PL 3 · cols. 993–1000
Novatianus, Epistola ad S. Cyprianum, cleri Romani nomine scripta
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PL 3 · cols. 993–1000
Editors' preface
Heading: Variorum notae. (printed under page 548)
(1) ‹anchor: PRESBYTERI ET DIACONI› · call in col 993
Diaconi. Diacones edit. Spirensis 1471 et vetus innominata. Et sic inscribitur (epistola xxx, edit. Baluz.) apud Cyprianum. Utroque modo scripserunt auctores ecclesiastici: et vox diaconibus frequenter occurrit in epistolis Cyprianicis JACKSON.
Diaconi. The Speyer edition of 1471 and the old anonymous edition have Diacones. And that is how it is headed in Cyprian (Letter 30 in Baluze's edition). Church writers wrote it both ways, and the form diaconibus occurs often in Cyprian's letters. JACKSON.
(printed under page 548)
(2) ‹anchor: in decretis coelestibus› · call in col 993
Decretis coelestibus. Hanc lectionem reperi in octo codicibus antiquis. Angli monent in codice Vaticano legi castris coelestibus. Quam lectionem merito ait Rigaltius sibi non placere. BALUZ.
Decretis coelestibus ("by heavenly decrees"). I found this reading in eight old manuscripts. The English editors point out that the Vatican manuscript reads castris coelestibus ("by the heavenly camps"). Rigault rightly says that he does not like that reading. BALUZE.
(printed under page 548)
(3) ‹anchor: Deo soli debere se judici› · call in col 993
Deo soli debere se judici. Cod. Vern. apud Fellum. Dei solius debere se judicio. Conjici Jacsonus legendum, Deo soli debere subjici· Sed lectionem vulgatam comprobare videtur ipsemet auctor, qui paulo ante dixit, solo Deo judice esse contentus, COUSTANT. GALLAND.
Deo soli debere se judici ("that they owe their conscience to God alone as judge"). The Verona manuscript, cited by Fell, reads Dei solius debere se judicio ("that they owe it to the judgement of God alone"). Jackson conjectures that we should read Deo soli debere subjici ("that it ought to be subject to God alone"). But the author himself seems to confirm the common reading, since a little earlier he said solo Deo judice esse contentus ("to be content with God alone as judge"). COUSTANT. GALLAND.
(printed under page 548)
(4) ‹anchor: verecundia et ingenita› · call in col 993
Ingenita, Deest haec vox in cod. Lincol, Paulo post deest item in eodem eod. et in edit. Spir vox bonorum. Utrumque recte omissum, ut videtur GALLAND.
Ingenita ("inborn"). This word is missing in the Lincoln manuscript. A little further on, the word bonorum ("good") is likewise missing in the same manuscript and in the Speyer edition. Both seem to have been rightly left out. GALLAND.
(printed under page 548)
(5) ‹anchor: consiliorum bonorum cohaeredes quia› · call in col 993 (the foot misprints this note's number as (6); the text's call is (5), and the next note, Navim, is also numbered (6))
Quia. Cod. Vat. qui Mox Lincol. operari. Sed recte operati propter sequens sociati eadem constructione, JACKSON.
Quia. The Vatican manuscript reads qui. Just after, the Lincoln manuscript reads operari ("to work"). But operati ("having worked") is right, because of the sociati ("joined") that follows in the same construction. JACKSON.
(printed under page 548)
- text, col 993: intabili (for instabili) - note (3): Conjici (for Conjicit) - note (5): numbered (6) at the foot
(6) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 994
Navim, etc. Cod. Sancti Remigii Remensis (et Lincol.) Navem ecclesiasticae disciplinae illidat. Divionensis et recentior Victorinus, navem Ecclesiae falsos illidat in scopulos BALUZ. — Magis placet posterior lectio propter sequentia salutis eccclesiasticae; ne inconcinna videatur oratio GALLAND.
Navim, etc. The manuscript of Saint-Remi at Reims (and the Lincoln manuscript) read Navem ecclesiasticae disciplinae illidat ("dash the ship of the Church's discipline"). The Dijon manuscript and the later Victorinus read navem Ecclesiae falsos illidat in scopulos ("dash the ship of the Church on false rocks"). BALUZE. — The latter reading is preferable because of the words that follow, salutis ecclesiasticae ("of the Church's salvation"), so that the sentence does not seem awkward. GALLAND.
