Migne Reading Room

PL 38 · cols. 1120–1124

Augustine, Sermones 234-243 (Classis II, de Tempore)

Sermons CCXXXVI–CCXXXVII

PL 38:1120
supplicium, fiduciae reddatur praemium. Ibunt enim illi in ambustionem aeternam. justi autem in vitam aeternam (Matth. XXV, 46). Conversi ad Dominum, etc.
punishment, to confidence a reward is rendered. For those shall go into everlasting burning, but the just into life everlasting (Matt. 25:46). Turning to the Lord, etc.
SERMO CCXXXVI. In diebus Paschalibus, VII. De eadem lectione Evangelii Lucae, cap. XXIV, ℣. 13-31.
Sermon 236. On the Days of Easter, 7. On the same reading of the Gospel of Luke, chapter 24, verses 13-31.
1. Mors Christi propter aliud, et propter aliud resurrectio. Dominus noster Jesus Christus, sicut Apostolus dicit, mortuus est propter delicta nostra, et resurrexit propter justificationem nostram (Rom. IV, 25). Sicut morte ipsius seminamur, sic resurrectione ipsius germinamus. Etenim morte ipsius significatur mors vitae nostrae. De hac re audi Apostolum: Consepulti, inquit, sumus Christo per Baptismum in mortem, ut quemadmodum Christus resurrexit a mortuis, sic et nos in novitate vitae ambulemus (Id. VI, 4). Ille non habuit quod emendaret in cruce: quia sine peccato ascendit in crucem. Nos in cruce ejus emendemur, et ibi ponamus quod male contraximus, ut justificari ejus resurrectione possimus. Distinguere enim ita debetis: Traditus est propter delicta nostra, et resurrexit propter justificationem nostram. Non dixit, Traditus est propter justificationem nostram, et resurrexit propter delicta nostra. In ejus traditione delictum sonat, in ejus resurrectione justitia sonat. Ergo moriatur delictum, et resurgat justitia.
1. The death of Christ was for one thing, and the resurrection for another. Our Lord Jesus Christ, as the Apostle says, died for our offences, and rose again for our justification (Rom. 4:25). As by His death we are sown, so by His resurrection we spring up. For by His death is signified the death of our life. On this matter hear the Apostle: We are buried together, he says, with Christ through Baptism into death, that just as Christ rose from the dead, so we also may walk in newness of life (Rom. 6:4). He had nothing to amend on the cross, because He went up onto the cross without sin. Let us be amended on His cross, and let us lay down there what we have wickedly contracted, so that we may be able to be justified by His resurrection. For you ought to distinguish thus: He was delivered up for our offences, and rose again for our justification. He did not say: He was delivered up for our justification, and rose again for our offences. In His being delivered up, offence sounds forth; in His resurrection, justice sounds forth. Therefore let offence die, and let justice rise again.
2. Spes discipulis morte Christi ablata. Istam spem, hoc donum, hanc promissionem, hanc tantam gratiam, quando mortuus est Christus, discipuli ejus de animo perdiderunt, et in ejus morte ab spe deciderunt. Ecce annuntiabatur illis resurrectio ejus, et videbantur illis verba nuntiantium quasi deliramentum. Quasi deliramentum facta erat veritas. Si quando praedicatur resurrectio in isto tempore, et videtur alicui esse deliramentum, nonne omnes dicunt habere illum grande tormentum? Nonne omnes detestantur, abhorrent, aversantur, aures claudunt, audire nolunt? Ecce quod erant discipuli, mortuo Christo: quod nos exhorremus, hoc erant illi. Hoc malum habebant arietes, quod horrent agni. Dei⟨n⟩de isti duo quibus apparuit in via, et tenebantur oculi eorum, no illum agnoscerent, ubi erat cor, indicant verba; et quid agatur in animo, vox testis est, sed nobis: nam illi etiam cor patebat. De illius morte loquebantur inter se. Adjunxit se illis ipse quasi tertius viator; et via in via coepit colloqui, commiscui⟨t⟩ sermonem. Quaerit quid inter se loquerentur, cum omnia sciret; ut
2. Hope taken from the disciples by the death of Christ. This hope, this gift, this promise, this so great grace, His disciples lost from their mind when Christ died, and in His death they fell away from hope. See, His resurrection was being announced to them, and the words of those announcing it seemed to them like raving. The truth had become like raving. If at any time in this present age the resurrection is preached, and it seems to someone to be raving, do not all say that he has a great torment? Do not all detest, shrink from, turn away, close their ears, refuse to hear? See what the disciples were when Christ had died: what we shudder at, that they were. The rams had this evil, which the lambs shudder at. Then those two to whom He appeared on the way, and whose eyes were held so that they should not recognize Him: where their heart was, their words show; and of what goes on in the mind the voice is a witness, but to us, for to Him even the heart lay open. They were speaking among themselves about His death. He Himself joined Himself to them as a third traveller; and, the Way on the way, He began to converse with them, He mingled in their talk. He asks what they were speaking of among themselves, though He knew all things; so that
Editors' notes and page, col. 1120

