PL 40 · cols. 637–652
Quodvultdeus (printed among the works of Augustine), First Sermon on the Creed
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PL 40 · cols. 637–652
Editors' preface
(1) ‹anchor: hic actus est› · call in col 637
Sola editio Lov., exactus est.
Only the Louvain edition has "exactus est".
(printed under page 323)
(2) ‹anchor: contra serpentis› · call in col 637
Apud Lov. additur, antiqui.
The Louvain edition adds "antiqui" [of the ancient serpent].
(printed under page 323)
(a) ‹anchor: SERMO (title)› · call in col 637
Alias, Liber secundus, in ante editis, tom. 9.
Elsewhere, "Book Two", in the earlier editions, vol. 9.
(printed under page 323)
Sequuntur alii de SYMBOLO sermones tres, Augustinum, cui hactenus adscripti in ante editis fuerunt, haudquaquam nobis repraesentantes, sed oratorem genere dicendi, eruditione et ingenio multo inferiorem.
There follow three other sermons on the Creed, which were ascribed to Augustine in the earlier editions until now, but which in no way show us Augustine; they show an orator far inferior in style, learning and talent.
(1) ‹anchor: Quid nobis› · call in col 638
Hic editi addunt, opus est.
Here the printed editions add "opus est" [what need is there for us].
(printed under page 323)
(2) ‹anchor: videre certantes› · call in col 638
Editio Lov. ad marginem habet: « Alias, currentes. »
The Louvain edition has in the margin: "Elsewhere, currentes [racing]."
(printed under page 323)
(3) ‹anchor: delectatur, vanum› · call in col 638
Sic Mss. At editi loco, vanum, habent, jam.
So the manuscripts. But the printed editions have "jam" in place of "vanum".
(printed under page 323)
(4) ‹anchor: figura ea equorum› · call in col 638
In Mss., figurae equorum.
In the manuscripts, "figurae equorum".
(printed under page 323)
(1) ‹anchor: duos noxios voluntate› · call in col 639
Er. et Mss., voluptate.
Erasmus and the manuscripts: "voluptate" [by pleasure].
(printed under page 324)
(a) ‹anchor: spiritualia munera› · call in col 639
Id est spectacula.
That is, the spectacles.
(printed under page 324)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible in the foot image› · call in col 640
Locus perplexus, in quo Fuliensium codex omittit, sed ut ab illo essent, jam accepisse.
A tangled passage, in which the Feuillants' manuscript omits "sed ut ab illo essent, jam accepisse".
(printed under page 324)
(2) ‹anchor: a morte excludatur› · call in col 640
Mss., a morte non excludatur.
The manuscripts: "a morte non excludatur" [is not shut out from death].
(printed under page 324)
(3) ‹anchor: non eum› · call in col 640
Mss., non enim. Sic etiam editio Er. quae deinde sola prosequitur, minuit aequalitatem.
The manuscripts: "non enim". So too Erasmus's edition, which then alone goes on "minuit aequalitatem".
(printed under page 324)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible in the foot image› · call in col 641
Sic melioris notae Mss. juxta graecum. At editi bis, videt.
So the manuscripts of better standing, following the Greek. But the printed editions have "videt" twice.
(printed under page 325)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible in the foot image› · call in col 643
Mss., non in vobis habitat.
The manuscripts: "non in vobis habitat" [does not dwell in you].
(printed under page 326)
(1) ‹anchor: qui fecit te› · call in col 644
Sic Fuliensium codex. At Divionensis, sed in eo fecit te. Editi vero, sed in eo qui fecit te.
So the Feuillants' manuscript. But the Dijon manuscript has "sed in eo fecit te", and the printed editions "sed in eo qui fecit te".
(printed under page 326)
(1) ‹anchor: fide tantum concipit› · call in col 645
In Mss., conspicit.
In the manuscripts, "conspicit" [beholds].
(printed under page 327)
(2) ‹anchor: Pontiusque Pilatus› · call in col 645
Sic Mss. At editi, potius quam Pilatus.
So the manuscripts. But the printed editions have "potius quam Pilatus".
(printed under page 327)
(3) ‹anchor: in crucis ligno solvit› · call in col 645
Er. et Mss., persolvit.
Erasmus and the manuscripts: "persolvit" [paid in full].
(printed under page 327)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible in the foot image› · call in col 646
Sic Er. et Mss. At Lov., collidantur praesumentes.
So Erasmus and the manuscripts. But the Louvain edition has "collidantur praesumentes" [let the presumptuous be dashed together].
(printed under page 327)
(1) ‹anchor: vulnera quae inflixistis› · call in col 647
Er. et Mss, infixistis.
Erasmus and the manuscripts: "infixistis" [you drove in].
(printed under page 328)
(1) ‹anchor: praecipitio erroris› · call in col 648
Mss., Haec cogitans ille, maximus est praecipitio erroris
The manuscripts: "Haec cogitans ille, maximus est praecipitio erroris" [one who thinks this is greatest in the headlong fall of error].
(printed under page 328)
(1) ‹anchor: se visibiliter demonstravit› · call in col 649
In Mss., et pro congruentia sui cujusque rei se invisibiliter demonstravit. Erasmiana quoque editio habet, invisibiliter demonstravit.
In the manuscripts: "et pro congruentia sui cujusque rei se invisibiliter demonstravit" [and according to the fitness of each thing showed himself invisibly]. Erasmus's edition too has "invisibiliter demonstravit".
(printed under page 329)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible in the foot image› · call in col 650
Ita Mss. At editi: Quid cogitatis malum?
So the manuscripts. But the printed editions: "Quid cogitatis malum?" [Why do you think evil?].
(printed under page 329)
(2) ‹anchor: not visible in the foot image› · call in col 650
Sic Mss. Editi vero, curari exterius volebat, ut jam interius non laborabat.
So the manuscripts. The printed editions, however: "curari exterius volebat, ut jam interius non laborabat" [he wished to be healed outwardly, since he no longer suffered inwardly].
(printed under page 329)
(1) ‹anchor: nescio quo ubique manens› · call in col 651
In Mss., ubi manens.
In the manuscripts, "ubi manens" [where abiding].
(printed under page 330)