PL 4 · cols. 835–870
De singularitate clericorum (opusculum suppositum)
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PL 4 · cols. 835–870
Editors' preface
[Above the title rule: the closing notes of the preceding work (Lectiones variantes a–c and Variorum notae under cols 835–836), cut at the foot image's top edge but legible in the column images; all are set here (Q4 2026-10-22).] (prev-a) ‹anchor: sordidissimo aere› · variant reading (preceding work), col 835 a Sic Corb. Imp. Sordidissimus aeris.
a So the Corbie manuscript; the printed editions, "sordidissimus aeris".
(prev-b) ‹anchor: de saeculo› · variant reading (preceding work), col 835 b Cum saeculo Bod. 1. Corb.
b "Cum saeculo" (with the world): Bodleian 1, Corbie.
(prev-c) ‹anchor: crimen mortale› · variant reading (preceding work), col 836 c Crimen immortale Corb.
c "Crimen immortale" (an immortal crime): Corbie.
(prev-2) ‹anchor: Ad paradisum remove› · lemma note (preceding work), col 835 XI.—Ad paradisum remove. Forte, remitte. PAMEL.
XI. "Remove to paradise." Perhaps "remitte" (send). PAMELIUS.
(prev-1) ‹anchor: Et crimen mortale› · lemma note (preceding work), col 835 Et crimen mortale. Prorsus sic lego cum altero Morelii cod. pro. immortale. PAMEL.
"And a mortal crime." I read it exactly so, with Morel's other manuscript, instead of "immortal". PAMELIUS.
(prev-3) ‹anchor: Mendaciorum mandra› · lemma note (preceding work), col 836 Mendaciorum mandra. Alius, mendacii malitia. PAMEL.
"A fold of lies." Another manuscript: "mendacii malitia" (the malice of lying). PAMELIUS.
[EDIT. OXON. NOTAE — lemma notes without call marks; numbered here in print order.] (printed under page 409)
(1) ‹anchor: De Singularitate Clericorum› · lemma note (title), col 835
De Singularitate Clericorum. Videtur circa Bedae popularis nostri tempora, quando de coelibatu Clericorum maxime fervebat praesertim in Occidente controversia, conscriptus liber; qui saeculo respondet a revelatione desumptum argumentum. Ferebatur enim, Gabrielem Angelum duodecim articulos signatos detulisse, quod conjugium Sacerdotum non esset tolerandum. Post vulgatam versionem in usu receptam, scriptum fuisse constat: nec refert quod Origenis sententiam tueri videatur auctor; siquidem hoc ad hypothesin quam susceperat, pertinebat. Rigaltius ait, Codex Fossatensis Cypriano tribuit. In Corbeiensi inscribitur, Augustini de Singulariate Clericorum.
On the Singleness of Clerics. The book seems to have been written about the time of our countryman Bede, when the controversy over the celibacy of clerics was most heated, especially in the West; and its argument, taken from a revelation, fits that age. For it was reported that the angel Gabriel had brought twelve sealed articles to the effect that the marriage of priests was not to be tolerated. It was certainly written after the Vulgate version had come into use; nor does it matter that the author seems to defend an opinion of Origen's, since that belonged to the hypothesis he had taken up. Rigault says: the Fossés manuscript attributes it to Cyprian; in the Corbie manuscript it is titled "Augustine, On the Singleness [as printed: Singulariate] of Clerics".
(printed under page 409)
(2) ‹anchor: Sed quia nunc de feminarum commoratione› · lemma note, col 835 (runs into col 836)
Sed quia nunc de feminarum commoratione. Pamelius ait, Manutius et Morellius, cum Landulpho de Columna, commemoratione. Verum prius habet Antoninus cum vet. excus. et argumento libri magis convenit. Nisi vero etiam Landulphus legeret illud de, superfluum putarem, et omitterem cum Antonino. PAMEL.
"But since now, concerning the dwelling together with women." Pamelius says: Manutius and Morel, with Landulf of Colonna, read "commemoratione" (mention). But Antoninus, with the old printed edition, has the former, and it suits the book's argument better. Indeed, did not Landulf also read that "de", I would think it superfluous and omit it with Antoninus. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 409)
(3) ‹anchor: Ad ignominiam devoluti sunt› · lemma note, col 836
Ad ignominiam devoluti sunt. Pamelius ait, Ex vitio codicis Remboldi legebatur ignominiae, duntaxat quod non placeret, reposuit Erasmus ignominiose, et illud legunt Antoninus et vet. exc. PAMEL.
"Have sunk into disgrace." Pamelius says: through a fault of Rembold's manuscript "ignominiae" was read; simply because this did not please him, Erasmus put "ignominiose" (disgracefully), and that is what Antoninus and the old printed edition read. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 409)
(4) ‹anchor: Domini correptione› · lemma note, col 836
Domini correptione. Pamelius ait, Manutius et Morellius correptione, verum prius placet obsequentia, praesertim si legamus cum Antonino, corripiens pro conveniens. PAMEL.
"By the Lord's rebuke." Pamelius says: Manutius and Morel read "correptione"; but the former pleases for its consistency, especially if we read with Antoninus "corripiens" (rebuking) instead of "conveniens" (meeting). PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 409)
[EDIT. OXON. NOTAE — lemma notes without call marks; numbered here in print order. Lemmata not visible in the page-foot image are placed by inference.] (printed under page 410)
(1) ‹anchor: Reum semetipsum conscribat› · lemma note, col 837 (lemma above the image)
Reum semetipsum conscribat. Pamelius ait, Etiam hic Remboldus reposuit, rerum corruptissime; nam illud habent vet. excus. Gravius et Morelius. PAMEL.
