Migne Reading Room

PL 35 · cols. 1833–1836

Augustinus, In Joannis Evangelium tractatus LXVI-LXXXIV

Tractates LXXVII–LXXVIII

PL 35:1833
TRACTATUS LXXVII. De eo quod sequitur, Haec locutus sum vobis apud vos manens; usque ad id, Pacem meam do vobis; non quomodo mundus dat, ego do vobis. Cap. XIV, ℣. 25-27.
Tractate 77. On what follows, "These things I have spoken to you, remaining with you," as far as "My peace I give to you; not as the world gives, do I give to you." (John 14:25–27)
1. In praecedenti lectione sancti Evangelii, quam sequitur ista quae modo recitata est, Dominus Jesus dixerat se et Patrem ad dilectores suos esse venturos, et apud eos mansionem esse facturos. Jamvero et superius dixerat de Spiritu sancto, Vos autem cognoscetis eum, quia apud vos manebit, et in vobis erit (Joan. XIV, 17): unde intelleximus in sanctis tanquam in templo suo simul manere Tripitatem Deum. Nunc autem dicit: Haec locutus sum vobis apud vos manens. Illa itaque mansio alia est, quam promisit futuram; haec vero alia, quam praesentem esse testatur. Illa spiritualis est, atque intrinsecus mentibus redditur: haec corporalis forinsecus oculis atque auribus exhibetur. Illa in aeternum beatificat liberatos; haec in tempore visitat liberandos. Secundum illam Dominus a suis dilectoribus non recedit; secundum hanc it et recedit. Haec, inquit, locutus sum vobis, apud vos manens: utique praesentia corporali, qua cum illis visibilis loquebatur.
1. In the preceding reading of the holy Gospel, which this one that has just been read follows, the Lord Jesus had said that He and the Father would come to those who love Him, and would make Their dwelling with them. Moreover, He had also said earlier of the Holy Spirit, "But you will know Him, because He will remain with you, and will be in you" (John 14:17); from which we understood that the Trinity, God, dwells together in the saints as in His temple. But now He says, "These things I have spoken to you, remaining with you." That dwelling, then, which He promised as future, is one thing; this one, which He testifies to be present, is another. That one is spiritual, and is rendered to minds inwardly; this one is bodily, and is presented outwardly to eyes and ears. That one makes the delivered blessed for ever; this one visits in time those who are to be delivered. According to that one the Lord does not depart from those who love Him; according to this one He goes and departs. "These things," He says, "I have spoken to you, remaining with you": that is, by bodily presence, in which He spoke with them as a visible person.
2. Paracletus autem, inquit, Spiritus sanctus, quem mi⟨t⟩tet Pater in nomine meo, ille vos docebit omnia, et commemorabit vos omnia quaecumque dixero vobis. Numquidnam dicit Filius, et docet Spiritus sanctus, ut dicente Filio verba capiamus, docente autem Spiritu sancto eadem verba intelligamus? Quasi dicat Filius sine Spiritu sancto, aut Spiritus sanctus doceat sine Filio: aut vero non et Filius doceat et Spiritus sanctus dicat, et cum Deus aliquid dicit et docet, Trinitas ipsa dicat et doceat? Sed quoniam Trinitas est, oportebat ejus singulas insinuare personas, eamque nos distincte audire, inseparabiliter intelligere. Audi Patrem dicentem ubi legis, Dominus dixit ad me, Filius meus es tu (Psal. II, 7): audi et docentem ubi legis, Omnis qui audivit a Patre et didicit, venit ad me (Joan. VI, 45). Filium vero dicentem modo audisti; de se quippe ait, Quaecumque dixero vobis: quem si et docentem vis nosse, magistrum recole, Unus est, inquit, Magister vester Christus (Matth. XXIII, 10). Spiritum porro sanctum, quem modo audisti docentem ubi dictum est, Ipse vos docebit omnia, audi etiam dicentem, ubi legis in Actibus Apostolorum, beato Petro dixisse Spiritum sanctum, Vade cum illis, quia ego misi eos (Act. X, 20). Omnis igitur et dicit et docet Trinitas: sed nisi etiam singillatim commendaretur, eam nullo modo humana capere utique posset infirmitas. Cum ergo omnino sit inseparabilis, nunquam Trinitas esse sciretur, si semper inseparabiliter diceretur: nam et cum dicimus Patrem et Filium et Spiritum sanctum, non eos utique dicimus simul, cum ipsi non possint esse non simul. Quod vero addidit, commemorabit vos, intelligere debemus etiam, quod jubemur non oblivisci saluberrimos monitus ad gratiam pertinere, quam nos commemorat Spiritus.
2. "But the Paraclete," He says, "the Holy Spirit, Whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and will remind you of all things whatever I shall have said to you." Is it then that the Son speaks and the Holy Spirit teaches, so that when the Son speaks we grasp the words, but when the Holy Spirit teaches we understand those same words? As if the Son were to speak without the Holy Spirit, or the Holy Spirit were to teach without the Son; or rather, does not the Son also teach and the Holy Spirit also speak, and when God speaks and teaches anything, does not the Trinity itself speak and teach? But since it is a Trinity, it was fitting that its several persons should be made known, and that we should hear it distinctly, but understand it inseparably. Hear the Father speaking where you read, "The Lord said to me, You are My Son" (Ps. 2:7); hear Him also teaching where you read, "Everyone who has heard from the Father and has learned comes to Me" (John 6:45). The Son, indeed, you have just heard speaking, for He says of Himself, "Whatever I shall have said to you"; and if you wish to know Him also as teaching, recall the Master: "One," He says, "is your Master, Christ" (Matt. 23:10). Further, the Holy Spirit, Whom you have just heard teaching where it is said, "He will teach you all things," hear also speaking, where you read in the Acts of the Apostles that the Holy Spirit said to blessed Peter, "Go with them, for I have sent them" (Acts 10:20). The whole Trinity, therefore, both speaks and teaches; but unless it were also commended to us one by one, human weakness could by no means grasp it. Since, then, it is wholly inseparable, it would never be known to be a Trinity if it were always spoken of inseparably; for even when we say "the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit," we certainly do not say them simultaneously, although they themselves cannot be other than together. But as to His having added, "will remind you," we ought to understand also that the very fact that we are commanded not to forget most salutary admonitions belongs to grace, of which the Spirit reminds us.
Editors' notes and page, col. 1833

