Migne Reading Room

PL 1 · cols. 1223–1248

Tertullian, On Repentance (De paenitentia)

Editors' preface

PL 1:1223
QUINTI SEPTIMII FLORENTIS TERTULLIANI
OF QUINTUS SEPTIMIUS FLORENS TERTULLIANUS
DE POENITENTIA
ON REPENTANCE
LIBER.
A BOOK.
Editors' notes and page, col. 1223

Footnotes

LECTIONES VARIANTES. (printed under page 658)

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1223

Conflatione Rigalt.

"Conflatione" (by the blowing-together): Rigault.

(printed under page 658)

(2) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1223

Quantulum aestimo Fran.

"Quantulum aestimo" (how little I reckon): Franeker edition.

(printed under page 658)

(3) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1223

Proinde Latin.

"Proinde" (accordingly): Latinius.

(printed under page 658)

Editors' prose

PROOEMIUM.

PROEM.

De Poenitentia librum eo tempore scripsisse Tertullianum, quo nondum Montani dogmata sectaretur, libri ipsius argumentum edocet; in eo enim post Baptismum lapsi ad poenitentiam excitantur, quam Montanistae dandam esse negabant: Omnibus ergo, aiebat, delictis, seu carne, seu spiritu, seu facto, seu voluntate commissis, qui poenam per judicium destinavit, idem et veniam per poenitentiam spopondit dicens: Vivo ego, dicit Dominus, poenitentiam malo magis quam mortem (Infra cap. IV). Et capite VII diserte unum ex praecipuis Montanistarum erroribus impugnat, demonstrando eos, qui post Baptismum peccata commiserunt, ab Ecclesia absolutionem eorum impetrare posse, dum eos illorum poenituerit. An is liber sit Tertulliani, nemo neque olim dubitavit, neque nunc dubitat. Unus erat Erasmus Rotterodamus, eumdem Tertulliano detrahere conatus, quem non nisi Beatus Rhenanus secutus est, uterque uni huic argumento, satis imbecilli, innixus, styli diversitas. Atque hunc quidem non nego in hoc libro paulo floridiorem esse, sed non magna a reliquorum, etiam quos extrema ferme aetate scripsit, diversitate, et solum in quibusdam allegoriis ac me-

That Tertullian wrote the book On Repentance at a time when he did not yet follow the doctrines of Montanus, the subject of the book itself shows; for in it those who have fallen after Baptism are roused to repentance, which the Montanists denied ought to be granted: For all sins, then, he said, whether committed by the flesh or by the spirit, whether in deed or in will, He who has appointed punishment through judgement has likewise promised pardon through repentance, saying: As I live, saith the Lord, I would rather repentance than death (below, ch. IV). And in chapter VII he expressly attacks one of the chief errors of the Montanists, by showing that those who have committed sins after Baptism can obtain from the Church absolution of them, provided they repent of them. Whether this book is Tertullian's, no one either doubted of old or doubts now. Erasmus of Rotterdam alone tried to take it away from Tertullian, and only Beatus Rhenanus followed him, both resting on this one argument, a rather weak one: the difference of style. And indeed I do not deny that the style is somewhat more florid in this book, but with no great difference from that of the rest, even those he wrote at almost the end of his life, and only in certain allegories and me-

<!-- note: the column opens with the end of De baptismo (text, Lectiones variantes, and Rigault's commentary note ending "Ric."), then the title spanning both columns (QUINTI SEPTIMII FLOR[ENTIS TERTULLIANI] DE POENI[TENTIA] LIBE[R]); the heading below it is cropped at the right edge of the image ("PROOEMI…"), set here as PROOEMIUM. The Prooemium begins at margin letter C and runs to the column foot, breaking mid-word ("ac me-"); it continues in the next column. The bold-italic quotation (De paen. 4) is set in italics as printed. "Rotterodamus" as printed. -->

Page

  • running head: 1223 TERTULLIANI (spanning 1223–1224)
  • marginal letters: A enim et de pristinis satisfacimus (De baptismo); B torsit. Namque populus (De baptismo); C De Poenitentia librum eo tempore (Procemium); D rum erroribus impugnat / post Baptismum (Procemium)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: The column opens with the end of De baptismo (not set; this unit's work does not include it), followed by its Lectiones variantes and Commentarius. The title of De poenitentia is printed across both columns (1223–1224) below the rule; set here once, whole (its right half read from the 1224 images). Below it stands the editors' PROOEMIUM ("De Poenitentia librum eo tempore scripsisse Tertullianum...") running through 1223 and 1224 and beyond: editors' prose, not set. No author's text of De poenitentia in this column beyond the title.
PL 1:1224
<!-- head: 1223 TERTULLIANI 1224 (running across the page) -->
<!-- margin: A ‹litudine translatus›; B ‹memineritis›; C ‹taphoris paulo› (editors' prose); D ‹que orationis contextus› (editors' prose) -->
<!-- oldnum: (none) -->
<!-- misprint: expectat. cum | expectat, cum -->
<!-- note: The column holds no text of De paenitentia. Its first paragraph is the CLOSE OF DE BAPTISMO (cap. XX), not set here (the misprint listed above stands in that paragraph). The work's title spans both columns of the page and is set once, in c1223. Below it the editors' PROOEMIUM (editors' prose, not set) fills the rest of the column; see notes/n1224.md. -->
Editors' notes and page, col. 1224

Footnotes

(4) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1224

Deserto v. c. Wouw.

"Deserto" (desert): an old manuscript cited by Wouwer.

(printed under page 658)

(5) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1224

Haec vox redund. visa fuit Jun.

This word seemed redundant to Junius.

(printed under page 658)

(6) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1224

Subjacente Paris.

"Subjacente" (lying beneath): Paris edition.

COMMENTARIUS.

(continued) · col 1223

satisfacimus, et subsecuturis tentationibus munimenta praestruimus. Quod si conflictatione carnis et spiritus de pristinis delictis satisfacimus, sane satisfactio facta per conflictationem carnis et spiritus, confessionem quoque ipsa conflictatione factam includit. Atque haec de confessione seu poenitentia venientium ad fidem christianam. Hic enim de aliis non agitur Ric.

"we make satisfaction, and build defences in advance against the temptations that will follow." If by the struggle of flesh and spirit we make satisfaction for former sins, then surely the satisfaction made through the struggle of flesh and spirit includes also the confession made in that very struggle. And this concerns the confession or repentance of those who come to the Christian faith; for others are not in question here. Rigault.

(printed under page 658)

(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1224

Post aquam segregatus in deserto. Post aquam, hoc est, post Baptismum Joannis. Ric.

"After the water, set apart in the desert." After the water, that is, after John's baptism. Rigault.

(printed under page 658)

(b) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1224

Primas manus aperitis. Orabant manibus expansis. Itaque primas manus dicit, tum primum a fide ad orationem apertas sive expansas. Ric.

"You open your hands for the first time." They prayed with hands spread out. So he says "first hands", that is, hands then for the first time opened or spread out from faith to prayer. Rigault.

(printed under page 658)

(c) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1224

Apud matrem. Apud Ecclesiam. Sic lib. de Idololatria, Attollere ad Deum Patrem manus. Ric.

"With the mother." With the Church. So in the book On Idolatry: "to lift up the hands to God the Father." Rigault.

(printed under page 658)

Editors' prose

taphoris paulo illustrioribus sita. Quodsi vero similes flosculos ex aliis ejusdem areolis decerpere vacaret, facile integras corollas nectere possem. Caeterum ex sola et quacumque styli discordantia, nisi aliorum, et graviorum quidem argumentum adminicula concurrant, vix auctorem suspectum fieri, ne dicam, aliquid contra eumdem decerni posse, pridem sensere alii optimae notae critici, ex quibus vel unum adduco Guillelmum Caveum, qui in Hist. suae litterar. Prolegomenis, sect. IV, num. 64, tum demum, seu suppositionis argumentum probari ait, si stylus totiusque orationis contextus, sit longe diversus ab eo dicendi charactere, quo in genuinis suis usus est auctor. Atqui vero adeo non longe diversum quivis legens deprehendet, ut potius praeter paucas quasdam phrases, paulo excitatiores, et in aliis Tertulliani scriptis vix occurentes, afrum illud, ac concisum eloquii genus, uni ferme Tertulliano proprium, illa deinde styli velut quaedam majestas, sensuumque in singulis prope verbis ubertas; illa grandis eloquentia, quae, utut dura sit, nescio, quomodo tamen lectorem vel invitum ad se rapere potest, non minus in hoc libro triumphet: ut nil dicam de aliis phrasibus, ex aliis ejusdem libris

[me]taphors, lying somewhat brighter. But if I had leisure to pluck similar little flowers from other garden-beds of his, I could easily weave whole garlands. For the rest, that from a mere discordance of style, of whatever kind, unless the supports of other and indeed weightier arguments concur, an author can hardly be made suspect, not to say that anything can be decided against him, other critics of the first rank have long since perceived, of whom I adduce but one, William Cave, who in the Prolegomena to his Literary History, sect. IV, num. 64, says that an argument of spuriousness is proved only if the style and the texture of the whole discourse be far different from that character of speaking which the author has used in his genuine works. But any reader will find it so far from being far different that, rather, apart from a few phrases somewhat more animated and scarcely occurring in the other writings of Tertullian, that African and terse kind of eloquence, peculiar almost to Tertullian alone, and then that majesty, as it were, of style, and the richness of meaning in almost every single word; that grand eloquence which, harsh though it be, can yet somehow carry the reader away to itself even against his will, triumphs no less in this book: not to speak of other phrases, from other books of the same

<!-- note: the column's left half carries the end of De baptismo (text ending "meminerit[i]s.", Lectiones variantes, Rigault's commentary notes a–c), then the work's title (spanning both columns) and the heading PROOEMIUM. The Prooemium continues in the right half from margin letter C, beginning mid-word ("taphoris", completing "me-" at the foot of col. 1223), and runs to the column foot, breaking mid-sentence; it continues in the next column. The right edge of the lower half is heavily inked: "similes", "vacaret", "aliorum", "concurrant", "sensere", "adduco", "Atqui", "deprehendet", "genus", "velut", "utut dura", "invitum ad", "triumphet" are read through blots, and the last word ("libris") is barely legible and uncertain. "occurentes" as printed. -->

Page

  • running head: 1224 TERTULLIANI (spanning 1223–1224)
  • marginal letters: A litudine translatus; B memineritis; C taphoris paulo (editors' prose); D que orationis contextus (editors' prose)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • text of De paenitentia: none in this column (end of De baptismo, the title set in c1223, and the editors' Prooemium)
PL 1:1225
Editors' notes and page, col. 1225

Editors' prose

tam sedulo expressis. Fatetur dein ipse beatus Rhenanus auctorem hujus libri verbis et figuris iisdem uti, et quisquis fuerit, ejus indubie esse saeculi, et Tertulliani studiosissimum; quidni vero Tertullianum ipsum? Quis enim alius stylum ejus, certe singularem, et vix a quopiam imitabilem, tam scite expresserit, ut apud S. Pacianum, saec. IV scriptorem, omnesque alios per plusquam undecim saecula ad Erasmum usque, pro ipso Tertulliano fefellerit, et nulli unquam ex styli diversitate quidpiam de alio libri hujus auctore suboluerit? Tandem ergo ex illa qualicumque demum styli discordantia plus argui non posse censemus, quam Tertullianum, cum adhuc vegetiori esset aetate vivaciorique ingenio, hanc scriptionem suscepisse. Solent enim ingenia ejusmodi fervida ac agilia, instar apum per varios flores circumvolitare, atque ex alienis etiam rebus allegorias et metaphoras exsugere, suumque in alveare eas comportare. Solet item aetate sensim provectiori subsidere stilus, temperatiorque et robustior fieri. Et denique haud facile scriptorem quisquam reperiet, qui perpetuo sibi constet, praesertim si non uno continuo opere protraxerit, sed per varias, neque cohaerentes materias, variis temporibus, annisque ipsis interpolatas, circumduxerit calamum. Est enim quaedam suapte natura tristior aut humilior, atque exsucca magis, quae juvenilis quoque ingenii vigorem satis retundat atque deprimat, et ad quam succulenta caeteroquin virorum eloquentia velut exarescat: est autem alia rursus materia suavior, amoeniorque, et ipsius auctoris ingenio accommodatior, quae languidius caeteroquin ingenium satis excitare ac stimulare queat: est denique ita vivax ac radiosum quidpiam diffundens, quae scribentem penitus incendere ac inflammare, quem et ex senectute jamjam cinericia diu consopitos igniculos quandoque suscitare valeat. Sunt deinde alia quoque, scribenti aliunde, ac velut per obliquum, advenientia, quae tamen ad ejus ingenium, ut ita dicam, alterandum quandoque multum possunt. Quid mirum igitur, si neque Tertullianus undequaque sibi constet, sed, cum primitus, licet jam adultiori aetate, se ad scribendum contulit, nonnihil alacriori stylo usus fuerit, deinceps aliis in ejus operibus nonnihil magis subsidente, majorique eruditionis apparatu ornatum velut compensare.

written out so carefully. Then Beatus Rhenanus himself admits that the author of this book uses the same words and figures, and that, whoever he was, he was without doubt of his age, and a most zealous student of Tertullian; but why not Tertullian himself? For who else could have reproduced his style, which is certainly singular and scarcely imitable by anyone, so skilfully that with St Pacian, a writer of the fourth century, and with all others for more than eleven centuries down to Erasmus, he passed for Tertullian himself, and that no one ever caught any scent, from the difference of style, of another author of this book? In the end, then, we judge that from that discordance of style, whatever it amounts to, no more can be argued than that Tertullian undertook this writing while he was still of a more vigorous age and of livelier wit. For fervent and nimble minds of this kind are wont, like bees, to flit about among various flowers, and to suck allegories and metaphors even out of things foreign to them, and to carry them into their own hive. Likewise the style is wont, as age gradually advances, to settle, and to become more tempered and more robust. And finally, one will not easily find a writer who is always consistent with himself, especially if he has not drawn out one continuous work, but has led his pen about through various and unconnected subjects, interrupted by different times and by years themselves. For there is a kind of subject which by its own nature is sadder or lowlier, and more sapless, which fairly blunts and depresses the vigour even of a youthful wit, and before which the otherwise juicy eloquence of men as it were dries up; but there is again another subject, sweeter and more pleasant, and better suited to the author's own wit, which can sufficiently rouse and spur an otherwise more languid wit; there is, finally, one so lively and spreading forth something so radiant that it can wholly kindle and inflame the writer, and can sometimes rouse in him, even out of an old age already turned to ashes, little sparks long lulled asleep. Then there are other things too which come to the writer from elsewhere, and as it were obliquely, which nevertheless can sometimes do much to alter, so to speak, his wit. What wonder, then, if Tertullian too is not everywhere consistent with himself, but, when he first betook himself to writing, though already of a riper age, used a somewhat livelier style, and afterwards, in his other works, with the style settling somewhat more, as it were compensated for it with an ornament of greater learned apparatus.

Si jam vero tempus ipsum, quo hunc tractatum exaraverit, paulo propinquius (quamquam id praecise fieri nequeat) designandum sit, ita opinor, hanc tractationem certo ante annum Christi CC et verisimiliter anno CXCVII aut fortasse maturius, litteris consignatam fuisse, certe autem et hujus, et alterius de Baptismo scripti, tempus haud procul invicem distare. An vero librum de Baptismo huic de Poenitentia, an hunc illi, scribendi ordine, subjunxerit, vix quidquam determinari potest. Verisimilius tamen mihi quidem videtur, subjunxisse; si enim hunc de Poenitentia praemisisset, credo, in cap. ult. de Baptismo, ubi de poenitentia, baptismo instar prae orationis praemittenda, agit, hujus, ceu jam alibi fusius per-

If now the very time at which he wrote this treatise is to be fixed somewhat more nearly (although this cannot be done precisely), I am of the opinion that this treatise was certainly committed to writing before the year of Christ 200, and probably in the year 197, or perhaps earlier, and that at any rate the time of this and of the other writing, On Baptism, lie not far apart from each other. Whether, in the order of writing, he added the book On Baptism to this one On Repentance, or this one to that, can scarcely be determined at all. It seems to me, however, more likely that he added it; for if he had put this one On Repentance first, I believe that in the last chapter of On Baptism, where he treats of repentance, which is to be put before baptism in the manner of a preliminary prayer, he would [have mentioned] this [subject] as already more fully

<!-- note: the column (left half of the page) holds the Prooemium only. It opens mid-sentence, continuing from col. 1224 ("ex aliis ejusdem libris / tam sedulo expressis"), with a paragraph break at "Si jam vero"; the second paragraph breaks mid-word at the column foot ("per-") and continues in the next column. The bracketed words in the last English sentence anticipate the clause's completion there. Below the column stands the signature line "TERTULLIANI I.", a printer's mark, not set. "stilus" beside "stylus", and "prae orationis" (two words), as printed. -->

PL 1:1226
Editors' notes and page, col. 1226

Editors' prose

tractatae, nonnullam mentionem facturum fuisse. Certe autem in ipso libro de Baptismo ad finem cap. 15 lectores suos ad alium de eodem tractatum, jam antea graeco sermone exaratum, solerter remittit. Quis ergo male videtur opinari, si materiam hanc de Poenitentia, quam ad calcem libri de Bapt. nonnihil brevius perstrinxerat, novo consilio, et in peculiari libro ampliorem ejus tractationem postea suscepisse dicatur, et quidem partim in catechumenorum gratiam, ut hi eo majorem de baptismi pretio aestimationem conciperent, quem intelligerent tam laboriosis poenitentiae operibus comparandum esse? Quidni ergo in his se eo ardentiori deinceps studio exercerent, ut tam largiter propositum Baptismi praemium, ejusque gratiam, eo certius consequerentur, eoque tutius deinceps conservarent?

treated elsewhere, have made some mention of it. Certainly, in the book On Baptism itself, at the end of chapter 15, he skilfully refers his readers to another treatise on the same subject, written before in the Greek tongue. Who, then, would seem to judge amiss if he is said to have afterwards undertaken, by a new design and in a book of its own, a fuller treatment of this subject of Repentance, which he had touched upon somewhat more briefly at the close of the book On Baptism, and that partly for the sake of the catechumens, so that they might conceive the higher esteem of the worth of baptism, the more they understood that it was to be obtained by such laborious works of repentance? Why, then, should they not exercise themselves in these with all the more ardent zeal thereafter, so that they might the more surely attain the reward of Baptism so bountifully set before them, and its grace, and the more safely preserve it thereafter?

Denique vero praeclarum de hoc libro judicium audiendum est, quod ipse Beatus Rhenanus, vir magni judicii, in praemisso ad eumdem argumento tulit, nempe commentarium hunc esse ejusmodi, ut theologi eum debeant ad unguem ediscere; nam egregium, pergit, monumentum est antiquitatis; tam sancte docet, tam pie suadet, tam instanter urget rem ecclesiasticae disciplinae summopere necessariam, EXOMOLOGESIN, hoc est, actum et ministerium poenitentiae. Certe autem ut passim ex Tertulliano veteris Ecclesiae traditiones et disciplinam addiscimus, ita etiam hic, insigni contra novatores nostros utilitate, modum agendae poenitentiae, prout ea primis mox saeculis et utique ex Apostolica institutione, agi consueverat, pulchre solideque docemur. LUMP.

Finally, we must hear the excellent judgement on this book which Beatus Rhenanus himself, a man of great judgement, delivered in the argument he prefixed to it: namely, that this commentary is of such a kind that theologians ought to learn it to the finger-nail; for it is, he goes on, a noble monument of antiquity; so holily does it teach, so piously does it persuade, so urgently does it press a thing supremely necessary to ecclesiastical discipline, EXOMOLOGESIS, that is, the act and ministry of repentance. Certainly, as we learn here and there from Tertullian the traditions and discipline of the ancient Church, so here too, with signal usefulness against our innovators, we are finely and soundly taught the manner of performing repentance, as it was wont to be performed from the very first centuries, and indeed by Apostolic institution. LUMPER.

ARGUMENTUM.

ARGUMENT.

Principio generatim de poenitentia pertractat (cap. 1) eamque necessariam adstruit pro omnibus peccatis et delictis, seu carne, seu spiritu, seu facto, seu voluntate commissis (cap. 4). Dein duo distinguit poenitentiae genera. Prior est, quae baptismo debet praemitti a catechumenis, seu quae agitur ante baptismum (cap. 6); posterior eorum, qui in peccata gravia post baptismum infeliciter lapsi, ex iis exsurgunt operosa poenitentia. In priori parte necessitatem sese probandi urget, et sese praeparandi ad baptismi gratiam vera poenitentia. Baptismum inanem esse non veretur asserere, cum aliquem peccatorum suorum non poenituit, nec vita emendavit, et vanam esse fiduciam, sibi fingere, cum quis prave ad baptismi usque diem vixerit, eum repente in virum sanctum evasurum, et a peccato desiturum, ubi primum illud sacramentum receperit (cap. 6). Tractatus hujus pars posterior est de poenitentia post baptismum, quae Exomologesis dicitur. Testatur (cap. 7) illico se aegre de hac posteriore poenitentia loqui, quae postrema spes est iis reliqua, qui criminibus, h. e. peccatis atrocibus post baptismum se obstrinxerunt, ne, inquit, de hac nova a peccatis exsurgendi ratione agendo, a Deo nobis oblata, de novo peccandi viam aperire videatur. Illius postea poenitentiae publicae Exomologesis dictae operosa depingit exercitia (cap. 9), ejus necessitatem demonstrat (cap. 11) ac tandem eos objurgat, quos eam amplecti pudebat criminibus post baptismum admissis (cap. 10).

At the beginning he treats of repentance in general (ch. 1), and establishes that it is necessary for all sins and offences, whether committed by the flesh or by the spirit, in deed or in will (ch. 4). Then he distinguishes two kinds of repentance. The first is that which ought to be put before baptism by catechumens, that is, which is performed before baptism (ch. 6); the second is that of those who, having unhappily fallen into grave sins after baptism, rise up from them by laborious repentance. In the first part he presses the necessity of proving oneself, and of preparing oneself for the grace of baptism by true repentance. He does not fear to assert that baptism is void when someone has not repented of his sins nor amended his life, and that it is a vain confidence to imagine to oneself, when someone has lived wickedly right up to the day of his baptism, that he will suddenly turn out a holy man and cease from sin as soon as he has received that sacrament (ch. 6). The second part of this treatise is on repentance after baptism, which is called Exomologesis. He declares straightway (ch. 7) that he speaks reluctantly of this second repentance, which is the last hope left to those who have bound themselves after baptism by crimes, that is, by heinous sins, lest, he says, by treating of this new way, offered to us by God, of rising up from sins, he should seem to open anew the way to sinning. Afterwards he depicts the laborious exercises of that public repentance called Exomologesis (ch. 9), demonstrates its necessity (ch. 11), and finally rebukes those who were ashamed to embrace it for crimes committed after baptism (ch. 10).