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1120

¹ In Mss., laetitiae.

In the manuscripts, "laetitiae" (of joy).

(*) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1120 * Emendatus ad d. r. t. vat. v. Lov.

Emended against d. r. t., the Vatican [manuscript], v., and the Louvain edition.

(printed under page 566)

(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1120

(printed under page 566)

(b) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1120

(printed under page 566)

Page

  • running head: [A]UGUSTINI EPISCOPI 1120
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:1121
eos ad confessionem tanquam nesciens provocaret. Et dicunt illi : Tu solus peregrinaris in Jerusalem, et nescis quid actum sit in illa istis diebus, de Jesu Nazareno, qui fuit propheta magnus? Jam non Dominus, sed propheta. Hoc enim eum putabant fuisse, cum mortuus esset. Adhuc honorabant quasi prophetam; nondum agnoscebant Dominum, non solum Prophetarum, sed etiam Angelorum. Quomodo, inquiunt, seniores nostri et principes sacerdotum tradiderunt eum in damnationem mortis. Et ecce jam tertius est dies ex quo ista gesta sunt. Nos autem sperabamus quia ipse erat redempturus Israel. Ipse est totus labor? Sperabatis, jam desperatis? Videtis quia perdiderant spem. Coepit ergo eis exponere Scripturas, ut illic magis agnoscerent Christum, ubi deseruerant Christum. Ideo enim desperaverant Christum, quia viderant mortuum. Ille vero aperuit eis Scripturas, ut agnoscerent quia si mortuus non fuisset, Christus esse non posset. Docuit de Moyse, docuit de subsequentibus Scripturis, docuit de Prophetis, quod illis dixerat, Quia oportebat Christum mori, et sic intrare in gloriam suam. Audiebant, gaudebant, suspirabant; et quomodo ipsi confessi sunt, ardebant : et praesentem lucem non agnoscebant.
He might draw them out to a confession, as though He did not know. And they say to Him: Are you the only stranger in Jerusalem, and do you not know what has been done in it in these days, concerning Jesus of Nazareth, Who was a great prophet? Now not Lord, but prophet. For this is what they thought He had been, since He had died. They still honoured Him as a prophet; they did not yet recognize Him as Lord, not only of the Prophets, but also of the Angels. How, they say, our elders and the chief priests handed Him over to the condemnation of death. And behold, it is now the third day since these things were done. But we were hoping that He was the one who would redeem Israel. Is that the whole of the trouble? You were hoping, and now you despair? You see that they had lost hope. So He began to expound the Scriptures to them, so that they might recognize Christ there above all where they had abandoned Christ. For this is why they had despaired of Christ, because they had seen Him dead. But He opened the Scriptures to them, so that they might recognize that if He had not died, He could not be the Christ. He taught from Moses, He taught from the Scriptures that follow, He taught from the Prophets, what He had told them, That the Christ had to die, and so enter into His glory. They listened, they rejoiced, they sighed; and, as they themselves confessed, they were burning: and they did not recognize the light that was present.
