Migne Reading Room

PL 35 · cols. 1535–1542

Augustinus, In Joannis Evangelium tractatus XIII-XIX

Tractate XVIII

PL 35:1535
fecit, et per me regit cum regit. Dixit haec, sed quibus? Surdis, caecis, claudis, languidis, medicum non agnoscentibus, et tanquam in phrenesi mente perdita occidere volentibus.
made, and through Me rules when He rules. He said these things, but to whom? To the deaf, the blind, the lame, the sick, who did not recognize the physician and who, as if in a frenzy with their mind lost, wanted to kill Him.
16. Proinde quid secutus Evangelista dixit? Hinc ergo magis quaerebant eum Judaei interficere, quia non solum solvebat sabbatum, sed et patrem suum dicebat Deum. Non quomodocumque: sed quid? Aequalem se faciens Deo. Nam omnes dicimus Deo, Pater noster qui es in coelis (Matth. VI, 9): legimus et Judaeos dixisse, Cum tu sis pater noster (Isai. LXIII, 16 et LXIV, 8). Ergo non hinc irascebantur, quia patrem suum dicebat Deum; sed quod longe alio modo quam homines. Ecce intelligunt Judaei quod non intelligunt Ariani. Ariani quippe inaequalem Patri Filium dicunt, et inde haeresis est pulsa de Ecclesia. Ecce ipsi caeci, ipsi interfectores Christi, intellexerunt tamen verba Christi. Non eum intellexerunt esse Christum, nec eum intellexerunt Filium Dei: sed tamen intellexerunt in illis verbis, quia talis commendaretur Filius Dei, qui aequalis esset Deo. Quis erat nesciebant; talem tamen praedicari agnoscebant, quia patrem suum dicebat Deum, aequalem se faciens Deo. Non erat ergo aequalis Deo? Non ipse se faciebat aequalem, sed ille illum genuerat aequalem. Si se ipse faceret aequalem Deo, caderet per rapinam. Qui enim se voluit aequalem facere Deo cum non esset, cecidit (Isai. XIV, 14, 15), et ex angelo factus est diabolus: et hanc superbiam homini propinavit, unde ipse dejectus est. Nam hoc dixit homini, cui stanti lapsus invidit, Gustate, et eritis sicut dii (Gen. III, 5): id est, usurpatione rapite quod facti non estis; quia et ego rapiendo dejectus sum. Non hoc prodebat, sed hoc suadebat. Christus autem aequalis Patri natus erat, non factus: natus de substantia Patris. Unde illum sic commendat Apostolus: Qui cum in forma Dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse aequalis Deo. Quid est, non rapinam arbitratus est? Non usurpavit aequalitatem Dei; sed erat in illa, in qua natus erat. Et nos ad aequalem Deum quomodo perveniremus? Semetipsum exinanivit formam servi accipiens (Philipp. II, 6, 7). Non ergo se exinanivit amittens quod erat, sed accipiens quod non erat. Hanc formam servi contemnentes Judaei, Dominum Christum aequalem Patri intelligere non poterant; quamvis eum hoc de se dicere minime dubitabant, et ideo saeviebant: et adhuc tamen eos ille perferebat, et sanitatem saevientium requirebat.
16. Accordingly, what did the Evangelist say next? Therefore the Jews sought all the more to kill Him, because He not only broke the sabbath, but also called God His father. Not in just any way: but how? Making Himself equal to God. For we all say to God, Our Father Who art in heaven (Matt. 6:9); we read also that the Jews said, Since Thou art our father (Isa. 63:16 and 64:8). So it was not on this account that they were angry, that He called God His father, but because He did so in a way far different from men. See, the Jews understand what the Arians do not understand. For the Arians say that the Son is unequal to the Father, and for that reason the heresy has been driven out of the Church. See, these very blind men, these very slayers of Christ, nevertheless understood the words of Christ. They did not understand Him to be the Christ, nor did they understand Him to be the Son of God; but they nevertheless understood in those words that such a Son of God was being set forth as was equal to God. Who He was they did not know; yet they recognized that such a one was being proclaimed, because He called God His father, making Himself equal to God. Was He then not equal to God? He did not make Himself equal, but that One had begotten Him equal. If He made Himself equal to God, He would fall through robbery. For he who wished to make himself equal to God when he was not, fell (Isa. 14:14–15), and from an angel was made a devil; and he gave this pride to man to drink, the pride by which he himself was cast down. For he said this to man, whose standing he begrudged, being himself fallen: Taste, and you will be as gods (Gen. 3:5); that is, seize by usurpation what you have not been made, because I too was cast down by seizing. He did not disclose this, but he urged this. But Christ had been born equal to the Father, not made: born of the substance of the Father. Hence the Apostle sets Him forth thus: Who, when He was in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal to God. What is, He thought it not robbery? He did not usurp equality with God, but He was in that in which He had been born. And how would we come to the God Who is equal? He emptied Himself, taking the form of a servant (Phil. 2:6–7). So He did not empty Himself by losing what He was, but by taking what He was not. The Jews, despising this form of a servant, could not understand the Lord Christ as equal to the Father, although they did not in the least doubt that He said this of Himself, and for that reason they raged: and yet He still bore with them, and sought the healing of those who raged.
TRACTATUS XVIII.
Tractate 18.
In eum Evangelii locum, Amen, amen dico vobis, non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem: quaecumque enim ille fecerit, haec et Filius similiter facit. Cap. V, ℣. 19.
On that passage of the Gospel, Amen, amen, I say to you, the Son cannot do anything of Himself, but what He has seen the Father doing; for whatever things He has done, these the Son also does likewise. Chapter 5, verse 19.
1. Joannes evangelista inter consortes et comparticipes suos alios evangelistas, hoc praecipuum et
1. John the evangelist, among his fellows and co-partakers, the other evangelists, this particular and
Editors' notes and page, col. 1535

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 1535 (note printed at the foot of col 1535; call above the rendered area)

Sic vetus codex Carcassonensis, et melius : nam infra, Tract. 23, n. 6, ubi sermo est de Apollinaristis, sic loquitur : « Fuerunt enim quidam haeretici, et pulsi sunt ab Ecclesia ; » et hoc loquendi modo passim utitur. [et inde haeresis pulsat Ecclesiam].

So the old Carcassonne manuscript, and better: for below, Tractate 23, n. 6, where he speaks of the Apollinarists, he says: "For there were certain heretics, and they were driven out of the Church"; and he uses this way of speaking throughout. [and from there heresy beats upon the Church].