<!-- note: the column (right half of the page) holds editors' prose only. It opens mid-word, completing "per-" at the foot of col. 1225 ("[per]tractatae"), and the Prooemium ends at "docemur." with the signature LUMP. (Lumper). The heading ARGUMENTUM follows, and the Argumentum, printed wholly in italics, runs to "(cap. 10)." at the column foot; CAPUT PRIMUM does not appear in this column, so whether the Argumentum continues into col. 1227 cannot be seen here, though its last sentence is complete. Below stands the signature "(Trente-neuf.)", a printer's mark, not set. "quos eam" is read through damaged type (the scan shows something like "qubs cam"). "Bapt." abbreviation and the order cap. 11 before cap. 10 as printed. -->

PL 1:1227
CAPUT PRIMUM.
CHAPTER I.
Poenitentiam hoc genus hominum, quod et ipsi retro fuimus, caeci, sine Domini lumine, natura tenus norunt passionem animi quamdam esse quae veniat de offensa sententiae prioris. Caeterum a ratione ejus tantum absunt, qnantum ab ipso rationis auctore: quippe res Dei, ratio; quia Deus omnium conditor, nihil non ratione tractari, intelligique voluit. Igitur ignorantes quique Deum rem quoque ejus ignorent necesse est, quia nullus omnino thesaurus extraneis patet. Itaque universam vitae conversationem sine gubernaculo rationis transfretantes imminentem saeculo procellam vitare non norunt. Quam autem in poenitentiae actu irrationaliter deversentur, vel uno isto satis erit expedire, eum illam etiam in bonis factis suis adhibent. Poenitet fidei, amoris, simplicitatis, patientiae, misericordiae,
Repentance this kind of men, which we ourselves also formerly were, blind, without the Lord's light, know so far as nature goes to be a certain passion of the mind which comes from displeasure at a former judgement. But they are as far from its reason as they are from the very Author of reason: for reason is a thing of God, since God, the Founder of all things, willed nothing to be handled and understood without reason. Therefore all who are ignorant of God must be ignorant also of His thing, because no treasure whatever lies open to strangers. And so, crossing the whole course of life without the rudder of reason, they do not know how to avoid the storm that hangs over the world. And how irrationally they go astray in the act of repentance it will be enough to set out by this one point, that they apply it even to their good deeds. They repent of faith, of love, of simplicity, of patience, of mercy,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1227

Footnotes

LECTIONES VARIANTES. (printed under page 660)

(1) ‹anchor: sententiae prioris› · call in col 1227

Sententiae pejoris Semler.

"Sententiae pejoris" (of a worse judgement): Semler.

(printed under page 660)

(2) ‹anchor: irrationaliter› · call in col 1227

Irrationabiles Rig. Paris.

"Irrationabiles" (irrational, adjective): Rigault, Paris edition.

(printed under page 660)

(3) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1228

Patientiae speciem Semler.

"Patientiae speciem" (the appearance of patience): Semler.

(printed under page 660)

(4) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1228

In corde figunt. Semler. Leop.

"In corde figunt" (they fix in the heart): Semler, Leopold.

(printed under page 660)

(a) ‹anchor: Poenitentiam› · call in col 1227

CAP. I.—(a) Multa fuere olim et recentius docte sapienterque dicta de hujusce libri argumento, multa simul de multiplici veterum Christianorum poenitentia, ac praesertim de ea quae vocatur Exomologesis, cum publica criminum satisfactione, perperam ac malesana mente olim et recentius permixta; nec etiam abfuerit severior nota optimis quibusdam Tertulliani commentatoribus, ac proinde nemini in nos suggillandum erit, dum in hujus libri fronte pauca perstringamus capita, praecipuasque stabiliamus conclusiones de institutione, progressu et cessatione poenitentiae solemnis. Eamdem fusius breviusve describendam susceperunt provinciam ex veteribus post Tertullianum B. Cyprianus in libris epistolisque de lapsis adversus Novatianum; item S. Pacianus lib. et epist. II, ad Sympronianum, ac paraen. ad poenitentiam; D. Ambrosius, lib. II de Poenitentia; Joh. Chrysostomi ac τοῦ Μακαρίου Ephrem homiliae sermonesque de Poenitent.; Fulgentius lib. II de Remissione peccatorum ad Euthymium. — Inter recentiores unus omnium instar est ac nemini ea de re secundus doctiss. Morinus, de Sacrament. lib. IV, cap 9, 10, cujus porro totam doctrinam satis ibi erit ad quaedam brevia capita reductam proponere. Cum eo igitur clarissimo viro statuendum est, 1° poenitentiam ab initio Ecclesiae usque ad Montani haeresim, id est ad annum circiter 175 breviorem fuisse et clementius inflictam; 2° a Montani aevo ad Novatum usque, id est ad annum circiter CCL, levem ac brevem fuisse poenitentiam, si cum subsequentis aevi severitate comparetur; tunc tamen nonnihil crevisse, quoad modum et tempus, etsi istud necdum in specie determinatum fuerit ab Ecclesia; 3° Post Novatianum schisma graviorem ac diuturniorem fuisse poenitentiam, quam prius, eique certa temporis spatia praefixa fuisse, variis in classibus evolvenda, idque in orientali Ecclesia ante viguisse quam in occidentali; 4° In Ecclesia orientali post quartum saeculum, in occidentali vero post septimum multopere refriguisse solemnem poenitentiae disciplinam, fereque in desuetudinem abiisse praedictae poenitentiae stationes; 5° Non omnia lethalia etiam publica, nec clericos omnes, saltem majores, publice reos, poenitentiae solemni subjacuisse; 6° Poenitentiam publicam, nisi forte quoad crimen haereseos, nunquam iteratam fuisse. — An vero, sublata peccatori relapso publicae poenitentiae medicina, nihil jam ille in clavibus haberet remedii, anceps agitatur controversia. Affirmat Albaspineus lib. II, observ. 5; Morinus lib. V, c. 27; Petavius in Epiphan. ad haeresim 59. Contra vero Nat. Alexander dissert. 10 in hist. saecul. III, eadem est Tournelii opinio, ac omnino videtur posterior illa tenenda. Cf. theol. Curs. complet. tom, 22, p. 691. Adisis imprimis Cl. P. Corbiniani Thomae luculentos de hoc ipsomet libello Tertullii commentarios; quos cum eo loci continuos adserere magnopere juvisset, nimia vero difficultate ac tardiori mora nactos tandem et receptos, ad calcem hujusce editionis Tertullianae, quo lectorem remittimus, seponere oportuit. Edd.

Much has been said, learnedly and wisely, in former and in recent times on the subject of this book, and much too on the manifold penance of the ancient Christians, and above all on what is called Exomologesis, which has wrongly and wrong-headedly been confused, formerly and recently, with the public satisfaction for crimes; nor has a sharper censure been spared some of the best commentators on Tertullian. No one, then, should fault us if at the head of this book we touch briefly on a few points and set down the chief conclusions on the institution, growth and ending of solemn penance. Among the ancients after Tertullian, the same task of describing it at greater or less length was taken up by Blessed Cyprian, in his books and letters on the lapsed, against Novatian; likewise St Pacian, book and letter II, to Sympronianus, and the exhortation to penance; St Ambrose, book II On Penance; the homilies and sermons On Penance of John Chrysostom and of the blessed Ephrem; Fulgentius, book II On the Remission of Sins, to Euthymius. — Among the moderns the most learned Morinus, On the Sacrament, book IV, chapters 9 and 10, is worth all the rest and second to none on the matter, and it will be enough here to set out his whole teaching reduced to a few short heads. With that most distinguished man, then, it is to be held: 1° that from the beginning of the Church to the heresy of Montanus, that is, to about the year 175, penance was shorter and more mildly imposed; 2° that from the time of Montanus to Novatus, that is, to about the year 250, penance was light and short, if compared with the severity of the following age, though it then grew somewhat in manner and duration, even if this had not yet been fixed in detail by the Church; 3° that after the Novatian schism penance was heavier and longer than before, and fixed periods of time were set for it, to be passed through in various classes, and that this flourished in the Eastern Church before the Western; 4° that in the Eastern Church after the fourth century, and in the Western after the seventh, the discipline of solemn penance cooled greatly, and the stations of that penance all but fell out of use; 5° that not all mortal sins, even public ones, and not all clerics, at least the higher clergy, when publicly guilty, were subject to solemn penance; 6° that public penance, except perhaps for the crime of heresy, was never repeated. — But whether, once the medicine of public penance was withdrawn from the sinner who relapsed, he had no remedy left in the keys, is a disputed question. Aubespine affirms it, book II, observation 5; Morinus, book V, ch. 27; Petavius, on Epiphanius, heresy 59. Against them Natalis Alexander, dissertation 10 in the history of the third century; Tournely holds the same opinion, and the latter view seems by all means the one to hold. Cf. the Theologiae Cursus completus, vol. 22, p. 691. Consult above all the excellent commentaries of the distinguished Fr Corbinian Thomas on this very little book of Tertullian; it would have been of great help to set them here continuously with the text, but since they were obtained and received only at last, with too much difficulty and too late, they had to be put aside to the end of this edition of Tertullian, to which we refer the reader. The Editors.

(printed under page 660)

(b) ‹anchor: Poenitentiam› · call in col 1227

Poenitentiam. Hunc librum Erasmus non esse Tertulliani tandem Rhenano persuasit; nullo magis argumento, quam stili, ut ipsis videtur, accuratioris. Cujus argumenti vim sane frivolam esse, mecum sensuros omnes confido, qui Septimio legendo attentius incubuerint. Nam et hic genium plane Tertullianicum agnoscent, et in aliis libris, qui nullam status unquam sui controversiam sunt passi, partes ejusdem operis longe aliis accuratiores et elegantiores animadvertent. Rig.

"Penance." Erasmus at last persuaded Rhenanus that this book is not Tertullian's, by no argument more than its style, which seemed to them more polished. I trust that all who have applied themselves attentively to reading Septimius will agree with me that the force of this argument is plainly trifling. For here too they will recognise the genius of Tertullian unmistakably, and in other books whose standing has never been disputed they will notice parts of the same work far more polished and elegant than others. Rigault.

(printed under page 660)

(c) ‹anchor: saeculo procellam› · call in col 1227

Imminentem saeculo procellam. Quam in Apologetico dixit, Vim maximam universo orbi imminentem ipsamque clausulam saeculi acerbitates horrendas comminantem, pag. 447. Rig.

"The storm hanging over the world." What he called in the Apology "the very great violence hanging over the whole world, and the close of the age itself, threatening horrible bitterness", p. 447. Rigault.

(printed under page 660)

(d) ‹anchor: in poenitentiae actu› · call in col 1227

In poenitentiae actu. Nihil aliud quam in agenda poenitentia. Lac.

"In the act of repentance." Nothing other than in doing penance. La Cerda.

(printed under page 660)

(e) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1228

Poenitet fidei amoris, etc., prout quid in ingratiam cecidit, semetipsos exsecrantur. Quintilianus, Instit. XI: Jus mortis a senatu quidem vel ob aliquam magnam infelicitatem, vel etiam poenitentiam, petunt. Rig.—In ingratiam. Nos, attento quod alibi etiam ingratiae vocabulo utatur pro ingratitudine, scripsimus, Prout quid in ingratiam cecidit. Sic in hoc libro infra. Rhen.

"They repent of faith, love, etc.; as each thing has fallen into ingratitude, they curse themselves." Quintilian, Institutes XI: "Some indeed ask the senate for the right to die, either because of some great misfortune, or even out of repentance." Rigault. — "Into ingratitude." Noting that elsewhere too he uses the word ingratia for ingratitude, we have written "as each thing has fallen into ingratitude". So in this book below. Rhenanus.

(printed under page 660)

Page

  • running head: 1227 TERTULLIANI (spanning 1227–1228)
  • marginal letters: A CAPUT PRIMUM. (caption line); B tur, vel uno isto satis erit expedire; C and D stand beside the Commentarius at the page foot
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:1228
prout quid in ingratiam cecidit. Semetipsos exsecrantur, quia benefecerint, eamque maxime poenitentiae speciem, quae optimis operibus irrogatur, in corde fingunt, meminisse curantes, ne quid boni rursus praestent; contra, poenitentiae malorum levius incubant: denique facilius per eamdem delinquunt, quam per eamdem recte faciunt.
according as anything has turned out to [their] disfavour. They curse themselves for having done good, and that species of repentance above all, which is imposed on the best works, they fashion in their heart, taking care to remember not to do any good again; on the other hand, they press but lightly on repentance for evils: in short, they sin more easily through it than they do right through it.
CAPUT II.
CHAPTER II.
Quod si Dei ac per hoc rationis quoque compotes agerent, merita primo poenitentiae expenderent, nec unquam eam ad argumentum perversae emendationis adhiberent; modum denique poenitendi temperarent, quia et delinquendi tenerent; timentes Dominum scilicet. Sed ubi metus nullus, emendatio proinde nulla. Ubi emendatio nulla, poenitentia necessario vana: quia caret fructu suo, cui eam Deus sevit, id est, hominis saluti. Nam Deus post tot ac tanta delicta humanae temeritatis, a principe generis
But if they acted as men possessed of God, and through this of reason also, they would first weigh the merits of repentance, and would never apply it as proof of a perverse amendment; in short, they would temper the measure of repenting, because they would also keep [a measure] of sinning; fearing the Lord, that is. But where there is no fear, there is accordingly no amendment. Where there is no amendment, repentance is necessarily vain: because it lacks its fruit, for which God sowed it, that is, the salvation of man. For God, after so many and such great offences of human rashness, begun by the head of the race,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1228

Footnotes

(5) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1228

Contra patientiae malum. Seml. quod emendaverat Rhen. e cod. Gorz et post eum Rigal. Paris. Venet. Franeq.

"Contra patientiae malum" (against the evil of patience): Semler; Rhenanus had so corrected it from the Gorze manuscript, and after him Rigault and the Paris, Venice and Franeker editions.

(printed under page 660)

(6) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1228

Per eam r. Wouw.

"Per eam" (through it): reading of Wouwer.

(printed under page 660)

(7) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1228

Ad augmentum Seml. Leop.

"Ad augmentum" (for increase): Semler, Leopold.

COMMENTARIUS. (printed under page 660)

(f) ‹anchor: Dominum scilicet› · call in col 1228

CAP. II. — (f) Timentes Dominum scilicet. Pertinet hoc ad primam poenitentiae partem, quae est contritio, cujus initium timor Domini, sicut infra cap. 5, et Aug. lib. de Poenit. med. contra quam sentiunt nostri adversarii, dicentes, uti Lutherus, optimam poenitentiam esse novam vitam, neque ulla contritione opus esse, aut sicuti Melancthon, nonnisi servili timore quodam qui metum incutiat. Pam.

"Fearing the Lord, that is." This belongs to the first part of penance, which is contrition, whose beginning is the fear of the Lord, as below, ch. 5, and Augustine in the book On the Medicine of Penance; against what our adversaries hold, saying, like Luther, that the best penance is a new life and that no contrition is needed, or, like Melanchthon, that it is nothing but a certain servile fear which strikes terror. Pamelius.

(printed under page 660)

Page

  • running head: TERTULLIANI 1228 (spanning 1227–1228)
  • marginal letters: A prout quid in ingratiam; B necessario vana: quia caret
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:1229
Adam auspicata (Gen. III), post condemnatum hominem cum saeculi dote post ejectum paradiso, mortique subjectum, cum rursus ad suam misericordiam maturavisset, jam inde in semetipso poenitentiam dedicavit, rescissa sententia irarum pristinarum, ignoscere pactus operi et imagini suae (Gen. VIII et IX). Itaque et populum sibi congregavit, et multis bonitatis suae largitionibus fovit, et ingratissimum totiens expertus, ad poenitentiam semper hortatus est (Gen. XII); et prophetando universorum prophetarum emisit ora, mox gratiam pollicitus, quam in extremitatibus temporum per Spiritum suum universo orbi illuminaturus esset, praeire intinctionem poenitentiae jussit, si quos per gratiam vocaret ad promissionem semini Abraham destinatam, per poenitentiae subsignationem ante componeret. Non tacet Joannes, Poenitentiam initote, dicens (Matth. III): jam enim salus nationibus appropinquabit, Dominus scilicet, afferens secundum Dei promissum, cui praeministrans, poenitentiam destinabat purgandis mentibus propositam, uti quicquid error vetus inquinasset, quicquid in corde hominis ignorantia contaminasset, id poenitentia verrens et radens, et foras abjiciens mundam pectoris domum superventuro Spiritui Sancto paret, quo se ille cum coelestibus bonis libens
Adam (Gen. 3), after condemning man with the world's dowry, after he had been cast out of paradise and made subject to death, when He had hastened back to His own mercy, from that time dedicated repentance in Himself, rescinding the sentence of His former wrath, having covenanted to pardon His work and image (Gen. 8 and 9). And so He both gathered a people to Himself, and cherished it with many largesses of His goodness, and, having so often found it most ungrateful, He always exhorted it to repentance (Gen. 12); and He sent forth the mouths of all the prophets to prophesy, and soon, having promised the grace with which in the last stretches of the times He was to illumine the whole world through His Spirit, He commanded the dipping of repentance to go before, so that those whom He should call through grace to the promise destined for the seed of Abraham He might first settle by the sealing of repentance. John is not silent, saying, “Repent” (Matt. 3): for now salvation would draw near to the nations, the Lord, that is, bringing it according to God's promise; and, ministering beforehand to Him, he appointed repentance as set forth for the cleansing of minds, so that whatever the old error had defiled, whatever ignorance had contaminated in the heart of man, repentance, sweeping and scraping it, and casting it out of doors, might make ready the house of the breast clean for the Holy Spirit about to come upon it, so that He might gladly bring Himself in, with the heavenly goods.
Editors' notes and page, col. 1229

Footnotes

LECTIONES VARIANTES. (printed under page 661)

(1) ‹anchor: jussit, si› · call in col 1229

Ut Fran. Paris.

"Ut" (that) for "si": Franeker and Paris editions.

(printed under page 661)

(2) ‹anchor: poenitentiae subsignationem› · call in col 1229

Anteponeret Seml.

"Anteponeret" (would set before): Semler.

(printed under page 661)

(3) ‹anchor: purgandis mentibus› · call in col 1229

Praepositam Seml.

"Praepositam" (set over): Semler.

(printed under page 661)

(4) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1230

Profecit Rig.

"Profecit" (has profited): Rigault.

(printed under page 661)

(a) ‹anchor: cum saeculi dote› · call in col 1229

Post condemnatum hominem cum saeculi dote. Dotem saeculi dicit delicta, per quae homo excidit a divina gratia. Rig.—Cum saeculi dote. Miserias humanas intelligit, quae post peccatum mortalibus in dotem assignatae sunt. Albasp.

"After man was condemned with the dowry of the world." By the world's dowry he means sins, through which man fell from divine grace. Rigault. — "With the dowry of the world." He means the human miseries assigned to mortals as a dowry after sin. Aubespine.

(printed under page 661)

(b) ‹anchor: maturavisset› · call in col 1229

Cum ad suam misericordiam maturavisset. Optime explicat Rhenanus, Cum ad suam misericordiam Deus mature se recepisset. Rig.—Ad suam misericordiam maturavisset. Hoc est mature se recepisset et in tempore. Sic Cyprianus ad Donatum gratiam maturantem dixit. Rhen.

"When He had hastened to His mercy." Rhenanus explains it best: "When God had betaken Himself early to His mercy." Rigault. — "Had hastened to His mercy." That is, had betaken Himself early and in good time. So Cyprian To Donatus spoke of grace "hastening". Rhenanus.

(printed under page 661)

(c) ‹anchor: in semetipso› · call in col 1229

Jam inde in semetipso poenitentiam dedicavit. Quasi Deum poenituerit fecisse hominem: quasi etiam poenituerit damnasse. Rig.

"From then on He consecrated repentance in Himself." As though God repented of having made man; as though He also repented of having condemned him. Rigault.

(printed under page 661)

(d) ‹anchor: poenitentiam dedicavit› · call in col 1229

Poenitentiam dedicavit. Punito Adami peccato, cum mortales novis beneficiis complesset, docuit prius acta poenitentia emendari posse. Albasp.

"He consecrated repentance." When Adam's sin had been punished and He had filled mortals with new benefits, He taught that it could be amended by penance done first. Aubespine.

(printed under page 661)

(e) ‹anchor: ignoscere pactus› · call in col 1229

Ignoscere pactus. Quasi icto nobiscum foedere. Rig.

"Having covenanted to pardon." As though a treaty had been struck with us. Rigault.

(printed under page 661)

(f) ‹anchor: emisit ora› · call in col 1229

Prophetando emisit. Ad prophetandi munus. Rig.

"He sent out by prophesying." For the office of prophesying. Rigault.

(printed under page 661)

(g) ‹anchor: jussit› · call in col 1229

Praeire intinctionem. Jussit ut poenitentia baptismum praecederet: quam eleganter docet poenitentiam ante baptismum necessariam esse. Albasp.—Intinctionem poenitentiae. Quam hic intinctionem, mox dicet subsignationem. Rig.—Intinctionem poenitentiae. Significat baptismum Joannis, qui fuit poenitentiae baptismus, praecursor baptismi christiani, qui fuit etiam Spiritus Sancti. Rig.

"To go before the dipping." He commanded that repentance should precede baptism: how elegantly he teaches that repentance is necessary before baptism! Aubespine. — "The dipping of repentance." What he here calls dipping he will shortly call sealing. Rigault. — "The dipping of repentance." He means the baptism of John, which was a baptism of repentance, forerunner of Christian baptism, which was also of the Holy Spirit. Rigault.

(printed under page 661)

(h) ‹anchor: ante componeret› · call in col 1229

Per poenitentiae subsignationem ante componeret. Verba sunt e Jure petita fisc. Etenim Juris auctoribus subsignatae facultates reo dicuntur, quae conductorum subscriptionibus obligatae sunt fisco, et subsignata apud aerarium et censorem praedia quae sunt in censum delata. Eo sensu Tertullianus poenitentiam subsignatam dicit, qua se apud Deum quis proposito vitae sanctioris obligavit, adhibito intinctionis sive baptismi sacramento, tanquam signaculo. Sic enim lib. I ad Uxor. Viduitatem apud Deum subsignatam. Rig. — Componeret. Componere dicitur praetor quos jurisdictione sua compescit, deque adversariis amicos et quietos reddit. Componit sacramentis suis Deus homines pessime meritos, et in suorum amicorum numero esse jubet. Rig.

