Migne Reading Room

PL 35 · cols. 1741–1745

Augustinus, In Joannis Evangelium tractatus XLVI-L

Tractate XLVIII

PL 35:1741
gignendo dedit. Ita illi dedit suam aequalitatem, quem non genuit inaequalem. Sed haec loquente Domino, quoniam lux lucebat in tenebris, et tenebrae eam non comprehendebant (Joan. I, 5), Dissensio iterum facta est inter Judaeos propter sermones hos. Dicebant autem multi ex ipsis: Daemonium habet, et insanit; quid eum auditis? Istae fuerunt densissimae tenebrae. Alii dicebant: Haec verba non sunt daemonium habentis; numquid daemonium potest caecorum oculos aperire? Jam istorum oculi coeperant aperiri.
He gave by begetting. So He gave Him His own equality, Whom He did not beget unequal. But while the Lord was saying these things, since the light was shining in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it (John 1:5), A division arose again among the Jews because of these words. And many of them were saying: He has a demon, and is mad; why do you listen to Him? This was the densest darkness. Others were saying: These are not the words of one who has a demon; can a demon open the eyes of the blind? Now the eyes of these men had begun to be opened.
TRACTATUS XLVIII. Ab eo loco, Facta sunt Encaenia in Jerosolymis; usque ad id, Omnia autem quaecumque dixit Joannes de hoc, vera erant: et multi crediderunt in eum. Cap. X, ℣. 22-42.
Tractate 48. From the place, The Encaenia took place in Jerusalem; as far as, But all things whatsoever John said about this man were true: and many believed in Him. Chapter 10, verses 22-42.
1. Quod jam commendavi Dilectioni vestrae, stabiliter meminisse debetis, sanctum Joannem evangelistam nolle nos semper lacte nutriri, sed solido cibo vesci. Quisquis autem ad sumendum solidum cibum verbi Dei adhuc minus idoneus est, lacte fidei nutriatur, et verbum quod intelligere non potest, credere non cunctetur. Fides enim meritum est, intellectus praemium. In ipso labore intentionis desudat acies mentis nostrae, ut ponat sordiculas nebulae humanae, et serenetur ad Verbum Dei. Non ergo recusetur labor, si adest amor: nostis enim quoniam qui amat non laborat. Omnis enim labor non amantibus gravis est. Si tantos labores cum avaris portat cupiditas, nobiscum non portat charitas?
1. What I have already commended to your Love, you ought to remember steadfastly: that the holy John the evangelist does not wish us always to be nourished with milk, but to feed on solid food. But whoever is still less fit to take the solid food of the word of God, let him be nourished with the milk of faith, and let him not hesitate to believe the word which he cannot understand. For faith is the merit, understanding the reward. In the very labour of attention the keen edge of our mind sweats, so that it may lay aside the little filths of the human mist, and be made clear towards the Word of God. Let the labour, then, not be refused, if love is present: for you know that he who loves does not labour. For all labour is heavy to those who do not love. If greed bears such great labours along with the avaricious, does charity not bear them along with us?
2. Evangelium intendite: Facta sunt autem Encaenia in Jerosolymis. Encaenia festivitas erat dedicationis templi. Graece enim καινὸν dicitur novum quandocumque novum aliquid fuerit dedicatum, Encaenia vocantur. Jam et usus habet hoc verbum: si quis nova tunica induatur, encaeniare dicitur. Illum enim diem quo templum dedicatum est, Judaei solemniter celebrabant: ipse dies festus agebatur, cum ea quae lecta sunt, locutus est Dominus.
2. Attend to the Gospel: Now the Encaenia took place in Jerusalem. The Encaenia was the festival of the dedication of the temple. For in Greek kainon means new; whenever something new has been dedicated, it is called Encaenia. Now usage too has this word: if anyone puts on a new tunic, he is said to encaeniate. For the Jews solemnly celebrated that day on which the temple was dedicated: that very feast day was being kept when the Lord spoke the things that have been read.
3. Hiems erat. Et ambulabat Jesus in templo in porticu Salomonis. Circumdederunt ergo eum Judaei, et dicebant ei: Quousque animam nostram tollis? Si tu es Christus, dic nobis palam. Non veritatem desiderabant, sed calumniam praeparabant. Hiems erat, et frigidi erant: ad illum enim divinum ignem accedere pigri erant. Sed accedere est credere: qui credit, accedit; qui negat, recedit. Non movetur anima pedibus, sed affectibus. Friguerant a diligendi charitate, et ardebant nocendi cupiditate. Longe aberant, et ibi erant: non accedebant credendo, et premebant persequendo. Quaerebant audire a Domino, Ego sum Christus: et fortasse de Christo secundum hominem sapiebant. Praedicaverunt Prophetae Christum: sed divinitatem Christi et in Prophetis et in ipso Evangelio nec haeretici intelligunt; quanto minus Judaei, quamdiu velamen est super cor eorum (II Cor. III, 15)? Denique quodam loco sciens Dominus Jesus eos de Christo secundum hominem sapere, non secundum
3. It was winter. And Jesus was walking in the temple in the portico of Solomon. So the Jews surrounded Him, and were saying to Him: How long dost Thou take away our soul? If Thou art the Christ, tell us openly. They did not desire the truth, but were preparing a false accusation. It was winter, and they were cold: for they were slow to approach that divine fire. But to approach is to believe: he who believes, approaches; he who denies, withdraws. The soul is not moved by feet, but by affections. They had grown cold towards the charity of loving, and were burning with the desire of harming. They were far away, and they were there: they did not approach by believing, and they pressed upon Him by persecuting. They sought to hear from the Lord, I am the Christ: and perhaps they had a notion of Christ according to man. The Prophets proclaimed Christ: but the divinity of Christ, both in the Prophets and in the Gospel itself, not even heretics understand; how much less the Jews, as long as the veil is over their heart (2 Cor. 3:15)? Then, in a certain place, the Lord Jesus, knowing that they thought of Christ according to man, not according to
Editors' notes and page, col. 1741

