PL 4 · cols. 909–918
De montibus Sina et Sion, tractatus ignoti auctoris adversus Judaeos
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PL 4 · cols. 909–918
Editors' preface
(printed under page 446)
(a) ‹anchor: facta illius sunt› · call in col 910 (after "sunt", before "mala"; QA Q5: anchor read on the page)
Sunt facta illius Foss. Mic. Vict.
"Are his deeds" in Foss., Mic., Vict.
(printed under page 446)
(b) ‹anchor: Sion autem› · call in col 910
Sic Foss. Mic. Vict. Imp. Non tam ex.
So Foss., Mic., Vict., and the printed editions. Not "tam ex".
(printed under page 446)
(c) ‹anchor: Spiritus sanctus› · call in col 910
Spiritu sancto Foss. Mic. Vict.
"By the Holy Spirit" in Foss., Mic., Vict.
(printed under page 446)
(d) ‹anchor: imperium Dei› · call in col 910
Sic Foss. Mic. Vic. Imp. Dei et Patris.
So Foss., Mic., Vic., and the printed editions. "Of God and the Father."
(printed under page 446)
(e) ‹anchor: et civitas› · call in col 910
Sic Foss. Mic. Vict. Imp. Ubi est civitas.
So Foss., Mic., Vict., and the printed editions. "Where is the city."
(These notes carry no call marks; each is keyed to the text by its lemma.) (lemma 1) ‹I. — Probatio capitulorum› · col 909 I. — Probatio capitulorum. Mutilum est atque adeo obscurum hujus libri frontispicium, quod tamen legunt omnes excusi et mss. codd. præter Cambron., qui sic habet: Quod probatio capitulorum, etc. Neque ille satisfacit. PAMEL.
I. — Proof of the chapters. The heading of this book is mutilated and therefore obscure; yet all the printed editions and the manuscript codices read it so, except the Cambron codex, which has: That the proof of the chapters, etc. Nor does that reading satisfy. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 2) ‹Ipso Jesu› · col 909 Ipso Jesu. Cambron. Christo. PAMEL.
Jesus himself. Cambron: Christ. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 3) ‹Secundum Joannem› · col 909 Secundum Joannem. Hoc ex cod. Cambron. Marchin. Dunen. et Affligin. ad marginem, cum Morellio, pro eo quod Affligin. in ipso contextu et vet. exc. juxta; cæteri vero, secundum. PAMEL.
According to John. This from the Cambron, Marchiennes, Dunes and Affligem codices (Affligem in the margin), with Morel, instead of the reading juxta in the Affligem text itself and the old printed edition; the others, however, have secundum. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 4) ‹De Sion enim exiet lex› · col 909 De Sion enim exiet lex. Etiam hoc cum Morellio ex tribus codd. mss. pro exibit. PAMEL.
For out of Sion shall go forth the law. This too with Morel from three manuscript codices, instead of exibit. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 5) ‹Quatenus hoc intelligere debemus› · col 909 Quatenus hoc intelligere debemus. Adjecimus interrogandi notam cum vet. exc. Gravio et Cauchio; et cum nulli eam legerent, loco submovimus ubi erat, An unum. PAMEL.
How far ought we to understand this. We have added the question mark with the old printed edition, Gravius and Cauchius; and since no one read it there, we removed it from where it stood, at An unum. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 6) ‹Verum latina interpretatio› · col 909 Verum latina interpretatio. Manutius, latina vero. At illud genuinum est. PAMEL.
But the Latin interpretation. Manutius: latina vero. But the former is genuine. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 7) ‹II. — Sina mons interpretatur› · col 909 II. — Sina mons interpretatur. Tamquam verbo prorsus passivo auctor noster voce interpretor passim utitur; in grammatica non minus quam in theologia hospes. PAMEL.
II. — Mount Sinai is interpreted. Our author uses the word interpretor throughout as though it were a wholly passive verb, being a stranger to grammar no less than to theology. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 8) ‹In Psalmo II› · col 910 In Psalmo II. Prorsus sic lego, non primo, cum etiam Cyprianus supra lib. Testim. III, cap. 29, secundum nuncupet hunc psalmum, hæc verba citans, non primum. PAMEL.
