negaverit? Totum quippe istum locum Apostolus, propter ipsum corpus jam emptum pretio magno, id est, Christi sanguine pretioso, templum Spiritus sancti factum a Domino, ne talibus flagitiis pollueretur, sed potius inviolatum tanquam Dei habitaculum servaretur, agebat et defendebat. Quare ergo subjungere voluit hoc, unde difficilis quaestio nasceretur; id est, ut diceret, Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus suum peccat: cum sive ipsa fornicatio, sive alia hujusmodi, quae nonnisi per corpus fiunt peccata turpitudini et fornicationi simillima, nonnisi per ipsum corpus gerantur atque exerceantur? Quid enim? poteritne esse quispiam (ut caetera superius memorata taceam) fur, vel ebriosus, vel maledicus, vel rapax, extra operationem corporis hujus? Quamvis nec ipsa idololatria neque ipsa avaritia, praeter servitium corporis hujus poterit ad usum fructumque suum pervenire. Quid est ergo, Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat? Primum, quia in corpore isto homo constitutus, quidquid solo tantum animo poterit inique concupiscere, dici non potest extra corpus hoc hominem facere, cum constet eum carnali sensu et carnali prudentia hoc agere, isto adhuc circumseptum corpore. Nam et quod in Psalmo sc⟨r⟩iptum est, Dixit impius in corde suo, Non est Deus (Psal. XIII, 1): idem beatus Paulus apostolus non potuit utique separare a corporali opere, illo loco ubi ait, Omnes astabimus ante tribunal Christi, ut recipiat unusquisque secundum ea quae per corpus gessit, sive bonum, sive malum (II Cor. V, 10). Quia videlicet nonnisi in corpore constitutus impius potuit dicere, Non est Deus. Ut taceam quod in alia Epistola ipse Doctor Gentium dicit, Manifesta autem sunt opera carnis: et exsequitur, Quae sunt fornicationes, immunditiae, luxuriae, veneficia, inimicitiae, contentiones, aemulationes, animositates, dissensiones, haereses, invidiae, ebrietates, et his similia; quae praedico vobis, sicut praedixi, quia qui talia agunt, regnum Dei non possidebunt (Galat. V, 19-21). Numquid enim non videtur nobis extra corpus fieri caetera illa quae ibi imterposuit, aemulationes, animositates, dissensiones, invidias, haereses? et tamen operibus carnis ista tribuit Doctor Gentium in fide et veritate. Quid est ergo, Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; et unum tantummodo fornicationis peccatum nominans, ait: Qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat?
would deny? For the Apostle was urging and defending this whole passage on account of the body itself, already bought at a great price, that is, with the precious blood of Christ, made by the Lord a temple of the Holy Spirit, so that it might not be polluted by such shameful deeds, but rather be kept inviolate as the dwelling-place of God. Why then did he wish to add this, from which a difficult question would arise; that is, to say, Every sin whatsoever that a man does is outside the body; but he who commits fornication sins against his own body: since both fornication itself and other sins of this kind, which are committed only through the body and are most like to foulness and fornication, are carried on and practised only through the body itself? For what? Could anyone be (to say nothing of the other things mentioned above) a thief, or a drunkard, or a reviler, or a robber, without the operation of this body? Although not even idolatry itself nor avarice itself could attain its own use and enjoyment without the service of this body. What then is meant by, Every sin whatsoever that a man does is outside the body; but he who commits fornication sins against his own body? First, because a man placed in this body, whatever he can wickedly desire with the mind alone, cannot be said to do outside this body, since it is clear that he does this by carnal sense and carnal prudence, being still enclosed in this body. For what is written in the Psalm, The impious man said in his heart, There is no God (Ps. 13:1): this same blessed Paul the apostle certainly could not separate from bodily action, in the place where he says, We shall all stand before the judgement-seat of Christ, that each one may receive according to what he has done through the body, whether good or evil (2 Cor. 5:10). Because clearly only when placed in the body could the impious man say, There is no God. To say nothing of what the Teacher of the Gentiles himself says in another Epistle, Now the works of the flesh are manifest: and he goes on, Which are fornications, uncleannesses, luxuries, poisonings, enmities, contentions, rivalries, animosities, dissensions, heresies, envies, drunkennesses, and things like these; of which I forewarn you, as I have forewarned, that those who do such things will not possess the kingdom of God (Gal. 5:19–21). For does it not seem to us that those other things which he inserted there, rivalries, animosities, dissensions, envies, heresies, are done outside the body? And yet the Teacher of the Gentiles in faith and truth assigned these to the works of the flesh. What then is meant by, Every sin whatsoever that a man does is outside the body; and, naming only the one sin of fornication, he says: But he who commits fornication sins against his own body?
2. Solutio difficultatis. Cur sola fornicatio dicitur peccatum in corpus proprium. Apparet igitur cuivis tardo et obtunso, quam sit ista quaestio difficilis: quam Dominus piae intentioni nostrae, si aliquantulum dignatus fuerit dilucescere atque revelare, poterimus aliquid rationabiliter dicere. Videtur enim beatus Apostolus, in quo loquebatur Christus, aut exaggerare voluisse fornicationis malum super caetera omnia peccata, quae etsi per corpus committantur; non tamen animum humanum concupiscentiae carnali ita efficiunt obstrictum et obnoxium, quemadmodum in solo opere
2. Solution of the difficulty. Why fornication alone is called a sin against one's own body. It is evident, then, to anyone however slow and dull, how difficult this question is: if the Lord deigns to make it somewhat clear and to reveal it to our pious intention, we shall be able to say something reasonable [about it]. For the blessed Apostle, in whom Christ was speaking, seems either to have wished to magnify the evil of fornication above all other sins, which, even if they are committed through the body, nevertheless do not make the human mind so bound and subject to carnal concupiscence as in the sole act