PL 3 · cols. 1003–1008
S. Cyprianus, Epistola ad S. Lucium papam ab exsilio reversum
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PL 3 · cols. 1003–1008
Editors' preface
(printed under page 553)
(1) ‹anchor: fecit› · call in col 1003
Vos denuo fecit Voss. 2.
"Vos denuo fecit" (has made you again): Vossius 2.
(printed under page 553)
(2) ‹anchor: In confessoribus Christi› · call in col 1003
Gloriam. Confessoribus Christi Lam. Ebor. NC. 1,
"Gloriam. Confessoribus Christi" (to glory. In the confessors of Christ): Lambeth, York, New College 1.
(printed under page 553)
(3) ‹anchor: not visible› · call not visible in the page foot
Prompti omnes Bod. 2.
"Prompti omnes" (all ready): Bodleian 2.
(printed under page 553)
(11) ‹anchor: not visible› · call not visible in the page foot
Lucius papa Cornelio successit anno Christi 255, et mox pulsus est in exsilium; sed brevi postea rediit in Urbem, anno nimirum sequente. Tum sanctus Cyprianus tam suo quam collegarum suorum nomine hanc ad eum epistolam dedit, in ea faciens mentionem alterius epistolae quam ad illum scripserat in initiis suscepti ab eo episcopatus. Istud patet esse extra difficultatem. Et tamen Joannes Launoius sibi persuasit ex ipsis epistolae istius verbis colligi non posse alias antea litteras datas esse ad Lucium quia, ut ille ait: Cyprianus se quidem gratulatum fuissse ait, sed gratulatum se per litteras non ait. Quod argumentum est sane levissimum, ut ante me censuit auctor Annalium Cyprianicorum. Porro Lucius martyrio coronatus sepultus est in coemeterio Callisti, via Appia. BALUZ.
Pope Lucius succeeded Cornelius in the year of Christ 255, and was soon driven into exile; but a little later he returned to the City, namely in the following year. Then Saint Cyprian, in his own name as well as his colleagues', sent him this letter, mentioning in it another letter which he had written to him at the beginning of the episcopate Lucius had taken up. This is plainly beyond difficulty. And yet Jean de Launoy persuaded himself that it cannot be gathered from the very words of this letter that another letter had been sent to Lucius before, because, as he says: Cyprian says that he had congratulated him, but he does not say that he congratulated him by letter. That argument is very slight indeed, as the author of the Annales Cyprianici judged before me. Further, Lucius, crowned with martyrdom, was buried in the cemetery of Callistus on the Appian Way. Baluze.
(printed under page 553)
(12) ‹anchor: gratulati sumus› · call in col 1003
Gratulati sumus. Litteris videlicet, quas ad pontificem Romanum, statim ut se episcopum factum nuntiaret, mitti divina traditio et ecclesiastica institutio volebat, ut ipse Cyprianus ep. XLII docet. Hunc merito respuitur Launoii opinio, qua hoc ita intelligi posse censet, ut Cyprianus quidem secum et collegis de gemino Lucii honore gratulatus sit; sed hanc gratulationem minime Lucio per litteras significarit. COUSTANT.
We congratulated. That is, by the letter which divine tradition and the Church's ordinance required to be sent to the Roman pontiff as soon as he announced that he had been made bishop, as Cyprian himself teaches in Letter 42. Hence Launoy's opinion is rightly rejected, by which he thinks this can be understood to mean that Cyprian congratulated himself and his colleagues on Lucius's twofold honour, but did not convey this congratulation to Lucius by letter at all. Coustant.
(printed under page 553)
(13) ‹anchor: administratione confessorem› · call in col 1003
Administratione confessorem, Qui Lucium cum Cornellio, prius quam in Romanum pontificem cooptaretur, relegatum fuisse putant, niti videntur hoc loco, quem nimirum sic interpretantur, quasi Lucius jam confessor pridem factus, pontifex postmodum constitutus sit: cum hoc potius dicat Cyprianus, eum simul atque Ecclesiae regimen suscepit, exsilio confessionis laudem meruisse. Quippe Gallus, Cornelii morte nihil profecisse se audiens, si Lucium ejus successorem in Urbe manere sineret, eum statim exsilio multavit. Neque vero haec, reduces vos denuo duplex exsilium aut duplicem reditum, sed pontificis semel suis ablati, qui de integro iisdem redditus sit, simplicem reditum sonant, de quo nunc Cyprianus gratulatur. COUSTANT.
