PL 4 · cols. 329–338
Cyprianus, Epistolae XXII-LI
Letters XXXVIII–XL
Migne Reading Room
PL 4 · cols. 329–338
Letters XXXVIII–XL
<!-- Two layers: LECTIONES VARIANTES (called a–f) and STEPH. BALUZII NOTAE (lemma notes, labelled [Baluze]). Calls (a) and (b) are in col 329's text; (c) is called at the top of col 330. The Tertullus note marked "(continues)" at the foot of p. 157 does not visibly resume at the head of this page's Baluze notes, which open with a new lemma; check the full page. -->
(printed under page 158)
(a) ‹anchor: caetera sollicitudine› · call in col 329
Pro certa sollicitudine Ver.
"Pro certa sollicitudine" (out of sure concern): Ver.
(printed under page 158)
(b) ‹anchor: fraudes veteres› · call in col 329
Fraudes suas Bod. 1.
"Fraudes suas" (his frauds): Bodleian 1.
(printed under page 158)
(c) ‹anchor: a parente (col 330)› · call in col 330
A pastore oves separare et filios a parente secernere Bod. 1.
"A pastore oves separare et filios a parente secernere" (to separate the sheep from the shepherd and to part the sons from the parent): Bodleian 1.
(printed under page 158)
(Baluze, lemma "Immortalitatem") · col 329 Immortalitatem. Codex Fuxensis, ad immortalitatis gloriosae palmam mortis exitu transeunt. Salustius in Jugurtha : Etenim nemo ignavia immortalis factus.
"Immortalitatem" (to immortality). The Foix manuscript: "ad immortalitatis gloriosae palmam mortis exitu transeunt" (pass over by the departure of death to the glorious palm of immortality). Sallust in the Jugurtha: "For no one has been made immortal by idleness."
(printed under page 158) (Baluze, lemma "Adacti") · col 329 Adacti. Ita plerique libri veteres et editiones. Morellius posuit adjecti, quam lectionem ego inveni in libro Gratianopolitano. Angli scripserunt victi ex fide codicis Bodleiani. Eamdem ego lectionem reperi in septem codicibus antiquis. Et tamen praefero veterem.
"Adacti" (driven). So most of the old books and editions. Morel put "adjecti" (cast down), a reading I found in the Grenoble book. The English editors wrote "victi" (overcome) on the authority of the Bodleian manuscript. I found the same reading in seven old manuscripts. And yet I prefer the old one.
(printed under page 158) (Baluze, lemma "Pauperibus") · col 329 Pauperibus. Vetus codex Remigianus habet fratribus.
"Pauperibus" (to the poor). The old manuscript of St Remigius has "fratribus" (to the brethren).
(printed under page 158) (Baluze, lemma "Epist. XXXVIII.") · col 329 Epist. xxxviii. — Haec epistola primum prodiit in editione Manutiana. Duo porro vetera illius exemplaria habuerunt Angli, unum ex bibliotheca Vaticana, aliud ex Bodleiana. Ego illam contuli cum quatuor antiquis ; quorum unum extat in bibliotheca sancti Dionysii Remensis, aliud, quod fuit olim collegii Fuxensis, extat nunc in Colbertina, tertium in mea : quartum habui ex urbe Gratianopolitana.
Letter XXXVIII. — This letter first appeared in the edition of Manutius. The English editors had two old copies of it, one from the Vatican library, the other from the Bodleian. I collated it with four old ones: one of them is in the library of St Denis at Reims; another, which once belonged to the college of Foix, is now in the Colbert library; the third is in mine; the fourth I had from the city of Grenoble.
(printed under page 158) <!-- note (Q4): Baluze's notes on col 329's text added from the foot image. "Et tamen praefero" is printed with damaged type (n and p broken) and read so; "re-peri" is joined. The next note, "I.—Expungeretis" (lemma in col 330's text), begins at the foot of col 329 and runs into col 330's foot ending "RIGALT."; it belongs to col 330's notes and is not set here. Ligatures æ/œ set as ae/oe. -->
(Pamel., Rigalt., Baluz., XXXVIII. Paris., XXXVII. Oxon., Lips., XLI.)
(Pamelius, Rigault, Baluze, 38. Paris, 37. Oxford, Leipzig, 41.)
ARGUMENTUM. — Felicissimus, una cum seditionis suae sociis, a communione omnium arcendus.
ARGUMENT. — Felicissimus, together with the associates of his sedition, is to be kept from the communion of all.
<!-- note: Column 329 is the left half of page 158 (cols 329–330). Upper column: tail of Ep. XXVII (Cyprian's text, ending "Valete."), then the heading "EPISTOLA XXXVIII" (with Migne's running number 51), the editions concordance line, the letter's title "AD CALDONIUM, HERCULANUM ET CAETEROS, DE ABSTINENDO FELICISSIMO" (treated as the letter's title, not set here), the italic Argumentum (set), then Cyprian's text from "I. Cyprianus Caldonio…". The editors' prose is wholly in this column: it begins at the concordance line and ends at "arcendus." Foot apparatus: LECTIONES VARIANTES a–c in this column, then STEPH. BALUZII NOTAE opening with the new lemma "Immortalitatem". Nothing runs over from the foot of page 157 (cols 327–328): no note was left open there, so no tail is set. The foot notes themselves are set elsewhere. -->
(d) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 330
Illi Rig.
"Illi" (they / to him): Rigault.
(printed under page 158)
(e) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 330
Diligentiæ vestræ Bod. 1.