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1833

Lov. redit. Caeteri codices, recedit.

The Louvain edition reads "redit" ("returns"). The other copies read "recedit" ("withdraws").

(printed under page 265)

Page

  • running head: 1833 TRACTATUS LXXVII. C[ut off at image edge]
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1834
3. Pacem, inquit, relinquo vobis, pacem meam do vobis. Hoc est quod legimus apud prophetam, Pacem super pacem: pacem nobis relinquit iturus, pacem suam nobis dabit in fine venturus. Pacem nobis relinquit in hoc saeculo, pacem suam nobis dabit in futuro saeculo. Pacem suam nobis relinquit, in qua manentes hostem vincimus: pacem suam nobis dabit, quando sine hoste regnabimus. Pacem relinquit nobis, ut etiam hic invicem diligamus: pacem suam nobis dabit, ubi nunquam dissentire pos⟨s⟩imus. Pacem relinquit nobis, ne de occultis nostris invicem judicemus, cum in hoc sumus mundo: pacem suam dabit nobis, cum manifestabit cogitationes cordis, et tunc laus erit unicuique a Deo (I Cor. IV, 5). In illo tamen atque ab illo nobis est pax, sive quam nobis relinquit iturus ad Patrem, sive quam nobis dabit nos perducturus ad Patrem. Quid autem nobis relinquit ascendens a nobis, nisi seipsum, dum non recedit a nobis? Ipse est enim pax nostra; qui fecit utraque unum (Ephes. II, 14). Pax ergo ipse nobis est, et cum credimus quia est, et cum videmus eum sicuti est (I Joan. III, 2). Si enim quamdiu sumus in corpore corruptibili quod aggravat animam, cum per fidem ambula⟨m⟩us, non per speciem, non deserit peregrinantes a se (II Cor. V, 6, 7); quanto magis cum ad ipsam speciem venerimus, nos implebit ex se?
3. "Peace," He says, "I leave to you, My peace I give to you." This is what we read in the prophet, "Peace upon peace": peace He leaves to us as He is about to go, His own peace He will give to us when He comes at the end. Peace He leaves to us in this world, His own peace He will give to us in the world to come. His own peace He leaves to us, abiding in which we conquer the enemy: His own peace He will give to us when we shall reign without an enemy. Peace He leaves to us, so that here too we may love one another: His own peace He will give to us where we can never disagree. Peace He leaves to us, so that we may not judge one another concerning our hidden things while we are in this world: His own peace He will give to us when He shall make manifest the thoughts of the heart, and then each one shall have praise from God (1 Cor. 4:5). Yet in Him and from Him we have peace, whether that which He leaves to us as He is about to go to the Father, or that which He will give to us when He is about to lead us through to the Father. And what does He leave to us in ascending from us, but Himself, while He does not withdraw from us? For He Himself is our peace, Who has made both one (Eph. 2:14). He Himself, then, is peace to us, both when we believe that He is, and when we see Him as He is (1 John 3:2). For if, as long as we are in the corruptible body which weighs down the soul, while we walk by faith, not by sight, He does not forsake those who are journeying abroad from Him (2 Cor. 5:6–7), how much more, when we have come to that sight itself, will He fill us from Himself?
