Migne Reading Room

PL 194 · cols. 1827–1832

Isaac of Stella, Sermons

Sermons XLI–XLII

PL 194:1827
humanitas inseparabilis personali copula adhaesit, et a delectatione et amore Verbi nullo peregrino amore anima ad punctum abscessit. Vixit itaque mortuus, qui obiit vivus: in uno eodemque tempore vivus et mortuus. Vixit ex virtute humanitas cum divinitate: vixit ex charitate cum Dei Verbo anima rationalis. Mortua est sola separatione animae caro; et ejus receptione sola resurrexit.
the humanity clung, inseparable, by a personal bond, and the soul did not for an instant depart, through any foreign love, from delight in and love of the Word. He therefore lived when dead, who died living: at one and the same time living and dead. The humanity lived with the divinity by virtue: the rational soul lived with the Word of God by love. The flesh alone died, by the separation of the soul; and by its return the flesh alone rose again.
Si ergo, dilectissimi, consurrexistis in anima interim sola cum Christo resurgente in carne sola, quae sursum sunt quaerite, intentione et desiderio animae, ubi Christus est in dextera Dei sedens, etiam corpore (Coloss. III, 1). Multi enim, quae sursum sunt, quaerunt deorsum, quales sunt, qui dignitatem et gratiam, sufficientiam et delectationem quaerunt in terrenis. Isti sunt, qui statuerunt oculos suos declinare in terram, quaerentes summa in imis. Alii autem quae deorsum sunt, quaerunt sursum; id est in virtute vanam gloriam, in sapientia jactantiam, in veritate curiositatem, ad extremum in studio spirituali, et habitu religioso emolumentum aliquod temporale, vel laudis, vel dignitatis, vel pecuniae, vel licentiosae libertatis. Alii, quae deorsum sunt, quaerunt deorsum, terrena videlicet in terrenis, et in carnalibus carnalia; qui omnes omnino quae super terram sunt sapiunt, et non quae sursum. Alii vero quae sursum sunt quaerunt sursum, id est in veris vera, in spiritualibus spiritualia, in coelestibus coelestia, et in divinis divina, sapientes quae Dei sunt, et in novitate vitae ambulantes, complantati similitudini mortis Christi, dum peccato et carni et mundo mortui sunt, configurati resurrectioni Christi, dum alienati a prioris corruptelae, et sensualitatis vita, in carne quodammodo supra carnem degunt, consedentes quoque cum eo in coelestibus, dum eorum requies et conversatio in coelis est, et conregnantes illi, dum omnia sua ad spiritualem profectum deservire compellunt. Praeterea, qui coelestem remunerationem quaerunt in actibus terrenis, profecto laudabiliter summa quaerunt in imis, sicut reprehensibiliter ima in summis, qui terrenum in spiritualibus. Minus quidem ab his reprehensibiliter agant, qui ima quaerunt in imis; omnium vero laudabilius, qui summa in summis, quae est, dilectissimi, professio, et propositum nostrum. Quod in nobis adimplere dignetur is, cujus resurrectionem colimus et imitamur, quoad possumus: sine quo nihil, et in quo omnia possumus, Christus Dominus: qui cum Patre et Spiritu sancto vivit et regnat Deus, per omnia saecula saeculorum. Amen.
If, then, dearly beloved, you have risen, for the present in the soul alone, together with Christ who rose in the flesh alone, seek the things that are above, by the intention and desire of the soul, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God, even in the body (Col. 3:1). For many seek below the things that are above: such are those who seek dignity and favour, sufficiency and delight, in earthly things. These are they who have set their eyes to bend down to the earth, seeking the highest things in the lowest. Others, again, seek above the things that are below; that is, vainglory in virtue, boasting in wisdom, curiosity in truth, and finally, in spiritual study and the religious habit, some temporal gain, whether of praise, or of dignity, or of money, or of licentious liberty. Others seek below the things that are below, namely earthly things in earthly things, and carnal things in carnal; who all mind entirely the things that are upon the earth, and not those that are above. Others, however, seek above the things that are above, that is, true things in true, spiritual in spiritual, heavenly in heavenly, and divine in divine, minding the things of God and walking in newness of life, planted together in the likeness of Christ's death, while they are dead to sin and the flesh and the world, conformed to Christ's resurrection, while, estranged from the life of their former corruption and of sensuality, they live in the flesh in a certain manner above the flesh, sitting together with Him also in the heavenly places, while their rest and their conversation is in heaven, and reigning together with Him, while they compel all that is theirs to serve their spiritual progress. Further, those who seek a heavenly reward in earthly actions are surely praiseworthy in seeking the highest things in the lowest, just as those are blameworthy who seek the lowest in the highest, who [seek] what is earthly in spiritual things. Less blameworthily than these, indeed, do they act who seek the lowest things in the lowest; but most praiseworthily of all those who [seek] the highest in the highest, which, dearly beloved, is our profession and our purpose. May He deign to fulfil this in us, whose resurrection we celebrate and imitate as far as we can: without whom we can do nothing, and in whom we can do all things, Christ the Lord: who with the Father and the Holy Spirit lives and reigns, God, for ever and ever. Amen.
SERMO XLI. IN EODEM FESTO II.
SERMON XLI. ON THE SAME FEAST II
Dominus dixit ad me: Filius meus es tu, ego hodie genui te (Psal. II). Quaeritis, charissimi, quare beatus Paulus, cum de resurrectione loqueretur, hujus versiculi testimonio usus sit: quippe
The Lord said to me: You are My Son, today I have begotten you (Ps. 2:7). You ask, dearest ones, why blessed Paul, when he was speaking of the resurrection, used the testimony of this little verse: since
Editors' notes and page, col. 1827