(printed under page 116)

Page

  • running head: 1535 IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1536
proprium donum accepit a Domino (super cujus pectus in convivio discumbebat (Joan. XIII, 25), ut per hoc significaret quia secreta altiora de intimo ejus corde potabat), ut ea diceret de Filio Dei quae parvulorum mentes fortassis intentas excitare possint; implere autem nondum capaces non possint: grandiusculis autem quibusque mentibus et ad aetatem quamdam interius virilem pervenientibus, dat aliquid verbis his, quo et exerceantur, et pascantur. Audistis cum legeretur, et unde sermo iste venerit meministis. Hesterno enim die lectum est, quod propterea volebant Jesum Judaei interficere, quia non solum solvebat sabbatum, sed etiam patrem suum dicebat Deum, aequalem se faciens Deo (Id. V, 18). Quod Judaeis displicebat, hoc ipsi Patri placebat. Hoc sine dubio placet etiam eis qui honorificant Filium, sicut honorificant Patrem; quia si eis non placeat, displicebunt. Non enim Deus erit major, quia placet tibi; sed tu minor, si displicet tibi. Adversus hanc autem eorum calumniam, venientem vel de ignorantia, vel de malitia, loquitur Dominus non omnino quod capiant, sed unde agitentur et conturbentur, et fortasse vel conturbati medicum quaerant. Dicebat autem quae scriberentur, ut etiam a nobis postea legerentur. Viderimus ergo quid in Judaeorum cordibus factum sit, cum haec audirent: quid in nobis fiat cum haec audimus, amplius cogitemus. Neque enim natae sunt haereses, et quaedam dogmata perversitatis illaqueantia animas et in profundum praecipitantia, nisi dum Scripturae bonae intelliguntur non bene; et quod in eis non bene intelligitur, etiam temere et audacter asseritur. Itaque, charissimi, valde caute haec audire debemus, ad quae capienda parvuli sumus; et corde pio et cum tremore, sicut scriptum est, hanc tenentes regulam sanitatis, ut quod secundum fidem qua imbuti sumus, intelligere valuerimus, tanquam de cibo gaudeamus: quod autem secundum sanam fidei regulam intelligere nondum potuerimus, dubitationem auferamus, intelligentiam differamus; hoc est, ut etiam si quid sit nescimus, bonum tamen et verum esse minime dubitemus. Et ego, fratres, qui suscepi loqui vobis, cogitandus sum a vobis qui susceperim, et quae susceperim: suscepi enim tractanda divina homo, spiritualia carnalis, aeterna mortalis. Etiam a me, charissimi, longe sit vana praesumptio, si volo sanus in domo Dei conversari, quae est Ecclesia Dei vivi, columna et firmamentum veritatis (I Tim. III, 15): pro modulo meo capio quod vobis appono; ubi aperitur, pascor vobiscum; ubi clauditur, pulso vobiscum.
proper gift he received from the Lord (on Whose breast he reclined at the supper (John 13:25), so that by this he might signify that he was drinking higher secrets from His inmost heart), that he should say such things about the Son of God as might perhaps rouse the attentive minds of little ones, but could not fill them, since they are not yet capable; but to minds somewhat more grown, and to those arriving at a certain inwardly manly age, he gives something in these words by which they may be both exercised and fed. You heard it when it was read, and you remember from where this discourse has come. For yesterday it was read that the Jews wished to kill Jesus for this reason, that He not only broke the sabbath, but also called God His father, making Himself equal to God (ibid. 5:18). What displeased the Jews, that pleased the Father Himself. This without doubt pleases also those who honour the Son as they honour the Father; for if it does not please them, they will be displeasing. For God will not be greater because it pleases you; but you will be less if it displeases you. Now against this calumny of theirs, coming either from ignorance or from malice, the Lord speaks not at all what they may grasp, but that by which they may be stirred and troubled, and perhaps, being troubled, may seek the physician. And He was saying things that would be written, so that they might afterwards be read by us too. Let us leave aside, then, what took place in the hearts of the Jews when they heard these things: let us rather consider what takes place in us when we hear them. For heresies have not been born, nor certain dogmas of perversity that ensnare souls and hurl them into the deep, except when good Scriptures are understood not well; and what is not well understood in them is also rashly and boldly asserted. Therefore, dearly beloved, we ought to hear these things very cautiously, for the grasping of which we are little ones; and with a pious heart and with trembling, as it is written, holding this rule of soundness: that what we have been able to understand according to the faith in which we have been instructed, we may rejoice in as in food; but what we have not yet been able to understand according to the sound rule of faith, we may put away doubt and defer understanding; that is, that even if we do not know what something is, we may in no way doubt that it is good and true. And I, brethren, who have undertaken to speak to you, must be considered by you as to who I am that have undertaken it, and what I have undertaken: for I, a man, have undertaken to treat divine things; a carnal man, spiritual things; a mortal, eternal things. Even from me, dearly beloved, let vain presumption be far, if I wish to dwell soundly in the house of God, which is the Church of the living God, the pillar and firmament of truth (1 Tim. 3:15): according to my small measure I grasp what I set before you; where it is opened, I am fed with you; where it is shut, I knock with you.
2. Commoti sunt ergo Judaei, et indignati sunt; merito quidem, quod audebat homo aequalem se facere Deo: sed ideo immerito, quia in homine non intelligebant Deum. Carnem videbant, Deum nesciebant: habitaculum cernebant, habitatorem ignorabant. Caro illa templum erat, Deus inhabitabat intus. Non ergo Jesus carnem aequabat Patri, non formam servi Domino comparabat; non quod factum est propter nos, sed quod erat quando fecit nos.
2. The Jews therefore were moved, and were indignant; rightly indeed, in that a man dared to make himself equal to God: but for this reason wrongly, that in the man they did not understand God. They saw the flesh, they did not know God: they discerned the dwelling, they were ignorant of the dweller. That flesh was a temple, God dwelt within. Jesus, then, was not making the flesh equal to the Father, He was not comparing the form of a servant to the Lord; not what was made for our sake, but what He was when He made us.
Editors' notes and page, col. 1536

