Migne Reading Room

PL 35 · cols. 1713–1718

Augustinus, In Joannis Evangelium tractatus XXXVI-XLV

Tractate XLIV

PL 35:1713
sui. Semen suum significavit dicendo, Mitte manum sub femore meo. Dominum suum significavit addendo, et jura per Deum caeli.
He signified his seed by saying, Put your hand under my thigh. He signified his Lord by adding, and swear by the God of heaven.
17. Irati Judaei responderunt: Quinquaginta annos nondum habes, et Abraham vidisti! Et Dominus: Amen, amen dico vobis; antequam Abraham fieret, ego sum. Appende verba, et cognosce mysterium. Antequam Abraham fieret. Intellige, fieret ad humanam facturam, sum vero ad divinam pertinere substantiam. Fieret, quia creatura est Abraham. Non dixit, Antequam Abraham esset, ego eram; sed, Antequam Abraham fieret, qui nisi per me non fieret, ego sum. Neque hoc dixit, Antequam Abraham fieret, ego factus sum, In principio enim fecit Deus caelum et terram (Gen. I, 1): nam in principio erat Verbum (Joan. I, 1). Antequam fieret Abraham, ego sum. Agnoscite Creatorem, discernite creaturam. Qui loquebatur, semen Abrahae factus erat; et ut Abraham ⟨f⟩ieret, ante Abraham ipse erat.
17. The Jews in anger answered: You are not yet fifty years old, and you have seen Abraham! And the Lord: Amen, amen I say to you; before Abraham was made, I am. Weigh the words and recognize the mystery. Before Abraham was made. Understand that "was made" pertains to human making, but "I am" to the divine substance. "Was made", because Abraham is a creature. He did not say, Before Abraham was, I was; but, Before Abraham was made, who would not have been made except through Me, I am. Nor did He say this, Before Abraham was made, I was made; for In the beginning God made heaven and earth (Gen. 1:1): for in the beginning was the Word (John 1:1). Before Abraham was made, I am. Recognize the Creator, distinguish the creature. He Who was speaking had been made the seed of Abraham; and that Abraham might be made, He Himself was before Abraham.
18. Hinc jam velut Abrahae apertissimo convicio commoti sunt acrius. Blasphemasse quippe illis visus est Dominus Christus, quoniam dixit, Antequam Abraham fieret, ego sum. Tulerunt ergo lapides ut jacerent in eum. Tanta duritia quo curreret, nisi ad similes? Jesus autem, tanquam homo, tanquam in forma servi, ta⟨n⟩quam humilis, tanquam passurus, tanquam moriturus, tanquam nos suo sanguine redempturus: non tanquam ille qui est, non tanquam in principio Verbum, et Verbum apud Deum. Nam cum illi lapides tulerunt ut mitterent in eum, quid magnum erat ut eos continuo dehiscens terra sorberet, et pro lapidibus inferos invenirent? Non erat magnum Deo: sed magis erat commendanda patientia, quam exserenda potentia. Abscondit se ergo ab eis, ne lapidaretur. Tanquam homo a lapidibus fugit: sed vae illis a quorum lapideis cordibus Deus fugit!
18. Hereupon, as though at a most open insult to Abraham, they were stirred more fiercely. For the Lord Christ seemed to them to have blasphemed, because He said, Before Abraham was made, I am. They took up stones, therefore, to cast at Him. Where should such hardness run, if not to its like? But Jesus, as man, as in the form of a servant, as lowly, as One about to suffer, as One about to die, as One about to redeem us by His blood: not as He Who is, not as the Word in the beginning, and the Word with God. For when they took up stones to throw at Him, what great thing would it have been that the earth should at once gape open and swallow them, and that instead of stones they should find the underworld? It would not have been great for God: but patience was rather to be commended than power to be put forth. He hid Himself, therefore, from them, lest He be stoned. As man He fled from stones: but woe to those from whose stony hearts God flees!
TRACTATUS XLIV. Ab eo quod scriptum est, Et praeteriens vidit hominem caecum a nativitate; usque ad id, Nunc vero dicitis, Quia videmus: peccatum vestrum manet. Cap. IX.
Tractate 44. From what is written, And passing by He saw a man blind from birth; as far as this, But now you say, We see: your sin remains. Chapter 9.
1. De homine quem Dominus Jesus illuminavit, qui caecus natus fuit, prolixa lectio recitata est: quam si universam pertractare conemur, pro sui dignitate, sicut valemus, singula considerantes, non sufficit dies. Proinde peto et admoneo Charitatem vestram, ut in iis quae aperta sunt, sermonem nostrum non requiratis: nam nimis longum erit in singulis immorari. Breviter ergo caeci hujus illuminati commendo mysterium. Ea quippe quae fecit Dominus noster Jesus Christus stupenda atque miranda, et opera et verba sunt: opera, quia facta sunt; verba, quia signa sunt. Si ergo quid significet hoc quod factum est cogitemus, genus humanum est iste caecus: haec enim caecitas contigit in primo homine per peccatum, de quo omnes originem duximus, non solum mortis, sed etiam iniquitatis. Si enim caecitas est infidelitas, et illuminatio fides; quem fidelem quando venit Christus invenit? Quandoquidem Apostolus natus in gente Prophetarum dicit: Fuimus et nos aliquando natura filii irae, sicut et caeteri (Ephes. II, 3). Si filii irae, filii vindictae, filii poenae, filii gehennae.
1. A long reading has been recited concerning the man whom the Lord Jesus enlightened, who was born blind: if we should try to treat the whole of it according to its dignity, as far as we are able, considering each point, a day would not suffice. Therefore I ask and admonish your Charity that in those things which are plain you do not look for our discourse: for it would be too long to dwell on each point. Briefly, then, I commend to you the mystery of this blind man enlightened. For the things which our Lord Jesus Christ did, astonishing and wonderful, are both works and words: works, because they were done; words, because they are signs. If, then, we consider what this thing that was done signifies, this blind man is the human race: for this blindness befell the first man through sin, from whom we all have drawn our origin, not only of death but also of iniquity. For if blindness is unbelief, and enlightenment faith, whom did Christ find faithful when He came? Since the Apostle, born in the nation of the Prophets, says: We too were once by nature children of wrath, even as the rest (Eph. 2:3). If children of wrath, children of vengeance, children of punishment, children of Gehenna.
Editors' notes and page, col. 1713

