PL 39 · cols. 2190–2193
Appendix to Augustine's Sermones: Sermones supposititii, Sermones 241-257
Sermons CCXLI–CCXLIII
Migne Reading Room
PL 39 · cols. 2190–2193
Sermons CCXLI–CCXLIII
(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 2190
Olim, de Tempore 115; et post, in Appendice 42.
Formerly [Sermon] 115 de Tempore; and afterwards, in the Appendix, 42.
(printed under page 357)
(b) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 2190
Incerti auctoris, qui Symbolum hic, « ut cum mysterio, » ait, « conveniat Trinitatis, » tertium usque repetit. Qua in re consentientem habet subsequentis sermonis scriptorem; sed nequaquam Augustinum, qui suo scripto sermone 214, de Symbolo, religione impediebatur, quominus Symbolum ipsum vel semel litteris mandaret. Symboli sententiae non eaedem hic semper, imo paucae iisdem Apostolis tribuuntur, quibus in superiore sermone.
By an uncertain author, who here repeats the Creed as many as three times, "so that," he says, "it may agree with the mystery of the Trinity." In this he has the writer of the following sermon agreeing with him; but by no means Augustine, who in his written Sermon 214, on the Creed, was restrained by scruple from committing the Creed itself to writing even once. The clauses of the Creed are not always the same here; indeed few are assigned to the same Apostles as in the preceding sermon.
(printed under page 357)
(a) ‹anchor: SERMO CCXLII› · call in col 2191
Alias, de Tempore 131.
Elsewhere, [Sermon] 131 de Tempore.
(printed under page 358)
(b) ‹anchor: ad Competentes› · call in col 2191
In Appendice nunc primum collocatur. In Lovaniensium editione dubius, Verlini autem et Vindingi sententia falsus est. Non sapit Augustinum, nisi in conclusione, quae ex sermone 212 desumpta est. In caeteris convenit plerumque cum Eusebianis de symbolo sermonibus 1 et 2, auctore forsitan Fausto conscriptis. Confer censuram sermonis praecedentis. Caeterum is ipse sermo olim in Ecclesia Gallicana legebatur Competentibus in traditione symboli, uti liquet ex vetustissimo Missali Gallicano quod Thomasius edidit, ex quo et noster Edmundus Martene illum suo de antiquis Ecclesiae ritibus libro primo, pag. 95, inseruit; cum prius idem, pag. 85, observasset, in Ecclesia Gallicana, ante receptum in ea ordinem Romanum usitatum fuisse, ut inter tradendum Competentibus Symbolum, illud ter repeteretur.
Placed in the Appendix now for the first time. In the Louvain edition it is doubtful, and in the judgement of Verlinus and Vindingus spurious. It does not savour of Augustine, except in the conclusion, which is taken from Sermon 212. In the rest it mostly agrees with the Eusebian sermons 1 and 2 on the Creed, written perhaps by Faustus. Compare the critique of the preceding sermon. Moreover, this very sermon was formerly read in the Gallican Church to the Competentes at the handing-over of the Creed, as is clear from the very ancient Gallican Missal which Thomasius edited, from which our Edmund Martène also inserted it in the first book of his work on the ancient rites of the Church, p. 95; the same having earlier observed, p. 85, that in the Gallican Church, before the Roman order was received there, it was customary for the Creed to be repeated three times while it was being handed over to the Competentes.
(printed under page 358)
(a) ‹anchor: reddidi, etc.› · call in col 2193
Conclusio est sermonis 212 inter Augustinianos.
The conclusion is that of Sermon 212 among the Augustinian [sermons].
(printed under page 359)
(b) ‹anchor: SERMO CCXLIII› · call in col 2193
Alias, de Tempore 125.
Elsewhere, [Sermon] 125 de Tempore.
(printed under page 359)
(c) ‹anchor: De Symbolo, VII› · call in col 2193
In Appendice nunc primum collocatur. Erat apud Lovanienses dubius, apud Verlinum autem et Vindingum falsus. Initio quidem plures alloquitur concionator, utens isthac appellatione, quae in spuriis sermonibus solemnis et consueta est, « fratres charissimi : » deinceps vero ad unum quempiam in singulari verba dirigit; nec Augustinum in Symbolo explicando imitatur.
Placed in the Appendix now for the first time. With the Louvain editors it was doubtful, but with Verlinus and Vindingus spurious. At the beginning the preacher addresses many, using that form of address which is customary and usual in the spurious sermons, "dearest brethren"; but thereafter he directs his words to some one person in the singular; nor does he imitate Augustine in explaining the Creed.
(printed under page 359)