"Should enrol himself as guilty." Pamelius says: here too Rembold put "rerum", most corruptly; for the old printed edition, Gravius and Morel have the former. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 410)
(2) ‹anchor: Cum advenerit vobis interitus› · lemma note, col 837 (lemma above the image)
Cum advenerit vobis interitus. Pamelius ait, Nec vet. excus. Neque Remboldus hoc habent, sed est apud 70. Quare recte quoque ex conjectura Cauchii adjecimus, et illud quod sequitur. PAMEL.
"When destruction comes upon you." Pamelius says: neither the old printed edition nor Rembold has this, but it is in the Seventy. So we have rightly added it, on Cauchius's conjecture, along with what follows. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 410)
(3) ‹anchor: Adversaria est confidentia› · lemma note, col 837
Adversaria est confidentia. Pamelius ait, Ita etiam ille rectius, quam vulg. adversa. PAMEL.
"Confidence is an adversary." Pamelius says: so he too reads, more correctly than the common text's "adversa". PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 410)
(4) ‹anchor: quinimo quam nostrae› · lemma note, col 837
Quinimo quam nostrae. Pamelius ait, Accipit quinimo pro potius; nam illud plus: neque habent vet.exc. neque Remboldus, sed primus Erasmus addidit. PAMEL.
"Rather than our own." Pamelius says: he takes "quinimo" for "potius" (rather); for the word "plus" is in neither the old printed edition nor Rembold, but Erasmus first added it. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 410)
(5) ‹anchor: suam contulit gloriam› · lemma note, col 838
Quae unicuique homini suam contulit gloriam. Pamelius ait, Remboldus vitio operarum habebat suo, quod cum non quadraret, reposuit Erasmus, undique pro unicuique; at prius genuinum est. PAMEL.
"Which has conferred on each man his own glory." Pamelius says: through a printers' error Rembold had "suo"; as this did not fit, Erasmus put "undique" (on every side) instead of "unicuique"; but the former is genuine. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 410)
[EDIT. OXON. NOTAE — lemma notes without call marks; numbered here in print order. Lemmata not visible in the page-foot image are placed by inference.] (printed under page 411)
(1) ‹anchor: Et in muscipulas› · lemma note, col 839 (lemma above the image)
Et in muscipulas. Pamelius ait, Omisimus vocem diaboli, quod neque vet. excus. neque Remboldus habeant, neque alibi Cyprianus, tamen ubique muscipulam legit. PAMEL.
"And into the mousetraps." Pamelius says: we have left out the word "of the devil", because neither the old printed edition nor Rembold has it, nor does Cyprian elsewhere, though he reads "mousetrap" everywhere. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 411)
(2) ‹anchor: de magnis efficit praedam› · lemma note, col 839
De magnis efficit praedam. Pamelius ait, Antoninus addit ejus pro suam; antiquus vero alter codex Morellii longe aliter legit, de magnis tantum et fortibus suam mixtam efficit praedam. PAMEL.
"Makes a prey of great men." Pamelius says: Antoninus adds "ejus" in place of "suam"; but Morel's other, ancient manuscript reads very differently: "of great and strong men alone it makes its mixed prey". PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 411)
(3) ‹anchor: promeritos aut invalidos opinatur› · lemma note, col 839 (runs into col 840)
Dum illos promeritos aut invalidos opinatur. Pamelius ait, Non male etiam Erasmus, emeritos, nisi sequeretur, si autem multum mereri, quare illud ex vet. excus. et Remboldo reposuimus. PAMEL.
"While it supposes them to have deserved it, or to be weak." Pamelius says: Erasmus's "emeritos" (worn out) would also not be bad, were it not followed by "but if [it supposes itself] to deserve much"; so we have restored the former from the old printed edition and Rembold. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 411)
(4) ‹anchor: O quam inordinabilis› · lemma note, col 839 or 840 (lemma above the image)
O quam inordinabilis. Pamelius ait, Sic etiam Antoninus. Vet. excus. vero et Remboldus inordinalis, locus obscurus. Conjicit autem Gravius legendum lenocinium pro latrocinium, sed hoc non satisfacit. PAMEL.
"O how disorderly." Pamelius says: so also Antoninus; but the old printed edition and Rembold have "inordinalis"; an obscure passage. Gravius conjectures that "lenocinium" (enticement) should be read for "latrocinium" (robbery), but this does not satisfy. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 411)
(5) ‹anchor: Causale est omne› · lemma note, col 840
Causale est omne quod feminae est. Pamelius ait, Erasmus Casuale, at illud vet. exc. et Remboldus. Alludere videtur ad illud: Semper habet lites, alternaque jurgia lectus. PAMEL.
"All that belongs to a woman is a cause of strife." Pamelius says: Erasmus has "Casuale" (chancy), but the old printed edition and Rembold have the former. He seems to allude to the line: "The bed always holds quarrels and mutual wrangling." PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 411)
[EDIT. OXON. NOTAE — lemma notes without call marks; numbered here in print order. Lemmata not visible in the page-foot image are placed by inference. Signature line at foot of col 841: "PATROL. IV. S. CYPRIAN."; at foot of col 842: "27".] (printed under page 412)
(1) ‹anchor: Omnis qui non manducaverit carnem› · lemma note, col 841 (lemma above the image)
Omnis qui non manducaverit carnem. Videntur ea aetate clerici a carnibus et vino abstinuisse. PAMEL.
