PL 3 · cols. 1253–1268
Anonymus, Tractatus adversus Novatianum haereticum (quod lapsis spes veniae non sit deneganda), cum prolegomenis
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PL 3 · cols. 1253–1268
Editors' preface
(1) ‹anchor: victores fuisse dicit› · call in col 1253
Anonym, Tractat. ad Novatian. cap. 9; apud Galland. tom. III Bibl. vet. PP. pag. 373; et inter Cyprian. pag. 17, edit. Brem., et Venet. pag 775.
Anonymous, Treatise against Novatian, ch. 9; in Galland, vol. III of the Bibliotheca veterum Patrum, p. 373; and among Cyprian's works, p. 17 of the Bremen edition, and p. 775 of the Venice edition.
(printed under page 678)
(2) ‹anchor: in Felicissimi nomine› · call in col 1253
Id. Ibid. cap. 2; apud Galland. pag. 371; et apud Cypr. pag. 16, edit. Brem. et Venet. pag. 772.
The same, ibid., ch. 2; in Galland, p. 371; and among Cyprian's works, p. 16 of the Bremen edition, and p. 772 of the Venice edition.
(printed under page 678)
(3) ‹anchor: baptizare pronuntians› · call in col 1253
Id. ibid. cap. 3, pag 372, apud Galland.; inter Cypr. pag. 17, edit. Brem, ; et pag. 773 edit. Venet.
The same, ibid., ch. 3, p. 372, in Galland; among Cyprian's works, p. 17 of the Bremen edition; and p. 773 of the Venice edition.
(printed under page 678)
(4) ‹anchor: Tillemontium› · call in col 1253
Tillemont. Memoire, tom. IV, pag. 133 et 622, not. 37, sur S. Cypr.; et edit. Bruxell. 1732, pag. 56. et pag 22, in notis.
Tillemont, Mémoires, vol. IV, pp. 133 and 622, note 37, on St Cyprian; and in the Brussels edition of 1732, p. 56, and p. 22, in the notes.
(printed under page 678)
(5) ‹anchor: etiam infra› · call in col 1253
Anonym. l. cap. 6, pag. 372; apud Galland., et inter Cypr. 17; edit. Brem., et Venet. pag. 775.
Anonymous, at the place cited, ch. 6, p. 372, in Galland; and among Cyprian's works, p. 17 of the Bremen edition, and p. 775 of the Venice edition.
(printed under page 678)
(6) ‹anchor: not in col 1253› · call in col 1254 (no call in col 1253)
Conferantur quae tomo XI Histor. Theolog. crit. a pag. 360 — 363. de tractatus hujus auctore disserimus.
Compare what we discuss about the author of this treatise in vol. XI of the Historia theologica critica, pp. 360–363.
(printed under page 678)
(7) ‹anchor: not in col 1253› · call in col 1254 (no call in col 1253)
Maran., Vita S. Cypriani, cap. 34, pag. 127, edit. Paris. 1726; et Venet, ; 1748, 118 et seq.
Maran, Life of St Cyprian, ch. 34, p. 127, Paris edition of 1726; and Venice edition of 1748, pp. 118 ff.
(printed under page 678)
DE ANONYMO AUCTORE TRACTATUS ADVERSUS NOVATIANUM.
ON THE ANONYMOUS AUTHOR OF THE TREATISE AGAINST NOVATIAN.
Constat auctorem libri ad Novatianum aequalem esse Cypriani; nec dubium esse potest, quin in pacifis, et Ecclesiae faventibus Valeriani primordiis scripserit. Unam enim tantum persecutionem numerat post eam, quae sub Decio saeviit, et eos, qui in prima ceciderunt, in secunda victores fuisse dicit (1). Videtur etiam Africanus fuisse, tum quia sic ludit in Felicissimi nomine (2): Quid ad ista respondeant perversissimi isti Novatiani, vel nunc infelicissimi pauci? Tum, quia solam Ecclesiam coelesti ratione baptizare pronuntians (3), haereticorum Baptisma non obscure rejicit. Sola styli dissimilitudo Tillemontium (4) deterruit, quo minus hoc opusculum Cypriano tribuerit.
It is agreed that the author of the book to Novatian was a contemporary of Cyprian; nor can there be any doubt that he wrote in the peaceful [pacifis, as printed] opening years of Valerian, when they were favourable to the Church. For he reckons only one persecution after the one which raged under Decius, and he says that those who fell in the first were victors in the second (1). He seems also to have been an African, both because he plays thus on the name of Felicissimus (2): What can these most perverse followers of Novatian, or the now most unhappy [infelicissimi] few, answer to this? and because, in declaring that the Church alone baptizes by a heavenly principle (3), he quite plainly rejects the baptism of heretics. Only the dissimilarity of style deterred Tillemont (4) from ascribing this little work to Cyprian.