Page

  • running head: 1827 ISAAC DE STEL[LA …] (right part of the head cut off in the image)
  • marginal letters: A ‹nitati humanitas inseparabilis›; B ‹gnitatem et gratiam, sufficientiam›; C ‹tualia, in coelestibus coelestia›; D ‹in imis; omnium vero laudabilius›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column opens mid-word "nitati" (completing "divi-" at the foot of col. 1826: divinitati). "agant" read so (could be "agunt"): check. "Alii ,quae" printed with the comma after a space; set "Alii, quae". Column ends mid-sentence.
PL 194:1828
qui magis natali quam resurrectioni congruere videtur. Nos autem ipsam resurrectionem natale dicere non dubitamus, maxime quia a Salvatore eam dici regenerationem non ignoramus. Si enim regeneratio dicitur resurrectio prima, quae est animae, cur non regeneratio dicetur et secunda, quae est corporis? Resurrectio itaque Christi cum non possit esse nisi una, resurrectionum tamen nostrarum, quae duae sunt, primam significat, teste eodem Apostolo ubi ait: Quemadmodum Christus surrexit a mortuis per gloriam Patris, ita et nos in novitate vitae ambulemus (Rom. VI). Secundam initiat, unde et dicitur primitiae dormientium Christus. Sunt itaque hominum tres quodammodo nativitates, duae resurrectiones. Nascimur enim homines de hominibus per homines carnaliter, caro de carne: quae nativitas ubi resurrectio dicatur, non occurrit. Renascimur de Deo dii per spiritum spiritualiter, ubi quod nascitur de spiritu, spiritus est; et haec est resurrectio prima, nativitas secunda: regenerabimur autem de corruptis incorruptibiles, de mortuis immortales, de terrae pulvere in coelestem qualitatem: quae est nativitas tertia, resurrectio secunda. Primam nativitatem ignoravit Christus, secundam suscepit de Virgine, tertiam de sepulcro. Quales enim renascimur de fonte, talis natus est Christus ex Virgine: qualis regeneratus est Christus de tumulo, tales renascemur in futuro. Et hic est status, ad quem factus est homo: nec antea erit homo consummatus, donec perficiatur in eo, ad quod fuit inchoatus. Tunc enim generatus proprie dicetur, cum fuerit pergeneratus; tunc factus, quando completus. Interim vero duabus primis nativitatibus generatur et fit, qui in tertia tantum generatus est, et factus. Unde in die resurrectionis suae congrue ac subtiliter dicitur genitus Christus, tanquam in die perfectionis et consummationis suae pergenitus. Unde et ipse dicit: Hodie et cras sanitates perficio, et tertia die consummor (Luc. XIII).
it seems to fit a birthday better than a resurrection. But we do not hesitate to call the resurrection itself a birth, above all because we are not unaware that the Saviour calls it a regeneration. For if the first resurrection, which is of the soul, is called regeneration, why should the second too, which is of the body, not be called regeneration? So the resurrection of Christ, though it can be only one, yet signifies the first of our resurrections, which are two, as the same Apostle witnesses where he says: As Christ rose from the dead through the glory of the Father, so we too may walk in newness of life (Rom. 6:4). The second it begins, and hence Christ is also called the first-fruits of those who sleep. There are, then, in a certain manner three births of men, and two resurrections. For we are born as men from men through men in the flesh, flesh from flesh: and nowhere do we find this birth called a resurrection. We are reborn from God as gods through the Spirit spiritually, where what is born of the Spirit is spirit; and this is the first resurrection, the second birth: but we shall be regenerated from corruptible to incorruptible, from mortal to immortal, from the dust of the earth to a heavenly quality: which is the third birth, the second resurrection. The first birth Christ did not know; the second He received from the Virgin, the third from the tomb. For such as we are reborn from the font, such was Christ born of the Virgin: such as Christ was regenerated from the tomb, such shall we be reborn in the world to come. And this is the state for which man was made: nor will man be consummated until that is perfected in him for which he was begun. For then will he properly be said to be begotten, when he has been fully begotten; then made, when completed. Meanwhile, in the first two births he is being begotten and made, who in the third alone has been begotten and made. Hence on the day of His resurrection Christ is fittingly and subtly said to be begotten, as being fully begotten on the day of His perfection and consummation. Hence He Himself also says: Today and tomorrow I accomplish cures, and on the third day I am consummated (Luke 13:32).
Sicut igitur primo homini, antequam nasceretur, praeparaverat Deus, unde sustentaretur: sic secundo, antequam renasceretur, ⟨p⟩raeformavit, quo pasceretur. Ideo ante resurrectionem suam unicam, quae figura est nostrae primae, et exemplum secundae, die videlicet calicis, panem et vinum vertit in sacramentum corporis sui et sanguinis. Sicut enim de vetere homine novum hominem creavit, ita et de veteris cibo veteri novo homini escam novam transformavit. Ecce, inquit, nova facio omnia (Apoc. XXI). Nova creatura, nova esca; nova vita, nova nativitas; nova mors, nova resurrectio. Sicut enim primum homo factus in animam viventem necesse habet alimonia, ne cadat a vita, sed per eam sustentetur, et crescat, ac corroboretur in ea, non ut aliam vitam sumat per alimoniam, sed ne pereat ab ipsa per indigentiam: sola enim anima vitam dare potest, sed sola retinere non potest. Sic et nova creatura in Christo, antequam perficiatur secunda
As, then, for the first man, before he was born, God had prepared that by which he should be sustained: so for the second, before he was reborn, He fashioned beforehand that by which he should be fed. Therefore before His one resurrection, which is the figure of our first and the pattern of our second, namely on the day of the cup, He turned bread and wine into the sacrament of His body and blood. For as from the old man He created the new man, so too from the old food of the old [man] He transformed new food for the new man. Behold, He says, I make all things new (Rev. 21:5). A new creature, new food; a new life, a new birth; a new death, a new resurrection. For as man, first made a living soul, has need of nourishment, lest he fall from life, but that through it he may be sustained, and grow, and be strengthened in it, not that he may take another life through nourishment, but that he may not perish from it through want: for the soul alone can give life, but alone it cannot keep it. So too the new creature in Christ, before it is perfected by the second
Editors' notes and page, col. 1828

