: Domine, da mihi hanc aqu⟨a⟩m, ut non sitiam, neque veniam huc haurire. Ad laborem indigentia cogebat, et laborem infirmitas recusabat. Utinam audiret, Venite ad me, omnes qui laboratis et onerati estis, et ego vos reficiam (Matth. XI, 28). Hoc enim ei dicebat Jesus, ut jam non laboraret: sed illa nondum intelligebat.
Lord, give me this water, that I may not thirst, nor come here to draw. Need was driving her to toil, and weakness was refusing the toil. Would that she heard, Come to Me, all you who toil and are burdened, and I will refresh you (Matt. 11:28). For this is what Jesus was saying to her, that she might no longer toil; but she did not yet understand.
18. Denique volens ut intelligeret, dicit ei Jesus: Vade, voca virum tuum, et veni huc. Quid est, Voca virum tuum? Per virum suum ei volebat aquam illam dare? An quia non intelligebat, per virum suum eam volebat docere? Forte quomodo ait Apostolus de mulieribus, Si quid autem volunt discere, domi viros suos interrogent? Sed ibi dicitur, domi viros suos interrogent, ubi non est Jesus qui doceat: denique dicitur mulieribus quas prohibebat Apostolus loqui in Ecclesia (I Cor. XIV, 35, 34). Cum vero ipse Dominus aderat, et praesens praesenti loquebatur? quid opus erat ut per virum ejus ei loqueretur? Numquid per virum suum loquebatur Mariae sedenti ad pedes suos, et excipienti verbum suum, quando Martha circa multum ministerium etiam de sororis suae felicitate occupatissima murmurabat (Luc. X, 39, 40)? Ergo, fratres mei, audiamus et intelligamus quod ait Dominus, Voca virum tuum, mulieri. Forte enim et animae nostrae dicit, Voca virum tuum. Quaeramus et de viro animae. Cur jam non ipse Jesus vir animae verus est? Adsit intellectus, quoniam quod dicturi sumus, vix capitur nisi ab intentis: adsit ergo intellectus ut capiatur, et ipse intellectus erit fortasse vir animae.
18. At length, wishing that she should understand, Jesus says to her: Go, call your husband, and come here. What is, Call your husband? Was He wishing to give her that water through her husband? Or, because she did not understand, was He wishing to teach her through her husband? Perhaps as the Apostle says concerning women, But if they wish to learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home? But there it is said, let them ask their husbands at home, where Jesus is not present to teach; indeed it is said to women whom the Apostle was forbidding to speak in the Church (1 Cor. 14:35, 34). But when the Lord Himself was present, and He, present, was speaking to her, present? what need was there that He should speak to her through her husband? Was He speaking through her husband to Mary as she sat at His feet and received His word, when Martha, very much occupied about much serving, was even murmuring at her sister's happiness (Luke 10:39, 40)? Therefore, my brothers, let us hear and understand what the Lord says to the woman, Call your husband. For perhaps He says to our soul too, Call your husband. Let us inquire also about the husband of the soul. Why is not Jesus Himself already the true husband of the soul? Let understanding be present, since what we are about to say is scarcely grasped except by the attentive: let understanding therefore be present, that it may be grasped, and understanding itself will perhaps be the husband of the soul.
19. Videns ergo Jesus quia mulier non intelligebat, et volens eam intelligere, Voca, inquit, virum tuum. Ideo enim nescis quod dico, quia intellectus tuus non adest: loquor ego secundum spiritum, tu audis secundum carnem. Quae loquor, nec ad voluptatem aurium pertinent, nec ad oculos, nec ad olfactum, nec ad gustum, nec ad tactum; mente sola capiuntur, intellectu solo hauriuntur: ille intellectus non tibi adest, quomodo capis quod dico? Voca virum tuum, praesenta intellectum tuum. Quid tibi est enim animam habere? Non est magnum, nam et pecus habet. Unde tu melior? Quia intellectum habes, quod pecus non habet. Quid est ergo, Voca virum tuum? Non me capis, non me intelligis: de dono Dei tibi loquor, tu autem carnem cogitas; secundum carnem sitire non vis, ego spiritum alloquor: absens est intellectus tuus, Voca virum tuum. Noli esse sicut equus et mulus, quibus non est intellectus (Psal. XXXI, 9). Ergo, fratres mei, animam habere, et intellectum non habere, hoc est, non adhibere, nec secundum eum vivere, bestialis est vita. Est enim in nobis quiddam bestiale quo in carne vivimus, sed intellectu regendum est. Motus enim animae secundum carnem se moventis, et in delicias carnales immoderate diffluere cupientis, regit desuper intellectus. Qui debet dici vir? qui regit, an qui regitur? Procul dubio cum ordinata vita est, intellectus animam regit, ad ipsam animam pertinens. Non enim aliquid aliud est quam anima, sed aliquid animae est intellectus: quomodo non aliquid aliud quam caro est oculus, sed aliquid carnis est oculus. Cum autem carnis
19. Jesus therefore, seeing that the woman did not understand, and wishing her to understand, says, Call your husband. For the reason you do not know what I am saying is that your understanding is not present: I speak according to the spirit, you hear according to the flesh. The things I speak pertain neither to the pleasure of the ears, nor to the eyes, nor to the smell, nor to the taste, nor to the touch; they are grasped by the mind alone, they are drawn up by the understanding alone: that understanding is not present in you; how do you grasp what I am saying? Call your husband, make your understanding present. For what is it to you to have a soul? It is no great thing, for even a beast has one. In what are you better? Because you have understanding, which a beast does not have. What then is, Call your husband? You do not grasp Me, you do not understand Me: I speak to you of the gift of God, but you are thinking of the flesh; you do not wish to thirst according to the flesh, I am addressing the spirit: your understanding is absent; Call your husband. Do not be like the horse and the mule, which have no understanding (Ps. 31:9). Therefore, my brothers, to have a soul and not to have understanding, that is, not to use it nor to live according to it, is a beastly life. For there is in us something beastly by which we live in the flesh, but it must be ruled by the understanding. For the understanding rules from above the motions of the soul, which moves itself according to the flesh and desires to flow away immoderately into carnal delights. Which ought to be called the husband? that which rules, or that which is ruled? Without doubt, when life is well ordered, the understanding rules the soul, belonging to the soul itself. For the understanding is not something other than the soul, but something of the soul: just as the eye is not something other than the flesh, but something of the flesh. But though the eye is something of the flesh,