(printed under page 548)
(7) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 994
Faciunt quasi quidam adversi fluctus repellantur. Sic distinguimus cum Jacksono Al. Faciunt quasi quidam adversi fluctus repellantur. GALLAND.
Faciunt quasi quidam adversi fluctus repellantur. We punctuate it this way, following Jackson. Other editions: Faciunt quasi quidam adversi fluctus repellantur. GALLAND. [The two forms are printed alike; the difference was in the punctuation.]
(printed under page 548)
(8) ‹anchor: hunc nuper› · call in col 994
Nunc nuper. Omittit nunc cod. Lincol. GALL.
Nunc nuper ("now, lately"). The Lincoln manuscript leaves out nunc. GALLAND.
(printed under page 548)
(9) ‹anchor: nos severitas› · call in col 994
Antiqua... severitas. Ista, quae addita sunt in editione Manutiana, desunt in antiquis editionibus et in duobus antiquis codd. Habentur autem in aliis. BALUZ.
Antiqua ... severitas ("the ancient ... severity"). These words, added in Manutius's edition, are missing in the old editions and in two old manuscripts. They are found in others, though. BALUZE.
(printed under page 548)
(10) ‹anchor: gloriae degenerem› · call in col 994
Degenerem. Cod. Lincol. degeneres. Sed sequentia honoratum, ignobilem exhaeredem, lectionem vulgatam confirmant. JACKSON.
Degenerem ("degenerate", singular). The Lincoln manuscript reads degeneres (plural). But the words that follow, honoratum, ignobilem, exhaeredem, confirm the common reading. JACKSON.
(printed under page 548)
Heading: Variorum notae. (printed under page 549)
(11) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 995
Superiores nostrae litterae. Hae intercidisse videntur, GALLAND.
Superiores nostrae litterae ("our earlier letter"). This seems to have been lost. GALLAND.
(printed under page 549)
(12) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 995
Irretientes. In uno libro meo veteri, retinentes. In Renensis sancii Dionysii, in retinendis illis diaboli laqueis. BALUZ. — Cod. Lincol. quasi hoc evasuri in retinendis illos diaboli laqueos viderentur, quod, Bodl. I. Fossat, et edit. vetus innominata, quasi hoc evasuri FELL.
Irretientes ("entangling"). One of my old books reads retinentes ("holding"). The Reims manuscript of Saint-Denis [so printed: "Renensis sancii"] reads in retinendis illis diaboli laqueis ("in holding them in the devil's snares"). BALUZE. — The Lincoln manuscript reads quasi hoc evasuri in retinendis illos diaboli laqueos viderentur ("as though they seemed about to escape by this, in holding them in the devil's snares"), and Bodleian 1, the Saint-Maur-des-Fossés manuscript and the old anonymous edition read quasi hoc evasuri ("as though about to escape by this"). FELL.
(printed under page 549)
(13) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 995
Quo. Al. quod Latinius quando. GALLAND.
Quo. Other editions read quod; Latini reads quando. GALLAND.
(printed under page 549)
(14) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 995
Accepta fecissent. Ita codd. Lincol. Bodl. I. Benevent. editt. Manut. Fell. Welch. et Jackson. At Pamelius quem secutus est Baluzius, acta fecissent. Lectionem priorem confirmat Rigaltius: « Rectissime inquit, in Beneventano exemplari et in editione Romana legitur, qui accepta fecissent: hoc est, qui submissos libellos accepissent; sic enim accepto et rato habuerant quidquid illis continebatur. Continebatur autem illum (Libellaticum) illo die in Capitolium ascendisse, ac dedisse thura Jovi: quod etsi ille non fecerat, attamen fecerat, ut se fecisse publice legeretur: lecto scilicet libello, quo videri voluti propositis adversus Evangelium edictis satisfecisse; quod erat, fidem Christo datam deseruisse. »GALLAND.
Accepta fecissent ("had accepted"). So the Lincoln manuscript, Bodleian 1, the Benevento manuscript, and the editions of Manutius, Fell, Welchman and Jackson. But Pamelius, whom Baluze followed, reads acta fecissent. Rigault confirms the first reading: "In the Benevento copy and in the Roman edition," he says, "it reads quite rightly qui accepta fecissent: that is, those who had accepted the certificates submitted for them; for in this way they had taken as accepted and ratified whatever the certificates contained. What they contained was that he (the libellaticus) had gone up to the Capitol on such a day and offered incense to Jupiter. Even if he had not done it, he had still brought it about that he would be read out in public as having done it: once the certificate was read, he wished [so printed: "voluti"] to be seen as having complied with the edicts published against the Gospel, which was to have abandoned the faith pledged to Christ." GALLAND.