"Everyone who has not eaten meat." In that age clerics seem to have abstained from meat and wine. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 412)
(2) ‹anchor: Videndi oblectatione perfruitur› · lemma note, col 841 (lemma above the image)
Videndi oblectatione perfruitur. Sic lego cum vetere excus. pro vini, neutrum habet Remboldus. PAMEL.
"Enjoys the delight of seeing." So I read with the old printed edition, instead of "vini" (of wine); Rembold has neither. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 412)
(3) ‹anchor: suspectum placitum› · lemma note, col 841
Suspectum placitum. Placitum pro decretum. Solus enim Manut. placidum. PAMEL.
"A suspect resolution." "Placitum" stands for "decretum" (decree). Manutius alone has "placidum". PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 412)
(4) ‹anchor: qui illud forinsecus efficit infamari› · lemma note, col 841 (runs into col 842)
Qui illud forinsecus efficit infamari. Ita ex Antonino, et quodam Morellii cod. pro quod forinsecus; legit etiam ille codex permittit pro efficit. PAMEL.
"Who causes it to be defamed outwardly." So from Antoninus and one of Morel's manuscripts, instead of "quod forinsecus"; that manuscript also reads "permittit" (allows) for "efficit" (causes). PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 412)
(5) ‹anchor: Blasphemiam ingerit religioni› · lemma note, col 841
Blasphemiam ingerit religioni quam colit. Sic optime quidam Morellii codex, pro contulit. PAMEL.
"Brings blasphemy upon the religion he practises." So, excellently, one of Morel's manuscripts, instead of "contulit". PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 412)
(6) ‹anchor: senectute dignus› · lemma note, col 842
Senectute quidem dignus. Adjicimus quidem, ex vet. cod. Nam legitur in Machabaeis. PAMEL.
"Indeed worthy of old age." We add "quidem" from the old manuscript, for it is read in Maccabees. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 412)
[EDIT. OXON. NOTAE — lemma notes without call marks; numbered here in print order.] (printed under page 413)
(1) ‹anchor: quinimmo consummatus› · lemma note, col 843
Quinimo consummatus. Prorsus sic lego cum Morellio pro qui minimo. Quia supra hanc vocem habuimus eadem significatione, et consentiunt vet. exc. cod. et Remboldus. PAMEL.
"Rather, perfected." I read exactly so with Morel, instead of "qui minimo". For we had this word above in the same sense, and the old printed edition, the manuscript and Rembold agree. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 413)
(2) ‹anchor: Certe etiam soli cuicumque› · lemma note, col 843
Certe etiam soli cuicumque. Adjicio ex iisdem soli. PAMEL.
"Surely also to anyone single." I add "soli" from the same sources. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 413)
(3) ‹anchor: hemitritaeo insanabili laborare› · lemma note, col 843 (runs into col 844)
Hemetritaeo insanabili laborare. Hemetritaeus febris est, juxta Remboldum, tertiana una et dimidia. PAMEL.
"To suffer from an incurable semitertian." The semitertian [as printed: Hemetritaeus] is a fever, according to Rembold, of a tertian and a half. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 413)
(4) ‹anchor: Sed quisquam› · lemma note, col 843 (lemma as printed; the text there reads "Nec quisquam")
Sed quisquam. Omisimus voculam si interjectam juxta cod. vet. et Remboldum. PAMEL.
"But anyone." We have omitted the little word "si" that had been inserted, following the old manuscript and Rembold. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 413)
(5) ‹anchor: Ex improviso vel transeunter› · lemma note, col 844
Ex improviso vel transeunter, Antoninus in transitu, sed illud bis terve infra repetitur. PAMEL.
"Unexpectedly or in passing": Antoninus has "in transitu", but the former is repeated two or three times below. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 413)
(6) ‹anchor: aut in usu aliquando dissolvitur› · lemma note, col 844 (continues)
Aut in usu aliquando dissolvitur. Remboldus legebat
"Or at times is undone in use." Rembold read (continues)
(printed under page 413)
[EDIT. OXON. NOTAE — lemma notes without call marks; numbered here in print order. Lemmata not visible in the page-foot image are placed by inference.] (printed under page 414)
(1) ‹anchor: aut in usu aliquando dissolvitur› · lemma note (continued from p. 413), col 844
(continued) in risu; pro quo Erasmus rectius in risum: sed illud habet vet. exc. PAMEL.
(printed under page 414)
(2) ‹anchor: Neque ostendere› · lemma note, col 845 (lemma above the image)
Neque ostendere. Non est istud hodie apud Apostolum. PAMEL.
"Nor to show." This is not in the Apostle's text today. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 414)
(3) ‹anchor: ab apostolo Paulo› · lemma note, col 845
Ab apostolo Paulo. Erasmus testante Apostolo, at illud arridet, quia est in vet. cod. PAMEL.
"By the apostle Paul." Erasmus has "testante Apostolo" (as the Apostle testifies), but the former appeals to me, because it is in the old manuscript. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 414)
(4) ‹anchor: In conventu vero sacrorum› · lemma note, col 846 (continues)
In conventu vero Sacrorum, etc. Pulcher locus pro Sacris Ecclesiae; quippe ubi dicit tractari coelestia,
"But in the assembly of the sacred rites," etc. A fine passage in support of the Church's sacred rites; for where he says that heavenly things are handled, (continues)
(printed under page 414)
[EDIT. OXON. NOTAE — lemma notes without call marks; numbered here in print order. Lemmata not visible in the page-foot image are placed by inference.] (printed under page 415)
(1) ‹anchor: In conventu vero sacrorum› · lemma note (continued from p. 414), col 846
(continued) celebrari sancta mysteria, opus spiritale Angelorum geri, ea Dei praecepta nos congregare et colligere. PAMEL.
