Migne Reading Room

PL 1 · cols. 627–662

Tertullian, On the Shows (De spectaculis)

Editors' preface

PL 1:627
QUINTI SEPTIMII FLORENTIS TERTULLIANI DE SPECTACULIS LIBER.
QUINTUS SEPTIMIUS FLORENS TERTULLIAN'S BOOK ON THE SHOWS.
Editors' notes and page, col. 627

Footnotes

(none: the footnotes printed under page 352 belong to the end of Ad martyres; set in that unit's n627)

Editors' prose

Cum non Romae solum, sed per provincias etiam propter Severi reditum, victoriamque de Albino reportatam ederentur spectacula, libros de Spectaculis et de Idololatria ea occasione scripsisse Tertullianum Cl. Noesseltus demonstravit. Nonnulli equidem conjectant librum de Spectaculis abs Tertulliano compositum fuisse in montanismo, quia in illo iis suffragari videtur, qui revelationes petebant (Tertull. lib. de Spect., cap. 29). Verum quis nescit, et ipsos Ecclesiae catholicae martyres revelationes a Deo postulasse, ut videre est in actis sanctarum Perpetuae et Felicitatis (XXXV. Acta sincera, Ruinart, pag. 87); Quae publice in collectis legebantur temporibus D. Augustini (Augustin. Serm. 280)? Adde, quod S. Cyprianus expresse asserat, confessores de imminenti eorum martyrio per visionem saepe admonitos fuisse (Cyprian. Epist, XI et XVI). Utut autem haec sint, certe scopus hujus tractatus fuit apud Tertullianum, christianos, ipsosque catechumenos a spectaculis avocare, demonstrando quam inverecunda sint hujusmodi oblectamenta, verae pietati, cultuique sincero quem Deo debemus, contraria, atque iis etiam infesta qui fastus mundi, voluptates, ac idololatriam ejurarunt. Primo duo plausibilia ethnicorum argumenta removet, quorum primum: Nihil obstrepere religioni in animo et in conscientia tanta solatia extrinsecus oculorum, vel aurium, nec vero Deum offendi oblectatione hominis. Secundum: Christianos, expeditum morti genus, ad hanc obstinationem erudiri abdicatione voluptatum quo facilius vitam contemnant, amputatis quasi retinaculis ejus. Explosa dein alia ridicula objectione paganorum, quod omnia quae theatro inserviunt, terra, saxa, leones, vires corporis, vocis

Since, not at Rome only but throughout the provinces as well, shows were being given on account of Severus's return and the victory won over Albinus, the celebrated Nösselt has shown that Tertullian wrote the books On the Shows and On Idolatry on that occasion. Some indeed conjecture that the book On the Shows was composed by Tertullian in his Montanism, because in it he seems to side with those who sought revelations (Tertull., book On the Shows, ch. 29). But who does not know that the very martyrs of the Catholic Church also asked revelations of God, as may be seen in the acts of the holy Perpetua and Felicity (XXXV, Acta sincera, Ruinart, p. 87), which were read publicly in the assemblies in the time of St Augustine (Augustine, Sermon 280)? Add that St Cyprian expressly asserts that confessors were often warned by a vision of their impending martyrdom (Cyprian, Epistles XI and XVI). However that may be, the aim of this treatise for Tertullian was certainly to call Christians, and the catechumens themselves, away from the shows, by demonstrating how shameless such delights are, how contrary to true piety and to the sincere worship which we owe to God, and how hostile even to those who have forsworn the pomp of the world, its pleasures, and idolatry. First he removes two plausible arguments of the heathen, of which the first is: That such great solaces from without, of the eyes or of the ears, do not clash with religion in the mind and in the conscience, nor indeed is God offended by the delight of man. The second: That Christians, a race ready for death, are trained to this obstinacy by the renunciation of pleasures, so that they may the more easily despise life, its moorings, as it were, being cut away. Then, having hooted off another ridiculous objection of the pagans, that all the things which serve the theatre, earth, stones, lions, strength of body, of voice

<!-- note: the editors' Argumentum begins below the title DE SPECTACULIS LIBER and its ornament, after the end of Ad martyres and its Commentarius notes at the head of the column; it runs to the foot of the column and continues mid-sentence into col. 628 ("suavitas…"). Italics of the print (book titles, references, the quoted objections) are not marked. -->

Page

  • running head: 627 TERTULLIANI
  • marginal letters: A evenire consueverunt; B (in the commentary, beside "(b) Et in mediis civitatibus"); C num Cl. Noesselus demonstravit; D care, demonstrando quam inverecunda
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: The first paragraph is the END OF AD MARTYRES (ch. 6), not De spectaculis; Ad martyres continues at the top of col. 628 and ends there ("si pro eo steterint."), so it ends in 628, not 626. De spectaculis begins with the title set across both columns of the page, below the commentary rule, in reading order after the Ad martyres tail of col. 628; the caption is set here once, whole (its right half seen in the col. 628 image). Below the title, the editors' Argumentum ("Cum non Romae solum ...") fills the rest of col. 627 and col. 628: editors' prose, not set. The commentary notes (a), (b) at the page foot are out. UNSURE: "evenire" (first word, heavily blurred) and "extincti" (blurred) read from context.
PL 1:628
Editors' notes and page, col. 628

Footnotes

(none: the footnotes printed under page 352 belong to the end of Ad martyres; set in that unit's n627)

Editors' prose

suavitates sint res a Deo creatae, atque propterea non repudiandae, exceptioni quorumdam christianorum asserentium, in Scriptura sacra nullibi spectaculis adesse expresse prohiberi, opponit illa regii Prophetae: Beatus vir, qui non abiit in concilium impiorum, et in via peccatorum non stetit, et in cathedra pestilentiae non sedit. Addit dein ad hanc fugam teneri fideles, quia aquam ingressi fidem professi sunt, et renuntiasse diabolo, et pompae et angelis ejus ore suo contestati sunt, et ludos ac spectacula ad idololatriam pertinere affirmat, a qua originem suam traxisse demonstrat, atque ludorum nomina, eorumdem apparatum idololatricum, loca superstitiosa, et artes recenset. De circo disserens ait: quamvis circus idolis, et signis superstitiosis esset impletus, nihilominus christianos extra spectaculorum tempus sine crimine posse intrare, sicut in ipsa templa intrarent, si caussa intrandi culpa vacet. De circo transit ad theatrum particulariter Veneri et Baccho consecratum; inde ad athletarum certamina suo quaeque numini sacrata et denique ad gladiatores, qui suum pompis funereis originem debebant; ultima haec spectacula ad amphitheatrum pertinebant. Sed praeter idololatriam, caussam principalem, alias adhuc commemorat rationes, ob quas spectacula a christianis vitanda sint, Periculum scilicet amittendi Spiritum sanctum in commotione passionum nostrarum; damnum temporis christiano adeo pretiosi; injurias, maledicta, calumnias, et convicia. Ibi quippe publice omnia nefanda producebantur, quae alibi summa cura occultabantur. Quantum a sana ratione abhorreat, ostendit, ea in spectaculis cupide quaerere, quae in reliquo vitae commercio videre vel committere pudor et horror vetant. Tum

sweetnesses, are things created by God, and therefore not to be rejected, against the exception of certain Christians who assert that nowhere in sacred Scripture is attending the shows expressly forbidden, he sets those words of the royal Prophet: Blessed is the man who hath not gone into the council of the ungodly, nor stood in the way of sinners, nor sat in the chair of pestilence. He then adds that the faithful are bound to this flight because, on entering the water, they professed the faith and bore witness with their own mouth that they had renounced the devil and his pomp and his angels; and he affirms that the games and shows belong to idolatry, from which he demonstrates that they drew their origin, and he reviews the names of the games, their idolatrous apparatus, their superstitious places, and their arts. Discoursing on the circus, he says that although the circus was filled with idols and superstitious images, Christians could nevertheless enter it without crime outside the time of the shows, just as they might enter the temples themselves, if the cause of entering be free from fault. From the circus he passes to the theatre, consecrated particularly to Venus and Bacchus; thence to the contests of the athletes, each sacred to its own deity; and finally to the gladiators, who owed their origin to funeral processions; these last shows belonged to the amphitheatre. But besides idolatry, the principal cause, he records yet other reasons why the shows are to be avoided by Christians: namely, the danger of losing the Holy Spirit in the agitation of our passions; the loss of time, so precious to a Christian; injuries, curses, calumnies, and insults. For there everything abominable was publicly produced which elsewhere was concealed with the greatest care. He shows how far it is from sound reason to seek eagerly in the shows those things which in the rest of life's dealings shame and horror forbid us to see or to commit. Then

<!-- note: the Argumentum continues mid-sentence from col. 627 ("vocis / suavitates…"), beginning below the end of Ad martyres, its Commentarius notes, and the title DE SPECTACULIS LIBER; it runs to the foot of the column and continues into col. 629 ("Tum …"). Italics of the print (quotations, key phrases) are not marked. -->

Page

  • running head: TERTULLIANI 628
  • marginal letters: A pati potest, quod in caussa Dei; B (in the commentary, beside "illi non sint perpessi"); C phetae: Beatus vir, qui non abiit; D athletarum certamina suo quaeque
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: The paragraph is the closing sentence of AD MARTYRES (ch. 6); Ad martyres ends in this column. The title of De spectaculis spans both columns and is set once in c627. The rest of this column is the editors' Argumentum to De spectaculis (continued from col. 627, running on past this column): editors' prose, not set. Commentary note (c) at the page foot is out.
PL 1:629
Editors' notes and page, col. 629

Footnotes

<!-- The upper part of the page continues the editor's argument (not a footnote, not set). The notes are in two series: Lectiones variantes, then Commentarius. --> LECTIONES VARIANTES (printed under page 353)

(a) ‹Qui status fidei› · call in col 629

Qui status fidei. Scriptum hunc librum non ad jam Christianos tantum, sed et Catechumenos, quos auctor Audientes solet nuncupare, patet, tum ex verbis istis: Dei servi, cognoscite, qui maxime ad Deum acceditis, quae ad Catechumenos: tum ex illis: Recognoscite qui jam accessisse vos testificati et confessi estis, quod ad jam baptizatos, qui fidei testificationem in baptismo reddiderant, pertinet. Pam.

What the state of faith is. That this book was written not only to those already Christians but also to catechumens, whom the author is wont to call Hearers, is plain, both from these words, "Servants of God, take notice, you who are just now drawing near to God", which refer to the catechumens, and from these, "Recognize it, you who have testified and confessed that you have already drawn near", which belongs to those already baptized, who had made their testimony of faith in baptism. Pam[elius].

(printed under page 353)

(b) ‹Spectaculorum voluptates› · call in col 629

Spectaculorum voluptates. Illud est profecto quod dixit B. Athanasius hom. de Sem. θεατρομανεῖς ἡδονάς. Le Pr.

The pleasures of the shows. This is surely what blessed Athanasius called, in his homily on the Seed, "theatre-mad pleasures". Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 353)

Editors' prose

pergit: Rerum earum imaginem, quas facere non licet videre non expedit; atqui in Tragoedia horrenda crimina, in Comoedia lasciviam, spectatorum oculis exhibetis. Hominem ratione praeditum, crudelem et saevum esse non decet, ergo etiam aspectu horrido, ubi homines trucidantur, delectari non decet, quamvis etiam necati fuerint morte ob scelera digni. Insanum est, artem illam magni facere, cujus periti ob infamiae notam honestorum hominum societate excluduntur. Exin larvatorum proterviam increpat, virisque, qui vestes muliebres assumerent, intentatam a Deo maledictionem memorat; quippe viri muliebri habitu mulierum personam in scena agebant. Postea ostendit iterum spectaculorum usum esse baptismo contrarium, ipsosque gentiles christianos a repudio spectaculorum distinguere consuevisse. Tandem exempla duo adducit christianorum propter frequentata spectacula punitorum. Dein exhortatur christianos, ut in gemitibus hic vitam degant, dum gentiles voluptatibus sese immergunt, nihilque magis in votis habeant, quam exire de hoc saeculo, ut ad Deum perveniant. Volens autem ostendere Tertullianus quaenam sint voluptates, et oblectamenta, quae christianos decent, scribit: Quae major voluptas, quam fastidium ipsius voluptatis, quam saeculi totius contemptus, quam vera libertas, quam conscientia integra.... quod calcas Deos nationum, quod daemonia expellis, quod medicinas facis, quod revelationes petis,

He proceeds: It is not expedient to look upon the image of those things which it is not lawful to do; and yet in Tragedy you display horrible crimes, in Comedy wantonness, to the eyes of the spectators. It is not fitting that a man endowed with reason be cruel and savage; therefore neither is it fitting that he take delight in a horrid spectacle where men are slaughtered, even though those put to death were worthy of death for their crimes. It is madness to make much of that art whose practitioners are excluded, by the mark of infamy, from the society of honourable men. Next he rebukes the effrontery of the masked players, and recalls the curse threatened by God against men who should put on women's garments; for men in women's dress played the parts of women on the stage. Afterwards he shows again that the practice of the shows is contrary to baptism, and that the gentiles themselves were accustomed to distinguish Christians by their repudiation of the shows. At length he adduces two examples of Christians punished for frequenting the shows. Then he exhorts Christians to pass their life here in groanings while the gentiles plunge themselves into pleasures, and to have nothing more in their prayers than to go out of this world, that they may come to God. And Tertullian, wishing to show what pleasures and delights befit Christians, writes: What greater pleasure than disgust at pleasure itself, than contempt of the whole world, than true liberty, than an untouched conscience.... that you trample on the gods of the nations, that you drive out demons, that you effect cures, that you seek revelations,

<!-- note: the Argumentum continues mid-sentence from col. 628 ("Tum / pergit…") at the head of the column and fills its upper part, down to the rule above LECTIONES VARIANTES; it continues mid-sentence into col. 630 ("quod Deo vivis…"). Below it stand the variant readings and the Commentarius notes (a)–(e) on De spectaculis, which are not editors' prose of the column and are not set here. Italics (the quotations from Tertullian) are not marked. -->

Page

  • running head: 629 LIBER DE SPECTACULIS.
  • marginal letters: A pergit: Rerum earum imaginem; B consuevisse. Tandem exempla duo; C (in the commentary) Deum accediltis, quae ad Catechumenos; D (in the commentary) tismo quem perceperunt
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: NO AUTHOR'S TEXT IN THIS COLUMN. The text area holds only the continuation of the editors' Argumentum to De spectaculis ("pergit: Rerum earum imaginem ... quod revelationes petis,"), running on into col. 630: editors' prose, not set. Below it, the Lectiones variantes (1)-(3) and the Commentarius notes (a)-(e) belong to the opening chapter, which begins in col. 630; all apparatus, out. Running head partly cut at the image edge; its full form inferred.
PL 1:630
CAPUT PRIMUM.
CHAPTER I.
Qui status fidei, quae ratio veritatis, quod praescriptum disciplinae, inter caetera saecularium errorum, etiam spectaculorum voluptates adimat, Dei servi cognoscite, qui cum maxime ad Deum acceditis: recognoscite, qui jam accessisse vos testificati et confessi estis, ne aut ignorando aut dissimulando quis peccet. Tanta est enim vis voluptatum, ut et ignorantiam protelet in occasionem, et conscientiam corrumpat in dissimulationem. Ad utrumque, adhuc forsan alicui opiniones ethnicorum blandiuntur, quae in ista caussa adversus nos ita argumentari consueverunt: Nihil obstrepere religioni in animo et consciencia tanta solatia extrinsecus oculorum vel aurium: nec vero Deum offend⟨i⟩ oblectatione hominis, qua, salvo erga Deum metu et honore, suo in tempore et suo in loco frui, scelus non sit. Atquin hoc cum maxime paramus demonstrare, quemadmodum isthaec non competant verae religioni et vero obsequio erga Deum verum. Sunt qui existiment Christianos expeditum
What state of faith, what reason of truth, what prescript of discipline, among the other errors of the world, takes away also the pleasures of the shows, learn, servants of God, you who are even now approaching God; recognize it, you who have testified and confessed that you have already approached, lest anyone sin either by not knowing or by pretending not to know. For so great is the force of pleasures that it both draws out ignorance into an opportunity and corrupts conscience into pretence. Towards both, perhaps, the opinions of the heathen still flatter someone, opinions which in this cause are wont to argue thus against us: that such great solaces of the eyes or ears from without are no hindrance to religion in the mind and conscience; nor indeed is God offended by the delight of a man, which it is no crime to enjoy in its own time and its own place, fear and honour towards God being kept safe. But this is the very thing we are preparing to demonstrate: how these things do not befit true religion and true obedience towards the true God. There are those who think that Christians, a race ready
Editors' notes and page, col. 630

Footnotes

(1) ‹quae› · call in col 630

Qui um, Seml.

Qui um [sic], Semler.

(printed under page 353)

(2) ‹et consciencia› · call in col 630

Tua add. Fran.

Fran[eker edition] adds "tua" (your).

(printed under page 353)

(3) ‹isthaec› · call in col 630

Ista Rigalt.

Rigault: "ista".

(printed under page 353)

(4) ‹existiment› · call in col 630

Existimant Rigalt.

Rigault: "existimant".

(printed under page 353)

(5) ‹Christianos› · call in col 630

Christianum Seml.

Semler: "Christianum".

COMMENTARIUS (printed under page 353)

(c) ‹ut et› · call in col 630

Ut ignorantiam protelet in occasionem. Tanta est, inquit, voluptatum vis, ut hominem suum tamdiu doceri nolit vitanda esse Christiano spectacula, quamdiu spectandi occasio sperabitur. Hac insania etiam aevi sui Christianos laborasse queritur Augustinus in Psal. LXXX: Sunt autem multi non digne viventes baptismo quem perceperunt. Quam multi enim baptizati hodie circum implere quam istam basilicam maluerunt! Le Pr.

That it should stretch out ignorance into opportunity. So great, he says, is the power of pleasures that it will not let its man be taught that the shows are to be shunned by a Christian, so long as an opportunity of watching is hoped for. Augustine complains that the Christians of his own age too suffered from this madness, on Psalm 80: "There are many who do not live worthily of the baptism they have received. How many baptized people today have preferred to fill the circus rather than this basilica!" Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 353)

(d) ‹Nihil› · call in col 630

Obstrepere religioni. Verbum pro impedire et esse obstaculo. Omnino quod Seneca ep. 115. obstrigillant; et quod Synodus Tricastina ad Nicol. PP. obdicere: quae duo verba notare volui, ut pecularia. Lac.

To clamour against religion. The word stands for "to hinder" and "to be an obstacle": altogether what Seneca, letter 115, means by "obstrigillant", and the Synod of Tricastin, to Pope Nicholas, by "obdicere"; two words I wished to note as peculiar. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 353)

(e) ‹existiment› · call in col 630

Christianos, expeditum morti genus. Arrianus ad Epictetum, lib. iv. cap. 7. Christianorum in obeunda morte pro Christi nomine obstinationem non furori tribuit, sed ritui et assuetudini: Ὑπὸ μανίας μὲν δύναταί τις οὕτως διατεθῆναι πρὸς ταῦτα, καὶ ὑπὸ ἔθους οἱ γαλιλαῖοι. Nos talem ritum agnoscimus, et constantissime retinendum scimus; imo furorem esse non negabimus, sed sanctum, sed divini spiritus afflatum vehementiorem, qui suos agat incitatos. Hujus constantiae gloriam Ethnici obstinationis appellatione deterere conabantur, adeoque inter proverbia rerum minime sperandarum dictitabant: Θᾶσσον ἄν τις τοὺς ἀπὸ Μωυσοῦ καὶ Χριστοῦ μεταδιδάξειεν; Citius quispiam eos Moysen et Christum dedoceret. Quod usurpavit Galenus lib. iii. de diff. puls. Et ab Augustino, lib. de Civit. Dei xix, Apollinis oraculum notatur, sciscitanti Porphyrio, qua ratione ab Christianismo conjugem suam revocare posset, respondentis, Facilius ipsum litteras impressurum flumini rapidissimo, aut per aera volaturum. Rig. — Christianos expeditum morti genus. Quasi ἐπιθανατίους ῥιψοκινδύνους, παραβόλους, παρακεκινδυνευμένους. Paulus ad Philipp. cap. 2. de Epaphrodito μέχρι θανάτου ἤγγισε, παραβολευσάμενος τῇ ψυχῇ. Nam ita legitur in vetustissimo exemplari ubi et Latina versio sic habet: Parabolatus de anima sua. Auctor illius versionis addubitavit, dicendum sibi esset, parabolatus animam suam an parabolatus de anima sua. Eodem vero sensu auctor historiae Tripart. dixit artificem parabolum lib. xi. sub finem: Crudeli bestiae artifex, parabolus pugnet. Quod Socrates hist. 7. dixerat, παραβολευσάμενος. Minime autem Epaphroditus aliive Christiani, vitam suam ita sprevisse existimandi sunt, quasi obstinatione sola temerarii, perditi ac desperati mortem oppeterent, κατὰ ψιλὴν παράταξιν. Quod putavit M. Antoninus lib. de vita sua undec. Verum summo judicio, summa ratione ac prudentia paratissimi semper erant ad mortem fortiter obeundam pro Christi nomine, hoc est pro veritate fidei Christianae, ἀπὸ ἰδίας κρίσεως, λελογισμένως, καὶ σεμνῶς. Rig.

Christians, a race ready for death. Arrian, on Epictetus, book 4 chapter 7, puts down the Christians' obstinacy in meeting death for the name of Christ not to madness but to custom and habit: "By madness one can be so disposed towards these things, and the Galileans by habit." We acknowledge such a custom and know it is to be held most firmly; indeed we will not deny it is a madness, but a holy one, a stronger breath of the divine Spirit, which drives its own on, roused. The heathen tried to wear down the glory of this constancy by calling it obstinacy, and so they used to say among the proverbs for things least to be hoped for: "Sooner would one unteach the followers of Moses and Christ"; sooner would someone make them unlearn Moses and Christ. Galen used this in book 3 of On the Differences of Pulses. And Augustine, City of God book 19, notes an oracle of Apollo answering Porphyry, who asked how he could call his wife back from Christianity, that he would more easily print letters on a most rapid river, or fly through the air. Rig[ault]. — Christians, a race ready for death: as if "doomed to death, reckless of danger, venturesome, risking all". Paul, to the Philippians chapter 2, of Epaphroditus: "he came near to death, hazarding his life". For so it is read in a very ancient copy, where the Latin version too has "parabolatus de anima sua". The author of that version was in doubt whether he should say "parabolatus animam suam" or "parabolatus de anima sua". In the same sense the author of the Tripartite History, book 11 near the end, called a performer "parabolus": "Let the performer, a parabolus, fight with a cruel beast", where Socrates, History 7, had said παραβολευσάμενος. But Epaphroditus and the other Christians are by no means to be thought to have so despised their lives as though, rash, abandoned and desperate from mere obstinacy, they went to meet death "in mere opposition", as Marcus Antoninus thought, book 11 of his On His Own Life. Rather, with the highest judgement, reason and prudence they were always most ready to meet death bravely for the name of Christ, that is, for the truth of the Christian faith, "from their own judgement, deliberately, and with dignity". Rig[ault].

(e, continued) ‹Expeditum morti genus› Expeditum morti genus. Multa in hunc locum Rigaltius de voce παραβολευσάμενος, quibus addi potest illud Hesychii: Παραβολευσάμενος, εἰς θάνατον ἑαυτὸν ἐκδούς. Legendus item Phrynichus in ecloge dictionum Atticarum ad vocem παραβόλιον. Qua de re nos nonnulla diximus in notis ad Gloss. graecolat. pag. 141. col. 1. lin. 19. Le Pr.

A race ready for death. Rigault has much on this place about the word παραβολευσάμενος, to which may be added Hesychius's entry: "Παραβολευσάμενος: having given himself up to death." Phrynichus too should be read, in his Selection of Attic Words, at the word παραβόλιον. On this matter we have said something in our notes to the Greek-Latin Glossary, page 141, column 1, line 19. Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 353)

Editors' prose

quod Deo vivis? Hae voluptates, haec spectacula christianorum, sancta, perpetua, gratuita. Tandem agones Martyrum, passionem D. N. J. Christi, propinquum illius adventum, judicium extremum, poenas impiorum aeternas, praemiaque bonorum, ut sedulo contemplentur, hortatur. LUMP.

that you live to God? These are the pleasures, these the shows of Christians: holy, perpetual, free of charge. Finally he exhorts them to contemplate diligently the contests of the Martyrs, the passion of our Lord Jesus Christ, His approaching coming, the last judgement, the eternal punishments of the ungodly, and the rewards of the good. LUMPER.

<!-- note: the Argumentum continues mid-sentence from col. 629 ("revelationes petis, / quod Deo vivis?") at the head of the column and ends after six lines with the signature LUMP. (Lumper), set at the right of the last line; CAPUT PRIMUM and Tertullian's text follow, then the variant readings and the Commentarius notes, none of which is set here. Italics (the quoted phrases) are not marked. -->

Page

  • running head: DE SPECTACULIS. 630
  • marginal letters: A quod Deo vivis? (editors' Argumentum); B et conscientiam corrumpat in dissimulationem; C (in the commentary) Apollinis oraculum notatur; D (in the commentary) parabolum lib. xi.
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:631
morti genus ad hanc obstinationem abdicatione voluptatum erudiri, quo facilius vitam contemnant, amputatis quasi retinaculis ejus, ne desiderent, quam jam supervacuam sibi fecerint: ut hoc consilio potius et humano prospectu, non divino praescripto definitum existimetur. Pigebat scilicet etiam perseverantes in tantis voluptatibus propter Deum mori. Quanquam etsi ita esset, tam apto consilio, tantae obstinatio disciplinae debebat obsequium.
for death, are trained to this obstinacy by the renunciation of pleasures, so that they may the more easily despise life, its moorings, as it were, being cut away, lest they long for a life they have already made superfluous to themselves: so that this is thought to have been settled by counsel and human foresight rather than by divine prescript. It would, forsooth, have been irksome for men who persevered in such great pleasures to die for God. Although, even if it were so, the obstinacy of so great a discipline owed obedience to so fitting a counsel.
CAPUT II.
CHAPTER II.
Jam vero nemo est, qui non hoc quoque praetendat (Gen. 1.), omnia a Deo instituta, et homini attributa (sicut praedicamus), et utique bona omnia, ut boni auctoris: inter haec deputari universa ista, ex quibus spectacula instruuntur, circum verbi gratia, et leonem, et vires corporis, et vocis suavitates. Igitur neque alienum videri posse, neque inimicum Dei, quod de conditione constet ipsius: neque cultoribus Dei vitandum, quod Dei non sit inimicum, quia nec alienum. Plane et ipsae exstructiones locorum, quod saxa, quod caementa, quod marmora, quod columnae, Dei res sunt, qui ea ad instrumentum terrae dedit: sed et ipsi actus sub coelo Dei transiguntur. Quam sapiens argumentatrix sibi videtur ignorantia humana, praesertim cum aliquid ejusmodi de gaudiis et de fructibus saeculi metuit amittere! Plures denique invenias, quos magis periculum voluptatis, quam vitae, avocet ab hac secta. Nam mortem etiam stultus ut debitam non extimescit, voluptatem etiam sapiens ut tantam non contemnit, cum alia non sit et stulto et sapienti vitae gratia, nisi voluptas. Nemo negat, quia nemo ignorat quod ultro natura suggerit, Deum esse universitatis conditorem, eamque universitatem tam bonam, quam homini mancipatam. Sed quia non penitus Deum noverunt
Now indeed there is no one who does not put forward this too (Gen. 1): that all things were established by God and assigned to man (as we preach), and that all are certainly good, as being of a good Author; that among these are reckoned all those things from which the shows are furnished, the circus, for example, and the lion, and strength of body, and sweetness of voice. Therefore that which is agreed to be of His own creation cannot seem either alien or hostile to God; nor is that to be shunned by the worshippers of God which is not hostile to God, because it is not alien either. Plainly the very structures of the places too, in that they are stones, cement, marbles, columns, are things of God, Who gave them for the furnishing of the earth; and the performances themselves are carried on under God's sky. How wise an arguer human ignorance seems to itself, especially when it fears to lose something of this kind from the joys and fruits of the world! Indeed you would find more whom the danger to pleasure, rather than to life, calls away from this sect. For even the fool does not dread death, as something owed; even the wise man does not despise pleasure, as something so great, since for fool and wise man alike there is no other charm of life but pleasure. No one denies, because no one is ignorant of what nature of her own accord suggests, that God is the Maker of the universe, and that this universe is both good and made over to man. But because they have not thoroughly known God,
Editors' notes and page, col. 631

Footnotes

<!-- Calls (1)–(4), (9)–(14) and (a)–(c) fall above the part of the page shown in the images; their anchors are not visible and their columns are inferred from print order. --> LECTIONES VARIANTES (printed under page 354)

(1) · call in col 631

Supervacuum Jun. Paris.

Junius, Paris [edition]: "supervacuum".

(printed under page 354)

(2) · call in col 631

Fecerant Jun. fecerunt Rigalt.

Junius: "fecerant"; Rigault: "fecerunt".

(printed under page 354)

(3) · call in col 631

Quamquam et, si ita esset. Tam etc. distinguit Jun.

Junius punctuates: "Quamquam et, si ita esset. Tam" etc.

(printed under page 354)

(4) ‹ut boni auctoris› · call in col 631

Bona, ut omnia boni auctoris Rig.

Rigault: "Bona, ut omnia boni auctoris" (good, as all things of a good author).

(printed under page 354)

(5) ‹circum› · call in col 631

Equum Rigalt.

Rigault: "equum" (a horse).

(printed under page 354)

(6) ‹inimicum Dei› · call in col 631

Deo Paris. Rigalt.

Paris [edition], Rigault: "Deo".

(printed under page 354)

(7) ‹vitandum› · call in col 631

Putandum Paris. neque culpae deputandum Rigalt.

Paris [edition]: "putandum"; Rigault: "neque culpae deputandum" (nor to be counted a fault).

(printed under page 354)

(8) ‹sapiens› · call in col 631

Utendam Jun.

Junius: "utendam".

(printed under page 354)

(a) ‹Ad hanc obstinationem› · call in col 631

Ad hanc obstinationem. Familiaris est auctori vox obstinatio in bonam partem, pro constantia, sicuti et apud Tacitum lib. IX obstinatio fidei. Pam.

To this obstinacy. The word "obstinatio" in a good sense, for constancy, is familiar to the author, as also in Tacitus, book 9, "obstinacy of faith". Pam[elius].

(printed under page 354)

(b) ‹Abdicatione voluptatum› · call in col 631

Abdicatione voluptatum. Vagabatur dogma inter gentiles philosophos, utpote magnos procuratores avertendi doloris, abdicandas esse voluptates ante mortem, ut haec dolore careret. Dogma hoc philosophicum repraesentat Seneca epist. 27. Putabant ergo Gentiles illud praeceptum exerceri Christianis in abdicatione spectaculorum, ut ita paratiores essent ad ferendam mortem sine dolore. Lac.

