Migne Reading Room

PL 35 · cols. 1628–1631

Augustinus, In Joannis Evangelium tractatus XXVII-XXXIV

Tractate XXIX

PL 35:1628
mihi manducare : in alia vero parte, hoc est in dextera, apparebit fecunditas fructuum, dignitasque foliorum; viriditas, aeternitas erit. Illis ergo tanquam aridis dicetur, Ite in ignem aeternum (Matth. XXV, 42, 41). Ecce enim, inquit, securis ad radicem arborum posita est. Omnis ergo arbor quae non facit fructum bonum, excidetur, et in ignem mittetur (Id. III, 10). Dicant ergo de te, si proficis in Christo, dicant homines, Seducit turbas. De ipso, de toto corpore Christi hoc dicitur. Cogita corpus Christi adhuc in mundo, cogita corpus Christi adhuc in area; vide quemadmodum blasphemetur a palea. Simul quidem triturantur; sed paleae conteruntur, frumenta purgantur. Quod dictum est ergo de Domino, valet ad consolationem, de quocumque hoc dictum fuerit christiano.
me to eat: but on the other side, that is, on the right, there will appear the fruitfulness of fruits and the dignity of leaves; the greenness will be eternity. To those, therefore, as to dry trees it will be said, Go into the eternal fire (Matt. 25:42, 41). For behold, he says, the axe is laid to the root of the trees. Every tree, therefore, that does not bear good fruit will be cut down and will be thrown into the fire (Matt. 3:10). Let them say of you, then, if you are making progress in Christ, let men say, He seduces the crowds. It is said of Him Himself, it is said of the whole body of Christ. Consider the body of Christ still in the world, consider the body of Christ still on the threshing-floor; see how it is blasphemed by the chaff. They are threshed together, indeed; but the chaff is crushed, the grain is cleansed. What was said of the Lord, therefore, serves for the consolation of whatever Christian this has been said of.
12. Nemo tamen palam loquebatur de illo, propter metum Judaeorum. Sed qui non loquebantur de illo propter metum Judaeorum? Utique qui dicebant, Bonus est : non qui dicebant, Seducit turbas. Qui dicebant, Seducit turbas, sonitus eorum audiebatur tanquam aridorum foliorum. Seducit turbas, clarius sonabant; Bonus est, pressius susurrabant. Modo autem, fratres, quamvis nondum venerit illa gloria Christi, quae nos aeternos factura est; modo tamen ita crescit Ecclesia ejus, ita eam dignatus est per cuncta diffundere, ut jam susurretur, Seducit turbas; et clarius personet, Bonus est.
12. No one, however, spoke openly of Him, for fear of the Jews. But who were they who did not speak of Him for fear of the Jews? Surely those who were saying, He is good: not those who were saying, He seduces the crowds. Those who were saying, He seduces the crowds, their sound was heard like that of dry leaves. He seduces the crowds, they sounded out more loudly; He is good, they whispered more under their breath. Now, however, brethren, although that glory of Christ which is to make us eternal has not yet come, yet now His Church so grows, He has so deigned to spread it through all things, that now it is whispered, He seduces the crowds, and it resounds more loudly, He is good.
TRACTATUS XXIX. In illud Evangelii, Jam autem die festo mediante, ascendit Jesus in templum; usque ad id, Qui misit illum, hic verax est, et injustitia in illo non est. Cap. VII, ℣. 14-18.
Tractate 29. On that passage of the Gospel, Now when the feast was half over, Jesus went up into the temple; as far as this, He Who sent Him, He is true, and there is no unrighteousness in Him. Chapter 7, verses 14-18.
1. Quod sequitur de Evangelio et hodie lectum est, consequenter et nos videamus; et quod Dominus donaverit, hinc dicamus. Hesterno die huc usque lectum erat, quia licet non vidissent Dominum Jesum in templo per diem festum, loquebantur tamen de illo : Et alii dicebant, Bonus est; alii autem, Non, sed seducit turbas (Joan. VII, 12). Dictum enim hoc est ad eorum solatium, qui postea praedicantes verbum Dei, futuri erant ut seductores et veraces (II Cor. VI, 8). Si enim seducere decipere est; nec Christus seductor, nec Apostoli ejus; nec quisquam seductor debet esse christianus : si autem seducere, aliunde aliquem ad aliud persuadendo ducere est, quaerendum est unde et quo : si a malo ad bonum, bonus seductor est; si a bono ad malum, malus seductor est. In hanc ergo partem qua seducuntur homines de malo ad bonum, utinam omnes seductores et vocemur et simus!
1. What follows in the Gospel and has been read today, let us too examine in order; and what the Lord shall have granted, let us speak from it. Yesterday the reading went as far as this: that although they had not seen the Lord Jesus in the temple during the feast day, they were nevertheless speaking of Him: And some were saying, He is good; but others, No, but He seduces the crowds (John 7:12). For this was said for the consolation of those who afterwards, preaching the word of God, were to be as seducers and yet true (2 Cor. 6:8). For if to seduce is to deceive, then neither is Christ a seducer, nor His apostles, nor ought any Christian to be a seducer: but if to seduce is to lead someone away from one thing to another by persuading, we must ask from where and to where: if from evil to good, he is a good seducer; if from good to evil, he is a bad seducer. In this sense, then, in which men are seduced from evil to good, would that we all might both be called and be seducers!
2. Ascendit ergo postea Dominus ad diem festum, mediante die festo, et docebat. Et mirabantur Judaei dicentes : Quomodo hic litteras scit, cum non didicerit? Ille qui latebat, docebat; et palam loquebatur, et non tenebatur. Illud enim ut lateret, erat causa exempli, hoc potestatis. Sed cum doceret, mirabantur Judaei. Omnes quidem, quantum arbitror, mirabantur; sed non omnes convertebantur. Et unde admiratio? Quia multi noverant ubi natus, quemadmodum
2. The Lord, then, went up afterwards to the feast day, when the feast was half over, and was teaching. And the Jews marvelled, saying: How does this man know letters, when He has not learned? He Who was hiding was teaching; and He spoke openly, and was not seized. For that He hid was for the sake of example, this for the sake of power. But when He was teaching, the Jews marvelled. All indeed, as far as I judge, marvelled; but not all were converted. And whence the wonder? Because many knew where He was born, how
Editors' notes and page, col. 1628

