Migne Reading Room

PL 35 · cols. 1936–1940

Augustinus, In Joannis Evangelium tractatus CIII-CXVI

Tractates CXIV–CXV

PL 35:1936
quae de Domino apud Pontium Pilatum praesidem gesta sunt, ab alio consideremus exordio.
the things that were done concerning the Lord before Pontius Pilate the governor, let us consider from another starting point.
TRACTATUS CXIV.
Tractate 114.
Ab eo loco, Adducunt ergo Jesum ad Caipham in praetorium; usque ad id, Ut sermo Jesu impleretur quem dixit, significans qua morte esset moriturus. Cap. XVIII, ℣. 28-32.
From the place, Then they lead Jesus to Caiaphas into the praetorium; up to this, That the word of Jesus might be fulfilled which He spoke, signifying by what death He was to die. Chapter 18, verses 28-32.
1. Quae cum Domino vel de Domino nostro Jesu Christo apud Pontium Pilatum praesidem gesta sint, quantum Joannes evangelista indicat, deinde videamus. Redit enim ad locum narrationis suae ubi eam reliquerat, ut explicaret Petri negationem. Jam quippe dixerat, Et misit eum Annas ligatum ad Caipham pontificem (Joan. XVIII, 24): atque inde regressus ubi dimiserat Petrum calefacientem se ad ignem in atrio, posteaquam totam ejus negationem, quae ter facta est, terminavit, Adducunt ergo Jesum, inquit, ad Caipham in praetorium. Ad Caipham quippe ab Anna collega et socero ejus dixerat missum. Sed si ad Caipham, cur in praetorium? Quod nihil aliud vult intelligi, quam ubi praeses Pilatus habitabat. Aut igitur aliqua urgente causa de domo Annae, quo ad audiendum Jesum ambo convenerant, Caiphas perrexerat ad praetorium praesidis, et socero suo Jesum reliquerat audiendum: aut in domo Caiphae praetorium Pilatus acceperat, et tanta domus erat, ut seorsum habitantem dominum suum, seorsum judicem ferret.
1. Next let us see what things were done with our Lord Jesus Christ, or concerning Him, before Pontius Pilate the governor, so far as John the evangelist indicates. For he returns to the place in his narrative where he had left it in order to set out Peter's denial. For he had already said, And Annas sent Him bound to Caiaphas the high priest (John 18:24); and returning from there to where he had left Peter warming himself at the fire in the courtyard, after he had finished the whole of his denial, which was made three times, he says, Then they lead Jesus to Caiaphas into the praetorium. For he had said that He was sent to Caiaphas by Annas, his colleague and father-in-law. But if to Caiaphas, why into the praetorium? By this nothing else is meant to be understood than where the governor Pilate lived. Either, then, for some pressing reason Caiaphas had gone from the house of Annas, where both had come together to hear Jesus, to the governor's praetorium, and had left Jesus to his father-in-law to be heard; or Pilate had taken up his praetorium in the house of Caiaphas, and the house was so large that it held its master living apart and the judge apart.
2. Erat autem mane, et ipsi, id est qui ducebant Jesum: non introierunt in praetorium, hoc est in eam partem domus quam Pilatus tenebat, si ipsa erat domus Caiphae. Cur autem non introierunt in praetorium, exponens causam, Ut non contaminarentur, inquit, sed ut manducarent Pascha. Dies enim agere coeperant azymorum: quibus diebus contaminatio illis erat in alienigenae habitaculum intrare. O impia caecitas! Habitaculo videlicet contaminarentur alieno, et non contaminarentur scelere proprio? Alienigenae judicis praetorio contaminari timebant, et fratris innocentis sanguine non timebant: ut hoc solum interim dicam, ubi rea malorum conscientia tenebatur. Nam quod etiam Dominus erat, qui eorum impietate ducebatur ad mortem, et vitae dator occidebatur; non eorum conscientiae, sed ignorantiae deputetur.
2. Now it was morning, and they themselves, that is, those who were leading Jesus, did not enter the praetorium, that is, that part of the house which Pilate occupied, if it was in fact the house of Caiaphas. And setting out the reason why they did not enter the praetorium, he says, That they might not be defiled, but that they might eat the Passover. For they had begun to keep the days of unleavened bread, on which days it was a defilement for them to enter the dwelling of a foreigner. O impious blindness! They would be defiled, forsooth, by another's dwelling, and would not be defiled by their own crime? They feared to be defiled by the praetorium of a foreign judge, and did not fear to be defiled by the blood of an innocent brother: to say only this for the present, wherein the guilty conscience of evil men was held fast. For that it was also the Lord Who was being led to death by their impiety, and that the Giver of life was being slain, let that be set down not to their conscience but to their ignorance.
3. Exivit ergo Pilatus ad eos foras, et dixit: Quam accusationem affertis adversus hominem hunc? Responderunt, et dixerunt ei: Si non esset hic malefactor, non tibi tradidissemus eum. Interrogentur atque respondeant ab immundis spiritibus liberati, languidi sanati, leprosi mundati, surdi audientes, muti loquentes, caeci videntes, mortui resurgentes, et quod omnia superat, stulti sapientes, utrum sit malefactor Jesus. Sed ista dicebant, de quibus per prophetam jam ipse praedixerat, Retribuebant mihi mala pro bonis (Psal. XXXIV, 12).
3. Pilate therefore went out to them and said: What accusation do you bring against this man? They answered and said to him: If this man were not an evildoer, we would not have handed Him over to you. Let those freed from unclean spirits be asked and answer, the sick healed, the lepers cleansed, the deaf hearing, the dumb speaking, the blind seeing, the dead rising again, and, what surpasses all, the foolish made wise, whether Jesus is an evildoer. But those were saying these things of whom He Himself had already foretold through the prophet, They repaid me evil for good (Ps. 34:12).
Editors' notes and page, col. 1936

