Migne Reading Room

PL 35 · cols. 1510–1521

Augustinus, In Joannis Evangelium tractatus XIII-XIX

Tractate XV

PL 35:1510
carne. Manens enim Deus apud Patrem, apud homines factus est homo, ut tu per illum qui ad te factus est homo, fieres talis qualis capit Deum. Non enim homo poterat capere Deum: videre poterat homo hominem, capere Deum non poterat. Unde non poterat capere Deum? Quia oculum cordis unde caperet, non habebat. Erat ergo aliquid intus saucium, et aliquid foris sanum: corporis oculos habebat sanos, cordis oculos habebat saucios. Factus est ille homo ad corporis oculum; ut credens in eum qui videri corporaliter potuit, curareris ad eum ipsum videndum quem spiritualiter videre non poteras. Tanto tempore vobiscum sum, et non cognovistis me, Philippe? Qui me vidit, vidit et Patrem. Quare illi non illum videbant? Ecce videbant illum, et Patrem non videbant: videbant carnem, sed majestas latebat. Quod videbant discipuli qui amaverunt, viderunt et Judaei qui crucifixerunt. Intus ergo erat totus ille, et sic intus in carne, ut apud Patrem maneret: non enim deseruit Patrem quando venit ad carnem.
by the flesh. For abiding as God with the Father, He was made man among men, so that through Him Who was made man towards you, you might become such as can receive God. For man could not receive God: man could see man, he could not receive God. Why could he not receive God? Because he did not have the eye of the heart with which to receive. So there was something wounded within, and something sound without: he had the eyes of the body sound, he had the eyes of the heart wounded. He was made man for the eye of the body, so that, believing in Him Who could be seen bodily, you might be healed for seeing that very One Whom you could not see spiritually. Have I been with you so long a time, and you have not known Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father also. Why did they not see Him? See, they were seeing Him, and they were not seeing the Father: they were seeing the flesh, but the majesty lay hidden. What the disciples who loved saw, the Jews who crucified also saw. So He was wholly within, and within the flesh in such a way that He abode with the Father: for He did not desert the Father when He came to the flesh.
13. Carnalis cogitatio non capit quod dico: differat intellectum, et incipiat a fide; audiat quod sequitur: Qui credit in Filium, habet vitam aeternam: qui autem incredulus est Filio, non videbit vitam, sed ira Dei manet super eum. Non dixit, ira Dei venit ad eum; sed, ira Dei manet super eum. Omnes qui nascuntur mortales, habent secum iram Dei. Quam iram Dei? Quam accepit primus Adam. Si enim peccavit primus homo, et audivit, Morte morieris (Gen. II, 17); factus est mortalis ille, et coepimus nasci mortales; cum ira Dei nati sumus. Venit inde Filius non habens peccatum, et indutus est carne, indutus est mortalitate. Si ille nobiscum communicavit iram Dei, nos pigri sumus cum illo communicare gratiam Dei? Qui ergo non vult credere in Filium, ira Dei manet super eum. Quae ira Dei? De qua dicit Apostolus, Fuimus et nos natura filii irae sicut et caeteri (Ephes. II, 3). Omnes ergo filii irae; quia de maledicto mortis venientes. Crede in Christum factum pro te mortalem, ut illum capias immortalem: quando enim ceperis ejus immortalitatem, nec tu eris mortalis. Vivebat, moriebaris: mortuus est, ut vivas. Attulit gratiam Dei, abstulit iram Dei. Deus vicit mortem, ne mors vinceret hominem.
13. Carnal thinking does not grasp what I say: let it put off understanding, and begin from faith; let it hear what follows: He who believes in the Son has eternal life: but he who is unbelieving towards the Son will not see life, but the wrath of God abides upon him. He did not say, the wrath of God comes to him; but, the wrath of God abides upon him. All who are born mortal have the wrath of God with them. What wrath of God? That which the first Adam received. For if the first man sinned, and heard, You shall die the death (Gen. 2:17); he was made mortal, and we began to be born mortal; we were born with the wrath of God. Thence came the Son, not having sin, and He was clothed with flesh, clothed with mortality. If He shared with us the wrath of God, are we slow to share with Him the grace of God? So he who will not believe in the Son, the wrath of God abides upon him. What wrath of God? That of which the Apostle says, We too were by nature children of wrath, even as the rest (Eph. 2:3). So all are children of wrath, because they come from the curse of death. Believe in Christ, made mortal for you, so that you may receive Him immortal: for when you have received His immortality, you too will not be mortal. He was living, you were dying: He died, that you may live. He brought the grace of God, He took away the wrath of God. God conquered death, lest death should conquer man.
TRACTATUS XV.
Tractate 15.
Ab eo Evangelii loco, Ut ergo cognovit Jesus quia audierunt Pharisaei, quia Jesus plures discipulos facit, etc., usque ad id, Et scimus quia hic est vere Salvator mundi. Cap. IV, ℣. 1-42.
From that passage of the Gospel, So when Jesus knew that the Pharisees had heard that Jesus makes more disciples, etc., up to this, And we know that this is truly the Saviour of the world. Chapter 4, verses 1-42.
1. Non rude est auribus Charitatis vestrae, evangelistam Joannem velut aquilam volare altius, caliginemque terrae transcendere, et lucem veritatis firmioribus oculis intueri. Multa enim jam ex Evangelio ejus per ministerium nostrum Domino adjuvante tractata sunt: ex ordine autem sequitur haec lectio, quae
1. It is not unfamiliar to the ears of your Charity that the evangelist John, like an eagle, flies higher, and transcends the mist of the earth, and gazes upon the light of truth with steadier eyes. For many things from his Gospel have already been treated through our ministry, with the Lord's help: and in order there now follows this reading, which
Editors' notes and page, col. 1510

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1510

Editi, curreres. Consentiunt Mss., exceptis duobus qui ferunt, curareris.

The printed editions: "curreres" ("you would run"). The manuscripts agree, except two, which have "curareris" ("you would be healed").

(printed under page 103)

(2) ‹anchor: ret hominem› · call in col 1510

Sic aliquot optimae notae Mss. At editi, bibit mortem, ne mors biberet hominem.

So some manuscripts of the best quality. But the printed editions read: "bibit mortem, ne mors biberet hominem" ("he drank death, lest death should drink man").

(printed under page 103)

Page

  • running head: TUS XV. CAPUT IV. (cut off at the left edge of the image)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1511
hodie recitata est. Ea quae dicturus sum Domino donante multi sic audituri estis, ut magis recognoscatis quam discatis. Non ideo tamen pigra debet esse intentio, quia non est cognitio, sed recognitio. Hoc lectum est, et hanc lectionem tractandam gestamus in manibus, quod Dominus Jesus ad puteum Jacob loquebatur cum Samaritana muliere. Dicta enim ibi sunt magna mysteria, et magnarum similitudines rerum; pascentes animam esurientem, reficientes languentem.
was read today. Many of you, the Lord granting, will hear the things I am about to say in such a way that you recognize them rather than learn them. Yet attention ought not to be sluggish on that account, because it is not cognition but recognition. This is what has been read, and this is the reading we hold in our hands to be treated: that the Lord Jesus was speaking with the Samaritan woman at Jacob's well. For great mysteries were spoken there, and likenesses of great things, feeding the hungry soul and refreshing the languishing one.
2. Dominus enim haec « cum audisset, cognovisse Pharisaeos quod plures discipulos faceret quam Joannes, et plures baptizaret (quanquam Jesus non baptizaret, sed discipuli ejus), reliquit Judaeam terram, et abiit iterum in Galilaeam. » Hinc diutius disputandum non est, ne immorantes in manifestis, angustias temporis patiamur ad obscura scrutanda et aperienda. Utique Dominus si sciret Pharisaeos ita de se cognovisse, quod plures discipulos faceret, et quod plures baptizaret, ut hoc eis ad salutem valeret sequendi eum, ut et ipsi essent discipuli, et ipsi vellent ab eo baptizari; magis non relinqueret Judaeam terram, sed propter illos maneret ibi: quia vero cognovit eorum scientiam, simul cognovit et invidentiam, quia non hoc propterea didicerunt ut sequerentur, sed ut persequerentur; abiit inde. Poterat quidem ille et praesens ab his non teneri, si nollet; non occidi, si nollet; quia potuit et non nasci, si nollet: sed quia in omni re quam gessit ut homo, hominibus in se credituris praebebat exemplum (quia unusquisque servus Dei non peccat, si secesserit in alium locum, videns furorem forte persequentium se, aut quaerentium in malum animam suam; videretur autem sibi servus Dei peccare si faceret, nisi in faciendo Dominus praecessisset), fecit hoc ille magister bonus ut doceret, non quod timeret.
2. For the Lord, "when He had heard" this, "that the Pharisees had learned that He was making more disciples than John, and baptizing more (although Jesus was not baptizing, but His disciples), left the land of Judaea and went away again into Galilee." There is no need to discuss this at greater length, lest by lingering over what is plain we suffer from shortness of time for searching out and opening what is obscure. Certainly, if the Lord had known that the Pharisees had come to know about Him that He was making more disciples and baptizing more in such a way that this would avail them for salvation by following Him, so that they too might be disciples and they too might wish to be baptized by Him, He would rather not have left the land of Judaea, but would have remained there for their sake. But because He knew their knowledge, He knew at the same time their envy too, since they had learned this not in order to follow but in order to persecute; He went away from there. He could indeed, even when present, not be seized by them if He did not wish it, not be killed if He did not wish it, since He could also not have been born if He had not wished it. But because in everything that He did as man He was offering an example to men who would believe in Him (for no servant of God sins if he withdraws to another place, seeing perhaps the fury of those who persecute him or seek his soul for evil; yet the servant of God would seem to himself to sin if he did so, unless the Lord had gone before him in doing it), that good Master did this in order to teach, not because He feared.
3. Fortassis etiam hoc moveat, cur dictum sit, Baptizabat Jesus plures quam Joannes; et posteaquam dictum est, Baptizabat, subjectum est, Quanquam Jesus non baptizabat, sed discipuli ejus. Quid ergo? falsum dictum erat, et correctum est, cum additum est, Quanquam Jesus non baptizabat, sed discipuli ejus? An utrumque verum est, quia et Jesus baptizabat, et non baptizabat? Baptizabat enim, quia ipse mundabat; non baptizabat, quia non ipse tingebat. Praebebant discipuli ministerium corporis, praebebat ille adjutorium majestatis. Quando enim cessaret a baptizando, quamdiu non cessat a mundando? De quo dictum est ab eodem Joanne, per Joannis Baptistae personam dicentis, Hic est qui baptizat (Joan. I, 33). Ergo Jesus adhuc baptizat; et quo usque baptizandi sumus, Jesus baptizat. Securus homo accedat ad inferiorem ministrum; habet enim superiorem magistrum.
3. Perhaps this too may trouble someone: why it was said, Jesus was baptizing more than John; and after it was said, He was baptizing, there was added, Although Jesus was not baptizing, but His disciples. What then? Had something false been said, and was it corrected when there was added, Although Jesus was not baptizing, but His disciples? Or is each true, because Jesus both was baptizing and was not baptizing? For He was baptizing, because He Himself was cleansing; He was not baptizing, because He Himself was not dipping. The disciples were supplying the ministry of the body; He was supplying the aid of majesty. For when would He cease from baptizing, so long as He does not cease from cleansing? Of Him it was said by the same John, through the person of John the Baptist speaking, This is He Who baptizes (John 1:33). Therefore Jesus still baptizes; and as long as we are to be baptized, Jesus baptizes. Let a man approach the lower minister without anxiety; for he has a higher Master.
4. Sed forte ait aliquis: Baptizat quidem Christus in spiritu, non in corpore. Quasi vero alterius dono quam illius, quisquam etiam sacramento corporalis et visibilis Baptismatis imbuatur. Vis nosse quia ipse baptizat, non solum spiritu, sed etiam aqua? Audi Apostolum: « Sicut Christus, inquit, dilexit Ecclesiam,
4. But perhaps someone says: Christ indeed baptizes in the spirit, not in the body. As if anyone were imbued even with the sacrament of corporal and visible Baptism by the gift of another than Him! Do you wish to know that He Himself baptizes, not only with the spirit but also with water? Hear the Apostle: "As Christ," he says, "loved the Church,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1511