Page

  • running head: 1713 TRACTATUS XLIV. CA (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: the word gehennae. was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 1714
PL 35:1714
Quomodo natura, nisi quia peccante primo homine, vitium pro natura inolevit? Si vitium pro natura inolevit, secundum mentem omnis homo caecus natus est. Si enim videt, non opus habet ductore; si opus habet ductore et illuminatore, caecus est ergo a nativitate.
How "by nature", unless because, when the first man sinned, vice grew in as nature? If vice grew in as nature, then according to the mind every man is born blind. For if he sees, he has no need of a guide; if he has need of a guide and an enlightener, he is therefore blind from birth.
2. Venit Dominus: quid fecit? Magnum mysterium commendavit. Exspuit in terram, de saliva sua lutum fecit: quia Verbum caro factum est (Joan. I, 14). Et inunxit oculos caeci. Inunctus erat, et nondum videbat. Misit illum ad piscinam quae vocatur Siloe. Pertinuit autem ad Evangelistam commendare nobis nomen hujus piscinae; et ait, Quod interpretatur Missus. Jam quis sit missus agnoscitis: nisi enim ille fuisset missus, nemo nostrum esset ab iniquitate dimissus. Lavit ergo oculos in ea piscina quae interpretatur Missus, baptizatus est in Christo. Si ergo quando eum in seipso quodammodo baptizavit, tunc illuminavit; quando inunxit, fortasse catechumenum fecit. Potest quidem aliter atque aliter tanti sacramenti exponi profunditas et pertractari: sed hoc sufficiat Charitati vestrae; audistis grande mysterium. Interroga hominem, Christianus es? Respondet tibi, Non sum, si Paganus est aut Judaeus. Si autem dixerit, Sum; adhuc quaeris ab eo, Catechumenus, an fidelis? Si responderit, Catechumenus; inunctus est, nondum lotus. Sed unde inunctus? Quaere, et respondet; quaere ab illo in quem credat: eo ipso quo catechumenus est, dicit, In Christum. Ecce modo loquor et fidelibus et catechumenis. Quid dixi de sputo et luto? Quia Verbum caro factum est. Hoc et catechumeni audiunt: sed non eis sufficit ad quod inuncti sunt; festinent ad lavacrum, si lumen inquirunt.
2. The Lord came: what did He do? He commended a great mystery. He spat on the ground, from His saliva He made clay: because the Word was made flesh (John 1:14). And He anointed the eyes of the blind man. He had been anointed, and still did not see. He sent him to the pool which is called Siloam. Now it fell to the Evangelist to commend to us the name of this pool; and he says, Which is interpreted Sent. You already recognize who the One sent is: for unless He had been sent, none of us would have been released from iniquity. So he washed his eyes in that pool which is interpreted Sent; he was baptized in Christ. If, then, when He in a manner baptized him in Himself, He then enlightened him, when He anointed him, perhaps He made him a catechumen. The depth of so great a sacrament can indeed be expounded and treated in one way and another: but let this suffice for your Charity; you have heard a great mystery. Ask a man, Are you a Christian? He answers you, I am not, if he is a pagan or a Jew. But if he says, I am, you still ask him, A catechumen, or one of the faithful? If he answers, A catechumen, he is anointed, not yet washed. But anointed from what? Ask, and he answers; ask him in whom he believes: by the very fact that he is a catechumen, he says, In Christ. See, I am now speaking both to the faithful and to the catechumens. What did I say about the spittle and the clay? That the Word was made flesh. This the catechumens too hear: but that with which they have been anointed is not enough for them; let them hasten to the font, if they seek light.
3. Jam ergo propter quasdam in hac ipsa lectione quaestiones, verba Domini et ipsius universae lectionis percurramus potius quam tractemus. Exiens vidit hominem caecum: non utcumque caecum, sed, a nativitate. Et interrogaverunt eum discipuli ejus: Rabbi. Scitis Rabbi quia magister est. Magistrum appellabant, quia discere desiderabant: quaestionem quippe Domino proposuerunt tanquam magistro, Quis peccavit, hic, an parentes ejus, ut caecus nasceretur? Respondit Jesus: Neque hic peccavit, neque parentes ejus, ut caecus nasceretur. Quid est quod dixit? Si nullus homo sine peccato, numquid parentes hujus caeci sine peccato erant? Numquid ipse vel sine originali peccato natus erat, vel vivendo nihil addiderat? An quia oculos clausos habebat, concupiscentiae minime vigilabant? Quanta mala committunt caeci! A quo malo abstinet mens mala, etiam clausis oculis? Non poterat videre, sed noverat cogitare, et forte concupiscere aliquid quod caecus non posset implere, sed in corde judicari a cordis perscrutatore. Si ergo et parentes ejus habuerunt peccatum, et iste habuit peccatum; quare Dominus dixit, Neque hic peccavit, neque parentes ejus: nisi ad rem de qua interrogatus est, ut caecus nasceretur? Habebant enim peccatum parentes
3. Now, then, because of certain questions in this very reading, let us run through the words of the Lord and of the whole reading itself rather than treat them at length. Going out, He saw a man blind: not blind in just any way, but from birth. And His disciples asked Him: Rabbi. You know that Rabbi means teacher. They called Him Teacher, because they desired to learn: for they put a question to the Lord as to a teacher, Who sinned, this man, or his parents, that he should be born blind? Jesus answered: Neither has this man sinned, nor his parents, that he should be born blind. What is it that He said? If no man is without sin, were the parents of this blind man without sin? Had he himself either been born without original sin, or added nothing by living? Or, because he had his eyes closed, were his concupiscences not at all awake? How many evils the blind commit! From what evil does an evil mind abstain, even with the eyes closed? He could not see, but he knew how to think, and perhaps to desire something which, being blind, he could not carry out, but which could be judged in the heart by the searcher of the heart. If, then, both his parents had sin and this man had sin, why did the Lord say, Neither has this man sinned, nor his parents, unless with respect to the matter about which He was asked, that he should be born blind? For his parents had sin
Editors' notes and page, col. 1714

