Migne Reading Room

PL 35 · cols. 1615–1621

Augustinus, In Joannis Evangelium tractatus XXVII-XXXIV

Tractate XXVII

PL 35:1615
TRACTATUS XXVII.
Tractate XXVII.
Ab eo quod scriptum est, Haec dixit in synagoga doce⟨n⟩s sabbato in Capharnaum; usque ad id, Ille enim traditurus erat eum, cum esset unus ex duodecim. Cap. VI, ℣. 60-72.
From what is written, "These things He said teaching in the synagogue on the sabbath at Capernaum", as far as this, "For he was to betray Him, though he was one of the twelve." Chapter 6, verses 60-72.
1. Verba Domini ex Evangelio, quae sermonem
1. The words of the Lord from the Gospel, which follow the former
Editors' notes and page, col. 1615

Footnotes

(1) ‹this note concerns the closing lines of Tractate XXVI above the title (Nec manducat carnem ejus ...), it belongs to PL035/tractatus_026 and stands here only as a pointer› ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 1615

Sic editi quidam; at Mss. nostri omnes habent hoc modo: Nec manducat carnem ejus, nec bibit ejus sanguinem, etiamsi tantae rei sacramentum ad judicium sibi manducet et bibat. Sicut, inquit, misit me vivens Pater, etc., carentque verbis caeteris, quae hic ansulis concluduntur; quae verba nullo etiam e suis Mss. contineri testantur Lovanienses: habentur ipsa in Bedae et Alcuini Commentariis super Joannem.

So some editions; but all our manuscripts have it thus: "Neither does he eat his flesh nor drink his blood, even though he eat and drink the sacrament of so great a thing to his own judgement. As, he says, the living Father sent me," etc., and they lack the other words, which are enclosed here in hooks; the Louvain editors attest that these words are contained in none of their manuscripts either: they are found in the Commentaries of Bede and Alcuin on John.

(printed under page 156)

(2) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 1615

In omnibus fere Mss., nos efficit.

In almost all manuscripts, "makes us".

(printed under page 156)

Page

  • running head: 1615 IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, S[...] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: the column opens with the end of the previous work (another unit); not set here: the unit begins at TRACTATUS XXVII.
PL 35:1616
pristinum consequuntur, audivimus. Hinc sermo debetur auribus et mentibus vestris, et hodierno diei non importunus est: est enim de corpore Domini, quod dicebat se dare ad manducandum propter aeternam vitam. Exposuit autem modum attributionis hujus et doni sui, quomodo daret carnem suam manducare, dicens, Qui manducat carnem meam, et bibit sanguinem meum, in me manet, et ego in illo (Joan. VI, 57). Signum quia manducavit et bibit hoc est, si manet et manetur, si habitat et inhabitatur, si haeret ut non deseratur. Hoc ergo nos docuit et admonuit mysticis verbis, ut simus in ejus corpore sub ipso capite in membris ejus, edentes carnem ejus, non relinquentes unitatem ejus. Sed qui aderant plures non intelligendo scandalizati sunt: non enim cogitabant haec audiendo, nisi carnem, quod ipsi erant. Apostolus autem dicit, et verum dicit, Sapere secundum carnem, mors est (Rom. VIII, 6). Carnem suam dat nobis Dominus manducare, et sapere secundum carnem mors est; cum de carne sua dicat, quia ibi est vita aeterna. Ergo nec carnem debemus sapere secundum carnem, sicut in his verbis:
discourse, we have heard. Hence a sermon is owed to your ears and minds, and it is not unsuited to today's day: for it concerns the body of the Lord, which He said He was giving to be eaten for the sake of eternal life. And He set forth the manner of this bestowal and of His gift, how He would give His flesh to eat, saying, He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in him (John 6:57). The sign that one has eaten and drunk is this: if he abides and is abided in, if he dwells and is dwelt in, if he cleaves so as not to be forsaken. This therefore He taught us and admonished us in mystical words, that we should be in His body, under Him as head, among His members, eating His flesh, not forsaking His unity. But the many who were present, by not understanding, were scandalized: for in hearing these things they thought of nothing but flesh, which they themselves were. But the Apostle says, and says truly, To savour according to the flesh is death (Rom. 8:6). The Lord gives us His flesh to eat, and to savour according to the flesh is death; whereas He says of His flesh that in it is eternal life. Therefore neither ought we to savour the flesh according to the flesh, as in these words:
2. Multi itaque audientes; non ex inimicis, sed ex discipulis ejus, dixerunt: Durus est hic sermo; quis potest eum audire? Si discipuli durum habuerunt istum sermonem, quid inimici? Et tamen sic oportebat ut diceretur, quod non ab omnibus intelligeretur. Secretum Dei intentos debet facere, non adversos. Isti autem cito defecerunt, talia loquente Domino Jesu: non crediderunt aliquid magnum dicentem, et verbis illis aliquam gratiam cooperientem; sed prout voluerunt ita intellexerunt, et more hominum, quia poterat Jesus, aut hoc disponebat Jesus, carnem quia indutum erat Verbum, veluti concisam distribuere credentibus in se. Durus est, inquiunt, hic sermo; quia potest eum audire?
2. Many therefore, hearing; not of His enemies, but of His disciples, said: This is a hard saying; who can hear it? If the disciples held this saying hard, what of the enemies? And yet it had to be said thus, as something not understood by all. The secret of God ought to make men attentive, not hostile. But these quickly fell away, when the Lord Jesus spoke such things: they did not believe that He was saying something great and covering some grace with those words; but just as they wished, so they understood, and after the manner of men, that Jesus was able, or that Jesus was arranging this, to distribute the flesh with which the Word was clothed, as if cut in pieces, to those believing in Him. This is a hard saying, they say; who can hear it?
3. Sciens autem Jesus apud semetipsum quia murmurarent de eo discipuli ejus. Sic enim apud se ista dixerunt, ut ab illo non audirentur; sed ille qui eos noverat in seipsis, audiens apud semetipsum, respondit, et ait, Hoc vos scandalizat: quia dixi, Carnem meam do vobis manducare, et sanguinem meum bibere, hoc vos nempe scandalizat. Si ergo videritis Filium hominis ascendentem ubi erat prius? Quid est hoc? Hinc solvit quod illos moverat? hinc aperuit unde fuerant scandalizati? Hinc plane, si intelligerent. Il⟨l⟩i enim putabant eum erogaturum corpus suum; ille autem dixit se ascensurum in coelum, utique integrum. Cum videritis Filium hominis ascendentem ubi erat prius; certe vel tunc videbitis quia non eo modo quo putatis, erogat corpus suum; certe vel tunc intelligetis quia gratia ejus non consumitur morsibus.
3. But Jesus, knowing within Himself that His disciples were murmuring about Him. For they said these things among themselves in such a way as not to be heard by Him; but He who knew them in themselves, hearing within Himself, answered and said, Does this scandalize you: that I said, I give you My flesh to eat and My blood to drink, this indeed scandalizes you. What then if you should see the Son of man ascending where He was before? What is this? Did He hereby resolve what had disturbed them? Did He hereby disclose why they had been scandalized? Hereby plainly, if they understood. For they supposed that He would pay out His body; but He said that He would ascend into heaven, whole, to be sure. When you see the Son of man ascending where He was before; surely then at least you will see that He does not pay out His body in the way you suppose; surely then at least you will understand that His grace is not consumed by bites.
4. Et ait: Spiritus est qui vivificat, caro non prodest quidquam. Hoc antequam exponamus, ut Dominus donat, illud non negligenter praetereundum est, quod ait, Si ergo videritis Filium hominis ascendentem ubi erat prius? Filius enim hominis Christus, ex virgine Maria. Ergo filius hominis hic coepit ⟨e⟩sse in terra, ubi
4. And He said: It is the Spirit that gives life, the flesh profits nothing. Before we expound this, as the Lord grants, that must not be carelessly passed over which He said, What then if you should see the Son of man ascending where He was before? For Christ is the Son of man, from the Virgin Mary. Therefore the son of man began to be here on earth, where
Editors' notes and page, col. 1616