Page

  • running head: 1511 IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, (rest of the head cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins mid-sentence (hodie recitata est) and ends with Eccle- split at the column break; head numeral faintly printed, read as 1511; "alium" and "invidentiam" slightly damaged type, read as such; no full-width line; no editors' matter
  • other: the word Ecclesiam, was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 1512
  • other: QA Q1a joined the English across the break: col 1511 now ends "loved the Church,"; col 1512's English still opens "[the Church], and gave Himself" and should drop the bracketed "[the Church]" (fix in col 1512, not here). The page-104 footnote (Mss. quatuor, fortem) belongs to col 1512.
PL 35:1512
et seipsum tradidit pro ea, mundans eam lavacro aquae in verbo, ut exhiberet ipse sibi gloriosam Ecclesiam, non habentem maculam aut rugam, aut aliquid hujusmodi » (Ephes. V, 25-27). Mundans eam. Unde? Lavacro aquae in verbo. Quid est baptismus Christi? Lavacrum aquae in verbo. Tolle aquam, non est baptismus: tolle verbum, non est baptismus.
and gave Himself up for her, cleansing her by the washing of water in the word, that He might present to Himself a glorious Church, not having spot or wrinkle, or anything of this kind" (Eph. 5:25–27). Cleansing her. By what? By the washing of water in the word. What is the baptism of Christ? The washing of water in the word. Take away the water, there is no baptism; take away the word, there is no baptism.
5. Jam ergo his praejactis, per quae venit ad collocutionem cum illa muliere, videamus quae restant plena mysteriis, et gravida sacramentis. « Oportebat autem, inquit, eum transire per Samariam. Venit ergo in civitatem Samariae quae dicitur Sichar, juxta praedium quod dedit Jacob filio suo Joseph. Erat autem ibi fons Jacob. » Puteus erat: sed omnis puteus fons, non omnis fons puteus: Ubi enim aqua de terra manat, et usui praebetur haurientibus, fons dicitur: sed si in promptu et superficie sit, fons tantum dicitur; si autem in alto et profundo sit, ita puteus vocatur, ut fontis nomen non amittat.
5. Now therefore, these things having been set down beforehand, through which He came to the conversation with that woman, let us see the things that remain, full of mysteries and pregnant with sacraments. "Now He had to pass," it says, "through Samaria. So He came into a city of Samaria which is called Sichar, near the estate which Jacob gave to his son Joseph. Now Jacob's spring was there." It was a well; but every well is a spring, not every spring is a well. For where water flows out of the earth and is made available for the use of those who draw, it is called a spring; but if it is ready to hand and at the surface, it is called only a spring; whereas if it is deep and far down, it is called a well in such a way that it does not lose the name of spring.
6. Jesus ergo fatigatus ex itinere, sedebat sic super fontem. Hora erat quasi sexta. Jam incipiunt mysteria. Non enim frustra fatigatur Jesus; non enim frustra fatigatur Virtus Dei; non enim frustra fatigatur, per quem fatigati recreantur; non enim frustra fatigatur, quo deserente fatigamur, quo praesente firmamur. Fatigatur tamen Jesus; et fatigatur ab itinere, et sedet, et juxta puteum sedet, et hora sexta fatigatus sedet. Omnia ista innuunt aliquid, indicare volunt aliquid; intentos nos faciunt, ut pulsemus hortantur. Ipse ergo aperiat et nobis et vobis, qui dignatus est ita hortari ut diceret, Pulsate, et aperietur vobis (Matth. VII, 7). Tibi fatigatus est ab itinere Jesus. Invenimus Virtutem Jesum, et invenimus infirmum Jesum; fortem et infirmum Jesum: fortem, quia in principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum: hoc erat in principio apud Deum. Vis videre quam iste Filius Dei fortis sit? Omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum est nihil; et sine labore facta sunt. Quid ergo illo fortius, per quem sine labore facta sunt omnia? Infirmum vis nosse? Verbum caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis (Joan. I, 1, 3, 14). Fortitudo Christi te creavit, infirmitas Christi te recreavit. Fortitudo Christi fecit ut quod non erat esset: infirmitas Christi fecit ut quod erat non periret. Condidit nos fortitudine sua, quaesivit nos infirmitate sua.
6. Jesus therefore, wearied from the journey, was sitting thus upon the spring. It was about the sixth hour. Now the mysteries begin. For not in vain is Jesus wearied; not in vain is the Power of God wearied; not in vain is He wearied through Whom the weary are refreshed; not in vain is He wearied, by Whose leaving us we are wearied, by Whose presence we are strengthened. Yet Jesus is wearied; and He is wearied from the journey, and He sits, and He sits beside the well, and at the sixth hour He sits wearied. All these things hint at something, they wish to point to something; they make us attentive, they urge us to knock. May He Himself therefore open both to us and to you, He Who deigned so to urge us as to say, Knock, and it shall be opened to you (Matt. 7:7). For you Jesus was wearied from the journey. We find Jesus as Power, and we find Jesus weak; Jesus strong and weak: strong, because in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God: this was in the beginning with God. Do you wish to see how strong this Son of God is? All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made; and they were made without toil. What then is stronger than He, through Whom all things were made without toil? Do you wish to know Him weak? The Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us (John 1:1, 3, 14). The strength of Christ created you, the weakness of Christ re-created you. The strength of Christ brought it about that what was not should be; the weakness of Christ brought it about that what was should not perish. He founded us by His strength, He sought us by His weakness.
7. Nutrit ergo ipse infirmus infirmos, tanquam gallina pullos suos; huic enim se similem fecit: Quoties volui, inquit ad Jerusalem, congregare filios tuos sub alas, tanquam gallina pullos suos, et noluisti (Matth. XXIII, 37)? Videtis autem, fratres, quemadmodum gallina infirmetur cum pullis suis. Nulla alia avis quod sit mater agnoscitur. Videmus nidificare passeres quoslibet ante oculos nostros; hirundines, ciconias, columbas quotidie videmus nidificare; quos nisi quando in nidis videmus, parentes esse non agnoscimus. Gallina vero sic infirmatur in pullis suis, ut etiamsi ipsi pulli non sequantur, filios non videas,
7. He therefore, being weak, nourishes the weak, as a hen her chicks; for He made Himself like her: How often have I willed, He says to Jerusalem, to gather your children under My wings, as a hen her chicks, and you would not (Matt. 23:37)? Now you see, brothers, how a hen is made weak together with her chicks. No other bird is recognized as being a mother. We see sparrows of every kind building nests before our eyes; swallows, storks, doves we see daily building nests; and unless we see them in their nests, we do not recognize that they are parents. But the hen is so made weak in her chicks that, even if the chicks themselves are not following, though you do not see the young,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1512

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: Invenimus Virtutem› · call in col 1512

Mss. quatuor, fortem.

Four manuscripts: "fortem" ("strong", i.e. "we find Jesus strong").

