PL 4 · cols. 298–301
Cyprianus, Epistolae XXII-LI
Letters XXVII–XXVIII
Migne Reading Room
PL 4 · cols. 298–301
Letters XXVII–XXVIII
(g) ‹anchor: not visible in the foot image› · call in col 298
Ubi qui detenti gloriosas, Lam. Ebor. NC. 1. Manut.
"Ubi qui detenti gloriosas" (where those who, detained, glorious ...) Lambeth, York, first New College manuscript, Manutius.
(printed under page 144)
(j) ‹anchor: not visible in the foot image› · call in col 298
Optamus te, frater Rigalt. Oxon.
"Optamus te, frater" (we wish you, brother) Rigault, Oxford edition.
(printed under page 144)
(k) ‹anchor: not visible in the foot image› · call in col 298
Loquitur Ecclesiae Bod. 1.
"Loquitur Ecclesiae" (speaks ... of the Church) first Bodleian manuscript.
(printed under page 144)
(l) ‹anchor: divina lege› · call in col 298
Hoc ita divina lege Bod. 1.
"Hoc ita divina lege" (this thus by divine law) first Bodleian manuscript.
STEPH. BALUZII NOTAE. (Baluze, lemma "Vaporem restinguit", from p. 143) · col 297
(continued) Vetus Remigianus, morbum restinguit et finit. Ita etiam Gratianopolitanus.
(Baluze, lemma "VII. — Nisi patientia") · col 297 VII.—414 Nisi patientia. Idem codex Remigianus, non est impatientia. Ita etiam Sorbonicus, Fuxensis et Gratianopolitanus. In recentiore Remigiano et in Divionensi: Non est nisi patientia in morbis. Lucanus IX: Gaudet patientia duris.
VII. — 414 "Nisi patientia" (except patience). The same Remigian manuscript: "non est impatientia" (it is not impatience). So too the Sorbonne, Foix and Grenoble manuscripts. In the more recent Remigian and the Dijon: "Non est nisi patientia in morbis" (there is nothing but patience in diseases). Lucan IX:
"Endurance rejoices in hardships." (Baluze, lemma "Intolerabili festinatione") · col 297 Intolerabili festinatione. Vetera exemplaria, intolerabilem festinationem communicationis. Sed hanc lectionem Pamelius ait esse pessimam.
"Intolerabili festinatione" (with intolerable haste). The old copies: "intolerabilem festinationem communicationis" (an intolerable haste for communion). But Pamelius says this reading is very bad.
(Baluze, lemma "Querula") · col 297 Querula. Quidam libri veteres, querelosa.
"Querula" (complaining). Some old books: "querelosa" (querulous).
(Baluze, lemma "Optamus te") · col 297 Optamus te. Revocavimus hanc clausulam veterum editionum, quam reperimus etiam in quatuor antiquis codicibus. Nescio autem qua auctoritate Rigaltius aliam induxit, quam ego nuspiam reperi. Angli tamen eam retinuerunt.
"Optamus te" (we wish you). We have brought back this closing formula of the old editions, which we found also in four old manuscripts. I do not know on what authority Rigault brought in another, which I have found nowhere. The English editors, however, kept it.
(Baluze, lemma "Epist. XXVII") · col 297 Epist. XXVII. — Haec epistola in veteri libro sancti Dionysii Remensis et in uno meo est anepigrapha. In editione Morelliana dicitur esse Celerini ad lapsos. In editione Manutiana, quae prima omnium est, et in libro Fuxensi, Cyprianus lapsis. Quae est vera lectio.
Letter XXVII. — This letter is without heading in the old book of St Denis of Reims and in one of mine. In Morel's edition it is said to be Celerinus's to the lapsed. In Manutius's edition, which is the first of all, and in the Foix book: "Cyprian to the lapsed". This is the true reading.
(Baluze, lemma "I. — Cujus praecepta") · col 297 to col 298 I.—Cujus praecepta. Sequi in hoc loco placuit scripturam libri Fuxensis, quam puto esse meliorem ea quam praeferunt editiones Manutii et Morellii et vetus liber meus, ubi scriptum est, cujus praecepta debemus metuere et observare. Codex sancti Dionysii Remensis, praecepta servire et observare.
