Migne Reading Room

PL 38 · cols. 1327–1335

Augustine, Sermo 293 (In Nativitate Ioannis Baptistae)

Sermon CCXCIII

PL 38:1327
SERMO CCXCIII.
SERMON 293.
In Natali Joannis Baptistae, VII.
On the Birthday of John the Baptist, the seventh.
1. Sancti Joannis, cujus nativitatem, cum Evangelium legeretur, mirantes audivimus, solemnitatem hodie celebramus. Quanta est gloria judicis, si tanta est praeconis? Qualis est venturus via, si talis est qui praeparat viam? Nativitatem Joannis quodam modo consecratam observat Ecclesia: nec invenitur ullus in Patribus, cujus nativitatem solemniter celebremus: celebramus Joannis, celebramus et Christi: hoc vacare non potest, et si forte a nobis pro tantae rei dignitate minus explicatur, fructuosius tamen et altius cogitatur. Nascitur Joannes de anicula sterili, nascitur Christus de juvencula virgine. Joannem parit sterilitas, Christum integritas. In nativitate Joannis aetas congrua non erat parentalis, in nativitate Christi complexus non exstitit maritalis. Ille angelo praedicante nuntiatur, iste angelo nuntiante concipitur. Non creditur Joannes nasciturus, et fit pater mutus: creditur Christus, et fide concipitur. Fit prius adventus fidei in cor virginis, et sequitur fecunditas in utero matris. Et tamen prope eadem verba sunt Zachariae dicentis, cum angelus Joannem nuntiaret, Per quid cognoscam hoc? Ego enim sum senex, et uxor mea jam processit in diebus suis: et Mariae sanctae angelo nuntiante partum ejus futurum, Quomodo fiet istud, quoniam virum non cognosco? pene eadem verba. Illi dicitur: Ecce eris tacens, nec potens loqui, quousque fiant haec, propter quod non credidisti verbis meis, quae adimplebuntur tempore suo. Illi autem: Spiritus sanctus superveniet in te, et virtus Altissimi obumbrabit tibi; propterea quod nascetur ex te Sanctum, vocabitur Filius Dei. Ille corripitur, illa instruitur. Illi dicitur, Quia non credidisti: illi dicitur, Accipe quod quaesisti. Propemodum eadem
1. We have heard, marvelling, the nativity of Saint John when the Gospel was being read; today we celebrate his solemnity. How great is the glory of the judge, if so great is that of the herald? What sort is He Who is to come, the Way, if such is he who prepares the way? The Church observes the nativity of John as in a manner consecrated: nor is anyone found among the Fathers whose nativity we celebrate solemnly: we celebrate John's, we celebrate Christ's too: this cannot be without purpose, and even if perhaps it is explained by us too little, in proportion to the worth of so great a matter, yet it is pondered the more fruitfully and the more deeply. John is born of a barren old woman, Christ is born of a young virgin. Barrenness bears John, wholeness bears Christ. At John's nativity the age was not fit for parenthood; at Christ's nativity there was no marital embrace. The one is announced by an angel preaching it, the other is conceived while an angel announces it. It is not believed that John is to be born, and his father becomes mute; it is believed that Christ [is to be born], and He is conceived through faith. The coming of faith into the heart happens first with the virgin, and fruitfulness in the mother's womb follows. And yet the words of Zacharias, when the angel announced John to him, are almost the same: By what shall I know this? For I am an old man, and my wife is already advanced in her days — and of holy Mary, when the angel announced to her that her offspring was to come: How shall this be, since I do not know a man? — almost the same words. To him it is said: Behold, you shall be silent and unable to speak, until these things come to pass, because you did not believe my words, which shall be fulfilled in their time. But to her: The Holy Spirit shall come upon you, and the power of the Most High shall overshadow you; for this reason the Holy One Who shall be born of you shall be called the Son of God. He is rebuked, she is instructed. To him it is said: Because you did not believe; to her it is said: Receive what you sought. Almost the same
Editors' notes and page, col. 1327

Footnotes

(*) ‹anchor: not visible in the foot image (call at the sermon's heading)› · call in col 1327 Castigatus ad cl. f. rm. t. vat. et ad Vign.

Corrected against the manuscripts cl., f., rm., t., vat., and against Vign. [Vignier's edition]. [The second siglum is faint on the scan; read as "f."]

(printed under page 670)

(a) ‹anchor: not visible in the foot image (call at the sermon's heading)› · call in col 1327

Alias, inter Vignerianos 5.

Formerly the 5th among the Vignier sermons.

(printed under page 670)

(b) ‹anchor: not visible in the foot image (call at the sermon's heading)› · call in col 1327

Citatur in Bedae vera Collectione nondum impressa, ad I Tim. II, et in exordio sermonis subsequentis Carthagine pronuntiati.

It is cited in Bede's genuine Collection, not yet printed, on 1 Tim. 2, and in the opening of the following sermon, delivered at Carthage.

(printed under page 670)