Page

  • running head: EVANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1536
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins mid-sentence (proprium donum); left-hand fragments belong to col. 1535 and are not set; running head visible only from EVANGELIUM, its beginning lies over the other column; "immerito" printed with a smudged stop after it, set as comma (unsure); no marginal letters visible in the images
PL 35:1537
Quis namque sit Christus, Catholicis loquor, nostis, quia bene credidistis: non Verbum tantum, nec caro tantum; sed Verbum caro factum est, ut habitaret in nobis. Recenseo de Verbo quod nostis: In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum: hic aequalitas cum Patre. Sed Verbum caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis (Joan. I, 1-14): hac carne major est Pater. Ita Pater et aequalis, et major: aequalis Verbo, major carne; aequalis ei per quem fecit nos, major eo qui factus est propter nos. Ad hanc regulam sanam catholicam, quam praecipue nosse debetis, quam tenete qui nostis, a qua prorsus fides vestra labi non debet, quae nullis hominum argumentis extorquenda est cordi vestro, dirigamus ea quae intelligimus; et quae forte non intelligimus, dirigenda ad hanc regulam quandoque differamus, cum idonei fuerimus. Novimus ergo aequalem Patri Filium Dei, quia novimus in principio Deum Verbum. Quid ergo Judaei volebant eum interficere? Quia non solum solvebat sabbatum, sed et patrem suum dicebat Deum, aequalem se faciens Deo: videntes carnem, non videntes Verbum. Loquatur ergo et contra eos Verbum per carnem, et interior habitator sonet per habitaculum suum; ut qui potest, noverit quis intus habitet.
For who Christ is (I am speaking to Catholics) you know, because you have believed well: not the Word only, nor the flesh only; but the Word was made flesh, that He might dwell among us. I go over concerning the Word what you know: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God: here is equality with the Father. But the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us (John 1:1–14): than this flesh the Father is greater. Thus the Father is both equal and greater: equal to the Word, greater than the flesh; equal to Him through Whom He made us, greater than Him Who was made for our sake. To this sound catholic rule, which you ought above all to know, which you who know it must hold, from which your faith ought not to slip at all, which by no arguments of men is to be wrested from your heart, let us direct the things that we understand; and the things that perhaps we do not understand, let us put off directing to this rule until some time when we shall have become fit. We know, then, that the Son of God is equal to the Father, because we know that in the beginning the Word was God. Why then did the Jews seek to kill Him? Because not only did He break the sabbath, but He also said that God was His Father, making Himself equal to God: seeing the flesh, not seeing the Word. Let the Word, then, speak against them too through the flesh, and let the inner Indweller sound forth through His dwelling; so that whoever can may know Who dwells within.
3. Quid ergo eis dicit? Respondit itaque Jesus, et dixit eis, commotis quod aequalem se faceret Deo, Amen, amen dico vobis, non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem. Ad haec quid responderint Judaei, scriptum non est: et fortasse tacuerunt. Quidam tamen, qui christianos se haberi volunt, non tacent, et quodammodo ex his verbis concipiunt quaedam dicenda contra nos: quae contemnenda non sunt, et propter ipsos et propter nos. Ariani quippe haeretici dicentes, non per carnem, sed ante carnem, Filium ipsum qui suscepit carnem, minorem esse quam Pater est, et non esse ejusdem substantiae cujus Pater est, capiunt ex his verbis ansam calumniae, et respondent nobis: Videtis quia Dominus Jesus, cum animadverteret Judaeos ex hoc moveri, quod Patri Deo aequalem se faceret, talia verba subjunxit, ut se aequalem non esse monstraret. Movebat enim Judaeos, aiunt, adversus Christum, quia aequalem se faciebat Deo; et volens eos corrigere ab hoc motu Christus, et eis demonstrare Filium non esse aequalem Patri, id est, aequalem Deo, ait, quasi dicens, Quid irascimini? quid indignamini? Non sum aequalis, quia non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem. Qui enim non potest, inquiunt, facere a se quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem, utique minor est, non aequalis.
3. What then does He say to them? Jesus therefore answered, and said to them, stirred up as they were because He made Himself equal to God, Amen, amen I say to you, the Son cannot do anything of Himself, except what He sees the Father doing. What the Jews answered to this is not written: and perhaps they were silent. Some, however, who wish to be regarded as Christians, are not silent, and in a certain way draw from these words some things to be said against us: things which are not to be despised, both for their sake and for ours. For the Arian heretics, who say that not through the flesh, but before the flesh, the Son Himself Who took up flesh is less than the Father is, and is not of the same substance of which the Father is, take from these words a handle for slander, and answer us: You see that the Lord Jesus, when He noticed that the Jews were stirred by this, that He made Himself equal to God the Father, added such words as to show that He was not equal. For this stirred the Jews against Christ, they say, that He made Himself equal to God; and Christ, wishing to correct them from this agitation, and to demonstrate to them that the Son is not equal to the Father, that is, equal to God, said, as if saying, Why are you angry? Why are you indignant? I am not equal, because the Son cannot do anything of Himself, except what He sees the Father doing. For he who cannot, they say, do anything of himself, except what he sees the Father doing, is surely less, not equal.
4. Iu hac regula cordis sui distorta et prava, haereticus audiat nos nondum objurgantes, sed adhuc quasi quaerentes, et explicet nobis quod sentit. Puto enim, o quisquis ille es (faciamus enim eum tanquam praesentem adesse), tenes nobiscum quia in principio erat Verbum. Teneo, inquit. Et quia Verbum erat apud Deum? Et hoc, inquit, teneo. Sequere ergo, et hoc fortius tene, quia Deus erat Verbum. Et hoc, inquit,
4. In this twisted and crooked rule of his heart, let the heretic hear us not yet rebuking, but still as it were inquiring, and let him explain to us what he thinks. For I suppose, O whoever you are (for let us make him present as though he were here), you hold with us that in the beginning was the Word. I hold it, he says. And that the Word was with God? This too, he says, I hold. Follow on, then, and hold this more firmly, that the Word was God. This too, he says,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1537

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 1537 or 1538 (call above the rendered area)

Duodecim Mss., et sic individuam charitatem.

Twelve manuscripts: "and so undivided charity."

