PL 35 · cols. 2199–2206
Pseudo-Augustinus, De benedictionibus patriarchae Jacob
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PL 35 · cols. 2199–2206
Editors' preface
(1) ‹anchor: de ipso Juda facit› · call in col 2201
Ms. Corb.: Quod autem dicit, Fili mi, apostrophen ad ipsum Judam facit.
The Corbie manuscript reads: "But in saying, My son, he makes an apostrophe to Judah himself."
(printed under page 449)
(a) ‹anchor: et maculasti stratum ejus (Gen. III, 4)› · call in col 2201
Ex Hieronymo, lib. Quaest. in Genesim.
From Jerome, the book of Questions on Genesis.
(printed under page 449)
(b) ‹anchor: commoventur viscera parentum› · call in col 2201
Haec non sunt Hieronymi.
These words are not Jerome's.
(printed under page 449)
(c) ‹anchor: in Hebraeo habetur, Soreth› · call in col 2201
Leg. sorec : sic enim vitis hebraice appellatur.
Read sorec: for that is what the vine is called in Hebrew.
(printed under page 449)
(d) ‹anchor: est exspectatio gentium› · call in col 2201
Non sunt haec Hieronymi.
These words are not Jerome's.
(printed under page 449)
(a) ‹anchor: vivunt de altari› · call in col 2203
Hucusque ex Hieronymo.
Up to this point, from Jerome.
(printed under page 450)
(a) ‹anchor: terram quod optima› · call in col 2204
Ex Gregorio, lib. i Moral., cap. 6.
From Gregory, Moralia, book 1, chapter 6.
(printed under page 450)
(a) ‹anchor: Dicunt quidam› · call in col 2205
Ex Gregorio, lib. 31 Moral., cap. 10.
From Gregory, Moralia, book 31, chapter 10.
(printed under col 2205, above the full-width rule) (*) ‹anchor: none; unnumbered editors' censura printed in small type across the full page width below the rule, no call letter› · cols 2205–2206 Hoc opus Augustino abjudicant eruditi quique. Nec injuria sane, quandoquidem res ratioque docendi, ut de stili distantia nihil dicamus, procul abhorret a S. Doctoris ingenio et fide. In quaestione secunda dicitur Deus, ut diaboli praesumptionem non potestate sed ratione destrueret, materiam condidisse, quae esset rerum confusio, ex qua faceret mundum. In Q. decima tertia infantes qui in Sodomis cum parentibus perierunt, a gehenna liberos esse, quia in aliena causa occisi sunt, absolute pronuntiatur. Quo loco Quaestionum auctor, quisquis est, originale peccatum inficiari videbatur Bellarmino. Et revera ad hanc ipsam quaestionem respondens Alcuinus in opere super Genesim, interrog. 103, cum alioquin iisdem, quae hic leguntur, verbis usus fuerit, nequaquam tamen originalis peccati reatum dissimulavit : Nonne, ait, provisum est illis, ne diu viventes exempla sequerentur patrum; et ut levius in futuro crucientur, vel omnino non, aliena causa occisi? In Q. vigesima prima, et quadragesima quinta, contendit auctor, mulierem non esse creatam ad imaginem Dei : contra quam docet Augustinus in lib. 3 de Genesi ad litt., cap. 22. In Q. vigesima tertia non patitur quidquam difficultatis, ut Augustinus, circa originem animae. Q. vigesima septima non Samuelem a pythonissa excitatum, sed ejus spectrum sive diabolum Saüli apparuisse sic asserit, ut falsam et absurdam esse velit aliam opinionem : quam tamen pulchre congruere sacris Scripturis ostendit Augustinus in lib. 2 Quaest. ad Simplicianum. Q. quadragesima prima illud Geneseos, Spiritus Domini ferebatur super aquas, pugnat ne intelligatur de Spiritu sancto, de quo passim ab Augustino explicatur. Q. quadragesima tertia vehementer improbat votum Jephte, quem facinorosum appellat, nullumque justitiae testimonium habere dicit, cum is tamen inter insignes viros laudetur in Epistola ad Hebr., cap. 11. In Q. quadragesima sexta nota ignorantiae aut stultitiae condemnat eos, qui dicunt Samuelem functum officio sacerdotis, quod ipse cum aliis plurimis sentit Augustinus in lib. 17 de Civit. Dei, cap 4. In Q. quadragesima octava de Filio Dei loquitur more Arianorum. Q. quinquagesima sexta dicit immerito quibusdam videri (quod tamen Augustino etiam visum est) Joseph esse filium Heli et Jacob, unius secundum naturam, alterius secundum Legem. Q. quinquagesima nona quod apud Joannem dixit Dominus, Spiritus ubi vult spirat, vult de vento interpretandum esse, non de Spiritu sancto : cum Augustinus aliter interpretetur. Q. centesima octava multis conviciis insectatur eos, qui volunt Hebraeos dictos ab Heber, non ab Abraham : at Augustinus in lib. 2 Retract., cap. 16, et de Civitate Dei lib. 16, cap. 11, eam sequitur sententiam. Q. centesima nona incumbit ut suadeat Melchisedech non hominem fuisse, sed Spiritum sanctum, ipsumque in oblatione dici summum sacerdotem improbat. Q. centesima decima quinta dicit Abrahamum cum patre suo idola coluisse : contra Augustinus, in lib. 16 de Civit. Dei, cap. 13. In Q. centesima decima sexta ille pascha a passione, Augustinus vero ab hebraea voce transitum significante censet fuisse appellatum, in Epist. 53 ad Januarium, n. 2. Praeterea Pelagianam haeresim quaestiones aliquot resipiunt Lovaniensium Theologorum judicio, veluti Quaest. septuagesima nona, octogesima, octogesima tertia, etc. Perpaucae demum sunt, quae non aliqua ex parte pugnent in Augustini doctrinam; ut superfluum sit his addere, quod hujus operis prolixi nullam S. Doctor mentionem facit in libris Retractationum, cum illic diligenter Quaestionum libros alios recenseat.