By renouncing pleasures. A doctrine went about among the pagan philosophers, as great managers of the warding-off of pain, that pleasures should be renounced before death so that death might be free of pain. Seneca sets out this philosophical doctrine in letter 27. The pagans therefore thought that this precept was practised by the Christians in renouncing the shows, so that they would be readier to bear death without pain. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 354)

Page

  • running head: 631 TERTULLIANI
  • marginal letters: A morti genus ad hanc obstinationem; B verbi gratia, et leonem; C nit, cum alia non sit; D (in the Lectiones variantes, beside "(11) A quo")
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:632
, nisi naturali jure, non etiam familiari, de longinquo, non de proximo; necesse est ignorent qualiter administrari aut jubeat aut prohibeat quae instituit, simul quis sit aemulus ex diverso, adulterandis usibus divinae conditionis, quia neque voluntatem, neque adversarium noveris ejus, quem minus noveris. Non ergo hoc solum respiciendum est, quo omnia sint instituta, sed a quo conversa. Ita enim apparebit cujus vi sint instituta, si appareat cujus non sint. Multum interest inter corruptelam et integritatem, quia multum est inter institutorem et interpolatorem. Caeterum omnes species malorum, quae etiam ethnici ut indubitata, et prohibent et defendunt, ex operibus Dei constant: Vis homicidium ferro, veneno, magicis devinctionibus perfici. Tam ferrum Dei res est, quam herbae, quam angeli: numquid tamen in hominis necem auctor ista providit? Atquin omnem homicidii speciem uno et principali praecepto interemit: Non occides (Exod. 20.) Proinde aurum, aes, argentum, ebur, lignum, et quaecumque fabricandis idolis materia captatur, quis in saeculo posuit, nisi saeculi auctor Deus? Numquid tamen ut haec adversus ipsum adorentur? Atquin summa offensio penes illum idololatria est. Quid non Dei est, quod Deum offendit? Sed cum offendit, Dei esse desiit; et cum desiit, offendit. Ipse homo omnium flagitiorum actor, non tantum opus Dei, verum etiam imago est, et tamen et corpore et spiritu descivit a suo institutore. Neque enim oculos ad concupiscentias sumpsimus, neque linguam ad maliloquium, et aures ad exceptaculum maliloquii, et gulam ad gulae crimen, et ventrem ad gulae satietatem, et genitalia ad excessus impudicitiae, et manus ad vim, et gressus ad vagam vitam, aut spiritus ideo insitus
except by natural right, not also by the right of familiarity, from afar, not from near at hand, they must needs be ignorant how He commands or forbids the things He established to be administered, and at the same time who the rival on the other side is, adulterating the uses of the divine creation; for you cannot know either the will or the adversary of one whom you know too little. Therefore we must look not only to the end for which all things were established, but by whom they were perverted. For thus it will appear by whose power they were established, if it appears whose they are not. There is a great difference between corruption and integrity, because there is a great distance between the founder and the falsifier. Moreover, all the kinds of evils, which even the heathen, as beyond doubt, both forbid and ward off, consist of the works of God. You will have murder accomplished by iron, by poison, by magical bindings. Iron is as much a thing of God as herbs are, as angels are: yet did their Author provide these for the slaying of man? Nay, He did away with every kind of murder by one principal precept: You shall not kill (Exod. 20). Likewise gold, bronze, silver, ivory, wood, and whatever material is sought out for the making of idols, who placed them in the world but God, the Author of the world? Yet was it so that these should be worshipped against Himself? Nay, the supreme offence in His sight is idolatry. What is there that is not God's which offends God? But when it offends, it has ceased to be God's; and when it has ceased, it offends. Man himself, the doer of every shameful deed, is not only the work of God but also His image, and yet both in body and in spirit he has fallen away from his Maker. For we did not receive eyes for lusts, nor the tongue for evil-speaking, and the ears for the reception of evil-speaking, and the gullet for the crime of gluttony, and the belly for the gullet's surfeit, and the genitals for the excesses of unchastity, and the hands for violence, and the steps for a wandering life; or was the spirit implanted for this reason
Editors' notes and page, col. 632

Footnotes

(9) · call in col 632

Administrari jubeat, quae instituit Rigalt.

Rigault: "administrari jubeat, quae instituit" (bids the things he established be managed).

(printed under page 354)

(10) · call in col 632

Quae vis aemula ex adverso Rigalt.

Rigault: "quae vis aemula ex adverso" (what rival power from the opposite side).

(printed under page 354)

(11) · call in col 632

A quo Wouw. M. S. Rigalt.

Wouwer's manuscript, Rigault: "a quo".

(printed under page 354)

(12) · call in col 632

Cui usui Rigalt.

Rigault: "cui usui" (for what use).

(printed under page 354)

(13) · call in col 632

Si appareat cui non. Rig.

Rigault: "si appareat cui non".

(printed under page 354)

(14) · call in col 632

Indubitate, Seml.

Semler: "indubitate".

(printed under page 354)

(15) ‹Vis› · call in col 632

Vides Jun.

Junius: "vides" (you see).

(printed under page 354)

(16) ‹perfici› · call in col 632

Perfici Rig.

Rigault: "perfici".

(printed under page 354)

(17) ‹summa offensio› · call in col 632

Offensa Rigalt.

Rigault: "offensa".

(printed under page 354)

(18) ‹flagitiorum actor› · call in col 632

Auctor Paris. Rig.

Paris [edition], Rigault: "auctor".

(printed under page 354)

(19) ‹descivit› · call in col 632

Et tamen corpore et spiritu desiit Rig.

Rigault: "et tamen corpore et spiritu desiit" (and yet ceased in body and spirit).

(printed under page 354)

(20) ‹ad concupiscentias› · call in col 632

Concupiscentiam Rig.

Rigault: "concupiscentiam".

(printed under page 354)

(21) ‹neque› · call in col 632

Et Rig.

Rigault: "et".

(printed under page 354)

(22) ‹ad gulae satietatem› · call in col 632

Societatem Jun. ex M. S. Rig.

Junius from a manuscript, Rigault: "societatem".

COMMENTARIUS (printed under page 354)

(c) ‹Quae etiam Ethnici› · call in col 632

Quae etiam Ethnici ut indubitata et prohibent et defendunt. Defendunt, hoc est, asserunt, nempe esse mala, et quidem indubitata; quae scilicet mala esse nemo etiam Ethnicorum ambigit. Rig.

Which even the heathen forbid and maintain as beyond doubt. "Defendunt", that is, they assert, namely that they are evils, and evils beyond doubt; things, that is, which not even any of the heathen doubts to be evils. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 354)

(d) ‹magicis devinctionibus› · call in col 632

Magicis devinctionibus. Devinctiones accipit pro ligaturis, de quibus latius lib. de Anima. Et hic vero pulchra est Gelenii castigatio, in hominis necem auctor, pro in nece est auctor. Ex Ms. paulo post lego, flagitiorum actor pro auctor: neque enim homo, sed Diabolus interpolator illorum est auctor. Pam.

By magic bindings. He takes "devinctiones" for ligatures (amulets), of which more at length in the book On the Soul. And here Gelenius's correction is a fine one, "in hominis necem auctor" for "in nece est auctor". A little later, from a manuscript, I read "flagitiorum actor" for "auctor": for not man but the Devil, the falsifier, is the author of these. Pam[elius].

(printed under page 354)

(e) ‹imago est› · call in col 632

Imago Dei est. Intellige mentem scriptoris: ait hominem esse et opus Dei et imaginem Dei: opus propter corpus, imaginem propter spiritum. Ideo statim adjicit, defecisse et corpore et spiritu. Itaque non debent confundi verba. Nam homo imago Dei tantum dicitur propter spiritum. Zeno Veronen. serm. 2. in gen. Lac.

He is the image of God. Understand the writer's meaning: he says that man is both the work of God and the image of God: work because of the body, image because of the spirit. So he adds at once that he fell away both in body and in spirit. The words therefore must not be confused. For man is called the image of God only because of the spirit. Zeno of Verona, sermon 2 on Genesis. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 354)

(f) ‹gulae crimen› · call in col 632

Et gulam ad gulae crimen. Gulae crimen solummodo ecclesiasticis notum pro gulae intemperantia seu gulositate; profanis non item. Similiter dixit lib. de Jejuniis: Adam salutem gula vendidit, et lib. 1. adv. Marc. comitibus gulae, libidini scilicet atque luxuriae. Pam.

And the gullet for the crime of the gullet. "Crime of the gullet" is known only to church writers, for intemperance of the gullet or gluttony; not so to profane ones. Likewise he said in the book On Fasting: "Adam sold salvation for his gullet", and in Against Marcion book 1, "with the companions of the gullet", namely lust and luxury. Pam[elius].

(printed under page 354)

Page

  • running head: TERTULLIANI 632
  • marginal letters: A runt, nisi naturali jure; B ctionibus perfici. Tam ferrum; C sumpsimus, neque linguam; D (in the Lectiones variantes, beside "(22) Societatem")
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:633
corpori, ut insidiarum, et fraudum, et iniquitatum cogitatorium fieret, non opinor. Nam si omnem malignitatem, et si tantam malitiam excogitatam Deus exactor innocentiae odit, indubitate quaecunque condidit, non in exitum operum constat condidisse quae damnat, licet eadem opera per ea quae condidit administrentur, quando haec sit tota ratio damnationis, perversa administratio conditionis a conditis. Nos igitur qui, Domino cognito, etiam aemulum ejus inspicimus, qui, institutore comperto, etiam interpolatorem una deprehendimus, neque mirari, neque dubitare oportet, quum ipsum hominem, opus et imaginem Dei, totius universitatis possessorem, illa vis interpolatoris et aemulatoris angeli ab initio de integritate dejecerit, universam substantiam ejus pariter cum ipso in perversitatem demutatam adversus institutorem, ut quam doluerat homini concessam, non sibi, in ea ipsa et hominem reum Deo faceret, et suam dominationem collocaret.
to the body, that it might become a workshop of plots and frauds and iniquities, I do not think. For if God, the exactor of innocence, hates all malignity, and malice, however great, once it is devised, it is beyond doubt that of whatever He founded, it is certain that He did not found for the outcome of works the things which He condemns, although those same works are carried out through the things He founded; since this is the whole ground of condemnation: the perverse administration of the creation by the creatures. We therefore, who, having known the Lord, perceive His rival also, who, having found out the Founder, detect along with Him the falsifier too, ought neither to wonder nor to doubt, since that force of the falsifying and rival angel cast down from integrity at the beginning man himself, the work and image of God, the possessor of the whole universe, his whole substance being changed together with himself into perversity against the Founder, so that in that very thing which he had grieved to see granted to man and not to himself he might both make man guilty before God and set up his own dominion.
CAPUT III.
CHAPTER III.
Hac conscientia instructi adversus opinionem ethnicorum, convertamur magis ad nostrorum detractatus. Quorumdam enim fides aut simplicior, aut scrupulosior, ad hanc abdicationem
Equipped with this knowledge against the opinion of the heathen, let us turn rather to the evasions of our own people. For the faith of some, either too simple or too scrupulous, for this renunciation
Editors' notes and page, col. 633

Footnotes

<!-- Calls (1)–(4), (11)–(13) and (a)–(c) fall above the part of the page shown in the images; anchors not visible, columns inferred from print order. --> LECTIONES VARIANTES (printed under page 355)

(1) · call in col 633

Tantum Wouw. M. S. Rig.

Wouwer's manuscript, Rigault: "tantum".

(printed under page 355)

(2) · call in col 633

A conditis abest Rig.

Rigault lacks "a conditis".

(printed under page 355)

(3) · call in col 633

Deo Rig.

Rigault: "Deo".

(printed under page 355)

(4) · call in col 633

Inspeximus Rig.

Rigault: "inspeximus".

(printed under page 355)

(5) ‹illa› · call in col 633

Illi Paris. vis abest Paris.

Paris [edition]: "illi"; the Paris edition lacks "vis".

(printed under page 355)

(6) ‹dejecerit› · call in col 633

Quin universam addit Wouw. M. S.

Wouwer's manuscript adds "quin universam".

(printed under page 355)

(7) ‹ejus› · call in col 633

Pariter cum ipso integritati institutam add. Rig.

Rigault adds "pariter cum ipso integritati institutam" (established along with him in integrity).

(printed under page 355)

(8) ‹demutatam› · call in col 633

Demutarit Wouw. M. S. demutavit Rig.

Wouwer's manuscript: "demutarit"; Rigault: "demutavit".

(printed under page 355)

(9) ‹instructi› · call in col 633

Instructa Rig.

Rigault: "instructa".

(printed under page 355)

(10) ‹detractatus› · call in col 633

Retractatus Wouw. M. S.

Wouwer's manuscript: "retractatus".

(printed under page 355)

(a) ‹Non in exitum operum› · call in col 633

Non in exitum operum condidisse. Locus annotandus contra Calvinum, qui Institut. lib. III. cap. 22, 23 et 24. adstruit, quod Deus creavit maximam partem mundi ad damnationem et perditionem simplici decreto voluntatis suae, quemadmodum ipsi ab Helvetiis objectum est. Pam. — In exitum operum. Non placet Pamelius, qui hic exitum accepit pro exitio. Perfectissimus est sensus. Nam vox conferenda est ad pravum usum rerum, et ita omnia cohaerent; non ad perniciem: nam de hac non disputat Tertullianus. Lac.

That he did not make them for the ruin of his works. A passage to be noted against Calvin, who in the Institutes, book 3, chapters 22, 23 and 24, maintains that God created the greatest part of the world for damnation and perdition by a simple decree of his will, as was objected to him by the Swiss. Pam[elius]. — For the outcome of his works. Pamelius does not satisfy, who here took "exitum" for "exitium" (destruction). The sense is perfectly complete. For the word is to be referred to the wrong use of things, and so everything holds together; not to destruction, for Tertullian is not discussing that. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 355)

(b) ‹Nos igitur qui Deo cognito› · call in col 633

Nos igitur qui Deo cognito etiam aemulum ejus inspeximus. Nihil mutavimus in hac periodo, quia sic constitutam reperimus in codice Agobardi. Et si commodior videatur scriptura cod. Fulvii Ursini: Nos igitur qui Deo cognito etiam aemulum ejus inspeximus, quid institutore comperto etiam interpolatorem una deprehendimus, nec mirari, neque dubitare oportet, cum ipsum hominem, opus et imaginem Dei, totius universitatis possessorem, illa vis interpolatoris et aemulatoris angeli ab initio de integritate dejecerit, quin universam substantiam ejus, pariter cum ipso integritati institutam, pariter cum ipso in perversitatem demutarit adversus institutorem, etc. Rig.

We therefore, who, having known God, have also discerned his rival. We have changed nothing in this sentence, because we found it so set out in the Agobard codex. And yet the reading of Fulvio Orsini's codex may seem more convenient: "We therefore, who, having known God, have also discerned his rival, since having found the founder we have caught the falsifier along with him, ought neither to wonder nor to doubt, since that power of the falsifying and rival angel cast down from integrity at the beginning man himself, the work and image of God, the possessor of the whole universe, that it changed his whole substance, established along with him in integrity, along with him into perversity against its founder," etc. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 355)

Page

  • running head: 633 LIBER DE SPECTACULIS.
  • marginal letters: A corpori, ut insidiarum; B substantiam ejus (7) pariter cum ipso in perversi-; C (in the Lectiones variantes, beside "(18)"); D (in the Commentarius, beside "sic constitutam reperimus")
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:634
spectaculorum de Scripturis auctoritatem exposcit, et se in incertum constituit, quod non significanter neque nominatim denuntietur servis Dei abstinentia ejusmodi. Plane nusquam invenimus, quemadmodum aperte positum est (Exod., 20.), Non occides, non idolum coles, non adulterium, non fraudem admittes; ita exerte definitum, « Non in Circum ibis, non in theatrum; agonem, munus non spectabis. » Sed invenimus ad hanc quoque speciem pertinere illam primam vocem David, Felix, inquit (ps. 1.), qui non abiit in concilium impiorum, et in via peccatorum non stetit, et in cathedra pestium non sedit. Nam etsi justum illum videtur praedicasse, quod in concilio et in concessu Judaeorum de Deo denegando consultantium, non communicavit; late tamen semper Scriptura divina dividitur, ubicunque secundum praesentis rei sensum etiam disciplina munitur, ut hic quoque non sit aliena vox a spectaculorum interdictione. Si enim pauculos tunc judaeos impiorum concilium vocavit, quanto magis tantum conventum ethnici populi! ni pii ethnici, minus peccatores, minus hostes Christi, quam tunc Judaei, quo et caetera congruunt. Nam apud spectacula et in via statur. Vias enim vocant cardines balteorum per ambitum
demands authority from the Scriptures for the renunciation of the shows, and puts itself in doubt, because abstinence of this kind is not announced to the servants of God expressly or by name. Plainly we nowhere find, as it is openly laid down (Exod. 20), You shall not kill, you shall not worship an idol, you shall not commit adultery or fraud, that it is in like manner expressly defined: 'You shall not go into the circus, nor into the theatre; you shall not watch a contest or a gladiatorial show.' But we find that that first utterance of David pertains to this kind also: Happy, he says (Ps. 1), is he who has not gone into the council of the ungodly, and has not stood in the way of sinners, and has not sat in the chair of pestilences. For although he seems to have proclaimed that just man who took no part in the council and assembly of the Jews deliberating about denying God, yet divine Scripture is always divided out broadly, wherever, according to the sense of the matter in hand, discipline too is fortified, so that here also the utterance is not foreign to the prohibition of the shows. For if he called the handful of Jews of that time a council of the ungodly, how much more so great an assembly of the heathen people! unless the heathen are godly, less sinners, less enemies of Christ than the Jews were then; with which the rest also agrees. For at the shows one stands in the way as well. For they call 'ways' the passages of the belts round the circuit,
Editors' notes and page, col. 634

Footnotes

(11) · call in col 634

Non ibis in Circum Rig.

Rigault: "non ibis in circum" (you shall not go to the circus).

(printed under page 355)

(12) · call in col 634

Exspectabis Rig.

Rigault: "exspectabis".

(printed under page 355)

(13) · call in col 634

Nec — pestium sedit Rig.

Rigault: "nec … pestium sedit".

(printed under page 355)

(14) ‹in concessu› · call in col 634

Et in sessu Rig.

Rigault: "et in sessu".

(printed under page 355)

(15) ‹de Deo denegando› · call in col 634

De necando domino Rig.

Rigault: "de necando domino" (about killing the Lord).

(printed under page 355)

(16) ‹ut hic› · call in col 634

Haec Wouw. M. S.

Wouwer's manuscript: "haec".

(printed under page 355)

(17) ‹ni pii ethnici› · call in col 634

Minus impii ethnici Rigalt.

Rigault: "minus impii ethnici".

(printed under page 355)

(18) ‹quo› · call in col 634

Quid quod Rigalt. ethnici populi? impii, minus peccatores, minus hostes Christi, quam tunc Judaei, quid? non et caetera congruunt. Wouw. Cod. script. quo ad caetera congruunt. Latin. Jun. mavult Quo et caetera.

Rigault: "quid quod"; Wouwer's written codex: "ethnici populi? impii, minus peccatores, minus hostes Christi, quam tunc Judaei, quid? non et caetera congruunt"; Latinius: "quo ad caetera congruunt"; Junius prefers "quo et caetera".

COMMENTARIUS (printed under page 355)

(c) ‹De scripturis› · call in col 634

De scripturis auctoritatem exposcit. Cyprianus de spectaculis ait quoque ita quaesitum a Christianis: (verba ejus) Ubi, inquiunt, scripta sunt ista? ubi prohibita? et adjicit loca Scripturae, quibus niterentur ad tuenda spectacula, male explicata, post quae subjicit: Hoc in loco dixerim, longe melius fuisset istis nullas litteras nosse, quam sic litteras legere. Lac.

It demands authority from the Scriptures. Cyprian, On the Shows, says that the Christians asked this too (his words): "Where, they say, are these things written? Where forbidden?" And he adds the passages of Scripture, badly explained, on which they relied to defend the shows, after which he goes on: "In this place I would say that it would have been far better for these men to know no letters at all than to read letters so." Lac[erda].

(printed under page 355)

(d) ‹In cathedra pestium› · call in col 634

In cathedra pestium. Idem habet eruditus Clemens Alex. Paedagogi lib. III. cum enim utitur hoc loco prophetae regii, infertque Christianis omni genere spectaculorum esse interdictum, subjicit, Οὐ δὲ ἀπεικότως τὰ στάδια καὶ τὰ θέατρα καθέδραν λοιμῶν προσείποι τις ἄν, neque abs re quis theatra et spectacula cathedram pestilentiae dixerit. Le Pr.

In the seat of pestilences. The learned Clement of Alexandria has the same, Paedagogus book 3: for when he uses this passage of the royal prophet and infers that the Christians are forbidden every kind of show, he adds: "Not unfittingly might one call the stadia and the theatres a seat of pestilences"; nor would anyone without reason call the theatres and shows a seat of pestilence. Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 355)

(e) ‹justum› · call in col 634

Nam etsi justum illum videtur praedicasse. Innuit Josephum Arimathaeensem, quem Lucas ait virum fuisse probum ac justum, nec interfuisse aut consensisse Judaeorum consilio adversus Christum. Auctor Commentariorum in Psalmos, Praef. Psal. 1. Tertullianus in libro de Spectaculis, asserit hunc Psalmum et de Josepho posse intelligi, qui corpus Domini sepelivit, et de his qui ad spectacula Gentium non conveniunt. Sunt qui eos Commentarios Hieronymo adscribant. Inserti sunt autem operibus Bedae. Rig.

For though it seems to have proclaimed him just. He hints at Joseph of Arimathea, who Luke says was a good and just man and did not take part in or consent to the Jews' counsel against Christ. The author of the Commentaries on the Psalms, preface to Psalm 1: "Tertullian, in the book On the Shows, asserts that this psalm can be understood both of Joseph, who buried the Lord's body, and of those who do not gather at the shows of the Gentiles." Some ascribe those Commentaries to Jerome; but they are inserted among the works of Bede. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 355)

(f) ‹Scriptura divina› · call in col 634

Late tamen semper Scriptura divina dividitur. Ex divinae copiae occasione, ut ait adversus Valentinianos. Rig.

Yet divine Scripture is always divided widely: by occasion of the divine abundance, as he says against the Valentinians. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 355)

(g) ‹concilium› · call in col 634

Judaeos impiorum concilium. Hoc misero elogio affecti sunt isti miserrimi. Sic et Augustinus epist. 54. Impios vocat Judaeos. Joan. Chrysost. orat. 2. adv. illos, dat illis ἀσέβειαν, et conc. Trullense cap. 1. δυσσέβειαν. Dionysio Alexandrino vocantur perfidi. Et Joan. Chrysost. loco citato vocat illos παράνομον πολιτείαν, et infra διαφθαρεῖς καὶ μιαρούς. Lac.

The Jews, a council of the ungodly. These most wretched men were branded with this wretched title. So too Augustine, letter 54, calls the Jews ungodly. John Chrysostom, oration 2 against them, gives them "impiety", and the Council in Trullo, chapter 1, "irreligion". By Dionysius of Alexandria they are called faithless. And John Chrysostom in the place cited calls them "a lawless commonwealth", and below "corrupted and defiled". Lac[erda]. [The first of the last two Greek words is not clearly legible in the image.]

(printed under page 355)

(h) ‹Vias enim vocant› · call in col 634

Vias enim vocant et cardines balteorum. De his omnibus quae ad Circum pertinent notabilia multa collegit doctissimus Salmasius Plinianis ad Solinum (continues)

For they call both "ways" and the hinges of the belts. On all these things that belong to the Circus the most learned Salmasius has gathered many notable points in his Plinian Exercises on Solinus (continues)

(printed under page 355)

Page

  • running head: DE SPECTACULIS. 634
  • marginal letters: A spectaculorum de Scripturis auctoritatem; B communicavit; late tamen semper; C (in the Lectiones variantes, beside "(18) ... catores"); D (in the Commentarius, beside "Auctor Commentariorum in Psalmos")
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:635
, et discrimina popularium per proclivum. Cathedra quoque nominatur ipse in anfractu ad consessum situs. Itaque e contrario infelix qui in quodcunque concilium impiorum abierit, et in quacunque via peccatorum steterit, et in quacunque cathedra pestium sederit. Generaliter dictum intelligamus, cum quid etiam specialiter interpretari capit. Nam et specialiter quaedam pronuntiata, generaliter sapiunt. Cum Deus Israelitas admonet disciplinae vel objurgat, utique ad omnes habet (Exod. 12.): cum Aegypto et Aethiopiae exitium comminatur, in omnem gentem peccatricem praejudicat. Sic omnis gens peccatrix vocatur Aegyptus et Aethiopia (Is. 14 et alibi.), a specie ad genus. Quemadmodum etiam de origine spectaculorum omne spectaculum concilium vocat impiorum, a genere ad speciem.
and the divisions of the people's seats down the slope. The seating itself, too, set in the curve for the assembly, is called a 'chair'. Therefore, conversely, unhappy is he who has gone into any council of the ungodly whatever, and has stood in any way of sinners whatever, and has sat in any chair of pestilences whatever. Let us understand a thing as said generally, even when it admits of being interpreted specially as well. For some things pronounced specially have a general meaning too. When God admonishes the Israelites to discipline or rebukes them, He certainly has all in view (Exod. 12); when He threatens destruction to Egypt and Ethiopia, He passes judgement beforehand on every sinful nation. So every sinful nation is called Egypt and Ethiopia (Isa. 14 and elsewhere), from the species to the genus. Just as also, from the origin of the shows, [Scripture] calls every show a council of the ungodly, from the genus to the species.
CAPUT IV.
CHAPTER IV.
Ne quis argumentari nos putet, ad principalem auctoritatem convertar ipsius signaculi nostri. Cum aquam ingressi christianam fidem in legis suae verba profitemur, renuntiasse nos diabolo et pompae et angelis ejus ore nostro contestamur. Quid erit summum ac praecipuum, in quo diabolus et pompae et angeli ejus censeantur, quam idololatria? ex qua omnis immundus et nequam spiritus, ut ita dixerim, quia nec diutius de hoc. Igitur si ex idololatria universam spectaculorum paraturam constare constiterit, indubitate praejudicatum erit etiam ad spectacula pertinere renuntiationis nostrae testimonium in lavacro, quae diabolo et pompae et angelis eius sint mancipata, scilicet per idololatriam. Commemorabimus origines singulorum, quibus
Lest anyone think that we are merely arguing, I will turn to the principal authority of our very seal. When, having entered the water, we profess the Christian faith in the words of its law, we testify with our own mouth that we have renounced the devil and his pomp and his angels. What will be the chief and foremost thing in which the devil and his pomps and angels are reckoned, if not idolatry? from which [comes] every unclean and wicked spirit, if I may so put it, for I will not [dwell] longer on this. Therefore, if it is established that the whole apparatus of the shows consists of idolatry, it will be settled beyond doubt that the testimony of our renunciation in the laver pertains to the shows also, since they are made over to the devil and his pomp and his angels, namely through idolatry. We shall recall the origins of each, in what
Editors' notes and page, col. 635

Footnotes

<!-- Calls (3)–(6) and (a)–(d) fall above the part of the page shown in the images (col 636 upper part); anchors not visible, columns inferred from print order. --> LECTIONES VARIANTES (printed under page 356)

(1) ‹summum ac› · call in col 635

Atque Rigalt.

Rigault: "atque".

(printed under page 356)

(2) ‹quibus› · call in col 635

A quibus Jun.

Junius: "a quibus".

(printed under page 356)

Page

  • running head: 635 TERTULLIANI
  • marginal letters: A tum, et discrimina popularium; B vocat impiorum, a genere ad speciem; C angelis eius sint mancipata; D (in the Commentarius, beside "luxum indicans Themistius")
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:636
in cunabulis in saeculo adoleverint: exinde titulos quorumdam, quibus nominibus nuncupentur: exinde apparatus, quibus superstitionibus instruantur: tum loca, quibus praesidibus dicentur: tum artes, quibus auctoribus deputentur. Si quid ex his non ad idolum pertinuerit, id neque ad idololatriam, neque ad nostram ejerationem pertinebit.
cradles they grew up in the world; then the titles of some, by what names they are called; then the apparatus, with what superstitions they are furnished; then the places, to what patrons they are dedicated; then the arts, to what authors they are ascribed. If any of these does not pertain to an idol, it will pertain neither to idolatry nor to our abjuration.
CAPUT V.
CHAPTER V.
De originibus quidem ut secretioribus et ignotis penes plures nostrorum altius, nec aliunde investigandum fuit; quam de instrumentis ethnicarum litterarum. Exstant auctores multi, qui super ista re commentarios ediderunt. Ab his ludorum origo sic traditur: Lydos ex Asia transvenas in Hetruria consedisse, ut Timaeus refert, duce Tyrrheno, qui fratri suo cesserat regni contentione: igitur in Hetruria, inter caeteros ritus superstitionum suarum spectacula quoque religionis nomine instituunt: inde Romani accersitos artifices mutuantur, tempus, enuntiationem, ut ludi a Lydis vocarentur. Sed etsi Varro ludos a ludo, id est a lusu interpretatur, sicut et Lupercos ludos appellabant, quod ludendo discurrant; tamen eum lusum juvenum et diebus festis, et templis, et religionibus reputat. Nihil jam de caussa vocabuli, cum rei caussa idololatria sit. Nam et cum promiscue ludi Liberalia vocarentur, honorem Liberi patris manifeste sonabant. Libero enim a rusticis primo fiebant ob beneficium quod ei adscribunt pro demonstrata gratia vini. Exinde ludi Consualia dicti, qui initio Neptunum honorabant. Eumdem enim et Consum vocabant. Dehinc Equiria Marti
Concerning the origins, indeed, as being rather hidden and unknown to most of our people, we had to inquire more deeply, and from no other source than from the records of heathen literature. Many authors are extant who have published commentaries on this matter. By them the origin of the games is handed down thus: that the Lydians, crossing over from Asia, settled in Etruria, as Timaeus relates, under the leadership of Tyrrhenus, who had yielded to his brother in a contest for the kingdom; and so in Etruria, among the other rites of their superstitions, they establish shows also in the name of religion; from there the Romans borrow the craftsmen they have sent for, the season, the name, so that the games (ludi) were called after the Lydians. But although Varro derives ludi from ludus, that is, from play, just as they also called the Luperci ludi, because they run about in play, yet he reckons that play of the young men as belonging to feast days and temples and religious rites. Nothing more now about the cause of the word, since the cause of the thing is idolatry. For even when the games were called Liberalia without distinction, they plainly sounded the honour of Father Liber; for they were first held for Liber by country folk on account of the benefit they ascribe to him for having shown the delight of wine. After that the games were called Consualia, which at first honoured Neptune; for they called him Consus too. Next the Equiria to Mars
Editors' notes and page, col. 636

Footnotes

(3) · call in col 636

Incunabulis Rigalt.

Rigault: "incunabulis".

(printed under page 356)

(4) · call in col 636

Tunc Rig.

Rigault: "tunc".

(printed under page 356)

(5) · call in col 636

Tum abest Rig.

Rigault lacks "tum".

(printed under page 356)

(6) · call in col 636

Ethnicalium Rig.

Rigault: "ethnicalium".

(printed under page 356)

(7) ‹cum› · call in col 636

Dum Rig.

Rigault: "dum".

(printed under page 356)

(8) ‹pro› · call in col 636

Pro abest Rig.

Rigault lacks "pro".

(printed under page 356)

(9) ‹qui› · call in col 636

Queis Jun.

Junius: "queis".

(printed under page 356)

(10) ‹vocabant› · call in col 636

Vocant Rig.

Rigault: "vocant".

(printed under page 356)

(11) ‹Equiria› · call in col 636

Quis add. Rig.

Rigault adds "quis".

COMMENTARIUS

(continued) · note (h) of page 355

Exercitationibus, pag. 895. Rig.

Exercises, page 895. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 356)

(a) ‹Et cardines Balteorum› · call in col 636

Et cardines Balteorum. Baltei repagula erant, seu cingula coriacea bullis ornata, quibus constringebantur equitum romanorum subsellia qui in cavea sedebant, loco operto: baltei autem isti hamis seu fibulis quibusdam erant annexi, quam ob rem theatri luxum indicans Themistius orat. Dixit, ὁ κόσμος τῶν περιστύλων τοῦ θεάτρου, mundus peristylorum theatri; quo sensu dicitur muliebris. Edd.