Sed tamen praeter hanc rationem alia videtur afferri posse. Nam declarat auctor hujus libri in ipso exordio: « Cogitant sibi, et intolerabiliter animo aestuanti, quiduam agere deberet de miserandis fratribus qui vulnerati non propria voluntate, sed diaboli saevientis irruptione, adhuc usque, hoc est, per longam temporum seriem agentes poenas darent, ex adverso exortum esse alium hostem, et ipsius paternae pietatis adversarium haereticum Novatianum. » His autem verbis indicat episcopum se esse, ac perhumaniter lapsis jam dudum poenitentiam agentibus consulentem, moleste ferre, quod suae lenitati adversarium habeat haereticum Novatianum. Hinc etiam infra (5), postquam de iis locutus est, qui prima acie, id est, Deciana persecutione vulnerati, postea, id est, secundo praelio vincant, addit eorum pares, hoc est, in eodem crimine lapsus sui adhuc constitutos, nec ad poenitentiam admittendos a Novatianis judicari. Nondum ergo auctor hujus operis pacem concesserat his qui
But nevertheless, besides this reason, another seems capable of being brought forward. For the author of this book declares in the very opening: « As he was thinking within himself, with a mind intolerably agitated, what he ought to do about the pitiable brethren who, wounded not by their own will but by the onslaught of the raging devil, were still to this day, that is, through a long succession of times, paying the penalty in doing penance, there arose from the opposite quarter another enemy, the adversary of his very fatherly tenderness, the heretic Novatian. » By these words he shows that he is a bishop, and that, providing most humanely for the lapsed who had long been doing penance, he takes it ill that he has the heretic Novatian as adversary of his leniency. Hence too, further on (5), after he has spoken of those who, wounded in the first battle-line, that is, in the Decian persecution, afterwards, that is, in the second battle, are victorious, he adds that their equals, that is, those still standing in the same guilt of their lapse, are judged by the Novatianists not to be admitted to penance. The author of this work, therefore, had not yet granted peace to those who
<!-- note: Editors' matter (Lumper's prolegomena on the anonymous author). The heading DE ANONYMO AUCTORE TRACTATUS / ADVERSUS NOVATIANUM is printed across the top of cols 1253–1254 and is set here once. The prose fills the whole left column (1253) under the heading down to the footnote rule; the second paragraph runs over mid-sentence into col 1254 ("sub Decio lapsi fuerant..."), and only what stands in col 1253 is set here. The first two note calls are printed as malformed superscripts and are set as (1) and (2) to match the footnotes; the other calls are kept as printed. The bold earlier-edition page number "1205" printed inline is omitted as apparatus. Misprints kept: "pacifis", "Cogitant", "quiduam". Footnotes (1)–(7) at the page foot are not set here. -->
(8) ‹anchor: Remigius Ceillierius› · call in col 1254
Cecillier, Hist. Génér. des Auteurs, tom. III, chap. 1, art. 4, § 2, n. 4, pag. 155.
Ceillier, Histoire générale des auteurs sacrés, vol. III, ch. 1, art. 4, § 2, no. 4, p. 155.
(printed under page 678)
(9) ‹anchor: adhuc Novatiano› · call in col 1254
In qua domo, si perseverasses, Novatiane, vas forsitan pretiosum fuisses; sed nunc te in paleas, et stipulam conversum nec intelligis, nec plangis: Anonym., cap. 1, apud Gallant. pag. 371, et inter Cypriani opp. edit. Brem. pag. 16; edit. Venet. pag. 771 et 772.
"In which house, had you persevered, Novatian, you might perhaps have been a precious vessel; but now you neither understand nor lament that you have been turned into chaff and stubble": Anonymous, ch. 1, in Galland, p. 371, and among Cyprian's works, Bremen edition p. 16; Venice edition pp. 771 and 772.
(printed under page 678)
(10) ‹anchor: non metuerint (printed "(19)")› · call in col 1254
Anonym. apud Galland. pag. 372, § 6; edit. Brem. pag. 17; et Venet. p. 772.
Anonymous, in Galland, p. 372, § 6; Bremen edition p. 17; and Venice edition p. 772.
