Migne Reading Room

PL 38 · cols. 595–601

Augustine, Sermones 98-101 (Classis I, de Scripturis)

Sermon XCIX

PL 38:595
Increpatur aliquis in mala consuetudine positus, verbo veritatis. Quam multi increpantur et non audiunt! Quis ergo agit intus cum illo qui audit? Quis vitam inspirat intrinsecus? Quis est qui secretam pellit mortem, secretam dat vitam? Nonne post objurgationes, post increpationes dimittuntur homines cogitationibus suis, et incipiunt secum volvere quam malam vitam gerant, quam pessima consuetudine premantur? Deinde displicentes sibi, mutare vitam instituunt. Resurrexerunt isti; revixerunt quibus displicet quod fuerunt: sed reviviscentes ambulare non possunt. Haec sunt vincula ipsius reatus. Opus est ergo ut qui revixit, solvatur, et ire permittatur. Hoc officium discipulis dedit, quibus ait: Quae solveritis in terra, soluta sunt et in coelo (Matth. XVIII, 18).
Someone set in a bad habit is rebuked by the word of truth. How many are rebuked and do not hear! Who then is it that acts within, together with the one who hears? Who breathes life into him inwardly? Who is it that drives out a hidden death and gives a hidden life? After reproofs, after rebukes, are not men left to their own thoughts, and do they not begin to turn over within themselves what a bad life they lead, by what a most wicked habit they are weighed down? Then, displeased with themselves, they resolve to change their life. These have risen again; those who are displeased with what they were have come back to life: but though coming back to life, they cannot walk. These are the bonds of guilt itself. It is needful, therefore, that he who has come back to life be loosed and be allowed to go. This office He gave to the disciples, to whom He says: Whatever you loose on earth is loosed in heaven also (Matt. 18:18).
CAPUT VII. — 7. Resurgendum celeriter a peccato. Haec ergo, charissimi, sic audiamus, ut qui vivunt, vivant; qui mortui sunt, reviviscant. Sive adhuc peccatum in corde conceptum est, et non processit in factum; poeniteat, corrigatur cogitatio, surgat mortuus intra domum conscientiae. Sive jam quod cogitavit admisit; nec sic desperetur. Non surrexit mortuus intus, surgat elatus. Poeniteat facti, de proximo reviviscat: non eat in profundum sepulturae, non accipiat desuper consuetudinis molem. Sed forte jam illi loquor, qui jam duro sui moris lapide premitur, qui jam urgetur consuetudinis pondere, qui jam quatriduanus putet. Nec ipse desperet: profundus mortuus est, sed altus est Christus. Novit clamando terrena onera rumpere, novit intrinsecus per se ipsum vivificare, solvendum discipulis tradere. Agant etiam tales poenitentiam. Neque enim Lazaro resuscitato post quatriduum ullus putor in vivente remanserat. Ergo qui vivunt, vivant: quicumque autem mortui sunt, in quacumque harum trium morte se invenerint, agant ut celeriter jam resurgant.
Chapter VII. — 7. One must rise quickly from sin. Let us therefore, dearly beloved, so hear these things that those who live may live, and those who are dead may come back to life. If sin has so far been conceived in the heart and has not gone forth into deed, let there be repentance, let the thought be corrected, let the dead man rise within the house of conscience. If he has already committed what he thought, not even so is there to be despair. The dead man did not rise within; let him rise when carried out. Let him repent of the deed, let him come back to life while still close at hand: let him not go into the depth of burial, let him not receive from above the mass of habit. But perhaps I am now speaking to one who is already pressed down by the hard stone of his own way of life, who is already weighed upon by the burden of habit, who already stinks, four days dead. Let not even him despair: the dead man lies deep, but Christ is high. He knows how to burst earthly burdens by calling out; He knows how to quicken inwardly through Himself, and to hand [him] over to the disciples to be loosed. Let such as these also do penance. For in Lazarus, raised after four days, no stench remained once he was living. Therefore let those who live, live: and whoever are dead, in whichever of these three deaths they find themselves, let them act so as to rise again now, quickly.
SERMO XCIX. De verbis Evangelii Lucae, cap. VII, 36-50, Et ecce mulier quae erat in civitate peccatrix, etc. De remissione peccatorum, contra Donatistas.
Sermon 99. On the words of the Gospel of Luke, chapter 7:36-50, And behold, a woman who was a sinner in the city, etc. On the remission of sins, against the Donatists.
CAPUT PRIMUM. — 1. Mulier peccatrix ad pedes Domini recumbentis. Quod admonemur Domini eloquiis de divinis lectionibus, hinc credentes Deum velle nos loqui, proferimus Charitati vestrae, illo adjuvante, sermonem de remissione peccatorum. Evangelium enim cum legeretur, attentissime audistis, et res gesta narrata atque versata est ante oculos cordis vestri. Vidistis enim, non carne, sed mente, Dominum Jesum Christum in domo Pharisaei recumbentem, et ab illo invitatum non fastidientem. Vidistis etiam mulierem in civitate famosam, mala utique fama, quae erat peccatrix, non invitatam irruisse convivio, ubi suus medicus recumbebat, et quaesisse pia impudentia sanitatem. Irruens quasi importuna convivio, opportuna
Chapter I. — 1. The sinful woman at the feet of the Lord as He reclined. Since we are admonished by the Lord's words in the divine readings, believing from this that God wishes us to speak on it, we set before your Charity, with His help, a sermon on the remission of sins. For when the Gospel was being read, you listened most attentively, and the deed that was done was narrated and turned over before the eyes of your heart. For you saw, not with the flesh but with the mind, the Lord Jesus Christ reclining in the house of the Pharisee, and not disdaining to be invited by him. You saw also a woman notorious in the city, of bad repute indeed, who was a sinner, burst uninvited into the banquet where her physician was reclining, and seek health with a holy shamelessness. Bursting in as though unseasonably for the banquet, seasonably for the
Editors' notes and page, col. 595

Footnotes

(*) ‹anchor: SERMO XCIX› · call in col 595 Collatus est cum tribus cl. cum duobus cb. cum gr. rm. Am. Er. Par. Lov.