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: Encaenia vocantur› · call in col 1741

Mss., Encaenia vocatur.

The manuscripts: "it is called Encaenia" (singular verb).

(printed under page 219)

Page

  • running head: 1741 TRACTATUS XLVIII. ( (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1742
Deum, secundum id quod homo erat, non secundum id quod Deus etiam assumpto homine permanebat, ait illis : Quid vobis videtur de Christo? cujus filius est? Responderunt secundum opinationem suam : David. Sic enim legerant, et hoc solum tenebant : quia divinitatem ejus legebant, sed non intelligebant. Dominus autem ut eos suspenderet ad quaerendam ejus divinitatem, cujus contemnebant infirmitatem, respondit eis : Quomodo ergo David in spiritu dicit eum Dominum, dicens, Dixit Dominus Domino meo, Sede a dextris meis, donec ponam inimicos tuos sub pedibus tuis? Si ergo David in spiritu dicit eum Dominum, quomodo filius ejus est (Matth. XXII, 42-45)? Non negavit, sed interrogavit. Ne quis hoc cum audierit, putet quod Dominus Jesus negaverit se filium esse David. Filium David Dominus Christus si se negaret, caecos sic eum invocantes non illuminaret. Transibat enim aliquando, et duo caeci sedentes juxta viam clamaverunt : Miserere nostri, fili David. Qua voce audita, misertus est; stetit, sanavit, lumen dedit (Id. XX, 30-34); quia nomen agnovit. Dicit et apostolus Paulus, Qui factus est ei ex semine David secundum carnem (Rom. I, 3) : et ad Timotheum, Memor esto Jesum Christum resurrexisse a mortuis ex semine David secundum Evangelium meum (II Tim. II, 8). Quia de semi⟨n⟩e David originem Maria virgo ducebat, inde Dominus d⟨e⟩ semine David.
God, according to that which He was as man, not according to that which He remained as God even when the man had been assumed, He said to them: What do you think of the Christ? Whose son is He? They answered according to their own opinion: David's. For so they had read, and this alone they held: because they read of His divinity, but did not understand it. But the Lord, in order to raise them up to seek His divinity, whose weakness they despised, answered them: How then does David in the spirit call Him Lord, saying, The Lord said to my Lord, Sit at My right hand, until I put Thine enemies under Thy feet? If then David in the spirit calls Him Lord, how is He his son (Matt. 22:42–45)? He did not deny, but questioned. Let no one, when he has heard this, think that the Lord Jesus denied that He was the son of David. If the Lord Christ denied that He was the son of David, He would not have enlightened the blind who called upon Him so. For He was once passing by, and two blind men sitting beside the way cried out: Have mercy on us, son of David. Having heard this cry, He had mercy; He stood still, He healed, He gave light (Matt. 20:30–34); because He acknowledged the name. The apostle Paul also says, Who was made for Him of the seed of David according to the flesh (Rom. 1:3); and to Timothy, Remember that Jesus Christ has risen from the dead, of the seed of David, according to my Gospel (2 Tim. 2:8). Because the Virgin Mary drew her origin from the seed of David, hence the Lord is of the seed of David.
4. Hoc pro magno Judaei a Christo quaerebant, ut si diceret, Ego sum Christus, secundum quod illi solum sapiebant de semine David, calumniarentur quod sibi arrogaret regiam potestatem. Plus est quod eis respondit : illi de filio David volebant calumniari, ille Filium Dei se esse respondit. Et quomodo? Audite : Respondit eis Jesus : Loquor vobis, et non creditis; opera quae ego facio in nomine Patris mei, haec testimonium perhibent de me : sed vos non creditis, quia non estis ex ovibus meis. Jam supra (in Tract. 45) didicistis quae sint oves : estote oves. Oves credendo sunt, oves pastorem sequendo sunt, o⟨v⟩es redemptorem non contemnendo sunt, oves per ostium intrando sunt, oves exeundo et pascua inveniendo sunt, oves vita aeterna perfruendo sunt. Quomodo ergo istis dixit, Non estis ex ovibus meis? Quia videbat eos ad sempiternum interitum praedestinatos, non ad vitam aeternam sui sanguinis pretio comparatos.
4. This the Jews sought from Christ as a great thing, so that if He said, I am the Christ, according to what alone they understood concerning the seed of David, they might bring the slander against Him that He was claiming royal power for Himself. What He answered them is more: they wished to slander Him concerning the son of David; He answered that He was the Son of God. And how? Listen: Jesus answered them: I speak to you, and you do not believe; the works that I do in the name of My Father, these bear witness concerning Me: but you do not believe, because you are not of My sheep. Already above (in Tractate 45) you have learned what the sheep are: be sheep. They are sheep by believing, they are sheep by following the shepherd, they are sheep by not despising the Redeemer, they are sheep by entering through the door, they are sheep by going out and finding pasture, they are sheep by enjoying eternal life. How then did He say to these men, You are not of My sheep? Because He saw them predestined to everlasting destruction, not purchased for eternal life at the price of His blood.
5. Oves meae vocem meam audiunt, et cognosco eas, et sequuntur me : et ego vitam aeternam do eis. Ecce sunt pascua. Si recolitis, superius dixerat, Et ingredietur, et egredietur, et pascua inveniet. Ingressi sumus credendo, egredimur moriendo. Sed quomodo per ostium fidei ingressi sumus, sic fideles de corpore exeamus : sic enim per ipsum ostium egredimur, ut pascua invenire possimus. Bona pascua, vita aeterna dicitur : ibi nulla herba arescit, totum viret, totum viget. Solet quaedam herba dici semper viva : ibi solum vivere invenitur. Vitam aeternam, inquit, dabo eis, ovibus meis. Vos calumnias propterea quaeritis, quia de vita praesenti cogitatis.
5. My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me: and I give them eternal life. Behold, here are the pastures. If you recall, He had said above, And he shall go in, and he shall go out, and he shall find pasture. We have gone in by believing, we go out by dying. But just as we have gone in through the door of faith, so let us as faithful go out from the body: for thus do we go out through that same door, so that we may be able to find pasture. Good pasture is called eternal life: there no grass withers, everything is green, everything flourishes. A certain herb is commonly called ever-living: there, only living is found. Eternal life, He says, I will give to them, to My sheep. You seek slanders for this reason, because you think about the present life.
Editors' notes and page, col. 1742

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: semper viva› · call in col 1742

In Mss., semper vivit : dicitur Graecis, aeizôn, sive aeizôon.