I. — "Cujus praecepta" (whose precepts). In this place I chose to follow the text of the Foix book, which I think better than the one shown by the editions of Manutius and Morel and my old book, where is written "cujus praecepta debemus metuere et observare" (whose precepts we must fear and observe). The manuscript of St Denis of Reims: "praecepta servire et observare" (to serve and observe the precepts).
(Baluze, lemma "Non vincent eam") · col 298 Non vincent eam. Ita etiam in libro de Unitate Ecclesiae, pag. 194. Codex Fuxensis, non praevalebunt adversus eam. Apud Pacianum in epistola ad Sympronianum contra tractatus Novatianorum, non convalescent adversus eam.
"Non vincent eam" (shall not conquer it). So too in the book On the Unity of the Church, p. 194. The Foix manuscript: "non praevalebunt adversus eam" (shall not prevail against it). In Pacian, in the letter to Sympronianus against the treatises of the Novatianists: "non convalescent adversus eam" (shall not grow strong against it).
(Baluze, lemma "Tibi dabo claves") · col 298 Tibi dabo claves. Quamvis istic claves non dentur Petro, sed promittantur, veteres tamen existimarunt et recte, datas esse, easque solum Petrum accepisse ait Optatus, sed communicandas cum caeteris. Gerebat enim, ut ait sanctus Augustinus, totius Ecclesiae figurata generalitate personam; et erant utique caeteri Apostoli quod fuit Petrus, pari consortio praediti et honoris et potestatis, ut ait Cyprianus in libro de Unitate Ecclesiae. Vide epistolam Stephani episcopi Larissaeae ad Bonifacium papam II, editam in collectione Romana Holstenii, epistolam Mapinii episcopi Remensis apud Freherum et Duchesnium, et Franciscum Masonum lib. IV, cap. 3, 4, de Ministerio Anglicano.
"Tibi dabo claves" (to you I will give the keys). Although here the keys are not given to Peter but promised, the ancients nevertheless held, and rightly, that they were given; and Optatus says that Peter alone received them, but to be shared with the rest. For, as St Augustine says, he bore the person of the whole Church in a figured generality; and the other Apostles were certainly what Peter was, endowed with an equal partnership of both honour and power, as Cyprian says in the book On the Unity of the Church. See the letter of Stephen, bishop of Larissa, to Pope Boniface II, published in Holste's Roman collection, the letter of Mapinius, bishop of Reims, in Freher and Duchesne, and Francis Mason, book IV, chapters 3, 4, On the English Ministry.
(printed under page 144)
LECTIONES VARIANTES. (printed under page 145)
(a) ‹anchor: not visible in the foot image› · call in col 299
Voluisse, quando Impr.
"Voluisse, quando" (to have wished, when) printed editions.
(printed under page 145)
(b) ‹anchor: not visible in the foot image› · call in col 299
Ne Domini Oxon.
"Ne Domini" (lest ... of the Lord) Oxford edition.
(printed under page 145)
(c) ‹anchor: omni humilitate› · call in col 300
Utilitate Bod. 1.
"Utilitate" (with advantage) first Bodleian manuscript.
(printed under page 145)
(d) ‹anchor: pleno Dominum› · call in col 300
Domini Bod. 1.
"Domini" (of the Lord) first Bodleian manuscript.
(printed under page 145)
(e) ‹anchor: Qui vos felices› · call in col 300
Nescientes scriptum esse: Qui vos et beatos Bod.
"Nescientes scriptum esse: Qui vos et beatos" (not knowing that it is written: Those who [call] you blessed too) Bodleian manuscript.
(printed under page 145)
(f) ‹anchor: dum blanditiis› · call in col 300
Blandientis Conjic. Rigalt.
"Blandientis" (of one flattering) Rigault's conjecture.
