PL 3 · cols. 999–1002
S. Lucius I papa et martyr, notitia historica
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PL 3 · cols. 999–1002
Editors' preface
<!-- Notes (33)–(37) are the closing "Variorum notae" of the preceding piece, printed above the rule that opens the Lucius notitia; their calls stand on an earlier page and are not visible here. Notes (1)–(2) belong to the notitia. --> (printed under page 551)
(33) ‹anchor: not visible; lemma "Aeternamque"› · call not on this page (note printed in col 999)
Aeternamque. Sic edit. ferme omnes. Cod. Vatic. et tetram : quam lectionem in textum inferre non dubitarunt editores Anglicani. GALL.
"Aeternamque" ("and eternal"). So read nearly all the editions. The Vatican codex has "et tetram" ("and foul"), a reading which the English editors did not hesitate to bring into the text. GALLANDI.
(printed under page 551)
(34) ‹anchor: not visible; lemma "Vicinis nobis"› · call not on this page (note printed in col 999)
Vicinis nobis. Ita Fellus et Baluzius. Omittunt nobis Welchmanus et Jacksonus.
"Vicinis nobis" ("neighbours to us"). So Fell and Baluze. Welchman and Jackson omit "nobis".
(printed under page 551)
(35) ‹anchor: not visible; lemma "Et quos"› · call not on this page (note printed in col 999)
Et quos. Conjunctionem et redundare putat Welchmanus. Jacksono autem sensus videtur et cum quibusdam quos. Mox deest positis in cod. Lincoln. GALL.
"Et quos" ("and whom"). Welchman thinks the conjunction "et" is redundant; to Jackson, however, the sense seems to be "and with certain ones whom". Just after, "positis" is lacking in the Lincoln codex. GALLANDI.
(printed under page 551)
(36) ‹anchor: not visible; lemma "Credidimus"› · call not on this page (note printed in col 1000)
Credidimus. Ita ex cod. Bodl. I Fellus, Welchmanus et Jacksonus. Al. credimus. GALL.
"Credidimus" ("we believed"). So Fell, Welchman and Jackson, from Bodleian codex I. Others read "credimus" ("we believe"). GALLANDI.
(printed under page 551)
(37) ‹anchor: not visible; lemma "In suspensio… moras… sustinere"› · call not on this page (note printed in col 1000)
In suspensio... moras... sustinere. In suspenso emendavit Morellius pro eo quod antea legebatur in suspendio. Unus liber meus habet voto suspenso. Mox cod. Gratianopolitanus, qui foris possunt dilectionem sustinere. Vetustiores editiones, foris possunt dilatione sustineri. BALUZ.
"In suspensio… moras… sustinere." Morel corrected to "in suspenso" ("in suspense") in place of what was read before, "in suspendio". One manuscript of mine has "voto suspenso" ("with suspended wish"). Just after, the Grenoble codex reads "qui foris possunt dilectionem sustinere" ("who outside can sustain love"); the older editions, "foris possunt dilatione sustineri" ("outside can be sustained by delay"). BALUZE.
(printed under page 551)
(1) ‹anchor: Maurini arbitrantur› · call in col 999
Pag. ed. ann. 252, § 14; l'Art de verifier, loc. cit.
Pagi's edition, year 252, § 14; L'Art de vérifier [les dates], at the place cited.
(printed under page 551)
(2) ‹anchor: scribit Cyprianus› · call in col 1000
Cyprian., Ep. 61, ad Lucium, al. 58.
Cyprian, Letter 61, to Lucius (in other editions 58).
(printed under page 551)
<!-- Printed misprints kept: "Stepnanum", "Nicepbor.", "eccless.", "Sanetor.", "Cornelii.cujus". Note (8) ends mid-sentence ("dici non potest") as printed, and (9) follows directly. Text misprint kept as printed: "antecessorrm" (for antecessorum). --> (printed under page 552)
(3) ‹anchor: verba divi› · call in col 1001
Cyprian., Ep. 78, ad Stepnanum, al. 67.
Cyprian, Letter 78, to Stephen (in other editions 67).
(printed under page 552)
(4) ‹anchor: testatur Eusebius› · call in col 1001
Euseb. Hist. eccles., lib. VII, cap. 2.
Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, book VII, chapter 2.
(printed under page 552)
(5) ‹anchor: tenuisse affirmat› · call in col 1001
Nicepbor., Hist. eccless., lib. VI, cap. 7.
Nicephorus [Callistus], Ecclesiastical History, book VI, chapter 7.
(printed under page 552)
(6) ‹anchor: Chronologico historico› · call in col 1001
Propylaeum ad Acta Sanetor. Maii.
The Propylaeum to the Acta Sanctorum for May.
(printed under page 552)
(7) ‹anchor: judice Pagio› · call in col 1001
Pag., not. ad ann. 253.2,3; Pearson., Annal. Cyprian. ann. 253.
Pagi, note on the year 253, [§§] 2, 3; Pearson, Annales Cyprianici, year 253.
(printed under page 552)
(8) ‹anchor: contenti sumus› · call in col 1001
Cum Cyprianus Stephanum Lucii vicarium successoremque dicit, alio plane sensu vicarii phrasin adhibuit ab eo quae vulgo solet usurpari, ut nempe illum significet, qui alterius vices gerit : nam vicarius et successor idem est apud Cyprianum, ideoque Stephanum non solum vicarium dicit sed et Cornelii.cujus sane vicarium dici non potest
When Cyprian calls Stephen the vicar and successor of Lucius, he used the expression "vicar" in a sense quite other than the one commonly in use, namely to mean him who takes another's place: for vicar and successor are the same thing in Cyprian, and so he calls Stephen not only the vicar [of Lucius] but also of Cornelius, whose vicar he certainly cannot be called
(printed under page 552)
<!-- Printed misprints kept in the text: "Drecretalis" (for Decretalis), "Rsmani" (for Romani). The four lines at the head of this foot ("nempe illum significet ... dici non potest") are the end of note (8), set whole in n1001. -->
(9) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1002
Euseb., Hist. eccl. lib. VII, cap. 10.
Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, book VII, chapter 10.
(printed under page 552)
(10) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1002
Vid. Petr. Coustant., Epistolar. romanor. pontificum, pag. 206 et 207, ubi ostendit, quam immaniter lapsus sit in Lucio Bucherianus Catalogus et libri Pontificalis auctor.
See Pierre Coustant, Epistolae Romanorum pontificum, pp. 206 and 207, where he shows how grossly the Bucherian Catalogue and the author of the Liber Pontificalis went astray over Lucius.
(printed under page 552)