(printed under page 117)

Page

  • running head: 1537 TRACTATUS XVIII. CA[...] (cut off at the image edge; column number looks like 1557 in the type but is 1537)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1538
teneo : sed ille Deus major, ille Deus minor. Jam nescio quid paganum redolet : cum christiano me loqui arbitrabar. Si est Deus major, et est Deus minor; duos deos colimus, non unum Deum. Quare, inquit? et tu non duos deos dicis aequales sibi? Hoc ego non dico : aequalitatem enim istam sic intelligo, ut ibi intelligam etiam individuam charitatem; et si individuam charitatem, perfectam unitatem. Si enim charitas quam misit hominibus Deus, de multis hominum cordibus facit cor unum, et multas hominum animas facit animam unam, sicut de credentibus seseque invicem diligentibus scriptum est in Actibus Apostolorum, Erat illis anima una, et cor unum in Deum (Act. IV, 32) : si ergo anima mea et anima tua, cum idem sapimus nosque diligimus, fit anima una : quanto magis Pater Deus et Filius Deus in fonte dilectionis Deus unus est?
I hold; but that God is greater, that God is lesser. Now it smells of something pagan, when I thought I was speaking with a Christian. If there is a greater God and there is a lesser God, we worship two gods, not one God. Why, he says? Do you too not speak of two gods equal to each other? This I do not say: for I understand this equality in such a way that I understand there also an undivided charity; and if an undivided charity, a perfect unity. For if the charity which God has sent to men makes of the many hearts of men one heart, and makes of the many souls of men one soul, as it is written in the Acts of the Apostles of those who believed and loved one another, They had one soul and one heart towards God (Acts 4:32): if, then, my soul and your soul, when we think the same thing and love each other, become one soul, how much more are God the Father and God the Son, in the fountain of love, one God?
5. Verum ad haec verba, quibus commotum est cor tuum, intende, et recole mecum quod de Verbo requirebamus. Jam tenemus, Deus erat Verbum : adjungo aliud, quia cum dixisset, Hoc erat in principio apud Deum, continuo subjecit Evangelista, Omnia per ipsum facta sunt. Nunc te quaerendo exagito, nunc te contra te moveo, et te contra te interpello : tene tantum memoriter ista de Verbo, quia Deus erat Verbum, et omnia per ipsum facta sunt. Audi jam verba quibus commotus es, ut minorem diceres Filium, nempe quia dixit, Non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem. Ita, inquit. Expone hoc mihi paululum : sic, quantum opinor, intelligis, quoniam quaedam facit Pater, Filius autem attendit quemadmodum faciat Pater, ut possit et ipse ea facere quae viderit Patrem facientem. Duos quasi fabros constituisti : ita Patrem et Filium, ut etiam magistrum et discipulum, quomodo solent patres fabri docere filios suos artem suam. Ecce descendo ad carnalem sensum tuum, ita interim cogito ut tu : videamus si cogitatio haec nostra inveniat exitum secundum illa quae jam de Verbo pariter locuti sumus pariterque sentimus, quia Deus Verbum, et omnia per ipsum facta sunt. Pone igitur Patrem tanquam fabrum, quaedam opera facientem, Filium autem tanquam discipulum, qui non potest facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem : intendit enim quodammodo in manus Patris, ut quomodo viderit eum fabricare, sic et ipse tale aliquid fabricet in operibus suis. Sed Pater iste omnia illa quae facit, et vult ut attendat eum Filius et talia et ipse faciat; per quem facit? Eia nunc est ut adsis sententiae tuae priori, quam mecum recensuisti mecumque tenuisti, quia in principio Verbum, et apud Deum Verbum, et Deus Verbum, et omnia per ipsum facta sunt. Tu ergo cum mecum tenueris quia per Verbum facta sunt omnia; rursum carnali sapore et puerili motu facis tibi in animo Deum facientem, et Verbum attendentem, ut cum fecerit Deus, faciat et Verbum. Quid enim facit Deus praeter Verbum? Si enim facit, non omnia per Verbum facta sunt; perdidisti
5. But turn your attention to these words by which your heart has been stirred, and recall with me what we were inquiring about the Word. We already hold that the Word was God; I add something else, that when he had said, This was in the beginning with God, the Evangelist straightway added, All things were made through Him. Now I press you by questioning, now I move you against yourself, and I challenge you against yourself: only keep firmly in memory these things about the Word, that the Word was God, and all things were made through Him. Hear now the words by which you were stirred to call the Son lesser, namely because He said, The Son cannot do anything of Himself, except what He has seen the Father doing. Yes, he says. Explain this to me a little: you understand it thus, as far as I suppose, that the Father does certain things, and the Son watches how the Father does them, so that He too may be able to do the things which He has seen the Father doing. You have set up, as it were, two craftsmen: so the Father and the Son, as also master and pupil, in the way that craftsmen fathers are accustomed to teach their sons their craft. See, I come down to your carnal sense, for the moment I think as you do: let us see whether this thought of ours finds a way out in accordance with those things which we have already spoken together about the Word and hold together, that the Word is God, and all things were made through Him. Suppose, then, the Father as a craftsman, doing certain works, and the Son as a pupil, Who cannot do anything except what He has seen the Father doing: for He gazes, in a manner, at the Father's hands, so that as He has seen Him fashion, so He too may fashion something of the kind in His own works. But all those things which this Father does, and wishes the Son to watch Him and Himself to do the like, through Whom does He do them? Come now, it is time for you to stand by your former judgement, which you went over with me and held with me, that in the beginning [was] the Word, and the Word [was] with God, and the Word [was] God, and all things were made through Him. You therefore, when you have held with me that all things were made through the Word, again with carnal taste and childish impulse picture to yourself in your mind God making and the Word watching, so that when God has made, the Word too may make. For what does God make apart from the Word? For if He makes [anything apart from it], not all things were made through the Word; you have lost
Editors' notes and page, col. 1538

Footnotes

(2) ‹anchor: per quem facit› · call in col 1538

Lov. sic habent hunc locum : Sed Pater iste omnia illa quae facit, vult ut attendat eum Filius et talia et ipse faciat, per quem facit. M.

The Louvain editors have this passage thus: "But this Father wills that the Son, through whom he makes all the things he makes, attend to him and himself make such things too." M.