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 1714

In plerisque Mss., aliter atque aliter ratio tanti sacramenti exponi et pertractari profunditas.

In most manuscripts: "the meaning of so great a mystery [can] be set out one way and another, and its depth handled thoroughly."

(printed under page 205)

(2) ‹anchor: concupiscentiae minime vigilabant› · call in col 1714

Sic omnes prope Mss. At editi, vigilabat.

So almost all the manuscripts. But the printed editions read vigilabat (singular, "was awake").

(printed under page 205)

Page

  • running head: TUS XLIV. CAPUT IX. (cut off at left; column number printed 17:4, i.e. 1714)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1715
ejus, sed non ipso peccato factum est ut caecus nasceretur. Si ergo non peccato factum est parentum ut caecus nasceretur, quare caecus natus est? Audi magistrum docentem: quaerit credentem, ut faciat intelligentem. Ipse causam dicit quare ille caecus sit natus: Neque hic peccavit, inquit, neque parentes ejus: sed ut manifestentur opera Dei in illo.
his, but it was not by that sin itself that it came about that he was born blind. If, then, it was not by the sin of his parents that it came about that he was born blind, why was he born blind? Hear the Master teaching: He seeks one who believes, so as to make him one who understands. He Himself tells the reason why that blind man was born: Neither has this man sinned, He says, nor his parents: but that the works of God may be made manifest in him.
4. Deinde quid sequitur? Me oportet operari opera ejus qui misit me. Ecce est ille missus in quo faciem lavit caecus. Et videte quid dixerit, Me oportet operari opera ejus qui misit me, donec dies est. Memento te quomodo universam gloriam illi dat de quo est: quia ille habet filium qui de illo sit, ipse non habet de quo sit. Sed quare dixisti, Domine, donec dies est? Audi quare. Venit nox quando nemo potest operari. Nec tu, Domine? Itane tantum valebit nox illa, ut nec tu possis in ea operari, cujus opus nox est? Puto enim, Domine Jesu, imo non puto, sed credo atque confirmo te ibi fuisse, quando dixit Deus, Fiat lux; et facta est lux (Gen. ⟨ ⟩, 3). Si enim Verbo fecit, per te fecit: et ideo dictum est, Omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum est nihil (Joan. I, 3). Divisit Deus inter lucem et tenebras; lucem vocavit diem, et tenebras vocavit noctem (Gen. I, 4, 5).
4. Then what follows? I must work the works of Him Who sent Me. Behold, here is that Sent One in whom the blind man washed his face. And see what He said: I must work the works of Him Who sent Me, while it is day. Remember how He gives all the glory to Him from Whom He is: for that One has a Son Who is from Him, He Himself has none from whom He is. But why didst Thou say, Lord, while it is day? Hear why. The night comes when no one can work. Not even Thou, Lord? Will that night be of such power that not even Thou canst work in it, Whose work the night is? For I think, Lord Jesus, nay, I do not think, but I believe and affirm that Thou wast there when God said, Let there be light; and light was made (Gen. 1:3). For if He made it by the Word, He made it through Thee: and therefore it was said, All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made (John 1:3). God divided between the light and the darkness; the light He called day, and the darkness He called night (Gen. 1:4–5).