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 1616

Er. legit, et non deseretur. M.

Erasmus reads, "and will not be deserted". M.

(printed under page 156)

Page

  • running head: …VANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1616 (start of head cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1617
carnem assumpsit ex terra. Unde prophetice dictum erat, Veritas de terra orta est (Psalm. LXXXIV, 12). Quid sibi ergo vult quod ait, Cum videritis Filium hominis ascendentem ubi erat prius? Nulla enim esset quaestio si ita dixisset, Si videritis Filium Dei ascendentem ubi erat prius? cum vero Filium hominis dixit ascendentem ubi erat prius, numquid Filius hominis in coelo erat prius, quando in terra esse coepit? Hic quidem dixit, ubi erat prius, quasi tunc non ibi esset quando haec loquebatur. Alio autem loco ait, Nemo ascendit in coelum, nisi qui de coelo descendit, Filius hominis, qui est in coelo (Joan. III, 13): non dixit, erat, sed, Filius, inquit, hominis qui est in coelo. In terra loquebatur, et in coelo se esse dicebat. Et non ita dixit: Nemo ascendit in coelum, nisi qui de coelo descendit, Filius Dei, qui est in coelo. Quo pertinet, nisi ut intelligamus, quod etiam pristino sermone commendavi Charitati vestrae, unam personam esse Christum Deum et hominem, non duas; ne fides nostra non sit Trinitas, sed quaternitas? Christus ergo unus est: Verbum, anima et caro unus Christus: Filius Dei et filius hominis unus Christus. Filius Dei semper, filius hominis ex tempore; tamen unus Christus secundum unitatem personae. In coelo erat, quando in terra loquebatur. Sic erat filius hominis in coelo, quomodo Filius Dei erat in terra; Filius Dei in terra in suscepta carne, filius hominis in coelo in unitate personae.
He took flesh from the earth. Hence it had been said prophetically, Truth has sprung from the earth (Ps. 84:12). What then does He mean when He says, When you see the Son of man ascending where He was before? For there would be no question if He had said thus: If you see the Son of God ascending where He was before? But since He said the Son of man ascending where He was before, was the Son of man in heaven before, when He began to be on earth? Here indeed He said, where He was before, as if He were not there at the time when He was saying these things. But in another place He says, No one ascends into heaven except He Who descended from heaven, the Son of man, Who is in heaven (John 3:13): He did not say "was", but, the Son, He says, of man Who is in heaven. He was speaking on earth, and He said that He was in heaven. And He did not say thus: No one ascends into heaven except He Who descended from heaven, the Son of God, Who is in heaven. To what does this tend, except that we should understand what I also commended to your Charity in the former sermon, that Christ, God and man, is one person, not two, lest our faith be not a Trinity but a quaternity? Christ therefore is one: the Word, soul and flesh, one Christ; the Son of God and the son of man, one Christ. Son of God always, son of man from a point in time; yet one Christ according to the unity of person. He was in heaven when He was speaking on earth. Thus was the son of man in heaven, as the Son of God was on earth: the Son of God on earth in the flesh He had taken up, the son of man in heaven in the unity of person.
5. Quid est ergo quod adjungit, Spiritus est qui vivificat, caro non prodest quidquam? Dicamus ei (patitur enim nos non contradicentes, sed nosse cupientes): O Domine, magister bone, quomodo caro non prodest quidquam, cum tu dixeris, Nisi quis manducaverit carnem meam, et biberit sanguinem meum, non habebit in se vitam? An vita non prodest quidquam? et propter quid sumus quod sumus, nisi ut habeamus vitam aeternam, quam tua carne promittis? quid est ergo, non prodest quidquam caro? Non prodest quidquam, sed quomodo illi intellexerunt: carnem quippe sic intellexerunt, quomodo in cadavere dilaniatur, aut in macello venditur, non quomodo spiritu vegetatur. Proinde sic dictum est, Caro non prodest quidquam; quomodo dictum est, Scientia inflat. Jam ergo debemus odisse scientiam? Absit. Et quid est, Scientia inflat? Sola, sine charitate: ideo adjunxit, Charitas vero aedificat (I Cor. VIII, 1). Adde ergo scientiae charitatem, et utilis erit scientia; non per se, sed per charitatem. Sic etiam nunc, caro non prodest quidquam, sed sola caro: accedat spiritus ad carnem, quomodo accedit charitas ad scientiam, et prodest plurimum. Nam si caro nihil prodesset, Verbum caro non fieret, ut inhabitaret in nobis. Si per carnem nobis multum profuit Christus, quomodo caro nihil prodest? Sed per carnem Spiritus aliquid pro salute nostra egit. Caro vas fuit; quod habebat attende, non quod erat. Apostoli missi sunt; numquid caro ipsorum nihil nobis profuit? Si caro Apostolorum nobis profuit, caro Domini potuit nihil prodesse? Unde enim ad nos sonus verbi, nisi per vocem carnis? unde stilus, unde conscriptio? Ista omnia opera carnis sunt, sed agitante spiritu tanquam organum
5. What then is it that He adds, It is the spirit that gives life, the flesh profits nothing? Let us say to Him (for He bears with us, since we do not contradict but desire to know): O Lord, good Master, how does the flesh profit nothing, when Thou hast said, Unless one eats My flesh and drinks My blood, he will not have life in himself? Does life profit nothing? And for what purpose are we what we are, except that we may have eternal life, which Thou promisest by Thy flesh? What then does "the flesh profits nothing" mean? It profits nothing, but in the way those men understood it: for they understood flesh in the way it is torn apart in a corpse or sold in the meat-market, not as it is quickened by the spirit. Accordingly it was said, The flesh profits nothing, in the way it was said, Knowledge puffs up. Must we then now hate knowledge? Far from it. And what does "knowledge puffs up" mean? Alone, without charity: that is why he added, But charity builds up (1 Cor. 8:1). Add charity, then, to knowledge, and knowledge will be useful; not through itself, but through charity. So also now, the flesh profits nothing, but flesh alone: let the spirit come to the flesh, as charity comes to knowledge, and it profits very much. For if the flesh profited nothing, the Word would not have become flesh, that He might dwell in us. If Christ profited us much through the flesh, how does the flesh profit nothing? But through the flesh the Spirit did something for our salvation. The flesh was a vessel; consider what it held, not what it was. The apostles were sent; did their flesh profit us nothing? If the flesh of the apostles profited us, could the flesh of the Lord profit nothing? For whence [comes] to us the sound of the word, except through the voice of the flesh? Whence the pen, whence the writing? All these are works of the flesh, but with the spirit moving it as an instrument
Editors' notes and page, col. 1617