"Diligentiae vestrae" (to your diligence): Bodleian 1.
(printed under page 158)
(f) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 330
Sic edd. et Vat. In monte Manut. Morel. Pamel. Oxon. Lips.
So the editions and the Vatican MS. "In monte" (on the mountain): Manutius, Morel, Pamelius, Oxford, Leipzig.
[Baluze] Immortalitatem. · col 329 Immortalitatem. Codex Fuxensis, ad immortalitatis gloriosæ palmam mortis exitu transeunt. Salustius in Jugurtha : Etenim nemo ignavia immortalis factus.
"Immortality." The Foix manuscript: "they pass over by the exit of death to the palm of glorious immortality." Sallust in the Jugurtha: "For no one was ever made immortal by sloth."
[Baluze] Adacti. · col 329 Adacti. Ita plerique libri veteres et editiones. Morellius posuit adjecti, quam lectionem ego inveni in libro Gratianopolitano. Angli scripserunt victi ex fide codicis Bodleiani. Eamdem ego lectionem reperi in septem codicibus antiquis. Et tamen præfero veterem.
"Adacti" (driven). So most old books and editions. Morel set "adjecti," a reading I found in the Grenoble book. The English wrote "victi" (overcome) on the authority of the Bodleian manuscript. I found the same reading in seven old manuscripts. And yet I prefer the old one.
[Baluze] Pauperibus. · col 329 Pauperibus. Vetus codex Remigianus habet fratribus.
"Pauperibus" (to the poor). The old manuscript of St Remi has "fratribus" (to the brethren).
[Baluze] Epist. xxxviii. · col 329 Epist. xxxviii. — Hæc epistola primum prodiit in editione Manutiana. Duo porro vetera illius exemplaria habuerunt Angli, unum ex bibliotheca Vaticana, aliud ex Bodleiana. Ego illam contuli cum quatuor antiquis ; quorum unum extat in bibliotheca sancti Dionysii Remensis, aliud, quod fuit olim collegii Fuxensis, extat nunc in Colbertina, tertium in mea : quartum habui ex urbe Gratianopolitana.
Letter 38. — This letter first appeared in the Manutius edition. The English had two old copies of it, one from the Vatican library, the other from the Bodleian. I collated it with four old ones: one is in the library of St Denis at Reims; another, once the Foix college's, is now in the Colbert library; the third is in mine; the fourth I had from the city of Grenoble.
[Baluze] I.— Expungeretis. · cols 329–330 I.— Expungeretis. Matricula necessitatum continebat nomina personarum egentium. Cujus ergo necessitas beneficentia fratrum sublevabatur, ejus et nomen expungebatur. Sic beneficentia necessitatem et cum necessitate nomen egentis expungebat. Rigalt.
1. — "Expungeretis" (you should strike off). The register of needs held the names of needy persons. When anyone's need was relieved by the brethren's kindness, his name too was struck off. So kindness struck off the need, and with the need the name of the needy man. Rigault.
[Baluze] Additamento. · col 330 Additamento. Codex Fuxensis, exercere addidit tamen tamquam sua satis esse desideria. Meus, exerceret, addidi tamen tamquam sua satis essent.
"Additamento." The Foix manuscript: "exercere addidit tamen tamquam sua satis esse desideria." Mine: "exerceret, addidi tamen tamquam sua satis essent."
[Baluze] Accesserant. · col 330 Accesserant. Codex sancti Dionysii, arcessebantur.
"Accesserant" (they had come). The St Denis manuscript: "arcessebantur" (they were summoned).
[Baluze] In morte. · col 330 In morte. Ita veteres libri. Manutius, Morellius, et Pamelius maluerunt in monte. Ita etiam Angli, tametsi moneant in codice Vaticano scriptum esse in morte. Nescio autem quem istic montem apud Carthaginem comminiscatur Pamelius. Et tamen Rigaltius multum approbavit ejus opinionem. Vide quæ idem Rigaltius de monte Bellonæ scribit in addendis ad observationes suas in Tertullianum pag. 127. Baronius anno 254 legit in monte, et hinc repetit originem Montensium sive Donatistarum. Vide notas nostras ad caput 11 Lactantii de Mortibus Persecutorum et ad acta purgationis Cæciliani.
"In death." So the old books. Manutius, Morel and Pamelius preferred "on the mountain." So too the English, though they note that the Vatican manuscript has "in death." I do not know what mountain near Carthage Pamelius is imagining here; and yet Rigault strongly approved his opinion. See what Rigault writes on the mount of Bellona in the addenda to his observations on Tertullian, p. 127. Baronius, at the year 254, reads "on the mountain," and from this traces the origin of the Montenses or Donatists. See our notes on chapter 11 of Lactantius "On the Deaths of the Persecutors" and on the acts of the purgation of Caecilian.
(printed under page 158)
<!-- Two layers: one variant reading (a), from LECTIONES VARIANTES (its heading is above the cropped foot), and STEPH. BALUZII NOTAE (lemma notes, labelled [Baluze]). The call is above the cropped foot. The Greek word in the Budinarium note is faint in this crop; it is read as βουτίνη (UNSURE; check at higher zoom). -->
(printed under page 159)
(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 331
Viritus MR. Thu.
"Viritus" (man by man): MR, de Thou's MS.
[Baluze] II.— Augendus. · col 331 II.— Augendus. Hic homo confundendus non est cum Augendo confessore cujus mentio est in Epistola xlviii, pag. 62.
2. — "Augendus." This man is not to be confused with Augendus the confessor mentioned in Letter 48, p. 62.
