PL 4 · cols. 925–932
Coena, Cypriano falso inscripta
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PL 4 · cols. 925–932
Editors' preface
<!-- These notes have no call letters: each is keyed by a lemma in italics. The first six are the closing notes of the PRECEDING treatise (Maran's notes), printed above the rule. The Coena's own notes follow under the heading EDITIONIS BALUZII NOTAE. --> [notes to the preceding treatise] (printed under page 454)
(1) ‹Hierusalem› · lemma note, text above the rule, col not visible
(continued) exibit lex, et verbum Domini de Hierusalem. Editi: de Sion Dei exiet verbum de Hierusalem. MARAN.
(printed under page 454)
(2) ‹Miserere errantium› · lemma note, col not visible
Miserere errantium. Rursum videtur hic locus mutilus. PAMEL.
"Have mercy on those who stray." Again this passage seems to be mutilated. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 454)
(3) ‹Pauperes› · lemma note, col not visible
Pauperes. Hanc vocem quae deerat in editis restitui ex tribus codicibus mss. qui usui etiam fuerunt ad caetera emendanda: sic enim habebant editi: Divites ad paupertatem redacti, haereditati dominantes servi, dominatui subjecti ad regnum vocati. Pamel legit dominatui. MARAN.
"The poor." I have restored this word, which was missing in the printed editions, from three manuscripts, which were also of use for correcting the rest; for the editions read thus: "The rich brought to poverty, made heirs, slaves ruling, those subject to lordship called to the kingdom." Pamelius reads "dominatui". MARAN.
(printed under page 454)
(4) ‹X.—Quae acta sunt› · lemma note, col not visible
X.—Quae acta sunt. Codex Reg. quae acta est; alius quae acta in Choreb. MARAN.
X.—"Which were done." The Regius codex has "which was done"; another, "which was done in Horeb." MARAN.
(printed under page 454)
(5) ‹In lege› · lemma note, col not visible
In lege. Sic cod. Colbert., editi intellige. MARAN.
"In the law." So the Colbert manuscript; the editions have "understand". MARAN.
(printed under page 454)
(6) ‹Discunt› · lemma note, col not visible
Discunt. Sic Colbert., discum edit., unde Pamelius, ut sententiam expleret, addiderat docentur ante haec verba, qui olim docebant. MARAN.
"They learn." So the Colbert manuscript; the editions have "discum", whence Pamelius, to complete the sense, had added "they are taught" before the words "who once taught". MARAN.
[EDITIONIS BALUZII NOTAE — notes on the Coena] (printed under page 454)
(7) ‹His nuptiis› · lemma note, col 925
His nuptiis etc. Sic codices octo mss.; editi: Is invitavit plures ut coenam ejus frequentarent.
"To this wedding," etc. So eight manuscripts; the editions: "He invited many to attend his supper."
(printed under page 454)
(8) ‹Commendavit› · lemma note, col 925
Commendavit. Sic Pamelius et codices omnes mss. Non tamen male Morellius, commundavit.
"Commendavit." So Pamelius and all the manuscripts. Yet Morel's "commundavit" (cleansed) is not bad.
(printed under page 454)
(9) ‹Recumbentium› · lemma note, col 925
Recumbentium. Multi codices habent discumbentium, et paulo post, prout poterant locum sibi inveniebant.
"Of those reclining." Many manuscripts have "discumbentium", and a little after, "as they could, they found themselves a place."
(printed under page 454)
(10) ‹Lateres› · lemma note, col 925
Lateres. Lapides in plerisque codicibus mss. Quae sequuntur Abraham sub arbore desunt in multis.
"Bricks." "Stones" in most manuscripts. The words that follow, "Abraham under the tree", are missing in many.
(printed under page 454)
(11) ‹Daniel super tribunal› · lemma note, col 926
Daniel super tribunal. In tribus codicibus David super tribunal, et paulo post Daniel super monticulum.
"Daniel on the judgement-seat." In three manuscripts "David on the judgement-seat", and a little after "Daniel on the hillock".
(printed under page 454)
(12) ‹Joannes› · lemma note, col 926
Joannes. Sic codices omnes, unus Colbertinus Jonas super lectum; editi Jonas super terram.
"John." So all the manuscripts; one Colbert manuscript has "Jonah on the bed"; the editions "Jonah on the ground".
