Deo nostro, et non accepero, facile de me potest dicere unusquisque, Non habet charitatem; et de quolibet homine hujus temporis facile dici potest; et sentiat quis quod vult homo de homine: majorem quaestionem non faciunt, nisi illi viri, quos sanctos constat fuisse cum scriberent, et modo esse cum Deo. Quis habet charitatem, si eam Paulus non habebat, qui dicebat, Os nostrum patet ad vos, o Corinthii, cor nostrum dilatatum est; non angustamini in nobis (II Cor. VI, 11, 12); qui dicebat, Impendar pro animabus vestris (Id. XII, 15): et tanta gratia in illo erat, ut manifestaretur eum habere charitatem? Invenimus eum tamen petisse, et non accepisse. Quid dicimus, fratres? Quaestio est; intenti estote ad Deum. Magna et ista quaestio est. Quomodo de peccato ubi dictum est, Qui natus est ex Deo, non peccat (I Joan. III, 9); invenimus hoc esse peccatum violare charitatem, et hoc proprie designatum esse in hoc loco: sic et nunc quaerimus quid dixerit. Si enim verba attendas, planum videtur; si exempla, obscurum est. Verbis his nihil est planius: « Et quidquid postulaverimus, accipiemus ab eo; quia mandata ejus servamus, et quae placent illi, in conspectu ejus facimus. Quidquid postulaverimus, » ait, « accipiemus ab eo. » Angustavit vehementer. Quia et ibi angustaret, si diceret omne peccatum: sed ideo invenimus locum exponendi, quia de certo peccato dixit, non de omni; sed de quodam peccato, quod omnis qui ex Deo natus est, non facit: et invenimus ipsum quoddam peccatum violationem esse charitatis. Et habemus exemplum de Evangelio manifestum, quando ait Dominus, Si non venissem, peccatum non haberent (Joan. XV, 22). Quid ergo? ad innocentes Judaeos venerat, quia sic loquitur? Ergo si ipse non veniret, peccatum non haberent? Praesentia ergo medici fecit aegrotum, febrem non abstulit? Quis hoc vel demens dicat? Ille non venit nisi curare et sanare aegrotos. Quare ergo dixit, Si non venissem, peccatum non haberent, nisi quia certum quoddam peccatum voluit intelligi? Quoddam enim peccatum non haberent Judaei. Quod peccatum? Quo in eum non crediderunt, quo praesentem contempserunt. Sicut ergo ibi peccatum dixit, et non est consequens ut omne peccatum intelligamus, sed certum peccatum: sic et hic non omne peccatum, ne contrarius sit illi loco ubi ait, Si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus, nosmetipsos seducimus, et veritas in nobis non est (I Joan. I, 8); sed certum quoddam peccatum, id est, violationem charitatis. Hic autem plus nos constrinxit: Si petierimus, dixit, si nos non accusaverit cor nostrum, et renuntiaverit in conspectu Dei quia vera dilectio est in nobis; quidquid postulaverimus, ab eo accipiemus.
to our God, and do not receive it, anyone can easily say of me, He has not charity; and it can easily be said of any man of this time; and let anyone think what he will, man of man: those who raise the greater question are none but those men who are known to have been saints when they wrote, and to be with God now. Who has charity, if Paul had it not, who said, Our mouth is open to you, O Corinthians, our heart is enlarged; you are not straitened in us (II Cor. 6:11, 12); who said, I will be spent for your souls (II Cor. 12:15): and so great was the grace in him that it was made manifest that he had charity? Yet we find that he asked, and did not receive. What do we say, brethren? It is a question; be attentive to God. This too is a great question. As concerning sin, where it was said, He who is born of God does not sin (I John 3:9), we found that this sin is to violate charity, and that this was properly marked out in that place: so now too we ask what he meant. For if you attend to the words, it seems plain; if to the examples, it is obscure. Nothing is plainer than these words: « And whatever we ask, we shall receive from Him; because we keep His commandments, and do the things that please Him in His sight. Whatever we ask, » he says, « we shall receive from Him. » He has straitened us exceedingly. For there too he would straiten us if he spoke of every sin: but we therefore found a way of expounding the place, because he spoke of a certain sin, not of every one; but of a certain sin which everyone who is born of God does not commit: and we found that this certain sin is the violation of charity. And we have a plain example from the Gospel, when the Lord says, If I had not come, they would not have sin (John 15:22). What then? had He come to innocent Jews, since He speaks thus? So if He Himself had not come, they would not have sin? Did the presence of the physician, then, make the man sick, and not take away the fever? Who, even a madman, would say this? He came only to cure and heal the sick. Why then did He say, If I had not come, they would not have sin, unless because He wished a certain particular sin to be understood? For there was a certain sin the Jews would not have had. What sin? That by which they did not believe in Him, by which they despised Him when present. As, then, He spoke there of sin, and it does not follow that we understand every sin, but a certain sin: so here too not every sin, lest it be contrary to that place where he says, If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us (I John 1:8); but a certain particular sin, that is, the violation of charity. But here he has bound us more tightly: If we ask, he said, if our heart does not accuse us, and declares in the sight of God that true love is in us; whatever we ask, we shall receive from Him.
6. Jam ergo dixi Charitati vestrae, fratres, nemo attendat ad nos. Quid enim sumus nos? Aut quid estis vos? Quid, nisi Ecclesia Dei, quae nota est omnibus? Et si illi placet, in illa sumus; et qui dilectione in illa manemus, ibi perseveremus, si volumus ostendere dilectionem quam habemus. Verumtamen de apostolo Paulo quid mali sensuri sumus? Ipse non diligeba⟨t⟩
6. Now, then, I have said to Your Charity, brethren, let no one attend to us. For what are we? Or what are you? What, but the Church of God, which is known to all? And if it pleases Him, we are in it; and let us who abide in it by love persevere there, if we wish to show the love we have. Yet what evil are we to think of the apostle Paul? Did he himself not love