In the manuscripts, "always lives" [i.e. the herb "semper vivit"]: the Greeks call it aeizōn or aeizōon ("ever-living," houseleek).

(printed under page 219)

Page

  • running head: ATUS XLVIII. CAPUT X. 1742 (start of running head cut off at left edge; column number printed blurred, as 17:2)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1743
6. Et non peribunt in aeternum : subaudis, tanquam eis dixerit, Vos peribitis in aeternum, quia non estis ex ovibus meis. Non rapiet eas quisquam de manu mea. Intentius accipite : Pater meus quod dedit mihi, majus est omnibus. Quid potest lupus? quid potest fur et latro? Non perdunt nisi ad interitum praedestinatos. De illis autem ovibus, de quibus dicit Apostolus, Novit Dominus qui sunt ejus (II Tim. II, 19); et, Quos praescivit, ipsos et praedestinavit; quos autem praedestinavit, ipsos et vocavit; quos autem vocavit, illos et justificavit; quos autem justificavit, ipsos et glorificavit (Rom. VIII, 29, 30) : de ovibus istis nec lupus rapit, nec fur tollit, nec latro interficit. Securus est de numero earum, qui pro eis novit quod dedit. Et hoc est quod ait, Non rapiet eas quisquam de manu mea : et item ad Patrem, Pater meus quod dedit mihi, majus est omnibus. Quid dedit Filio Pater majus omnibus? Ut ipse illi esset unigenitus Filius. Quid est ergo, dedit? jam erat cui daret, an gignendo dedit? Nam si erat cui daret ut Filius esset, aliquando erat, et Filius non erat : Absit ut aliquando Dominus Christus fuerit, et Filius non fuerit. De nobis hoc dici potest : aliquando filii hominum eramus, filii Dei non eramus. Nos enim filios Dei gratia fecit, illum natura, quia ita natus est. Et non est ut dicas, Non erat antequam natus erat : nunquam enim non natus erat, qui Patri coaeternus erat. Qui sapit capiat; qui non capit credat, nutriatur, et capiet. Verbum Dei semper cum Patre, et semper Verbum : et quia Verbum, ideo Filius. Semper ergo Filius, et semper aequalis. Non enim crescendo, sed nascendo aequalis est, qui semper natus est de Patre Filius, de Deo Deus, de aeterno coaeternus. Pater autem non de Filio Deus : Filius de Patre Deus; ideo Pater Filio gignendo dedit ut Deus esset, gignendo dedit ut sibi coaeternus esset, gignendo dedit ut aequalis esset. Hoc est quod majus est omnibus. Quomodo vita Filius, et habens vitam Filius? Quod habet hoc est : tu aliud es, aliud habes. Verbi gratia, habes sapientiam; numquid tu es ipsa sapientia? Denique quia non es tu ipse quod habes, si amiseris quod habes, redis ut non habeas : et aliquando resumis, aliquando amittis. Quomodo oculus noster non in seipso habet inseparabiliter lucem; aperitur et capit, clauditur et amittit. Non sic est Deus Dei Filius, non sic est Verbum Patris : non sic est Verbum quod non sonando transit, sed nascendo manet. Sic habet sapientiam, ut ipse sit sapientia, faciatque sapientes; sic habet vitam, ut sit ipse vita, faciatque viventes. Hoc est quod majus est omnibus. Attendit Joannes ipse evangelista coelum et terram, volens dicere de Filio Dei; attendit, et transcendit. Cogitavit supra coelum millia exercitus Angelorum, cogitavit et transcendit universam, sicut aquila nubes, sic sua mente creaturam : transcendit magna omnia, pervenit ad illud quod majus est omnibus; et dixit, In principio erat Verbum (Joan. I, 1). Sed quia ille cujus est Verbum non est de Verbo, Verbum autem de illo est cujus est Verbum; ideo ait,