A confessor in [your] administration. Those who think that Lucius was banished with Cornelius before he was chosen Roman pontiff seem to rely on this place, which they interpret as if Lucius, having long since become a confessor, was afterwards made pontiff; whereas Cyprian rather says that as soon as he took up the government of the Church he earned the praise of confession by exile. For Gallus, hearing that he had gained nothing by the death of Cornelius if he let Lucius, his successor, remain in the City, at once punished him with exile. Nor do these words, you, brought back again, signify a double exile or a double return, but the single return of a pontiff once taken from his people and restored to them anew, on which Cyprian now congratulates him. Coustant.
(printed under page 553)
(14) ‹anchor: dispositam› · call in col 1003
Divinitus esse dispositam. His concinit illud Bucheriani catalogi: Hic exsul fuit: et postea nutu Dei incolumis ad Ecclesiam reversus est. COUSTANT.
Was divinely ordered. With this agrees the line of Bucher's catalogue: He was an exile, and afterwards by God's will returned safe to the Church. Coustant.
(14*) ‹anchor: imminente Antichristo› · call in col 1004 Imminente Antichristo. Rigaltius ait, Persecutione. Tertulliano in Apocal, c. 32 describente, hic status rerum dicitur vis maxima universo orbi imminens, Clausula saeculi quae acerbitates horrendas comminatur. FELL.
With Antichrist at hand. Rigault says: persecution. As Tertullian describes it in "Apocal." [as printed; the words are from the Apology], ch. 32, this state of things is called the greatest violence hanging over the whole world, the close of the age, which threatens horrible bitterness. Fell.
(printed under page 553)
- col 1003 "nuprr" (for nuper) - col 1003 "gemiuato" (for geminato)
(3) ‹anchor: prompti omne› · call in col 1004
Prompti omnes Bod. 2.
"Prompti omnes" (all ready): Bodleian 2.
(printed under page 553)
(4) ‹anchor: ad praelium milites› · call in col 1004
Praelium milites Christi Bod. 2 Ebor. NC. 1.
"Praelium milites Christi" (the soldiers of Christ ... battle): Bodleian 2, York, New College 1.
(printed under page 553)
(5) ‹anchor: non solo sermonis› · call in col 1004
Non solo sermonis Bod. 1.
"Non solo sermonis" (not only of speech): Bodleian 1.
(printed under page 553) (14*) ‹anchor: imminente Antichristo› · call in col 1004 (printed in the text as (14)) Imminente Antichristo. Rigaltius ait, Persecutione. Tertulliano in Apocal, c. 32 describente, hic status rerum dicitur vis maxima universo orbi imminens, Clausula saeculi quae acerbitates horrendas comminatur. FELL.
Imminente Antichristo. Rigault says, Persecutione (with persecution at hand). As Tertullian describes it in the Apocal. [Apology], ch. 32, this state of things is called the greatest violence hanging over the whole world, the close of the age, which threatens horrible bitternesses. Fell.
(printed under page 553)
(15) ‹anchor: non solo sermonis› · call in col 1004
Solum sermonis. Octo libri veteres habent solo sermonis, alii duo solo sermone, alius solum sermone. BALUZ.
Solum sermonis. Eight old books have solo sermonis, two others solo sermone, another solum sermone. Baluze.
(printed under page 553)
- col 1004 "Quod in invenimus" (stray "in"; for Quod invenimus)
<!-- The page-foot image is cropped above this band: only its last line is visible. The variant(s) printed before it are not in the image and are not set here. --> (?) ‹anchor: not visible› · call not visible in the page foot [… cropped …] Imp. NC. 2.
[… cropped …] printed editions; New College 2.
(printed under page 554)
(16) ‹anchor: not visible› · call not visible in the page foot
Et ego et Bod. 2.