Page

  • running head: [cut off at left]EVANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1628
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: running head cut off at the left edge of the image (only "...EVANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI" visible); verse sign printed as ŷ, set as ℣; near the column foot the scan shows "malti" and "undo", set as multi and unde as worn/blurred type rather than misprints (UNSURE); last word "quemad-" split at the column break; no editors' matter; no full-width line besides the running head.
  • other: the word quemadmodum was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 1629
PL 35:1629
fuerit educatus; nunquam eum viderant litteras discentem, audiebant autem de Lege disputantem, Legis testimonia proferentem, quae nemo posset proferre nisi legisset, nemo legere nisi litteras didicisset: et ideo mirabantur. Eorum autem admiratio Magistro facta est insinuandae altius veritatis occasio. Ex eorum quippe admiratione et verbis, dixit Dominus profundum aliquid, et diligentius inspici et discuti dignum. Propter quod intentam facio Charitatem vestram, non solum ad audiendum pro vobis, sed etiam ad orandum pro nobis.
He had been brought up; they had never seen Him learning letters, but they heard Him disputing about the Law, bringing forward testimonies of the Law, which no one could bring forward unless he had read, and no one could read unless he had learnt letters: and therefore they marvelled. But their marvelling became for the Master an occasion of instilling the truth more deeply. For out of their marvelling and their words the Lord said something profound, and worthy to be examined and discussed more diligently. For this reason I make your Charity attentive, not only to listening for yourselves, but also to praying for us.
3. Quid ergo Dominus respondit eis admirantibus quomodo sciret litteras quas non didicerat? Mea, inquit, doctrina non est mea, sed ejus qui misit me. Haec est profunditas prima: videtur enim paucis verbis quasi contraria locutus. Non enim ait, Ista doctrina non est mea; sed, Mea doctrina non est mea. Si non tua, quomodo tua? Si tua, quomodo non tua? Tu enim dicis utrumque: et, mea doctrina; et, non mea. Nam si dixisset, Ista doctrina non est mea, nulla esset quaestio. Nunc vero, fratres, primitus intendite quaestionem, et sic ordine exspectate solutionem. Nam qui non videt quaestionem quae proponitur, quomodo intelligit quod exponitur? Hoc est ergo in quaestione, quod ait, mea non mea: hoc videtur esse contrarium, quomodo mea, quomodo non mea. Si ergo intueamur diligenter quod ipse in exordio dicit sanctus Evangelista, In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat verbum (Joan. I, 1); inde pendet hujus solutio quaestionis. Quae est ergo doctrina Patris, nisi Verbum Patris? Ipse ergo Christus doctrina Patris, si Verbum Patris. Sed quia Verbum non potest esse nullius, sed alicujus: et suam doctrinam dixit, seipsum; et non suam, quia Patris est Verbum. Quid enim tam tuum quam tu? et quid tam non tuum quam tu, si alicujus est quod es?
3. What then did the Lord answer them as they marvelled how He knew letters which He had not learnt? My teaching, He says, is not Mine, but His Who sent Me. This is the first depth: for He seems in a few words to have spoken as if contrary things. For He does not say, This teaching is not Mine; but, My teaching is not Mine. If not Thine, how Thine? If Thine, how not Thine? For Thou sayest both: both, My teaching; and, not Mine. For if He had said, This teaching is not Mine, there would be no question. But now, brethren, first attend to the question, and