Migne Reading Room

PL 38 · cols. 559–566

Augustine, Sermones 89-94 (Classis I, de Scripturis)

Sermon XC

PL 38:559
SERMO XC. De verbis Evangelii Matthaei, cap. XXII, 1-14, ubi de nuptiis filii regis. Contra Donatistas, de charitate. Habitus Carthagine in Restituta.
Sermon 90. On the words of the Gospel of Matthew, chap. 22:1-14, where [it speaks] of the wedding of the king's son. Against the Donatists, on charity. Preached at Carthage in the Restituta.
1. Convivium dominicum duplex: aliud hic, fidelium; aliud in coelis, beatorum. Nuptias filii regis ejusque convivium norunt omnes fideles, et apparatus mensae dominicae omnium est voluntati propositus. Interest autem quomodo quis accedat, cum accedere non vetatur. Scripturae quippe sanctae docent nos dominica duo esse convivia; unum quo veniunt boni et mali, alterum quo non accedunt mali. Ergo convivium Domini, unde modo cum Evangelium legeretur audivimus, habet utique bonos et malos. Omnes qui ab hoc convivio excusaverunt, mali sunt: sed non omn⟨e⟩s qui intraverunt, boni sunt. Alloquor ergo vos, qui in hoc convivio boni discumbitis, quicumque attenditis quod dictum est, Qui manducat et bibit indigne, judicium sibi manducat et bibit (I Cor. XI, 29). Omnes qui tales estis, alloquor vos, ut foris non quaeratis bonos, intus toleretis malos.
1. The Lord's banquet is twofold: one here, of the faithful; the other in heaven, of the blessed. All the faithful know the wedding of the king's son and his banquet, and the preparation of the Lord's table is set before the will of all. But it matters how one approaches, since one is not forbidden to approach. For the holy Scriptures teach us that there are two banquets of the Lord: one to which the good and the bad come, the other to which the bad do not come. Therefore the banquet of the Lord, of which we heard just now when the Gospel was being read, has both good and bad. All who excused themselves from this banquet are bad; but not all who entered are good. I address you therefore, you who recline as good guests at this banquet, whoever of you heed what has been said, He who eats and drinks unworthily, eats and drinks judgement on himself (1 Cor. 11:29). All of you who are such, I address you, that you not seek the good outside, [but] bear with the bad inside.
2. Justi omnes hac in vita et mali sunt et boni. Non d⟨u⟩bito audire velle Charitatem vestram, quinam isti sunt, de quibus alloquens disputavi, ut foris non quaerant bonos, intus tolerent malos. Si omnes mali sunt intus, quos sum allocutus? Si autem omnes boni sunt intus, quos monui ut tolerent malos? Prius ergo adjuvante Domino, de hac quaestione ut possumus, exeamus. Bonum si perfecte liquidoque perpendas, nemo bonus nisi unus Deus. Habes apertissime Dominum dicentem, Quid me interrogas de bono? Nemo bonus, nisi unus Deus (Matth. XIX, 17). Quomodo ergo nuptiae illae habent bonos et malos, si nemo bonus nisi unus Deus? Primo scire debetis, secundum quemdam modum omnes nos es⟨s⟩e malos. Prorsus secundum quemdam modum omnes mali sumus: secundum autem quemdam modum, non omnes boni sumus. Possumus enim nos Apostolis comparare? quibus ipse Dominus ait, Si ergo vos, cum sitis mali, nostis bona data dare filiis vestris. Si consideremus Scripturas, unus ibi erat malus inter duodecim Apostolos, propter quem Dominus ait quodam loco, Et vos mundi estis, sed non omnes (Joan. XIII, 10). Allocutus tamen in commune omnes ait, Si vos cum sitis mali. Audivit hoc Petrus, audivit Joannes, audivit Andraeas, audierunt caeteri omnes undecim Apostoli. Quid audierunt? Vos cum sitis mali, nostis bona data dare filiis vestris: quanto magis Pater vester qui in coelis est, dabit bona petentibus se (Matth. VII, 11)? Audito quod mali essent, desperaverunt: audito quod Deus in coelis esset pater ipsorum, respiraverunt. Cum sitis, inquit, mali: quid ergo debetur malis, nisi supplicium? Quanto magis, inquit, Pater vester, qui in coelis est? quid debetur filiis, nisi
2. All the righteous in this life are both bad and good. I do not doubt that your Charity wishes to hear who exactly these are whom I addressed in my discourse, that they should not seek the good outside, [but] bear with the bad inside. If all inside are bad, whom have I addressed? But if all inside are good, whom have I admonished to bear with the bad? First, then, with the Lord's help, let us get out of this question as best we can. If you weigh the good perfectly and clearly, no one is good but God alone. You have the Lord saying most plainly, Why do you ask Me about the good? No one is good but God alone (Matt. 19:17). How then does that wedding have good and bad, if no one is good but God alone? First you must know that in a certain way we are all bad. Indeed, in a certain way we are all bad; but in a certain way, not all of us are good. For can we compare ourselves with the Apostles? To whom the Lord Himself says, If you then, though you are bad, know how to give good gifts to your children. If we consider the Scriptures, there was one bad man there among the twelve Apostles, on whose account the Lord says in a certain place, And you are clean, but not all (John 13:10). Yet addressing all in common He says, If you, though you are bad. Peter heard this, John heard it, Andrew heard it, all the other eleven Apostles heard it. What did they hear? You, though you are bad, know how to give good gifts to your children: how much more will your Father Who is in heaven give good things to those who ask Him (Matt. 7:11)? On hearing that they were bad, they despaired; on hearing that God in heaven was their Father, they breathed again. Though you are, He says, bad: what then is owed to the bad, if not punishment? How much more, He says, your Father, Who is in heaven? What is owed to children, if not
Editors' notes and page, col. 559

Footnotes

(*) ‹anchor: call not visible in the foot image› · call in col 559 Habuimus exemplaria in duobus Mss. cb, et apud Sirm.

We had copies in two Corbie manuscripts, and in Sirmond.

(printed under page 286)

(a) ‹anchor: call not visible in the foot image› · call in col 559

Alias, ex Sirmondianis 14.

Formerly the 14th of those published by Sirmond.

(printed under page 286)

(b) ‹anchor: call not visible in the foot image› · call in col 559

Sic in altero e Mss. Corbeiensibus inscribitur. Porro de Basilica Restituta dictum est supra, ad sermonem 19.

So it is entitled in one of the two Corbie manuscripts. As for the Basilica Restituta, it has been spoken of above, at sermon 19.