3. Hospitalitatis meritum. Quale autem mysterium, fratres mei? Intrat ad eos, fit eis hospes; et qui per totam viam non agnoscebatur, in fractione panis agnoscitur. Discite hospites suscipere, ubi agnoscitur Christus. An nescitis quia si quem christianum susceperitis, ipsum suscipitis? Nonne ipse dicit, Hospes fui, et suscepistis me? Et quando ei dicitur, Domine, quando te vidimus hospitem? Respondet, Cum uni ex minimis meis fecistis, mihi fecistis (Matth. XXV, 35, 38, 40). Cum ergo christianus christianum suscipit, serviunt membra membris; et gaudet caput, et sibi imputat datum quod membro ejus fuerit erogatum. Hic ergo pascatur Christus esuriens, accipiat potum sitiens, vestiatur nudus, suscipiatur peregrinus, visitetur aegrotus. Hoc habet necessitas itineris. Sic in ista peregrinatione vivendum est, ubi eget Christus. Eget in suis, plenus est in se. Sed qui eget in suis, et plenus est in se, egentes adducit ad se. Ibi non erit fames, non erit sitis, non erit nuditas, non erit aegritudo, non erit peregrinatio, non erit labor, non erit dolor. Scio quia ista ibi non erunt, et nescio quid ibi erit. Ista enim quae ibi non erunt, novi : illud autem quod ibi inventuri sumus, nec oculus vidit, nec auris audivit, nec in cor hominis ascendit (I Cor. II, 9). Amare possumus, desiderare possumus, in hac peregrinatione tanto bono suspirare possumus : digne hoc cogitare et verbis explicare non possumus. Certe ego non possum. Ergo, fratres mei, quaerite quis possit. Si invenire potestis; et me vobiscum discipulum trahite. Illud scio, quoniam qui potens est, sicut Apostolus ait, facere super quam petimus, aut intelligimus (Ephes. III, 20), illuc perducet, ubi fiat quod scriptum est, Beati qui habitant in domo tua, in saecula saeculorum laudabunt te (Psal. LXXXIII, 5). Totum negotium nostrum, laus Dei erit. Quid laudabimus, si non amabimus;
3. The merit of hospitality. But what a mystery is this, my brothers? He goes in to them, He becomes their guest; and He Who was not recognized along the whole way is recognized in the breaking of bread. Learn to receive guests, where Christ is recognized. Or do you not know that if you receive any Christian, you receive Him? Does He not Himself say, I was a stranger, and you received Me? And when it is said to Him, Lord, when did we see Thee a stranger? He replies, When you did it to one of the least of Mine, you did it to Me (Matt. 25:35, 38, 40). So when a Christian receives a Christian, members serve members; and the Head rejoices, and counts as given to Himself whatever has been bestowed on His member. Here, then, let Christ be fed when hungry, receive drink when thirsty, be clothed when naked, be taken in when a stranger, be visited when sick. This is what the necessity of the journey requires. So must one live in this pilgrimage, where Christ is in need. He is in need in His own, He is full in Himself. But He Who is in need in His own, and is full in Himself, draws the needy to Himself. There, there will be no hunger, there will be no thirst, there will be no nakedness, there will be no sickness, there will be no pilgrimage, there will be no toil, there will be no pain. I know that these things will not be there, and I do not know what will be there. For the things that will not be there, I know: but that which we shall find there, eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor has it ascended into the heart of man (1 Cor. 2:9). We can love, we can desire, in this pilgrimage we can sigh for so great a good: to think of it worthily and to set it out in words, we cannot. Certainly I cannot. So, my brothers, seek who can. If you can find him; draw me too along with you as a disciple. This I know, that He Who is able, as the Apostle says, to do beyond what we ask or understand (Eph. 3:20), will bring us there, where what is written may come to pass, Blessed are they who dwell in Thy house, unto ages of ages they will praise Thee (Ps. 83:5). Our whole business will be the praise of God. What shall we praise, if we do not love;
Editors' notes and page, col. 1121

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: si non ama-› · call in col 1121

¹ Editi, hoc et proximo loco, amavimus. At Victorinus Ms., amabimus. Quo etiam ex codice restituitur haec sententia, Verum enim videbimus, etc., quae in editis desideratur.