(printed under page 549)
(14) [so printed; read (15)] ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 995
Mandano, Sic Natalis ab OEa sententiam dixit in concilio Cathaginensis sub Cypriano pro se et pro Pompeia Sahratensi et Dioga Leptimagnensi, qui mihi mandaverunt. BALUZ.
Mandano [so printed, for Mandando?]. In this way Natalis of Oea gave his opinion at the Council of Carthage under Cyprian on behalf of himself and of Pompeius of Sabratha and Dioga of Leptis Magna, "who have commissioned me". BALUZE.
(printed under page 549)
(16) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 995
Imperavit. Haec lectio videtur optima. Et tamen illam non inveni nisi in uno veteri libro. Caeteri et editiones Pamelianae vetustiores habent impetravit. Pamelius autem mutavit, secutus conjecuram Costerii, quamvis fateatur se ubique legisse impetravit. Sic in epistola XLIV codicis encyclii scriptum est; in codice Bellovacensi quibus impetrare divino judicio pro imperare. Facilis error qui admissus est etiam in alio veteri codice ejusdem Ecclesiae, in breviario nimirum Liberati cap. 18, ubi pro nihil impetrantes dimisit, uti habent editiones et tres libri veteres, codex Ecclesiae Bellovacensis habet imperantes. Sic apud Fulgentium Placiadem lib. II Mythol. ubi agit de Vulcano et Minerva, legendum est Jupiter imperavit pro eo quod ibi legitur impetravit. BALUZ.
Imperavit ("commanded"). This reading seems best. Yet I found it in only one old book. The rest, and the editions older than Pamelius's, have impetravit ("obtained"). Pamelius changed it, following Costerus's conjecture [so printed: "conjecuram"], though he admits he read impetravit everywhere. So it is written in Letter 44 of the encyclical codex; in the Beauvais manuscript, quibus impetrare divino judicio stands for imperare. It is an easy error, made also in another old manuscript of the same church, namely in the Breviarium of Liberatus, ch. 18: where the editions and three old books read nihil impetrantes dimisit ("he sent them away having obtained nothing"), the manuscript of the church of Beauvais has imperantes. Likewise in Fulgentius Planciades [so printed: "Placiadem"], Mythologies book II, where he treats of Vulcan and Minerva, we must read Jupiter imperavit in place of the impetravit read there. BALUZE.
(printed under page 549)
(17) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 996
Proficere. Ita emendandum esse existimavi secutus auctoritatem veterum exemplarium et editionum, pro eo quod posteriores editiones praeferunt procedere. Sed hanc tamen ultimam lectionem ego me reperisse fateor in duobus libris meis veteribus, in Gratianopolitano et in uno Victorino, tum etiam in editione Manutiana: codex Remensis sancti Dionysii et Lamonianus habent prodesse. eodem sensu. BALUZ.
Proficere ("to profit"). I judged that it should be corrected so, following the authority of the old copies and editions, in place of procedere ("to proceed"), which the later editions offer. I admit, though, that I found this last reading in two of my old books, the Grenoble one and one Victorine, and also in Manutius's edition. The Reims manuscript of Saint-Denis and the Lamoignon manuscript have prodesse ("to benefit"), with the same sense. BALUZE.
(printed under page 549)
(18) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 996
Ruina... sarciretur. Unus Baluzius edidit, ruinae sarcirentur: qua vero auctoritate, silet. Mox apud eumdem congruens, ul habet editio Oxoniensis, Al. congruum. GALLAND.
Ruina ... sarciretur ("the ruin ... might be repaired"). Baluze alone printed ruinae sarcirentur ("the ruins might be repaired"), but on what authority he does not say. Just after, he has congruens ("fitting"), as [so printed: "ul"] the Oxford edition has it; other editions read congruum. GALLAND.
(printed under page 549)
(19) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 996
Illibatum dignitatemque servare Quod. Vat. illibata dignitate servare, Quam lectionem retinuit Wulchmanus: sed male apud ipsum, excusum servari. Ctatim vero suspicatur idem editor legendum quam iis qui. GALLAND.