(printed under page 286)

Page

  • running head: 559 S. AUGUSTINI EPIS[cut off at image edge]
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:560
praemium? In nomine malorum, metus poenarum: in nomine filiorum, spes haeredum.
reward? In the name of the wicked, the fear of punishments: in the name of sons, the hope of heirs.
3. Mali a convivio exclusi, quinam intelligendi. Secundum quid ergo mali erant iidem ipsi, qui secundum aliquid boni erant. Quibus enim dictum est, Cum sitis mali, nostis bona data dare filiis vestris; continuo subjectum, Quanto magis Pater vester qui in coelis est? Pater ergo malorum, sed non relinquendorum; quia medicus sanandorum. Secundum ergo quemdam modum mali erant. Et tamen illi convivae patrisfamilias in regis nuptiis, puto quia non erant de illo numero, de quibus dictum est, Invitaverunt bonos et malos; ut in numero malorum deputentur, quos audivimus exclusos in illo, qui inventus est non habere vestem nuptialem. Secundum quid, inquam, mali erant qui boni erant: secundum quid boni erant qui mali erant. Audi Joannem secundum quid mali erant: Si dixerimus quia non habemus peccatum, nos ipsos seducimus, et veritas in nobis non est. Ecce secundum quid mali erant: quia habebant peccatum. Secundum quid boni erant? Si confessi fuerimus peccata nostra, fidelis est et justus, qui dimittat nobis peccata, et mundet nos ab omni iniquitate (I Joan. I, 8, 9). Si ergo dixerimus, secundum hanc expositionem, quam audistis me de sanctis Scripturis, ut arbitror, protulisse, eosdem homines et bonos esse secundum quemdam modum, et malos secundum quemdam modum; si secundum hunc sensum voluerimus accipere quod dictum est, Invitaverunt bonos et malos, id est eosdem ipsos et bonos et malos; si hoc voluerimus accipere, non permittimur, propter illum qui inventus est non habens vestem nuptialem, et non utcumque projectus, ut tantum illo convivio privaretur, sed ut aeterno in tenebrarum supplicio damnaretur.
3. The wicked shut out from the banquet: who are to be understood by them. In some respect, then, those very same people were wicked who in some respect were good. For to those to whom it was said, Since you are wicked, you know how to give good gifts to your sons, there was added at once, How much more your Father Who is in heaven? The Father, then, of the wicked, but not of those to be abandoned; because He is the Physician of those to be healed. In a certain manner, therefore, they were wicked. And yet those guests of the householder at the king's wedding were, I think, not of that number of whom it was said, They invited good and bad, so as to be reckoned in the number of the wicked whom we heard were shut out in that one who was found not to have a wedding garment. In some respect, I say, they were wicked who were good: in some respect they were good who were wicked. Hear John on the respect in which they were wicked: If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. See the respect in which they were wicked: because they had sin. In what respect were they good? If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just, so as to forgive us our sins, and cleanse us from all iniquity (1 John 1:8–9). If therefore we should say, according to this exposition which you have heard me bring forth, as I think, from the holy Scriptures, that the same men are both good in a certain manner and wicked in a certain manner; if we should wish to take in this sense what was said, They invited good and bad, that is, the very same people both good and wicked; if we should wish to take it so, we are not permitted, because of that man who was found not having a wedding garment, and was not merely cast out in any fashion, so as only to be deprived of that banquet, but so as to be condemned to the eternal punishment of darkness.
4. Uno excluso multos exclusos significari. Sed dicit aliquis: Quid de uno homine? quid mirum? quid magnum, si servis patrisfamilias subrepsit unus in turba non habens vestem nuptialem? Numquid propter illum poterat dici, Invitaverunt bonos et malos? Intendite ergo, et intelligite, fratres mei. Unus ille unum genus erat; nam multi erant. Respondeat hic mihi diligens auditor, et dicat: Nolo mihi narres suspiciones tuas; probari mihi volo quia unus ille multi erant. Aderit Dominus, probabo plane, nec longius requiram ut possim probare. In ipsis suis verbis Deus adjuvabit me, et quod vobis apertum sit ministrabit per me. Ecce ingressus paterfamilias, ut inspiceret discumbentes. Videte, fratres mei, quia non pertinuit ad servos, nisi invitare et adducere bonos et malos: videte quia non dictum est, Consideraverunt servi discumbentes, et ibi invenerunt hominem non habentem vestem nuptialem, et dixerunt ei. Non hoc scriptum est. Paterfamilias inspexit, paterfamilias invenit, paterfamilias distinxit, paterfamilias separavit. Hoc quidem praetereundum non fuit. Aliud autem probare suscepimus, quomodo multi essent ille unus. Intravit ergo paterfamilias inspicere discumbentes, et invenit hominem non habentem vestem nuptialem: et ait illi, Amice,
4. That by the one shut out many shut out are signified. But someone says: Why make so much of one man? What is surprising, what is great, if one man not having a wedding garment slipped past the householder's servants in the crowd? Could it on his account be said, They invited good and bad? Attend, then, and understand, my brothers. That one man was one kind; for they were many. Let a careful hearer answer me here and say: I do not want you to tell me your suppositions; I want it proved to me that that one man was many. The Lord will be present, I shall prove it plainly, nor shall I seek far afield so as to be able to prove it. In His own words God will help me, and will supply through me what may be plain to you. Behold, the householder came in to look over those reclining. See, my brothers, that it did not pertain to the servants except to invite and bring in good and bad: see that it was not said, The servants observed those reclining, and found there a man not having a wedding garment, and said to him. This is not written. The householder looked over them, the householder found him, the householder distinguished, the householder separated. This indeed was not to be passed over. But we have undertaken to prove something else, how that one man was many. The householder came in, then, to look over those reclining, and found a man not having a wedding garment: and he said to him, Friend,
Editors' notes and page, col. 560

Footnotes

(a) ‹anchor: nam multi erant› · call in col 560

Vide infra sermonem 95.

See below, sermon 95.