The printed editions, here and in the next place, have "amavimus" (we have loved). But the Saint-Victor manuscript has "amabimus" (we shall love). From that codex also this sentence is restored, "Verum enim videbimus" (For we shall see the truth), etc., which is wanting in the printed editions.

(printed under page 567)

Page

  • running head: 1121 SERMO CCXXXVII. (one head centred across both columns of the page; cut at the right edge of this image)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:1122
et illud amabimus, quod videbimus? Verum enim videbimus, et ipsum verum Deus erit, quem laudabimus. Ibi inveniemus quod hodie cantavimus, Amen, Verum est: Alleluia, Laudate Dominum.
and we shall love that which we shall see? For we shall see the truth, and that very truth will be God, Whom we shall praise. There we shall find what we have sung today: Amen, It is true; Alleluia, Praise the Lord.
SERMO CCXXXVII. In diebus Paschalibus, VIII. De ultima lectione Evangelii Lucae, cap. XXIV, 37-39; cum refutatione Manichaeorum.
Sermon 237. On the Easter days, 8. On the last reading of the Gospel of Luke, chapter 24:37-39; with a refutation of the Manichaeans.
CAPUT PRIMUM. — 1. Discipulis spiritum, non carnem Christi se videre putantibus, similes Manichaei. Negantes carnem Christi, totum mysterium redemptionis nostrae evacuant. De resurrectione Domini quod sequebatur in Evangelio secundum Lucam, hodie terminatum est, ubi audivimus apparuisse Dominum in medio discipulorum suorum disceptantium de resurrectione ejus, et non credentium. Tam vero eis inopinatum fuit et incredibile, ut nec videntes viderent. Videbant enim vivum, quem planxerant mortuum: videbant in medio sui stantem, quem doluerant in cruce pendentem. Videbant ergo; et quia suis oculis non credebant, ut verum viderent, falli so putabant. Existimabant enim, sicut audistis, se spiritum videre. Quod postea crediderunt de Christo pessimi haeretici, prius hoc crediderunt titubantes Apostoli. Sunt enim hodie qui non credunt carnem habuisse Christum: quia et partum virginis destruunt, et nolunt eum natum ex femina credere. Verbum caro factum est (Joan. I, 14), prorsus alienant a sua fide, vel potius a sua infidelitate. Totam istam dispensationem salutis nostrae, quod factus est homo pro inveniendo homine qui Deus fecerat hominem; totum hoc, quod Christus in remissionem peccatorum nostrorum verum, non falsum sanguinem fudit, et de vero suo sanguine chirographum peccatorum nostrorum delevit; hoc totum haeretici damnabiles evacuare conantur. Totum hoc, ut Manichaei credunt, quod apparuit oculis hominum, spiritus fuit, caro non fuit.
Chapter I. — 1. The Manichaeans are like the disciples who thought they were seeing a spirit, not the flesh of Christ. By denying the flesh of Christ they empty out the whole mystery of our redemption. What followed in the Gospel according to Luke concerning the resurrection of the Lord has been completed today, where we heard that the Lord appeared in the midst of His disciples as they were disputing about His resurrection and not believing. So unexpected and incredible was it to them that even seeing they did not see. For they saw alive Him Whom they had mourned as dead; they saw standing in their midst Him Whom they had grieved over hanging on the cross. So they saw; and because they did not believe their own eyes, so as to see the truth, they thought they were being deceived. For they supposed, as you have heard, that they were seeing a spirit. What the worst heretics afterwards believed about Christ, the wavering Apostles believed first. For there are those today who do not believe that Christ had flesh: for they both do away with the virgin's childbearing and refuse to believe that He was born of a woman. The Word was made flesh (John 1:14) they utterly estrange from their faith, or rather from their unbelief. This whole dispensation of our salvation, that He Who as God had made man was made man for the finding of man; all this, that Christ shed true, not false, blood for the remission of our sins, and with His own true blood blotted out the bond of our sins: all this the damnable heretics try to empty out. All this, as the Manichaeans believe, which appeared to the eyes of men, was spirit, was not flesh.
CAPUT II. — 2. Non melius de Christo sentire, qui eum dicunt spiritum fuisse sine carne. Ecce loquitur Evangelium. Stabat Dominus inter discipulos suos, nondum credentes quod resurrexerat. Videbant eum, et putabant se spiritum videre. Si nihil mali est, credere Christum spiritum fuisse, non carnem; si nihil mali est, dimittantur in ista opinione discipuli. Attendite, ut intelligatis quod volo dicere: Deus autem donet ut dicam, id est, sic dicam, quomodo vos audire expedit. Ecce hoc ipsum repeto. Aliquando ipsi detestabiles, carnem detestantes, et secundum carnem viventes, aliquando hoc dicunt, et sic decipiant:
Chapter II. — 2. Those who say that He was spirit without flesh think no better of Christ. See, the Gospel speaks. The Lord was standing among His disciples, who did not yet believe that He had risen. They saw Him, and thought they were seeing a spirit. If there is nothing evil in believing that Christ was spirit, not flesh; if there is nothing evil in it, let the disciples be left in that opinion. Pay attention, so that you may understand what I wish to say: and may God grant that I say it, that is, that I say it in the way that it is profitable for you to hear. See, I repeat this very thing. Sometimes these detestable people, who detest the flesh and live according to the flesh, sometimes they say this, and so they deceive:
Editors' notes and page, col. 1122