(printed under page 104)

Page

  • running head: EVANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1512
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1513
matrem tamen agnoscas. Ita fit alis demissis, plumis hispida, voce rauca, omnibus membris demissa et abjecta, ut quemadmodum dixi, etiamsi filios non videas, matrem tamen intelligas. Sic ergo infirmus Jesus, fatigatus ab itinere. Iter ipsius est caro pro nobis assumpta. Quomodo enim iter habet qui ubique est, qui nusquam deest? Quo it, aut unde it, nisi quia non ad nos veniret, nisi formam visibilis carnis assumeret? Quia ergo venire ad nos eo modo dignatus est, ut in forma servi assumpta carne appareret, ipsa carnis assumptio est iter ipsius. Ideo fatigatus ab itinere quid est aliud, quam fatigatus in carne? Infirmus in carne Jesus: sed noli tu infirmari; in illius infirmitate tu fortis esto, quia quod infirmum est Dei, fortius est hominibus (I Cor. I, 25).
you still recognize the mother. So she becomes, with wings lowered, her feathers bristling, her voice hoarse, lowered and downcast in all her limbs, so that, as I said, even if you do not see the chicks, you still understand that she is a mother. Thus, then, Jesus was weak, wearied from the journey. His journey is the flesh taken on for us. For how does He have a journey Who is everywhere, Who is absent nowhere? Where does He go, or from where does He go, except that He would not come to us unless He took on the form of visible flesh? Since, therefore, He deigned to come to us in such a way that He appeared in the form of a servant, having taken on flesh, that very taking on of flesh is His journey. Therefore what else is "wearied from the journey" than wearied in the flesh? Jesus is weak in the flesh: but do not you be weak; in His weakness be you strong, because what is weak of God is stronger than men (1 Cor. 1:25).
8. Sub hac rerum imagine Adam qui erat forma futuri (Rom. V, 14), praebuit nobis magnum indicium sacramenti; imo Deus in illo praebuit. Nam et dormiens meruit accipere uxorem, et de costa ejus facta est ei uxor (Gen. II, 21): quoniam de Christo in cruce dormiente futura erat Ecclesia de latere ejus, de latere scilicet dormientis; quia et de latere in cruce pendentis lancea percusso (Joan. XIX, 34) Sacramenta Ecclesiae profluxerunt. Sed quare hoc dicere volui, fratres? Quia infirmitas Christi nos facit fortes. Magna ibi imago praecessit. Potuit Deus carnem detrahere homini unde faceret feminam, et magis videtur quasi congruere potuisse. Fiebat enim sexus infirmior, et magis de carne infirmitas fieri debuit quam de osse: ossa enim in carne firmiora sunt. Non detraxit carnem unde faceret mulierem; sed detraxit os, et detracto osse formata est mulier, et in locum ossis caro adimpleta est. Poterat pro osse os reddere, poterat ad faciendam mulierem non costam, sed carnem detrahere. Quid igitur significavit? Facta est mulier in costa tanquam fortis: factus est Adam in carne tanquam infirmus. Christus est et Ecclesia, illius infirmitas nostra est fortitudo.
8. Under this image of things Adam, who was the form of the one to come (Rom. 5:14), offered us a great token of the sacrament; or rather God offered it in him. For he also, while sleeping, was found worthy to receive a wife, and from his rib a wife was made for him (Gen. 2:21): because from Christ sleeping on the cross the Church was to come from His side, that is, from the side of the one sleeping; since also from the side of Him hanging on the cross, struck by the lance (John 19:34), the Sacraments of the Church flowed forth. But why did I wish to say this, brothers? Because the weakness of Christ makes us strong. A great image went before there. God could have taken flesh from the man from which to make the woman, and it seems as if that could have been more fitting. For the weaker sex was being made, and weakness ought rather to have been made from flesh than from bone: for bones are the firmer parts in the flesh. He did not take flesh from which to make the woman; but He took a bone, and with the bone taken out the woman was formed, and in the place of the bone flesh was filled in. He could have given back bone for bone; He could, to make the woman, have taken not a rib but flesh. What, then, did He signify? The woman was made in the rib as if strong: Adam was made in the flesh as if weak. It is Christ and the Church: His weakness is our strength.
9. Quare ergo hora sexta? Quia aetate saeculi sexta. Computa in Evangelio tanquam unam horam, unam aetatem ab Adam usque ad Noe; secundam a Noe usque ad Abraham; tertiam ab Abraham usque ad David; quartam a David usque ad transmigrationem Babyloniae; quintam a transmigratione Babyloniae usque ad baptismum Joannis: inde sexta agitur. Quid miraris? Venit Jesus, et humiliando se venit ad puteum. Fatigatus venit, quia in⟨fi⟩rmam carnem portavit. Hora sexta, quia aetate saeculi sexta. Ad puteum, quia ad profunditatem hujus habitationis nostrae. Unde dicitur in Psalmis, De profundis clamavi ad te, Domine (Psal. CXXIX, 1). Sedit, ut dixi, quia humiliatus est.
9. Why, then, at the sixth hour? Because in the sixth age of the world. Reckon in the Gospel as one hour one age, from Adam up to Noah; the second from Noah up to Abraham; the third from Abraham up to David; the fourth from David up to the deportation to Babylon; the fifth from the deportation to Babylon up to the baptism of John: from then the sixth is being passed. Why do you wonder? Jesus came, and by humbling Himself He came to the well. He came wearied, because He bore weak flesh. At the sixth hour, because in the sixth age of the world. To the well, because to the depth of this our dwelling. Whence it is said in the Psalms, Out of the depths I have cried to Thee, Lord (Ps. 129:1). He sat down, as I said, because He was humbled.
10. Et venit mulier. Forma Ecclesiae, non jam justificatae, sed jam justificandae; nam hoc agit sermo. Venit ignara, invenit eum, et agitur cum illa. Videamus quid, videamus quare: Venit mulier de Samaria haurire aquam. Samaritani ad Judaeorum gentem non pertinebant: alienigenae enim fuerunt, quamvis vicinas
10. And a woman came. The form of the Church, not yet justified, but now to be justified; for this is what the discourse is about. She came unknowing, she found Him, and He deals with her. Let us see what, let us see why: A woman came from Samaria to draw water. The Samaritans did not belong to the nation of the Jews: for they were foreigners, although they inhabited neighbouring
Editors' notes and page, col. 1513

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: humiliatus est› · call in col 1513

Sic Mss. cum Bad. et Am. At Er. et Lov., humilis venit.

So the manuscripts, with the Badius and Amerbach editions. But Erasmus and the Louvain edition read "humilis venit" ("he came humble").

(printed under page 105)

Page

  • running head: 1513 TRACTATUS XV. CAPU[T] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1514
terras incolerent. Longum est originem Samaritanorum retexere, ne nos multa teneant, et necessaria non loquamur: sufficit ergo ut Samaritanos inter alienigenas deputemus. Et ne hoc audacius me arbitremini dixisse quam verius, audite ipsum Dominum Jesum, quid dixerit de illo Samaritano, uno de decem leprosis quos mundaverat, qui solus rediit ut gratias ageret: Nonne decem mundati sunt? et novem ubi sunt? non erat alius qui daret gloriam Deo, nisi alienigena iste (Luc. XVII, 17, 18). Pertinet ad imaginem rei, quod ab alienigenis venit ista mulier, quae typum gerebat Ecclesiae: ventura enim erat Ecclesia de Gentibus, alienigena a genere Judaeorum. Audiamus ergo in illa nos, et in illa agnoscamus nos, et in illa gratias Deo agamus pro nobis. Illa enim figura erat, non veritas; quia et ipsa praemisit figuram, et facta est veritas. Nam credidit in eum, qui de illa figuram nobis praetendebat. Venit ergo haurire aquam. Simpliciter venerat haurire aquam, sicut solent vel viri vel feminae.
lands. It is a long matter to unravel the origin of the Samaritans, lest many things detain us and we fail to say what is necessary: it suffices, then, that we count the Samaritans among foreigners. And lest you think that I have said this more boldly than truly, hear the Lord Jesus Himself, what He said about that Samaritan, one of the ten lepers whom He had cleansed, who alone returned to give thanks: Were not ten cleansed? and where are the nine? there was no other to give glory to God except this foreigner (Luke 17:17–18). It belongs to the image of the matter that this woman, who bore the type of the Church, came from foreigners: for the Church was to come from the Gentiles, foreign to the race of the Jews. Let us, then, hear ourselves in her, and in her let us recognize ourselves, and in her let us give thanks to God for ourselves. For she was a figure, not the truth; because she too first set forth the figure, and then became the truth. For she believed in Him Who was holding forth a figure to us from her. She came, then, to draw water. She had simply come to draw water, as men or women are accustomed to do.
11. « Dicit ei Jesus: Da mihi bibere. Discipuli enim ejus abierant in civitatem, ut cibos emerent. Dicit ergo ei mulier illa Samaritana: Quomodo tu Judaeus cum sis, bibere a me poscis, quae sum mulier Samaritana? Non enim coutuntur Judaei Samaritanis. » Videtis alienigenas: omnino vasculis eorum Judaei non utebantur. Et quia ferebat secum mulier vasculum unde aquam hauriret, eo mirata est, quia Judaeus petebat ab ea bibere, quod non solebant facere Judaei. Ille autem qui bibere quaerebat, fidem ipsius mulieris sitiebat.
11. « Jesus says to her: Give Me to drink. For His disciples had gone away into the city to buy food. So that Samaritan woman says to Him: How is it that you, being a Jew, ask to drink from me, who am a Samaritan woman? For Jews do not associate with Samaritans. » You see that they are foreigners: the Jews did not use their vessels at all. And because the woman was carrying with her a vessel with which to draw water, she wondered at this, that a Jew was asking to drink from her, which the Jews were not accustomed to do. But He Who was asking to drink was thirsting for the faith of the woman herself.
12. Denique audi quis petat bibere. Respondit Jesus, et dixit ei: Si scires donum Dei, et quis est qui dicit tibi, Da mihi bibere, tu forsitan petisses ab eo, et dedisset tibi aquam vivam. Petit bibere, et promittit bibere. Eget quasi accepturus, et affluit tanquam satiaturus. Si scires, inquit, donum Dei. Donum Dei est Spiritus sanctus. Sed adhuc mulieri tecte loquitur, et paulatim intrat in cor. Fortassis jam docet. Quid enim ista hortatione suavius et benignius? Si scires donum Dei, et scires quis est qui dicit tibi, Da mihi bibere, tu forsitan peteres, et daret tibi aquam vivam: huc usque suspendit. Viva aqua dicitur vulgo illa quae de fonte exit. Illa enim quae colligitur de pluvia in lacunas aut cisternas, aqua viva non dicitur. Et si de fonte manaverit, et in loco aliquo collecta steterit, nec ad se illud unde manabat admiserit, sed interrupto meatu, tanquam a fontis tramite separata fuerit; non dicitur aqua viva: sed illa aqua viva dicitur, quae manans excipitur. Talis aqua erat in illo fonte. Quid ergo promittebat quod petebat?
12. Then hear Who it is that asks to drink. Jesus answered and said to her: If you knew the gift of God, and Who it is that says to you, Give Me to drink, you would perhaps have asked of Him, and He would have given you living water. He asks to drink, and He promises to give drink. He is in need as one about to receive, and He abounds as one about to satisfy. If you knew, He says, the gift of God. The gift of God is the Holy Spirit. But He still speaks to the woman covertly, and little by little enters into her heart. Perhaps He is already teaching. For what is sweeter and kinder than this exhortation? If you knew the gift of God, and knew Who it is that says to you, Give Me to drink, you would perhaps ask, and He would give you living water: thus far He holds her in suspense. Living water is commonly the name for that which comes out of a spring. For that which is collected from rain into pools or cisterns is not called living water. And if it has flowed from a spring, and has stood collected in some place, and has not let into itself that from which it was flowing, but, its course being interrupted, has been, as it were, separated from the channel of the spring, it is not called living water: but that water is called living which is taken up as it flows. Such water was in that spring. What, then, was He promising that He was asking for?
13. Tamen mulier suspensa ait: Domine, neque in quo haurias habes, et puteus altus est. Videte quomodo intellexerit aquam vivam, aquam scilicet quae erat in illo fonte. Tu mihi vis dare aquam vivam, et ego fero unde hauriam, et tu non fers. Aqua viva hic est, quomodo mihi daturus es? Aliud intelligens et carnaliter sapiens quodammodo pulsat, ut aperiat magister quod
13. Yet the woman, held in suspense, says: Sir, you have nothing to draw with, and the well is deep. See how she understood living water, namely the water that was in that spring. You wish to give me living water, and I carry something to draw with, and you do not carry it. The living water is here: how are you going to give it to me? Understanding something else, and thinking in a carnal way, she in a manner knocks, so that the Master may open what
Editors' notes and page, col. 1514