5. Quae est illa nox, quae cum venerit, nemo poterit operari? Audi quid sit dies, et tunc intelliges quae sit nox. Unde sumus audituri quisnam sit dies iste? Ipse dicat: Quamdiu in hoc mundo sum, lux sum mundi. Ecce ipse est dies. Lavet oculos caecus in die, ut videat diem. Quamdiu, inquit, in mundo sum, lux sum mundi. Ergo nescio quae nox erit, quando ibi Christus non erit; ideo nemo poterit operari. Restat inquirere, fratres mei, patienter accipite inquirentem me: vobiscum quaero, vobiscum inveniam a quo quaero. Constat, expressum ac definitum est, diem commemorasse Dominum hoc loco seipsum, id est lumen mundi: Quamdiu, inquit, sum in hoc mundo, lux sum mundi. Ergo ipse operatur. Quamdiu est autem in hoc mundo? Putamus eum, fratres, fuisse hic tunc, et modo non hic esse? Si ergo hoc putamus, jam ergo post ascensum Domini facta est nox ista metuenda, ubi nemo possit operari: si post ascensum Domini facta est nox ista, unde Apostoli tanta operati sunt? Numquid ista nox erat, quando Spiritus sanctus veniens, et omnes qui in uno loco erant adimplens, dedit eis loqui omnium gentium linguis (Act. II, 1-6)? Numquid nox erat quando claudus ille ad verbum Petri salvus effectus est, imo ad verbum Domini habitantis in Petro (Id. III, 6-8)? Numquid nox erat quando transeuntibus discipulis aegri cum lectulis ponebantur, ut vel umbra transeuntium tangerentur (Id. V, 15)? Dominus autem cum hic esset, neminem transiens umbra sua salvum fecit: sed ipse discipulis dixerat, Majora horum facietis (Joan. XIV, 12). Dixerat quidem Dominus, Majora horum facietis: sed non se extollat caro et sanguis; audiat dicentem, Sine me nihil potestis facere (Id. XV, 5).
5. What is that night such that, when it has come, no one will be able to work? Hear what the day is, and then you will understand what the night is. From where are we to hear what this day is? Let Him Himself say: As long as I am in this world, I am the light of the world. Behold, He Himself is the day. Let the blind man wash his eyes in the day, that he may see the day. As long, He says, as I am in the world, I am the light of the world. So I do not know what night it will be when Christ will not be there; therefore no one will be able to work. It remains to inquire, my brothers (bear patiently with me as I inquire): with you I seek, with you I shall find from Him of Whom I seek. It is agreed, it is plainly stated and settled, that in this place the Lord called Himself the day, that is, the light of the world: As long, He says, as I am in this world, I am the light of the world. Therefore He Himself works. But how long is He in this world? Do we think, brothers, that He was here then, and is not here now? If, then, we think this, then that fearful night, in which no one can work, came about after the Lord's ascension: if that night came about after the Lord's ascension, how did the Apostles accomplish such great works? Was it that night when the Holy Spirit, coming and filling all who were in one place, gave them to speak in the tongues of all nations (Acts 2:1–6)? Was it night when that lame man was made whole at the word of Peter, nay rather at the word of the Lord dwelling in Peter (Acts 3:6–8)? Was it night when, as the disciples passed by, the sick were laid out with their beds, that they might be touched even by the shadow of those passing by (Acts 5:15)? Yet the Lord, when He was here, made no one whole by His shadow as He passed: but He Himself had said to the disciples, Greater things than these you will do (John 14:12). The Lord had indeed said, Greater things than these you will do: but let flesh and blood not exalt itself; let it hear Him saying, Without Me you can do nothing (John 15:5).
6. Quid igitur? quid dicemus de nocte ista? Quando
6. What then? What shall we say of that night? When
Editors' notes and page, col. 1715

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 1715

Mss. plerique, veniet

Most manuscripts read veniet ("will come"). [The note is faintly printed; the word reads most probably veniet.]