(printed under page 415)
(2) ‹anchor: Cum sine justitia non potest esse› · lemma note, col 847 (lemma below the image's last line)
Cum sine justitia non potest esse. Phrasis est auctoris. Vetus exc. et Remboldus legunt sine victoria. Sed non placet. PAMEL.
"Since without justice it cannot be." The phrase is the author's. The old printed edition and Rembold read "sine victoria" (without victory). But it does not please. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 415)
(3) ‹anchor: Cogitationes enim mortalium› · lemma note, col 847 or 848 (lemma above the image)
Cogitationes enim mortalium. Recte sic Gravius et Morellius, pro eo quod alii cogitationes immortalium. Nam sic habet liber Sapientiae, quam Salomonis titulo citat, quomodo et paulo post librum Ecclesiastici. PAMEL.
"For the thoughts of mortals." So, rightly, Gravius and Morel, instead of the others' "thoughts of immortals". For so the book of Wisdom has it, which he cites under Solomon's name, as he does the book of Ecclesiasticus a little later. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 415)
[EDIT. OXON. NOTAE — lemma notes without call marks; numbered here in print order. Lemmata not visible in the page-foot image are placed by inference.] (printed under page 416)
(1) ‹anchor: Ut ipsam consolationem nostram suscipiat› · lemma note, col 849 (lemma above the image)
Ut ipsam consolationem nostram suscipiat. Vetus excusus ac Remboldus, et hoc et sequentia plurali numero legunt, sed praecedit feminam. PAMEL.
"That she may take up our very consolation." The old printed edition and Rembold read both this and what follows in the plural; but "feminam" (a woman) precedes. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 416)
(2) ‹anchor: et omne quod voti est› · lemma note, col 849
Et omni quod voti est. Confirmatum hinc votum tacitum castitatis annexum coelibatui clericorum, de quo paulo post apertius.
"And all that belongs to a vow." Hence is confirmed the tacit vow of chastity attached to the celibacy of clerics, of which more openly a little later. [No signature printed.]
(printed under page 416)
(3) ‹anchor: et palma perfecta› · lemma note, col 849
Et palma perfecta. Hinc apparet atque etiam legi debere: unus accepit palmam. Sicut ubique legit Cyprianus. PAMEL.
"And the perfect palm." Hence it appears that one should also read "one received the palm", as Cyprian reads everywhere. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 416)
(4) ‹anchor: Ipse se voluit superari› · lemma note, col 849 or 850 (lemma below the image)
Ipse se voluit superari. Vet. exc. et Remboldus penetrari. PAMEL.
"He willed himself to be overcome." The old printed edition and Rembold have "penetrari" (to be pierced). PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 416)
(5) ‹anchor: Sine causa dicit› · lemma note, col 849 or 850 (lemma below the image; runs into col 850)
Sine causa dicit. Vet. exc. non dicit: sed prius placet. PAMEL.
"He says without cause." The old printed edition has "non dicit" (does not say); but the former pleases. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 416)
(6) ‹anchor: Qui spernit modica, paulatim cadet› · lemma note, col 850
Qui spernit modica, paulatim cadet. Erasmus, male, cadit; nam prius habet Ecclesiasticus. PAMEL.
"He who despises small things shall fall little by little." Erasmus, wrongly, has "cadit" (falls); for Ecclesiasticus has the former. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 416)
(7) ‹anchor: Fit studio autem› · lemma note, col 850
Sic studeo autem, etc. Hoc Erasmo placet pro eo quod erat, arbitrio. Legendum videtur, fit studio. PAMEL.
"But so I strive," etc. This pleases Erasmus in place of what stood there, "arbitrio". It seems one should read "fit studio" (it comes about by the zeal). PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 416)
(8) ‹anchor: quam bonos effectus mulieris› · lemma note, col 850
Quam bonos effectus mulieris. Erasmus affectus, minus recte. PAMEL.
"Than the good effects of a woman." Erasmus has "affectus" (affections), less correctly. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 416)
(9) ‹anchor: agit prius masculum et feminam› · lemma note, col 850
Agit prius masculum et feminam, etc. Remboldus omiserat conversari, et Erasmus legeba adjicit, illud vero habet vet. exc. PAMEL.
"He first brings man and woman," etc. Rembold had omitted "conversari" (to live together), and Erasmus read [as printed: legeba] "adjicit" (adds); but the old printed edition has the former. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 416)
[EDIT. OXON. NOTAE — lemma notes without call marks; numbered here in print order. Lemmata not visible in the page-foot image are placed by inference.] (printed under page 417)
(1) ‹anchor: in semetipsas elidere› · lemma note, col 851
In semetipsas elidere. Censeo legendum illidere. PAMEL.
"To dash against each other." I think "illidere" should be read. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 417)
(2) ‹anchor: ignem sine ullis flammis occultet› · lemma note, col 851
Ignem sine ullis flammis occultet. Recte sic Morellius et Gravius cum vet. exc. et Remboldus pro eo quod alii occultat. PAMEL.
"Hides the fire without any flames." So, rightly, Morel and Gravius, with the old printed edition and Rembold, instead of the others' "occultat". PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 417)
(3) ‹anchor: et dum summissus› · lemma note, col 851
Et dum summissus. Adjicio dum et vet. exc. PAMEL.