Page

  • running head: 1617 TRACTATUS XXVII. CAPU[...] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1618
suum. Spiritus ergo est qui vivificat, caro autem non prodest quidquam: sicut illi intellexerunt carnem, non sic ego do ad manducandum carnem meam.
of its own. It is the Spirit, therefore, that gives life, but the flesh profits nothing: not in the way they understood flesh do I give My flesh to be eaten.
6. Proinde, Verba, inquit, quae ego locutus sum vobis, spiritus et vita est. Diximus enim, fratres, hoc Dominum commendasse in manducatione carnis suae et potatione sanguinis sui, ut in illo maneamus, et ipse in nobis. Manemus autem in illo, cum sumus membra ejus: manet autem ipse in nobis, cum sumus templum ejus. Ut autem simus membra ejus, unitas nos compaginat. Ut compaginet unitas, quae facit nisi charitas? Et charitas Dei unde? Apostolum interroga: Charitas, inquit, Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum sanctum qui datus est nobis (Rom. V, 5). Ergo Spiritus est qui vivificat: spiritus enim facit viva membra. Nec viva membra spiritus facit, ni⟨s⟩i quae in corpore quod vegetat ipse spiritus, invenerit. Nam spiritus qui est in te, o homo, quo constas u⟨t⟩ homo sis, numquid vivificat membrum quod separatum invenerit a carne tua? Spiritum tuum dico animam tuam: anima tua non vivificat nisi membra quae sunt in carne tua; unum si tollas, jam non vivificatur ex anima tua, quia unitati corporis tui non copulatur. Haec dicuntur ut amemus unitatem, et timeamus separationem. Nihil enim sic debet formidare christianus, quam separari a corpore Christi. Si enim separatur a corpore Christi, non est membrum ejus; si non est membrum ejus, non vegetatur Spiritu ejus: Quisquis autem, inquit Apostolus, Spiritum Christi non habet, hic non est ejus (Id. VIII, 9). Spiritus ergo est qui vivificat, caro autem non prodest quidquam. Verba quae ego locutus sum vobis, spiritus et vita sunt. Quid est, spiritus et vita sunt? Spiritualiter intelligenda sunt. Intellexisti spiritualiter? spiritus et vita sunt. Intellexisti carnaliter? etiam sic illa spiritus et vita sunt, sed tibi non sunt.
6. Accordingly, The words, He says, that I have spoken to you is spirit and life. For we have said, brothers, that the Lord commended this in the eating of His flesh and the drinking of His blood: that we should abide in Him, and He in us. Now we abide in Him when we are His members; and He abides in us when we are His temple. But that we may be His members, unity joins us together. And that unity may join together, what brings this about but charity? And the charity of God, whence is it? Ask the Apostle: The charity of God, he says, is poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit Who has been given to us (Rom. 5:5). Therefore it is the Spirit that gives life: for the spirit makes members living. Nor does the spirit make any members living except those it has found in the body which that spirit itself quickens. For the spirit which is in you, O man, by which you subsist so as to be a man, does it give life to a member which it has found separated from your flesh? By your spirit I mean your soul: your soul gives life only to the members which are in your flesh; if you take one away, it is no longer given life from your soul, because it is not joined to the unity of your body. These things are said so that we may love unity and fear separation. For there is nothing a Christian ought to dread so much as being separated from the body of Christ. For if he is separated from the body of Christ, he is not His member; if he is not His member, he is not quickened by His Spirit: But whoever, says the Apostle, does not have the Spirit of Christ, he is not His (Rom. 8:9). It is the Spirit, therefore, that gives life, but the flesh profits nothing. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life. What does are spirit and life mean? They are to be understood spiritually. Have you understood them spiritually? they are spirit and life. Have you understood them carnally? even so they are spirit and life, but not for you.
7. Sed sunt quidam, inquit, in vobis qui non credunt. Non dixit, Sunt quidam in vobis qui non intelligunt; sed causam dixit, quare non intelligant. Sunt enim quidam in vobis qui non credunt; et ideo non intelligunt, quia non credunt. Propheta enim dixit, Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis (Isai. VII, 9, sec. LXX). Per fidem copulamur, per intellectum vivificamur. Prius haereamus per fidem, ut sit quod vivificetur per intellectum. Nam qui non haeret, resistit; qui resistit, non credit. Nam qui resistit, quomodo vivificatur? Adversarius est radio lucis, quo penetrandus est: non avertit aciem, sed claudit mentem. Sunt ergo quidam qui non credunt. Credant et aperiant, aperiant et illuminabuntur. Sciebat enim ab initio Jesus qui essent credentes, et quis traditurus esset eum. Ibi enim erat et Judas. Nam quidam scandalizati sunt: ille autem mansit ad insidiandum, non ad intelligendum. Et quia ideo manserat, non de illo tacuit Dominus. Non illum expressit, sed nec siluit; ut omnes timerent, quamvis unus periret. Sed posteaquam dixit et distinxit credentes a non credentibus, expressit causam quare non credant: Propterea dixi vobis, inquit, quia nemo potest venire ad me, nisi fuerit ei datum a Patre meo. Ergo et credere datur nobis: non enim nihil est credere. Si autem magnum
7. But there are some among you, He says, who do not believe. He did not say, There are some among you who do not understand; but He stated the cause why they do not understand. For there are some among you who do not believe; and therefore they do not understand, because they do not believe. For the prophet said, Unless you believe, you will not understand (Isa. 7:9, according to the Septuagint). By faith we are joined, by understanding we are given life. Let us first cleave by faith, so that there may be something to be given life by understanding. For he who does not cleave resists; he who resists does not believe. And he who resists, how is he given life? He is an adversary of the ray of light by which he ought to be pierced: he does not turn away his gaze, but shuts his mind. There are, therefore, some who do not believe. Let them believe and open, let them open and they will be enlightened. For Jesus knew from the beginning who were believing, and who was to betray Him. For Judas too was there. For some were scandalized; but he remained in order to lie in wait, not in order to understand. And because he had remained for that purpose, the Lord was not silent about him. He did not name him, but neither was He silent, so that all might fear, though only one was perishing. But after He had spoken and distinguished believers from unbelievers, He stated the cause why they do not believe: For this reason I said to you, He says, that no one can come to Me unless it has been given to him by My Father. Therefore believing too is given to us: for believing is not nothing. But if it is a great
Editors' notes and page, col. 1618