In Psalm 2. I read exactly so, not the first, since Cyprian too, above, in Testimonies book III, chapter 29, calls this psalm the second when citing these words, not the first. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 9) ‹Et montem Sina› · col 910 Et montem Sina. Adjicio montem, ex Cambron. cod. ex eodem reposui illud, Cum totus mundus mala facta habeat, et a diabolo, pro eo quod erat, cum totus mundus propter mala facta a diabolo. PAMEL.
And Mount Sinai. I add mount from the Cambron codex; from the same I have restored the words since the whole world has evil deeds, and from the devil, in place of what stood there, since the whole world because of evil deeds from the devil. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 10) ‹Quia et ego illud› · col 910 Quia et ego illud. Cambron., omisso quia, legit et ego odi illud; neutrum placet, quia longe aliter Evangelista, Quia ego testimonium perhibeo de illo. PAMEL.
Because I too it. Cambron, omitting quia, reads and I hate it; neither pleases, because the Evangelist has it far otherwise: Because I bear witness of it. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 11) ‹III. — Spiritus sanctus filius Dei› · col 910 III. — Spiritus sanctus filius Dei. De hac veterum loquendi formula, vide supra librum, quod idola non sint dii. Quare nihil movere debent lectorem, aut ista hunc aut duo similes infra doccre. Neque enim ante hæreses de Spiritu sancto exortas, tam caute scripserunt veteres. PAMEL.
III. — The Holy Spirit, the Son of God. On this manner of speaking among the ancients, see above the book That idols are not gods. So this passage, or two similar ones below, ought not to disturb the reader at all. For before the heresies concerning the Holy Spirit arose, the ancients did not write so cautiously. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 446)
(No Lectiones variantes on this page foot. These notes carry no call marks; each is keyed to the text by its lemma.) (lemma 1) ‹Licet digitis sacris› · col 911 Licet digitis sacris, tamen digitis in figura carnis. Manutius omissa voce licet, et semel tantum recitans voces illas, digitis sacris, paulo prius certa posuit. Verum vulgatæ lectioni consentiunt mss. nostri; et si parenthesi hæc includantur, sensus erit perspicuus. PAMEL.
Although with sacred fingers, yet with fingers in the figure of flesh. Manutius, omitting the word licet and giving the words digitis sacris only once, put certa a little before. But our manuscripts agree with the common reading; and if these words are enclosed in a parenthesis, the sense will be clear. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 2) ‹Ita enim hanc veritatis› · col 911 Ita enim hanc veritatis, etc. Locum hunc depravatissimum ex codic. mss. partim Affligin. Dun. Marchin. et vet. exc., partim Cambronensi ista restitui. Ita ab initio mundi et deinceps omnes homines nascentes, de tempore et facto nomina a parentibus suis accipiebant (non quidem ex se, sed a Deo mente impellebantur, qui antequam fiant, præscius est futurum), ut quales post crementum ætatis suæ futuri essent, posteriori tempore verbis et nominibus hebraicis designaretur et quid singulis futurum esset, interpretatio nominum designaret veritatem. PAMEL.
For thus this [interpretation] of the truth, etc. This badly corrupted passage I have restored as follows, partly from the manuscript codices of Affligem, Dunes and Marchiennes and the old printed edition, partly from the Cambron codex: Thus from the beginning of the world and thereafter all men at their birth received names from their parents according to the time and the event (not indeed of themselves, but they were moved in mind by God, who foreknows what is to come before it happens), so that what they would be after the growth of their years might be designated at a later time by Hebrew words and names, and the interpretation of the names might designate the truth of what was to befall each. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 3) ‹IV. — Ex quatuor cardinibus orbis terrarum pugno comprehendit› · cols 911–912 IV. — Ex quatuor cardinibus orbis terrarum pugno comprehendit. Hæc ex lacunis rabbinorum hausta; in Pirke R. Eliezer dicitur: «Incœpit Deus colligere pulverem primi hominis, e quatuor terræ angulis, vid. rubrum, nigrum, album, viridem. Ruber pulvis factus est sanguis, niger fuit pro visceribus, albus pro ossibus et nervis, viridis factus est corpus. Cur congesserit pulverem ejus ex quatuor mundi angulis? quia dixerat sanctus benedictus, sive iverit homo ex oriente in occidentem, vel ex occidente in orientem, seu in quemcumque locum contenderit, et venerit terminus ejus ut separetur ex hoc mundo, ne tum terra dicat: In isto loco non est a me pulvis corporis tui, etc.» OXON.