6. And they shall not perish for ever: you are to understand [it] as though He had said to them, You shall perish for ever, because you are not of My sheep. No one shall snatch them from My hand. Listen more attentively: What My Father has given Me is greater than all. What can the wolf do? what can the thief and the robber do? They destroy none but those predestined to ruin. But as for those sheep of whom the Apostle says, The Lord knows who are His (2 Tim. 2:19); and, Whom He foreknew, them He also predestined; and whom He predestined, them He also called; and whom He called, them He also justified; and whom He justified, them He also glorified (Rom. 8:29–30): of these sheep the wolf does not snatch any, nor the thief carry any off, nor the robber kill any. He is secure about their number Who knows what He gave for them. And this is what He says, No one shall snatch them from My hand: and likewise concerning the Father, What My Father has given Me is greater than all. What did the Father give the Son that is greater than all? That He Himself should be His only-begotten Son. What, then, does has given mean? Was there already one to whom He might give, or did He give by begetting? For if there was one to whom He gave that He might be the Son, then at some time He was, and was not the Son: far be it that at some time the Lord Christ should have been, and not have been the Son. Of us this can be said: at some time we were sons of men, we were not sons of God. For us He made sons of God by grace, Him by nature, because He was so born. And you cannot say, He was not before He was born: for He was never not born Who was coeternal with the Father. Let him who understands grasp it; let him who does not grasp it believe, be nourished, and he will grasp it. The Word of God is always with the Father, and always the Word: and because the Word, therefore the Son. Always, then, the Son, and always equal. For not by growing but by being born is He equal, Who is always born of the Father, the Son, God from God, coeternal from the eternal. But the Father is not God from the Son: the Son is God from the Father; therefore the Father by begetting gave the Son to be God, by begetting gave Him to be coeternal with Himself, by begetting gave Him to be equal. This is what is greater than all. How is the Son life, and the Son having life? What He has, this He is: you are one thing, you have another. For example, you have wisdom; are you yourself wisdom itself? In short, because you yourself are not what you have, if you lose what you have, you return to not having it: and sometimes you take it up again, sometimes you lose it. Just as our eye does not have light inseparably in itself; it opens and receives it, it closes and loses it. Not so is God the Son of God, not so is the Word of the Father: not so is the Word, which does not pass away by sounding, but abides by being born. He so has wisdom that He Himself is wisdom and makes men wise; He so has life that He Himself is life and makes men living. This is what is greater than all. John the evangelist himself considered heaven and earth, wishing to speak of the Son of God; he considered them, and passed beyond. He pondered the thousands of the host of Angels above heaven, he pondered and passed beyond the whole of creation in his mind, as the eagle passes beyond the clouds: he passed beyond all great things, he came to that which is greater than all; and he said, In the beginning was the Word (John 1:1). But because He Whose Word it is is not from the Word, while the Word is from Him Whose Word it is; therefore He says,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1743