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: call not visible in the crop› · call in col 1936

Sic etiam in libro tertio de Consensu Evangelistarum, cap. 7. At in sacris Bibliis habetur nunc, apo tou Caipha. a Caipha.

So also in the third book On the Harmony of the Evangelists, chapter 7. But in the sacred Bibles the reading now is "apo tou Caipha", "from Caiaphas".

(printed under page 316)

Page

  • running head: [IN JOANNIS] EVANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1936 (left part cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1937
4. Dixit ergo eis Pilatus : Accipite eum vos, et secundum Legem vestram judicate eum. Dixerunt ergo ei Judaei : Nobis non licet interficere quemquam. Quid est quod loquitur insana crudelitas? An non interficiebant, quem interficiendum offerebant? An forte crux non interficit? Sic desipiunt, qui non sectantur, sed insectantur sapientiam. Quid est autem, Nobis non licet interficere quemquam? Si malefactor est, cur non licet? Nonne Lex eis praecepit, ne malefactoribus, praesertim (qualem istum putabant) a suo Deo seductoribus parcant (Deut. XIII, 5)? Sed intelligendum est eos dixisse non sibi licere interficere quemquam, propter diei festi sanctitatem, quem celebrare jam coeperant; propter quem de ingressu etiam praetorii contaminari metuebant. Itane obduruistis, falsi Israelitae? itane omnem sensum nimia malitia perdidistis, ut ideo vos a sanguine innocentis impollutos esse credatis, quia eum fundendum alteri tradidistis? Numquid et Pilatus illum, qui potestati ejus a vobis ingeritur occidendus, suis est manibus occisurus? Si non eum voluistis occidi, si non insidiati estis, si non vobis tradendum pecunia comparastis, si non comprehendistis, vinxistis, adduxistis, si non occidendum manibus obtulistis, vocibus poposcistis, non eum a vobis interfectum esse jactate. Si autem illis omnibus vestris praecedentibus factis, etiam Crucifige, crucifige, clamastis (Joan. XIX, 6); audite quod contra vos etiam propheta clamat : Filii hominum, dentes eorum arma et sagittae, et lingua eorum machaera acuta (Psal. LVI, 5). Ecce quibus armis, quibus sagittis, qua machaera justum interfecistis, quando vobis interficere quemquam non licere dixistis. Hinc est quod ad comprehendendum Jesum, cum sacerdotum non venissent principes, sed misissent; Lucas tamen evangelista in eodem narrationis suae loco ait : Dixit autem, inquit, Jesus ad eos qui venerant ad se, principes sacerdotum, et magistratus templi, et seniores : Quasi ad latronem existis (Luc. XXII, 52), et caetera. Sicut ergo principes sacerdotum non per seipsos, sed per eos quos miserant ad comprehendendum Jesum, quid aliud quam ipsi in suae jussionis potestate venerunt? sic omnes qui crucifigendum Christum impiis vocibus clamaverunt, non quidem per seipsos eum, sed tamen ipsi per illum qui eorum clamore ad hoc nefas impulsus est, occiderunt.
4. Pilate therefore said to them: Take Him yourselves, and judge Him according to your Law. The Jews therefore said to him: It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death. What is it that insane cruelty is saying? Were they not putting to death the one whom they were offering to be put to death? Or perhaps the cross does not kill? So foolish are those who do not pursue wisdom but persecute it. But what does it mean, It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death? If He is a malefactor, why is it not lawful? Did not the Law command them not to spare malefactors, especially those who lead men astray from their God (such as they thought this man to be) (Deut. 13:5)? But it is to be understood that they said it was not lawful for them to put anyone to death on account of the sanctity