Footnotes

(2) ‹anchor: In diebus Paschalibus, VIII› · call in col 1122

² In optimae notae Floriacensi manuscripto hic sermo inscribitur, Tractatus quarta feria.

In the Fleury manuscript, of the best quality, this sermon is headed "Tractatus quarta feria" (Discourse on the Wednesday).

(printed under page 567)

(3) ‹anchor: prorsus alienant› · call in col 1122

³ Sic in manuscriptis. At in editis alia inducta est vocum interpunctio, omisso verbo, alienant.

So in the manuscripts. But in the printed editions a different punctuation of the words has been brought in, and the word "alienant" (they estrange) is omitted.

(printed under page 567) (*) ‹anchor: SERMO CCXXXVII› · call in col 1122 * Castigatus ad f. r. t. v. Am. Er. Par. Lov.

Corrected against f. r. t. v., and the Amerbach, Erasmus, Paris and Louvain editions.

(printed under page 567)

(a) ‹anchor: SERMO CCXXXVII *› · call in col 1122

(a) Alias, de Tempore 143.

Otherwise numbered: On the Season 143. [last digit faint in the scan: 3 or 5]

(printed under page 567)

Page

  • running head: [S]ERMO CCXXXVII. 1122 (left edge cut off)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • misprints kept as printed: "falli so putabant" (so for se)
PL 38:1123
Qui melius credunt de Christo, illi qui dicunt quia carnem habuit, an nos qui dicimus, Deus erat, spiritus erat, et oculis hominum non corpus, sed Deus apparebat? Quid e⟨s⟩t melius, caro, an spiritus? Quid responsuri sumus, nisi spiritum carne esse meliorem? Si ergo, dicit, confiteris quia spiritus melior sit quam caro; melius ego de Christo sentio, qui eum spiritum fuisse dico, non carnem. O infelix error! Quare? Ego carnem dico fuisse Christum? Tu dicis spiritum: ego spiritum et carnem. Non tu melius dicis, sed minus dicis. Audi ergo totum quod dico ego: id est, quod dicit catholica fides, quod dicit fundatissima et serenissima veritas. Tu qui dicis spiritum tantum fuisse Christum; quod est et spiritus noster, id est, anima nostra, hoc dicis tantum fuisse Christum: audi quid dicas. Dico quod dicis. Erat ipse spiritus ex ea natura et substantia, unde et noster est spiritus. Quanto minus dicas, attende. Erat ibi Verbum, erat ibi caro. Tu dicis: Humanus spiritus solus. Ego di⟨c⟩o: Verbum, spiritus, corpus; Deus et homo. Si duo nolo dicere, si duas res nolo dicere; isto utor compendio, D⟨e⟩us et homo. Et verus Deus, et verus homo. Nihil falsum in humanitate, nihil falsum in divinitate. Sed de ipso homine si quaeris a me, duo iterum dico: Anima humana, et caro humana. Tu homo es propter animam et carnem: ille Christus propter Deum et hominem. Ecce quod dico.
Who believe better about Christ: those who say that He had flesh, or we who say, He was God, He was spirit, and to the eyes of men it was not a body but God that appeared? Which is better, flesh or spirit? What are we going to answer, except that spirit is better than flesh? If therefore, he says, you confess that spirit is better than flesh, I think better about Christ, since I say that He was spirit, not flesh. O unhappy error! Why? Do I say that Christ was flesh? You say spirit; I say spirit and flesh. You do not say better, but you say less. Hear therefore the whole of what I say: that is, what the catholic faith says, what the most firmly founded and most serene truth says. You who say that Christ was spirit only; what our spirit also is, that is, our soul, this you say Christ only was: hear what you are saying. I say what you say. He was Himself spirit of that nature and substance from which our spirit also is. Pay attention to how much less you say. The Word was there, flesh was there. You say: A human spirit alone. I say: Word, spirit, body; God and man. If I do not wish to say two, if I do not wish to say two things, I use this abridgement: God and man. Both true God and true man. Nothing false in the humanity, nothing false in the divinity. But if you ask me about the man himself, again I say two: a human soul and human flesh. You are a man by reason of soul and flesh; He [is] Christ by reason of God and man. Behold what I say.