And the hinges of the belts. The "baltei" were barriers, or leather belts decorated with studs, by which the benches of the Roman knights who sat in the auditorium were closed off, in a covered place; these belts were attached by hooks or clasps of some kind. Hence Themistius, describing the luxury of the theatre in an oration, said "the adornment of the theatre's colonnades", mundus peristylorum theatri, in the sense in which "mundus muliebris" (a woman's finery) is said. Edd[itors].

(printed under page 356)

(b) ‹specialiter› · call in col 636

Nam et specialiter quaedam pronuntiata. Regula ad intellectum Scripturae sacrae apprime utilis. Atqui quod dicit hic omnibus, dictum quod Israelitis dicebatur, non uno in loco annotavit B. Hieronymus in proph. Pam.

For some things too were pronounced specially. A rule exceedingly useful for understanding sacred Scripture. And what he says here, that something said to the Israelites was said to all, blessed Jerome noted in more than one place in his commentaries on the prophets. Pam[elius].

(printed under page 356)

(c) ‹in omnem gentem› · call in col 636

In omnem gentem peccatricem praejudicat. Hunc locum tractat etiam adversus Judaeos. Sic et Aegyptus, inquit, nonnunquam totus orbis intelligitur, etc. Rig.

It pronounces judgement beforehand on every sinful nation. He treats this passage also in Against the Jews: "So too by Egypt," he says, "the whole world is sometimes understood," etc. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 356)

(d) ‹Altius nec aliunde› · call in col 636

Altius nec aliunde investigandum fuit. Sic libri hactenus excusi, Penes plures nostrorum altius. In exemplari Agobardi legitur: Ut secretioribus et ignotis penes plures nostrorum artis. Forte, actis, ut Romanorum sive Gentilium rerum Origines, acta esse dixerit secretiora, et plerisque christianorum ignota. Sed minime displicet vulgata lectio, Altius nec aliunde.

It was not to be looked into more deeply, nor elsewhere. So the books printed hitherto: "Penes plures nostrorum altius". In the Agobard copy is read: "ut secretioribus et ignotis penes plures nostrorum artis". Perhaps "actis", so that he would have called the Origins of the Romans or the Gentiles' history more secret records, unknown to most Christians. But the common reading, "Altius nec aliunde", by no means displeases.

(printed under page 356)

(e) ‹a Lydis› · call in col 636

Ut ludi a Lydis vocarentur. Varia hic ludorum genera enumerat quae fuse a bene multis explicata sunt. Lupercales ludi in honorem Panis primum, ac deinde in honorem Lupae Romuli nutricis instituti sunt. Liberalia in honorem Liberi, seu Bacchi. Consualia, ab aliis ludi circenses, in honorem Neptuni. Cerealia in honorem Cereris, Equiria in honorem Martis, sic dicti sunt ii ludi ab equorum cursu, qui in campo Martio exercebantur. Le Pr.

So that the games were called "ludi" from the Lydians. Here he lists various kinds of games, which have been explained at length by a good many. The Lupercalian games were instituted first in honour of Pan, and then in honour of the she-wolf, Romulus's nurse. The Liberalia in honour of Liber, or Bacchus. The Consualia, called by others the circus games, in honour of Neptune. The Cerealia in honour of Ceres, the Equiria in honour of Mars: these games were so called from the racing of horses, which was held in the Campus Martius. Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 356)

(f) ‹Liberalia› · call in col 636

Promiscue ludi liberalia voc. Non intellexere hunc locum qui dixere ludos omnes promiscue dictos Liberalia, multos noto, in primis Heraldum lib. i, digress. cap. 28. nihil absurdius. An, obsecro, Consualia, Equiria, Tarpeia, Robigalia, dici poterant Liberalia? apage. Hoc enim nemo dixit, nemo audivit. Qui istud imponunt Tertulliano, injuriam faciunt homini scientissimo. Tantum promiscuam hanc usurpationem nominis in eo ponit, quod Liberalia, Consualia, et reliqua hujusmodi, dicuntur etiam absolute ludi. Itaque vox ista, ludus, miscetur omnibus festivitatibus idololatricis; nam omnes isti dicuntur ludi. Et ideo statim addit, Exinde ludi Consualia dicti; et inde liquet non nomen solum ludi, sed rem significatam per ludum mancipatam esse daemonibus; hoc enim probare Tertullianus vult. Lac.

The games were indiscriminately called Liberalia. Those did not understand this passage who said that all games were indiscriminately called Liberalia; I mark many, Herald first of all, book 1, digression chapter 28. Nothing is more absurd. Could the Consualia, Equiria, Tarpeia, Robigalia, I ask you, be called Liberalia? Away with it! No one ever said it, no one ever heard it. Those who foist this on Tertullian wrong a most learned man. He places this indiscriminate use of the name only in this: that the Liberalia, Consualia and the rest of the kind are also called simply "ludi". So the word "ludus" is mixed in with all the idolatrous festivals; for all these are called "ludi". And so he adds at once, "Thence the games were called Consualia"; and from this it is plain that not only the name "ludus" but the thing signified by "ludus" was made over to the demons; for this is what Tertullian wants to prove. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 356)

Page

  • running head: TERTULLIANI 636
  • marginal letters: A in cunabulis (3) in saeculo adoleverint; B rheno, qui fratri suo cesserat; C qui (9) initio Neptunum honorabant; D (in the Commentarius, beside "Cerealia in honorem Cereris")
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:637
Romulus dixit: quanquam et Consualia Romulo defendunt, quod ea Conso dicaverit Deo, ut volunt, consilii: ejus scilicet, quo tunc Sabinarum virginum rapinam militibus suis in matrimonia excogitavit. Probum plane consilium, et nunc quoque apud ipsos Romanos justum et licitum, ne dixerim, penes Deum. Facit etenim ad originis maculam, ne bonum existimes, quod initium a malo accepit, ab impudentia, a violentia, ab odio, a fratricida institutore, a filio Martis: et nunc ara Conso illi in Circo defossa est ad primas metas sub terra, cum inscriptione hujusmodi, CONSUS CONSILIO, MARS DUELLO, LARES COMITIO POTENTES. Sacrificant apud eam nonis Juliis sacerdotes publici, XII. Kalen. Septembres flamen Quirinalis, et virgines. Dehinc idem Romulus Jovi Feretrio ludos instituit in Tarpeio, quos Tarpeios dictos et Capitolinos Piso tradidit. Post hunc Numa Pompilius Marti et Robigini fecit. Nam et Robiginis Deam finxerunt. Dehinc Tullus Hostilius. Dehinc Ancus Martius, et caeteri. Qui quotque per ordinem, et quibus idolis ludos instituerunt, positum est apud Suetonium Tranquillum, vel a quibus Tranquillus accepit. Sed haec satis erunt ad originis de idololatria reatum.
Romulus said [so]: although they also claim the Consualia for Romulus, on the ground that he dedicated them to Consus, the god, as they will have it, of counsel: that counsel, namely, by which he then devised for his soldiers the rape of the Sabine virgins into marriage. A fine counsel indeed, and even now among the Romans themselves just and lawful, not to say in the sight of God. For it adds to the stain of the origin, lest you should think good what took its beginning from evil, from shamelessness, from violence, from hatred, from a fratricide as founder, from a son of Mars: and even now an altar to that Consus is sunk in the Circus at the first turning-posts, under the earth, with an inscription of this kind: CONSUS POWERFUL IN COUNSEL, MARS IN WAR, THE LARES IN THE ASSEMBLY. The public priests sacrifice at it on the nones of July, and on the twelfth day before the Kalends of September the flamen of Quirinus and the virgins. Next the same Romulus instituted games to Jupiter Feretrius on the Tarpeian [hill], which Piso has recorded were called the Tarpeian and Capitoline [games]. After him Numa Pompilius made [games] to Mars and to Robigo. For they even invented a goddess of Robigo. Next Tullus Hostilius. Next Ancus Martius, and the rest. Who they were, and how many in order, and to which idols they instituted games, is set down in Suetonius Tranquillus, or in those from whom Tranquillus received it. But this will suffice for the guilt of their origin in idolatry.
CAPUT VI.
CHAPTER VI.
Accedit ad testimonium antiquitatis subsecuta posteritas, formam originis de titulis hujus quoque temporis praeferens; per quos signatum est, cui
To the testimony of antiquity is added the posterity that followed, displaying the form of the origin in the titles of this time also; by which it is marked, to which
Editors' notes and page, col. 637

Footnotes

<!-- Calls (1)–(5), (13)–(16) and (a), (d)–(g) fall above the part of the page shown in the images; anchors not visible, columns inferred from print order. --> LECTIONES VARIANTES (printed under page 357)

(1) · call in col 637

A Romulo Jun.

Junius: "a Romulo".

(printed under page 357)

(2) · call in col 637

Quod Rig.

Rigault: "quod".

(printed under page 357)

(3) · call in col 637

Inter Rig.

Rigault: "inter".

(printed under page 357)

(4) · call in col 637

Enim et hoc Rig.

Rigault: "enim et hoc".

(printed under page 357)

(5) · call in col 637

Ab impudentis violentiae alio deo Fran.

Franeker [edition]: "ab impudentis violentiae alio deo".

(printed under page 357)

(6) ‹Lares (b) comitio› · call in col 637

collo Rig.

Rigault: "COLLO".

(printed under page 357)

(7) ‹Septembres› · call in col 637

XV Kalendr. septembris Junius.

Junius: "XV Kalendr. septembris" (the fifteenth day before the Kalends of September).

(printed under page 357)

(8) ‹Robigini fecit› · call in col 637

Fecit abest Rig.

Rigault lacks "fecit".

(printed under page 357)

(9) ‹Robiginis› · call in col 637

Robiginem Wouw. M. S.

Wouwer's manuscript: "Robiginem".

(printed under page 357)

(10) ‹per ordinem› · call in col 637

Et caeteri quoque per ordinem. Et Fran.

Franeker [edition]: "et caeteri quoque per ordinem. Et".

(printed under page 357)

(11) · call in col 637

Uniuscujusque alii.

Others: "uniuscujusque".

(printed under page 357)

(12) · call in col 637

Additur enim Rig.

Rigault adds "enim".

(printed under page 357)

(a) · call in col 637

A violentia, ab odio. Sic emendandum censuit Wowerenius, nec habeo quod Auctoris menti magis conveniat, aut proprius accedat ad haec veteris scripturae vestigia, a violentiae alio deo. Lac.

From violence, from hatred. So Wouwer thought it should be emended, and I have nothing that better suits the author's mind or comes nearer to these traces of the old writing, "a violentiae alio deo". Lac[erda].

(printed under page 357)

(b) ‹Lares› · call in col 637

Lares coillo potentes habet vetus exemplar. Graecum est Κοίλῳ, Cavo, penetrali. Coelum veteres dixisse Coum, auctor est Festus. Ad eum vero Scaliger se in veteri membrana legisse refert ex Ennio, —— complere coum terroribus coeli. Primum igitur Coum, cavum, κοῖλον, deinde coilum, aut coillum, domus penetrale, ubi Lares colebantur. Ab hoc igitur Coilli vocabulo, coillinus et coilinus: unde incoilinus, qui et inquilinus. Lac.

The old copy has "Lares coillo potentes". It is the Greek κοίλῳ, "in the hollow", the inner part of the house. Festus is the authority that the ancients said "coum" for heaven. On him Scaliger reports that he read in an old parchment, from Ennius, "—— to fill the coum with the terrors of heaven". First, then, "coum", hollow, κοῖλον; then "coilum" or "coillum", the inner part of the house, where the Lares were worshipped. From this word "coillum", then, come "coillinus" and "coilinus", whence "incoilinus", which is also "inquilinus" (lodger). Lac[erda].

(printed under page 357)

(c) ‹Deam› · call in col 637

Nam et Robiginem deam. Quemadmodum Deus erat Robigus, ita et Dea Robigo, quae rubiginem averteret; sic et Pallorem Deam, et Febrim fecerant. Huic Deae sacra fieri solita erant, ne rubigo segetes corrumperet. Le Pr.

For they made Robigo too a goddess. As Robigus was a god, so also Robigo was a goddess, to avert blight; so too they had made Pallor a goddess, and Fever. Sacrifices used to be made to this goddess so that blight should not spoil the crops. Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 357)

Page

  • running head: 637 LIBER DE SPECTA[CULIS] (head cropped at the image's right edge)
  • marginal letters: A Romulus dixit : quanquam et Consualia; B virgines. Dehinc idem Romulus Jovi Feretrio ludos; C (in the variant readings); D (in the commentary)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:638
idolo, et cui superstitioni utriusque generis ludi notarentur, Megalenses et Apollinares, item Cereales et Neptunales, et Latiares, et Florales in commune celebrantur: reliqui ludorum, de natalibus et solemnitatibus regum, et publicis prosperitatibus et municipalibus fastis superstitionis caussas originis habent. Inter quos etiam privatorum memoriis legatariae editiones parentant, id quoque secundum institutionis antiquitatem. Nam et a primordio bifariam ludi censebantur, sacri et funebres, id est, diis nationum et mortuis. Sed de idololatria nihil differt apud nos, sub quo nomine et titulo, dum ad eosdem spiritus perveniat, quibus renuntiamus, licet mortuis, licet diis suis faciant. Proinde mortuis suis ut diis faciant, una conditio partis utriusque est, una idololatria, una renuntiatio nostra adversus idololatriam.
idol, and to which superstition the games of each kind were to be noted: the Megalensian and Apollinarian, likewise the Cerealian and Neptunalian, and the Latiar, and the Floral are celebrated in common; the rest of the games have the causes of their origin in superstition, from the birthdays and solemnities of kings, and from public successes and municipal festivals. Among these also the shows bequeathed by legacy make offering to the memory of private persons, this too according to the antiquity of their institution. For from the beginning games were reckoned in two kinds, sacred and funeral, that is, to the gods of the nations and to the dead. But with regard to idolatry it makes no difference with us under what name and title [it is done], so long as it reaches the same spirits whom we renounce; whether they do it to the dead or to their gods. Accordingly, since they do it to their dead as to gods, the condition of both parts is one, the idolatry is one, our renunciation against idolatry is one.
CAPUT VII.
CHAPTER VII.
Communis igitur origo ludorum utriusque generis, commenes et tituli, ut de communibus caussis, proinde apparatus communes habeant necesse est de reatu generali idololatriae conditricis suae. Sed Circensium paulo pompatior suggestus, quibus proprie hoc nomen, pompa, praecedit, quorum sit in semetipsa probans, de simulacrorum serie, de imaginum agmine, de curribus, de thensis, de armamaxis,
Since, then, the origin of the games of each kind is common, their titles too are common, as springing from common causes; so it is necessary that they have common equipment from the general guilt of idolatry, their foundress. But the display of the Circensian [games] is somewhat more pompous, for which, properly, this very name, the procession [pompa], goes before, proving in itself whose it is, by the line of statues, by the column of images, by the chariots, by the thensae, by the armamaxae,
Editors' notes and page, col. 638

Footnotes

(13) · call in col 638

Solemnibus Rig.

Rigault: "solemnibus".

(printed under page 357)

(14) · call in col 638

Festis Wouw. M. S.

Wouwer's manuscript: "festis".

(printed under page 357)

(15) · call in col 638

Superstitionibusque Paris. Jun.

Paris [edition], Junius: "superstitionibusque".

(printed under page 357)

(16) · call in col 638

Originis abest Rig.

Rigault lacks "originis".

(printed under page 357)

(17) ‹renuntiamus› · call in col 638

Renuntiavimus Wouw. M. S.

Wouwer's manuscript: "renuntiavimus".

(printed under page 357)

(18) ‹licet mortuis, licet› · call in col 638

Mortuis. Licebit Rig.

Rigault: "mortuis. Licebit".

(printed under page 357)

(19) ‹diis faciant› · call in col 638

Faciunt Jun. proinde mortuis faciunt Rig.

Junius: "faciunt"; Rigault: "proinde mortuis faciunt".

(printed under page 357)

(20) ‹Communis igitur› · call in col 638

Igitur abest Rigalt.

Rigault lacks "igitur".

(printed under page 357)

(21) ‹proinde› · call in col 638

Perinde Rigalt.

Rigault: "perinde".

(printed under page 357)

(22) ‹generali› · call in col 638

Genitali Jun. ex M. S.

Junius, from a manuscript: "genitali".

(printed under page 357)

(23) ‹praecedit› · call in col 638

Praecedens Rig.

Rigault: "praecedens".

(printed under page 357)

(24) ‹probans› · call in col 638

Probat Rig.

Rigault: "probat".

COMMENTARIUS (printed under page 357)

(d) · call in col 638

Utriusque generis ludi. Legunt aliqui uniuscujusque: non placent; praestat certe Pamelii explicatio, qui ait Scriptorem locutum cum respectu ad duo tantum ludorum genera, Circensium et Theatralium. Haec enim solum comprehendit superiore cap. Lac.

Games of both kinds. Some read "uniuscujusque" (of each): they do not satisfy; Pamelius's explanation is certainly better, who says that the writer spoke with regard to only two kinds of games, those of the circus and those of the theatre. For these alone he comprised in the preceding chapter. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 357)

(e) · call in col 638

Megalenses. Megalesia, (inquit Varro lib. 5. de ling. lat.) dicta a Graecis, quod ex libris sibyllineis accersita ab Attalo rege Pergami Pessinunte, ubi Megalesion templum ejus Deae, magnae inquam matris Deum, unde advecta Romam. Hinc et ludi Megalenses. Pam.

The Megalensian games. The Megalesia (says Varro, On the Latin Language, book 5) are so called from the Greeks, because by the Sibylline books she was sent for from King Attalus of Pergamum, from Pessinus, where the Megalesion was, the temple of that goddess, the great mother of the gods, I mean, whence she was brought to Rome. Hence too the Megalensian games. Pam[elius].

(printed under page 357)

(f) · call in col 638

Latiares. Sacri Jovi Latiari cujus in Caligula meminit Suetonius, et alii passim. Puto decipi Pamelium qui hos ludos ad gladiatores refert: exorbitaret sic a suo argumento Tertullianus, qui ludos comprehensos superiore et isto capite, tantum determinat ad Scenam et Circum, ut apparet ex cap. 10. hujus operis. Lac.

The Latiar games. Sacred to Jupiter Latiaris, whom Suetonius mentions in his Caligula, and others here and there. I think Pamelius is mistaken in referring these games to the gladiators: Tertullian would so stray from his subject, for he confines the games comprised in the preceding chapter and in this one to the stage and the circus only, as appears from chapter 10 of this work. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 357)

(g) · call in col 638

Sacri et funebres. Sacri erant ludi de quibus egit antea, nimirum Megalenses, Apollinares, etc. funebres vero de quibus acturus est, quoniam mortuis in ejusmodi conventibus parentabatur. Le Pr.

Sacred and funeral. The sacred games were those he treated before, namely the Megalensian, the Apollinarian, etc.; the funeral ones those he is about to treat, since at such gatherings offerings were made to the dead. Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 357)

(h) ‹de thensis› · call in col 638

De Curribus, de thensis. Currus profana, thensae sacra erant vehicula: Thensam enim [teste Festo] ait vocari Sinnius (seu uti legendum ex Lactantio patet Sisinnicus) Capito, vehiculum, quo exuviae Deorum ludicris circensibus in Circum ad pulvinar vehuntur, et ex ebore, ut apud Litinium in Barbato, et ex argento. Pam.

Of chariots, of thensae. Chariots were profane vehicles, thensae sacred ones: for Sinnius Capito (or, as it plainly should be read from Lactantius, Sisinnicus) says [on Festus's testimony] that a thensa is the vehicle in which the effigies of the gods are carried at the circus games into the Circus to the sacred couch; and of ivory, as in Litinius's Barbatus, and of silver. Pam[elius].

(printed under page 357)

(i) ‹de armamaxis› · call in col 638

Armamaxis. Discriminat harmamaxam (sive (continues)

Armamaxae. He distinguishes the harmamaxa (or (continues)

(printed under page 357)

Page

  • running head: LIBER DE SPECTACULIS. 638
  • marginal letters: A idolo, et cui superstitioni; B diis faciant, una conditio; C (in the variant readings); D (in the commentary)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:639
de sedibus, de coronis, de exuviis, quanta praeterea sacra, quanta sacrificia praecedant, intercedant, succedant, quot collegia, quot sacerdotia, quot officia moveantur, sciunt homines illius urbis in qua daemoniorum conventus consedit. Ea si minore cura per provincias pro minoribus viribus administrantur, tamen omnes ubique Circenses illuc deputandi, unde et petuntur; inde inquinantur, unde sumuntur. Nam et rivulus tenuis ex suo fonte, et surculus modicus ex sua fronde, qualitatem originis continet. Viderit ambitio sive frugalitas ejus quo Deum offendit: qualiscunque pompa circi, etsi pauca simulacra circumferat, in uno idololatria est: et si unam thensam trahat, Jovis tamen plaustrum est: quaevis idololatria sordide instructa, vel modice locuples splendida est censu criminis sui.
by the seats, by the crowns, by the spoils; how many sacred rites besides, how many sacrifices go before, come between, follow after, how many guilds, how many priesthoods, how many offices are set in motion, the men of that city know in which the assembly of demons has taken its seat. If these things are administered throughout the provinces with less care, in proportion to their lesser strength, yet all Circensian [games] everywhere are to be assigned thither whence also they are fetched; they are defiled from the source from which they are taken. For even a slender streamlet from its own spring, and a modest shoot from its own leafage, keeps the quality of its origin. Let the ambition or the frugality of that by which it offends God see to itself: whatever the procession of the circus be, even if it carries round few statues, idolatry is in one; and if it draws but one thensa, it is still Jupiter's wagon: any idolatry whatever, shabbily furnished or moderately rich, is splendid by the assessment of its crime.
CAPUT VIII.
CHAPTER VIII.
Ut et de locis, secundum propositum exsequar, circus Soli principaliter consecratur: cujus aedes medio spatio, et effigies de fastigio aedis emicat, quod non putaverint sub tecto consecrandum, quem in aperto habent. Quod spectaculum primum a Circe habent. Soli patri suo, ut volunt, editum affirmant: ab ea et Circi appellationem argumentantur. Plane venefica eis utique negotium gessit hoc, nomine quorum sacerdos erat, daemoniis et angelis scilicet. Quot igitur in habitu loci ipsius idololatrias recognoscis! singula ornamenta Circi, singula templa sunt. Ova honori Castorum adscribunt, qui illos ovo editos credendo de cygno Jove non erubescunt. Delphinos Neptuno vovent, columnas sessias a sementationibus, messias a messibus, tutelinas a tutelis fructuum sustinent. Ante has tres arae,
To pursue the places also, according to my plan: the circus is consecrated chiefly to the Sun; his temple [stands] in the middle of the course, and his effigy shines out from the gable of the temple, because they did not think that one should be consecrated under a roof whom they have in the open. They hold that this spectacle was first given by Circe. They affirm that it was put on for the Sun, her father, as they will have it; from her they argue also the name of the Circus. Plainly the sorceress transacted this business for them in the name of those whose priestess she was, namely the demons and angels. How many idolatries, then, do you recognize in the very appearance of the place! Every ornament of the Circus is a temple. The eggs they ascribe to the honour of the Castors, who are not ashamed to believe them born from the egg of Jupiter the swan. The dolphins they vow to Neptune; the columns bear [images of] the Sessiae from sowings, the Messiae from harvests, the Tutelinae from the keeping of the crops. Before these [stand] three altars,
Editors' notes and page, col. 639

Footnotes

<!-- Calls (1), (9), (10), (a), (e), (f) fall above the part of the page shown in the images; anchors not visible, columns inferred from print order. --> LECTIONES VARIANTES (printed under page 358)

(1) · call in col 639

Quod Paris. utrumque abest Rig.

Paris [edition]: "quod"; Rigault lacks both.

(printed under page 358)

(2) ‹modice locuples› · call in col 639

Et splendida Latin. sed splendida Paris.

Latinius: "et splendida"; Paris [edition]: "sed splendida".

(printed under page 358)

(3) ‹putaverint› · call in col 639

Putaverunt. Rig. Et ut Pet. Ciacon.

Rigault: "putaverunt"; Pedro Chacón: "et ut".

(printed under page 358)

(4) ‹Quod› · call in col 639

Qui Rig.

Rigault: "qui".

(printed under page 358)

(5) ‹ut volunt› · call in col 639

Ut volunt abest Rig.

Rigault lacks "ut volunt".

(printed under page 358)

(6) ‹Plane› · call in col 639

Argutantur plane Jun.

Junius: "argutantur plane".

(printed under page 358)

(7) ‹columnas› · call in col 639

Vomunt columnae Rig.

Rigault: "vomunt columnae".

(printed under page 358)

(8) ‹tutelis› · call in col 639

Tutela Rig.

Rigault: "tutela".

(printed under page 358)

(a) · call in col 639

Illius urbis in qua daemoniorum conventus consedit. Romam et Capitolium significat. Et Capitolium quidem in Apolog. pag. 7. Curiam Deorum esse ait, ubi scilicet Deorum synodus, ejusdem Apologetici cap. 6. Rig.

Of that city in which the assembly of demons has taken its seat. He means Rome and the Capitol. And the Capitol, in the Apology, page 7, he calls the senate-house of the gods, where, that is, the synod of the gods is, chapter 6 of the same Apology. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 358)

(b) ‹Castorum› · call in col 639

Ova honori Castrorum. Spatia curriculorum in circo ovis notata fuisse ex Livio, Dione, et Cassiodoro primus annotavit Alciatus lib. 4. Parergon cap. ult. Quo etiam alludit Varro de re rustica lib. 1. Pam.

Eggs in honour of the Castors. Alciati, Parerga book 4, last chapter, first noted from Livy, Dio and Cassiodorus that the laps of the races in the circus were marked by eggs. Varro alludes to this too, On Agriculture book 1. Pam[elius].

(printed under page 358)

(c) ‹non erubescunt› · call in col 639

Qui illos ovo editos credendo, de cygno Jove non erubescunt. Sic habet vetus exemplar Agobardi, nisi quod syllabam geminavit, decus cygno, quod est de cucno, sive de cygno. Rig.

Who are not ashamed, in believing them born of an egg, of Jove the swan. So the old Agobard copy has it, except that it doubled a syllable, "decus cygno", which is "de cucno", that is "de cygno". Rig[ault].

(printed under page 358)

(d) ‹Neptuno vovent› · call in col 639

Delphinos Neptuno vomunt col. Juvenalis Sat. 6. Consulit ante falas, delphinorumque columnas. Septimius columnas dicit vomere delphinos, quasi de columnarum alvis emissos, ut per tubos et canales. Rig.

The columns spew out dolphins for Neptune. Juvenal, Satire 6: "She consults before the towers and the dolphins' columns." Septimius [Tertullian] says the columns spew out dolphins, as though sent out from the bellies of the columns, as through pipes and channels. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 358)

Page

  • running head: 639 TERTULLIANI
  • marginal letters: A de sedibus, de coronis; B modice locuples splendida est; C dendo de cygno Jove non erubescunt; D (in the commentary)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:640
trinis diis parent, magnis, potentibus, valentibus. Eosdem Samothracas existimant. Obelisci enormitas, ut Hermateles affirmat, Soli prostituta: scriptura ejus unde et census, de Aegypto superstitio est. Frigebat daemonum concilium sine sua matre magna; ea itaque illic praesidet Euripo. Consus (ut diximus) apud metas sub terra delitescit. Murtias quoque idolum fecit. Murtiam enim deam amoris volunt, cui in illa parte aedem vovere. Animadverte, christiane, quot nomina immunda possederint Circum. Aliena est tibi religio, quam tot diaboli spiritus occupaverunt. De locis quidem locus est retractandi ad praeveniendam quorumdam interrogationem. Quid enim, inquis, si alio in tempore Circum adiero, periclitabor de inquinamento? Nulla est praescriptio de locis. Nam non sola ista conciliabula spectaculorum, sed etiam templa ipsa sine periculo disciplinae adire servus Dei potest, urgente caussa simplici duntaxat, quae non pertineat ad proprium ejus loci negotium vel officium. Caeterum et plateae, et forum, et balneae, et stabula, et ipsae domus nostrae sine idolis omnino non sunt; totum saeculum Satanas et angeli ejus repleverunt. Non tamen quod in saeculo sumus, a Deo excidimus, sed si quid de saeculi criminibus attigerimus. Proinde si Capitolium, si Serapeum sacrificator et adorator intravero, a Deo excidam, quemadmodum circum vel theatrum spectator. Loca nos non contaminant per se, sed quae in locis fiunt, a quibus et ipsa loca contaminari altercati sumus: de contaminatis contaminamur. Propterea autem commemoramus, quibus ejusmodi loca dicentur, ut eorum demonstremus esse, quae in his locis fiunt, quibus loca dicantur.
sacrifice to triple gods, the great, the powerful, the strong. They think these the same as the Samothracian [gods]. The huge bulk of the obelisk, as Hermateles affirms, is prostituted to the Sun: its inscription, like its origin, is superstition from Egypt. The council of demons was cold without its great mother; so she presides there over the Euripus. Consus (as we have said) lurks at the turning-posts under the earth. The Murtiae too he made an idol. For they will have Murtia [to be] a goddess of love, to whom [they say] a temple was vowed in that part. Take note, Christian, how many unclean names have taken possession of the Circus. A religion is foreign to you which so many spirits of the devil have occupied. Concerning places, indeed, there is room for a further word, to forestall the question of certain persons. For what, you say, if I go to the Circus at another time, shall I be in danger of defilement? There is no prescription as to places. For not only these meeting-places of the shows, but even the temples themselves the servant of God may approach without danger to his discipline, provided only some simple cause presses him which does not belong to the proper business or office of that place. Besides, the streets and the forum and the baths and the inns and our very houses are not altogether without idols; Satan and his angels have filled the whole world. Yet it is not because we are in the world that we fall away from God, but if we touch anything of the world's crimes. Accordingly, if I enter the Capitol or the Serapeum as a sacrificer and worshipper, I shall fall away from God, just as [I should] as a spectator at the circus or the theatre. Places do not defile us of themselves, but the things done in the places, by which, as we have argued, the places themselves also are defiled: we are defiled by defiled things. For this reason, then, we record to whom places of this kind are dedicated, to show that the things done in these places belong to those to whom the places are dedicated.
Editors' notes and page, col. 640

Footnotes

(9) · call in col 640

Murtia quoque id olim fecit Latin. Murtias. Has quoque Rig.

Latinius: "Murtia quoque id olim fecit"; Rigault: "Murtias. Has quoque".

(printed under page 358)

(10) · call in col 640

Numina Jun.

Junius: "numina".

(printed under page 358)

(11) ‹contaminamur› · call in col 640

Contaminantur Rig.

Rigault: "contaminantur".

