PL 38 · cols. 32–51
Augustine, Sermones 1-18 (Classis I, de Scripturis: de Vetere Testamento)
Sermons III–IV
Migne Reading Room
PL 38 · cols. 32–51
Sermons III–IV
(1) ‹anchor: Et fides quae per dilectionem operatur› · call in col 32
Hic apud Am. Er et Par. finitur tractatus, apposita clausula, Per quam adipisci credimus salutem aeternam. Amen.
Here in Am., Er. and Par. the discourse ends, with the closing formula appended: Per quam adipisci credimus salutem aeternam. Amen.
(printed under page 20)
(2) ‹anchor: De Agar et Ismaele (call not legible; placed from the note's sense)› · call in col 32
Bedae Mss., ad Galat., cap. 4, v. 29, titulo addunt, in natali Martyrum.
The manuscripts of Bede, on Galatians, ch. 4, v. 29, add to the title: in natali Martyrum.
(printed under page 20)
(3) ‹anchor: pars Donati› · call in col 32
Ita in Mss. At in editis, pars Domini
So in the manuscripts. But in the printed editions, pars Domini.
(printed under page 20) (*) ‹anchor: SERMO III› · call in col 32 Recognitus est ad bd. fl. r. et ad Ulim. Par. Lov.
Revised against bd. fl. r. [manuscripts] and against Ulim., Par., Lov. [editions].
(printed under page 20)
(a) ‹anchor: FRAGMENTUM› · call in col 32
Alias, in Fragmentis 32. In Bedae ac Flori collectione et in Regio Ms. repertum.
Elsewhere, among the Fragments, 32. Found in the collection of Bede and Florus and in the Royal manuscript.
(printed under page 20)
(1) ‹anchor: et filios earum› · call in col 33
Sic Bedae Mss. Caeteri libri, Ejice haereticos et filios eorum.
So the manuscripts of Bede. The other books have Ejice haereticos et filios eorum.
(*) ‹anchor: SERMO IV› · call in col 33 Recognitus ad gr. r. Ulim. Par. Lov.
Revised against gr. r. [manuscripts] and Ulim., Par., Lov. [editions].
(printed under page 21)
(a) ‹anchor: SERMO IV› · call in col 33
Alias, de Diversis 44.
Elsewhere, de Diversis 44.
(printed under page 21)
(b) ‹anchor: Jacob et Esau› · call in col 33
Possidius hunc in Indiculo, c. 8, sermonem notat: qui quidem in Regio Ms. inscribitur, « De benedictionibus Esau et Jacob. »
Possidius records this sermon in the Indiculus, ch. 8; in the Royal manuscript it is in fact entitled "On the blessings of Esau and Jacob."
(printed under page 21)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 34
Par. et Ulim., in via praeceptorum Dei. Regius autem Ms. praeterit isthaec verba, praeceptorum Dei: nec vestigia ejus nutent, nec; ac sic affirmanter dicitur, Oculi ejus palpitent. Forte non male, quando infra, n. 7, affirmans sententia est, Palpitet mentis acies, purgetur ut videat.
Par. and Ulim. have in via praeceptorum Dei. The Royal manuscript, however, passes over these words, praeceptorum Dei: nec vestigia ejus nutent, nec; and so it is said affirmatively, Oculi ejus palpitent. Perhaps not badly, since below, n. 7, the sentence is affirmative: Palpitet mentis acies, purgetur ut videat.
(printed under page 21)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 35
Par. et Ulim., vel quaecumque nihil sunt. Lov., in eo sunt. At Mss., in his sunt.
Par. and Ulim. have vel quaecumque nihil sunt. Lov. has in eo sunt. But the manuscripts have in his sunt.
(printed under page 22)
(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 35
Forte, infimum.
Perhaps, infimum.
(printed under page 22)
(1) ‹anchor: regulam vident› · call in col 36
Sic Mss. Editi vero, secundum enim regulam videt.
So the manuscripts. The printed editions, however, have secundum enim regulam videt.
(printed under page 22)
(a) ‹anchor: intueatur et videat› · call in col 36
Forte, ut vivat. [reading uncertain: the note's last two words are badly printed in the scan]
Perhaps, ut vivat.