PL 38:1328
verba sunt, Per quid cognoscam hoc? et, Quomodo fiet istud? Sed eum qui verba audiebat et cor videbat, non latebat. In utriusque verbis cogitatio latebat; sed homines, non angelum latebat: imo non latebat eum qui loquebatur per angelum. Postremo nascitur Joannes, dum jam lux minuitur, et nox incipit crescere: nascitur Christus, dum nox accipit detrimentum, et dies augmentum. Et tanquam hoc signum nativitatis amborum Joannes ipse respiciens, dicit: Illum oportet crescere, me autem minui (Joan. III, 30). Proposuimus inquirenda, et discutienda praediximus: sed hoc praelocutus sum, et si omnibus tanti mysterii sinibus perscrutandis non sufficimus, vel facultate, vel tempore; melius vos docebit qui loquitur in vobis, etiam absentibus nobis, quem pie cogitatis, quem corde suscepistis, cujus templa facti estis.
the words are: By what shall I know this? and: How shall this be? But it did not lie hidden from him who was hearing the words and seeing the heart. In the words of both the thought lay hidden; but it lay hidden from men, it did not lie hidden from the angel: nay rather, it did not lie hidden from Him Who was speaking through the angel. Lastly, John is born while the light is already lessening and the night begins to grow: Christ is born while the night takes loss and the day increase. And as though looking upon this very sign of the nativity of them both, John himself says: He must grow, but I must be lessened (John 3:30). We have set forth the things to be inquired into, and have announced beforehand the things to be discussed; but this I have said by way of preface: even if we are not sufficient, either in faculty or in time, for searching out all the recesses of so great a mystery, He will teach you better Who speaks within you, even when we are absent — He Whom you devoutly think upon, Whom you have received in the heart, Whose temples you have been made.
2. Videtur ergo Joannes interjectus quidam limes Testamentorum duorum, veteris et novi. Nam eum esse, ut dixi, quodam modo limitem Dominus ipse testatur dicens: Lex et Prophetae usque ad Joannem Baptistam (Luc. XVI, 16). Sustinet ergo personam vetustatis, et praeconium novitatis. Propter personam vetustatis, de senibus nascitur: propter personam novitatis, in visceribus matris propheta declaratur. Nondum enim natus ad sanctae Mariae adventum, exsultavit in utero matris. Jam ibi designatus erat, designatus antequam natus: cujus praecursor esset ostenditur, antequam ab eo videretur. Divina sunt haec, et mensuram humanae fragilitatis excedunt. Postremo nascitur, accipit nomen, lingua solvitur patris (Luc. I). Refer quod factum est ad significantem imaginem rerum: tantum quod factum est ne non factum putes, quoniam quid significaret forsitan dices. Hoc quod factum est, refer ad significationem rerum, et vide magnum mysterium. Zacharias tacet, et amittit vocem, donec Joannes nasceretur praecursor Domini, et aperiret vocem. Quid est silentium Zachariae, nisi prophetia latens, et ante praedicationem Christi quodam modo occulta et clausa? Aperitur illius adventu, clara fit venturo eo qui prophetabatur. Hoc est apertio vocis Zachariae in nativitate Joannis, quod est discissio veli in cruce Christi Joannes si se ipsum nuntiaret, Zachariae os non aperiret. Solvitur lingua, quia nascitur vox: nam Joanni jam praenuntianti Dominum dictum est, Tu quis es? Et respondit, Ego sum vox clamantis in eremo (Joan. I, 22, 23).
2. John, then, is seen as a kind of boundary set between the two Testaments, the old and the new. For that he is, as I have said, in a certain manner a boundary, the Lord Himself bears witness, saying: The Law and the Prophets as far as John the Baptist (Luke 16:16). He sustains, therefore, the person of the old, and the heralding of the new. Because of the person of the old, he is born of aged parents; because of the person of the new, in the inward parts of his mother he is declared a prophet. For not yet born, at the coming of holy Mary, he leaped in his mother's womb. Already there he had been designated, designated before he was born: Whose forerunner he was is shown, before he was seen by Him. Divine are these things, and they exceed the measure of human frailty. Lastly he is born, he receives a name, his father's tongue is loosed (Luke 1). Refer what was done to the image that signifies the realities — only, do not think that what was done was not done, because you will perhaps say what it signified. This that was done, refer to the signification of the realities, and see a great mystery. Zacharias is silent, and loses his voice, until John should be born, the forerunner of the Lord, and should open his voice. What is the silence of Zacharias, but prophecy lying hidden, and before the preaching of Christ in a certain manner concealed and shut up? It is opened at His coming; it becomes clear now that He Who was being prophesied is at hand. The opening of the voice of Zacharias at the nativity of John is what the rending of the veil is at the cross of Christ. If John were announcing himself, he would not open the mouth of Zacharias. The tongue is loosed, because the voice is born: for to John, already announcing the Lord beforehand, it was said: Who are you? And he answered: I am the voice of one who cries in the desert (John 1:22, 23).
3. Vox Joannes, Dominus autem in principio erat Verbum (Ibid., 1). Joannes vox ad tempus, Christus Verbum in principio aeternum. Tolle verbum, quid est vox? Ubi nullus est intellectus, inanis est strepitus. Vox sine verbo aurem pulsat, cor non aedificat. Verumtamen in ipso corde nostro aedificando advertamus ordinem rerum. Si cogito quid dicam, jam verbum est in corde meo: sed loqui ad te volens, quaero quemadmodum sit etiam in corde tuo, quod jam est in meo. Hoc quaerens quomodo ad te perveniat, et in
3. John is the voice, but the Lord in the beginning was the Word (ibid. 1:1). John a voice for a time, Christ the Word in the beginning eternal. Take away the word — what is the voice? Where there is no understanding, it is an empty noise. A voice without a word strikes the ear, it does not build up the heart. Yet in the building up of this very heart of ours let us mark the order of things. If I think what I am to say, the word is already in my heart; but wishing to speak to you, I seek how that which is already in mine may be also in your heart. Seeking this — how it may come through to you, and