(printed under page 117)

Page

  • running head: [...]ATUS XVIII. CAPUT V. 1538 (left part of the head cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1539
quod tenebas: si autem omnia per Verbum facta sunt, corrige quod male intelligebas. Fecit Pater, et non fecit nisi per Verbum: quomodo attendit Verbum, ut videat Patrem facientem sine Verbo, quod similiter faciat Verbum? Quidquid fecit Pater, per Verbum fecit: aut falsum est, Omnia per ipsum facta sunt. Sed verum est, Omnia per ipsum facta sunt. Parum fortasse tibi videbatur? Et sine ipso factum est nihil.
what you held. But if all things were made through the Word, correct what you were understanding wrongly. The Father made, and He made nothing except through the Word. How then does the Word attend, so as to see the Father making without the Word something that the Word may likewise make? Whatever the Father made, He made through the Word; or else it is false that All things were made through Him. But it is true: All things were made through Him. Did that perhaps seem too little to you? And without Him nothing was made.
6. Recede ergo ab ista carnis prudentia, et quaeramus quemadmodum dictum sit, Non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem. Quaeramus, si digni sumus qui apprehendamus. Fateor enim, magna res est, ardua omnino, videre Patrem facientem per Filium, non singula opera facientem Patrem et Filium sed quodlibet opus Patrem per Filium, ut nulla opera fiant vel a Patre sine Filio, vel a Filio sine Patre: quia omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum est nihil. Quibus in fundamento fidei firmissime constitutis, jam quale est videre, quia non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem? Quaeris, ut opinor, nosse Filium facientem; quaere prius nosse Filium videntem. Certe enim quid ait? Non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem. Intende quod dixit, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem. Praecedit visio, et sequitur effectio: videt enim ut faciat. Tu quid quaeris jam nosse quomodo faciat, dum nondum scias quomodo videat? Quid curris ad id quod posterius est, relicto quod prius est? Videntem se dixit et facientem; non, facientem et videntem: quia non potest a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem. Vis ut explicem tibi quomodo faciat? Tu mihi explica quomodo videat. Si hoc tu explicare non potes, nec ego illud: si hoc tu percipere nondum es idoneus, nec ego illud. Uterque ergo nostrum quaerat, uterque pulset, ut uterque accipere mereatur. Quid quasi doctus calumniaris indocto? Ego ad faciendum, tu ad videndum, ambo indocti a magistro quaeramus, non in schola ejus pueriliter litigemus. Tamen simul jam didicimus quia omnia per ipsum facta sunt. Ergo manifestum est quia non alia opera facit Pater, quae videat Filius, ut ipse faciat similia: sed eadem opera facit Pater per Filium, quia omnia per Verbum facta sunt. Jam quomodo faciat Deus quis novit? Non dico quomodo fecerit mundum, sed quomodo fecerit oculum tuum, cui carnaliter inhaerens, visibilia invisibilibus comparas. Talia enim de Deo cogitas, qualia his oculis videre consuesti. Si autem istis oculis videri posset Deus, non diceret, Beati mundo corde, quia ipsi Deum videbunt (Matth. V, 8). Ergo habes oculum corporis ad videndum fabrum, sed nondum habes oculum cordis ad videndum Deum: ideo quod soles videre in fabro, transferre vis ad Deum. Pone in terra terrena, sursum cor.
6. Withdraw, then, from this prudence of the flesh, and let us seek how it was said, The Son cannot do anything of Himself, except what He has seen the Father doing. Let us seek, if we are worthy to grasp it. For I confess it is a great matter, altogether arduous, to see the Father doing through the Son: not the Father and the Son doing separate works, but the Father doing any work whatever through the Son, so that no works are done either by the Father without the Son or by the Son without the Father, because all things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made. With these things most firmly established on the foundation of faith, what sort of thing is it now to see that the Son cannot do anything of Himself, except what He has seen the Father doing? You seek, I think, to know the Son doing; seek first to know the Son seeing. For what indeed does He say? The Son cannot do anything of Himself, except what He has seen the Father doing. Attend to what He said: except what He has seen the Father doing. Seeing goes before, and doing follows: for He sees in order to do. Why do you seek to know already how He does, while you do not yet know how He sees? Why do you run to what is later, leaving behind what is first? He spoke of Himself as seeing and doing, not as doing and seeing: for He cannot do anything of Himself, except what He has seen the Father doing. Do you want me to explain to you how He does? You explain to me how He sees. If you cannot explain this, neither can I explain that; if you are not yet fit to perceive this, neither am I fit to perceive that. Let each of us, then, seek, let each knock, that each may deserve to receive. Why do you, as though learned, cavil at one unlearned? I as to the doing, you as to the seeing: both unlearned, let us seek from the Master, and not quarrel childishly in His school. Yet together we have already learned that all things were made through Him. Therefore it is manifest that the Father does not do other works, which the Son may see so that He Himself may do the like; rather, the Father does the same works through the Son, because all things were made through the Word. Now, who knows how God does? I do not say how He made the world, but how He made your eye, clinging to which in a carnal way you compare visible things with invisible. For you think of God such things as you are accustomed to see with these eyes. But if God could be seen with these eyes, He would not say, Blessed are the clean of heart, for they shall see God (Matt. 5:8). So you have the eye of the body for seeing a craftsman, but you do not yet have the eye of the heart for seeing God; therefore what you are accustomed to see in a craftsman you want to transfer to God. Put earthly things on the earth: the heart on high.
7. Quid ergo, charissimi? explicaturi sumus nos quod interrogavimus, quomodo videat Verbum, quomodo Pater videatur a Verbo, quid sit videre Verbi? Non sum tam audax, tam temerarius, ut hoc explicare pollicear et me et vos: utcumque suspicor modulum
7. What then, dearly beloved? Are we going to explain what we have asked: how the Word sees, how the Father is seen by the Word, what the seeing of the Word is? I am not so bold, so rash, as to promise to explain this both to myself and to you; however I may surmise your measure,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1539

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 1539 (call numeral not legible at the note's head in the rendered area; taken as (1))

Plerique Mss., non singula opera faciente Patre et Filio.

Most manuscripts: "not with the Father and the Son each doing separate works."