(printed under page 678)
(11) ‹anchor: veniam indulgendi› · call in col 1254
Id. apud Galland, capp. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 16, et 18; a pag. 373, 376: et inter Cypr. opp. edit. Brem. pag. 18-21; et Venet. a pag, 776-783.
The same, in Galland, chs. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 18; from p. 373 to 376; and among Cyprian's works, Bremen edition pp. 18–21; and Venice edition pp. 776–783.
(printed under page 678)
(12) ‹anchor: suum colorabant› · call in col 1254
Id. apud Galland, cap. 7, pag. 372 et seqq: inter Cypr. opp. edit. Brem. pag. 18 et seqq.; Venet. pag. 775.
The same, in Galland, ch. 7, pp. 372 ff.; among Cyprian's works, Bremen edition pp. 18 ff.; Venice edition p. 775.
(printed under page 678)
(13) ‹anchor: Joannis Evangelistae› · call in col 1254
Audi in Apocalypsi Dominicam vocem justis te objurgationibus increpantem. Anonym. cap. 2, pag. 371, apud Galland; conf. Apocal. III, 17, Sicut Apocalypsis docet dicens, etc. Id. cap. 5, pag. 322, 371; conf. Apoct. XVIII, 15: Clamante Scriptura (continues)
"Hear in the Apocalypse the Lord's voice rebuking you with just reproaches." Anonymous, ch. 2, p. 371, in Galland; compare Apoc. 3:17. "As the Apocalypse teaches, saying," etc. The same, ch. 5, pp. 322, 371; compare Apoc. 18:15. "As Scripture cries out" (continues)
(printed under page 678)
sub Decio lapsi fuerant. Non enim de aliis loquitur: pares illos vocat eorum, qui primo prælio victi, in secundo victores fuerant: ait eos post longam temporum seriem agentes pœnas dare, et adhuc usque constitutos in eodem crimine lapsus, quod alii martyrio expiaverant. At Cyprianus, instante Galli et Volusiani persecutione, lapsos, qui a primo lapsus die pœnitentiam egerant, in dominicum gregem collegerat, ac eis Christi sanguinem dederat, ut illos ad suum pro Christo fundendum armaret (6). Hactenus vir doctissimus (7) Prudentius Maranus. ex congregatione Sancti Mauri. Observat reverendissimus Remigius Ceillierius (8), auctorem hunc anonymum, vivente adhuc Novatiano (9), contra eumdem hoc opusculum exarasse circiter 255 Jesu Christi quo schisma Felicissimi propemodum jam compressum atque exstinctum erat.
[who] had lapsed under Decius. For he is not speaking of others: he calls them the equals of those who, vanquished in the first battle, had been victors in the second; he says that they, passing a long series of times, are paying penalties, and are still placed in the same crime of lapse which others had expiated by martyrdom. But Cyprian, when the persecution of Gallus and Volusianus was pressing, had gathered into the Lord's flock the lapsed who had done penance from the first day of their lapse, and had given them the blood of Christ, that he might arm them to shed their own for Christ (6). Thus far the most learned man (7) Prudentius Maran, of the Congregation of Saint Maur. The most reverend Remy Ceillier (8) observes that this anonymous author, while Novatian was still living (9), composed this little work against him about the year of Jesus Christ 255, in which the schism of Felicissimus had been well-nigh already suppressed and extinguished.