Page

  • running head: [IS]AAC DE STELLA 1828 (left part of the head cut off in the image)
  • marginal letters: A ‹qui magis natali quam resurrectioni›; B ‹nibus per homines carnaliter›; C ‹homo consummatus, donec perficiatur›; D ‹quae figura est nostrae primae›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column ends with the word split "se-"; set whole here as "secunda" (completion "cunda" read at the top of col. 1829), and the English ends "by the second", continued in col. 1829. "⟨p⟩raeformavit": the first letter is damaged (a comma-like mark stands before it), read as praeformavit after praeparaverat. "die videlicet calicis" and "necesse habet alimonia" set as printed.
PL 194:1829
resurrectione in spiritum vivificantem, post primam regenerationem opus habet alimonia, qua vivat in ea, et crescat, ac corroboretur, qua regenerata est vita, non ut post baptismi gratiam, aliam sumat vitam, sed ne per indigentiam perdat acceptam. Ad eamdem enim vitam regeneramur et pascimur sacramentis diversis, in qua tamen non perficimur, donec tertio nascamur in spiritum vivificantem, in quem natus est, sive factus de sepulcro Christus, sicut ait Apostolus: Secundus homo factus est in spiritum vivificantem (I Cor. XV). Tunc enim immediate ac sufficienter vivet de anima sola caro tota; immediate ac perfecte de Deo solo anima tota, ubi nec caro indiga erit alimentis, nec anima sacramentis. Tunc vere, secure et plene audituri sunt, quotquot filii Dei sunt: Filius meus es tu, quia ego hodie genui te, quia pergenui te. In principio inchoavi, ubi dictum est: Fecit Deus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem suam (Genes. I). In medio reparavi: unde dictum est: In medio annorum vivifica illud (Habac. III). In tertio consummavi, unde dictum est hic: Ego hodie genui te. Hodie talem te genui in statu tertio, propter quem te creavi in primo, et vivificavi in secundo. Primo creavi in animam viventem, secundo reformavi in Spiritum vivificantem, tertio consummavi in Spiritum vivificantem, qui carnem vivificet sine alimento, et ipse de facie mea vivat sine sacramento. Haec est gratia, hic fructus resurrectionis secundae, in qua partem nemo habebit, qui non fuerit particeps primae: particeps vero esse non poterit resurrectionis, nisi qui fuerit mortis: mortis quoque esse non poterit, qui non fuerit passionis. Si ergo compatimur, et commorimur, conresurgemus, et conregnabimus. Quod ipse praestare dignetur, qui vivit et regnat Deus per omnia saecula saeculorum. Amen.
resurrection into a life-giving spirit, after the first regeneration has need of nourishment, by which it may live, and grow, and be strengthened in that life by which it was regenerated: not that after the grace of baptism it should take up another life, but that it may not through want lose the life it has received. For we are regenerated and fed for the same life by diverse sacraments, and yet we are not perfected in it until we are born a third time into a life-giving spirit, into which Christ was born, or made, from the tomb, as the Apostle says: The second man was made a life-giving spirit (1 Cor. 15:45). For then the whole flesh will live immediately and sufficiently from the soul alone, and the whole soul immediately and perfectly from God alone, where neither will the flesh be in need of food, nor the soul of sacraments. Then truly, securely and fully, all who are sons of God shall hear: You are my son, for today I have begotten you, for I have fully begotten you. In the beginning I began [you], where it is said: God made man to His image and likeness (Gen. 1:26). In the middle I repaired [you]: whence it is said: In the midst of the years bring it to life (Hab. 3:2). In the third I consummated [you], whence it is said here: Today I have begotten you. Today I have begotten you such in the third state, for the sake of which I created you in the first, and gave you life in the second. In the first I created you into a living soul, in the second I re-formed you into a life-giving Spirit, in the third I consummated you into a life-giving Spirit, which is to give life to the flesh without food, and is itself to live from my face without sacrament. This is the grace, this the fruit of the second resurrection, in which no one will have part who has not been a partaker of the first: but no one can be a partaker of the resurrection unless he has been [a partaker] of death; nor can he be [a partaker] of death who has not been [a partaker] of the passion. If, then, we suffer with [Him] and die with [Him], we shall rise with [Him] and reign with [Him]. May He Himself deign to grant this, Who lives and reigns, God, for ever and ever. Amen.
SERMO XLII. SERMO IN ASCENSIONE DOMINI.
SERMON XLII. SERMON ON THE ASCENSION OF THE LORD.
Nemo ascendit in coelum, nisi qui descendit de coelo, Filius hominis, qui est in coelo (Joan. III). Haec sunt, fratres mei, illa coelestia ad credendum difficilia, ad intelligendum difficiliora, ad explicandum difficillima. Si terrena, inquit coelicus Magister, dixi vobis, et non creditis; quomodo si coelestia dixero vobis, credetis? Coelestis coelestia subtiliter loquitur; et terrenus terrena tarde credit; et qui magister potest esse carnalium, coelesti diciplinatui non sufficit. Nobis vero, dilectissimi, quibus olim conversatio in coelis est, coelestia non debent esse incognita. Ignominiosum, quippe nimis est, ea ignorare in quibus habitas; stultum autem, habitare ubi ignoras. Filium igitur hominis familiari humiliatione seipsum designat. Solus enim Dei Filius de coelo descendit, propria tam voluntate, quam potestate: unde diabolus pulsus cecidit, bonus angelus praelatae potestati parens ad tempus recedit. Sed quomodo Filius hominis inde
No one has ascended into heaven, except He who descended from heaven, the Son of man, Who is in heaven (John 3:13). These, my brothers, are those heavenly things that are hard to believe, harder to understand, hardest to explain. If I have told you earthly things, says the heavenly Master, and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you heavenly things? The heavenly one speaks heavenly things subtly; and the earthly one is slow to believe even earthly things; and he who can be a master of the carnal is not equal to a heavenly schooling. But to us, dearly beloved, whose conversation has long been in the heavens, heavenly things ought not to be unknown. For it is exceedingly shameful to be ignorant of the things in which you dwell; and foolish to dwell where you are ignorant. He designates Himself, therefore, Son of man, by a familiar humbling. For the Son of God alone descended from heaven, by His own will as much as by His own power: from which [place] the devil, driven out, fell; the good angel, obedient to the power set over him, withdraws for a time. But how did the Son of man descend from thence,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1829