COMMENTARIUS

(continued) · note (i) of page 357

armamaxam, ut alii scribunt) Junius ab essedo, pilento, petorito, quia alii confundunt cum illis. aitque esse proprie vectem gestatorium, qui opera hominum tolleretur manibus humerisve, ad eum modum, quo sellae gestatoriae apud Suetonium, et lecticae apud Senecam. Ergo Tertullianus a curribus, qui jumentis agebantur, a thensis quae funibus, transit ad harmamaxas, quae humeris tollebantur ab hominibus, ita attestantibus studium suum erga sacra Circensia. Lac.

armamaxa, as others write) Junius distinguishes from the essedum, the pilentum and the petoritum, because others confuse it with them; and he says it is properly a carrying-pole, lifted by men's labour on hands or shoulders, after the manner of the sedan chairs in Suetonius and the litters in Seneca. So Tertullian passes from the chariots, which were drawn by beasts, and from the thensae, which were drawn by ropes, to the harmamaxae, which were lifted on men's shoulders, men thus attesting their zeal for the sacred rites of the Circus. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 358)

(e) · call in col 640

Obelisci enormitas. De hoc Plinius lib. 36. cap. 9. Is autem Obeliscus, inquit, quem Divus Augustus in Circo magno statuit, excisus a rege Semneserteo, quo regnante Pythagoras in Aegypto fuit, centum viginti quinque pedum et dodrantis praeter basim ejusdem lapidis. Is vero qui est in campo Martio novem pedibus minor a Sesostride. Pam.

The hugeness of the obelisk. On this Pliny, book 36, chapter 9: "The obelisk," he says, "which the deified Augustus set up in the Circus Maximus was quarried by King Semnesertaeus, in whose reign Pythagoras was in Egypt; it is a hundred and twenty-five feet and three-quarters high, besides a base of the same stone. The one in the Campus Martius, nine feet shorter, was made by Sesostris." Pam[elius].

(printed under page 358)

(f) · call in col 640

Murciam enim deam marcoris, leg. Rigalt. Augustinus iv. de Civit. Dei, cap. 16. Deam Murciam vocaverunt, quae praeter modum non moveret, ac faceret hominem, ut ait Pomponius, murcidum, id est, nimis desidiosum, et inactuosum. Rig. — Murciam Deam amoris. Insigniter deceptus Turnebus lib. 22. adv. c. 17, qui legit: Murtiam enim Deam marmoris, quod cum insolens illi videretur, corrigit Deam marcoris, aitque spectatum ad deam segnium Murtiam cujus meminit Arnobius. Vere legen- (continues)

For Murcia, goddess of sloth: so read Rigault. Augustine, City of God book 4, chapter 16: "They called a goddess Murcia, who would not move a man beyond measure and would make him, as Pomponius says, 'murcidus', that is, too idle and inactive." Rig[ault]. — Murcia, goddess of love. Turnebus was signally deceived, Adversaria book 22, chapter 17, who reads "Murtiam enim Deam marmoris" (goddess of marble), and since this seemed strange to him, corrects it to "Deam marcoris" (goddess of sloth), and says that it looks to the goddess of the sluggish, Murtia, whom Arnobius mentions. Truly it should be read (continues)

<!-- In (f), "videretur" and "ad deam" are partly blotted at the right edge of the image. --> (printed under page 358)

Page

  • running head: TERTULLIANI 640
  • marginal letters: A trinis diis parent; B est praescriptio de locis; C minamur. Propterea autem commemoramus; D (in the commentary)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:641
CAPUT IX.
CHAPTER IX.
Nunc de artificio quo circenses exhibentur. Res equestris retro simplex de dorso agebatur, et utique communis usus reus non erat. Sed cum ad ludos coactus est, transiit a Dei munere ad daemoniorum officia. Itaque Castori et Polluci deputatur haec species, quibus equos a Mercurio distributos Stesichorus docet. Sed et Neptunus equestris est, quem Graeci ἵππιον appellant. De jugo vero quadrigas soli, bigas lunae sanxerunt. Sed et
Now concerning the art by which the circus games are exhibited. Horsemanship was formerly a simple matter, done from the horse's back, and certainly its common use was not guilty. But when it was pressed into the games, it passed from a gift of God to the services of demons. So this kind [of show] is assigned to Castor and Pollux, to whom, as Stesichorus teaches, horses were allotted by Mercury. But Neptune too is equestrian, whom the Greeks call Hippios. As for the yoke, they have consecrated the four-horse chariot to the sun, the two-horse to the moon. But also
Primus Erichthonius currus et quattuor ausus / Jungere equos, rapidusque rotis insistere victor.
Erichthonius first dared to yoke chariots and four horses, and to stand a swift victor upon the wheels.
Erichthonius Minervae et Vulcani filius, et quidem de caduca in terram libidine, portentum est daemonicum, imo diabolus ipse, non coluber. Si vero Trochilus Argivus auctor est currus, primo Junoni, id opus suum dedicavit. Si Romae Romulus quadrigam primus ostendit, puto et ipse inter idola conscriptus, si idem est Quirinus. Talibus auctoribus quadrigae productae, merito et aurigis coloribus idololatriam vestierunt, et ab initio duo soli fuerunt, albus et russeus: albus hiemi, ob nives candidas; russeus aestati, ob solis ruborem, voti erant. Sed postea tam voluptate, quam superstitione provecta, russeum alii Marti, alii album Zephyris consecraverunt; Prasinum vero terrae matri vel verno, Venetum coelo et mari, vel autumno. Cum autem omnis species idololatriae damnata
Erichthonius, son of Minerva and Vulcan, and indeed [born] of lust fallen to the earth, is a demonic monster, nay the devil himself, no mere serpent. If, however, Trochilus the Argive is the author of the chariot, he dedicated that work of his first to Juno. If at Rome Romulus first displayed the four-horse chariot, I think that he too has been enrolled among the idols, if he is the same as Quirinus. The chariots having been brought forth by such authors, they fittingly clothed the charioteers too in the colours of idolatry; and from the beginning there were only two, white and red: the white was vowed to winter, for the white snows; the red to summer, for the redness of the sun. But afterwards, as pleasure no less than superstition advanced, some consecrated the red to Mars, others the white to the Zephyrs; the green to mother earth or to spring, the blue to the sky and the sea, or to autumn. But since every kind of idolatry [is] condemned
Editors' notes and page, col. 641

Footnotes

<!-- Calls (1)–(3) and (a) fall above the part of the page shown in the images; anchors not visible. The left edge of note (d) is blotted in the image: "pateat", "rubo-rem", "Mar[tiali]" and "significat" are read from partial letters. --> LECTIONES VARIANTES (printed under page 359)

(1) · call in col 641

De dorso abest Rig.

Rigault lacks "de dorso".

(printed under page 359)

(2) · call in col 641

De jugo vero abest Rigalt.

Rigault lacks "de jugo vero".

(printed under page 359)

(3) · call in col 641

Sane Rigalt.

Rigault: "sane".

(printed under page 359)

(4) ‹Trochilus› · call in col 641

Aerophilus Paris.

Paris [edition]: "Aerophilus".

(printed under page 359)

(5) ‹primo› · call in col 641

Patriae Junoni Wouw. M. S. Latin.

Wouwer's manuscript, Latinius: "patriae Junoni" (to Juno of his country).

(printed under page 359)

(6) ‹soli fuerunt› · call in col 641

Et aurigas colorib. idololatriae vestierunt. Et ab initio equi duo soli fuerunt Wouwer. nam equi initio duo soli fuerunt Rigalt.

Wouwer: "et aurigas colorib[us] idololatriae vestierunt. Et ab initio equi duo soli fuerunt"; Rigault: "nam equi initio duo soli fuerunt" (for at first there were only two horses).

(printed under page 359)

(7) ‹vero› · call in col 641

Veri Latin.

Latinius: "veri".

(printed under page 359)

(a) · call in col 641

Res equestris retro simplex agebatur. In exemplari Agobardi legitur, Res equestris retro simplex de dorso agebatur. Retro simplex, hoc est, olim simplex agebatur, nimirum, perite equitandi studio simplici, nondum consecrata daemonibus ulla ludorum equestrium solemnitate. Stultissimus aliquis apposuit, de dorso, cum ita belle sibi interpretari videretur Septimianum illud retro. At hic certe cautior fuit Isidorus: Nam res equestris, inquit, antea simplex agebatur. Rig.

Horsemanship was formerly carried on simply. In the Agobard copy is read: "Horsemanship was formerly carried on simply, from the back." "Retro simplex", that is, it was once carried on simply, namely with the simple aim of riding skilfully, with no solemnity of equestrian games yet consecrated to the demons. Some very foolish person added "de dorso", thinking he was neatly interpreting Septimius's "retro" (back). But Isidore here was certainly more careful: "For horsemanship," he says, "was formerly carried on simply." Rig[ault].

(printed under page 359)

(b) ‹Junoni› · call in col 641

Junoni id opus suum. Legit Pamelius primo Junoni, alii primae Junoni, sed Joannes a Wouv. ex Ms. correxit patriae. Forte autem quia Juno Argiva, Trochilus Argivus opus illud primum populari deae consecravit. Memoria forsan lapsus est Isidorus, qui haec non de Trochilo sed de Ericthonio accipit. Le Pr.

That work of his to Juno. Pamelius reads "primo Junoni", others "primae Junoni", but Jan van Wouwer corrected from a manuscript to "patriae". Perhaps, because Juno was Argive, Trochilus the Argive consecrated that work first to the goddess of his people. Isidore perhaps slipped in memory, who takes this not of Trochilus but of Erichthonius. Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 359)

(c) ‹coloribus› · call in col 641

Coloribus idololatriae vestierunt. Colores idololatriae dicit colores idolis dicatos. Agitatorum factiones quatuor totidem coloribus distinguebantur: russatam Marti consecraverant; albatam Zephyris; prasinam Terrae matri: venetam Coelo. Rig.

They clothed them in the colours of idolatry. By colours of idolatry he means colours dedicated to idols. The four factions of the charioteers were distinguished by as many colours: the red they had consecrated to Mars; the white to the Zephyrs; the green to Mother Earth; the blue to Heaven. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 359)

(d) ‹albus et› · call in col 641

Albus et russeus. Pro eo quod hic et bis postea russeus legitur, Gagnaeus legebat, et similiter Isidorus, roseus. Verum nostram lectionem veram esse pateat vel ex his verbis, russeus aestati ob Solis ruborem. Quum enim duo Soli ascribantur equi a Mar[tiali], Xanthus et Aethon, et ξανθός graece rufeum significat flavum, et proinde etiam russeum. Eodem pertinent fere quatuor nomina equorum apud Ovid. Pyrois, Eous, Aethon et Phlegon, et quae sunt apud Fulgentium Mythol. lib. 1. Erythraeus, Actaeon, Lampos, et Philogeus. Nam Pyrois, et Erythraeus russeum etiam significat, si graecam derivationem spectemus. Pam.

White and red. Where "russeus" is read here and twice later, Gagnée read "roseus", and likewise Isidore. But that our reading is the true one may be clear even from these words, "red for the summer, because of the Sun's redness". For since two horses are ascribed to the Sun by Mar[tial], Xanthus and Aethon, and ξανθός in Greek means reddish-yellow, and so also red. To the same point belong, more or less, the four names of the horses in Ovid, Pyrois, Eous, Aethon and Phlegon, and those in Fulgentius, Mythologies book 1, Erythraeus, Actaeon, Lampos and Philogeus. For Pyrois and Erythraeus too mean red, if we look at the Greek derivation. Pam[elius].

(printed under page 359)

(e) ‹verno› · call in col 641

Verno. Cod. Agobardi, Vero. Cassiodorus Variar. iii. 51: Prasibus virenti Verno. Rig.

To spring. The Agobard codex: "vero". Cassiodorus, Variae 3.51: "green to the verdant Spring". Rig[ault].

(printed under page 359)

Page

  • running head: 641 LIBER DE SPECTACU[LIS] (head cropped at the image's right edge)
  • marginal letters: A CAPUT IX.; B Trochilus Argivus auctor est currus; C (in the variant readings); D (in the commentary)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:642
sit a Deo, utique etiam illa damnatur, quae elementis mundialibus profanatur.
by God, that kind too is certainly condemned which is profaned to the elements of the world.
CAPUT X.
CHAPTER X.
Transeamus ad scenicas res, quarum et originem communem, et titulos pares secundum ipsam ab initio ludorum appellationem et administrationem conjunctam cum re equestri jam ostendimus. Apparatus etiam ex ea parte consortes, quae ad scenam spectat: nam a templis et aris, et illa infelicitate thuris et sanguinis inter tibias et tubas itur, duobus inquinatissimis arbitris, funerum et sacrorum, designatore et haruspice. Ita cum de originibus ludorum ad circenses transimus, inde nunc ad scenicos ludos dirigimus, a loci vitio. Theatrum proprie sacrarium Veneris est. Hoc denique modo id genus operis in saeculo evasit. Nam saepe censores renascentia cum maxime theatra destruebant, moribus consulentes, quorum scilicet periculum ingens de lascivia providebant, ut jam hinc ethnicis in testimonium cedat sententia ipsorum nobiscum faciens, et nobis in exaggerationem disciplinae etiam humanae praerogativa. Itaque Pompeius Magnus solo theatro suo minor, cum illam arcem omnium turpitudinum exstruxisset, veritus quandoque memoriae suae censoriam animadversionem, Veneris aedem superposuit, et ad dedicationem edicto populum vocans, non theatrum, sed Veneris templum nuncupavit: Cui subjecimus, inquit, gradus spectaculo-
Let us pass to the things of the stage, whose common origin, and equal titles, in accordance with the very name of the games from the beginning and their management joined with the equestrian [show], we have already shown. Their equipment too is shared, on that side which looks to the stage: for one goes from temples and altars, and from that wretchedness of incense and blood, amid flutes and trumpets, under two most defiled masters of ceremonies, of funerals and of sacred rites, the undertaker and the soothsayer. So, as we passed from the origins of the games to the circus games, from there we now direct [our course] to the stage games, [beginning] from the vice of the place. The theatre is properly the shrine of Venus. In this way, in short, that kind of structure came into being in the world. For often the censors used to pull down theatres just as they were springing up again, taking thought for morals, whose great danger, of course, they foresaw from lewdness, so that already from this point their own judgement, siding with us, should serve as a testimony to the heathen, and for us the precedent even of a human [ruling] should go to the strengthening of discipline. And so Pompey the Great, less great only than his theatre, when he had built that citadel of all base things, fearing at some time the censors' censure upon his memory, set a temple of Venus on top of it, and, calling the people by edict to its dedication, he called it not a theatre but a temple of Venus: Beneath which, he said, we have placed the tiers of seats for the show[s]
Editors' notes and page, col. 642

Footnotes

(8) · call in col 642

Mundalibus Jun.

Junius: "mundalibus".

(printed under page 359)

(9) ‹a loci vitio› · call in col 642

Initio Latin. Rig.

Latinius, Rigault: "initio".

(printed under page 359)

(10) ‹renascentia› · call in col 642

Enascentia? Jun. nascentia Rig.

Junius: "enascentia?"; Rigault: "nascentia".

COMMENTARIUS

(continued) · note (f) of page 358

dum amoris cum Pamel. et res illustranda a Plinio lib. 15. cap. 29. ubi de Venere Myrtea aut Murtia. Lac.

[Truly it should be rea]d "amoris" (of love) with Pamelius, and the matter is to be illustrated from Pliny, book 15, chapter 29, where he speaks of Venus Myrtea or Murtia. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 359)

(f) · call in col 642

Thuris et sanguinis. Tibiae scenam, Tubae ad circum pertinebant, pariter ad scenam respicit, et sanguis circi feritatem. Le Pr.

Of incense and blood. Pipes belonged to the stage, trumpets to the circus; [incense] likewise looks to the stage, and blood to the savagery of the circus. Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 359)

(g) ‹censores› · call in col 642

Censores nascentia cum maxime theatra destruebant. Ipse in Apologetico, cap. 6. Theatra stuprandis moribus orientia statim destruebant. Rig. — Nam saepe censores.] Tumultuaria Romae olim fuisse theatra certissimum est: lege namque cautum erat, ne perpetua essent, propter morum corruptelam. Theatra quippe Tertulliano nostro Apolog. c. 6. stuprandis moribus orientia dicuntur. Idem apud Athenienses observatum fuisse nemo ambigere potest: antequam enim stabilia fuerint, tumultuaria dicebantur, id enim ἰκρία significat. Sic. Ὥστ' εὐθὺς εἰσιόντες, ἀπὸ τῶν ἰκρίων ὑποβλέπουσ' ἡμᾶς. Aristoph. in Θεσμ. Le Pr.

The censors were pulling down the theatres just as they were rising. He himself in the Apology, chapter 6: "They would pull down at once theatres rising for the debauching of morals." Rig[ault]. — For often the censors.] It is quite certain that the theatres at Rome were once makeshift: for the law provided that they should not be permanent, because of the corruption of morals. Indeed by our Tertullian, Apology chapter 6, theatres are called "rising for the debauching of morals". No one can doubt that the same was observed among the Athenians: for before they were permanent they were called makeshift, for that is what ἰκρία (wooden stands) means. So: "So that as soon as they come in, they glower at us from the stands." Aristophanes, in the Thesmophoriazusae. Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 359)

(h) ‹Pompeius Magnus› · call in col 642

Pompeius Magnus. Huic loco adsimilis omnino alter ille lib. 6. de all. Ubi loquitur de Alexandro Magno, et vocat illum, sola gloria minorem. En tibi Pompeius et Alexander (uterque enim dictus est Magnus) hic minor theatro suo, ille gloria. Lac.

Pompey the Great. Quite like this passage is that other one in book 6 of On the Pallium, where he speaks of Alexander the Great and calls him "less only than his glory". There you have Pompey and Alexander (for each was called the Great): the one less than his theatre, the other than his glory. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 359)

Page

  • running head: [LIBE]R DE SPECTACULIS. 642 (head's start cropped at the image's left edge)
  • marginal letters: A sit a Deo, utique etiam illa damnatur; B genus operis in saeculo evasit; C (in the variant readings); D (in the commentary)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:643
rum: ita damnatum et damnandum opus templi titulo praetexuit, et disciplinam superstitione delusit. Sed Veneri et Libero convenit. Duo ista daemonia conspirata et conjurata inter se sunt, ebrietatis et libidinis. Itaque theatrum Veneris, Liberi quoque domus est. Nam et alios ludos scenicos Liberalia proprie vocabant, praeterquam Libero devotos, quod sunt Dionysia penes Graecos, etiam a Libero institutos. Et est plane in artibus quoque scenicis Liberi et Veneris patrocinium, quae privata et propria sunt scenae, de gestu et corporis fluxu. Nam mollitiam Veneri et Libero immolabant: illi per sexum, illi per fluxum, dissoluti. Quae vero voce et modis et organis et lyris transiguntur, Apollines et Musas et Minervas et Mercurios mancipes habent. Oderis, christiane, quorum auctores non potes non odisse. Jam nunc volumus suggerere de artibus, et de his, quorum auctores in nominibus exsecramur. Scimus nihil esse nomina mortuorum, sicut nec ipsa simulacra eorum. Sed non ignoramus, qui sub istis nominibus et institutis simulacris operentur et gaudeant, et divinitatem mentiantur, nequam spiritus scilicet daemones. Videmus igitur etiam artes eorum honoribus dicatas esse, qui nomina incolunt auctorum earum, nec ab idololatria vacare, quarum institutores etiam propterea dii habentur. Imo quod ad artes pertinet, altius praescripsisse debemus, daemonas ab initio prospicientes sibi inter caetera idololatriae etiam spectaculorum inquinamenta, quibus hominem a Deo avocarent, et suo honori obligarent, ejusmodi quoque artium ingenia inspirasse. Neque
[of the show]s: thus he cloaked a condemned and condemnable work with the title of a temple, and made sport of discipline by superstition. But Venus and Liber go well together. Those two demons, of drunkenness and of lust, are leagued and sworn together. So the theatre of Venus is also the house of Liber. For they properly called other stage games too the Liberalia, besides being devoted to Liber, as are the Dionysia among the Greeks, being also instituted by Liber. And plainly in the arts of the stage too there is the patronage of Liber and Venus, in those things which are private and proper to the stage, in gesture and the bending of the body. For they offered effeminacy to Venus and Liber: dissolute, the one through sex, the other through looseness. But the things performed with voice and measures and instruments and lyres have Apollos and Muses and Minervas and Mercuries for owners. You will hate, Christian, the things whose authors you cannot but hate. Now we wish to say something about the arts, and about those whose authors we execrate in their names. We know that the names of the dead are nothing, just as their images themselves [are nothing]. But we are not ignorant who they are that work and rejoice under those names and the images set up [to them], and feign divinity, namely wicked spirits, demons. We see, then, that the arts too are dedicated to the honours of those who inhabit the names of their authors, and that those arts are not free from idolatry whose founders are on that account held to be gods. Nay, as regards the arts, we ought to have laid it down from further back that the demons, from the beginning providing for themselves, among the other defilements of idolatry, the defilements of the shows also, by which they might call man away from God and bind him to their own honour, inspired as well the talents for arts of this kind. Nor
Editors' notes and page, col. 643

Footnotes

<!-- Calls (1), (2), (9)–(14), (a), (b), (d) and the note printed "(c) Romae Capitolina" fall above the part of the page shown in the images; anchors not visible, columns inferred from print order. The second note lettered (c) stands where (e) is expected: a misprint, kept as printed. --> LECTIONES VARIANTES (printed under page 360)

(1) · call in col 643

De gestu et corporis flexu mollitiam Veneri et Libero immolant: Paris. de gestu et flexu corporis mollitiae Veneris et Liberi immolant Rigalt.

Paris [edition]: "de gestu et corporis flexu mollitiam Veneri et Libero immolant" (by gesture and bending of the body they offer softness to Venus and Liber); Rigault: "de gestu et flexu corporis mollitiae Veneris et Liberi immolant".

(printed under page 360)

(2) ‹luxum› · call in col 643

Luxum Wouw. M. S.

Wouwer's manuscript: "luxum".

(printed under page 360)

(3) ‹dissoluti› · call in col 643

Dissolutis Paris. Rig.

Paris [edition], Rigault: "dissolutis".

(printed under page 360)

(4) ‹et lyris› · call in col 643

Litteris Paris. Jun.

Paris [edition], Junius: "litteris".

(printed under page 360)

(5) ‹quorum› · call in col 643

Quarum Jun.

Junius: "quarum".

(printed under page 360)

(6) ‹sicut nec› · call in col 643

Et Rig.

Rigault: "et".

(printed under page 360)

(7) ‹earum› · call in col 643

Earum abest Rig.

Rigault lacks "earum".

(printed under page 360)

(8) ‹institutores› · call in col 643

Institores Jun.

Junius: "institores".

(printed under page 360)

(a) · call in col 643

Illi per sexum, illi per fluxum, dissoluti. Hoc est, Veneri per sexum dissolutae, Libero per luxum dissoluto. Ambo dissoluti: illa per sexum, ille per fluxum. Rig.

The one dissolute through sex, the other through looseness. That is, to Venus, dissolute through sex, to Liber, dissolute through luxury. Both dissolute: she through sex, he through looseness. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 360)

(b) · call in col 643

Illi per sexum, illi per fluxum. Sunt nimirum dissoluti et διαλελυμένοι. Apuleius Milesi 11. — incessu perfluo foeminam mentiebantur. ὑγρὸν ἐστὶ βάδισμα apud Clem. Alexand. Le Pr.

The one through sex, the other through looseness. They are, that is, "dissolute" and "unstrung". Apuleius, Milesian Tales 11: "— with a flowing gait they counterfeited a woman." In Clement of Alexandria it is "a languid walk". Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 360)

(c) ‹Musas› · call in col 643

Apollines et Musas. Vel hinc confirmatur praecedens lectio, Lyris; Nam, et Apollinis simulacro lyra adjungebatur, et Musis tribuebatur lyra septichordis, quemadmodum et Musica ab eis ita cognominata, atque adeo omnis generis, et vocum modi, et organata instrumenta reliqua. Recte etiam Minervis et Mercuriis eadem tribuuntur, eo quod artium omnium illi parentes tradantur. Plura vide apud Georg. Gyraldum de Diis Gentium. Pam.

Apollos and Muses. The preceding reading, "lyris", is confirmed even from this; for a lyre was joined to the statue of Apollo, and the seven-stringed lyre was assigned to the Muses, as Music too was named from them, and so music of every kind, both the modes of the voice and the other instruments with organs. Rightly too the same things are assigned to the Minervas and Mercuries, because they are held to be the parents of all the arts. See more in Giorgio Giraldi, On the Gods of the Gentiles. Pam[elius].

(printed under page 360)

Page

  • running head: 643 TERTULLIANI
  • marginal letters: A rum : ita damnatum et damnandum; B christiane, quorum auctores non potes; C minem a Deo avocarent; D (in the commentary)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:644
enim ab aliis praeoccupatum fuisset, quod ad illos perventurum esset. Nec per alios tunc homines edidissent, quam per ipsos, in quorum nominibus et imaginibus et historiis fallaciam consecrationis sibi negotium acturae constituerant.
For that which was to come round to them would not have been taken up beforehand by others. Nor would they have brought them forth then through other men than those very ones in whose names and images and histories they had settled [that] the deceit of consecration [should] do business for them.
CAPUT XI.
CHAPTER XI.
Ut ordo peragatur, ineamus etiam agonum retractatum. Origo istis de ludorum propinquitate est. Inde et ipsi sacri vel funebres instituti, aut diis nationum aut mortuis fiunt. Proinde Tituli: Olympia Jovi, quae sunt Romae capitolina; item Herculi Nemaea, Neptuno Isthmia, caeteri mortuarii agones. Quid ergo mirum, si apparatus agonum idololatria conspurcat de coronis profanis, de sacerdotalibus praesidibus, de collegiariis ministris, de ipso postremo boum sanguine? Ut de loco suppleam, ac de loco communi pro collegio artium Musicarum et Minervalium, et Apollinarium, etiam Martialium, per duellum, per tubam, stadio circum aemulantur, quod utique templum est, et ipsum ejus idoli, cujus solemnitates agit. Sed et gymnicas artes Castorum et Herculum et Mercuriorum disciplinae prodiderunt.
That the order may be completed, let us enter also upon a review of the contests. Their origin comes from their kinship with the games. Hence they too, instituted as sacred or funeral, are held either to the gods of the nations or to the dead. Accordingly their titles: the Olympia to Jupiter, which at Rome are the Capitoline; likewise the Nemean to Hercules, the Isthmian to Neptune, the rest are funeral contests. What wonder, then, if idolatry befouls the equipment of the contests, with profane crowns, with priestly presidents, with attendants from the guilds, and lastly with the very blood of oxen? To add a word about the place: also about the place common to the guild of the arts of the Muses and of Minerva, and of Apollo, and even of Mars, they rival the circus with a stadium, in combat and with the trumpet; which is certainly a temple, and the very temple of that idol whose solemnities it celebrates. And the gymnastic arts too the disciplines of the Castors and the Hercules and the Mercuries have brought forth.
CAPUT XII.
CHAPTER XII.
Superest illius insignissimi spectaculi acceptissimi recognitio. Munus dictum est ab officio, quoniam officium etiam muneris nomen est. Officium autem mortuis hoc spectaculo facere se veteres arbitrabantur, posteaquam illud humaniores atrocitate temperaverunt. Nam olim quoniam animas defunctorum humano sanguine propitiari
There remains the review of that most notable and most acceptable spectacle. It is called a munus from officium [duty], since officium is also a name for munus. And the ancients thought that by this spectacle they did a duty to the dead, after they, grown more humane, had tempered it with [this] atrocity. For of old, since [they believed] the souls of the departed were propitiated with human blood,
Editors' notes and page, col. 644

Footnotes

(9) · call in col 644

Procuratum Rig.

Rigault: "procuratum".

(printed under page 360)

(10) · call in col 644

Acturi Rig.

Rigault: "acturi".

(printed under page 360)

(11) · call in col 644

Constituerunt Paris.

Paris [edition]: "constituerunt".

(printed under page 360)

(12) · call in col 644

Tituli abest Paris.

The Paris edition lacks "tituli".

(printed under page 360)

(13) · call in col 644

Capitolina, Apollini Pythia, Herculi Nemaea, Jun.

Junius: "Capitolina, Apollini Pythia, Herculi Nemaea".

(printed under page 360)

(14) · call in col 644

Mortuorum varii, Pam.

Pamelius: "mortuorum varii".

(printed under page 360)

(15) ‹aemulantur› · call in col 644

Ut s. c. aemulentur Seml.

Semler: "ut s. c. aemulentur".

(printed under page 360)

(16) ‹spectaculi› · call in col 644

Indignissimi spectaculi, sed Jun. Insignissimi Seml.

Junius: "indignissimi spectaculi, sed"; Semler: "insignissimi".

(printed under page 360)

(17) ‹recognitio› · call in col 644

Recognitio munus dictum Jun. ex M. S.

Junius, from a manuscript: "recognitio munus dictum".

COMMENTARIUS (printed under page 360)

(d) · call in col 644

Olympia Jovi. Quanquam nonnullis otio abuti videatur, si horumce ludorum originem repeteremus; dicam tamen obiter, Ludos Olympicos celebratos primum fuisse sub Aeschylo judice Atheniensium, in iisque Choroebum Heliensem victorem exstitisse. Nemaea fiunt in honorem Herculis qui leonem occidit in sylva Nemaea. Isthmia dicti sunt ludi gymnici. qui prius in Arcadia celebrati, ac postea in Isthmo Corinthiaco, erant autem sacri Neptuno. Le Pr.

Olympia to Jupiter. Though to some it may seem an abuse of leisure if we went back to the origin of these games, I will say in passing that the Olympic Games were first celebrated under Aeschylus, judge of the Athenians, and that in them Coroebus of Elis was the victor. The Nemean games are held in honour of Hercules, who killed the lion in the Nemean forest. The Isthmian were the name of gymnastic games, first celebrated in Arcadia and afterwards on the Isthmus of Corinth; they were sacred to Neptune. Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 360)

(e) ‹capitolina› · call in col 644

Romae Capitolina Apollini Pythia. In omnibus libris scribitur; Capitolina, item Herculi Nemaea, etc. Restituit Junius, interponens Apollini Pythia, quae deerant. Nam cur ex quatuor ludis principibus unum omitteret? Itaque credibile est haec verba abrasa ab inscientibus librariis, qui cum non intelligerent, qua mente Tertullianus dixisset Capitolina, deleverunt Apollini, putantes sacra apollinea esse eadem quae Capitolina. Lac.

At Rome the Capitoline, to Apollo the Pythian. In all the books is written: "Capitolina, item Herculi Nemaea", etc. Junius restored it, inserting "Apollini Pythia", which were missing. For why would he leave out one of the four chief games? So it is credible that these words were scraped out by ignorant copyists, who, not understanding with what meaning Tertullian had said "Capitolina", deleted "Apollini", thinking the Apolline rites the same as the Capitoline. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 360)

(f) ‹illius› · call in col 644

Superest illius insignissimi spectaculi acceptissimi recognitio. Haec omnino est antiqui exemplaris scriptura. Dicturus de Circo, hoc est, de gladiatoribus et agitatoribus equorum: Superest, inquit, recognitio illius spectaculi, quod esse acceptissimum solet viris etiam insignissimis. An vero sic emendemus? Superest illius insignissimi spectaculi, ac septissimi, recognitio. Septissimum dixerit spectaculum, quod in Circo et amphitheatro, maxima undequaque populi corona circumseptum. Rig.