(printed under page 118)

Page

  • running head: 1539 IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, [cut off at the image edge]
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1540
vestrum, novi tamen meum. Si ergc placet, non diutius immoremur, percurramus lectionem, et videamus verbis Domini turbari corda carnalia; ad hoc turbari, ne in eo quod tenent remaneant. Extorqueatur tanquam pueris ludicrum nescio quid, quo se malo avocant, ut possint inseri utiliora grandioribus, ut possint proficere qui repebant in terra. Surge, quaere, suspira, anhela desiderio, et ad clausa pulsa. Si autem nondum desideramus, nondum inhiamus, nondum suspiramus, margaritas quibuscumque projecturi sumus, aut margaritas qualescumque nos ipsi inventuri sumus. Moverim ergo, charissimi, desiderium in corde vestro. Mores perducunt ad intelligentiam: genus vitae perducit ad genus vitae. Alia vita terrena, alia vita coelestis; alia vita pecorum, alia vita hominum, alia vita Angelorum. Vita pecorum terrenis voluptatibus aestuat, sola terrena conquirit, in ea prona atque projecta est: vita Angelorum sola coelestis: vita hominum media est inter Angelorum et pecorum. Si vivit homo secundum carnem, pecoribus comparatur: si vivit secundum spiritum, Angelis sociatur. Quando secundum spiritum vivis, quaere etiam in ipsa angelica vita utrum parvus an grandis sis. Si enim adhuc parvus es, dicunt tibi Angeli: Cresce; nos panem manducamus, tu lacte nutrire, lacte fidei, ut pervenias ad cibum speciei. Si autem adhuc inhiatur sordidis voluptatibus, si adhuc fraudes cogitantur, si mendacia non vitantur, si mendacia perjuriis cumulantur; tam immundum cor audet dicere, Explica mihi quomodo videt Verbum; etiam si possim, etiam si ego jam videam? Porro autem si forte ego non sum in his moribus, et tamen ab ista visione longe sum; quantum ille qui nondum isto superno desiderio rapitur, terrenis desideriis praegravatus? Multum interest inter aversantem et desiderantem: et iterum multum interest inter desiderantem et fruentem. Vivis ut pecora, aversaris: Angeli perfruuntur. Tu autem si non vivis ut pecora, jam non aversaris: desideras aliquid, et non capis; inchoasti ipso desiderio vitam Angelorum. Crescat in te, et perficiatur in te; et capias hoc non a me, sed ab illo qui et me fecit et te.
yet I know my own. So if it pleases you, let us not linger any longer; let us run through the reading, and let us see carnal hearts troubled by the words of the Lord; troubled to this end, that they may not remain in what they hold. Let some plaything or other be wrenched away from them, as from children, with which they wrongly divert themselves, so that more useful things may be implanted in those who are older, so that those who crawled on the ground may be able to advance. Rise, seek, sigh, pant with longing, and knock at what is shut. But if we do not yet long, do not yet gape after it, do not yet sigh, we shall be casting pearls to just anyone, or we ourselves shall find pearls of whatever sort. May I therefore have stirred up longing in your heart, dearly beloved. Conduct leads to understanding: a kind of life leads to a kind of life. One life is earthly, another heavenly; one is the life of beasts, another the life of men, another the life of angels. The life of beasts seethes with earthly pleasures, seeks after earthly things alone, is bent and cast down upon them: the life of angels is heavenly alone: the life of men is midway between that of angels and that of beasts. If a man lives according to the flesh, he is compared to beasts: if he lives according to the spirit, he is joined in fellowship with angels. When you live according to the spirit, ask also, within the angelic life itself, whether you are small or great. For if you are still small, the angels say to you: Grow; we eat bread, you, be nourished with milk, the milk of faith, that you may come to the food of sight. But if there is still gaping after filthy pleasures, if frauds are still being devised, if lies are not avoided, if lies are heaped upon perjuries; does so unclean a heart dare to say, Explain to me how the Word sees; even if I were able, even if I myself already see? Moreover, if perhaps I am not in such ways of life, and yet I am far from that vision; how far is he who is not yet caught up by this heavenly longing, weighed down by earthly longings? There is a great difference between one who turns away and one who longs: and again there is a great difference between one who longs and one who enjoys. You live like beasts, you turn away: the angels enjoy to the full. But you, if you do not live like beasts, no longer turn away: you long for something and do not grasp it; by that very longing you have begun the life of angels. May it grow in you and be perfected in you; and may you receive this not from me, but from Him Who made both me and you.
8. Tamen non utcumque nos dimisit et Dominus, qui voluit intelligi quia in eo quod dixit, Non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem, non alia opera Pater facit quae videat Filius, et alia Filius cum viderit Patrem facientem; sed eadem opera ipse et Pater et Filius. Secutus enim ait: Quaecumque enim ille fecerit, haec et Filius similiter facit. Non cum ille fecerit, alia Filius similiter facit; sed quaecumque ille fecerit, haec et Filius similiter facit. Si haec facit Filius quae fecerit Pater, per Filium facit Pater: si per Filium facit quae facit Pater, non alia Pater, alia Filius facit; sed eadem opera sunt Patris et Filii. Et quomodo eadem facit et Filius? Et eadem et similiter. Ne forte eadem sed dissimiliter: Eadem, inquit, et similiter. Et quomodo posset eadem non similiter? Accipite exemplum, quod puto ad vos non sit grande: cum scribimus litteras, facit eas primo cor nostrum, et deinde manus
8. Yet the Lord has not left us just anyhow, He Who wished it to be understood that in what He said, The Son cannot do anything of Himself, except what He has seen the Father doing, the Father does not do some works which the Son is to see, and the Son other works when He has seen the Father doing them; but the very same works are done by Him, both Father and Son. For He went on to say: For whatever He has done, these things the Son also does likewise. Not that when He has done them, the Son does other things likewise; but whatever He has done, these things the Son also does likewise. If the Son does these things which the Father has done, the Father does them through the Son: if He does through the Son what the Father does, the Father does not do some things and the Son others; but the very same works are the Father's and the Son's. And how does the Son also do the same things? Both the same and likewise. Lest perhaps they should be the same but done unlike: The same, He says, and likewise. And how could the same things be done not likewise? Take an example which I think will not be too great for you: when we write letters, first our heart makes them, and then our hand.
Editors' notes and page, col. 1540