Impugnat hoc suo in libello anonymus rigorem Novatiani, eique adhærentium 1. Illis ante oculos ponendo, quod sine injustitiæ crimiue non possent recusare admissionem ad pœnitentiam plerisque lapsorum, qui eam postulabant. cum plurimi ex iis qui in persecutione Decii lapsi erant, in Galli persecutione invincti steterint, et sanguinem suum, et vitam pro Christo Jesu fundere non metuerint (19) 2. Eos auctoritate sacrarum litterarum convincendo, quod Deus infinite misericors sit, paratus semper vere pœnitentibus 1206 peccatorum veniam indulgendi (11). 3. Confutando eorum argumenta ex sacris litteris desumpta, queis rigorem suum colorabant (12). Allegat hic anonymus Apocalypsin sub nomine Joannis; sed non dicit expresse esse Joannis Evangelistæ (13). Scribit idem anonymus
In this his little book the anonymous author attacks the rigour of Novatian and of those adhering to him: 1. By setting before their eyes that they could not without the crime of injustice refuse admission to penance to most of the lapsed who sought it, since very many of those who had lapsed in the persecution of Decius had stood unconquered in the persecution of Gallus, and had not feared to shed their blood and their life for Christ Jesus (19). 2. By convincing them on the authority of the sacred writings that God is infinitely merciful, ever ready to grant pardon of sins to those who truly repent (11). 3. By refuting their arguments drawn from the sacred writings, with which they coloured their rigour (12). Here the anonymous author cites the Apocalypse under the name of John, but does not say expressly that it is John the Evangelist's (13). The same anonymous author writes
<!-- note: col 1254 is the right-hand column of a page whose centred heading (DE ANONYMO AUCTORE TRACTATUS ADVERSUS NOVATIANUM) and opening paragraphs stand above and in col 1253; the first paragraph here continues mid-sentence from col 1253 ("…his qui | sub Decio lapsi fuerant"), and the second runs on into the next column after "Scribit idem anonymus". The whole column is editors' prose; below it stand footnotes (8)–(13), not set here. "(19)" is printed so (the footnote it calls is (10)); bold 1206 is the original edition's page number printed in the column. Misprints kept as printed: "Maranus. ex" (full stop for comma); "postulabant. cum" (full stop for comma); "invincti" (for invicti; rendered "unconquered"); "crimiue" (for crimine, turned letter; rendered "crime"; restored as printed by Q5). -->
(13) ‹anchor: not in col 1255 (continuation of note (13), called in col 1254)› · continued from page 678
et dicente Id. cap. 13; conf. Apoc. II, 5: Joannes autem manifestus et de die judicii et consummationis saeculi declarat dicens. Id. cap. 17. pag. 375; conf. Apoc. VI, 12-17: Idem in eadem Apocalypsi hoc quoque Joannes dicit sibi revelatum. etc. Id., l. c. et inter Cyp. opp., edit. Brem., pag. 21; Venetae, pag. 782; conf. Apoc., XX. 11.
"and saying." The same, ch. 13; compare Rev. 2:5. "But John also makes plain and declares concerning the day of judgement and of the consummation of the world, saying." The same, ch. 17, p. 375; compare Rev. 6:12–17. "The same John says in the same Apocalypse that this too was revealed to him," etc. The same, at the place cited, and among Cyprian's works, Bremen edition p. 21; Venice edition p. 782; compare Rev. 20:11.
(printed under page 679, left, above the full-width band; Q2a)
(14) ‹anchor: hoc suo in tractatu› · call in col 1255
Anonym., cap. 13, apud Galland. 374; et inier Cypr. opp. edit. Brem. pag. 19; et Venet. pag, 778 E.
Anonymous, ch. 13, in Galland, 374; and among Cyprian's works, Bremen edition p. 19; and Venice edition p. 778 E.
(printed under page 679, right, above the full-width band; Q2a)
(15) ‹anchor: testatur apud Eusebium› · call in col 1255
Euseb. Hist. Eccl. lib. VI, cap. 43.
Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, book VI, ch. 43.
(printed under page 679, right, above the full-width band; Q2a)
(16) ‹anchor: verba fecimus› · call in col 1256 (text set under col 1255, reading order)
Vid. Hist. Théolog. Crit. part. XI, sect. II, cap. 2, art. 3, pag. 42-44.
See the Historia theologica critica, part XI, section II, ch. 2, art. 3, pp. 42–44.
(printed under page 679, right, above the full-width band; Q2a) [Heading over the notes, as printed: Variorum notae.] (printed under page 679)
(1) ‹anchor: Aegyptiis excusa sunt› · call in col 1256
Excusa sunt. Legendum puto excussa sunt. Respicit enim auctor ad illud Exod. XII, 35, 36: Filii Israel — petierunt ab Aegyptiis vasa argentea et aurea, et spoliaverunt Aegyptios. GALLAND.
Excusa sunt ("were struck out"). I think excussa sunt ("were shaken out") should be read. For the author has in view the passage Exod. 12:35–36: "The children of Israel — asked of the Egyptians vessels of silver and gold, and despoiled the Egyptians." GALLAND.
(printed under page 679)
[Heading over the notes, as printed: Variorum notae.] (printed under page 680)
(2) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1257
Nisi desertores. Sicut et alibi, mendum heic irrepserat apud Erasmum, ut legeretur non, eo quod vetus excusum legat non; cum potius juxta ms. cod. significet nisi, PAMEL.
Nisi desertores ("except deserters"). As elsewhere too, an error had crept in here in Erasmus, so that non ("not") was read, because the old printing reads non; whereas, following the manuscript, it rather means nisi ("except"). PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 680)
(3) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1257
Ordinationem Dei. Hoc quoque recte Gravius et ms. cod. pro ordiuem: alludit enim ad ordinationem Cornelii, de qua paulo post. PAMEL.
