomine sancti Procli habetur pagg. 485-495; estque num. XVII.
Besides the other codices that Riccardi cites, the Séguier codex of Proclus also has this oration. Its whole style and composition speak of Proclus; whereas the other one on Stephen showed nothing of him, and I have taken it from him and restored it to its rightful author. — I preferred, that is, to publish that oration of Asterius separately and add it to the already published remains of that holy Father, rather than mix it with the orations of Proclus, with which it has nothing in common. Riccardi himself had noticed (p. 496) that it has none of Proclus's marks: none of the antitheses so familiar to Proclus, no paronomasia, no compressed sentences, no little flowers of Holy Scripture strewn in; so that he ascribed it to him persuaded only by the age of the codices. . . . Photius therefore, in his Bibliotheca (cod. 271), excerpted this sermon as Asterius's; and it agrees wholly with the rest of Asterius in style and everything else. — So Combefis in the Auctarium novum, vol. I, p. 299, where the said Oration on Saint Stephen, claimed for Asterius, is found; in Riccardi's edition it stands under the name of Saint Proclus, pp. 485–495, and is no. XVII.
(printed under page 411)
(14) · call in col 810
Vat. cod. προανατ.
Vatican codex: προανατ[…] (abbreviated as printed).
(printed under page 411)
(15) ‹anchor: Aegritudines depellens› · call in col 814
Aegritudines depellens, τὰ πάθη διώκων ἐγχορεύειν, quo et sequentibus miracula declarat, quibus dixerat Stephanum ἐγχορεύειν· eis velut tripudiare: quocirca non probo quod Riccardus reddit: perturbatos animi motus sedans.
"Driving away sicknesses," τὰ πάθη διώκων ἐγχορεύειν, by which, as also by what follows, he declares the miracles in which he had said that Stephen ἐγχορεύειν, as it were danced in them; wherefore I do not approve Riccardi's rendering, "calming the disturbed motions of the soul."
(printed under page 413)
(16) ‹anchor: Passionem mortis enectricem› · call in col 814
Passionem mortis enectricem, τὸ θανατοκτόνον πάθος. Quippe mortem nostram Dominus moriendo destruxit. Male Riccardus passionem mortem inferentem; nisi omissum est aliquid, aut male typis expressum.
"The passion that slays death," τὸ θανατοκτόνον πάθος. For the Lord by dying destroyed our death. Riccardi wrongly has "the passion that brings death," unless something has been left out or badly printed.
(printed under page 413)
(17) · call in col 815
Ἴσ. δέ.
Perhaps δέ ("but").
(printed under page 414)
(18) ‹anchor: ORATIO XVIII› · call in col 818
Haec Procli Oratio, sequenti in Andream apostolum valde affinis est, ut etiam eadem verba ex altera in alteram ab auctore derivata sint. Adeo autem effuse in Pauli rapitur laudes, ut pene mirifica amoris vi velut se excessisse significet. Exscripta est e codice antiquo Vatic.
This oration of Proclus is closely akin to the following one, on the apostle Andrew, so that the author has even carried the same words over from one to the other. And he is carried away so lavishly into the praises of Paul that he almost shows himself, by a wonderful force of love, to have gone as it were out of himself. It was copied from an ancient Vatican codex.
(printed under page 415)
(81) ‹anchor: Ministrarunt verbo› · call in col 819
Luc. I, 2.
Luke 1:2.
(printed under page 416)
(82) ‹anchor: incarnatum contrectaverunt› · call in col 819
I Joan. I, 1.
1 John 1:1.
(printed under page 416)
(83) ‹anchor: tanquam ea quae sunt› · call in col 819
Rom. IV, 17.
Romans 4:17.
(printed under page 416)
(84) ‹anchor: Sufficit tibi gratia mea› · call in col 819
II Cor. XII, 5.
2 Corinthians 12:5 [as printed; the words are at 12:9].
(printed under page 416)
(19) ‹anchor: ut spinas combusserunt› · call in col 819
Combusserunt, ἐνέπρησαν. Prima est haec significatio ejus vocis: eoque sensu quadrat optime in spinas: non item in altaria, quae solent alterius esse materiae, quam ut comburi possint. Apud Paulum (Rom. XI, 3) de altaribus dicitur, κατέσκαψαν, suffoderunt. Sequenti Orat. qua haec omnia repetuntur, loco ἐνέπρησαν est ἐθέρισαν, velut messuerunt et amputarunt: quae dictio propinquius videatur notare metaphoram.
"They burned," ἐνέπρησαν. This is the first meaning of that word, and in that sense it fits thorns very well, but not altars likewise, which are usually of some other material than can be burned. In Paul (Rom. 11:3) it is said of altars κατέσκαψαν, "they dug them down." In the following oration, where all this is repeated, in place of ἐνέπρησαν there is ἐθέρισαν, as it were "they reaped and cut down," a wording that would seem to mark the metaphor more closely.