Page

  • running head: 1829 SERMONES. SERMO XLII. IN A[SCENSIONE DOMINI] (right part of the head cut off in the image)
  • marginal letters: A ‹cunda resurrectione in spiritum vivificantem›; B ‹dituri sunt, quotquot filii Dei sunt›; C ‹surrectionis secundae, in qua partem nemo habe-›; D ‹candum difficillima. Si terrena›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: the column opens with "cunda", the end of "se-cunda" split from col. 1828, set whole there. Sermo XLI ends in this column (to "Amen."); the earlier import began only at the Sermo XLII heading and lacked it. "diciplinatui" (Q8): the page breaks the word "di-" / "ciplinatui"; the second half clearly reads -ciplinatui (p followed by l), not -cipulatui, and no s is visible before the break, so set as printed (for disciplinatui). UNSURE whether a faint s stands at the line end: check at higher zoom.
PL 194:1830
descendit, ubi nullus hominum unquam fuit? Nunquid Filius hominis non homo? Tametsi non filius hominis omnis homo, omnis tamen filius hominis homo. Quomodo ergo Filius hominis inde descendit, ubi nec natus est, nec adhuc ascendit? An fortasse sic natus est in coelo filius hominis, quemadmodum Dei Filius in terra: sic ubique corporalis filius hominis, quomodo alicubi illocalis Filius Dei; sic temporalis aeternus, quomodo aeternus temporalis? Sed esto, quae mira sunt, ideo mira sunt, quia unus idemque ante se et post se, prior ac posterior seipso: minor quoque et major, factus a se, factor sui, servus ac Dominus; unus idemque est Deus et homo: una persona, duae naturae; vel potius in duabus naturis tres substantiae. Secundum hominem ascendit Deus, qui secundum Deum descendit homo. Filius hominis, qui secundum Dei Filium simul est in coelo, et in terra, omnino ubique, ac veraciter nusquam, Deus homo, totum hoc exigit personalis unionis admirabilis ratio; ac coelestis coelestibus coelestia, tanquam spiritualibus spiritualia, vel etiam divinis divina comparans, haec omnia dijudicat. Veruntamen, quae utilitas descensionis Filii Dei, si singularitas est ascensionis ejusdem filii hominis, aut ubi nos positurus est, qui postpositis omnibus eum arctius sequimur? Qui infernum fugimus, mundum contemnimus, quo ituri sumus, si in coelum non ascendimus? In coelum vero nemo ascendit, nisi qui de coelo descendit?
where no man has ever been? Is the Son of man not a man? Although not every man is a son of man, yet every son of man is a man. How then did the Son of man descend from thence, where He was neither born nor had yet ascended? Or perhaps was the son of man born in heaven in the same way as the Son of God on earth: the son of man, [though] bodily, everywhere, just as the Son of God, [though] not bound to place, somewhere; the temporal [one] eternal, just as the eternal temporal? But be it so: the things that are wonderful are wonderful for this reason, that one and the same is before Himself and after Himself, prior and posterior to Himself: lesser also and greater, made by Himself, His own maker, servant and Lord; one and the same is God and man: one person, two natures; or rather in two natures three substances. According to the man God ascended, Who according to God descended [as] man. That the Son of man, Who according to the Son of God is at once in heaven and on earth, altogether everywhere, and truly nowhere, is God [and] man: all this the admirable principle of the personal union demands; and the heavenly [man], comparing heavenly things with heavenly, as spiritual things with spiritual, or even divine things with divine, discerns all these things. Yet what is the profit of the descent of the Son of God, if the ascension of the same son of man is a singular one, or where is He going to place us, who, having set all things aside, follow Him the more closely? We who flee hell, who despise the world, where are we to go, if we do not ascend into heaven? But no one ascends into heaven except He who descended from heaven?