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: non capit credat› · call in col 1743

Omnes Mss., qui non sapit credat.

All the manuscripts: "let him who does not understand believe."

(printed under page 220)

(2) ‹anchor: quod habes, redis› · call in col 1743

Sic Mss. At editi, reddis.

So the manuscripts. But the printed editions have reddis ("you render") [for redis, "you return"].

(printed under page 220)

Page

  • running head: 1743 IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, S. [cut off at image edge]
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1744
Quod dedit mihi Pater, id est, ut sim Verbum ejus, ut sim unigenitus Filius ejus, ut sim splendor lucis ejus, majus est omnibus. Ideo, Nemo rapit, inquit, oves meas de manu mea. Nemo potest rapere de manu Patris mei.
What the Father has given Me, that is, that I should be His Word, that I should be His only-begotten Son, that I should be the splendour of His light, is greater than all. Therefore, No one snatches, He says, My sheep from My hand. No one can snatch from the hand of My Father.
7. De manu mea, et de manu Patris mei: quid est hoc, Nemo rapit de manu mea, et, Nemo rapit de manu Patris mei? Utrum una manus est Patris et Filii, an forte ipse Filius manus est Patris sui? Si manum intellig⟨a⟩mus potestatem, una est Patris et Filii potestas; quia una est divinitas: si autem manum intelligamus, sicut dictum est per prophetam, Et brachium Domini cui revelatum est (Isa. LIII, 1), manus Patris ipse est Filius. Quod non ita dictum est, tanquam Deus habeat humanam formam, et quasi corporis membra; sed quod per ipsum facta sunt omnia. Nam solent et homines dicere manus suas esse alios homines, per quos faciunt quod volunt. Aliquando et ipsum opus hominis, manus hominis dicitur quod fit per manum: sicut dicitur quisque agnoscere manum suam, cum id quod scripsit agnoscit. Cum ergo multis modis etiam hominis dicatur manus, qui proprie manum habet in sui corporis membris; quanto magis non uno modo intelligendum est cum legitur manus Dei, cui forma corporis nulla est? Ac per hoc melius hoc loco manum Patris et Filii intelligimus potestatem Patris et Filii; ne forte cum hic manum Patris ipsum Filium dictum acceperimus, incipiat carnalis cogitatio etiam ipsius Filii quaerere Filium, quem similiter credat Christi manum. Ergo, Nemo rapit de manu Patris mei; hoc est, Nemo rapit mihi.
7. From My hand, and from the hand of My Father: what is this, No one snatches from My hand, and, No one snatches from the hand of My Father? Is there one hand of the Father and of the Son, or is the Son Himself perhaps the hand of His Father? If we understand the hand as power, the power of the Father and of the Son is one, because the divinity is one; but if we understand the hand as it was said through the prophet, And to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed? (Isa. 53:1), then the Son Himself is the hand of the Father. This was not said as though God had a human form and something like the members of a body, but because through Him all things were made. For men too are accustomed to say that other men, through whom they do what they wish, are their hands. Sometimes also the very work of a man, which is done by the hand, is called the man's hand, as each person is said to recognize his own hand when he recognizes what he has written. Since, therefore, even a man's hand is spoken of in many ways, though he properly has a hand among the members of his body, how much more is it not to be understood in one way only when the hand of God is read of, Who has no bodily form at all? And for this reason in this place we better understand the hand of the Father and of the Son as the power of the Father and of the Son; lest perhaps, if we took it that the Son Himself is here called the hand of the Father, carnal thinking should begin to seek a Son of the Son Himself as well, whom it might likewise believe to be the hand of Christ. Therefore, No one snatches from the hand of My Father; that is, No one snatches from Me.
