PL 39 · cols. 2005–2009
Appendix to Augustine's Sermones: Sermones supposititii, Sermones 121-137
Sermons CXXXI–CXXXIII
Migne Reading Room
PL 39 · cols. 2005–2009
Sermons CXXXI–CXXXIII
(1) ‹anchor: not visible in the image (call higher in the column)› · call in col 2005
Vox, feria, hic addita fuisse videtur, cum ejus loco subintelligenda forte esset vox, dies. In veteri codice f. omittitur, et quinta et sexta feria.
The word feria seems to have been added here, since in its place the word day was perhaps to be understood. In the old codex f. and the fifth and sixth feria is omitted.
(printed under page 265)
(a) ‹anchor: not visible in the image (call higher in the column)› · call in col 2005
Hunc loquendi usum etiam Augustinus improbat enarr. in Psal. 93, n. 3, cupitque ut Christiani corrigant et ecclesiastico ritu loquantur.
Augustine too disapproves this usage of speech, in the exposition of Psalm 93, no. 3, and wishes Christians to correct it and speak in the Church's manner.
(printed under page 265)
(b) ‹anchor: SERMO CXXXI› · call in col 2005
Alias, 1 inter additos a Parisiensibus.
Elsewhere, 1st among those added by the Paris editors.
(printed under page 265)
(c) ‹anchor: In Epiphania Domini, i› · call in col 2005
In Appendice nunc primum collocatur. Lovanienses dubium, Verlinus et Vindingus supposititium habent. Stilus revera ab Augustiniano manifeste diversus: sed etiam ipsius doctrinae adversum est quod hic dicitur, stellam Magis biennio ante Christum natum apparuisse. Nam stellae apparitionem Augustinus ad diem Nativitatis Christi refert in sermonibus de Epiphania 200, 201, 202, etc.
It is now placed in the Appendix for the first time. The Louvain editors hold it doubtful, Verlinus and Vindingus spurious. The style is indeed plainly different from Augustine's; and what is said here, that the star appeared to the Magi two years before Christ's birth, is also contrary to his own teaching. For Augustine refers the star's appearance to the day of Christ's Nativity in the sermons on the Epiphany 200, 201, 202, etc.
(printed under page 265)
- §4 "binc" (for "hinc"), as the page shows it; possibly a broken h (QA Q1, UNSURE).
(a) ‹anchor: SERMO CXXXII› · call in col 2007
Alias, de Tempore 35.
Elsewhere [Sermon] 35 de Tempore.
(printed under page 266)
(b) ‹anchor: In Epiphania Domini, ii› · call in col 2007
In Appendice nunc primum collocatur. Dubius videbatur Lovaniensibus: at Verlino et Vindingo falsus, iisdem scilicet indiciis et argumentis, quibus rejectus est sermo superior.
It is now placed in the Appendix for the first time. It seemed doubtful to the Louvain editors, but false to Verlinus and Vindingus, on the same indications and arguments, that is, by which the preceding sermon was rejected.
(printed under page 266)
(1) ‹anchor: majestatem clarebat› · call in col 2008
Ita Mss. omnes. At editi, clamabat.
So all the manuscripts. But the printed editions, he was crying out.
(printed under page 266)
(2) ‹anchor: noxius noxio gladio› · call in col 2008
In Mss. desunt voces, noxio gladio.
In the manuscripts the words with a guilty sword are missing.
(printed under page 266)
(a) ‹anchor: SERMO CXXXIII› · call in col 2008
Olim, de Tempore 33; et post, in Appendice 28.
Formerly [Sermon] 33 de Tempore; and afterwards [Sermon] 28 in the Appendix.
(printed under page 266)
(b) ‹anchor: In Epiphania Domini, iii› · call in col 2008
Est Leonis papae de Epiphania Domini octavus, ipsique in omnibus manuscriptis tribuitur.
It is Pope Leo's eighth [sermon] on the Epiphany of the Lord, and is attributed to him in all the manuscripts.
(printed under page 266)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible in the image (call higher in the column)› · call in col 2009
Post verbum, debeat, additur in Mss., fide.
After the word ought, the manuscripts add by faith.
(printed under page 267)
(2) ‹anchor: discretionis inspectio› · call in col 2009
Mss. cb. et n.: Ac ne in multis in vanum laboret, sollicite discretionem inspiciat.
Manuscripts cb. and n.: And lest he labour in vain over many things, let him examine discernment carefully.
(printed under page 267)