4. Sed quid est quod ubi ait, Pacem relinquo vobis, non addidit meam; ubi vero ait, do vobis, ibi dixit meam? Utrum subaudiendum est meam, et ubi dictum non est, quia potest referri ad utrumque etiam quod semel dictum est? An forte et hic aliquid latet quod petendum est et quaerendum, et ad quod pulsantibus aperiendum? Quid si enim pacem suam eam voluit intelligi qualem habet ipse? Pax vero ista quam nobis relinquit in hoc saeculo, nostra est potius dicenda quam ipsius. Illi quippe nihil repugnat in seipso, qui nullum habet omnino peccatum: nos autem talem pacem nunc habemus, In qua adhuc dicamus, Dimitte nobis debita nostra (Matth. VI, 12). Est ergo nobis pax aliqua, quoniam condelectamur legi Dei secundum interiorem hominem: sed non est plena, quia videmus aliam legem in membris nostris, repugnantem legi mentis nostrae (Rom. VII, 22 et 23). Itemque inter nos ipsos est nobis pax, quia invicem nobis credimus quod invicem diligamus: sed nec ipsa plena est, quia cogitationes cordis nostri invicem non videmus; et quaedam de nobis quae non sunt in nobis, vel in melius invicem vel in deterius opinamur. Itaque ista etiamsi ab illo nobis relicta est, pax nostra est: nisi enim ab illo, non haberemus et talem; sed ipse non habet talem. Si tenuerimus usque in finem qualem accepimus, qualem habet habebimus, ubi nihil nobis repugnet ex nobis, et nihil nos invicem lateat in cordibus nostris. Nec ignoro ista Domini verba etiam sic accipi posse, ut ejusdem sententiae repetitio videatur, Pacem relinquo vobis, pacem meam do vobis: ut quod dixerat, pacem, hoc repetierit dicens, pacem meam; et quod dixerat, relinquo vobis, hoc repetierit dicens, do vobis. Ut volet
4. But why is it that where He says, "Peace I leave to you," He did not add "My," whereas where He says, "I give to you," there He said "My"? Is "My" to be understood also where it is not said, because what is said once can be referred to both? Or perhaps here too something lies hidden which is to be asked for and sought, and which is to be opened to those who knock? For what if He wished that to be understood as His own peace which is such as He Himself has? But this peace which He leaves to us in this world is rather to be called ours than His. For to Him nothing in Himself is in conflict, since He has no sin at all: but we now have such a peace that in it we still say, "Forgive us our debts" (Matt. 6:12). There is therefore some peace for us, since we delight in the law of God according to the inner man: but it is not full, since we see another law in our members, warring against the law of our mind (Rom. 7:22–23). Likewise among ourselves there is peace for us, because we believe of one another that we love one another: but neither is that full, since we do not see the thoughts of one another's hearts; and some things about ourselves which are not in us we suppose of one another, either for the better or for the worse. Therefore this peace, even though it has been left to us by Him, is our peace: for unless it were from Him, we should not have even such a peace; but He Himself does not have such a one. If we hold fast to the end such a peace as we have received, we shall have such as He has, where nothing from within us will be in conflict with us, and nothing will lie hidden from one another in our hearts. Nor am I unaware that these words of the Lord can also be taken in such a way that there seems to be a repetition of the same statement, "Peace I leave to you, My peace I give to you": so that what He had said, "peace," He repeated in saying "My peace"; and what He had said, "I leave to you," He repeated in saying "I give to you." Let each
Editors' notes and page, col. 1834