PL 38:1329
corde tuo insideat verbum quod jam est in corde meo, assumo vocem, et assumpta voce loquor tibi: sonus vocis ducit ad te intellectum verbi: et cum ad te duxit sonus vocis intellectum verbi, sonus quidem ipse pertransit; verbum autem quod ad te sonus perduxit, jam est in corde tuo, nec recessit a meo. Sonus ergo, transacto verbo ad te, nonne tibi videtur dicere sonus ipse, Illum oportet crescere, me autem minui? Sonus vocis strepuit in ministerium, et abiit, quasi dicens, Hoc gaudium meum completum est (Joan. III, 30, 29). Verbum teneamus, verbum medullitus conceptum non amittamus. Vis videre vocem transeuntem, et Verbi divinitatem manentem? Baptismus Joannis modo ubi est? Ministravit, et abiit. Christi nunc Baptismus frequentatur. Omnes in Christum credimus, salutem in Christo speramus: hoc sonuit vox. Nam quia discernere difficile est a voce verbum, et ipse Joannes putatus est Christus. Vox verbum putata est: sed agnovit se vox, ne offenderet verbum. Non sum, inquit, Christus, nec Elias, nec propheta. Responsum est, Tu ergo quis es? Ego sum, inquit, vox clamantis in eremo, Parate viam Domino (Id. I, 20-23). Vox clamantis in eremo, vox rumpentis silentium. Parate viam Domino, tanquam diceret, Ego ideo sono, ut illum in cor introducam: sed quo introducam non dignatur venire, nisi viam praeparetis. Quid est, Viam parate; nisi, congrue supplicate? Quid est, Viam parate; nisi, humiliter cogitate? Ab ipso accipite humilitatis exemplum. Putatur Christus, dicit se non esse quod putatur, nec ad suum fastum errorem assumit alienum. Si diceret, Ego sum Christus; quam facillime crederetur, qui antequam diceret, credebatur? Non dixit: agnovit se, distinxit se, humiliavit se. Vidit ubi haberet salutem: lucernam se intellexit, et ne exstingueretur vento superbiae timuit.
may settle in your heart the word which is already in my heart, I take up a voice, and with the voice taken up I speak to you: the sound of the voice leads the understanding of the word across to you; and when the sound of the voice has led the understanding of the word across to you, the sound indeed passes away, but the word which the sound conveyed to you is now in your heart, and yet has not withdrawn from mine. The sound therefore, the word having passed over to you — does not the sound itself seem to you to say: He must grow, but I must be lessened? The sound of the voice made its noise for a ministry, and went away, as if saying: This joy of mine is complete (John 3:30, 29). Let us hold the word fast; let us not lose the word conceived in the marrow. Do you wish to see the voice passing away, and the divinity of the Word remaining? Where now is the baptism of John? It ministered, and went away. Now the baptism of Christ is frequented. We all believe in Christ, we all hope for salvation in Christ: this is what the voice sounded. For because it is hard to tell the word apart from the voice, even John himself was thought to be the Christ. The voice was thought to be the word; but the voice knew itself, lest it give offence to the word. I am not, he says, the Christ, nor Elias, nor the prophet. The answer came: Who then are you? I am, he says, the voice of one who cries in the desert: Make ready the way for the Lord (ibid. 1:20–23). The voice of one who cries in the desert, the voice of one breaking the silence. Make ready the way for the Lord — as though he said: I sound for this, that I may bring Him into the heart; but He does not deign to come where I would bring Him, unless you prepare the way. What is Make ready the way, but: Make fitting supplication? What is Make ready the way, but: Think humbly? From him receive the example of humility. He is thought to be the Christ; he says that he is not what he is thought to be, and does not take up another's error for his own pride. If he were to say, I am the Christ, how very easily would he be believed, who before he said it was believed already? He did not say it: he knew himself, he distinguished himself, he humbled himself. He saw where he had his salvation: he understood himself to be a lamp, and feared to be put out by the wind of pride.
4. Haec enim dispositio placuit Deo, ut tantae gratiae homo testimonium perhiberet Christo, qui posset putari Christus. Denique in natis mulierum, sicut dixit ipse Christus, nemo exsurrexit major Joanne Baptista (Matth. XI, 11). Si hoc homine nullus erat major homo, qui major est illo, plus est quam homo. Magnum testimonium Christi de se ipso, sed lippientibus et infirmis oculis parum de se testificatur dies. Infirmi oculi diem expavescunt, lucernam ferunt. Ideo praemisit lucernam dies venturus. Sed in corda fidelium lucernam praemisit, ad confundenda corda infidelium. Paravi, inquit, lucernam Christo meo: Deus Pater in prophetia loquens, Paravi lucernam Christo meo: Joannem Salvatori praeconem, judici praecursorem venturo, futuro amicum sponso. Paravi, inquit, lucernam Christo meo. Quare parasti? Inimicos ejus induam confusione: super ipsum autem florebit sanctificatio mea (Psal. CXXXI, 17, 18). Quomodo per hanc lucernam inimici ejus induti sunt confusione? Evangelium perscrutemur. Calumniantes
4. For this arrangement pleased God, that a man of such great grace should bear witness to Christ — a man who could be thought to be the Christ. In fine, among those born of women, as Christ Himself said, none has arisen greater than John the Baptist (Matt. 11:11). If no man was greater than this man, then He Who is greater than he is more than man. Great is the testimony of Christ concerning Himself; but to bleary and weak eyes the day testifies too little of itself. Weak eyes take fright at the day, they endure a lamp. Therefore the day that was to come sent a lamp before it. But it sent the lamp before it into the hearts of the faithful, for the confounding of the hearts of the unfaithful. I have prepared, He says, a lamp for my Christ: God the Father speaking in prophecy, I have prepared a lamp for my Christ — John, a herald for the Saviour, a forerunner for the judge Who was to come, a friend for the bridegroom Who was to be. I have prepared, He says, a lamp for my Christ. Why hast Thou prepared it? I will clothe His enemies in confusion, but over Him my sanctification shall flower (Ps. 131:17, 18). How were His enemies clothed with confusion by means of this lamp? Let us search the Gospel through. Slandering
Editors' notes and page, col. 1329