"Should first settle them by the sealing of repentance." The words are taken from fiscal law. For in the legal authorities a defendant's goods are said to be "under seal" when they are bound to the treasury by the signatures of the contractors, and estates are "sealed" before the treasury and the censor when they have been entered in the census. In that sense Tertullian speaks of a sealed repentance, by which a man has bound himself before God to the purpose of a holier life, the sacrament of dipping, that is, of baptism, being applied as a seal. So in book I To his Wife: "widowhood sealed before God." Rigault. — "Should settle." The praetor is said to "settle" those whom he restrains by his jurisdiction, making friends and peaceable men out of adversaries. God by His sacraments settles men who have deserved the worst, and bids them be numbered among His friends. Rigault.

(printed under page 661)

(i) ‹anchor: Dominus scilicet› · call in col 1229

Dominus scilicet, etc. Novas tabulas, novum foedus, Novum Testamentum, Evangelium. Rig.

"The Lord, that is," etc. New tables, a new covenant, the New Testament, the Gospel. Rigault.

(printed under page 661)

(j) ‹anchor: ignorantia contaminasset› · call in col 1229

Ignorantia contaminasset. Cum Dei legem ignorarent ethnici, quidquid peccarunt ignorantia fecisse videbantur. Albasp.

"Ignorance had defiled." Since the heathen did not know God's law, whatever they sinned they seemed to have done in ignorance. Aubespine.

(printed under page 661)

Page

  • running head: 1229 LIBER DE POENITENTIA. (spanning 1229–1230)
  • marginal letters: A neris Adam auspicata; B ante componeret. Non tacet; C and D stand beside the Lectiones variantes and the Commentarius
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:1230
inferat. Horum bonorum unus est titulus, salus hominis, criminum pristinorum abolitione praemissa. Haec poenitentiae caussa: haec opera negotium divinae misericordiae curans: quod homini proficit, Deo servit. Caeterum ratio ejus, quam cognito Domino discimus, certam formam tenet, ne bonis unquam factis cogitatisve quasi violenta aliqua manus injiciatur, Deus enim reprobationem bonorum ratam non habet utpote suorum, quorum cum auctor et defensor sit, necesse est proinde et acceptator; si aceeptator, etiam remunerator. Viderit ergo ingratia hominum, si etiam bonis factis poenitentiam cogit. Viderit et gratia, si captatio ejus ad benefaciendum incitamento est, terrena, mortalis utraque. Quantulum enim compendii, si grato benefeceris? vel dispendii, si ingrato? Bonum factum Deum habet debitorem, sicuti et malum: quia judex omnis remunerator est caussae. At cum judex Deus justitiae carissime sibi exigendae tuendaeque praesideat, et in eam omnem summam disciplinae suae sanciat: dubitandum est sicut in universis actibus nostris, ita in poenitentiae quoque caussa, justitiam Deo praestandam esse? quod quidem ita impleri licebit, si peccatis solummodo adhibeatur. Porro peccatum, nisi malum factum, dici non meretur; nec quisquam benefaciendo delinquit. Quod si non delinquit,
Of these goods there is one title, the salvation of man, the abolition of former crimes having been sent ahead. This is the cause of repentance; this its work, attending to the business of the divine mercy: what profits man serves God. But its rule, which we learn once the Lord is known, holds a fixed form: that no violent hand, as it were, is ever laid on good deeds or thoughts. For God does not hold valid the rejection of good things, since they are His own; and since He is their Author and defender, He must accordingly be their accepter too; if their accepter, then also their rewarder. Let the ingratitude of men see to it, then, if it drives even good deeds to repentance. Let gratitude also see to it, if the courting of it is an incentive to doing good: earthly and mortal is each. For how little is the gain if you have done good to a grateful man, or the loss if to an ungrateful one? A good deed has God for its debtor, as an evil one does too: for a judge is the rewarder of every cause. And since God as judge presides over the exacting and guarding of justice, which is most dear to Him, and in it establishes the whole sum of His discipline, is it to be doubted that, as in all our acts, so also in the matter of repentance, justice must be rendered to God? This indeed can be fulfilled only if repentance is applied to sins alone. Moreover, nothing deserves to be called sin unless it is an evil deed; and no one sins by doing good. But if he does not sin,
<!-- head: 1229 LIBER DE POENITENTIA. 1230 (running across the page) -->
<!-- margin: A ‹inferat. Horum bonorum›; B ‹feceris? vel dispendii›; C ‹(8) Suae omitt. Seml.› (Lectiones variantes); D ‹ficat dona Spiritus Sancti› (Commentarius) -->
<!-- oldnum: (none) -->
<!-- misprint: aceeptator | acceptator -->
<!-- note: Footnote calls (k), (4), (l), (m), (5), (n), (6), (7), (o), (8) removed. Last word "delin-|quit" hyphenated across the break, completed from the top of c1231. Lower half: Lectiones variantes and Commentarius (footnotes, not set). -->
Editors' notes and page, col. 1230

Footnotes

(5) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1230

Violentia Seml.

"Violentia" (violence): Semler.

(printed under page 661)

(6) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1230

Habens Seml.

"Habens" (having): Semler.

(printed under page 661)

(7) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1230

Est, Wouw. M. S. Seml.

"Est" (is): Wouwer's manuscript, Semler.

(printed under page 661)

(8) ‹anchor: summam disciplinae› · call in col 1230

Suae omitt. Seml.

Semler omits "suae" (his).

COMMENTARIUS. (printed under page 661)

(k) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1230

Quo se ille cum coelestibus bonis inferat. Significat dona Spiritus Sancti, velut invecta et illata praestantissimi inquilini. Eodem sensu libro de Patientia dixit, Rector animus facile communicat spiritus invecta cum habitaculo suo. Rig.

"Into which He may bring Himself with heavenly goods." He means the gifts of the Holy Spirit, as the goods brought in and carried in by a most excellent tenant. In the same sense he said in the book On Patience: "the ruling mind readily shares the spirit's goods brought in with its dwelling." Rigault.

(printed under page 661)

(l) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1230

Quod homini proficit, etc. Expendatur hoc, quasi dicat, Deus non eget Poenitentia, sed tu eges. Et quia res tua agitur, ideo servitium Deo. Tale quiddam Joan. Chrysost. orat 2. adv. Jud. ubi tractat locum Malachiae. Lac.

"What profits man," etc. Weigh this, as if he said: God has no need of repentance, but you have. And because it is your affair that is at stake, therefore it is a service to God. Something similar in John Chrysostom, oration 2 against the Jews, where he treats the passage of Malachi. La Cerda.

(printed under page 661)

(m) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1230

Ne bonis unquam factis. Ut gentiles qui manus injiciunt bonis factis, id est, qui cum de bonis factis dolent, crines aut barbam sibi evellunt. Albasp.

"Never on good deeds." Like the heathen who lay hands on good deeds, that is, who, when they grieve over good deeds, tear out their hair or beard. Aubespine.

(printed under page 661)

(n) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1230

Quasi violenta aliqua manus injiciatur. Quae bene facta aut bene cogitata interficiat et strangulet, convertens in deteriora. Unde illud Ennii: Quo vobis mentes rectae quae stare solebant Antehac, dementes, sese flexere vietae? Rig.

"As though some violent hand were laid on." Which kills and strangles things well done or well thought, turning them to worse. Hence that line of Ennius: "Whither have your minds, once upright and wont to stand firm, turned, bent and witless?" Rigault.

(printed under page 661)

(o) ‹anchor: Bonum factum› · call in col 1230

Bonum factum. Alludit ad formam qua veteres (continues)

"A good deed." He alludes to the formula by which the ancients (continues)

(printed under page 661)

Page

  • running head: 1230 LIBER DE POENITENTIA. (spanning 1229–1230)
  • marginal letters: A inferat. Horum bonorum; B feceris? vel dispendii; C and D stand beside the Lectiones variantes and the Commentarius
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • text: set from the filter re-test of 2026-10-19 and read against the page by QA (Q3, 2026-10-24); the earlier gap entry is withdrawn. Footnote (4), called in this column, is printed in the left-hand Lectiones and is set in n1229.
PL 1:1231
cur poenitentiam invadit, delinquentium privatum cur malitiae officium bonitati suae imponit? ita evenit, ut cum aliquid ubi non oportet adhibetur, illic ubi oportet negligatur.
why does he lay hold of repentance, the private property of those who sin? Why does he impose on his own goodness the office of wickedness? So it comes about that when something is applied where it ought not to be, it is neglected there where it ought to be.
CAPUT III.
CHAPTER III.
Quorum ergo poenitentia justa et debita videatur, id est, quae delicto deputanda sint, locus quidem expostulat denotare, sed otiosum videri potest. Domino enim cognito, ultro spiritus a suo auctore respectus emergit ad notitiam veritatis, et admissus ad dominica praecepta, ex ipsis statim eruditur, id peccato deputandum, a quo Deus arceat. Quoniam cum Deum grande quid boni constet esse, utique bono nisi malum non displiceret, quod inter contraria sibi nulla amicitia est. Perstringere tamen non pigebit, delictorum quaedam esse carnalia, id est, corporalia, quaedam vero spiritalia. Nam cum ex hac duplicis substantiae congregatione confectus homo sit, non aliunde delinquit, quam unde constat. Sed non eo inter se differunt, quod corpus et spiritus duo sunt: alioquin eo magis paria sunt, quia duo unum efficiunt: ne quis pro diversitate materiarum peccata eorum discernat, ut alterum altero levius aut gravius existimet. Siquidem et caro, et spiritus, Dei res: alia, manu ejus expressa; alia afflatu ejus consummata (Gen. II). Cum ergo ex pari ad Dominum pertineant: quodcumque eorum deliquerit, ex pari Dominum offendit. An tu discernas actus carnis et spiritus? quorum et in vita, et in morte, et in resurrectione, tantum communionis atque consortii est (Joan. V), ut pariter tunc aut in vitam aut in judicium suscitentur: quia scilicet pariter aut deliquerint, aut innocenter egerint. Hoc eo praemiserimus, ut non minorem alteri quam utrique parti, si quid deliquerit, poenitentiae
For which things, then, repentance may seem just and due, that is, what things are to be reckoned as sin, the place indeed demands that we point out, but it may seem superfluous. For once the Lord is known, the spirit, looked upon by its Author, emerges of its own accord into the knowledge of the truth, and, admitted to the Lord's precepts, is at once taught by them that that is to be reckoned sin from which God holds us back. For since it is agreed that God is some great good, surely nothing but evil would displease the good, because between contraries there is no friendship. Yet it will not be irksome to touch on this: that of sins some are carnal, that is, bodily, and some spiritual. For since man is made up of this joining of a twofold substance, he sins from no other source than that of which he consists. But they do not differ from one another in that body and spirit are two: otherwise they are all the more equal because the two make one; lest anyone distinguish their sins by the difference of their materials, so as to reckon the one lighter or heavier than the other. For both flesh and spirit are things of God: the one formed by His hand, the other completed by His breath (Gen. 2). Since, then, they belong to the Lord equally, whichever of them has sinned offends the Lord equally. Or would you distinguish the acts of flesh and spirit, between which in life, in death and in resurrection there is so much communion and fellowship (John 5) that they are then raised alike either to life or to judgement, because, of course, they have alike either sinned or acted innocently? We have set this down beforehand so that we may understand that the necessity of repentance
<!-- head: 1231 TERTULLIANI 1232 (running across the page) -->
<!-- margin: A ‹quit, cur poenitentiam›; B ‹bit, delictorum quaedam›; C ‹tantum communionis›; D ‹Privatum absolute› (Commentarius) -->
<!-- oldnum: (none) -->
<!-- note: Opening "quit" belongs to "delinquit", set whole at the end of c1230. Footnote calls (1), (a), (b), (2) removed. Last word "poeni-|tentiae" hyphenated across the break, completed from the top of c1232. Lower half: Lectiones variantes and Commentarius (footnotes, not set). -->
Editors' notes and page, col. 1231

Footnotes

LECTIONES VARIANTES. (printed under page 662)

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1231

Privatum abest Latin. delinquentium privatum? Wouwer. M. S. Rig. delinquentium peccatum? Jun. delinquentium? Privatum cur malitiae Semler.

"Privatum" is lacking in Latinius; "delinquentium privatum?": Wouwer's manuscript, Rigault; "delinquentium peccatum?": Junius; "delinquentium? Privatum cur malitiae": Semler.

(printed under page 662)

(2) ‹anchor: aut› · call in col 1231

Innocentes Rig.

"Innocentes" (innocent, adjective) for "innocenter": Rigault.

(printed under page 662)

(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1231

Cur poenitentiam invadit, delinquentium privatum. Sic legitur in cod. Ursini. Poenitentiam dicit esse delinquentium privatum, hoc est, rem et curam delinquentium propriam et privatam. Injuste autem facit, qui privatis utitur tanquam communibus et publicis. Privatum absolute, pro agro privato, dixit Ovidius, V Fastor. Vindice servabat nullo sua publica vulgus: Jamque in privato pascere inertis erat. Rig.

"Why does he seize upon repentance, the private property of sinners?" So it reads in Orsini's manuscript. He says that repentance is the private property of sinners, that is, a matter and care proper and private to sinners. And he acts unjustly who uses private things as though they were common and public. Ovid used privatum absolutely, for private land, Fasti V: "The common people kept their public lands with none to defend them, and it was now a lazy man's way to graze on private ground." Rigault.

(printed under page 662)

(b) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1231

CAP. III. — (b) Otiosum videri potest. Supersedendum esse censet de pietate et religione catechumenorum, qui cum Dei legem perspectam haberent, ultroque poenitentiam amplecterentur, illius elogia aut ad illam adhortationes non postulabant. Le Pr.

"It may seem idle." He judges that he need not speak of the piety and religion of catechumens, who, since they had a clear view of God's law and embraced repentance of their own accord, did not need its praises or exhortations to it. Le Prieur.

(printed under page 662)

(c) ‹anchor: solum judicat› · call in col 1232 (printed in the left-hand Commentarius)

Facti solum judicat. Facti, scilicet delicta. Etenim praecessit, Non facti solum, verum et voluntatis delicta vitanda. Rig.

"Judges only of the deed." Of the deed, that is, sins of the deed. For it went before: "Not only sins of the deed but also of the will are to be avoided." Rigault.

(printed under page 662)

Page

  • running head: 1231 TERTULLIANI (spanning 1231–1232)
  • marginal letters: A quit, cur poenitentiam; B bit, delictorum quaedam; C tantum communionis; D stands beside the Commentarius (Privatum absolute)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • text: set from the filter re-test of 2026-10-19 and read against the page by QA (Q3, 2026-10-24); the earlier gap entry is withdrawn. The left-hand Commentarius opens with the close of note (o) from col 1230, set in n1232.
PL 1:1232
necessitatem intelligamus impendere. Communis reatus amborum est, communis et judex, Deus scilicet: communis igitur et poenitentiae medela. Exinde spiritalia et corporalia nominantur, quod delictum omne, aut agitur, aut cogitatur, ut corporale sit, quod in facto est: quia factum, ut corpus, et videri et contingi habet. Spiritale vero, quod in animo est, quia spiritus neque videtur, neque tenetur; per quod ostenditur non facti solum, verum et voluntatis delicta vitanda, et poenitentia purganda esse. Neque enim si mediocritas humana, facti solum judicat, quia voluntatis latebris par non est, idcirco crimina ejus etiam sub Deo negligamus, Deus in omnia sufficit. Nihil a conspectu ejus remotum, unde omnino delinquitur. Quia non ignorat nec omittit, quominus in judicium decernat. Dissimulator et praevaricator perspicaciae suae non est. Quid quod voluntas facti origo est? viderint enim, si qua casui, aut necessitati, aut ignorantiae imputantur: quibus exceptis jam non nisi voluntate delinquitur. Cum ergo facti origo est, non tanto potior ad poenam est, quanto principalis ad culpam: quae ne tunc quidem liberatur, cum aliqua difficultas perpetrationem ejus intercipit. Ipsa enim sibi imputatur, nec excusari poterit per illam perficiendi infelicitatem, operata quod suum fuerat. Denique Dominus quemadmodum se adjectionem legi superstruere demonstrat (Matth. V), nisi et voluntatis interdicendo delicta? Cum adulterum non eum solum definit, qui cominus in alienum matrimonium cecidisset, verum etiam illum, qui aspectus concupiscentia contaminasset: adeo quod prohibetur administrare, satis periculose animus sibi repraesentat, et temere per voluntatem expungit effectum. Cujus voluntatis cum vis tanta sit,
hangs over the one part no less than over both, if it has sinned in anything. The guilt of both is common, common also the judge, namely God: common, therefore, is the remedy of repentance too. Hence they are named spiritual and bodily, because every sin is either done or thought: so that that is bodily which lies in deed, because a deed, like a body, can be both seen and touched; but that is spiritual which lies in the mind, because the spirit is neither seen nor held. By this it is shown that not only sins of deed but also those of will are to be avoided, and to be purged by repentance. For if human limitation judges only of the deed, because it is not equal to the hiding places of the will, let us not on that account neglect its crimes before God as well: God is sufficient for all things. Nothing from which sin is committed at all is removed from His sight. For He neither is ignorant of it nor fails to bring it to judgement. He is no dissembler or betrayer of His own clear sight. What of the fact that the will is the origin of the deed? Let them see to it if some sins are put down to chance, or necessity, or ignorance: with these excepted, sin is now committed only by the will. Since, then, it is the origin of the deed, it is not so much the stronger towards punishment as it is the chief towards guilt; and it is not set free even when some difficulty cuts off its execution. For it is imputed to itself, nor will it be able to be excused through that unsuccess in accomplishing, having done what was its own. In short, how does the Lord show that He builds an addition upon the law, if not by forbidding sins of the will too? When He defines as an adulterer not only him who had actually fallen upon another's marriage, but also him who had defiled it with the lust of his gaze (Matt. 5): so much so that what the mind is forbidden to carry out it represents to itself at great peril, and rashly accomplishes the effect through the will. Since the force of this will is so great,
<!-- head: 1231 TERTULLIANI 1232 (running across the page) -->
<!-- margin: A ‹tentiae necessitatem›; B ‹omnino delinquitur›; C ‹terum non eum solum›; D ‹nog. habet secum› (Commentarius) -->
<!-- oldnum: (none) -->
<!-- note: Opening "tentiae" belongs to "poenitentiae", set whole at the end of c1231. Footnote calls (3), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j) removed. In the English the reference (Matthew 5) is placed at the adultery saying it introduces; in the Latin it stands after "demonstrat" as printed. Lower half: Lectiones variantes and Commentarius (footnotes, not set). -->
Editors' notes and page, col. 1232

Footnotes

(3) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1232

Factis Pam. Seml. e factis Leop.

"Factis" (by deeds): Pamelius, Semler; "e factis" (from deeds): Leopold.

(printed under page 662) COMMENTARIUS.

(continued) · col 1231

caussa boni ominis bonum factum praefari solebant. Notavit hoc Turnebus lib. III, cap. 22. Lac.

(continued) used to say bonum factum, "a good deed", at the outset, for the sake of good omen. Turnebus noted this, book III, ch. 22. La Cerda.

(printed under page 662)

(d) ‹anchor: praevaricator› · call in col 1232

Praevaricator. Proprie qui prodit caussam. Nam et glossae non solum συκοφάντης, sed etiam προδιδοὺς τὴν ἰδίαν δίκην, καὶ τῷ ἀντιδίκῳ βοηθῶν. Lac.

"Collusive pleader." Properly, one who betrays a case. For the glossaries give not only "false accuser" but also "one who betrays his own suit and helps the opposing party". La Cerda.

(printed under page 662)

(e) ‹anchor: perficiendi infelicitatem› · call in col 1232

Perficiendi infelicitatem. Frustrationem, ἀτυχίαν. Rig.— Perficiendi infelicitatem. Metaphora illa ab arboribus ducitur, quae cum fructus non ferant seu temporis injuria, seu cultorum negligentia, infelices vocantur. Le Pr.

"The ill-success of accomplishing." Frustration, atychia. Rigault. — "The ill-success of accomplishing." The metaphor is drawn from trees, which, when they bear no fruit, whether through the harm of the season or the neglect of those who tend them, are called infelices, unfruitful. Le Prieur.

(printed under page 662)

(f) ‹anchor: matrimonium cecidisset› · call in col 1232

Cominus in alienum matrimonium cecidisset. Adultero scilicet concubitu. Rig.

"Had fallen hand to hand upon another's marriage." That is, by adulterous intercourse. Rigault.

(printed under page 662)

(g) ‹anchor: satis periculose› · call in col 1232

Satis periculose. Ipse Tertullianus lib. de Monog. habet secum animi licentiam, qui omnia homini, quae non habet, imaginario fructu repraesentat. Rig.

"Dangerously enough." Tertullian himself, in the book On Monogamy: "he has with him the licence of the mind, which presents to a man, with imagined enjoyment, all the things he does not have." Rigault.

(printed under page 662)

(h) ‹anchor: sibi repraesentat› · call in col 1232

Sibi repraesentat. Ex hoc loco Petrus Martyr, et caeteri haeretici aiunt hoc verbum praesentem exhibere, apud Auctorem non significare; atque adeo cum ait pane Christum corpus suum repraesentasse, non ita accipiendum ut praesens corpus tradiderit: verum huic uni sexcentos opponere possem, ubi praesentem rem ipsam exponere significat. Albasp.

"Presents to itself." From this passage Peter Martyr and the other heretics say that in our author this verb does not mean to show as present; and so, when he says that Christ "represented" His body by the bread, it is not to be taken as though He gave His body as present. But against this one passage I could set six hundred where it means to set forth the very thing as present. Aubespine.

(printed under page 662)

(i) ‹anchor: temere per voluntatem› · call in col 1232

Et temere per voluntatem. In eamdem sententiam dixerat Juvenal. sat. 13. Has poenas patitur peccandi sola voluntas; Nam scelus intra se tacitum qui cogitat ullum Facti crimen habet. Rig.

"And rashly through the will." To the same effect Juvenal had said, Satire 13: "Such punishment does the mere will to sin suffer; for he who silently plots any crime within himself has the guilt of the deed." Rigault.