(printed under page 286)

Page

  • running head: UGUSTINI EPISCOPI 560 (start of head cut off at left edge; column number printed blurred, read as 560)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:561
quomodo huc venisti non habens vestem nuptialem? At ille obmutuit. Talis enim interrog⟨a⟩bat, cui ille fingere nihil poterat. Vestis quip⟨p⟩e illa in corde, non in carne inspiciebatur: quae si desuper fuisset induta, etiam servis non fuisset occultata. Ubi sit induenda vestis nuptialis, accipite, ubi loquitur, Sacerdotes tui induantur justitiam (Psal. CXX, 9). De ea veste dicit Apostolus, Si tamen induti, et non nudi inveniamur (II Cor. V, 3). Ergo inventus est a Domino qui servos latebat. Interrogatus obmutescit: ligatur, projicitur, damnatur unus a multis. Domine, dixeram, quia tu admones omnes admonere. Recolite mecum verba quae audistis, et multos fuisse unum illum modo invenietis, modo judicabitis. Unum certe interrogaverat Dominus, uni dixerat, Amice, quomodo huc intrasti? Unus obmutuerat, et de ipso uno dictum fuerat, Ligate illi manus et pedes, et mittite illum in tenebras exteriores: ibi erit fletus et stridor dentium. Quare hoc? Multi enim sunt vocati, pauci vero electi. Quid huic manifestationi veritatis quispiam contradicat? Mittite, inquit, illum in tenebras exteriores. Illum certe unum, de quo dicit Dominus, Multi enim sunt vocati, pauci vero electi. Ergo p⟨a⟩uci non mittuntur foras. Certe unus erat ille, qui non habebat vestem nuptialem. Projicite eum. Quare ⟨p⟩rojicitur? Multi enim sunt vocati, pauci vero electi. Dimittite paucos, projicite multos. Certe unus erat. Unus omnino iste, non solum multi erant, sed multitudine bonorum numerum superabant. Multi enim et boni: sed in comparatione malorum pauci sunt boni. Multa frumenta nata sunt: compara paleis, et pauca grana sunt. Iidem ipsi in se ipsis multi, in comparatione malorum pauci. Quomodo probamus quia in se ipsis multi? Multi ab oriente et ab occidente venient. Quo venient? Ad illud convivium, in quod boni et mali intrant. De alio convivio locutus adjunxit, Et recumbent cum Abraham, Isaac et Jacob, in regno coelorum (Matth. VIII, 11). Illud est convivium quo non accessuri sunt mali. Hoc quod modo est digne accipiatur, ut ad illud perveniatur. Iidem ergo multi, qui pauci: multi in se ipsis, pauci in malorum comparatione. Ergo quid ait Dominus? Invenit unum, et ait, Projiciantur multi, remaneant pauci. Dicere enim, Multi vocati, pauci vero electi, nihil est aliud, quam aperte ostendere, qui in isto convivio tales habeantur, ut ad aliud convivium perducantur, quo nullus accedet malorum.
how did you come in here not having a wedding garment? But he was struck dumb. For such a One was questioning him, before Whom he could feign nothing. For that garment was looked for in the heart, not in the flesh: had it been put on outwardly, it would not have been hidden even from the servants. Where the wedding garment is to be put on, hear, where it says, Let Thy priests be clothed with righteousness (Ps. 131:9). Of that garment the Apostle says, If indeed we be found clothed, and not naked (2 Cor. 5:3). So he was found by the Lord who was hidden from the servants. Questioned, he is struck dumb: he is bound, he is cast out, one is condemned out of many. Lord, I had said, because Thou admonishest [me] to admonish all. Recall with me the words which you have heard, and you will now find, and now judge, that that one man was many. Certainly the Lord had questioned one, to one He had said, Friend, how did you come in here? One had been struck dumb, and of that one it had been said, Bind his hands and feet, and send him into the outer darkness: there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Why this? For many are called, but few chosen. What could anyone say against this plain showing of the truth? Send him, He says, into the outer darkness. Him certainly, the one, of whom the Lord says, For many are called, but few chosen. So the few are not sent out. Certainly that man was one, who did not have a wedding garment. Cast him out. Why is he cast out? For many are called, but few chosen. Let the few go, cast out the many. Certainly he was one. This one was altogether one, yet not only were they many, but they outnumbered the multitude of the good. For the good also are many: but in comparison with the bad the good are few. Much wheat has sprung up: compare it with the chaff, and the grains are few. The very same are many in themselves, few in comparison with the bad. How do we prove that they are many in themselves? Many will come from the east and from the west. Where will they come? To that banquet, into which good and bad enter. Speaking of another banquet He added, And they will recline with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven (Matt. 8:11). That is the banquet to which the bad will not come. Let this which now is be worthily received, so that that may be reached. So the same are many who are few: many in themselves, few in comparison with the bad. So what does the Lord say? He finds one, and says, Let the many be cast out, let the few remain. For to say, Many are called, but few chosen, is nothing else than to show openly who are held to be such in this banquet that they may be led on to the other banquet, to which none of the bad will come.
5. Quaenam sit vestis nuptialis. Quid ergo est? Omnes qui acceditis ad mensam dominicam, quae hic est, nolo esse cum multis separandis, sed cum paucis conservandis. Unde hoc poteritis? Accipite vestem nuptialem. Expone, inquies, nobis vestem nuptialem. Procul dubio illa vestis est, quam non habent nisi boni, in convivio relinquendi, servandi ad convivium quo nullus malus accedit, per Domini gratiam perducendi: ipsi habent vestem nuptialem. Quaeramus ergo, fratres mei, inter fideles qui sunt qui habent aliquid, quod mali non habent, et ipsa erit vestis nuptialis. Si Sacramenta dixerimus, videtis quemadmodum sint malis bonisque communia. Baptismus est?
5. What the wedding garment is. What then is it? All you who come to the Lord's table, which is here, I do not want you to be among the many who are to be separated, but among the few who are to be preserved. Whence will you be able to do this? Receive the wedding garment. Explain to us, you will say, the wedding garment. Without doubt that is the garment which none have but the good, those who are to be left in the banquet, kept for the banquet to which no bad man comes, to be led on to it by the grace of the Lord: they have the wedding garment. Let us seek then, my brothers, among the faithful, who are those who have something which the bad do not have, and that will be the wedding garment. If we say the Sacraments, you see how they are common to bad and good. Is it Baptism?
Editors' notes and page, col. 561