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: sed interrupto› · call in col 1514

Mss., inrupto; sive, irrupto.

The manuscripts: "inrupto", or "irrupto" ("broken in upon").

(printed under page 105)

Page

  • running head: ATUS XV. CAPUT IV. 1514 (left part of the running head cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1515
clausum est. Pulsabat ignorantia, non studio; adhuc miseranda, non dum instruenda.
is shut. She knocked out of ignorance, not out of eagerness; still to be pitied, not yet to be instructed.
14. Dicit aliquid evidentius Dominus de illa aqua viva. Dixerat enim mulier, Numquid tu major es patre nostro Jacob, qui dedit nobis puteum, et ipse ex eo bibit, et filii ejus, et pecora ejus? De hac aqua viva dare mihi non potes, quoniam hauritorium non habes: forte alium fontem promittis? Patre nostro melior potes esse, qui hunc puteum fodit, et ipse cum suis usus est eo? Dominus ergo dicat quid dixerit aquam vivam. « Respondit Jesus, et dixit ei: Omnis qui biberit ex aqua hac, sitiet iterum: qui autem biberit ex aqua quam ego dabo ei, non sitiet in aeternum; sed aqua quam ego dabo ei, fiet in eo fons aquae salientis in vitam aeternam. » Apertius locutus est Dominus, Fiet in eo fons aquae salientis in vitam aeternam. Qui biberit de aqua ista, non sitiet in aeternum. Quid evidentius, quia non aquam visibilem, sed invisibilem promittebat? quid evidentius, quia non carnaliter, sed spiritualiter loquebatur?
14. The Lord says something more plainly about that living water. For the woman had said, Are you greater than our father Jacob, who gave us the well, and drank from it himself, and his sons, and his cattle? (John 4:12). You cannot give me of this living water, since you have no vessel to draw with: perhaps you are promising another spring? Can you be better than our father, who dug this well, and himself made use of it with his own? Let the Lord, then, say what He called living water. "Jesus answered and said to her: Everyone who drinks of this water will thirst again: but whoever drinks of the water that I shall give him will not thirst for ever; but the water that I shall give him will become in him a spring of water leaping up into eternal life" (John 4:13–14). The Lord has spoken more openly, It will become in him a spring of water leaping up into eternal life. Whoever drinks of this water will not thirst for ever. What could be plainer than that He was promising not visible water but invisible? What could be plainer than that He was speaking not carnally but spiritually?
15. Adhuc tamen illa mulier carnem sapit: delectata est non sitire, et putabat hoc secundum carnem promissum sibi esse a Domino. Quod quidem fiet, sed in resurrectione mortuorum. Jam hoc volebat illa. Dederat enim Deus aliquando servo suo Eliae, ut per quadraginta dies nec esuriret, nec sitiret (III Reg. XIX, 8). Qui hoc potuit dare per quadraginta dies, non potuit dare semper? Suspirabat tamen illa, nolens indigere, nolens laborare. Assidue venire ad illum fontem, onerari pondere, quo indigentia suppleretur; et finito quod hauserat, rursus redire cogebatur: et quotidianus ei fuit iste labor; quia indigentia illa reficiebatur, non exstinguebatur. Delectata ergo tali munere, rogat ut ei aquam vivam daret.
15. Yet that woman still savours of the flesh: she was delighted at not thirsting, and she thought this had been promised her by the Lord according to the flesh. This indeed will come to pass, but in the resurrection of the dead. She wanted it already. For God had once granted to His servant Elijah that for forty days he should neither hunger nor thirst (1 Kgs. 19:8). He Who could grant this for forty days, could He not grant it for ever? She sighed for it, however, not wishing to be in want, not wishing to toil. To come constantly to that spring, to be loaded with a burden by which her want might be supplied; and when what she had drawn was used up, she was compelled to come back again: and this toil was hers every day, because that want was replenished, not extinguished. Delighted, therefore, at such a gift, she asks Him to give her living water.
16. Verumtamen non praetereamus, quoniam Dominus spirituale aliquid promittebat. Quid est, Qui biberit de aqua hac, sitiet iterum? Et verum est secundum hanc aquam; et verum est secundum quod significabat illa aqua. Etenim aqua in puteo, voluptas saeculi est in profunditate tenebrosa: hinc eam hauriunt homines hydria cupiditatum. Cupiditatem quippe proni submittunt, ut ad voluptatem haustam de profundo perveniant; et fruuntur voluptate, praecedente et praemissa cupiditate. Nam qui non praemiserit cupiditatem, pervenire non potest ad voluptatem. Pone ergo hydriam, cupiditatem; et aquam de profundo, voluptatem: cum pervenerit quisque ad voluptatem saeculi hujus, cibus est, potus est, lavacrum est, spectaculum est, concubitus est; numquid non iterum sitiet? Ergo de hac aqua qui biberit, iterum, inquit, sitiet: si autem acceperit à me aquam, non sitiet in aeternum. Satiabimur, inquit, in bonis domus tuae (Psal. LXIV, 5). De qua ergo aqua daturus est, nisi de illa de qua dictum est, Apud te est fons vitae? Nam quomodo sitient qui inebriabuntur ab ubertate domus tuae (Psal. XXXV, 10, 9)?
16. Nevertheless let us not pass over the fact that the Lord was promising something spiritual. What does it mean, Whoever drinks of this water will thirst again? It is true with regard to this water; and it is true with regard to what that water signified. For the water in the well is the pleasure of the world in its dark depth: from there men draw it with the water-pot of their desires. For they stoop forward and let down desire, so as to reach the pleasure drawn from the depth; and they enjoy the pleasure, desire having gone before and been sent down first. For whoever has not first sent down desire cannot reach pleasure. Take, then, the water-pot as desire, and the water from the depth as pleasure: when anyone has reached the pleasure of this world, be it food, be it drink, be it the bath, be it the show, be it sexual intercourse, will he not thirst again? Therefore, whoever drinks of this water, He says, will thirst again: but if he receives water from Me, he will not thirst for ever. We shall be filled, it says, with the good things of Thy house (Ps. 64:5). Of what water, then, is He going to give, if not of that of which it is said, With Thee is the spring of life? For how shall they thirst who will be inebriated with the abundance of Thy house (Ps. 35:10, 9)?
17. Promittebat ergo saginam quamdam et satietatem Spiritus sancti: et illa nondum intelligebat; et non intelligens, quid respondebat? Dicit ad eum mulier
17. He was promising, then, a certain fattening and fullness of the Holy Spirit: and she did not yet understand; and not understanding, what did she answer? The woman says to Him:
Editors' notes and page, col. 1515