of the feast day, which they had already begun to celebrate; on account of which they also feared being defiled by entering the praetorium. Have you become so hardened, false Israelites? Have you so lost all sense through excessive malice that you believe yourselves undefiled by the blood of the innocent for this reason, that you handed it over to another to be shed? Is Pilate too going to kill with his own hands Him who is thrust by you upon his authority to be killed? If you did not want Him to be killed, if you did not lie in wait for Him, if you did not buy Him with money to be handed over to you, if you did not seize, bind and lead Him off, if you did not offer Him to hands to be killed, did not demand it with your voices, then boast that He was not killed by you. But if, after all these deeds of yours that went before, you also shouted, Crucify, crucify (John 19:6), hear what the prophet too cries out against you: The sons of men, their teeth are weapons and arrows, and their tongue a sharp sword (Ps. 56:5). Behold with what weapons, with what arrows, with what sword you killed the just one, when you said that it was not lawful for you to put anyone to death. Hence it is that, although the chief priests had not come to seize Jesus but had sent others, Luke the evangelist nevertheless says at the same place in his narrative: And Jesus said, he says, to those who had come to Him, the chief priests and the officers of the temple and the elders: You have come out as against a robber (Luke 22:52), and so on. Just as, then, the chief priests came not in their own persons but through those whom they had sent to seize Jesus, and what else was this than that they themselves came in the power of their own command? so all who with impious voices shouted for Christ to be crucified killed Him, not indeed in their own persons, but nevertheless they themselves did so, through him who was driven to this crime by their shouting.
5. Quod vero Joannes evangelista subjungit, Ut sermo Jesu impleretur quem dixit, significans qua morte esset moriturus : si mortem crucis hic velimus accipere, tanquam ideo dixerint Judaei, Nobis non licet interficere quemquam, quia interfici aliud est, aliud crucifigi; non video quomodo id possit consequenter intelligi, cum hoc ad Pilati verba responderint, quibus eis dixerat, Accipite eum vos, et secundum Legem vestram judicate eum. Numquid ergo eum non poterant accipere, et ipsi eum crucifigere, si per tale genus supplicii interfectionem cujusquam vitare cupiebant? Quis autem non videat quam sit absurdum eis licere quemquam crucifigere, quibus non licet quemquam interficere? Quid quod ipse Dominus eamdem mortem suam, id est mortem crucis, etiam interfectionem
5. But as for what John the evangelist adds, That the word of Jesus might be fulfilled which He spoke, signifying by what death He was to die: if we wish to understand the death of the cross here, as though the Jews said, It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death, for this reason, that to be killed is one thing and to be crucified another, I do not see how this can be understood consistently, since they gave this answer to the words of Pilate in which he had said to them, Take Him yourselves, and judge Him according to your Law. Could they not, then, have taken Him and crucified Him themselves, if by such a kind of punishment they wished to avoid putting anyone to death? And who would not see how absurd it is that those for whom it is not lawful to kill anyone should be allowed to crucify anyone? What of the fact that the Lord Himself also calls that same death of His, that is, the death of the cross, a killing
Editors' notes and page, col. 1937