Itaque aut, inde descendimus, et adhuc ibi sumus, et Filius ille hominis ibi sumus; aut nequaquam eo ascendemus, et ubi volumus, esse non possumus: et sic certe miserabiliores omnibus hominibus facti sumus. Veruntamen, dilectissimi, vim verborum, et libertatem spiritus in eloquio divino attendentibus facile occurrit, Filium hominis aut Filium Dei, aut Verbum Patris, aut Christum, aut si quo simili sermone designatur is, qui ista loquitur coelestia, non simplicem habere rationem, nec secundum uniformem acceptionem pronuntiari. Dicitur enim Christus aliquando ipsa simplex natura quae nec coepit, nec desinit, nec mutari, et moveri potest; quae de solo Patre cum Patre, in Patre: nec ipse qui Pater, nec aliud quam Pater, semper est: juxta quod loquens ipse Judaeis dicit: Principium qui et loquor vobis (Joan. VIII). Et alibi: Ego et Pater unum sumus (Joan. X). Ipse etenim Filius Dei et homo sic sunt unus, non unum, quemadmodum ipse et Pater unum, non unus. Hic duae naturae, una persona, ibi duae personae, natura una. Similiter quoque: Antequam Abraham fieret ego sum (Joan. VIII); et alia sexcenta, quae nisi propter hunc sensum vera esse non possunt, et ad proprietatem superioris naturae pertinent, licet indifferenter de ipso, qui superior, ut diximus, et inferior est seipso, pronuntientur. E regione autem his ipsis nonnunquam designatur, quae nisi pro inferiori natura pronuntiari veraciter nequaquam possunt de persona
Therefore either we have descended from thence, and are still there, and are that Son of man there; or we shall by no means ascend thither, and cannot be where we wish: and so we have surely been made more wretched than all men. Yet, dearly beloved, to those who attend to the force of the words and the freedom of the spirit in the divine utterance it readily appears that the Son of man, or the Son of God, or the Word of the Father, or Christ, or by whatever like term He is designated Who speaks these heavenly things, does not have a simple meaning, nor is spoken of according to a uniform acceptation. For Christ is sometimes called that simple nature itself which neither began nor ceases, nor can be changed or moved; which, from the Father alone, is with the Father, in the Father: neither itself He Who is the Father, nor other than the Father, it always is: according to which He Himself, speaking to the Jews, says: The Beginning, who also speak to you (John 8:25). And elsewhere: I and the Father are one (John 10:30). For the Son of God Himself and the man are thus one [person], not one [thing], just as He and the Father are one [thing], not one [person]. Here two natures, one person; there two persons, one nature. So likewise: Before Abraham was made, I am (John 8:58); and six hundred other things, which cannot be true except in this sense, and belong to the property of the higher nature, although they are said without distinction of Him Who, as we have said, is both higher and lower than Himself. Over against these, however, He is sometimes designated by those things which can in no way truly be said of the person except with respect to the lower nature,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1830

