religiosa: non in me vasculum, sed in illum attendite qui panem ponit in vasculo. Attendite ergo paululum. In his enim quae supra diximus hortantes ad fidem, ut animus imbutus fide sit intellectus capax, ea quae dicta sunt, festiva, laeta, facilia, sonuerunt, exhilaraverunt mentes vestras, secuti estis, intellexistis quae dixi. Quae vero dicturus sum, spero aliquos intellecturos: vereor tamen non omnes intellecturos. Et quia Deus nobis proposuit per lectionem Evangelii unde dicamus, nec vitare possumus quod proposuit Magister; forte vereor ne qui non intellexerint, qui fortassis plures erunt, putent me frustra sibi locutum: sed tamen propter eos qui intellexerint non frustra loquor. Laetetur qui intelligit, patienter ferat qui non intelligit: quod non intelligit ferat, et ut intelligat differat.
that is religious: look not to me, the little vessel, but give your attention to Him who places the bread in the little vessel. Attend, then, for a little. For in those things which we said above, exhorting you to faith, so that the mind imbued with faith might be capable of understanding, what was said sounded festive, joyful, easy; it gladdened your minds; you followed, you understood what I said. But what I am about to say, I hope that some will understand; yet I fear that not all will understand. And since God has set before us, through the reading of the Gospel, the matter of our speaking, and we cannot avoid what the Master has set before us, I perhaps fear that those who will not have understood, who will perhaps be the greater number, may think that I have spoken to them in vain; but nevertheless, for the sake of those who will have understood, I do not speak in vain. Let him who understands rejoice; let him who does not understand bear it patiently: what he does not understand let him bear, and let him wait in order to understand.
CAPUT VII. — 9. Refellit Arianos. Carnalem ipsorum sensum explodit. Quae fecit Pater nonnisi per Filium fecit. Non ergo ait, Quaecumque Pater facit, talia Filius facit: tanquam alia faciat Pater, et alia Filius. Videbatur enim tanquam hoc dixisse, cum superius diceret, Non facit a se Filius quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem. Intende: neque ibi ait, Nisi quod audierit Patrem jubentem; sed, Viderit, inquit, Patrem facientem. Si ergo carnalem intellectum, vel potius sensum interrogemus, quasi duos sibi proposuit artifices, Patrem et Filium; Patrem facientem nullo viso, Filium facientem a Patre viso. Carnalis adhuc aspectus est. Verumtamen ut ea quae superiora sunt intelligamus, ista humiliora et abjecta non declinemus. Primo sic nobis ante oculos constituamus aliquid, putemus esse duos fabros, patrem et filium. Fecit pater arcam, quam filius facere non poterat, nisi patrem videret facientem: attendit arcam quam fecit pater, et fecit arcam aliam talem, non eamdem. Differo paululum verba quae sequuntur, et jam interrogo Arianum: Siccine intelligis, quomodo proposui? Fecit Pater aliquid, quod cum videret Filius Patrem facientem, fecit et ipse tale aliquid? Hoc enim videntur sonare verba, quibus permotus es? Neque enim ait, Non potest a se facere Filius quidquam, nisi quod audierit Patrem jubentem: sed ait, Non potest a se facere Filius quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem. Ecce si sic intelligis, fecit Pater, et attendit Filius, ut videret et ipse quod faceret; faceret autem aliud aliquod tale, quale fecerat Pater. Hoc quod fecit Pater, per quem fecit? Si non per Filium, si non per Verbum; incurristi in blasphemiam Evangelii. Omnia enim per ipsum facta sunt (Joan. I, 3). Ergo jam quod fecerat Pater, per Verbum fecerat: si per Verbum fecerat, per Filium fecerat. Quis est alius qui attendit, ut faciat aliud aliquid quod viderit Patrem facientem? Non soletis dicere duos filios habere Patrem: unus est Unicus de illo genitus. Per misericordiam vero suam, solus ad divinitatem, et non solus ad haereditatem. Cohaeredes Unico suo fecit Pater: non quos de sua substantia sicut ipsum genuit, sed quos de familia sua per ipsum adoptavit.
Chapter VII. — 9. He refutes the Arians. He rejects their carnal sense. What the Father has made, He has made only through the Son. He does not, then, say, Whatever the Father does, such things the Son does: as though the Father did some things and the Son others. For He seemed, as it were, to have said this when He said above, The Son does nothing of Himself, except what He has seen the Father doing. Pay attention: there He does not say, Except what He has heard the Father commanding; but, Has seen, He says, the Father doing. If, then, we consult the carnal understanding, or rather sense, it has, as it were, set before itself two craftsmen, the Father and the Son: the Father making with nothing seen, the Son making having seen the Father. This is still a carnal view. Nevertheless, in order that we may understand the things that are higher, let us not turn away from these lower and humbler things. First let us set something before our eyes in this way: let us suppose that there are two carpenters, a father and a son. The father made a chest, which the son could not make unless he saw the father making it; he observed the chest which the father made, and he made another chest like it, not the same one. I put off for a little the words that follow, and now I question the Arian: Is this how you understand it, as I have set it out? The Father made something, and when the Son saw the Father making it, He too made something like it? For is this what the words by which you have been moved seem to sound? For He does not say, The Son cannot do anything of Himself, except what He has heard the Father commanding; but He says, The Son cannot do anything of Himself, except what He has seen the Father doing. See, if you understand it thus: the Father made, and the Son observed, so that He too might see what He should make; but He would make some other such thing, such as the Father had made. This which the Father made, through whom did He make it? If not through the Son, if not through the Word, you have run into blasphemy against the Gospel. For all things were made through Him (John 1:3). Therefore what the Father had made, He had made through the Word; if He had made it through the Word, He had made it through the Son. Who is the other who observes, in order to make some other thing which he has seen the Father making? You are not accustomed to say that the Father has two sons: there is one, the Only One, begotten of Him. But through His mercy, He is alone as regards divinity, and not alone as regards the inheritance. The Father has made co-heirs for His Only One: not those whom He begot of His own substance as He begot Him, but those whom He adopted from His household through Him.