(printed under page 662)

(j) ‹anchor: vis tanta sit› · call in col 1232

Cujus voluntatis cum vis tanta sit, cur non solatium sui saturans, pro facto cedat? Sic edidit Rhenanus. Sed retinendam censeo codicis antiqui scripturam hujusmodi, Cujus voluntatis cum vis tanta sit, ut non solatium sui saturans pro facto cedat, pro facto (continues)

"Since the force of this will is so great, why should it not, glutting its own satisfaction, count for the deed?" So Rhenanus printed it. But I judge that the reading of the old manuscript should be kept, as follows: "Since the force of this will is so great that, not glutting its own satisfaction, it counts for the deed, for the deed (continues)

(printed under page 662)

Page

  • running head: 1232 TERTULLIANI (spanning 1231–1232)
  • marginal letters: A tentiae necessitatem; B omnino delinquitur; C terum non eum solum; D stands beside the Commentarius (nog. habet secum)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • text: set from the filter re-test of 2026-10-19 and read against the page by QA (Q3, 2026-10-24); the earlier gap entry is withdrawn. Note (c), called in this column, is printed in the left-hand Commentarius and is set in n1231.
PL 1:1233
ut non solatium sui saturans pro facto cedat, ergo plectetur. Vanissimum est dicere, volni, nec tamen feci. Atquin perficere debes quia vis: aut nec velle, quia nec perficis. Sed ipse conscientiae tuae confessione pronuntias. Nam si bonum concupisceres, perficere gestisses; porro sicut malum non perficis, nec concupiscere debueras. Quaqua te constitueris, crimine astringeris, quia aut malum volueris, aut bonum non adimpleveris.
so that, sating itself with its own solace, it does not stand in place of the deed, [and] therefore will be punished. It is most empty to say, "I willed it, and yet I did not do it." But you ought to accomplish it because you will it; or else not to will it, since you do not accomplish it. But you pronounce [sentence] by the confession of your own conscience. For if you desired the good, you would have been eager to accomplish it; further, just as you do not accomplish the evil, you ought not to have desired it either. Wherever you place yourself, you are bound by a charge, because either you have willed evil, or you have not fulfilled good.
CAPUT IV.
CHAPTER IV.
Omnibus ergo delictis seu carne, seu spiritu, seu facto, seu voluntate commissis, qui poenam per judicium destinavit, idem et veniam per poenitentiam spopondit, dicens ad populum: Poenitere, et salvum faciam te (Ezech. XVIII, 21, 23). Et iterum, Vivo, inquit Dominus, et poenitentiam malo quam mortem. Ergo poenitentia vita est, cum praeponitur morti. Eam tu peccator, mei similis (imo me minor, ego enim praestantiam in delictis meam agnosco), ita invade, ita amplexare, ut naufragus alicujus tabulae fidem. Haec te peccatorum fluctibus mersum, prolevabit et in portum divinae clementiae protelabit. Rape occasionem inopinatae felicitatis, ut ille tu nihil quondam penes Deum, nisi (Is. XL, 15; LXIV, 8; Dan. II; Ps. I, 3; Jer. XIX, 11; Matth. III) stilla situlae, et areae pulvis et vasculum figuli, arbor exinde fias illa, quae penes aquas seritur, et in foliis perennat, et tempore suo fructus agit, quae non ignem, non securim videbit. Poeniteat errorum, reperta veritate; poeniteat amasse quae Deus non amat, quando ne nos quidem ipsi servulis nostris ea
For all offences, then, whether committed by the flesh or by the spirit, whether by deed or by will, He who appointed punishment through judgement has likewise pledged pardon through repentance, saying to the people: "Repent, and I will save you" (Ezek. 18:21, 23). And again: "I live," says the Lord, "and I would rather have repentance than death." Repentance, therefore, is life, since it is preferred to death. You, sinner, like me (indeed, less than me, for I acknowledge my pre-eminence in offences), so lay hold of it, so embrace it, as a shipwrecked man [clings to] the trustworthiness of some plank. This will lift you up when you are sunk in the waves of sins, and will bear you on into the harbour of the divine clemency. Seize the occasion of unexpected happiness, so that you, who were once nothing before God but (Isa. 40:15; 64:8; Dan. 2; Ps. 1:3; Jer. 19:11; Matt. 3) "a drop from a bucket" and "dust of the threshing-floor" and "a potter's vessel", may thenceforth become that tree which "is planted beside the waters" and "endures in its leaves" and "brings forth its fruits in its season", which will see neither "fire" nor "axe". Let there be repentance of errors, now that the truth has been found; let there be repentance for having loved what God does not love, since not even we ourselves [allow] our little slaves those things
Editors' notes and page, col. 1233

Footnotes

LECTIONES VARIANTES. (printed under page 663)

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1233

Cur Franeq. Paris. Rigalt.

"Cur" (why): Franeker and Paris editions, Rigault.

(printed under page 663)

(2) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1233

Converteris Latin. Jun.

"Converteris" (you will be turned): Latinius, Junius.

(printed under page 663)

(3) ‹anchor: Poenitere› · call in col 1233

Poeniteat te Wouw. M. S.

"Poeniteat te" (repent): Wouwer's manuscript.

(printed under page 663)

(4) ‹anchor: prolevabit (f)› · call in col 1233

Perlavabit Franeq.

"Perlavabit" (will wash thoroughly): Franeker edition.

(printed under page 663)

(5) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1233

Nosse Rhen. male.

"Nosse" (to know): Rhenanus, wrongly.

(printed under page 663)

(6) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1233

Pro Jun.

"Pro" (for): Junius.

(printed under page 663)

(7) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1233

Praecipit Fran. Paris. Rig.

"Praecipit" (commands): Franeker and Paris editions, Rigault.

(printed under page 663)

(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1233

Solatium sui saturans. Animus per voluntatem apud seipsum fecit et adeptus est quod libuit; itaque hoc jam fruitur et saturatur solatio. Nam quod superest non est animi, sed corporis. Rig.

"Glutting its own satisfaction." Through the will the mind has within itself done and obtained what it pleased; so it now enjoys this satisfaction and is glutted with it. For what remains belongs not to the mind but to the body. Rigault.

(printed under page 663)

(b) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1233

CAP. IV.—(b) Omnibus ergo delictis. De prima poenitentia loquitur, quod non animadvertens Pamelius, nescio quid turbat, aut cur primam cum secunda confundit; nam necesse est mihi det, hoc nihil pro particulari poenitentia facere, atque adeo pro confessione, et remissione omnium peccatorum, cum de prima sit mentio, quia nemo inquam negavit omnia omnino peccata deleri. Albasp.

"For all sins, then." He is speaking of the first repentance; Pamelius, not noticing this, makes some confusion, or confounds the first with the second, I know not why. For he must grant me that this does nothing for particular penance, and so for confession and the remission of all sins, since the first is in question; for no one, I say, has denied that absolutely all sins are blotted out. Aubespine.

(printed under page 663)

(c) ‹anchor: vita est› · call in col 1233

Ergo poenitentia vita est. Ait Dominus, Poenitentiam malo quam mortem; opponens poenitentiam morti. Quid autem verius opponitur morti quam vita? Ergo opposita morti poenitentia, vita est. Rig.

"Repentance, then, is life." The Lord says, "I prefer repentance to death", setting repentance against death. And what is more truly opposed to death than life? Therefore repentance, opposed to death, is life. Rigault.

(printed under page 663)

(d) ‹anchor: imo me minor› · call in col 1233

Imo me minor. Quidquid ante lavacrum commeruerant catechumeni aut fecerant, id omne naturae magis impetu quam voluntate fecisse existimabantur, ut Auctor de Pudic., D. Cypr., aut quisquis libellum de Pedum Ablutione nobis dedit, Hermes et Justinus affirmant: quamobrem ait catechumenum minus se peccasse. Albasp.

"Nay, less than I." Whatever the catechumens had deserved or done before the washing, all of it was thought to have been done by the impulse of nature rather than by the will, as the author On Modesty, St Cyprian (or whoever gave us the little book On the Washing of the Feet), Hermas and Justin affirm: that is why he says the catechumen has sinned less than himself. Aubespine.

(printed under page 663)

(e) ‹anchor: alicujus tabulae fidem› · call in col 1233

Alicujus tabulae. Quando aiunt Patres poenitentiam esse secundam post naufragium tabulam, de secunda et post baptismum poenitentia id accipiendum, non de prima, quae non erat secunda, sed prima tabula. Alb.—Alicujus tabulae. Optime monuit Albaspineus secundam tabulam dici tantum de poenitentia secunda seu post baptismum suscepta. Prima quippe poenitentia qua fideles accedebant ad baptismum suscipiendum navis dicebatur, qua scilicet fracta, secunda poenitentia ceu tabula in naufragio restabat. Le Pr.

"Of some plank." When the Fathers say that repentance is the second plank after shipwreck, this is to be understood of the second repentance, after baptism, not of the first, which was not the second but the first plank. Aubespine. — "Of some plank." Aubespine rightly observed that "second plank" is said only of the second repentance, taken up after baptism. For the first repentance, by which the faithful came to receive baptism, was called the ship; when it was wrecked, the second repentance remained like a plank in the shipwreck. Le Prieur.

(printed under page 663)

(f) ‹anchor: prolevabit› · call in col 1233

Prolevabit. Sic legitur in antiquis exemplaribus. Rig.

"Will lift up." So it reads in the old copies. Rigault.

(printed under page 663)

Page

  • running head: 1233 LIBER DE POENITEN[TIA] (truncated at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ut non solatium sui saturans pro facto cedat; B salvum faciam te (Ezech. XVIII, 21, 23). Et iterum; C non ignem, non securim videbit. Poeniteat errorum; D (beside the commentary at the page foot, not in the text)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:1234
quibus offendimur non odisse permittimus. Obsequii enim ratio in similitudine animorum constituta est. De bono poenitentiae enumerando, diffusa et per hoc magno eloquio committenda materia est. Nos vero pro nostris angustiis unum inculcamus: bonum atque optimum esse, quod Deus praecepit. Audaciam existimo, de bono divini praecepti disputare. Neque enim quia bonum est, idcirco auscultare debemus; sed quia Deus praecepit. Ad exhibitionem obsequii, prior est majestas divinae potestatis: prior est auctoritas imperantis, quam utilitas servientis. Bonum est poenitere, annon? Quid revolvis? Deus praecipit. At enim ille non praecipit tantum; sed etiam hortatur. Invitat (Ezech. XXXIII, 11) praemio salutem, jurans, etiam vivo dicens, cupit credi sibi. O beatos nos quorum caussa Deus jurat! O miserrimos, si nec juranti Domino credimus! Quod igitur Deus tantopere commendat, quod etiam humano more sub dejeratione testatur, summa utique gravitate et aggredi et custodire debemus, ut in asseveratione divinae gratiae permanentes, in fructu quoque ejus et emolumento proinde perseverare possimus.
by which we are offended, not to hate. For the principle of obedience is founded on likeness of minds. The subject of enumerating the good of repentance is a broad one, and for that reason must be entrusted to great eloquence. We, however, in keeping with our narrow powers, press home one thing: that what God has commanded is good and best. I count it audacity to dispute about the good of a divine command. For it is not because it is good that we ought to hearken, but because God has commanded. In the rendering of obedience, the majesty of the divine power comes first: the authority of the one who commands comes before the advantage of the one who serves. Is it good to repent, or not? Why do you turn it over? God commands it. But indeed He does not only command; He also exhorts. He invites (Ezek. 33:11) to salvation by a reward; swearing, even saying "I live", He desires to be believed. O blessed are we, for whose sake God swears! O most wretched, if we do not believe the Lord even when He swears! What, then, God so earnestly commends, what He even attests under oath after the human manner, we ought assuredly both to undertake and to keep with the utmost seriousness, so that, abiding in the solemn assurance of the divine grace, we may likewise persevere in its fruit and benefit.
CAPUT V.
CHAPTER V.
Hoc enim dico, poenitentiam quae per Dei gratiam ostensa et indicta nobis, in gratiam nos Domino revocat, semel cognitam atque susceptam nunquam post hoc iteratione delicti resignari oportere. Jam quidem nullum ignorantiae praetextum tibi patrocinatur, quod Domino agnito praeceptisque ejus admissis, denique poenitentia delictorum functus, rursus te in delicta restituis. Ita in quantum
For this I say: that repentance, which, shown and enjoined on us through the grace of God, calls us back into favour with the Lord, once known and undertaken ought never thereafter to be cancelled by a repetition of offence. Now indeed no pretext of ignorance pleads on your behalf, since, having acknowledged the Lord and accepted His precepts, and having at length performed repentance for your offences, you restore yourself once more to offences. Thus in so far as
Editors' notes and page, col. 1234

Footnotes

(8) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1234

Praecipit Rigalt.

"Praecipit" (commands): Rigault.

(printed under page 663)

(9) ‹anchor: At enim› · call in col 1234

At ille Rig.

"At ille" (but he): Rigault.

(printed under page 663)

(10) ‹anchor: praemio salutem› · call in col 1234

Salutis Pet. Ciacconius; salute Rig.

"Salutis" (of salvation): Pedro Chacón; "salute" (by salvation): Rigault.

(printed under page 663)

(11) ‹anchor: O beatos nos› · call in col 1234

Nos omittit Seml.

Semler omits "nos" (we).

(printed under page 663)

(12) ‹anchor: resignari› · call in col 1234

Resignare Venet.

"Resignare" (to unseal, active): Venice edition.

(printed under page 663)

(13) ‹anchor: delicta restituis› · call in col 1234

Ita... Leop. Restitues Seml. Fran. Paris. Rig.

"Ita…": Leopold; "Restitues" (you will restore): Semler, Franeker and Paris editions, Rigault.

COMMENTARIUS.

(continued) · col 1233

ergo plectetur. Sic autem interpretor: Qui foeminam non suam aspectu concupiscentiae contaminat, imaginaria voluptatis praesentia animo quod concupivit, jam moechatus est in corde suo. Jure igitur voluntas cujus tanta vis est, ut per ipsam animus imaginario fructu delectetur, pro facto cedit, et pro facto plectitur. Rig.

(continued) it will therefore be punished. I interpret it thus: he who defiles a woman not his own by a look of lust, with the imagined presence of the pleasure in his mind, has already committed adultery in his heart with what he desired. Rightly, then, the will, whose force is so great that through it the mind delights in an imagined enjoyment, counts for the deed and is punished for the deed. Rigault.

(printed under page 663)

(g) ‹anchor: ignorantiae praetextum› · call in col 1234

CAP. V.—(g) Ignorantiae praetextum. Gentiles sive audientes hac una ratione peccatis suis ignosci volebant, quod quid optimum esset factu ignorassent: qua excusatione iis non liceret uti qui Christi mandatis imbuti essent, unde etiam constabit totum hoc caput ad audientes et catechumenos pertinere. Albasp.

"The pretext of ignorance." The Gentiles, or hearers, wished their sins forgiven on this one ground, that they had not known what was best to do: an excuse not open to those who had been instructed in Christ's commandments; from which it will also be clear that this whole chapter concerns hearers and catechumens. Aubespine.

(printed under page 663)

(h) ‹anchor: in delicta restituis› · call in col 1234

Rursus te in delicta restituis. Stultissimus qui pugnans adversus propria commoda, et in deteriorem statum restitui postulas. Rig.

"You restore yourself again to sins." Most foolish you, who fight against your own advantage and ask to be restored to a worse state. Rigault.

(printed under page 663)

Page

  • running head: LIBER DE POENITENTIA. 1234
  • marginal letters: A quibus offendimur non odisse permittimus; B sibi. O beatos nos quorum caussa Deus jurat; C patrocinatur, quod Domino agnito; D (beside the commentary at the page foot, not in the text)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:1235
ignorantia segregaris, in tantum contumaciae agglutinaris. Nam si idcirco te deliquisse poenituerat, quia Dominum coeperas timere, cur quod metus gratia gessisti rescindere maluisti, nisi quia metuere desisti? Neque enim timorem alia res, quam contumacia subvertit. Cum etiam ignorantes Dominum nulla exceptio tueatur ad poenam; quia Deum in aperto constitutum, et vel ex ipsis coelestibus bonis comprehensibilem, ignorari non licet: quanto cognitum despici periculosum est! Despicit porro, qui bonorum ac malorum intellectum ab illo consecutus, quod intelligit fugiendum, quodque jam fugit, resumens, intellectui suo, id est, Dei dono, contumeliam facit: respuit datorem cum datum deserit, negat beneficium, cum beneficium non honorat. Quemadmodum ei potest placere, cujus munus sibi displicet? Ita in Dominum non modo contumax, sed etiam ingratus apparet. Caeterum non leviter in Dominum peccat, qui, cum aemulo ejus diabolo poenitentia renuntiasset, et hoc nomine illum Domino subjecisset, rursus eumdem regressu suo erigit, et exultationem ejus seipsum facit, ut denuo malus, recuperata praeda sua, adversus Dominum gaudeat. Nonne quod dicere quoque periculosum est, sed ad aedificationem proferendum est, diabolum Domino praeponit? Comparationem enim videtur egisse, qui utrumque cognoverit, et judicato pronuntiasse eum meliorem, cujus se rursus esse maluerit. Ita qui per delictorum poenitentiam instituerat Domino satisfacere, diabolo
you are separated from ignorance, so far are you glued fast to contumacy. For if you had repented of having offended for this reason, that you had begun to fear the Lord, why have you preferred to undo what you did for fear's sake, unless because you have ceased to fear? For nothing else overturns fear but contumacy. Since no plea protects even those who are ignorant of the Lord against punishment, because it is not permitted to be ignorant of God, who is set in the open and is comprehensible even from the heavenly goods themselves, how perilous is it for Him to be despised once known! And he despises Him who, having obtained from Him the understanding of good and evil, by taking up again what he understands is to be shunned, and what he has already shunned, does insult to his own understanding, that is, to the gift of God: he spurns the Giver when he abandons the gift; he denies the benefit when he does not honour the benefit. How can he please Him whose gift displeases himself? Thus he appears towards the Lord not only contumacious but also ungrateful. Moreover, he sins not lightly against the Lord who, when by repentance he had renounced the devil, His rival, and on this account had made him subject to the Lord, raises him up again by his own return and makes himself the devil's exultation, so that the evil one, his prey recovered, rejoices anew against the Lord. Does he not, a thing perilous even to say, but which must be brought forward for edification, prefer the devil to the Lord? For he seems to have made a comparison, having known both, and to have pronounced by his judgement that one the better whose he has chosen to be once more. So he who through repentance for his offences had set about making satisfaction to the Lord, to the devil
Editors' notes and page, col. 1235

Footnotes

LECTIONES VARIANTES. (printed under page 664)

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1235

A poena Fran. Paris. Rig.; ad poenam Seml.

"A poena" (from punishment): Franeker and Paris editions, Rigault; "ad poenam" (to punishment): Semler.

(printed under page 664)

(2) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1235

Quanto magis Junius.

"Quanto magis" (how much more): Junius.

(printed under page 664)

(3) ‹anchor: negat› · call in col 1235

Beneficum Jun.

"Beneficum" (the benefactor): Junius.

(printed under page 664)

(4) ‹anchor: proferendum› · call in col 1235

Praeferendum Seml.

"Praeferendum" (to be put forward): Semler.

(printed under page 664)

(5) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1235

Satisfaciat Seml.

"Satisfaciat" (may make satisfaction): Semler.

(printed under page 664)

(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1235

Cum etiam ignorantes Dominum. Facit locus ille contra novos istos evangelicos qui ab Apostolorum tempore majores nostros in ignorantia perpetua vixisse dicunt, et tamen a culpa excusatos. Imprimis autem pro Auctoris sententia faciunt frequentissima illa sacrificia immolari jussa pro peccatis ignorantiae, Levit. IV et V, et num. XV, de quibus et Hebr. IX. Deinde et in Novo Test., Act. II, B. Petrus ad illos quos sciebat per ignorantiam peccasse: Poenitemini, inquit, et convertimini, ut deleantur peccata vestra. Hinc Patrum omnium conformis est sententia quod ignorantia, quam crassam moderni Theologi vocant, neminem a culpa excuset, qualis illa haud dubie fuisset, si verum illi dicerent. Pam.

"Since even those ignorant of the Lord." This passage tells against those new evangelicals who say that from the time of the Apostles our forefathers lived in perpetual ignorance, and yet were excused from guilt. In support of the author's view there are above all those very frequent sacrifices commanded to be offered for sins of ignorance, Leviticus 4 and 5 and Numbers 15, of which Hebrews 9 also speaks. Then in the New Testament too, Acts 2, Blessed Peter says to those whom he knew to have sinned through ignorance: "Repent," he says, "and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out." Hence the agreed judgement of all the Fathers, that ignorance of the kind modern theologians call crass excuses no one from guilt; and such without doubt it would have been, if what those men say were true. Pamelius.

(printed under page 664)

(b) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1235

Per aliam poenitentiae poenitentiam. Plinius, ep. 10, lib. VII: Superest ne rursus provinciae quod damnasse dicitur, placeat agatque poenitentiam poenitentiae suae. Rig.

"By another repentance of his repentance." Pliny, letter 10, book VII: "It remains that the province should not again approve what it is said to have condemned, and should repent of its repentance." Rigault.

(printed under page 664)

(c) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1235

Sed aiunt quidam. Adnotatu dignus etiam iste locus adversus novam quorumdam haeresim (a qua nec Calvinistae abhorrent), qui sibi sufficere arbitrantur, si corde et animo suam religionem retineant, quamvis catholicorum contrariae sibi religioni exercitiis ac mysteriis se immisceant, imo et communicent. Pam.

"But some say." This passage too is worth noting against the new heresy of certain people (from which the Calvinists do not shrink either), who think it enough for them to keep their religion in heart and mind, though they mix in the exercises and mysteries of the Catholics, a religion contrary to their own, and even receive communion. Pamelius.