Collated with three cl. manuscripts, with two cb., with gr., rm., and with the editions Am. [Amerbach], Er. [Erasmus], Par. [Paris], Lov. [Louvain].

(printed under page 304)

(a) ‹anchor: SERMO XCIX› · call in col 595

Alias 23 ex Homiliis 50.

Formerly no. 23 of the Fifty Homilies.

(printed under page 304)

Page

  • running head: 595 S. AUGUSTINI EPI[SCOPI] (cut off at right edge of image)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:596
beneficio (noverat enim quanto morbo laboraret, et illi sanando idoneum esse ad quem venerat, sciebat) : accessit ergo, non ad caput Domini, sed ad pedes, et quae diu male ambulaverat, vestigia recta quaerebat. Prius fudit lacrymas, sanguinem cordis, et lavit Domini pedes obsequio confessionis. Capillis suis tersit, osculata est, unxit : tacita loquebatur; non sermonem promebat, sed devotionem ostendebat.
benefit (for she knew with how great a disease she was labouring, and she knew that He to Whom she had come was fit to heal it): she approached, therefore, not the Lord's head but His feet, and she who had long walked badly was seeking right footsteps. First she poured out tears, the blood of the heart, and washed the Lord's feet with the service of confession. With her hair she wiped them, she kissed them, she anointed them: silent, she spoke; she did not bring forth speech, but showed devotion.
CAPUT II.—2. Pharisaei superbi cogitatio. Quia ergo tetigit Dominum, rigando, osculando, tergendo, ungendo pedes ejus : Pharisaeus qui invitaverat Dominum Jesum Christum, quia ex illo genere erat hominum superborum, de quibus Isaias propheta dicit, Qui dicunt Longe recede a me, noli me tangere, quoniam mundus sum (Isai. LXV, 5) ; putavit Dominum nescisse mulierem : Hoc apud se cogitabat, et dicebat in corde suo : Hic si esset propheta, sciret quae mulier illi accessit ad pedes. Ideo eum nescire credidit, quia illam non repulit, quia accedentem non prohibuit, quia tangi se a peccatrice permisit. Nam illum nescisse, unde sciebat? Quid enim si sciebat, o Pharisaee, invitator et irrisor Domini? Dominum pascis, et a quo pascendus sis, non intelligis. Unde scis, nescisse Dominum quae fuerat illa mulier, nisi quia permissa est accedere, nisi quia illo patiente osculata est pedes ejus, nisi quia tersit, nisi quia unxit? Haec enim non debuit permitti facere in pedibus mundis mulier immunda? Ad illius ergo pharisaei pedes si talis mulier accessisset, dicturus erat quod Isaias de talibus dicit : Recede a me, noli me tangere, quoniam mundus sum. Accessit autem ad Dominum immunda, ut rediret munda : accessit aegra, ut rediret sana : accessit confessa, ut rediret professa.
Chapter II.—2. The thought of the proud Pharisee. Because, therefore, she touched the Lord, wetting, kissing, wiping, anointing His feet, the Pharisee who had invited the Lord Jesus Christ, since he was of that kind of proud men of whom the prophet Isaiah says, Who say, Withdraw far from me, do not touch me, for I am clean (Isa. 65:5), thought that the Lord had not known the woman. This he was thinking within himself, and saying in his heart: This man, if he were a prophet, would know what woman has come to His feet. He believed that He did not know for this reason: because He did not repel her, because He did not forbid her as she approached, because He allowed Himself to be touched by a sinful woman. For that He had not known, how did he know? For what if He did know, O Pharisee, inviter and mocker of the Lord? You feed the Lord, and you do not understand by Whom you are to be fed. How do you know