Ordinationem Dei ("the ordination of God"). This too Gravius and the manuscript read rightly, instead of ordinem ("order"); for the author alludes to the ordination of Cornelius, of which shortly after. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 680)
(4) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1257
Fecisti conventionem. Hunc locum sic restitui, tum ex epist. LV Cypr., tum ob vocem Graecam συνθήκας, Hactenus legebatur cogitationem. PAMEL.
Fecisti conventionem ("you made a compact"). I have restored this passage thus, both from Cyprian's Letter 55 and because of the Greek word συνθήκας ("compacts"). Until now cogitationem ("thought") was read. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 680)
(5) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1257
Infelicissimi. Costerius et ms. cod. infelicissime. Non male. Sed illud placet magis, ut per ἀντίφρασιν alludat ad Felicissimum; cujus saepe in Cyprianis mentio, et oaesertim epist. jam laudata LV, PAMEL.
Infelicissimi ("of the most unhappy"). Costerius and the manuscript read infelicissime ("most unhappily"). Not badly. But the former pleases more, so that by antiphrasis the author alludes to Felicissimus, who is often mentioned in Cyprian's writings, and especially in Letter 55, already cited. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 680)
(6) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1258
Primrm quidem et principalem. Locus obscurus et corruptus, etiam in ms. cod., praeterquam quod hic satis significet auctor solam Ecclesiam baptismi sacramentum habere: quod ad errorem Cypriani pertinet. PAMEL.
Primum quidem et principalem ("the first and principal"). An obscure and corrupt passage, even in the manuscript, except that here the author indicates clearly enough that the Church alone has the sacrament of baptism: which bears on Cyprian's error. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 680)
(7) ‹anchor: est, ut Trinitas› · call in col 1258
Trinitas. Quidam ternitas. Rectius meo judicio Trinitas: sic enim ms. codex. PAMEL.
Trinitas ("the Trinity"). Some read ternitas ("threeness"). More rightly, in my judgement, Trinitas: for so the manuscript reads. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 680)
[Heading over the notes, as printed: Variorum notae.] (printed under page 681)
(8) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1259
Praedictionum Sic lego pro praedicationum; eo quod sequitur: Quorum Dominus ruinam in Evangelio futuram. etc. PAMEL.
Praedictionum ("of the predictions"). So I read instead of praedicationum ("of the preachings"), because of what follows: "whose ruin the Lord in the Gospel [foretold] would come," etc. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 681)
(9) ‹anchor: et non nocebunt vobis› · call in col 1259
Non nocebant vobis. Sic Manut. et Morell. pro vos, quod tamen habet etiam ms. codex. PAMEL.
Non nocebant vobis ("they were not harming you"). So Manutius and Morel, instead of vos, which, however, the manuscript also has. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 681)
(10) ‹anchor: saecularium principum› · call in col 1259
Saecularium principum. Galli nempe et Volusiani...
Saecularium principum ("of the worldly princes"): namely of Gallus and Volusianus...
(printed under page 681)
(11) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1259
Intelligant interpretentur. Ms. cod. intelligunt et interpretantur. HAMEL.
Intelligant interpretentur ("let them understand, let them interpret"). The manuscript reads intelligunt et interpretantur ("they understand and interpret"). PAMELIUS (printed "HAMEL.").
(printed under page 681)
(12) ‹anchor: nominis appellationem mutastis› · call in col 1260
Per nominis appellationem mutastis. Istud denuo ex Gravio, pro eo quod alii per nominis mutastis velum: praesertim cum etiam legat velim, ms. codex. AAMEL.
Per nominis appellationem mutastis ("you have changed by the title of your name"). This again from Gravius, in place of what others read, per nominis mutastis velum ("you have changed by the veil of the name"): especially since the manuscript also reads velim. PAMELIUS (printed "AAMEL.").
(printed under page 681)
(13) ‹anchor: Poenitentiam agite› · call in col 1260
Poenitentiam agite, etc. Haec quoque Gravio et mss. codicibus accepta debemus. alibi desiderata. IDEM.
Poenitentiam agite ("Do penance"), etc. These words too, missing elsewhere, we owe to Gravius and the manuscripts. THE SAME.