(printed under page 664)

Page

  • running head: 1235 TERTULLIANI
  • marginal letters: A ignorantia segregaris, in tantum contumaciae; B displicet? Ita in Dominum non modo contumax; C poenitentiam instituerat Domino satisfacere, diabolo; D (beside the commentary at the page foot, not in the text)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:1236
per aliam poenitentiae poenitentiam satisfaciet: eritque tanto magis perosus Deo, quanto aemulo ejus acceptus. Sed aiunt quidam satis Deum habere, si corde et animo suspiciatur, licet actu minus fiat. Itaque se salvo metu et fide peccare: hoc est, salva castitate matrimonia violare, salva pietate parenti venenum temperare. Sic ergo et ipsi salva venia in gehennam detrudentur, dum salvo metu peccant. Primum exemplum perversitatis, quia timent, delinquunt: opinor non delinquerent, si non timerent. Igitur, qui Deum nolit offensum, nec revereatur omnino, si timor offendendi patrocinium est. Sed ista ingenia de semine hypocritarum pullulare consuerunt, quorum individua cum diabolo amicitia est, quorum poenitentia nunquam fidelis.
will make satisfaction by another repentance of his repentance; and he will be the more hateful to God, the more acceptable he is to His rival. But some say that God is satisfied if He is looked up to in heart and mind, even though it be done less in act; and that therefore they sin with fear and faith unimpaired: that is, they violate marriages with chastity unimpaired, they mix poison for a parent with filial piety unimpaired. Thus, then, they themselves too will be thrust down into Gehenna with pardon unimpaired, while they sin with fear unimpaired. A prime example of perversity: because they fear, they offend! I suppose they would not offend if they did not fear. Therefore let him who would not have God offended not revere Him at all, if fear is a defence for offending. But such dispositions are wont to sprout from the seed of the hypocrites, whose friendship with the devil is indivisible, whose repentance is never faithful.
CAPUT VI.
CHAPTER VI.
Quicquid ergo mediocritas nostra ad poenitentiam semel capessendam et perpetuo continendam suggerere conata est, omnes quidem deditos Domino spectat, ut omnis salutis in promerendo Deo petitores, sed praecipue novitiolis istis imminet. Qui cum maxime incipiunt divinis sermonibus aures rigare, quique catuli infantiae adhuc recentis, nec perfectis luminibus incerta reptant; et dicunt quidem pristinis renuntiare, et poenitentiam assumunt, sed includere eam negligunt. Interpellat enim illos ad desiderandum ex pristinis
Whatever, then, our slender ability has tried to suggest for taking up repentance once for all and keeping it perpetually concerns indeed all who are devoted to the Lord, as all seekers of salvation in winning God's favour; but it presses especially upon these little novices, who are just now beginning to water their ears with the divine discourses, and who, like whelps of an infancy still fresh, crawl about uncertainly with eyes not yet perfected; and they say indeed that they renounce their former things, and they take up repentance, but they neglect to bring it to its close. For [the hope of] desiring something from their former things interrupts them
Editors' notes and page, col. 1236

Footnotes

(6) ‹anchor: quorum› · call in col 1236

Invidia Fran. Paris.

"Invidia" (envy): Franeker and Paris editions.

(printed under page 664)

(7) ‹anchor: ut omnis› · call in col 1236

Omnes Paris. Jun.

"Omnes" (all): Paris edition, Junius.

(printed under page 664)

(8) ‹anchor: dicunt quidem› · call in col 1236

Ita edd. omnes, except. Leop. qui scribit: se renuntiare.

So all the editions, except Leopold, who writes: "se renuntiare" (that they renounce).

COMMENTARIUS. (printed under page 664)

(d) ‹anchor: amicitia est› · call in col 1236

Quorum individua cum diabolo amicitia est. Rectissima scriptura, nec debuit sollicitari. Est enim sermo de genere hypocritarum, quorum poenitentia nunquam fidelis, quorum scilicet individua cum diabolo amicitia est; adeoque semper ad ejus castra revertuntur. Rig.

"Whose friendship with the devil is inseparable." A perfectly correct reading, which ought not to have been tampered with. For he is speaking of the race of hypocrites, whose repentance is never faithful, whose friendship, that is, with the devil is inseparable; and so they always return to his camp. Rigault.

(printed under page 664)

(e) ‹anchor: mediocritas nostra› · call in col 1236

CAP. VI. — (e) Quidquid ergo mediocritas nostra, etc. Docere videtur Tertullianus hoc loco catechumenos quos tirones vocat poenitentiam usque ad baptismum aliquando protraxisse; cum enim probe intelligerent omnia peccata baptismo deleri, poenitentiae suscipiendae tempus producebant quantum in se erat, adeoque non includebant poenitentiam, hoc est non peragebant. Qua in interpretatione a Rigaltio tantisper discedo, etenim includere est πληρῶσαι, τελειῶσαι. Le Pr.

"Whatever, then, our littleness," etc. Tertullian seems in this passage to teach that the catechumens, whom he calls recruits, sometimes drew out their repentance until baptism; for since they well understood that all sins are blotted out by baptism, they put off the time of undertaking repentance as far as they could, and so did not "close" repentance, that is, did not carry it through. In this interpretation I depart for a little from Rigault, for includere is "to fulfil, to complete". Le Prieur.

(printed under page 664)

(f) ‹anchor: imminet› · call in col 1236

Novitiolis istis. Novitiolos istos post paulo dicet audientes, et auditorum tirocinia. Rig.— Novitiolis istis. Notetur catechumenos ita dictos, unde fortasse sumpta vox monasticae disciplinae quae hodie retinetur, ita ut novitii religionum sint veluti audientes et catechumeni. Lac.

"These little novices." A little later he will call these little novices "hearers", and "the recruitships of hearers". Rigault. — "These little novices." Note that catechumens were so called; from which perhaps comes the term of monastic discipline still kept today, so that the novices of religious orders are as it were hearers and catechumens. La Cerda.

(printed under page 664)

(g) ‹anchor: pristinis renuntiare› · call in col 1236

Pristinis renuntiare. Hoc est, idololatriae, et negotiis vitae secularis. Rig.

"To renounce former things." That is, idolatry and the business of worldly life. Rigault.

(printed under page 664)

(h) ‹anchor: poenitentiam assumunt› · call in col 1236

Et Poenitentiam assumunt. Assumere poenitentiam dicuntur, qui inter audientes nomina profitentur sua. Rig.—Poenitentiam assumunt. Notetur in primis poenitentiam assumere esse propriam locutionem eorum qui invadebant poenitentiam, cujus ipse primus aditus dicebatur assumptio. Et quidem hanc esse propriam locutionem invadentium poenitentiam notavit Heraldus, lib. I, c. 4, digress., sed nulla re probavit. Lac.

"And they take up repentance." Those are said to take up repentance who give in their names among the hearers. Rigault. — "They take up repentance." Note above all that "to take up repentance" is the proper expression for those who entered upon repentance, whose very first entry was called the assumptio. Hérault noted that this is the proper expression for those entering upon repentance, book I, ch. 4, digression, but proved it by nothing. La Cerda.

(printed under page 664)

(i) ‹anchor: includere eam negligunt› · call in col 1236

Sed includere eam negligunt. Baptismo scilicet, qui et obsignatio dicitur. Et ipse mox dicet, Intinctionis seram obstructam. Poenitentia igitur et fides tunc includitur, cum in baptismum deducitur; sicut ac- (continues)

"But they neglect to close it." With baptism, that is, which is also called the sealing. He himself will shortly say, "the bolt of the dipping shot fast." Repentance, then, and faith are closed in when they are brought into baptism; just as (continues)

(printed under page 664)

Page

  • running head: TERTULLIANI 1236
  • marginal letters: A per aliam poenitentiae poenitentiam; B delis.; C Interpellat enim illos ad desiderandum ex pristinis; D (beside the commentary at the page foot, not in the text)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:1237
aliquid, ipse finis desiderandi: velut poma cum jam in acorem vel amaritudinem senescere incipiunt, ex parte aliqua tamen adhuc ipsi gratiae suae adulantur. Omne praeterea cunctationis et tergiversationis erga poenitentiam vitium, praesumptio intinctionis importat. Certi enim indubitatae veniae delictorum, medium tempus interim furantur, et commeatum sibi faciunt delinquendi, quam eruditionem non delinquendi. Quam porro ineptum, quam iniquum, poenitentiam non adimplere, et veniam delictorum sustinere, hoc est, pretium non exhibere, ad mercem manum emittere! Hoc enim pretio Dominus veniam addicere instituit; hac poenitentiae compensatione redimendam proponit impunitatem. Si ergo qui venditant, prius nummum, quo paciscuntur, examinant, ne scalptus, neve rasus, ne adulter etiam: Dominum credimus poenitentiae probationem prius inire, tantam nobis mercedem perennis scilicet vitae concessurum? Sed differamus tantisper poenitentiae veritatem. Tunc opinor emendatos liquebit, cum absolvimur? Nullo pacto. Sed cum pendente venia, poena prospicitur, cum adhuc liberari
something, the very end of desiring: as apples, when they are already beginning to age into sourness or bitterness, still in some part nonetheless flatter with their own charm. Besides, the presumption of the dipping brings in every vice of delay and evasion towards repentance. For, sure of an undoubted pardon of their offences, they meanwhile steal the intervening time, and make for themselves a furlough for offending rather than a schooling in not offending. How senseless, moreover, how unjust, not to fulfil repentance and yet to expect the pardon of offences, that is, not to pay the price and to put out one's hand for the merchandise! For it is at this price that the Lord has appointed to knock down pardon; it is by this compensation of repentance that He offers impunity to be redeemed. If, then, those who sell first examine the coin with which they bargain, lest it be clipped, or scraped, or even counterfeit, do we believe that the Lord first enters on a testing of repentance, being about to grant us so great a reward, that of everlasting life, to be sure? But let us put off the reality of repentance for a while. Then, I suppose, it will be clear that we are amended, when we are absolved? By no means. But [it will be clear] when, while pardon hangs in suspense, the penalty is looked forward to, when we do not yet deserve to be freed,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1237

Footnotes

LECTIONES VARIANTES. (printed under page 665)

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1237

Mercedem Rig.

"Mercedem" (reward, as wages): Rigault.

(printed under page 665)

(2) ‹anchor: nobis mercedem› · call in col 1237

Mercem Latin.

"Mercem" (merchandise): Latinius.

(printed under page 665)

(3) ‹anchor: emendatos› · call in col 1237

Licebit Rhen.

"Licebit" (it will be allowed): Rhenanus.

(printed under page 665)

(4) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1237

Idem Fran. Rig.

"Idem" (the same): Franeker edition, Rigault.

(printed under page 665)

(5) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1237

Asparginem Jun. ex M. S.

"Asparginem" (a sprinkling): Junius, from a manuscript.

(printed under page 665)

(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1237

Praesumptio intinctionis. Fiducia veniae per baptismum impetrandae. Rig.

"Presumption on the dipping." Confidence of obtaining pardon through baptism. Rigault.

(printed under page 665)

(b) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1237

Commeatum sibi faciunt. Docebantur audientes non solum quam grave et periculosum esset peccare, Deumque iratum habere, sed etiam omnia retro delicta baptismo condonari, unde ait Tertullianus quibusdam peccandi audaciam et securitatem ejusmodi praeceptis fieri. Albasp.

"They make themselves a furlough." The hearers were taught not only how grave and dangerous it was to sin and to have God angry, but also that all past sins are forgiven by baptism; hence Tertullian says that for some, such teaching produced boldness and carelessness in sinning. Aubespine.

(printed under page 665)

(c) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1237

Hoc est pretium non exhibere. Id cautum fuerat lege 12 tab. ne venditoris res emptori aliter acquireretur, quam si is pretium solvisset, § venditor Inst. de rerum divisione et ex jure Attico petitum: id enim graecam fidem vocat Plautus in Asinaria; Ausonius in Epistolis, Graeca non bona fide. Turneb. advers. lib. XII, cap. 18. Albasp.

"This is not to produce the price." It was provided by the law of the Twelve Tables that the seller's property should not pass to the buyer unless he had paid the price (Institutes, On the division of things, § venditor), and this was taken from Attic law: Plautus in the Asinaria calls it "Greek credit"; Ausonius in his Letters, "on Greek, not good, credit." Turnebus, Adversaria, book XII, ch. 18. Aubespine.

(printed under page 665)

(d) ‹anchor: ne adulter› · call in col 1237

Ne scalptus, ne rasus, ne adulter. Lege Cornelia de falsis, punitur qui nummos aureos partim raserit, partim tinxerit, vel finxerit, l. VIII ad l. Corn. de fal.; ubi Basilicorum auctores legisse videntur, cinxerit, non tinxerit. Etenim dixere, Οἱ τὰ νομίσματα ξέοντες ἢ περικόπτοντες. Rig.

"Not clipped, not shaved, not counterfeit." By the Cornelian law on forgeries, he is punished who has partly shaved gold coins, partly dyed or counterfeited them, law 8 on the Cornelian law on forgeries; where the authors of the Basilica seem to have read cinxerit (has trimmed round), not tinxerit (has dyed). For they said, "those who shave or clip the coins". Rigault.

(printed under page 665)

(e) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1237

Cum adhuc liberari non meremur ut possimus mereri. Sic ista uno spiritu, absque ulla distinctione sunt perducenda. Disputat Tertullianus de poenitentium processu. Et quando nos, inquit, poenitentiam qui adsumpsimus, pro emendatis habebimur? An cum absolvimur, lavacro impetrato, aqua concessa? Minime inquit; sed cum pendente venia prospicimus poenas anteactae vitae piaculis constitutas, cum adhuc liberari dicam non meremur; nam quis merita sua coram Deo reputare ausit unquam? sed cum adhuc non meremur ut possimus, divina misericordia sic largiente de suo, mereri. Rig.

"While we do not yet merit to be set free, so that we may be able to merit." These words are to be read in one breath, without any pause. Tertullian is discussing the progress of penitents. "And when," he says, "shall we who have taken up repentance be held amended? When we are absolved, the washing obtained, the water granted? Not at all," he says; "but when, with pardon still pending, we look ahead to the punishments appointed for the sins of our past life, while we do not yet merit to be set free" (I will say "merit"; for who would ever dare to reckon his merits before God?) "but while we do not yet merit so as to be able to merit, the divine mercy so granting of its own." Rigault.

(printed under page 665)

(f) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1237

Servus libertate mutatus. Sacramentum libertatis, vertigo, mutationis signum. Hinc illa, Quibus una Quiritem Vertigo facit Et, Momento turbinis exit Marcus Dama. Et qui de ethnicis fiunt christiani, dicuntur conversi ad Deum scilicet verum, cui soli servire vera est libertas. Rig.

"A slave changed by freedom." The rite of freedom, the turning round, was the sign of the change. Hence those lines: "for whom a single turn makes a Roman citizen"; and: "in the moment of a spin, out comes Marcus Dama." And those who from heathen become Christians are said to be "converted", "turned", that is, to the true God, whom alone to serve is true freedom. Rigault.

(printed under page 665)

Page

  • running head: 1237 LIBER DE POENIT[ENTIA] (truncated at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A aliquid, ipse finis desiderandi; B minant, ne scalptus, neve rasus, ne adulter etiam; C (beside the commentary at the page foot, not in the text); D (beside the commentary, not in the text)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:1238
non meremur ut possimus mereri cum Deus comminatur, non cum ignoscit. Quis enim servus, postquam libertate mutatus est, furta sua et fugas sibi imputat? Quis miles postquam castris suis emissus, pro notis suis satagit? Peccator ante veniam deflere se debet; quia tempus poenitentiae, id est, quod periculi et timoris. Neque ego renuo divinum beneficium, id est, abolitionem delictorum inituris aquam omnimodo salvum esse; sed ut eo pervenire contingat, elaborandum est. Quis enim tibi tam infidae poenitentiae viro asperginem unam cujuslibet aquae commodabit? furto quidem aggredi, et praepositum hujus rei asseverationibus tuis circumduci facile est. Sed Deus thesauro suo providet, nec sinit obrepere indignos. Quid denique ait? Nihil occultum, quod non revelabitur (Luc, VIII. 17). Quantascumque tenebras factis tuis superstruxeris, Deus lumen est. Quidam autem sic opinantur, quasi Deus necesse habeat praestare etiam indignis quod spopondit: et liberalitatem ejus faciunt servitutem. Quod si necessitate nobis, symbolum mortis indulget
not to deserve, but so that we may be able to deserve; when God threatens, not when He forgives. For what slave, after he has been changed by freedom, charges himself with his thefts and runnings-away? What soldier, once discharged from his camp, troubles himself about his marks of disgrace? The sinner ought to weep for himself before pardon, because the time of repentance is that, namely, of peril and fear. Nor do I deny that the divine benefit, that is, the abolition of offences, is wholly secure for those about to enter the water; but that it may be our lot to arrive there, labour must be spent. For who will lend you, a man of so faithless a repentance, a single sprinkling of any water whatever? To approach it by stealth, indeed, and to get round the one set over this matter with your protestations, is easy. But God provides for His treasury, and does not suffer the unworthy to creep in. What, indeed, does He say? "Nothing is hidden which will not be revealed" (Luke 8:17). However great the darkness you build over your deeds, God is light. Some, however, think thus, as if God were under the necessity of furnishing even to the unworthy what He has promised; and they make His liberality a servitude. But if it is of necessity that He grants us the bond of death,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1238

Footnotes

(6) ‹anchor: et› · call in col 1238

Propositum Seml. Praepositum Wouw. M. S. Rig. melius.

"Propositum" (purpose): Semler; "Praepositum" (the one set over): Wouwer's manuscript, Rigault; the better reading.

(printed under page 665)

(7) ‹anchor: necessitate nobis› · call in col 1238

A. Neander haec w. transponenda esse censet, ita ut scribatur: Quodsi necessitate, ergo invitus facit; symbolum mortis indulget. Sed tollitur loci difficultas apposito post facit interrogandi signo.

A. Neander judges that these words should be transposed, so as to read: "But if by necessity, then he does it unwillingly; he grants the token of death." But the difficulty of the passage is removed by placing a question mark after facit.

COMMENTARIUS.

(continued) · col 1237

tiones judicio inclusas dixit Caius, quae sunt in judicium deductae, l. CXXXIX de reg. ju. Porro poenitentiam includere negligunt, qui pristinis aegre renuntiant; quasi maleficiorum summa, quam includi baptismo volunt, nondum confecta. Rig.

(continued) Gaius spoke of actions "closed in by judgement", meaning those brought to judgement, law 139 On the rules of law. Moreover, those neglect to close repentance who renounce their former ways reluctantly, as though the sum of their misdeeds, which they want closed in by baptism, were not yet complete. Rigault.

(printed under page 665)

(g) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1238

Pro notis suis satagit. Notas militares dicit, quibus miles denotatur, ob delicta militaria, puta si fuerit emansor, desertor, seditiosus, etc. Eadem metaphora de seipso dicet, peccatorem omnium notarum, sub finem hujus operis. Rig.

"He busies himself about his marks." He means military marks of disgrace, by which a soldier is branded for military offences, for instance if he has overstayed his leave, deserted, mutinied, and so on. He will use the same metaphor of himself towards the end of this work: "a sinner of every mark". Rigault.

(printed under page 665)

(h) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1238

Quis enim tibi tam infidae poenitentiae viro asperginem unam cujuslibet aquae commodaret? Qualis illa fuit Isiacorum, quam apertius describit lib. de Baptis. Villas, domos, templa, totasque urbes aspergine circumlatae aquae expiant. Rig.

"For who would lend you, a man of so faithless a repentance, a single sprinkling of any water at all?" Such as was that of the worshippers of Isis, which he describes more plainly in the book On Baptism: "they expiate country houses, homes, temples and whole cities by sprinkling water carried round." Rigault.

(printed under page 665)

(i) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1238

Adsperginem unam cujuslibet aquae. Aquae communis, profanae. Tam infidae, inquit, poenitentiae virum nemo aquae communis, non dicam cyatho, sed ne gutta quidem una dignabitur, tantum abest ut velit ad baptismum deducere. Splendide nugantur qui haec verba de baptismo per adspersionem accipiunt, nam ubicumque de baptismo sermonem facit, Lavacrum dicit, et Tingere, et Intingere, et Ablui, et Mergitari, et Immersionem, quae sane adspersionem minime significant. Non est propterea tamen culpanda Ecclesiae benignitas quae postmodum invaluisse videtur ut cogente necessitate saltem aquae aspergine Christiani perficerentur. Etenim Cyprianus epist. ad Magnum secunda ex sacris litteris probat, aquam aspersionis purificationem esse, nec moveri quemquam debere quod aspergi vel perfundi videntur aegri, non baptizari. Rig.

"A single sprinkling of any water." Of common, profane water. A man of so faithless a repentance, he says, no one will deem worthy, I will not say of a ladleful, but not even of a single drop of common water, much less be willing to bring him to baptism. Those talk splendid nonsense who take these words of baptism by sprinkling; for wherever he speaks of baptism he says washing, to dip, to dip in, to be washed, to be plunged, and immersion, which certainly do not mean sprinkling. Yet the Church's kindness is not therefore to be blamed, which seems to have prevailed afterwards, that in case of necessity Christians should be made perfect at least by a sprinkling of water. For Cyprian, in the second letter to Magnus, proves from the sacred writings that the water of sprinkling is a purification, and that no one should be troubled because the sick seem to be sprinkled or poured upon rather than baptised. Rigault.

(printed under page 665)

(j) ‹anchor: hujus rei› · call in col 1238

Praepositum hujus rei asseverationibus tuis circumduci facile est. Presbyterum significat lavacro ministrando praepositum, quem lib. de Baptismo, angelum vocat baptismi arbitrum. Rig.

"It is easy for the one set over this matter to be taken in by your protestations." He means the presbyter set over the administering of the washing, whom in the book On Baptism he calls the angel who is the arbiter of baptism. Rigault.

(printed under page 665)

Page

  • running head: LIBER DE POENITENTIA. 1238
  • marginal letters: A non meremur ut possimus mereri; B dignos. Quid denique ait?; C (beside the commentary at the page foot, not in the text); D (beside the commentary, not in the text)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:1239
ergo invitus facit: quis enim permittit permansurum id, quod tribuerit invitus? Non enim multi postea excidunt? non a multis donum illud aufertur? Hi sunt scilicet, qui obrepunt, qui poenitentiae fidem aggressi, super arenas domum ruituram collocant. Nemo ergo sibi aduletur, quia inter auditorum tirocinia deputatur, quasi eo etiam nunc sibi delinquere liceat Dominum simul cognoveris, timeas: simul inspexeris, reverearis. Caeterum quid te cognovisse interest, cum iisdem incubas, quibus retro ignarus? Quid autem te a perfecto servo Dei separat? An alius est intinctis Christus, alius audientibus? Num spes alia, vel merces, alia formido judicii, alia necessitas poenitentiae? Lavacrum illud obsignatio est fidei: quae fides a poenitentiae fide incipitur et commendatur. Non ideo abluimur, ut delinquere desinamus, quoniam jam corde loti sumus. Haec enim prima audientis intinctio est metus integer; exinde quoad Dominum senseris, fides sana, conscientia, semel poenitentiam amplexata. Caeterum, si ab aquis peccare desistimus, necessitate, non sponte innocentiam induimus. Quis ergo in bonitate praecellens? cui non licet, aut cui displicet malo esse? qui jubetur, an qui delectatur a crimine vacare? Ergo nec a furto manus avertamus, nisi claustrorum duritia repugnet: nec oculos a stupri concupiscentiis refraenemus, nisi a custodibus corporum obstructi, si nemo Domino deditus delinquere desinet, nisi intinctione alligatus. Quod si qui ita senserit, nescio an intinctus magis contristetur, quod peccare desierit, quam laetetur, quod evaserit. Itaque audientes
then He does it unwillingly; for who allows that to remain which he has granted unwillingly? For do not many afterwards fall away? Is not that gift taken away from many? These, namely, are they who creep in, who, having taken up the pledge of repentance, set on the sands a house that will fall. Let no one, then, flatter himself because he is reckoned among the novitiates of the hearers, as though for that reason it were still lawful for him to offend. As soon as you have known the Lord, you should fear Him; as soon as you have looked upon Him, you should revere Him. Besides, what does it matter that you have known Him, when you brood over the same things as when you were formerly ignorant? And what separates you from the perfect servant of God? Is there one Christ for the dipped, another for the hearers? Is there another hope, or reward, another dread of judgement, another necessity of repentance? That washing is the sealing of faith; and that faith is begun and commended by the faith of repentance. We are not washed in order that we may cease to offend, but because we have already been cleansed in heart. For this is the first dipping of the hearer: fear entire; thereafter, so far as you have perceived the Lord, a sound faith, a conscience that has once for all embraced repentance. Besides, if it is from the waters that we cease to sin, we put on innocence of necessity, not of our own accord. Who, then, excels in goodness? He who is not permitted, or he who is displeased, to be evil? He who is ordered, or he who delights, to be free of crime? So then let us not turn our hands from theft unless the hardness of bolts resists; nor restrain our eyes from the lusts of fornication unless hindered by the guardians of bodies, if no one devoted to the Lord will cease to offend unless bound by the dipping. But if anyone has thought thus, I do not know whether, once dipped, he will be more sorry that he has ceased to sin than glad that he has escaped. And so the hearers
Editors' notes and page, col. 1239

Footnotes

LECTIONES VARIANTES. (printed under page 666)

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1239

Promittit Jun.