that the Lord had not known what that woman had been, except because she was permitted to approach, except because, with Him allowing it, she kissed His feet, except because she wiped them, except because she anointed them? For ought an unclean woman not to have been permitted to do these things on clean feet? So if such a woman had approached the feet of that Pharisee, he would have said what Isaiah says of such men: Withdraw from me, do not touch me, for I am clean. But she approached the Lord unclean, that she might return clean; she approached sick, that she might return healthy; she approached having confessed, that she might return having professed.
CAPUT III. — 3. Dominus Pharisaei cogitationem castigat. Audivit enim Dominus Pharisaeum cogitantem. Jam hinc intelligat Pharisaeus, si non poterat videre peccantem, qui potuit audire cogitantem. Proposuit ergo homini similitudinem de duobus qui debebant uni feneratori. Etiam ipsum enim sanare cupiebat, ne gratis apud eum panem comederet : ipsum pascentem esuriebat ; ipsum emendare, ipsum mactare, ipsum manducare, ipsum in suum corpus trajicere volebat : sicut et illi mulieri Samaritanae dixit, Sitio (Joan. IV, 7). Quid est, Sitio? Desidero fidem tuam. Dicuntur ergo verba Domini in hac similitudine; et agitur utrumque, ut et invitator ille sanetur cum suis condiscumbentibus, Dominum Jesum Christum pariter videntibus, pariter ignorantibus; et ut illa mulier habeat fiduciam confessionis suae, nec pungatur ulterius aculeis conscientiae suae. Debebat unus, inquit, quinquaginta denarios, alius quingentos; donavit ambobus : quis eum plus dilexit? Respondit cui similitudo proposita erat, quod respondere utique ratio compellebat : Credo, Domine, cui plus donavit. Et attendens ad mulierem, dixit ad Simonem : Vides hanc mulierem? Intravi in domum tuam, aquam pedibus meis non dedisti : haec lacrymis suis lavit mihi pedes, et capillis suis tersit. Osculum mihi non dedisti : illa ex quo ingressa est, non cessavit pedes meos osculari.
Chapter III.—3. The Lord rebukes the thought of the Pharisee. For the Lord heard the Pharisee thinking. From this let the Pharisee now understand whether He could not see her sinning Who was able to hear him thinking. He therefore set before the man a similitude about two men who owed money to one moneylender. For He desired to heal him too, so that He might not eat bread at his house for nothing: He hungered for the very man who was feeding Him; He wished to amend him, to slay him, to eat him, to take him over into His own body: just as He also said to that Samaritan woman, I thirst (John 4:7). What is I thirst? I desire your faith. So the Lord's words are spoken in this similitude, and both things are achieved: that the inviter may be healed together with his fellow guests, who alike saw the Lord Jesus Christ and alike did not know Him; and that the woman may have confidence in her confession, and no longer be pricked by the stings of her conscience. One, He says, owed fifty denarii, the other five hundred; he forgave them both: which of them loved him more? The man to whom the similitude had been set forth answered what reason certainly compelled him to answer: I believe, Lord, the one to whom he forgave more. And turning towards the woman, He said to Simon: Do you see this woman? I entered your house, you gave no water for My feet: she has washed My feet with her tears, and wiped them with her hair. You gave Me no kiss: she, from the time she came in, has not ceased to kiss My feet.
Editors' notes and page, col. 596