IV. — From the four cardinal points of the world He grasped in His fist. This is drawn from the pools of the rabbis; in the Pirke of Rabbi Eliezer it is said: "God began to gather the dust of the first man from the four corners of the earth, namely red, black, white and green. The red dust became the blood, the black served for the entrails, the white for the bones and sinews, the green became the body. Why did He heap up his dust from the four corners of the world? Because the Holy One, blessed be He, had said: whether a man go from east to west or from west to east, or make for any place whatever, and his end come that he be parted from this world, then let the earth not say: In this place there is no dust of your body from me, etc." OXFORD EDITORS.
(lemma 4) ‹Quatuor litteris cardinalibus habes nomen Adam› · col 912 Quatuor litteris cardinalibus habes nomen Adam. Nescivit cabbalista noster in nomine אדם tres tantum reperiri litteras. Sed, si nugarum istarum magis idoneus auctor exspectetur, consulat lector tomum nonum operum D. Augustini, tract. 10, in Evang. Joan., ubi hæc omnia occurrunt. OXON.
In four cardinal letters you have the name Adam. Our cabbalist did not know that only three letters are found in the name אדם. But if a more competent author of these trifles is wanted, let the reader consult the ninth volume of the works of Saint Augustine, Tractate 10 on the Gospel of John, where all this occurs. OXFORD EDITORS.
(lemma 5) ‹Id est unum› · col 912 Id est unum, etc. Tum hoc, tum quæ sequuntur, id est quatuor, et id est unum, et rursum, id est quadraginta, adscripta erant in cod. ms. Dun. ad interpretationem græcarum vocum, in aliis mss. et vet. exc. omnino desiderabantur. Ad intellectum tamen majorem putavimus retinenda. PAMEL.
That is, one, etc. Both this and what follows, that is, four, and that is, one, and again that is, forty, were written in the Dunes manuscript codex to interpret the Greek words; in the other manuscripts and the old printed edition they were wholly lacking. We thought them worth keeping, however, for better understanding. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 6) ‹Quam carnem in se figuralem› · col 912 Quam carnem in se figuralem. Sane et caute hoc intelligendum recte annotavit Manutius. PAMEL.
Which flesh, figural in itself. Manutius rightly noted that this is to be understood soundly and cautiously. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 7) ‹Hic numerus 46› · col 912 Hic numerus 46. Ligneus hic supputator numerum 46 conficit ex numero 6000, numero 6 et 40. PAMEL.
This number 46. This wooden reckoner makes up the number 46 from the number 6000, the number 6, and 40. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 8) ‹Destruite fanum istud› · col 912 Destruite fanum istud. Gravius phanum, et hic et bis postea: verum illud constanter mss. omnes, et non Festus modo, sed et Varro de L. L. lib. v, et Livius 1 dec. lib. x, a fando dictum fanum volunt, (continues)
Destroy this shrine. Gravius reads phanum, both here and twice afterwards; but all the manuscripts consistently have the former, and not only Festus but also Varro, On the Latin Language book 5, and Livy, first decade, book 10, hold that fanum is so called from fari, "to speak," (continues)
(printed under page 447) <!-- note: lemma 8 stands at the foot of the page's right-hand column (the 912 side), last in the Variorum notae. The page ends at "fanum volunt," and the note continues onto the next page (col. 913 and after); its rest must be set from that page. (QA Q2: this note was formerly also set a second time under "Editors' prose"; the duplicate is removed, since foot apparatus is not editors' prose.) -->
(No Lectiones variantes on this page foot. These notes carry no call marks; each is keyed to the text by its lemma. The foot opens with a new note, not a continuation, so the last note of page 447 ("Destruite fanum istud") probably finishes on page 447 below the crop of that image.) (lemma 1) ‹VI. — Et mons Sion tentatio exacerbationis› · col 913 VI. — Et mons Sion tentatio exacerbationis. Addebant alii, æternæ; verum recte omisit Manutius cum Cambron. cod., quia supra non legitur. PAMEL.