[Baluze] Carthaginem. · col 331 Carthaginem. Fuit nuper vir quidam doctus et eruditus qui locum istum existimans esse mendosum censuit hanc vocem esse amovendam ab hoc loco et scribendum esse Romam. Et sane argumenta ejus ita fortia sunt et valida ut necessaria videatur hæc emendatio, quamvis omnes editiones et omnia vetera exemplaria, ut ipse annotat et verum est, habeant Carthaginem. Quæ sententia hinc quoque confirmari posse videtur quod epistola ista scripta est in initiis schismatis Felicissimi, qui de Romano itinere cogitabat, ut in Epistola lv, pag. 85, docet Cyprianus. Et ideo operæ pretium videbatur illum prævenire et admonere clerum Romanum ne se decipi ac falli sineret fraude et perfidia hominis scelerati.
"Carthage." There was lately a learned and erudite man who, thinking this place corrupt, judged that this word should be removed from it and "Rome" written. And indeed his arguments are so strong and sound that the correction seems necessary, although all the editions and all the old copies, as he himself notes and as is true, have "Carthage." This view seems also to be confirmed by the fact that this letter was written at the beginning of Felicissimus' schism, when he was thinking of a journey to Rome, as Cyprian shows in Letter 55, p. 85. And so it seemed worth while to forestall him and to warn the Roman clergy not to let themselves be deceived and misled by the fraud and treachery of a wicked man.
[Baluze] Epist. xxxix. · col 331 Epist. xxxix. — Hanc epistolam, cujus duo tantum vetera exemplaria habui, unum ex bibliotheca mea, aliud ex urbe Gratianopolitana, primum prodiit ex typographia Manutii. Variæ sunt autem opiniones ad quem vel ad quos scripta sit. Ego non dubito quin sit Caldonii reddentis Cypriano rationem eorum quæ ab eo et aliis vicariis collegis suis gesta fuerant adversus Felicissimum et socios ejus. Itaque optima est lectio librorum qui habent debuisti. Solus enim Caldonius scribit nomine suo et collegarum suorum. Arbitror [487] autem litteras scriptas ad clerum Romanum habuisse aliam formam et explicasse latius, ut par erat, causam Felicissimi, addita porro fuisse nomina eorum qui se Felicissimo junxerant, uti Cyprianus præscripserat. Hanc meam opinionem confirmat codex Bodleianus ab illustrissimo episcopo Oxoniensi laudatus, in quo epistola ista dicitur scripta ad Cyprianum. Cæterum assentiri non possum iis qui putant illam esse tabellam publice affixam et propositam in ecclesia Carthaginiensi. Est enim certo epistola Caldonii. Istud tamen non impedit quin aliquid simile publicatum sit in ecclesia.
Letter 39. — This letter, of which I had only two old copies, one from my own library, the other from the city of Grenoble, first came out from the press of Manutius. Opinions vary as to whom it was written to. I do not doubt that it is Caldonius', giving Cyprian an account of what he and his other fellow-deputies had done against Felicissimus and his associates. So the best reading is that of the books which have "debuisti" (you ought, singular), for Caldonius alone writes, in his own name and his colleagues'. I think [487] that the letter written to the Roman clergy had another form and set out the case of Felicissimus more fully, as was fitting, and that the names of those who had joined Felicissimus were added, as Cyprian had directed. This view of mine is confirmed by the Bodleian manuscript cited by the most illustrious bishop of Oxford, in which this letter is said to be written to Cyprian. But I cannot agree with those who think it a notice publicly posted and displayed in the church of Carthage. For it is certainly Caldonius' letter. That does not prevent something similar having been published in the church.
[Baluze] Extorribus. · col 331 Extorribus. Veteres libri et editio Manutii istic et paulo post habent extorrentibus. Quæ lectio confirmari potest ex iis quæ observata sunt supra ad Epistolas xiv et xviii.
"Extorribus" (to the exiles). The old books and Manutius' edition have, here and a little after, "extorrentibus." This reading can be confirmed from what was observed above on Letters 14 and 18.
[Baluze] Sarcinatricem. · col 332 Sarcinatricem. Salmasius ad scriptores Historiæ Augustæ, pag. 408, scripsit farcinatricem, forte errore typographi. Nonius Marcellus : Sarcinatricis, non, ut quidam volunt, sarsitricis, quasi a sarciendo, sed magis a sarcinis, quod plurimum vestium sumant, Varro onos lyras : Homines rusticos in vindemia incondita cantare sarcinatricis in machinis.
"Sarcinatricem" (seamstress). Salmasius, on the writers of the Historia Augusta, p. 408, wrote "farcinatricem," perhaps by a printer's error. Nonius Marcellus: "Sarcinatricis, not, as some would have it, sarsitricis, as though from sarcire (to mend), but rather from sarcinae (packs), because they take in a great many garments; Varro, 'The Ass and the Lyre': country people at the vintage sing rough songs at the seamstress's frames."
[Baluze] Annotatione. · col 332 Annotatione. Id est subscriptione. Vide novam nostram collectionem Conciliorum, pag. 1011, 1090.
"Annotatione." That is, by a subscription. See our new collection of the Councils, pp. 1011, 1090.
[Baluze] Debuisti. · col 332 Debuisti. Ita editio Manutii et libri veteres. Morellius et Pamelius posuerunt debuistis, itemque editio Anglicana. Sed ista lectio non est bona. Epistola enim est Caldonii scribentis, ut dixi, nomine suo et collegarum suorum ad Cyprianum. Rigaltius, tametsi posuerit in contextu debuistis, in observationibus censet legendum esse debuisti.