Illibatum dignitatemque servare ("to keep it unimpaired and its dignity"). The Vatican manuscript [so printed: "Quod."] reads illibata dignitate servare ("to keep with dignity unimpaired"). Welchman [so printed: "Wulchmanus"] kept this reading, but in his edition servari is wrongly printed. Right after [so printed: "Ctatim"], the same editor suspects we should read quam iis qui. GALLAND.
(printed under page 549)
(20) ‹anchor: honorem merito› · call in col 996
Merito. Deest haec vox in ms Lincol. Mox idem codex occisione martyrii: mendose, ut quidem puto. GALLAND,
Merito ("deservedly"). This word is missing in the Lincoln manuscript. Just after, the same manuscript reads occisione martyrii ("in the slaying of martyrdom"), wrongly, I think. GALLAND.
(printed under page 549)
Heading: Variorum notae. (printed under page 550)
(21) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 997
Persecutus. Cod. Bodl. I prosecutus: atque hanc lectionem in textum intulit Baluzius. GALL.
Persecutus ("pursued"). Bodleian manuscript 1 reads prosecutus ("followed up"), and Baluze put this reading into the text. GALLAND.
(printed under page 550)
(22) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 997
Animasti. Bodl. I, et Vat. Armasti. GALL.
Animasti ("you have encouraged"). Bodleian 1 and the Vatican manuscript read Armasti ("you have armed"). GALLAND.
(printed under page 550)
(23) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 997
Litteras subjectas habebis. Hujusmodi Novatiani litterae nusquam apparent. GALL.
Litteras subjectas habebis ("you will find the letter appended"). No such letter of Novatian's is to be found anywhere. GALLAND.
(printed under page 550)
(24) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 997
Fabiani. Martyrio sublatus est Fabianus anno Christi CCL. 13 kal. febr. eique successit Cornelius ineunte junio anni CCLI, ut ex Pagio erudimur. GALL.
Fabiani ("of Fabian"). Fabian was taken by martyrdom in the year of Christ 250, on 20 January (the 13th day before the Kalends of February), and Cornelius succeeded him at the beginning of June 251, as we learn from Pagi. GALLAND.
(printed under page 550)
(25) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 997
Quanquam... tractare rationem. Hunc locum recitat Cyprianus in epist. LII edit. Baluz. ad Antonianum. Eam habes infra Cornelianas. Subditque sanctus Martyr: Additum est etiam Novatiano tunc scribente, et quod scripserat sua voce recitante, etc. Quae Cypriani verba descripsit Pacianus in epistola II ad Sympronianum. GALL.
Quanquam ... tractare rationem ("Although ... to deal with the case"). Cyprian quotes this passage in his Letter 52 (Baluze's edition), to Antonianus. You will find it below, after the letters of Cornelius. And the holy martyr adds: "It was added too, Novatian writing it at the time, and reading aloud with his own voice what he had written," etc. Pacian copied out these words of Cyprian in his second letter to Sympronianus. GALLAND.
(printed under page 550)
(26) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 997
Prius Ecclesiae. Cyprianus, I. c. prius esse Ecclesiae. Et mox, diaconibus. GALL.
Prius Ecclesiae ("first ... of the Church"). Cyprian, in the place cited, reads prius esse Ecclesiae. And just after, diaconibus. GALLAND.
(printed under page 550)
(27) ‹anchor: reliquias et ruinas› · call in col 997
Et ruinas. Editio Spirensis et tres libri veteres non habent haec duo vocabula, Veneta vetus habet. Duo alii libri veteres praeferunt laqueos pro ruinas. BALUZ.
Et ruinas ("and ruins"). The Speyer edition and three old books do not have these two words; the old Venice edition has them. Two other old books give laqueos ("snares") in place of ruinas. BALUZE.
(printed under page 550)
(28) ‹anchor: quam funera› · call in col 997
Funera. Codex Sancti Arnulphi habet vulnera. Quae lectio mihi videtur esse melior: eamque posuissem in contextu, si tum cum hic locus cudebatur, habuissem codicem illum. At si quis retinendam putat vocem funera, intelligere oportet mortes, seu potius cadavera mortuorum. BALUZ.
Funera ("deaths"). The manuscript of Saint-Arnoul has vulnera ("wounds"). That reading seems better to me, and I would have put it in the text if I had had that manuscript when this passage was being printed. But if anyone thinks the word funera should be kept, it must be understood as deaths, or rather the corpses of the dead. BALUZE.
(printed under page 550)
- text, col 997: differeudae (for differendae)
(29) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 998
Ecclesiastico nomini. Ita nos reposuimus, editionem Anglicanam et auctoritatem quorumdam veterum librorum secuti. Si quis tamen legere malit nomine, non repugno. BALUZ.