Page

  • running head: …AUGUSTINI EPISCOPI 596 (left part cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins mid-sentence with "beneficio"; column ends with "oscu-" broken across the column break; damaged type read as "dicunt" (printed like dicuut), "esset" (printed like essct), "similitudinem" and "ipsum" (blurred letters); section numeral after CAPUT III read as 3 (type resembles 5); left column (PL 38:595) and "Digitized by Google" stamp not set
  • other: the word osculari. was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 597
PL 38:597
Oleo caput meum non unxisti: illa autem pedes meos unxit unguento. Ideo dico: Dimittuntur ei peccata multa, quoniam dilexit multum. Cui autem modicum dimittitur, modicum diligit.
You did not anoint My head with oil: but she has anointed My feet with ointment. Therefore I say: Many sins are forgiven her, because she loved much. But he to whom little is forgiven loves little.
CAPUT IV. — 4. Ardua quaestio ex Domini verbis nata. Oritur quaestio profecto solvenda, quae attentionem vestrae Charitatis desiderat, ne forte sufficere non possimus verbis ad t⟨o⟩tam ejus obscuritatem removendam et dilucidandam pro angustia temporis; maxime cum caro ista aestibus fatigata, jam recreari desideret, et debitum suum poscens, animae aviditatem impediens ostendat quod dictum est: Spiritus quidem promptus est, caro autem infirma. (Matth. XXVI, 41). Metuendum est, et valde metuendum, ne in his verbis Domini non bene intelligentibus his qui concupiscentiis suis carnalibus favent, et ab eis in libertatem educi pigrescunt, subrepat illa sententia, quae praedicantibus etiam Apostolis nata est in linguis maledicorum, unde dicit apostolus Paulus: Et sicut quidam dicunt nos dicere, Faciamus mala, ut veniant bona (Rom. III, 8). Dicit enim aliquis: Si cui modicum dimittitur, modicum diligit; cui autem plus dimittitur, plus diligit: expedit plus diligere, quam minus diligere; oportet ut multum peccemus, et multum debeamus, quod nobis dimitti cupiamus, ut dimissorem magnorum debitorum amplius diligamus. Peccatrix enim illa mulier quanto plus debebat, tanto dimissorem debitorum suorum amplius diligebat, Domino ipso dicente, Dimittuntur ei peccata multa, quoniam dilexit multum. Quare autem dilexit multum, nisi quia debebat multum? Denique addidit et adjunxit, Cui autem modicum dimittitur, modicum diligit. Nonne expedit, inquit, ut multum mihi dimittatur, quam minus, unde amplius diligam Dominum meum? Videtis certe profunditatem quaestionis: scio, videtis. Videtis angustias temporis, et hoc videtis et sentitis.
Chapter IV. — 4. A difficult question arising from the Lord's words. There arises indeed a question that must be solved, which requires the attention of your Charity, lest perhaps we may not be able to suffice in words for removing and clarifying its whole obscurity, given the narrowness of the time; especially since this flesh, wearied by the heat, now desires to be refreshed, and, demanding its due and hindering the eagerness of the soul, shows what is said: The spirit indeed is ready, but the flesh weak (Matt. 26:41). It is to be feared, and greatly to be feared, lest, these words of the Lord being not well understood by those who favour their carnal desires and are sluggish to be led out from them into liberty, there creep in that opinion which arose on the tongues of slanderers even while the Apostles were preaching, whence the apostle Paul says: And as some say that we say, Let us do evil, that good may come (Rom. 3:8). For someone says: If he to whom little is forgiven loves little, but he to whom more is forgiven loves more, it is better to love more than to love less; we ought to sin much and owe much, which we may desire to be forgiven us, so that we may love the more the forgiver of great debts. For that sinful woman, the more she owed, the more she loved the forgiver of her debts, the Lord Himself saying, Many sins are forgiven her, because she loved much. But why did she love much, unless because she owed much? Finally He added and joined to it, But he to whom little is forgiven loves little. Is it not better, he says, that much be forgiven me rather than less, so that I may love my Lord the more? You surely see the depth of the question: I know, you see it. You see the narrowness of the time, and this you both see and feel.
CAPUT V. — 5. Exemplis res declaratur. Accipite ergo pauca. Si magnitudini quaestionis satis non fecero, interim praesentem recondite sermonem, in futuro tenete debitorem. Da nunc duos homines, ut sub exemplis evidentioribus quod proposui cogitetis. Unus eorum peccatis plenus est, diu pessime vixit; alter eorum pauca peccavit: accedunt ambo ad gratiam, baptizantur ambo; intrant debitores, exeunt liberi: plus donatum est uni, minus alteri. Interrogo quantum quisque diligat. Si invenero plus diligere eum, cui plura peccata dimissa sunt; utilius multa peccavit, utilior erat multa iniquitas, ne esset tepida charitas. Interrogo alium quantum diligat, invenio minus: nam si invenio tantum et illum diligere, quantum et ille diligit cui multa donata sunt, quomodo respondebo verbis Domini? quomodo verum erit quod Veritas dixit, Cui modicum dimittitur, modicum diligit? Ecce ait aliquis; mihi modicum dimissum est, non multa peccavi; et tantum diligo, quantum iste, cui multa dimissa sunt. Tu verum dicis, an Christus? Ad hoc tibi dimissum est mendacium tuum,
Chapter V. — 5. The matter is made clear by examples. Receive, then, a few things. If I do not do justice to the magnitude of the question, meanwhile store away the present sermon, and hold me as a debtor for the future. Take now two men, so that you may consider what I have proposed under clearer examples. One of them is full of sins, and has lived most wickedly for a long time; the other of them has sinned a little: both come to grace, both are baptized; they go in debtors, they come out free: more has been given to the one, less to the other. I ask how much each loves. If I find that he loves more to whom more sins have been forgiven, it was more useful that he sinned much, much iniquity was more useful, lest charity be lukewarm. I ask the other how much he loves, and I find less: for if I find that he too loves as much as he loves to whom many things were given, how shall I answer the words of the Lord? how will that be true which the Truth said, He to whom little is forgiven loves little? Behold, someone says: little has been forgiven me, I have not sinned much; and I love as much as this man to whom many things have been forgiven. Do you speak the truth, or Christ? To this end your lie has been forgiven you,
Editors' notes and page, col. 597