"And while submissive." I add "dum" (while), and [so] the old printed edition [as printed: "et vet. exc."]. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 417)
(4) ‹anchor: Controversias, actionesque causarum› · lemma note, col 851 or 852 (lemma above the images)
Controversias, actionesque causarum. Genuina quoque est haec lectio, et Remboldus pro eo quod reposuit Erasmus: controversas actiones, quae causarum. PAMEL.
"Disputes, and the pleadings of cases." This reading too is genuine, and Rembold's, in place of what Erasmus put: "disputed pleadings, which of cases". PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 417)
(5) ‹anchor: sed per correctionem› · lemma note, col 852
Sed per correctionem. Placet et ista pro correptionem. PAMEL.
"But by correction." This too pleases, in place of "correptionem" (rebuke). PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 417)
(6) ‹anchor: et in caeteros actus› · lemma note, col 852
Et in caeteros actus. Etiam haec pro inter. PAMEL.
"And in other acts." This too in place of "inter". PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 417)
(7) ‹anchor: Video plane sic› · lemma note, col 852
Video plane sic. Et hic et paulo post adjecit negationem non, Erasmus; sed non est opus. Est enim ironia, sicut et in eo quod sequitur cognosco, etc. Idem est judicium de his adjuncta ab illo negatione, ad illam sententiam, si Christus seipsum, etc. praesertim si legamus cum illis facit pro faciet. PAMEL.
"I plainly see thus." Here and a little later Erasmus added the negative "non"; but there is no need. For it is irony, as also in what follows, "I recognize", etc. The same judgement holds of the negative he attached to these words at the sentence "if Christ himself", etc., especially if we read with them "facit" (does) for "faciet" (will do). PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 417)
[EDIT. OXON. NOTAE — lemma notes without call marks; numbered here in print order. Lemmata not visible in the page-foot image are placed by inference.] (printed under page 418)
(1) ‹anchor: In invocationibus› · lemma note, col 853 (lemma above the image)
In invocationibus. Voces nonnullae hic redundantes e margine videntur in textum irrepsisse.
"In invocations." Some superfluous words here seem to have crept into the text from the margin. [No signature printed.]
(printed under page 418)
(2) ‹anchor: unus per rupes› · lemma note, col 854
Unus per rupes. Vetus exc. et Remboldus ripas. PAMEL.
"One over the crags." The old printed edition and Rembold have "ripas" (banks). PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 418)
(3) ‹anchor: Paulus apostolus decernit, dicens› · lemma note, col 854
Paulus apostolus decernit, dicens. Adjicio dicens ex vet. exc. PAMEL.
"The apostle Paul decrees, saying." I add "saying" from the old printed edition. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 418)
(4) ‹anchor: quid aliud exemplum nolunt› · lemma note, col 854
Quid aliud exemplum volunt. Ex eodem cum Morellio lego sic, pro volunt. PAMEL.
"What other example do they want." From the same [edition], with Morel, I read so, instead of "volunt". [As printed, lemma and rejected reading are both "volunt"; the text above reads "nolunt".] PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 418)
(5) ‹anchor: et qui Apostolis› · lemma note, col 854
Et qui Apostolis. Solus Manutius Apostolicis. PAMEL.
"And he who [contends to be equalled] to the Apostles." Manutius alone has "Apostolicis" (to apostolic men). PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 418)
[EDIT. OXON. NOTAE — lemma notes without call marks; numbered here in print order. Lemmata not visible in the page-foot image are placed by inference.] (printed under page 419)
(1) ‹anchor: quos Dominus junxit› · lemma note, col 855
Quos Dominus junxit. Aut sic legendum cum Erasmo, aut cum vet. exc. et Remboldo, quod Dominus jussit; prius tamen arridet magis. PAMEL.
"Those whom the Lord has joined." Either one should read so with Erasmus, or with the old printed edition and Rembold, "what the Lord commanded"; the former, however, appeals more. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 419)
(2) ‹anchor: Sic Apostolos mulierum comitatus decebat› · lemma note, col 855 (lemma above the image)
Sic Apostolos mulierum comitatus decebat. Vet. exc. Apostolus, etc. docebat. PAMEL.
"So did the company of women befit the Apostles." The old printed edition has "Apostolus" (the Apostle), etc., "docebat" (taught). PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 419)
(3) ‹anchor: Ubi tota Ecclesia propemodum videbitur› · lemma note, col 855 (lemma above the image; runs into col 856)
Ubi tota Ecclesia propemodum videbitur. Locus prorsus obscurus. Vet. excusus vero et Remboldus legunt conjurationes improbrosas, pro convivationes improbas, non recte. PAMEL.
"Where nearly the whole Church will be seen." A wholly obscure passage. The old printed edition and Rembold read "conjurationes improbrosas" (shameful conspiracies) instead of "convivationes improbas" (wicked banquetings), not correctly. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 419)
(4) ‹anchor: Ideo non inde scribitur› · lemma note, col 856
Ideo non inde scribitur. Hoc ex cod. vet. exc. pro quo Remboldus, adeo; Erasmus vero, ad ea bene describitur. Morell. adeo non bene. PAMEL.
"Therefore it is not written thence." This from the manuscript and the old printed edition; for it Rembold has "adeo"; Erasmus, "ad ea bene describitur" (is well described for those things); Morel, "adeo non bene". PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 419)
(5) ‹anchor: Tamen non possum› · lemma note, col 856
Tamen non possum. Istud rursum ex illorum utroque, pro eo quod Erasmus possunt. PAMEL.