Page

  • running head: 561 SERMO XC.
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: Psalm numeral blurred, reads like CXX; quotation is Ps. 131:9, so it is translated as such. Damaged letters in interrog⟨a⟩bat, quip⟨p⟩e, p⟨a⟩uci, ⟨p⟩rojicitur; latebat printed with a broken final t. The ligature in coelorum is unsure (œ assumed). Right-hand column (562) not set.
PL 38:562
Sine Baptismo quidem nemo ad Deum pervenit: sed non omnis qui habet Baptismum ad Deum pervenit. Non ergo possum intelligere Baptismum esse vestem nuptialem, id est ipsum sacramentum; quam vestem video in bonis, video in malis. Forte altare est, vel quod accipitur de altari. Videmus quia multi manducant, et judicium sibi manducant et bibunt. Quid ergo est? Jejunatur? Jejunant et mali. Ad Ecclesiam concurritur? Concurrunt et mali. Postremo miracula fiunt? Non solum boni faciunt et mali, sed aliquando non faciunt boni. Ecce in vetere populo magi Pharaonis miracula faciebant (Exod. VII et VIII), Israelitae non faciebant: in Israelitis solus Moyses et Aaron faciebant; caeteri non faciebant, sed videbant, timebant, credebant. Numquid meliores magi Pharaonis miracula facientes, quam populus Israel, qui miracula facere non valebat, et ad Deum tamen populus pertinebat? In ipsa Ecclesia, Apostolum audi, Numquid omnes prophetae? numquid omnes dona habent curationum? numquid omnes linguis loquuntur (I Cor. XII, 29, 30)?
Without baptism, indeed, no one comes to God; but not everyone who has baptism comes to God. So I cannot understand baptism to be the wedding garment, that is, the sacrament itself; for this garment I see in the good, I see in the bad. Perhaps it is the altar, or what is received from the altar. We see that many eat, and eat and drink judgement to themselves. What then is it? Is it fasting? The bad also fast. Is it running together to church? The bad also run together. Lastly, is it the working of miracles? Not only do the good work them and the bad too, but sometimes the good do not work them. See, among the ancient people the magicians of Pharaoh worked miracles (Exod. 7 and 8); the Israelites did not work them: among the Israelites Moses and Aaron alone worked them; the rest did not work them, but saw, feared, believed. Were the magicians of Pharaoh, who worked miracles, better than the people of Israel, who were not able to work miracles, and yet that people belonged to God? In the Church itself, hear the Apostle: Are all prophets? Do all have gifts of healings? Do all speak with tongues (1 Cor. 12:29–30)?
6. Vestis nuptialis charitas. Bona caetera sine charitate non prosunt. Charitas et cupiditas in homine. Quae est ergo vestis illa nuptialis? Haec est vestis nuptialis: Finis autem praecepti est, Apostolus dicit, charitas de corde puro, et conscientia bona, et fide non ficta (I Tim. I, 5). Haec est vestis nuptialis. Non quaecumque charitas: nam plerumque videntur se diligere etiam homines participes malae conscientiae. Qui simul latrocinia faciunt, qui simul maleficia, qui simul histriones amant, qui simul aurigis et venatoribus clamant, plerumque diligunt se: sed non est in eis charitas de corde puro, et conscientia bona, et fide non ficta. Talis charitas vestis est nuptialis. Si linguis hominum loquar et Angelorum, charitatem autem non habeam, factus sum, inquit, ut aeramentum sonans, aut cymbalum tinniens. Advenerunt linguae solae, et dicitur eis, Quid huc intrastis non habentes vestem nuptialem? Si habuero, inquit, prophetiam, et sciero omnia sacramenta, et omnem scientiam, et habuero fidem, ita ut montes transferam, charitatem autem non habeam, nihil sum. Ecce sunt illa miracula hominum plerumque non habentium vestem nuptialem. Si haec, inquit, habeam omnia, et Christum non habeam, nihil sum. Nihil, inquit, sum. Ergo prophetia nihil est? ergo scientia sacramentorum nihil est? Non illa nihil sunt: sed ego, si illa habeam, et charitatem non habeam, nihil sum. Quanta bona nihil prosunt sine uno bono? Si non habeam charitatem, si eleemosynas largior in pauperes, si ad confessionem nominis Christi usque ad sanguinem, usque ad ignes accedo, possunt ista fieri et amore gloriae, inania sunt. Quia ergo possunt fieri etiam amore gloriae inania, non charitate pinguissima pietatis, etiam ipsa commemorat, et ipsa audi: Si distribuero omnia mea in usum pauperum, et si tradidero corpus meum ut ardeam, charitatem non habeam, nihil mihi prodest (I Cor. XIII, 1-3). Haec est vestis nuptialis. Interrogate vos; si habetis illam, securi estis in convivio dominico. Duae sunt in homine uno, charitas et cupiditas. Charitas nascatur in te, si nondum nata est; et si nata est,
6. The wedding garment is charity. Other goods are of no profit without charity. Charity and cupidity in man. What, then, is that wedding garment? This is the wedding garment: Now the end of the commandment, says the Apostle, is charity from a pure heart, and a good conscience, and faith unfeigned (1 Tim. 1:5). This is the wedding garment. Not any charity whatever: for very often even men who share in a bad conscience are seen to love one another. Those who commit robberies together, who commit evil deeds together, who love actors together, who shout together for charioteers and beast-fighters, very often love one another: but there is not in them charity from a pure heart, and a good conscience, and faith unfeigned. Such charity is the wedding garment. If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but do not have charity, I have become, he says, as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. Tongues alone have come, and it is said to them, Why have you come in here not having a wedding garment? If I have, he says, prophecy, and know all mysteries, and all knowledge, and have faith, so that I remove mountains, but do not have charity, I am nothing. See, these are the miracles of men who very often do not have the wedding garment. If I have all these things, he says, and do not have Christ, I am nothing. Nothing, he says, am I. Is prophecy, then, nothing? Is the knowledge of mysteries, then, nothing? It is not they that are nothing: but I, if I have them and do not have charity, am nothing. How many goods are of no profit without one good? If I do not have charity, if I bestow alms on the poor, if for the confession of the name of Christ I go even to blood, even to the flames, these things can be done also from love of glory; they are empty. Because, then, they can be done, empty, even from love of glory, and not from the richest charity of godliness, he mentions these too; hear these too: If I distribute all my goods for the use of the poor, and if I deliver my body to be burned, but do not have charity, it profits me nothing (1 Cor. 13:1–3). This is the wedding garment. Question yourselves; if you have it, you are secure at the Lord's banquet. There are two things in one man, charity and cupidity. Let charity be born in you, if it is not yet born; and if it is born,
Editors' notes and page, col. 562