"Et ego et" (and I and): Bodleian 2.
(printed under page 554)
(16) ‹anchor: not visible› · call not visible in the page foot
Repentina persecutio. Sub Gallo et Valeriano, ut censet illustrissimus episcopus Oxoniensis. Hi enim ut numinum suorum iram lenirent, et pestem in republica grassantem averterent, cujus uti et aliorum malorum causam rejiciebant in Christianos, persecutionem repente adversus eos moverunt. Contra apud Hieronymum in Epistola ad Pammachium et Marcellam pax repentina: Belli rationem pax repentina commutat. Et apud Petronium repentina tranquillitas. BALLUZ.
A sudden persecution. Under Gallus and Valerian, as the most illustrious bishop of Oxford judges. For these, to soothe the anger of their gods and to avert the plague raging in the commonwealth, the cause of which, as of other evils, they laid upon the Christians, suddenly raised a persecution against them. Conversely, in Jerome's Letter to Pammachius and Marcella, a sudden peace: a sudden peace changes the plan of war. And in Petronius, a sudden calm. Baluze.
(printed under page 554)
(17) ‹anchor: not visible› · call not visible in the page foot
Et episcopum. Particula et ms. Corb. deest, nulla sensus mutatione. COUSTANT.
And the bishop. The particle et is missing in the Corbie manuscript, with no change of sense. Coustant.
(printed under page 554)
(18) ‹anchor: not visible› · call not visible in the page foot
Cum episcopo. Idem ms. et alii sex Anglic. cum episcopis. Rectius caeteri libri, cum episcopo, quem unum in una Ecclesia esse debere Cyprianus proxime docuit, et alibi constanter praedicat COUSTANT.
With the bishop. The same manuscript and six others of the English [edition] have cum episcopis (with the bishops). The other books more rightly read cum episcopo (with the bishop), who, as Cyprian has just taught and elsewhere constantly proclaims, must be one in one Church. Coustant.
(printed under page 554)
(19) ‹anchor: not visible› · call not visible in the page foot
Diabolus ut suis parceret. Decuisset Novatianum et ejus sequaces ad Martyria subeunda fuisse promptissimos, qui ab Ecclesiae communione eo nomine recesserunt, quia illa cum lapsis communicaret, et exinde Orthodoxos appellabant, Paciano teste, Apostaticos Capitolinos, et Synedrios. Dicit quidem Socrates quod Novatianus ἐπὶ Οὐαλεριανοῦ τοῦ βασιλέως διωγμὸν κατὰ Χριστιανῶν κινήσαντος ἐμαρτύρησεν, Hist. lib. IV, c. 28, et libellus circumferebatur cui titulus erat Martyrium Novatiani, quem confutavit Eulogius episcopus Alexandrinus lib. sexto contra Novatianos; cujus excerpta habentur in Photii Bibliotheca. Narratio ista dicit Novatianum Martyrem sive Confessorem fuisse, antequam ad Episcopatum promoveretur; quod quidem apertissime falsum. Certe Pacianus disertissimis verbis ait, quod Novatianus nunquam Martyrium tulit. Addit porro, ideo ab Ecclesia recesserat, ne illum labor confessionis urgeret. Nec puduit illum, teste Cypriano, affirmare ingruente persecutione, quod ad philosophiam redire vellet, potius quam capitis periculum adire. FELL.
That the devil might spare his own. It would have become Novatian and his followers to be most ready to undergo martyrdom, since they withdrew from the communion of the Church on the ground that she communicated with the lapsed, and thereafter called the orthodox, as Pacian testifies, apostates of the Capitol, and Synedrians. Socrates does say that Novatian bore witness [as a martyr] when the emperor Valerian stirred up persecution against the Christians (Hist. book IV, ch. 28), and a little book was circulated entitled The Martyrdom of Novatian, which Eulogius, bishop of Alexandria, refuted in the sixth book against the Novatians; excerpts of it are found in Photius's Bibliotheca. That account says that Novatian was a martyr or confessor before he was raised to the episcopate; which is most plainly false. Certainly Pacian says in the clearest words that Novatian never suffered martyrdom. He adds further, he had withdrawn from the Church for this reason, that the toil of confession might not press upon him. Nor was he ashamed, as Cyprian testifies, to declare when persecution was breaking out that he wished to return to philosophy, rather than face danger to his life. Fell.