"Yet I cannot." This again from both of them, instead of Erasmus's "possunt" (they can). PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 419)
[EDIT. OXON. NOTAE — lemma notes without call marks; numbered here in print order. Lemmata not visible in the page-foot image are placed by inference.] (printed under page 420)
(1) ‹anchor: Egestosam› · lemma note, col 857 (lemma above the image)
Egestosam. Sic recte Morellius, Remboldus et vet. exc. quum alii egestuosam. PAMEL.
"Needy." So, rightly, Morel, Rembold and the old printed edition, whereas others have "egestuosam". PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 420)
(2) ‹anchor: amicos Dei non novimus› · lemma note, col 857
Amicos Dei non novimus, nisi ad venerationem. Locus insignis pro veneratione Sanctorum. PAMEL.
"We know the friends of God only for veneration." A notable passage in support of the veneration of the saints. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 420)
(3) ‹anchor: qui novimus et Angelos cum feminis cecidisse› · lemma note, col 857
Qui novimus et Angelos cum feminis cecidisse. Etiam hic auctor filios Dei (Gen. VI) Angelos interpretatur. PAMEL.
"We who know that angels too fell with women." Here too the author interprets the sons of God (Gen. 6) as angels. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 420)
(4) ‹anchor: suae aviditatis ingluviem› · lemma note, col 857
Suae aviditatis ingluviem. Vet. exc. et Remboldus illuviem, neutrum displicet. PAMEL.
"The gluttony of their greed." The old printed edition and Rembold have "illuviem" (filth); neither displeases. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 420)
(5) ‹anchor: Quando indigeant› · lemma note, col 857 or 858 (lemma not in the image)
Quando indigeant. Hoc certe ex illo reposuimus pro cum. PAMEL.
"When they are in need." This, certainly, we restored from it, in place of "cum". PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 420)
(6) ‹anchor: Si talis Christiana charitas annotatur› · lemma note, col 858
Si talis Christiana charitas adnotatur. Rectius sic vet. exc. et Remboldus, quam alii advocatur. PAMEL.
"If such is noted down as Christian charity." So, more rightly, the old printed edition and Rembold, than the others' "advocatur" (is called). PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 420)
[EDIT. OXON. NOTAE — lemma notes without call marks; numbered here in print order. Lemmata not visible in the page-foot image are placed by inference.] (printed under page 421)
(1) ‹anchor: Adhuc habeo quid mirari› · lemma note, col 859
Adhuc habeo quid mirari. Non placet quod reposuit Erasmus, quid mirari non valeo, nisi addatur satis. Certe illud habent vet. exc. et Remboldus. Est autem locus de voto continentiae conjugum. PAMEL.
"I still have something to wonder at." What Erasmus put, "what I cannot wonder at", does not please, unless "enough" is added. Certainly the old printed edition and Rembold have the former. The passage concerns the vow of continence of married couples. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 421)
(2) ‹anchor: et eunuchi nostri non durant› · lemma note, col 859
Eunuchi nostri non durant. Neque hic arridet lectio Erasmi: Et eunuchi dubitant. PAMEL.
"Our eunuchs do not hold out." Here too Erasmus's reading does not appeal: "And the eunuchs hesitate". PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 421)
(3) ‹anchor: Potestatem unius› · lemma note, col 859 or 860 (lemma not in the image)
Potestatem unius. Adjecerat Erasmus conversationis, sed superflue. PAMEL.
"The power of one." Erasmus had added "conversationis" (of conduct), but superfluously. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 421)
(4) ‹anchor: Non cunctati sunt depellere› · lemma note, col 859 or 860 (lemma not in the image; runs into col 860)
Non cunctati sunt depellere. Hoc rursum ex vet. exc. cum Gravio et Morellio, pro eo quod corrupte Remboldus et caeteri contati. Manutius vero contenti. PAMEL.
"They did not hesitate to drive away." This again from the old printed edition, with Gravius and Morel, instead of the corrupt "contati" of Rembold and the rest; Manutius has "contenti" (content). PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 421)
(5) ‹anchor: Verum fatear, si permittor› · lemma note, col 860 (lemma not in the image)
Verum fatear, si permittor. Etiam haec Morellii et illorum genuina est lectio, pro eo quod Erasmus fateor, si permittar. PAMEL.
"Let me confess the truth, if I am permitted." This too is the genuine reading of Morel and those others, instead of Erasmus's "I confess, if I may be permitted". PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 421)
(6) ‹anchor: Nec minus eos, sed pejus etiam illi confundunt› · lemma note, col 860
Nec minus eos, sed pejus etiam illi confundunt. Mendum cod. Remboldi hic quoque remansit hactenus in excusis, nec minis eos sed poenis. PAMEL.
"Nor less, but even worse, do those put them to shame." The error of Rembold's manuscript has remained here too in the printed editions till now: "nor with threats but with punishments". PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 421)
[EDIT. OXON. NOTAE — lemma notes without call marks; numbered here in print order. Lemmata not visible in the page-foot image are placed by inference.] (printed under page 422)
(1) ‹anchor: De Gallis suis› · lemma note, col 861 (lemma above the image)
De Gallis suis. Galli uti vere annotavit Remboldus erant sacerdotes Cybeles, a Gallo fluvio sic dicti. PAMEL.
"Of their Galli." The Galli, as Rembold truly noted, were priests of Cybele, so called from the river Gallus. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 422)
(2) ‹anchor: meruerunt ad martyrii veniam› · lemma note, col 861 (runs into col 862)
Meruerunt ad martyrii veniam. Reposuit Erasmus palmam, sed quia de peccatoribus loquitur, qui ipso martyrio veniam impetrabant, illud illorum placet. PAMEL.