Page

  • running head: EVANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1540
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: running head cut off at the left edge of the image; only "EVANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI" visible, and the column number is blurred but read as 1540. The column opens with the fragment "lum", the tail of a word broken from col. 1539; the word stands whole at the end of col. 1539 and the tail is not set here. It closes with "man" with no hyphen visible (manus continues in col. 1541); the word is set whole here. "tur-bari" is likewise broken at a line end with no hyphen visible and is set whole. The left-hand column fragments belong to col. 1539 and are not set. "ergc" in "Si ergc placet" is printed with a clear c and is set as a misprint; it may be a worn o.
PL 35:1541
nostra. Certe unde omnes acclamastis, nisi quia cognovistis? Certum est quod dixi, et manifestum omnibus nobis. Litterae fiunt primo a corde nostro, deinde a corpore nostro; manus servit imperanti cordi, easdem litteras facit et cor et manus: numquid alias cor, alias manus? Easdem quidem facit manus, sed non similiter: cor enim nostrum facit eas intelligibiliter, manus autem visibiliter. Ecce quomodo fiunt eadem dissimiliter. Unde parum fuit Domino dicere, Quaecumque Pater fecerit, haec et Filius facit, nisi adderet, et similiter. Quid si enim hoc modo intelligeres quomodo quaecumque cor facit, haec et manus facit, sed non similiter? Hic vero addidit, haec et Filius similiter facit. Si et haec facit, et similiter facit, expergiscere, stringatur Judaeus, credat Christianus, convincatur haereticus; aequalis est Patri Filius.
Surely, why did you all cry out, except because you understood? What I said is certain, and plain to all of us. Letters are made first by our heart, then by our body; the hand serves the heart that commands it, and both heart and hand make the same letters: does the heart make some and the hand others? The hand does indeed make the same ones, but not in the same way: for our heart makes them intelligibly, but the hand visibly. See how the same things are made in different ways. Hence it was not enough for the Lord to say, Whatever the Father does, these the Son also does, unless He added, likewise. For what if you were to understand it in the way in which whatever the heart does, the hand also does, but not likewise? Here, however, He added, these the Son also does likewise. If He both does these things and does them likewise, wake up: let the Jew be bound fast, let the Christian believe, let the heretic be refuted; the Son is equal to the Father.
9. Pater enim diligit Filium, et omnia demonstrat ei quae ipse facit (Joan. V, 20). Ecce est illud, demonstrat. Demonstrat quasi cui? Utique quasi videnti. Redimus ad id quod explicare non possumus, quomodo Verbum videat. Ecce homo factus est per Verbum; sed homo habet oculos, habet aures, habet manus, diversa membra in corpore: per oculos potest videre, per aures potest audire, per manus operari; diversa membra, diversa membrorum officia. Non potest illud membrum quod potest alterum: tamen propter corporis unitatem, oculus et sibi et auri videt, et auris sibi et oculo audit. Numquid tale aliquid in Verbo arbitrandum est esse, quoniam omnia per ipsum? Et dixit Scriptura in Psalmo, Intelligite, qui insipientes estis in populo; et stulti, aliquando sapite. Qui plantavit aurem non audiet? aut qui finxit oculum non considerat (Psal. XCIII, 8, 9)? Si ergo finxit oculum Verbum, quia omnia per Verbum; si plantavit aurem Verbum, ⟨q⟩uia omnia per Verbum: non possumus dicere, Non audit Verbum, non videt Verbum; ne objurget nos Psalmus, et dicat, Stulti, aliquando sapite. Itaque si audit Verbum et videt Verbum, audit Filius et videt Filius: numquid tamen et in ipso diversis locis quaesituri sumus oculos et aures? Aliunde audit, aliunde videt; et auris ejus non potest quod oculus, et oculus non potest quod potest auris? An totus ille visus est, et totus auditus? Forte ita: imo non forte, sed vere ita; dum tamen et ipsum ejus videre, et ipsum ejus audire, longe alio modo quam nostrum sit. Et videre et audire simul in Verbo est, nec aliud est ibi audire, et aliud videre; sed auditus visus, et visus auditus.
9. For the Father loves the Son, and shows Him all things that He Himself does (John 5:20). Here is that word, shows. Shows to whom, as it were? Surely to one who sees, as it were. We come back to what we cannot explain, how the Word sees. Behold, man was made through the Word; but man has eyes, has ears, has hands, different members in the body: through the eyes he can see, through the ears he can hear, through the hands he can work; different members, different offices of the members. The one member cannot do what the other can: yet because of the unity of the body, the eye sees both for itself and for the ear, and the ear hears both for itself and for the eye. Must we suppose that there is anything of this sort in the Word, since all things were made through Him? And Scripture said in the Psalm, Understand, you who are senseless among the people; and you fools, at last be wise. He Who planted the ear, shall He not hear? or He Who formed the eye, does He not consider? (Ps. 93:8–9). If, then, the Word formed the eye, because all things were made through the Word; if the Word planted the ear, because all things were made through the Word: we cannot say, The Word does not hear, the Word does not see; lest the Psalm rebuke us and say, You fools, at last be wise. Therefore, if the Word hears and the Word sees, the Son hears and the Son sees: yet are we to look for eyes and ears in Him too, in different places? Does He hear from one part, see from another; and can His ear not do what the eye can, and the eye not do what the ear can? Or is He wholly sight and wholly hearing? Perhaps so: nay, not perhaps, but truly so; provided, however, that His very seeing and His very hearing are in a far different manner from ours. Both seeing and hearing are together in the Word, nor is hearing one thing there and seeing another; but hearing is sight, and sight is hearing.
10. Et nos qui aliter audimus, aliter videmus, hoc unde novimus? Redimus forte ad nos, si non sumus praevaricatores, quibus dictum est, Redite, praevaricatores, ad cor (Isai. XLVI, 8). Redite ad cor: quid itis a vobis, et peritis ex vobis? quid itis solitudinis vias? Erratis vagando; redite. Quo? Ad Dominum. Cito est: primo redi ad cor tuum, exsul a te, vagaris foris; teipsum non nosti, et quaeris a quo factus es! Redi, redi ad cor, tolle te a corpore: corpus tuum habitatio tua est; cor tuum sentit etiam per corpus
10. And we who hear in one way and see in another, how do we know this? Perhaps we return to ourselves, if we are not transgressors, to whom it was said, Return, you transgressors, to the heart (Isa. 46:8). Return to the heart: why do you go away from yourselves, and perish out of yourselves? why do you go the ways of solitude? You go astray by wandering; return. Where to? To the Lord. It is quickly done: first return to your heart; an exile from yourself, you wander outside; you do not know yourself, and you ask by Whom you were made! Return, return to the heart, take yourself away from the body: your body is your dwelling; your heart perceives even through the body
Editors' notes and page, col. 1541

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: Dominum. Cito est› · call in col 1541

Lov., ad Dominum cito ; omisso, est, quod caeteri codices habent.

Louvain: "to the Lord quickly", leaving out "est" ("it is"), which the other manuscripts have.