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: quomodo verum erit› · call in col 597

Editi, quomodo non verum erit. Abest, non, a Mss. praecipuis.

The printed editions: "how will it not be true." The "not" is absent from the principal manuscripts.

(printed under page 305)

Page

  • running head: 597 SERMO XCIX.
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:598
ut mendacii dimissori crimen imponas? Si modicum tibi dimissum est, modicum diligis. Si enim modicum est tibi dimissum, et plurimum diligis, contradicis ei qui dixit, Cui modicum dimittitur, modicum diligit. Illi ergo plus credo, qui te plus novit. Parum tibi dimissum putas, prorsus parum diligis. Quid ergo, inquit, facere debui? Multa mala committere, ut multa essent, quae posset ille mihi dimittere, ut amplius possem diligere? Angustat nos; sed Dominus qui haec vera proposuit, ab angustiis liberet me.
that you should lay a charge of lying on the One Who forgives? If little has been forgiven you, you love little. For if little has been forgiven you, and you love very much, you contradict Him Who said, To whom little is forgiven, he loves little. I therefore believe Him the more, Who knows you the more. You think little has been forgiven you; you love altogether little. "What then," he says, "ought I to have done? Committed many evils, so that there might be many things which He could forgive me, so that I might be able to love more?" He hems us in; but may the Lord, Who set forth these true things, free me from these straits.
CAPUT VI. — 6. Quaestio solvitur. Inter debita dimissa numerari vult quae vitavimus peccata. Dictum est hoc propter pharisaeum illum, qui vel nulla vel pauca se putabat habere peccata. Non enim Dominum invitaret, nisi aliquantum diligeret. Sed quam parum erat? Non osculum dedit, non saltem aquam ad pedes, et si non lacrymas: non illo obsequio prosecutus est, quo illa mulier quae noverat quid sanaretur, et a quo sanaretur. O Pharisaee, ideo parum diligis, quia parum tibi dimitti suspicaris: non quia parum dimittitur, sed quia parum putas esse quod dimittitur. Quid ergo, inquit ille? Ego qui homicidium non feci, homicida deputandus sum? qui adulterium non admisi, pro adulterio puniendus sum? Aut ista mihi dimittenda sunt, quae non commisi? Ecce iterum constitue duos, et loquamur ad eos. Venit unus supplex peccator, coopertus spinis tanquam hericius, et nimis timidus tanquam lepus. Sed petra est refugium hericiis (Psal. CIII, 18) et leporibus. Venit ergo ad petram, invenit refugium, accipit auxilium. Alius non multa commisit: quid ei faciemus, ut multum diligat? quid persuadebimus? Contra Domini verba veniemus, Cui modicum dimittitur, modicum diligit? Ita plane, cui modicum dimittitur. Sed o tu qui dicis te non multa commisisse; quare? quo regente? Deo gratias, quod motu et voce vestra intellexisse vos significastis. Jam, ut video, soluta quaestio est. Hic multa commisit, et multorum debitor factus est: ille gubernante Deo pauca commisit. Cui deputat ille quod dimisit, huic et iste deputat quod non commisit. Adulter non fuisti in illa tua vita praeterita plena ignorantia, nondum illuminatus, nondum bonum malumque discernens, nondum credens in illum, qui te nescientem regebat. Hoc tibi dicit Deus tuus: Regebam te mihi, servabam te mihi. Ut adulterium non committeres, suasor defuit: ut suasor deesset, ego feci. Locus et tempus defuit; et ut haec deessent, ego feci. Adfuit suasor, non defuit locus, non defuit tempus: ut non consentires, ego terrui. Agnosce ergo gratiam ejus, cui debes et quod non admisisti. Mihi debet iste quod factum est, et dimissum vidisti: mibi debes et tu quod non fecisti. Nullum est enim peccatum quod fecit homo, quod non possit facere et alter homo, si desit rector a quo factus est homo.
Chapter VI. — 6. The question is resolved. He wishes the sins we have avoided to be counted among the debts forgiven. This was said on account of that Pharisee, who thought he had either no sins or few. For he would not have invited the Lord unless he loved Him somewhat. But how little was it? He gave no kiss, not even water for the feet, let alone tears: he did not attend Him with that devotion with which that woman did who knew what was being healed in her, and by Whom she was being healed. O Pharisee, you love little for this reason, that you suppose little is forgiven you: not because little is forgiven, but because you think what is forgiven is little. "What then," says he? "Am I, who have committed no murder, to be reckoned a murderer? Am I, who have not committed adultery, to be punished for adultery? Or are those things to be forgiven me which I did not commit?" See, set up two men once more, and let us speak to them. One comes, a suppliant sinner, covered with spines like a hedgehog, and exceedingly timid like a hare. But the rock is a refuge for hedgehogs (Ps. 103:18) and for hares. He comes therefore to the rock, finds refuge, receives help. The other has not committed many sins: what shall we do for him, that he may love much? Of what shall we persuade him? Shall we come against the words of the Lord, To whom little is forgiven, he loves little? Plainly so, to whom little is forgiven. But O you who say that you have not committed many sins; why is that? Under Whose guidance? Thanks be to God, that by your movement and your voice you have shown that you have understood. Now, as I see, the question is resolved. This man committed many sins, and became a debtor for many: that one, with God governing him, committed few. To Him to whom the former ascribes what He forgave, the latter too ascribes what he did not commit. You were not an adulterer in that past life of yours, full of ignorance, not yet enlightened, not yet discerning good and evil, not yet believing in Him Who was guiding you without your knowing it. This is what your God says to you: I was guiding you for Myself, I was keeping you for Myself. That you should not commit adultery, there was no one to tempt you: that there should be no one to tempt you, I brought about. Place and time were lacking; and that these should be lacking, I brought about. A tempter was present, place was not lacking, time was not lacking: that you should not consent, I put fear into you. Acknowledge therefore the grace of Him to Whom you owe even what you did not commit. This man owes Me what was done, and you have seen it forgiven: you too owe Me what you did not do. For there is no sin which one man has done that another man could not also do, if the Ruler by Whom man was made were absent.
CAPUT VII. — 7. Deinceps de remissione peccatorum, quod ab homine dimitti non possint. Jam nunc quia ut potuimus, quaestionem profundam in tantilla temporis brevitate solvimus; aut si nondum solvimus,
Chapter VII. — 7. Next, on the remission of sins, that they cannot be forgiven by man. Now then, since, as best we could, we have resolved a deep question in so very short a space of time; or if we have not yet resolved it,
Editors' notes and page, col. 598