so in order await the solution. For he who does not see the question which is put forward, how does he understand what is expounded? This then is what is in question, that He says, Mine, not Mine: this seems to be contradictory, how Mine, how not Mine. If then we look carefully at what the holy Evangelist himself says at the beginning, In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God (John 1:1); on that hangs the solution of this question. What then is the teaching of the Father, except the Word of the Father? Christ Himself, therefore, is the teaching of the Father, if He is the Word of the Father. But because a word cannot be no one's, but must be someone's: He both called His teaching His own, namely Himself; and not His own, because He is the Word of the Father. For what is so much yours as you yourself? And what is so much not yours as you yourself, if what you are is someone else's?
4. Verbum ergo et Deus est, et doctrinae stabilis Verbum est, non sonabilis per syllabas et volatilis, sed manentis cum Patre, ad quam convertamur manentem, sonis transeuntibus admoniti. Non enim nos ita admonet quod transit, ut ad transitoria vocet. Admonemur ut diligamus Deum. Totum hoc quod dixi, syllabae fuerunt; percussum aerem verberaverunt, ut ad sensum vestrarum aurium pervenirent, sonando transierunt: non tamen illud quod vos admonui, transire debet; quia ille quem vos diligere admonui, non transit; et cum transeuntibus syllabis admoniti, conversi ad eum fueritis, nec vos transibitis, sed cum manente manebitis. Hoc est ergo in doctrina magnum, altum et aeternum quod manet; quo vocant omnia quae temporaliter transeunt, quando bene significant, nec mendaciter proferuntur. Omnia quippe signa quae proferimus sonis, aliquid significant quod non est sonus. Non enim duae breves syllabae Deus est, et duas breves syllabas colimus, et duas breves syllabas
4. The Word, then, is both God, and is the Word of a stable teaching, not one sounding through syllables and fleeting, but one abiding with the Father, to which, abiding, let us turn, admonished by passing sounds. For what passes does not admonish us in such a way as to call us to passing things. We are admonished to love God. All this that I have said was syllables; they struck the air they beat upon, so as to reach the sense of your ears, and in sounding they passed away: yet that to which I admonished you ought not to pass away; for He Whom I admonished you to love does not pass away; and when, admonished by passing syllables, you have turned to Him, neither will you pass away, but you will abide with Him Who abides. This then is what is great in teaching, lofty and eternal, that which abides; to which all things that pass away in time call us, when they signify well and are not uttered falsely. For all the signs which we utter by sounds signify something which is not a sound. For God is not two short syllables, and we do not worship two short syllables, and two short syllables
Editors' notes and page, col. 1629

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: ad quam› · call in col 1629

Lov., ad quem: refragantibus editis aliis et Mss.

The Louvain edition, "to whom" (ad quem): against the other editions and the manuscripts.

(printed under page 163)

(2) ‹anchor: ad sensum› · call in col 1629

Mss., ut ad sonum.

The manuscripts, "that to the sound".

(printed under page 163)

(3) ‹anchor: quo vocant› · call in col 1629

Sic Mss. At editi Am. Bad. Er., quod vocant. Lov., quo vocantur.

So the manuscripts. But the editions of Amerbach, Badius and Erasmus have "which they call"; the Louvain edition, "to which are called".