(printed under page 454)
(13) ‹Ruth super stipulam› · lemma note, col 926
Ruth super stipulam. Addidit has voces Pamelius, quae deerant apud Morel. et in omnibus exstant codicibus mss. Quae praecedunt Raab super stuppam in uno tantum vidi codice Sorbonico.
"Ruth on the stubble." Pamelius added these words, which were missing in Morel and are found in all the manuscripts. The preceding words, "Rahab on the flax", I have seen in only one manuscript, the Sorbonne's.
(printed under page 454)
(14) ‹Absalon› · lemma note, col 926
Absalon. Legitur in multis codicibus Abessalon, et hic habet Pamelius.
"Absalom." In many manuscripts one reads "Abessalon", and Pamelius has this.
(printed under page 454)
(15) ‹Dolebat Job› · lemma note, col 926
Dolebat Job. Sic emendavimus auctoritate septem vetustorum codicum: editi et dolebat Jacob, Job solus sedebat in stercore; quod in nullo inveni codice.
"Job grieved." So we have corrected on the authority of seven old manuscripts; the editions: "and Jacob grieved, Job alone sat on the dunghill", which I found in no manuscript.
(printed under page 454)
<!-- EDITIONIS BALUZII NOTAE (heading continued from p. 454). No call letters: each note is keyed by a lemma in italics. Where the lemma's line is not in the visible part of the page, the column is inferred from print order and marked "?". --> (printed under page 455)
(1) ‹Agar stragulum› · lemma note, col 927
Agar stragulum. Haec desunt in plerisque codicibus mss. Non pauci habent cooperuerunt recumbentes, unus Colbertinus cooperuerunt se.
"Hagar a coverlet." These words are missing in most manuscripts. Not a few have "those reclining covered [themselves]", one Colbert manuscript "they covered themselves".
(printed under page 455)
(2) ‹Olivas Aaron› · lemma note, col 927
Olivas Aaron. Plerique codices mss. et Morellius habent uvas Aaron, et paulo post olivas Noe.
"Aaron olives." Most manuscripts and Morel have "Aaron grapes", and a little after "Noah olives".
(printed under page 455)
(3) ‹Acetum Jonas› · lemma note, col 927
Acetum Jonas. Sic octo codices mss. editi dedit Acetum Jonas.
"Jonah vinegar." So eight manuscripts; the editions "Jonah gave vinegar".
(printed under page 455)
(4) ‹Oxygarum› · lemma note, col 927
Oxygarum. Aliter in sex codicibus mss. accepit et hoc J. C.
"Oxygarum" (vinegar-and-fish-sauce). Otherwise in six manuscripts: "and J[esus] C[hrist] received this too".
(printed under page 455)
(5) ‹Unusquisque … veniat … et dabo› · lemma note, col 927
Unusquisque.... veniat.... et dabo. Sic emendavimus codicibus plerisque consentientibus, nisi quod nonnulli habent in vestiario meo: editi, Quisque voluerit vestrum venire.... dabo Pamelius addidit singulas, quam vocem in uno tantum vidi codice ms.
"Let each one … come … and I will give." So we have corrected, with most manuscripts agreeing, except that some have "in my wardrobe"; the editions: "Whoever of you will come … I will give." Pamelius added "one each", a word I have seen in only one manuscript.
(printed under page 455)
(6) ‹Loth sulphurinam› · lemma note, col 927
Loth sulphurinam. Sic codices mss. et editi, praeter Oxoniensem, ubi legitur Job.
"Lot a sulphur-coloured one." So the manuscripts and editions, except the Oxford edition, where "Job" is read.
(printed under page 455)
(7) ‹Joannes triclinam› · lemma note, col 927
Joannes triclinam. Trichinam legendum esse observat Salmasius annot. in Trebel. Pol. p. 342, in uno ex regiis codicibus legitur triginam.
"John a triclina." Salmasius, in his notes on Trebellius Pollio, p. 342, observes that "trichina" (a hair garment) should be read; in one of the royal manuscripts "trigina" is read.
(printed under page 455)
(8) ‹Judas argyrinam› · lemma note, col 927
Judas argyrinam. Quidam codices mss. argurinam, alii arguirinam.
"Judas a silver one." Some manuscripts "argurinam", others "arguirinam".
(printed under page 455)
(9) ‹Herodias› · lemma note, col 927
Herodias. Cod. Sorb. Herodes.
"Herodias." The Sorbonne manuscript: "Herod".
(printed under page 455)
(10) ‹Helias aeriam› · lemma note, col 927
Helias aeriam. Quidam codices aeream, alii aerinam.
