Index rerum quae in hoc quinto volumine continentur

(unnumbered) ‹anchor: none — editors' addendum in small type below a rule, set across both columns, no call› · cols 2439–2440

In fine tomi XI editionis Benedictinae, praeter haud pauca additamenta ad praesentem tomum V pertinentia, quae nos in decursu voluminis loco suo naturali intertexuimus, occurrunt insuper nonnullae adnotationes quas hic lectorum oculis subjicere non abs re erit. 1° Itaque, col. 1579, not. ², post verba, nolo habeas talem byrrhum, non habet, adde : « Et Enarr. in Psal. 130, n. 10 : Si vestis tua conscindatur, non dicis, Conscidit byrrhum meum, sed, Conscidit me. Si potuit et meruit vestis tua dici tu, quae non est tu, sed vestis tua, etc. Messianus, etc. » 2° Col. 1866, nota (b), pro his verbis ad Serm. 64 Appendicis spectantibus, praefationem vero et conclusionem habet aliunde ascitam, haec substituenda sunt : « Ivoni Carnutensi restitutus est, atque inter ipsius opera editus Parisiis an. 1647. » 3° Col. 1895, Serm. 77, n. 1, lin. 7, attendite, etc., lege cum veteri Ms. Colb., contendite et hanc lectionem divinam in domibus vestris frequenter legere, et in ecclesia libenter et obedienter audire. Sicut, etc. Et paulo infra ibidem, pro, sceleratis, lege cum eodem Ms., sterilibus ; ac iterum infra, n. 2, lin. 6-7, loco verborum, nobis praedestinatum est, in praedicto Ms. exstat tantum, propter nos. 4° Col. 2011, not. (b), post verba, opus fuit, adde : « Quanquam superius dicta sic commode interpretari licet, ut nimirum in his Christus non sibi, sed nobis renasci aut consecrari dicatur, maxime cum non semel ibidem doceatur, aquas aut Joannem nihil contulisse Christo, sed contra aquis et Joanni plurimum per Christum fuisse collatum. » 5° Col. 2065, loco notae (b), quae spectat ad serm. 163, haec substituenda monent RR. Patres : « Excepta conclusione, a verbis, nos vero charissimi, qui nullis, etc., quae Caesarium omnino spirat, caetera (in supradicto Sermone) Eusebium seu Faustum redolent. Hic quidem, num. 3, innuitur ad reparationem nostram Christi mortem fuisse necessariam ; cum Faustus superiori sermone 161, num. 2, doceat Christum potuisse hostem humani generis sola majestate prosternere, sine incarnationis humilitate, sine certamine passionis. Sed superiora verba interpretari licet de necessitate congruentiae aut etiam justitiae : cujusmodi necessitatis causas exponit Eusebius vulgatus homil. 6 de Pascha, quamvis ibi concedat, Deum absolute potuisse hominem solo nutu majestatis suae liberare. » 6° Col. 2087, in nota ultima, quae ad Serm. 182 attinet, post verbum, mittendus, supple : « Eadem illa verba, necnon superiora ista ejusdem num. 1 : alium Paracletum, id est, similis gloriae, vel naturae, ejusdemque substantiae, etc., deprehendimus in lib. 1 de spiritu sancto, cap. 9, quem Paschasio diacono vulgo adscriptum, Fausto Regiensi multi jam non temere restituunt, uti probavimus in nova editione S. Hilarii Pictaviensis, p. 1200, not. (g). » 7° Tandem, col. 2291, in fine num. 5, illud annotant PP. Maurini : « Quod hic traditur de consuetudine Romana iis qui virgines non fuerint, negandae benedictionis nuptialis, confirmant haec Innocentii I epist. ad Victricium Rothomag. cap. 10: Nec benedici cum sponsa potest corruptus. Vide Jonam Aurelianensem, de institutione laicali, lib. 2, initio cap. 2. » M.

At the end of volume XI of the Benedictine edition, besides a good many addenda belonging to the present volume V, which we have worked in at their natural places in the course of the volume, there are also some annotations which it will not be out of place to set here before the readers' eyes. 1° So, col. 1579, note ², after the words "I do not want you to have such a cloak; he does not have it," add: « And Enarr. in Ps. 130, n. 10: If your garment is torn, you do not say, "He has torn my cloak," but, "He has torn me." If your garment could and deserved to be called "you," though it is not you but your garment, etc. Messianus, etc. » 2° Col. 1866, note (b): in place of these words concerning Sermon 64 of the Appendix, "but it has its preface and conclusion taken from elsewhere," substitute the following: « It has been restored to Ivo of Chartres, and was published among his works at Paris in 1647. » 3° Col. 1895, Sermon 77, n. 1, line 7: for "attendite, etc.," read with the old Colbert manuscript, "strive also to read this divine lesson often in your homes, and to hear it in church willingly and obediently. As, etc." And a little further on in the same place, for "sceleratis" (the wicked), read with the same manuscript "sterilibus" (the barren); and again further on, n. 2, lines 6–7, in place of the words "it was predestined for us," the said manuscript has only "for our sake." 4° Col. 2011, note (b): after the words "opus fuit," add: « Although what was said above may conveniently be interpreted thus: that in these passages Christ is said to be reborn or consecrated not for Himself but for us, especially since it is taught more than once in the same place that the waters or John conferred nothing on Christ, but on the contrary that a very great deal was conferred on the waters and on John through Christ. » 5° Col. 2065: in place of note (b), which concerns Sermon 163, the Reverend Fathers advise substituting the following: « Except for the conclusion, from the words "but we, dearest ones, who by no," etc., which breathes Caesarius throughout, the rest (in the aforesaid sermon) smacks of Eusebius or Faustus. Here indeed, in n. 3, it is suggested that Christ's death was necessary for our restoration; whereas Faustus, in the preceding Sermon 161, n. 2, teaches that Christ could have laid low the enemy of the human race by His majesty alone, without the humility of the incarnation, without the contest of the passion. But the words above may be interpreted of a necessity of fittingness, or even of justice: the reasons for a necessity of this kind are set out by the so-called Eusebius, homily 6 on Easter, although he grants there that God could absolutely have freed man by the mere nod of His majesty. » 6° Col. 2087, in the last note, which concerns Sermon 182: after the word "mittendus," supply: « Those same words, and also those above in the same n. 1, "another Paraclete, that is, of like glory or nature, and of the same substance," etc., we have found in Book 1 On the Holy Spirit, ch. 9, which is commonly ascribed to the deacon Paschasius but which many now, not without reason, restore to Faustus of Riez, as we have shown in the new edition of St Hilary of Poitiers, p. 1200, note (g). » 7° Finally, col. 2291, at the end of n. 5, the Maurist Fathers note: « What is handed down here about the Roman custom of refusing the nuptial blessing to those who were not virgins is confirmed by the letter of Innocent I to Victricius of Rouen, ch. 10: "Nor can one who has been corrupted be blessed with the bride." See Jonas of Orléans, On the Instruction of the Laity, book 2, beginning of ch. 2. » M.

(printed under page 482)