Page

  • running head: TUS LXXVII. CAPUT XIV. 1834 (left part of head cut off at image edge; column number printed blurred, read as 1834)
  • marginal letters: (none) (no marginal letters visible)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1835
quisque accipiat: me tamen delectat, credo et vos, fratres mei dilecti, sic tenere istam pacem, ubi adversarium concorditer vincimus, ut desideremus pacem, ubi adversarium non habebimus.
take it as he will; yet it delights me, and I believe you too, my beloved brothers, so to hold this peace, in which we overcome the adversary in concord, that we may long for the peace in which we shall have no adversary.
5. Quod vero Dominus adjuaxit, atque ait, Non quomodo mundus dat, ego do vobis; quid est aliud, nisi, non quomodo homines dant qui diligunt mundum, ita do vobis? Qui propterea dant sibi pacem, ut sine molestia litium atque bellorum, non Deo, sed amico suo mundo perfruantur: et quando justis dant pacem ut non eos persequantur, pax non potest esse vera, ubi non est vera concordia; quia disjuncta sunt corda. Quomodo enim consors dicitur, qui sortem jungit; ita ille concors dicendus est, qui corda jungit. Nos ergo, charissimi, quibus Christus pacem relinquit, et pacem suam nobis dat, non sicut mundus, sed sicut ille per quem factus est mundus, ut concordes simus; jungamus invicem corda, et cor unum sursum habeamus, ne corrumpatur in terra.
5. But what the Lord added, saying, Not as the world gives do I give to you; what else is it but, not as men give who love the world, so do I give to you? These give themselves peace for this reason, that without the trouble of lawsuits and wars they may enjoy, not God, but their friend the world; and when they give peace to the just so as not to persecute them, the peace cannot be true where there is no true concord, because the hearts are disjoined. For as he is called a consort who joins his lot [with another], so he is to be called concordant who joins hearts. Let us therefore, dearly beloved, to whom Christ leaves peace and gives His peace, not as the world does, but as He through Whom the world was made, that we may be of one heart: let us join our hearts to one another, and have one heart lifted upward, lest it be corrupted on earth.
TRACTATUS LXXVIII. In id quod Dominus dicit, Non turbetur cor vestrum, neque formidet, etc. Cap. XIV, ℣℣. 27, 28.
Tractate 78. On what the Lord says, Let not your heart be troubled, nor let it be afraid, etc. Chapter 14, verses 27-28.
1. Accepimus, fratres, verba Domini dicentis ad discipulos suos: Non turbetur cor vestrum, neque formidet. Audistis quia ego dixi vobis, Vado, et venio ad vos: si diligeretis me, gauderetis utique, quia ego vado ad Patrem; quia Pater major me est. Hinc ergo turbari et formidare poterat cor illorum, quod ibat ab eis, quamvis venturus ad eos: ne forsitan gregem lupus hoc intervallo invaderet, pastoris absentia. Sed a quibus homo abscedebat, Deus non derelinquebat: et idem ipse Christus homo et Deus. Ergo et ibat per id quod homo erat, et manebat per id quod Deus erat: ibat per id quod uno loco erat, manebat per id quod ubique erat. Cur itaque turbaretur et formidaret cor, quando ita deserebat oculos, ut non desereret cor? Quamvis Deus etiam qui nullo continetur loco, discedat ab eorum cordibus, qui eum relinquunt moribus, non pedibus; et veniat ad eos qui convertuntur ad eum non facie, sed fide, et accedunt ad eum mente, non carne. Ut autem intelligerent secundum id quod homo erat eum dixisse, Vado et venio ad vos; adjecit, atque ait, Si diligeretis me, gauderetis utique, quia ego vado ad Patrem; quia Pater major me est. Per quod ergo Filius non est aequalis Patri, per hoc iturus erat ad Patrem, a quo venturus est vivos judicaturus et mortuos: per illud autem in quo aequalis est gignenti Unigenitus, nunquam recedit a Patre; sed cum illo est ubique totus pari divinitate, quam nullus continet locus. Cum enim in forma Dei esset, sicut Apostolus loquitur, non rapinam arbitratus est esse aequalis Deo. Quomodo enim rapina posset esse natura quae non erat usurpata, sed nata? Semetipsum autem exinanivit, formam servi accipiens (Philipp. II, 6, 7): non ergo amittens illam, sed accipiens istam. Eo modo se exinaniens, quo hic minor apparebat quam apud Patrem manebat. Forma quippe servi accessit, non forma Dei recessit: haec est assumpta, non illa consumpta. Propter hanc dicit, Pater major me
1. We have received, brothers, the words of the Lord saying to His disciples: Let not your heart be troubled, nor let it be afraid. You have heard that I said to you, I go, and I come to you: if you loved Me, you would surely rejoice, because I go to the Father; for the Father is greater than I. From this, then, their heart could be troubled and afraid, that He was going from them, though He was to come to them: lest perhaps in this interval the wolf should attack the flock in the shepherd's absence. But those whom He was leaving as man, He was not forsaking as God; and the same Christ is Himself man and God. Therefore He both went by that which He was as man, and remained by that which He was as God: He went by that by which He was in one place, He remained by that by which He was everywhere. Why then should the heart be troubled and afraid, when He so forsook their eyes as not to forsake their heart? Although God too, Who is contained by no place, departs from the hearts of those who leave Him by their conduct, not by their feet; and comes to those who turn to Him not with the face but with faith, and approach Him with the mind, not the flesh. But that they might understand that He had said according to that which He was as man, I go and I come to you, He added, saying, If you loved Me, you would surely rejoice, because I go to the Father; for the Father is greater than I. By that, then, by which the Son is not equal to the Father, by this He was to go to the Father, from Whom He is to come to judge the living and the dead; but by that in which the Only-begotten is equal to the One Who begets, He never withdraws from the Father, but is with Him everywhere whole in equal divinity, which no place contains. For though He was in the form of God, as the Apostle says, He did not think it robbery to be equal to God. For how could that be robbery which was a nature not usurped but born? But He emptied Himself, taking the form of a servant (Phil. 2:6–7): not therefore losing that, but taking this. He emptied Himself in such a way that here He appeared less than He remained with the Father. For the form of a servant was added, the form of God did not withdraw: this was assumed, that was not consumed. On account of this He says, The Father is greater than I
Editors' notes and page, col. 1835