3. Manichaeorum error in discipulorum reprehensione damnatus. Discipuli spiritum se videre putantes, reprehenduntur. Sed tu melius te dicere putas, quia dicis: Spiritus erat, spiritus apparebat, spiritus videbatur, spiritus in homine conversabatur. Hoc dicis: ut dixi, hoc putabant et discipuli. Si nihil mali dicis, si bonum est quod dicis; bonum erat et quod discipuli putabant. Si Dominus sic eos dimisit, ut hoc putarent; dimittendus es et tu. Hoc enim credebant quod et tu: si bonum est quod tu credis, bonum erat quod illi credebant. Sed non erat bonum.
3. The error of the Manichaeans condemned in the reproof of the disciples. The disciples, thinking that they saw a spirit, are reproved. But you think that you speak better, because you say: It was a spirit, a spirit appeared, a spirit was seen, a spirit went about in a man. This you say: as I have said, this the disciples too thought. If you say nothing evil, if what you say is good, then what the disciples thought was good too. If the Lord left them thus, so that they should think this, you too are to be let go. For they believed what you also believe: if what you believe is good, what they believed was good. But it was not good.
CAPUT III. — Ait illis Dominus, Quid turbati estis? Perturbatio credidit quod credis. Quid? Putabant se spiritum videre. Et Dominus ad haec: Quid turbati estis, et cogitationes ascendunt in cor vestrum? Cogitationes istae terrenae sunt. Si enim coelestes essent, descenderent in cor, non ascenderent. Quare enim dicitur nobis, Sursum cor, nisi ut terrenae cogitationes non ante se inveniat cor nostrum, quod sursum posuerimus? Ergo, Quid turbati estis, et cogitationes ascendunt in cor vestrum? Videte manus meas et pedes meos, palpate et videte. Si parum est vobis attendere; manus mittite. Si parum est attendere, nec sufficiat tangere; palpate. Nec, Tangite, solum dixit; sed Palpate et contrectate. Probent sibi manus vestrae, si mentiuntur oculi vestri: Palpate et videte, oculos in manibus habete. Quid palpate, et quid videte? Quia spiritus carnem et ossa non habet, sicut me videtis habere. Errabas cum discipulis, corrigere cum discipulis. Humanum est, concedo. Putatis spiritum Christum: hoc et Petrus, hoc et caeteri qui spiritum putaverunt se videre; sed in isto errore non remanserunt, ut
Chapter III. — The Lord said to them, Why are you troubled? Perturbation believed what you believe. What? They thought that they saw a spirit. And the Lord to this: Why are you troubled, and why do thoughts rise up into your heart? These thoughts are earthly. For if they were heavenly, they would come down into the heart, not rise up. For why is it said to us, Heart upward, unless so that our heart, which we have set upward, may not find earthly thoughts before it? Therefore, Why are you troubled, and why do thoughts rise up into your heart? See My hands and My feet, handle and see (Luke 24:38–39). If it is too little for you to look, put out your hands. If it is too little to look, and touching is not enough, handle. Nor did He say only, Touch; but Handle and feel. Let your hands prove to themselves whether your eyes are lying: Handle and see, have eyes in your hands. What are you to handle, and what to see? For a spirit does not have flesh and bones, as you see that I have (Luke 24:39). You were erring with the disciples; be corrected with the disciples. It is human, I grant. You think Christ a spirit: so did Peter, so did the others who thought that they saw a spirit; but they did not remain in that error, so that
Editors' notes and page, col. 1123