8. Sed ne forte adhuc titubes, audi quid sequitur: Ego et Pater unum sumus. Huc usque Judaei tolerare potuerunt: audierunt, Ego et Pater unum sumus, et non pertulerunt; et more suo duri, ad lapides cucurrerunt. Tulerunt lapides, ut lapidarent eum. Dominus quia non patiebatur quod nolebat pati, et non est passus nisi quod voluit pati, adhuc eos lapidare cupientes alloquitur. « Sustulerunt lapides Judaei, ut lapidarent illum. Respondit eis Jesus: Multa bona opera ostendi vobis ex Patre meo, propter quod eorum opus me lapidatis? Et illi responderunt: De bono opere non lapidamus te, sed de blasphemia, et quia tu homo cum sis, facis teipsum Deum. » Ad illud hoc responderunt quod dixerat, Ego et Pater unum sumus. Ecce Judaei intellexerunt quod non intelligunt Ariani. Ideo enim irati sunt, quoniam senserunt non posse dici, Ego et Pater unum sumus, nisi ubi aequalitas est Patris et Filii.
8. But lest perhaps you still waver, hear what follows: I and the Father are one. Up to this point the Jews were able to bear it; they heard, I and the Father are one, and they did not endure it; and, hard after their manner, they ran to stones. They took up stones to stone Him. The Lord, because He did not suffer what He did not wish to suffer, and suffered nothing except what He willed to suffer, still addresses them as they long to stone Him. "The Jews took up stones to stone Him. Jesus answered them: Many good works I have shown you from My Father; for which of those works do you stone Me? And they answered: For a good work we do not stone Thee, but for blasphemy, and because Thou, though Thou art a man, makest Thyself God." This they answered to what He had said, I and the Father are one. See, the Jews understood what the Arians do not understand. For they were angry precisely because they perceived that I and the Father are one could not be said except where there is equality of the Father and the Son.
9. Dominus autem videte quid responderit tardis. Vidit eos non ferre splendorem veritatis, et eum temperavit in verbis. Nonne scriptum est in Lege vestra, id est, vobis data, quia ego dixi, Dii estis? Deus dicit per Prophetam in Psalmo hominibus: Ego dixi, Dii estis (Psal. LXXXI, 6). Et Legem appellavit Dominus generaliter omnes illas Scripturas: quamvis alibi specialiter dicat Legem, a Prophetis eam distinguens; sicuti est, Lex et Prophetae usque ad Joannem (Luc. XVI, 16); et, In his duobus praeceptis tota Lex pendet et Prophetae
9. But see what the Lord answered to the slow of understanding. He saw that they could not bear the splendour of the truth, and He tempered it in words. Is it not written in your Law, that is, the Law given to you, that I said, You are gods? God says through the Prophet in a Psalm to men: I said, You are gods (Ps. 81:6). And the Lord called all those Scriptures the Law in a general sense, although elsewhere He speaks of the Law specifically, distinguishing it from the Prophets, as in, The Law and the Prophets until John (Luke 16:16); and, On these two commandments the whole Law hangs and the Prophets
Editors' notes and page, col. 1744