"Promittit" (promises): Junius.

(printed under page 666)

(2) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1239

Dei Verbo Jun. ex M. SS.

"Dei Verbo" (by the Word of God): Junius, from manuscripts.

(printed under page 666)

(3) ‹anchor: exinde› · call in col 1239

Quo ad Rigalt.

"Quo ad" (to which), as two words: Rigault.

(printed under page 666)

(4) ‹anchor: cui non licet, aut› · call in col 1239

An Fran. Rig.

"An" (or) for "aut": Franeker edition, Rigault.

(printed under page 666)

(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1239

Qui poenitentiae fidem aggressi. Id est qui incipiunt credere poenitendum esse, et tamen eos non vere poenitet; nihil enim prius catechumeni sive tirones docebantur, quam ut prioris vitae poenitentiam agerent. Albasp.

"Who have set about the faith of repentance." That is, those who begin to believe that they must repent, and yet do not truly repent; for catechumens, or recruits, were taught nothing before this, that they should do penance for their former life. Aubespine.

(printed under page 666)

(b) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1239

Inter auditorum tirocinia. Catechumenos non intelligit, ut opinor, nam proprie catechumeni illi vocabantur, qui probe edocti et eruditi de lege Christi orarent et jus haberent ad baptismum (quamvis non ignorem tirones, audientes, et catechumenos uno eodemque nonnunquam nomine appellari), quique primam poenitentiam pene finierant; sed tirones et novitiolos qui christianae legis prima elementa docebantur. Albasp.

"Among the recruitships of hearers." He does not mean catechumens, in my opinion; for those were properly called catechumens who, well taught and instructed in the law of Christ, prayed and had the right to baptism (though I am aware that recruits, hearers and catechumens are sometimes called by one and the same name), and who had nearly finished the first repentance; he means the recruits and little novices who were being taught the first elements of the Christian law. Aubespine.

(printed under page 666)

(c) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1239

A perfecto Dei servo. Initiabantur adsumpta poenitentia; perficiebantur baptismo, unctione, Eucharistia. Rig.

"From the perfected servant of God." They were initiated by taking up repentance; they were perfected by baptism, anointing and the Eucharist. Rigault.

(printed under page 666)

(d) ‹anchor: a poenitentiae› · call in col 1239

Quae fides a poenitentiae. Non accedebant ad baptismum, nisi de rebus fidei plane instructi, id est, de Dei magnitudine et potestate, rebusque qui in Evangeliis continentur, uno excepto Eucharistiae mysterio, neque baptizabantur nisi postquam ea omnia se credere jurassent, quorum fides a poenitentia incipiebat, quia scilicet non censendi erant Deo credere eumque magnificare et timere, nisi eum dignum existimarent, cui de pristinis satisfacerent, et poenitentia diluerent, quae in eum ejusque legem olim peccassent. Albasp.

"Which faith … from repentance." They did not come to baptism unless fully instructed in the matters of faith, that is, in the greatness and power of God and the things contained in the Gospels, with the one exception of the mystery of the Eucharist; nor were they baptised until they had sworn that they believed all these things. Their faith began from repentance, because they were not to be counted as believing God, glorifying and fearing him, unless they thought him worthy to receive satisfaction for their former deeds, and to have them wash away by repentance the sins they had once committed against him and his law. Aubespine.

(printed under page 666)

(e) ‹anchor: intinctio est› · call in col 1239

Prima audientis intinctio, etc. Quo tenetur tota vita sua christianus qui integre sapit ad Deum, mente ad idololatriam, ad stuprum, ad homicidium irretorta. Rig.

"The hearer's first dipping," etc. By which the Christian who is wholly minded towards God is bound for his whole life, his mind never turned back to idolatry, to fornication, to murder. Rigault.

(printed under page 666)

(f) ‹anchor: Dominum senseris› · call in col 1239

Exinde quoad Dominum senseris. Domino deditus, infra. Rig.

"From then on, as far as you have come to know the Lord." "Given to the Lord", below. Rigault.

(printed under page 666)

(g) ‹anchor: non sponte› · call in col 1239

Necessitate non sponte. Jurabant in baptismo solennibus verbis se nunquam peccaturos, deinde renuntiabant diabolo et pompis ejus; denique censura, si peccarent post baptismum coercebant: quapropter ait, necessitate. Albasp.

"By necessity, not willingly." At baptism they swore in solemn words that they would never sin; then they renounced the devil and his pomps; finally, if they sinned after baptism, they were restrained by censure: that is why he says "by necessity". Aubespine.

(printed under page 666)

Page

  • running head: 1239 TERTULLIANI
  • marginal letters: A get ergo invitus facit; B tentiae fide incipitur et commendatur; C an intinctus magis contristetur; D (beside the commentary at the page foot, not in the text)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:1240
optare intinctionem, non praesumere oportet. Qui enim optat, honorat: qui praesumit, superbit. In illo verecundia, in isto petulantia apparet. Ille satagit, hic negligit. Ille mereri cupit, at hic, ut debitum, sibi repromittit: ille sumit, hic invadit. Quem censeas digniorem, nisi emendatiorem? quem emendatiorem, nisi timidiorem, et idcirco vera poenitentia functum? Timuit enim adhuc delinquere, ne non mereretur accipere. At ille praesumptor, cum sibi repromitteret, securus scilicet, timere non potuit: sic nec poenitentiam implevit, quia instrumento poenitentiae, id est, metu, caruit. Praesumptio inverecundiae portio est, instat petitorem, despicit datorem. Itaque decipit nonnunquam. Ante enim quam debeatur repromittit, quo semper is, qui est praestaturus, offenditur.
ought to desire the dipping, not to presume upon it. For he who desires it honours it; he who presumes upon it is proud. In the one modesty appears, in the other insolence. The one takes pains, the other is negligent. The one longs to deserve it, but the other promises it to himself as a debt; the one receives, the other seizes. Whom would you judge the worthier, if not the more amended? Whom the more amended, if not the more fearful, and for that reason one who has performed a true repentance? For he has feared to offend any longer, lest he should not deserve to receive. But that presumer, since he promised it to himself, being secure, to be sure, could not fear; so neither did he fulfil repentance, because he lacked the instrument of repentance, that is, fear. Presumption is a portion of shamelessness: it presses the petitioner's claim, it despises the giver. And so it sometimes deceives. For it promises itself [the gift] before it is due, whereby he who is to bestow it is always offended.
CAPUT VII.
CHAPTER VII.
Hucusque, Christe Domine, de poenitentiae disciplina servis tuis dicere vel audire contingat, quousque etiam delinquere non oportet audientibus: vel nihil jam de poenitentia noverint, nihil ejus requirant. Piget secundae, imo iam ultimae spei subtexere mentionem, ne retractantes de residuo auxilio poenitendi, spatium adhuc delinquendi demonstrare videamur. Absit, ut aliquis ita interpretetur, quasi eo sibi etiam nunc pateat ad delinquendum, quia patet ad poenitendum; et redundantia clementiae coelestis, libidinem faciat humanae temeritatis. Nemo idcirco deterior sit, quia Deus melior est, totiens delinquendo quotiens ignoscitur. Caeterum finem utique evadendi habebit, cum offendendi non habebit. Evasimus semel; hactenus
So far, O Christ, Lord, may it be granted to Thy servants to speak or to hear of the discipline of repentance, as far as it is fitting also for hearers not to offend: or let them now know nothing of repentance, let them seek nothing of it. It is irksome to append mention of a second, nay, now a last hope, lest, in treating of a remaining aid of repenting, we seem to point out room still for offending. Far be it that anyone should so interpret it, as though the way were still open to him for offending because it is open for repenting, and the overflowing of the heavenly clemency should make a licence for human rashness. Let no one be the worse because God is the better, by offending as often as he is forgiven. Otherwise he will surely find an end of escaping when he does not find one of offending. We have escaped once; thus far
Editors' notes and page, col. 1240

Footnotes

(5) ‹anchor: servis tuis› · call in col 1240

Discere Wouw. M. S. Rig.

"Discere" (to learn) for "dicere": Wouwer's manuscript, Rigault.

COMMENTARIUS. (printed under page 666)

(h) ‹anchor: quotiens ignoscitur› · call in col 1240

CAP. VII.—(h) Totiens delinquendo quotiens ignoscitur. Quis ex his non existimaret Ecclesiae fores poenitentibus semper patuisse, cum dicat Christum toties parcere, quoties delinquitur? Pamelius quoque ex his non dubitat affirmare Ecclesiam peccatoribus veniam semper indulsisse, et si quid apud auctores inter legendum de secunda et ultima poenitentia occurrat, id omne de publica accipiendum esse, atque ad confirmandum multa ex auctoribus accumulat, quae nihil referret explicare, cum quae istic ait Tertullianus cujusmodi (continues)

"By sinning as often as one is pardoned." Who would not think from these words that the doors of the Church always stood open to penitents, since he says that Christ spares as often as sin is committed? Pamelius too does not hesitate to affirm from them that the Church always granted pardon to sinners, and that whatever one meets in reading the authors about a second and last repentance is all to be understood of public penance; and to confirm it he heaps up many passages from the authors, which it would be pointless to explain, since what Tertullian says here, of whatever kind (continues)

(printed under page 666)

Page

  • running head: TERTULLIANI 1240
  • marginal letters: A optare intinctionem, non praesumere oportet; B (beside the space above CAPUT VII, after "offenditur."); C sit, quia Deus melior est; D (beside the commentary at the page foot, not in the text)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:1241
periculosis nosmetipsos inferamus, et si iterum evasuri videmur. Plerique naufragio liberati exinde repudium et navi et mari dicunt, et Dei beneficium, salutem suam scilicet, memoria periculi honorant. Laudo timorem, diligo verecundiam, nolunt iterum divinae misericordiae oneri esse: formidant videri inculcare, quod consecuti sunt: bona certe sollicitudine iterum experiri vitant quod semel didicerunt timere. Ita modus temeritatis, testatio est timoris. Timor autem hominis, Dei honor est. Sed enim pervicacissimus hostis ille, nunquam malitiae suae otium facit. Atquin tunc maxime saevit, cum hominem plene sentit liberatum; tunc plurimum accenditur, dum extinguitur. Doleat et ingemiscat necesse est, venia peccatorum permissa, tot in homine mortis opera diruta, tot titulos damnationis retro suae erasos. Dolet quod ipsum et angelos ejus, Christi servus illi peccator judicaturus est. Itaque observat, oppugnat, obsidet, si qua possit aut oculos concupiscentia carnali ferire, aut animum illecebris saecularibus irretire, aut fidem terrenae potestatis formidine evertere, aut a via certa perversis traditionibus detorquere: non scandalis, non tentationibus deficit. Haec igitur venena ejus providens Deus, clausa licet ignoscentiae janua, et intinctionis sera obstructa, aliquid adhuc permisit patere. Collocavit in vestibulo poenitentiam secundam, quae pulsantibus patefaciat: sed jam semel, quia jam secundo. Sed amplius nunquam, quia proxime frustra. Non enim et hoc semel satis est? Habes, quod jam non merebaris; amisisti enim quod acceperas. Si tibi indulgentia Domini accommodat, unde restituas quod amiseras, iterato beneficio gratus esto, nedum ampliato: majus est enim restituere, quam dare: quoniam miserius est perdidisse, quam omnino non accepisse. Verum non statim succidendus ac subruendus
let us not bring ourselves into perils, even if we seem likely to escape again. Many, once freed from shipwreck, thenceforth give notice of divorce both to ship and to sea, and honour the benefit of God, namely their own safety, by the memory of the peril. I praise their fear, I love their modesty: they are unwilling to be a burden again to the divine mercy; they dread to seem to trample on what they have obtained; with a good anxiety, surely, they avoid trying a second time what they have once learned to fear. So the limit set to rashness is the attestation of fear. And a man's fear is God's honour. But that most obstinate enemy never gives his malice a holiday. Nay, he rages most of all when he feels that a man has been fully freed; he is most inflamed when he is being extinguished. He must needs grieve and groan that, with pardon of sins granted, so many works of death in man have been demolished, so many titles of his own former condemnation erased. He grieves that the sinner, the servant of Christ, is to judge him and his angels. And so he watches, assaults, besieges, if in any way he can strike the eyes with carnal lust, or ensnare the mind with worldly allurements, or overturn faith by fear of earthly power, or twist it from the sure way by perverse traditions: he does not fail in stumbling-blocks, nor in temptations. Foreseeing, therefore, these poisons of his, God, although the gate of forgiveness has been shut and barred with the bolt of the dipping, has permitted something still to stand open. He has placed in the vestibule a second repentance, to open to those who knock; but now once only, because it is now the second time; but never more, because the last time it was in vain. For is not even this once enough? You have what you were no longer deserving; for you had lost what you had received. If the indulgence of the Lord grants you the means to restore what you had lost, be grateful for a benefit repeated, not to say enlarged; for it is a greater thing to restore than to give, since it is more wretched to have lost than never to have received at all. But [the mind] is not at once to be cut down and overthrown
Editors' notes and page, col. 1241

Footnotes

LECTIONES VARIANTES. (printed under page 667)

(1) ‹anchor: sentit liberatum› · call in col 1241

Baptismo scilicet.

That is, by baptism.

(printed under page 667)

(2) ‹anchor: perversis› · call in col 1241

Conditionibus alii. Pamel. in trib. codd.

"Conditionibus" (conditions) for "traditionibus": others; Pamelius in three manuscripts.

(printed under page 667)

(3) ‹anchor: quod jam› · call in col 1241

Non abest Rig.

"Non" (not) is lacking in Rigault.

(printed under page 667)

(4) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1241

Domino Seml.

"Domino" (to the Lord): Semler.

(printed under page 667)

(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1241

Hactenus periculosis nosmetipsos inferamus. Hactenus, id est, nunquam postbac. Rig.

"Thus far let us bring ourselves into perils." "Thus far", that is, never hereafter. Rigault.

(printed under page 667)

(b) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1241

Repudium et navi et mari dicunt. Nam, inquit Rhenanus, ut est apud Publium Mimographum: improbe Neptunum accusat, qui iterum naufragium facit. Venustus vero sermo, cum, inquit, repudium et navi et mari dicunt, translatione sumpta ab his qui uxori libellum repudii mittunt. Similiter lib. de Hab. mul. cap. 4, repudium coeli dixit. Pam.

"They give notice of divorce to both ship and sea." For, says Rhenanus, as we find in Publilius the mime-writer: "He wrongly blames Neptune who is shipwrecked a second time." A charming expression, he says, when they "give notice of divorce to both ship and sea", the figure being taken from those who send their wife a bill of divorce. Likewise in the book On Women's Dress, ch. 4, he spoke of "divorce from heaven". Pamelius.

(printed under page 667)

(c) ‹anchor: perversis traditionibus› · call in col 1241

Perversis traditionibus. Mss. tres conditionib. Illud tamen magis placet, ut agat contra Montanistas, qui perversis traditionibus suis de nulla post baptismum poenitentia, a via certa fideles detorquebant. Eo autem quod addit, perversis, patet non omnes ab Auctore traditiones impugnari; verum de his latius lib. de Cor. mil. ubi multas Ecclesiae traditiones probat. Pam.

"By perverse traditions." Three manuscripts have conditionibus. But I prefer the view that he is acting against the Montanists, who by their perverse traditions of no repentance after baptism were twisting the faithful from the sure way. And from his adding "perverse" it is clear that not all traditions are attacked by the author; but on these more fully in the book On the Soldier's Crown, where he approves many traditions of the Church. Pamelius.

(printed under page 667)

(d) ‹anchor: in vestibulo› · call in col 1241

Collocavit in vestibulo. Consuetudo et ritus erat ut poenitentes in vestibulo ecclesiae manerent, ad quem respicit. Albasp.

"He placed in the vestibule." It was the custom and rite that penitents should remain in the vestibule of the church, to which he refers. Aubespine.

(printed under page 667)

(e) ‹anchor: amplius nunquam› · call in col 1241

Sed amplius nunquam. Ergo una tantum erat post baptismum poenitentia. Albasp.

"But never again." So there was only one repentance after baptism. Aubespine.

(printed under page 667)

(f) ‹anchor: perdidisse› · call in col 1241

Miserius est perdidisse quam, etc. Miserius est multo salutem quam accepisti baptismo perdere peccando, quam omnino eam non accepisse. Albasp.

"It is more wretched to have lost than," etc. It is far more wretched to lose by sinning the salvation you received in baptism than never to have received it at all. Aubespine.

(printed under page 667)

Page

  • running head: 1241 LIBER DE POENIT[ENTIA] (truncated at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A nus periculosis nosmetipsos inferamus; B diruta, tot titulos damnationis; C rebaris; amisisti enim quod acceperas; D (beside the commentary at the page foot, not in the text)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:1242
est animus desperatione, si secundae quis poenitentiae debitor fuerit: pigeat sane peccare rursus, sed rursus poenitere non pigeat: pigeat iterum periclitari, sed non iterum liberari. Neminem pudeat; iteratae valetudinis iteranda medicina est: gratus in Dominum exstiteris, si quod tibi Dominus offert, non recusaveris: offendisti, sed reconciliari adhuc potes. Habes cui satisfacias, et quidem volentem.
by despair, if anyone has become a debtor of a second repentance. Let it irk him, surely, to sin again, but let it not irk him to repent again; let it irk him to be imperilled again, but not to be freed again. Let no one be ashamed: for a repeated sickness the medicine must be repeated. You will have shown yourself grateful towards the Lord if you have not refused what the Lord offers you. You have offended, but you can still be reconciled. You have One to whom you may make satisfaction, and One, indeed, who is willing.
CAPUT VIII.
CHAPTER VIII.
Id si dubitas, evolve quae Spiritus Ecclesiis dicat (Apoc., I, II, III). Desertam dilectionem Ephesiis imputat, stuprum et idolothytorum esum Thyatirenis exprobrat, Sardos non plenorum operum incusat, Pergamenos docentes perversa reprehendit; Laodicenos fidentes divitiis objurgat: et tamen omnes ad poenitentiam commonet, sub comminationibus quidem. Non comminaretur autem non poenitenti, si non ignosceret poenitenti. Dubium, si non et alibi hanc clementiae suae profusionem demonstrasset. Non, ait (Jer., VIII, 4; Osee, VI, 6), qui ceciderit, resurget, et qui aversatus fuerit convertetur? Ille est scilicet, ille est qui misericordiam mavult quam sacrificia. Laetantur coeli, et qui illic Angeli, poenitentia hominis (Matth., IX, 13). Heus tu, peccator, bono animo sis, vides ubi de tuo reditu gaudeatur. Quid illa similitudinum dominicarum argumenta nobis volunt? Quod mulier drachmam perdidit et requirit, et reperit, et amicas ad gaudium invitat, nonne restituti peccatoris exemplum est? Errat et una pastoris ovicula, sed grex una carior non erat: una illa conquiritur, una pro omnibus desideratur, et tandem invenitur, et humeris pastoris ipsius refertur: multum enim errando laboraverat. Illum etiam mitissimum patrem non tacebo, qui prodigum filium revocat, et post inopiam poenitentem libens suscipit, immolat vitulum praeopimum, convivio gaudium suum exornat. Quid
If you doubt this, unroll what the Spirit says to the Churches (Rev. 1, 2, 3). He charges the Ephesians with forsaken love; He reproaches the Thyatirans with fornication and the eating of things sacrificed to idols; He accuses the Sardians of works not full; He rebukes the Pergamenes for teaching perverse things; He chides the Laodiceans for trusting in riches: and yet He admonishes all to repentance, under threats indeed. But He would not threaten the one who does not repent if He did not forgive the one who repents. It would be doubtful, had He not shown this outpouring of His clemency elsewhere too. "Shall not," He says (Jer. 8:4; Hos. 6:6), "he who has fallen rise again, and he who has turned away be converted?" He it is, to be sure, He it is who "would rather have mercy than sacrifices". "The heavens rejoice, and the Angels who are there, at a man's repentance" (Matt. 9:13). Come, you sinner, be of good heart: you see where there is rejoicing over your return. What do those subjects of the Lord's parables mean for us? That a woman has lost a drachma, and seeks it, and finds it, and invites her friends to rejoice: is it not an example of the sinner restored? There strays, too, one little sheep of the shepherd, but the flock was not dearer than the one: that one is sought out, that one is longed for in place of all, and at length it is found, and is carried back on the shoulders of the shepherd himself; for it had laboured much in straying. Nor shall I pass over that most gentle father, who calls back his prodigal son and gladly receives him repentant after his want, sacrifices a fatted calf, adorns his joy with a banquet. Why
Editors' notes and page, col. 1242

Footnotes

(5) ‹anchor: Sardos› · call in col 1242

Sardios Paris. Fran.

"Sardios" (the Sardians): Paris and Franeker editions.

(printed under page 667)

(6) ‹anchor: quam sacrificia› · call in col 1242

Sacrificium Fran.

"Sacrificium" (sacrifice, singular): Franeker edition.

(printed under page 667)

(7) ‹anchor: tuo reditu› · call in col 1242

Reditu aberat a Rhen.

"Reditu" (return) was lacking in Rhenanus.

(printed under page 667)

(8) ‹anchor: una pastoris› · call in col 1242

Pastori Rigalt.