Page

  • running head: SERMO XC. 562
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column ends mid-sentence at "nata est,"; left-column fragments belong to col. 561 and are not set; "fieri et amore gloriae" in the third image is blotted and run together ("etamore"), set as "et amore", unsure whether "etiam amore" was intended; "In ipsa Ecclesia" is damaged in print, read as In
PL 38:563
alatur, nutriatur, crescat. Illa vero cupiditas, et si in hac vita exstingui penitus non potest; quia si dixerimus quod peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos seducimus, et veritas in nobis non est: in quantum autem est in nobis cupiditas, in tantum sine peccato non sumus: charitas crescat, cupiditas decrescat; ut aliquando illa perficiatur, hoc est charitas, cupiditas consumatur. Induite vos vestem nuptialem: vos alloquor, qui necdum habetis. Jam intus estis, jam ad convivium acceditis, et vestem in honorem sponsi nondum habetis: vestra adhuc quaeritis, non quae Jesu Christi. Vestis enim nuptialis in honore accipitur conjugationis, id est sponsi et sponsae. Nostis sponsum: Christus est. Nostis sponsam: Ecclesia est. Deferte nubenti, deferte ducenti. Si istis bene detuleritis qui nubent, vos filii eritis. Ergo in hoc proficite. Diligite Dominum, et ibi discite diligere vos: ut cum diligendo Dominum dilexeritis vos, securi diligatis proximos sicut vos. Quando enim non invenio se ipsum diligentem, quomodo ei permitto proximum, quem diligat sicut se ipsum? Et quis est, inquit, qui non diligat se ipsum? Ecce quis est: Qui diligit iniquitatem, odit animam suam (Psal. X, 6). Numquid diligit se, qui amat carnem suam, et odit animam suam, malo suo, malo animae suae et carnis suae? Quis autem diligit animam suam? Qui diligit Deum ex toto corde suo, et ex tota mente sua. Jam tali committo proximum. Diligite proximos, tanquam vos ipsos.
let it be fed, be nourished, grow. But that desire, even if in this life it cannot be entirely extinguished, because if we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us: yet in so far as desire is in us, to that extent we are not without sin: let charity grow, let desire diminish, so that one day the one may be perfected, that is charity, and desire be consumed. Put on the wedding garment: I am addressing you who do not yet have it. You are already inside, you are already coming to the banquet, and you do not yet have the garment in honour of the bridegroom: you still seek your own things, not those of Jesus Christ. For the wedding garment is taken in honour of the union, that is, of the bridegroom and the bride. You know the bridegroom: it is Christ. You know the bride: it is the Church. Pay deference to her who is being married, pay deference to Him who is taking her in marriage. If you pay due deference to these who are marrying, you will be sons. Therefore make progress in this. Love the Lord, and there learn to love yourselves: so that when, by loving the Lord, you have loved yourselves, you may securely love your neighbours as yourselves. For when I do not find someone loving himself, how can I entrust to him a neighbour, whom he is to love as himself? And who is there, someone says, who does not love himself? See who it is: He who loves iniquity hates his own soul (Ps. 10:6). Does he love himself who loves his flesh and hates his soul, to his own harm, to the harm of his soul and of his flesh? But who loves his soul? He who loves God with his whole heart and with his whole mind. To such a one I now entrust the neighbour. Love your neighbours as yourselves.
7. Proximus, omnis homo. Quis est, inquit, mihi proximus? Omnis homo proximus tuus est. Nonne duos parentes habuimus omnes? Proxima sunt sibi cujusque generis animalia, columbus columbo, pardus pardo; aspis aspidi, pecus pecori, et non est proximus homo homini? Recolite institutionem creaturae. Dixit Deus, protulerunt aquae; natantia, cetos magnos, pisces, alites, similiaque protulerunt. Numquid de una ave omnes aves? Numquid de uno vulture omnes vultures? Numquid de uno columbo omnes columbi? Numquid de uno colubro omnes colubri? Numquid de una aurata omnes auratae? Numquid de una ove omnes oves? Utique simul terra genera protulit omnia. Ventum est ad hominem, et non protulit terra hominem. Factus est nobis unus pater: nec saltem duo, pater et mater: factus est, inquam, nobis unus pater, nec saltem duo, pater et mater: sed de uno patre una mater; unus de nullo, sed a Deo factus est, et una de illo (Gen. I et II). Attendite genus nostrum: de uno fonte manavimus; et quia ille unus in amaritudinem versus est, omnes ex oliva oleaster facti sumus. Venit et gratia. Generavit unus ad peccatum et ad mortem, tamen unum genus, tamen proximos sibi omnes; tamen non solum similes, sed etiam cognatos. Venit unus contra unum: contra unum qui sparsit, unus qui colligit. Sic contra unum qui occidit, unus qui vivificat. Sicut enim in Adam omnes moriuntur, sic in Christo omnes vivificabuntur
7. The neighbour is every human being. Who, someone says, is my neighbour? Every human being is your neighbour. Did we not all have the two parents? Animals of each kind are neighbours to one another, dove to dove, leopard to leopard, asp to asp, beast to beast, and is a human being not neighbour to a human being? Recall the establishing of creation. God spoke, the waters brought forth; swimming things, great whales, fish, birds and the like they brought forth. Did all birds come from one bird? Did all vultures come from one vulture? Did all doves come from one dove? Did all snakes come from one snake? Did all gilt-heads come from one gilt-head? Did all sheep come from one sheep? Certainly the earth brought forth all kinds together. When it came to man, the earth did not bring forth man. One father was made for us: not even two, father and mother: one father, I say, was made for us, not even two, father and mother: but from the one father one mother; he from no one, but made by God, and she from him (Gen. 1 and 2). Consider our race: we have flowed from one source; and because that one was turned into bitterness, we have all been made a wild olive from the olive. Grace came too. One begot unto sin and unto death, yet one race, yet all neighbours to one another; yet not only alike, but also kin. One came against one: against the one who scattered, One Who gathers. So against the one who killed, One Who gives life. For as in Adam all die, so in Christ all will be made alive
Editors' notes and page, col. 563

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: tali committo proximum› · call in col 563

Sic Corbeiensis Ms. antiqua manu emendatus : nam habuit primum, sicuti Sirmondus ex eo edidit, committo proximo.

So the Corbie manuscript, as corrected by an ancient hand: for at first it had, as Sirmond published from it, committo proximo.