(printed under page 554)
(20) ‹anchor: not visible› · call not visible in the page foot
Semel et suos Editio Rigaltii semel et ipsos et suos factos. Nescio autem unde acceperit hanc lectionem. Ego quippe illam nuspiam reperi quam in illius editione. Et tamen vidi omnes libros veteres quibus ille usus est. Itaque delevi et ipsos, putans non debere me ponere in mea editione quod illic et in Anglicana scriptum est absque auctoritate. Nam et ipsimet Angli laudant novem libros veteres in quibus ea desunt quae a me praetermissa sunt. Confirmant meam emendationem haec verba Tertulliani ex libro ad Martyres: Non ergo dicat [diabolus], In mea sunt, tentabo illos vilibus discidiis aut inter se desensionibus. Et in libro de Spectaculis ait diabolum, cum oneraretur in exorcismo quod mulierem fidelem quae adierat theatrum aggredi ausus esset, respondisse: Justissime quidem feci, in meo eam inveni. BALUZ.
Once, and his own. Rigault's edition has once, and both themselves and made his own. I do not know where he got this reading. For I have found it nowhere but in his edition. And yet I have seen all the old books that he used. So I have deleted et ipsos, thinking that I ought not to put in my edition what is written there and in the English edition without authority. For the English themselves cite nine old books in which the words I have omitted are missing. These words of Tertullian from the book To the Martyrs confirm my emendation: Let him [the devil] not say, then, "They are in my domain; I will tempt them with base quarrels or with dissensions among themselves." And in the book On the Shows he says that the devil, when he was pressed in exorcism for having dared to attack a believing woman who had gone to the theatre, answered: I did quite rightly; I found her on my ground. Baluze.
(printed under page 554)
(21) ‹anchor: not visible› · call not visible in the page foot
Et ipsos suos. Edit. Oxon., minus concinne. Horum loco in novem mss. exstat tantum suos, in Corb. et suos. Diabolum in Dei servos saevire, ac sibi addictos minime fatigare solere Cyprianus, supra, Epist. 13, n. 3, ad Cornelium fusius edisserit. COUSTANT.
And themselves his own. The Oxford edition, less neatly. In their place nine manuscripts have only suos, the Corbie manuscript et suos. That the devil is wont to rage against the servants of God and hardly to trouble those given over to him, Cyprian sets out more fully above, Letter 13, no. 3, to Cornelius. Coustant.
(printed under page 554)
(22) ‹anchor: not visible› · call not visible in the page foot
Vix osculis. Error certissimus, qui exstat in omnibus fere libris veteribus et editionibus, oculis dat, cum scribendum osculis. Angli recte emendarunt ex ingenio, non auctoritate. Nullum enim veterem codicem laudant auctorem hujus emendationis. Ego illam nuspiam inseni quam in Metensi sancti Arnulphi, quem tardiuscule accepi. Infra in libro de Lapsis, pag. 181: Sanctis osculis adhaerentes. Miror autem me non animadvertisse bonam lectionem in editione Anglicana. BALUZ.
Hardly with kisses. A most certain error, found in almost all the old books and editions, gives oculis (with eyes), when osculis (with kisses) should be written. The English emended it rightly by conjecture, not by authority, for they cite no old manuscript as warrant for this emendation. I found it nowhere but in the Metz manuscript of Saint Arnulf, which I received rather late. Below, in the book On the Lapsed, p. 181: clinging with holy kisses. I wonder, though, that I did not notice the good reading in the English edition. Baluze.