(printed under page 206)

Page

  • running head: 1715 IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, S[...] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1716
erit, quando nemo poterit operari? Nox ista impiorum erit: nox ista eorum erit quibus in fine dicetur, Ite in ignem aeternum, qui paratus est diabolo et angelis ejus. Sed nox dicta est, non flamma, non ignis. Audi quia et nox est. De quodam servo dicit, Ligate illi manus et pedes, et projicite eum in tenebras exteriores (Matth. XXII, 13). Operetur ergo homo dum vivit, ne illa nocte praeveniatur, ubi nemo possit operari. Modo est ut operetur fides per dilectionem: et si modo operamur, hic est dies, hic est Christus. Audi promittentem, et ne árbitreris absentem. Ipse dixit, Ecce ego vobiscum sum. Quamdiu? Non sit in nobis sollicitudo qui vivimus: si fieri posset, de hac etiam voce posteros qui futuri sunt, securissimos faceremus. Ecce, inquit, ego vobiscum sum usque in consummationem saeculi (Id. XXVIII, 20). Dies iste qui circuitu solis hujus impletur, paucas horas habet, dies praesentiae Christi usque in consummationem saeculi extenditur. Post resurrectionem vero vivorum et mortuorum, cum positis ad dexteram dixerit, Venite, benedicti Patris mei, percipite regnum, positis autem ad sinistram dixerit, Ite in ignem aeternum, qui paratus est diabolo et angelis ejus (Id. XXV, 34, 41): ibi erit nox ubi nemo potest operari, sed recipere quod operatus est. Aliud est tempus operationis, aliud receptionis: reddet enim Dominus unicuique secundum opera sua (Id. XVI, 27). Cum vivis, fac, si facturus es: erit enim tunc nox valida, quae involvat impios. Sed et modo omnis infidelis, quando moritur, illa nocte suscipitur: non est ut illic aliquid operetur. In illa nocte dives ardebat, et stillam aquae de digito pauperis requirebat: dolebat, angebatur, fatebatur, nec ei subveniebatur; et conatus est benefacere. Ait enim Abrahae: Pater Abraham, mitte Lazarum ad fratres meos, ut dicat illis quid hic agatur, ne et ipsi veniant in hunc locum tormentorum (Luc. XVI, 24-28). O infelix! quando vivebas, tunc erat tempus operandi; modo jam in nocte es, in qua nemo possit operari.
will be, when no one will be able to work? That night will belong to the ungodly: that night will belong to those to whom it will be said at the end, Depart into the eternal fire, which is prepared for the devil and his angels. But it has been called night, not flame, not fire. Hear that it is also night. Of a certain servant He says, Bind his hands and feet, and cast him into the outer darkness (Matt. 22:13). Let a man therefore work while he lives, lest he be overtaken by that night, where no one can work. Now is the time for faith to work through love: and if we work now, this is the day, this is Christ. Hear Him promising, and do not suppose Him absent. He Himself said, Behold, I am with you. How long? Let there be no anxiety in us who are living: if it were possible, by this very utterance we would make even our descendants who are yet to be most secure. Behold, He says, I am with you even to the consummation of the age (Matt. 28:20). This day, which is filled out by the circuit of this sun, has few hours; the day of the presence of Christ extends even to the consummation of the age. But after the resurrection of the living and the dead, when He has said to those placed at the right hand, Come, blessed of My Father, receive the kingdom, and has said to those placed at the left, Depart into the eternal fire, which is prepared for the devil and his angels (Matt. 25:34, 41): there will be the night where no one can work, but only receive what he has worked. One is the time of working, another the time of receiving: for the Lord will render to each according to his works (Matt. 16:27). While you live, act, if you are going to act: for then there will be a mighty night, which will envelop the ungodly. But even now every unbeliever, when he dies, is received into that night: there is no working of anything there. In that night the rich man was burning, and was seeking a drop of water from the finger of the poor man: he was in pain, he was in anguish, he was confessing, and no help was given him; and he tried to do good. For he said to Abraham: Father Abraham, send Lazarus to my brothers, that he may tell them what is done here, lest they too come into this place of torments (Luke 16:24–28). O unhappy man! when you were living, then was the time for working; now you are already in the night, in which no one can work.
7. « Haec cum dixisset, exspuit in terram, et fecit lutum ex sputo, et linivit lutum super oculos ejus, et dixit ei: Vade, et lava in natatoria Siloe » (quod interpretatur Missus). « Abiit ergo, et lavit, et venit videns. » Haec quia manifesta sunt, transeamus.
7. "When He had said these things, He spat on the ground, and made clay from the spittle, and smeared the clay upon his eyes, and said to him: Go, and wash in the pool of Siloe" (which is interpreted Sent). "He went therefore, and washed, and came seeing." Since these things are plain, let us pass on.
8. « Itaque vicini, et qui videbant eum prius quia mendicus erat, dicebant: Nonne hic est qui sedebat, et mendicabat? Alii dicebant, Quia hic est: alii, Nequaquam, sed similis est ejus. » Aperti oculi vultum mutaverant. « Ille dicebat, Quia ego sum. » Vox grata, ne damnaretur ingrata. « Dicebant ergo ei: Quomodo aperti sunt oculi tui? Respondit: Ille homo qui dicitur Jesus, lutum fecit, et unxit oculos meos, et dixit mihi, Vade ad natatoriam Siloe, et lava. Et abii, et lavi, et vidi. » Ecce annuntiator factus est gratiae; ecce evangelizat, confitetur videns. Caecus ille confitebatur, et cor impiorum frangebatur; quia non habebant in corde, quod jam ille habebat in facie. Dixerunt ei: Ubi est ille qui tibi aperuit oculos? Ait: Nescio. In his verbis animus ipsius adhuc inuncto similis
8. "So the neighbours, and those who had seen him before, that he was a beggar, were saying: Is this not he who used to sit and beg? Some were saying, It is he: others, By no means, but he is like him." His opened eyes had changed his face. "He was saying, I am he." A grateful voice, lest it be condemned as ungrateful. "They were saying therefore to him: How were your eyes opened? He answered: That man who is called Jesus made clay, and anointed my eyes, and said to me, Go to the pool of Siloe, and wash. And I went, and washed, and saw." Behold, he has become a herald of grace; behold, he preaches the gospel, he confesses, seeing. That blind man was confessing, and the heart of the ungodly was being broken; for they did not have in their heart what he now had in his face. They said to him: Where is he who opened your eyes? He said: I do not know. In these words his mind was still like one anointed
Editors' notes and page, col. 1716