(printed under page 119)

Page

  • running head: 1541 TRACTATUS XVIII. CA (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1542
tuum: sed corpus tuum non quod cor tuum; dimitte et corpus tuum, redi ad cor tuum. In corpore tuo inveniebas alibi oculos, alibi aures: in corde tuo numquid hoc invenis? An in corde tuo non habes aures? De quibus ergo Dominus dicebat, Qui habet aures audiendi, audiat (Luc. VIII, 8)? An in corde non habes oculos? Unde dicit Apostolus, Illuminatos oculos cordis vestri (Ephes. I, 18). Redi ad cor; vide ibi quid sentias forte de Deo, quia ibi est imago Dei. In interiore homine habitat Christus (Id. III, 16, 17), in interiore homine renovaris ad imaginem Dei, in imagine sua cognosce auctorem ejus. Vide quemadmodum omnes corporis sensus cordi intro nuntient quid senserint foris: vide quam multos ministros habeat unus interior imperator, et quid apud se etiam sine his ministris agat. Renuntiant oculi cordi alba et nigra; renuntiant aures eidem cordi canora et dissona; renuntiant nares eidem cordi odora et putentia; renuntiat gustus eidem cordi amara et dulcia; renuntiat tactus eidem cordi lenia et aspera: renuntiat et sibi ipsum cor justa et injusta. Cor tuum et videt et audit, et caetera sensibilia dijudicat; et quo non aspirant corporis sensus, justa et injusta, mala et bona discernit. Ostende mihi oculos, aures, nares cordis tui. Diversa sunt quae ad cor tuum referuntur, et diversa ibi membra non inveniuntur. In carne tua alibi audis, alibi vides: in corde tuo ibi audis, ubi vides. Si hoc imago, quanto potentius ille cujus imago? Ergo et audit Filius, et videt Filius, et ipsa visio et auditio Filius: et hoc est illi audire quod esse, et hoc est illi videre quod esse. Tibi non hoc est videre quod esse: quia et si perdas visum, potes esse; et si perdas auditum, potes esse.
your body: but your body is not what your heart is; leave your body too, return to your heart. In your body you found eyes in one place, ears in another: do you find this in your heart? Or do you not have ears in your heart? Of which, then, did the Lord speak, He who has ears to hear, let him hear (Luke 8:8)? Or do you not have eyes in your heart? Whence the Apostle says, The eyes of your heart enlightened (Eph. 1:18). Return to the heart; see there what perhaps you perceive of God, because there is the image of God. In the inner man Christ dwells (ibid. 3:16–17), in the inner man you are renewed according to the image of God; in His image know its Author. See how all the senses of the body report inwardly to the heart what they have perceived outside: see how many ministers the one inner emperor has, and what he does within himself even without these ministers. The eyes report to the heart white and black things; the ears report to the same heart melodious and discordant things; the nostrils report to the same heart fragrant and stinking things; taste reports to the same heart bitter and sweet things; touch reports to the same heart smooth and rough things: and the heart reports to itself just and unjust things. Your heart both sees and hears, and judges the other sensible things; and where the senses of the body do not reach, it discerns just and unjust, evil and good. Show me the eyes, ears, nostrils of your heart. Diverse are the things that are referred to your heart, and yet diverse members are not found there. In your flesh you hear in one place, you see in another: in your heart you hear in the same place where you see. If the image is thus, how much more powerful is He Whose image it is? Therefore the Son both hears, and the Son sees, and the Son is Himself the seeing and the hearing: and for Him to hear is the same as to be, and for Him to see is the same as to be. For you, to see is not the same as to be: for even if you lose your sight, you can be; and if you lose your hearing, you can be.
11. Putamusne pulsavimus? Erectum est aliquid in nobis quo vel tenuiter suspicemur unde lumen veniat nobis? Puto, fratres, quia cum loquimur ista, et cum meditamur, exercemus nos. Et cum exercemus nos in ipsis, et rursus quasi reflectimur pondere nostro ad ista consueta, tales sumus quales lippientes, cum producuntur ad videndum lumen, si forte antea visum omnino non habebant, et incipiunt eumdem visum per diligentiam medicorum utcumque reparare. Et cum probare vult medicus quantum salutis eis accesserit, tentat eis ostendere quod videre desiderabant, et non poterant cum caeci essent: et redeunte jam utcumque acie oculorum, producuntur ad lucem; et cum viderint, fulgore ipso reverberantur quodammodo, et respondent medico demonstranti, Jam jam vidi, sed videre non possum. Quid ergo facit medicus? Revocat ad solita, et addit collyrium, ut ad illud quod visum est, et videri non potuit, desiderium nutriat, et ex ipso desiderio curetur plenius; et si qua mordacia reparandae sanitati adhibentur, fortiter ferat, ut amore illius lucis accensus dicat sibi: Quando erit ut illud firmis oculis videam, quod sauciis infirmisque non potui? Urget medicum, et rogat ut curet. Ergo, fratres, si forte tale aliquid factum est in cordibus vestris, si utcumque erexistis cor vestrum ad videndum Verbum, et ipsius luce reverberati ad solita recidistis; rogate medicum ut adhibeat collyria
11. Do we think we have knocked? Has something been raised up in us by which we may even faintly guess whence the light comes to us? I think, brothers, that when we speak these things, and when we meditate on them, we exercise ourselves. And when we exercise ourselves in them, and are as it were bent back again by our own weight to these accustomed things, we are like people with bleary eyes when they are brought out to see the light, if perhaps before they had no sight at all, and begin to recover that same sight in some measure through the diligence of physicians. And when the physician wishes to test how much health has come to them, he tries to show them what they longed to see and could not while they were blind: and, the keenness of their eyes now returning in some measure, they are brought out to the light; and when they have seen, they are in a manner beaten back by the very brightness, and they answer the physician who shows it to them, Just now I saw, but I cannot see. What then does the physician do? He calls them back to their usual state, and adds an eye-salve, so that the patient may nourish desire for that which was seen and could not be seen, and by that very desire be more fully cured; and if any stinging remedies are applied to restore health, he may bear them bravely, so that, kindled by love of that light, he may say to himself: When will it be that I may see with firm eyes that which I could not with wounded and weak ones? He presses the physician, and asks him to cure him. Therefore, brothers, if perhaps something of this kind has happened in your hearts, if in some measure you have raised your heart to see the Word, and, beaten back by its light, have fallen back to your usual things, ask the physician to apply eye-salves
Editors' notes and page, col. 1542

Page

  • running head: [TRACT]ATUS XVIII. CAPUT V. 1542
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: running head cut off at left edge of image; column number poorly printed, read as 1542; "sensus" (in "omnes corporis sensus") has a damaged s, read as sensus; column begins and ends mid-sentence; partial adjacent column (1541) at left not set