VI. — And Mount Sion, the trial of provocation. Others added eternal; but Manutius rightly omitted it, with the Cambron codex, because it is not read above. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 2) ‹Inventi sunt› · col 913 Inventi sunt. Ex auctoritate ejusdem cod. omisi particulam et, superfluam. PAMEL.
They were found. On the authority of the same codex I have omitted the particle et, as superfluous. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 3) ‹Manifesta vero et Moysen› · cols 913–914 Manifesta vero et Moysen, etc. Ad Moysis nomen, si sonus spectetur, accedere videtur Massa, quod tentationem denotat. OXON. — Locus usque adeo corruptus, ut mederi ex mss. non licuerit. Ex illis enim quatuor consentiunt cum excusis vulgatis, sicut etiam veteres excusi, præterquam quod legant Moyses, quomodo et Morellius legens etiam Manifestat, Cambron. cod. vero longe aliter: Manifesta vero Moysi et Aaroni, per quos eos Deus per legem tentavit, in latino interpretatur. Similiter in monte tentati a Deo inventi sunt alieni, etc. Fortassis ita legendum: Et completa est interpretatio Sina, manifesta Moysi et Aaroni per quos eos Deus per legem tentavit, omissis cæteris omnibus; quandoquidem prius eadem verba sint posita, atque adeo hic videantur superflua. PAMEL.
But manifest also Moses, etc. If the sound is considered, the name of Moses seems to approach Massah, which denotes trial. OXFORD EDITORS. — The passage is so corrupt that it could not be healed from the manuscripts. Four of them agree with the common printed editions, as do the old printed editions too, except that they read Moyses, as does Morel, who also reads Manifestat; but the Cambron codex has it far otherwise: But manifest to Moses and Aaron, through whom God tried them by the law, is interpreted in Latin. Likewise on the mountain, tried by God, they were found estranged, etc. Perhaps it should be read thus: And the interpretation of Sinai was fulfilled, manifest to Moses and Aaron, through whom God tried them by the law, all the rest being omitted; since the same words were set down earlier and so seem superfluous here. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 4) ‹VII. — Tentatio exacerbationis› · col 914 VII. — Tentatio exacerbationis. Videtur sono vocis deceptus a [Hebrew word, not legible at this resolution] derivasse scriptor hic suum interpretamentum. OXON.
VII. — The trial of provocation. Deceived by the sound of the word, the writer seems to have derived his interpretation here from [Hebrew word]. OXFORD EDITORS.
(lemma 5) ‹Et tentemus quæ eventura sunt illi› · col 914 Et tentemus quæ eventura sunt illi. Iterum istud ex Cambron. cod. pro quæ ventura sunt; est enim græce apud LXX, τὰ ἐν ἐκβάσει. Omittunt vero mss. voculam et, paulo post.
And let us test what will befall him. This again from the Cambron codex, in place of what will come; for in the Greek of the Septuagint it is τὰ ἐν ἐκβάσει ("the things at his end"). The manuscripts, however, omit the little word et a little further on.
(printed under page 448)
(No Lectiones variantes on this page foot. These notes carry no call marks; each is keyed to the text by its lemma.) (lemma 1) ‹VIII. — Et corpora sua ejecerunt› · col 915 VIII. — Et corpora sua ejecerunt et foras a se miserunt. Locum mutilum sic supplevimus ex Cambron. et Cauchii codd. Vulgati habebant dumtaxat: et corpora a seipso, pro quo non male Manut. cum aliis mss. et corpora foras emisit. PAMEL.
VIII. — And they cast out their bodies and sent them forth from themselves. We have filled out this mutilated passage thus from the Cambron codex and that of Cauchius. The printed editions had only: and the bodies from himself, for which Manutius, with other manuscripts, not badly gave and he sent the bodies forth. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 2) ‹Prostrati in faciem› · col 915 Prostrati in faciem. Hoc habeo ex omnibus mss. pro prostrati in facie. PAMEL.
Prostrate on their face. I have this from all the manuscripts, in place of prostrati in facie. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 3) ‹IX. — Pontius Pilatus impulsa mente› · col 915 IX. — Pontius Pilatus impulsa mente. Cum codex Remboldi negligentia operarum haberet impolluta, non male reposuit ex conjectura Erasmus, infusa. At illud genuinum est. PAMEL.