Page

  • running head: …VANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1744 (left edge cut off in image)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: "oves" in para. 1 looks like "ores" in the scan, read as damaged italic v, unsure; "intellig⟨a⟩mus" has a damaged letter in para. 7; column ends mid-sentence at "Prophetae" with no hyphen; left column (1743) not set; editors' matter set: (none)
PL 35:1745
(Matth. XXII, 40). Aliquando autem in tria distribuit easdem Scripturas, ubi ait: Oportebat impleri omnia quae scripta sunt in Lege, et Prophetis, et Psalmis de me (Luc. XXIV, 44). Nunc vero Psalmos etiam Legis nomine nuncupavit, ubi scriptum est: Ego dixi, Dii estis. Si illos dixit deos ad quos sermo Dei factus est, et non potest solvi Scriptura: quem Pater sanctificavit et misit in mundum, vos dicitis, Quia blasphemas; quia dixi, Filius Dei sum? Si sermo Dei factus est ad homines ut dicerentur dii, ipsum Verbum Dei quod est apud Deum, quomodo non est Deus? Si per sermonem Dei fiunt homines dii, si participando fiunt dii, unde participant non est Deus? Si lumina illuminata dii sunt, lumen quod illuminat non est Deus? Si calefacti quodammodo igne salutari dii efficiuntur, unde calefiunt non est Deus? Accedis ad lumen et illuminaris, et inter filios Dei numeraris; si recedis a lumine, obscuraris, et in tenebris computaris: illud tamen lumen nec accedit ad se, quia non recedit a se. Si ergo vos deos facit sermo Dei, quomodo non est Deus Verbum Dei? Pater ergo sanctificavit Filium suum, et misit in mundum. Forte aliquis dicat: Si Pater eum sanctificavit, ergo aliquando non erat sanctus? Sic sanctificavit, quomodo genuit. Ut enim sanctus esset, gignendo ei dedit, quia sanctum eum genuit. Nam si quod sanctificatur, ante non erat sanctum; quomodo dicimus Deo Patri, Sanctificetur nomen tuum (Matth. VI, 9)?
(Matt. 22:40). But at another time He divided the same Scriptures into three, where He says: "All things had to be fulfilled which are written in the Law, and in the Prophets, and in the Psalms concerning Me" (Luke 24:44). But now He has called the Psalms too by the name of the Law, where it is written: "I have said, You are gods. If He called them gods to whom the word of God came, and the Scripture cannot be broken, do you say of Him Whom the Father sanctified and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest, because I said, I am the Son of God?" If the word of God came to men so that they were called gods, how is the very Word of God, Which is with God, not God? If through the word of God men become gods, if by participating they become gods, is that in which they participate not God? If lights that are lit are gods, is the Light that lights them not God? If those who are warmed, in a certain manner, by the saving fire are made gods, is that by which they are warmed not God? You approach the light and are lit, and you are numbered among the sons of God; if you withdraw from the light, you are darkened, and you are reckoned among the darkness: yet that Light does not approach itself, since it does not withdraw from itself. If then the word of God makes you gods, how is the Word of God not God? The Father therefore sanctified His Son, and sent Him into the world. Perhaps someone may say: If the Father sanctified Him, was He then at some time not holy? He sanctified Him in the same way as He begot Him. For He gave it to Him to be holy by begetting Him, since He begot Him holy. For if whatever is sanctified was not holy before, how do we say to God the Father, "Hallowed be Thy name" (Matt. 6:9)?