"Debuisti." So Manutius' edition and the old books. Morel and Pamelius set "debuistis," and so does the English edition. But that reading is not good, for the letter is Caldonius', writing, as I said, in his own name and his colleagues' to Cyprian. Rigault, though he set "debuistis" in the text, judges in his observations that "debuisti" should be read.
[Baluze] Budinarium. · col 332 Budinarium. Vetus liber meus habet budianarium. At Salmasius in loco mox laudato censet reponi debere butinarium a voce Græca βουτίνη apud Hesychium, et inde dictum butinum, quod acetabulum significat. Si ea conjectura esset certa, facile amplecterer opinionem Salmasii, cum Quintilianus, lib. i, cap. 4, scribat quamdam cognationem esse inter litteras t et d, ac propterea facile existimarem Cyprianum heic loqui de artifice acetabulorum sive lagenarum, ut interpretatur Cangius, id est parvorum vasorum in quibus reponuntur olea, vina, et alia liquida, præsertim cum voce butina utatur Joannes Damascenus a Cangio citatus. Plinius, lib. xxi, cap. 34, scribit, cum acetabuli mensura dicitur, significari heminæ quartam partem, id est drachmas quindecim. Illustrissimus episcopus Oxoniensis contendit legendum esse istic apud Cyprianum burdonarium, qua voce significari mulionem ait. Sed hæc conjectura mihi non probatur, cum nihil in verbo budinarium extet ex quo ea sumi possit, præsertim cum burdonarii nuspiam reperiantur apud auctores linguæ Latinæ. Si genus illud farciminis quod nos vocamus bodinos fuisset olim in Africa et vocabulum accedens ad nostrum vulgare deprehendi posset in aliquo veteri scriptore, absoluta res esset. Verum nihil istiusmodi reperio.
"Budinarium." My old book has "budianarium." But Salmasius, in the place just cited, judges that "butinarium" should be restored, from the Greek word βουτίνη in Hesychius, whence "butinum," meaning a small cup. If that conjecture were certain I should readily embrace Salmasius' view, since Quintilian (book 1, ch. 4) writes that there is a certain kinship between the letters t and d; and so I should readily think that Cyprian here speaks of a maker of cups or flasks, as Du Cange interprets it, that is, of small vessels in which oils, wines and other liquids are kept, especially as John Damascene, cited by Du Cange, uses the word "butina." Pliny (book 21, ch. 34) writes that when the measure of an acetabulum is named, a quarter of a hemina is meant, that is, fifteen drachms. The most illustrious bishop of Oxford maintains that "burdonarium" should be read here in Cyprian, a word which he says means a mule-driver. But I do not approve that conjecture, since there is nothing in the word "budinarium" from which it could be drawn, especially as burdonarii are found nowhere in the authors of the Latin tongue. If the kind of sausage we call "bodins" had once existed in Africa, and a word close to our vernacular one could be found in some old writer, the matter would be settled. But I find nothing of the kind.
[Baluze] Epist. xl. — I. Virtius. · col 332 (continues) Epist. xl. — I. Virtius. Ita scripsi, secutus editio- (continues)
Letter 40. — 1. "Virtius." So I have written, following the edition- (continues)
(printed under page 159)
<!-- Two layers: LECTIONES VARIANTES (called a–e) and STEPH. BALUZII NOTAE (lemma notes, labelled [Baluze]). Calls (c) and (d) are visible in col 333, though (d) is printed under the right-hand column. The marginal "488" in the Baluze notes is kept as [488]. -->
(printed under page 160)
(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 333
Ministeriis Lam. Ebor. NC. 1. Thu. Mich.
"Ministeriis" (to the ministries): Lamonius, York, NC 1, de Thou, St Michael's.
(printed under page 160)
(b) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 333
Perficit Rigalt. Vict. Perfert Bod. 3.
"Perficit" (accomplishes): Rigault, St Victor's MS. "Perfert" (carries through): Bodleian 3.
(printed under page 160)
(c) ‹anchor: Nunc apparuit› · call in col 333
Nunc apparebit Lin.
"Nunc apparebit" (now it will appear): Lincoln.
(printed under page 160)
(d) ‹anchor: Felicissimi factio› · call in col 333
Provectis Vic. Fat. Profectio Thu.
"Provectis": St Victor's MS, Fat. "Profectio" (setting out): de Thou.
(printed under page 160)
(e) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 334
Allectare Bod. 1. Thu.
"Allectare" (to entice): Bodleian 1, de Thou.
[Baluze] (continued) · col 333 nem Manutii, et quia ita scriptum vidi in multis codicibus antiquis. Quædam editiones et quidam libri veteres habent Briccius. Ista sunt levioris momenti. Et tamen erant annotanda.
(continued) …of Manutius, and because I saw it so written in many old manuscripts. Some editions and some old books have "Briccius." These are matters of slight weight; and yet they had to be noted.
[Baluze] Ecclesiasticæ administrationi. · col 333 Ecclesiasticæ administrationi. Quidam libri veteres habent ecclesiasticæ disciplinæ administrationi.
"To the Church's administration." Some old books have "to the administration of the Church's discipline."
[Baluze] Præbeant. · col 333 Præbeant. Codex Fuxensis præstent.
"Praebeant" (let them provide). The Foix manuscript: "praestent."