Every scholar denies this work to Augustine, and rightly so, since its matter and its way of teaching (to say nothing of the difference in style) are far removed from the holy Doctor's mind and faith. In the second question God is said to have created matter, a confusion of things out of which he would make the world, so that he might overthrow the devil's presumption not by power but by reason. In the thirteenth question it is stated outright that the infants who perished in Sodom with their parents are free of hell, because they were killed in another's cause. In this place the author of the Questions, whoever he is, seemed to Bellarmine to deny original sin. And indeed Alcuin, answering this very question in his work on Genesis, interrogation 103, though he otherwise used the same words that are read here, by no means passed over the guilt of original sin: "Was it not provided for them," he says, "that they should not live long and follow their fathers' example; and that they should be tormented more lightly in the future, or not at all, being killed in another's cause?" In the twenty-first and forty-fifth questions the author contends that woman was not created in the image of God, against which Augustine teaches in book 3 of On Genesis according to the Letter, chapter 22. In the twenty-third question he does not allow, as Augustine does, any difficulty about the origin of the soul. The twenty-seventh question asserts that it was not Samuel raised by the pythoness, but his phantom or the devil, that appeared to Saul, and so asserts it as to hold the other opinion false and absurd; yet Augustine, in book 2 of the Questions to Simplician, shows that this opinion fits the holy Scriptures beautifully. The forty-first question argues that the verse of Genesis, "The Spirit of the Lord was borne over the waters," is not to be understood of the Holy Spirit, of whom Augustine everywhere explains it. The forty-third question vehemently condemns the vow of Jephthah, whom it calls a criminal and says has no witness to his righteousness, though he is praised among the illustrious men in the Epistle to the Hebrews, chapter 11. In the forty-sixth question it condemns of ignorance or folly those who say that Samuel performed the office of a priest, which Augustine himself, with very many others, holds in book 17 of the City of God, chapter 4. In the forty-eighth question it speaks of the Son of God in the manner of the Arians. The fifty-sixth question says that some wrongly think (as Augustine nevertheless also thought) that Joseph was the son of Heli and of Jacob, of the one by nature, of the other by the Law. The fifty-ninth question would have what the Lord said in John, "The Spirit breathes where he will," interpreted of the wind, not of the Holy Spirit, whereas Augustine interprets it otherwise. The hundred and eighth question assails with many insults those who hold that the Hebrews are named from Heber, not from Abraham; but Augustine follows that opinion in book 2 of the Retractations, chapter 16, and in the City of God, book 16, chapter 11. The hundred and ninth question labours to persuade that Melchizedek was not a man but the Holy Spirit, and rejects his being called high priest in the offering. The hundred and fifteenth question says that Abraham worshipped idols with his father; against this Augustine, in book 16 of the City of God, chapter 13. In the hundred and sixteenth question that author [derives] "pasch" from "passion", whereas Augustine judges that it was so named from a Hebrew word meaning "passing over", in Letter 53 to Januarius, number 2. Moreover, in the judgement of the Louvain theologians several questions smack of the Pelagian heresy, such as questions seventy-nine, eighty, eighty-three, etc. Finally, very few are not at odds in some respect with Augustine's teaching; so that it is superfluous to add that the holy Doctor makes no mention of this lengthy work in the books of the Retractations, although there he carefully reviews his other books of Questions.
(printed under page 451)
1 In Ms. Corb sic desinit: Ascensor equi est quisquis iniquitatibus hujus mundi extollitur, qui retro cadere dicitur.
1 In the Corbie manuscript it ends thus: The rider of the horse is whoever is lifted up by the iniquities of this world, who is said to fall backwards.
<!-- Q2b: footnote 1 is printed at the foot of the column itself (call after "retro"), above the rule, not in the page-foot crops, which carry the opening of the ADMONITIO (next unit). -->