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: cor impiorum frangebatur› · call in col 1716

In duobus Mss., stringebatur.

In two manuscripts, stringebatur ("was being wrung").

(printed under page 206)

Page

  • running head: VANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1716 (left part of head cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: in the first quotation (line 3) "Ite in ignem" reads like "Ite m ignem" and "angelis" like "argelis" in the scan; possibly a dropped or damaged letter, set as the normal reading, UNSURE; stray accent kept as printed in "árbitreris"
PL 35:1717
erat, nondum videnti. Sic ponamus, fratres, tanquam illam inunctionem in anino habuerit. Praedicat, et nescit quem praedicat.
but not yet seeing. Let us suppose it so, brothers, as though he had that anointing in his mind. He preaches, and does not know Whom he preaches.
9. « Adducunt eum ad Pharisaeos, qui caecus fuerat. Erat autem sabbatum quando lutum fecit Jesus, et aperuit oculos ejus. Iterum ergo interrogabant eum Pharisaei quomodo vidisset. Ille autem dixit eis: Lutum posuit mihi super oculos, et lavi, et video. Dicebant ergo ex Pharisaeis quidam. » Non omnes, sed quidam: jam enim inungebantur quidam. Quid ergo dicebant, nec videntes, nec inuncti? Non est hic homo a Deo, qui sabbatum non custodit. Ipse potius custodiebat, qui sine peccato erat. Sabbatum enim spirituale hoc est, non habere peccatum. Denique, fratres, hoc admonet Deus, quando commendat sabbatum: Omne opus servile non facietis (Levit. XXIII, 8). Haec sunt verba Dei sabbatum commendantis: Omne opus servile non facietis. Jam superiores lectiones interrogate, quid sit opus servile (Tract. 20, n. 2); et Dominum audite, Omnis qui facit peccatum, servus est peccati (Joan. VIII, 34). Sed isti nec videntes, ut dixi, nec inuncti, sabbatum carnaliter observabant, spiritualiter violabant. Alii dicebant: Quomodo potest homo peccator haec signa facere? Ecce sunt inuncti. Et schisma erat in eis. Dies ille diviserat inter lucem et tenebras. Dicunt ergo caeco iterum: Tu quid dicis de eo qui aperuit oculos tuos? Quid de illo sentis? quid existimas? quid judicas? Quaerebant quemadmodum homini calumniarentur, ut de synagoga pelleretur, sed a Christo inveniretur. Sed ille constanter quod sentiebat expressit. Ait enim: Quia propheta est. Adhuc quidem inunctus in corde, nondum Dei Filium confitetur, nec mentitur tamen. Ipse enim Dominus de seipso ait: Non est propheta sine honore, nisi in patria sua (Matth. XIII, 57).
9. "They bring to the Pharisees him who had been blind. Now it was the sabbath when Jesus made the clay and opened his eyes. Again therefore the Pharisees asked him how he had come to see. And he said to them: He put clay upon my eyes, and I washed, and I see. Some of the Pharisees therefore said." Not all, but some: for some were already being anointed. What then did they say, neither seeing nor anointed? This man is not from God, who does not keep the sabbath. Rather, He Himself was keeping it, Who was without sin. For the spiritual sabbath is this: to have no sin. Indeed, brothers, God admonishes us of this when He commends the sabbath: You shall do no servile work (Lev. 23:8). These are the words of God commending the sabbath: You shall do no servile work. Now ask the earlier readings what servile work is (Tract. 20, n. 2); and hear the Lord: Everyone who commits sin is the slave of sin (John 8:34). But these men, neither seeing, as I said, nor anointed, kept the sabbath carnally and violated it spiritually. Others said: How can a man who is a sinner do these signs? See, these are anointed. And there was a division among them. That Day had divided between the light and the darkness. They say therefore to the blind man again: What do you say of Him Who opened your eyes? What do you feel about Him? What do you think? What do you judge? They were seeking how they might slander the man, so that he might be driven out of the synagogue, but found by Christ. But he steadfastly expressed what he felt. For he says: That He is a prophet. Still only anointed in heart, he does not yet confess the Son of God, and yet he does not lie. For the Lord Himself says of Himself: A prophet is not without honour, except in his own country (Matt. 13:57).
10. « Non crediderunt ergo Judaei de illo quia caecus fuisset et vidisset, donec vocarent parentes ejus qui viderat: » id est, qui caecus fuerat, et viderat. « Et interrogaverunt eos, dicentes: Hic est filius vester, quem vos dicitis quia caecus natus est? quomodo ergo nunc videt? Responderunt eis parentes ejus, et dixerunt: Scimus quia hic est filius noster, et quia caecus natus est: quomodo autem nunc videat nescimus; aut quis ejus aperuit oculos, nos nescimus. Et dixerunt: Ipsum interrogate, aetatem habet, ipse de se loquatur. » Filius quidem noster est, sed juste cogeremur loqui pro infante, quia ipse pro se loqui non posset: olim loquitur, modo videt; caecum a nativitate novimus, loquentem olim scimus, videntem modo videmus: ipsum interrogate, ut instruamini; quid nobis calumniamini? Haec dixerunt parentes ejus, quia timebant Judaeos. Jam enim conspiraverant Judaei, ut si quis eum confiteretur Christum, extra synagogam fieret. Jam non erat malum fieri extra synagogam. Illi expellebant, sed Christus excipiebat. Propterea parentes ejus dixerunt, Quia aetatem habet, ipsum interrogate.
10. "The Jews therefore did not believe of him that he had been blind and had come to see, until they called the parents of him who had come to see": that is, of him who had been blind and had come to see. "And they asked them, saying: Is this your son, who you say was born blind? How then does he now see? His parents answered them and said: We know that this is our son, and that he was born blind; but how he now sees we do not know; or who opened his eyes, we do not know. And they said: Ask him; he is of age, let him speak for himself." He is indeed our son, but we would rightly be compelled to speak for an infant, because he could not speak for himself: he has long been speaking, now he sees; we have known him blind from birth, we have long known him speaking, now we see him seeing: ask him, that you may be instructed; why do you slander us? These things his parents said because they feared the Jews. For the Jews had already agreed that if anyone should confess Him to be the Christ, he should be put out of the synagogue. It was no longer an evil to be put out of the synagogue. They were expelling, but Christ was receiving. Therefore his parents said: He is of age, ask him.
11. Vocaverunt ergo rursum hominem qui fuerat caecus, et dixerunt ei: Da gloriam Deo. Quid est, Da gloriam
11. They therefore called again the man who had been blind, and said to him: Give glory to God. What is, Give glory
Editors' notes and page, col. 1717