IX. — Pontius Pilate, his mind moved. Since Rembold's codex, through the carelessness of the workmen, had impolluta ("unpolluted"), Erasmus not badly restored infusa ("poured in") by conjecture. But the former is genuine. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 4) ‹Sic vero et alius propheta› · cols 915–916 Sic vero et alius propheta. Manutius, verum et alius, sed illud habent mss. nostri. Mirum autem est quod alium prophetam dicat, quum idem David id pronuntiarit. PAMEL.
And so also another prophet. Manutius: verum et alius; but our manuscripts have the former. It is strange, though, that he speaks of another prophet, since the same David pronounced it. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 5) ‹Et non juravit subdole› · col 916 Et non juravit subdole. Quum sic legat alibi Cyprianus, hoc malo cum tribus mss. et excusis vulgatis, quam in dolo cum Cambron., sub dolo, cum Manutio. PAMEL.
And has not sworn deceitfully. Since Cyprian reads so elsewhere, I prefer this, with three manuscripts and the common printed editions, to in dolo with Cambron, or sub dolo with Manutius. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 6) ‹X. — Hierusalem dicit› · col 916 X. — Hierusalem dicit. Quod adjecerat Erasmus, ut sensus constaret, de qua dicitur in Apocalypsi: Vidi. Nulli habent mss; sed prius, cum illis legunt veteres excusi codd. PAMEL.
X. — He says Jerusalem. What Erasmus had added so that the sense might hold, "of which it is said in the Apocalypse: I saw", no manuscripts have; but the old printed copies read the former with them. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 449)
(No Lectiones variantes on this page foot. These notes carry no call marks; each is keyed to the text by its lemma.) (lemma 1) ‹XII. — De hebraico in græcum, vel in latinum› · col 917 XII. — De hebraico in græcum, vel in latinum. Istud ex tribus aliis mss. pro eo quod erat, in græco et latino. Tamen locus adhuc obscurus. Quæ vero sequuntur intelligenda sunt sicut supra. PAMEL.
XII. — From Hebrew into Greek or into Latin. This from three other manuscripts, in place of what stood there, in Greek and Latin. Yet the passage is still obscure. What follows is to be understood as above. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 2) ‹XIII. — Per Salomonem› · col 917 XIII. — Per Salomonem. Et hic et antea adscribit Salomoni quoque Sapientiæ librum. PAMEL.
XIII. — Through Solomon. Both here and before he ascribes the book of Wisdom also to Solomon. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 3) ‹In Epistola Joannis discipuli sui› · col 917 In Epistola Joannis discipuli sui. Nusquam tale quid habent Joannis Epistolæ catholicæ. Videtur itaque reponendum Jacobi, ut alludat ad illud: Hic comparabitur viro consideranti vultum suum in speculo. Quo magis miror quod legat Cambronensis, ad Paulum. PAMEL.
In the Epistle of John his disciple. The catholic Epistles of John nowhere have anything of the kind. It seems, then, that of James should be restored, so that it alludes to the words: He shall be likened to a man beholding his face in a glass. All the more do I wonder that the Cambron codex reads to Paul. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 4) ‹XIV. — Speculam quadratam› · col 918 XIV. — Speculam quadratam. Bonus hic scriptor nihil distare credidit speculum et speculam: pariter peritus derivationum et mysteriorum interpres. PAMEL.
XIV. — A square watchtower. This good writer believed that speculum (mirror) and specula (watchtower) differ not at all: an interpreter equally expert in derivations and in mysteries. PAMELIUS.
(lemma 5) ‹XV. — Et in nomine ejus gentes credent et sperabunt› · col 918 XV. — Et in nomine ejus gentes credent et sperabunt. Etiam hoc est iisdem, quod miror, cum et apud Esaiam, et apud Matthæum non aliud habeatur, quam sperabunt, græce et latine; neque etiam Cyprianus supra lib. Testim. II, cap. 13, aliud legat quam, credent. PAMEL.
XV. — And in his name the Gentiles shall believe and shall hope. This too is in the same [manuscripts], which surprises me, since both in Isaiah and in Matthew nothing else is found but shall hope, in Greek and in Latin; nor does Cyprian, above, in Testimonies book II, chapter 13, read anything other than shall believe. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 450)