Page

  • running head: 1937 TRACTATUS CXV. CAP[...] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: left column set; the right-hand column (the next column) is cut off in the images and is not set. "genus" has a damaged final letter but reads clearly. "praetorii" and "caetera" are read as printed with æ. The column ends mid-sentence at "interfectionem".
PL 35:1938
vocat, sicut legimus apud Marcum, ubi ait: « Ecce ascendimus Jerosolymam, et Filius hominis tradetur principibus sacerdotum et Scribis, et damnabunt eum morte, et tradent eum Gentibus; et illudent ei, et conspuent eum, et flagellabunt eum, et interficient eum, et tertia die resurget » (Marc. X, 33, 34)? Nimirum ergo ista dicendo significavit Dominus qua esset morte moriturus: non quod hic mortem crucis vellet intelligi, sed quod eum Judaei fuissent Gentibus tradituri, hoc est Romanis. Nam Pilatus Romanus erat, eumque in Judaeam Romani praesidem miserant. Ut ergo iste sermo Jesu impleretur, id est, ut eum sibi traditum Gentes interficerent, quod Jesus futurum esse praedixerat; ideo Pilatus qui judex Romanus erat, cum vellet eum reddere Judaeis, ut secundum Legem suam judicarent eum, noluerunt eum accipere dicentes, Nobis non licet interficere quemquam. Ac sic impletus est sermo Jesu, quem de sua morte praedixit, ut eum a Judaeis traditum interficerent Gentes; minore scelere quam Judaei, qui se isto modo ab ejus interfectione velut alienos facere voluerunt, non ut eorum innocentia, sed ut dementia monstraretur.
as we read in Mark, where He says: "Behold, we are going up to Jerusalem, and the Son of man will be handed over to the chief priests and the scribes, and they will condemn Him to death, and will hand Him over to the Gentiles; and they will mock Him, and spit upon Him, and scourge Him, and kill Him, and on the third day He will rise again" (Mark 10:33–34)? Clearly, then, by saying these things the Lord signified by what death He was going to die: not that He wished the death of the cross to be understood here, but that the Jews were going to hand Him over to the Gentiles, that is, to the Romans. For Pilate was a Roman, and the Romans had sent him into Judaea as governor. So, that this word of Jesus might be fulfilled, that is, that the Gentiles should kill Him when He had been handed over to them, which Jesus had foretold would happen, therefore, when Pilate, who was a Roman judge, wished to give Him back to the Jews so that they might judge Him according to their Law, they refused to accept Him, saying, It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death. And thus the word of Jesus was fulfilled, which He foretold concerning His own death, that the Gentiles should kill Him when He had been handed over by the Jews; with a lesser crime than the Jews, who in this way wished to make themselves as it were strangers to His killing, so that it was not their innocence but their madness that was shown.
TRACTATUS CXV.
Tractate 115.
De eo quod dicitur, Introivit ergo iterum in praetorium Pilatus; usque ad id, Erat autem Barabbas latro. Cap. XVIII, ℣. 33-40.
On that which is said, Pilate therefore entered the praetorium again; as far as this, Now Barabbas was a robber. Chapter 18, verses 33-40.
1. Quid Pilatus dixerit Christo, quidve Pilato ille responderit, isto sermone considerandum atque tractandum est. Cum enim dictum esset Judaeis, « Accipite eum vos, et secundum Legem vestram judicate eum » atque illi respondissent, « Nobis non licet occidere quemquam; introivit iterum in praetorium Pilatus, et vocavit Jesum, et dixit ei: Tu es rex Judaeorum? Et respondit Jesus: A temetipso hoc dicis, an alii tibi dixerunt de me? » Sciebat utique Dominus et quod ip⟨s⟩e interrogavit, et quod ille responsurus fuit; sed tamen dici voluit, non ut ipse sciret, sed ut scriberetur quod nos voluit ut sciremus. « Respondit Pilatus: Numquid ego Judaeus sum? Gens tua et pontifices tradiderunt te mihi: quid fecisti? Respondit Jesus: Regnum meum non est de hoc mundo. Si ex hoc mundo esset regnum meum, ministri mei utique decertarent, ut non traderer Judaeis: nunc autem regnum meum non est hinc. » Hoc est quod bonus magister scire nos voluit: sed prius nobis demonstranda fuerat vana hominum de regno ejus opinio, sive Gentium, sive Judaeorum, a quibus id Pilatus audierat; quasi propterea morte fuisset plectendus, quod illicitum affectaverit regnum; vel quoniam solent regnaturis invidere regnantes, et videlicet cavendum erat ne ejus regnum sive Romanis, sive Judaeis esset adversum. Poterat autem Dominus quod ait, Regnum meum non est de hoc mundo, etc., ad primam interrogationem praesidis respondere, ubi ei dixit, Tu es rex Judaeorum? sed cum vicissim interrogans utrum hoc a semetipso diceret, an audisset ab aliis, illo respondente ostendere voluit hoc sibi apud illum fuisse a Judaeis velut crimen objectum: patefaciens nobis cogitationes
1. What Pilate said to Christ, and what He answered Pilate, is to be considered and treated in this discourse. For when it had been said to the Jews, "Take Him yourselves, and judge Him according to your Law", and they had answered, "It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death; Pilate entered the praetorium again, and called Jesus, and said to Him: Art Thou the king of the Jews? And Jesus answered: Do you say this of yourself, or did others tell you about Me?" The Lord certainly knew both what He Himself asked and what that man was going to answer; but nevertheless He wished it to be said, not so that He Himself might know, but so that there might be written what He wished us to know. "Pilate answered: Am I a Jew? Thine own nation and the chief priests have handed Thee over to me: what hast Thou done? Jesus answered: My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would certainly fight, so that I should not be handed over to the Jews: but now My kingdom is not from here." This is what the good Master wished us to know: but first there had to be shown to us the vain opinion of men about His kingdom, whether of the Gentiles or of the Jews, from whom Pilate had heard it; as though He ought to be punished with death on this account, that He had aspired to an unlawful kingship; or because those who reign are wont to envy those who are going to reign, and evidently care had to be taken lest His kingdom should be hostile either to the Romans or to the Jews. Now the Lord could have given what He says, My kingdom is not of this world, etc., in answer to the governor's first question, when he said to Him, Art Thou the king of the Jews? but when, questioning him in turn whether he said this of himself or had heard it from others, He wished by that man's answer to show that this had been laid against Him before him by the Jews as a charge: disclosing to us the
Editors' notes and page, col. 1938