(printed under page 163)

Page

  • running head: TRACTATUS XXIX. CAPU[T] (cut off at the image edge; column number 1629 at left)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1630
adoramus, et ad duas breves syllabas pervenire desideramus: quae pene ante desinunt sonare, quam coeperint; nec in eis secundae locus est, nisi prima transierit. Manet ergo aliquid magnum quod dicitur Deus, quamvis non maneat sonus cum dicitur Deus. Sic intendite doctrinam Christi, et pervenietis ad Verbum Dei: cum autem perveneritis ad Verbum Dei, intendite, Deus erat Verbum; et videbitis verum dictum esse, mea doctrina: intendite etiam cujus est Verbum; et videbitis recte dictum esse, non est mea.
we adore, and we desire to arrive at two short syllables, which almost cease to sound before they have begun; nor is there room in them for the second unless the first has passed away. Something great therefore remains which is called God, although the sound does not remain when "God" is said. So attend to the doctrine of Christ, and you will arrive at the Word of God; but when you have arrived at the Word of God, attend: The Word was God; and you will see that "my doctrine" was truly said. Attend also to Whose the Word is; and you will see that "is not mine" was rightly said.
5. Breviter ergo dico Charitati vestrae; hoc videtur mihi dixisse Dominus Jesus Christus, Mea doctrina non est mea, ac si diceret, Ego non sum a meipso. Quamvis enim Filium Patri dicamus et credamus aequalem, nec ullam in eis esse naturae substantiaeque distantiam, nec inter generantem atque generatum aliquod interfuisse temporis intervallum; tamen hoc servato et custodito ista dicimus, quod ille Pater est, ille Filius. Pater autem non est, si non habeat Filium; et Filius non est, si non habeat Patrem: sed tamen Filius Deus de Patre; Pater autem Deus, sed non de Filio. Pater Filii, non Deus de Filio: ille autem Filius Patris, et Deus de Patre. Dominus enim Christus dicitur Lumen ex Lumine. Lumen ergo quod non ex lumine, et Lumen aequale quod ex Lumine, simul unum Lumen, non duo lumina.
5. Briefly, then, I say to your Charity: the Lord Jesus Christ seems to me to have said this, My doctrine is not mine, as if He were saying, I am not from Myself. For although we say and believe that the Son is equal to the Father, and that there is no distance of nature and substance between Them, and that no interval of time came between the Begetter and the Begotten, nevertheless, with this kept and safeguarded, we say these things: that the One is the Father, the Other the Son. Yet He is not the Father if He does not have a Son; and the Son is not the Son if He does not have a Father; but nevertheless the Son is God from the Father, whereas the Father is God, but not from the Son. Father of the Son, not God from the Son; but the Other is Son of the Father, and God from the Father. For the Lord Christ is called Light from Light. The Light, therefore, which is not from light, and the equal Light which is from Light, are together one Light, not two lights.
6. Si intelleximus, Deo gratias: si quis autem parum intellexit, fecit homo quo usque potuit, caetera videat unde speret. Forinsecus ut operarii possumus plantare et rigare, sed Dei est incrementum dare (I Cor. III, 6). Mea, inquit, doctrina non est mea, sed ejus qui misit me. Audiat consilium, qui dicit, Nondum intellexi. Magna quippe res et profunda cum fuisset dicta, vidit utique ipse Dominus Christus hoc tam profundum non omnes intellecturos, et in consequenti dedit consilium. Intelligere vis? crede. Deus enim per prophetam dixit: Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis (Isai. VII, 9, sec. LXX). Ad hoc pertinet quod etiam hic Dominus secutus adjunxit: Si quis voluerit voluntatem ejus facere, cognoscet de doctrina, utrum ex Deo sit, an ego a meipso loquor. Quid est hoc, Si quis voluerit voluntatem ejus facere? Sed ego dixeram, Si quis crediderit; et hoc consilium dederam. Si non intellexisti, inquam, crede. Intellectus enim merces est fidei. Ergo noli quaerere intelligere ut credas, sed crede ut intelligas; quoniam nisi credideritis, non intelligetis. Cum ergo ad possibilitatem intelligendi consilium dederim obedientiam credendi, et dixerim Dominum Jesum Christum hoc ipsum adjunxisse in consequenti sententia, invenimus eum dixisse, Si quis voluerit voluntatem ejus facere, cognoscet de doctrina. Quid est, cognoscet? Hoc est intelliget. Quod est autem, Si quis voluerit voluntatem ejus facere, hoc est credere. Sed quia cognoscet, hoc est intelliget, omnes intelligunt: quia vero quod ait, Si quis voluerit voluntatem ejus facere, hoc pertinet ad credere, ut diligentius intelligatur, opus est nobis ipso Domino nostro expositore, ut indicet nobis utrum revera ad credere pertineat facere voluntatem Patris ejus. Quis nesciat
6. If we have understood, thanks be to God; but if anyone has understood too little, a man has done as far as he could; for the rest, let him see whence he may hope. Outwardly, as labourers, we can plant and water, but it is God's to give the increase (1 Cor. 3:6). My doctrine, He says, is not mine, but His Who sent me. Let him who says, I have not yet understood, hear counsel. For since a great and profound thing had been said, the Lord Christ Himself certainly saw that not all would understand something so profound, and in what follows He gave counsel. Do you wish to understand? Believe. For God said through the prophet: Unless you believe, you will not understand (Isa. 7:9, according to the LXX). To this pertains what the Lord also added here, following on: If anyone wills to do His will, he will know concerning the doctrine, whether it is from God, or whether I speak from Myself. What is this, If anyone wills to do His will? But I had said, If anyone believes; and I had given this counsel: If you have not understood, I said, believe. For understanding is the reward of faith. Therefore do not seek to understand in order that you may believe, but believe in order that you may understand; since unless you believe, you will not understand. Since, then, I have given as counsel towards the possibility of understanding the obedience of believing, and have said that the Lord Jesus Christ added this very thing in the following sentence, we find that He said, If anyone wills to do His will, he will know concerning the doctrine. What is "he will know"? That is, he will understand. But what is "If anyone wills to do His will"? That is, to believe. But that "he will know" means "he will understand", all understand; but since what He says, If anyone wills to do His will, pertains to believing, in order that it may be more carefully understood, we need our Lord Himself as expositor, that He may show us whether doing the will of His Father really pertains to believing. Who does not know
Editors' notes and page, col. 1630

