proprium donum accepit a Domino (super cujus pectus in convivio discumbebat (Joan. XIII, 25), ut per hoc significaret quia secreta altiora de intimo ejus corde potabat), ut ea diceret de Filio Dei quae parvulorum mentes fortassis intentas excitare possint; implere autem nondum capaces non possint: grandiusculis autem quibusque mentibus et ad aetatem quamdam interius virilem pervenientibus, dat aliquid verbis his, quo et exerceantur, et pascantur. Audistis cum legeretur, et unde sermo iste venerit meministis. Hesterno enim die lectum est, quod propterea volebant Jesum Judaei interficere, quia non solum solvebat sabbatum, sed etiam patrem suum dicebat Deum, aequalem se faciens Deo (Id. V, 18). Quod Judaeis displicebat, hoc ipsi Patri placebat. Hoc sine dubio placet etiam eis qui honorificant Filium, sicut honorificant Patrem; quia si eis non placeat, displicebunt. Non enim Deus erit major, quia placet tibi; sed tu minor, si displicet tibi. Adversus hanc autem eorum calumniam, venientem vel de ignorantia, vel de malitia, loquitur Dominus non omnino quod capiant, sed unde agitentur et conturbentur, et fortasse vel conturbati medicum quaerant. Dicebat autem quae scriberentur, ut etiam a nobis postea legerentur. Viderimus ergo quid in Judaeorum cordibus factum sit, cum haec audirent: quid in nobis fiat cum haec audimus, amplius cogitemus. Neque enim natae sunt haereses, et quaedam dogmata perversitatis illaqueantia animas et in profundum praecipitantia, nisi dum Scripturae bonae intelliguntur non bene; et quod in eis non bene intelligitur, etiam temere et audacter asseritur. Itaque, charissimi, valde caute haec audire debemus, ad quae capienda parvuli sumus; et corde pio et cum tremore, sicut scriptum est, hanc tenentes regulam sanitatis, ut quod secundum fidem qua imbuti sumus, intelligere valuerimus, tanquam de cibo gaudeamus: quod autem secundum sanam fidei regulam intelligere nondum potuerimus, dubitationem auferamus, intelligentiam differamus; hoc est, ut etiam si quid sit nescimus, bonum tamen et verum esse minime dubitemus. Et ego, fratres, qui suscepi loqui vobis, cogitandus sum a vobis qui susceperim, et quae susceperim: suscepi enim tractanda divina homo, spiritualia carnalis, aeterna mortalis. Etiam a me, charissimi, longe sit vana praesumptio, si volo sanus in domo Dei conversari, quae est Ecclesia Dei vivi, columna et firmamentum veritatis (I Tim. III, 15): pro modulo meo capio quod vobis appono; ubi aperitur, pascor vobiscum; ubi clauditur, pulso vobiscum.
proper gift he received from the Lord (on Whose breast he reclined at the supper (John 13:25), so that by this he might signify that he was drinking higher secrets from His inmost heart), that he should say such things about the Son of God as might perhaps rouse the attentive minds of little ones, but could not fill them, since they are not yet capable; but to minds somewhat more grown, and to those arriving at a certain inwardly manly age, he gives something in these words by which they may be both exercised and fed. You heard it when it was read, and you remember from where this discourse has come. For yesterday it was read that the Jews wished to kill Jesus for this reason, that He not only broke the sabbath, but also called God His father, making Himself equal to God (ibid. 5:18). What displeased the Jews, that pleased the Father Himself. This without doubt pleases also those who honour the Son as they honour the Father; for if it does not please them, they will be displeasing. For God will not be greater because it pleases you; but you will be less if it displeases you. Now against this calumny of theirs, coming either from ignorance or from malice, the Lord speaks not at all what they may grasp, but that by which they may be stirred and troubled, and perhaps, being troubled, may seek the physician. And He was saying things that would be written, so that they might afterwards be read by us too. Let us leave aside, then, what took place in the hearts of the Jews when they heard these things: let us rather consider what takes place in us when we hear them. For heresies have not been born, nor certain dogmas of perversity that ensnare souls and hurl them into the deep, except when good Scriptures are understood not well; and what is not well understood in them is also rashly and boldly asserted. Therefore, dearly beloved, we ought to hear these things very cautiously, for the grasping of which we are little ones; and with a pious heart and with trembling, as it is written, holding this rule of soundness: that what we have been able to understand according to the faith in which we have been instructed, we may rejoice in as in food; but what we have not yet been able to understand according to the sound rule of faith, we may put away doubt and defer understanding; that is, that even if we do not know what something is, we may in no way doubt that it is good and true. And I, brethren, who have undertaken to speak to you, must be considered by you as to who I am that have undertaken it, and what I have undertaken: for I, a man, have undertaken to treat divine things; a carnal man, spiritual things; a mortal, eternal things. Even from me, dearly beloved, let vain presumption be far, if I wish to dwell soundly in the house of God, which is the Church of the living God, the pillar and firmament of truth (1 Tim. 3:15): according to my small measure I grasp what I set before you; where it is opened, I am fed with you; where it is shut, I knock with you.
2. Commoti sunt ergo Judaei, et indignati sunt; merito quidem, quod audebat homo aequalem se facere Deo: sed ideo immerito, quia in homine non intelligebant Deum. Carnem videbant, Deum nesciebant: habitaculum cernebant, habitatorem ignorabant. Caro illa templum erat, Deus inhabitabat intus. Non ergo Jesus carnem aequabat Patri, non formam servi Domino comparabat; non quod factum est propter nos, sed quod erat quando fecit nos.
2. The Jews therefore were moved, and were indignant; rightly indeed, in that a man dared to make himself equal to God: but for this reason wrongly, that in the man they did not understand God. They saw the flesh, they did not know God: they discerned the dwelling, they were ignorant of the dweller. That flesh was a temple, God dwelt within. Jesus, then, was not making the flesh equal to the Father, He was not comparing the form of a servant to the Lord; not what was made for our sake, but what He was when He made us.