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: ad suum fastum› · call in col 1329

Vign., factum. Verius Mss., fastum

Vign. [Vignier]: factum ("deed"). The manuscripts, more correctly: fastum ("pride").

(printed under page 671)

(2) ‹anchor: testificatur dies› · call in col 1329

Mss., justificatur dies.

The manuscripts: justificatur dies ("the day is justified").

(printed under page 671)

PL 38:1330
Judaei Domino dixerunt, In qua potestate ista facis? Si tu es Christus, dic nobis palam. Causam quaerebant, non fidem; unde insidiarentur, non unde liberarentur. Denique qui corda eorum vidit, attendite quid respondit confusurus eos de lucerna. Interrogo, inquit, etiam vos unum sermonem: Dicite mihi, Baptisma Joannis unde est? de coelo, an ex hominibus? Illi continuo repercussi, et quamvis tenuiter radiante die, ad palpandum compulsi, quoniam claritatem illam speculari non poterant, ad sui cordis tenebras confugerunt, et ibi secum turbari coeperunt, offendentes et ruentes. Si dixerimus, inquiunt: hoc apud se ipsos, ubi cogitabant, sed quo ille cernebat: Si dixerimus, inquiunt, De coelo est; dicet nobis, Quare ergo non credidistis ei? Ipse enim testimonium perhibuerat Christo Domino. Si autem dixerimus, Ab hominibus; lapidant nos populi: quia propheta magnus Joannes habebatur. Et dixerunt, Nescimus. Nescitis: in tenebris estis, lumen amittitis. Quanto enim melius, si forte tenebrae in corde humano versantur, lumen admittere, non amittere. Ubi dixerunt, Nescimus: ait Dominus, Nec ego dico vobis in qua potestate ista facio (Matth. XXI, 23-27). Scio enim quo corde dixeritis, Nescimus, non volentes doceri, sed timentes confiteri.
Jews said to the Lord: By what power dost Thou do these things? If Thou art the Christ, tell us plainly. They were seeking a charge, not faith; something to lay snares by, not something to be set free by. Finally, mark what He Who saw their hearts answered, when He was about to confound them out of the lamp. I too, He says, ask you one word: Tell me, the baptism of John, whence was it? from heaven, or from men? They, struck back at once, and, though the day shone but thinly, driven to grope, since they could not gaze upon that brightness, took refuge in the darkness of their own heart, and there began to be troubled within themselves, stumbling and falling headlong. If we shall say — they say (this among their own selves, where they were thinking, but where He was seeing) — If we shall say, they say, It is from heaven; He will say to us: Why, then, did you put no faith in him? For he had borne witness to Christ the Lord. But if we shall say, From men; the people stone us: because John was held to be a great prophet. And they said: We do not know. You do not know: you are in the dark, you are letting the light go. For how much better it is, if darkness chances to be at work in a human heart, to let the light in, not to let it go. When they had said, We do not know, the Lord says: Nor do I tell you in what power I do these things (Matt. 21:23–27). For I know with what heart you said, We do not know: not willing to be taught, but afraid to confess.
5. Haec divina dispensatio; quantum homo perscrutari potest, melior melius, inferior inferius; haec divina dispensatio magnum nobis insinuat sacramentum. Venturus enim erat Christus in carne, non quicumque, non angelus, non legatus; sed ipse veniens salvos faciet eos (Isai. XXXV, 4). Non erat quicumque venturus: et tamen quomodo erat venturus? In carne mortali nasciturus, infans parvulus futurus, in praesepi ponendus, cunis involvendus, lacte nutriendus, per aetates augendus, postremo etiam morte perimendus. Haec ergo omnia humilitatis indicia et nimiae humilitatis est forma. Cujus haec humilitas? Excelsi. Quam excelsi? Noli quaerere in terra, transcende et sidera. Cum ad coelestes exercitus Angelorum veneris, audies ab eis, Transi et nos. Cum veneris ad Sedes, Dominationes, Principatus, Potestates, audies, Transi et nos; et nos facti sumus: Omnia per ipsum facta sunt. Universam transcende creaturam; quidquid conditum est, quidquid institutum, quidquid mutabile, sive corporeum, sive incorporeum, cuncta transcende. Videndo nondum potes, credendo transcende: perveni ad Creatorem, et interim fide antecedente te, quae perducit te, perveni ad Creatorem. Ibi vide, In principio erat Verbum. Non enim aliquando factum est: sed in principio erat. Non quomodo creatura, de qua dicitur, In principio fecit Deus coelum et terram (Gen. I, 1). Hoc quod in principio erat, non est quando non erat. Hoc ergo quod in principio erat, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et ipsum Verbum Deus erat: et omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum est nihil: et in quo est vita quod factum est (Joan. I, 1-4), venit ad nos. Ad quos? ad dignos? Absit: sed ad indignos. Etenim
5. This divine dispensation — so far as a man can search it out, the better man the better, the lesser man the less — this divine dispensation conveys to us a great sacrament. For Christ was to come in the flesh: not just anyone, not an angel, not an envoy; but He Himself, coming, shall save them (Isa. 35:4). It was not just anyone who was to come; and yet in what manner was He to come? To be born in mortal flesh, to be a little infant, to be laid in a manger, to be wrapped in swaddling clothes, to be nourished with milk, to be increased through the ages of life, and at the last even to be destroyed by death. All these, then, are the tokens of humility, and it is the form of an exceeding humility. Whose is this humility? The Most High's. How high? Do not look for Him on earth; pass beyond the stars as well. When you have come to the heavenly armies of the Angels, you will hear from them: Pass beyond us too. When you have come to the Thrones, Dominations, Principalities, Powers, you will hear: Pass beyond us too; we also were made. All things were made through Him. Pass beyond the whole creation; whatever has been founded, whatever established, whatever is mutable, whether bodily or bodiless, pass beyond it all. By seeing you cannot yet; by believing, pass beyond: come through to the Creator, and meanwhile, with faith going before you, which leads you through, come through to the Creator. There see: In the beginning was the Word. For it was not made at some time: but in the beginning it was. Not as the creature is, of which it is said, In the beginning God made heaven and earth (Gen. 1:1). Of this which was in the beginning, there is no 'when' in which it was not. This, then, which was in the beginning, and the Word was with God, and the Word itself was God: and all things were made through Him, and without Him was made nothing: and that which was made, in Him is life (John 1:1–4) — came to us. To whom? to the worthy? God forbid: but to the unworthy. For indeed