"Elijah a sky-coloured one." Some manuscripts "aeream" (bronze), others "aerinam".
(printed under page 455)
(11) ‹Job biplagiam› · lemma note, col 927
Job biplagiam. Edit. Oxon. biblagiam; repugnant alii codices mss. et editi.
"Job a twice-striped one." The Oxford edition "biblagiam"; the other manuscripts and editions are against it.
(printed under page 455)
(12) ‹Isaias mesotropam› · lemma note, col 927
Isaias mesotropam. Colbertinorum codicum alter mesotratam, quae vox aptior videtur ad indicandum Esaiam medium fuisse scissum. Forte melius legeretur mesotretam.
"Isaiah a mesotropa." The second of the Colbert manuscripts has "mesotrata", a word that seems more apt to indicate that Isaiah was sawn through the middle. Perhaps "mesotreta" would be a better reading.
(printed under page 455)
(13) ‹Susanna castaninam› · lemma note, col 927
Susanna castaninam. Sic pro castalinam legendum monet Salmasius not. in Vopisc., p. 410. Hanc observationem confirmat auctoritate Azelini monachi Remensis, qui coenam hanc versibus rithmicis ante aliquot saecula reddidit. In hoc opere, quod manu exaratum habebat penes se Salmasius, sic legebatur. Heleiae pulchra filia, Secura per pomaeria, Susanna fert castaneam.
"Susanna a chestnut-coloured one." Salmasius, in his notes on Vopiscus, p. 410, advises that this be read for "castalinam". He confirms this observation by the authority of Azelinus, a monk of Reims, who rendered this Supper in rhyming verse some centuries ago. In that work, which Salmasius had in his possession in manuscript, it read thus:
(printed under page 455)
(14) ‹Levi spartacinam› · lemma note, col 927
Levi spartacinam. Cod. Colb. partacinam, unus ex regiis spartaginam.
"Levi a spartacina." The Colbert manuscript "partacinam", one of the royal ones "spartaginam".
(printed under page 455)
(15) ‹Thamar coloriam› · lemma note, col 927
Thamar coloriam. Sic alter codicum Colbert., atque ita legendum observat Casaubonus not. in Vopisc. p. 396; editi colorinam.
"Tamar a coloured one." So the second of the Colbert manuscripts, and Casaubon, in his notes on Vopiscus, p. 396, observes that it should be read so; the editions "colorinam".
(printed under page 455)
(16) ‹Aaron murrinam› · lemma note, col 927
Aaron murrinam. Multi codices mss. myrrinam.
"Aaron a murrine one." Many manuscripts "myrrinam" (myrrh-coloured).
(printed under page 455)
(17) ‹Judith hyacinthinam› · lemma note, col 927
Judith hyacinthinam. Judas in plerisque mss. Colbertinorum, alter Judas Zantinam.
"Judith a hyacinth-blue one." "Judas" in most manuscripts; of the Colbert manuscripts, the second has "Judas a Zantina".
(printed under page 455)
(18) ‹Anna Persicinam› · lemma note, col 927
Anna Persicinam. Persinam Sorbon. et unus ex regiis.
"Anna a Persian one." "Persinam" in the Sorbonne manuscript and one of the royal ones.
(printed under page 455)
(19) ‹Paulus Tharsicam› · lemma note, col 927
Paulus Tharsicam. Candidam octo codices mss.
"Paul a Tarsian one." Eight manuscripts: "a white one".
(printed under page 455)
(20) ‹Jacob pseudoalethinam› · lemma note, col 927
Jacob pseudoalethinam. Sic unus ex Regiis codicibus. Sic etiam legisse se testatur Salmasius in vetusto codice, not. in Treb. Pol. p. 342. Caeteri codices hanc lectionem confirmant, quorum multi habent pseudoallechinam vel pseudoallecinam: editi alethinam. Joannes legitur pro Jacob in sex codicibus mss.
"Jacob a false-true one." So one of the royal manuscripts. Salmasius too testifies that he read so in an old manuscript (notes on Trebellius Pollio, p. 342). The other manuscripts confirm this reading, many of them having "pseudoallechinam" or "pseudoallecinam"; the editions "alethinam". "John" is read for "Jacob" in six manuscripts.
(printed under page 455)
(21) ‹Praeceptas diaconias› · lemma note, col 927? (lemma not in the visible text)
Praeceptas diaconias. Sic plerique codices mss. editi praecepta diaconia. Paulo ante singuli deest in plerisque codicibus mss.