(printed under page 681)
[Heading over the notes, as printed: Variorum notae.] (printed under page 682)
(15) [printed so; the call in the text is (14)] ‹anchor: non defendam vos› · call in col 1261
Neque semper non defendam vos. Mira translatio ad verbum Graece sit οὐδὲ διὰ παντὸς ὀργισθήσομαι ὑμῖν, quod Latine sonat neque semper irascar vobis Costerius omittens secundam negationem, accipit defendam pro ulciscar: qua significatione alibi quoque utitur Cyprianus. Certe negandi particula postea fuit adjecta in cod. ms. ID. — Non solum Cyprianus, sed etiam Vulgatus interpres defendere pro vindicare, ulcisci, frequenter adhibet. Vid. Judith. I, 12; II, 1; Rom. XII, 19. Quin et apud probatissimos Latinos scriptores verbum ejusmodi eodem sensu usurpatum comperimus. GALLAND.
Neque semper non defendam vos ("nor will I always not defend you"). A strange rendering, since the Greek word for word is οὐδὲ διὰ παντὸς ὀργισθήσομαι ὑμῖν, which in Latin is neque semper irascar vobis ("nor will I always be angry with you"). Costerius, omitting the second negative, takes defendam for ulciscar ("I will avenge"): a sense in which Cyprian also uses it elsewhere. Certainly the negative particle was added later in the manuscript. THE SAME. — Not only Cyprian but the Vulgate translator too often uses defendere for vindicare, ulcisci ("to avenge, to punish"). See Judith 1:12; 2:1; Rom. 12:19. Indeed, we find a word of this kind used in the same sense in the most approved Latin writers as well. GALLAND.
(printed under page 682)
(15) ‹anchor: pacem: poenitentibus› · call in col 1261
Poenitentibus, etc. Sunt haec verba auctoris, non Isaiae, uti male censuit Morellus: est tamen ita adhuc locus obscurus. PAMEL.
Poenitentibus ("to the penitent"), etc. These are the author's words, not Isaiah's, as Morel wrongly thought: yet even so the passage remains obscure. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 682)
[Heading over the notes, as printed: Variorum notae.] (printed under page 683)
(16) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1263
Noli gratulari, inimica mea. Non minus et istud, pro eo quod corrupte erat amica. Nam Graece apud LXX est ἐχθρά μου. PAMEL.
Noli gratulari, inimica mea ("Do not rejoice, my enemy"). This too, no less, in place of the corrupt reading amica ("friend"). For in the Greek of the Septuagint it is ἐχθρά μου ("my enemy"). PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 683)
(17) ‹anchor: ut propria fleverit› · call in col 1263
Proximorum delicta ut propria fleverit. Respicit auctor epistolam Novatiani, Romani cleri nomine scriptam, quam superius cum aliis ejusdem Novatiani operibus edidimus. GALLAND.
Proximorum delicta ut propria fleverit ("he wept for his neighbours' sins as his own"). The author has in view Novatian's letter written in the name of the Roman clergy, which we have published above with the other works of the same Novatian. GALLAND.
(printed under page 683)
(18) ‹anchor: Cainam illam haeresim› · call in col 1263
Cainam illam haeresim. Recte Erasmus, pro caninam. Sic enim et Hieronymus appellat eam quae adimit spem remittendi peccati. Locus Hierosymi est Epist. ad Oceanum; et meminit ejusdem quasi tollentis martyrium, lib. Contra Vigilantium: ut sit eadem quae Gnosticorum, de quibus Tertullianus in Scorpiaco. Atque adeo etiam Caina legendum censeo apud eumdem Tertull. initio libri de Baptismo, aut saltem Caiana, pro eo quod est Gaiana: quippe quae remedium etiam baptismo tolleret. De aliis hujus sectae erroribus vide eumdem de Praescript. adv. haer.; Irenaeum, lib. I, cap. ult.; Epiphanium haeres. 38. et Augustinum, haeres. 18. PAMEL.
Cainam illam haeresim ("that Cainite heresy"). Erasmus rightly, instead of caninam ("canine"). For so Jerome too names the heresy that takes away the hope of the remission of sin. Jerome's passage is the Letter to Oceanus; and he mentions the same heresy as doing away with martyrdom, in the book Against Vigilantius: so that it is the same as that of the Gnostics, of whom Tertullian treats in the Scorpiace. And so I judge that Caina should also be read in the same Tertullian at the beginning of the book On Baptism, or at least Caiana, instead of Gaiana: since it would take away the remedy even from baptism. On the other errors of this sect see the same author, On the Prescription against Heretics; Irenaeus, book I, last chapter; Epiphanius, heresy 38; and Augustine, heresy 18. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 683)
(19) ‹anchor: violentia aquae› · call in col 1264
Violentia aquae, etc. Intelligit persecutionem quam diabolus immisit in Ecclesiam. PAMEL.