There remains the review of that most notable and most welcome show. This is exactly the reading of the old copy. Being about to speak of the Circus, that is, of gladiators and charioteers, he says: "There remains the review of that show which is wont to be most welcome even to the most distinguished men." Or should we emend thus: "There remains the review of that most notable and most enclosed show"? He would have called "most enclosed" the show which in the Circus and the amphitheatre is hemmed in on every side by a huge ring of people. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 360)

(g) ‹ab officio› · call in col 644

Munus dictum est ab officio. Ut ludus ipse dictum munus, ita editor munerarius, et Floro Munerator, ubi loquitur de Spartaco. vide Lipsium. Caeterum ne putes etymologiam duci a Tertulliano: esset enim stultissima. Sed tantum ait munus dici ab officio ad (continues)

"Munus" is named from duty. As the show itself is called "munus", so its giver is "munerarius", and in Florus "munerator", where he speaks of Spartacus; see Lipsius. But do not think an etymology is being drawn by Tertullian: it would be most foolish. He only says that "munus" is named from the duty to (continues)

(printed under page 360)

Page

  • running head: TERTULLIANI 644
  • marginal letters: A enim ab aliis praeoccupatum; B nistris, de ipso postremo boum sanguine; C maniores atrocitate temperaverunt; D (in the commentary)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:645
creditum erat, captivos vel malo ingenio servos mercati in exsequiis immolabant. Postea placuit impietatem voluptate adumbrare. Itaque quos paraverunt armis, quibus tunc et qualiter poterant eruditos, tantum ut occidi discerent, mox edicto die Inferiarum apud tumulos erogabant. Ita mortem homicidiis consolabantur. Haec muneris origo, sed paulatim provecti ad tantam gratiam, ad quantam et crudelitatem, quia ferrum voluptati satis non faciebat, nisi et feris humana corpora dissiparentur. Quod ergo mortuis litabatur, utique parentationi deputabatur. Quae species proinde idololatria est, quoniam et idololatria parentationis est species. Tam haec quam illa mortuis ministrat. In mortuorum autem idolis daemonia consistunt, ut et titulos consideremus: licet transierit hoc genus editionis ab honoribus mortuorum ad honores viventium, quaesturas dico et magistratus, et flaminia et sacerdotia: cum tamen nominis dignitas idololatriae crimine teneatur, necesse est quidquid dignitatis nomine administratur, communicet etiam maculas ejus, a qua habet caussas. Idem de apparatibus interpretabimur in ipsorum honorum suggestu deputandis, quod purpurae, quod fasciae, quod vittae, quod coronae, quod denique conciones et edicta, et pultes pridianae sine pompa diaboli, sine invitatione daemonum non sunt. Quid ergo de horrido loco perorem, quem nec perjuria sustinent? pluribus enim et asperioribus nominibus
it had been believed, they used to sacrifice at funerals captives, or slaves of bad character whom they had bought. Afterwards they chose to veil the impiety with pleasure. So those whom they had prepared, trained in such arms as they then could and in such manner as they could, only so that they might learn to be killed, they presently paid out at the tombs on the day appointed for the offerings to the dead. Thus they consoled death with murders. This is the origin of the munus; but little by little they advanced to as great a refinement as to cruelty, because the sword did not satisfy the pleasure unless human bodies were also torn apart by wild beasts. What, then, was offered to the dead was certainly reckoned as a rite for the dead. This kind is accordingly idolatry, since idolatry too is a kind of rite for the dead. The one as much as the other ministers to the dead. And in the idols of the dead demons take up their abode, to consider the titles as well: although this kind of exhibition has passed from honours of the dead to honours of the living, I mean quaestorships and magistracies, and flaminates and priesthoods; yet since the dignity of the name is held by the crime of idolatry, it is necessary that whatever is administered in the name of the dignity should share also in its stains, from which it has its causes. We shall interpret the same of the trappings to be reckoned in the display of these honours themselves: that the purple robes, the fasces, the fillets, the crowns, and lastly the public addresses and edicts, and the dinners of the day before, are not without the pomp of the devil, without the invitation of demons. What, then, shall I say in conclusion of that dreadful place, which not even perjuries can bear? For with more and harsher names
Editors' notes and page, col. 645

Footnotes

<!-- Calls (1)–(3), (7), (a), (f), (g) fall above the part of the page shown in the images; anchors not visible, columns inferred from print order. --> LECTIONES VARIANTES (printed under page 361)

(1) · call in col 645

Vel mali status Rig.

Rigault: "vel mali status".

(printed under page 361)

(2) · call in col 645

Muneri Paris.

Paris [edition]: "muneri".

(printed under page 361)

(3) · call in col 645

Ferarum voluptati satis non fiebat Paris. Lat. Rig.

Paris [edition], Latinius, Rigault: "ferarum voluptati satis non fiebat" (the pleasure of the beasts was not satisfied).

(printed under page 361)

(4) ‹flaminia› · call in col 645

Flamina Rig.

Rigault: "flamina".

(printed under page 361)

(5) ‹horrido› · call in col 645

Horrendo Rig.

Rigault: "horrendo".

(printed under page 361)

(6) ‹numinibus› · call in col 645

Nominibus Fran. Paris.

Franeker, Paris [editions]: "nominibus".

(printed under page 361)

(a) · call in col 645

Apud tumulos erogabant. Potest simpliciter explicari, ut dicat, Dabant, praebebant gladiatores, qui decertarent ad tumulos; sed rectius est ut explices erogabant, id est, expendebant consumebantque in rogum. Nam cum respectu ad rogos mortuorum dictum verbum erogo. Niti potest ista explicatio versibus Virgil. lib. 10: Quattuor hic juvenes, totidem quos educat Ufens Viventes rapit, inferias quos immolet umbris. Captivoque rogi perfundat sanguine flammas. Lac.

They paid them out at the tombs. It can be explained simply, as if he were saying: they gave, they furnished gladiators to fight it out at the tombs; but it is more correct to explain "erogabant" as "they spent and consumed them on the pyre". For the verb "erogo" is said with regard to the pyres of the dead. This explanation can rest on Virgil's lines, book 10: "Here he seizes alive four youths, sons of Sulmo, as many reared by Ufens, to offer as funeral victims to the shades and drench the flames of the pyre with captive blood." Lac[erda].

(printed under page 361)

(b) ‹parentationis est species› · call in col 645

Idololatria parentationis est species. Certe idololatria genus est ad omnem cultum idololatricum, si vivos et mortuos comprehendas: si vero tantum de mortuis sit sermo, quos ut plurimum agnovit idololatria gentilium [nam Jupiter, Mars, Neptunus, reliqui demum dii fuere homines mortui], tunc quidem parentatio est genus, idololatria species: nam cum parentatio sit omnis cultus exhibitus mortuis, non dubium quin hic possit esse vel idololatricus, vel non idololatricus. Lac.

Idolatry is a species of offering to the dead. Certainly idolatry is the genus with respect to all idolatrous worship, if you include the living and the dead; but if the talk is only of the dead, whom the idolatry of the Gentiles mostly acknowledged [for Jupiter, Mars, Neptune and the rest of the gods were in the end dead men], then indeed offering to the dead is the genus and idolatry the species: for since offering to the dead is all worship paid to the dead, there is no doubt that this can be either idolatrous or not idolatrous. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 361)

(c) ‹conciones et edicta› · call in col 645

Denique conciones et edicta. Similiter loquitur Livius lib. 2. concione, inquit, et edicto fecit fidem, ne quis civem Romanum vinctum aut clausum teneret. Videntur itaque ante editionem muneris gladiatorii, aut inter sacrificandum, aut paulo post, variae usurpatae fuisse conciones et edicta, ut cum Tacito loquar, in populum; quae plerumque etiam edicebantur contra Christianos. Pam.

Finally the harangues and edicts. Livy speaks similarly, book 2: "By a harangue," he says, "and an edict he gave assurance that no one should hold a Roman citizen bound or shut up." It seems, then, that before the giving of a gladiatorial show, or during the sacrificing, or a little after, various harangues and edicts were used, "to the people", to speak with Tacitus; and these were often proclaimed against the Christians too. Pam[elius].

(printed under page 361)

(d) ‹pultes pridianae› · call in col 645

Et pultes pridianae. Pultium et liborum solitos deorum victus irridet Arnobius lib. 7. dicens se opinari propterea illis vino opus esse in sacrificiis, quo putrefiat facilius, et percoquatur cibus. et multo ante eodem lib. Quid fritilla (sic enim lego a frit. pro fitilia), quid frumen: quid gratilla, etc. Pam.

And the day-before porridge. Arnobius, book 7, mocks the gods' customary fare of porridge and cakes, saying he supposes that is why they need wine in the sacrifices, so that the food may rot more easily and be thoroughly digested; and much earlier in the same book: "What of the fritilla (for so I read, from 'frit', for 'fitilia'), what of the frumen, what of the gratilla," etc. Pam[elius].

(printed under page 361)

(e) ‹horrido loco› · call in col 645

Quid de horrendo loco perorem, quem nec perjuria sustinent. Circum significat, quasi ejus loci horrorem non sustinerent pejeraturi. Hoc est, horrore loci terrerentur; adeoque pejeratum irent in Capitolium. Etenim jurisjurandi solemnia fiebant in Capitolio, non in Circo. Et notissimum est illud Plinii: Alii in ipso Capitolio fallunt, ac fulminantem pejerant Jovem. Denique Romulum ipsum pejerante Proculo consecratum in Capitolio colebant. Interpretationem nostram confirmant sequentia Septimii verba: Pluribus enim et asperioribus numinibus Amphitheatrum consecratur quam Capitolium. Rig.

What am I to say in closing of the dreadful place, which not even perjuries can bear? He means the Circus, as though those about to perjure themselves could not bear the horror of that place; that is, they would be frightened by the horror of the place, and so would go to perjure themselves in the Capitol. For the solemnities of oath-taking took place in the Capitol, not in the Circus. And Pliny's saying is very well known: "Others deceive in the Capitol itself and forswear Jupiter as he hurls his thunderbolts." Lastly, they worshipped in the Capitol Romulus himself, consecrated on the perjured word of Proculus. Septimius's following words confirm our interpretation: "For the Amphitheatre is consecrated to more numerous and harsher deities than the Capitol." Rig[ault].

(printed under page 361)

Page

  • running head: 645 LIBER DE SPECTAC[ULIS] (head cropped at the image's right edge)
  • marginal letters: A creditum erat, captivos; B transierit hoc genus editionis; C (in the variant readings); D (in the commentary)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:646
amphitheatrum consecratur, quam Capitolium omnium daemonum templum est. Tot illic immundi spiritus considunt, quot homines capit. Ut et de artibus concludam, Martem et Dianam utriusque ludi praesides novimus.
is the amphitheatre consecrated than the Capitol: it is the temple of all the demons. As many unclean spirits sit there as it holds men. And to conclude about the arts as well, we know Mars and Diana as the presidents of both kinds of game.
CAPUT XIII.
CHAPTER XIII.
Satis, opinor, implevimus ordinem, quot et quibus modis spectacula idololatriam committant, de apparatibus, de locis. De sacrificiis quidem certi sumus, nulla ex parte competere nobis ea, qui bis idolis renuntiavimus, I Cor. VIII. Non quod idolum sit aliquid (ut Apostolus ait), sed quod quae faciunt, daemoniis faciunt, consistentibus scilicet in consecrationibus idolorum sive mortuorum, sive species (ut putant) deorum. Propterea igitur, quoniam utraque idolorum conditionis unius est, dum mortui et dii unum sunt, utraque idololatria abstinemus, nec minus templa, quam monumenta despuimus: neutram aram novimus (Act. XX; I Cor., X), neutram effigiem adoramus: non sacrificamus, non parentamus, sed neque de sacrificato et parentato edimus, quia non possumus coenam Dei edere, et coenam daemoniorum. Si ergo gulam et ventrem ab inquinamentis liberamus, quanto magis augustiora nostra, oculos et aures, ab idolothytis et necrothytis voluptatibus abstinemus, quae non intestinis transiguntur, sed in ipso spiritu et anima digeruntur: quorum munditia magis ad Deum pertinet, quam intestinorum.
We have, I think, sufficiently completed the order [of the argument]: how many and in what ways the shows commit idolatry, in their equipment, in their places. As to the sacrifices, indeed, we are certain that they in no respect befit us, who have twice renounced idols (1 Cor. 8). Not that an idol is anything (as the Apostle says), but because what they do, they do to demons, who, that is, take up their abode in the consecrations of idols, whether of the dead or of the forms (as they think) of gods. For this reason, then, since both kinds of idols are of one condition, inasmuch as the dead and the gods are one, we abstain from both idolatries; we spit upon temples no less than upon tombs: we know neither altar (Acts 20; 1 Cor. 10), we adore neither image: we do not sacrifice, we do not make offerings to the dead; nay, we do not even eat of what has been sacrificed or offered to the dead, because we cannot eat the supper of God and the supper of demons. If, then, we free the gullet and the belly from defilements, how much more do we keep our nobler parts, the eyes and the ears, from pleasures offered to idols and offered to the dead, which are not passed through the bowels but are digested in the very spirit and soul: whose cleanness belongs more to God than that of the bowels.
Editors' notes and page, col. 646

Footnotes

(7) · call in col 646

De sacrificiis; quo certi Fran.

Franeker [edition]: "de sacrificiis; quo certi".

COMMENTARIUS

(continued) · note (g) of page 360

eum modum quo Suetonius dictus est Tranquillus, quia pater ejus dictus est lenis. Sic Vitruvius dictus est Pellio, si Alciato credis, non Pollio ut vulgo legitur, et ideo Pellio quia prius Cerdo. Est itaque quaedam species ducendi nominis tantum a significatione. Lac.

[from duty, in] the way in which Suetonius was called Tranquillus, because his father was called "lenis" (gentle). So Vitruvius was called Pellio, if you believe Alciati, not Pollio as is commonly read, and Pellio because he had first been a Cerdo (a leather-worker). It is thus a kind of deriving a name from the meaning only. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 361)

(f) · call in col 646

Martem et Dianam. Geminum amphitheatri spectaculum proponit: gladiatores scilicet quibus praeerat Mars, et venationem, seu pugnam cum bestiis, quibus in venationibus praeses erat Diana. Sic de Consulatu Manlii Theod. Claudianus: Amphitheatrali faveat latonia pompae. Le Pr.

Mars and Diana. He sets out the twofold show of the amphitheatre: the gladiators, over whom Mars presided, and the hunt, or fight with beasts, over which hunts Diana presided. So Claudian, On the Consulship of Manlius Theodorus: "May Latona's daughter favour the amphitheatre's procession." Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 361)

(g) · call in col 646

Qui bis idolis renuntiavimus. Primo, in Ecclesia sub antistitis manu, aliquanto prius ante lavacrum; Deinde in ipso lavacro, aquam adituri. Sic enim solebant veteres, ut discimus ex libro de Corona, cap. 3.

We who have twice renounced idols. First in the church under the bishop's hand, some while before the washing; then in the washing itself, as we were about to enter the water. For so the ancients used to do, as we learn from the book On the Crown, chapter 3.

(printed under page 361)

(h) ‹neutram› · call in col 646

Neutram aram novimus. In templis Graecorum duo erant altaria, alterum majus, alterum minus: illud in medio situm ἁγία τράπεζα dicebatur, hoc ad sinistram πρόθεσις appellabatur ut scripsit Simeon, archiepiscopus Thessalonicensis lib. de templ. sacerd. et mysta. Lac.

We know neither altar. In the churches of the Greeks there were two altars, one greater, the other lesser: the one placed in the middle was called the "holy table", the one on the left the "prothesis", as Symeon, archbishop of Thessalonica, wrote in his book On the Temple, the Priest and the Initiate. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 361)

Page

  • running head: [LIBE]R DE SPECTACULIS. 646 (head's start cropped at the image's left edge)
  • marginal letters: A amphitheatrum consecratur, quam Capitolium; B idolorum conditionis unius est; C (in the variant readings); D (in the commentary)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:647
CAPUT XIV.
CHAPTER XIV.
Nunc interposito nomine idololatriae, quod solum subjectum sufficere deberet ad abdicationem spectaculorum, alia jam ratione tractemus ex abundanti: propter eos maxime qui sibi blandiuntur, quod non nominatim abstinentia ista praescripta sit, quasi parum etiam de spectaculis pronuntietur, cum concupiscentiae saeculi damnantur. Nam sicut pecuniae, vel dignitatis, vel gulae, vel libidinis, vel gloriae; ita et voluptatis concupiscentia est: species autem voluptatis etiam spectacula. Opinor, generaliter nominatae concupiscentiae continent in se et voluptates: aeque generaliter intellectae voluptates specialiter et in spectacula disseruntur. Caeterum retulimus supra de locorum conditione, quod non per semetipsa nos inquinent, sed per ea quae illic geruntur, per quae simul inquinamentum combiberint, tunc et in alteros respuunt.
Now, the name of idolatry being set aside for a while, which alone, once put forward, ought to suffice for the renunciation of the shows, let us now treat the matter on another ground, out of abundance: chiefly on account of those who flatter themselves that this abstinence has not been prescribed by name, as though too little were pronounced even about the shows when the lusts of the world are condemned. For just as there is a lust for money, or for rank, or for gluttony, or for sensual pleasure, or for glory, so there is also a lust for pleasure; and the shows are a species of pleasure. I suppose that lusts named in general contain pleasures also within themselves; and pleasures, understood in general just as much, are discussed specifically in the shows as well. For the rest, we said above about the character of the places that they do not defile us of themselves, but through the things that are done there; and once they have drunk in the defilement from these, they then spit it out upon others in turn.
CAPUT XV.
CHAPTER XV.
Viderit ergo, ut diximus, principalis titulus idololatriae, reliquas ipsarum rerum qualitates contra Dei omnes feramus. Deus praecepit Spiritum sanctum, utpote pro naturae suae bono tenerum et delicatum (Eph. IV), tranquillitate, et quiete et pace tractare, non furore, non bile, non ira, non dolore inquietare. Huic quomodo cum spectaculis poterit convenire? Omne enim spectaculum sine concussione spiritus non est. Ubi enim voluptas, ibi et studium, per quod scilicet voluptas sapit. Ubi studium, et aemulatio, per quam studium sapit. Porro et ubi aemulatio, ibi et furor et bilis, et ira et dolor, et caetera ex his quae cum his non competunt disciplinae.
So let the chief heading, idolatry, look to itself, as we have said; let us set all the remaining qualities of the things themselves against those of God. God has commanded that the Holy Spirit, as being tender and delicate by the goodness of His nature (Eph. 4), be handled with tranquillity and quiet and peace, not disturbed by frenzy, not by bile, not by anger, not by grief. How will this be able to agree with the shows? For no show is without a shaking of the spirit. For where there is pleasure, there is also eagerness, through which, namely, pleasure has its savour. Where there is eagerness, there is also rivalry, through which eagerness has its savour. And further, where there is rivalry, there too are frenzy and bile, and anger and grief, and the rest that come from these, which do not agree with these things of the discipline.
Editors' notes and page, col. 647

Footnotes

<!-- Calls (1)–(3), (8) and (a) fall above the part of the page shown in the images; anchors not visible, columns inferred from print order. --> LECTIONES VARIANTES (printed under page 362)

(1) · call in col 647

De litteris Paris.

Paris [edition]: "de litteris".

(printed under page 362)

(2) · call in col 647

Pronuntiemus Rig.

Rigault: "pronuntiemus".

(printed under page 362)

(3) · call in col 647

Nomina Pamel.

Pamelius: "nomina".

(printed under page 362)

(4) ‹in alteros› · call in col 647

Et tunc altero Rig.

Rigault: "et tunc altero".

(printed under page 362)

(5) ‹ut diximus› · call in col 647

Hic erit ergo, ut d. Jun.

Junius: "hic erit ergo, ut d[iximus]".

(printed under page 362)

(6) ‹idololatriae› · call in col 647

Idololatria Rig.

Rigault: "idololatria".

(printed under page 362)

(7) ‹contra Dei› · call in col 647

Contrariis omnes Franeq.

Franeker [edition]: "contrariis omnes".

(printed under page 362)

(a) · call in col 647

Nunc interposito nomine idololatriae. Hoc est, nomine idololatriae tantisper omisso, intermisso. Rig.

Now with the name of idolatry set aside. That is, with the name of idolatry left out for a while, interrupted. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 362)

(b) ‹respuunt› · call in col 647

Tum altero respuunt. Rig.) Codex Agobardi: Et tum altero respuunt. Altero dixit adverbialiter, quemadmodum Alio et sub finem libri 11. ad Uxor. Alterutro. Sic et Alteras positum olim fuisse ait Festus, pro eo quod est adverbium Alias. De hisce autem locorum inquinamentis, supra, cap. 3. Rig.

Then they spit it out on another. Rig[ault].) The Agobard codex: "Et tum altero respuunt." He said "altero" adverbially, as "alio", and near the end of book 2 To His Wife, "alterutro". So too Festus says "alteras" was once used for the adverb "alias". On these defilements of places, see above, chapter 3. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 362)

(c) ‹feramus› · call in col 647

Contra Dei omnes feramus. Sic restituimus ex codice Agobardi: Feramus, inquit, res spectaculorum contra res Dei. Nota locutio, Res Dei, pro divina seu Christiana disciplina. Contra ferre, est contra ponere, opponere, componere, committere, conferre. Rig.

Let us bring them all against those of God. So we have restored from the Agobard codex: "Let us bring," he says, "the things of the shows against the things of God." Note the expression "the things of God" for the divine or Christian discipline. "Contra ferre" is to set against, oppose, compare, match, confront. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 362)

(d) ‹Spiritum sanctum› · call in col 647

Deus praecepit Spiritum S. Alludit haud dubie ad illud Ephes. 4. « Nolite contristare Spiritum Sanctum Dei, in quo signati estis in die redemptionis. Omnis amaritudo, et ira, et indignatio, et clamor et blasphemia tollatur a vobis, cum omni malitia: indicans per posteriora illa verba explicari praecedentia.

God commanded [us to treat] the Holy Spirit. He undoubtedly alludes to Ephesians 4: "Grieve not the Holy Spirit of God, in whom you were sealed for the day of redemption. Let all bitterness and anger and indignation and clamour and blasphemy be put away from you, with all malice": showing that the earlier words are explained by those later ones.

(printed under page 362)

(e) ‹dolor› · call in col 647

Et ira et dolor. Insigne hujus rei exemplum recitat Plinius lib. 7. cap. 7: Universi, inquit, Pompeiani elephanti eruptionem tentavere, non sine vexatione populi, circumdati clathris ferreis. Sed amissa fugae spe, misericordiam vulgi inenarrabili habitu quaerentes, supplicavere, quadam sese lamentatione complorantes tanto populi dolore, ut oblitus imperatoris ac munificentiae honori suo exquisitae, flens universus consurgeret, dirasque Pompeio, quas ille mox luit, poenas imprecaretur. Pam.

And anger and grief. Pliny gives a notable example of this, book 7, chapter 7: "All Pompey's elephants," he says, "tried to break out, not without distress to the people, though they were surrounded by iron railings. But having lost hope of escape, they sought the crowd's pity with an indescribable bearing and made supplication, bewailing themselves with a kind of lamentation, to such grief of the people that, forgetting the general and the munificence devised in their honour, the whole crowd rose weeping and called down on Pompey curses, for which he soon paid." Pam[elius].

(printed under page 362)

Page

  • running head: 647 TERTULLIANI (rest cut at image edge)
  • marginal letters: A quod non nominatim abstinentia; B Viderit ergo, ut diximus; C and D stand in the footnote area (Lectiones variantes; Commentarius)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:648
Nam etsi qui modeste et probe spectaculis fruitur, pro dignitatis vel aetatis, vel etiam naturae suae conditione: non tamen immobilis animi est sine tacita spiritus passione. Nemo ad voluptatem venit sine affectu, nemo affectum sine casibus suis patitur. Ipsi casus incitamenta sunt affectus. Caeterum si cessat affectus, nulla est voluptas, et est reus jam ille vanitatis eo conveniens, ubi nihil consequitur. Puto autem, etiam vanitas extranea est nobis. Quid quod et ipse se judicat inter eos positus, quorum se similem nolens utique detestatorem confitetur? Nobis satis non est, si ipsi nihil tale faciamus, nisi et talia facientibus non conferamur. Si furem, inquit (Ps. 49), videbas, concurrebas cum eo. Utinam ne in saeculo quidem simul cum illis moraremur: sed tamen in saecularibus separamur, quia saeculum Dei est, saecularia autem diaboli.
For even if someone enjoys the shows modestly and decently, in keeping with the condition of his rank or age, or even of his nature, still he is not of an unmoved mind, without a silent passion of the spirit. No one comes to pleasure without feeling, no one undergoes feeling without its own falls. The falls themselves are incitements of feeling. Besides, if feeling ceases, there is no pleasure, and he is then guilty of vanity, gathering there where nothing is gained. But I think that vanity, too, is foreign to us. What of the fact that he judges himself as well, placed among those whose likeness he certainly confesses by being unwilling to be their detester? It is not enough for us if we ourselves do nothing of the kind, unless we also do not join those who do such things. If you saw a thief, He says (Ps. 49:18), you ran along with him. Would that we did not even live together with them in the world! But yet we are separated from them in the things of the world, because the world is God's, but worldly things are the devil's.
CAPUT XVI.
CHAPTER XVI.
Cum ergo furor interdicitur nobis, ab omni spectaculo auferimur, etiam a Circo, ubi proprie furor praesidet. Aspice populum ad spectaculum jam cum furore venientem, jam tumultuosum, jam caecum, jam de sponsionibus concitatum. Tardus est illi Praetor, semper oculi in urna ejus cum sortibus volutantur. Dehinc ad signum anxii pendent, unius dementiae una vox est. Cognosce dementiam de vanitate. Misit dicunt, et nuntiant invicem, quod simul ab omnibus visum est. Teneo testimonium caecitatis: non vident quid sit: mappam missam putant; sed est diaboli ab alto praecipitati gula. Ex eo itaque itur in furias et animos et
Since, then, frenzy is forbidden us, we are withdrawn from every show, even from the Circus, where frenzy properly presides. Look at the people coming to the show already with frenzy, already in tumult, already blind, already roused over their wagers. The praetor is too slow for them; their eyes are ever rolling in his urn together with the lots. Then they hang anxious upon the signal; one madness has one voice. Recognize the madness from its vanity. "He has thrown it," they say, and they announce to one another what has been seen by all at once. I hold the evidence of their blindness: they do not see what it is; they think it is a napkin thrown down; but it is the gullet of the devil cast headlong from on high. From that, accordingly, they go on into furies and passions and
Editors' notes and page, col. 648

Footnotes

(8) · call in col 648

Immobili animo est Jun.

Junius: "immobili animo est".

(printed under page 362)

(9) ‹furor› · call in col 648

Furore Jun.

Junius: "furore".

(printed under page 362)

(10) ‹ad› · call in col 648

Id add. Fran.

Franeker [edition] adds "id".

(printed under page 362)

(11) ‹Cognosce› · call in col 648

Cognosco Rig.

Rigault: "cognosco".

(printed under page 362)

(12) ‹praecipitati› · call in col 648

Praecitati Paris. Jun.

Paris [edition], Junius: "praecitati".

(printed under page 362)

(13) ‹gula› · call in col 648

Figura, Seml.

Semler: "figura".

COMMENTARIUS (printed under page 362)

(f) ‹Misit dicunt› · call in col 648

Misit, dicunt. Placet Budaei sententia, qui tradit signum fuisse committendorum aurigarum. Confirmatur idipsum ex Suetonio (Vit. Neron. c. 22), Martiali (l. 12) et Juvenali (Satir. 22). Certe nostram sententiam veram esse convincit Cassiodorus (Var. l. 3. ep. 51 ad Faustum praepos.): Mappa, inquit, quae signum dare solet circensibus, tali casu fluxit in morem. Cum Nero prandium protenderet, et celeritatem, ut assolet, avidus spectandi populus flagitaret, ille mappam, qua tergendis manibus utebatur, jussit abjici per fenestram, ut libertatem daret certaminis postulati. Hinc tractum est, ut, ostensa mappa, certa videatur esse promissio circensium furorum. Pam.

"He has dropped it," they say. Budé's opinion pleases, who holds that it was the signal for starting the charioteers. The same is confirmed from Suetonius (Life of Nero, chapter 22), Martial (book 12) and Juvenal (Satire 22). Certainly Cassiodorus proves our opinion true (Variae book 3, letter 51, to Faustus the prefect): "The napkin," he says, "which is wont to give the signal at the circus games, came into custom by this chance. When Nero was prolonging his luncheon and the people, eager to watch, were demanding speed, as they do, he ordered the napkin he used for wiping his hands to be thrown out of the window, to give leave for the contest they called for. Hence it has come about that the showing of the napkin seems a sure promise of the circus frenzies." Pam[elius].

(printed under page 362)

(g) ‹caecitatis› · call in col 648

Teneo testimonium caecitatis. Hoc est, Accuso caecitatis. Et caecitatem explicat deinceps. Rig.

I hold the evidence of blindness. That is, I charge them with blindness. And he goes on to explain the blindness. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 362)

(h) ‹gula› · call in col 648

Sed est diaboli ab alto praecipitati gula. Expressimus codicis vetustissimi scripturam. Antea legebatur: Diaboli ab alto praecipitati figura, acumine obtuso Alludit enim ad ea quae sacris paginis traduntur de Satana, quem de coelo Deus egit in tartara praecipitem. Itaque mappam illam Septimius, quam Praetor pro signo mittere solebat, mappam esse negat. Ait vero ipsum esse Diabolum, qui totus gula (continues)

But it is the gullet of the devil cast down from on high. We have reproduced the reading of the very old codex. Before, it was read "the figure of the devil cast down from on high", with the point blunted. For he alludes to what the sacred pages relate of Satan, whom God drove headlong from heaven into Tartarus. So Septimius denies that the napkin the praetor used to drop as the signal is a napkin. He says it is the Devil himself, who, all gullet (continues)

(printed under page 362)

Page

  • running head: TERTULLIANI 648 (left part of the head cut at image edge)
  • marginal letters: A nit sine affectu, nemo affectum; B Cum ergo furor interdicitur; C and D stand in the footnote area (Lectiones variantes; Commentarius)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:649
et discordias, et quidquid non licet sacerdotibus pacis. Inde maledicta, convicia sine justitia, odii etiam suffragia sine merito amoris. Quid enim consecuturi suum illic agunt, qui sui non sunt? nisi forte hoc solum, per quod sui non sunt: de aliena infelicitate contristantur, de aliena felicitate laetantur. Quidquid optant, quidquid abominantur, extraneum ab illis est, ita et amor apud illos otiosus, et odium injustum. At forsitan sine caussa amare liceat, quam sine caussa odisse. Deus certe etiam cum caussa prohibet odisse, qui inimicos diligi jubet. Deus etiam cum caussa maledicere non sinit, qui maledicentes benedici praecipit (Matth. V. Marc. VII. Rom. XIII). Sed Circo quid amarius, ubi ne principibus quidem aut civibus suis parcunt? Si quid horum quibus Circus furit, alicubi competit sanctis, etiam in Circo licebit. Si vero nusquam, ideo nec in Circo.
and discords, and whatever is not lawful for priests of peace. Thence come curses, abuse without justice, the votes of hatred too without the merit of love. For what do they do there to attain their own, who are not their own? Unless perhaps this alone, through which they are not their own: they are saddened at another's misfortune, they rejoice at another's good fortune. Whatever they wish, whatever they abhor, is foreign to them; so love among them is idle, and hatred unjust. But perhaps it may be lawful to love without cause rather than to hate without cause. God certainly forbids hating even with cause, He Who commands that enemies be loved. God does not allow cursing even with cause, He Who commands that those who curse be blessed (Matt. 5; Mark 7; Rom. 13). But what is more bitter than the Circus, where they spare not even their princes or their fellow citizens? If any of those things with which the Circus raves befits the saints anywhere, it will be lawful in the Circus too. But if nowhere, then not in the Circus either.
CAPUT XVII.
CHAPTER XVII.
Similiter impudicitiam omnem amoliri jubemur. Hoc igitur modo etiam a theatro separamur, quod est privatum consistorium impudicitiae, ubi nihil probatur, quam quod alibi non probatur. Ita summa gratia ejus de spurcitia plurimum concinnata est, quam Atellanus gesticulator, quam mimus etiam per mulieres, repraesentat, sexum pudoris exterminans, ut facilius domi quam in scena erubescant; quam denique pantomimus a pueritia patitur in corpore, ut artifex esse possit. Ipsa etiam prostibula publicae libidinis hostiae in scena proferuntur, plus miserae in praesentia feminarum, quibus solis latebant, perque omnis aetatis, omnis dignitatis ora transducuntur; locus, stipes, elogium, etiam quibus
Likewise we are commanded to put away all unchastity. In this way, therefore, we are separated also from the theatre, which is the private council-chamber of unchastity, where nothing is approved but what is disapproved elsewhere. So its highest charm is for the most part contrived out of filth, which the Atellan gesturer acts out, which the mime acts out even through women, banishing the sex of modesty, so that they blush more easily at home than on the stage; which, finally, the pantomime suffers in his body from boyhood, that he may be able to be an artist. The very harlots too, victims of public lust, are brought forward on the stage, more wretched in the presence of women, from whom alone they used to be hidden, and they are paraded before the faces of every age and every rank; their place, their price, their record, even to those for whom
Editors' notes and page, col. 649

Footnotes

<!-- Calls (1)–(3) and (d) fall above the part of the page shown in the images; anchors not visible, columns inferred from print order. The printer's signature lines at the page foot ("Tertulliani I." and "(Vingt et une.)") are not notes and are not set. --> LECTIONES VARIANTES (printed under page 363)

(1) · call in col 649

Sine justitia odii; etiam suffragia Rig.