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 1717

In aliquot Mss., spiritualiter.

In some manuscripts, spiritualiter ("spiritually").

(printed under page 207)

Page

  • running head: 1717 TRACTATUS XLIV. CA[PUT IX.] (cut off at right edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1718
Deo? Nega quod accepisti. Hoc plane non est gloriam Deo dare, sed Deum potius blasphemare Da, inquiunt, gloriam Deo. Nos scimus quia hic homo peccator est. Dixit ergo ille : Si peccator est, nescio; unum scio, quia caecus cum essem, modo video. Dixerunt ergo illi : Quid fecit tibi? quomodo aperuit tibi oculos? Et ille jam stomachans adversus duritiam Judaeorum, et ex caeco videns, non ferens caecos, respondit eis : Dixi jam vobis, et audistis; quid iterum vultis audire? Numquid et vos vultis discipuli ejus fieri? Quid est, Numquid et vos, nisi, quia ego jam sum? Numquid et vos vultis? Jam video, sed non invideo.
to God? Deny what you have received. This is plainly not to give glory to God, but rather to blaspheme God. Give, they say, glory to God. We know that this man is a sinner. So he said: If he is a sinner, I do not know; one thing I know, that whereas I was blind, now I see. So they said: What did He do to you? How did He open your eyes? And he, now indignant at the hardness of the Jews, and seeing where he had been blind, not bearing the blind, answered them: I have told you already, and you heard; why do you want to hear it again? Do you also want to become His disciples? What does "Do you also" mean, if not "because I already am"? Do you also want to? I see now, but I do not begrudge it.
12. Maledixerunt ei, et dixerunt : Tu discipulus ejus sis. Tale maledictum super nos, et super filios nostros. Maledictum enim est, si cor discutias, non si verba perpendas. Nos autem Moysi discipuli sumus : nos scimus quia Moysi locutus est Deus, istum autem nescimus unde sit. Utinam sciretis quia Moysi locutus est Deus; sciretis quia per Moysen praedicatus est Deus. Habetis enim Dominum dicentem, Si crederetis Moysi, crederetis et mihi; de me enim ille scripsit (Joan. V, 46). Itane sequimini servum, et dorsum ponitis contra Dominum? Sed nec servum sequimini; nam per illum ad Dominum duceremini.
12. They reviled him, and said: You be His disciple. May such a curse be upon us, and upon our children. For it is a curse if you examine the heart, not if you weigh the words. But we are disciples of Moses: we know that God spoke to Moses, but as for this man, we do not know where He is from. Would that you knew that God spoke to Moses; you would know that God was preached through Moses. For you have the Lord saying: If you believed Moses, you would believe Me also; for he wrote of Me (John 5:46). Do you thus follow the servant, and turn your back against the Lord? But you do not even follow the servant; for through him you would be led to the Lord.
13. Respondit ille homo, et dixit eis : In hoc mirabile est, quia vos nescitis unde sit, et aperuit oculos meos. Scimus autem quia peccatores Deus non audit; sed si quis Dei cultor est, et voluntatem ejus facit, hunc exaudit. Adhuc inunctus loquitur. Nam et peccatores exaudit Deus. Si enim peccatores Deus non exaudiret, frustra ille Publicanus oculos in terram demittens et pectus suum percutiens diceret, Domine: propitius esto mihi peccatori. Et ista confessio meruit justificationem, quomodo iste caecus illuminationem. A saeculo non est auditum quia aperuit quis oculos caeci nati. Nisi esset hic a Deo, non poterat facere quidquam. Libere, constanter, veraciter. Haec enim quae facta sunt a Domino, a quo fierent nisi a Deo? Aut quando a discipulis talia fierent, nisi in eis Dominus habitaret?