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: quod motu› · call in col 598

Mss., metu.

The manuscripts: "by fear."

(printed under page 305)

Page

  • running head: SERMO XCIX. 598
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:599
debitores, ut dixi, teneamur: illud potius breviter videamus de remissione peccatorum. Homo putabatur Christus, et ab illo qui invitavit, et ab eis qui pariter discumbebant. Nescio quid illa peccatrix plus in Domino viderat. Nam quare fecit illa omnia, nisi ut sibi dimitterentur peccata? Noverat ergo illum posse peccata dimittere: illi autem noverant hominem non posse dimittere. Et credendum est quod omnes, id est, et illi discumbentes, et illa mulier accedens ad pedes Domini, omnes hi noverant hominem non posse peccata dimittere. Cum ergo omnes hoc nossent; illa quae credidit eum dimittere posse peccata, plus quam hominem esse intellexit. Denique cum dixisset mulieri, Dimittuntur tibi peccata tua; continuo illi, Quis est iste qui et peccata dimittit? Quis est iste, quem jam mulier peccatrix cognovit? Tu recumbens quasi sanus, medicum ignoras: quia majore forsitan febre mentem etiam perdidisti. Nam et phreneticus ridens ploratur a sanis. Tamen illud bene nostis, bene tenetis: tenete, quia homo non potest peccata dimittere. Illa quae sibi a Christo dimitti credidit, Christum non hominem tantum, sed et Deum credidit. Quis est iste, inquiunt, qui et peccata dimittit? Et Dominus, Quis est iste, dicentibus, non dixit, Filius Dei, Verbum Dei: non hoc dixit, sed in eo quod putabant aliquantum eos manere permittens, solvit quaestionem motus illorum. Qui enim videbat discumbentes, audiebat cogitantes; conversus ad mulierem, Fides tua, inquit, te salvam fecit. Isti qui dicunt, Quis est iste qui et peccata dimittit? qui me putant hominem, hominem putent. Fides tua te salvam fecit.
let us, as I said, be held as debtors: let us rather look briefly at the remission of sins. Christ was thought to be a man, both by him who had invited Him and by those who were reclining at table with Him. That sinful woman had seen something more in the Lord, I know not what. For why did she do all those things, if not so that her sins might be forgiven her? She knew, then, that He could forgive sins; but they knew that a man cannot forgive. And it is to be believed that all of them, that is, both those reclining at table and that woman coming to the Lord's feet, all of these knew that a man cannot forgive sins. Since, then, all knew this, she who believed that He could forgive sins understood that He was more than a man. Accordingly, when He had said to the woman, Your sins are forgiven you, at once they said, Who is this who even forgives sins? Who is this, whom the sinful woman has already recognized? You, reclining as though healthy, do not recognize the physician: because perhaps through a greater fever you have even lost your mind. For the delirious man too, laughing, is wept over by the healthy. Yet this you know well, this you hold well: hold it, that a man cannot forgive sins. She who believed that sins were forgiven her by Christ believed Christ to be not a man only, but God as well. Who is this, they say, who even forgives sins? And the Lord, to those saying, Who is this, did not say, The Son of God, the Word of God: He did not say this, but, allowing them to remain for a while in what they supposed, He resolved the question that was stirring them. For He who saw them reclining heard them thinking; turning to the woman, He said, Your faith has saved you. Let those who say, Who is this who even forgives sins?, who think Me a man, think Me a man. Your faith has saved you.
CAPUT VIII. — 8. Donatistarum error et arrogantia. Medicus bonus aegros non solum praesentes sanabat, sed et futuros etiam praevidebat. Futuri erant homines qui dicerent: Ego peccata dimitto, ego justifico, ego sanctifico, ego sano quemcumque baptizo. Ex ipso numero et isti sunt, qui dicunt, Noli me tangere. Usque adeo ex ipso numero sunt, ut nuper in collatione nostra, quod etiam in Gestis ipsis legere potestis, cum eis a Cognitore esset consessus oblatus, ut sederent nobiscum, respondendum putarent, Scriptum est nobis, cum talibus non sedere, scilicet ne per contactum subselliorum ad eos velut nostra contagio perveniret. Vide si non est, Noli me tangere, quia mundus sum. Alio autem die, ubi opportunius erat, commemoravimus eos hujus miserrimae vanitatis, cum ageretur de Ecclesia, quia mali in ea non contaminant bonos; respondimus eis, quia ideo nobiscum sedere noluerunt, et dixerunt, se Scriptura Dei fuisse commonitos, quia videlicet scriptum est, Non sedi in concilio vanitatis: diximus, Si ideo nobiscum sedere noluistis, quia scriptum est, Non sedi in concilio vanitatis; quare nobiscum ingressi estis, cum consequenter scriptum sit, Et cum iniqua gerentibus non introibo (Psal. XXV, 4)? Ergo in hoc quod dicunt, Noli me tangere, quia mundus sum, similes sunt illi pharisaeo
Chapter VIII. — 8. The error and arrogance of the Donatists. The good Physician not only healed the sick who were present, but also foresaw those who were to come. There were going to be men who would say: I forgive sins, I justify, I sanctify, I heal whomever I baptize. Of that very number are these too, who say, Do not touch me. They are of that very number to such a degree that recently at our conference, as you can also read in the Proceedings themselves, when a seat was offered them by the Judge so that they might sit with us, they thought they should answer, It is written for us not to sit with such men, namely lest through contact of the benches our contagion, as it were, should reach them. See whether this is not, Do not touch me, because I am clean. But on another day, when it was more opportune, we reminded them of this most wretched vanity, when the matter of the Church was being treated, that the wicked in it do not defile the good; we answered them, since they had refused to sit with us for this reason, and had said that they had been warned by the Scripture of God, namely because it is written, I have not sat in the council of vanity: we said, If you refused to sit with us because it is written, I have not sat in the council of vanity, why did you come in with us, since it is written next, And with those who do wicked things I will not go in (Ps. 25:4)? So in saying, Do not touch me, because I am clean, they are like that Pharisee
Editors' notes and page, col. 599

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: quaestionem motus illorum› · call in col 599

Editi, et motus illorum. Particula, et, abest a manuscriptis.

The printed editions: "and their agitation." The particle "and" is absent from the manuscripts.

(printed under page 306)

(2) ‹anchor: legere potestis› · call in col 599

Sic potiores Mss. At editi, loqui poterimus.

So the better manuscripts. But the printed editions: "we shall be able to speak."

(printed under page 306)

(a) ‹anchor: non introibo (Psal. XXV, 4)› · call in col 599

Vide librum ad Donatistas post Collationem, cap. 5.

See the book To the Donatists after the Conference, ch. 5.

(printed under page 306)