Violentia aquae ("the violence of the water"), etc. He means the persecution which the devil let loose upon the Church. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 683)
(20) ‹anchor: legimus apud Zachariam› · call in col 1264
Apnd Zachariam. Hoc ex conjectu a Costerii, pro ad: consentit etiam ms. codex. PAMEL.
Apud Zachariam ("in Zechariah"). This from Costerius's conjecture, instead of ad ("to"): the manuscript also agrees. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 683)
[Heading over the notes, as printed: Variorum notae.] (printed under page 684)
(21) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1265
De manibus illorum. Adjecit istud recte Gravius: nam habent LXX. et Cyprianus epist, LIV, sic etiam ms, codex. PAMEL.
De manibus illorum ("from their hands"). Gravius rightly added this: for the Septuagint has it, and Cyprian, Letter 54; and so too the manuscript. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 684)
(22) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1265
De omnibus factis... impie. Ita ex margine Graevii in textum inseruimus, eo quod reperiantur apud Judam apostolum, praesertim consentiente ms. codice. PAMEL.
De omnibus factis... impie ("of all the deeds... ungodly"). We have inserted this into the text from Gravius's margin, because the words are found in the apostle Jude, the manuscript especially agreeing. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 684)
(23) ‹anchor: Flumen ignis› · call in col 1266
Flumen ignsi. Cravins et Minutius flamma: sed pugnat vox Graeca ποταμός PAMEL,
Flumen ignis ("a river of fire"). Gravius and Minucius read flamma ("a flame"): but the Greek word ποταμός ("river") is against it. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 684)
[Note (24) stands in two columns above the double rule that closes the treatise. Its left half (call, lemma and opening) is visible in the column images; of its right half only the last three lines are visible in the foot image: four lines between "Etasmus" and "reperiatur" (beginning "an", "ex c", "pon", "cod") are cut off and are marked […]. The rest of the page foot is the start of "Pars altera" (Thomassin's dissertation), with no footnotes.]
(24) ‹anchor: Prae manu sit vobis oratio illa› · call in col 1268 (text moved into reading order under col 1267)
Prae manu sit vobis oratio illa. Ex ms. codice reposuimus vobis pro nobis. Hinc autem apparet, nisi foret illud, Dic tu facinora, etc., mutilum esse et imperfectum hunc librum: Neque tamen oratio illa Cypriani pro martyribus, ea esse potest cujus meminit; quod nulla poenitentiae aut relaxationis peccatorum (uti ante me quoque Etasmus an[…] […] reperiatur illa Oratio cum sequenti, abeque tamen hoc libro; ac vicissim hic liber in ms cod. sine ulla oratione. PAMEL.
Prae manu sit vobis oratio illa ("let that prayer be at hand for you"). From the manuscript we have restored vobis ("for you") in place of nobis ("for us"). Hence, moreover, it is apparent that, were it not for the words Dic tu facinora ("Tell your wickednesses"), etc., this book would be mutilated and incomplete. Yet that prayer of Cyprian's for the martyrs cannot be the one he mentions, because no [mention] of penance or of the remission of sins (as Erasmus too before me [… four lines not visible …]) that Prayer is found together with the following one, but without this book; and conversely this book in the manuscript is without any prayer. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 685)
PARS ALTERA.
SECOND PART.
PRAECIPUI RECENTIORUM EXCURSUS IN EAMDEM DE HAERETICORUM BAPTISMATE DISPUTATIONEM
THE PRINCIPAL EXCURSUSES OF MORE RECENT WRITERS ON THE SAME DISPUTE CONCERNING THE BAPTISM OF HERETICS
L. THOMASSINI DILSERTATIO AD SYNODOS SUB STEPHANO PAPA IN CAUSA BAPTISMI HAERETICORUM COLLECTAS CARTHAGINE, ROMAE ET ALIBI ANNIS CHRISTI 256, 257, etc.
L. THOMASSIN'S DISSERTATION ON THE SYNODS GATHERED UNDER POPE STEPHEN IN THE CAUSE OF THE BAPTISM OF HERETICS, AT CARTHAGE, AT ROME AND ELSEWHERE, IN THE YEARS OF CHRIST 256, 257, etc.