13. The man answered and said to them: Herein is a wonderful thing, that you do not know where He is from, and He opened my eyes. But we know that God does not hear sinners; but if anyone is a worshipper of God and does His will, him He hears. He is still speaking as one only anointed. For God does hear sinners too. For if God did not hear sinners, in vain would that Publican, lowering his eyes to the ground and beating his breast, have said: Lord, be merciful to me a sinner. And that confession merited justification, as this blind man merited illumination. Since the world began it has not been heard that anyone opened the eyes of one born blind. If this man were not from God, He could do nothing. Freely, steadfastly, truthfully. For these things that were done by the Lord, by whom would they be done if not by God? Or when would such things be done by the disciples, unless the Lord dwelt in them?
14. Responderunt, et dixerunt ei : In peccatis natus es totus. Totus quid est? Cum oculis clausis. Sed qui aperuit oculos, salvat et totum : ipse dabit ad dexteram resurrectionem, qui in facie dedit illuminationem. In peccatis totus natus es, et tu doces nos? Et ejecerunt eum foras. Ipsi illum magistrum fecerunt, ipsi ut discerent toties interrogaverunt, et ingrati docentem projecerunt.
14. They answered and said to him: You were born wholly in sins. What does "wholly" mean? With eyes closed. But He who opened the eyes saves the whole as well: He will give resurrection at the right hand, who gave illumination in the face. You were wholly born in sins, and do you teach us? And they cast him out. They themselves made him a teacher, they themselves questioned him so many times in order to learn, and ungratefully they threw out the one who taught them.
15. Sed quod dixi jam dudum, fratres, ill⟨i⟩ pellunt, excipit Dominus : magis enim quia expulsus est, christianus factus est. Audivit Jesus quia ejecerunt eum foras, et cum invenisset eum dixit ei : Tu credis in Filium Dei? Modo lavat faciem cordis. Respondit ille, et ait, quasi adhuc inunctus, Quis est, Domine, ut credam in eum? Et dixit ei Jesus : Et vidisti eum, et qui loquitur tecum, ipse est. Missus est ille, iste lavans faciem in Siloe, quod interpretatur Missus. Denique jam facie lota cordis et mundata conscientia, agnoscens eum non filium hominis tantum, quod ante crediderat, sed jam
15. But, as I said a while ago, brethren, they drive out, the Lord takes in: for it was rather because he was expelled that he was made a Christian. Jesus heard that they had cast him out, and when He had found him He said to him: Do you believe in the Son of God? Now He washes the face of the heart. He answered and said, as one still only anointed: Who is He, Lord, that I may believe in Him? And Jesus said to him: You have both seen Him, and it is He who is speaking with you. He is the One Sent; this man was washing his face in Siloam, which is interpreted Sent. At last, with the face of his heart now washed and his conscience cleansed, recognizing Him not as son of man only, which he had believed before, but now
Editors' notes and page, col. 1718

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: in facie dedit illuminationem› · call in col 1718

Omnes Mss., in faciem dedit illuminationem.

All the manuscripts read in faciem dedit illuminationem ("gave enlightenment to the face", accusative).

(printed under page 207)

Page

  • running head: ATUS XLIV. CAPUT IX. 1718 (left part of the head cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)