Page

  • running head: 599 S. AUGUSTINI EPISC[OPI] (cut off at right edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: the word pharisaeo was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 600
PL 38:600
qui Dominum invitaverat, et propterea putabat eum nescisse mulierem, quia non eam prohibuerat a contactu pedum suorum. Sed in alio melior Pharisaeus, quia cum putaret hominem Chris⟨t⟩um, non credebat ab homine posse dimitti peccata. Melior ergo Judaeis quam haereticis apparuit intellectus. Judaei quid dixerunt? Quis est hic, qui et peccata dimittit? Audet sibi homo hoc usurpare? Quid contra haereticus? Ego dimitto, ego mundo, ego sa⟨n⟩ctifico. Respondeat illi, non ego, sed Christus: O homo, quando ego a Judaeis putatus sum homo, dimissionem peccatorum fidei dedi. Non ego, respondet tibi Christus. O haeretice, tu cum sis homo, dicis: Veni, mulier; ego te salvam facio! Ego cum putarer homo, dixi: Vade, mulier; fides tua salvam te fecit.
who had invited the Lord, and for that reason he thought that He did not know the woman, because He had not forbidden her to touch His feet. But in another respect the Pharisee was better, because, though he thought Christ a man, he did not believe that sins could be forgiven by a man. The Jews, then, showed a better understanding than the heretics. What did the Jews say? Who is this, who even forgives sins? Does a man dare to claim this for himself? What does the heretic say against this? I forgive, I cleanse, I sanctify. Let not me but Christ answer him: O man, when I was thought by the Jews to be a man, I gave the forgiveness of sins to faith. Not I, Christ answers you. O heretic, though you are a man, you say: Come, woman; I make you whole! I, when I was thought a man, said: Go, woman; your faith has made you whole.
CAPUT IX. — 9. Argumentum Donatistarum. Peccata per Ecclesiam Spiritus sanctus dimittit. Respondent, nescientes, sicut ait Apostolus, neque quae loquuntur, neque de quibus affirmant (I Tim. I, 7): respondent et dicunt, Si non dimittunt homines peccata, falsum est ergo quod ait Christus, Quae solveritis in terra, soluta erunt et in coelo (Matth. XVIII, 18). Nescis quare hoc dictum sit, quomodo dictum sit. Daturus erat Dominus hominibus Spiritum sanctum, ⟨e⟩t ab ipso Spiritu sancto fidelibus suis dimitti peccata, non meritis hominum volebat intelligi dimitti peccata. Nam quid es, homo, nisi aeger sanandus? Vis mihi esse medicus? Mecum quaere medicum. Nam hoc ut evidentius ostenderet Dominus, ab Spiritu sancto quem donavit fidelibus suis, dimitti peccata, non meritis hominum, quodam loco sic ait resurgens a mortuis, Accipite Spiritum sanctum; et cum dixisset, Accipite Spiritum sanctum, continuo subjecit, Si cui dimiseritis peccata, dimittuntur ei (Joan. XX, 22, 23): hoc est, Spiritus dimittit, non vos. Spiritus autem Deus est. Deus ergo dimittit, non vos. Sed ad Spiritum quid estis vos? Nescitis quia templum Dei estis, et Spiritus Dei habitat in vobis (I Cor. III, 16)? Et iterum: Nescitis, quia corpora vestra templum in vobis est Spiritus sancti, quem habetis a Deo (Id. VI, 19)? Deus ergo habitat in templo sancto suo, hoc est, in sanctis suis fidelibus, in Ecclesia sua: per eos dimittit peccata; quia viva templa sunt.
Chapter IX. — 9. The argument of the Donatists. The Holy Spirit forgives sins through the Church. They answer, understanding, as the Apostle says, neither what they say nor what they affirm (1 Tim. 1:7): they answer and say, If men do not forgive sins, then what Christ says is false, Whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed also in heaven (Matt. 18:18). You do not know why this was said, how it was said. The Lord was about to give the Holy Spirit to men, and He wished it to be understood that sins are forgiven to His faithful by the Holy Spirit Himself, not by the merits of men. For what are you, man, but a sick man to be healed? Do you want to be a physician to me? Seek the physician with me. For, so that the Lord might show more clearly that sins are forgiven by the Holy Spirit Whom He gave to His faithful, not by the merits of men, in a certain place, rising from the dead, He speaks thus, Receive the Holy Spirit; and when He had said, Receive the Holy Spirit, He at once added, If you forgive anyone his sins, they are forgiven him (John 20:22–23): that is, the Spirit forgives, not you. But the Spirit is God. God therefore forgives, not you. But what are you in relation to the Spirit? Do you not know that you are the temple of God, and the Spirit of God dwells in you (1 Cor. 3:16)? And again: Do you not know that your bodies are a temple of the Holy Spirit in you, Whom you have from God (ibid. 6:19)? God therefore dwells in His holy temple, that is, in His holy faithful, in His Church: through them He forgives sins, because they are living temples.
CAPUT X. — 10. Peccata a Deo dimittuntur, et per hominem, et praeter hominem. Spiritus sanctus per ministerium hominum datus. Sed qui dimittit per hominem, potest dimittere et praeter hominem. Neque enim minus idoneus est per se dare, qui potest per alium dare. Per Joannem quibusdam dedit, ipsi Joanni per quem dedit? Merito volens Deus hoc ostendere, et huic veritati attestari, cum quidam in Samaria evangelizati essent, et baptizati essent, et baptizati a Philippo evangelista, uno de septem diaconibus primitus electis, non acceperunt Spiritum sanctum, et baptizati erant. Nuntiatum est discipulis, qui erant Jerosolymis, et venerunt
Chapter X. — 10. Sins are forgiven by God both through man and apart from man. The Holy Spirit given through the ministry of men. But He who forgives through man can also forgive apart from man. For He who is able to give through another is no less able to give by Himself. Through John He gave to some; [through whom did He give] to John himself, through whom He gave? Rightly, God wishing to show this and to bear witness to this truth, when certain people in Samaria had been evangelized and had been baptized, and baptized by Philip the evangelist, one of the seven deacons first chosen, they did not receive the Holy Spirit, and yet they had been baptized. It was announced to the disciples who were at Jerusalem, and they
Editors' notes and page, col. 600

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: respondet tibi Christus› · call in col 600

Colbertinus vetus codex, non mihi. Respondet tibi ergo Christus.

The old Colbert codex: "not to me. Christ therefore answers you."

(printed under page 306)

(2) ‹anchor: dimitti peccata› · call in col 600

In Colbertino Ms., per ipsum Spiritum sanctum, et ab ipso Spiritu sancto volebat intelligi dimitti peccata. Nam quid, etc.

In the Colbert manuscript: "through the Holy Spirit Himself, and by the Holy Spirit Himself He wished it to be understood that sins are forgiven. For what," etc.

(printed under page 306)