Page

  • running head: IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, S. (cut off at the image edge), column number 1515
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins mid-sentence with "clausum" (sentence continues from col. 1514); last word "mu-" (mulier) split at the column break; italic ae in "aeternam/aeternum/vitae/tuae" looks like oe in the scan, set ae as Migne's usual, UNSURE; "non dum" printed as two words; "à me" printed with grave accent; damaged letters in "acceperit", "suppleretur", "Domino" read as intended; no full-width lines, no editors' matter
PL 35:1516
: Domine, da mihi hanc aqu⟨a⟩m, ut non sitiam, neque veniam huc haurire. Ad laborem indigentia cogebat, et laborem infirmitas recusabat. Utinam audiret, Venite ad me, omnes qui laboratis et onerati estis, et ego vos reficiam (Matth. XI, 28). Hoc enim ei dicebat Jesus, ut jam non laboraret: sed illa nondum intelligebat.
Lord, give me this water, that I may not thirst, nor come here to draw. Need was driving her to toil, and weakness was refusing the toil. Would that she heard, Come to Me, all you who toil and are burdened, and I will refresh you (Matt. 11:28). For this is what Jesus was saying to her, that she might no longer toil; but she did not yet understand.
18. Denique volens ut intelligeret, dicit ei Jesus: Vade, voca virum tuum, et veni huc. Quid est, Voca virum tuum? Per virum suum ei volebat aquam illam dare? An quia non intelligebat, per virum suum eam volebat docere? Forte quomodo ait Apostolus de mulieribus, Si quid autem volunt discere, domi viros suos interrogent? Sed ibi dicitur, domi viros suos interrogent, ubi non est Jesus qui doceat: denique dicitur mulieribus quas prohibebat Apostolus loqui in Ecclesia (I Cor. XIV, 35, 34). Cum vero ipse Dominus aderat, et praesens praesenti loquebatur? quid opus erat ut per virum ejus ei loqueretur? Numquid per virum suum loquebatur Mariae sedenti ad pedes suos, et excipienti verbum suum, quando Martha circa multum ministerium etiam de sororis suae felicitate occupatissima murmurabat (Luc. X, 39, 40)? Ergo, fratres mei, audiamus et intelligamus quod ait Dominus, Voca virum tuum, mulieri. Forte enim et animae nostrae dicit, Voca virum tuum. Quaeramus et de viro animae. Cur jam non ipse Jesus vir animae verus est? Adsit intellectus, quoniam quod dicturi sumus, vix capitur nisi ab intentis: adsit ergo intellectus ut capiatur, et ipse intellectus erit fortasse vir animae.
18. At length, wishing that she should understand, Jesus says to her: Go, call your husband, and come here. What is, Call your husband? Was He wishing to give her that water through her husband? Or, because she did not understand, was He wishing to teach her through her husband? Perhaps as the Apostle says concerning women, But if they wish to learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home? But there it is said, let them ask their husbands at home, where Jesus is not present to teach; indeed it is said to women whom the Apostle was forbidding to speak in the Church (1 Cor. 14:35, 34). But when the Lord Himself was present, and He, present, was speaking to her, present? what need was there that He should speak to her through her husband? Was He speaking through her husband to Mary as she sat at His feet and received His word, when Martha, very much occupied about much serving, was even murmuring at her sister's happiness (Luke 10:39, 40)? Therefore, my brothers, let us hear and understand what the Lord says to the woman, Call your husband. For perhaps He says to our soul too, Call your husband. Let us inquire also about the husband of the soul. Why is not Jesus Himself already the true husband of the soul? Let understanding be present, since what we are about to say is scarcely grasped except by the attentive: let understanding therefore be present, that it may be grasped, and understanding itself will perhaps be the husband of the soul.
19. Videns ergo Jesus quia mulier non intelligebat, et volens eam intelligere, Voca, inquit, virum tuum. Ideo enim nescis quod dico, quia intellectus tuus non adest: loquor ego secundum spiritum, tu audis secundum carnem. Quae loquor, nec ad voluptatem aurium pertinent, nec ad oculos, nec ad olfactum, nec ad gustum, nec ad tactum; mente sola capiuntur, intellectu solo hauriuntur: ille intellectus non tibi adest, quomodo capis quod dico? Voca virum tuum, praesenta intellectum tuum. Quid tibi est enim animam habere? Non est magnum, nam et pecus habet. Unde tu melior? Quia intellectum habes, quod pecus non habet. Quid est ergo, Voca virum tuum? Non me capis, non me intelligis: de dono Dei tibi loquor, tu autem carnem cogitas; secundum carnem sitire non vis, ego spiritum alloquor: absens est intellectus tuus, Voca virum tuum. Noli esse sicut equus et mulus, quibus non est intellectus (Psal. XXXI, 9). Ergo, fratres mei, animam habere, et intellectum non habere, hoc est, non adhibere, nec secundum eum vivere, bestialis est vita. Est enim in nobis quiddam bestiale quo in carne vivimus, sed intellectu regendum est. Motus enim animae secundum carnem se moventis, et in delicias carnales immoderate diffluere cupientis, regit desuper intellectus. Qui debet dici vir? qui regit, an qui regitur? Procul dubio cum ordinata vita est, intellectus animam regit, ad ipsam animam pertinens. Non enim aliquid aliud est quam anima, sed aliquid animae est intellectus: quomodo non aliquid aliud quam caro est oculus, sed aliquid carnis est oculus. Cum autem carnis
19. Jesus therefore, seeing that the woman did not understand, and wishing her to understand, says, Call your husband. For the reason you do not know what I am saying is that your understanding is not present: I speak according to the spirit, you hear according to the flesh. The things I speak pertain neither to the pleasure of the ears, nor to the eyes, nor to the smell, nor to the taste, nor to the touch; they are grasped by the mind alone, they are drawn up by the understanding alone: that understanding is not present in you; how do you grasp what I am saying? Call your husband, make your understanding present. For what is it to you to have a soul? It is no great thing, for even a beast has one. In what are you better? Because you have understanding, which a beast does not have. What then is, Call your husband? You do not grasp Me, you do not understand Me: I speak to you of the gift of God, but you are thinking of the flesh; you do not wish to thirst according to the flesh, I am addressing the spirit: your understanding is absent; Call your husband. Do not be like the horse and the mule, which have no understanding (Ps. 31:9). Therefore, my brothers, to have a soul and not to have understanding, that is, not to use it nor to live according to it, is a beastly life. For there is in us something beastly by which we live in the flesh, but it must be ruled by the understanding. For the understanding rules from above the motions of the soul, which moves itself according to the flesh and desires to flow away immoderately into carnal delights. Which ought to be called the husband? that which rules, or that which is ruled? Without doubt, when life is well ordered, the understanding rules the soul, belonging to the soul itself. For the understanding is not something other than the soul, but something of the soul: just as the eye is not something other than the flesh, but something of the flesh. But though the eye is something of the flesh,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1516

Page

  • running head: …VANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1516 (left part cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with "lier", the rest of "mulier" broken from the previous column; "aqu⟨a⟩m" in the first line has a damaged letter (prints like "aqutm"); column ends with "car-" (carnem/caro broken at the column break); no editors' matter or full-width lines
  • other: the word carnis was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 1517
PL 35:1517
aliquid sit oculus, solus tamen luce perfruitur: caetera autem membra carnalia luce perfundi possunt, lucem sentire non possunt; solus ea oculus et perfunditur et perfruitur. Sic in anima nostra quiddam est quod intellectus vocatur. Hoc ipsum animae quod intellectus et mens dicitur, illuminatur luce superiore. Jam superior illa lux, qua mens humana illuminatur, Deus est; Erat enim verum lumen, quod illuminat omnem hominem venientem in hunc mundum (Joan. I, 9). Talis lux Christus erat, talis lux cum muliere loquebatur: et illa intellectu non aderat, qui illa luce illuminaretur, nec tantum perfunderetur, verum etiam frueretur. Ergo Dominus tanquam diceret, Illustrare volo, et non adest quem; Voca, inquit, virum tuum: adhibe intellectum, per quem docearis, quo regaris. Ergo constitue animam excepto intellectu tanquam feminam: intellectum autem habere, tanquam virum. Sed iste vir non bene regit feminam suam, nisi cum a superiore regitur. Caput enim mulieris vir, caput autem viri Christus (I Cor. XI, 3). Loquebatur caput viri cum femina, et non aderat vir. Et tanquam diceret Dominus, Adhibe caput tuum ut ille suscipiat caput suum: ergo voca virum tuum, et veni huc; id est, adesto, praesens esto: velut enim absens es, dum non intelligis praesentis vocem veritatis; praesens esto, sed noli sola; cum viro tuo adesto.
yet it alone enjoys the light: the other fleshly members can be bathed in light, but they cannot perceive the light; the eye alone is both bathed in it and enjoys it. So in our soul there is something which is called the understanding. This very thing of the soul which is called understanding and mind is illuminated by a higher light. Now that higher light, by which the human mind is illuminated, is God; for He was the true light, which illuminates every man coming into this world (John 1:9). Such a light was Christ, such a light was speaking with the woman: and she was not present with her understanding, by which she might be illuminated by that light, and not only be bathed in it, but also enjoy it. Therefore the Lord, as if He were saying, "I wish to enlighten, and there is no one [to enlighten]", says, Call your husband: bring your understanding to bear, through which you may be taught, by which you may be governed. So consider the soul, apart from the understanding, as the woman, and the having of understanding as the husband. But this husband does not govern his wife well unless he is himself governed by one higher. For the head of the woman is the man, but the head of the man is Christ (1 Cor. 11:3). The Head of the man was speaking with the woman, and the man was not present. And it is as if the Lord were saying, "Bring your head, so that he may receive his Head": therefore, call your husband, and come here; that is, be present, be at hand: for you are as if absent, while you do not understand the voice of the Truth that is present; be present, but not alone; be present with your husband.
20. Et adhuc illa nondum advocato illo viro, non intelligit, adhuc carnem sapit; absens est enim vir: Non habeo, inquit, virum. Et Dominus sequitur, et mysteria loquitur. Intelligas revera istam mulierem non habuisse tunc virum; sed coutebatur nescio quo non legitimo viro, adultero magis quam viro. Et Dominus ei: Bene dixisti, Quia non habeo virum. Unde ergo tu dixisti, Voca virum tuum? Et audi quia bene novit Dominus eam non habere virum, Dicit ei, etc. Ne forte putaret mulier ideo dixisse Dominum, Bene dixisti, Quia non habeo virum, quod hoc a muliere didicerit, non quod ipse istud divinitate cognoverit, audi aliquid quod non dixisti: Quinque enim viros habuisti, et iste quem habes, non est vir tuus, hoc vere dixisti.
20. And still she, that husband not yet having been called, does not understand, still savours of the flesh; for the husband is absent: I have no husband, she says. And the Lord follows on, and speaks mysteries. You may understand that this woman really had no husband at that time; but she was living with some man or other who was not her lawful husband, an adulterer rather than a husband. And the Lord to her: You have said well, I have no husband. Why then did You say, Call your husband? And hear that the Lord knew well that she had no husband: He says to her, etc. Lest perhaps the woman should think that the Lord had said, You have said well, I have no husband, because He had learned this from the woman, and not because He Himself had known it by His divinity, hear something which you have not said: For you have had five husbands, and he whom you have is not your husband; this you have said truly.
21. Iterum cogit de istis quinque viris subtilius aliquid perscrutari. Multi quippe intellexerunt, non quidem absurde, nec usquequaque improbabiliter, quinque viros mulieris hujus, quinque libros Moysi. Utebantur enim eis Samaritani, et sub eadem Lege erant: nam inde illis et circumcisio inerat. Sed quoniam angustat nos quod sequitur, Et nunc quem habes, non est vir tuus; videtur mihi facilius nos posse accipere quinque viros priores animae, quinque sensus corporis esse. Quando enim quisque nascitur, antequam uti possit mente atque ratione, non regitur nisi sensibus carnis. Anima in puero parvulo, quod auditur, quod videtur, quod olet, quod sapit, quod tactu sentitur, hoc appetit aut fugit. Appetit quidquid mulcet, fugit quidquid offendit hos quinque sensus. Hos enim quinque sensus mulcet voluptas, offendit dolor. Secundum hos quinque sensus, tanquam quinque viros,
21. Again it compels us to search out something more subtly concerning these five husbands. For many have understood, not indeed absurdly, nor altogether improbably, the five husbands of this woman to be the five books of Moses. For the Samaritans used them, and were under the same Law: for from it they also had circumcision. But since what follows straitens us, And he whom you now have is not your husband, it seems to me that we can more easily take the five former husbands of the soul to be the five senses of the body. For when anyone is born, before he is able to use mind and reason, he is governed only by the senses of the flesh. The soul in a little child seeks or shuns what is heard, what is seen, what smells, what tastes, what is felt by touch. It seeks whatever soothes, it shuns whatever offends these five senses. For pleasure soothes these five senses, pain offends them. According to these five senses, as according to five husbands,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1517