Ecclesiastico nomini ("to the Church's name"). We have restored it so, following the English edition and the authority of some old books. If anyone prefers to read nomine, though, I do not object. BALUZE.
(printed under page 550)
(30) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 998
Desiderare. Duo libri veteres habent, desiderare debere medicinam. BALUZ.
Desiderare ("to long for"). Two old books have desiderare debere medicinam ("ought to long for the remedy"). BALUZE.
(printed under page 550)
(31) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 998
Poenitentia. Antea legebatur poenitentiam: eamque lectionem confirmant veteres editiones et septem vetera exemplaria. Nostram quae videtur esse melior, confirmant tres antiqui codices. BALUZ.
Poenitentia ("penance"; the text reads poenitentiae). It used to read poenitentiam (accusative), and the old editions and seven old copies confirm that reading. Ours, which seems better, is confirmed by three ancient manuscripts. BALUZE.
(printed under page 550)
(32) ‹anchor: patientia› · call in col 998
Patientia. Poenitentia Cod. Lincoln,
Patientia ("patience"). The Lincoln manuscript reads Poenitentia ("penance"). [The note is printed ending with a comma and no editor's name.]
(printed under page 550)
Heading: Variorum notae. [Notes 33–37 close the letter; the page then opens Sanctus Lucius I, Papa et Martyr, Notitia historica, whose own notes (1)–(2) follow below.] (printed under page 551)
(33) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 999
Aeternamque. Sic edit. ferme omnes. Cod. Vatic. et tetram: quam lectionem in textum inferre non dubitarunt editores Anglicani. GALL.
Aeternamque ("and eternal"). So nearly all the editions. The Vatican manuscript reads et tetram ("and foul"), and the English editors did not hesitate to put that reading into the text. GALLAND.
(printed under page 551)
(34) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 999
Vicinis nobis. Ita Fellus et Baluzius. Omittunt nobis Welchmanus et Jacksonus.
Vicinis nobis ("to our neighbours"). So Fell and Baluze. Welchman and Jackson leave out nobis.
(printed under page 551)
(35) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 999
Et quos. Conjunctionem et redundare putat Welchmanus. Jacksono autem sensus videtur et cum quibusdam quos. Mox deest positis in cod. Lincoln. GALL.
Et quos ("and whom"). Welchman thinks the conjunction et is redundant. To Jackson, though, the sense seems to be et cum quibusdam quos ("and with some whom"). Just after, positis is missing in the Lincoln manuscript. GALLAND.
(printed under page 551)
(1) ‹anchor: Maurini arbitrantur› · call in col 999
Pag. ed. ann. 252, § 14; l'Art de verifier, loc. cit.
Pagi, edition, year 252, § 14; L'Art de vérifier les dates, in the place cited.
(printed under page 551)
Heading: Variorum notae. (printed under page 551)
(36) ‹anchor: temperandam esse credidimus› · call in col 1000
Credidimus. Ita ex cod. Bodl. I Fellus, Welchmanus et Jacksonus. Al. credimus. GALL.
Credidimus ("we have believed"). So Fell, Welchman and Jackson, from Bodleian manuscript 1. Other editions read credimus ("we believe"). GALLAND.
(printed under page 551)
(37) ‹anchor: moras possunt dilationis sustinere› · call in col 1000
In suspensio... moras... sustinere. In suspenso emendavit Morellius pro eo quod antea legebatur in suspendio. Unus liber meus habet voto suspenso. Mox cod. Gratianopolitanus, qui foris possunt dilectionem sustinere. Vetustiores editiones, foris possunt dilatione sustineri. BALUZ.
In suspensio [so printed] ... moras ... sustinere ("in suspense ... to bear the delays"). Morel corrected it to in suspenso, in place of the earlier reading in suspendio. One of my books has voto suspenso ("with their wish held in suspense"). Just after, the Grenoble manuscript reads qui foris possunt dilectionem sustinere ("who can sustain love from outside"). The older editions read foris possunt dilatione sustineri ("can be sustained outside by the delay"). BALUZE.
(printed under page 551) Notitia historica on Lucius I: (printed under page 551)
(2) ‹anchor: scribit Cyprianus› · call in col 1000
Cyprian., Ep. 61, ad Lucium, al. 58,
Cyprian, Letter 61, to Lucius (in other editions 58).
(printed under page 551)