Page

  • running head: [...]S XXIX. CAPUT VII. 1630
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: running head cut off at left edge, only "S XXIX. CAPUT VII." visible; column number blurred in print (read as 1630 per task); column begins mid-sentence ("adoramus") and ends mid-sentence ("Quis nesciat"); no full-width line; no editors' matter in this column; left-column text (col. 1629) and its foot notes not set
PL 35:1631
hoc esse facere voluntatem Dei, operari opus ejus, id est, quod illi placet? Ipse autem Dominus aperte alio loco dicit: Hoc est opus Dei, ut credatis in eum quem ille misit (Joan. VI, 29). Ut credatis in eum; non, ut credatis ei. Sed si creditis in eum, creditis ei: non autem continuo qui credit ei, credit in eum. Nam et daemones credebant ei, et non credebant in eum. Rursus etiam de Apostolis ipsius possumus dicere, Credimus Paulo; sed non, Credimus in Paulum: Credimus Petro; sed non, Credimus in Petrum. Credenti enim in eum qui justificat impium, deputatur fides ejus ad justitiam (Rom. IV, 5). Quid est ergo credere in eum? Credendo amare, credendo diligere, credendo in eum ire, et ejus membris incorporari. Ipsa est ergo fides quam de nobis exigit Deus: et non invenit quod exigat, nisi donaverit quod inveniat. Quae fides, nisi quam definivit alio loco Apostolus plenissime dicens: Neque circumcisio aliquid valet, neque praeputium, sed fides quae per dilectionem operatur (Galat. V, 6)? Non qualiscumque fides, sed fides quae per dilectionem operatur: haec in te sit, et intelliges de doctrina. Quid enim intelliges? Quia doctrina ista non est mea, sed ejus qui misit me: id est, intelliges quia Christus Filius Dei, qui est doctrina Patris, non est ex seipso, sed Filius est Patris.
this is to do the will of God, to work His work, that is, what pleases Him? But the Lord Himself says openly in another place: This is the work of God, that you believe in Him Whom He has sent (John 6:29). That you believe in Him; not, that you believe Him. But if you believe in Him, you believe Him; yet it does not follow that whoever believes Him believes in Him. For the demons too believed Him, and did not believe in Him. Again, we can also say of His apostles, We believe Paul, but not, We believe in Paul; We believe Peter, but not, We believe in Peter. For to him who believes in Him Who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness (Rom. 4:5). What then is it to believe in Him? By believing to love, by believing to cherish, by believing to go into Him and to be incorporated into His members. This, then, is the faith which God demands of us; and He does not find what He may demand unless He has given what He may find. What faith, if not that which the Apostle defined most fully in another place, saying: Neither circumcision avails anything, nor uncircumcision, but faith which works through love (Gal. 5:6)? Not faith of any kind whatever, but faith which works through love: let this be in you, and you will understand concerning the teaching. For what will you understand? That this teaching is not mine, but His Who sent me; that is, you will understand that Christ the Son of God, Who is the teaching of the Father, is not from Himself, but is the Son of the Father.
7. Sabellianam haeresim sententia ista dissolvit. Sabelliani enim dicere ausi sunt ipsum esse Filium qui est et Pater; duo esse nomina, sed unam rem. Si duo essent nomina, et res una, non diceretur, Mea doctrina non est mea. Utique si tua doctrina non est tua, o Domine, cujus est, nisi alius sit cujus sit? Quod dixisti, Sabelliani non intelligunt: non enim Trinitatem viderunt, sed sui cordis errorem secuti sunt. Nos cultores Trinitatis et unitatis Patris et Filii et Spiritus sancti, et unius Dei, intelligamus de doctrina Christi, quoniam non est ejus. Et ideo dixit non se a seipso loqui, quoniam Christus Patris est Filius, et Pater Christi est Pater, et Filius de Deo Patre Deus est: Pater autem Deus, non de Filio Deo Deus est.