Rigault: "sine justitia odii; etiam suffragia".

(printed under page 363)

(2) · call in col 649

Quod enim suum consecuturi sunt qui Rig.

Rigault: "quod enim suum consecuturi sunt qui".

(printed under page 363)

(3) · call in col 649

Et forsitan sine Fran. Paris. An fors sit. Seml. Oberth.

Franeker, Paris [editions]: "et forsitan sine"; Semler, Oberthür: "an fors sit".

(printed under page 363)

(4) ‹amoliri› · call in col 649

Similiter nec impudicitiam omnem amare Rig.

Rigault: "similiter nec impudicitiam omnem amare" (likewise not to love any unchastity).

(printed under page 363)

(a) ‹impudicitiam› · call in col 649

CAP. XVII. — Similiter impudicitiam omnem amoliri jubemur. In quo illum diserti imitantur B. Cypr. (ep. 2 et l. de Spect., c. 5); Lactant. (l. VI, c 20); Aug. (l. II, de Civit. Dei, c. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 et 13). Alludit autem hic Auctor ad illud Marci (VII), de quo reliqua citat sub finem hujus capitis: Quae de homine exeunt, illa communicant hominem, etc.; fortassis et ad illud Rom. XIII: Non in cubilibus et impudicitiis. Pam.

Chapter 17. — Likewise we are commanded to put away all unchastity. In this the eloquent imitate him: blessed Cyprian (letter 2, and On the Shows, chapter 5); Lactantius (book 6, chapter 20); Augustine (City of God book 2, chapters 4 to 13). The author alludes here to the passage of Mark 7, of which he quotes the rest near the end of this chapter: "The things that come out of a man, these defile the man," etc.; perhaps also to Romans 13: "Not in chambering and impurities." Pam[elius].

(printed under page 363)

(b) ‹Atellanus› · call in col 649

Attelanus gesticulatur. Ludiones Attellani notissimi sunt ab urbe Atella, vetusto Oscorum oppido: ea in urbe egregium erat olim amphitheatrum; videris. C. Hieronymum epist. ad Sabinianum. Le Pr.

The Atellan gesticulates. The Atellan players are very well known, named from the town of Atella, an ancient town of the Oscans: in that town there was once a splendid amphitheatre; see Jerome, letter to Sabinianus. Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 363)

(c) ‹exterminans› · call in col 649

Sexum pudoris exterminans. Graeca phrasis. Sexum longe a pudore abducens. graeca locutio: statuens extra terminos pudoris. Rig. — Sexum pudoris exterminans. Retuli ad nudationem corporum, nam mimae ita saepe in theatro. Valer. Max. lib. 3. loquens de floralibus ait, M. Porcio Catone spectante hos ludos populum erubuisse postulare, ut mimae nudarentur. Quod cum Cato cognosceret a Faonio amicissimo una secum sedente in ludis, discessit e theatro, ne praesentia sua spectaculi consuetudinem impediret. Lac.

Banishing the sex from shame. A Greek turn of phrase: leading the sex far from shame; a Greek expression: setting it outside the bounds of shame. Rig[ault]. — Banishing the sex from shame. I have referred it to the stripping of bodies, for the actresses were often so in the theatre. Valerius Maximus, book 3, speaking of the Floralia, says that when Marcus Porcius Cato was watching these games the people were ashamed to demand that the actresses be stripped. When Cato learned this from Faonius, a very close friend sitting with him at the games, he left the theatre, so as not to hinder the custom of the show by his presence. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 363)

Page

  • running head: 649 LIBER DE SPECTACU[LIS] (cut at image edge)
  • marginal letters: A et discordias, et quidquid; B competit sanctis, etiam in Circo; C lis latebant, perque omnis; D stands in the Commentarius area
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:650
opus non est, praedicatur. Taceo de reliquis, ea quae in tenebris et in speluncis suis delitescere decebat, ne diem contaminarent. Erubescat senatus, erubescant ordines omnes. Ipsae illae pudoris sui interemptrices, de gestibus suis ad lucem et populum expavescentes, semel anno erubescant. Quod si nobis omnis impudicitia exsecranda est, cur liceat audire quae loqui non licet? Cum etiam scurrilitatem et omne vanum verbum judicatum a Deo sciamus, cur aeque liceat videre, quae facere flagitium est? Cur quae ore prolata communicant hominem, ea per oculos et aures admissa non videantur hominem communicare: cum spiritui appareant aures et oculi, nec possit mundus praestari, cujus apparitores inquinantur? Habes igitur et theatri interdictionem, de interdictione impudicitiae.
there is no need, is proclaimed. I am silent about the rest, things which it befitted to lie hidden in darkness and in their own caves, lest they defile the day. Let the senate blush, let all the orders blush. Let those very women, the slayers of their own modesty, who tremble at their gestures before the light and the people, blush once a year. But if all unchastity is to be abhorred by us, why should it be lawful to hear what it is not lawful to speak? Since we know that buffoonery too, and every idle word, is judged by God, why should it be equally lawful to see what it is a shameful deed to do? Why should the things which, brought forth by the mouth, defile a man, not be thought to defile a man when admitted through the eyes and ears, since the ears and eyes are attendants upon the spirit, and that cannot be kept clean whose attendants are defiled? You have, therefore, the prohibition of the theatre too, from the prohibition of unchastity.
CAPUT XVIII.
CHAPTER XVIII.
Sin et doctrinam saecularis litteraturae, ut stultitiae apud Deum deputatam, aspernamur, satis praescribitur nobis et de illis speciebus spectaculorum, quae saeculari litteratura lusoriam vel agonisticam scenam dispungunt. Quod si tragoediae et comoediae scelerum et libidinum actrices, cruentae et lascivae, impiae et prodigae: nullius rei aut atrocis, aut vilis, commemoratio melior est: quod in facto rejicitur, etiam in dicto non est recipiendum. Quod si et stadium contendas in Scripturis nominari, sane obtinebis. Sed quae in stadio geruntur, indigna conspectui tuo non negabis, pugnos et calces et colaphos et omnem petulantiam manus, et quamcumque humani oris, id est, divinae imaginis depugnationem. Non probatis usquam vanos cursus jaculatus
But if we also despise the learning of secular literature, as reckoned foolishness with God, enough is prescribed to us also about those kinds of shows which by secular literature make up the playful or the competitive stage. But if tragedies and comedies are the performers of crimes and lusts, bloody and wanton, impious and prodigal, the recollection of no thing either atrocious or vile is any better: what is rejected in deed is not to be received in word either. But if you contend that the stadium too is named in the Scriptures, you will certainly carry your point. But you will not deny that the things done in the stadium are unworthy of your sight: fists and kicks and blows and every wantonness of the hand, and every battering of the human face, that is, of the divine image. You will nowhere approve the vain runnings, the throwings
Editors' notes and page, col. 650

Footnotes

(5) ‹scenam› · call in col 650

Scena Jun.

Junius: "scena".

(printed under page 363)

(6) ‹Quod si› · call in col 650

Quod sint Fran. Oberth.

Franeker [edition], Oberthür: "quod sint".

(printed under page 363)

(7) ‹actrices› · call in col 650

Auctrices Fran. Oberth.

Franeker [edition], Oberthür: "auctrices".

(printed under page 363)

(8) ‹conspectui› · call in col 650

Conspectu Jun.

Junius: "conspectu".

(printed under page 363)

(9) ‹humani oris› · call in col 650

Humanioris Fran.

Franeker [edition]: "humanioris".

COMMENTARIUS

(continued) · note (h) of page 362

totus gurges, totus vorago expanditur, et furit effusus toto circo, et saevit immaniter. Rig. — Diaboli ab alto praecipitati. Sic libro de Anima, pag. 319. Satanam prospectarit de coelo praecipitatum. Rig.

[all gullet], all whirlpool, all abyss, spreads himself out, rages poured over the whole circus, and storms monstrously. Rig[ault]. — Of the devil cast down from on high. So in the book On the Soul, page 319: "he looked upon Satan cast down from heaven". Rig[ault].

(printed under page 363)

(d) · call in col 650

Semel anno erubescant. Floralibus scilicet, quos ludos a meretricia turba celebrari solitos narrat Ovidius Fastor. V. In iis enim meretricum, semper alias impudentium lascivia major, et liberiores joci. Sed ipsae alias quidem in cellis et fornicibus pudorem exuunt, hic vero in propatulo. Expavescant, inquit, ad lucem populum, et saltem semel anno erubescant. Rig.

Let them blush once a year. At the Floralia, that is, games which Ovid, Fasti 5, tells were customarily celebrated by the crowd of harlots. For in them the wantonness of the harlots, at all other times shameless, was greater, and the jests freer. But at other times they put off their shame in cells and arches; here, in the open. "Let them dread," he says, "the people in the daylight, and blush at least once a year." Rig[ault].

(printed under page 363)

(e) ‹aures› · call in col 650

Cum spiritui appareant aures. Sic et Tullius sensus vocat mentis satellites. Greg. Nyss. lib. de perfecta Christiani forma, δεχομένης τῆς ἀκοῆς τὴν ὑφήγησιν auribus imperium accipientibus, ut quae subditae spiritui. Hic notetur locus Hieronymi lib. 1. adv. Jovinian., ubi ait quinque sensus reges fuisse et principes saeculi, ante adventum Christi: quos tamen JESUS ita subjecit, ut illos occisione interfecerit: ad quam rem accommodat locum Scripturae. Lac.

Since the ears are attendants of the spirit. So Cicero too calls the senses the satellites of the mind. Gregory of Nyssa, book On the Perfect Form of the Christian: "the hearing receiving the guidance", the ears receiving command, as being subject to the spirit. Here let a passage of Jerome be noted, Against Jovinian book 1, where he says that the five senses were the kings and princes of the world before the coming of Christ, whom Jesus so subdued that he slew them with slaughter; to which he applies a passage of Scripture. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 363)

(f) ‹agonisticam› · call in col 650

CAP. XVIII. — Agonisticam scenam. Quin haec de histrionibus et pantominis accipienda sint nemo dubitet ἀγωνισταί Hesychio sunt ὑποκριταί, hoc est mimi. Caput autem istud et proxime sequens antiquorum impunitatem arguit; unde miror vehementer Christianos homines tantopere laborasse, ut turpitudinem suis commen- (continues)

Chapter 18. — The competitive stage. Let no one doubt that this is to be taken of actors and pantomimes: "agonistai" in Hesychius are "hypokritai", that is, mimes. This chapter and the next convict the ancients' impunity; whence I wonder greatly that Christian men laboured so hard to [set out] filthiness in their commen- (continues)

(printed under page 363)

Page

  • running head: [LIBER] DE SPECTACULIS. 650
  • marginal letters: A bus opus non est; B terdictione impudicitiae; C que humani oris; D stands in the Commentarius area
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:651
et saltus vaniores, nusquam tibi vires aut injuriosae aut vanae placebunt, sed nec cura factitii corporis, ut plasticam Dei supergressa. Et propter otium Graeciae altiles homines oderis. Et palaestrica diaboli negotium est. Primos homines diabolus elisit (Genes. III). Ipse gestus colubrina vis, est tenax ad occupandum, tortuosa ad obligandum, liquida ad elabendum. Nullus tibi coronarum usus est, quid de coronis voluptates aucuparis?
and the vainer leaps; nowhere will strength please you, whether injurious or vain, nor indeed the cultivation of a manufactured body, as having overstepped the moulding of God. And you will hate men fattened for the sake of the idleness of Greece. And wrestling is the devil's business. The devil threw the first men (Gen. 3). The very movement is the serpent's force: it is tenacious for seizing, twisting for binding, slippery for escaping. You have no use for crowns; why do you go hunting pleasures from crowns?
CAPUT XIX.
CHAPTER XIX.
Expectabimus nunc et amphiteatri repudium de Scripturis (Gen. IX. Exod. XX. Matth. VI). Si saevitiam, si impietatem, si feritatem permissam nobis contendere possumus, eamus in amphiteatrum. Si tales sumus, quales dicimur, delectemur sanguine humano. Bonum est cum puniuntur nocentes. Quis hoc nisi nocens negabit? Et tamen innocens de supplicio alterius laetari non potest, cum magis competat innocenti dolere, quod homo par ejus tam nocens factus est, ut tam crudeliter impendatur. Quis autem mihi sponsor est, nocentes semper vel ad bestias vel ad quodcunque supplicium decerni, ut non innocentia quoque inferatur, aut ultione judicantis, aut infirmitate defendentis, aut instantia quaestionis? Quam melius ergo est nescire cum mali puniuntur, ne sciam et quum boni pereunt, si tamen bonum sapiunt. Certe quidem gladiatores innocentes in ludum veniunt, ut publicae voluptatis hostiae fiant. Etiam qui damnantur in ludum, quale est ut de leviore
Shall we now await the repudiation of the amphitheatre too from the Scriptures (Gen. 9; Exod. 20; Matt. 6)? If we can contend that cruelty, that impiety, that savagery is permitted us, let us go to the amphitheatre. If we are such as we are said to be, let us take delight in human blood. It is good when the guilty are punished. Who but a guilty man will deny this? And yet an innocent man cannot rejoice at the punishment of another, since it befits an innocent man rather to grieve that a man, his equal, has become so guilty that he is spent so cruelly. But who is my guarantor that it is always the guilty who are sentenced to the beasts or to whatever punishment, so that innocence too is not inflicted with it, whether by the vengeance of the judge, or by the weakness of the defender, or by the pressure of the torture? How much better, then, is it not to know when the wicked are punished, lest I know also when the good perish, if indeed they savour of good. Certainly gladiators come innocent into the school, to become victims of the public pleasure. Even those who are condemned to the school, what sort of thing is it that from a lighter
Editors' notes and page, col. 651

Footnotes

<!-- Calls (1)–(3), (5)–(7), (a), (b) fall above the part of the page shown in the images; anchors not visible, columns inferred from print order. The page is heavily inked; the lemma of (d) and parts of (g) are read through the blotting. --> LECTIONES VARIANTES (printed under page 364)

(1) · call in col 651

Supergressae propter Fran.

Franeker [edition]: "supergressae propter".

(printed under page 364)

(2) · call in col 651

Ut add. Fran.

Franeker [edition] adds "ut".

(printed under page 364)

(3) · call in col 651

Petamus add. Fran.

Franeker [edition] adds "petamus".

(printed under page 364)

(4) ‹innocentia› · call in col 651

Innocentiae Paris.

Paris [edition]: "innocentiae".

(printed under page 364)

(5) · call in col 651

Tergiversatione Rig.

Rigault: "tergiversatione".

(printed under page 364)

(a) · call in col 651

Altiles homines. Athletas seu palaestritas intelligit, ab gymnasiarchis ali solitos summa cura, ut essent viribus ad certamina valentissimis nobiles. Talium vero certaminum studiosissimi erant Graeci, publicae securitatis otio gaudentes. Haec enim patiebantur longae pacis mala. Altiles homines Septimius dixit, ut Varo et Martialis boves et gallinas altiles, pro opimis et saginatis. Sic lib. de Poenitentia, Enormem altilium saginam, pag. 147. Rig.

Fattened men. He means athletes or wrestlers, who were customarily fed with the greatest care by the gymnasiarchs, so that they might be renowned for strength most powerful for the contests. The Greeks were most devoted to such contests, delighting in the leisure of public security. For they suffered these evils of a long peace. Septimius said "fattened men" as Varro and Martial say fattened oxen and hens, for well-fed and stuffed. So in the book On Penitence, "the enormous stuffing of fattened creatures", page 147. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 364)

(b) · call in col 651

Et palaestrica diaboli negotium est. Palaestra, inquit Isodorus vel ἀπὸ τῆς πάλης, id est a luctatione, vel ἀπὸ τοῦ πάλλειν, id est a motu ruinae fortis, scilicet quod in luctando, cum medios arripiant, fere quatiant, idque apud Graecos πάλλειν vocatur. Et recte quidem ille, non secus ac qui derivant ἀπὸ τοῦ πάλλειν, id est a motu urnae, eo quod ducta forte luctabantur. Nam πάλλειν vibrare, et concutere, et fortiri significat. Pam.

And wrestling is the devil's business. "Palaestra," says Isidore, comes either from πάλη, that is, from wrestling, or from πάλλειν, that is, from the motion of a strong fall, because in wrestling, when they seize each other round the middle, they almost shake each other, and among the Greeks this is called πάλλειν. And he is right, no less than those who derive it from πάλλειν in the sense of the shaking of the urn, because they wrestled after the lot was drawn. For πάλλειν means to brandish, to shake, and to cast lots. Pam[elius].

(printed under page 364)

(c) ‹si impietatem› · call in col 651

CAP. XIX. — Si Saevitiam, si impietatem. Alludit ad Scripturas interdicentes saevitiam, impietatem, feritatem. Quales sunt imprimis illa Genes. IX. Qui effuderit sanguinem hominis, pro sanguine hominis ejus effundetur. Deinde praeceptum Decalogi, Exod., XX, Non occides illique correspondet sermo Domini in monte, Matth. VI, et complures alii. Pam.

Chapter 19. — If cruelty, if impiety. He alludes to the Scriptures that forbid cruelty, impiety, savagery. Such are, first of all, Genesis 9: "Whoever sheds man's blood, his blood shall be shed for the blood of the man." Then the precept of the Decalogue, Exodus 20, "You shall not kill", and to it corresponds the Lord's sermon on the mount, Matthew 6, and many others. Pam[elius].

(printed under page 364)

(d) ‹ne sciam› · call in col 651

Ne sciam et quum boni pereunt, si tamen bonum sapiunt, certe quidem, etc. De ethnicis loquitur, qui magistratuum ethnicorum sententiis ad bestias damnantur. Ait igitur: Quis autem mihi sponsor est, nocentes semper damnari, ut non quandoque etiam innocentes? Quam melius ergo est, nescire quum mali puniuntur! ne sciam et quum boni pereunt. Hic vero, ne quis christianus obstreperet, Ergo sunt inter ethnicos boni, corrigit semetipsum, si tamen bonum sapiunt, inquit, hoc est, si tamen est ullus boni sapor hominibus ad Christum minime pertinentibus! Deinde adjicit: Certe quidem gladiatores innocentes in ludum veniunt, ut publicae voluptatis hostiae fiant. Jam non dicit, bonos; sed tantum innocentes, qui non damnati, sed ultro in ludum veniunt. Rig.

Lest I know also when good men perish, if indeed they have any taste of good; certainly, etc. He speaks of the heathen who are condemned to the beasts by the sentences of heathen magistrates. He says then: "Who is my guarantor that the guilty are always condemned, so that the innocent are not sometimes condemned too? How much better, then, not to know when the wicked are punished, lest I know also when the good perish!" Here, lest some Christian should protest, "So there are good men among the heathen", he corrects himself: "if indeed they have any taste of good", he says, that is, if indeed there is any taste of good in men who in no way belong to Christ! Then he adds: "Certainly gladiators come innocent into the school, to become victims of the public pleasure." Now he does not say "good", but only "innocent", those who come into the school not condemned but of their own accord. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 364)

Page

  • running head: 651 TERTULLIANI (rest cut at image edge)
  • marginal letters: A latus et saltus vaniores; B delectemur sanguine humano; C and D stand in the footnote area (Lectiones variantes; Commentarius)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:652
delicto in homicidas emendatione proficiant. Sed haec ethnicis respondi. Caeterum absit ut de istius spectaculi aversione diutius discat Christianus: quanquam nemo haec omnia plenius exprimere potest, nisi qui adhuc spectat malo non implere, quam meminisse.
offence they should advance by correction to murderers? But I have given this answer to the heathen. For the rest, far be it that a Christian should learn at greater length about his aversion from this show; although no one can express all these things more fully than one who still watches them. I prefer to leave it incomplete rather than to remember.
CAPUT XX.
CHAPTER XX.
Quam vana igitur, imo desperata argumentatio eorum, qui sine dubio tergiversationem admittendae voluptatis obtendunt, nullam ejus abstinentiae mentionem specialiter in Scripturis determinari, quae directo prohibeat, ejusmodi conventibus interesse servum Dei. Novam proxime defensionem suaviludii cujusdam audivi. Sol (inquit), imo etiam ipse Deus de coelo spectat, nec contaminatur. Plane sol et in cloacam radios suos defert, nec inquinatur. Utinam autem Deus nulla flagitia hominum spectaret, ut omnes judicium evaderemus. Sed spectat et latrocinia, spectat et falsa, et adulteria, et fraudes, et idololatrias, et spectacula ipsa. Idcirco ergo nos non spectabimus, ne videamur ab illo qui omnia spectat. Comparas, homo, reum et judicem: reum, qui quia videtur, reus est; judicem, qui quia videt, judex est. Numquid ergo et extra limites circi furori studemus, et extra cardines theatri impudicitiae intendimus, et insolentiae extra stadium, et immisericordiae extra amphitheatrum, quod deus etiam extra cameras, et gradus, et apulias oculos habet. Erramus, nusquam et nunquam excusatur
How vain, then, nay how desperate, is the argument of those who, doubtless to evade giving up a pleasure, put forward the pretext that no mention of that abstinence is specifically laid down in the Scriptures, such as would directly forbid a servant of God to be present at gatherings of this kind. Lately I heard a new defence from a certain lover of sweet sport. "The sun," he says, "nay, God Himself, watches from heaven, and is not defiled." Plainly the sun casts its rays even into the sewer, and is not soiled. But would that God watched no shameful deeds of men, that we might all escape judgement! But He watches robberies too, He watches falsehoods too, and adulteries, and frauds, and idolatries, and the shows themselves. Therefore, then, shall we not watch them, lest we be seen by Him Who watches all things? You are comparing, O man, the accused and the judge: the accused, who is accused because he is seen; the judge, who is judge because he sees. Do we then devote ourselves to frenzy outside the bounds of the circus, and apply ourselves to unchastity outside the hinges of the theatre, and to insolence outside the stadium, and to mercilessness outside the amphitheatre, because God has eyes even outside the vaults and the tiers and the awnings? We are in error: nowhere and never is that excused
Editors' notes and page, col. 652

Footnotes

(6) · call in col 652

Voluptati Jun.

Junius: "voluptati".

(printed under page 364)

(7) · call in col 652

Vel localiter add. Fran.

Franeker [edition] adds "vel localiter".

(printed under page 364)

(8) ‹defert› · call in col 652

Deflexit Jun. ex M. S.

Junius, from a manuscript: "deflexit".

(printed under page 364)

(9) ‹Comparas› · call in col 652

Compares. Seml.

Semler: "compares".

(printed under page 364)

(10) ‹apulias› · call in col 652

Ἐπαυλίας Wouw. corrigit.

Wouwer corrects to "epaulias".

COMMENTARIUS

(continued) · note (f) of page 363

tariis non modo revelarent, sed et multis exponerent. Le Pr. — Agonisticam scenam. Quamquam prima facie pertinere istud adhuc videatur ad theatrum, certe et in olympiis, ac quinquenniorum certaminibus quae in stadio fiebant more Graecorum (quo pertinet illud propter Graeciae otium) coeperunt tandem etiam comoediae et tragoediae celebrari. Pam.

[in their commen]taries not only to reveal it but also to expound it at length. Le Pr[ieur]. — The competitive stage. Although at first sight this may still seem to belong to the theatre, certainly at the Olympic games too, and in the five-yearly contests held in the stadium after the manner of the Greeks (to which belongs the phrase "because of the idleness of Greece"), comedies and tragedies at length began to be performed as well. Pam[elius].

(printed under page 364)

(e) ‹defensionem› · call in col 652

CAP. XX. — Novam proxime defensionem suaviludii cujusdam audivi. Sic lib. de Baptis.: Audivi Domino teste, ejusmodi, etc. Rig.

Chapter 20. — Lately I heard a new defence from a certain lover of the games. So in the book On Baptism: "I have heard, the Lord is my witness, such," etc. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 364)

(f) ‹cujusdam› · call in col 652

Suaviludii cujusdam. Eodem modo dixit Suaviludios vestros lib. de corona militis, quos recte Rhenanus ibi interpretatur, eos qui ex Christianis spectaculorum adhuc oblectamentis, seu suavitate ludorum delectabantur. Pam.

Of a certain lover of the games. In the same way he said "your game-lovers" in the book On the Soldier's Crown, whom Rhenanus there rightly interprets as those Christians who were still delighted by the enjoyments of the shows, or the sweetness of the games. Pam[elius].

(printed under page 364)

(g) ‹gradus› · call in col 652

Extra gradus. In circo gradus fuisse patet ex Suetonio. Hinc lex illa Othonis, Livio et Plinio testibus, ne quis nisi cui 400 essent sestertia ex 14 gradibus spectaret: cum legem Juliam theatralem alicubi Plinius nuncupat. Pam.

Outside the tiers. That there were tiers in the circus is plain from Suetonius. Hence that law of Otho, on the testimony of Livy and Pliny, that no one should watch from the fourteen rows unless he had 400 sestertia; while Pliny somewhere calls it the Julian theatre law. Pam[elius].

(printed under page 364)

(h) ‹apulias› · call in col 652

Et apulias. Sic legitur in cod. Agobardi. Atque hoc vocabulo significari videntur vela quae in theatris (continues)

And the "apuliae". So it is read in the Agobard codex. And by this word seem to be meant the awnings which in the theatres (continues)

(printed under page 364)

Page

  • running head: TERTULLIANI 652
  • marginal letters: A viore delicto in homicidas; B tur. Plane sol et in cloacam; C and D stand in the footnote area (Lectiones variantes; Commentarius)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:653
quod Deus damnat. Nusquam et nunquam licet, quod semper et ubique non licet. Haec est veritatis integritas, et quae ei debetur disciplinae plenitudo et aequalitas timoris, et fides obsequii, non immutare sententiam, nec variare judicium. Non potest aliud esse, quod vere quidem est bonum seu malum. Omnia autem penes veritatem Dei fixa sunt.
what God condemns. Nowhere and never is that lawful which always and everywhere is not lawful. This is the integrity of truth, and the fullness of discipline owed to it, and the evenness of fear, and the faithfulness of obedience: not to change one's opinion, nor to vary one's judgement. That which is truly good or evil cannot be anything else. And all things are fixed in God's truth.
CAPUT XXI.
CHAPTER XXI.
Ethnici, quos penes nulla est veritatis plenitudo, quia nec doctor veritatis Deus, malum ac bonum pro arbitrio ac libidine interpretantur, alibi bonum quod alibi malum, et alibi malum quod alibi bonum. Sic ergo evenit, ut qui in publico vix necessitate vesicae tunicam levet, idem in circo aliter non exsultet, nisi totum pudorem in faciem omnium intentet; et qui filiae virginis ab omni spurco verbo aures tuetur, ipse eam in theatrum ad illas voces gesticulationesque deducat; et qui in plateis litem manu agentem aut compescit, aut detestatur, idem in stadio gravioribus pugnis suffragium ferat; et qui ad cadaver hominis communi lege defuncti exhorret, idem in amphiteatro derosa et dissipata, et in suo sanguine squalentia corpora patientissimis oculis desuper incumbat. Imo qui propter homicidae poenam probandam ad spectaculum veniat, idem gladiatorem ad homicidium flagellis et virgis compellat invitum; et qui insigniori cuique homicidae leonem poscit, idem gladiatori atroci petat rudem, et pileum praemium conferat: illum vero confectum
The heathen, with whom there is no fullness of truth, because God is not their teacher of truth, interpret evil and good according to their will and lust, good in one place what is evil in another, and evil in one place what is good in another. So it comes about that one who in public will scarcely lift his tunic for the necessity of the bladder, in the circus will exult in no other way than by thrusting his whole shame in the face of all; and one who guards his virgin daughter's ears from every filthy word, himself leads her into the theatre to those words and gestures; and one who in the streets either restrains or abhors a quarrel carried on with the fist, in the stadium casts his vote for heavier blows; and one who shudders at the corpse of a man who died by the common law [of nature], in the amphitheatre bends down from above with most patient eyes upon bodies gnawed and torn apart and filthy in their own blood. Nay, one who comes to the show to approve the punishment of a murderer, forces an unwilling gladiator to murder with whips and rods; and one who demands a lion for every more notorious murderer, asks the rod [of discharge] for a savage gladiator, and bestows the cap as a reward: but the other, once dispatched,
Editors' notes and page, col. 653

Footnotes

<!-- Calls (4)–(11), (a), (b), (e)–(g) fall above the part of the page shown in the images; anchors not visible, columns inferred from print order. --> LECTIONES VARIANTES (printed under page 365)

(1) ‹non exsultet› · call in col 653

Exuat Wouw. M. S.

Wouwer's manuscript: "exuat".

(printed under page 365)

(2) ‹et qui› · call in col 653

Ut qui Wouw. M. S.

Wouwer's manuscript: "ut qui".

(printed under page 365)

(3) ‹illum vero› · call in col 653

Et pileum illum vero Rig.

Rigault: "et pileum illum vero".

(printed under page 365)

(a) · call in col 653

Veritatis integritas. Incorrupta debet esse veritas quae et virginitatis nomine aliquando donatur. unde haeretici veritatem cauponari seu corrumpere dicuntur, τὴν ἀλήθειαν καπηλεύειν, can. 2. synodi Trullanae, ubi recensentur canones tum Apostolorum, tum superiorum conciliorum, quibus adhaerendum decernitur. Le Pr.

The integrity of truth. Truth must be uncorrupted, which is sometimes even given the name of virginity. Hence heretics are said to huckster or corrupt the truth, "to peddle the truth", canon 2 of the Synod in Trullo, where the canons both of the Apostles and of the earlier councils are listed, to which it is decreed one must adhere. Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 365)

(b) · call in col 653

CAP. XXI. — Ethnici, quos penes nulla est veritatis plenitudo. Hoc est, quod supra explicavimus, Si tamen bonum sapiunt. Rig.

Chapter 21. — The heathen, with whom there is no fullness of truth. This is what we explained above: "if indeed they have any taste of good". Rig[ault].

(printed under page 365)

(c) ‹dissipata› · call in col 653

Et dissipata. Intellige hanc voculam, et simul cape incredibilem atrocitatem ludi gladiatorii. Solebat victor gladiator ita frequenter vulnera repetere, ut victum miserum dissiparet in partes, divideretque horrenda laceratione. Testis hujus crudelitatis Lactant.: quin etiam percussos jacentesque repeti jubent spectatores, et cadavera ictibus dissipari, ne quis illos simulata morte deludat. Habentur haec lib. VI. c. 20. Lac.