[Baluze] Quorumdam presbyterorum. · col 333 Quorumdam presbyterorum. Nominantur in Epistola lv, pag. 81, quam consule.
"Of certain presbyters." They are named in Letter 55, p. 81; consult it.
[Baluze] Conjurationis. · col 333 Conjurationis. Agitur heic de causa Felicissimi, ut patet etiam ex his quæ sequuntur et ex Epistola xlii, pag. 57 : Quantum vero hic et ad presbyterorum quorumdam et Felicissimi causam pertinet, etc.
"Of the conspiracy." The case of Felicissimus is meant here, as is clear also from what follows and from Letter 42, p. 57: "But as far as concerns here also the case of certain presbyters and of Felicissimus," etc.
[Baluze] Veterem contra nos. · col 333 Veterem contra nos. Cum Pontii diaconi testimonio constet quosdam se opposuisse electioni Cypriani, hinc colligi posse videtur Felicissimum fuisse ex illorum numero, et fortasse principem illius factionis.
"Old [grudge] against us." Since it is established by the testimony of the deacon Pontius that some opposed Cyprian's election, it seems one may infer from this that Felicissimus was of their number, and perhaps the leader of that faction.
[Baluze] Renovant. · col 333 Renovant. Revocavimus antiquam lectionem, quæ nititur auctoritate plurium veterum librorum. Rigaltius posuit revocant, quia ita scriptum invenit in Fuxensi. Ea vero lectio extat etiam in Michaelino et in Lamoniano. Cæteri et editiones Rigaltiana antiquiores habent uti nos reposuimus. Et tamen Angli maluerunt sequi editionem Rigaltii, [488] nullum interim istius suæ opinionis testimonium referentes ex libris veteribus, immo plura adducentes in favorem antiquarum editionum. Reinhartus quoque retinuit editionem Rigaltii.
"Renovant" (they renew). We have restored the old reading, which rests on the authority of several old books. Rigault set "revocant" (they recall), because he found it so written in the Foix manuscript; that reading is also in the St Michael and Lamonius manuscripts. The rest, and the editions older than Rigault's, have what we have restored. And yet the English preferred to follow Rigault's edition, [488] meanwhile citing no witness from the old books for this opinion of theirs, indeed bringing more in favour of the old editions. Reinhart too kept Rigault's text.
[Baluze] Ignoscentibus. · col 333 Ignoscentibus. In uno codice Anglicano scriptum est ignorantibus. Quo etiam modo in margine libri sui impressi scripsit Nicolaus Faber.
"Ignoscentibus" (to those who pardon). In one English manuscript "ignorantibus" (to those who do not know) is written; Nicolas Le Fèvre also wrote it so in the margin of his printed copy.
[Baluze] Rependerunt. · cols 333–334 Rependerunt. Non admonerem omnes antiquas editiones et omnia fere vetera exemplaria præferre hanc lectionem, nisi Rigaltius edidisset rependerunt. Quæ sane lectio nititur auctoritate codicis Veronensis et illius quem habui ex monasterio sancti Eligii Attrebatensis.
"Rependerunt." I would not point out that all the old editions and nearly all the old copies show this reading, had Rigault not printed "rependerunt." That reading does indeed rest on the authority of the Verona manuscript and of the one I had from the monastery of St Eligius at Arras.
[Baluze] Ultro. · col 334 Ultro. Codex sancti Arnulphi habet ipsi.
"Ultro" (of their own accord). The St Arnulf manuscript has "ipsi" (they themselves).
[Baluze] II.— Contra sacerdotium. · col 334 II.— Contra sacerdotium. In uno codice Vaticano et in Lamoniano legitur adversus dispositionem Domini et contra sacerdotium Dei. Ubi admoneri convenit hanc lectionem non reperiri in codice Thuano, neque in Fossatensi, in quibus Angli dixerunt eam extare.
2. — "Against the priesthood." In one Vatican manuscript and in Lamonius' one reads "against the Lord's ordering and against the priesthood of God." Here it should be noted that this reading is not found in the de Thou manuscript, nor in the Saint-Maur-des-Fossés one, in which the English said it stands.
[Baluze] III.— Subruerent. · col 334 III.— Subruerent. Ita omnes libri veteres et editiones Rigaltiana antiquiores, si tres priores excipias, in quibus legitur obruerent. Solus ex codicibus a me visis Fuxensis habet subverterent. Scio tamen ita quoque scriptum fuisse in Veronensi. Verum alia lectio mihi magis placet, eam porro liquet adjuvari ex lectione antiquarum editionum.
3. — "Subruerent" (they would undermine). So all the old books and the editions older than Rigault's, except the first three, which read "obruerent" (they would overwhelm). Of the manuscripts I have seen only the Foix has "subverterent" (they would overturn). I know, however, that it was so written in the Verona one too. But the other reading pleases me more, and it is plainly supported by the reading of the old editions.
[Baluze] Gracilia. · col 334 Gracilia. In codice Veronensi et in uno Anglicano scriptum est fragilia. Sic etiam scripsit Nicolaus Faber in margine libri sui impressi. In codice Lamonii legitur gracilium, tanquam si istud referendum esset ad fratres.
"Gracilia" (slender). In the Verona manuscript and in one English one "fragilia" (frail) is written; Nicolas Le Fèvre also wrote so in the margin of his printed copy. In Lamonius' manuscript one reads "gracilium," as though it referred to the brethren.