7. This saying dissolves the Sabellian heresy. For the Sabellians dared to say that the Son is the very same who is also the Father: that there are two names, but one thing. If there were two names and one thing, it would not be said, My teaching is not mine. Surely, if Thy teaching is not Thine, O Lord, whose is it, unless there is another whose it is? What Thou hast said the Sabellians do not understand: for they have not seen the Trinity, but have followed the error of their own heart. Let us, worshippers of the Trinity and of the unity of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, and of the one God, understand concerning the teaching of Christ that it is not His. And therefore He said that He does not speak from Himself, because Christ is the Son of the Father, and the Father is the Father of Christ, and the Son is God from God the Father; but the Father is God, not God from God the Son.
8. Qui a semetipso loquitur, gloriam propriam quaerit. Hoc erit ille qui vocatur Antichristus, extollens se, sicut Apostolus ait, supra omne quod dicitur Deus, et quod colitur (II Thess. II, 4). Ipsum quippe annuntians Dominus gloriam suam quaesiturum, non gloriam Patris, ait ad Judaeos: Ego veni in nomine Patris mei, et non suscepistis me: alius veniet in nomine suo, hunc suscipietis (Joan. V, 43). Significavit eos Antichristum suscepturos, qui gloriam nominis sui quaesiturus est, inflatus, non solidus; et ideo non stabilis, sed utique ruinosus. Dominus autem noster Jesus Christus magnum exemplum nobis praebuit humilitatis: nempe aequalis est Patri, nempe in principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum; nempe ipse dixit, et verissime dixit, Tanto tempore vobiscum sum, et non cognovistis me? Philippe, qui vidit me, vidit et Patrem (Id. XIV, 9); nempe ipse dixit, et verissime dixit, Ego et Pater unum sumus (Id. X, 30). Si ergo ille cum Patre unum, aequalis Patri, Deus de
8. He who speaks from himself seeks his own glory. This will be the one who is called the Antichrist, exalting himself, as the Apostle says, above all that is called God, and that is worshipped (2 Thess. 2:4). For the Lord, announcing that he would seek his own glory, not the glory of the Father, says to the Jews: I have come in the name of My Father, and you have not received Me; another will come in his own name, him you will receive (John 5:43). He signified that they would receive the Antichrist, who is going to seek the glory of his own name, puffed up, not solid; and therefore not stable, but certainly ruinous. But our Lord Jesus Christ has given us a great example of humility: surely He is equal to the Father, surely in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God; surely He Himself said, and said most truly, So long a time I am with you, and you have not known Me? Philip, he who has seen Me has seen the Father also (John 14:9); surely He Himself said, and said most truly, I and the Father are one (John 10:30). If then He is one with the Father, equal to the Father, God from
Editors' notes and page, col. 1631

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: non est ejus› · call in col 1631

Juxta Er. Lugd. Ven. Lov., quomodo non est ejus. M.

According to Erasmus and the Lyons, Venice and Louvain editions, "how it is not his". M.

(printed under page 164)

Page

  • running head: 1631 IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)