And torn apart. Understand this little word, and at the same time grasp the incredible savagery of the gladiatorial show. The victorious gladiator used to strike again and again, so that he tore the wretched loser into pieces and divided him with horrible mangling. Lactantius is witness of this cruelty: "Indeed the spectators order the struck and fallen to be struck again, and the corpses torn apart with blows, so that no one may cheat them by feigned death." This is in book 6, chapter 20. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 365)

(d) ‹pileum› · call in col 653

Petat rudem et Pileum. Rudis et pileus signa libertatis, rude nimirum seu baculo grandiore donabantur gladiatores qui in arena feliciter pugnaverant, atque rudiari dicebantur. Le Pr.

Let him ask for the wooden sword and the cap. The wooden sword and the cap are signs of freedom: gladiators who had fought successfully in the arena were presented with the rudis, that is, a larger staff, and were called "rudiarii". Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 365)

Page

  • running head: 653 LIBER DE SPECTA[CULIS] (cut at image edge)
  • marginal letters: A satur quod Deus damnat; B spurco verbo aures tuetur; C and D stand in the footnote area (Lectiones variantes; Commentarius)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:654
etiam oris spectaculo repetat, libentius recognoscens de proximo, quem voluit occidere de longinquo, tanto durior si noluit.
he has brought back even for a sight of his face, more gladly recognizing close at hand the man whom he willed to be killed from afar; so much the harder if he did not will it.
CAPUT XXII.
CHAPTER XXII.
Quid mirum de inaequata ista hominum miscentium et commutantium statum boni et mali per inconstantiam sensus et judicii varietate? Etenim ipsi actores et administratores spectaculorum, quadrigarios, scenicos, xysticos, arenarios illos amentissimos, quibus viri animas, foeminae, aut illi etiam, corpora sua substernunt, propter quos in ea committunt quae reprehendunt, ex eadem arte, quam magnifaciunt, deponunt, imo manifeste damnant ignominia et capitis minutione, arcentes curia, rostris, senatu, equite, caeterisque honoribus omnibus simul ac ornamentis quibusdam. Quanta perversitas! Amant quos mulctant, depretiant quos probant. Artem magnificant, artificem notant. Quale judicium est, ut ob ea quis offuscetur, per quae promeretur? Imo quanta confessio est malae rei, cujus auctores, cum acceptissimi sint, sine nota non sunt!
What wonder is it, coming from that uneven inconstancy of men who mix and interchange the state of good and evil through the fickleness of their feeling and the changeableness of their judgement? For the very promoters and managers of the shows, those charioteers, actors, athletes, and most frenzied arena-fighters, to whom men submit their souls, and women, or the men too, their bodies, on whose account they commit the very things they blame, by that same art which they make so much of, they degrade; nay, they openly condemn them with disgrace and loss of civil status, keeping them from the council-house, the rostra, the senate, the equestrian order, and from all the other honours together, and from certain distinctions. What perversity! They love those whom they punish; they depreciate those whom they approve. They extol the art, they brand the artist. What sort of judgement is it, that a man should be darkened for the very things by which he earns favour? Nay, what a confession it is of an evil thing, whose performers, though they are most welcome, are not without a mark of shame!
CAPUT XXIII.
CHAPTER XXIII.
Quum igitur humana recordatio, etiam obstrepente gratia voluptatis, damnandos eos censeat, ademptis bonis dignitatum in quemdam scopulum famositatis, quanto magis divina justitia in ejusmodi artifices animadvertit? An Deo placebit auriga ille tot animarum inquietator, tot furiarum minister,
Since, then, human reflection, even with the charm of pleasure clamouring against it, judges that they should be condemned, stripped of the goods of rank, onto a kind of rock of infamy, how much more does divine justice punish artists of this kind? Will that charioteer please God, the disturber of so many souls, the minister of so many furies,
Editors' notes and page, col. 654

Footnotes

(4) · call in col 654

Amoris Fran. Paris. Oberth.

Franeker, Paris [editions], Oberthür: "amoris".

(printed under page 365)

(5) · call in col 654

Quem noluit Cod. Wouw.

Wouwer's codex: "quem noluit".

(printed under page 365)

(6) · call in col 654

Si voluit Cod. Wouw. si non voluit Rig.

Wouwer's codex: "si voluit"; Rigault: "si non voluit".

(printed under page 365)

(7) · call in col 654

De, abest Rig.

Rigault lacks "de".

(printed under page 365)

(8) · call in col 654

Varietatem Paris.

Paris [edition]: "varietatem".

(printed under page 365)

(9) · call in col 654

Auctores Seml. Oberth. Leop.

Semler, Oberthür, Leopold: "auctores".

(printed under page 365)

(10) · call in col 654

Amantissimos Fran.; amatissimos Cod. Wouw.

Franeker [edition]: "amantissimos"; Wouwer's codex: "amatissimos".

(printed under page 365)

(11) · call in col 654

Viles animas Fran. Oberth.

Franeker [edition], Oberthür: "viles animas".

(printed under page 365)

(12) ‹arte› · call in col 654

Parte Fran.

Franeker [edition]: "parte".

(printed under page 365)

(13) ‹quam› · call in col 654

Qua Rig.

Rigault: "qua".

(printed under page 365)

(14) ‹deponunt› · call in col 654

Et deminuunt add. Fran.

Franeker [edition] adds "et deminuunt".

(printed under page 365)

(15) ‹auctores› · call in col 654

Cujus actores Wouw. M. S.

Wouwer's manuscript: "cujus actores".

COMMENTARIUS

(continued) · note (h) of page 364

et amphitheatris, ad ornatum, et ad excludendos ictus solis fervidos. Ea vero quandoque purpurea, quo colore praestantissimae, ut versimile est, lanae imbuebantur, quales ex Apulia. Martialis, Velleribus primis Apuleia. Unde et velis nomen Apularium. Rig.

[in the theatres] and amphitheatres [were spread] for ornament and to keep out the burning strokes of the sun. They were sometimes purple, a colour in which, as is likely, the finest wools were dyed, such as those from Apulia. Martial: "Apulia for the first fleeces." Hence too the awnings' name "Apularium". Rig[ault].

(printed under page 365)

(e) · call in col 654

Illum vero confectum etiam oris spectaculo repetat. Ut etiam os et vultum expirantis intueri velit. Rig.

But let him call back the one who is finished, for the spectacle of his face too: so that he wants to gaze even on the mouth and face of the dying man. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 365)

(f) · call in col 654

CAP. XXII. — Arenarios. Ludus quippe gladiatorius, sicut et amphitheatrum, dictus κατ' ἐξοχὴν arena. Nam tametsi haec sparsa in locis aliorum ludorum, sed nomen ipsum tantum communicatum est amphitheatro, pessime vero Barraeus explicat: « Quadrigarios et arenarios, illos qui currus reficiebant, istos qui arenam deferebant in amphitheatrum ». Non est ita; aurigas et gladiatores intelligit. Lac.

Chapter 22. — Arena-men. The gladiatorial show, like the amphitheatre, was called "the arena" par excellence. For although sand was strewn in the places of other games too, the name itself was given only to the amphitheatre. Barraeus explains very badly: "Charioteers and arena-men: the former those who repaired the chariots, the latter those who carried the sand into the amphitheatre." It is not so: he means charioteers and gladiators. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 365)

(g) · call in col 654

Quibus viri animas, foeminae, aut etiam illi, corpora sua substernunt. Gladiatores significat, amatos ad insaniam usque et viris et foeminis: viris, etiam ex nobilium ordine, in arenam descendentibus; foeminis quoque nobilissimis, imo et viris, pudicitiam suam vilissimi alicujus mirmillonis aut retiarii amore profligantibus. Cujus insaniae exempla suggerit sexta Juvenalis satira. Rig.

To whom men surrender their souls, and women, or even men, their bodies. He means the gladiators, loved to the point of madness by both men and women: by men, even of the noble order, who went down into the arena; by women too of the noblest, and indeed by men, who squandered their chastity for love of some vile myrmillo or net-fighter. Juvenal's sixth satire supplies examples of this madness. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 365)

(h) ‹capitis minutione› · call in col 654

Et capitis minutione. Haec phrasis est jureconsultorum apud quos est D. lib. IV, tit. 5. de capite diminutis. Pam.

And by loss of civil status. This phrase belongs to the jurists, among whom there is Digest book 4, title 5, "On those who have suffered loss of status". Pam[elius].

(printed under page 365)

(i) ‹furiarum› · call in col 654

CAP. XXIII. — Tot furiarum minister, tot statuum. Notat furiosa veterum circa aurigas sive agitatores studia, in quae saepenumero contrariis votis spectantium mentes scindebantur; aliis prasinae factioni, aliis venetae faventibus: unde animorum varii motus, et varii status, pro varia scilicet agitatione, ministrati. Itaque vulgatam ab Rhenano et Pamelio lectionem retinemus, (continues)

Chapter 23. — Servant of so many furies, of so many states. He notes the ancients' frenzied partisanship for the charioteers or drivers, over which the spectators' minds were often split by contrary wishes, some favouring the green faction, others the blue: whence various motions of the mind, and various states, served out, that is, according to the varied driving. So we keep the reading made common by Rhenanus and Pamelius, (continues)

(printed under page 365)

Page

  • running head: [LIB]ER DE SPECTACULIS. 654
  • marginal letters: A fectum etiam oris spectaculo; B busdam. Quanta perversitas; C and D stand in the footnote area (Lectiones variantes; Commentarius)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:655
tot statuum, ut sacerdos coronatus, vel coloratus ut leno, quem curru rapiendum diabolus adversus Heliam exornavit? Placebit et ille, qui vultus suos novacula mutat? infidelis erga faciem suam, quam non contentus Saturno et Isidi et Libero proximam facere, insuper contumeliis alaparum sic objicit, quasi de praecepto Domini ludat? Docet scilicet et diabolus verberandam maxillam patienter offerre (Matth. VI). Sic et tragoedos cothurnis extulit, quia nemo potest adjicere cubitum unum ad staturam suam (Luc XII): mendacem facere vult Christum. Jam vero ipsum opus personarum, quaero an Deo placeat, qui omnem similitudinem vetat fieri, quanto magis imaginis suae. Non amat falsum auctor veritatis (Exod. XX): adulterium est apud illum omne quod fingitur. Proinde vocem, sexus, aetates mentientem, amores, iras, gemitus, lacrymas adseverantem non probabit, qui omnem hypocrisin damnat. Caeterum cum in lege praescribit, maledictum esse qui muliebribus vestietur (Deut. XXII), quid de pantomimo judicabit, qui etiam muliebribus curatur? Sane et ille artifex pugnorum impunitus ibit? Tales enim cicatrices caestuum, et callos pugnorum, et aurium fungos a Deo cum suo plasmate accepit. Ideo illi oculos Deus plasmavit, ut vapulando deficiant. Taceo de illo, qui hominem leoni prae se opponit, ne parum sit homicida, qui eumdem postmodum jugulat.
of so many states of mind, crowned like a priest or coloured like a pimp, whom the devil decked out to be carried off in a chariot in rivalry with Elijah? Will he too please Him who changes his features with the razor, unfaithful to his own face, which, not content to make it like Saturn and Isis and Liber, he moreover exposes to the insults of slaps, as though he were making sport of the Lord's precept? The devil too, forsooth, teaches us to offer the cheek patiently to be struck (Matt. 6). So too he has raised up the tragic actors on buskins, because no one can add one cubit to his stature (Luke 12): he wants to make Christ a liar. And now as to the very business of the masks, I ask whether it can please God, Who forbids any likeness to be made, how much more of His own image. The Author of truth does not love what is false (Exod. 20): with Him everything that is feigned is adultery. Accordingly He Who condemns all hypocrisy will not approve one who counterfeits voice, sex, ages, who asserts loves, angers, groans, tears. Moreover, since in the law He prescribes that he is accursed who is clothed in women's garments (Deut. 22), what will He judge of the pantomime, who is even trained in womanish ways? Will that artist of the fists too go unpunished? For he received such scars of the gloves, and callouses of the fists, and swellings of the ears from God with his own fashioning! God fashioned eyes for him for this, that they should fail under beating! I say nothing of him who sets a man before himself in the way of the lion, lest he be too little a murderer, he who afterwards cuts the throat of that same man.
CAPUT XXIV.
CHAPTER XXIV.
Quot adhuc modis perorabimus, nihil ex his quae spectaculis deputantur, placitum Deo esse
In how many more ways shall we plead our case to the end, that nothing of those things which are reckoned to the shows is pleasing to God,
Editors' notes and page, col. 655

Footnotes

<!-- Calls (1), (2) and (8) fall above the part of the page shown in the images; anchors not visible, columns inferred from print order. --> LECTIONES VARIANTES (printed under page 366)

(1) · call in col 655

Velut Wouw. M. S.

Wouwer's manuscript: "velut".

(printed under page 366)

(2) · call in col 655

Et ille abest Rigalt.

Rigault lacks "et ille".

(printed under page 366)

(3) ‹curatur› · call in col 655

Utatur Wouw. M. S.

Wouwer's manuscript: "utatur".

(printed under page 366)

(4) ‹aurium› · call in col 655

Rudium Latin.

Latinius: "rudium".

(printed under page 366)

(5) ‹plasmate› · call in col 655

Cum plasmaretur Rig.

Rigault: "cum plasmaretur" (when he was formed).

(printed under page 366)

(6) ‹illi› · call in col 655

Illos Rig.

Rigault: "illos".

(printed under page 366)

(7) ‹qui eumdem› · call in col 655

Quam, add. Pam. Seml.

Pamelius, Semler add "quam".

(printed under page 366)

(a) ‹muliebribus› · call in col 655

Qui muliebribus vestietur. Illud quoque B. Cyprianus exagitat ep. 61, ad Euchratium. Atque can. 62 concilii in Trullo prohibetur, ne vir foemineis vestibus; atque etiam ne foemina virorum vestibus utatur, aut comicas personas, satiricas, aut tragicas quisquam induat. Le Pr.

Who shall be clothed in women's garments. Blessed Cyprian too attacks this, letter 61, to Eucratius. And canon 62 of the Council in Trullo forbids a man to wear women's clothes, and also a woman to wear men's, or anyone to put on comic, satyric or tragic masks. Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 366)

(b) ‹muliebribus› · call in col 655

Qui etiam mulieribus curatur. Qui nimirum et voce et gestu et incessu accuratissime effoeminatur, ut saltandis foeminarum fabulis pro foemina haberi possit. Rig.

Who is even dressed up in women's things. Who, that is, is made womanish with the greatest care in voice and gesture and gait, so that in dancing women's plays he can be taken for a woman. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 366)

(c) ‹homicida› · call in col 655

Ne parum sit homicida, qui eumdem postmodum jugulat. Gladiatoribus commissis populus nonnunquam deposcebat leonem. Emisso leone, gladiator periculo proximus, quacunque arte poterat, subtili recessu aut declinatione, commilitonem opponebat. Plerumque autem accidebat, ut secundus iste gladiator, post rem cum leone feliciter gestam, repetita commissione gladiatoria, cum primo illo compositus, jugularetur. Hac ratione, primus ille Tertulliano dicitur non parum homicida, hoc est, iterum homicida: nempe jam semel, cum hominem leoni prae se opposuit; iterum vero, cum eumdem ipsum, cujus se corpore texerat, postmodum jugulavit. Denique non parum homicida est, qui servatorem suum jugulat. Rig.

Lest he be too little a murderer, who afterwards cuts the same man's throat. When gladiators had been matched, the people sometimes called for a lion. When the lion was let loose, the gladiator nearest the danger would, by whatever art he could, with a subtle withdrawal or swerve, put his comrade in front of him. And it often happened that this second gladiator, after dealing successfully with the lion, was matched again in a gladiatorial bout with that first one, and had his throat cut. In this way that first man is called by Tertullian "not a little a murderer", that is, a murderer twice over: once when he put the man in front of himself before the lion; and again when he afterwards cut the throat of the very man with whose body he had shielded himself. In short, he is no small murderer who cuts the throat of his own saviour. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 366)

Page

  • running head: 655 TERTULLIANI
  • marginal letters: A tot statuum, ut sacerdos; B quod fingitur. Proinde vocem; C quae spectaculis deputantur (beside the line above it: "Quot adhuc modis"), D stands in the Commentarius area
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:656
aut congruens Dei servis, quod Domino placitum non sit, si omnia propter diabolum instituta, et ex diaboli rebus instructa monstravimus: nihil enim non diaboli est, quidquid Dei non est, vel Deo displicet: hoc erit pompa diaboli, adversus quam in signaculo fidei ejeramus. Quod autem ejeramus, neque facto, neque dicto, neque visu, neque prospectu participare debemus. Caeterum nonne ejeramus et rescindimus signaculum, rescindendo testationem ejus? Numquid ergo superest ut ab ipsis ethnicis responsum flagitemus? Illi jam nobis renuntient, an liceat christianis spectaculo uti. Atquin hinc vel maxime intelligunt factum christianum, de repudio spectaculorum. Itaque negat manifeste, qui per quod agnoscitur tollit. Quid autem spei superest in hujusmodi homine? Nemo in castra hostium transit, nisi projectis armis suis, nisi destitutis signis et sacramentis principis sui, nisi pactus simul perire.
or befitting the servants of God, which is not pleasing to the Lord, if we have shown that all of them were instituted for the devil's sake and furnished out of the devil's goods? For everything is the devil's that is not God's or that displeases God: this will be the pomp of the devil, which we renounce in the seal of faith. And what we renounce we ought to share neither by deed, nor by word, nor by sight, nor by looking on. Besides, do we not renounce and break the seal by breaking its attestation? Does it remain, then, that we should demand an answer from the heathen themselves? Let them now tell us whether it is lawful for Christians to make use of the show. Yet it is from this above all that they understand that a man has become a Christian: from his repudiation of the shows. So he openly denies [the faith] who removes that by which he is recognized. And what hope remains in a man of this kind? No one passes over into the camp of the enemy except having thrown away his arms, except having deserted the standards and the oath of his own commander, except having bargained to perish with them.
CAPUT XXV.
CHAPTER XXV.
An ille recogitabit eo tempore de Deo, positus illic ubi nihil est de Deo? pacem, opinor, habebit in animo contendens pro auriga; pudicitiam ediscet, attonitus in mimos. Imo in omni spectaculo nullum magis scandalum occurret, quam ipse ille mulierum et virorum accuratior cultus: ipsa consensio, ipsa in favoribus aut conspiratio aut dissensio inter se de commercio scintillas libidinum constabellant. Nemo denique in spectaculo ineundo prius cogitat, nisi videri et videre. Sed tragoedo vociferante, exclamationes ille alicujus prophetae retractabit, et inter effoeminati histrionis modos psalmum secum comminiscetur, et cum athletae agent,
Will that man think on God at that time, placed there where there is nothing of God? He will have peace in his soul, I suppose, as he strains on behalf of a charioteer; he will learn chastity, gaping at the mimes! Nay, at every show no stumbling-block will meet him more than that very over-elaborate adornment of women and men: the very agreement, the very conspiring or disagreeing among themselves in their partisanship, fan the sparks of lusts from their intercourse. In short, no one in going to a show thinks first of anything but to be seen and to see. But while the tragic actor is bawling, he will be going over the exclamations of some prophet, and amid the measures of an effeminate player he will compose a psalm to himself, and when the athletes are at work,
Editors' notes and page, col. 656

Footnotes

(8) · call in col 656

Servo Dei Rig.

Rigault: "servo Dei".

COMMENTARIUS

(continued) · note (i) of page 365

nihil enim hic juvat mutila codicis Agobardini scriptura, Tot furiarum minister, tot status ut leno. Cassiodorus: « Transit prasinus; pars populi moeret; praecedit venetus; et potior turba civitatis affligitur, nihil proficientes ferventer insultant; nihil patientes graviter vulnerantur: et ad inanes contentiones sic descenditur, tanquam de statu periclitantis patriae laboretur. » Rig.

for the mutilated reading of the Agobard codex, "Tot furiarum minister, tot status ut leno", is no help here. Cassiodorus: "The green passes; part of the people mourns; the blue takes the lead, and the greater crowd of the city is afflicted; they hurl hot insults though they gain nothing; they are gravely wounded though they suffer nothing; and they descend into empty quarrels as though they were labouring over the state of an endangered country." Rig[ault].

(printed under page 366)

(d) ‹sacramentis› · call in col 656

CAP. XXIV. — Signis et sacramentis. A militia sumptum ut reliqua hujus tractatus. Fulbertus Carnotensis epist. 41. Lac.

Chapter 24. — Standards and oaths. Taken from military service, like the rest of this treatise. Fulbert of Chartres, letter 41. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 366)

(e) ‹in favoribus› · call in col 656

CAP. XXV. — Ipsa in favoribus aut conspiratio, aut dissensio inter se de commercio scintillas libidinum conflabellant. Itaque hoc etiam praecipit magister Artis, lib. I: Cujus equi veniant facito studiose requiras: Nec mora, quisquis erit cui favet illa, fave etc. Rig.

Chapter 25. — The very agreement or disagreement among them in their partisanship fans the sparks of lust from their mingling. So the master of the Art [of Love] also teaches this, book 1: "Be sure to ask eagerly whose horses are coming; and at once, whoever it is she favours, favour him," etc. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 366)

(f) ‹de commercio› · call in col 656

De commercio. Jungenda haec vox cum sequentibus, non cum praecedentibus: attende itaque interpunctioni nostrae. Junius commercium explicat ἐπιμιξίαν, nam olim, teste Velio Longo, dictum commercium a commiscendo esse, ex litterarum commutatione. Originatio ista hic ad rem, nam a promiscua conjunctione scintillae libidinum. Quod illustratur cap. 2. lib. III. paedag. Clem. Alex. et cap. 7. lib. II. Lac.

From the mingling. This word is to be joined with what follows, not with what precedes: so attend to our punctuation. Junius explains "commercium" as "intermingling", for of old, on the witness of Velius Longus, "commercium" was said from "commiscere", by a change of letters. That derivation suits the matter here, for the sparks of lust come from promiscuous association. This is illustrated in Clement of Alexandria, Paedagogus book 3, chapter 2, and book 2, chapter 7. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 366)

(g) ‹constabellant› · call in col 656

Scintillas conflabellant. Codex Agob. Flagellant, non spernenda lectione: quamvis ipse Tertullianus adversus Valentinianos, dixerit, Ignem inflabellatum corporibus. Scintillas autem absistere oculis dixit Virgilius; et absistendo quasi flagellant. Rig.

They fan the sparks. The Agobard codex: "flagellant" (lash), a reading not to be despised, although Tertullian himself, Against the Valentinians, said "fire fanned into bodies". Virgil said that sparks leap from the eyes; and in leaping they as it were lash. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 366)

(h) ‹tragoedo vociferante› · call in col 656

Sed tragoedo vociferante. Studium fuit tragi- (continues)

But while the tragic actor bawls. It was the aim of the tragi[c actors] (continues)

(printed under page 366)

Page

  • running head: TERTULLIANI 656
  • marginal letters: A aut congruens Dei servis; B Nemo in castra hostium; C retractabit, et inter effoeminati; D stands in the Commentarius area
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:657
ille dicturus est repercutiendum non esse (Matth. V)? Poterit et de misericordia moneri defixus in morsus ursorum et spongias retiariorum? Avertat Deus a suis tantam voluptatis exitiosae cupiditatem. Quale est enim de Ecclesia Dei in diaboli Ecclesiam tendere? de coelo (quod aiunt) in coenum? illas manus quas ad Dominum extuleris, postmodum laudando histrionem fatigare? ex ore quo amen in Sanctum protuleris, gladiatori testimonium reddere, εἰς αἰῶνας ἀπ' αἰῶνος alii omnino dicere nisi Deo Christo?
will he say that one is not to strike back (Matt. 5)? Will he be able to be admonished about mercy while fixed on the bites of bears and the sponges of the net-fighters? May God turn away from His own so great a desire for a ruinous pleasure. For what sort of thing is it to go from the Church of God into the church of the devil? from heaven (as they say) into the mire? to tire out in applauding an actor those hands which you have raised to the Lord? from the mouth with which you have uttered "amen" to the Holy One, to give testimony to a gladiator, to say "for ages from age" to any other at all except to God Christ?
CAPUT XXVI.
CHAPTER XXVI.
Cur ergo non ejusmodi etiam daemoniis penetrabiles fiant? Nam et exemplum accidit, Domino teste, ejus mulieris quae theatrum adiit, et inde cum daemonio rediit. Itaque in exorcismo cum oneraretur immundus spiritus, quod ausus esset fidelem aggredi: constanter et justissime quidem (inquit) feci, in meo eam inveni. Constat et alii linteum in somnis ostensum ejus diei nocte, qua tragoedum audierat, cum exprobratione nominato tragoedo, nec ultra quintum diem eam mulierem in saeculo fuisse. Quot utique et alia documenta cesserunt de his qui cum diabolo apud spectacula communicando a Domino exciderunt. Nemo enim potest duobus
Why then should not such people also become open to demons? For there is indeed the example which occurred, the Lord being witness, of that woman who went to the theatre and came back from there with a demon. And so in the exorcism, when the unclean spirit was being charged with having dared to attack a believer, "And quite rightly," it said, "I did it, for I found her in my own place." It is also well established that to another woman a linen sheet was shown in her sleep on the night of the day on which she had heard a tragic actor, with a reproach in which the tragic actor was named, and that this woman was not in the world beyond the fifth day. How many other proofs indeed have there been in the case of those who, by communing with the devil at the shows, have fallen away from the Lord! For no one can [serve] two
Editors' notes and page, col. 657

Footnotes

<!-- Calls (1) and (a)–(e) fall above the part of the page shown in the images; anchors not visible, columns inferred from print order. --> LECTIONES VARIANTES (printed under page 367)

(1) · call in col 657

Ἀπ' αἰῶνος abest Rig.

Rigault lacks "from eternity" (ἀπ' αἰῶνος).

(printed under page 367)

(a) · call in col 657

Spongias retiariorum. Spongias dicit retia sic apta certamini, ut effusa in adversarium sese expanderent, confestimque contracta sic prehensum attraherent, non ut vivus caperetur, sed ut retiarii fulcina seu tridente confoderetur. Tale forte an fuit rete quo Pittacus Phrynona Pancratiasten singulari certamine involutum correptumque interfecit. Σπόγγον Graeci dixere παρὰ τὸ σπᾶν, et σφόγγον, quod propius accedit ad verbum σφίγγειν, utrumque retiariorum certamini conveniens. Nam sunt retiarii σπαστικοὶ πρὸς αὐτούς. — Spongias retiariorum. Mitto quae Rigaltius adduxit. Retiarii spongiis uti solebant ad extergendum sanguinem e vulneribus defluentem. Le Pr.

The net-fighters' sponges. He calls "sponges" the nets so fitted for the fight that, cast at the opponent, they spread out, and at once drawn tight they dragged in the man so caught, not to take him alive but to have him run through with the net-fighter's fork or trident. Perhaps such was the net with which Pittacus, in single combat, entangled, seized and killed Phrynon the pancratiast. The Greeks said σπόγγος from σπᾶν (to draw), and σφόγγος, which comes nearer the verb σφίγγειν (to bind tight), both suiting the net-fighters' contest. For the net-fighters "draw" their men towards them. — The net-fighters' sponges. I pass over what Rigault adduced. The net-fighters used to use sponges to wipe off the blood flowing from their wounds. Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 367)

(b) · call in col 657

Quale est enim de Ecclesia Dei. Etiam ad saeculum Augustini durasse istam perversitatem testatur sanctissimi viri gravis querela in psal. 39: Quantis turbis implentur Ecclesiae, stipantur parietes, pressuris se urgent, prope se suffocant multitudine. Rursus ab eis ipsis, si mimus est, curritur ad amphitheatrum. Et in psal. 50: Si forte in ipso Circo aliqua ex caussa expavescant, continuo se signant, et stant illic portantes in fronte, unde abcederent, si hoc in corde portarent. Rig.

For what sort of thing is it, from the Church of God. That this perversity lasted even to Augustine's age is attested by the grave complaint of that most holy man on Psalm 39: "With what crowds the churches are filled, the walls packed; they press on one another in the crush, they nearly suffocate one another with their numbers. And again, if there is a mime-show, these same people run to the amphitheatre." And on Psalm 50: "If by chance in the Circus itself they take fright for some reason, at once they sign themselves, and stand there carrying on their foreheads that which, if they carried it in their hearts, would make them leave." Rig[ault].

(printed under page 367)

(c) · call in col 657

Illas manus quas ad Deum extuleris. Dolet, eas manus quae sublatae ad Deum, occupari rei idololatricae. Eadem querela magni Athanasii Apolog. adversus gentes, ubi dolet membra dicata Deo, inservire idolorum obsequio, interque alia adducit etiam manus quae factae εἰς ἔκτασιν τῆς πρὸς τὸν Θεὸν εὐχῆς. Putant aliqui verba Tertulliani (in his est Stephanus Dur. de ritib. eccl.) capienda esse de manuum sublatione ad adorandum corpus Christi, cum in missa attollitur. Lac.

Those hands which you have lifted up to God. He grieves that the hands lifted up to God are busied with an idolatrous business. The same complaint is in the great Athanasius, Apology against the Gentiles, where he grieves that members dedicated to God serve the worship of idols, and among other things he mentions also the hands, which were made "for stretching out in prayer to God". Some think (among them Stephanus Durantus, On the Rites of the Church) that Tertullian's words are to be taken of the raising of the hands to adore the body of Christ when it is lifted up at Mass. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 367)

(d) · call in col 657

Ex ore quo amen in Sanctum protuleris. Sanctum intellige, mysterium, sacramentum, Corpus Domini. Etenim Fidelis quisque oblatam sibi a praeside eucharistiae buccellam cum his verbis, CORPUS CHRISTI, accipiens dicebat, AMEN, quod est, Fiat. Augustinus Sermone ad infantes de Sacram.: Si ergo vos estis corpus Christi et membra, mysterium vestrum in mensa Domini positum est: mysterium Domini accipitis. Ad id quod estis, Amen respondetis, et respondendo subscribitis. Audis ergo, CORPUS CHRISTI, et respondes, AMEN. Esto membrum corporis Christi, ut verum sit Amen. Ambrosius lib. IV de Sacram. cap. 5. Dicit tibi sacerdos, CORPUS CHRISTI, et tu dicis AMEN, hoc est Verum. Quod confitetur lingua, teneat affectus. Cornelius Episcopus Rom. in illa epistola quae refertur ab Eusebio lib. V Hist. eccl. cap. 31. jure notavit sacrilegam Novati mentem, eo quod ab suarum partium fratribus Eucharistiam accipientibus, pro formula solemni, qua porrigenti sacramentum, dicentique corpus Christi respondebatur, Amen, jusjurandum adversus Pontificem Rom. exigit. ἀντὶ τοῦ εἰπεῖν λαμβάνοντα τὸν ἄρτον ἐκεῖνον, τὸ ἀμήν. Rig.