"Merited to come to the pardon of martyrdom." Erasmus put "palmam" (palm); but since he is speaking of sinners who obtained pardon by martyrdom itself, their reading pleases. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 422)
[EDIT. OXON. NOTAE — lemma notes without call marks; numbered here in print order. Lemmata not visible in the page-foot image are placed by inference.] (printed under page 423)
(1) ‹anchor: Jus tractat vivendi et non edendi› · lemma note, col 863 (lemma above the image)
Jus tractat vivendi et non edendi. Obscurus locus. PAMEL.
"He treats the law of living and not of eating." An obscure passage. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 423)
(2) ‹anchor: Transgressores ordinariae transgressionis› · lemma note, col 863 (lemma above the image)
Transgressores ordinariae transgressionis. Recte sic Erasmus pro eo quod illi ordinari. PAMEL.
"Transgressors of an ordinary transgression." So, rightly, Erasmus, instead of their "ordinari". PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 423)
(3) ‹anchor: Rationabile› · lemma note, col 863 or 864 (lemma above the image)
Rationabile. Et hic et supra alicubi vetus excusus, et Remboldus rationali. PAMEL.
"Reasonable." Here and somewhere above, the old printed edition and Rembold have "rationali". PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 423)
(4) ‹anchor: Alteris placere debent qui alteris vivunt› · lemma note, col 864
Alteris placere debent qui alteris vivunt. Haec quoque genuina est lectio, pro eo quod non male Erasmus, altaribus placere debent, qui de altaribus vivunt. PAMEL.
"Those who live for others ought to please others." This too is the genuine reading, in place of Erasmus's not bad "those who live by the altars ought to please the altars". PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 423)
(5) ‹anchor: ministerium nostrum› · lemma note, col 864
Ministerium nostrum. Prorsus sic legendum cum Morellio pro vestrum, quia consentit Apostolus. PAMEL.
"Our ministry." It should certainly be read so, with Morel, instead of "vestrum" (your), because the Apostle agrees. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 423)
(6) ‹anchor: casus exaltat› · lemma note, col 864
Casus exaltat. Male Erasmus casas, neque vero etiam placet, quod reposuit ipse; rapinas exigit, pro eo quod illi μεταφορικῶς, ripas eripit. PAMEL.
"It exalts falls." Erasmus wrongly has "casas" (huts); nor does what he put in pleases, "rapinas exigit" (it exacts plunder), in place of their figurative "ripas eripit" (it tears away the banks). PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 423)
(7) ‹anchor: multiplices mortes invehit› · lemma note, col 864
Multiplices mortes invehit. Vetus excus. simplices mentes. Remboldus et alii plerique simplices mortes, pro quo Gravius et Manut. mores; Morellius autem multiplices mortes, quod placet maxime. PAMEL.
"It brings in manifold deaths." The old printed edition has "simple minds"; Rembold and most others "simple deaths", for which Gravius and Manutius have "mores" (manners); Morel, however, has "manifold deaths", which pleases most. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 423)
(8) ‹anchor: et pessimae conversationis› · lemma note, col 864
Et pessimae conversationis. Interjecerat Remboldus denuo strages, sed non est opus. PAMEL.
"And of the worst way of life." Rembold had inserted "strages" (slaughters) again, but there is no need. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 423)
[EDIT. OXON. NOTAE — lemma notes without call marks; numbered here in print order. Lemmata not visible in the page-foot image are placed by inference.] (printed under page 424)
(1) ‹anchor: Et sterilitas criminum› · lemma note, col 865 (lemma above the image)
Et sterilitas criminum. Haec lectio vet. excus. genuina est, quia praecedit ubertas, pro qua cum Remboldus legeret cupiditas, reposuit, Erasmus captivitas. PAMEL.
"And barrenness of crimes." This reading of the old printed edition is genuine, because "ubertas" (fruitfulness) precedes; where Rembold read "cupiditas" (greed), Erasmus put "captivitas" (captivity). PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 424)
(2) ‹anchor: Immortalitas enim est memoria illius› · lemma note, col 865 (lemma above the image; runs into col 866)
Immortalitas enim est memoria illius. Contra hic recte non posuit Erasmus immortalitas est enim memoria illius; quia illud reperitur ad verbum Graece. Recte tamen ipse quia pro quae; Graece enim est ὅτι. PAMEL.
"For immortality is the memory of it." Here, on the other hand, Erasmus did not rightly put "immortalitas est enim memoria illius", because the former is found word for word in the Greek. Rightly, however, he has "quia" (because) for "quae" (which); for the Greek is ὅτι. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 424)
(3) ‹anchor: Suspectae pluralitatis› · lemma note, col 865 or 866 (lemma above the image)
Suspectae pluralitatis. Rursum hic legebatur ex mendo cod. Remboldi parilitatis. PAMEL.
"Of suspect plurality." Here again, from an error of Rembold's manuscript, "parilitatis" (of equality) used to be read. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 424)
(4) ‹anchor: Non habet claritatem› · lemma note, col 865 or 866 (lemma above the image)
Non habet claritatem. Ego negationem superfluam censeo. PAMEL.
"It has no brightness." I judge the negative superfluous. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 424)
(5) ‹anchor: ut omnes pro illa splendere non dubitent› · lemma note, col 866
Ut omnes pro illa splendere non dubitent. Metaphrasis efficit ut Erasmus reponeret spondere. PAMEL.
