Sed erat Verbum, quando audivimus, In principio fecit Deus. Agnoscamus Creatorem: Creator est enim qui fecit; creatura autem quod fecit. Non erat enim creatura quae facta est, sicut semper erat Verbum Deus, per quem facta est. Quando autem audivimus, Erat Verbum, apud quem erat? Intelligimus Patrem, qui non fecit, nec creavit idem Verbum, sed genuit. In principio enim fecit Deus coelum et terram. Per quid fecit? Erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum: sed quale Verbum? Sonabat et transibat? Numquid cogitabatur et volvebatur? Non. Recordabatur, et proferebatur? Non. Ergo quale Verbum? Quid a me quaeris multa? Deus erat Verbum. Quando audimus, Deus erat Verbum, non duplicamus Deum; sed intelligimus Filium. Verbum enim Dei Filius est. Ecce Filius, et quod nisi Deus? Nam Deus erat Verbum. Quid Pater? Utique Deus. Si pater Deus, et Filius Deus, duplicamus Deum? Absit. Pater Deus, Filius Deus: sed Pater et Filius unus Deus. Non est enim unicus Filius factus, sed natus. In principio fecit Deus coelum et terram: sed erat Verbum a Patre. Ergo factum est Verbum a Patre? Non. Omnia per ipsum facta sunt. Si per ipsum omnia facta sunt, numquid et ipse per se ipsum factus est? Per quem audis facta esse omnia, noli putare factum esse inter omnia. Nam si et ipse factus est, non per illum facta sunt omnia, sed inter caetera factus est ipse. Dicis, Factus est: numquid per se? Quis est qui faciat se? Si ergo factus est, quomodo per ipsum facta sunt omnia? Ecce et ipse factus est, sicut tu dicis, non ego, quia genitum non nego. Si ergo dicis factum esse, quaero per quid, quaero per quem. Per se ipsum? Ergo erat, antequam fieret, ut faceret se ipsum. Si autem omnia per ipsum facta sunt, intellige quia non est factus ipse. Si non potes intelligere, crede ut intelligas. Praecedit fides, sequitur intellectus: quoniam propheta dicit, Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis (Isai. VII, 9, sec. LXX). Erat Verbum. Noli ergo quaerere tempus ei, per quem facta sunt tempora. Erat Verbum. Sed tu dicis: Aliquando non erat Verbum. Mentiris, nusquam legis. Ego autem lego tibi, In principio erat Verbum. Quid quaeris ante principium? Si autem aliquid invenire potueris ante principium, ipsum erit principium. Insanit qui aliquid quaerit ante principium. Quid ergo dicit quia fuit ante principium? In principio erat Verbum.
But the Word was, when we heard, In the beginning God made. Let us acknowledge the Creator: for the Creator is He Who made; the creature, however, is what He made. For the creature which was made did not exist, as the Word, God, always existed, through Whom it was made. But when we have heard, The Word was, with whom was He? We understand the Father, Who did not make nor create that same Word, but begot [Him]. For in the beginning God made heaven and earth. Through what did He make [them]? The Word was, and the Word was with God: but what kind of Word? Did it sound and pass away? Was it thought over and turned about? No. Was it recalled to mind and uttered? No. What kind of Word, then? Why do you ask many things of me? The Word was God. When we hear, The Word was God, we do not double God; but we understand the Son. For the Word of God is the Son. Behold the Son, and what [is He] but God? For the Word was God. What is the Father? God, certainly. If the Father is God, and the Son is God, do we double God? Far from it. The Father is God, the Son is God: but the Father and the Son are one God. For the only Son was not made, but born. In the beginning God made heaven and earth: but the Word was from the Father. Was the Word then made by the Father? No. All things were made through Him. If all things were made through Him, was He too made through Himself? He through Whom you hear that all things were made, do not suppose that He was made among all things. For if He too was made, all things were not made through Him, but He Himself was made among the rest. You say, He was made: surely not through Himself? Who is there that makes himself? If then He was made, how were all things made through Him? See, He too was made, as you say, not I, for I do not deny that He was begotten. If then you say that He was made, I ask through what, I ask through whom. Through Himself? Then He was before He came to be, so as to make Himself. But if all things were made through Him, understand that He Himself was not made. If you cannot understand, believe that you may understand. Faith goes before, understanding follows: for the prophet says, Unless you believe, you will not understand (Isa. 7:9, according to the LXX). The Word was. Do not then seek a time for Him through Whom times were made. The Word was. But you say: There was a time when the Word was not. You lie; nowhere do you read it. But I read to you, In the beginning was the Word. What do you seek before the beginning? But if you are able to find anything before the beginning, that itself will be the beginning. He is mad who seeks anything before the beginning. What then does he say existed before the beginning? In the beginning was the Word.
2. Similitudine ostenditur coaeternum esse Deo Patri Filium. Sed dicis: Et erat Pater; et ante Verbum? Quid quaeris? In principio erat Verbum. Quod invenis intellige: noli quaerere quod non potes invenire. Nihil est ante principium. In principio erat Verbum. Splendor Patris Filius est. De sapientia Patris, quod est Filius, dictum est, Candor est enim lucis aeternae (Sap. VII, 26). Quaeris Filium sine Patre? Da mihi lucem sine candore. Si aliquando non erat Filius, Pater lux obscura erat. Quomodo enim non obscura lux erat, si candorem non habebat? Ergo semper Pater, semper Filius. Si semper Pater, semper Filius. Quaeris a me utrum natus sit Filius? Respondeo, Natus.
2. By a likeness the Son is shown to be coeternal with God the Father. But you say: And the Father was; [was He] also before the Word? What are you asking? In the beginning was the Word. Understand what you find: do not seek what you cannot find. There is nothing before the beginning. In the beginning was the Word. The Son is the splendour of the Father. Of the wisdom of the Father, which is the Son, it is said, For she is the brightness of eternal light (Wisd. 7:26). Do you seek the Son without the Father? Give me light without brightness. If at some time the Son was not, the Father was a dark light. For how was the light not dark, if it did not have brightness? Therefore always the Father, always the Son. If always the Father, always the Son. Do you ask me whether the Son was born? I answer, Born.