Page

  • running head: S. AUGUSTINI EPIS[COPI] (cut off at image edge), column number 1123
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:1124
scias prorsus hoc fuisse in cordibus eorum. Medicus eos non dimisit sic: accessit, medicamentum adhibuit: vulnera in cordibus videbat; et unde vulnera cordium curaret, in corpore cicatrices ferebat.
you may know for certain that this was in their hearts. The Physician did not leave them so: He came near, He applied medicine: He saw wounds in their hearts; and to have the means of curing the wounds of hearts, He bore scars in His body.
CAPUT IV. — 4. De Christo quid credendum. Verbum Dei. Incarnatione suscepit totum hominem. Sic ergo credamus. Scio quia sic creditis: sed ne forte in agro isto Domini sit herba mala, etiam eos alloquor quos non video. Nemo credat de Christo, nisi quod de se credi voluit Christus: ante quem nobis expedit, ut credamus quod credi de se voluit, qui nos redemit, qui salutem nostram quaesivit, qui pro nobis sanguinem fudit; qui pro nobis quod non ei debebatur pertulit, qui nobis quod nobis non debebatur attulit: hoc credamus. Christus quid est? Filius Dei, Verbum Dei. Quid est Verbum Dei? Quod dici non potest per verbum hominis, hoc est Verbum Dei. Quaeris a me quid sit Verbum Dei. Si tibi vellem dicere quid sit verbum hominis, non explico, fatigor, haesito, succumbo; non possum explicare vim verbi humani. Ecce antequam dicam vobis, quod volo dicere, jam verbum est in corde meo; nondum a me dictum est, et apud me est: dicitur a me, et pervenit ad te, et non recedit a me. Intenditis, ut audiatis verbum a me; mentes vestras pasco, cum loquor. Divideretis inter vos cibum, si afferrem ventribus, nec totus perveniret ad singulos; sed quanto plures estis, tanto in plura frusta quod ponerem divideretis, et tanto minus quisque acciperet, quanto major esset accipientium multitudo. Modo autem cibum attuli mentibus; dico, Accipite, sumite, comedite: accepistis, comedistis, et non divisistis. Quidquid loquor, et omnibus totum est, et singulis totum est. Ecce quomodo non potest satis explicari, quantam vim habet hominis verbum: et dicitis mihi, Quid est verbum Dei? Verbum Dei pascit Angelorum tot millia. Mente enim pascuntur, mente implentur. Implet Angelos, implet mundum, implet virginis uterum: nec ibi spatiatur, nec hic angustatur. Quid est Verbum Dei? Ipse dicat: breviter de se dicit; sed magnum est quod dicit: Ego et Pater unum sumus (Joan. X, 30). Nolo numeres, verba appende. Quid ergo? Plura verba de uno verbo non sufficiunt explicando. Verbum ergo quod non potest explicari, caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis (Id. I, 14). Suscepit totum quasi plenum hominem, animam et corpus hominis. Et si aliquid scrupulosius vis audire; quia animam et carnem habet et pecus: cum dico animam humanam et carnem humanam, totam animam humanam accepit. Fuerunt enim qui hinc haeresim facerent, et dicerent quia anima Christi non habuit mentem, non habuit intellectum, non habuit rationem; sed Verbum Dei fuit illi pro mente, pro intellectu, pro ratione. Nolo sic credas. Totum redemit, qui totum creavit: totum suscepit, totum liberavit Verbum. Ibi mens hominis et intellectus, ibi anima vivificans carnem; ibi caro vera et integra: peccatum solum non ibi.