"Pastori" (to the shepherd): Rigault.

(printed under page 667)

(9) ‹anchor: inopiam poenitentem› · call in col 1242

Poenitentiam Seml. poenitentiam Fran. Paris. Rigal.

"Poenitentiam" (repentance): Semler; "poenitentiam": Franeker and Paris editions, Rigault.

COMMENTARIUS.

(continued) · col 1241

aut quomodo accipienda sint nostri duntaxat sit instituti edocere. Haec igitur quotiens ignoscitur ita intelligas quasi post secundam poenitentiam alius esset poenitendi locus, sed nihil aliud voluit dicere, quam tametsi aliqua post baptismum spes veniae supersit, et secunda atque ultima concedatur poenitentia, tamen rursus peccandum non esse post baptismum; nam sexcentis locis, non dicam hoc capite, unam tantum ait a lavacro veniam superesse, neque ullum primis illis temporibus inter privatam aut publicam graviorum criminum discrimen occurret. Itaque illa totiens et quotiens dicuntur, recte de duabus veniis, ut ita dicam, et totidem peccatis, de iis scilicet, quae ante sive post baptismum remittebantur. Caeterum Ecclesiae universae hanc fuisse sententiam vel hanc consuetudinem in omnibus omnino Ecclesiis observatam fuisse, non ausim affirmare. Albasp.

(continued) or how it is to be understood, it is our sole purpose to explain. Do not, then, take these words as often as one is pardoned as though after the second repentance there were further room for repenting; he meant nothing else than this: although some hope of pardon remains after baptism, and a second and last repentance is granted, still one must not sin again after baptism. For in six hundred places, not to say in this chapter, he says that only one pardon remains after the washing; nor in those first times will one meet any distinction between private and public penance for the graver crimes. So "as often" and "so often" are rightly said of two pardons, so to speak, and of as many sins, namely those remitted before and after baptism. But I would not dare to affirm that this was the view of the whole Church, or that this custom was observed in absolutely all the Churches. Aubespine.

(printed under page 667)

Page

  • running head: LIBER DE POENITENTIA. 1242
  • marginal letters: A est animus desperatione; B poenitentiam commonet, sub comminationibus; C una carior non erat; D (beside the commentary at the page foot, not in the text)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:1243
filium enim invenerat, quem amiserat; cariorem senserat, quem lucri fecerat. Quis ille nobis intelligendus pater? Deus scilicet: tam pater nemo, tam pius nemo. Is ergo te filium suum, etsi acceptum ab eo prodegeris, etsi nudus redieris, recipiet, quia redisti, magisque de regressu tuo, quam de alterius sobrietate laetabitur, sed si poeniteat ex animo, si famem tuam cum saturitate mercenariorum paternorum compares, si porcos immundum relinquas pecus, si patrem repetas vel offensum, Deliqui, dicens, pater, nec dignus ego jam vocari tuus. Tantum relevat confessio delictorum, quantum dissimulatio exaggerat. Confessio enim satisfactionis consilium est, dissimulatio contumaciae.
For he had found the son whom he had lost; he had felt him the dearer whom he had gained back. Who is that father to be understood by us? God, of course: no one is so truly a father, no one so loving. He, then, will receive you, His son, even if you have squandered what you received from Him, even if you return naked, because you have returned; and He will rejoice more over your return than over the sobriety of the other — but only if you repent from the heart, if you compare your hunger with the plenty of your father's hired servants, if you leave the swine, that unclean herd, if you seek your father again, offended though He be, saying, I have sinned, father, and I am no longer worthy to be called yours (cf. Luke 15:17–21). Confession of sins lightens as much as concealment aggravates. For confession is the counsel of satisfaction, concealment the counsel of contumacy.
CAPUT IX.
CHAPTER IX.
Hujus igitur poenitentiae secundae et unius, quanto in arcto negotium est, tanto operosior probatio, ut non sola conscientia proferatur, sed aliquo etiam actu administretur. Is actus, qui magis graeco vocabulo exprimitur et frequentatur, Exomologesis est, qua delictum Domino nostrum confitemur: non quidem ut ignaro, sed quatenus satisfactio confessione disponitur, confessione poenitentia nascitur, poenitentia Deus mitigatur. Itaque Exomologesis prosternendi et humilificandi hominis disciplina est, conversationem
Of this second and single repentance, then, the narrower the business is, the more laborious is its proof, so that it is not brought forward in the conscience alone but is also carried out in some act. This act, which is more often expressed and spoken of by a Greek word, is exomologesis, by which we confess our sin to the Lord: not indeed as to One unaware of it, but inasmuch as satisfaction is set in order by confession, of confession repentance is born, and by repentance God is appeased. And so exomologesis is a discipline of prostrating and humbling a man, enjoining a manner of life
Editors' notes and page, col. 1243

Footnotes

LECTIONES VARIANTES. (printed under page 668)

(1) ‹anchor: poeniteat› · call in col 1243

Te add. Jun.

Junius adds "te" (you).

(printed under page 668)

(2) ‹anchor: confessio delictorum› · call in col 1243

Delictum Paris.

"Delictum" (the sin): Paris edition.

(printed under page 668)

(3) ‹anchor: operosior probatio› · call in col 1243

Est addit Paris. Fran. Rigalt.

The Paris and Franeker editions and Rigault add "est" (is).

(printed under page 668)

(4) ‹anchor: sola conscientia› · call in col 1243

Praeferatur Fran. Paris. Rigalt. Perferatur P. Ciaconius.

"Praeferatur" (be shown forth): Franeker and Paris editions, Rigault; "Perferatur" (be carried through): Pedro Chacón.

(printed under page 668)

(5) ‹anchor: injungens› · call in col 1244

Inungeas cod. Divion.

"Inungeas" (anoint): the Dijon manuscript.

(printed under page 668)

(a) ‹anchor: confessio delictorum› · call in col 1243

CAP. VIII.—(a) Tantum relevat. De confessione publica ac particulari haec accipienda non sunt, sed de confessione qua peccator seipsum Deo accusat. Alb.

"So much does it relieve." These words are not to be taken of public or particular confession, but of the confession by which the sinner accuses himself to God. Aubespine.

(printed under page 668)

(b) ‹anchor: Exomologesis est› · call in col 1243

CAP. IX. — (b) Exomologesis est. Dum pluribus dicamus quid sit Exomologesis, pluribusque probemus, satis tum erit dicere per eam confessionem auricularem non intelligi; sed actus quibus poenitentes caeteris poenitentiae suae fidem facerent. Albasp.

"It is the Exomologesis." Until we say at more length what the Exomologesis is, and prove it at more length, it will be enough for now to say that by it auricular confession is not meant, but the acts by which penitents gave others proof of their repentance. Aubespine.

(printed under page 668)

(c) ‹anchor: cineri incubare› · call in col 1244

Sacco et cineri incubare. Conciliciatum et concineratum, ut ipse dicet lib. de Pudic. In asperitudine sacci et horrore cineris, ut hic paulo post saccum sic describit Paulinus ad Pneumatium: Si modo lugentem gravis hirto tegmine saccus Caprigenum setis dum tegat et stimulet. Rig.

"To lie in sackcloth and ashes." "Clad in haircloth and covered with ashes", as he himself will say in the book On Modesty: "in the roughness of sackcloth and the horror of ashes", as a little after here. Paulinus describes sackcloth thus, to Pneumatius: "if only heavy sackcloth, with its shaggy covering of goats' bristles, covers the mourner and goads him." Rigault.

(printed under page 668)

(d) ‹anchor: pura nosse› · call in col 1244

Pastum et potum pura nosse. Alibi dixit, mero pane et aqua, id est, puro, sive solo, absque ullis aliis esculentis, absque condimentis. Sic ad Scapulam, sacrificamus pura prece, hoc est, absque odoribus, absque sanguine, absque thure, absque victima, hoc est pane et aqua. Eodem significatu ἄρτον καθαρὸν dixit Alexis Poeta comicus in Tarentinis, ubi jocatur versibus elegantissimis in diaetam Pithagoraeorum: Πυθαγορισμοί, καὶ λόγοι Λεπτοί, διεσμιλευμέναι τε φροντίδες Τρέφουσ' ἐκείνους· τὰ δὲ καθ' ἡμέραν, τάδε Ἄρτος καθαρὸς, εἷς ἑκατέρῳ, ποτήριον Ὕδατος, τοσαῦτα ταῦτα. De frugalitate Pythagoraeorum, notum est illud Juvenalis: Unde epulum possis centum dare Pythagoreis. Rig.

"To know food and drink only plain." Elsewhere he said "with bread and water only", that is, plain, or alone, without any other foods, without seasonings. So to Scapula, "we sacrifice with pure prayer", that is, without incense, without blood, without frankincense, without a victim; that is, with bread and water. In the same sense the comic poet Alexis said "pure bread" in the Tarentines, where he jokes in most elegant verses about the diet of the Pythagoreans: "Pythagoreanisms and subtle talk and finely chiselled thoughts are their nourishment; their daily fare is this: one plain loaf apiece, a cup of water; and that is all." On the frugality of the Pythagoreans, there is Juvenal's well-known line: "from which you could give a banquet to a hundred Pythagoreans." Rigault.

<!-- The Greek verses in (d) are in very small type; read at the image's resolution, with the word-division supported by the known text of Alexis. Check against the page. Q1 (2026-10-04): the lean images cannot settle line 1 (the page may print the first word divided) or the second word of line 2; needs a high-zoom render. --> (printed under page 668)

(e) ‹anchor: presbyteris advolvi› · call in col 1244

Presbyteris advolvi. En quomodo ante sacerdotes volverentur, ut peccata sua confiterentur, et eorum veniam obtinerent, aiunt interpretes, cum Baronio, Bellarmino, Maldonato in controversiis. Ego etsi hunc ritum antiquissimum esse fatear, ex his tamen probari nequit; nam cum pro foribus templi starent poenitentes, praetereuntibus sacerdotibus caeterisque fidelibus, omnibus omnino dolentis animi signis poenitentiam suam testabantur, lacrymis non parcebant, precibus insistebant, volvebantur, et si quae alia habet poenitentia, quae misericordiam movere possint, non omittebant, ut pacem recuperarent: quem ritum describit Auctor, cum ait presbyteris advolvi, quare nihil haec ad confess. auricularem. Albasp.

"To fall down before the presbyters." See, say the interpreters, with Baronius, Bellarmine and Maldonado in the controversies, how they rolled themselves before the priests to confess their sins and obtain pardon for them. For my part, though I grant that this rite is very ancient, it cannot be proved from these words. For when the penitents stood before the doors of the church, as the priests and the rest of the faithful went by they testified their repentance with every sign of a grieving soul, did not spare their tears, persisted in prayers, rolled on the ground, and left out nothing else that repentance has that might move to mercy, in order to recover peace: this is the rite the author describes when he says "to fall down before the presbyters"; so this has nothing to do with auricular confession. Aubespine.

(printed under page 668)

(f) ‹anchor: et caris› · call in col 1244

Et caris Dei adgeniculari. Putarim ego per caros Dei intelligendos esse martyres, quos poenitentes rogare solebant, ut se Ecclesiae redderent, et nonnihil de poenitentia indulgerent. Unde Tertull. noster Protrep. ad mart.: Quam quidam, pacem nimirum, non habentes a martyribus petere consueverunt. Ea ratione faciliores habebant presbyteros, caeterosque christianos. Quae affert La Cerda ut probet per caros Dei intelligi presbyteros nihil ad rem facere videntur; loca quippe illa tum ex Eusebio, tum ex Greg. Nazianzeno aliisque, referenda sunt ad has voces, presbyteris advolvi. Le Pr.

"And to kneel before God's dear ones." I would think that by God's dear ones the martyrs are to be understood, whom penitents used to beg to restore them to the Church and to remit something of their penance. Hence our Tertullian in the exhortation To the Martyrs: "which some, not having it (namely peace), have been accustomed to ask from the martyrs." In this way they found the presbyters and the other Christians more lenient. What La Cerda brings forward to prove that the presbyters are meant by God's dear ones seems irrelevant; for those passages, from Eusebius and from Gregory Nazianzen and others, are to be referred to the words "to fall down before the presbyters." Le Prieur.

(printed under page 668)

Page

  • running head: 1243 TERTULLIANI
  • marginal letters: A ‹ni? filium enim invenerat›; B ‹Hujus igitur poenitentiae›; C ‹beside the Lectiones variantes, (5) Inungeas cod. Divion.›; D ‹beside the Commentarius, (d) … absque ullis aliis›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:1244
injungens misericordiae illicem; de ipso quoque habitu atque victu mandat, sacco et cineri incubare corpus sordibus obscurare, animum moeroribus dejicere, illa quae peccavit tristi tractatione mutare; caeterum pastum et potum pura nosse, non ventris scilicet, sed animae caussa: plerumque vero jejuniis preces alere, ingemiscere, lacrymari, et mugire dies noctesque ad Dominum Deum tuum, presbyteris advolvi, et caris Dei adgeniculari, omnibus fratribus legationes deprecationis suae injungere. Haec omnia Exomologesis, ut poenitentiam commendet, ut de periculi timore Dominum honoret, ut in peccatorem ipsa pronuntians pro Dei indignatione fungatur, et temporali afflictatione aeterna supplicia non dicam frustretur, sed expungat. Cum igitur provolvit hominem, magis relevat: cum squalidum facit, magis mundatum reddit: cum accusat, cum condemnat, absolvit. In quantum non peperceris tibi, in tantum tibi Deus, crede, parcet.
that draws down mercy; it gives commands also concerning one's very dress and food: to lie in sackcloth and ashes, to darken the body with squalor, to cast down the spirit with sorrows, to change by sorrowful treatment the things in which one has sinned; for the rest, to know only plain food and drink, for the sake, that is, not of the belly but of the soul; and for the most part to feed prayers with fasting, to groan, to weep, and to cry aloud day and night to the Lord your God, to throw oneself down before the presbyters and to kneel to those dear to God, to lay on all the brethren the errand of pleading for oneself. All this exomologesis does, so that it may commend repentance, so that by fear of the danger it may honour the Lord, so that, itself passing sentence on the sinner, it may do duty in place of God's indignation, and by temporal affliction may — I will not say frustrate, but — wipe out eternal punishments. When therefore it casts a man down, it raises him the more; when it makes him squalid, it renders him the more cleansed; when it accuses, when it condemns, it absolves. As far as you have not spared yourself, so far, believe me, God will spare you.
CAPUT X.
CHAPTER X.
Plerosque tamen hoc opus, ut publicationem sui, aut suffugere, aut de die in diem differre, praesumo; pudoris magis memores quam salutis: velut illi, qui in partibus verecundioribus corporis contracta vexatione, conscientiam medentium vitant,
Yet I suppose that most people either shirk this work, as being a public exposure of themselves, or put it off from day to day, more mindful of shame than of salvation: like those who, having contracted some affliction in the more shameful parts of the body, avoid the knowledge of physicians,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1244

Footnotes

(6) ‹anchor: atque› · call in col 1244

Sic et Junius legit; alii addunt, victu mandat; quod a Rhen. abest. Vox mandat deest in edition. Rhen., sed ab eo postea addita in cod. Gorz.

So Junius also reads; others add "victu mandat" (commands in diet), which is lacking in Rhenanus. The word "mandat" is lacking in Rhenanus's editions, but was afterwards added by him in the Gorze manuscript.

(printed under page 668)

(7) ‹anchor: Dominum Deum tuum› · call in col 1244

Suum Rig.

"Suum" (his own): Rigault.

(printed under page 668)

(8) ‹anchor: et caris› · call in col 1244

Aris Seml.

"Aris" (at the altars): Semler.

(printed under page 668)

(9) ‹anchor: temporali afflictatione› · call in col 1244

alii affliction. Est autem parum proba haec sententia.

Others read "affliction[e]" (affliction). But this reading is hardly sound.

(printed under page 668) COMMENTARIUS. (printed under page 668)

(g) ‹anchor: provolvit hominem› · call in col 1244

Provolvit hominem. Etenim poenitentes volutabantur ad genua fratrum. Rig.

"It casts a man down." For penitents rolled themselves at the knees of the brethren. Rigault.

(printed under page 668)

(h) ‹anchor: publicationem sui› · call in col 1244

CAP. X. — (h) Ut publicationem sui. Quia scilicet post baptismum per publicam semper poenitentiam, in graviora delicta animadvertebant, eaque ob hanc caussam palam nonnunquam exponebantur. Caeterum non assentior interpretibus, neque Card. Baronio an. Chr. 56, qui haec de auriculari confessione, non de publicae poenitentiae actu intelligi volunt, toto enim hoc capite de publica confessione peccatorum et de publica poenitentia agitur. Albasp.

"So as … the making public of oneself." Because, namely, after baptism they always dealt with the graver sins by public penance, and for this reason these were sometimes set out openly. But I do not agree with the interpreters, nor with Cardinal Baronius at the year of Christ 56, who want this understood of auricular confession and not of the act of public penance; for this whole chapter is about the public confession of sins and public penance. Aubespine.

(printed under page 668)

Page

  • running head: TERTULLIANI 1244
  • marginal letters: A ‹versationem injungens misericordiae›; B ‹igitur provolvit hominem›; C ‹beside the Lectiones variantes, (9) alii affliction.›; D ‹beside the Commentarius, trep. ad mart.›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:1245
et ita cum erubescentia sua pereunt. Intolerandum scilicet pudori, Domino offenso satisfacere, saluti prodactae reformari. Nae tu verecundia bonus, ad delinquendum expandens frontem, ad deprecandum vero subducens. Ego rubori locum non facio, cum plus de detrimento ejus acquiro, cum ipsa hominem quodammodo exhortatur, Ne me respexeris, dicens, per te mihi melius est perire. Certe periculum ejus tunc, si forte, onerosum est, cum penes insultaturos in risiloquio consistit, ubi de alterius ruina alter attollitur, ubi prostrato superscenditur. Caeterum inter fratres atque conservos, ubi communis spes, metus, gaudium, dolor, passio (quia communis spiritus de communi Domino et Patre), quid tu hos aliud quam te opinaris? Quid consortes casuum tuorum, ut plausores, fugis? Non potest corpus de unius membri vexatione laetum agere: condoleat universum, et ad remedium conlaboret, necesse est. In uno et altero Ecclesia est, Ecclesia vero Christus. Ergo cum te ad fratrum genua protendis, Christum contrectas, Christum exoras. Aeque illi cum super te lacrymas agunt, Christus patitur, Christus Patrem deprecatur. Facile impetratur semper, quod filius postulat. Grande plane emolumentum verecundiae occultatio delicti pollicetur. Videlicet si quid humanae notitiae subduxerimus, proinde et Deum celabimus? Adeone existimatio hominum et Dei conscientia comparantur? An melius est damnatum latere, quam palam absolvi? Miserum est sic ad Exomologesin pervenire. Malo enim ad miseriam pervenitur,
and so perish together with their own blushing. It is intolerable to shame, of course, to make satisfaction to the offended Lord, to be restored to the salvation it squandered! Truly you are a fine one for modesty, spreading your brow wide for sinning but drawing it in for supplication. I make no room for blushing when I gain more by its loss, when it itself in a manner exhorts the man, saying: Do not regard me; it is better for me to perish through you. Its danger is burdensome then, if ever, when it lies at the mercy of those who will insult it with jeering talk, where one man is raised up by another's ruin, where the fallen is climbed over. But among brethren and fellow servants, where hope, fear, joy, grief and suffering are common (because the spirit is common, from a common Lord and Father), why do you think these anything other than yourself? Why do you flee the sharers of your misfortunes as though they were applauding? The body cannot be glad at the hurt of one member: the whole must needs grieve with it and labour together for its cure. In one and another is the Church, and the Church is Christ. So when you stretch yourself out at the knees of the brethren, you are touching Christ, you are entreating Christ. Equally, when they shed tears over you, it is Christ who suffers, Christ who entreats the Father. What the Son asks is always easily obtained. A great profit indeed does the concealment of sin promise to modesty! Clearly, if we withdraw something from the knowledge of men, shall we in the same way hide it from God too? Are the opinion of men and the knowledge of God to be compared like that? Or is it better to be damned in hiding than to be absolved in the open? It is wretched to come to exomologesis like this. Yes, for it is through evil that one comes to wretchedness;
Editors' notes and page, col. 1245

Footnotes

LECTIONES VARIANTES. (printed under page 669)

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1245

Quin Latin. et Jun.

"Quin" (nay rather): Latinius and Junius.

(printed under page 669)

(2) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1245

Species Fran. Paris.

"Species" (appearance): Franeker and Paris editions.

(printed under page 669)

(3) ‹anchor: quid tu hos› · call in col 1245

Tuos Seml. Leop. tu hos Rig. ex cod. div.

"Tuos" (your own): Semler, Leopold; "tu hos" (you … these): Rigault, from the Dijon manuscript.

(printed under page 669)

(4) ‹anchor: ad miseriam› · call in col 1245

Ad miseriam Fran. Paris. Rigalt. amans si perv. Seml. adventum est volebat Rhen. minus bene.

"Ad miseriam" (to misery): Franeker and Paris editions, Rigault; "amans si perv[enitur]": Semler; Rhenanus wanted "adventum est", less well.

(printed under page 669)

(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1245

Saluti prodactae. Prodiga peccandi protervia perditissimae. Rig.

"Squandered to salvation." Utterly lost by a wanton recklessness in sinning. Rigault.

(printed under page 669)

(b) ‹anchor: te opinaris› · call in col 1245

Quid tu hos aliud quam te opinaris. Sic legitur in codice Divionensi. Et esse verissimum puto. Rig.

"Why do you think these anything other than yourself?" So it reads in the Dijon manuscript, and I think it entirely right. Rigault.

(printed under page 669)

(c) ‹anchor: casuum tuorum› · call in col 1245

Quid consortes casuum tuorum. Hunc locum sic expressit B. Pacianus: consortes casuum vestrorum timere nolite. Nullum corpus membrorum suorum vexatione laetatur; imo pariter dolet, et ad remedium collaborat. In uno et altero Ecclesia est, in Ecclesia vero Christus; atque adeo qui fratribus peccata sua non tacet, Ecclesiae lacrymis adjutus, Christi precibus absolvitur. Pam.

"Why [do you shun] the sharers of your misfortunes?" Blessed Pacian rendered this passage thus: "do not fear the sharers of your misfortunes." No body rejoices in the suffering of its members; rather it grieves with them and works together for the remedy. In one and another is the Church, and in the Church is Christ; and so he who does not keep his sins silent from the brethren, helped by the Church's tears, is absolved by Christ's prayers. Pamelius.