Footnotes

(a) ‹anchor: quinque libros Moysi› · call in col 1517

Sic intellexit Ambrosius in Luc., capp. 14 et 20. At Origeni cum Augustino visum est significari sensus corporis.

So Ambrose understood it, on Luke, chapters 14 and 20. But Origen, with Augustine, held that the senses of the body are meant.

(printed under page 107)

Page

  • running head: 1517 TRACTATUS XV. CAP (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1518
prius vivit anima; quia istis regitur. Q⟨u⟩are autem viri dicti sunt? Quia legitimi. A Deo quippe facti, et a Deo donati animae. Infirma est adhuc quae istis quinque sensibus regitur, et sub istis quinque viris agit: at ubi venerit ad annos exserendae rationis, si eam susceperit optima disciplina et doctrina sapientiae; quinque illis viris ad regendum non succedit, nisi vir verus legitimus et illis melior, et qui melius regat, et qui ad aeternitatem regat, ad aeternitatem excolat, ad aeternitatem instruat. Nam nisi quinque sensus non ad aeternitatem nos regunt, sed ad ista temporalia vel appetenda vel fugienda. Ubi vero intellectus sapientia imbutus regere coeperit animam, scit jam no⟨n⟩ solum fugere foveam, et ambulare in aequali quod oculi ostendunt animae infirmae: nec tantum canoras voces suaviter audire, dissonasque repellere; vel blandis odoribus delectari, putoresque respuere; aut dulcedine capi, et amaritudine offendi; aut lenibus mulceri, et asperis laedi. Ista enim omnia infirmae animae sunt necessaria. Quid ergo regiminis adhibetur per illum intellectum? Non alba et nigra discreturus est, sed justa et injusta, bona et mala, utilia et inutilia, castitatem et impudicitiam, hanc ut amet, istam ut vitet; charitatem et odium, in hac ut sit, in illo ut non sit.
the soul lives first; because it is ruled by these. But why are they called husbands? Because they are lawful. For they were made by God, and given by God to the soul. Still weak is the soul that is ruled by these five senses and acts under these five husbands: but when it has come to the years of putting forth reason, if the best discipline and the teaching of wisdom have taken it up, no one succeeds those five husbands in ruling it except the true, lawful husband, better than they, one who rules better, and who rules for eternity, cultivates for eternity, instructs for eternity. For these five senses do not rule us for eternity, but towards these temporal things, either to be sought or to be fled. But when understanding imbued with wisdom has begun to rule the soul, it knows now not only to flee a pit and to walk on level ground, which the eyes show to the weak soul; nor only to hear melodious voices with pleasure and to repel discordant ones; or to be delighted by pleasant odours and to reject stenches; or to be captivated by sweetness and offended by bitterness; or to be soothed by soft things and hurt by rough ones. For all these things are necessary to the weak soul. What governance, then, is applied through that understanding? It is not going to distinguish white and black, but just and unjust, good and evil, useful and useless, chastity and unchastity, so that it may love the one and shun the other; charity and hatred, so that it may be in the one and not be in the other.
22. Hic vir quinque illis viris in ista muliere non successerat. Ubi enim non succedit ille, error dominatur. Nam cum coeperit anima capax esse rationis, aut a sapiente mente regitur, aut ab errore: sed error non regit, sed perdit. Post istos ergo quinque sensus mulier illa adhuc errabat, et error eam ventilabat. Error autem iste non erat legitimus vir, sed adulter: ideo ei Dominus ait, Bene dixisti, Quia non habeo virum. Quinque enim viros habuisti: quinque te sensus carnis primo rexerunt; venisti ad aetatem utendae rationis, nec ad sapientiam pervenisti, sed in errorem incidisti. Ergo post illos quinque viros, iste quem habes, non est tuus vir. Et quid erat, si vir non erat, nisi adulter? Voca itaque non adulterum, sed virum tuum; ut intellectu me capias, non errore de me aliquid falsum sentias. Adhuc enim errabat mulier, quae aquam illam cogitabat; cum jam Dominus de Spiritu sancto loqueretur. Quare errabat, nisi quia adulterum, non virum habebat? Tolle ergo hinc istum adulterum qui te corrumpit, et vade, voca virum tuum. Voca, et veni, ut intelligas me.
22. This husband had not succeeded those five husbands in this woman. For where he does not succeed, error holds sway. For when the soul has begun to be capable of reason, it is ruled either by a wise mind or by error: but error does not rule, it destroys. After those five senses, then, that woman was still wandering, and error was tossing her about. Now this error was not a lawful husband, but an adulterer: therefore the Lord says to her, You have said well, That I have no husband. For you have had five husbands: the five senses of the flesh first ruled you; you came to the age of using reason, and you did not attain to wisdom, but fell into error. Therefore after those five husbands, this one whom you have is not your husband. And what was he, if he was not a husband, but an adulterer? Call, then, not the adulterer, but your husband; so that you may grasp Me by understanding, and not, by error, think something false about Me. For the woman was still in error, as she was thinking of that water, when the Lord was already speaking of the Holy Spirit. Why was she in error, except because she had an adulterer, not a husband? Take away from here, then, this adulterer who corrupts you, and go, call your husband. Call, and come, so that you may understand Me.
23. Dicit ei mulier: Domine, video quia propheta es tu. Coepit venire vir, nondum plene venit. Prophetam Dominum putabat. Erat quidem et propheta: nam de seipso ait, Non est propheta sine honore, nisi in patria sua (Luc. IV, 24). Item de illo dictum est ad Moysen, Prophetam eis suscitabo de fratribus eorum, similem tui (Deut. XVIII, 18). Similem scilicet ad formam carnis, non ad eminentiam majestatis. Ergo invenimus Dominum Jesum dictum prophetam. Proinde jam non multum errat mulier ista. Video, inquit, quia propheta es tu. Incipit vocare virum, adulterum excludere: Video quia propheta es tu. Et incipit quaerere quod illam solet movere. Contentio quippe fuerat inter Samaritanos et Judaeos, quia Judaei in templo a Salomone
23. The woman says to Him: Lord, I see that You are a prophet. The husband has begun to come; he has not yet fully come. She thought the Lord a prophet. He was indeed also a prophet: for He says of Himself, A prophet is not without honour except in his own country (Luke 4:24). Again it was said of Him to Moses, I will raise up for them a prophet from among their brethren, like you (Deut. 18:18). Like, that is, as to the form of the flesh, not as to the eminence of majesty. Therefore we find the Lord Jesus called a prophet. Accordingly this woman is now not much in error. I see, she says, that You are a prophet. She begins to call the husband, to shut out the adulterer: I see that You are a prophet. And she begins to ask about what usually troubles her. For there had been a dispute between the Samaritans and the Jews, because the Jews
Editors' notes and page, col. 1518