Page

  • running head: [SER]MO XLII. IN ASCENSIONE DOMINI. 1830 (left part of the head cut off in the image)
  • marginal letters: A ‹descendit, ubi nullus hominum›; B ‹Secundum hominem ascendit Deus›; C ‹coelo descendit?›; D ‹Patre: nec ipse qui Pater›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 194:1831
utpote minoratio paulominus ab angelis, et nativitas temporalis et similia. Nonnulla quoque pro anima sola, et nonnulla pro carne sola; aliqua autem pro utraque simul, id est humanitate tota, sed sola dicuntur; aliqua vero pro tota simul Christi persona, id est divinitate simul et humanitate, ut cum mediator ab Apostolo dicitur Dei et hominum, homo Christus Jesus: Mediator siquidem nisi ex utroque inter utrumque esse non potest. Sed in his omnibus quid emolumenti miseris hominibus, si sic descendit de coelo hominis illius divinitas, ut cum illa sola ascendat Dei illius humanitas? Unde et cogimur aliam adhuc ex his quae posita sunt, elicere intelligentiam, ubi Christi, vel Filii hominis nuncupatione non solum totus, aut pro parte, vel partibus, Christus, sicut supra positum est, intelligatur: ipse denique de coelo olim increpans persecutorem, ait: Saule, Saule, quid me persequeris? (Act. IX.) qui dicturus est aliquando: Infirmus fui, et visitastis me (Matth. XXV). Et haec qua ratione, nisi propter unitatem sponsi et sponsae, vel capitis et corporis? Sicuti unius hominis caput et corpus, ipse unus homo, sic Filius ille Virginis, et electa ejus membra, ipse unus homo et unus hominis filius. Totus, inquit Scriptura, et integer Christus caput et corpus, siquidem omnia simul membra unum corpus, quod cum suo capite unus hominis filius, qui cum Dei Filio unus Dei Filius, qui et ipse cum Deo unus Deus. Ergo et totum corpus cum capite hominis filius et Dei Filius, et Deus. Unde est et illud: Volo, Pater, ut sicut ego et tu unum sumus, ita et isti unum sint nobiscum (Joan. XVII).
such as the being made a little less than the angels, and the temporal birth, and the like. Some things, too, [are said] with respect to the soul alone, and some with respect to the flesh alone; some, however, with respect to both at once, that is, to the whole humanity, but alone; and some with respect to the whole person of Christ at once, that is, to the divinity together with the humanity, as when the Apostle calls Him mediator of God and men, the man Christ Jesus: for a Mediator cannot be between both unless He be of both. But in all these, what gain is there for wretched men, if the divinity of that man so descended from heaven that with it alone the humanity of that God ascends? Whence we are compelled to draw yet another understanding out of what has been set down, in which by the name of Christ, or of the Son of man, is understood not only the whole Christ, or [Christ] with respect to a part, or parts, as was set down above: He, in short, Who once, rebuking the persecutor from heaven, says: Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me? (Acts 9:4), [and] Who will one day say: I was sick, and you visited me (Matt. 25:36). And on what principle are these [said], unless on account of the unity of bridegroom and bride, or of head and body? Just as the head and body of one man are the one man himself, so that Son of the Virgin and His chosen members are the one man Himself and the one son of man. The whole and entire Christ, says Scripture, is head and body, since all the members together are one body, which with its head is one son of man, which with the Son of God is one Son of God, Who Himself also with God is one God. Therefore the whole body also, with the head, is son of man and Son of God, and God. Whence is that saying also: I will, Father, that as I and Thou are one, so these also may be one with us (John 17:21–22).
Itaque secundum hunc in Scripturis sensum celebrem, nec sine capite corpus, nec sine corpore caput; nec sine Deo caput et corpus totus Christus. Caput siquidem mulieris vir, caput viri Christus, caput Christi Deus. Caput igitur, mediante viro, mulieris Christus; caput viri, mediante Christo, Deus. Caput ergo mulieris, viri, et Christi, Deus. Itaque et omnia cum Deo unus Deus; sed Filius Dei cum Deo naturaliter, et cum ipso Filius hominis personaliter, cum quo suum corpus sacramentaliter. Solus itaque descendit de coelo Filius hominis propter divinitatem, sed non totus, propter humanitatem, qui solus et totus ascendit, propter capitis ac corporis unitatem. Nemo ergo ascendit, nisi ille solus et totus, qui descendit solus, et non totus. Si quando pauper pascitur, Christus pascitur, quomodo quando pauper ascendit, Christus non ascendit? Quod Deus conjunxit, homo non separet (Matth. XIX). Sacramentum hoc parvum est in viro, et femina, magnum autem in Christo et in Ecclesia. Quomodo ergo, si loqui posset pes meus, sicut lingua, hoc diceret, quod dicit lingua: Ego videlicet sum Isaac, sic fidelia et rationabilia Christi membra dicere se veraciter possunt hoc, quod est ipse, etiam Dei Filium, ac Deum. Sed quod ipse natura, hoc ipsa consortio; quod ipse plenitudine, hoc ipsa participatione; denique quod Dei Filius generatione,
Therefore, according to this sense, much frequented in the Scriptures, neither is there a body without a head, nor a head without a body; nor is the whole Christ, head and body, without God. For the head of the woman is the man, the head of the man is Christ, the head of Christ is God. The head of the woman, then, by the mediation of the man, is Christ; the head of the man, by the mediation of Christ, is God. Therefore the head of the woman, of the man, and of Christ, is God. And so all things too, with God, are one God; but the Son of God with God by nature, and with Him the Son of man personally, [and] with Him His body sacramentally. Alone, therefore, the Son of man descended from heaven by reason of the divinity, but not whole, by reason of the humanity; Who ascended alone and whole, by reason of the unity of head and body. No one therefore ascends, except He alone and whole, Who descended alone, and not whole. If, whenever a poor man is fed, Christ is fed, how, when a poor man ascends, does Christ not ascend? What God has joined together, let not man put asunder (Matt. 19:6). This sacrament is small in man and woman, but great in Christ and in the Church. As, therefore, if my foot could speak as the tongue does, it would say what the tongue says, namely, I am Isaac, so the faithful and rational members of Christ can truly say that they are what He is, even Son of God, and God. But what He is by nature, they are by fellowship; what He is in fullness, they are by participation; in short, what the Son of God is by generation,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1831