Page

  • running head: TUS CXV. CAPUT XVIII. 1938
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: running head cut off at the left edge of the image (only "...TUS CXV. CAPUT XVIII." visible); marginal letters not visible in the images; line-ends at the left belong to column 1937 and are not set; "ip e" printed with a gap, set ip⟨s⟩e; closing guillemet after "occidere quemquam;" not printed there, set as printed; verse sign printed as ŷ, set ℣; last word "co-" (cognoscendum or similar) split at the column break; no editors' matter in this column
  • other: the word cogitationes was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 1939
PL 35:1939
hominum, quas ipse noverat, quoniam vanae sunt (Psal. XCIII, 11); eisque post responsionem Pilati, jam Judaeis et Gentibus opportunius aptiusque respondens, Regnum meum non est de hoc mundo. Quod si interroganti Pilato continuo respondisset; non etiam Judaeis, sed solis Gentibus hoc de se opinantibus respondisse videretur. Nunc vero quoniam respondit Pilatus, Numquid ego Judaeus sum? Gens tua et pontifices tradiderunt te mihi; abstulit a se suspicionem, qua posset putari a semetipso dixisse quod Jesum regem dixerat esse Judaeorum, id se a Judaeis audisse demonstrans. Deinde dicendo, Quid fecisti? satis ostendit illud ei pro crimine objectum: tanquam diceret, Si regem te negas, quid fecisti ut tradereris mihi? Quasi mirum non esset si puniendus judici traderetur, qui se diceret regem: si autem hoc non diceret, quaerendum ab illo esset quid aliud forte fecisset, unde tradi judici dignus esset.
thoughts of men, which He knew, that they are vain (Ps. 93:11); and, after Pilate's reply, now answering the Jews and the Gentiles more opportunely and more fittingly, My kingdom is not of this world. For if He had answered Pilate straight away when he asked, He would have seemed to answer not the Jews as well, but only the Gentiles, who held this opinion of Him. But now, since Pilate answered, Am I a Jew? Thy nation and the chief priests have handed Thee over to me, he removed from himself the suspicion by which he might have been thought to have said of his own accord what he had said, that Jesus was king of the Jews, showing that he had heard it from the Jews. Then, by saying, What hast Thou done? he showed clearly enough that this had been laid against Him as a charge: as though he were saying, If Thou deniest that Thou art a king, what hast Thou done that Thou shouldst be handed over to me? As if it would be no wonder that one who called himself a king should be handed over to a judge to be punished; but if he did not say this, it would have to be asked of him what else he had perhaps done for which he deserved to be handed over to a judge.
2. Audite ergo, Judaei et Gentes; audi, circumcisio; audi, praeputium; audite, omnia regna terrena: Non impedio dominationem vestram in hoc mundo, Regnum meum non est de hoc mundo. Nolite metuere metu vanissimo quo Herodes ille major, cum Christus natus nuntiaretur, expavit, et tot infantes ut ad eum mors perveniret, occidit (Matth. II, 3, 16), timendo magis quam irascendo crudelior, Regnum, inquit, meum non est de hoc mundo. Quid vultis amplius? Venite ad regnum quod non est de hoc mundo; venite credendo, et nolite saevire metuendo. Dicit quidem in prophetia de Deo Patre, Ego autem constitutus sum rex ab eo super Sion montem sanctum ejus (Psal. II, 6); sed Sion illa et mons ille non est de hoc mundo. Quod est enim ejus regnum nisi credentes in eum, quibus dicit, De mundo non es⟨t⟩is, sicut et ego non sum de mundo? Quamvis eos esse vellet in mundo: propter quod de illis dixit ad Patrem, Non rogo ut tollas eos de