(printed under page 288)

Page

  • running head: 563 S. AUGUSTINI EPISC (cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:564
(I Cor. XV, 22). Sed quomodo de illo omnis qui n⟨a⟩scitur, moritur: sic in Christo omnis qui credit, vivificatur. Sed si habeat vestem nuptialem, si invitetur servandus, non separandus.
(1 Cor. 15:22). But just as from him everyone who is born dies, so in Christ everyone who believes is made alive. But [this holds] if he has the wedding garment, if he is invited to be kept, not to be separated.
8. Fides non quaelibet laudatur. Habete itaque charitatem, fratres mei. Exposui vobis vestem nuptialem, exposui vobis vestem. Laudatur fides, constat, laudatur: sed quae fides, distinguit Apostolus. Nam quosdam gloriantes de fide, et non habentes bonos mores, objurgat apostolus Jacobus, et dicit: Tu credis quoniam unus est Deus, et bene facis. Et daemones credunt, et contremiscunt (Jacobi II, 19). Unde laudatus est Petrus, unde dictus est beatus, recolite mecum. Quia dixit, Tu es Christus Filius Dei vivi (Matth. XVI, 16, 17)? Ille non sonum verborum, sed affectum cordis intendit, qui beatum pronuntiavit. Nam vultis nosse beatitudinem Petri non in illis verbis fuisse? Haec dixerunt et daemones. Scimus qui sis; tu es Filius Dei (Marc. I, 24). Filium Dei confessus est Petrus: Filium Dei confessi sunt daemones. Distingue, domine, distingue. Distinguo plane. Petrus dixit in amore, daemones a timore. Denique ille dicit, Tecum sum usque ad mortem (Luc. XXII, 33). Illi dicunt, Quid nobis et tibi (Matth. VIII, 29)? Ergo qui venisti ad convivium, noli de sola fide gloriari. Distingue et ipsam fidem, et tunc in te agnoscitur vestis nuptialis. Distinguat Apostolus, doceat nos: Neque circumcisio, inquit, aliquid valet, neque praeputium, sed fides. Dic quae: numquid non et daemones credunt et contremiscunt? Dico, inquit, audi, distinguo, modo distinguo: Sed fides, quae per dilectionem operatur (Galat. V, 6). Quae ergo fides? qualis fides? Quae per dilectionem operatur. Omnem, inquit, scientiam si habeam, et omnem fidem, ita ut montes transferam, charitatem autem non habeam, nihil sum. Habete fidem cum dilectione: nam dilectionem non potestis habere sine fide. Hoc moneo, hoc exhortor, hoc in nomine Domini doceo Charitatem vestram, ut habeatis fidem cum dilectione: quia potestis habere fidem sine dilectione. Nam non vos exhortor ut habeatis fidem, sed charitatem. Non potestis enim habere charitatem sine fide; charitatem enim dico Dei et proximi: unde potest ista esse sine fide? Quomodo amat Deum, qui non credit in Deum? Quomodo amat Deum stultus, qui dicit in corde suo, Non est Deus (Psal. XIII, 1)? Potest fieri ut credas venisse Christum, et non diligas Christum. Non potest autem fieri ut diligas Christum, et non dicas venisse Christum.
8. Not just any faith is praised. Have charity, therefore, my brothers. I have explained to you the wedding garment; I have explained to you the garment. Faith is praised; it is agreed, it is praised: but which faith, the Apostle distinguishes. For certain people who boast of faith and do not have good morals the apostle James rebukes, and he says: You believe that God is one, and you do well. The demons also believe, and they tremble (Jas. 2:19). Recall with me why Peter was praised, why he was called blessed. Was it because he said, You are the Christ, the Son of the living God (Matt. 16:16–17)? He Who pronounced him blessed paid attention not to the sound of the words but to the disposition of the heart. For do you wish to know that Peter's blessedness did not lie in those words? The demons too said these things. We know who You are; You are the Son of God (Mark 1:24). Peter confessed the Son of God: the demons confessed the Son of God. Distinguish, sir, distinguish. I do distinguish plainly. Peter spoke out of love, the demons out of fear. In short, he says, I am with You even unto death (Luke 22:33). They say, What have we to do with You (Matt. 8:29)? So you who have come to the banquet, do not boast of faith alone. Distinguish faith itself too, and then the wedding garment is recognized in you. Let the Apostle distinguish, let him teach us: Neither circumcision, he says, avails anything, nor uncircumcision, but faith. Tell [us] which: do not the demons also believe and tremble? I tell you, he says, listen, I distinguish, now I distinguish: But faith which works through love (Gal. 5:6). Which faith, then? What kind of faith? That which works through love. If I should have all knowledge, he says, and all faith, so that I could move mountains, but have not charity, I am nothing. Have faith with love: for you cannot have love without faith. This I urge, this I exhort, this in the name of the Lord I teach Your Charity, that you have faith with love: because you can have faith without love. For I do not exhort you to have faith, but charity. For you cannot have charity without faith; for I mean charity towards God and neighbour: how can it exist without faith? How does he love God who does not believe in God? How does the fool love God, who says in his heart, There is no God (Ps. 13:1)? It can happen that you believe that Christ has come and do not love Christ. But it cannot happen that you love Christ and do not say that Christ has come.
9. Charitas ad inimicos extendi debet. Oratio contra inimicos quaenam illicita, quaenam licita. Ergo habete fidem cum dilectione. Ista est vestis nuptialis. Amate invicem, qui Christum diligitis: amate amicos, amate inimicos. Non sit vobis durum. Quid ergo perditis, ubi multum acquiritis? Quid pro magno rogas Deum, ut moriatur inimicus tuus? Non est vestis ista nuptialis. Attende ipsum sponsum in cruce pro te pendentem, et pro suis inimicis Patrem rogantem: Pater, inquit, ignosce illis, quia nesciunt quid faciunt (Luc. XXIII, 34). Vidisti sponsum ista dicentem, vide
9. Charity must be extended to enemies. Which prayer against enemies is unlawful, which is lawful. Therefore have faith with love. This is the wedding garment. Love one another, you who love Christ: love your friends, love your enemies. Let it not be hard for you. What then do you lose, where you gain much? Why do you ask God, as if for some great thing, that your enemy may die? That is not the wedding garment. Look at the Bridegroom Himself hanging on the cross for you, and asking the Father for His enemies: Father, He says, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing (Luke 23:34). You have seen the Bridegroom saying these things, see
Editors' notes and page, col. 564