PL 38:1331
Christus pro impiis mortuus est (Rom. V, 6), et indignis, sed dignus. Nos enim indigni quorum misereretur; sed dignus ille qui misereretur, cui diceretur, Propter misericordiam tuam, Domine, libera nos. Non propter praecedentia nostra merita, sed propter misericordiam tuam, Domine, libera nos; et propitius esto peccatis nostris propter nomen tuum (Psal. LXXVIII, 9), non propter meritum nostrum. Nam non propter meritum peccatorum, sed propter nomen tuum. Nam meritum peccatorum, non utique praemium, sed supplicium. Ergo propter nomen tuum. Ecce ad quos venit, ecce quantus venit. Ad nos ille quomodo venit? Verbum plane caro factum est, ut inhabitaret in nobis (Joan. I, 14). Si enim in sua d⟨i⟩vinitate tantummodo veniret, quis eum ferret? quis eum caperet? quis susciperet? Sed suscepit quod nos eramus, ne remaneremus quod eramus: sed quod nos eramus natura, non culpa. Quia enim ad homines homo, non tamen quia ad peccatores peccator. De duobus istis, natura humana et culpa humana, unum suscepit, aliud sanavit. Nam si ipse susciperet nostram iniquitatem, et ipse quaereret salvatorem. Suscepit tamen ferendam et sanandam, non autem habendam: et homo apparuit inter homines, latens Deus.
Christ died for the ungodly (Rom. 5:6), and for the unworthy — but He was worthy. For we were unworthy to be pitied; but He was worthy Who should pity, He to Whom it should be said: For Thy mercy's sake, Lord, deliver us. Not for our preceding merits, but for Thy mercy's sake, Lord, deliver us; and be merciful to our sins for Thy name's sake (Ps. 78:9), not for our merit's sake. For it is not for the merit of sins, but for Thy name's sake. For the merit of sins is assuredly not a reward but a punishment. Therefore for Thy name's sake. See to whom He came; see how great He came. How did He come to us? The Word plainly was made flesh, that He might dwell in us (John 1:14). For if He came only in His divinity, who would bear Him? who would contain Him? who would receive Him? But He took up what we were, lest we should remain what we were: yet what we were by nature, not by fault. For because He came to men, a man; yet not, because He came to sinners, a sinner. Of these two, human nature and human fault, He took up the one, He healed the other. For if He Himself were to take up our iniquity, He too would be looking for a saviour. He took it up, however, to be borne and to be healed, not to be had: and He appeared a man among men, God lying hidden.
6. Quis ergo testimonium huic perhibeat diei latenti in quadam nube carnis? Da lucernam, testetur diem: sed hanc lucernam auge, ut quisquis plus illa fuerit, dies sit: In natis mulierum non exsurrexit major Joanne Baptista (Matth. XI, 11). O ineffabilis dispensatio! Ego, fratres, cum haec cogito, multum miror quod dicit Joannes de Christo, teste Evangelio: Non sum dignus, inquit, corrigiam calceamenti ejus solvere (Joan. I, 27). Quid humilius dici potest? Quid excelsius Christo? quid humilius crucifixo? Qui habet sponsam, sponsus est; amicus autem sponsi stat, et audit eum, et gaudio gaudet propter vocem sponsi (Joan. III, 29), non propter suam. Nos, inquit, de plenitudine ejus omnes accepimus (Id. I, 16). Quanta dicit de Christo, quam praeclara! quam excelsa! quam digna! si tamen de illo aliquid ab aliquo digne dicitur. Et tamen non ambulat inter discipulos Domini, non eum secutus est, ut Petrus, ut Andreas, ut Joannes, ut caeteri. Sed discipulos sibi ipse etiam congregavit, et constituto hic licet Domino cum discipulis suis, habebat discipulos et Joannes. Dicebantur discipuli Joannis. Dicebatur ipsi Domino, Quare Joannis discipuli jejunant, discipuli autem tui non jejunant (Marc. II, 18)? Hoc erat procul dubio necessarium praecursori fideli, ab eo Christum praedicari qui posset aemulus credi. Habebat discipulos Joannes, habebat et Christus: quasi extra docebat, sed testis inhaerebat. Ideo in natis mulierum nemo exsurrexit major Joanne Baptista. Fuerunt Prophetae, habuerunt discipulos, sed non praesente Christo. Fuerunt postea magni Apostoli, sed quia discipuli Christi, non quia
6. Who then shall bear testimony to this day hidden in a certain cloud of flesh? Give a lamp, let it testify to the day: but increase this lamp, so that whoever shall be more than it is the day itself: Among those born of women there has arisen none greater than John the Baptist (Matt. 11:11). O unutterable dispensation! When I consider these things, brethren, I greatly marvel at what John says of Christ, the Gospel being witness: I am not worthy, he says, to loose the strap of His sandal (John 1:27). What humbler thing can be said? What is loftier than Christ? what humbler than the crucified? Whoever has the bride is the bridegroom; but the bridegroom's friend stands and listens to Him, and rejoices with gladness at the bridegroom's voice (John 3:29), not because of his own. We, he says, have all received of His fullness (ibid. 1:16). How great the things he says of Christ, how splendid! how lofty! how worthy! — if indeed anything is said worthily of Him by anyone. And yet he does not walk among the disciples of the Lord, he did not follow Him, as Peter did, as Andrew, as John, as the rest. But he gathered disciples to himself as well, and although the Lord was here established with His own disciples, John too had disciples. They were called the disciples of John. It was said to the Lord Himself: Why do John's disciples keep fasts, while Thy disciples do not fast (Mark 2:18)? This without doubt was necessary for a faithful forerunner, that Christ should be preached by one who could be believed a rival. John had disciples, Christ had them too: he taught as though outside, but as a witness he clung close. Therefore among those born of women none has arisen greater than John the Baptist. There were Prophets, they had disciples, but not while Christ was present. There were afterwards great Apostles, but [they had them] because they were Christ's disciples, not because
Editors' notes and page, col. 1331