"The ordered services." So most manuscripts; the editions "praecepta diaconia". A little before, "each" is missing in most manuscripts.
(printed under page 455)
(22) ‹Collegit Jephte› · lemma note, col not visible
Collegit Jephte. Desunt haec in plerisque mss.
"Jephthah gathered." These words are missing in most manuscripts.
(printed under page 455)
(23) ‹Hermocrates› · lemma note, col 928
Hermocrates. In quibusdam codicibus Hermogrates. Sic etiam paulo post in quibusdam legitur Malassadon.
"Hermocrates." In some manuscripts "Hermogrates". So too, a little after, "Malassadon" is read in some.
(printed under page 455)
(24) ‹Antiochus› · lemma note, col not visible
Antiochus. Ariochus in multis codicibus mss.
"Antiochus." "Arioch" in many manuscripts.
(printed under page 455)
(25) ‹Amelsad› · lemma note, col 928
Amelsad. Melsad. in pluribus codicibus mss.
"Amelsad." "Melsad" in several manuscripts.
(printed under page 455)
(26) ‹Esau cervinam› · lemma note, col 928
Esau cervinam. Sic Morel. et codices mss. Pamelius Isaac.
"Esau venison." So Morel and the manuscripts; Pamelius "Isaac".
(printed under page 455)
<!-- EDITIONIS BALUZII NOTAE, continued. No call letters: each note is keyed by a lemma in italics. Where the lemma's line is not in the visible part of the page, the column is inferred from print order and marked "?". --> (printed under page 456)
(1) ‹Intulit Jacob› · lemma note, col 929? (lemma above the visible text)
Intulit Jacob. Haec non inveni in mss.
"Jacob brought in." I did not find these words in the manuscripts.
(printed under page 456)
(2) ‹Fel piscis› · lemma note, col 929?
Fel piscis. Sicotum in sex mss. Syrcotum Remig.
"The gall of a fish." "Sicotum" in six manuscripts; "Syrcotum" in the Remigius manuscript.
(printed under page 456)
(3) ‹Polypum› · lemma note, col 929?
Polypum. Polytum in mss.
"Polyp." "Polytum" in the manuscripts.
(printed under page 456)
(4) ‹Cantharidem› · lemma note, col 929?
Cantharidem. Cantoridem mss. Sic etiam halegem, saxitanum, umbras, soliam in plerisque.
"Cantharis." "Cantoridem" in the manuscripts. So too "halegem", "saxitanum", "umbras", "soliam" in most.
(printed under page 456)
(5) ‹Hirundinem› · lemma note, col 929?
Hirundinem. Arundinem in pluribus mss.
"Swallow." "Reed" in several manuscripts.
(printed under page 456)
(6) ‹Glauculum Jonas› · lemma note, col 929?
Glauculum Jonas. Quidam mss. conculam, alii glaucum.
"Jonah a glauculus." Some manuscripts "conculam", others "glaucum".
(printed under page 456)
(7) ‹Alopidam Jacob› · lemma note, col 929?
Alopidam Jacob. Plerique codices Job. Paulo post ereneam, coracinam, helionem in multis codicibus, dentilem in uno mss.
"Jacob an alopis." Most manuscripts "Job". A little after, "ereneam", "coracinam", "helionem" in many manuscripts, "dentilem" in one manuscript.
(printed under page 456)
(8) ‹Mel Jonathas› · lemma note, col 929
Mel Jonathas. Sic codex Sorb. alii Jonas, editi Joannes.
"Jonathan honey." So the Sorbonne manuscript; others "Jonah", the editions "John".
(printed under page 456)
(9) ‹Conspersit› · lemma note, col 929
Conspersit. Consparsit in mss.
"Sprinkled." "Consparsit" in the manuscripts.
(printed under page 456)
(10) ‹Perministravit› · lemma note, col 929
Perministravit. Sic codices mss. editi perministravit.
"Served throughout." So the manuscripts; the editions "perministravit" [the variant is printed identical to the lemma].
(printed under page 456)
(11) ‹Suscitabatur› · lemma note, col 929
Suscitabatur. Suscitabat mss.
"Was being roused." "Suscitabat" (was rousing) in the manuscripts.
(printed under page 456)
(12) ‹Laban› · lemma note, col 929
Laban. Lazarus Morel. et quidam mss.
"Laban." "Lazarus" in Morel and some manuscripts.