Page

  • running head: S XXVII. CAPUT VI. (left part of the running head cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: first word "num" is the rest of "orga-num" broken from col. 1617; last word "magnum" is not hyphenated; the clipped line ends at the left of the images belong to col. 1617 and are not set; "spiritus et vita est" in the first lemma of section 6 is printed so (the later citations read "sunt"), so it is kept and translated literally; letters partly lost in "ni⟨s⟩i" and "u⟨t⟩"; "carne" (membra quae sunt in carne) has a damaged final letter but is read as carne; the image shows no margin letters or old-edition numerals
PL 35:1619
aliquid est, gaude quia credidisti, sed noli extolli: quid enim habes quod non accepisti (I Cor. IV, 7)?
something, rejoice that you have believed, but do not be puffed up: for what do you have that you have not received (1 Cor. 4:7)?
8. Ex hoc multi discipulorum ejus abierunt retro, et jam non cum illo ambulaverunt. Abierunt retro, sed post Satanam, non post Christum. Nam aliquando Dominus Christus Petrum appellavit Satanam, magis quia volebat praecedere Dominum suum, et consilium dare ne moreretur ille, qui venerat ut moreretur, ne nos in aeternum moreremur; et ait illi: Redi post me, Satanas; non enim sapis quae Dei sunt, sed quae hominis sunt (Matth. XVI, 23). Non illum repulit retro ire post Satanam, et appellavit Satanam; sed fecit post se ire, ut non esset Satanas ambulando post Dominum. Is⟨t⟩i autem sic redierunt retro, quomodo de quibusdam feminis dicit Apostolus: Quaedam enim conversae sunt retro post Satanam (I Tim. V, 15). Ulterius cum illo non ambulaverunt. Ecce praecisi a corpore vitam perdiderunt, quia forte in corpore nec fuerunt. Inter non credentes et ipsi deputandi sunt, quamvis discipuli dicerentur. Abierunt retro, non pauci, sed multi. Hoc forte factum est ad consolationem, quoniam aliquando contingit ut dicat homo verum, et quod dicit, non capiatur, atque illi qui audiunt, scandalizentur et discedant. Poenitet autem hominem dixisse quod verum est: di⟨c⟩it enim apud se homo, Non debui sic dicere, non hoc dicere debui. Ecce Domino contigit; dixit, et perdidit multos, remansit ad paucos. Sed non turbabatur ipse, quia ab initio noverat et qui credentes essent, et qui non credentes: nos si nobis contingat, perturbamur. Solatium in Domino inveniamus, et tamen caute verba dicamus.
8. From this many of His disciples went away backwards, and no longer walked with Him. They went away backwards, but after Satan, not after Christ. For once the Lord Christ called Peter Satan, rather because he wanted to go before his Lord, and to give counsel that He should not die, He who had come in order to die, so that we might not die for eternity; and He said to him: Get back behind me, Satan; for you do not savour the things that are of God, but the things that are of man (Matt. 16:23). He did not drive him back to go after Satan, even though He called him Satan; but He made him go after Himself, so that by walking after the Lord he might not be Satan. These, however, went back in the way in which the Apostle speaks of certain women: For some have turned back after Satan (1 Tim. 5:15). They no longer walked with Him. Behold, cut off from the body they lost life, because perhaps they were not even in the body. They too are to be reckoned among those who do not believe, although they were called disciples. They went away backwards, not a few, but many. Perhaps this was done for consolation, since it sometimes happens that a man says what is true, and what he says is not grasped, and those who hear are scandalized and depart. And the man regrets having said what is true: for the man says within himself, I ought not to have spoken so, I ought not to have said this. Behold, it happened to the Lord; He spoke, and lost many, He was left with few. But He Himself was not troubled, because He had known from the beginning both who would be believers and who would not be believers: we, if it should happen to us, are thrown into disturbance. Let us find solace in the Lord, and yet let us speak our words with caution.