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: necessarium praecursori fideli› · call in col 1331

Mss., fidei.

The manuscripts: fidei ("of faith").

(printed under page 672)

PL 38:1332
discipulos potuerunt habere cum Christo. Habet ille discipulos, congregat, baptizat: quid putamus? foris, an intus? Imo vero reipsa intus, ut tanquam homo a Deo liberaretur; specie quasi foris, ut testis crederetur. Intende hoc ipsum: perhibebant Domino testimonium, verbi gratia, Petrus, Andreas, Joannes et caeteri; cum diceretur eis, Laudatis quem sequimini, praedicatis cui adhaeretis. Veniat lucerna, confundens inimicos, colligat discipulos. Habet Christus, habet et Joannes. Baptizat Christus, baptizat et Joannes; et venitur ad Joannem, et dicitur ei, Ille cui testimonium perhibuisti, ecce baptizat, et omnes veniunt ad eum: ut quasi aemulus invidiae de Christo aliquid mali loqueretur. Sed ibi lucerna ardet tutius, ibi splendet clarius, ibi vegetatur, quanto distinctius, tanto securius. Jam, inquit, dixi vobis, quia ego non sum Christus. Qui habet sponsam, sponsus est: qui de coelo venit, super omnes est (Joan. III, 26-31). Tunc illi credentes Christum admirabantur, tunc vero inimici confundebantur, quando quodam modo compellebatur praedicare, qui credi poterat invidere. Cogitur enim Dominum servus agnoscere, cogitur creatura Creatori testimonium perhibere: nec cogitur, sed libenter facit. Amicus est enim, non invidus: nec sibi, sed sponso zelat.
they could have disciples along with Christ. He has disciples, he gathers them, he baptizes: what are we to think? outside, or inside? Rather, in the very fact, inside, so that as a man he might be set free by God; in appearance as though outside, so that as a witness he might be believed. Consider this very thing: they bore testimony to the Lord — Peter, for instance, Andrew, John and the rest — when it might be said to them: You praise Him Whom you follow, you preach Him to Whom you cling. Let the lamp come, confounding the enemies, let it gather disciples. Christ has them, John has them too. Christ baptizes, John baptizes too; and men come to John, and it is said to him: He to Whom you bore witness, behold He baptizes, and all are coming to Him — that as a rival he might say something evil of Christ out of envy. But the lamp there burns more safely, there shines more brightly, there is quickened; the more distinctly, so much the more securely. Already, he says, I told you that I am not the Christ. Whoever has the bride is the bridegroom: whoever comes from heaven is over all (John 3:26–31). Then those who believed marvelled at Christ, and then indeed the enemies were confounded, when in a certain manner he was compelled to preach who could have been believed to envy. For the servant is compelled to acknowledge the Lord, the creature is compelled to bear testimony to the Creator: nor is he compelled, but does it willingly. For he is a friend, not envious: nor is he jealous for himself, but for the bridegroom.
7. Faciunt hoc amici sponsi; et est quaedam in nuptiis humanis solemnitas, ut exceptis aliis amicis, etiam paranymphus adhibeatur, amicus interior, conscius secreti cubicularis. Sed hic interest, et plane multum interest. Quod in nuptiis humanis homo homini paranymphus est, hoc est Joannes Christo, et idem Deus Christus sponsus, mediator Dei et hominum; sed in quantum homo. Nam in quantum Deus non mediator, sed aequalis Patri, hoc idem quod Pater, cum Patre unus Deus. Quando esset ista sublimitas mediatrix, a qua multum longe disjuncti jacebamus? Ut medius sit, aliquid assumat quod non erat: sed ut perveniamus, maneat quod erat. Ecce enim Deus super nos, ecce nos infra illum, et multa interjacent spatia, maxime peccati intervallum longe nos distinguit atque abjicit. In hac tanta distantia cum veniendum esset ad Deum, qua venturi eramus? Ipse Deus, Deus manet: accedit homo Deo, et fit una persona, ut sit non semideus, quasi parte Dei Deus, et parte hominis homo; sed totus Deus et totus homo: Deus liberator, homo mediator; ut per illum ad illum, non per alium, nec non ad illum; sed per id quod in illo nos sumus, ad illum per quem facti sumus. Ideo Apostolus quamvis Christum noverit Deum: nam ipse de illo dixit, cum de Judaeorum praecedentibus meritis loqueretur, Quorum patres, et ex quibus Christus secundum carnem, qui est super omnia Deus benedictus in saecula (Rom. IX, 5): cum ergo sciret illum Deum, et super omnia Deum, ac per hoc utique super omnia, quia per illum facta sunt omnia; ventum est ut commendaret mediatorem, et non dixit Deum; non enim per hoc mediator est, quod Deus est; sed per hoc mediator, quia
7. The friends of the bridegroom do this; and there is a certain solemnity in human weddings, that besides the other friends a groomsman also is brought in, an inner friend, privy to the secret of the bridal chamber. But here there is a difference, and plainly a great difference. What in human weddings a man is to a man as groomsman, that John is to Christ; and the same Christ is God, the bridegroom, the mediator of God and men — but inasmuch as He is man. For inasmuch as He is God, He is not mediator, but equal to the Father, this same thing which the Father is, one God with the Father. When would that sublimity be a mediatrix, from which we lay parted very far off? That He may be in the middle, let Him take up something which He was not: but that we may come through, let Him remain what He was. For see, God is above us, see, we are below Him, and many spaces lie between; above all, the interval of sin marks us off and casts us far away. In so great a distance, when there was need of coming to God, by what were we to come? God Himself remains God: man draws near to God, and one person comes to be, so that He is not a half-god, as it were God in the part that is God's and man in the part that is man's; but wholly God and wholly man: God the deliverer, man the mediator; that it is through Him that we come to Him, not through anyone else, nor indeed without coming to Him; but by what we are in Him, [we come] to Him through Whom we were made. Therefore the Apostle, although he knew Christ to be God — for he himself said of Him, when he was speaking of the preceding merits of the Jews: To whom the fathers belong, and from whom Christ [came] according to the flesh, Who is God above all things, blessed unto the ages (Rom. 9:5) — since therefore he knew Him to be God, and God over all, and by this assuredly over all, because through Him all things were made; when it came to commending the mediator, he did not say God; for He is not mediator by this, that He is God, but is mediator by this, that
PL 38:1333
factus est homo. Ipsa est liberatio nostra. Unus enim Deus. Quia utique Catholici auditis, instructi auditis, vigilanter auditis, Unus Deus: numquid solus Pater? numquid solus Filius? numquid solus Spiritus sanctus? Sed utique Pater et Filius et Spiritus sanctus unus Deus. Ergo, Unus Deus, unus et mediator Dei et hominum homo Christus Jesus (I Tim. II, 5). Si diceret, Unus Deus, unus et mediator Dei et hominum Christus Jesus; tanquam minor Deus intelligeretur. Etenim ab illa Trinitatis deitate quasi separaretur, si unus Deus, unus et mediator Dei et hominum Jesus Christus, quasi non ille Deus qui unus diceretur. Sed quia in unitate Dei, ibi Pater et Filius et Spiritus sanctus: unitatem teneat divinitas, medietatem suscipiat humanitas.
He was made man. This is our deliverance. For there is one God. Since assuredly you hear as Catholics, you hear as instructed men, you hear watchfully: One God — is it the Father alone? is it the Son alone? is it the Holy Spirit alone? But assuredly the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are one God. Therefore, One God, one also the mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus (1 Tim. 2:5). If he had said, One God, one also the mediator between God and men, Christ Jesus, He would have been understood as a lesser God. For He would as it were be separated from that deity of the Trinity, if it were one God, one also the mediator between God and men, Jesus Christ — as though He were not that God Who was called one. But because in the unity of God there are the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit: let the divinity hold the unity, let the humanity take up the mediation.
8. Hac medietate reconciliatur Deo omnis generis humani massa ab illo per Adam alienata. Per Adam enim peccatum intravit in mundum, et per peccatum mors; et ita in omnes homines pertransiit, in quo omnes peccaverunt (Rom. V, 12). Quis hinc erueretur? quis ab hac massa irae ad misericordiam distingueretur? Quis enim te discernit? Quid autem habes quod non accepisti (I Cor. IV, 7)? Non ergo nos discernunt merita, sed gratia. Nam si merita, debitum est: si debitum est, gratis non est: si gratis non est, gratia non est. Hoc ipse Apostolus dixit: Si autem gratia, jam non ex operibus; alioquin gratia jam non est gratia (Rom. XI, 6). Per unum salvamur, majores, minores, senes, juvenes, parvuli, infantes; per unum salvamur. Unus enim Deus, unus et mediator Dei et hominum homo Christus Jesus. Per unum hominem mors, et per unum resurrectio mortuorum. Sicut in Adam omnes moriuntur, sic et in Christo omnes vivificabuntur (I Cor. XV, 21, 22).
8. By this mediation the whole lump of the human race, estranged from Him through Adam, is reconciled to God. For through Adam sin entered into the world, and through sin death; and so it passed through into all men, in whom all have sinned (Rom. 5:12). Who was to be rescued from this? who was to be marked off from this lump of wrath unto mercy? For who singles you out? And what do you have that you did not receive (1 Cor. 4:7)? It is not merits, then, that distinguish us, but grace. For if merits, it is a debt: if a debt, it is not free: if not free, it is not grace. This the Apostle himself said: But if by grace, then not now of works; otherwise grace is now not grace (Rom. 11:6). Through one we are saved, greater and lesser, old men, young men, little children, infants: through one we are saved. For there is one God, one also the mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus. Through one man death, and through one the resurrection of the dead. Just as in Adam all are dying, so too in Christ all will be brought to life (1 Cor. 15:21, 22).
9. Hic aliquis occurrit, et dicit mihi: Quomodo omnes? Qui ergo in gehennam mittendi sunt, qui cum diabolo damnabuntur, qui aeternis ignibus torquebuntur? Quomodo omnes et omnes? Quia nemo ad mortem nisi per Adam, nemo ad vitam nisi per Christum. Si esset alius per quem veniremus ad mortem, non omnes in Adam morerentur. Si esset alius per quem veniremus ad vitam, non omnes in Christo vivificarentur.
9. Here someone meets me, and says to me: How all? Those then who are to be sent into hell, who will be damned with the devil, who will be tormented with eternal fires — how all, and all? Because no one comes to death but through Adam, no one to life but through Christ. If there were another through whom we might come to death, not all would die in Adam. If there were another through whom we might come to life, not all would be made alive in Christ.
10. Quid ergo, ait aliquis, et infans indiget liberatore? Plane indiget: testis est mater fideliter currens cum parvulo baptizando ad ecclesiam. Testis est ipsa mater Ecclesia suscipiens parvulum abluendum, et aut liberatum dimittendum, aut pietate nutriendum. Quis audeat dicere testimonium contra tantam matrem? Postremo et in ipso parvulo miseriae ipsius testis est fletus. Quantum potest, testatur natura infirma, parum intelligens; non incipit a risu, incipit a fletu. Agnosce miserum, porrige auxilium. Omnes misericordiae
10. What then, says someone: does an infant too need a deliverer? Plainly he needs one: the witness is the mother running faithfully with her little one to the church to have him baptized. The witness is mother Church herself, taking up the little one to be washed, and either, once set free, to be sent away, or to be nursed in piety. Who would dare to speak testimony against so great a mother? Lastly, in the little one himself, his weeping is the witness of his misery. So far as it can, weak nature testifies, with little understanding: he does not begin from laughter, he begins from weeping. Recognize the wretched one, hold out help. Let all with the bowels of mercy
Editors' notes and page, col. 1333