10. Si non facio opera Patris mei, nolite mihi credere: si autem facio, et si mihi non vultis credere, operibus credite, ut cognoscatis et credatis quia in me est Pater, et ego in illo. Non sic dicit Filius, in me est Pater, et ego in illo, quomodo possunt homin⟨e⟩s dicere. Si enim bene cogitemus, in Deo sumus; et si bene vivamus, Deus in nobis est: fideles participantes ejus gratiam, illuminati ab ipso, in illo sumus, et ipse in nobis. Sed non sic unigenitus Filius: ille in Patre, et Pater in illo, tanquam aequalis in eo cui est aequalis. Denique nos aliquando possumus dicere, In Deo sumus, et Deus in nobis: Ego et Deus unum sumus, numquid possumus dicere? In Deo es, quia Deus te continet; Deus est in te, quia templum Dei factus es: sed numquid quia in Deo es, et Deus est in te, potes dicere, Qui me videt, Deum videt: quomodo Unigenitus dixit, Qui me vidit, vidit et Patrem (Joan. XIV, 9); et, Ego et Pater unum sumus? Agnosce proprium Domini, et munus servi. Proprium Domini, est aequalitas Patris: munus servi, est participatio Salvatoris.
10. "If I do not do the works of My Father, do not believe Me: but if I do them, even if you will not believe Me, believe the works, that you may know and believe that the Father is in Me, and I in Him." The Son does not say "the Father is in Me, and I in Him" in the way that men can say it. For if we think well, we are in God; and if we live well, God is in us: the faithful, participating in His grace, enlightened by Him, are in Him, and He in us. But not so the only-begotten Son: He is in the Father, and the Father in Him, as an equal in Him to Whom He is equal. In short, we can at times say, We are in God, and God is in us: can we say, I and God are one? You are in God, because God contains you; God is in you, because you have been made a temple of God: but because you are in God, and God is in you, can you say, He who sees me sees God, as the Only-begotten said, "He who has seen Me has seen the Father also" (John 14:9); and, "I and the Father are one"? Recognize what is proper to the Lord, and what is the gift to the servant. Proper to the Lord is equality with the Father: the gift to the servant is participation in the Saviour.
11. Quaerebant ergo eum apprehendere. Utinam apprehenderent, sed credendo et intelligendo, non saeviendo et occidendo. Nam modo, fratres mei, quando talia loquor, infirmus fortia, parvus magna, fragilis solida, et vos tanquam ex eadem massa unde sum et ego, et ego ipse qui vobis loquor, simul omnes apprehendere volumus Christum. Quid est apprehendere? Intellexisti, apprehendisti. Sed non sic Judaei: tu apprehendisti ut habeas, illi apprehendere volebant
11. "They sought therefore to seize Him." Would that they had seized Him, but by believing and understanding, not by raging and killing. For now, my brothers, when I say such things, weak, strong things, small, great things, frail, solid things, both you, as from the same lump from which I too am, and I myself who speak to you, all of us together wish to seize Christ. What is it to seize? You have understood, you have seized. But not so the Jews: you have seized in order to possess, they wished to seize
Editors' notes and page, col. 1745

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: et ego› · call in col 1745

Er. Lugd. Ven. semel ferunt, et ego. M.

The Erasmus, Lyons and Venice editions give "and I" only once. M[aurists].

(printed under page 221)

Page

  • running head: 1745 TRACTATUS XLIX. CAP (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)