(printed under page 456)
(13) ‹Intulit Martha› · lemma note, col 929
Intulit Martha. Maria in sex mss. Thamar Sorbon.
"Martha brought in." "Mary" in six manuscripts; "Tamar" in the Sorbonne manuscript.
(printed under page 456)
(14) ‹Aquam› · lemma note, col 929? (lemma below the visible text)
Aquam. Plerique mss. aquatum.
"Water." Most manuscripts "aquatum" (watered wine).
(printed under page 456)
(15) ‹Non consentiebat Susanna› · lemma note, col 929?
Non consentiebat Susanna. Non inveni in mss.
"Susanna did not consent." I did not find this in the manuscripts.
(printed under page 456)
(16) ‹Martha› · lemma note, col 929?
Martha. Thamar in codice Sorbonico.
"Martha." "Tamar" in the Sorbonne manuscript.
(printed under page 456)
(17) ‹Petrus› · lemma note, col 929?
Petrus. Sic novem codices mss. Martialis in editis.
"Peter." So nine manuscripts; "Martial" in the editions.
(printed under page 456)
(18) ‹David hyssopum porrexit› · lemma note, col 930? (lemma above the visible text)
David hyssopum porrexit. Haec desunt in octo codicibus mss. in quibus etiam legitur: dedit unguentum Aaron. Postea perunxit Maria in uno ex regiis codicibus.
"David held out hyssop." These words are missing in eight manuscripts, in which one also reads: "Aaron gave ointment." Then "Mary anointed" in one of the royal manuscripts.
(printed under page 456)
(19) ‹Percussit› · lemma note, col 930?
Percussit. Porrexit in plerisque codicibus mss.
"Struck." "Held out" in most manuscripts.
(printed under page 456)
(20) ‹Choros› · lemma note, col 930?
Choros. Multi codices habent choreas.
"Choirs." Many manuscripts have "choreas" (dances).
(printed under page 456)
(21) ‹Cantavit Asael› · lemma note, col 930?
Cantavit Asael. Cantavit David in plerisque mss. codicibus.
"Asahel sang." "David sang" in most manuscripts.
(printed under page 456)
(22) ‹Ite in domos vestras› · lemma note, col 930?
Ite in domos vestras. Ite domibus vestris in plerisque mss. sic etiam paulo post in iisdem prodit in magistro Jesus.
"Go to your homes." "Ite domibus vestris" in most manuscripts; so too, a little after, the same have "Jesus comes forth as the master".
(printed under page 456)
(23) ‹In custode› · lemma note, col 930?
In custode. Omnes codices mss. in custodia.
"As the keeper." All the manuscripts "in custody".
(printed under page 456)
(24) ‹Nemroth› · lemma note, col 930?
Nemroth. Mambres in omnibus mss.
"Nimrod." "Mambres" in all the manuscripts.
(printed under page 456)
(25) ‹In exordiario› · lemma note, col 930
In exordiario. Morel. et codices mss. in exodiario.
"As the exordiarius." Morel and the manuscripts "as the exodiarius" (the after-piece player).
(printed under page 456)
(26) ‹In coco Antiochus› · lemma note, col 930
In coco Antiochus. Ariochus in codicibus mss. in coco jarito Sorb.
"Antiochus as the cook." "Arioch" in the manuscripts; "in coco jarito" in the Sorbonne manuscript.
(printed under page 456)
(27) ‹In furnitore Ananias› · lemma note, col 930
In furnitore Ananias. mss. in fornatorio.
"Ananias as the furnace-man." The manuscripts "in fornatorio".
(printed under page 456)
(28) ‹In ministra› · lemma note, col 930
In ministra. mss. in ministro.
"As the serving-woman." The manuscripts "in ministro" (as the servant).
(printed under page 456)
(29) ‹In rusticulo› · lemma note, col 930
In rusticulo. Plerique mss. in rustico. Iidem paulo post nudus erat Joannes, stolam petebat Auses.
"As the little rustic." Most manuscripts "as the rustic". The same, a little after, "John was naked, Hoshea asked for a robe".