Chapter IV. — 4. What is to be believed concerning Christ. The Word of God. In the Incarnation He took up the whole man. Let us therefore believe thus. I know that you do believe thus; but lest perhaps there be some bad weed in this field of the Lord, I address also those whom I do not see. Let no one believe anything concerning Christ except what Christ willed to be believed of Himself: before Whom it is expedient for us that we believe what He willed to be believed of Himself, Who redeemed us, Who sought our salvation, Who shed His blood for us; Who for us bore what was not owed to Him, Who brought to us what was not owed to us: this let us believe. What is Christ? The Son of God, the Word of God. What is the Word of God? That which cannot be told by the word of man, that is the Word of God. You ask me what the Word of God is. If I wished to tell you what the word of man is, I do not explain it, I grow weary, I hesitate, I give way; I cannot explain the power of the human word. See, before I say to you what I wish to say, the word is already in my heart; it has not yet been spoken by me, and yet it is with me: it is spoken by me, and it reaches you, and it does not depart from me. You are attending, so as to hear a word from me; I feed your minds when I speak. You would divide the food among you, if I brought it to your bellies, and it would not reach each one whole; but the more of you there are, the more pieces you would divide what I set before you into, and the less each one would receive, the greater the multitude of those receiving. Now, however, I have brought food to minds; I say, Take, receive, eat: you have taken, you have eaten, and you have not divided it. Whatever I speak is both whole for all and whole for each. See how it cannot be sufficiently explained how much power the word of man has: and you say to me, What is the Word of God? The Word of God feeds so many thousands of Angels. For with the mind they are fed, with the mind they are filled. He fills the Angels, fills the world, fills a virgin's womb: neither is He spread out there, nor is He narrowed here. What is the Word of God? Let Him say it Himself: He speaks briefly of Himself; but what He says is great: I and the Father are one (John 10:30). I do not want you to count, weigh the words. What then? Many words do not suffice for explaining one Word. The Word, therefore, which cannot be explained, was made flesh, and dwelt in us (John 1:14). He took up the whole, as it were the full, man, the soul and body of a man. And if you wish to hear something more precisely; since even a beast has a soul and flesh: when I say a human soul and human flesh, [I mean] He took up a whole human soul. For there were those who made a heresy out of this, and said that the soul of Christ did not have a mind, did not have an intellect, did not have reason; but the Word of God was for Him in place of mind, in place of intellect, in place of reason. I do not want you to believe thus. He Who created the whole redeemed the whole: the Word took up the whole, set free the whole. There was the mind of a man and intellect, there the soul giving life to the flesh; there the flesh true and entire: sin alone not there.
Editors' notes and page, col. 1124

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: solum non ibi› · call in col 1124

¹ Er. et Lov. sic: Vivificans carnem. Caro vera et integra erat ibi, peccatum solum non erat ibi. M.

Erasmus and Louvain read thus: "Vivificans carnem. Caro vera et integra erat ibi, peccatum solum non erat ibi" (Quickening the flesh. True and whole flesh was there; sin alone was not there). M.

(printed under page 568)

Page

  • running head: UGUSTINI EPISCOPI 1124 (left edge cut off; column number printed in worn type)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)