9. Atque ille ad paucos qui remanserant: Dixit ergo Jesus duod⟨e⟩cim; id est illis duodecim qui remanserunt: Numquid et vos, inquit, vultis ire? Non discessit nec Judas. S⟨e⟩d quare manebat, Domino jam apparebat; nobis postea manifestatus est. Respondit Petrus pro omnibus, unus pro multis, unitas pro universis: Respondit ergo ei Simon Petrus: Domine, ad quem ibimus? Repellis nos a te, da nobis alterum te. Ad quem ibimus? Si a te recedimus, ad quem ibimus? Verba vitae aeternae habes. Videte quemadmodum Petrus, dante Deo, recreante Spiritu sancto, intellexit. Unde, nisi quia credidit? Verba vitae aeternae habes. Vitam enim aeternam habes in ministratione corporis et sanguinis tui. Et nos credidimus, et cognovimus. Non cognovimus, et credidimus, sed credidimus, et cognovimus. Credidimus enim ut cognosceremus: nam si prius cognoscere, et deinde credere vellemus, nec cognoscere nec credere valeremus. Quid credidimus, et quid cognovimus? Quia tu es Christus Filius Dei; id est, quia ipsa vita aeterna tu es, et non das in carne et sanguine tuo nisi quod es.
9. And He [spoke] to the few who had remained: Jesus therefore said to the twelve; that is, to those twelve who remained: Do you also, He says, wish to go? Not even Judas departed. But why he was staying was already apparent to the Lord; to us it was made manifest afterwards. Peter answered for all, one for many, unity for the whole: Simon Peter therefore answered Him: Lord, to whom shall we go? Thou drivest us away from Thee: give us another Thee. To whom shall we go? If we withdraw from Thee, to whom shall we go? Thou hast the words of eternal life. See how Peter, God granting it, the Holy Spirit renewing him, understood. From where, unless because he believed? Thou hast the words of eternal life. For Thou hast eternal life in the ministration of Thy body and blood. And we have believed, and have known. Not we have known and have believed, but we have believed and have known. For we believed in order that we might know: for if we wished first to know and then to believe, we would be able neither to know nor to believe. What have we believed, and what have we known? That Thou art the Christ, the Son of God; that is, that Thou art eternal life itself, and Thou givest in Thy flesh and blood nothing but what Thou art.
10. Ait ergo Dominus Jesus: Nonne ego vos duodecim elegi, et unus ex vobis diabolus est? Ergo, Undecim elegi diceret: an eligitur et diabolus, et in electis est diabolus? Electi in laude solent dici: an electus est et iste, de quo nolente et nesciente magnum aliquid boni fieret? Hoc est proprium Dei; contrarium iniquis. Sicut enim iniqui male utuntur bonis
10. The Lord Jesus therefore said: Have I not chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil? Then He should have said, I chose eleven: is a devil also chosen, and is there a devil among the chosen? The chosen are usually so called in praise: or was this one too chosen, through whom, unwilling and unknowing, some great good would be done? This is proper to God; the contrary is proper to the wicked. For just as the wicked make bad use of good
Editors' notes and page, col. 1619

