PL 38 · cols. 1058–1064
Augustine, Sermones 210-216 (Classis II, de Tempore)
Sermons CCXII–CCXIII
Migne Reading Room
PL 38 · cols. 1058–1064
Sermons CCXII–CCXIII
(a) ‹anchor: not visible (heading of Sermo CCXII)› · call in col 1058
Alias, de Diversis 75.
Elsewhere numbered "On Various Subjects" 75.
(printed under page 535)
(b) ‹anchor: not visible (title of Sermo CCXII)› · call in col 1058
Sic inscribitur hic sermo apud Lovanienses. At in Victorino Ms. notatur, « Dominica in ramis palmarum ; » In Regio, « Feria secunda : » post ipsam videlicet Dominicam palmarum; quandoquidem isti Dominicae assignatur sermo qui hunc in eodem codice antecedit. Testatur quidem Isidorus in libro 1 de Of. Eccl. cap. 27, Symbolum Competentibus tradi die dominica palmarum : sed non erat Ecclesiarum omnium una et constans ubique consuetudo. Nam ex Ordinis Romani praescripto, Symbolum feria quarta hebdomadae quartae simul cum oratione dominica tradebatur, reddendum sabbato sancto Paschae; eumdemque ritum describit Amalarius Fortunatus, libro 1 de Offic. cap. 8. In Africa vero, aetate Augustini, Symboli seorsim traditio fiebat die ante Pascha serius ocius quinto decimo, dieque abhinc octavo redditio : post redditionem Symboli mox subsequebatur traditio dominicae orationis, reddendae post octo dies. Mos iste liquido explicatur exordio Sermonum 58 et 59. Redditionem alteram Symboli faciendam die sabbati in vigiliis Paschae commemorat Augustinus in eodem Sermone 58, nn. 1 et 13, ibique diserte significat orationis redditionem non incidere in eumdem diem sabbati Paschalis. Hanc tamen ipse in Sermone 227, die Paschae habito, indicat jam factam, his verbis : « Ecce ubi est peracta sanctificatio, dicimus orationem dominicam, quam accepistis et reddidistis. »
So this sermon is headed in the Louvain edition. But in the Victorine manuscript it is marked "Palm Sunday"; in the Royal, "Monday", that is, after Palm Sunday itself, since the sermon that precedes this one in the same manuscript is assigned to that Sunday. Isidore indeed attests, in book 1 of On the Offices of the Church, chapter 27, that the Creed was handed over to the Competents on Palm Sunday; but there was not one constant custom everywhere among all the Churches. For by the prescription of the Roman Ordo the Creed was handed over on the Wednesday of the fourth week together with the Lord's Prayer, to be given back on Holy Saturday of Easter; and Amalarius Fortunatus describes the same rite in book 1 of On the Offices, chapter 8. In Africa, however, in Augustine's time, the handing over of the Creed took place separately, on about the fifteenth day before Easter, and its giving back on the eighth day after that; after the giving back of the Creed there followed at once the handing over of the Lord's Prayer, to be given back eight days later. This custom is clearly set out in the opening of Sermons 58 and 59. In the same Sermon 58, nos. 1 and 13, Augustine mentions a second giving back of the Creed, to be made on Saturday at the Easter Vigil, and there he says expressly that the giving back of the Prayer did not fall on that same Easter Saturday. Yet in Sermon 227, preached on Easter Day, he indicates that it had already been done, in these words: "See, when the sanctification has been completed, we say the Lord's Prayer, which you have received and given back."
(printed under page 535)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1059
Sic in manuscriptis. At in editis, ex Maria virgine
So in the manuscripts. But in the printed editions: "of the Virgin Mary".
(printed under page 536)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1060
Editi hic, discitur. Sed melius in sermone 243 Appendicis, scribitur.
The printed editions here: "is learned". But better, in Sermon 243 of the Appendix: "is written".
(*) ‹anchor: SERMO CCXIII› · call in col 1060 In editis tantum sermonem hunc vidimus, non in manuscriptis.
We have seen this sermon only in the printed editions, not in the manuscripts.
(printed under page 536)
(a) ‹anchor: SERMO CCXIII› · call in col 1060
Alias, de Tempore 119.
Elsewhere numbered "On the Season" 119.
(printed under page 536)
(1) ‹anchor: Dominus noster sepultus est› · call in col 1061
In editis, Quia Filius Dei unicus Dominus non crucifixus, Filius Dei unicus Dominus non sepultus. Mendosissime. Sic enim id quod mox affirmat et ex Apostolo probat, Filium Dei crucifixum negare videbatur : quo videlicet argumento permotus Emmanuel Sa rejiciendum hunc sermonem existimavit. Errata corriguntur ex altero inferius loco, ubi sine vitio in iisdem editis eadem sententia bis terque repetitur.
In the printed editions: "Because the only Son of God, the Lord, was not crucified; the only Son of God, the Lord, was not buried." Most faultily. For so he seemed to deny the very thing he presently affirms and proves from the Apostle, that the Son of God was crucified; and moved by this argument, it seems, Emmanuel Sa judged that this sermon should be rejected. The errors are corrected from another passage further down, where the same statement is repeated two or three times without fault in those same editions.
(printed under page 537)
(1) ‹anchor: ex eis non remansit› · call in col 1064
Forte : Peccasti multa, peccasti pauca ; peccasti magna, peccasti parva : delebuntur omnia, et magna et parva, quod est, Unus ex eis non remansit.
Perhaps: "You have sinned much, you have sinned little; you have sinned greatly, you have sinned slightly: all will be blotted out, both great and small, which is: Not one of them remained."
(printed under page 538)