(printed under page 416)
(20) ‹anchor: ut silvam concremarunt› · call in col 819
Ut silvam concremarunt. Lectionem quam sequor modo adscriptam, ut sit κατέπρησαν a verbo καταπρήζω, confirmat quod in sequenti verbum repetitur, κατέφλεξαν ὡς ὕλην· ubi etiam bene Riccardus, tanquam silvam combusserunt. Hic autem legendo κατέπρισαν velut a πρίω nihil aptum reddit: Dissecuerunt gentilium sectam, ut serra segetem. Nimis certe durum hoc ad metaphoram.
"They burned it up like a forest." The reading I follow, just written above, namely κατέπρησαν from the verb καταπρήζω, is confirmed by the fact that in the following oration the verb is repeated, κατέφλεξαν ὡς ὕλην, where Riccardi too rightly has "they burned it like a forest." Here, however, by reading κατέπρισαν, as if from πρίω, he gives nothing fitting: "They cut up the sect of the gentiles as a saw cuts a crop." That is certainly too harsh for the metaphor.
(printed under page 416)
(21) ‹anchor: ORATIO XIX› · call in col 822
Exstat apud Lipomanum ac deinde Surium, interprete cardinali Sirleto, inscripta Chrysostomo. Verum codices alii melius vindicant Proclo: e quibus edidit Riccardus. Erat Andreas summae ve- (continues)
It is found in Lippomano and then in Surius, in the translation of Cardinal Sirleto, ascribed to Chrysostom. But other codices more rightly claim it for Proclus; from these Riccardi edited it. Andrew was of the highest (continues)
(printed under page 417)
(22) ‹anchor: Immateriali curru› · call in col 826
Immateriali curru, ἀΰλῳ ἅρματι. Non male annotat Riccardus, intelligi posse angelos, quos perinde πνεῦμα καὶ πῦρ appellari, auctor est Basilius in Catena psal. CIII, apud Agellium. Haud sane alio, quam angelorum ministerio propheta translatus sit, qui ita in specie ignis apparuerint. Vocant item ἄϋλον Graeci ipsum corpus, quod hisce sublunaribus subtilius est, ut liquet ex Gregor. II. De Theologia.
"In an immaterial chariot," ἀΰλῳ ἅρματι. Riccardi notes not badly that the angels can be understood, who are likewise called "spirit and fire," as Basil attests in the Catena on Psalm 103, in Agellio. The prophet was surely carried off by no other means than the ministry of angels, who thus appeared in the likeness of fire. The Greeks also call ἄϋλον a body itself that is finer than these sublunary ones, as is clear from Gregory, [Oration] II On Theology.
(printed under page 419)
(23) · call in col 826
Leg. δρόμῳ ex Vat.
Read δρόμῳ ("course"), from the Vatican manuscript.
(printed under page 419)
(24) ‹anchor: τοῦ Πέτρου (call printed in the Greek, col 825)› · call in col 826
Leg. τὸν Πέτρον, cum Sirl.
Read τὸν Πέτρον ("Peter," accusative), with Sirleto.
(printed under page 419)
(25) ‹anchor: Ut fluctuationi expositam› · call in col 827
Ut fluctuationi expositam. Non potui acquiescere Riccardo, ut legerem βωμοῦ· quid enim aris, et piscibus? maxime Christi et apostolorum, seu etiam Judaeorum, qui Christi Domini aetate erant alieno animo ab idolis? Aliud ergo melius legit Sirletus, quem sequor.
"As exposed to tossing." I could not agree with Riccardi so as to read βωμοῦ ("altar"); for what have altars to do with fish? Above all those of Christ and the apostles, or even of the Jews, who in the time of Christ the Lord were averse to idols? Sirleto therefore reads something else, and better, and I follow him.
(printed under page 420)
(26) · call in col 827
Leg. σάλου, vel quid simile, cum Sirl.
Read σάλου ("of tossing"), or something similar, with Sirleto.
(printed under page 420)
(27) ‹anchor: Multi fuerunt christi› · call in col 827
Multi fuerunt christi. Vim facit in articulo, τὸν Χριστόν· quo Christus ille, ac eximie denotetur, ac distinguatur ab iis qui dicuntur christi communiter: quo modo sanctus Joannes Chrysostomus philosophatur in voce Λόγος Joan. I. Nullus interpretum auctoris mentem satis expresserat. Eadem fere hic repetit, quae Orat. XI, ubi Christum majorem omnibus veteribus sanctis ostendit.
"Many were christs." He lays stress on the article, τὸν Χριστόν, by which that Christ is denoted, and pre-eminently, and is distinguished from those who are called christs in the common way; just as Saint John Chrysostom reasons on the word Λόγος in John 1. None of the translators had sufficiently expressed the author's mind. He repeats here almost the same things as in Oration XI, where he shows Christ to be greater than all the ancient saints.