(printed under page 554)
(23) ‹anchor: not visible› · call not visible in the page foot
De adventus vestri. Lectionem veterem, quam nos revocamus, quam omnes fere libri veteres et editiones confirmant, Pamelius pronuntiavit non esse bonam asserens pravam distinctionem a Rembolto inductam, id est eam lectionem quam nos revocamus, obscurare sensum. At si erratum illic est, culpandus non erat Remboltus. Quippe eadem distinctio exstat editione Spirensi et in veteri Veneta, quae eam antecesserunt quam Remboltus emisit. Caeterum Pamelius ait se ita distinxisse, uti distinxit secundum scripturam duorum veterum librorum quos laudat, sicuti nos eamdem distinctionem reperimus etiam in duobus codicibus manuscriptis. BALUZ.
Of your coming. The old reading, which we restore and which almost all the old books and editions confirm, Pamelius declared not to be good, asserting that a faulty punctuation introduced by Rembolt, that is, the reading we restore, obscures the sense. But if there is an error there, Rembolt was not to blame. For the same punctuation appears in the Speyer edition and in the old Venetian, which preceded the one Rembolt published. Moreover, Pamelius says he punctuated as he did following the text of two old books which he cites, just as we too have found the same punctuation in two manuscripts. Baluze.
(printed under page 554)
- col 1005 "Dominicis gregis" (for Dominici gregis) - note (16) "BALLUZ." (for BALUZ.) - note (22) "inseni" (for inveni)
- col 1006 "occurentium" (for occurrentium) - col 1006 "adventus. imago" (full stop and lower-case imago; for adventus, imago)
<!-- The page begins a new piece, EPISTOLA LUCII PAPAE I, Ad Galliae atque Hispaniae episcopos; its note (1) is set here as printed. -->
(printed under page 555)
(1) ‹anchor: EPISTOLA LUCII PAPAE I› · call in col 1007
Epistola suspecta eodem jure cum aliis Isodori mercibus. — Epistola. Non unam hanc duntaxat, sed plures decretales epistolas Lucium pontificem scripsisse, testis est Cyprianus epistola LXVII his verbis: Illi enim, loquitur de Cornelio et Lucio pontificibus, pleni Spiritu Dei et in glorioso martyrio constituti, dandam esse lapsis pacem censuerunt, et poenitentia acta fructum communicationis et pacis negandum non esse, litteris suis signaverunt. Quas hac de re Lucius scripsit epistolas non existant. Quae apud Cyprianum LXX reperitur hoc nomine Lucii insignita, a quibusdam hujus pontificis esse creditum fuit, sed ignorantes fuisse episcopum eodem nomine appellatum, decepti sunt perperam eam, quae alterius est, Lucio pontifici ascribentes. Baronius, anno 257, num. 4.
Letter. Suspect by the same right as the rest of Isidore's wares. — Letter. That Pope Lucius wrote not this one only but several decretal letters, Cyprian is witness in Letter 67, in these words: For they, he is speaking of the popes Cornelius and Lucius, full of the Spirit of God and established in glorious martyrdom, judged that peace should be given to the lapsed, and set down in their letters that, once penance had been done, the fruit of communion and peace was not to be denied. The letters Lucius wrote on this matter do not survive. The one found in Cyprian as Letter 70, marked with the name of Lucius, was believed by some to be this pope's; but, not knowing that there was a bishop called by the same name, they were deceived, wrongly ascribing to Pope Lucius a letter that belongs to the other. Baronius, year 257, no. 4.
(printed under page 555)
- col 1007 "exprominus" (for exprimimus)
APPENDIX UNICA. EPISTOLAE ET DECRETA S. LUCIO ASCRIPTA.
THE SOLE APPENDIX.
<!-- note: a mid-page band printed across the full width of cols 1007 and 1008, set once here under col 1007. Above it stand the last lines of Cyprian's letter to Lucius (col 1007 "mittimus, frater charissime ..." to "perficiat in"; col 1008 "vobis confessionis vestrae ... semper bene valere."), then the Variae lectiones (note 17) and the Variorum notae (24)-(25) at the foot of the upper half, with a rule under them; those are the author's text and the apparatus and are not set here. The band heads the next unit (Epistola Lucii papae I, Ad Galliae atque Hispaniae episcopos), not this letter. Nothing below the band is set: the Lucius letter's title, its Argumentum, chapter list, address and text, and the Variorum notae (1) belong to that next unit. Printed ligature AE in EPISTOLAE is set as ae. -->