(printed under page 669)

(d) ‹anchor: palam absolvi› · call in col 1245

Quam palam absolvi. Palam quidem et frequente Ecclesia absolvebantur, verum satis mihi non constat haec de sacramentali absolutione accipienda esse; quin potius conjicerem, de ultima exomologesi, quae permolesta et plena pudoris videbatur, illud palam absolvi dictum esse; nam quid posset inesse pudoris aut verecundiae in illa absolutione? at vero in ultima exomologesi multa occurrebant quae sine pudore non poterant ferri. Primum e limine in mediam ecclesiam adducebantur ab episcopo, istic ad ejus pedes prostrati veniam peccatorum suorum deprecabantur, precibus et lacrymis totius fraternitatis gratiam et misericordiam sollicitabant, tandem in eodem statu permanentes, id est humi jacentes, a peccatis liberabantur, haec omnia multis ita permolesta videbantur, ut mallent in culpa remanere, quam hoc modo ab ea liberari. Albasp.

"Than to be absolved openly." They were indeed absolved openly and before a full church; but I am not sure that this is to be understood of sacramental absolution. I would rather conjecture that "to be absolved openly" was said of the final exomologesis, which seemed very irksome and full of shame; for what shame or embarrassment could there be in that absolution? But in the final exomologesis there were many things that could not be borne without shame. First they were led by the bishop from the threshold into the middle of the church; there, prostrate at his feet, they begged pardon for their sins and sought by prayers and tears the favour and mercy of the whole brotherhood; at last, remaining in the same posture, that is, lying on the ground, they were freed from their sins. All this seemed so irksome to many that they preferred to remain in their guilt rather than be freed from it in this way. Aubespine.

(printed under page 669)

(e) ‹anchor: pervenire› · call in col 1245

Miserum est sic ad exomologesin pervenire. Forma loquendi abhorrentium aliquid, miserum est! Sic Horatius Deprehendi miserum est. Hic igitur aliquis abhorrens austeriorem poenitendi formam, ait, Miserum est sic ad exomologesin pervenire! Huic respondet Tertullianus; Malo enim ad miseriam pervenitur, etc., hoc est, peccato. Et mala sunt quae nos ad miseriam ducunt. Rig.

"It is wretched to come thus to the exomologesis." "It is wretched!" is a way of speaking of those who shrink from something. So Horace: "It is wretched to be caught." Here, then, someone shrinking from the harsher form of penance says, "It is wretched to come thus to the exomologesis!" Tertullian answers him: "For it is by evil that one comes to misery," etc., that is, by sin. And evil are the things that lead us to misery. Rigault.

(printed under page 669)

Page

  • running head: 1245 LIBER DE POENITENTIA.
  • marginal letters: A ‹tant, et ita cum erubescentia›; B ‹rum (c), ut plausores, fugis›; C ‹pervenire (e). Malo enim›; D ‹beside the Commentarius, (g) oris et formae›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:1246
sed ubi poenitendum est deserit miserum: quia factum est salutare. Miserum est secari et cauterio exuri, et pulveris alicujus mordacitate cruciari: tamen quae per insuavitatem medentur, et emolumento curationis offensam sui excusant, et praesentem injuriam superventurae utilitatis gratia commendant.
but where repentance has to be made, the wretchedness departs, because it has become salutary. It is wretched to be cut and burned out with the cautery and tormented by the bite of some powder; yet the things that heal through unpleasantness both excuse the offence they give by the profit of the cure and commend the present hurt for the sake of the benefit to come.
CAPUT XI.
CHAPTER XI.
Quid si praeter pudorem, quem potiorem putant, etiam incommoda corporis reformident, quod inlotos, quod sordulentos, quod extra laetitiam oportet deversari, in asperitudine sacci, et horrore cineris, et oris de jejunio vanitate? Num ergo in coccino et Tyrio pro delictis supplicare nos condecet? Cedo acum crinibus distinguendis, et pulverem dentibus elimandis, et bisulcum aliquid ferri vel aeris unguibus repastinendis. Si quid ficti nitoris, si quid coacti ruboris, in labia aut genas urgeat. Praeterea exquirito balneas laetiores hortulani maritimive secessus: adjicito ad sumptum; conquirito altilium enormem saginam; defecato senectutem vini. Cumque quis interrogarit, cuinam ea largiaris: Deliqui, dicito, in Deum, et periclitor in aeternum perire. Itaque nunc pendeo, et maceror, et excrucior, ut Deum reconciliem mihi, quem delinquendo laesi. Sed enim illos, qui ambitu obeunt capessendi magistratus, neque pudet, neque piget incommodis animae et corporis, nec incommodis tantum, verum et contumeliis omnibus eniti in caussa votorum suorum. Quas non ignobilitates vestium affectant? Quae non
What if, besides shame, which they reckon the weightier, they also shrink from the discomforts of the body — that they must go about unwashed, squalid, without gladness, in the roughness of sackcloth and the horror of ashes and the hollowness of face that comes from fasting? Is it fitting, then, for us to make supplication for our sins in scarlet and Tyrian purple? Bring the pin for parting the hair, and the powder for scouring the teeth, and some forked thing of iron or bronze for paring the nails. If there is any false gloss, any forced red, let him press it on lips or cheeks. Further, seek out the pleasanter baths of a garden or seaside retreat; add to the expense; search out an enormous fattening of fowls; clear old wine of its lees. And when anyone asks you on whom you are lavishing these things, say: I have sinned against God, and I am in danger of perishing for ever. So now I hang in suspense, and waste away, and am tormented, that I may reconcile to myself God, whom I wounded by sinning. Yet those who go about canvassing to win a magistracy are neither ashamed nor loath to struggle through discomforts of soul and body — and not discomforts only but every kind of insult — in the cause of their ambitions. What meanness of dress do they not affect? What
Editors' notes and page, col. 1246

Footnotes

(5) ‹anchor: poenitendum est› · call in col 1246

Desinit Fran.

"Desinit" (ceases): Franeker edition.

(printed under page 669)

(6) ‹anchor: mordacitate› · call in col 1246

Cruciari Fran. Rig. anxiari Seml.

"Cruciari" (to be tormented): Franeker edition, Rigault; "anxiari" (to be anxious): Semler.

(printed under page 669)

(7) ‹anchor: qui ambitu› · call in col 1246

Ambitus Rig.

"Ambitus" (canvassings): Rigault.

COMMENTARIUS. (printed under page 669)

(f) ‹anchor: extra laetitiam› · call in col 1246

CAP. XI. — (f) Extra laetitiam. Non licebat poenitentibus ullo delectationis genere, ne quidem balneis se oblectare. Albasp.

"Outside gladness." Penitents were not allowed to take pleasure in any kind of enjoyment, not even in baths. Aubespine.

(printed under page 669)

(g) ‹anchor: de jejunio vanitate› · call in col 1246

Oris de jejunio vanitate. Etenim jejunio nativus oris et formae vigor evanescit. Allusit ad illud Matthaei, VI, 16: Ἀφανίζουσι τὰ πρόσωπα αὐτῶν. Vultu incedunt evanido. Rig.

"The wasting of the face from fasting." For by fasting the natural vigour of the face and figure fades. He alludes to Matthew 6:16: "they disfigure their faces". They go about with a faded countenance. Rigault.

(printed under page 669)

(h) ‹anchor: in coccino› · call in col 1246

In coccino. Per coccinum inquit Rhen. intelligit vestem cocco infectam, Martialis. Coccina formosae donas et ianthina moechae. Coccum vulgo granum vocant latine reddentes τοῦ κόκκου graecum vocabulum. Pam.

"In scarlet." By scarlet, says Rhenanus, he means a garment dyed with kermes; Martial: "you give scarlet and violet garments to a handsome adulteress." The kermes is commonly called "grain", rendering in Latin the Greek word kokkos. Pamelius.

(printed under page 669)

(i) ‹anchor: et Tyrio› · call in col 1246

Et Tyrio. Tyrium, inquit idem, appellat vestimentum ex purpura Tyria constans. Ovid.: Sive erit in Tyriis Tyrios laudabis amictus. Qui etiam annotat cedo hic accipi pro da. Pam.

"And in Tyrian." By Tyrian, the same scholar says, he means a garment made of Tyrian purple. Ovid: "If she is in Tyrian dress, you will praise the Tyrian robes." He also notes that cedo is here taken for da, "give". Pamelius.

(printed under page 669)

(j) ‹anchor: dentibus elimandis› · call in col 1246

Et pulverem dentibus elimandis. Aptissime verbo elimare usus est, nam limus vocatur illa scabrities, seu sordes illae dentibus adhaerentes. At praeter pulverem, dentifricio utebantur veteres. Videsis Apuleium in apolog. Le Pr.

"And powder for filing the teeth." He used the verb elimare most aptly, for limus is the name of that roughness, or the dirt clinging to the teeth. Besides powder, the ancients used a dentifrice. See Apuleius in the Apology. Le Prieur.

(printed under page 669)

(k) ‹anchor: ea largiaris› · call in col 1246

Cuinam ea largiaris. Sic emendavimus secuti vestigia scripturae veteris, Cur anima largiaris. Rig.

"To whom you are lavishing these things." So we have corrected, following the traces of the old reading, "Why, soul, you lavish." Rigault.

(printed under page 669)

Page

  • running head: LIBER DE POENITENTIA. 1246
  • marginal letters: A ‹sed ubi poenitendum est›; B ‹dentibus elimandis (j)›; C ‹Quas non ignobilitates›; D ‹beside the Commentarius, (g) oris et formae›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:1247
atria nocturnis et crudis salutationibus occupant? Ad omnem occursum majoris cujusque personae decrescentes, nullis conviviis celebres, nullis comessationibus congreges, sed exules a libertatis et laetitiae felicitate. Idque totum propter unius anni volaticum gaudium. Nos, quod securium virgarumve petitio sustinet, in periculo aeternitatis tolerare dubitamus? et castigationem victus atque cultus offenso Domino praestare cessabimus, quae gentiles nemine omnino laeso sibi irrogant? Hi sunt de quibus Scriptura commemorat: Vae illis qui delicta sua velut procero fune nectunt.
halls do they not besiege with greetings by night and at raw dawn? Shrinking small at every encounter with any greater personage, frequenting no banquets, joining no revels, but exiles from the happiness of freedom and gladness. And all this for the fleeting joy of a single year. Do we hesitate to bear, in peril of eternity, what the seeking of the axes and rods endures? And shall we fail to offer the offended Lord a chastening of food and dress, which Gentiles impose on themselves when no one at all has been offended? These are those of whom Scripture speaks: Woe to those who tie their sins together as with a long rope (cf. Isa. 5:18).
CAPUT XII.
CHAPTER XII.
Si de exomologesi retractas, gehennam in corde considera, quam tibi exomologesis exstinguit: et poenae prius magnitudinem imaginare, ut de remedii adeptione non dubites. Quid illum thesaurum ignis aeterni aestimamus, cum fumariola quaedam ejus tales flammarum ictus suscitent, ut proximae urbes aut jam nullae exstent, aut idem sibi de die sperent. Dissiliunt superbissimi montes ignis intrinsecus foetu: et quod nobis judicii perpetuitatem probat, cum dissiliant, cum devorentur, nunquam tamen finiuntur. Quis haec supplicia interim montium non judicii minantis exemplaria deputabit? Quis scintillas tales non magni alicujus et inaestimabilis foci missilia quaedam et exercitoria jacula consentiet? Igitur cum scias adversus gehennam post prima illa intinctionis dominicae munimenta, esse adhuc in exomologesi secunda subsidia,
If you draw back from exomologesis, consider in your heart the gehenna which exomologesis quenches for you; and first picture the greatness of the penalty, so that you may not hesitate about obtaining the remedy. What do we reckon that storehouse of eternal fire to be, when certain little vents of it stir up such blasts of flame that the cities nearest them either no longer exist or look for the same fate from day to day? The proudest mountains burst asunder from the brood of fire within them; and — what proves to us the perpetuity of the judgement — though they burst asunder, though they are devoured, yet they never come to an end. Who will not reckon these punishments of the mountains as meanwhile patterns of the judgement that threatens? Who will not agree that such sparks are certain missiles and practice darts of some great and immeasurable furnace? Since, then, you know that against gehenna, after those first defences of the Lord's immersion, there are still second aids in exomologesis,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1247

Footnotes

LECTIONES VARIANTES. (printed under page 670)

(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1247

Propter unius anni volaticum gaud. Nam consulatus, inquit Rhen., erat magistratus annuus. Item aliae quaedam functiones annuae. Et vero antiqua vox volaticum pro inconstanti, etiam Ciceroni usitata lib. II ad Att. et de Harusp. cap. 43. Pam.

"For the fleeting joy of a single year." For the consulship, says Rhenanus, was a yearly magistracy, and so were certain other offices. And indeed the old word volaticum, for "inconstant", was used by Cicero too, Letters to Atticus, book II, and On the Responses of the Soothsayers, ch. 43. Pamelius.

(printed under page 670)

(b) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1247

Vae illis qui delicta sua, etc. Nemo odoratus est locum, cum is sit Isaiae, V: Οὐαὶ οἱ ἐπισπώμενοι τὰς ἁμαρτίας ὡς σχοινίῳ μακρῷ. Sed Tertullianus nunquam legebat latinum textum qui habet, vae qui trahitis iniquitatem in funiculis vanitatis. Cum septuaginta habeant, vae illis qui delicta sua velut longo fune nectunt. De fune contemptionis alia est ratio, lege lib. IV adv. Marcionem et lib. adv. Judaeos. Lac.

"Woe to those who [bind] their sins," etc. No one has scented out the passage, though it is Isaiah 5: "Woe to those who draw their sins along as with a long rope." But Tertullian never read the Latin text, which has "woe to you who draw iniquity with cords of vanity"; since the Seventy have "woe to those who tie their sins together as with a long rope." On the rope of contempt the case is different: read book IV Against Marcion and the book Against the Jews. La Cerda.

(printed under page 670)

(c) ‹anchor: exercitoria jacula› · call in col 1247

CAP. XII. — (c) Exercitoria jacula. Lusoria. Rig.

"Practice javelins." For sport. Rigault.

(printed under page 670)

(d) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1247

Ferrum et irrevocabiles moras ejus. Hamatile spiculum significat, quod ubi penetravit in vulnus, revocari aut avelli nequit, nisi vulnus ipsum novo vulnere diducatur. Rig.

"The iron and its delays that cannot be called back." He means a barbed arrowhead, which, once it has gone into the wound, cannot be drawn back or torn out unless the wound itself is opened by a new wound. Rigault.

(printed under page 670)

(e) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1247

Oculare. id est oculos reddere. Hoc ipso usus est verbo de Pud. et in Apolog.: quod mihi pro argumento est hunc Tertulliani esse libellum. Albasp.

"To give eyes." That is, to restore the eyes. He used this very word in On Modesty and in the Apology: which to me is an argument that this little book is Tertullian's. Aubespine.

(printed under page 670)

(f) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1247

Restituendo sibi. Restitutioni suae. Rig.

"For restoring himself." For his own restoration. Rigault.

(printed under page 670)

Page

  • running head: 1247 TERTULLIANI
  • marginal letters: A ‹atria nocturnis et crudis›; B ‹considera, quam tibi exomologesis›; C ‹beside the Lectiones variantes, before (4) of the right column›; D ‹beside the Commentarius, adv. Marcionem et lib. adv. Judaeos›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:1248
cur salutem tuam deseris? Cur cessas aggredi, quod scias mederi tibi? Mutae quidem animae et irrationales, medicinas sibi divinitus attributas in tempore agnoscunt. Cervus sagitta transfixus, ut ferrum et irrevocabiles moras ejus de vulnere expellat scit sibi dictamno medendum. Hirundo, si excaecaverit pullos, novit illos oculare rursus de sua chelidonia. Peccator restituendo sibi institutam a Domino exomologesin sciens, praeteribit illam (Dan IV)? quae Babylonium regem in regna restituit? Diu enim poenitentiam Domino immolarat, septenni squalore exomologesin operatus, unguium leoninum in modum efferatione, et capilli incuria horrorem aquilinum praeferente. Proh malae tractationis? quem homines perhorrebant, Deus recipiebat (Exod., XIV). Contra autem aegyptius imperator, qui populum Dei aliquando afflictum, diu Domino suo denegatum persecutus, in praelium irruit, post tot documenta plagarum, dissidio maris, quod soli populo pervium licebat, revolutis fluctibus perit. Poenitentiam enim et ministerium ejus exomologesin abjecerat. Quid ergo ultra de istis duabus humanae salutis quasi plancis, styli potius negotium quam officium conscientiae meae curans? peccator enim omnium notarum cum sim, nec ulli rei nisi poenitentiae natus, non facile possum super illa tacere, quam ipse quoque et stirpis humanae et offensae in Dominum princeps Adam exomologesi restitutus in paradisum suum, non tacet.
why do you abandon your own salvation? Why do you hold back from approaching what you know heals you? Even dumb and irrational creatures recognize in due time the medicines assigned to them by God. The stag pierced by an arrow knows that, to drive the iron and its irremovable lodging out of the wound, it must heal itself with dittany. The swallow, if she has blinded her chicks, knows how to give them eyes again with her own swallow-wort. Shall the sinner, knowing that exomologesis has been instituted by the Lord for his restoration, pass it by (Dan. 4) — that which restored the king of Babylon to his kingdom? For long had he offered repentance as a sacrifice to the Lord, performing exomologesis in seven years' squalor, his nails grown wild after the manner of a lion's, and his neglected hair showing the shagginess of an eagle. Oh, what ill usage! Him whom men shrank from in horror God was receiving (Exod. 14). But the Egyptian ruler, on the other hand, who pursued the people of God, long afflicted and long denied to their Lord, rushed into battle, and after so many proofs given by the plagues perished in the parting of the sea, which had been granted as a passage to that people alone, when the waves rolled back. For he had cast away repentance and its handmaid, exomologesis. Why say more, then, about these two planks, as it were, of human salvation, caring for the business of the pen rather than the duty of my conscience? For since I am a sinner of every mark and born for nothing but repentance, I cannot easily keep silent about that of which Adam himself, the first of the human race and of offence against the Lord, restored by exomologesis to his paradise, does not keep silent.
Editors' notes and page, col. 1248

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: horrorem aquilinum› · call in col 1248

Aquilinum in morem quidam addunt.

Some add "in morem" after "aquilinum" (after the manner of an eagle's).

(printed under page 670)

(2) ‹anchor: dissidio› · call in col 1248

Discidio Rig.

"Discidio" (by the parting): Rigault.

(printed under page 670)

(3) ‹anchor: abjecerat. Quid› · call in col 1248

Ego Fran. Paris. duobus Fran.

"Ego" (I): Franeker and Paris editions; "duobus" (two): Franeker edition.

(printed under page 670)

(4) ‹anchor: quasi› · call in col 1248

Pharis Pam.

"Pharis" (lighthouses): Pamelius.

(printed under page 670)

(5) ‹anchor: conscientiae meae curans› · call in col 1248

Curem? Latin.

"Curem?" (should I care for?): Latinius.

COMMENTARIUS. (printed under page 670)

(d) ‹anchor: de vulnere expellat› · call in col 1248

Ferrum et irrevocabiles moras ejus. Hamatile spiculum significat, quod ubi penetravit in vulnus, revocari aut avelli nequit, nisi vulnus ipsum novo vulnere diducatur. Rig.

"The iron and its delays that cannot be called back." He means a barbed arrowhead, which, once it has gone into the wound, cannot be drawn back or torn out unless the wound itself is opened by a new wound. Rigault.

(printed under page 670)

(e) ‹anchor: oculare rursus› · call in col 1248

Oculare. id est oculos reddere. Hoc ipso usus est verbo de Pud. et in Apolog.: quod mihi pro argumento est hunc Tertulliani esse libellum. Albasp.

"To give eyes." That is, to restore the eyes. He used this very word in On Modesty and in the Apology: which to me is an argument that this little book is Tertullian's. Aubespine.

(printed under page 670)

(f) ‹anchor: restituendo sibi› · call in col 1248

Restituendo sibi. Restitutioni suae. Rig.

"For restoring himself." For his own restoration. Rigault.

(printed under page 670)

(g) ‹anchor: malae tractationis› · call in col 1248

Pro malae tractationis. Suspicor Tertullianum scripsisse maletractationis dictione unica, cum dicat Turnebus lib. II, cap. 20, quae malatractio a multis dicitur, eam ab Arnobio maletractatio dici voce unica lib. IV adv. gentes. Apparet autem Arnobium imitatum esse scripta Tertulliani. Apud rhetoras etiam maletractatio dicitur unica dictione. Lac.

"O for the ill-treatment!" I suspect that Tertullian wrote maletractationis as a single word, since Turnebus says, book II, ch. 20, that what many call malatractio is called maletractatio, as one word, by Arnobius, Against the Nations, book IV. And it is evident that Arnobius imitated Tertullian's writings. Among the rhetoricians too maletractatio is used as a single word. La Cerda.

(printed under page 670)

(h) ‹anchor: ministerium ejus› · call in col 1248

Poenitentiam et ministerium ejus exomol. Peccatori ad poenitentiam admisso ministrabatur exomologesis, qua rite peracta, si satis episcopo et presbyteris et plebi factum fuisse videretur, Ecclesiae reddebatur. Rig.

"Repentance and its ministry, the exomologesis." To the sinner admitted to penance the exomologesis was administered; when it had been duly carried through, if the bishop, the presbyters and the people judged that satisfaction had been made, he was restored to the Church. Rigault.

(printed under page 670)

(i) ‹anchor: quasi plancis› · call in col 1248

Duabus humanae salutis quasi plancis. Alii legunt, Pharis, sed ab veteribus libris id habeant, an ab ingenio, non tradunt. Illud autem, quasi plancis, propius accedit ad haec veteris scripturae vestigia, quasi plane. Rig.

"These two planks, as it were, of human salvation." Others read Pharis, "lighthouses", but they do not say whether they have it from the old books or from their own wit. But quasi plancis, "as it were planks", comes nearer to these traces of the old reading, quasi plane. Rigault.

(printed under page 670)

(j) ‹anchor: exomologesi restitutus› · call in col 1248

Adam exomologesi restitutus. Hoc contra Tatianum haereticum, cujus erat haeresis, Adam salutem consequi non potuisse; uti patet ex lib. de Praescript. adv. haeres. Pam.

"Adam, restored by the exomologesis." This is against the heretic Tatian, whose heresy was that Adam could not attain salvation, as is clear from the book On the Prescription against Heretics. Pamelius.

(printed under page 670)

Page

  • running head: TERTULLIANI 1248
  • marginal letters: A ‹sidia, cur salutem tuam›; B ‹perhorrebant, Deus recipiebat›; C ‹beside the Lectiones variantes, (4) Pharis Pam.›; D ‹beside the Commentarius, (i) Duabus humanae salutis›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)