[Baluze] Clericis urbicis. · col 334 (continues) Clericis urbicis. Id est Romanis, quia Urbis vocabulo olim intelligebatur Roma Gentium domina, ut ait Quintilianus, lib. vi, cap. 3, et lib. viii, cap. 12. Optatus lib. i : Zephyrino urbico, et lib. ii, urbica commoratio ; et apud Victorem vitensem, lib. i, c. 8, urbici captivi… Vide Heriberti Rosweydi notas in D. Paulinum pag. 745. In præfatione symboli editi in concilio Toletano primo legitur cum præcepto (continues)
"To the clergy of the City." That is, the Roman clergy, because by the word "Urbs" was once understood Rome, mistress of the nations, as Quintilian says, book 6, ch. 3, and book 8, ch. 12. Optatus, book 1: "to Zephyrinus of the City," and book 2, "a stay in the City"; and in Victor of Vita, book 1, ch. 8, "captives of the City…" See Heribert Rosweyde's notes on St Paulinus, p. 745. In the preface to the creed published at the first Council of Toledo one reads "with the precept" (continues)
(printed under page 160)
<!-- Two layers: LECTIONES VARIANTES (called a–g) and STEPH. BALUZII NOTAE (lemma notes, labelled [Baluze]). Calls (c) and (g) are visible. The Baluze notes open by continuing the "Clericis urbicis" note from p. 160. The marginal "489" is kept as [489]. -->
(printed under page 161)
(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 335
Ministerium Nic. Fab.
"Ministerium" (ministry): Nicolas Le Fèvre.
(printed under page 161)
(b) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 335
Nos affectat Lam. affecerat Ebor. NC. 1.
"Nos affectat" (aims at us): Lamonius; "affecerat" (had affected): York, NC 1.
(printed under page 161)
(c) ‹anchor: ipse materiam› · call in col 335
Magisterium Thu.
"Magisterium" (mastery): de Thou.
(printed under page 161)
(d) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 335
Nec Pem. Bod. 3. Voss. 2. Lam. Thu. Foss. Vict.
"Nec" (nor): Pem., Bodleian 3, Vossius 2, Lamonius, de Thou, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés, St Victor.
(printed under page 161)
(e) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 336
In Ecclesia lapsos Vict.
"In Ecclesia lapsos" (the lapsed in the Church): St Victor.
(printed under page 161)
(f) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 336
De Ecclesiæ communione NC. 1.
"De Ecclesiae communione" (from the Church's communion): NC 1.
(printed under page 161)
(g) ‹anchor: precibus vestris, quas› · call in col 336
Precibus quas Ver. nostris Rig.
"Precibus quas" (by the prayers which): Ver.; "nostris" (our): Rigault.
[Baluze] (continued) Papæ urbis Romæ Leonis. · col 335 Papæ urbis Romæ Leonis. At in tribus antiquissimis et præstantissimis codicibus manuscriptis, uno illustrissimæ ecclesiæ Lugdunensis, altero qui fuit Leidradi Archiepiscopi Lugdunensis, et censetur nunc in bibliotheca Seguieriana, tertio bibliothecæ Colbertinæ, in quibus continetur vetus collectio canonum facta, ut opinor, paulo post concilium Toletanum duodecimum; in tribus inquam codicibus illis deest vox Romæ, et legitur simpliciter cum præcepto Papæ Urbis Leonis. Extat Hieronymi Epistola ad Paulum urbicum, quæ incipit, Nudius tertius, et in Epistola Augustini ad Casulanum legitur sermonem cujusdam urbici. Apud Burchardum, lib. iii, cap. 226 ; Juonem, par. iii, cap. 270 ; et Gratianum, dist. 2, de consecrat., reperitur quoddam decretum ex concilio urbico quod sic habet : In altari in quo episcopus Missam celebravit, presbyter eodem die aliam celebrare non præsumat; quod etiam reperitur in canone decimo synodi Autissiodorensis sub Aunachario. Et tamen non semper verum est vocabulum urbici significare civem Romanum. In Epistola quippe Evodii ad Augustinum civis quædam cujusdam oppidi Africæ vocatur urbica id est civis illius loci : Sed ecce post biennium quædam vidua honesta urbica de Frigentibus.
(continued) "Of Leo, Pope of the city of Rome." But in three very old and excellent manuscripts — one of the most illustrious church of Lyons, another that belonged to Leidrad, archbishop of Lyons, and is now kept in the Séguier library, the third of the Colbert library — which contain an old collection of canons made, I think, shortly after the twelfth Council of Toledo, in those three manuscripts, I say, the word "Romae" is missing, and one reads simply "with the precept of Leo, Pope of the City." There is Jerome's Letter to Paul "urbicus," beginning "Nudius tertius"; and in Augustine's Letter to Casulanus one reads "the sermon of a certain 'urbicus'." In Burchard, book 3, ch. 226, Ivo, part 3, ch. 270, and Gratian, dist. 2 "De consecratione," there is a decree "from the city council" which runs: "On an altar on which the bishop has celebrated Mass, let a presbyter not presume to celebrate another on the same day"; it is also found in the tenth canon of the synod of Auxerre under Aunacharius. And yet it is not always true that the word "urbicus" means a Roman citizen. In Evodius' Letter to Augustine a woman citizen of some town in Africa is called "urbica," that is, a citizen of that place: "But see, after two years, a certain respectable widow, 'urbica,' from Frigentes."
[Baluze] Trans mare. · col 335 Trans mare. Id est Romam. Inde appellationes transmarinæ postea vetitæ in codice canonum ecclesiæ Africanæ, et ut episcopi Africæ trans mare non proficiscantur nisi consulto primæ sedis episcopo ; quod et ipsum confirmatum est a papa Innocentio. Etiam transmarina judicia prohibita. Vide codicem canonum ecclesiæ Africanæ, cap. 23, 25, 56, 94.