mundo, sed ut serves eos ex malo (Joan. XVII, 16, 15). Unde et hic non ait, Regnum meum non est in hoc mundo; sed, non est de hoc mundo. Et cum hoc probaret dicens, Si ex hoc mundo esset regnum meum, ministri mei utique decertarent, ut non traderer Judaeis: non ait, Nunc autem regnum meum non est hic; sed, non est hinc. Hic est enim regnum ejus usque in finem saeculi, habens inter se commixta zizania usque ad messem; messis enim finis est saeculi, quando messores venient, id est Angeli, et colligent de regno ejus omnia scandala (Matth. XIII, 38-41); quod utique non fieret, si regnum ejus non esset hic. Sed tamen non est hinc; quia peregrinatur in mundo: regno suo quippe dicit, De mundo non estis, sed ego vos elegi de mundo (Joan. XV, 19). Erant ergo de mundo, quando regnum ejus non erant, sed ad mundi principem pertinebant. De mundo est ergo quidquid hominum a vero quidem Deo creatum, sed ex Adam vitiata atque damnata stirpe generatum est: factum est autem regnum non jam de mundo, quidquid inde in Christo regeneratum est. Sic enim nos Deus eruit de potestate tenebrarum, et transtulit in regnum Filii charitatis suae (Coloss. I, 13): de quo regno dicit, Regnum
2. Hear, then, Jews and Gentiles; hear, circumcision; hear, uncircumcision; hear, all earthly kingdoms: I do not hinder your dominion in this world, My kingdom is not of this world. Do not fear with that most vain fear with which Herod the elder was terrified when the birth of Christ was announced, and killed so many infants so that death might reach Him (Matt. 2:3, 16), made more cruel by fearing than by being angry: My kingdom, He says, is not of this world. What more do you want? Come to the kingdom which is not of this world; come by believing, and do not rage by fearing. He does indeed say in prophecy concerning God the Father, But I have been established as king by Him over Sion, His holy mountain (Ps. 2:6); but that Sion and that mountain is not of this world. For what is His kingdom but those who believe in Him, to whom He says, You are not of the world, just as I also am not of the world? Although He willed them to be in the world: for which reason He said of them to the Father, I do not ask that Thou take them out of the world, but that Thou keep them from evil (John 17:16, 15). Hence here too He does not say, My kingdom is not in this world; but, is not of this world. And when He was proving this by saying, If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would certainly fight, so that I should not be handed over to the Jews, He does not say, But now My kingdom is not here; but, is not from here. For His kingdom is here until the end of the age, having tares mixed within it until the harvest; for the harvest is the end of the age, when the reapers, that is the angels, will come and gather out of His kingdom all stumbling-blocks (Matt. 13:38–41); which certainly would not happen if His kingdom were not here. But yet it is not from here, because it is a sojourner in the world: for He says to His kingdom, You are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world (John 15:19). They were, then, of the world when they were not His kingdom but belonged to the prince of the world. Of the world, therefore, is whatever of men has been created indeed by the true God, but begotten from the vitiated and condemned stock of Adam; but whatever from there has been regenerated in Christ has been made a kingdom no longer of the world. For thus God has rescued us from the power of darkness and transferred us into the kingdom of the Son of His love (Col. 1:13): of which kingdom He says, My kingdom
Editors' notes and page, col. 1939