Page

  • running head: 1835 IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, S. (cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins mid-sentence and ends mid-sentence ("Pater major me"); "adjuaxit" in section 5 set as printed (turned n); tractate number and subject line joined as one title line; verse marks set as ℣℣
PL 35:1836
est : propter illam vero, Ego et Pater unum sumus (Joan. X, 30).
but on account of that one, I and the Father are one (John 10:30).
2. Hoc attendat arianus, et attentione sit sanus : ne contentione sit vanus, aut, quod est pejus, insanus. Haec est enim forma servi, in qua Dei Filius minor est, non Patre solo, sed etiam Spiritu sancto : neque id tantum, sed etiam seipso ; quia idem ipse in forma Dei major est seipso. Neque enim homo Christus non dicitur Filius Dei, quod etiam sola caro ejus in sepulcro meruit appellari. Nam quid aliud confitemur, cum dicimus credere nos in unigenitum Dei Filium, qui sub Pontio Pilato crucifixus est et sepultus? Et quid ejus nisi caro sepulta est sine anima? Ac per hoc cum credimus in Dei Filium qui sepultus est, profecto Filium Dei dicimus et carnem quae sola sepulta est. Ipse ergo Christus Filius Dei, aequalis Patri in forma Dei, quia semetipsum exinanivit, non formam Dei amittens, sed formam servi accipiens, major est et seipso; quia major est forma Dei quae amissa non est, quam servi quae accepta est. Quid itaque mirum, vel quid indignum, si secundum hanc formam servi loquens, ait Dei Filius, Pater major me est; et secundum Dei formam loquens, ait idem ipse Dei Filius, Ego et Pater unum sumus? Unum sunt enim, secundum id quod Deus erat Verbum : major est Pater, secundum id quod Verbum caro factum est (Id. I, 1, 14). Dicam etiam quod Ariani et Eunomiani negare non possunt : secundum hanc formam servi puer Christus etiam parentibus suis minor erat, quando parvus majoribus, sicut scriptum est, subditus erat (Luc. II, 51). Quid igitur, haeretice, cum Christus Deus sit et homo, loquitur ut homo, et calumniaris Deo? Ille in se naturam commendat humanam; tu in illo audes deformare divinam? Infidelis, ingrate, ideone tu minuis eum qui fecit te, quia dicit ille quid factus sit propter te? Aequalis enim Patri, Filius per quem factus est homo, ut minor esset Patre, factus est homo : quod nisi fieret, quid esset homo?
2. Let the Arian attend to this, and by attending be sound: lest by contention he be vain, or, what is worse, insane. For this is the form of a servant, in which the Son of God is less, not than the Father alone, but also than the Holy Spirit; and not only that, but even than Himself; because the same He in the form of God is greater than Himself. For the man Christ is not denied the name Son of God, which even His flesh alone in the sepulchre merited to be called. For what else do we confess, when we say that we believe in the only-begotten Son of God, Who was crucified under Pontius Pilate and buried? And what of Him was buried but the flesh without the soul? And therefore, when we believe in the Son of God Who was buried, we certainly call Son of God the flesh too, which alone was buried. Christ Himself, then, the Son of God, equal to the Father in the form of God, because He emptied Himself, not losing the form of God but receiving the form of a servant, is greater even than Himself; because the form of God, which was not lost, is greater than that of the servant, which was received. What wonder, then, or what unworthiness is there, if, speaking according to this form of a servant, the Son of God says, The Father is greater than I; and, speaking according to the form of God, the