Page

  • running head: 1831 ISAAC DE STELL[A] (right part of the head cut off in the image)
  • marginal letters: A ‹utpote minoratio paulominus›; B ‹partibus, Christus, sicut supra›; C ‹est et illud: Volo, Pater›; D ‹humanitatem, qui solus et totus ascendit›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 194:1832
hoc ejus membra non solum constitutione, ut Moyses deus Pharaonis (Exod. VII), aut tantum nuncupatione, ut dii multi, et domini multi (I Cor. VIII), sed adoptione, sicut scriptum est: Accepistis spiritum adoptionis filiorum, in quo clamamus, Abba, Pater (Rom. VIII). Juxta quem spiritum dedit eis potestatem filios Dei fieri, ut selectim doceantur ab eo qui primogenitus est in multis fratribus, dicere: Pater noster, qui es in coelis (Matth. VI). Et alibi: Ascendo ad Patrem meum, et Patrem vestrum, etc. (Joan. XX). Cum enim omnium sit communis Pater et Deus conditione, noster tamen specialis est gratuita adoptione, qui et ipsius Unigeniti singulari generatione.
this His members are, not only by appointment, as Moses was the god of Pharaoh (Exod. 7:1), or merely by name, as there are many gods and many lords (1 Cor. 8:5), but by adoption, as it is written: You have received the spirit of adoption of sons, in which we cry, Abba, Father (Rom. 8:15). According to which spirit He gave them power to become sons of God, so that they are taught, as a chosen few, by Him Who is the firstborn among many brothers, to say: Our Father, Who art in heaven (Matt. 6:9). And elsewhere: I ascend to my Father and your Father, etc. (John 20:17). For while He is the common Father and God of all by creation, yet He is ours in a special way by free adoption, as He is also [Father] of the Only-begotten Himself by a singular generation.
Generatio itaque sui, nativitas Christi, secundum quod a principio Dei Filius est, et secundum quod in fine Filius est hominis, et in mysterio caput et corpus unus Christus est, trina quodam modo intelligatur, necesse est. Prima igitur de Patre sine matre, secunda de matre sine patre, tertia secundum substantiam nec de patre nec de matre, secundum vero sacramentum de Deo Patre per Spiritum sanctum, et de Ecclesia virgine matre. Quo enim spiritu de utero Virginis natus est hominis Filius caput nostrum, eo renascimur de fonte baptismatis, filii Dei, corpus suum. Et sicut ille absque omni peccato, sic et nos in remissionem omnium peccatorum. Sicut enim totius corporis omnia peccata super lignum in corpore carnis portavit, sic spirituali corpori, ut nullum ei peccatum imputetur, per regenerationis gratiam donavit, sicut scriptum est: Beatus vir, cui non imputavit Dominus peccatum (Psal. XXXI). Beatus iste vir Christus procul dubio est, qui secundum quod caput Christi Deus est, peccata remittit: cui, secundum quod caput corporis homo unus est, nihil remittitur; secundum vero quod capitis corpus plures, nihil imputatur. Justus in seipso, et justificans seipsum ipse. Solus Salvator, solus salvatus; solus ascendens, solus descendens; qui dona cum Patre tribuit, quae in hominibus ipse accepit. Accepisti, inquit, dona in hominibus (Psal. LXVII); qui in corpore suo super lignum pertulit, quod de corpore suo per aquam abstulit. Iterum per lignum et aquam salvans, Agnus Dei, qui tollit quae pertulit peccata mundi; sacerdos et sacrificium, et Deus, qui se sibi offerens, se per se sibi, sicut Patri, et Spiritui sancto, reconciliavit. Prima ergo nativitas aeterna, ubi nascitur de Deo