"Across the sea." That is, to Rome. Hence overseas appeals were later forbidden in the code of canons of the African Church, and that the bishops of Africa should not go across the sea without consulting the bishop of the first see; which was itself confirmed by Pope Innocent. Overseas judgements too were forbidden. See the code of canons of the African Church, chs. 23, 25, 56, 94.
[Baluze] IV.— Quem tanto amore. · col 336 IV.— Quem tanto amore. Codex sancti Eligii Attrebatensis, quem tanto honore et amore fecistis. Fuxensis, tanto ardore, pari dolore. Ubi videtur legendum pari honore. Vide Pontium diaconum ubi agit de electione Cypriani.
4. — "Whom with such love." The manuscript of St Eligius at Arras: "whom you made with such honour and love." The Foix: "with such ardour, with equal sorrow," where "with equal honour" seems the right reading. See the deacon Pontius where he treats of Cyprian's election.
[Baluze] Paci et tranquillitati. · col 336 Paci et tranquillitati. Omnes fere libri veteres habent pacem et tranquillitatem.
"For peace and quiet." Nearly all the old books have "pacem et tranquillitatem."
[Baluze] Videatur. · col 336 Videatur. Codex Lamonii videamur.
"Videatur" (he may seem). Lamonius' manuscript: "videamur" (we may seem).
[Baluze] V.— Cancer. · col 336 V.— Cancer. Duo libri veteres præferunt cancerem, alii quatuor, cancrum. Michaelinus cancerum vel cancrum. Ego retinui vulgatam lectionem, quam plerique codices exhibent, quia locus iste ita vulgo citatur.
5. — "Cancer." Two old books show "cancerem," four others "cancrum." The St Michael manuscript, "cancerum vel cancrum." I have kept the common reading, which most manuscripts give, because this place is commonly quoted so.
[Baluze] Super petram. · col 336 Super petram. Veteres editiones et xvii libri veteres ita scribunt. Manutius posuit Petrum. Atque eam lectionem retinuit Pamelius, testatus tamen aliam reperiri in codicibus antiquis. Hinc propagata est, in posteriores editiones, etiam in Anglicanam. [489] Sane verum est quod adnotat Pamelius alibi frequentissime Cyprianum dicere Ecclesiam esse fundatam super Petrum, adeoque mirum non esse si etiam istic eo modo loquatur. Ego non disputo an Ecclesia fundata sit super Petrum. Id enim scio sensisse Cyprianum. Sed aio istic retinendam esse lectionem quam major veterum librorum numerus et veteres editiones præferunt. Petram quippe fuisse Christum et super hanc petram fundatam esse Ecclesiam nemo ambigit. Qua de re vide quæ notamus infra ad librum de Unitate Ecclesiæ. Cæterum ex prava lectione quæ irrepsit in hunc locum potuit auctor Epistolæ ii Pelagii II ad episcopos Istriæ accepisse quod scripsit, qui Cathedram Petri, super quem fundata est Ecclesia, deserit.
"Upon the rock." So the old editions and seventeen old books write. Manutius set "Petrum" (Peter), and Pamelius kept that reading, though testifying that the other is found in old manuscripts. From there it spread into the later editions, the English one included. [489] It is indeed true, as Pamelius notes, that elsewhere Cyprian very often says the Church is founded upon Peter, so that it would be no wonder if he spoke so here too. I do not dispute whether the Church is founded upon Peter; I know that Cyprian held it. But I say that here the reading must be kept which the greater number of old books and the old editions show. For no one doubts that the rock was Christ and that upon this rock the Church was founded. On this see what we note below on the book "On the Unity of the Church." Moreover, from the bad reading that crept into this place the author of the second Letter of Pelagius II to the bishops of Istria may have taken what he wrote: "who deserts the Chair of Peter, upon whom the Church is founded."
(printed under page 161)
<!-- Two layers: LECTIONES VARIANTES (called a–g) and STEPH. BALUZII NOTAE (lemma notes, labelled [Baluze]). Calls (c), (d) and (e) are visible in col 337, though (e) is printed under the right-hand column. The superscript "55" after "morietur" in col 338 appears to be an edition page marker, not a note call. -->
(printed under page 162)
(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 337
Dominicis Pem. Bod. 1.
"Dominicis" (the Lord's): Pem., Bodleian 1.
(printed under page 162)
(b) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 337
Nostra Nic. Fab.
"Nostra" (our): Nicolas Le Fèvre.
(printed under page 162)
(c) ‹anchor: omne itineris› · call in col 337
Muneris Lin.
"Muneris" (of the gift): Lincoln.
(printed under page 162)
(d) ‹anchor: stupore› · call in col 337
Tumore Erasm.
"Tumore" (with swelling pride): Erasmus.
(printed under page 162)
(e) ‹anchor: esse participes› · call in col 337
Non sit quod dec. vos. in verb. non pravitatis eorum incipiatis esse participes Nic. Fab.
"Non sit quod dec[epti] vos in verb[is] non pravitatis eorum incipiatis esse participes": Nicolas Le Fèvre.
(printed under page 162)
(f) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 338
Revocare Vict. Foss.
"Revocare" (to call back): St Victor, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés.
(printed under page 162)
(g) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 338
Et qui Pem. Voss. 2. Bod. 1, 2. Lam.