Page

  • running head: 1619 IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, S[...] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: UNSURE punctuation after "Redi post me" (comma or point, faint); UNSURE "XVI, 23" (final figure blurred, could read 25); "I Cor." and "I Tim." printed with a figure resembling 1, set as I; damaged type in Is⟨t⟩i, di⟨c⟩it, duod⟨e⟩cim, S⟨e⟩d; first word "aliquid" has a damaged l but is legible; column ends mid-sentence at "bonis"; right-hand column (1620) visible only in part and not set; no full-width line; no editors' matter in this column
PL 35:1620
operibus Dei; sic contra Deus bene utitur malis operibus hominum iniquorum. Quam bonum est membra corporis ita esse, quemadmodum disponi non possunt nisi ab artifice Deo! Petulantia tamen quam male utitur oculis? Fallacia quam male utitur lingua? Falsus testis nonne lingua sua et animam suam prius trucidat, et alterum laedere se perempto conatur? Male utitur lingua, nec ideo malum est lingua: opus Dei est lingua, sed bono opere Dei male utitur illa nequitia. Quomodo utuntur pedibus qui currunt ad scelera? quomodo utuntur manibus homicidae? et illis adjacentibus forinsecus bonis creaturis Dei quam male utuntur mali? Auro judicia corrumpunt, innocentes opprimunt. Luce ista mali male utuntur: male vivendo enim etiam ipsam lucem qua vident, ad ministerium scelerum suorum usurpant. Iens enim ut faciat aliquid mali malus, lucere sibi vult ne offendat, qui jam intus offendit et cecidit: quod timet in corpore, jam incurrit in corde. Omnibus ergo bonis Dei, ne per singula currere longum sit, male utitur malus: contra, malis hominum malorum bene utitur bonus. Et quid tam bonum quam unus Deus? Quandoquidem ipse Dominus dixit, Nemo bonus nisi unus Deus (Marc. X, 18). Quanto ergo ille melior, tanto melius utitur et malis nostris. Quid Juda pejus? Inter omnes adhaerentes Magistro, inter duodecim, loculi illi commissi sunt, et dispensatio pauperum distributa: ingratus tanto beneficio, honori tanto, accepit pecuniam, perdidit justitiam: tradidit vitam mortuus; quem ut discipulus secutus, ut inimicus persecutus est. Totum hoc malum Judae; sed malo ejus bene usus est Dominus. Tradi se pertulit ut redimeret nos. Ecce malum Judae in bonum conversum est. Satanas quantos martyres persecutus est? Si Satanas persequendo cessaret, hodie tam gloriosam coronam sancti Laurentii non celebraremus. Si ergo ipsius diaboli malis operibus bene utitur Deus: quod facit malus, male utendo, sibi nocet; non bonitati Dei contradicit. Artifex illo utitur; et magnus artifex, si illo uti non nosset, nec eum esse permitteret. Ergo unus ex vobis diabolus est, ait, cum ego vos duodecim elegerim. Potest et sic intelligi quod ait, duodecim elegi, quia sacratus est numerus. Non enim quia periit inde unus, ideo Illius numeri honor demptus est: nam in locum pereuntis, alius subrogatus est (Act. I, 26). Mansit numerus consecratus, numerus duodenarius; quia per universum mundum, hoc est per quatuor cardines mundi, Trinitatem fuerant annuntiaturi. Ideo ter quaterni. Se ergo exterminavit Judas, non duodenarium numerum violavit: ipse deseruit praeceptorem, nam Deus illi apposuit successorem.
works of God; so, on the contrary, God makes good use of the evil works of wicked men. How good it is that the members of the body are such as they could not have been arranged except by God the Craftsman! Yet how badly does wantonness use the eyes? How badly does deceit use the tongue? Does not the false witness first slay his own soul with his tongue, and, having himself perished, try to harm another? He uses the tongue badly, yet the tongue is not therefore evil: the tongue is a work of God, but that wickedness makes bad use of the good work of God. How do those who run to crimes use their feet? how do murderers use their hands? and how badly do the evil use those good creatures of God that lie around them outside? With gold they corrupt judgements, they oppress the innocent. The evil make bad use of this light: for by living evilly they usurp even the very light by which they see for the service of their crimes. For the evil man, going out to do something evil, wants it to give him light lest he stumble, he who has already stumbled within and fallen: what he fears in the body, he has already run into in the heart. Of all the good things of God, then, not to make it long by running through them one by one, the evil man makes bad use: on the contrary, the good man makes good use of the evils of evil men. And what is so good as the one God? Since the Lord Himself said, No one is good but the one God (Mark 10:18). The better He is, then, the better He uses even our evils. What is worse than Judas? Among all who clung to the Master, among the twelve, the purse was entrusted to him, and the stewardship for the poor was allotted [to him]: ungrateful for so great a kindness, for so great an honour, he took money, he lost righteousness: dead himself, he betrayed the Life; Him whom he had followed as a disciple, he persecuted as an enemy. All this is the evil of Judas; but the Lord made good use of his evil. He endured to be betrayed that He might redeem us. Behold, the evil of Judas has been turned into good. How many martyrs has Satan persecuted? If Satan had ceased from persecuting, we would not today be celebrating the so glorious crown of Saint Lawrence. If, then, God makes good use of the evil works of the devil himself, what the evil one does by using badly harms himself; it does not contradict the goodness of God. The Craftsman uses him; and a great craftsman, if He did not know how to use him, would not even permit him to exist. Therefore, one of you is a devil, He says, though I have chosen you twelve. What He says, I have chosen twelve, can also be understood thus: that the number is sacred. For it is not because one perished from it that the honour of that number was taken away: for in the place of him who perished, another was substituted (Acts 1:26). The consecrated number remained, the number twelve; because throughout the whole world, that is, through the four cardinal points of the world, they were to proclaim the Trinity. Therefore three times four. Judas, then, destroyed himself; he did not violate the number twelve: he himself deserted his teacher, for God appointed him a successor.
11. Hoc totum quod Dominus de carne et de sanguine suo locutus est, et quod in ejus distributionis gratia vitam nobis promisit aeternam, et quod hinc voluit intelligi manducatores et potatores carnis et sanguinis sui, ut in illo maneant et ipse in illis, et
11. All this which the Lord spoke concerning His flesh and His blood, and that in the grace of its distribution He promised us eternal life, and that He wished it to be understood hereby that the eaters and drinkers of His flesh and blood abide in Him and He in them, and
Editors' notes and page, col. 1620

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: Ideo ter quaterni› · call in col 1620

Editi hactenus, Ideo et quaterni, emendantur hic ad Mss.

The editions until now, "Therefore also by fours", are corrected here to agree with the manuscripts.

(printed under page 158)