(printed under page 22)
(1) ‹anchor: ad Novum Testamentum› · call in col 37
Isthaec sententia, Circumcisio carnalis pertinet ad Vetus Testamentum: circumcisio, etc., omissa in editis fuerat. Restituitur ex Ms. Corb.
This sentence, Circumcisio carnalis pertinet ad Vetus Testamentum: circumcisio, etc., had been omitted in the printed editions. It is restored from the Corbie manuscript.
(printed under page 23)
(1) ‹anchor: isto desiderio› · call in col 38
Corbeiensis Ms., ista desideria.
The Corbie manuscript has ista desideria.
(printed under page 23)
(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 38
Forte, desideriis. [reading uncertain: the last word is badly printed in the scan]
Perhaps, desideriis.
(printed under page 23)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 39
Editi, primo promittebat; omissa voce, populo, quae exstat in manuscriptis.
The printed editions have primo promittebat, omitting the word populo, which stands in the manuscripts.
(printed under page 24)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 40
Sic Mss. Editi vero, oculis hominum.
So the manuscripts. The printed editions, however, have oculis hominum.
(printed under page 24)
(2) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 40
Mss., praestaret.
The manuscripts have praestaret.
(printed under page 24)
(3) ‹anchor: benedictio spiritualis› · call in col 40
Sic in Mss. At in editis deest vox, spiritualis.
So in the manuscripts. But in the printed editions the word spiritualis is wanting.
(printed under page 24)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 41
Regius et Victorinus Ms., in scriptis Ecclesia propheticis docet nos, etc.
The Royal and Saint-Victor manuscripts have in scriptis Ecclesia propheticis docet nos, etc.
(printed under page 25)
(2) ‹anchor: schismata pereant› · call in col 41
Forte, pereunt.
Perhaps, pereunt.
(printed under page 25)
(3) ‹anchor: sine dolo erat› · call in col 41
Duo Mss., ideo sine dolo erat; omisso, quia.
Two manuscripts have ideo sine dolo erat, omitting quia.
(printed under page 25)
(a) ‹anchor: abstulit benedictionem› · call in col 41
Quaestionem hanc Augustinus in quaest. 72 super Gen. indicat jam a se in hoc ipso sermone tractatam.
In question 72 on Genesis Augustine indicates that this question has already been treated by him in this very sermon.
(printed under page 25)
(1) ‹anchor: Sic ergo› · call in col 42
Mss.: si ergo. Pauloque post duo Mss., id est, haedinas pelles, quod est dolus.
The manuscripts have si ergo. And a little further on two manuscripts have id est, haedinas pelles, quod est dolus.
(printed under page 25)
(2) ‹anchor: ad Christum post› · call in col 42
Forte, portat.
Perhaps, portat.
(printed under page 25)
(3) ‹anchor: ex his› · call in col 42
Sic duo Mss. Editi vero, et hi.
So two manuscripts. The printed editions, however, have et hi.
(printed under page 25)
(4) ‹anchor: in domo› · call in col 42
Duo Mss., in Domino.
Two manuscripts have in Domino.
(printed under page 25)
(1) ‹anchor: quamvis figurabatur› · call in col 43
Duo Mss., quae figurabatur.
Two manuscripts have quae figurabatur.
(printed under page 26)
(2) ‹anchor: ad istum perveniebant› · call in col 43
Isthaec verba: Respiciebant ad illum, quia, etc., in ante editis omissa restituuntur ex Mss.
These words, Respiciebant ad illum, quia, etc., omitted in the earlier editions, are restored from the manuscripts.
(printed under page 26)
(3) ‹anchor: benedictio non perveniret› · call in col 43
Lov., benedictio perveniret; omissa negante particula, quae habetur in caeteris libris
Lov. has benedictio perveniret, omitting the negative particle, which is found in the other books.
(printed under page 26)
(1) ‹anchor: ille, ut erat› · call in col 44
Duo Mss. omittunt, ille ut erat.
Two manuscripts omit ille ut erat.
(printed under page 26)
(2) ‹anchor: videte quid est› · call in col 44
Duo Mss.: Videamus quid est; omisso, dicebamus.
Two manuscripts have Videamus quid est, omitting dicebamus.