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: et hominum Christus Jesus› · call in col 1333

Vignerius ex Regio codice, homo Christus Jesus. Hoc loco meliores manuscripti non habent, homo; quam vocem hic reticuit Augustinus, ut sensum Apostoli ea detracta non constare ostenderet : qui nimirum sensus est, mediatoris officium ad hominem Christum, qui unus cum Patre et Spiritu sancto Deus est, pertinere.

Vignier, from the Royal codex: homo Christus Jesus ("the man Christ Jesus"). At this place the better manuscripts do not have homo ("man"); Augustine kept this word back here in order to show that, with it removed, the Apostle's meaning does not hold together: which meaning, of course, is that the office of mediator belongs to the man Christ, who is one God with the Father and the Holy Spirit.

(printed under page 673)

PL 38:1334
visceribus induantur. Quanto minus pro se ipsi possunt, tanto misericordius pro parvulis nos loquamur. Auxilium rerum suarum tuendarum Ecclesia solet praebere pupillis: omnes loquamur pro parvulis, ab omnibus eis praebeatur auxilium, ne perdant coeleste patrimonium. Et propter illos Dominus illorum parvulus factus est. Quomodo ad ejus liberationem non pertinuerunt, qui pro illo primi occidi meruerunt?
be clothed. The less they can do for themselves, the more mercifully let us speak for the little ones. The Church is accustomed to hold out help to orphans for the protection of their property: let us all speak for the little ones, let help be held out to them by all, lest they lose the heavenly patrimony. And for their sake the Lord of them was made a little one. How did they not belong to His deliverance, who first deserved to be killed for Him?
11. Postremo de ipso Domino Salvatore, cum ejus nativitas proxima praenuntiaretur, dictum est: Vocabunt nomen ejus Jesum: ipse enim salvum faciet populum suum a peccatis eorum (Matth. I, 21). Jesum tenemus, interpretationem nominis hujus habemus. Quare Jesus, quod latine Salvator dicitur, quare Jesus? Ipse enim salvum faciet populum suum. Sed salvum fecit populum suum in manu potenti Moyses, et in adjutorio Excelsi a persecutione et dominatione Aegyptiorum: fecit salvum populum suum et Jesus Nave a persecutoribus bellisque gentium: fecerunt salvum populum Judices, eum ab Allophylis liberantes; fecerunt et Reges, a dominatu circumquaque oblatrantium gentium liberantes. Non sic salvat Jesus: sed a peccatis eorum. Vocabunt nomen ejus Jesum. Quare? Ipse enim salvum faciet populum suum. Unde? A peccatis eorum. Nunc de parvulo interrogo, affertur ad ecclesiam faciendus christianus, baptizandus, puto quia ideo ut sit in populo Jesu. Cujus Jesu? Qui salvum facit populum suum a peccatis eorum. Si non habet quod in illo salvetur, auferatur hinc. Quare non dicimus matribus, Auferte hinc istos parvulos? Jesus namque salvator est: si non habent isti quod in illis salvetur, auferte hinc eos. Non est opus sanis medicus, sed male habentibus (Id. IX, 12). Audebit mihi quisquam in hoc parvuli discrimine dicere: Mihi est Jesus, huic non est Jesus. Ergo tibi est Jesus, huic non est Jesus? Non venit ad Jesum? non pro illo respondetur ut credat in Jesum? Alterum baptismum instituimus parvulis, in quo non fit remissio peccatorum? Plane si iste parvulus pro se loqui posset, vocem contradicentis refelleret, et clamaret: Da mihi vitam Christi; in Adam mortuus sum; da mihi vitam Christi, in cujus conspectu mundus non est, nec infans cujus est unius diei vita super terram (Job XIV, 4, sec. LXX). Istis gratiam non negaret, nec qui de suo daret. Fiat misericordia cum miseris. Utquid eorum innocentia ultra modum laudatur? Inveniant salvatorem, nondum sentiant adulatorem. Nos plane in tanto infantium periculo nec disputare debemus, ne eorum salutem vel disputando differre videamur. Afferatur, abluatur, liberetur, vivificetur. Sicut in Adam omnes moriuntur, sic et in Christo omnes vivificabuntur. Non invenit qua veniret in hujus saeculi vitam, nisi per Adam: non inveniet qua evadat futuri saeculi poenam, nisi per Christum. Quid claudis unicam januam? Unus enim
11. Lastly, of the Lord and Saviour Himself, when His nativity was foretold as at hand, it was said: They shall call His name Jesus: for He Himself shall save His people from their sins (Matt. 1:21). We hold Jesus; we have the interpretation of this name. Why Jesus, which in Latin is called Saviour — why Jesus? For He Himself shall save His people. But Moses saved his people too, with a mighty hand and with the help of the Most High, from the persecution and dominion of the Egyptians; Joshua the son of Nun also saved his people from the persecutors and the wars of the nations; the Judges saved the people, setting them free from the Philistines; the Kings did so too, setting them free from the dominion of the nations barking all around. Not so does Jesus save: but from their sins. They shall call His name Jesus. Why? For He Himself shall save His people. From what? From their sins. Now I ask about the little one: he is brought to church to be made a Christian, to be baptized — for this reason, I suppose, that he may be among the people of Jesus. Of which Jesus? Of Him Who saves His people from their sins. If he has nothing in him to be saved, let him be carried away from here. Why do we not say to the mothers: Carry away these little ones from here? For Jesus is a saviour: if these have nothing in them to be saved, carry them away from here. There is no need of a physician for the healthy, but for those who are unwell (ibid. 9:12). Will anyone dare to say to me, in this peril of a little one: Jesus is mine, Jesus is not his? Is Jesus then yours, and Jesus not his? Does he not come to Jesus? is answer not made for him that he may believe in Jesus? Do we institute a second baptism for little ones, in which no remission of sins takes place? Plainly, if that little one could speak for himself, he would refute the voice of the objector and cry out: Give me the life of Christ; in Adam I have died; give me the life of Christ, in Whose sight no one is clean, not even an infant whose life upon earth is of one day (Job 14:4, acc. to the LXX). To these one would not deny grace — not even one who gave of his own. Let mercy be done with the wretched. Why is their innocence praised beyond measure? Let them find a saviour, let them not yet meet a flatterer. We plainly, in so great a peril of infants, ought not even to dispute, lest we seem by disputing to delay their salvation. Let him be brought, let him be washed, let him be set free, let him be made alive. Just as in Adam all are dying, so too in Christ all will be brought to life. He found no way to come into the life of this world but through Adam: he will find no way to escape the punishment of the world to come but through Christ. Why do you shut the one door? For there is one
Editors' notes and page, col. 1334