"That all may not hesitate to shine on its behalf." A paraphrase led Erasmus to put "spondere" (to pledge). PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 424)
[EDIT. OXON. NOTAE — lemma notes without call marks; numbered here in print order. Lemmata not visible in the page-foot image are placed by inference.] (printed under page 425)
(1) ‹anchor: Ut providos, non ut praecipites tueatur› · lemma note, col 867 (lemma above the image)
Ut providos, non ut praecipites tueatur. Adjecimus cum Morelio ex vet. exc. et Remboldo ut, omissa tamen voce nos: cum iisdem. PAMEL.
"That he may protect the prudent, not the headlong." With Morel, from the old printed edition and Rembold, we have added "ut", leaving out, however, the word "nos", with the same sources. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 425)
(2) ‹anchor: fortiter facere ducis› · lemma note, col 867
Fortiter facere ducis, etc. Cum iisdem adjecimus fortiter. PAMEL.
"To act bravely ... of the general," etc. With the same sources we have added "fortiter" (bravely). PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 425)
(3) ‹anchor: multo magis perperam› · lemma note, col 867
Multo magis perperam. Hactenus corruptissime ex vitio codicis Remboldi legebatur per perituram. PAMEL.
"Much more wrongly." Until now, most corruptly, through a fault of Rembold's manuscript, "per perituram" was read. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 425)
(4) ‹anchor: quid spiritales deceat recordemini› · lemma note, col 867 (runs into col 868)
Quid spiritales deceat, recordemini. Remboldus denuo corrupte recordetur, pro quo Erasmus recordemur. At illud genuinum est. PAMEL.
"Remember what befits spiritual men." Rembold, again corruptly, has "recordetur", for which Erasmus has "recordemur" (let us remember). But the former is genuine. PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 425)
(5) ‹anchor: inter flagitiosorum armamenta› · lemma note, col 867
Inter flagitiosorum armamenta. Reposuerat Erasmus armenta. PAMEL.
"Among the armouries of the wicked." Erasmus had put "armenta" (herds). PAMELIUS.
(printed under page 425)
(6) ‹anchor: Protervitatis enim jam coepta› · lemma note, col 868
Protervitatis. Male haec cohaerent; nec promptum est conjicere quid sibi velit scriptor hic: qui etiam S. Scripturas quas passim adducit, pro libitu detorquet. Videtur per coepta intelligere initia.
"Of wantonness." These words hang together badly; nor is it easy to guess what the writer means here, who also twists at will the Holy Scriptures he cites throughout. By "coepta" he seems to mean "beginnings". [No signature printed.]
(printed under page 425)
[STEPH. BALUZII NOTAE — lemma notes without call marks, keyed by chapter; numbered here in print order. NB: this page's text is not De singularitate clericorum but the following pseudo-Cyprianic tract on the twelve abuses (Cap. I–II), so these notes belong to that work and to its own unit, they stand here only because the page is shared. Lemmata not visible in the page-foot image are placed by inference.] (printed under page 426)
(1) ‹anchor: Cap. I — Constituentis› · lemma note, col 869 (lemma above the image)
Cap. I. — Constituentis. Praedicantis apud Augustinum, tom. 6. Paulo ante apud eumdem complere.
Ch. I. — "Of one who establishes." "Of one who preaches" in Augustine, vol. 6. A little before, the same has "complere" (to fulfil).
(printed under page 426)
(2) ‹anchor: Rectoris› · lemma note, col 869
Rectoris. Largitoris, cod. Corbeiensis.
"Of their ruler." "Of their bestower", Corbie manuscript.
(printed under page 426)
(3) ‹anchor: Et gravioribus› · lemma note, col 869
Et gravioribus Sic duo codices mss. Reg. et Colbert. Aliter in edit. acrioribus flagellis gravioribusque vindictis vapulabit. Paulo ante apud Aug. solo suo merito.
"And heavier." So two manuscripts, the Royal and the Colbert. Otherwise in the editions: "shall be beaten with sharper scourges and heavier punishments". A little before, Augustine's [edition] has "by his own sole merit".
(printed under page 426)
(4) ‹anchor: Cap. II — Competit› · lemma note, col 869 or 870 (lemma below the image)
Cap. II. — Competit. Convenit apud Aug.
Ch. II. — "Is fitting." "Convenit" in Augustine.
(printed under page 426)
(5) ‹anchor: Deseruit› · lemma note, col 870
Deseruit. Deserit in duobus mss. et Morell. In sequenti periodo similiter legimus ut apud Aug. deseruit, quamvis legatur deserit in codicibus mss. et editis operum Cypriani.
"Has deserted." "Deserit" (deserts) in two manuscripts and Morel. In the next sentence likewise we read "deseruit", as in Augustine, though "deserit" is read in the manuscripts and in the editions of Cyprian's works.
(printed under page 426)
(6) ‹anchor: quomodo futura habitatio› · lemma note, col 870
Quam. Hanc vocem addidi ex edit. Aug. ubi sic legitur: Quam quomodo futurae aditus propere comprehendatur. In cod. Corb. futurae aditus prosperitatis; eamdem editionem sequimur in aliis nonnullis locis, de quibus necesse non est admonere.
"Than." I have added this word from the edition of Augustine, where it reads: "than how the entrance of the future [dwelling] may be quickly grasped". In the Corbie manuscript: "the entrance of future prosperity". We follow the same edition in some other places, of which there is no need to give notice.
(printed under page 426)
(7) ‹anchor: secum ad peccatum› · lemma note, col 870
Secum. Deest ea vox in duobus mss.
"With it." That word is missing in two manuscripts.
(printed under page 426)