PL 39 · cols. 2180–2184
Appendix to Augustine's Sermones: Sermones supposititii, Sermones 231-239
Sermons CCXXXV–CCXXXVII
Migne Reading Room
PL 39 · cols. 2180–2184
Sermons CCXXXV–CCXXXVII
(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 2180
Er. Lugd. et Ven. sic habent hunc locum ; Et in unigenitum Filium ejus Jesum Christum, Deum et Dominum salvatorem, et in Spiritum sanctum Deum. M.
The Erasmus, Lyons and Venice editions have this passage thus: "And in His only-begotten Son Jesus Christ, God and Lord and Saviour, and in the Holy Spirit, God." M.
(printed under page 352)
(2) ‹anchor: Patre naturae est› · call in col 2180
Editi : Et unum esse Deum Patrem, et ex uno Patre Filium qui est unius cum Patre naturae. Codices manuscriptos secuti sumus.
The printed editions: "And that God the Father is one, and from the one Father the Son, Who is of one nature with the Father." We have followed the manuscripts.
(printed under page 352)
(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 2180
Olim, de Tempore 125; et post, in Appendice 47.
Formerly [Sermon] 125 de Tempore; and later, Appendix 47.
(printed under page 352)
(b) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 2180
Ipsum fere est Symbolum, quod in Hieronymi Operum tomo 9 cernitur Damaso inscriptum; re autem vera conflatum est ex libello Fidei, qui cap. 39 Codicis canonum Ecclesiae Romanae continetur. Hunc autem libellum doctissimus Quesnellius probat, neque Athanasii esse, cujus etiam operibus insertus fuerat; neque Vigilii Tapsensis, cui tribui volebat Chiffletius; neque tandem Gregorii Nazianzeni, apud quem idem libellus est Tractatus sive Oratio ordine 50; sed Gregorii Boetici potius Eliberitani episcopi : quod huic nempe tribuenda videatur Oratio apud Gregorium Nazianzenum 49, ab Augustino in epist. 148 citata; quam Orationem 49 liquet ejusdem esse auctoris, cujus est praedicta Oratio 50, cum altera alterius explicatio sit ab auctore sua dicta vindicante conscripta. Porro hic « Filioque, » ubi de Spiritus sancti processu agitur, additamentum est, nec legitur in libello Fidei codicis Romani.
It is almost exactly the Creed which is seen in volume 9 of Jerome's Works inscribed to Damasus; in truth, however, it is put together from the libellus of Faith contained in ch. 39 of the Codex of the canons of the Roman Church. The most learned Quesnel shows that this libellus is not Athanasius's, among whose works it had also been inserted; nor that of Vigilius of Thapsus, to whom Chifflet wished to assign it; nor, finally, that of Gregory Nazianzen, among whose works the same libellus stands as Tractate or Oration 50; but rather that of Gregory the Baetican, bishop of Elvira: since to him, namely, Oration 49 among Gregory Nazianzen's works, cited by Augustine in Letter 148, seems to be ascribable; and it is clear that this Oration 49 is by the same author as the said Oration 50, since the one is an explanation of the other, written by an author vindicating his own statements. Further, "and from the Son" here, where the procession of the Holy Spirit is treated, is an addition, and is not read in the libellus of Faith in the Roman codex.
(printed under page 352)
(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 2181
Alias, de Tempore 191.
Elsewhere, [Sermon] 191 de Tempore.
(printed under page 353)
(b) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 2181
In Appendice nunc primum collocatur. Dubium reliquerunt Lovanienses : rejecerunt Verlinus et Vindingus. Quippe nihil aliud est quam fidei professio a Pelagio directa ad apostolicam Sedem, et in Operum Hieronymi tomo 9 contenta : quae hic exordio praefixo ac mutata conclusione formam sermonis accepit
It is now placed in the Appendix for the first time. The Louvain editors left it doubtful; Verlinus and Vindingus rejected it. For it is nothing other than the profession of faith addressed by Pelagius to the Apostolic See and contained in volume 9 of Jerome's Works, which here, with an opening prefixed and the conclusion altered, has taken the form of a sermon.
(printed under page 353)
(1) ‹anchor: tenere credamur› · call in col 2182
Ita Ms. At editi, temere credamus. Pelagius autem apud Hieronymum : Qui tum Deum imperfectum in Filio quam hominem confitentur, ut nec Deum vere nec hominem tenere credantur.
So the manuscript. But the printed editions: "rashly believe." Pelagius, however, in Jerome's works: "who confess both an imperfect God in the Son and [an imperfect] man, so that they are believed to hold neither true God nor [true] man."
(printed under page 353)
(a) ‹anchor: SERMO CCXXXVII› · call in col 2183
Alias, de Tempore 192.
Elsewhere, [Sermon] 192 de Tempore.
(printed under page 354)
(b) ‹anchor: omnipotentia Patris› · call in col 2183
In Appendice nunc primum collocatur. Dubius erat Lovaniensibus, falsus Verlino et Vindingo. Idem auctor hujus ac duorum subsequentium. Cum autem in exordio dicit jam se ostendisse Deum in quem credimus esse verum Deum, non superiorem tractatum, ut putarunt Verlinus et Vindingus, sed alium quemdam notat nobis incompertum.
It is now placed in the Appendix for the first time. It was doubtful to the Louvain editors, spurious to Verlinus and Vindingus. The author of this and of the two following is the same. When in the opening he says he has already shown that the God in whom we believe is true God, he refers not to the preceding treatise, as Verlinus and Vindingus thought, but to some other one unknown to us.
(printed under page 354)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 2184
Ms. rm., dena.
A manuscript [siglum "rm."]: "dena" ("ten each").
(printed under page 354)