Page

  • running head: 1939 IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, (rest cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with the fragment "gitationes" (co-gitationes, broken from the previous column); column ends mid-sentence at "Regnum"; "es⟨t⟩is" in "De mundo non es⟨t⟩is" has a damaged t (prints like "es:is"); "cstis" later in the column read as "estis" (the e is faint); the right-hand column (1940) is cut off and not set; no full-width line; no editors' matter
PL 35:1940
meum non est de hoc mundo; vel, Regnum meum non est hinc.
is not of this world; or, My kingdom is not from here.
3. Dixit itaque ei Pilatus: Ergo rex es tu? Respondit Jesus: Tu dicis quia rex sum ego. Non quia regem se timuit confiteri; sed Tu dicis ita libratum est, ut neque se regem neget (rex est enim cujus regnum non est de hoc mundo), neque regem talem se esse fateatur, cujus regnum putetur esse de hoc mundo. Talem quippe ille sentiebat qui dixerat, Ergo rex es tu? cui responsum est, Tu dicis quia rex sum ego. Dictum est enim, Tu dicis, ac si dictum esset, carnalis carnaliter dicis.
3. Pilate therefore said to Him: So Thou art a king? Jesus answered: You say that I am a king. Not because He feared to confess Himself a king; but You say is so balanced that He neither denies that He is a king (for He is a king Whose kingdom is not of this world), nor confesses Himself to be such a king as one whose kingdom might be thought to be of this world. For it was such a king that he had in mind who had said, So Thou art a king? and to him the answer was given, You say that I am a king. For You say was said as if it had been said: being carnal, you speak carnally.
4. Deinde subjungit: Ego in hoc natus sum, et ad hoc veni in mundum, ut testimonium perhibeam veritati. Non est producenda hujus pronominis syllaba, quod ait, In hoc natus sum, tanquam dixerit, In hac re natus sum: sed corripienda, tanquam dixerit, Ad hanc rem natus sum, vel ad hoc natus sum; sicut ait, Ad hoc veni in mundum. In graeco namque Evangelio nihil est hujus locutionis ambiguum. Unde manifestum est eum temporalem nativitatem suam hic commemorasse, qua incarnatus venit in mundum; non illam sine initio qua Deus erat, per quem Pater condidit mundum. In hoc ergo se dixit natum, id est propter hoc natum, et ad hoc venisse in mundum, utique nascendo de Virgine, ut testimonium perhibeat veritati. Sed quia non omnium est fides (II Thess. III, 2), adjunxit, atque ait: Omnis qui est ex veritate, audit meam vocem. Audit utique interioribus auribus, id est, obaudit meae voci: quod tantumdem valeret si diceret, Credit mihi. Cum itaque Christus testimonium perhibet veritati, profecto testimonium perhibet sibi: ejus quippe vox est, Ego sum veritas (Joan. XIV, 6): et dixit alio quoque loco, Ego testimonium perhibeo de me (Id. VIII, 18). Quod vero ait, Omnis qui est ex veritate, audit vocem meam, gratiam commendavit qua secundum propositum vocat. De quo proposito dicit Apostolus, Scimus quia diligentibus Deum omnia coopera⟨n⟩tur in bonum, his qui secundum propositum Dei vocati sunt (Rom. VIII, 28); propositum scilicet vocantis, non vocatorum: quod alibi apertius ita positum est, Collabora Evangelio secundum virtutem Dei, salvos nos facientis et vocantis vocatione sua sancta; non secundum opera nostra, sed secundum suum propositum et gratiam (II Tim. I, 8, 9). Nam si naturam cogitemus in qua creati sumus, cum omnes veritas creaverit, quis non est ex veritate? Sed non omnes sunt quibus ut audiant veritatem, hoc est ut obaudiant veritati, et credant in veritatem, ex ipsa veritate praestatur; nullis procul dubio praecedentibus meritis, ne gratia non sit gratia. Si enim dixisset, Omnis qui audit meam vocem, ex veritate est: ideo dictus ex veritate putaretur, quia obtemperat veritati: non autem hoc ait; sed ait, Omnis qui est ex veritate, audit meam vocem. Ac per hoc non ideo est ex veritate, quia ejus audit vocem; sed ideo audit, quia ex veritate est, id est, quia hoc illi donum ex veritate collatum est. Quod quid est aliud, quam