Deus; qualis Pater, talis Filius. Secunda temporalis, et brevis, ubi nascitur de homine homo; qualis mater, talis filius. Tertia temporalis et longa, ubi quod nascitur de spiritu spiritus est; sicut quod nascitur de Deo Deus est, et quod nascitur de carne caro est. Ista ergo Christi nativitas, vel vita, vel mors, vel resurrectio, vel ascensio, inchoata quidem, sed necdum completa est. Cum primo justo inchoatur, et cum extremo consummatur; per omne vero medium actitatur, sicut eleganter ait quis: Sub Noe, sub David, sub
The generation of Him, therefore, the nativity of Christ, according as from the beginning He is the Son of God, and according as at the end He is the Son of man, and [as] in the mystery head and body are one Christ, must needs be understood as in a certain manner threefold. The first, then, is of the Father without a mother; the second of a mother without a father; the third, according to substance, neither of father nor of mother, but according to the sacrament, of God the Father through the Holy Spirit, and of the Church, the virgin mother. For by the Spirit by which the Son of man, our head, was born of the womb of the Virgin, by that same [Spirit] are we, the sons of God, His body, reborn of the font of baptism. And as He [was born] without any sin, so we too [are reborn] unto the remission of all sins. For as He bore upon the wood, in the body of His flesh, all the sins of the whole body, so to the spiritual body, that no sin may be imputed to it, He has granted this through the grace of regeneration, as it is written: Blessed is the man to whom the Lord has not imputed sin (Ps. 31:2). This blessed man is without doubt Christ, Who, according as the head of Christ is God, remits sins: to Whom, according as the head of the body is one man, nothing is remitted; but according as the body of the head is many, nothing is imputed. Just in Himself, and Himself justifying Himself. Alone the Saviour, alone the saved; alone ascending, alone descending; Who with the Father bestows the gifts which He Himself received in men. Thou hast received, it says, gifts in men (Ps. 67:19); Who bore in His body upon the wood what He took away from His body through water. Saving again through wood and water, the Lamb of God, Who takes away the sins of the world which He bore; priest and sacrifice, and God, Who, offering Himself to Himself, reconciled Himself through Himself to Himself, as to the Father and to the Holy Spirit. The first nativity, then, is eternal, where God is born of God; such as the Father, such the Son. The second temporal and brief, where man is born of man; such as the mother, such the son. The third temporal and long, where that which is born of the spirit is spirit; as that which is born of God is God, and that which is born of the flesh is flesh. This nativity of Christ, then, or life, or death, or resurrection, or ascension, is indeed begun, but not yet completed. It is begun with the first just man, and it is consummated with the last; and through every [age] between it is carried on, as someone elegantly says: Under Noah, under David, under
Editors' notes and page, col. 1832

Page

  • running head: [IS]AAC DE STELLA 1832 (left part of the head cut off in the image)
  • marginal letters: A ‹hoc ejus membra non solum›; B ‹quod a principio Dei Filius est›; C ‹tur, per regenerationis gratiam›; D ‹Agnus Dei, qui tollit›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)