(printed under page 26)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 46
Editi: Illum enim est osculatus. At. Mss.: Illum non est osculatus, Scilicet Esau.
The printed editions have Illum enim est osculatus. But the manuscripts have Illum non est osculatus, that is, Esau.
(printed under page 27)
(2) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 46
Sic aliquot Mss. Editi vero, et benedixit.
So several manuscripts. The printed editions, however, have et benedixit.
(printed under page 27)
(3) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 46
Editi et Ms. Corbeiensis, quae nihil horum est per evidentiam, omnia sunt per figuram. Itemque infra ubi legitur, per essentiam, habent iidem libri constanter, per evidentiam. Quibus locis Victorinum Ms. et Regium secuti sumus
The printed editions and the Corbie manuscript have quae nihil horum est per evidentiam, omnia sunt per figuram. And likewise below, where per essentiam is read, the same books consistently have per evidentiam. In these places we have followed the Saint-Victor manuscript and the Royal one.
(printed under page 27)
(1) ‹anchor: Supplantatio enim› · call in col 47
Regius Ms., supplantator enim.
The Royal manuscript has supplantator enim.
(printed under page 28)
(a) ‹anchor: in benedictione patris› · call in col 47
Forte, fratris.
Perhaps, fratris.
(printed under page 28)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 48
Duobus in Mss. deest, non est osculatus.
In two manuscripts non est osculatus is wanting.
(printed under page 28)
(2) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 48
Victorinus Ms. et Regius habent, benedictio tua. At caeteri libri, habitatio tua: juxta LXX, hê katoikêsis sou. Et consentit hebraeus textus.
The Saint-Victor manuscript and the Royal one have benedictio tua. But the other books have habitatio tua, in accordance with the Septuagint, hê katoikêsis sou. And the Hebrew text agrees.
(printed under page 28)
(3) ‹anchor: de rore coeli› · call in col 48
Sic Mss. cum Par. et Ulim. At Lov., a tritico et vino, habent de rore coeli.
So the manuscripts, with Par. and Ulim. But Lov. has a tritico et vino, habent de rore coeli.
(printed under page 28)
(4) ‹anchor: habet› · call in col 48
In duobus Mss., habent.
In two manuscripts, habent.
(printed under page 28)
(1) ‹anchor: erant: sed› · call in col 49
Particula, sed, et quae hic paulo post occurrit, vel, abest a duobus Mss.
The particle sed, and the vel which occurs here a little further on, are absent from two manuscripts.
(printed under page 29)
(1) ‹anchor: in gladio› · call in col 50
Sic duo Mss. Editi vero, in malo.
So two manuscripts. The printed editions, however, have in malo.
(printed under page 29)
(2) ‹anchor: qui amant› · call in col 50
Lov., qui enim amant. M.
Lov. has qui enim amant. M.
(printed under page 29)
(3) ‹anchor: facere oves› · call in col 50
Ms. Regius caret voce, oves.
The Royal manuscript lacks the word oves.
(printed under page 29)
(a) ‹anchor: autem sugillatus› · call in col 50
Supra in cap. 27 habetur, strangulatus: quod videlicet apud LXX graece esset catanachthéntos, Gen. ℣. 27, cap. 39, ubi nunc legitur catanuchthéntos, compuncto. [first Greek word uncertain in the scan: catanachthéntos or catamachthéntos]
Above, in ch. 27, strangulatus is found: evidently because in the Septuagint the Greek would have been catanachthéntos, at Gen., verse 27, ch. 39 [as printed], where catanuchthéntos, "pricked with compunction," is now read.
(printed under page 29)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 51
Editi, non tibi vives. Melius Mss., ibi.
The printed editions have non tibi vives. Better the manuscripts: ibi.
(printed under page 30)
(2) ‹anchor: seditionibus gaudet› · call in col 51
Quae ansulis includuntur, desunt in duobus Mss.
What is enclosed in brackets is wanting in two manuscripts.
(printed under page 30)
(3) ‹anchor: tractentur, inveniuntur› · call in col 51
Duo Mss., discussa non est, date veniam, etc., omissis verbis istis, partim tamen magna, etc.
Two manuscripts have discussa non est, date veniam, etc., omitting these words, partim tamen magna, etc.
(printed under page 30)