(printed under page 420)
(28) ‹anchor: ORATIO XX› · call in col 827
Orationem XX primus edidit Baronius tom. V Annalium ad ann. 438, § 3, et seqq. e Vallicellana bibliotheca; ac post eum Riccardus. Dicta videtur cum adhuc reliquiae Joannis essent Comanae in Ponto; ob illa verba: in Ponto jacet, et in orbe, etc., quas ejus reliquias liquet postmodum relatas Constantinopolim Procli opera: de qua translatione, tum Georgius Alexandrinus, tum auctor anonymus vitae ejusdem; tum denique Cosmas Vestitor (sic enim inscribitur) luculenta oratione in eam Joannis reliquiarum translationem, in eminentissimi cardinalis Mazarini codice: ex quo fere animus erat ut ederem: verum absterruit, quod praeter verborum ornatum ac orationis compositionem, vix aliquid habeat, quam quae a praefatis Georgio, ac (continues)
Baronius first published Oration XX in volume V of the Annals, at the year 438, § 3 and following, from the Vallicelliana library; and after him Riccardi. It seems to have been delivered while John's relics were still at Comana in Pontus, because of the words "he lies in Pontus, and in the world," etc.; and it is clear that these relics of his were afterwards brought back to Constantinople by Proclus's efforts. Of this translation write George of Alexandria, and the anonymous author of his Life, and finally Cosmas Vestitor (for so he is styled) in a splendid oration on that translation of John's relics, in the codex of the most eminent Cardinal Mazarin; I had almost a mind to publish it from there, but was deterred because, apart from ornament of words and composition of speech, it has scarcely anything beyond what the aforesaid George and (continues)
(printed under page 420)
(29) · call in col 829
Joannes.
John.
(printed under page 421)
(30) · call in col 831
Baron. invaluit arundo, et floribus orthodoxiae portus impletur. At Combefisius: Hirundo, inquit, hic sane emendandum, ut alludat ad vernum tempus, quo hirundines prata, non portus, floribus replent.
Baronius: "the reed grew strong, and the harbour is filled with the flowers of orthodoxy." But Combefis says: "Here surely 'swallow' (hirundo) must be restored, so that it alludes to the springtime, when swallows fill the meadows, not harbours, with flowers."
(printed under page 422)
(31) · call in col 831
Baron. omnibus civibus.
Baronius: "to all the citizens."
(printed under page 422)
(32) · call in col 831
Ostentans vos, cl. Sic recte Baronius. Sed Combefisius post Riccardum, osculans, vobis clamat.
"Showing you, cl[amat]." So Baronius rightly. But Combefis, after Riccardi: "kissing, he cries to you."
(printed under page 422)
(33) · call in col 831
Baron. studiosis manibus adversus imperialem avaritiam acutissima falx. Adversus imperial. avarit. etc. Haec Procli dicta non minimum roboris addere iis videntur, quae alibi ad confirmandam Joannis Chrysostomi Epistolae ad imperatricem Eudoxiam sinceritatem, ex Marco Gazensi protulimus. Vide sis Prolegom. ad superiorem tomum VIII, cap. 9, § 3, pag. 2.
Baronius: "with zealous hands, a sickle sharpest against imperial greed." "Against imperial greed," etc. These words of Proclus seem to add no small strength to what we brought forward elsewhere from Mark of Gaza to confirm the genuineness of John Chrysostom's Letter to the Empress Eudoxia. See, if you please, the Prolegomena to the preceding volume VIII, ch. 9, § 3, p. 2.
(printed under page 422)
(34) · call in col 831
Baron. omissa negatione, Sed paveo minorem laudibus navem mergendam attonitus.
Baronius, leaving out the negative: "But, astonished, I fear that the ship, too small for the praises, must be sunk."
(printed under page 422)
(35) ‹anchor: rete concussit› · call in col 831
Baron. orthodoxiae rete deduxit.
Baronius: "he drew down the net of orthodoxy."
(printed under page 422)
(36) ‹anchor: merces autem copiosa› · call in col 831
Baron. merces autem copiosa. Huc usque Proclo perducere licuit orationem fine carentem, acclamationum jugibus tonitruis interruptam populi adstantis, et instantis, sibi Joannem reddi: cum Proclus ex more illa tantum apponens verba, Gratia et misericordia, etc., finem imposuit orationi clamoribus populis interceptae. Haec Baronius. Basnagio in suis Annalibus politico-ecclesiasticis ad ann. 438, § 3, haud probatur Baronii sententia, existimantis hunc Procli sermonem prius fuisse recitatum, quam ipse de revocando Chrysostomi corpore Theodosium adiret. Verum praeter ea quae infra refert Combefisius ex Cosma Vestitore, ipsemet Proclus Baronianam sententiam confirmat, dum ait sub initium Orationis: In ponto jaces (Chry- (continues)
Baronius: "but the reward abundant." Thus far Proclus was able to carry the oration, which lacks an ending, interrupted by continual thunders of acclamation from the people standing by and pressing for John to be given back to them; whereupon Proclus, adding as is customary only the words "Grace and mercy," etc., put an end to the oration, cut short by the shouts of the people [populis, as printed]. So Baronius. Basnage, in his Annales politico-ecclesiastici at the year 438, § 3, does not approve the opinion of Baronius, who thinks this sermon of Proclus was delivered before he himself approached Theodosius about recalling Chrysostom's body. But besides what Combefis reports below from Cosmas Vestitor, Proclus himself confirms Baronius's opinion when he says near the beginning of the oration: "You lie in Pontus (Chry- (continues)
(printed under page 422)