same Son of God says, I and the Father are one? For They are one according as the Word was God; the Father is greater according as the Word was made flesh (John 1:1, 14). I will say also what the Arians and Eunomians cannot deny: according to this form of a servant the boy Christ was less even than His parents, when, being small, He was, as it is written, subject to His elders (Luke 2:51). Why then, heretic, since Christ is God and man, does He speak as man, and you slander God? He commends human nature in Himself; do you dare to disfigure the divine in Him? Faithless, ungrateful one, do you therefore diminish Him Who made you, because He tells what He was made for your sake? For, equal to the Father, the Son through Whom man was made was made man, that He might be less than the Father: and if this were not done, what would man be?
3. Dicat plane Dominus et Magister noster, Si diligeretis me, gauderetis utique, quia vado ad Patrem, quia Pater major me est. Cum discipulis audiamus verba doctoris, non cum alienis sequamur astutiam deceptoris. Agnoscamus geminam substantiam Christi; divinam scilicet qua aequalis est Patri, humanam qua major est Pater. Utrumque autem simul non duo, sed unus est Christus; ne sit quaternitas, non Trinitas Deus. Sicut enim unus est homo anima rationalis et caro, sic unus est Christus Deus et homo : ac per hoc Christus, est Deus anima rationalis et caro. Christum in his omnibus, Christum in singulis confitemur. Quis est ergo per quem factus est mundus? Christus Jesus, sed in forma Dei. Quis est sub Pontio Pilato crucifixus? Christus Jesus, sed in forma servi. Item de singulis quibus homo constat. Quis non est derelictus in inferno? Christus Jesus, sed in anima sola. Quis resurrecturus triduo jacuit in sepulcro? Christus Jesus, sed in carne sola. Dicitur ergo et in his singulis Christus. Verum haec omnia non duo, vel tres, sed unus est Christus. Ideo ergo
3. Let our Lord and Master say plainly, If you loved Me, you would surely rejoice, because I go to the Father, because the Father is greater than I. With the disciples let us hear the words of the teacher; let us not with strangers follow the cunning of the deceiver. Let us acknowledge the twofold substance of Christ: namely the divine, by which He is equal to the Father, and the human, by which the Father is greater. Yet both together are not two, but Christ is one; lest God be a quaternity, not a Trinity. For as the rational soul and flesh is one man, so God and man is one Christ: and therefore Christ is God, rational soul and flesh. Christ we confess in all these, Christ in each. Who, then, is He through Whom the world was made? Christ Jesus, but in the form of God. Who was crucified under Pontius Pilate? Christ Jesus, but in the form of a servant. Likewise concerning each of the things of which man consists. Who was not left in hell? Christ Jesus, but in the soul alone. Who, being about to rise again, lay three days in the sepulchre? Christ Jesus, but in the flesh alone. Christ, therefore, is spoken of in each of these also. But all these are not two, or three, but Christ is one. Therefore, then,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1836

Page

  • running head: VANGELIUM, S. AUCUSTINI 1836 (left part cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: running head begins cut off ("...VANGELIUM"); "AUCUSTINI" may be blurred type for AUGUSTINI, UNSURE; the column begins mid-sentence with "est"; the stray mark in "quia, idem" is taken as a blemish and not set; the left-hand column fragments (col. 1835) are not set; no full-width lines and no editors' matter