STEPH. BALUZII NOTAE. (Baluze, lemma "Ut Ecclesiae... facerent") · col 299 Ut Ecclesiae... facerent. Ista addita sunt ex libro meo vetere et ex editione Morellii. Quae miror praetermissa fuisse a Pamelio et Rigaltio, cum absque iis sensus non sit integer. Recte ergo fecerunt Angli ista reponentes. Reinhartus omisit, quia ea non inveniebat in editione Rigaltii.
"Ut Ecclesiae... facerent" (that they might make ... of the Church). These words were added from my old book and from Morel's edition. I wonder that they were left out by Pamelius and Rigault, since without them the sense is not complete. The English editors therefore did right to restore them. Reinhart omitted them, because he did not find them in Rigault's edition.
(Baluze, lemma "Quando Ecclesia") · col 299 Quando Ecclesia. Verba sunt lapsorum ad Cyprianum.
"Quando Ecclesia" (since the Church). These are the words of the lapsed to Cyprian.
(Baluze, lemma "Invicta") · col 299 Invicta. Non admonerem hanc vocem, quam praeferunt editiones Manutii, Morellii, et Pamelii, quae exstat etiam in libro meo veteri et in Gratianopolitano, positam a me esse in hoc loco, nisi Rigaltius et editio Anglicana pro ea haberent, invidiam, nullo sensu aut certe pessimo. Puto autem Rigaltium eam pravam lectionem accepisse ex libro Fuxensi, quo usum esse illum constat.
"Invicta" (unconquered). I would not point out that I have put in this place this word, which the editions of Manutius, Morel and Pamelius show and which stands also in my old book and in the Grenoble manuscript, were it not that Rigault and the English edition have in its place "invidiam" (ill will), with no sense, or certainly the worst. I think Rigault took that bad reading from the Foix book, which he is known to have used.
(Baluze, lemma "II. — Benignitate") · col 300 II. — Benignitate. Liber meus et editio Morelliana, bonitatem.
II. — "Benignitate" (by the kindness). My book and Morel's edition: "bonitatem" (goodness).
(Baluze, lemma "Epist. XXVIII") · col 300 Epist. XXVIII. — Haec epistola primum edita est a Manutio. Pamelius nullum illius vetus exemplar habuit. Angli unum habuerunt ex bibliotheca Bodleiana. Ego unum habui ex Colbertina, quod fuit olim collegii Fuxensis. Habui etiam unum ex mea, aliud ex urbe Gratianopolitana. Porro epistola ista bis descripta est in libro Fuxensi.
Letter XXVIII. — This letter was first published by Manutius. Pamelius had no old copy of it. The English editors had one from the Bodleian Library. I had one from the Colbert library, which once belonged to the College of Foix. I had also one from my own library, another from the city of Grenoble. Further, this letter is copied twice in the Foix book.
(Baluze, lemma "I. — Composita") · col 300 I.—Composita. Ita codex Fuxensis et editiones Manutii et Morellii. At codex meus et Gratianopolitanus praeferunt corrupta. Sic etiam in uno Bodleiano legi monuerunt Angli.
I. — "Composita" (contrived). So the Foix manuscript and the editions of Manutius and Morel. But my manuscript and the Grenoble show "corrupta" (corrupt). The English editors noted that it is so read in one Bodleian manuscript too.
(Baluze, lemma "II. — Blanditiis") · col 300 II.—Blanditiis. Tacitus lib. I Historiarum: Blanditiae pessimum veri affectus venenum. 415 Et in vita Agricolae: Pessimum inimicorum genus laudantes. Cicero (continues)
II. — "Blanditiis" (by flatteries). Tacitus, Histories book I: "Flattery, the worst poison of true affection." 415 And in the Life of Agricola: "Those who praise, the worst kind of enemies." Cicero (continues)
(printed under page 145)
LECTIONES VARIANTES. (printed under page 146)
(a) ‹anchor: not visible in the foot image› · call in col 301
Cognitio haec differatur Bod. 1.
"Cognitio haec differatur" (let this inquiry be deferred) first Bodleian manuscript.
(printed under page 146)