SYNOPSIS
SYNOPSIS
Refellitur puditissima Novatorum calumnia, tam errasse Stephanum in omnium admittendo, quam Cypriunum et Firmilianum in omnium haereticorum baptismo repudiando. Evincitur ex omnium Patrum consensu eadem tunc fuisse Ecclesiae Romanae de baptismo haereticorum, quae postea fuit, et quae etiam nunc superest disciplina. Usque ad num, XXII. Deinceps, ad finem usque, multipliciter solvitur alia quaestio, ecquid Augustinus Cypriano hinc excusationam et patrocinium paret, quod necdum ea res plenario concilio elucidata atque terminata fuisset; cum idem ipse Pelagianis plenarium concilium flagitantibus os obturaverit, localibus synodis et rescriptis apostolicae Sedis litem finitam pronuntians.
The most rotten calumny of the Innovators is refuted, that Stephen erred as much in admitting the baptism of all heretics as Cyprian and Firmilian did in repudiating it. It is proved from the consensus of all the Fathers that the discipline of the Roman Church concerning the baptism of heretics was then the same as it was afterwards, and as still remains even now. As far as no. XXII. Thereafter, to the very end, another question is resolved in many ways: whether Augustine provides Cyprian on this account with an excuse and defence, because that matter had not yet been made clear and settled by a plenary council; since this same man stopped the mouths of the Pelagians when they demanded a plenary council, declaring the dispute ended by local synods and rescripts of the apostolic See.
I. Stephani papae et Cypriani concertatio. Novatorum calumnia in Stephanum. Duplex adversus eos controversia hic dirimenda.
I. The contention of Pope Stephen and Cyprian. The Innovators' calumny against Stephen. A twofold controversy against them to be decided here.
Illustris et copiosa haec se altera objicit quaestio et superiori gemella, de Stephani cum Cypriano concertatione circa baptismum ab haereticis collatum. Et hic enim sanctitate conspicui colliduntur pontifices: Romanus, etsi loco major et causa melior, a collega spernitur, contumaces adversus primae sedis decretum, et aviti moris plus aetquo retinentes, nihilosecius Ecclesiae communione fruuntur; denique secundum. Stephanum pronun-
This second question now presents itself, illustrious and copious, and twin to the former: concerning Stephen's contention with Cyprian over baptism conferred by heretics. For here too pontiffs conspicuous for holiness clash: the Roman, though greater in rank and better in cause, is spurned by his colleague; those who were defiant against the decree of the first see, and held more than was fair to an ancestral custom, nonetheless enjoy the communion of the Church; finally, in accordance with Stephen, [it is] pronoun[ced] …
<!-- note: the column opens with the end of the treatise's text (§XVIII, ending "exomologescos plena") and the Variorum note (24) above a double rule (set in n1267, not here). The editors' prose begins after the double rule: the Pars altera headings, the title of Thomassin's dissertation, and the italic synopsis; the dissertation's §I heading and the start of its text follow and are set too, since they are not the author's text; the paragraph runs on mid-word ("pronun-") into col. 1268. "puditissima", "Cypriunum", "DILSERTATIO", "num,", "excusationam", "aetquo" and "secundum." set as printed (scan unclear for "Cypriunum"); the column number 1219 inside the synopsis is omitted. The running head reads DE HAERETICORUM BAPTISMATE. Q2b: by the unit boundary, what stands below the band belongs to the next unit; whether the band, synopsis and §I opening belong here or with the Thomassin unit (misprints.tsv lists "aetquo" under col 1268) is left for the settle step. -->
(24) ‹anchor: oratio illa› · call in col 1268 (above the full-width band; the text is set under col 1267). Continuation printed at the head of the right-hand foot column under page 685 (Variorum notae); the note's opening stands in the left-hand foot column and is in n1267, whose text runs on from "Etasmus" to "reperiatur" and so omits these lines (Q1: n1267 to be completed, noted only)
[…] annotavit) fiat mentio. Accedit, quod in cod. vet. ex quo hunc librum descripsit ille, medius interponatur sermo D. Augustini de Cypriano; et in mss. codd. Afflingin. Marchinensi, Dunensi et Anglico reperiatur illa Oratio cum 'sequenti, abeque tamen hoc libro; ac vicissim hic liber in ms cod. sine ulla oratione. PAMEL.
[…] noted) mention is made. Add to this that in the old codex from which he copied this book, a sermon of St Augustine on Cyprian is set in between; and that in the manuscript codices of Afflighem, Marchiennes, Dunes and the English one that Prayer is found with the following one, but without this book; and conversely this book in a manuscript codex without any prayer. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 685)