Quasi aliquid utile quis unquam sine invidia scripserit; aut praesumptionis possis argui, qui monachus abbati parueris. Praecipio itaque in nomine Jesu Christi, et in Spiritu Dei nostri, quatenus ea quae tibi diuturna meditatione nota sunt, de excellentia charitatis, de fructu ejus, de ordine ejus, stylo adnotare non differas, ut et quid sit charitas, ⟨et⟩ quanta in ejus posessione habeatur dulcedo, quanta in cupiditate, quae ei contraria est, sentiatur oppressio; quam non ipsam dulcedinem charitatis minuat, ut quidam putant, sed potius augeat, hominis exterioris afflictio; postremo qualis in ejus exhibitione sit habenda discretio, in ipso opere tuo, quasi in quodam speculo agnoscamus. Verum, ut pudori tuo parcatur, haec ipsa epistola in fronte operis praefigatur, ut quidquid in Speculo charitatis (hoc enim libro nomen imponimus), lectori displicuerit, non tibi, qui parueris, sed mihi, qui invitum coegerim, imputetur. Vale in Christo, dilecte frater.
As if anyone ever wrote anything useful without envy; or as if you could be charged with presumption, who as a monk have obeyed your abbot. I command therefore in the name of Jesus Christ, and in the Spirit of our God, that you do not delay to set down with the pen those things which are known to you by daily meditation concerning the excellence of charity, its fruit and its order, so that we may recognize in your very work, as in a kind of mirror, both what charity is, and how great a sweetness is had in its possession, how great an oppression is felt in cupidity, which is contrary to it; how the affliction of the outer man does not diminish the very sweetness of charity, as some think, but rather increases it; lastly, what discretion is to be had in its exercise. But, that your modesty may be spared, let this very letter be prefixed at the front of the work, so that whatever in the Mirror of Charity (for we give the book this name) displeases the reader may be imputed not to you, who obeyed, but to me, who compelled you against your will. Farewell in Christ, beloved brother.
Vere sanctorum vera, et discreta humilitas virtus est; mea autem, et mei similium defectus virtutis, de qua Propheta: Vide humilitatem meam, et eripe me (Psal. CXVIII). Neque enim a virtute aliqua se eripi postulabat, aut de humilitate extollebat, sed dejectioni suae subventionem implorabat. Quam miseram humilitatem meam, et utinam sicut humilitatem veram, sic quoque virtutem discretam, ne aliqua inobedientiae importunitate velare videar; tantae dignationis petitioni, jussioni, attestationi, quia dignum est, minus digne licet, quod quidem mea interest, tamen pareo. Suscipio itaque opus impossibile, inexcusabile, dignum accusatione, ex mea pusillanimitate impossibile, ex praeceptione vestra inexcusabile, accusationi subjacens ex cujusvis inspectione. Quis enim digne ferat prima fronte, quadam auctoritate apostolica, de excellentiori via charitatis scribere praemittentem, non solum scribendi rudem, aut, sicut vobis placuit, illitteratum sed etiam elinguem, et lactis potum nondum idonee lingentem? Aut qualiter rerum portio una, aut certe nulla, de charitatis eminentia, incompositus, de ejus ordine, sterilis, de fructu disserat; infatuatus et insipidus, ejus dulcedinem eliciat, cupiditate victus, contra eam se erigat? denique, qualiter carnis contritione charitas augeatur, et ejus discretam exhibitionem, quis ego qui explicem? qui secus ac vobis videtur, quod tamen pace vestra dico, de coquinis ad eremum veniens, locum non officium mutavi?
The true and discreet humility of the saints is truly a virtue; but mine, and that of those like me, is a defect of virtue, of which the Prophet [says]: See my humility, and deliver me (Ps. 118[:153]). For he did not ask to be delivered from some virtue, nor was he boasting of his humility, but he implored succour for his abasement. Lest I seem to veil this wretched humility of mine (and would that, as it is true humility, so also it were discreet virtue) with some importunity of disobedience: to the petition, the command, the attestation of so great a condescension, because it is fitting, though less fittingly, which indeed is my concern, I nevertheless obey. I undertake therefore a work impossible, inexcusable, deserving accusation: impossible by my faint-heartedness, inexcusable by your precept, open to accusation from anyone's inspection. For who would fittingly bear one who at the very first, by a certain apostolic authority, sets out to write of the more excellent way of charity, being not only unskilled in writing, or, as it pleased you, unlettered, but even tongue-tied, and not yet fit to lap a drink of milk? Or how should one who is a single portion of things, or rather none, discourse on the eminence of charity; one disordered, on its order; one barren, on its fruit; how should one infatuated and insipid draw out its sweetness, one overcome by cupidity raise himself against it? Finally, how charity is increased by contrition of the flesh, and its discreet exercise, who am I to explain? I who, contrary to how it seems to you (which, however, I say by your leave), coming from kitchens to the desert, changed my place, not my office?