Page

  • running head: …ATUS XV. CAPUT IV. 1518 (left part cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: "Q⟨u⟩are" has a damaged u; "no⟨n⟩" in "scit jam non" has a damaged final letter; the final "templo" looks like "templc" (damaged o, set as templo; UNSURE); the column ends with "Salo-", broken across the column break (Salomone); "itaque" is slightly blurred; no full-width lines; no editors' matter
  • other: the word Salomone was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 1519
PL 35:1519
fabricato adorabant Deum; Samaritani longe inde positi, non in eo adorabant. Ideo Judaei meliores se esse jactabant, quia in templo adorabat Deum. Non enim coutuntur Judaei Samaritanis: quia dicebant eis, Quomodo vos jactatis, et ideo vos meliores nobis esse perhibetis, quia templum habetis quod nos non habemus? Numquid patres nostri qui Deo placuerunt in illo templo adoraverunt? nonne in monte isto adoraverunt, ubi nos sumus? Melius ergo nos, inquiunt, in hoc monte Deum rogamus, ubi patres nostri rogaverunt. Contendebant utrique ignari, quia virum non habentes: illi pro templo, illi pro monte inflabantur adversus invicem.
worshipped God in the temple built by Solomon; the Samaritans, placed far from there, did not worship in it. Therefore the Jews boasted that they were better, because they worshipped God in the temple. For the Jews do not associate with the Samaritans: because they said to them, How is it that you boast, and therefore declare yourselves better than us, because you have a temple which we do not have? Did our fathers, who pleased God, worship in that temple? Did they not worship on this mountain, where we are? We therefore do better, they say, to petition God on this mountain, where our fathers petitioned. Both sides disputed in ignorance, because they did not have the husband: the one party was puffed up against the other for the temple, the other for the mountain.
24. Dominus tamen modo quid docet mulierem, tanquam cujus vir coeperit praesens esse? Dicit ei mulier: Domine, video quia propheta es tu. Patres nostri in monte hoc adoraverunt, et vos dicitis quia Jerosolymis est locus ubi adorare oportet. Dicit ei Jesus: Mulier, crede mihi. Veniet enim Ecclesia, sicut dictum est in Canticis canticorum, veniet et pertransiet ab initio fidei (Cant. IV, 8, sec. LXX). Veniet ut pertranseat, et pertransire non potest nisi ab initio fidei. Merito jam praesente viro audit, Mulier, crede mihi. Jam enim est in te qui credat, quia praesens est vir tuus. Coepisti adesse intellectu, quando me prophetam appellasti. Mulier, crede mihi: quia nisi credideritis, non intelligetis (Isai. VII, 9, sec. LXX). Ergo, Mulier, crede mihi, quia veniet hora, quando neque in monte hoc, neque in Jerosolymis adorabitis Patrem. Vos adoratis quod nescitis, nos adoramus quod scimus; quia salus ex Judaeis est. Sed veniet hora. Quando? Et nunc est. Quae ergo hora? Quando veri adoratores adorabunt Patrem in spiritu et veritate; non in monte isto, non in templo, sed in spiritu et veritate. Nam et Pater tales quaerit, qui adorent eum. Quare Pater tales quaerit qui adorent eum, non in monte, non in templo, sed in spiritu et veritate? Spiritus est Deus. Si corpus esset Deus, oportebat eum adorari in monte, quia corporeus est mons; oportebat eum adorari in templo, quia corporeum est templum. Spiritus est Deus; et eos qui adorant eum, in spiritu et veritate oportet adorare.
24. Yet what does the Lord now teach the woman, as one whose husband has begun to be present? The woman says to Him: Lord, I see that You are a prophet. Our fathers worshipped on this mountain, and you say that in Jerusalem is the place where one ought to worship. Jesus says to her: Woman, believe Me. For the Church will come, as is said in the Song of Songs, she will come and will pass through from the beginning of faith (Song 4:8, according to the Septuagint). She will come in order to pass through, and she cannot pass through except from the beginning of faith. Fittingly, now that her husband is present, she hears, Woman, believe Me. For now there is in you that which may believe, because your husband is present. You began to be present with understanding when you called Me a prophet. Woman, believe Me: for unless you believe, you will not understand (Isa. 7:9, according to the Septuagint). Therefore, Woman, believe Me, for the hour will come when neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem will you worship the Father. You worship what you do not know, we worship what we know; for salvation is from the Jews. But the hour will come. When? And it is now. What hour, then? When the true worshippers will worship the Father in spirit and truth; not on this mountain, not in the temple, but in spirit and truth. For the Father too seeks such to worship Him. Why does the Father seek such to worship Him, not on a mountain, not in a temple, but in spirit and truth? God is spirit. If God were a body, He would have to be worshipped on a mountain, because a mountain is bodily; He would have to be worshipped in a temple, because a temple is bodily. God is spirit; and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth.
25. Audivimus, et manifestum est; foras ieramus, intro missi sumus. O si invenirem, dicebas, montem aliquem altum et solitarium! credo enim quia in alto est Deus, magis me exaudit ex alto. Quia in monte es, propinquum te Deo putas, et cito te exaudiri, quasi de proximo clamantem? In excelsis habitat, sed humilia respicit. Prope est Dominus. Quibus? forte altis? His qui obtriverunt cor (Psal. XXXIII, 19). Mira res est: et in altis habitat, et humilibus propinquat: humilia respicit, excelsa autem a longe cognoscit (Psal. CXXXVII, 6); superbos longe videt, eo illis minus propinquat, quo sibi videntur altiores. Quaerebas ergo montem? descende ut attingas. Sed ascendere vis? ascende: noli montem quaerere. Ascensiones, inquit, in corde ejus (hoc Psalmus dicit), in convalle plorationis (Psal. LXXXIII, 6, 7). Convallis humilitatem habet. Ergo intus age totum. Et si forte quaeris aliquem locum altum,
25. We have heard, and it is plain; we had gone outside, we have been sent within. O if I could find, you were saying, some high and solitary mountain! for I believe that God is on high, He hears me more from on high. Because you are on a mountain, do you think yourself near to God, and that you are quickly heard, as one crying out from close by? He dwells in the heights, but He regards lowly things. The Lord is near. To whom? To the high, perhaps? To those who have crushed their heart (Ps. 33:19). It is a wonderful thing: He both dwells in the heights and draws near to the lowly: He regards lowly things, but lofty things He knows from afar (Ps. 137:6); He sees the proud from afar, He draws the less near to them the higher they seem to themselves. Were you seeking a mountain, then? Come down, that you may reach Him. But do you wish to ascend? Ascend: do not seek a mountain. Ascents, it says, in his heart (this the Psalm says), in the valley of weeping (Ps. 83:6–7). A valley has lowliness. Therefore do everything within. And if perhaps you seek some high place,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1519

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1519

In Mss. omittitur, est locus ubi.

In the manuscripts "est locus ubi" ("there is a place where") is omitted.

(printed under page 108)

Page

  • running head: IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, S[...] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1520
aliquem locum sanctum, intus exhibe te templum Deo. Templum enim Dei sanctum est, quod estis vos (I Cor. III, 17). In templo vis orare? in te ora. Sed prius esto templum Dei, quia ille in templo suo exaudiet orantem.
some holy place, within show yourself a temple for God. For the temple of God is holy, which you are (1 Cor. 3:17). Do you wish to pray in a temple? Pray within yourself. But first be a temple of God, because He in His temple will hear the one who prays.
26. Venit ergo hora, et nunc est, quando veri adoratores adorabunt Patrem in spiritu et veritate. Nos adoramus quod scimus, vos adoratis quod nescitis; quoniam salus ex Judaeis est. Multum dedit Judaeis: sed noli istos reprobos accipere. Parietem illum accipe cui adjunctus est alius, ut pacati in lapide angulari, quod est Christus, copulentur. Unus enim paries a Judaeis, unus a Gentibus: longe a se isti parietes, sed donec in angulo conjungantur. Alienigenae autem hospites erant, et peregrini a testamentis Dei (Ephes. II, 12-22). Secundum hoc ergo dictum est, Nos adoramus quod scimus. Ex persona quidem Judaeorum dictum est, sed non omnium Judaeorum, non reproborum Judaeorum: sed de qualibus fuerunt Apostoli, quales fuerunt Prophetae, quales fuerunt illi omnes sancti, qui omnia sua vendiderunt, et pretia rerum suarum ad pedes Apostolorum posuerunt (Act. IV, 34, 35). Non enim repulit Deus plebem suam quam praescivit (Rom. XI, 2).
26. The hour therefore is coming, and now is, when the true worshippers will worship the Father in spirit and truth. We worship what we know, you worship what you do not know; since salvation is from the Jews. He granted much to the Jews: but do not understand by this those reprobate ones. Take that wall to which another is joined, so that, reconciled in the corner-stone, which is Christ, they may be coupled together. For one wall is from the Jews, one from the Gentiles: these walls are far from each other, but only until they are joined in the corner. Now the aliens were strangers, and foreigners to the covenants of God (Eph. 2:12–22). In accordance with this, then, it was said, We worship what we know. It was said indeed in the person of the Jews, but not of all the Jews, not of the reprobate Jews: but of such as the Apostles were, such as the Prophets were, such as were all those saints who sold all their goods and laid the prices of their things at the feet of the Apostles (Acts 4:34–35). For God has not cast away His people whom He foreknew (Rom. 11:2).
27. Audivit hoc mulier ista, et addidit. Jamdudum prophetam dixerat; vidit talia dicere eum cum quo loquebatur, quae jam plus essent ad prophetam; et quid respondit, videte: Dicit ei mulier, Scio quia Messias veniet, qui dicitur Christus: cum ergo venerit ille, omnia nobis demonstrabit. Quid est hoc? Modo, inquit, de templo contendunt Judaei, et nos de monte contendimus: cum ille venerit, et montem spernet, et templum evertet; docebit nos iste omnia, ut in spiritu et veritate noverimus adorare. Sciebat quis eam posset docere, sed jam docentem nondum agnoscebat. Jam ergo digna erat cui manifestaretur. Messias autem unctus est; unctus graece Christus est; hebraice Messias est: unde et punice, Messe dicitur unge. Cognatae quippe sunt linguae istae et vicinae, hebraica, punica, et syra.
27. That woman heard this, and added something. Long since she had called Him a prophet; she saw that He with whom she was speaking said such things as would now be more than belongs to a prophet; and see what she answered: The woman says to Him, I know that the Messiah will come, who is called Christ: when therefore He has come, He will show us all things. What is this? Now, she says, the Jews contend about the temple, and we contend about the mountain: when He comes, He will both spurn the mountain and overturn the temple; He will teach us all things, so that we may know how to worship in spirit and truth. She knew who could teach her, but she did not yet recognize Him who was already teaching her. Now therefore she was worthy that He should be manifested to her. Now Messiah means anointed; anointed in Greek is Christus; in Hebrew it is Messias: whence also in Punic, anoint is said Messe. For these languages are related and neighbouring, Hebrew, Punic and Syriac.
28. Ergo dicit ei mulier, Scio quia Messias veniet, qui dicitur Christus: cum ergo venerit ille, nobis annuntiabit omnia. Dicit ei Jesus: Ego sum qui loquor tecum. Vocavit virum suum, factus est vir ejus caput mulieris, factus est Christus caput viri (I Cor. XI, 3). Jam mulier ordinatur in fide, et regitur bene victura. Posteaquam audivit hoc, Ego sum qui loquor tecum, jam ultra quid diceret; quando Christus Dominus manifestare se voluit mulieri, cui dixerat, Crede mihi?
28. So the woman says to Him, I know that the Messiah will come, who is called Christ: when therefore He has come, He will announce all things to us. Jesus says to her: I am He who speak with you. She has called her husband: her husband has become the head of the woman, Christ has become the head of the man (1 Cor. 11:3). Now the woman is set in order in faith, and is ruled so as to live well. After she had heard this, I am He who speak with you, what further could she say, when Christ the Lord had willed to manifest Himself to the woman, to whom He had said, Believe Me?
29. Et continuo venerunt discipuli ejus, et mirabantur quia cum muliere loquebatur. Quia quaerebat perditam, qui venerat quaerere quod perierat, hoc illi mirabantur. Bonnm enim mirabantur, non malum suspicabantur. Nemo tamen dixit: Quid quaeris aut quid loqueris cum ea?
29. And at once His disciples came, and they marvelled that He was speaking with a woman. That He who had come to seek what had perished was seeking the lost woman, this is what they marvelled at. For they marvelled at a good thing; they did not suspect an evil one. Yet no one said: What do you seek, or why do you speak with her?
30. Reliquit ergo hydriam suam mulier. Audito, Ego sum qui loquor tecum, et recepto in cor Christo Domino, quid faceret, nisi jam hydriam dimitteret, et evangelizare curreret? Projecit cupiditatem, et properavit
30. The woman therefore left her water-jar. Having heard, I am He who speak with you, and having received Christ the Lord into her heart, what should she do but now leave her water-jar and run to preach the gospel? She cast away desire, and
Editors' notes and page, col. 1520