(printed under page 456)
(30) ‹Quo facto› · lemma note, col 930
Quo facto. Morel. et quidam codd. mss. pro quo facto, alii sub quo facto. Paulo post desunt hae voces (continues)
"When this was done." Morel and some manuscripts "pro quo facto", others "sub quo facto". A little after, these words are missing (continues)
(printed under page 456)
<!-- No call letters: each note is keyed by a lemma in italics. The first three are the last of the EDITIONIS BALUZII NOTAE on the Coena, which ends on this page; the rest are the COMMENTARIUS on the next piece, De revelatione capitis beati Joannis Baptistae (incerto auctore), which begins here. Where the lemma's line is not in the visible part of the page, the column is inferred and marked "?". --> [EDITIONIS BALUZII NOTAE — end of the notes on the Coena] (printed under page 457)
(1) ‹Quo facto› · lemma note, col 930 (from p. 456)
(continued) altera die. In iisdem legitur stropillos Levi vel stropilos, capsas Moyses. Ante diem quaedam de convivio.
(printed under page 457)
(2) ‹Cognoscitur› · lemma note, col 931? (lemma above the visible text)
Cognoscitur. Sic pro eo quod erat in editis cogitur, emendavi, codicis Colbert. auctoritate.
"Is recognized." So I have corrected, on the authority of the Colbert manuscript, in place of "cogitur" (is compelled), which stood in the editions.
(printed under page 457)
(3) ‹Quaerebat› · lemma note, col 931?
Quaerebat. Editi quaerebatur. Emendavimus auctoritate quatuor mss.
"Was seeking." The editions "quaerebatur" (was being sought). We have corrected on the authority of four manuscripts.
[COMMENTARIUS — notes on De revelatione capitis beati Joannis Baptistae] (printed under page 457)
(4) ‹I. Narrat Josephus› · lemma note, col 931
I.—Narrat Josephus. Stupendissimam hanc narrationem subnectimus, ne quid Cypriano olim appensum desideraretur. Laterem videtur lavare Pamelius, qui notis suis mendaciorum sentinam purgare satagit. OXON.—Narrat Josephus. Lib. nempe XVIII Antiq., c. 10, seu juxta novam versionem 7. Quod ipsum ex illo repetiit Eusebius lib. I Hist. Eccl., cap. 11, seu juxta graecum exemplar 11; et postea Beda in cap. XIV Marci, ubi cum iisdem verbis utatur, atque ideo illinc haec transcripta ad verbum videantur, non sum veritus reponere, in castellum Macheronta abductum. PAM.
I.—"Josephus relates." We append this most astonishing narrative so that nothing once attached to Cyprian should be missing. Pamelius seems to be washing a brick, busying himself in his notes to clean out a bilge of lies. OXFORD EDITION.—"Josephus relates." That is, Antiquities book XVIII, chapter 10, or by the new version 7. Eusebius repeated this very thing from him in Ecclesiastical History book I, chapter 11, or by the Greek copy 11; and afterwards Bede on Mark chapter XIV. Since he uses the same words, and so this seems to have been transcribed from there word for word, I have not hesitated to restore "led away to the fortress of Machaerus". PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 457)
(5) ‹Narrat historia ecclesiastica› · lemma note, col 931
Narrat historia ecclesiastica, etc. Sic lego, quia nullam hujus rei facit mentionem Josephus, sed Hist. Eccl. lib. XI, cap. 28, auctore Ruffino, in sua ad Eusebium Appendice. PAMEL.
"The Ecclesiastical History relates," etc. So I read, because Josephus makes no mention of this matter, but the Ecclesiastical History does, book XI, chapter 28, by Rufinus, in his Appendix to Eusebius. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 457)
(6) ‹Post longum vero tempus› · lemma note, col 932
Post longum vero tempus. Tempore nempe apostatae Juliani, inquit Beda cum Ruffino: qui etiam rectius narrant adfuisse tunc quum dispergerentur ossa Joannis Bapt. monachos, non postea advenisse. Ex quibus etiam omnino legendum censeo Philippum pro Josephum, praesertim consentientibus Petro Trecensi in Historia Scholastica, ut omittam ms. quemdam de hac re tractatum, et Adone in Martyrol. ad 4. kal. Septem., qui cum Ruffino missa dicunt haec ossa Athanasio per Julianum diaconum. PAMEL.
"But after a long time." That is, in the time of Julian the Apostate, says Bede with Rufinus; they also relate more correctly that monks were present at the time when the bones of John the Baptist were being scattered, and did not arrive afterwards. From them too I judge that "Philip" should certainly be read for "Joseph", especially as Peter of Troyes [Peter Comestor] agrees in the Historia Scholastica, not to mention a certain manuscript treatise on this matter, and Ado in his Martyrology for the fourth day before the Kalends of September, who say with Rufinus that these bones were sent to Athanasius by Julian the deacon. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 457)