Page

  • running head: GUSTINI EPISCOPI (cut off at left edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: "n·scitur" has a damaged/missing letter, set n⟨a⟩scitur; italic "ct contremiscunt" and "tu cs Filius" read as et / es (blurred italic e, not taken as misprints); reference "Luc. XXIII, 34" second digit blurred; left column text belongs to col. 563, not set
PL 38:565
et amicum sponsi cum veste nuptiali invitatum. Benedictum Stephanum attendite, quomodo increpat Judaeos, tanquam saevus, tanquam iratus: Dura cervice, et non circumcisi corde et auribus, vos restitistis Spiritui sancto. Quem Prophetarum non occiderunt patres vestri? Audisti quomodo lingua saeviat. Adhuc tu paratus es dicere in quemlibet, atque utinam in eum dicas, qui Deum offenderit, non qui te. Offendit Deum et non increpas; offendit te, clamas: ubi est vestis illa nuptialis? Audistis ergo quomodo saevierit Stephanus: audite quomodo dilexerit. Offendit eos quos increpabat, lapidatus est ab eis. Et cum undique furentium manibus, et lapidum ictibus premeretur et tunderetur, prius ait: Domine Jesu Christe, accipe spiritum meum. Deinde posteaquam pro se stans oravit, pro illis qui lapidabant eum, genu fixit, et dixit: Domine, ne statuas eis hoc delictum: ego moriar in carne, non illi in corde. Et hoc dicto obdormivit (Act. VII, 51-59). Post haec verba nihil addidit: dixit, et abiit; novissima ejus oratio pro inimicis fuit. Discite habere vestem nuptialem. Ita et tu fige genua, et collide frontem in terra, et accessurus ad mensam Domini, ad convivium sanctarum Scripturarum, noli dicere, Si moriatur inimicus: Domine, si quid a te merui, occide inimicum meum. Quod si forte dicis, non times ne tibi respondeat: Si occidere vellem inimicum tuum, te prius occiderem? An gloriaris, quia modo invitatus venisti? Cogita, paululum ante quid fuisti. Nonne me blasphemasti? nonne me irrisisti? nonne nomen meum de terra delere voluisti? sed plaudis tibi, quia invitatus venisti. Si te occidissem inimicum, quem facerem amicum? Quid male orando doces me, quod non feci in te? Imo ego, dicit tibi Deus, doceam te, ut imiteris me. In cruce pendens dixi, Ignosce illis, quia nesciunt quid faciunt. Docui hoc militem meum. Esto tiro meus contra diabolum. Aliter invicte nullo modo pugnabis, nisi pro tuis inimicis oraveris. Dic plane, dic etiam hoc, dic ut inimicum tuum persequaris: sed scienter dic; distingue quod dicis. Ecce homo est inimicus tuus: responde mihi, quid in illo inimicetur tibi; numquid hoc quod homo est, inimicatur tibi? Non. Sed quid? Quod malus est. Quod homo est, quod ego feci, non tibi inimicatur. Dicit tibi: Ego hominem feci non malum: factus est malus per inobedientiam, qui potius zabulo obedivit, quam Deo. Quod ipse fecit, hoc tibi inimicatur: unde malus, tibi inimicus est; non unde homo est. Audio enim hominem, et malum: unum nomen est naturae, alterum culpae: sano culpam, et servo naturam. Hoc tibi dicit Deus tuus: Et ecce vindico te, occido inimicum tuum; de illo tollo quod malus est, servo quod homo est: numquid si fecero illum hominem bonum, non occidi inimicum tuum, et feci amicum tuum? Sic roga quod rogas, ut non homines pereant, sed ipsae inimicitiae pereant. Si autem hoc oras, ut homo moriatur; malus oras contra malum: et cum dicis, Occide malum; respondet tibi, Quem vestrum.
also the bridegroom's friend invited with the wedding garment. Consider the blessed Stephen, how he rebukes the Jews, as if fierce, as if angry: Stiff of neck, and uncircumcised in heart and ears, you have resisted the Holy Spirit. Which of the Prophets did your fathers not kill? You have heard how his tongue rages. You are still ready to speak against anyone at all, and would that you spoke against him who has offended God, not him who has offended you. He offends God, and you do not rebuke; he offends you, and you shout: where is that wedding garment? You have heard, then, how Stephen raged: hear how he loved. He offended those whom he rebuked, and he was stoned by them. And when on every side he was pressed and pounded by the hands of raging men and the blows of stones, first he said: Lord Jesus Christ, receive my spirit. Then, after he had prayed standing for himself, for those who were stoning him he knelt down and said: Lord, do not set this offence against them: let me die in the flesh, not they in the heart. And having said this he fell asleep (Acts 7:51–59). After these words he added nothing: he spoke, and departed; his last prayer was for his enemies. Learn to have the wedding garment. So you too, bend your knees and strike your forehead on the ground, and as you are about to approach the table of the Lord, the banquet of the holy Scriptures, do not say, If only my enemy would die: Lord, if I have deserved anything of Thee, kill my enemy. But if perhaps you do say this, do you not fear lest He answer you: If I wished to kill your enemy, would I not have killed you first? Or do you boast because you have only now come when invited? Think what you were a little while ago. Did you not blaspheme Me? Did you not mock Me? Did you not wish to blot out My name from the earth? Yet you applaud yourself because you came when invited. If I had killed you as an enemy, whom would I have made a friend? Why, by praying badly, do you teach Me what I did not do in your case? Rather let Me, God says to you, teach you, so that you may imitate Me. Hanging on the cross I said, Forgive them, for they do not know what they do. I taught this to My soldier. Be My recruit against the devil. In no other way will you fight unconquered, unless you pray for your enemies. Say it plainly, say this too, say that you would pursue your enemy: but say it knowingly; distinguish what you are saying. Look, a man is your enemy: answer me, what in him is hostile to you; is it this, that he is a man, that is hostile to you? No. But what? That he is evil. That he is a man, that which I made, is not hostile to you. He says to you: I made man, not evil: he became evil through disobedience, he who obeyed the devil rather than God. What he himself made, this is hostile to you: from that by which he is evil, he is your enemy; not from that by which he is a man. For I hear "man" and "evil": the one is the name of nature, the other of fault: I heal the fault, and I preserve the nature. This your God says to you: And see, I avenge you, I kill your enemy; I take from him that which is evil, I preserve that which is man: if I make him a good man, have I not killed your enemy and made him your friend? So ask what you ask, that not men may perish, but the enmities themselves may perish. But if you pray this, that the man may die, you, an evil man, pray against an evil man: and when you say, Kill the evil man, He answers you, Which of you?
Editors' notes and page, col. 565

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: Quem vestrum› · call in col 565

Ita Corbeiensis Ms. tametsi qui eo utebatur Sirmondus descripserit, quem malum ? Versus etiam aliquot ex eodem codice tum supra, tum infra post verba, Habete fidem ad Deum, restituimus omissos a Sirmondo.

So the Corbie manuscript, although Sirmond, who used it, transcribed quem malum ? We have also restored from the same codex several lines omitted by Sirmond, both above and below, after the words Habete fidem ad Deum. [The word set as "descripserit" is damaged in the scan and is read from its outline; the note runs from the foot of col 565 into the foot of col 566.]