From the mouth with which you have uttered Amen over the Holy Thing. By "the Holy Thing" understand the mystery, the sacrament, the Body of the Lord. For each of the faithful, receiving the morsel offered him by the president of the eucharist with the words THE BODY OF CHRIST, used to say AMEN, that is, So be it. Augustine, Sermon to the newly baptized on the Sacrament: "If then you are the body of Christ and its members, your mystery is laid on the Lord's table: you receive the mystery of the Lord. To that which you are, you answer Amen, and by answering you sign your name to it. You hear, then, THE BODY OF CHRIST, and you answer AMEN. Be a member of the body of Christ, so that the Amen may be true." Ambrose, On the Sacraments book 4, chapter 5: "The priest says to you, THE BODY OF CHRIST, and you say AMEN, that is, It is true. What the tongue confesses, let the heart hold." Cornelius, bishop of Rome, in the letter reported by Eusebius, Church History book 5 [sic], chapter 31, rightly branded the sacrilegious mind of Novatus, in that from the brethren of his party, when they received the Eucharist, in place of the solemn formula by which Amen was answered to the one who held out the sacrament and said "the body of Christ", he exacted an oath against the Roman pontiff: "instead of saying, as he took that bread, the Amen". Rig[ault].

(printed under page 367)

(e) · call in col 657

ΕΙΣ ΑΙΩΝΑΣ ΑΠ' ΑΙΩΝΟΜ. In cod. Agobardi tantum legitur, ΕΙΣ ΑΠ' ΑΙΩΝΟΣ. alii omnino dicere, nisi Deo et Christo. Notat Tertullianus quod acclamatum fuisse Commodo Narrat Dio, ΝΙΚΑΣ ΝΙΚΗΣΕΙΣ ΑΠ' ΑΙΩΝΟΣ. lib. lxxii. Rig.

"UNTO AGES FROM ETERNITY" [the print has ΑΙΩΝΟΜ for ΑΙΩΝΟΣ]. In the Agobard codex is read only "ΕΙΣ ΑΠ' ΑΙΩΝΟΣ". [The words] "to say it at all to another, except to God and Christ" [follow in the text]. Tertullian notes what Dio, book 72, relates was acclaimed to Commodus: "YOU CONQUER, YOU WILL CONQUER, FROM ETERNITY." Rig[ault].

(printed under page 367)

(f) ‹mulieris› · call in col 657

CAP. XXVI. — Ejus mulieris. Exemplum istud laudatissimum atque omnium vulgo in ore. Suspicarer hic mulierem illam a daemone obsessam, quod forsan inconsulto aut renitente marito adiverit spectacula. Caussa enim ista erit repudii, ut legitur lib. 5. C. tit. 17. de Repudiis. Le Pr.

Chapter 26. — Of that woman. This example is very famous and in everyone's mouth. I should suspect here that the woman was possessed by a demon because she perhaps went to the shows without consulting her husband, or against his will. For that is a ground for divorce, as is read in the Code, book 5, title 17, On Divorces. Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 367)

Page

  • running head: 657 LIBER DE SPECTACULIS. (right half of the head cut off in the image; column 658's number not visible)
  • marginal letters: A ille dicturus est repercutiendum (letter printed in the gutter on this line); B teste, ejus mulieris; C corum vastissime loqui (commentary); D sanguinem e vulneribus / (b) Quale est (commentary)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:658
dominis servire (Matt., VI; II Cor. VI; Eccl., XXXIII). Quid luci cum tenebris? quid vitae et morti?
masters (Matt. 6; 2 Cor. 6; Ecclus. 33). What has light to do with darkness? what has life to do with death?
CAPUT XXVII.
CHAPTER XXVII.
Odisse debemus istos conventus et coetus ethnicorum, vel quod illic nomen Dei blasphematur, illic quotidiani in nos leones expostulantur, inde persecutiones decernuntur, inde tentationes emittuntur. Quid facies in illo suffragiorum impiorum aestuario deprehensus, non quasi aliquid illic pati possis ab hominibus, nemo te cognoscit christianum, sed recogita quid de te fiat in coelo. Dubitas enim illo momento, quo in diaboli Ecclesia fueris, omnes angelos prospicere de coelo, et singulos denotare, quis blasphemiam dixerit, quis audierit, quis linguam, quis aures diabolo adversus Deum administraverit? (Ps. I). Non ergo fugies sedilia hostium Christi, illam cathedram pestilentiarum, ipsumque aerem, qui desuper incubat, scelestis vocibus constupratum? Sint dulcia licet et grata et simplicia, etiam honesta quaedam. Nemo venenum temperat felle et elleboro, sed conditis pulmentis et bene saporatis, et plurimum dulcibus id mali injicit: ita et diabolus letale quod conficit, rebus Dei gratissimis et acceptissimis imbuit. Omnia illic seu fortia, seu honesta, seu sonora, seu canora, seu subtilia, proinde habe ac si stillicidia
We ought to hate those assemblies and gatherings of the heathen, if only because there the name of God is blasphemed, there daily lions are demanded against us, from there persecutions are decreed, from there temptations are sent out. What will you do if you are caught in that surging tide of impious votes? Not that you could suffer anything there from men — no one recognizes you as a Christian — but consider what becomes of you in heaven. For do you doubt that at that moment when you are in the church of the devil all the angels look forth from heaven and mark each one, who has spoken blasphemy, who has listened to it, who has lent his tongue, who his ears, to the devil against God (Ps. 1)? Will you not then flee the seats of the enemies of Christ, that chair of pestilences, and the very air that broods above it, defiled by wicked cries? Granted that some things there are sweet and pleasing and simple, even honourable. No one mixes poison with gall and hellebore, but puts that evil into seasoned and well-flavoured dishes, and mostly into sweet ones: so too the devil steeps the deadly thing he prepares in the things of God most pleasing and most acceptable. Everything there, whether brave or honourable, whether sonorous or melodious or subtle, regard just as if it were drops
Editors' notes and page, col. 658

Footnotes

(2) ‹fueris› · call in col 658

Quo diabolus in Ecclesiam furit Cod. Wouw. Rig.

Wouwer's codex, Rigault: "quo diabolus in Ecclesiam furit" (in which the devil rages against the Church).

(printed under page 367)

(3) ‹pestilentiarum› · call in col 658

Pestilentiarum Fran.

Franeker [edition]: "pestilentiarum" [the print reads "Pestilentiariam", apparently for this].

COMMENTARIUS

(continued) · note (h) of page 366

corum vastissime loqui et vociferanter. Illustrat Heraldus in Arnobium, lib. 7. ex Crantore, qui apud Diogenem dicebat tragoedos habere vocem ἀπελέκητον. Ex Demosthene qui Aeschini objicit φωνασκίας ἐπίδειξιν. Nam Aeschines histrioniam exercuerat. Lac.

[It was the aim of the tragi]c actors to speak as hugely and loudly as possible. Herald illustrates this in his notes on Arnobius, book 7, from Crantor, who in Diogenes [Laertius] said that tragic actors have an "unhewn" voice; and from Demosthenes, who reproaches Aeschines with "a display of voice-training". For Aeschines had practised acting. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 367)

Page

  • running head: DE SPECTACULIS. 658 (left part of the head belongs to column 657)
  • marginal letters: A bus dominis servire; B aures diabolo adversus Deum; C tione ad adorandum corpus (commentary); D quae refertur ab Eusebio (commentary)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:659
mellis de ranunculo venenato: nec tanti gulam facias voluptatis, quanti periculum per suavitatem.
of honey from a poisoned little frog; and do not value the gullet of pleasure so much as the danger [that comes] through its sweetness.
CAPUT XXVIII.
CHAPTER XXVIII.
Saginentur ejusmodi dulcibus convivae sui, et loca et tempora et invitator ipsorum est. Nostrae coenae, nostrae nuptiae nondum sunt, non possumus cum illis discumbere, quia nec illi nobiscum. Vicibus disposita res est. Nunc illi laetantur, nos conflictamur (Joan., XVI). Saeculum (inquit) gaudebit, vos tristes eritis. Lugeamus ergo dum ethnici gaudent, ut quum lugere coeperint, gaudeamus, ne pariter nunc gaudentes, tunc quoque pariter lugeamus. Delicatus es, christiane, si et in saeculo voluptatem concupiscis, imo nimium stultus, si hoc existimas voluptatem. Philosophi quidam hoc nomen quieti et tranquillitati dederunt, in ea gaudent, in ea avocantur, in ea etiam gloriantur. Tu mihi metas et scenas et pulverem et arenas suspiras. Dicas velim; non possumus vivere sine voluptate, qui mori cum voluptate debebimus? Nam quod est aliud votum nostrum, quam quod et Apostoli, exire de saeculo, et recipi apud Dominum (Phil. I)? Hic voluptas, ubi et votum.
Let its own guests be fattened on sweets of that kind; the places and the times and the host are theirs. Our banquets, our wedding feasts, are not yet; we cannot recline at table with them, for neither can they with us. The matter is arranged by turns. Now they rejoice, we are afflicted (John 16). The world, He says, will rejoice; you will be sorrowful. Let us mourn, then, while the heathen rejoice, so that when they begin to mourn we may rejoice; lest, rejoicing alike now, we should then too mourn alike. You are fastidious, Christian, if you long for pleasure even in the world; nay, exceedingly foolish, if you reckon this to be pleasure. Certain philosophers have given this name to quiet and tranquillity; in it they rejoice, in it they find diversion, in it they even glory. You, I find, sigh for turning-posts and stages and dust and arenas. I should like you to tell me: can we not live without pleasure, we who ought to die with pleasure? For what other wish is ours than that of the Apostle too, to go out of the world and to be received with the Lord (Phil. 1)? Here is pleasure, where also is the wish.
CAPUT XXIX.
CHAPTER XXIX.
Jam nunc si putas delectamentis exigere spatium hoc, cur tam ingratus es, ut tot et tales voluptates a Deo contributas tibi satis non habeas, neque recognoscas? Quid enim jucundius, quam Dei patris et domini reconciliatio, quam veritatis revelatio, quam errorum recognitio, quam tantorum retro criminum venia? Quae major voluptas, quam fastidium ipsius voluptatis, quam saeculi totius
Now then, if you think you must pass this span in delights, why are you so ungrateful as not to hold sufficient, nor to acknowledge, so many and such great pleasures bestowed on you by God? For what is more delightful than reconciliation with God, Father and Lord, than the revelation of the truth, than the recognition of errors, than pardon for such great crimes in the past? What greater pleasure than disdain for pleasure itself, than [contempt] of the whole world
Editors' notes and page, col. 659

Footnotes

<!-- Calls (1), (4), (5), (a), (b) fall above the part of the page shown in the images; anchors not visible, columns inferred from print order. --> LECTIONES VARIANTES (printed under page 368)

(1) · call in col 659

Libacunculo Fran. lucunculo Jun.

Franeker [edition]: "libacunculo"; Junius: "lucunculo".

(printed under page 368)

(2) ‹quidam› · call in col 659

Quidem Fran.

Franeker [edition]: "quidem".

(printed under page 368)

(3) ‹putas› · call in col 659

Nunc puta Rig.

Rigault: "nunc puta".

(printed under page 368)

(4) · call in col 659

Martyrum Rig.

Rigault: "martyrum".

(printed under page 368)

(a) · call in col 659

Stillicidia mellis de ranunculo venenato. Ut si quis favum mellis una cum ranae rubetae pulmonibus exprimat: nam inde confusa veneno mella stillabunt; mella quidem, sed venenata. Rig.

Drops of honey from a poisoned little frog. As if someone were to squeeze a honeycomb together with the lungs of a toad: for then honey mixed with poison will drip from it; honey indeed, but poisoned. Rig[ault].

(printed under page 368)

(b) · call in col 659

De ranunculo venenato. Juvenalis, in primo, Quae molle Calenum Porrectura viro miscet sitiente rubetam; Et in vii: At nunc res agitur tenui pulmone rubetae; Et in tertia: Ranarum viscera nunquam Inspexi. Rig. — De ranunculo venenato. Ita legit ex veteri cod. Joannes Wover. Putat Junius legendum lucunculum, vox enim ista a lucuns derivaretur, essetque lucunculus ὑποκοριστικὸν verbum; et quoddam saccarati tragematis et bellarii genus; de quo Afranius fratriis: Pistori navat, cur non scriblitario? Ut mittat fratris filio lucunculos. Quae in hanc vocem annotavit La Cerda, levia sunt, si ea eximas quae habentur apud doctissimum Turnebum lib. XVIII Adv. cap. 20. Le Pr.

From a poisoned little frog. Juvenal, in the first [satire]: "who, about to offer her husband mellow Calenian wine, mixes a toad into it for him when he is thirsty"; and in the seventh: "But now the business is done with a toad's slender lung"; and in the third: "I have never inspected the entrails of frogs." Rig[ault]. — From a poisoned little frog. So Jan van Wouwer reads from an old codex. Junius thinks "lucunculum" should be read, for that word would derive from "lucuns", and "lucunculus" would be a diminutive, and a kind of sugared sweetmeat and dessert; of which Afranius in the Fratriae: "He works for the baker; why not for the pastry-cook? To send his brother's son little cakes." What La Cerda noted on this word is slight, if you take away what is in the most learned Turnebus, Adversaria book 18, chapter 20. Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 368)

(c) ‹Philosophi quidam› · call in col 659

CAP. XXVIII. — Philosophi quidam. Epicureos tangit, qui in voluptate summum bonum reponebant. Le Pr.

Chapter 28. — Certain philosophers. He touches the Epicureans, who placed the highest good in pleasure. Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 368)

(d) ‹metas› · call in col 659

Tu mihi metas. Septem metis, inquit Cassiodorus variar. lect. lib. III. c. 51, omne certamen peragitur, in similitudinem hebdomadis reciprocae. Ipsae vero metae secundum Zodiacos decanos ternas obtinent summitates, quas ad instar solis celeres quadrigae pervagantur. Pam.

You, to me, the turning-posts. "Every race," says Cassiodorus, Variae book 3, chapter 51, "is run in seven laps round the turning-posts, in the likeness of the returning week. The posts themselves, after the decans of the Zodiac, have three peaks each, round which the swift four-horse chariots range like the sun." Pam[elius].

(printed under page 368)

Page

  • running head: 659 TERTULLIANI (rest of the head cut off in the image)
  • marginal letters: A dia mellis de ranunculo; B voluptatem. Philosophi quidam; C quam Dei patris et domini reconciliatio; D Et in vii / At nunc res agitur (commentary)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:660
contemptus, quam vera libertas, quam conscientia integra, quam vita sufficiens, quam mortis timor nullus; quod calcas deos nationum, quod daemonia expellis, quod medicinas facis, quod revelationes petis, quod Deo vivis? Hae voluptates, haec spectacula christianorum, sancta, perpetua, gratuita: in his tibi ludos Circenses interpretare, cursus saeculi intuere, tempora labentia, spatia dinumera, metas consummationis exspecta, societates Ecclesiarum defende, ad signum Dei suscitare, ad tubam angeli erigere, ad martyrii palmas gloriare. Si scenicae doctrinae delectant, satis nobis litterarum est, satis versuum est, satis sententiarum, satis etiam canticorum, satis vocum; nec fabulae, sed veritates; nec strophae, sed simplicitates. Vis et pugillatus et luctatus? praesto sunt, non parva, sed multa. Adspice impudicitiam dejectam a castitate, perfidiam caesam a fide, saevitiam a misericordia contusam, petulantiam a modestia obumbratam, et tales sunt apud nos agones, in quibus ipsi coronamur. Vis autem et sanguinis et aliquid? habes Christi.
contempt, than true liberty, than a whole conscience, than a sufficient life, than no fear of death; that you trample on the gods of the nations, that you cast out demons, that you work cures, that you seek revelations, that you live to God? These are the pleasures, these the shows of Christians, holy, everlasting, free of charge. In these interpret for yourself the Circensian games: watch the courses of the world, the seasons gliding by; count the laps; look for the turning-posts of the consummation; defend the companies of the Churches; be roused at the signal of God; be stirred up at the trumpet of the angel; glory in the palms of martyrdom. If the learning of the stage delights you, we have enough of letters, enough of verses, enough of maxims, enough also of songs, enough of voices; and not fables, but truths; not artful strophes, but simplicities. Do you want boxing and wrestling too? They are at hand, not small, but many. Behold unchastity thrown down by chastity, faithlessness slain by faith, cruelty crushed by mercy, wantonness overshadowed by modesty; and such are the contests among us, in which we ourselves are crowned. But do you want something of blood too? You have Christ's.
CAPUT XXX.
CHAPTER XXX.
Quale autem spectaculum in proximo est adventus Domini jam indubitati, jam superbi, jam triumphantis! Quae illa exsultatio angelorum, quae gloria resurgentium sanctorum! quale regnum exinde justorum! qualis civitas nova Hierusalem! At enim supersunt alia spectacula, ille ultimus et perpetuus judicii dies, ille nationibus insperatus, ille derisus, cum tanta saeculi vetustas, et tot ejus nativitates uno igni haurientur. Quae tunc spectaculi latitudo! quid admirer? quid rideam? ubi gaudeam, ubi exsultem, spectans tot ac tantos reges, qui in
But what a spectacle is close at hand: the coming of the Lord, now beyond doubt, now exalted, now triumphant! What is that exultation of the angels, what the glory of the saints rising again! What a kingdom of the just thereafter! What a city, the new Jerusalem! But indeed other spectacles remain: that last and everlasting day of judgement, unlooked-for by the nations, derided by them, when so great an antiquity of the world and its so many generations will be swallowed up in one fire. What breadth of spectacle then! What shall I wonder at? what shall I laugh at? where shall I rejoice, where exult, as I behold so many and such great kings, who
Editors' notes and page, col. 660

Footnotes

(4) ‹martyrii› · call in col 660

Martyrum Rig.

Rigault: "martyrum".

(printed under page 368)

(5) · call in col 660

Scientiae Rig.

Rigault: "scientiae".

(printed under page 368)

(6) ‹multa› · call in col 660

Non pauca simul Rigalt.

Rigault: "non pauca simul".

(printed under page 368)

(7) ‹obumbratam› · call in col 660

Adumbratam Par. Rig.

Paris [edition], Rigault: "adumbratam".

(printed under page 368)

(8) ‹reges› · call in col 660

Tot spectans reges Rig.

Rigault: "tot spectans reges".

COMMENTARIUS (printed under page 368)

(e) · call in col 660

CAP. XXIX. — Circenses ludos. Quae ad circum spectabant, hic egregie accommodat ad mores christianorum. Le Pr.

Chapter 29. — The circus games. What belonged to the circus he here applies admirably to the conduct of Christians. Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 368)

(f) ‹strophae› · call in col 660

Nec strophae. Explico technas et fraudes, sed cum respectu ad strophas et odas histrioniae, quibus oppositae antistrophae et antodae. Sed ut dixi hic fraudes sunt, et ita etiam accipit hunc locum Carolus Pasch. lib. I de Cor. cap. 11. Lac.

Nor twists. I explain it as tricks and deceits, but with regard to the strophes and odes of the actors' art, to which antistrophes and antodes are opposed. But, as I said, here they are deceits, and Charles Paschal too so takes this passage, On Crowns book 1, chapter 11. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 368)

(g) ‹coronamur› · call in col 660

Ipsi coronamur. Quis nescit coronas gymnicas stadii? imo de his unis dictae coronae κατ' ἐξοχήν. Id persequi otiosum, imo putidum. Inde Hieronymus 2. in Jovin. dum quaerit verborum consecutiones, luctatoribus dat coronas, ad eum modum quo navigantibus portum, et pugnantibus triumphum. Lac.

We ourselves are crowned. Who does not know the athletic crowns of the stadium? Indeed, of these alone "crowns" were said par excellence. To pursue it is idle, even tiresome. Hence Jerome, Against Jovinian 2, in seeking a sequence of words, gives crowns to wrestlers, as he gives harbour to sailors and triumph to fighters. Lac[erda].

(printed under page 368)

(h) ‹aliquid› · call in col 660

Vis autem et sanguinis aliquid? Cruentis voluptatibus et spectaculis opponit Christi Domini sanguinem pro recuperanda nostrum omnium salute effusum. Le Pr.

But do you want something of blood too? Against bloody pleasures and shows he sets the blood of Christ the Lord, poured out to recover the salvation of us all. Le Pr[ieur].

(printed under page 368)

(i) ‹Hierusalem› · call in col 660

CAP. XXX. — Qualis civitas nova Jerusalem? Istud fortassis ad errorem Millenariorum pertinet, quemadmodum et illud quod subjicit, de tot saeculi nativitatibus. Pam.

Chapter 30. — What a city, the new Jerusalem? This perhaps belongs to the error of the Millenarians, as does what he adds, about the world's so many generations. Pam[elius].

(printed under page 368)

(j) ‹latitudo› · call in col 660

Quae tunc spectaculi latitudo. Quot et quanta (continues)

What a breadth of spectacle then! How many and how great (continues)

(printed under page 368)

Page

  • running head: TERTULLIANI 660 (left part of the head belongs to column 659)
  • marginal letters: A contemptus, quam vera libertas; B luctatus? praesto sunt; C risus, cum tanta saeculi; D (f) Nec strophae (commentary)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:661
coelum recepti nuntiabantur, cum ipso Jove et ipsis suis testibus in imis tenebris congemiscentes? item praesides, persecutores dominici nominis, saevioribus, quam ipsi contra christianos saevierunt, flammis insultantibus, liquescentes? praeterea sapientes illos philosophos coram discipulis suis una conflagrantibus erubescentes, quibus nihil ad Deum pertinere suadebant, quibus animas aut nullas, aut non in pristina corpora redituras affirmabant, etiam poetas non ad Rhadamanti, nec ad Minois, sed ad inopinati Christi tribunal palpitantes? Tunc magis tragoedi audiendi, magis scilicet vocales in sua propria calamitate. Tunc histriones cognoscendi solutiores multo per ignem: tunc spectandus auriga in flammea rota totus rubens: tunc xystici contemplandi non in gymnasiis, sed in igne jaculati, nisi quod nec tunc quidem illos velim visos, ut qui
[who] were announced as received into heaven, groaning in the lowest darkness together with Jove himself and with their very witnesses? Likewise governors, persecutors of the Lord's name, melting in flames fiercer than those with which they themselves raged against the Christians, as the flames leap over them? Besides, those wise philosophers blushing before their disciples as they burn together with them, the disciples whom they persuaded that nothing pertains to God, to whom they affirmed that souls are either nothing or will not return into their former bodies; the poets too, trembling not before the tribunal of Rhadamanthus nor of Minos, but of the unexpected Christ? Then the tragedians will be the more worth hearing, more vocal, that is, in their own calamity. Then the actors will be worth recognizing, much more loose-limbed through the fire; then the charioteer will be worth watching, red all over on a flaming wheel; then the athletes will be worth contemplating, hurled not in the gymnasia but in the fire; except that not even then would I wish to have looked at them, as one who
Editors' notes and page, col. 661

Footnotes

NOTE: these notes belong to the end of De spectaculis, which closes at the head of this page; De idololatria begins below them. Lectiones variantes, then Commentarius. [LECTIONES VARIANTES] (printed under page 369)

(1) ‹rota totus rubens› · call in col 661

Rubes Rig.

Rubes (red): Rigault.

(printed under page 369)

(2) ‹anchor not visible› · call in col 661

Quaestuarii Fran.

Quaestuarii (of a woman who makes money [by her body]): Franeker edition.

(printed under page 369)

(a) ‹anchor not visible› · call in col 661

In caelum recepti. Indicat gentilicas apotheoses: illustre exemplum est in Herodiano loquente de Severo, qui vixit aevo Tertulliani. Justinus Mart. apolog. 2. sane in Augusti funere, ac postea Drusillae idem fuisse affirmatum a viris ordinis Senatorii, constat ex Suetonio et Dione. Lac.

Taken up into heaven. He points to the pagan apotheoses: a famous example is in Herodian, speaking of Severus, who lived in Tertullian's own time. Justin Martyr, Apology 2. Certainly at the funeral of Augustus, and afterwards of Drusilla, the same was affirmed by men of the senatorial order, as is plain from Suetonius and Dio. La Cerda.

(printed under page 369)

(b) ‹anchor not visible› · call in col 661

Una conflagrantibus. Hoc malum canit gentilibus, qui putabant non esse resurrectionem. Non sic est : resurgetis, sed ad poenam. Lac.

Burning together. He sings this evil to the pagans, who thought there was no resurrection. It is not so: you will rise again, but to punishment. La Cerda.

(printed under page 369)

(c) ‹histriones … solutiores› · call in col 661

Histriones solutiores multo per ignem. Soluti histriones, quia mollitia et lascivia effeminati, ac pene ultra foeminam fluentes. Solutiores vero per ignem, membris ustulatione liquescentibus. Rig.

Actors far more loose-limbed in the fire. Actors are "loose" because they are made womanish by softness and wantonness, and flow, almost beyond a woman. "Looser" indeed in the fire, their limbs melting in the scorching. Rigault.

(printed under page 369)

(d) ‹rota totus rubens› · call in col 661

Auriga in flammea rota totus ruber. Alludit ad agitatorum factionem Russatam. Ric.

The charioteer all red on a fiery wheel. He alludes to the Red faction of the charioteers. Rigault.

(printed under page 369)

(e) ‹non in gymnasiis› · call in col 661

Non in gymnasiis. Gymnici ludi locus, inquit Isid. lib. 18. cap. 17. gymnasium dicebatur, ubi exercebantur athletae, et cursorum velocitas comprobabatur : ita dictum, quod juvenes nudi exercerentur. Hinc accidit ut omnium prope artium exercitia gymnasia dicantur. Pam.

Not in the gymnasia. The place of the gymnastic games, says Isidore, book 18, chapter 17, was called the gymnasium, where athletes were trained and the speed of runners was tested: so called because the young men trained naked. Hence it came about that the exercises of almost all the arts are called gymnasia. Pamelius.

(printed under page 369)

Page

  • running head: 661 LIBER DE IDOLOLATRIA. (page head spanning cols 661–662, as printed, though the column still holds De spectaculis)
  • marginal letters: A ‹coelum recepti nuntiabantur›; B ‹flammea rota totus rubens›; C (beside the commentary, not the text); D (beside the Argumentum of De idololatria, not set)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 1:662
malim ad eos potius conspectum insatiabilem conferre, qui in Dominum desaevierunt. Hic est ille (dicam) fabri aut quaestuariae filius, sabbati destructor, Samarites et daemonium habens. Hic est quem a Juda redemistis, hic est ille arundine et colaphis diverberatus, sputamentis dedecoratus, felle et aceto potatus. Hic est quem clam discentes subripuerunt, ut resurrexisse dicatur, vel hortulanus detraxit, ne lactucae suae frequentia commeantium laederentur. Ut talia spectes, ut talibus exsultes, quis tibi praetor aut consul, aut quaestor, aut sacerdos de sua liberalitate praestabit? et tamen haec jam quodammodo habemus per fidem spiritu imaginante repraesentata. Caeterum qualia illa sunt quae nec oculus vidit, nec auris audivit, nec in cor hominis ascenderunt? Credo, circo et utraque cavea et omni stadio gratiora.
would rather turn an insatiable gaze upon those who raged against the Lord. "This," I shall say, "is that son of a carpenter or of a harlot, the destroyer of the sabbath, the Samaritan and the one who has a demon. This is He whom you bought from Judas; this is He who was beaten with a reed and with blows, defiled with spittle, given gall and vinegar to drink. This is He whom His disciples stole away secretly, so that it might be said He had risen, or whom the gardener removed, lest his lettuces be damaged by the crowd of those coming and going." That you may behold such things, that you may exult in such things, what praetor or consul or quaestor or priest will furnish them to you from his own liberality? And yet these things we already have in some measure, made present by faith through the imagining spirit. But what are those things which eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor have they ascended into the heart of man (1 Cor. 2:9)? More pleasing, I believe, than the circus and both the theatre's tiers and every stadium.
Editors' notes and page, col. 662

Footnotes

(3) ‹laederentur› · call in col 662

Adlaederentur Rig.

Adlaederentur (should be harmed): Rigault.

[COMMENTARIUS]

(continued) · col 661

occurrent in illo spectaculo consideranda! Rig.

...will meet the eye to be considered in that spectacle! Rigault.

(printed under page 369)

(f) ‹filius› · call in col 662

Fabri aut Quaestuariae filius. Hieronymus Epist. ad Heliodorum : Hic est ille operarii et quaestuariae filius. Haec fuere Judaeorum in sanctissimam et immaculatam Virginem convicia, flammis luenda sulphuratissimis. Satanica hujusmodi leguntur apud Theodoritum lib. III, cap. 11. Felicis sub Juliano Caesare Gazae praepositi, ἰδοὺ ἐν τόιοις σκεύεσιν ὑπηρετεῖται ὁ Μαρίας υἱὸς, quod historia Tripertita latine reddit : Ecce quibus vasis Mariae filio ministratur? Apud eumdem scriptorem, ubi de Hormisdae martyrio agitur, tyrannus ait, Nega filium fabri. Rig. — Fabri aut quaestuariae filius. Non possum libenter assentiri huic Rigaltii lectioni, neque etiam alteri quam ex Hieronymo adducit in ambobus locis Lacerda, quaestuarii. Nam diu est quod annotarunt eruditi jurisconsulti quaestuariam esse, quae lucrum aut quaestum facit corpore, sic in Glossario quaestuaria πρακτικὴ πόρνη. Le Pr.

The son of a carpenter or of a woman who sells herself. Jerome, Letter to Heliodorus: "This is that son of a workman and of a woman who sells herself." These were the Jews' insults against the most holy and immaculate Virgin, to be paid for in the most sulphurous flames. Satanic words of this kind are read in Theodoret, book III, chapter 11, of Felix, the governor of Gaza under Julian Caesar: "See with what vessels the son of Mary is served!", which the Tripartite History renders in Latin: "Behold with what vessels the son of Mary is ministered to?" In the same writer, where the martyrdom of Hormisdas is treated, the tyrant says: "Deny the son of the carpenter." Rigault. — The son of a carpenter or of a woman who sells herself. I cannot willingly agree with this reading of Rigault's, nor with the other which La Cerda adduces from Jerome in both places, quaestuarii. For learned jurists long ago noted that a quaestuaria is a woman who makes gain or profit with her body; so in the Glossary quaestuaria is "a working harlot." Le Prieur.

(printed under page 369)

(g) ‹detraxit› · call in col 662

Vel hortulanus detraxit. Ironia haec videtur irridere aliquem illorum haereticorum, qui Christum vere passum negant, Marcionem nempe, Cerdonem ejus magistrum, et ante eos Basilidem, et Simonem Magum. Pam.

Or the gardener took Him away. This irony seems to mock one of those heretics who deny that Christ truly suffered: Marcion, namely, Cerdo his master, and before them Basilides and Simon Magus. Pamelius.

(printed under page 369)

(h) ‹laederentur› · call in col 662

Ne lactucae suae frequentia commeantium adlaederentur. Ideoque in locis sacris aedificandis, quae apud antiquos in confinio fere, ubi trium vel quatuor possessionum terminatio conveniret, constitui solebant, unusquisque possessor donabat certum modum sacro illi ex agro suo, et quantum donasset scripto faciebat; ut per diem solemnitatis, privatorum agri nullam molestiam inculcantis populi sustinerent. Notat Aggenus ad lib. Frontini de Limitib. agror. Ric.

Lest his lettuces be damaged by the crowd of people passing by. And for this reason, in building sacred places, which among the ancients were usually set on a boundary, where the limits of three or four estates met, each owner gave a fixed measure of his land to that shrine, and recorded in writing how much he had given; so that on the feast day the private owners' fields should suffer no harm from the trampling crowd. So Aggenus notes on Frontinus's book On the Boundaries of Fields. Rigault.

(printed under page 369)

Page

  • running head: 662 LIBER DE IDOLOLATRIA. (page head spanning cols 661–662, as printed)
  • marginal letters: A ‹malim ad eos potius›; B ‹vidit, nec auris audivit›; C (beside the commentary, not the text); D (beside the Argumentum of De idololatria, not set)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)