PL 195 · cols. 659–702
Aelred of Rievaulx, On Spiritual Friendship
Book I
Migne Reading Room
PL 195 · cols. 659–702
Book I
Opusculi hujus compendium inter opera sancti Augustini reperitur, tomo IV, adjuncta Erasmi censura auctorem, quem ignoravit, affectasse Augustinum videri, inepte existimantis: qui alias saepe de similibus alienis libris, qui in opera Patrum irrepserunt, judicium facit. Quid enim emolumenti inde sperassent noster Aelredus, aliique viri docti et pii? Lucubrationes alienas sibi tribuere potest quis, ad nomen sibi conciliandum: haeretici quoque aliquando libros erroribus refertos Patribus affinxerunt; at a catholicis piis, atque a fictione et mendacio abhorrentibus hoc alienum fuit. Errore itaque eorum, qui Patrum opera ediderunt, accidit, ut aliena illis admiscerentur. Sane hoc Opusculum De amicitia, in manuscriptis passim nomen Aelredi Rievallis abbatis praefert: imo dialogus est, cujus interlocutores sunt ipse Aelredus, et Ivo ex monachis ejus unus. Digestum est autem in tres libros, et quadruplo prolixius est, quam apud Augustinum, apud quem cum sit mutilum, non mirum, si minus gratum appareat. Quos autem carpit Erasmus flosculos sermonis ita quod pro invicem, et similes, non adeo venustant opus, ut non obtinuerit, sicut idem Erasmus fatetur, ut Augustini esse crederetur. Patres saepe eloquentiam suam spreverunt, et Scripturae phrases nostrae versionis libenter usurparunt, licet minus elegantes.
A compendium of this little work is found among the works of Saint Augustine, in tome IV, with the censure of Erasmus attached, who foolishly supposes that its author, whom he did not know, affected to seem to be Augustine; he often passes such a judgement elsewhere on similar spurious books which have crept into the works of the Fathers. For what profit would our Aelred, and other learned and pious men, have hoped for from that? Someone may attribute the lucubrations of others to himself to win himself a name; heretics too have sometimes falsely ascribed to the Fathers books crammed with errors; but to pious Catholics, who shrink from fiction and falsehood, this was foreign. It came about, therefore, through the error of those who edited the works of the Fathers, that works not theirs were mixed in with them. This little work On Friendship, indeed, bears in the manuscripts here and there the name of Aelred, abbot of Rievaulx: in fact it is a dialogue, whose interlocutors are Aelred himself and Ivo, one of his monks. It is arranged, moreover, in three books, and is four times longer than in Augustine, where, since it is mutilated, it is no wonder if it appears less pleasing. But the little flowers of speech which Erasmus picks at, "ita quod", "pro invicem" and the like, do not adorn the work so much that it did not succeed, as the same Erasmus admits, in being believed to be Augustine's. The Fathers often spurned their own eloquence, and gladly adopted the phrases of Scripture in our version, though less elegant.
(23) ‹filios tuos› · printed under col 661, full-width across the foot of cols 661-662
Videtur Ivo fuisse monachus non Rievallis, sed alterius monasterii Rievalli subditi.
Ivo seems to have been a monk not of Rievaulx, but of another monastery subject to Rievaulx.
(24) printed at the foot of this column; its call is in col 694 ("ait sapiens"), set in n694.
(24) ‹AELREDUS. Felicissimam vitam, ait sapiens› · printed under col 693
Plato.
Plato.