(printed under page 289)

Page

  • running head: 565 SERMO XC.
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • note (Q2): foot notes (a) and (b) of page 289 are called in col 566 and are set in n566.md, not here.
PL 38:566
10. Extendenda dilectio, ut omnes rapiat ad Deum. Extendite ergo dilectionem, non usque ad conjuges et filios vestros. Ista dilectio etiam in pecoribus et passeribus invenitur. Scitis istos passeres et hirundines quemadmodum diligant conjuges, simul ova foveant, simul pullos nutriant, grata quadam et naturali bonitate, nulla cogitata mercede. Non enim dicit passer: Nutriam filios meos, ut cum senuero, pascant me. Nihil horum cogitat: gratis amat, gratis pascit; affectum parentis exhibet, retributionem non requirit. Et nos, novi, scio, sic amatis filios vestros. Non enim debent filii parentibus thesaurizare, sed parentes filiis (II Cor. XII, 14). Hinc etiam multi excitatis avaritiam vestram, quia filiis vestris acquiritis, eisque servatis. Sed extendite dilectionem, crescat ista dilectio: amare autem filios et conjuges, nondum vestis illa nuptialis est. Habete fidem ad Deum. Prius diligite Deum. Extendite ad Deum; et quos poteritis, rapite ad Deum. Inimicus est: rapiatur ad Deum. Filius est, uxor est, servus est: rapiatur ad Deum. Peregrinus est: rapiatur ad Deum. Inimicus est: rapiatur ad Deum. Rape, rape inimicum: rapiendo non erit inimicus. Sic proficiatur, sic charitas nutriatur, ut nutrita perficiatur: sic vestis nuptialis induatur: sic imago Dei, ad quam creati sumus, proficiendo resculpatur. Peccando enim obsolefacta erat, attrita erat. Unde attrita? unde obsolefacta? Cum fricatur ad terram. Quid est, ad terram fricatur? Terrenis cupiditatibus teritur. Quanquam enim in imagine ambulet homo, tamen vane conturbatur (Psal. XXXVIII, 7). Veritas quaeritur in Dei imagine, non vanitas. Amando enim veritatem imago illa, ad quam creati sumus, resculpatur, et proprius nummus Caesari nostro reddatur. Sic enim ex responsione Domini audistis, tentantibus Judaeis dicentem Dominum, Quid me tentatis, hypocritae? Ostendite mihi numisma census, id est, expressionem imaginis et superscriptionem. Ostendite mihi quid solvitis, quid paratis, quid a vobis exigitur; ostendite mihi. Ostenderunt illi denarium: et quaesivit cujus haberet imaginem et superscriptionem. Responderunt, Caesaris (Matth. XXII, 18-21). Caesar iste et imaginem suam quaerit. Caesar non vult sibi perire quod jussit, et Deus non vult perire quod fecit. Caesar, fratres mei, non fecit nummum: monetarii faciunt; artificibus jubetur, suis ministris imperavit. Imago exprimebatur in nummo: in nummo est imago Caesaris. Et tamen quod alii impresserunt quaeritur: ille thesaurizat, ille non vult sibi negari. Moneta Christi homo est. Ibi imago Christi, ibi nomen Christi, munus Christi, e⟨t⟩ officia Christi.
10. Love must be extended, so that it may snatch all to God. Extend, then, your love, not [only] as far as your wives and your children. This love is found even in cattle and sparrows. You know how these sparrows and swallows love their mates, together brood their eggs, together feed their chicks, with a certain pleasing and natural goodness, with no thought of reward. For the sparrow does not say: I will feed my young, so that when I have grown old they may feed me. It thinks of none of these things: it loves freely, it feeds freely; it shows a parent's affection, it does not seek repayment. And you too, I know, I am sure of it, love your children in this way. For the children ought not to lay up treasure for the parents, but the parents for the children (2 Cor. 12:14). Hence also many of you stir up your avarice, because you acquire for your children and keep for them. But extend your love, let this love grow: but to love children and wives is not yet that wedding garment. Have faith towards God. First love God. Extend [your love] to God; and whomever you can, snatch to God. Is he an enemy? Let him be snatched to God. Is he a son, is she a wife, is he a slave? Let him be snatched to God. Is he a stranger? Let him be snatched to God. Is he an enemy? Let him be snatched to God. Snatch, snatch the enemy: by being snatched he will not be an enemy. So let there be progress, so let charity be nourished, that being nourished it may be perfected: so let the wedding garment be put on: so let the image of God, to which we were created, be engraved anew by progressing. For by sinning it had been made shabby, it had been worn away. Whence worn away? whence made shabby? When it is rubbed against the earth. What is it, to be rubbed against the earth? It is worn down by earthly desires. For although man walks in the image, yet he is disquieted in vain (Ps. 38:7). Truth is sought in the image of God, not vanity. For by loving truth let that image, to which we were created, be engraved anew, and let his own coin be rendered to our Caesar. For so you have heard from the Lord's answer, when the Jews were tempting Him, the Lord saying, Why do you tempt Me, hypocrites? Show Me the coin of the tribute, that is, the impression of the image and the inscription. Show Me what you pay, what you prepare, what is demanded of you; show Me. They showed Him a denarius: and He asked whose image and inscription it had. They answered, Caesar's (Matt. 22:18–21). That Caesar too seeks his image. Caesar does not want what he ordered to perish for him, and God does not want what He made to perish. Caesar, my brothers, did not make the coin: the moneyers make it; the craftsmen are ordered, he commanded his ministers. The image was stamped on the coin: on the coin is the image of Caesar. And yet what others impressed is sought: he lays up treasure, he does not want it to be denied him. Christ's coin is man. There is the image of Christ, there the name of Christ, the gift of Christ, and the offices of Christ.
Editors' notes and page, col. 566

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: Sic proficiatur (top line of the image, partly cut)› · call in col 566

Sic Corbeiensis Ms. At Sirmondus, perficiatur.

So the Corbie manuscript. But Sirmond has perficiatur.

(printed under page 289)

(2) ‹anchor: ibi nomen Christi› · call in col 566

Apud Sirmondum deest, ibi nomen Christi, habetur in Corbeiensi Ms.; moxque in eodem codice pro, munus Christi, legitur, nummus Christi.

In Sirmond ibi nomen Christi is wanting; it stands in the Corbie manuscript; and directly afterwards in the same codex, in place of munus Christi, one reads nummus Christi.

(printed under page 289)

(a) ‹anchor: multi excitatis› · call in col 566

Forte, excusatis.

Perhaps, excusatis.

(printed under page 289)

(b) ‹anchor: eisque servatis› · call in col 566

Vide supra sermonem 86, n. 11.

See above, sermon 86, no. 11.

(printed under page 289)

Page

  • running head: SERMO XC. 566
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)

Misprints kept as printed

- "Et nos, novi, scio, sic amatis": the page prints nos where the sense (amatis, vestros) requires vos; the source keeps nos as printed and the English renders vos. (listed by Q2)