cum sit pudicus, a nobis creditur impudicus. Sine dubio enim si pudicum diligo, hoc est ipse quod diligo: ergo etiam ipsum diligo, et nescio. Et si impudicum odi, non ergo ipsum odi; quia non est quod odi: et tamen dilecto meo, cum quo semper in charitate pudicitiae habitat anima mea, facio ignarus injuriam, non errans in discretione virtutum atque vitiorum, sed in cordium tenebris humanorum. Proinde sicut fieri potest ut homo bonus hominem bonum oderit nesciens, vel potius diligat nesciens (ipsum enim diligit cum bonum diligit, quia id quod est ille, hoc iste diligit); oderit autem nesciens non ipsum, sed quod putat esse ipsum: ita fieri potest ut etiam homo injustus hominem oderit justum, et dum aestimat se sui similem injustum diligere, nesciens diligat justum; et tamen dum eum credit injustum, diligat non ipsum, sed quod putat esse ipsum. Quemadmodum autem hominem, sic et Deum. Denique si interrogarentur Judaei, utrum diligerent Deum; quid se aliud quam diligere responderent, nec ex animo mentientes, sed errando potius opinantes? Quomodo enim diligerent Patrem veritatis, qui haberent odio veritatem? Nolunt enim sua facta damnari, et hoc habet veritas ut talia facta damnentur: tantum igitur oderunt veritatem, quantum oderunt suas poenas, quas talibus irrogat veritas. Nesciunt autem illam esse veritatem, quae tales quales ipsi sunt damnat: oderunt ergo quam nesciunt; et cum illam oderunt, profecto et eum de quo nata est nisi odisse non possunt. Ac per hoc quia veritatem qua judicante damnantur, de Patre Deo natam nesciunt; utique etiam ipsum et nesciunt, et oderunt. O miseros homines, qui cum esse volunt mali, nolunt esse veritatem qua damnantur mali! Nolunt enim eam esse quod est, cum seipsos debeant nolle esse quod sunt; ut ipsa manente mutentur, ne ipsa judicante damnentur.
though he is chaste, is believed by us to be unchaste. For without doubt, if I love the chaste man, this is he himself whom I love: therefore I love him himself too, and do not know it. And if I hate the unchaste man, then it is not him himself that I hate; for he is not what I hate: and yet to my beloved, with whom my soul always dwells in the charity of chastity, I unknowingly do injury, not erring in the discernment of virtues and vices, but in the darkness of human hearts. Accordingly, just as it can happen that a good man hates a good man without knowing it, or rather loves him without knowing it (for he loves him himself when he loves the good, since what that man is, this is what this man loves), but hates, without knowing it, not him himself, but what he thinks him to be: so it can happen that an unjust man too hates a just man, and while he supposes that he loves an unjust man like himself, unknowingly loves a just man; and yet, while he believes him unjust, he loves not him himself, but what he thinks him to be. And as with a man, so also with God. Finally, if the Jews were asked whether they loved God, what else would they answer but that they loved Him, not lying deliberately, but rather supposing it in error? For how could they love the Father of truth, who held the truth in hatred? For they do not want their deeds to be condemned, and truth has this property, that such deeds are condemned: they therefore hate the truth as much as they hate their own punishments, which truth imposes on such men. But they do not know that that is the truth which condemns such men as they themselves are: they therefore hate what they do not know; and since they hate it, surely they cannot but hate Him also from Whom it was born. And for this reason, because they do not know that the truth, by whose judgement they are condemned, was born of God the Father, assuredly they both do not know Him also and hate Him. O wretched men, who, while they want to be evil, do not want the truth to exist by which the evil are condemned! For they do not want it to be what it is, when they ought rather not to want themselves to be what they are; so that, while it remains, they may be changed, lest by its judgement they be condemned.
TRACTATUS XCI. In haec verba, Si opera non fecissem in eis, quae nemo alius fecit; usque ad id, Quia odio habuerunt me gratis. Cap. XV, ℣℣. 24, 25.
Tractate 91. On these words: If I had not done among them the works which no other did; as far as this: Because they hated Me without cause. Chapter 15, verses 24, 25.
1. Dixerat Dominus: Qui me odit, et Patrem meum odit. Utique enim qui odit veritatem, necesse est oderit et a quo veritas nata est: unde jam quantum datum est, locuti sumus. Deinde addidit unde nobis nunc loquendum est: Si opera non fecissem in eis, quae nemo alius fecit, peccatum non haberent. Peccatum illud scilicet magnum, de quo et superius ait, Si non venissem, et locutus eis fuissem, peccatum non haberent. Hoc est peccatum quo in eum loquentem et operantem non crediderunt. Neque enim nullum habebant peccatum, antequam loqueretur eis et operaretur in eis; sed hoc peccatum quo in eum non crediderunt, ideo sic commemoratur, quia ipso peccato tenentur et caetera. Hoc enim si non haberent, et in eum crederent, dimitterentur et caetera.
1. The Lord had said: He who hates Me hates My Father also. For assuredly he who hates the truth must also hate Him from Whom the truth was born: on which we have already spoken, as far as was granted. Then He added that on which we must now speak: If I had not done among them the works which no other did, they would not have sin. That great sin, that is, of which He also said above, If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not have sin. This is the sin by which they did not believe in Him as He spoke and worked. For it is not that they had no sin before He spoke to them and worked among them; but this sin, by which they did not believe in Him, is mentioned in this way because by this very sin they are held fast in the rest also. For if they did not have this, and believed in Him, the rest also would be forgiven.
2. Sed quid est hoc quod cum dixisset, Si opera non fecissem in eis, mox addidit, quae nemo alius fecit? Nulla quippe in operibus Christi videntur esse majora quam suscitatio mortuorum; quod scimus etiam antiquos
2. But what is this, that when He had said, If I had not done among them the works, He at once added, which no other did? For none among the works of Christ seem to be greater than the raising of the dead; which we know that even the ancient