Footnotes

(a) ‹anchor: coeleste patrimonium› · call in col 1334

Vide serm. 176, n. 2.

See Sermon 176, n. 2.

(printed under page 673)

(b) ‹anchor: auferte hinc eos› · call in col 1334

Vide serm. 174, n. 7-9.

See Sermon 174, nn. 7-9.

(printed under page 673)

PL 38:1335
Deus, unus et mediator Dei et hominum homo Christus Jesus. Audi, clamat tibi: Non est enim opus sanis medicus, sed male habentibus. Quare istum sanum dicis, nisi quia medico contradicis?
God, one also the mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus. Hear, He cries out to you: For there is no need of a physician for the healthy, but for those who are unwell. Why do you call this one well, unless because you contradict the physician?
12. Plane, inquit, et Joannes, de quo loquebaris, cum peccato natus est? Invenisti plane praeter peccatum natum, quem invenis praeter Adam natum. Non avellis hanc sententiam de manibus fidelium: Per unum hominem mors, et per unum resurrectio mortuorum. Sicut in Adam omnes moriuntur, sic et in Christo omnes vivificabuntur. Per unum hominem peccatum intravit in mundum, et per peccatum mors, et ita in omnes homines pertransiit. Si verba mea haec essent, posset a me haec sententia dici expressius? posset evidentius? posset plenius? Ita in omnes homines pertransiit, in quo omnes peccaverunt. Jam tu excipe Joannem: si separaveris ab hominibus, si separaveris ab illo tramite humanae propaginis, si separaveris a complexu masculi et feminae, etiam ab ista sententia separabis. Nam ille qui voluit ab ea esse separatus, per virginem est venire dignatus. Utquid me cogis discutere merita Joannis? In utero Dominum salutavit: sed puto quia eum salutavit, a quo salutem desideravit. Non quaerit tuam perniciosissimam defensionem. Venienti Domino ad baptismum suum, conscius communis infirmitatis ait: Ego a te debeo baptizari (Matth. III, 14). Veniebat enim Dominus ad commendandam etiam in baptismo humilitatem, ad ipsius sacramenti consecrationem. Quia sic suscepit baptismum juvenis, quemadmodum infans circumcisionem. Suscepit commendanda medicamenta, non vulnera. Ille autem quare diceret, Ego a te debeo baptizari, mundus ab omni penitus noxa, si non in eo erat quod sanaretur, si non in eo erat quod mundaretur? Ille se dicit debitorem, et tu eum purgas, ne debita relaxentur. Ego a te, inquit, debeo baptizari: opus est mihi, necessarium est mihi. Et hoc illi ibi praestitum est. Quando enim Dominus in aquam, non ille praeter aquam. Quid pluribus? Cesset deinceps, si fieri potest, contrarius disputator; quia et praeconem suum liberavit ipse Salvator.
12. Plainly, he says: and was John too, of whom you were speaking, born with sin? You have plainly found one born apart from sin, when you find one born apart from Adam. You do not tear this sentence out of the hands of the faithful: Through one man death, and through one the resurrection of the dead. Just as in Adam all are dying, so too in Christ all will be brought to life. Through one man sin entered into the world, and through sin death, and so it passed through into all men. If these were my words, could this sentence be said by me more expressly? could it be said more evidently? could it be said more fully? So it passed through into all men, in whom all have sinned. Now do you make John an exception: if you shall have separated him from men, if you shall have separated him from that track of human propagation, if you shall have separated him from the embrace of male and female, you will separate him from this sentence too. For He Who willed to be separated from it deigned to come through a virgin. Why do you force me to sift John's merits? In the womb he saluted the Lord: but I suppose that he saluted Him from Whom he desired salvation. He does not ask for your most pernicious defence. When the Lord came to his baptism, conscious of the common infirmity he said: I must be baptized by Thee (Matt. 3:14). For the Lord was coming to commend humility in baptism also, and to the consecration of that sacrament itself. Because He took up baptism as a young man in the same way that He took up circumcision as an infant. He took up remedies that were to be commended, not wounds. But why should that man say, I must be baptized by Thee — he, clean from every hurt through and through — if there were not in him something to be healed, if there were not in him something to be cleansed? He calls himself a debtor, and you clear him, so that the debts should not be released. I must, he says, be baptized by Thee: I have need of it, it is necessary for me. And this was granted him there. For when the Lord [went] into the water, he was not [kept] out of the water. Why say more? Let the disputer on the other side cease from now on, if it can be done; because the Saviour Himself set free His own herald as well.