Page

  • running head: [IN JOANNIS E]VANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1620 (cut off at the left edge; only "VANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI" visible)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1621
quod non intellexerunt qui non crediderunt, et quod spiritualia carnaliter sapiendo scandalizati sunt, et quod eis scandalizatis et pereuntibus, consolationi Dominus adfuit discipulis qui remanserant, ad quos probandos interrogavit, Numquid et vos vultis ire? ut responsio permansionis eorum innotesceret nobis; nam ille noverat quia manebant: hoc ergo totum ad hoc nobis valeat, dilectissimi, ut carnem Christi et sanguinem Christi non edamus tantum in Sacramento, quod et multi mali; sed usque ad spiritus participationem manducemus et bibamus, ut in Domini corpore tanquam membra maneamus, ut ejus spiritu vegetemur, et non scandalizemur, etiam si multi modo nobiscum manducant et bibunt temporaliter Sacramenta, qui habebunt in fine aeterna tormenta. Modo enim corpus Christi mixtum est tanquam in area: sed novit Dominus qui sunt ejus (II Tim. II, 19). Si tu nosti quid trituras, quia ibi est latens massa, nec consumit trituratio quod purgatura est ventilatio; certi sumus, fratres, quia omnes qui sumus in corpore Domini, et manemus in illo, ut et ipse maneat in nobis, in hoc saeculo necesse habemus usque in finem inter malos vivere. Non inter illos dico malos, qui blasphemant Christum: rari enim jam inveniuntur qui lingua blasphemant, sed multi qui vita. Necesse est ergo ut inter illos usque in finem vivamus.
that those who did not believe did not understand, and that by savouring spiritual things carnally they were scandalized, and that while they were scandalized and perishing, the Lord was present as a consolation to the disciples who had remained, whom He questioned in order to test them, Do you also wish to go? so that the reply of their remaining might become known to us; for He knew that they were remaining: let all this, then, avail us for this, dearly beloved, that we eat the flesh of Christ and the blood of Christ not only in the Sacrament, which many evil men also do; but that we eat and drink even to participation in the Spirit, so that we may remain as members in the Lord's body, so that we may be quickened by His Spirit, and not be scandalized, even if many now eat and drink the Sacraments with us in time, who will have eternal torments at the end. For now the body of Christ is mixed, as on a threshing floor: but the Lord knows who are His (2 Tim. 2:19). If you know what you are threshing, that there is a hidden mass there, and the threshing does not consume what the winnowing will cleanse; we are certain, brethren, that all of us who are in the body of the Lord, and remain in Him, so that He also may remain in us, must in this world live among the wicked until the end. I do not mean among those wicked who blaspheme Christ: for now there are rarely found those who blaspheme with the tongue, but many who do so with their life. It is necessary, then, that we live among them until the end.
12. Sed quid est quod ait, Qui manet in me, et ego in illo (Joan. VI, 57, et XV, 5)? Quid, nisi quod martyres audiebant, Qui perseveraverit usque in finem, hic salvus erit (Matth. XXIV, 13)? Quomodo mansit in illo sanctus Laurentius, cujus hodie festa celebramus? Mansit usque ad tentationem, mansit usque ad tyrannicam interrogationem, mansit usque ad acerrimam comminationem, mansit usque ad peremptionem: parum est, usque ad immanem excruciationem mansit. Non enim occisus est cito, sed cruciatus est in igne: diu vivere permissus est; imo non diu vivere permissus est, sed tarde mori compulsus est. In illa ergo longa morte, in illis tormentis, quia bene manducaverat et bene biberat, tanquam illa esca saginatus et illo calice ebrius, torment⟨a⟩ non sensit. Ibi enim erat qui dixit, Spiritus est qui vivificat. Caro enim ardebat, sed spiritus animam vegetabat. Non cessit, et in regnum successit. Dixerat autem illi Xystus martyr sanctus, cujus diem quinto ab hinc retro die celebravimus: « Noli moerere, fili. » Episcopus enim erat ille, iste diaconus. « Noli moerere, inquit; sequeris me post triduum. » Triduum autem dixit medium inter diem passionis sancti Xysti, et diem hodiernae passionis sancti Laurentii. Triduum est medium. O consolatio! non ait, Noli moerere, fili; desinet persecutio, et securus eris: sed, Noli moerere; quo ego praecedo, tu sequeris; nec consecutio tua differtur: triduum medium erit, et mecum eris. Accepit oraculum, vicit diabolum, pervenit ad triumphum.
12. But what is it that He says, He who remains in Me, and I in him (John 6:57 [6:56], and 15:5)? What, except what the martyrs heard, He who perseveres to the end, he will be saved (Matt. 24:13)? How did Saint Laurence, whose feast we celebrate today, remain in Him? He remained even to temptation, he remained even to tyrannical interrogation, he remained even to the harshest threatening, he remained even to being put to death: that is little, he remained even to monstrous torture. For he was not killed quickly, but was tortured in the fire: he was permitted to live long; rather, he was not permitted to live long, but was compelled to die slowly. In that long death, then, in those torments, because he had eaten well and drunk well, as one fattened by that food and drunk with that cup, he did not feel the torments. For He was there who said, It is the Spirit that gives life. For the flesh was burning, but the Spirit was quickening the soul. He did not yield, and he passed into the kingdom. Now the holy martyr Xystus, whose day we celebrated on the fifth day back from this, had said to him: "Do not grieve, son." For the one was a bishop, the other a deacon. "Do not grieve," he said; "you will follow me after three days." Now he called three days the interval between the day of the passion of Saint Xystus and the day of today's passion of Saint Laurence. Three days is the interval. O consolation! He does not say, Do not grieve, son; the persecution will cease, and you will be safe: but, Do not grieve; where I go before, you will follow; nor is your following delayed: three days will be the interval, and you will be with me. He received the oracle, he conquered the devil, he arrived at the triumph.
Editors' notes and page, col. 1621

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: O consolatio› · call in col 1621

Sic Mss. Editi vero, consolatio Domini adfuit.

So the manuscripts. But the editions have, "the consolation of the Lord was present".

(printed under page 159)

Page

  • running head: TRACTATUS XXVIII. CA (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)