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: plus essent ad prophetam› · call in col 1520

In sex Mss., plus esset a propheta.

In six manuscripts: "plus esset a propheta" ("it was more than from a prophet").

(printed under page 108)

Page

  • running head: …EVANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1520
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: the word properavit was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 1521
PL 35:1521
annuntiare veritatem. Discant qui volunt evangelizare, projiciant hydriam ad puteum. Recordamini quid superius dixerim de hydria: vas erat unde aqua hauriebatur, graeco nomine appellatur hydria, quoniam graece ὕδωρ aqua dicitur; tanquam si aquarium diceretur. Projecit ergo hydriam, quae jam non usui, sed oneri fuit: avida quippe desiderabat aqua illa satiari. Ut nuntiaret Christum, onere abjecto, cucurrit ad civitatem, et dicit illis hominibus: Venite, et videte hominem qui mihi dixit omnia quaecumque feci. Pedetentim, ne illi quasi irascerentur, et indignarentur, et persequerentur. Venite, et videte hominem qui dixit mihi omnia quaecumque feci: numquid ipse est Christus? Exierunt de civitate, et veniebant ad eum.
hastened to announce the truth. Let those who wish to evangelize learn: let them throw down their water-jar at the well. Remember what I said above about the water-jar: it was a vessel from which water was drawn, and it is called by a Greek name, hydria, because in Greek water is called hydor; as if one were to say "water-vessel". So she threw down the water-jar, which was now no longer of use but a burden: for she eagerly desired to be filled with that water. In order to proclaim Christ, having cast off the burden, she ran to the city and says to those men: Come and see a man who told me all things whatsoever I have done. Step by step, lest they should be angered, as it were, and become indignant, and persecute her. Come and see a man who told me all things whatsoever I have done: can He be the Christ? They went out of the city and were coming to Him.
31. Et interea rogabant eum discipuli dicentes: Rabbi, manduca. Ierant enim emere cibos et venerant. Ille autem dixit: Ego habeo cibum manducare quem vos non scitis. Dicebant ergo discipuli ad invicem: Numquid aliquis attulit ei manducare? Quid mirum si mulier illa non intelligebat aquam? ecce discipuli nondum intelligunt escam. Audivit autem cogitationes illorum, et jam instruit ut magister; non per circuitum, sicut illam cujus adhuc virum requirebat, sed jam aperte: Meus, inquit, cibus est ut faciam voluntatem ejus qui misit me. Ergo et potus ipse erat in illa muliere, ut faceret voluntatem ejus, qui miserat eum. Ideo dicebat, Sitio, da mihi bibere; scilicet ut fidem in ea operaretur, et fidem ejus biberet, et eam in corpus suum trajiceret: corpus enim ejus Ecclesia. Ipse est ergo, inquit, cibus meus ut faciam voluntatem ejus qui me misit.
31. And meanwhile the disciples were asking Him, saying: Rabbi, eat. For they had gone to buy food and had come back. But He said: I have food to eat which you do not know. So the disciples were saying to one another: Has anyone brought Him something to eat? What wonder if that woman did not understand the water? See, the disciples do not yet understand the food. But He heard their thoughts, and now instructs them as a master; not in a roundabout way, as with her whose husband He was still asking after, but now openly: My food, He says, is to do the will of Him who sent Me. So the drink too was this very thing in that woman, that He might do the will of Him who had sent Him. That is why He said, I thirst, give Me to drink; namely, that He might work faith in her, and drink her faith, and transfer her into His body: for His body is the Church. This, then, He says, is My food, to do the will of Him who sent Me.
32. Nonne vos dicitis quod adhuc quatuor menses sunt, et messis venit? In opus fervebat, et operarios mittere disponebat. Vos quatuor menses computatis usque ad messem; ego vobis aliam messem albam et paratam ostendo. Ecce dico vobis, levate oculos vestros, et videte quia jam albae sunt regiones ad messem. Ergo messores missurus est. In hoc enim est verbum verum, quia alius est qui metit, alius qui seminat: ut et qui seminat simul gaudeat et qui metit. Ego misi vos metere quod vos non laborastis: alii laboraverunt, et vos in laborem eorum introistis. Quid ergo? messores misit, non seminatores? Quo messores? Ubi jam alii laboraverunt. Nam ubi jam laboratum erat, utique seminatum erat; et quod seminatum erat, jam maturum erat factum, falcem et trituram desiderabat. Quo ergo erant messores mittendi? Ubi jam Prophetae praedicaverant; ipsi enim seminatores. Nam si ipsi non seminatores, unde ad illam mulierem pervenerat, Scio quia Messias veniet? Jam ista mulier fructus maturus erat, et erant albae messes, et falcem quaerebant. Misi vos ergo: quo? Metere quod non seminastis: alii seminaverunt, et vos in labores eorum introistis. Qui laboraverunt? Ipse Abraham, Isaac, et Jacob. Legite labores eorum: in omnibus laboribus eorum prophetia Christi; et ideo seminatores. Moyses et caeteri Patriarchae et omnes Prophetae, quanta pertulerunt in illo frigore quando seminabant? Ergo jam in Judaea
32. Do you not say that there are still four months, and the harvest comes? He was burning for the work, and was arranging to send labourers. You count four months until the harvest; I show you another harvest, white and ready. See, I say to you, lift up your eyes, and see that the fields are already white for harvest. So He is about to send reapers. For in this is the saying true, that one is he who reaps, another he who sows: so that he who sows and he who reaps may rejoice together. I have sent you to reap what you have not laboured for: others have laboured, and you have entered into their labour. What then? Did He send reapers, not sowers? Where did He send reapers? Where others had already laboured. For where labour had already been done, sowing had surely been done; and what had been sown had already become ripe, and was calling for the sickle and the threshing. Where, then, were the reapers to be sent? Where the Prophets had already preached; for they were the sowers. For if they were not the sowers, from where had it come to that woman to say, I know that the Messiah is coming? That woman was already ripe fruit, and the harvests were white, and were looking for the sickle. I have sent you, then: where? To reap what you have not sown: others have sown, and you have entered into their labours. Who laboured? Abraham himself, Isaac, and Jacob. Read their labours: in all their labours there is prophecy of Christ; and therefore they were sowers. Moses and the other Patriarchs and all the Prophets, how much did they endure in that cold when they were sowing? Therefore already in Judaea
Editors' notes and page, col. 1521

Page

  • running head: 1521 TRACTATUS XVI. CAPU[T] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with the fragment "peravit", the rest of a word broken from the previous column (presumably properavit), rendered "hastened"; "operaretur" in section 31 looks like "operarefur" in the image, taken as a worn t, UNSURE; the right-hand column (1522: end of Tract XV and start of Tract XVI "Ab eo...") is not set; no full-width line; no editors' matter in this column.