"Et qui" (and who): Pem., Vossius 2, Bodleian 1 and 2, Lamonius.
[Baluze] Interficietur. · col 337 Interficietur. Hæc vox deest in antiquis editionibus et in omnibus antiquis codicibus quibus usus sum. Scio tamen illam fuisse in Veronensi et in Neapolitano uno. In codice Lamonii scriptum est morietur, eodem sensu. In uno meo vetere legitur, ut errare te faceret a Domino tuo, et cætera. Ex quo facile est colligere addenda fuisse nonnulla in hoc loco. Itaque cum plura addenda fuerint, non sufficiebat addere vocem interficietur aut morietur. Erasmus primus scripsit interficietur. Addendus autem erat integer locus ex capite xiii Deuteronomii, aut edendus ut exstat in veteribus libris, omissa voce illa.
"Interficietur" (he shall be put to death). This word is missing in the old editions and in all the old manuscripts I have used. I know, however, that it was in the Verona one and in one Naples one. In Lamonius' manuscript "morietur" (he shall die) is written, with the same sense. In one old one of mine one reads "that he might make you stray from the Lord your God, etc." From this it is easy to gather that something had to be added in this place. So, since more had to be added, it was not enough to add the word "interficietur" or "morietur." Erasmus first wrote "interficietur." But either the whole passage from chapter 13 of Deuteronomy should have been added, or it should have been printed as it stands in the old books, without that word.
[Baluze] A Domini viis. · col 337 A Domini viis. Hæc est lectio multorum veterum exemplarium et editionis Manutianæ.
"From the ways of the Lord." This is the reading of many old copies and of the Manutius edition.
[Baluze] Pereant sibi soli. · col 337 Pereant sibi soli. Nescio an sit præferenda lectio unius ex vetustis codicibus bibliothecæ regiæ, in quo legitur pereant illi soli.
"Let them perish by themselves alone." I wonder whether the reading of one of the old manuscripts of the royal library should be preferred, in which one reads "let them alone perish."
[Baluze] Nunc secundum. · col 337 Nunc secundum. Ita editio Manutii et septem libri veteres. In recentiore Remigiano, et secundum. Male in Sorbonico nec, in Eligiano non. In antiquis editionibus et in sex antiquis codicibus scriptum est olim secundum Dei judicia.
"Now according to." So Manutius' edition and seven old books. In the more recent St Remi manuscript, "and according to." Wrongly, in the Sorbonne manuscript "nec," in the St Eligius one "non." In the old editions and in six old manuscripts is written "once, according to God's judgements."
[Baluze] VI. — Ruina una. · cols 337–338 VI. — Ruina una. Ita xvi libri veteres et editio Manutiana. Veteres editiones et tria exemplaria vetera habent ruina sua.
6. — "In one ruin." So sixteen old books and the Manutius edition. The old editions and three old copies have "in their own ruin."
[Baluze] Non acquiescit sanis verbis. · col 338 Non acquiescit sanis verbis. Sex libri veteres, non acquiescit sanis sermonibus. Sic etiam in editione vulgata Epistolæ sancti Pauli ad Ephesios.
"Does not assent to sound words." Six old books: "does not assent to sound discourses." So too in the Vulgate edition of St Paul's Letter to the Ephesians.
[Baluze] Discede ab hujusmodi. · col 338 Discede ab hujusmodi. Ita scriptum vidi in xiv exemplaribus antiquis. Reliqua multum variant.
"Withdraw from such." I saw it so written in fourteen old copies. The rest vary greatly.
[Baluze] Contumaciæ. · col 338 Contumaciæ. Ita etiam Epist. lxiv, pag. 112 ; et in libro de Unitate Ecclesiæ, pag. 202. Vide Annotationes Erasmi ad hunc locum Pauli.
"Of contumacy." So also Letter 64, p. 112, and in the book "On the Unity of the Church," p. 202. See Erasmus' Annotations on this place of Paul.
[Baluze] VII. — Nunc est fratres. · col 338 VII. — Nunc est fratres. Veteres editiones habent. Nunc curandum est fratres. Editio Manutiana expunxit vocem curandum. Ea vero deest in quinque antiquis exemplaribus, et videtur esse ex glossemate.
7. — "Now it is, brethren." The old editions have "Now care must be taken, brethren." The Manutius edition struck out the word "curandum." It is indeed missing in five old copies, and seems to come from a gloss.
[Baluze] Repræsenter. · col 338 Repræsenter. Quatuor libri veteres habent repræsentem me.
"Repraesenter" (that I may be present). Four old books have "repraesentem me."
[Baluze] Omnium nostrum. · col 338 Omnium nostrum. In plerisque vetustis exemplaribus scriptum est animi nostri.
"Of us all." In most old copies "animi nostri" (of our mind) is written.
[Baluze] Ad Felicissimi. · col 338 Ad Felicissimi. Veteres editiones ante Manutianam et septem vetera exemplaria præferunt ad infelicissimi. Manutius et Morellius et octo item exemplaria vetera in felicissimi. Alia duo vetera, ad felicissimi.
"To Felicissimus'." The old editions before Manutius' and seven old copies show "ad infelicissimi" (to the most unhappy man's). Manutius and Morel, and likewise eight old copies, "in felicissimi." Two other old ones, "ad felicissimi."
[Baluze] Concesserit. · col 338 Concesserit. Codex Fuxensis, consenserit.
"Concesserit" (shall have gone over). The Foix manuscript: "consenserit" (shall have agreed).
(printed under page 162)