4. Then He adds: For this was I born, and for this I came into the world, that I may bear witness to the truth. The syllable of this pronoun in what He says, In hoc natus sum, is not to be lengthened, as though He had said, In this matter was I born; but shortened, as though He had said, For this thing was I born, or for this was I born; just as He says, For this I came into the world. For in the Greek Gospel there is nothing ambiguous in this expression. Hence it is plain that He here called to mind His temporal birth, by which, being incarnate, He came into the world; not that birth without beginning by which He was God, through Whom the Father founded the world. For this, then, He said He was born, that is, born on account of this, and for this He came into the world, namely by being born of the Virgin, that He might bear witness to the truth. But because faith is not of all (2 Thess. 3:2), He added and said: Everyone who is of the truth hears My voice. He hears, indeed, with the inner ears, that is, he obeys My voice: which would amount to the same as if He said, He believes Me. Since, then, Christ bears witness to the truth, He certainly bears witness to Himself: for His is the voice, I am the truth (John 14:6): and He said also in another place, I bear witness of Myself (John 8:18). But in saying, Everyone who is of the truth hears My voice, He commended the grace by which He calls according to His purpose. Of which purpose the Apostle says, We know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to the purpose of God (Rom. 8:28); the purpose, that is, of Him Who calls, not of those who are called: which elsewhere is set down more openly thus, Labour together with the Gospel according to the power of God, Who saves us and calls us with His holy calling; not according to our works, but according to His own purpose and grace (2 Tim. 1:8–9). For if we consider the nature in which we were created, since the truth created all, who is not of the truth? But not all are those to whom it is granted by the truth itself that they hear the truth, that is, that they obey the truth and believe in the truth; with no merits whatever, beyond doubt, going before, lest grace be not grace. For if He had said, Everyone who hears My voice is of the truth, it would be thought that he is called of the truth because he obeys the truth: but He does not say this; rather He says, Everyone who is of the truth hears My voice. And therefore he is not of the truth because he hears His voice; but he hears because he is of the truth, that is, because this gift has been conferred on him by the truth. And what else is this than
Editors' notes and page, col. 1940

Footnotes

(a) ‹anchor: after "ambiguum" ("In graeco namque Evangelio nihil est hujus locutionis ambiguum (a)"), §4› · call in col 1940

Graec., εἰς τοῦτο.

Greek: "for this" (εἰς τοῦτο).

(printed under page 318)

Page

  • running head: EVANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1940
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: "coopera⟨n⟩tur" has damaged type (the n is not printed clearly)