Page

  • running head: [cropped at left] ...UGUSTINI EPISCOPI 600
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: ligature doubt raised by the check: caelo | coelo; settled by the QA read Q1a from the page as coelo (text changed)
  • other: the word venerunt was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 601
  • other: QA read Q1a: the English head fragment of the word split at the 599/600 break was removed here; the whole word belongs at the end of col 599's English, which still ends on the broken half and is to be mended there
PL 38:601
ad Samariam, ut illi qui baptizati erant, per impositionem manus eorum acciperent Spiritum sanctum. Et ita factum est: venerunt et imposuerunt eis manus, et acceperunt Spiritum sanctum. Quia tunc sic dabatur Spiritus sanctus, ut etiam appareret datus. Qui enim eum accipiebant, linguis omnium gentium loquebantur: ut significarent Ecclesiam in gentibus linguis omnium locuturam. Acceperunt ergo Spiritum sanctum, et in eis evidenter apparuit. Quod cum vidisset Simon, putans hoc esse hominum, voluit esse et suum. Quod hominum putavit, ab hominibus emere voluit. Quantam, inquit, vultis a me pecuniam sumere, ut per impositionem manuum mearum detur Spiritus sanctus? Tunc eum detestatus Petrus ait: Non est tibi pars neque sors in hac fide. Donum enim Dei putasti pecunia comparandum? Pecunia tua tecum sit in perditionem: et caetera quae ibi congruenter locutus est (Act. VIII, 5-23).
went to Samaria, so that those who had been baptized might receive the Holy Spirit through the laying on of their hands. And so it was done: they came and laid hands on them, and they received the Holy Spirit. For at that time the Holy Spirit was given in such a way that it was also apparent that He had been given. For those who received Him spoke in the tongues of all nations, so as to signify that the Church among the nations would speak in the tongues of all. So they received the Holy Spirit, and He appeared plainly in them. When Simon saw this, thinking that this was something belonging to men, he wanted it to be his as well. What he thought belonged to men, he wanted to buy from men. 'How much money', he said, 'do you want to take from me, so that through the laying on of my hands the Holy Spirit may be given?' Then Peter, abhorring him, said: 'You have no part nor lot in this faith. Did you think the gift of God was to be acquired with money? May your money be with you unto perdition': and the rest that he fittingly said there (Acts 8:5–23).
CAPUT XI. — 11. Spiritus datus absque hominum ministerio. Exemplum in eunucho Candacis reginae. Quare autem hoc ego commemorare volui, intendat Charitas vestra. Oportebat ut Deus prius ostenderet se per homines operari: sed per se deinde, ne putarent homines, quod putavit Simon, hominum illud esse, non Dei. Quanquam et ipsi discipuli jam hoc noverant. Nam centum viginti homines collecti erant, quando in eos per nullius manus impositionem venit Spiritus sanctus (Id. I, 15, et II, 1-4). Quis enim tunc eis manus imposuerat? Et tamen venit, et primos implevit. Post illud scandalum Simonis, quid egit Deus? Videte doctorem, non sermonibus, sed rebus. Idem ipse Philippus, qui baptizaverat homines, et non in eos venerat Spiritus sanctus, nisi convenissent Apostoli, et eis manus imposuissent, baptizavit eunuchum, id est, spadonem quemdam Candacis reginae, qui adoraverat in Jerusalem, et rediens inde legebat in curru suo Isaiam prophetam, et non intelligebat. Admonitus Philippus accessit ad currum, exposuit lectionem, instruxit fidem, evangelizavit Christum. Credidit Eunuchus in Christum, et ait cum venissent ad quamdam aquam: Ecce aqua, quis prohibet me baptizari? Ait illi Philippus: Si credis in Jesum Christum? Respondit ille: Credo Filium Dei esse Jesum Christum. Continuo descendit cum illo in aquam. Impleto Baptismatis mysterio et sacramento, ne hominum putaretur donum Spiritus sancti, non exspectatum est, sicut tunc, ut venirent Apostoli, sed continuo venit Spiritus sanctus (Id. VIII, 26⟨-⟩39). Soluta est Simonis cog⟨i⟩ta⟨ti⟩o, ne in tali cogitatione haberet imitatores.
Chapter XI. — 11. The Spirit given without the ministry of men. An example in the eunuch of Queen Candace. But why I wished to recall this, let your Charity attend. It was fitting that God should first show that He works through men, but afterwards by Himself, lest men should think, as Simon thought, that this belonged to men, not to God. And yet the disciples themselves already knew this. For a hundred and twenty men had been gathered together when the Holy Spirit came upon them through the laying on of no one's hand (Acts 1:15 and 2:1–4). For who had then laid hands on them? And yet He came, and filled them first. After that scandal of Simon, what did God do? See the Teacher, teaching not by words but by deeds. That same Philip, who had baptized men, and the Holy Spirit had not come upon them until the Apostles had come together and laid hands on them, baptized a eunuch, that is, a certain gelding of Queen Candace, who had worshipped in Jerusalem, and returning from there was reading the prophet Isaiah in his chariot, and did not understand. Philip, being prompted, went up to the chariot, expounded the reading, instructed him in the faith, preached Christ. The eunuch believed in Christ, and when they had come to some water, he said: 'Behold water, who forbids me to be baptized?' Philip said to him: 'If you believe in Jesus Christ?' He answered: 'I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.' At once he went down with him into the water. When the mystery and sacrament of Baptism had been fulfilled, lest the gift of the Holy Spirit be thought to belong to men, there was no waiting, as at that time, for the Apostles to come, but at once the Holy Spirit came (Acts 8:26–39). Simon's thought was undone, so that in such a thought he should have no imitators.
CAPUT XII. — 12. Aliud exemplum in C⟨o⟩rnelio centurione. Deinde aliud mirabilius exemplum. Petrus venit ad centurionem Cornelium, ad hominem incircumcisum gentilem: coepit praedicare Christum Jesum, et illi, et eis qui cum illo erant. Adhuc loquente Petro, non dico, nondum imponente manum, sed nondum etiam baptizante, et cum dubitarent qui erant cum
Chapter XII. — 12. Another example in Cornelius the centurion. Then another, more wonderful example. Peter came to the centurion Cornelius, to an uncircumcised man, a Gentile: he began to preach Christ Jesus both to him and to those who were with him. While Peter was still speaking, I do not say not yet laying on his hand, but not yet even baptizing, and while those were in doubt who were with
Editors' notes and page, col. 601

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: et primos implevit› · call in col 601

Sic aliquot Mss. Alii, et primus. At editi, et prius.

So several manuscripts. Others: "and he first." But the printed editions: "and earlier."

(printed under page 307)

(2) ‹anchor: instruxit fidem› · call in col 601

Colbertinus Ms., inseruit fidem.

The Colbert manuscript: "he implanted the faith."

(printed under page 307)

Page

  • running head: 601 SERMO C.
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)